225 lines
9.6 KiB
JSON
225 lines
9.6 KiB
JSON
|
[
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Thinking Fast and Slow",
|
||
|
"target": "The Mathematical Theory of Communication",
|
||
|
"distance": 1000,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Jaime Sevilla\nThinking Fast and Slow is a recounting of the evidence about cogsci at the time, and large parts are already outdated.\nTMToC is an enduring piece of theory that kickstarted a new field "
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "The Global Priorities Institute's Research Agenda",
|
||
|
"target": "Superintelligence",
|
||
|
"distance": 20,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Jaime Sevilla\nI am unsure about the quality difference, but Superintelligence has had a far wider reach"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "The Global Priorities Institute's Research Agenda",
|
||
|
"target": "Thinking Fast and Slow",
|
||
|
"distance": 20,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Thinking Fast and Slow has had wider reach, and is a good synthesis of the field."
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Thinking Fast and Slow",
|
||
|
"target": "Superintelligence",
|
||
|
"distance": "1.1",
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Jaime Sevilla\nSuperintelligence gave prominence to the AI Safety field, possibly bringing forward research timelines a few years.\nThinking Fast and Slow made CogSci available to many people.\nLarge parts of both books are now outdated"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Superintelligence",
|
||
|
"target": "The Mathematical Theory of Communication",
|
||
|
"distance": 1000,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Jaime Sevilla\nTMToC has stood the test of time"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Law",
|
||
|
"target": "The Vulnerable World Hypothesis",
|
||
|
"distance": 33.333333333333336,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "TVWH has had wider reach"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "The motivated reasoning critique of effective altruism",
|
||
|
"target": "Shallow evaluations of longtermist organizations",
|
||
|
"distance": "2",
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Shallow evaluations contains more object level information"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "The motivated reasoning critique of effective altruism",
|
||
|
"target": "Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Law",
|
||
|
"distance": 100,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Goodhart contains more insight"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Shallow evaluations of longtermist organizations",
|
||
|
"target": "Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Law",
|
||
|
"distance": 20,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Goodhart contains more insights"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "The motivated reasoning critique of effective altruism",
|
||
|
"target": "The Global Priorities Institute's Research Agenda",
|
||
|
"distance": 100,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "GPIRA has presumably helped at least GPI set its agenda, and possibly other newcomers to the field.\nThe motivated reasoning critique might have helped some EAs by reiterating a core message"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Shallow evaluations of longtermist organizations",
|
||
|
"target": "The Global Priorities Institute's Research Agenda",
|
||
|
"distance": 12.5,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "GPIRA helped GPI set their priorities and decompose the problem, shallow evaluations is an experiment on institution evaluation which might result in more work later (I feel like I am not getting at the true reason for my scoring here)"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Law",
|
||
|
"target": "The Global Priorities Institute's Research Agenda",
|
||
|
"distance": 1.1111111111111112,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Research agendas can mobilize more talent, they can be a multiplier.\nBut Goodhearts law is tangible progress on a problem.\nOverall Im confused"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "The Global Priorities Institute's Research Agenda",
|
||
|
"target": "The Vulnerable World Hypothesis",
|
||
|
"distance": "10",
|
||
|
"reasoning": "vulnerable world had wider reach, and inspired more people"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "The Vulnerable World Hypothesis",
|
||
|
"target": "Thinking Fast and Slow",
|
||
|
"distance": 5,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Thinking fast and slow reached more people"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "A Model of Patient Spending and Movement Building",
|
||
|
"target": "Reversals in Psychology",
|
||
|
"distance": "10",
|
||
|
"reasoning": "I have heard more discussion of reversals than of AMPSMB"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "What are some low-information priors that you find practically useful for thinking about the world?",
|
||
|
"target": "Database of orgs relevant to longtermist/x-risk work",
|
||
|
"distance": 10,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "I learned a couple of things in the low-information priors post but I think curating databases is very very helpful"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "What are some low-information priors that you find practically useful for thinking about the world?",
|
||
|
"target": "A Model of Patient Spending and Movement Building",
|
||
|
"distance": 1.25,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "I personally learned more from low information priors, but I havent engaged with patient spending enough to evaluate its value"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Database of orgs relevant to longtermist/x-risk work",
|
||
|
"target": "A Model of Patient Spending and Movement Building",
|
||
|
"distance": 1.1111111111111112,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "I think its slighly more likely I will build on top of the patient spending than on top of the database"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Center for Election Science EA Wiki stub",
|
||
|
"target": "Extinguishing or preventing coal seam fires is a potential cause area",
|
||
|
"distance": 100,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Coal article seems more in-depth reasoning "
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "A comment on setting up a charity",
|
||
|
"target": "Center for Election Science EA Wiki stub",
|
||
|
"distance": 10,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "I imagine the wiki stub will reach more people"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "A comment on setting up a charity",
|
||
|
"target": "What are some low-information priors that you find practically useful for thinking about the world?",
|
||
|
"distance": 25,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "I learned more from low info priors"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Center for Election Science EA Wiki stub",
|
||
|
"target": "What are some low-information priors that you find practically useful for thinking about the world?",
|
||
|
"distance": 12.5,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Learned more from low info priors"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "What are some low-information priors that you find practically useful for thinking about the world?",
|
||
|
"target": "Extinguishing or preventing coal seam fires is a potential cause area",
|
||
|
"distance": "1.5",
|
||
|
"reasoning": "I learned more from low info priors but I expect I would learn more if I engaged with coal seam fires"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Database of orgs relevant to longtermist/x-risk work",
|
||
|
"target": "Extinguishing or preventing coal seam fires is a potential cause area",
|
||
|
"distance": "1.5",
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Database seems more reemplazable"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Extinguishing or preventing coal seam fires is a potential cause area",
|
||
|
"target": "A Model of Patient Spending and Movement Building",
|
||
|
"distance": 1.1111111111111112,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "I have no idea of which one would be more useful to me if I engaged with them\nI guess patient spending is more related to my work"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "A comment on setting up a charity",
|
||
|
"target": "The motivated reasoning critique of effective altruism",
|
||
|
"distance": 100,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "The motivated reasoning critique is better at setting a good culture"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Center for Election Science EA Wiki stub",
|
||
|
"target": "The motivated reasoning critique of effective altruism",
|
||
|
"distance": 12.5,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "The motivated reasoning critique is better at setting a good culture"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "The motivated reasoning critique of effective altruism",
|
||
|
"target": "What are some low-information priors that you find practically useful for thinking about the world?",
|
||
|
"distance": "1.1",
|
||
|
"reasoning": "I learned more from priors, critique is better at setting a culture"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "What are some low-information priors that you find practically useful for thinking about the world?",
|
||
|
"target": "Shallow evaluations of longtermist organizations",
|
||
|
"distance": 10,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Shallow evaluations has more object level content"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Database of orgs relevant to longtermist/x-risk work",
|
||
|
"target": "Shallow evaluations of longtermist organizations",
|
||
|
"distance": 1.1111111111111112,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Shallow evaluations contains more crystallized reasoning"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Shallow evaluations of longtermist organizations",
|
||
|
"target": "Extinguishing or preventing coal seam fires is a potential cause area",
|
||
|
"distance": "1.8",
|
||
|
"reasoning": "I expect I would learn more from coal seam if I engaged with it"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Extinguishing or preventing coal seam fires is a potential cause area",
|
||
|
"target": "Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Law",
|
||
|
"distance": 12.5,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Goodhart is more hard-to-replace progress "
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "A Model of Patient Spending and Movement Building",
|
||
|
"target": "Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Law",
|
||
|
"distance": 3.3333333333333335,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Goodheart feels like more hard-to-replace progress"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Categorizing Variants of Goodhart's Law",
|
||
|
"target": "Reversals in Psychology",
|
||
|
"distance": "2",
|
||
|
"reasoning": "reversals has had more reach"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "The Global Priorities Institute's Research Agenda",
|
||
|
"target": "Reversals in Psychology",
|
||
|
"distance": "3",
|
||
|
"reasoning": "reversals has had more reach"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "The Vulnerable World Hypothesis",
|
||
|
"target": "Reversals in Psychology",
|
||
|
"distance": "1.5",
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Reversals has had more reach"
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
"source": "Reversals in Psychology",
|
||
|
"target": "Thinking Fast and Slow",
|
||
|
"distance": 1.4285714285714286,
|
||
|
"reasoning": "Oof Im stumped.\nI think thinking fast and slow is enough of a good crystallization of knowledge I am giving it the nod, even though reversals in psychology might have a better insight compression rate"
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
]
|