more | ||
pretty | ||
sample | ||
simple | ||
f.go | ||
go.mod | ||
makefile | ||
README.md |
A minimalist calculator for f estimation
This project is a minimalist, stack-based DSL for f estimation. It can multiply and divide scalars, lognormals and beta distributions.
Motivation
Sometimes, Squiggle, simple squiggle or squiggle.c are still too complicated and un-unix-like.
Usage
Here is an example
$ go run f.go
5000000 12000000
=> 5.0M 12.0M
* beta 1 200
1.9K 123.1K
* 30 180
122.9K 11.7M
/ 48 52
2.5K 234.6K
/ 5 6
448.8 43.0K
/ 6 8
64.5 6.2K
/ 60
1.1 103.7
Perhaps this example is more understandable with comments and better units:
$ sed -u "s|#.*||" | sed -u 's|M|000000|g' | go run f.go
5M 12M # number of people living in Chicago
=> 5.0M 12.0M
* beta 1 200 # fraction of people that have a piano
1.9K 123.1K
30 180 # minutes it takes to tune a piano, including travel time
122.9K 11.7M
/ 48 52 # weeks a year pianotuners work for
2.5K 234.6K
/ 6 8 # hours a day
353.9 34.1K
/ 60 # minutes to an hour
5.9 568.3
=: piano_tuners_in_Chicago
piano_tuners_in_Chicago => 5.9 568.3
Here is instead an example using beta distributions and variables:
1 2
=> 1.0 2.0
* 1_000_000_000
=> 1000.0M 2.0B
=: x # assign to variable
x => 1000.0M 2.0B
. # clear the stack, i.e., make it be 1
beta 1 2
=> beta 1.0 2.0
beta 12 300
=> beta 13.0 302.0
=. y # assign to variable and clear the stack (return it to 1)
y => beta 13.0 302.0
x
=> 1000.0M 2.0B
* y
=> samples 31.3M 98.2M
The difference between =: x
and =. y
is that =.
clears the stack after the assignment.
If you type "help", you can see a small grammar:
help
Operation | Variable assignment | Special
Operation: operator operand
operator: (empty) | * | / | + | -
operand: scalar | lognormal | beta | variable
lognormal: low high
beta: beta alpha beta
Variable assignment: =: variable_name
Clear stack: . | c | clear
Variable assignment and clear stack: =. variable_name
Other special operations: help | debug | exit
Examples:
+ 2
/ 2.5
* 1 10 (interpreted as lognormal)
+ 1 10
* beta 1 10
1 10 (multiplication taken as default operation)
=: x
.
1 100
+ x
exit
Installation
make build
sudo make install
f # rather than the previous go run f.go
Why use make instead of the built-in go commands? Because the point of make is to be able to share command-line recipes.
Usage together with standard Linux utilities
f
sed -u "s|#.*||" | sed -u 's|M|000000|g' | f
cat more/piano-tuners.f | f
cat more/piano-tuners-commented.f | sed -u "s|#.*||" | sed -u 's|M|000000|g' | f
tee -a input.log | go run f.go | tee -a output.log
tee -a io.log | go run f.go | tee -a io.log
function f(){
sed -u "s|#.*||" |
sed -u "s|//.*||" |
sed -u 's|K|000|g' |
sed -u 's|M|000000|g' |
sed -u 's|B|000000000|g' |
/usr/bin/f
}
Note that these sed commands are just hacks, and won't parse e.g., 3.5K
correctly—it will just substitute for 3.5000
Tips & tricks
- It's conceptually clearer to have all the multiplications first and then all the divisions
- Sums and divisions now also supported
- For things between 0 and 1, consider using a beta distribution
Different levels of complexity
The top level f.go file (400 lines) has a bunch of complexity: variables, parenthesis, samples, beta distributions. In the simple/ folder:
- f_simple.go (370 lines) strips variables and parenthesis, but keeps beta distributions, samples, and addition and substraction
- f_minimal.go (140 lines) strips everything that isn't lognormal and scalar multiplication and addition, plus a few debug options.
Roadmap
Done:
- Write README
- Add division?
- Read from file?
- Save to file?
- Allow comments?
- Use a sed filter?
- Add show more info version
- Scalar multiplication and division
- Think how to integrate with squiggle.c to draw samples
- Copy the time to botec go code
- Define samplers
- Call those samplers when operating on distributions that can't be operted on algebraically
- Display output more nicely, with K/M/B/T
- Consider the following: make this into a stack-based DSL, with:
- Variables that can be saved to and then displayed
- Other types of distributions, particularly beta distributions? => But then this requires moving to bags of samples. It could still be ~instantaneous though.
- Figure out go syntax for
- Maps
- Joint types
- Enums
- Fix correlation problem, by spinning up a new randomness thing every time some serial computation is done.
- Clean up error code. Right now only needed for division
- Maintain both a more complex thing that's more featureful and the more simple multiplication of lognormals thing.
To (possibly) do:
- Document parenthesis syntax
- Allow input with K/M/T
- Add functions. Now easier to do with an explicit representation of the stakc
- Think about how to draw a histogram from samples
- Dump samples to file
- Represent samples/statistics in some other way
- Perhaps use qsort rather than full sorting
- Program into a small device, like a calculator?
Discarded:
Think of some way of calling bc