The new TorManager adds --launch-tor and --tor-control-port= arguments
(requiring the user to explicitly request a new Tor process, if that's what
they want). The default (when --tor is enabled) looks for a control port in
the usual places (/var/run/tor/control, localhost:9051, localhost:9151), then
falls back to hoping there's a SOCKS port in the usual
place (localhost:9050). (closes#64)
The ssh utilities should now accept the same tor arguments as ordinary
send/receive commands. There are now full tests for TorManager, and basic
tests for how send/receive use it. (closes#97)
Note that Tor is only supported on python2.7 for now, since txsocksx (and
therefore txtorcon) doesn't work on py3. You need to do "pip install
magic-wormhole[tor]" to get Tor support, and that will get you an inscrutable
error on py3 (referencing vcversioner, "install_requires must be a string or
list of strings", and "int object not iterable").
To run tests, you must install with the [dev] extra (to get "mock" and other
libraries). Our setup.py only includes "txtorcon" in the [dev] extra when on
py2, not on py3. Unit tests tolerate the lack of txtorcon (they mock out
everything txtorcon would provide), so they should provide the same coverage
on both py2 and py3.
Tools which use `wormhole send` under the hood should use a distinct
--appid= (setting the same URL-shaped value on both sides, starting with a
domain name related to the tool and/or its author), so wormhole codes used by
those tools won't compete for short channelids with other tools, or the
default text/file/directory-sending tool.
Closes#113
- move to 'wormhole ssh' group with accept/invite subcommands
- change names of methods
- check for permissions
- use --user option (instead of --auth-file)
- move implementation to cmd_ssh.py
- if multiple public-keys, ask user
