quantified.uncertainty/squiggle
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

the _correct_ 90 vs. 95 thing

Browse Source 
Value: [1e-6 to 1e-4]
This commit is contained in:
Quinn Dougherty 2022-04-27 16:56:30 -04:00
parent 6bd8aecb31
commit 8866b9d093
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
packages/website/docs/Internal/Processing-Confidence-Intervals.md
View File

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ $$
a \cdot Normal(\mu, \sigma) = Normal(a \cdot \mu, |a| \cdot \sigma) a \cdot Normal(\mu, \sigma) = Normal(a \cdot \mu, |a| \cdot \sigma)
$$ $$
We can now look at the inverse cdf of a $Normal(0,1)$. We find that the 90% point is reached at $1.6448536269514722$. ([source](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20626994/how-to-calculate-the-inverse-of-the-normal-cumulative-distribution-function-in-p)) This means that the 90% confidence interval is $[-1.6448536269514722, 1.6448536269514722]$, which has a width of $2 \cdot 1.6448536269514722$. We can now look at the inverse cdf of a $Normal(0,1)$. We find that the 95% point is reached at $1.6448536269514722$. ([source](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20626994/how-to-calculate-the-inverse-of-the-normal-cumulative-distribution-function-in-p)) This means that the 90% confidence interval is $[-1.6448536269514722, 1.6448536269514722]$, which has a width of $2 \cdot 1.6448536269514722$.
So then, if we take a $Normal(0,1)$ and we multiply it by $\frac{(high -. low)}{(2. *. 1.6448536269514722)}$, it's 90% confidence interval will be multiplied by the same amount. Then we just have to shift it by the mean to get our target normal. So then, if we take a $Normal(0,1)$ and we multiply it by $\frac{(high -. low)}{(2. *. 1.6448536269514722)}$, it's 90% confidence interval will be multiplied by the same amount. Then we just have to shift it by the mean to get our target normal.