metaforecast/data/merged-questions.json

[
  {
    "Title": "Some title",
    "URL": "someurl.com",
    "Platform": "some platform",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "X%/none",
    "Description": "Some long description which may contain html",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be more than 50 prediction questions embedded in LessWrong posts and comments this month?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20there%20be%20more%20than%2050%20prediction%20questions%20embedded%20in%20LessWrong%20posts%20and%20comments%20this%20month?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "56.39%",
    "# Forecasts": 337,
    "# Forecasters": 139,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will more than 50 people predict on this post?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20more%20than%2050%20people%20predict%20on%20this%20post?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "82.03%",
    "# Forecasts": 230,
    "# Forecasters": 122,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will AGI cause an existential catastrophe?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20AGI%20cause%20an%20existential%20catastrophe?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "36.85%",
    "# Forecasts": 158,
    "# Forecasters": 102,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will AGI cause an existential catastrophe without additional intervention from the existing AI Alignment research community?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20AGI%20cause%20an%20existential%20catastrophe%20without%20additional%20intervention%20from%20the%20existing%20AI%20Alignment%20research%20community?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "52.70%",
    "# Forecasts": 137,
    "# Forecasters": 95,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be an arms race dynamic in the lead-up to AGI?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20there%20be%20an%20arms%20race%20dynamic%20in%20the%20lead-up%20to%20AGI?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "75.52%",
    "# Forecasts": 113,
    "# Forecasters": 91,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The new English Strain is at least 50% more infectious than the currently dominant American strain of Covid-19",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20new%20English%20Strain%20is%20at%20least%2050%%20more%20infectious%20than%20the%20currently%20dominant%20American%20strain%20of%20Covid-19&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "63.37%",
    "# Forecasts": 211,
    "# Forecasters": 90,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a single AGI or AGI project achieve a decisive strategic advantage?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20a%20single%20AGI%20or%20AGI%20project%20achieve%20a%20decisive%20strategic%20advantage?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "61.63%",
    "# Forecasts": 115,
    "# Forecasters": 86,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How vivid is your visual imagination?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=How%20vivid%20is%20your%20visual%20imagination?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "50.68%",
    "# Forecasts": 119,
    "# Forecasters": 77,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will we get AGI from deep learning with small variations, without more insights on a similar level to deep learning?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20we%20get%20AGI%20from%20deep%20learning%20with%20small%20variations,%20without%20more%20insights%20on%20a%20similar%20level%20to%20deep%20learning?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33.50%",
    "# Forecasts": 110,
    "# Forecasters": 77,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will > 50% of AGI researchers agree with safety concerns by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20>%2050%%20of%20AGI%20researchers%20agree%20with%20safety%20concerns%20by%202030?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "42.70%",
    "# Forecasts": 107,
    "# Forecasters": 76,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will we experience an existential catastrophe before we build AGI?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20we%20experience%20an%20existential%20catastrophe%20before%20we%20build%20AGI?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11.79%",
    "# Forecasts": 100,
    "# Forecasters": 75,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How vivid is your sound imagination?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=How%20vivid%20is%20your%20sound%20imagination?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "61.17%",
    "# Forecasts": 106,
    "# Forecasters": 74,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be another AI Winter (a period commonly referred to as such) before we develop AGI?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20there%20be%20another%20AI%20Winter%20(a%20period%20commonly%20referred%20to%20as%20such)%20before%20we%20develop%20AGI?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "28.63%",
    "# Forecasts": 95,
    "# Forecasters": 72,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will we get AGI from 1-3 more insights on a similar level to deep learning?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20we%20get%20AGI%20from%201-3%20more%20insights%20on%20a%20similar%20level%20to%20deep%20learning?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "43.12%",
    "# Forecasts": 112,
    "# Forecasters": 71,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "There will be an additional distinct large wave of Covid-19 infections in the United States 2021",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=There%20will%20be%20an%20additional%20distinct%20large%20wave%20of%20Covid-19%20infections%20in%20the%20United%20States%202021&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "58.18%",
    "# Forecasts": 158,
    "# Forecasters": 70,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How vivid is your taste imagination?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=How%20vivid%20is%20your%20taste%20imagination?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25.73%",
    "# Forecasts": 84,
    "# Forecasters": 69,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How vivid is your smell imagination?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=How%20vivid%20is%20your%20smell%20imagination?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25.41%",
    "# Forecasts": 82,
    "# Forecasters": 68,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will we need > 3 breakthroughs on a similar level to deep learning to get AGI?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20we%20need%20>%203%20breakthroughs%20on%20a%20similar%20level%20to%20deep%20learning%20to%20get%20AGI?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25.38%",
    "# Forecasts": 84,
    "# Forecasters": 67,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How frequently do you think in words?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=How%20frequently%20do%20you%20think%20in%20words?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "78.13%",
    "# Forecasts": 86,
    "# Forecasters": 66,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Do you have a type of Synaesthesia?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Do%20you%20have%20a%20type%20of%20Synaesthesia?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "19.76%",
    "# Forecasts": 87,
    "# Forecasters": 66,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Do you have an internal monologue?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Do%20you%20have%20an%20internal%20monologue?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "82.28%",
    "# Forecasts": 80,
    "# Forecasters": 63,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How vivid is your touch imagination?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=How%20vivid%20is%20your%20touch%20imagination?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "36.13%",
    "# Forecasts": 79,
    "# Forecasters": 62,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How good is your memory?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=How%20good%20is%20your%20memory?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "52.65%",
    "# Forecasts": 78,
    "# Forecasters": 62,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much control do you have over your mind?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=How%20much%20control%20do%20you%20have%20over%20your%20mind?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "45.59%",
    "# Forecasts": 76,
    "# Forecasters": 61,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before reaching AGI, will we hit a point where we can no longer improve AI capabilities by scaling?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Before%20reaching%20AGI,%20will%20we%20hit%20a%20point%20where%20we%20can%20no%20longer%20improve%20AI%20capabilities%20by%20scaling?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "42.76%",
    "# Forecasts": 85,
    "# Forecasters": 57,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Trump will win a second term",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Trump%20will%20win%20a%20second%20term&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "46.20%",
    "# Forecasts": 74,
    "# Forecasters": 54,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before reaching AGI, will we hit a point where we can no longer improve AI capabilities by scaling because the increase in AI capabilities from scaling plateaus?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Before%20reaching%20AGI,%20will%20we%20hit%20a%20point%20where%20we%20can%20no%20longer%20improve%20AI%20capabilities%20by%20scaling%20because%20the%20increase%20in%20AI%20capabilities%20from%20scaling%20plateaus?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "31.56%",
    "# Forecasts": 66,
    "# Forecasters": 52,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before reaching AGI, will we hit a point where we can no longer improve AI capabilities by scaling because we are unable to continue scaling?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Before%20reaching%20AGI,%20will%20we%20hit%20a%20point%20where%20we%20can%20no%20longer%20improve%20AI%20capabilities%20by%20scaling%20because%20we%20are%20unable%20to%20continue%20scaling?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "24.51%",
    "# Forecasts": 75,
    "# Forecasters": 52,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the post \"Embedded Interactive Predictions on LessWrong\" get more than 80 karma by December 1st?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20the%20post%20\"Embedded%20Interactive%20Predictions%20on%20LessWrong\"%20get%20more%20than%2080%20karma%20by%20December%201st?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "89.52%",
    "# Forecasts": 83,
    "# Forecasters": 45,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Having a button/prompt for Elicit on LW would increase usage by at least 5x",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Having%20a%20button/prompt%20for%20Elicit%20on%20LW%20would%20increase%20usage%20by%20at%20least%205x&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "60.22%",
    "# Forecasts": 41,
    "# Forecasters": 37,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2025 bitcoin will no longer be the highest traded cryptocurrency. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%202025%20bitcoin%20will%20no%20longer%20be%20the%20highest%20traded%20cryptocurrency.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "55.49%",
    "# Forecasts": 37,
    "# Forecasters": 35,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "A Singularity will not occur by the year 2040.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=A%20Singularity%20will%20not%20occur%20by%20the%20year%202040.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "68.71%",
    "# Forecasts": 42,
    "# Forecasters": 34,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a 4 year interval in which world GDP doubles before the first 1 year interval in which world GDP doubles?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20there%20be%20a%204%20year%20interval%20in%20which%20world%20GDP%20doubles%20before%20the%20first%201%20year%20interval%20in%20which%20world%20GDP%20doubles?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "61.12%",
    "# Forecasts": 42,
    "# Forecasters": 33,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 2025, most of Russia will become part of the United States, or the reverse, or they will in some other manner become the same sovereign state, or part of the same sovereign state",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Before%202025,%20most%20of%20Russia%20will%20become%20part%20of%20the%20United%20States,%20or%20the%20reverse,%20or%20they%20will%20in%20some%20other%20manner%20become%20the%20same%20sovereign%20state,%20or%20part%20of%20the%20same%20sovereign%20state&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "0.79%",
    "# Forecasts": 34,
    "# Forecasters": 32,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The Pope will be assassinated.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20Pope%20will%20be%20assassinated.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "3.03%",
    "# Forecasts": 32,
    "# Forecasters": 30,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a 4 year interval in which world GDP growth doubles before the first 1 year interval in which world GDP growth doubles?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20there%20be%20a%204%20year%20interval%20in%20which%20world%20GDP%20growth%20doubles%20before%20the%20first%201%20year%20interval%20in%20which%20world%20GDP%20growth%20doubles?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "47.38%",
    "# Forecasts": 47,
    "# Forecasters": 28,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The real identity of Nakamoto Satoshi will be publicly known by 2022",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20real%20identity%20of%20Nakamoto%20Satoshi%20will%20be%20publicly%20known%20by%202022&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "38.97%",
    "# Forecasts": 31,
    "# Forecasters": 29,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "PredictionBook will still survive by the end of 2020",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=PredictionBook%20will%20still%20survive%20by%20the%20end%20of%202020&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "83.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 40,
    "# Forecasters": 29,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will AGI cause existential catastrophe conditional on there being a 4 year period of doubling of world GDP before a 1 year period of doubling?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20AGI%20cause%20existential%20catastrophe%20conditional%20on%20there%20being%20a%204%20year%20period%20of%20doubling%20of%20world%20GDP%20before%20a%201%20year%20period%20of%20doubling?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "36.91%",
    "# Forecasts": 34,
    "# Forecasters": 29,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "\"There will only be three languages in the world - English, Spanish and Mandarin\" --Bill Walker, BBC",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=\"There%20will%20only%20be%20three%20languages%20in%20the%20world%20-%20English,%20Spanish%20and%20Mandarin\"%20--Bill%20Walker,%20BBC&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2.91%",
    "# Forecasts": 33,
    "# Forecasters": 29,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will LessWrong add a button to embed interactive predictions before 2021-07-01?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20LessWrong%20add%20a%20button%20to%20embed%20interactive%20predictions%20before%202021-07-01?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "54.94%",
    "# Forecasts": 47,
    "# Forecasters": 28,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will AGI cause existential catastrophe conditional on there being a 1 year period of doubling of world GDP without there first being a 4 year period of doubling?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20AGI%20cause%20existential%20catastrophe%20conditional%20on%20there%20being%20a%201%20year%20period%20of%20doubling%20of%20world%20GDP%20without%20there%20first%20being%20a%204%20year%20period%20of%20doubling?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "47.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 34,
    "# Forecasters": 28,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "No nuclear weapon will be used for the remainder of this decade. (Does not count tests)",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=No%20nuclear%20weapon%20will%20be%20used%20for%20the%20remainder%20of%20this%20decade.%20(Does%20not%20count%20tests)&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "82.13%",
    "# Forecasts": 32,
    "# Forecasters": 28,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "No military draft in the United States before 2020.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=No%20military%20draft%20in%20the%20United%20States%20before%202020.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "90.27%",
    "# Forecasts": 33,
    "# Forecasters": 28,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Flying cars will become the dominant form of transportation in at least one major world city by 2035.  ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Flying%20cars%20will%20become%20the%20dominant%20form%20of%20transportation%20in%20at%20least%20one%20major%20world%20city%20by%202035.%20%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8.81%",
    "# Forecasts": 31,
    "# Forecasters": 28,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 2030 organised religions will no longer exist in any meaningful way and religion will no longer have any political influence.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Before%202030%20organised%20religions%20will%20no%20longer%20exist%20in%20any%20meaningful%20way%20and%20religion%20will%20no%20longer%20have%20any%20political%20influence.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8.68%",
    "# Forecasts": 28,
    "# Forecasters": 27,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Edward Snowden will be U.S. President before 2034",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Edward%20Snowden%20will%20be%20U.S.%20President%20before%202034&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "0.23%",
    "# Forecasts": 26,
    "# Forecasters": 26,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Trump wins Nobel",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Trump%20wins%20Nobel&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10.55%",
    "# Forecasts": 38,
    "# Forecasters": 26,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "California will secede from the United States before 2021",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=California%20will%20secede%20from%20the%20United%20States%20before%202021&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "0.68%",
    "# Forecasts": 34,
    "# Forecasters": 26,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will AGI cause existential catastrophe conditional on there being a 4 year period of doubling of world GDP growth before a 1 year period of doubling?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20AGI%20cause%20existential%20catastrophe%20conditional%20on%20there%20being%20a%204%20year%20period%20of%20doubling%20of%20world%20GDP%20growth%20before%20a%201%20year%20period%20of%20doubling?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40.24%",
    "# Forecasts": 42,
    "# Forecasters": 26,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Bitcoin was an official NSA or CIA project.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Bitcoin%20was%20an%20official%20NSA%20or%20CIA%20project.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1.88%",
    "# Forecasts": 26,
    "# Forecasters": 25,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will AGI cause existential catastrophe conditional on there being a 1 year period of doubling of world GDP growth without there first being a 4 year period of doubling?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20AGI%20cause%20existential%20catastrophe%20conditional%20on%20there%20being%20a%201%20year%20period%20of%20doubling%20of%20world%20GDP%20growth%20without%20there%20first%20being%20a%204%20year%20period%20of%20doubling?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "46.84%",
    "# Forecasts": 32,
    "# Forecasters": 24,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "...be an environmental disaster.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=...be%20an%20environmental%20disaster.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26.37%",
    "# Forecasts": 27,
    "# Forecasters": 24,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "For most of history, a human attempting to use reasoning to do things like cooking, crafting, or planning (instead of using inherited cultural heuristics, like omens or folk wisdom), would have been substantially worse off, and faced a major increase in their risk of death (without a commensurate increase in life quality).",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=For%20most%20of%20history,%20a%20human%20attempting%20to%20use%20reasoning%20to%20do%20things%20like%20cooking,%20crafting,%20or%20planning%20(instead%20of%20using%20inherited%20cultural%20heuristics,%20like%20omens%20or%20folk%20wisdom),%20would%20have%20been%20substantially%20worse%20off,%20and%20faced%20a%20major%20increase%20in%20their%20risk%20of%20death%20(without%20a%20commensurate%20increase%20in%20life%20quality).&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "58.56%",
    "# Forecasts": 34,
    "# Forecasters": 23,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "50% chance of AI by 2028 --Shane Legg",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=50%%20chance%20of%20AI%20by%202028%20--Shane%20Legg&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "24.39%",
    "# Forecasts": 28,
    "# Forecasters": 23,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "\"I predict that by 2020, China will ban foreign men from entering China, except for special cases.\"",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=\"I%20predict%20that%20by%202020,%20China%20will%20ban%20foreign%20men%20from%20entering%20China,%20except%20for%20special%20cases.\"&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "9.69%",
    "# Forecasts": 26,
    "# Forecasters": 23,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Queen Elizabeth II will abdicate before her death.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Queen%20Elizabeth%20II%20will%20abdicate%20before%20her%20death.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "7.46%",
    "# Forecasts": 26,
    "# Forecasters": 23,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The Singularity will occur by 2050.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20Singularity%20will%20occur%20by%202050.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "35.12%",
    "# Forecasts": 25,
    "# Forecasters": 23,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Does Pareto frontier trick allow people to circumvent the Generalized Efficient Market hypothesis? That is, take people in the 98th percentile of intelligence. Are there a few separate fields such that they could become experts in each, with less than 10 years of total time investment... and then have a realistic shot at a big money/status windfall, with relatively little *marginal* effort.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Does%20Pareto%20frontier%20trick%20allow%20people%20to%20circumvent%20the%20Generalized%20Efficient%20Market%20hypothesis?%20That%20is,%20take%20people%20in%20the%2098th%20percentile%20of%20intelligence.%20Are%20there%20a%20few%20separate%20fields%20such%20that%20they%20could%20become%20experts%20in%20each,%20with%20less%20than%2010%20years%20of%20total%20time%20investment...%20and%20then%20have%20a%20realistic%20shot%20at%20a%20big%20money/status%20windfall,%20with%20relatively%20little%20*marginal*%20effort.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "62.27%",
    "# Forecasts": 26,
    "# Forecasters": 22,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be an \"Inverse AlphaFold\" by end of 2025?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20there%20be%20an%20\"Inverse%20AlphaFold\"%20by%20end%20of%202025?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33.91%",
    "# Forecasts": 33,
    "# Forecasters": 22,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Computer Go running on commodity hardware (<$2k) to reach world champion level (>=9 dan) by 2030",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Computer%20Go%20running%20on%20commodity%20hardware%20(<$2k)%20to%20reach%20world%20champion%20level%20(>=9%20dan)%20by%202030&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "84.11%",
    "# Forecasts": 27,
    "# Forecasters": 22,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2020, Eliezer Yudkowsky will have given up building friendly AI.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%202020,%20Eliezer%20Yudkowsky%20will%20have%20given%20up%20building%20friendly%20AI.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "6.67%",
    "# Forecasts": 24,
    "# Forecasters": 22,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Polyamory will have legal status in the USA similar to 2013's gay marriage by 2035.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Polyamory%20will%20have%20legal%20status%20in%20the%20USA%20similar%20to%202013's%20gay%20marriage%20by%202035.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "19.35%",
    "# Forecasts": 23,
    "# Forecasters": 22,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "PredictionBook.com will be up and running 10 years from today - 5/31/2023 - with this individual prediction still accessible.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=PredictionBook.com%20will%20be%20up%20and%20running%2010%20years%20from%20today%20-%205/31/2023%20-%20with%20this%20individual%20prediction%20still%20accessible.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "68.88%",
    "# Forecasts": 25,
    "# Forecasters": 22,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Most babies born in 2022 do not have Zika virus.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Most%20babies%20born%20in%202022%20do%20not%20have%20Zika%20virus.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "99.41%",
    "# Forecasts": 22,
    "# Forecasters": 21,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The modern Scientific Revolution occurred in Europe between the 16th and 18th Centuries. Why did it not happen in China? Historian Toby Huff claims the reason is that China was unable to produce modern science primarily because a lack of the requisite intellectual freedom. Was he basically correct?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20modern%20Scientific%20Revolution%20occurred%20in%20Europe%20between%20the%2016th%20and%2018th%20Centuries.%20Why%20did%20it%20not%20happen%20in%20China?%20Historian%20Toby%20Huff%20claims%20the%20reason%20is%20that%20China%20was%20unable%20to%20produce%20modern%20science%20primarily%20because%20a%20lack%20of%20the%20requisite%20intellectual%20freedom.%20Was%20he%20basically%20correct?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "37.46%",
    "# Forecasts": 24,
    "# Forecasters": 21,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "...substantially improve current housing shortages and rent prices by 2035. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=...substantially%20improve%20current%20housing%20shortages%20and%20rent%20prices%20by%202035.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "70.19%",
    "# Forecasts": 21,
    "# Forecasters": 21,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Machiavellian Intelligence Hypothesis: humans evolved big brains in order to succeed at social manuevering and climbing dominance hierarchies.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Machiavellian%20Intelligence%20Hypothesis:%20humans%20evolved%20big%20brains%20in%20order%20to%20succeed%20at%20social%20manuevering%20and%20climbing%20dominance%20hierarchies.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "60.84%",
    "# Forecasts": 32,
    "# Forecasters": 21,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Background knowledge and motivation levels being equal, humans will learn how to perform new tasks at roughly equal rates.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Background%20knowledge%20and%20motivation%20levels%20being%20equal,%20humans%20will%20learn%20how%20to%20perform%20new%20tasks%20at%20roughly%20equal%20rates.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20.48%",
    "# Forecasts": 29,
    "# Forecasters": 21,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2070 there will be a human alive with age 150 or older.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=In%202070%20there%20will%20be%20a%20human%20alive%20with%20age%20150%20or%20older.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26.36%",
    "# Forecasts": 25,
    "# Forecasters": 21,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "TurnTrout will use the Elicit embedding on LessWrong for a non-prediction question by 28-11-2020",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=TurnTrout%20will%20use%20the%20Elicit%20embedding%20on%20LessWrong%20for%20a%20non-prediction%20question%20by%2028-11-2020&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "58.15%",
    "# Forecasts": 39,
    "# Forecasters": 21,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 2020 organized religions will have no political influence.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Before%202020%20organized%20religions%20will%20have%20no%20political%20influence.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11.68%",
    "# Forecasts": 22,
    "# Forecasters": 20,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Another version: roughly, everything that top-humans can learn, most humans can too if they actually tried. That is, there is psychological unity of humankind in what we can learn, but not necessarily what we have learned. By contrast, a mouse really couldn't learn chess, even if they tried. And in turn, no human can learn to play 90-dimensional chess, unlike the hypothetical superintelligences that can.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Another%20version:%20roughly,%20everything%20that%20top-humans%20can%20learn,%20most%20humans%20can%20too%20if%20they%20actually%20tried.%20That%20is,%20there is psychological%20unity%20of%20humankind%20in%20what%20we can%20learn,%20but%20not%20necessarily%20what%20we have%20learned. By%20contrast,%20a%20mouse%20really%20couldn't%20learn%20chess,%20even%20if%20they%20tried.%20And%20in%20turn,%20no%20human%20can%20learn%20to%20play%2090-dimensional%20chess,%20unlike%20the%20hypothetical%20superintelligences%20that%20can.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "27.83%",
    "# Forecasts": 35,
    "# Forecasters": 20,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis: humans evolved big brains in order to be able to maintain [complicated, detailed, arbitrary-seeming cultural knowledge like 20+ step Inuit seal hunting techniques]. Everything that separates us from the apes is part of an evolutionary package designed to help us maintain this kind of culture, exploit this kind of culture, or adjust to the new abilities that this kind of culture gave us. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Cultural%20Intelligence%20Hypothesis:%20humans%20evolved%20big%20brains%20in%20order%20to%20be%20able%20to%20maintain%20[complicated,%20detailed,%20arbitrary-seeming%20cultural%20knowledge%20like%2020+%20step%20Inuit%20seal%20hunting%20techniques].%20Everything%20that%20separates%20us%20from%20the%20apes%20is%20part%20of%20an%20evolutionary%20package%20designed%20to%20help%20us%20maintain%20this%20kind%20of%20culture,%20exploit%20this%20kind%20of%20culture,%20or%20adjust%20to%20the%20new%20abilities%20that%20this%20kind%20of%20culture%20gave%20us.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "34.13%",
    "# Forecasts": 47,
    "# Forecasters": 20,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Homo sapiens will be near or fully extinct by 2100.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Homo%20sapiens%20will%20be%20near%20or%20fully%20extinct%20by%202100.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "21.64%",
    "# Forecasts": 22,
    "# Forecasters": 20,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Google will survive for 15 more years",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Google%20will%20survive%20for%2015%20more%20years&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "88.38%",
    "# Forecasts": 21,
    "# Forecasters": 20,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Chess will be solved within 10 years, and the end result will be a draw for Black.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Chess%20will%20be%20solved%20within%2010%20years,%20and%20the%20end%20result%20will%20be%20a%20draw%20for%20Black.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15.33%",
    "# Forecasts": 21,
    "# Forecasters": 20,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "China and Japan will engage in armed conflict with each other resulting in > 1,000 deaths before 2023.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=China%20and%20Japan%20will%20engage%20in%20armed%20conflict%20with%20each%20other%20resulting%20in%20>%201,000%20deaths%20before%202023.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "7.45%",
    "# Forecasts": 22,
    "# Forecasters": 20,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Magick qua magick works AND hinges on the intersection between quantum physics and decision theory.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Magick%20qua%20magick%20works%20AND%20hinges%20on%20the%20intersection%20between%20quantum%20physics%20and%20decision%20theory.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4.74%",
    "# Forecasts": 23,
    "# Forecasters": 20,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before AGI, will we learn of an example of catastrophic deceptive misalignment?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Before%20AGI,%20will%20we%20learn%20of%20an%20example%20of%20catastrophic%20deceptive%20misalignment?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "56.94%",
    "# Forecasts": 35,
    "# Forecasters": 19,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "...all-things-considered, be good for the world.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=...all-things-considered,%20be%20good%20for%20the%20world.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "80.89%",
    "# Forecasts": 27,
    "# Forecasters": 19,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Conditional on the AI community learning of pre-AGI catastrophic deceptive misalignment, will the ($ spent on AI alignment research)/($ spent on AI research) ratio increase by more than 50% over the two years following the catastrophe?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Conditional%20on%20the%20AI%20community%20learning%20of%20pre-AGI%20catastrophic%20deceptive%20misalignment,%20will%20the%20($%20spent%20on%20AI%20alignment%20research)/($%20spent%20on%20AI%20research)%20ratio%20increase%20by%20more%20than%2050%%20over%20the%20two%20years%20following%20the%20catastrophe?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "39.69%",
    "# Forecasts": 35,
    "# Forecasters": 18,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "...cause a water shortage such that, in 2030, residents of the Bay Area would spend on average 100% more on water, after adjusting for inflation, compared to 2020. (In 2020 the average American spends around $200/year on water)",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=...cause%20a%20water%20shortage%20such%20that,%20in%202030,%20residents%20of%20the%20Bay%20Area%20would%20spend%20on%20average%20100%%20more%20on%20water,%20after%20adjusting%20for%20inflation,%20compared%20to%202020.%20(In%202020%20the%20average%20American%20spends%20around%20$200/year%20on%20water)&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "17.05%",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "# Forecasters": 19,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "...significantly worsen traffic in San Francisco.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=...significantly%20worsen%20traffic%20in%20San%20Francisco.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "48.40%",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "# Forecasters": 19,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Overall, in 2019, biosecurity in the context of catastrophic risks had been underfunded and underdiscussed.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Overall,%20in%202019,%20biosecurity%20in%20the%20context%20of%20catastrophic%20risks%20had%20been%20underfunded%20and%20underdiscussed.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "83.14%",
    "# Forecasts": 22,
    "# Forecasters": 19,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "...create buildings where the expected yearly damage from earthquakes (both in terms of reduced quality of life and property destroyed) is >1.5x that of nearby buildings on old land.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=...create%20buildings%20where%20the%20expected%20yearly%20damage%20from%20earthquakes%20(both%20in%20terms%20of%20reduced%20quality%20of%20life%20and%20property%20destroyed)%20is%20>1.5x%20that%20of%20nearby%20buildings%20on%20old%20land.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "36.38%",
    "# Forecasts": 21,
    "# Forecasters": 19,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "United States will invade Australia and take over",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=United%20States%20will%20invade%20Australia%20and%20take%20over&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 21,
    "# Forecasters": 19,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Contrary to my left leanings, Man Made Global Warming will be proved incorrect by 2022",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Contrary%20to%20my%20left%20leanings,%20Man%20Made%20Global%20Warming%20will%20be%20proved%20incorrect%20by%202022&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "6.95%",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "# Forecasters": 19,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "90% chance of AI by 2050 --Shane Legg",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=90%%20chance%20of%20AI%20by%202050%20--Shane%20Legg&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "47.05%",
    "# Forecasts": 21,
    "# Forecasters": 19,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "No human revived from cryonic suspension by 2040.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=No%20human%20revived%20from%20cryonic%20suspension%20by%202040.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "86.75%",
    "# Forecasts": 24,
    "# Forecasters": 19,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Robin Hanson: In 2032, less than 50% of cars on the road will completely autonomous. (to be assessed by asking an unbiased expert if the answer is not obvious) ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Robin%20Hanson:%20In%202032,%20less%20than%2050%%20of%20cars%20on%20the%20road%20will%20completely%20autonomous.%20(to%20be%20assessed%20by%20asking%20an%20unbiased%20expert%20if%20the%20answer%20is%20not%20obvious)%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "54.20%",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "# Forecasters": 19,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The United States will contain exactly 50 states by 2025.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20United%20States%20will%20contain%20exactly%2050%20states%20by%202025.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "72.43%",
    "# Forecasts": 23,
    "# Forecasters": 19,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Brexit will cause hundreds of thousands of deaths from mass starvation in the UK --Charlie Stross",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Brexit%20will%20cause%20hundreds%20of%20thousands%20of%20deaths%20from%20mass%20starvation%20in%20the%20UK%20--Charlie%20Stross&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2.21%",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "# Forecasters": 19,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "No human will visit the moon from 2012-2020.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=No%20human%20will%20visit%20the%20moon%20from%202012-2020.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "74.85%",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "# Forecasters": 19,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of people experience a \"Clogged drainpipe\" effect in idea generation? (That is, they'd agree that they recognised the feeling as described in the post, after attempting a babble challenge)",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=What%20percentage%20of%20people%20experience%20a%20\"Clogged%20drainpipe\"%20effect%20in%20idea%20generation?%20(That%20is,%20they'd%20agree%20that%20they%20recognised%20the%20feeling%20as%20described%20in%20the%20post,%20after%20attempting%20a%20babble%20challenge)&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "64.34%",
    "# Forecasts": 50,
    "# Forecasters": 18,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "We will make First Contact before we will have AGI.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=We%20will%20make%20First%20Contact%20before%20we%20will%20have%20AGI.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "12.05%",
    "# Forecasts": 21,
    "# Forecasters": 18,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will First Contact happen in the form of a message (e.g. radio waves), rather than by physical visitors?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20First%20Contact%20happen%20in%20the%20form%20of%20a%20message%20(e.g.%20radio%20waves),%20rather%20than%20by%20physical%20visitors?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "64.80%",
    "# Forecasts": 40,
    "# Forecasters": 18,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Trump eventually signs an executive order forcing everyone to kneel in his presence",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Trump%20eventually%20signs%20an%20executive%20order%20forcing%20everyone%20to%20kneel%20in%20his%20presence&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "3.32%",
    "# Forecasts": 22,
    "# Forecasters": 18,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "There will be driverless taxis available for use by the public in at least one US city in 2023.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=There%20will%20be%20driverless%20taxis%20available%20for%20use%20by%20the%20public%20in%20at%20least%20one%20US%20city%20in%202023.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "64.28%",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "# Forecasters": 18,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The percentage of people professing to be both athiest and agnostic will increase over the next decade",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20percentage%20of%20people%20professing%20to%20be%20both%20athiest%20and%20agnostic%20will%20increase%20over%20the%20next%20decade&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "67.55%",
    "# Forecasts": 22,
    "# Forecasters": 18,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "“No human will set his or her foot on Mars and return safely to earth before 2050.”",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=“No%20human%20will%20set%20his%20or%20her%20foot%20on%20Mars%20and%20return%20safely%20to%20earth%20before%202050.”&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40.27%",
    "# Forecasts": 26,
    "# Forecasters": 18,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Between 2016-2116, at least 1 American President will be neither Democratic or Republican.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Between%202016-2116,%20at%20least%201%20American%20President%20will%20be%20neither%20Democratic%20or%20Republican.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "51.78%",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "# Forecasters": 18,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "A professional athlete will voluntarily amputate their legs to use prosthetics like Oscar Pistorius, by 2021",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=A%20professional%20athlete%20will%20voluntarily%20amputate%20their%20legs%20to%20use%20prosthetics%20like%20Oscar%20Pistorius,%20by%202021&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30.95%",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "# Forecasters": 17,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Nuclear power plants will no longer operate by the year 2020.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Nuclear%20power%20plants%20will%20no%20longer%20operate%20by%20the%20year%202020.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "12.79%",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "# Forecasters": 17,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Russia will not have established moon bases by 2032",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Russia%20will%20not%20have%20established%20moon%20bases%20by%202032&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "69.33%",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "# Forecasters": 17,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "It will be illegal to drive yourself on USA public roads ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=It%20will%20be%20illegal%20to%20drive%20yourself%20on%20USA%20public%20roads%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1.72%",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "# Forecasters": 17,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Robin Hanson's brain will be cryogenically frozen.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Robin%20Hanson's%20brain%20will%20be%20cryogenically%20frozen.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "47.17%",
    "# Forecasts": 23,
    "# Forecasters": 17,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The strategy-stealing assumption is \"a good enough approximation that we can basically act as if it’s true\". That is, for any strategy an unaligned AI could use to influence the long-run future, there is an analogous strategy that a similarly-sized group of humans can use in order to capture a similar amount of flexible influence over the future. By “flexible” is meant that humans can decide later what to do with that influence  (which is important since humans don’t yet know what we want in the long run).",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20strategy-stealing%20assumption%20is%20\"a%20good%20enough%20approximation%20that%20we%20can%20basically%20act%20as%20if%20it’s%20true\".%20That%20is,%20for%20any%20strategy%20an%20unaligned%20AI%20could%20use%20to%20influence%20the%20long-run%20future,%20there%20is%20an%20analogous%20strategy%20that%20a%20similarly-sized%20group%20of%20humans%20can%20use%20in%20order%20to%20capture%20a%20similar%20amount%20of%20flexible%20influence%20over%20the%20future.%20By%20“flexible”%20is%20meant%20that%20humans%20can%20decide%20later%20what%20to%20do%20with%20that%20influence %20(which%20is%20important%20since%20humans%20don’t%20yet%20know%20what%20we%20want%20in%20the%20long%20run).&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33.27%",
    "# Forecasts": 26,
    "# Forecasters": 17,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Human-level artificial general intelligence by 2030",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Human-level%20artificial%20general%20intelligence%20by%202030&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26.89%",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "# Forecasters": 17,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "aliens invade earth in 2023",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=aliens%20invade%20earth%20in%202023&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "0.94%",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "# Forecasters": 17,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The Millennium Prize for solving P Versus NP will remain unclaimed by 2020.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20Millennium%20Prize%20for%20solving%20P%20Versus%20NP%20will%20remain%20unclaimed%20by%202020.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "83.95%",
    "# Forecasts": 21,
    "# Forecasters": 17,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "'2021 The first humans land on Mars.' --Arthur C. Clarke",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search='2021%20The%20first%20humans%20land%20on%20Mars.'%20--Arthur%20C.%20Clarke&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1.80%",
    "# Forecasts": 25,
    "# Forecasters": 17,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "My net financial worth will be greater than 10 million (2012-inflation adjusted), or enough to indefinitely earn a passive income to provide 100 people with cryonics, (whichever of the two is greater), by 2028",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=My%20net%20financial%20worth%20will%20be%20greater%20than%2010%20million%20(2012-inflation%20adjusted),%20or%20enough%20to%20indefinitely%20earn%20a%20passive%20income%20to%20provide%20100%20people%20with%20cryonics,%20(whichever%20of%20the%20two%20is%20greater),%20by%202028&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8.39%",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "# Forecasters": 17,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "A Level 7 (Chernobyl/2011 Japan level) nuclear accident will take place by end of 2020.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=A%20Level%207%20(Chernobyl/2011%20Japan%20level)%20nuclear%20accident%20will%20take%20place%20by%20end%20of%202020.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "21.62%",
    "# Forecasts": 21,
    "# Forecasters": 17,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "“One or more space agencies will send a manned mission to Mars by 2035.”",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=“One%20or%20more%20space%20agencies%20will%20send%20a%20manned%20mission%20to%20Mars%20by%202035.”&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "35.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 23,
    "# Forecasters": 17,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "An open atheist will be elected US President within 20 years.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=An%20open%20atheist%20will%20be%20elected%20US%20President%20within%2020%20years.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8.12%",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "# Forecasters": 16,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Elon Musk will come out as trans (MtF or MtX)",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Elon%20Musk%20will%20come%20out%20as%20trans%20(MtF%20or%20MtX)&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4.13%",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "# Forecasters": 16,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Man will travel to Mars by 2030. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Man%20will%20travel%20to%20Mars%20by%202030.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "42.89%",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "# Forecasters": 16,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Legal challenges initiated by the Donald Trump campaign will not change the outcome of the US Presidential election",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Legal%20challenges%20initiated%20by%20the%20Donald%20Trump%20campaign%20will%20not%20change%20the%20outcome%20of%20the%20US%20Presidential%20election&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "95.32%",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "# Forecasters": 16,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Some people living today (October 17th, 2009) will also be alive on October 17th, 3009.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Some%20people%20living%20today%20(October%2017th,%202009)%20will%20also%20be%20alive%20on%20October%2017th,%203009.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "35.53%",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "# Forecasters": 16,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If we receive a message from outer space, will it be in a form already accessible today (e.g., radio waves)?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=If%20we%20receive%20a%20message%20from%20outer%20space,%20will%20it%20be%20in%20a%20form%20already%20accessible%20today%20(e.g.,%20radio%20waves)?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "77.71%",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "# Forecasters": 16,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Information recorded in the predictionbook will be practically retrievable \"in ten thousand years, or so\"",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Information%20recorded%20in%20the%20predictionbook%20will%20be%20practically%20retrievable%20\"in%20ten%20thousand%20years,%20or%20so\"&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "19.11%",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "# Forecasters": 16,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "US presidents term limits abolished",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=US%20presidents%20term%20limits%20abolished&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2.24%",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "# Forecasters": 16,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2026 we will be technically capable of fixing arbitrary single-gene disorders - sickle cell anaemia, Huntington's, cystic fibrosis, Tay-Sachs, muscular dystrophy... - in living humans, with close to zero risk of severe complications.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%202026%20we%20will%20be%20technically%20capable%20of%20fixing%20arbitrary%20single-gene%20disorders%20-%20sickle%20cell%20anaemia,%20Huntington's,%20cystic%20fibrosis,%20Tay-Sachs,%20muscular%20dystrophy...%20-%20in%20living%20humans,%20with%20close%20to%20zero%20risk%20of%20severe%20complications.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "34.67%",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "# Forecasters": 16,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "An alive human has been on mars soil and returned to earth safely before year 2100.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=An%20alive%20human%20has%20been%20on%20mars%20soil%20and%20returned%20to%20earth%20safely%20before%20year%202100.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "57.78%",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "# Forecasters": 16,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "A Mars colony will be established in 2026. It will be an International establishment.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=A%20Mars%20colony%20will%20be%20established%20in%202026.%20It%20will%20be%20an%20International%20establishment.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4.90%",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "# Forecasters": 16,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Ghislane Maxwell will die by the end of the year 12/31",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Ghislane%20Maxwell%20will%20die%20by%20the%20end%20of%20the%20year%2012/31&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "14.48%",
    "# Forecasts": 25,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The Great Filter is the discovery of AGI, because it destroys their creators (us humans).",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20Great%20Filter%20is%20the%20discovery%20of%20AGI,%20because%20it%20destroys%20their%20creators%20(us%20humans).&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "28.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will humans continually pursue all simple yet powerful changes to our AIs?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20humans%20continually%20pursue%20all%20simple%20yet%20powerful%20changes%20to%20our%20AIs?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "59.36%",
    "# Forecasts": 25,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Are there simple changes to chimps (or other animals) that would make them much better at accumulating culture?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Are%20there%20simple%20changes%20to%20chimps%20(or%20other%20animals)%20that%20would%20make%20them%20much%20better%20at%20accumulating%20culture?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "56.90%",
    "# Forecasts": 29,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Decision-makers in media and PR, and corporate and government elites generally, have a lower tolerance for verbal conflict and taboo violations than the typical individual.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Decision-makers%20in%20media%20and%20PR,%20and%20corporate%20and%20government%20elites%20generally,%20have%20a%20lower%20tolerance%20for%20verbal%20conflict%20and%20taboo%20violations%20than%20the%20typical%20individual.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "76.55%",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If First Contact yields information beyond current human knowledge, will it be shared and made available for all humans?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=If%20First%20Contact%20yields%20information%20beyond%20current%20human%20knowledge,%20will%20it%20be%20shared%20and%20made%20available%20for%20all%20humans?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "66.47%",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If we answer it, will it be a single answer sent by all of humanity?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=If%20we%20answer%20it,%20will%20it%20be%20a%20single%20answer%20sent%20by%20all%20of%20humanity?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "29.44%",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If a message from outer space is detected, will we answer it?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=If%20a%20message%20from%20outer%20space%20is%20detected,%20will%20we%20answer%20it?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "73.94%",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The EA community has sometimes erred too much on the side of shutting down discussions of biology by turning them into discussions about info-hazards.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20EA%20community%20has%20sometimes%20erred%20too%20much%20on%20the%20side%20of%20shutting%20down%20discussions%20of%20biology%20by%20turning%20them%20into%20discussions%20about%20info-hazards.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "78.12%",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "A CRISPR-edited human baby will be born by 2020",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=A%20CRISPR-edited%20human%20baby%20will%20be%20born%20by%202020&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "43.47%",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder of Facebook, is President of the United States before 2026",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Mark%20Zuckerberg,%20co-founder%20of%20Facebook,%20is%20President%20of%20the%20United%20States%20before%202026&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "3.71%",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Kamala Harris will be president on Nov. 1, 2021.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Kamala%20Harris%20will%20be%20president%20on%20Nov.%201,%202021.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11.81%",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Extraterrestrial  life will be confirmed on at least one body by 2050. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Extraterrestrial%20%20life%20will%20be%20confirmed%20on%20at%20least%20one%20body%20by%202050.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "55.18%",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "There will NOT be a \"World War III\" within the next 10 years. (Between Russia and it's \"allies\" and NATO and/or western europe)",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=There%20will%20NOT%20be%20a%20\"World%20War%20III\"%20within%20the%20next%2010%20years.%20(Between%20Russia%20and%20it's%20\"allies\"%20and%20NATO%20and/or%20western%20europe)&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "93.31%",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "C still widely in use in the 2020s",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=C%20still%20widely%20in%20use%20in%20the%202020s&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "93.53%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Jesus will not come down from the heavens to judge mankind in my life time, my childrens life time, or my grand-childrens life time.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Jesus%20will%20not%20come%20down%20from%20the%20heavens%20to%20judge%20mankind%20in%20my%20life%20time,%20my%20childrens%20life%20time,%20or%20my%20grand-childrens%20life%20time.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "92.69%",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "USA will collapse before the People's Republic of China.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=USA%20will%20collapse%20before%20the%20People's%20Republic%20of%20China.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "41.47%",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "# Forecasters": 15,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Banning of incandescent light bulbs globally by 2022.Incandescent lightbulbs will not be bought, manufactured or sold legally.\r\n",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Banning%20of%20incandescent%20light%20bulbs%20globally%20by%202022.Incandescent%20lightbulbs%20will%20not%20be%20bought,%20manufactured%20or%20sold%20legally.\r\n&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11.19%",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Gay marriage will remain legal throughout a Trump presidency.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Gay%20marriage%20will%20remain%20legal%20throughout%20a%20Trump%20presidency.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "87.18%",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If First Contact is in physical form, will the ETI be in biological form?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=If%20First%20Contact%20is%20in%20physical%20form,%20will%20the%20ETI%20be%20in%20biological%20form?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "17.39%",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The message begins with \"Execute this algorithm on a computer today, or I will make your sun go supernova tomorrow\". Should we execute it?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20message%20begins%20with%20\"Execute%20this%20algorithm%20on%20a%20computer%20today,%20or%20I%20will%20make%20your%20sun%20go%20supernova%20tomorrow\".%20Should%20we%20execute%20it?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "7.86%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "I will not pass Eliezer in LW karma in the next 10 years.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=I%20will%20not%20pass%20Eliezer%20in%20LW%20karma%20in%20the%20next%2010%20years.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "82.20%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In the next ten years, scientists will publish a paper in a refereed journal claiming to have experimentally moved matter faster than the speed of light. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=In%20the%20next%20ten%20years,%20scientists%20will%20publish%20a%20paper%20in%20a%20refereed%20journal%20claiming%20to%20have%20experimentally%20moved%20matter%20faster%20than%20the%20speed%20of%20light.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "9.47%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "\"by 2030 we should have the capability to upload a person’s consciousness to a computer system\"",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=\"by%202030%20we%20should%20have%20the%20capability%20to%20upload%20a%20person’s%20consciousness%20to%20a%20computer%20system\"&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "6.20%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The United States will contain more than 50 states by 2025.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20United%20States%20will%20contain%20more%20than%2050%20states%20by%202025.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30.26%",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "\"Within ten years the SAT testing service will require students to take a blood test to prove they are not on cognitive enhancing drugs.\" --James Miller",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=\"Within%20ten%20years%20the%20SAT%20testing%20service%20will%20require%20students%20to%20take%20a%20blood%20test%20to%20prove%20they%20are%20not%20on%20cognitive%20enhancing%20drugs.\"%20--James%20Miller&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "9.55%",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The next non-Democrat to win the White House will also be a non-Republican.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20next%20non-Democrat%20to%20win%20the%20White%20House%20will%20also%20be%20a%20non-Republican.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "17.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "North Korea invades South Korea before the end of 2020",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=North%20Korea%20invades%20South%20Korea%20before%20the%20end%20of%202020&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5.94%",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "A right wing billionaire is behind the creation of bitcoin.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=A%20right%20wing%20billionaire%20is%20behind%20the%20creation%20of%20bitcoin.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8.79%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The United States will contain less than 50 states by 2025.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20United%20States%20will%20contain%20less%20than%2050%20states%20by%202025.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "9.82%",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will we understand the content of a message from outer space?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20we%20understand%20the%20content%20of%20a%20message%20from%20outer%20space?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "47.39%",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Microsoft will release the source code to the current version of Windows under a free-software license.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Microsoft%20will%20release%20the%20source%20code%20to%20the%20current%20version%20of%20Windows%20under%20a%20free-software%20license.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "14.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2022,  autonomous drones will have been used by a government agency to kill someone.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%202022,%20%20autonomous%20drones%20will%20have%20been%20used%20by%20a%20government%20agency%20to%20kill%20someone.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "53.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By mid-century, Mandarin will be more widely spoken in Africa than English. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%20mid-century,%20Mandarin%20will%20be%20more%20widely%20spoken%20in%20Africa%20than%20English.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "28.21%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Hacking and cyberterrorism will be punishable by death worldwide by Dec. 1, 2029.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Hacking%20and%20cyberterrorism%20will%20be%20punishable%20by%20death%20worldwide%20by%20Dec.%201,%202029.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "7.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The United States will reach less than 3% unemployment at some point within the next 15 years.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20United%20States%20will%20reach%20less%20than%203%%20unemployment%20at%20some%20point%20within%20the%20next%2015%20years.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11.73%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 14,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "All children in the US must have GPS attached to them in some sense by law if they leave their parents house.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=All%20children%20in%20the%20US%20must%20have%20GPS%20attached%20to%20them%20in%20some%20sense%20by%20law%20if%20they%20leave%20their%20parents%20house.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4.92%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Joe Biden is the sitting president 4 years from today",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Joe%20Biden%20is%20the%20sitting%20president%204%20years%20from%20today&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33.75%",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Steve Jobs' brain was cryopreserved or plastinated within two weeks of declaration of death, and this is known before 2070.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Steve%20Jobs'%20brain%20was%20cryopreserved%20or%20plastinated%20within%20two%20weeks%20of%20declaration%20of%20death,%20and%20this%20is%20known%20before%202070.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4.08%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2065, a majority of the world will be vegan. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%202065,%20a%20majority%20of%20the%20world%20will%20be%20vegan.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11.08%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "ETI is AGI",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=ETI%20is%20AGI&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "84.61%",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2030, mothers will be the primary breadwinner in the majority of households with children in the U.S.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%202030,%20mothers%20will%20be%20the%20primary%20breadwinner%20in%20the%20majority%20of%20households%20with%20children%20in%20the%20U.S.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "38.31%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "North Korea will invade South Korea by January 1st, 2022",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=North%20Korea%20will%20invade%20South%20Korea%20by%20January%201st,%202022&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5.33%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before receiving a message from outer space, will we need a technological breakthrough (e.g., by discovering yet unknown elementary particles)",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Before%20receiving%20a%20message%20from%20outer%20space,%20will%20we%20need%20a%20technological%20breakthrough%20(e.g.,%20by%20discovering%20yet%20unknown%20elementary%20particles)&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "29.33%",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Generic AI won't happen in the next 10 years.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Generic%20AI%20won't%20happen%20in%20the%20next%2010%20years.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "85.31%",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Trump dies of COVID-19",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Trump%20dies%20of%20COVID-19&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "6.63%",
    "# Forecasts": 32,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Fusion Power will revolutionize the world energy demands by 2025.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Fusion%20Power%20will%20revolutionize%20the%20world%20energy%20demands%20by%202025.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "9.47%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Average world IQ to decrease from 2015 to 2050",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Average%20world%20IQ%20to%20decrease%20from%202015%20to%202050&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "29.79%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Humanity still a thing in 2036",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Humanity%20still%20a%20thing%20in%202036&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "89.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If First Contact is in physical form, will the ETI \"spaceship\" be larger than 1m in size?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=If%20First%20Contact%20is%20in%20physical%20form,%20will%20the%20ETI%20\"spaceship\"%20be%20larger%20than%201m%20in%20size?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "51.36%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "There be a \"SETI Winter\" before First Contact.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=There%20be%20a%20\"SETI%20Winter\"%20before%20First%20Contact.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "73.89%",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Truly \"Pilotless\" air travel will be the standard in 2050.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Truly%20\"Pilotless\"%20air%20travel%20will%20be%20the%20standard%20in%202050.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "62.71%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The core cognitive loop that causes progress in accomplished Buddhists is basically cognitive behavioral therapy, supercharged with a mental state more intense than most pharmaceuticals.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20core%20cognitive%20loop%20that%20causes%20progress%20in%20accomplished%20Buddhists%20is%20basically%20cognitive%20behavioral%20therapy,%20supercharged%20with%20a%20mental%20state%20more%20intense%20than%20most%20pharmaceuticals.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "44.46%",
    "# Forecasts": 26,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "We will experience an existential catastrophe before First Contact.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=We%20will%20experience%20an%20existential%20catastrophe%20before%20First%20Contact.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40.84%",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2022, [almost] every new car will have broadband Internet. -- Alyssa Vance",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%202022,%20[almost]%20every%20new%20car%20will%20have%20broadband%20Internet.%20--%20Alyssa%20Vance&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "44.15%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Satoshi Nakamoto is just Wei Dai and this is known before 2060",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Satoshi%20Nakamoto%20is%20just%20Wei%20Dai%20and%20this%20is%20known%20before%202060&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "13.37%",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In the next ten years, self-identified Libertarians will outnumber self-identified Republicans in the US. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=In%20the%20next%20ten%20years,%20self-identified%20Libertarians%20will%20outnumber%20self-identified%20Republicans%20in%20the%20US.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "14.69%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "USA mints a coin worth $1,000,000,000 or more before 2021",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=USA%20mints%20a%20coin%20worth%20$1,000,000,000%20or%20more%20before%202021&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4.50%",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The Roman Catholic Church ordains female priests before 2033.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20Roman%20Catholic%20Church%20ordains%20female%20priests%20before%202033.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "18.54%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Reproductive human cloning widely socially accepted by 2040. -- Axel Boldt",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Reproductive%20human%20cloning%20widely%20socially%20accepted%20by%202040.%20--%20Axel%20Boldt&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "32.06%",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Human level AI by 2029 (Ray Kurzweil, \"How to create a mind\")",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Human%20level%20AI%20by%202029%20(Ray%20Kurzweil,%20\"How%20to%20create%20a%20mind\")&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26.75%",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "10 million",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=10%20million&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8.42%",
    "# Forecasts": 36,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Our descendants will colonize millions of star systems within ten thousand years or so. -- Robin Hanson",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Our%20descendants%20will%20colonize%20millions%20of%20star%20systems%20within%20ten%20thousand%20years%20or%20so.%20--%20Robin%20Hanson&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "27.64%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Saudi Arabian government collapses within the next 5 years.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Saudi%20Arabian%20government%20collapses%20within%20the%20next%205%20years.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10.69%",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The tech will exist and be relatively safe for media to be uploaded directly into the human brain by 2026.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20tech%20will%20exist%20and%20be%20relatively%20safe%20for%20media%20to%20be%20uploaded%20directly%20into%20the%20human%20brain%20by%202026.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "14.62%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "\"The Essential Workers\" (or similar subject) will be TIME Magazine's Person of the Year for 2020.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=\"The%20Essential%20Workers\"%20(or%20similar%20subject)%20will%20be%20TIME%20Magazine's%20Person%20of%20the%20Year%20for%202020.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40.27%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "\"Mankind is unlikely to exist in anything like its present form in 2150.\" -lukeprog",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=\"Mankind%20is%20unlikely%20to%20exist%20in%20anything%20like%20its%20present%20form%20in%202150.\"%20-lukeprog&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "66.54%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "1 year continuous human habitation of the moon",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=1%20year%20continuous%20human%20habitation%20of%20the%20moon&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15.93%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If someone does experience a clogged drainpipe effect, is it possible to \"train it away\"? That is, to, with 1000 hours of practice, get to a point where their life largely looks the same as it did before except that they report no longer experiencing the effect (and this is borne out by measures of # of quality-adjusted ideas babbled per time unit, or similar)? (It doesn't count if the only way of doing it is by, say, making sure to write 10 ideas every day, or something similar. I'm wondering if it's possible to change your cognition at a deep level, rather than using particular, deliberate, S2 techniques to sustain an equilibirum which you'd fall out of if you stopped using the techniques)",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=If%20someone%20does%20experience%20a%20clogged%20drainpipe%20effect,%20is%20it%20possible%20to%20\"train%20it%20away\"?%20That%20is,%20to,%20with%201000%20hours%20of%20practice,%20get%20to%20a%20point%20where%20their%20life%20largely%20looks%20the%20same%20as%20it%20did%20before%20except%20that%20they%20report%20no%20longer%20experiencing%20the%20effect%20(and%20this%20is%20borne%20out%20by%20measures%20of%20#%20of%20quality-adjusted%20ideas%20babbled%20per%20time%20unit,%20or%20similar)?%20(It%20doesn't%20count%20if%20the%20only%20way%20of%20doing%20it%20is%20by,%20say,%20making%20sure%20to%20write%2010%20ideas%20every%20day,%20or%20something%20similar.%20I'm%20wondering%20if%20it's%20possible%20to%20change%20your%20cognition%20at%20a%20deep%20level,%20rather%20than%20using%20particular,%20deliberate,%20S2%20techniques%20to%20sustain%20an%20equilibirum%20which%20you'd%20fall%20out%20of%20if%20you%20stopped%20using%20the%20techniques)&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "63.15%",
    "# Forecasts": 26,
    "# Forecasters": 13,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Russia will be an Islamic theocracy by 31 December 2050.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Russia%20will%20be%20an%20Islamic%20theocracy%20by%2031%20December%202050.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1.31%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Simon Cowell will be cryogenically stored.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Simon%20Cowell%20will%20be%20cryogenically%20stored.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "18.25%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will first contact cause an existential catastrophe?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20first%20contact%20cause%20an%20existential%20catastrophe?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "49.24%",
    "# Forecasts": 33,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The world’s first lunar tourist by end of 2025",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20world’s%20first%20lunar%20tourist%20by%20end%20of%202025&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30.40%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "At the end of the year, all SlateStarCodex archives are rehosted by Scott on SlateStarCodex or some other site (third-party created archives don't count) AND Scott has written at least one new post on SlateStarCodex or this new site",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=At%20the%20end%20of%20the%20year,%20all%20SlateStarCodex%20archives%20are%20rehosted%20by%20Scott%20on%20SlateStarCodex%20or%20some%20other%20site%20(third-party%20created%20archives%20don't%20count)%20AND%20Scott%20has%20written%20at%20least%20one%20new%20post%20on%20SlateStarCodex%20or%20this%20new%20site&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "78.92%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If we find indications of a dormant artifact buried on the moon, should we dig it up?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=If%20we%20find%20indications%20of%20a%20dormant%20artifact%20buried%20on%20the%20moon,%20should%20we%20dig%20it%20up?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "70.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Effective HIV vaccine developed by 2040. -- Axel Boldt",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Effective%20HIV%20vaccine%20developed%20by%202040.%20--%20Axel%20Boldt&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "69.69%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "“There will be a casino on the moon by 2040.”",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=“There%20will%20be%20a%20casino%20on%20the%20moon%20by%202040.”&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "3.83%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Lab-grown meat on sale at 20 times the price of animal-grown meat or cheaper.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Lab-grown%20meat%20on%20sale%20at%2020%20times%20the%20price%20of%20animal-grown%20meat%20or%20cheaper.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "63.33%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The European Union will unite into a single super state by 2030.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20European%20Union%20will%20unite%20into%20a%20single%20super%20state%20by%202030.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "17.50%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Some modes of the Large Hadron collider will never be reached and by 2025 the scientific community will debate in a peer reviewed physics journal with >median impact that this is due to the anthropic principle combined with the danger of those modes.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Some%20modes%20of%20the%20Large%20Hadron%20collider%20will%20never%20be%20reached%20and%20by%202025%20the%20scientific%20community%20will%20debate%20in%20a%20peer%20reviewed%20physics%20journal%20with%20>median%20impact%20that%20this%20is%20due%20to%20the%20anthropic%20principle%20combined%20with%20the%20danger%20of%20those%20modes.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "14.33%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "There will be a Youtube video with more views (on Youtube) than there will be living humans before 2020.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=There%20will%20be%20a%20Youtube%20video%20with%20more%20views%20(on%20Youtube)%20than%20there%20will%20be%20living%20humans%20before%202020.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "63.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a message from outer space contain deep and profound information?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20a%20message%20from%20outer%20space%20contain%20deep%20and%20profound%20information?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "52.47%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "We will detect evidence of Intelligent alien life within the next 50 years. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=We%20will%20detect%20evidence%20of%20Intelligent%20alien%20life%20within%20the%20next%2050%20years.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "24.33%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The world’s first lunar tourist by end of 2035",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20world’s%20first%20lunar%20tourist%20by%20end%20of%202035&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "51.07%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "North Korea and South Korea to unify by 2030",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=North%20Korea%20and%20South%20Korea%20to%20unify%20by%202030&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20.25%",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "the average lifespan will be eighty-five to ninety in 2100. --S. Jay Olshansky",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=the%20average%20lifespan%20will%20be%20eighty-five%20to%20ninety%20in%202100.%20--S.%20Jay%20Olshansky&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "7.64%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Riemann hypothesis proven by 2040. -- Axel Boldt",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Riemann%20hypothesis%20proven%20by%202040.%20--%20Axel%20Boldt&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "37.08%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Joe Biden dies of coronavirus in 2020",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Joe%20Biden%20dies%20of%20coronavirus%20in%202020&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4.64%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Warren Buffett: All cars on the road will be electric by year 2030",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Warren%20Buffett:%20All%20cars%20on%20the%20road%20will%20be%20electric%20by%20year%202030&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33.58%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Alphabet/Google buys Microsoft",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Alphabet/Google%20buys%20Microsoft&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "7.71%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If the message is not shared, will it yield a decisive advantage for its owner?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=If%20the%20message%20is%20not%20shared,%20will%20it%20yield%20a%20decisive%20advantage%20for%20its%20owner?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "43.11%",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Kanye West elected President by 2032 -- Scott Adams",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Kanye%20West%20elected%20President%20by%202032%20--%20Scott%20Adams&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "0.60%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "No amendments to the United States Constitution will be ratified by 2030.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=No%20amendments%20to%20the%20United%20States%20Constitution%20will%20be%20ratified%20by%202030.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "60.83%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Donald Knuth will die before finishing TAOCP.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Donald%20Knuth%20will%20die%20before%20finishing%20TAOCP.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "86.83%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2060 there will be a human alive with age 140 or older.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=In%202060%20there%20will%20be%20a%20human%20alive%20with%20age%20140%20or%20older.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "46.07%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "100 million",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=100%20million&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "0.79%",
    "# Forecasts": 29,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "'By the end of the decade, it will be clear that North Korea never had nuclear weapons under Kim Jong Il.' --Kevin",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search='By%20the%20end%20of%20the%20decade,%20it%20will%20be%20clear%20that%20North%20Korea%20never%20had%20nuclear%20weapons%20under%20Kim%20Jong%20Il.'%20--Kevin&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "14.17%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The first person to set foot on Mars will have left Earth holding American citizenship.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20first%20person%20to%20set%20foot%20on%20Mars%20will%20have%20left%20Earth%20holding%20American%20citizenship.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "46.69%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2020, there will be a new World government. --Ray Kurzweil",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%202020,%20there%20will%20be%20a%20new%20World%20government.%20--Ray%20Kurzweil&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2.73%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "“By 2030, commercial passengers will routinely fly in pilotless planes.”",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=“By%202030,%20commercial%20passengers%20will%20routinely%20fly%20in%20pilotless%20planes.”&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "35.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 12,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "\"within 5 years of leaving office, the Obamas will have a net worth of more than $50 million.\" --Dennis Mangan",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=\"within%205%20years%20of%20leaving%20office,%20the%20Obamas%20will%20have%20a%20net%20worth%20of%20more%20than%20$50%20million.\"%20--Dennis%20Mangan&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "64.82%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "\"there is a 100% chance you will see a private corporation go to war with a small country, and win, within twenty years.\" - Scott Adams",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=\"there%20is%20a%20100%%20chance%20you%20will%20see%20a%20private%20corporation%20go%20to%20war%20with%20a%20small%20country,%20and%20win,%20within%20twenty%20years.\"%20-%20Scott%20Adams&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20.73%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "GRRM dies before finishing _A Song of Ice and Fire_",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=GRRM%20dies%20before%20finishing%20_A%20Song%20of%20Ice%20and%20Fire_&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "41.54%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The phosphine detected on Venus is widely agreed among the scientific community to be from life.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20phosphine%20detected%20on%20Venus%20is%20widely%20agreed%20among%20the%20scientific%20community%20to%20be%20from%20life.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2.42%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "As of 2019, the US was in an era of unusually large amounts of free speech that elites were starting to get spooked by and defend against.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=As%20of%202019,%20the%20US%20was%20in%20an%20era%20of%20unusually%20large%20amounts%20of%20free%20speech%20that%20elites%20were%20starting%20to%20get%20spooked%20by%20and%20defend%20against.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "67.79%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2033, more than 5% of deaths in China will be the result of state-mandated involuntary euthanasia.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=In%202033,%20more%20than%205%%20of%20deaths%20in%20China%20will%20be%20the%20result%20of%20state-mandated%20involuntary%20euthanasia.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "\"In the next 10 years, I expect at least five billion people worldwide to own smartphones\" --Marc Andreessen",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=\"In%20the%20next%2010%20years,%20I%20expect%20at%20least%20five%20billion%20people%20worldwide%20to%20own%20smartphones\"%20--Marc%20Andreessen&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "75.17%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "People will choose virtual-reality clothes/make-up/accessories (like Snapchat filters), that are visible in real life to most people around them. This will be used by >10% of people, walking down the street, on dates, in business contexts.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=People%20will%20choose%20virtual-reality%20clothes/make-up/accessories%20(like%20Snapchat%20filters),%20that%20are%20visible%20in%20real%20life%20to%20most%20people%20around%20them.%20This%20will%20be%20used%20by%20>10%%20of%20people,%20walking%20down%20the%20street,%20on%20dates,%20in%20business%20contexts.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33.09%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Republicans will win the 2024 presidential election",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Republicans%20will%20win%20the%202024%20presidential%20election&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "45.69%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "A professional athlete will *not* voluntarily amputate their legs to use prosthetics like Oscar Pistorius, before 2041.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=A%20professional%20athlete%20will%20*not*%20voluntarily%20amputate%20their%20legs%20to%20use%20prosthetics%20like%20Oscar%20Pistorius,%20before%202041.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "38.64%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Arbital to become a top-1000 site by 2020",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Arbital%20to%20become%20a%20top-1000%20site%20by%202020&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "9.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Germany to decommission all nuclear reactors by 2023",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Germany%20to%20decommission%20all%20nuclear%20reactors%20by%202023&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "57.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Biden will resign sometime during the presidency conditional on him winning the election",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Biden%20will%20resign%20sometime%20during%20the%20presidency%20conditional%20on%20him%20winning%20the%20election&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10.18%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "They'll clone a woolly mammoth by 2040",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=They'll%20clone%20a%20woolly%20mammoth%20by%202040&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "55.57%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Machine translation no worse than human translation by 2040. -- Axel Boldt",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Machine%20translation%20no%20worse%20than%20human%20translation%20by%202040.%20--%20Axel%20Boldt&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "65.93%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Diagnosing standard medical conditions routinely involves DNA testing by 2040. -- Axel Boldt",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Diagnosing%20standard%20medical%20conditions%20routinely%20involves%20DNA%20testing%20by%202040.%20--%20Axel%20Boldt&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "68.67%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Goldbach's conjecture proven by 2040. -- Axel Boldt",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Goldbach's%20conjecture%20proven%20by%202040.%20--%20Axel%20Boldt&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "31.64%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "“I predict that by 2030, China will lay an ownership claim to the entire moon.”- Kelly L Anderson",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=“I%20predict%20that%20by%202030,%20China%20will%20lay%20an%20ownership%20claim%20to%20the%20entire%20moon.”-%20Kelly%20L%20Anderson&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Trump wins the 2020 election.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Trump%20wins%20the%202020%20election.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "47.54%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 2030 organized religions will have no political influence.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Before%202030%20organized%20religions%20will%20have%20no%20political%20influence.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10.29%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Heterogenity of ETI: Are they all the \"same\"? Over millions of years of evolution beyond humanity, have they evolved and converged to some \"final being\"?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Heterogenity%20of%20ETI:%20Are%20they%20all%20the%20\"same\"?%20Over%20millions%20of%20years%20of%20evolution%20beyond%20humanity,%20have%20they%20evolved%20and%20converged%20to%20some%20\"final%20being\"?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26.27%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Trump will run for president in 2024",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Trump%20will%20run%20for%20president%20in%202024&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20.38%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will legal factory farming end by January 1st 2100? ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20legal%20factory%20farming%20end%20by%20January%201st%202100?%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "23.38%",
    "# Forecasts": 24,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Joe Biden gets coronavirus in 2020",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Joe%20Biden%20gets%20coronavirus%20in%202020&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "28.09%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The US will institute a minimum guaranteed income (aka basic guaranteed income, unconditional basic income, etc.) at a Federal level by 2045.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20US%20will%20institute%20a%20minimum%20guaranteed%20income%20(aka%20basic%20guaranteed%20income,%20unconditional%20basic%20income,%20etc.)%20at%20a%20Federal%20level%20by%202045.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "28.43%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "“In the year 2050, there will not be an operating fusion power plant -- a device that generates net energy via a nuclear fusion reaction and transmits it to the electrical grid -- anywhere in the world.”",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=“In%20the%20year%202050,%20there%20will%20not%20be%20an%20operating%20fusion%20power%20plant%20--%20a%20device%20that%20generates%20net%20energy%20via%20a%20nuclear%20fusion%20reaction%20and%20transmits%20it%20to%20the%20electrical%20grid%20--%20anywhere%20in%20the%20world.”&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40.91%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Intel will revolutionize computing by placing the first artificial quantum computer chip on the maket by 2025.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Intel%20will%20revolutionize%20computing%20by%20placing%20the%20first%20artificial%20quantum%20computer%20chip%20on%20the%20maket%20by%202025.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Caffeine will be an illegal substance ... in 60 countries by 2027. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Caffeine%20will%20be%20an%20illegal%20substance%20...%20in%2060%20countries%20by%202027.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5.42%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "China will land a man on Mars by 2050.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=China%20will%20land%20a%20man%20on%20Mars%20by%202050.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "43.08%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "\"By March 25, 2033, there will be successful whole brain emulation.\"",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=\"By%20March%2025,%202033,%20there%20will%20be%20successful%20whole%20brain%20emulation.\"&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "16.33%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "At least 10 percent of people in the U.S. to be vegetarian (or in-vitro-ist) in 2030",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=At%20least%2010%20percent%20of%20people%20in%20the%20U.S.%20to%20be%20vegetarian%20(or%20in-vitro-ist)%20in%202030&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "29.08%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will humans (at least one) leave the solar system within 10 years after First Contact?",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20humans%20(at%20least%20one)%20leave%20the%20solar%20system%20within%2010%20years%20after%20First%20Contact?&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33.20%",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The effect of First contact is mostly neutral (e.g., invisible, indifferent, uninteresting, mild nuisance )",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20effect%20of%20First%20contact%20is%20mostly%20neutral%20(e.g.,%20invisible,%20indifferent,%20uninteresting,%20mild%20nuisance%20)&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "55.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 26,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The effect of First contact is mostly harmful (e.g., selfish ETI, hazards) ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20effect%20of%20First%20contact%20is%20mostly%20harmful%20(e.g.,%20selfish%20ETI,%20hazards)%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40.82%",
    "# Forecasts": 22,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The world’s first lunar tourist by end of 2045",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20world’s%20first%20lunar%20tourist%20by%20end%20of%202045&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "56.86%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The effect of First contact is mostly beneficial (e.g., cooperative or merely detectable)",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20effect%20of%20First%20contact%20is%20mostly%20beneficial%20(e.g.,%20cooperative%20or%20merely%20detectable)&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "28.88%",
    "# Forecasts": 25,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Human drivers will be illegal on *some* USA roads by 2030",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Human%20drivers%20will%20be%20illegal%20on%20*some*%20USA%20roads%20by%202030&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "44.08%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "With the making of the North American Union, a new revolutionary technology will be developed in the attempt to set a colony on Mars. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=With%20the%20making%20of%20the%20North%20American%20Union,%20a%20new%20revolutionary%20technology%20will%20be%20developed%20in%20the%20attempt%20to%20set%20a%20colony%20on%20Mars.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8.92%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "50 million",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=50%20million&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1.65%",
    "# Forecasts": 34,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "\"At least one human alive in the year 2000 will still be alive in 2150.\"",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=\"At%20least%20one%20human%20alive%20in%20the%20year%202000%20will%20still%20be%20alive%20in%202150.\"&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "56.21%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "SIAI shuts down or relocates outside the United States before 2021.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=SIAI%20shuts%20down%20or%20relocates%20outside%20the%20United%20States%20before%202021.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "13.67%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "'President Mike Pence'",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search='President%20Mike%20Pence'&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "14.06%",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Neutrino communication will be used commercially for high-frequency trading within 10 years.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Neutrino%20communication%20will%20be%20used%20commercially%20for%20high-frequency%20trading%20within%2010%20years.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10.79%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Michelle Obama will run for office before 2021",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Michelle%20Obama%20will%20run%20for%20office%20before%202021&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "21.27%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2025, 20% of all US driving miles to be by self-driving cars. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%202025,%2020%%20of%20all%20US%20driving%20miles%20to%20be%20by%20self-driving%20cars.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "31.38%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "No fusion scheme will succeed until 2050, when ITER will be the first and only successful fusion scheme. Nothing else will even come close to meeting the triple product, nτT of ITER. There won't be a commercial fusion reactor in 2050 though, just a demo",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=No%20fusion%20scheme%20will%20succeed%20until%202050,%20when%20ITER%20will%20be%20the%20first%20and%20only%20successful%20fusion%20scheme.%20Nothing%20else%20will%20even%20come%20close%20to%20meeting%20the%20triple%20product,%20nτT%20of%20ITER.%20There%20won't%20be%20a%20commercial%20fusion%20reactor%20in%202050%20though,%20just%20a%20demo&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "45.31%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The LW user account \"Grognor\" will make a comment in a thread other than rationality quotes some time in the next ten years.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20LW%20user%20account%20\"Grognor\"%20will%20make%20a%20comment%20in%20a%20thread%20other%20than%20rationality%20quotes%20some%20time%20in%20the%20next%20ten%20years.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "45.92%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By end of 2030, there will be commercially available self-driving cars in at least one OECD country where it will be legal to use them. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%20end%20of%202030,%20there%20will%20be%20commercially%20available%20self-driving%20cars%20in%20at%20least%20one%20OECD%20country%20where%20it%20will%20be%20legal%20to%20use%20them.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "93.25%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "At least two commercial reactors supplying fusion power to the grid by 2030. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=At%20least%20two%20commercial%20reactors%20supplying%20fusion%20power%20to%20the%20grid%20by%202030.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "23.67%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Significant third party challengers will temporally emerge  within the next eight years in the USA.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Significant%20third%20party%20challengers%20will%20temporally%20emerge%20%20within%20the%20next%20eight%20years%20in%20the%20USA.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "24.75%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "No amendments to the United States Constitution will be ratified by 2025.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=No%20amendments%20to%20the%20United%20States%20Constitution%20will%20be%20ratified%20by%202025.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "77.83%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Jeffrey Epstein was murdered and there is good evidence (e.g. footage or accepted confession or arrest warrant or conviction) that this was the case, before 2022",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Jeffrey%20Epstein%20was%20murdered%20and%20there%20is%20good%20evidence%20(e.g.%20footage%20or%20accepted%20confession%20or%20arrest%20warrant%20or%20conviction)%20that%20this%20was%20the%20case,%20before%202022&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "3.54%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "some portion of England and the United States will be unified as one country or similar state within 10 years",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=some%20portion%20of%20England%20and%20the%20United%20States%20will%20be%20unified%20as%20one%20country%20or%20similar%20state%20within%2010%20years&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "3.77%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "We will still need human translators for serious translation work by 2040",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=We%20will%20still%20need%20human%20translators%20for%20serious%20translation%20work%20by%202040&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "52.69%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 11,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By the end of 2063, the consumption of meat from animals will be illegal in at least one area of Europe or North America with a population of at least 100,000",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%20the%20end%20of%202063,%20the%20consumption%20of%20meat%20from%20animals%20will%20be%20illegal%20in%20at%20least%20one%20area%20of%20Europe%20or%20North%20America%20with%20a%20population%20of%20at%20least%20100,000&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "60.36%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "No human will visit the moon from 2012 to 2032",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=No%20human%20will%20visit%20the%20moon%20from%202012%20to%202032&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "52.73%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "We ask ETI \"do we live in a simulation\"? They answer \"yes\".",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=We%20ask%20ETI%20\"do%20we%20live%20in%20a%20simulation\"?%20They%20answer%20\"yes\".&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "17.92%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Advanced cultural skills are not directly selected for in species with sub-human levels of general cognitive skills and social skills.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Advanced%20cultural%20skills%20are%20not%20directly%20selected%20for%20in%20species%20with%20sub-human%20levels%20of%20general%20cognitive%20skills%20and%20social%20skills.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "46.70%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Advanced cultural skills are not very useful for species with sub-human levels of general cognitive skills and social skills.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Advanced%20cultural%20skills%20are%20not%20very%20useful%20for%20species%20with%20sub-human%20levels%20of%20general%20cognitive%20skills%20and%20social%20skills.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "34.38%",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will this question get an answer, within a month, I judge as \"very insightful and directly relevant to how I approach Babble challenges in the future, enabling me to learn and grow faster?\"",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Will%20this%20question%20get%20an%20answer,%20within%20a%20month,%20I%20judge%20as%20\"very%20insightful%20and%20directly%20relevant%20to%20how%20I%20approach%20Babble%20challenges%20in%20the%20future,%20enabling%20me%20to%20learn%20and%20grow%20faster?\"&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "29.64%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Elon Musk has sent a crewed mission to Mars",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Elon%20Musk%20has%20sent%20a%20crewed%20mission%20to%20Mars&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "17.30%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Generic molecular assemblers won't be developed within the next 20 years. \r\n\r\nBy “generic” I mean they can build macroscopic (≥ 10 mm³) objects for any reasonable function, and by “molecular” meaning 50%+ of chemical bonds don't come from bulk chemistry.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Generic%20molecular%20assemblers%20won't%20be%20developed%20within%20the%20next%2020%20years.%20\r\n\r\nBy%20“generic”%20I%20mean%20they%20can%20build%20macroscopic%20(≥ 10 mm³)%20objects%20for%20any%20reasonable%20function,%20and%20by%20“molecular”%20meaning%2050%+%20of%20chemical%20bonds%20don't%20come%20from%20bulk%20chemistry.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "77.10%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Caitlyn Jenner = POTUS",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Caitlyn%20Jenner%20=%20POTUS&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4.20%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Russia and Morocco have joined the European Union, and the EU slowly takes on the character of a nation; it has a common foreign policy and a standing army by 2040. -- Axel Boldt",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Russia%20and%20Morocco%20have%20joined%20the%20European%20Union,%20and%20the%20EU%20slowly%20takes%20on%20the%20character%20of%20a%20nation;%20it%20has%20a%20common%20foreign%20policy%20and%20a%20standing%20army%20by%202040.%20--%20Axel%20Boldt&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10.92%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By the time most of the world’s population has made the transition to a vegan or cultured-meat diet, the rearing of other sentient beings for human consumption will be illegal under international law. -- David Pearce",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%20the%20time%20most%20of%20the%20world’s%20population%20has%20made%20the%20transition%20to%20a%20vegan%20or%20cultured-meat%20diet,%20the%20rearing%20of%20other%20sentient%20beings%20for%20human%20consumption%20will%20be%20illegal%20under%20international%20law.%20--%20David%20Pearce&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "16.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Robust mouse rejuvenation by 2020 -- Aubrey de Grey",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Robust%20mouse%20rejuvenation%20by%202020%20--%20Aubrey%20de%20Grey&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "13.14%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Advanced cultural skills are too complex for species with sub-human levels of general cognitive skills and social skills to acquire.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Advanced%20cultural%20skills%20are%20too%20complex%20for%20species%20with%20sub-human%20levels%20of%20general%20cognitive%20skills%20and%20social%20skills%20to%20acquire.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "27.79%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Google self driving car will get in an accident (involving human injury or property damage > $2k) before end of 2018.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Google%20self%20driving%20car%20will%20get%20in%20an%20accident%20(involving%20human%20injury%20or%20property%20damage%20>%20$2k)%20before%20end%20of%202018.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "48.00%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2050, there will be at least one person cryonically frozen in space.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%202050,%20there%20will%20be%20at%20least%20one%20person%20cryonically%20frozen%20in%20space.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15.80%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Mars to have detectable non-anthropogenic life on it",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Mars%20to%20have%20detectable%20non-anthropogenic%20life%20on%20it&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "21.70%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "P!=NP, and proven by 2040 --Ken",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=P!=NP,%20and%20proven%20by%202040%20--Ken&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "44.17%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Alien/Time travelling human presence revealed on 27th of March 2022",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Alien/Time%20travelling%20human%20presence%20revealed%20on%2027th%20of%20March%202022&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "0.50%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "A Confirmed SETI detection of an ET technological civilization.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=A%20Confirmed%20SETI%20detection%20of%20an%20ET%20technological%20civilization.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "12.09%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The Internet Archive will operate through 2025-07-01",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20Internet%20Archive%20will%20operate%20through%202025-07-01&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "78.90%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Scotland holds another independence referendum in the next 5 years. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Scotland%20holds%20another%20independence%20referendum%20in%20the%20next%205%20years.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "55.60%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2050, a biologically functional but cosmetic novel body part produced by 3D printing technology will be demonstrated in a human, in vivo. For example: A horn, pointy ears, or an extra thumb. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%202050,%20a%20biologically%20functional%20but%20cosmetic%20novel%20body%20part%20produced%20by%203D%20printing%20technology%20will%20be%20demonstrated%20in%20a%20human,%20in%20vivo.%20For%20example:%20A%20horn,%20pointy%20ears,%20or%20an%20extra%20thumb.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "75.09%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "More than 50% of all passenger cars on the road are completely autonomous, self-driving vehicles.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=More%20than%2050%%20of%20all%20passenger%20cars%20on%20the%20road%20are%20completely%20autonomous,%20self-driving%20vehicles.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26.38%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Within the next 1000 years we will discover that the singularity already happened a very long time ago and that we are the AIs that resulted from it.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Within%20the%20next%201000%20years%20we%20will%20discover%20that%20the%20singularity%20already%20happened%20a%20very%20long%20time%20ago%20and%20that%20we%20are%20the%20AIs%20that%20resulted%20from%20it.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15.50%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "“By the year 2150, over 50% of schools in the USA or Western Europe will require classes in defending against robot attacks.”",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=“By%20the%20year%202150,%20over%2050%%20of%20schools%20in%20the%20USA%20or%20Western%20Europe%20will%20require%20classes%20in%20defending%20against%20robot%20attacks.”&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "7.42%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 10 years I will think Reddit/LW-style reputational/karma systems will be a bad thing (compared to non-karma systems like OB).",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=In%2010%20years%20I%20will%20think%20Reddit/LW-style%20reputational/karma%20systems%20will%20be%20a%20bad%20thing%20(compared%20to%20non-karma%20systems%20like%20OB).&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20.40%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Trump Elected and constitutional crisis with US military disobeying direct orders from POTUS",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Trump%20Elected%20and%20constitutional%20crisis%20with%20US%20military%20disobeying%20direct%20orders%20from%20POTUS&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11.30%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Larry King's brain will be cryopreserved or plastinated within 2 weeks of declaration of death, and this is known before 2070",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Larry%20King's%20brain%20will%20be%20cryopreserved%20or%20plastinated%20within%202%20weeks%20of%20declaration%20of%20death,%20and%20this%20is%20known%20before%202070&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "22.08%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "WWIII starts before 2030.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=WWIII%20starts%20before%202030.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8.86%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "“The End of State Sovereignty: By 2030, some form of international federation or global governmental structure will emerge that can exercise ultimate authority over world affairs.”",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=“The%20End%20of%20State%20Sovereignty:%20By%202030,%20some%20form%20of%20international%20federation%20or%20global%20governmental%20structure%20will%20emerge%20that%20can%20exercise%20ultimate%20authority%20over%20world%20affairs.”&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11.46%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2035, the general consensus will be that the US federal government orchestrated the 9/11 attacks. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%202035,%20the%20general%20consensus%20will%20be%20that%20the%20US%20federal%20government%20orchestrated%20the%209/11%20attacks.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "13.08%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Fewer than 30% of the US Population self-identify as Christians.\r\n\r\nhttp://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Fewer%20than%2030%%20of%20the%20US%20Population%20self-identify%20as%20Christians.\r\n\r\nhttp://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "19.80%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "“China will break apart by 2030”",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=“China%20will%20break%20apart%20by%202030”&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "24.60%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "homosexuality criminalized in the US",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=homosexuality%20criminalized%20in%20the%20US&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2.50%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "HIV will be cured by 2025, but 5 new viruses deadlier than it will replace it.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=HIV%20will%20be%20cured%20by%202025,%20but%205%20new%20viruses%20deadlier%20than%20it%20will%20replace%20it.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "7.09%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The First Domed City will exist before 2040. This will be the first above-ground structure since The third World War (WWIII).",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=The%20First%20Domed%20City%20will%20exist%20before%202040.%20This%20will%20be%20the%20first%20above-ground%20structure%20since%20The%20third%20World%20War%20(WWIII).&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "6.09%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Trump dies of Coronavirus in 2020",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Trump%20dies%20of%20Coronavirus%20in%202020&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1.36%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2085 there will be at least one confirmed person who has lived to 150",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%202085%20there%20will%20be%20at%20least%20one%20confirmed%20person%20who%20has%20lived%20to%20150&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33.46%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2030 the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence will have given up on friendly AI and instead focus on fail-safe mechanisms.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=By%202030%20the%20Singularity%20Institute%20for%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20will%20have%20given%20up%20on%20friendly%20AI%20and%20instead%20focus%20on%20fail-safe%20mechanisms.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30.90%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "SpaceX will launch a Mars orbit or flyby mission before 2021",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=SpaceX%20will%20launch%20a%20Mars%20orbit%20or%20flyby%20mission%20before%202021&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "70.67%",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "A working brain-to-brain direct communication interface will be demonstrated in human clinical trials by 2025.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=A%20working%20brain-to-brain%20direct%20communication%20interface%20will%20be%20demonstrated%20in%20human%20clinical%20trials%20by%202025.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "41.30%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Ecstasy (MDMA) will be legalized for prescription use in the U.S. by 2025. ",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Ecstasy%20(MDMA)%20will%20be%20legalized%20for%20prescription%20use%20in%20the%20U.S.%20by%202025.%20&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26.10%",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "At least one self-described \"anarchist\" will be voted into a national office in the United States by 2021.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=At%20least%20one%20self-described%20\"anarchist\"%20will%20be%20voted%20into%20a%20national%20office%20in%20the%20United%20States%20by%202021.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "36.82%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "1,000,000+ planets will have been cataloged by 2035",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=1,000,000+%20planets%20will%20have%20been%20cataloged%20by%202035&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "41.08%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "HIV will be eradicated by 2040 (Daniel Lemire)",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=HIV%20will%20be%20eradicated%20by%202040%20(Daniel%20Lemire)&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "56.91%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "EU to dissolve by 2040.",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=EU%20to%20dissolve%20by%202040.&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "39.45%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2038 the population of the US will be 2 billion, none of them illegal. -Moldbug",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=In%202038%20the%20population%20of%20the%20US%20will%20be%202%20billion,%20none%20of%20them%20illegal.%20-Moldbug&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "9.36%",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Reservatrol or a chemically similar compound will be an accepted anti-aging treatment in humans by 2025",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Reservatrol%20or%20a%20chemically%20similar%20compound%20will%20be%20an%20accepted%20anti-aging%20treatment%20in%20humans%20by%202025&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "29.08%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Airbnb to be acquired by 2025",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=Airbnb%20to%20be%20acquired%20by%202025&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "34.64%",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "\". The revenue for higher ed is falling into a black hole. I predict that by 2021 the whole enterprise will cease to exist in anything resembling its current form.\" --Dan King",
    "URL": "https://elicit.org/binary?binaryQuestions.search=\".%20The%20revenue%20for%20higher%20ed%20is%20falling%20into%20a%20black%20hole.%20I%20predict%20that%20by%202021%20the%20whole%20enterprise%20will%20cease%20to%20exist%20in%20anything%20resembling%20its%20current%20form.\"%20--Dan%20King&binaryQuestions.sortBy=popularity&limit=20&offset=0",
    "Platform": "Elicit",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11.46%",
    "# Forecasts": 13,
    "# Forecasters": 10,
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Universe end?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/161/will-the-universe-end/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "72%",
    "Description": "Warning: you're not going to win or lose any points on this one.\nThe question of whether the world will end is a perennial one, with The End sometimes forecast to come within a human lifetime or two. This is an ultra-important question, but not the biggest possible one: we can widen our question to whether \"The Universe\" will end. \nEven posing this question is not very straightforward, as \"The Universe\" has come to mean a great variety of things, from the observable universe that we see through telescopes, all the way through various types of [multiverses] (http://www.britannica.com/science/multiverse) . So let's start with some definitions.\nWhen we view a particular epoch of the universe through electromagnetic (and now gravitational!) radiation, we are seeing a two-dimensional sphere that we can think of as the \"sky\" at some \"distance.\" Assembling these nested spheres back to around the [nucleosynthesis era] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang_nucleosynthesis) era gives a ball of about [46.5 billion light years] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observable_universe) in radius. This [\"observiball\"] (http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-19373118) can also be thought of as a past [\"lightcone,\"] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_cone) and this lightcone and its interior constitute a [3+1 dimensional spacetime] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime) region containing every post-nucleosynthesis event that occurred to our past from which information can have reached us traveling at the speed of light or less.\nTurning this around to look into the future, we can consider the \"Affectiball,\" or future lightcone, which bounds the region of spacetime that we, here and now on Earth, could reach with sub-lightspeed travel or signaling. Assuming that no future technology allows faster-than-light information transfer (or at least does so only within regions of spacetime [pre-engineered] (http://www.physics.uofl.edu/wkomp/teaching/spring2006/589/final/wormholes.pdf) for this purposed), everything humanity will ever do or cause will sit within this Affectiball.\nWe can now ask whether this Affectiball (and its interior) goes on forever, or ends. This really contains two questions. First, will the spacetime go on forever, or terminate in a singularity like the [big crunch] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Crunch) ? Second, will interesting things continue to happen forever, or will the Affectiball approach some sort of equilibrium [\"heat death\"] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe) ? If we assert that \"interesting things\" require the ability to do computations, and that computations can't happen without spacetime (see [here] (http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0110141) and [here] (http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0404510) for some discussion), we can combine these into one question:\nIs the number of computations that can in principle be done within the Affectiball finite?\nIf so, we can say the universe will end, at least in terms of anything we can affect or take part in. (The question of whether interesting things will continue to happen elsewhere is an interesting but separate one.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 552,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will SpaceX land people on Mars prior to 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/349/will-spacex-land-people-on-mars-prior-to-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "[SpaceX] (http://www.spacex.com) recently released a detailed plan ( [transcription and slides here] (http://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-mars-speech-transcript-2016-9/#-52) ) to send people to Mars using an \"Interplanetary Transport System\" based on heavily reusable launch boosters, tanker-assisted refueling in low-Earth orbit, and a futuristic interplanetary spaceship. The ship is to traverse deep space and land intact on Mars after a high-speed retro-assisted atmospheric entry. The system will rely on in-situ fuel generation on Mars for return journeys, and it is envisioned that destinations across the Solar System may be within its reach.\nThe timeline has not been set in stone, but Elon Musk [has noted] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/06/10/Elon-musk-provides-new-details-on-his-mind-blowing-mission-to-mars/) that if SpaceX \"gets lucky and things go according to plan\", a manned flight could launch in the 2024 window with a landing on Mars in 2025. Subsequent launch windows, which are dictated by the Earth-Mars synodic period, occur at a roughly 2-year cadence. \nThere have been [numerous proposals] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_mission_to_Mars) over the years for landing people on Mars. Perhaps the first one that was both concrete and marginally credible was Wernher von Braun's Marsprojekt of the late 1940s and early 1950s. For the past six decades, trips to Mars have tended to lie 20-30 years in the future. The SpaceX plan is particularly notable for aggressively compressing the timeline.\nWill a SpaceX-branded mission land people on Mars prior to Jan 1, 2030?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 4915,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will someone born before 2001 live to be 150?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/353/will-someone-born-before-2001-live-to-be-150/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "59%",
    "Description": "A [recent question,] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/348/will-one-of-the-verified-oldest-living-persons-in-the-world-reach-120-years-old-by-the-23rd-of-march-2024/) pertaining to the \"natural\" human lifespan, addresses a study suggesting that 125 is an absolute upper limit. But what if we keep pushing beyond the natural limit using medical technology to extend the human lifespan?\nA [recent article] (http://www.nature.com/news/scientists-up-stakes-in-bet-on-whether-humans-will-live-to-150-1.20818) discusses a bet between Jay Olshansky and Steven Austad as to whether any human born before 2001 would live to be 150, and be of sound mind. \nWho will win? \nResolution is positive if a human born prior to 2001 is alive and of sound mind at an age of 150. Per the current list of oldest humans, the earliest possible resolution time is 2049.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 800,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first 100 Megawatt fusion-based electrical generation facility come into service?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/363/will-a-fusion-based-electrical-generation-facility-generation-100-mw-or-more-using-only-fusion-as-an-energy-source-come-into-service-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Large-scale generation of electric power by nuclear fusion is a holy grail of energy science research. The potential for scalability (due to abundant ocean reserves of deuterium), and the relatively small level and short lifetime of radioactive waste could allow fusion power to contribute significantly to a zero-carbon sustainable global electrical supply. \nIn additional to large governmental efforts like the US [National Ignition Facility] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Ignition_Facility) , Europe's [ITER] (https://www.iter.org) , [HiPER] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiPER) , and the [Wendelstein 7-X] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendelstein_7-X) , there are also a number of private companies developing fusion technology.\nPrivate efforts include [General Fusion] (http://generalfusion.com) , [Tri-Alpha Energy] (http://trialphaenergy.com) , and [Lockheed-Martin] (http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/products/compact-fusion.html) , but all are cagey about their benchmarks and progress. Is there a real shot at zero-carbon, zero-long-lived nuclear waste energy from fusion, from these or the larger governmental efforts?\nWell ask: When will the first facility generating a net 100 MW of electricity, using only fusion, come online? \nTo separate this from a distinct question of low-energy nuclear reaction technologies, we'll specify that this applies to hot nuclear fusion at 100,000 K or more.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 290,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will human brain emulation be the first successful route to human-level digital intelligence?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/372/will-human-brain-emulation-be-the-first-successful-route-to-human-level-digital-intelligence/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "In the quest for \"strong\" Artificial Intelligence, defined here as digital intelligences rivaling or surpassing that of humans, a number of potential path have been discussed. Among them is \"brain emulation,\" in which the physical functioning of a human brain is directly simulated, at some level of detail, in a digital computer. \nIn an interesting recent book, [The Age of Em] (https://www.amazon.com/Age-Em-Work-Robots-Earth/dp/0198754620) , Robin Hanson explores the potential dynamics of human society assuming such \"Ems\" can be created, and that this occurs prior to the advent of other forms of strong AI. (See also a [recent post by Hanson] (https://www.overcomingbias.com/2016/11/brains-simpler-than-brain-cells.html) discussing the relative timing of different AI paths.)\nThere is considerable debate about the technological feasibility of such simulation: though there is general (though not universal) agreement that the brain, being a physical system, is amenable to being simulated, the necessary computations (and data gathering) span many orders of magnitude depending upon the level of detail required. Significant intellectual effort and funding is being directed toward understanding the Brain well enough to simulate it, for example in the massive [Blue Brain Project] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Brain_Project) , but there is no clear consensus as to how much progress has been made toward the ultimate goal. See for example this [NYT editorial with a skeptical evaluation of brain emulation] (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/11/opinion/sunday/will-you-ever-be-able-to-upload-your-brain.html?&amp;_r=1&amp;mtrref=www.brainpreservation.org&amp;gwh=F7EC8C30CF7572E7C4416895098C6633&amp;gwt=pay&amp;assetType=opinion) , and this [response by the Brain Preservation Foundation] (http://www.brainpreservation.org/why-brain-emulation-is-coming-sooner-than-many-think-response-to-dr-miller-editorial/) \nTo gather thinking about this and track how the relative probabilities of \"Ems\" vs. other types of AIs evolve with time, we ask here:\nWill the first human-comparable digital intelligences be simulated human brains? \nResolution is positive if the effort to create a viable (functioning, lasting, sane, etc.) emulated human, based on direct simulation of the neural connectome (and a requisite level of its physical instantiation), succeeds before another form of human-level digital intelligence. The latter will be defined as a digital entity capable of equalling or surpassing most or all core human cognitive capabilities. No view is taken as to the timeline for either effort except that a resolve date of 2060 is set, and resolution is ambiguous if neither effort has succeeded by then.\n(Edit 10/20/18 to state that it resolves ambiguous rather than negative in the event of no AGI by 2060.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 407,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The end of the EU as we know it by 2026?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/375/the-end-of-the-eu-as-we-know-it/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "Anti-European sentiment is running strong in the EU and it may grow stronger – strong enough to destroy it, maybe? The UK voted for Brexit and political pundits are already discussing [Nexit] (http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/717904/Nexit-Dutch-turn-right-euroscepticism-Geert-Wilders-Mark-Rutte) , [Frexit] (https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/27/frexit-nexit-or-oexit-who-will-be-next-to-leave-the-eu) and [Quitaly] (https://www.theguardian.com/business/economics-blog/2016/jul/26/italy-economy-banks-loans-crisis-europe) .\nSome commentators argue that Brexit is already the end of the EU as we know it, some would say that Brexit may be fine but if any other country was to leave would spell the end of the union. We choose an even stricter criterion by requiring then one of the [6 original founders of the ECSC] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inner_Six) leave the union to decree the end of the EU as we know it.\nWill there the European Union effective cease to exist during the next ten years? \nThis question resolves as positive if, by the end of 2026, one or more of Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, and/or Germany triggers Article 50 of the Treaty of Lisbon by notifying the European Council of its intention to leave the union.\nIt also resolves as positive if by the same deadline the entity called European Union has dissolved completely or dissolved to create a new politico-economic union of some European nations under a different name.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 825,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Human-machine intelligence parity by 2040?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/384/human-machine-intelligence-parity-by-2040/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "61%",
    "Description": "Machine intelligence has been steadily progressing since the invention of the digital computer, but this progress has arguably been accelerating of late, with widespread deployment of machine learning systems and dramatically increased funding of artificial intelligence research. \nMachine intelligence long surpassed human capability in numerical computation, application of algorithms, data processing, and games such as checkers and chess. In 2005-2015 dramatic improvements in [image recognition and classification] (https://www.tensorflow.org/versions/r0.11/tutorials/image_recognition/index.html) , [speech transcription] (http://qz.com/812317/microsoft-msft-claims-its-speech-transcription-ai-is-now-better-than-human-professionals/) , game playing (e.g. [Go] (https://deepmind.com/research/alphago/) and [classic Atari] (https://deepmind.com/research/dqn/) ), and [automatic translation across many languages] (http://translate.google.com) have approached or surpassed human levels. As of 2015 there is still a large gulf, however, in many intellectual capabilities. But for how long?\nAssume that prior to 2040, a generalized intelligence test will be administered as follows. A team of three expert interviewers will interact with a candidate machine system (MS) and three humans (3H). The humans will be graduate students in each of physics, mathematics and computer science from one of the top 25 research universities (per some recognized list), chosen independently of the interviewers. The interviewers will electronically communicate (via text, image, spoken word, or other means) an identical series of exam questions of their choosing over a period of two hours to the MS and 3H, designed to advantage the 3H. Both MS and 3H have full access to the internet, but no party is allowed to consult additional humans, and we assume the MS is not an internet-accessible resource. The exam will be scored blindly by a disinterested third party. \nQuestion resolves positively if the machine system outscores at least two of the three humans on such a test prior to 2040.\nNote that this also effectively tests whether the internet as a whole functions as a human-level intelligence, in that a positive resolution indicates that the human participants are effectively superfluous. Resolves as ambiguous if no such tests are performed in the period 2035-2040.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 918,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Robocup Challenge",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/397/robocup-challenge/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "The [Robocup Challenge] (http://www.robocup.org/objective) was launched in the mid-1990s as a \"grand challenge\" in robotics. The stated goal of the challenge is:\nBy the middle of the 21st century, a team of fully autonomous humanoid robot soccer players shall win a soccer game, complying with the official rules of FIFA, against the winner of the most recent World Cup. \nOn the road to this challenge, annual Robocup games are played; see [here] (http://www.robocup.org/events/upcoming_events) for upcoming events.\nWill the Robocup challenge be met by 2050? \nPositive resolution requires announcement by the Robocup challenge organization that the challenge has been officially accomplished.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 301,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will there be machine-kindergartner parity in LEGO construction?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/404/how-long-until-machine-kindergartner-parity-in-lego-construction/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "For more than 100 years, machines have been replacing human physical labor, especially in jobs requiring great physical strength, or endurance, or extremely repetitive and well-defined motions. This has arguably accelerated in recent decades, and there is a current growing push for \" [lights out manufacturing] (http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1037666065632825628) ,\" i.e. have no light-requiring humans in-the-loop.\nIt has proven harder to create robots that can substitute for the fine-grained dexterity and motor control of many physical tasks, especially those where the action must be in response to, or dictated by, visual or verbal information. Robots are, however, continually improving, and it is not hard to extrapolate to a time when most non-intellectual factory-type jobs can be done by autonomous systems that can be directly \"slotted in\" for a human worker. As a benchmark for the type of visual and manual processing required, we ask:\nWhen will a robot exist that is able to completely assemble a generic Lego set? \nFor positive resolution, the system must be able to assemble on demand multiple possible production Lego sets of 50+ pieces. The box and bags may be open but the robot must turn the pages on the direction set. Credible video or report must exist of this being done. The robot can be a prototype rather than production model. Resolution can also be achieved by the existence of a robot that would, as judged by a robotics expert, very clearly be capable of assembling a Lego set.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 296,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will AIs program programs that can program AIs?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/406/when-will-ais-program-programs-that-can-program-ais/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of 2017, humans can (with assistance of various software tools) program machine learning (ML) systems that can learn to do various tasks – for example, recognize text, transcribe speech, or play games. \nML systems are currently not very good at writing programs to accomplish a specific purpose, though there are efforts in this direction, and some software systems (e.g. Mathematica and Wolfram-alpha) which are quite high-level programming systems. (See the related question [here] (http://www.metaculus.com/questions/405/when-will-programs-write-programs-for-us/) ).\nIf or when AI/ML systems become competent enough to do fairly general-purpose programming, for example to construct by themselves (according to some specifications) the types of narrow AI systems that AI researchers can create as of 2017, there could be a very rapid proliferation of such narrow AI systems since they could be constructed to-order for all manner of purposes even by non-programmers.\nIf an AI/ML system could become competent enough at programming that it could design a system (to some specification) that can itself design other systems, then it would presumably be sophisticated enough that it could also design upgrades or superior alternatives to itself, leading to recursive self-improvement that could dramatically increase the system's capability on a potentially short timescale.\nWhen will AI systems become sophisticated enough that they can build, to some specification, a system that can itself do sophisticated programming? \nResolution is positive if/when an AI system exists that could (if it chose to!) successfully comply with the request \"build me a general-purpose programming system that can write from scratch a deep-learning system capable of transcribing human speech.\"\n",
    "# Forecasts": 486,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first law concerning artificial intelligence be passed in the US?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/418/when-will-the-first-law-concerning-artificial-intelligence-be-passed-in-the-us/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of now, there are to the author's knowledge no laws (or even regulations) concerning artificial intelligence on the books. \nWhen will the first law be passed in the US concerning AI? \nResolution will occur if/when a bill with \"Artificial Intelligence\" or \"AI\" in either the long or short official title or official description listed at [https://www.gpo.gov/] (https://www.gpo.gov/) or other equivalent source.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 422,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If you die today and get cryonically frozen, will you \"wake up\"?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/455/if-you-die-today-and-get-cryonically-frozen-will-you-wake-up/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "Individual death has long been attributed a 100% long-term probability. But for just as long, there have been desires, schemes, and claims of ways to prolong life indefinitely. In moderns times, three examples include anti-aging research (the ultimate version of which would be personal immortality), digital mind-upload, and cryonics. The latter is the subject of this question.\nThe basic idea is simple: upon bodily death, preserve as much structure (especially in the brain) as possible via immediate freezing, and maintain this until medical technology had advanced to the degree that the individual can be fully reconstructed – memories, personality and all – using this preserved structure. (For an entertaining long read check out [this Wait-but-why piece] (http://waitbutwhy.com/2016/03/cryonics.html) .)\nThe ability to quickly freeze tissue in a structure-preserving way has steadily improved; an [existing question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/437/when-will-the-large-brain-preservation-prize-be-awarded-by-the-brain-preservation-foundation/) regarding the \"large brain preservation prize\" discusses some of the advances. Many questions remain however, including: Is it even in principle possible to reconstruct an individual human mind out of a frozen brain? If so, how much accuracy in preservation is necessary? Do current techniques have the requisite accuracy? How advanced will the reconstruction technology be, and when would/might that exist? etc., etc.\nLet's assume that an individual as of the reading of the question signs up with one of the top three (by number of currently preserved individuals). \nWhat is the probability that the individual will \"wake up\" in essentially the same or better form than they died? \nWe'll consider success if the revived individual has full mental faculties, an essentially complete set of memories of their former life, and a personality that is at least difficult for them or others to discern from the original. We'll assume for these purposes that the individual's last heartbeat (at least for some time) occurs in a hospital or similar setting where the body can be immediately cooled and moved (if not there already) to a facility for cryonic preservation, and that the individual dies with a relatively healthy brain intact.\nNote: like a few other Metaculus questions, we don't expect this to actually resolve. Rather it is a \"headline\" question that could fold in the results of others. Suggestions for shorter-term, resolvable questions that would bear upon the probabilities of this one are invited in the comments below.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 533,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If chess is solved before 2080, must perfect play result in white winning?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/480/if-chess-is-solved-before-2080-must-perfect-play-result-in-white-winning/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "39%",
    "Description": "[Zermelo's theorem] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zermelo%27s_theorem_(game_theory)) says that only one of three possibilities is possible in a 2-player solved game; First player (white) wins, second player (black) wins, or there is a forced draw. \nIn the game of chess, these outcomes correspond to:\n1-- \nWhite wins\n2-- \nBlack wins\n3-- \nForced draw\nIf chess is solved before 2080, must perfect play result in white winning? \nFor the purpose of this question, chess is considered to be solved if \n--- \nit is proved that white will win, lose or draw from the initial position, given [perfect play] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solved_game#Perfect_play) on both sides\n--- \nit is shown that there exists a unique result of perfect play from the initial position, which is either: white wins, black wins, or forced draw\nResolution is by publication of peer-reviewed article that is not shown to be mistaken for at least 3 years post-publication.\nFor the purpose of this question, the [50-move rule] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifty-move_rule) does not force a draw. Games that don't end, are considered drawn, for the purpose of this question\nThis question resolves ambiguously if the question does not resolve before Jan 1st, 2080.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 131,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the European Union meet its 2030 targets under the Paris Climate Treaty?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/489/will-the-european-union-meet-its-2030-targets-under-the-paris-climate-treaty/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "35%",
    "Description": "Although the United States has announced intentions to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, 194 countries are still part of [the agreement] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Agreement) , including the European Union, [the world's #3 carbon dioxide emitter.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions) \nUnder the agreement, each country sets its own emission reduction goals. The EU's goal was to reduce emissions by 40% below 1990 levels. If achieved, by 2030 the EU will emit around [3.4-3.9 gigatons of CO2-equivalent greenhouse gases per year] (http://climateactiontracker.org/countries/eu.html) , whereas today the region accounts for [3.46 gigatons per year, or nearly ten percent of the global total] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions) . Emissions have been in decline since 1990. Current projections estimate that the EU goals represent [a slowdown in the region's trend of emission reduction] (http://climateactiontracker.org/countries/eu.html) and that the slowdown is not be enough to limit global temperature rise to only 1.5 or even 2 degrees C.\n[Other goals] (https://ec.europa.eu/clima/citizens/eu_en) of the EU's by 2030:\n--- \nAt least 27% of total energy consumption from renewable energy\n--- \nAt least 27% increase in energy efficiency\nWill the EU achieve its Paris Climate Agreement goals?\nThis question will resolve as positive if a credible news report cites an analysis independent of the European Union government confirming that Europe has met all three 2030 climate action goals, including emission reduction by at least 40% below 1990 levels, on or before January 1, 2030.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 292,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will China achieve its Paris Climate Agreement goals?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/491/will-china-achieve-its-paris-climate-agreement-goals/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "64%",
    "Description": "Although the United States has announced intentions to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, 194 countries are still part of [the agreement] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Agreement) , including China, [the world's #1 carbon dioxide emitter.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions) \nUnder the agreement, each country sets its own emission reduction goals. China's goal was to reduce emissions by 60-65% per unit GDP by 2030. This means that the country plans to reduce the emissions intensity, or the [ratio of emissions to gross domestic product] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_intensity) , a measure that ties emissions goals to economic growth. If achieved, by 2030 China will emit around [13-14 gigatons of CO2-equivalent greenhouse gases per year] (http://climateactiontracker.org/countries/china.html) , whereas today the country accounts for [10.6 gigatons per year, or 29.5% of the global total] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions) . Current projections estimate that China will [better than meet its goal,] (http://climateactiontracker.org/countries/china.html) with 2030 emissions around 12-14 gigatons per year.\n[Analysts say] (http://climateactiontracker.org/countries/china.html) that China's goal is achievable, thanks to a decrease in coal use in the country. But the slowdown in emissions may not be enough to limit global temperature rise to only 2 degrees C.\n[Other goals] (http://unfccc.int/focus/indc_portal/items/8766.php) of China's by 2030:\n--- \nPeaking of carbon dioxide emissions around 2030 and making best efforts to peak early;\n--- \nIncreasing the share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy consumption to around 20 percent; and\n--- \nIncreasing the forest stock volume by around 4.5 billion cubic meters from the 2005 level.\nCurrently, China is making [good progress] (http://www.wri.org/blog/2017/03/china-making-progress-climate-goals-faster-expected) toward all of these goals.\nWill China achieve its Paris Climate Agreement goals?\nThis question will resolve as positive if a credible news report cites an analysis independent of the Chinese government confirming that China has met its primary 2030 climate action goals of cutting emissions intensity by at least 60% below 2005 levels on or before January 1, 2030.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 273,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "With an international nuclear weapons ban in place, will a country that has nuclear weapons actually give them up by 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/492/with-an-international-nuclear-weapons-ban-in-place-will-at-least-one-nuclear-state-actually-give-them-up-by-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "In July 2017, 122 member states of the United Nations [adopted a ban] (http://time.com/4848586/un-nuclear-weapons-ban-treaty/) on nuclear weapons. The participating states agreed to \"never under any circumstances to develop, test, produce, manufacture, otherwise acquire, possess or stockpile nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.\" \nNotably, [none of the nations] (http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/27/politics/un-nuclear-ban-boycott/) that currently possess nuclear weapons participated in the negotiations of the ban or adopted the document.\nSeveral treaties prior to this aimed to curb the development of nuclear weapons, notably the 1968 [Non-Proliferation Treaty] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_the_Non-Proliferation_of_Nuclear_Weapons) (NPT), which sought to limit nuclear development beyond five nuclear powers - the U.S., Russia, China, the U.K., and France.\nArguments against nuclear disarmament typically cite the principle of [deterrence] (http://americanhistory.si.edu/subs/history/timeline/different/nuclear_deterrence.html) , that the possession of nuclear weapons by some states precludes the development or use of weapons by other states, due to the threat of nuclear retaliation. Proponents of the ban argue that previous efforts have not prevented states such as North Korea from pursuing nuclear programs, and that [disarmament, rather than deterrence] (http://thebulletin.org/controversial-ban-and-long-game-delegitimize-nuclear-weapons10934) , is the best way to prevent nuclear war.\nIt's not unprecedented for states to completely disarm, however. South Africa [dismantled] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africa_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction#Dismantling) its nuclear weapons beginning in 1989 and joined the NPT as a non-nuclear state. Three former Soviet republics, previously part of a nuclear-capable nation, also joined the NPT as non-nuclear states.\nWill a state that currently possesses nuclear weapons voluntarily dismantle their stockpile, abandon their nuclear program, and join the UN ban on nuclear weapons by 2035?\nThis question will resolve if one of the nations currently known to possess operational nuclear weapons (U.S., China, Russia, U.K., France, Israel, India, Pakistan, or North Korea) is certified by the International Atomic Energy Agency to have dismantled all nuclear devices and signs the 2017 UN ban on nuclear weapons on or before Jan 1, 2035.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 258,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will an AI system do credibly well on a full math SAT exam by 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/512/will-an-ai-system-do-credibly-well-on-a-full-math-sat-exam-by-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "71%",
    "Description": "Humans have devised many ways of assessing other humans' intelligence, and forcing people to participate in such measures. University entrance exams are one of the most familiar, inflicted on countless high school students each year as standardized measures of academic competence and promise. Recently, these exams have begun the target of AI and machine learning projects.\nAccording to a [report by Engadget] (https://www.engadget.com/2016/11/16/japanese-ai-tokyo-university-fail/) , Japan’s National Institute of Informatics had been working on an AI since 2011 with the final objective of passing the entrance exam for the University of Tokyo, tentatively by March 2022. However, a recent [report] (https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/japanese-artificial-intelligence-gives-up-on-university-of-tokyo-admissions-exam/) has revealed that the institute will be terminating the project because of its AI's inability to fully understand the broad context of the entrance exam questions.\nMore recently, on September 21, 2015, the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (AI2) [announced in a paper] (http://geometry.allenai.org/assets/emnlp2015.pdf) that it created an AI system called [GeoS] (http://geometry.allenai.org/) that can solve SAT geometry questions \"as well as the average 11th-grade American student.\" According to [this story] (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150921095150.htm) GeoS \"uses a combination of computer vision to interpret diagrams, natural language processing to read and understand text, and a geometric solver to achieve 49 percent accuracy on geometry questions from the official SAT tests. If these results were extrapolated to the entire Math SAT test, the computer roughly achieved an SAT score of 500 (out of 800), the average test score for 2015.\" Although AI2 initially focused GeoS on solving plane geometry questions, it hopes to move to solve the full set of Math SAT questions by 2018.\nThis is not an easy feat; however it may be significantly more difficult to actually do decently well on such an exam, including all sections. We ask:\nBy end of 2025, will an AI system achieve the equivalent of 75th percentile on the full mathematics section of an SAT exam comparable to those circa 2015? \nResolution is by credible media report or published paper. The system must be given only page images, and trained on exams that do not include any questions from the scored test. Exams will count as long as the topics and difficulty is broadly comparable to the 2015 exams.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 650,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the first commercial hyperloop system be within the US?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/513/will-the-first-commercial-hyperloop-system-be-within-the-us/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "36%",
    "Description": "Elon Musk's dream of a hyperloop – a pod-based transportation system that uses magnetic levitation in a near-vacuum – is coming closer to reality. Tests in the Nevada desert have achieved speeds up to 192 mph, and Musk announced in July 2017 that he had [\"verbal approval\"] (https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2017/07/20/elon-musk-hyperloop/495735001/) for a hyperloop between New York and Washington, DC. (Though it is rather unclear what exactly this means.)\nBut other countries are interested too. Dubai and Russia are both developing plans. For Russia, a hyperloop could open up new areas of the country to [trade with China] (https://hyperloop-one.com/blog/hyperloop-one-can-open-russias-far-east-china-trade) . If, that is, [lawsuits] (https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-07-13/russia-s-hyperloop-dream-stalls) don't derail the project. In Dubai, designs for a Dubai-Abu Dhabi hyperloop network [already exist] (http://www.businessinsider.com/hyperloop-one-how-it-works-2017-7/#the-start-up-announced-in-early-novemberthat-it-signed-an-agreement-withdubai-roads-and-transport-authority-to-evaluate-using-the-hyperloop-between-dubai-and-abu-dhabi-1) . \nAlthough implementing the hyperloop concept is far from easy, [several] (http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2017/07/in-defense-of-elon-musks-audacious-insane-brilliant-crazy-plan-for-an-east-coast-hyperloop/) [writers] (http://grist.org/article/in-defense-of-the-east-coast-hyperloop-elon-musk/) have said that testing and construction should begin anyway, as the hyperloop may be the revolutionary transportation system the world desperately needs.\nWill the first commercial hyperloop system be built inside of the United States?\nThis question will resolve as positive if the first hyperloop system to commence commercial operations is located the US rather than in Dubai, Russia, or any other country outside the US. Resolves as ambiguous if no commercial hyperloop system is operating as of 2035.\n\"Commerical Operations\" means that people will utilize the system as transport (even if somewhat as a novelty) outside of a test setting and without signing any waivers etc.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 273,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "A major United States earthquake by 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/570/a-major-united-states-earthquake-within-the-next-five-years/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "The [major earthquakes] (http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/10/03/death-toll-in-mexico-earthquake-rises-to-366.html) in Mexico in early September 2017 reminded the United States of its own vulnerability to earthquakes. Nearly all of the West Coast of the United States lies in the zone of [highest seismic hazard] (https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/hazmaps/conterminous/2014/images/HazardMap2014_lg.jpg) , with other earthquake hotspots in Hawaii, Alaska, South Carolina, the Intermountain West, and the [New Madrid] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Madrid_Seismic_Zone) region on the Missouri-Tennessee border. \nThe [San Andreas fault] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Andreas_Fault) , which runs much of the length of California, is of significant concern due to the concentration of people in vulnerable regions. [2008 estimates] (http://www.newsweek.com/earthquake-san-andreas-fault-big-one-los-angeles-california-670303) of the damage caused by \"The Big One,\" with an estimated magnitude of 7.8, reached $200B in damage and 1,800 lives lost. Seismic zones along Utah's Wasatch Front and the New Madrid zone in the southeast would produce similarly catastrophically damaging major quakes. \n23 earthquakes of magnitude 7 or above have hit the United States in the past 200 years. Some of those, like the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, caused major loss of life and property. Some, like the [2016 Old Iliamna earthquake] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Old_Iliamna_earthquake) in Alaska, caused property damage, but no fatalities. The question is not whether another major earthquake will strike soon, but where and how damaging.\nWill a major United States earthquake strike by end of 2022?\nThis question will resolve as positive if an earthquake with a magnitude of at least 7.0 on the moment magnitude scale, with an epicenter within the borders of the United States and estimated damage of $10 billion or more, occurs on or before December 31, 2022. Damage estimates need not be completed before the target resolution date.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 535,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will humans go extinct by 2100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/578/human-extinction-by-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "While the general feeling of most people, especially now that the cold war is (mostly) over, is that the risk of human extinction is extremely small, experts have assigned a significantly higher probability to the event.\nIn 2008 an [informal poll at the Global Catastrophic Risk Conference at the University of Oxford] (https://www.webcitation.org/6YxiCAV0p?url=http://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/gcr-report.pdf) yielded a median probability of human extinction by 2100 of 19%. Yet, one might want to be cautious when using this result as a good estimate of the true probability of human extinction, as there may be a powerful selection effect at play. Only those who assign a high probability to human extinction are likely to attend the Global Catastrophic Risk Conference in the first place, meaning that the survey was effectively sampling opinions from one extreme tail of the opinion distribution on the subject. Indeed, the conference report itself stated that the findings should be taken 'with a grain of salt'.\nTherefore, it is asked: will there be zero living humans on planet earth on January 1, 2100? \nFor these purposes we'll define humans as biological creatures who have as their ancestors – via a chain of live births from mothers – circa 2000 humans OR who could mate with circa 2000 humans to produce viable offspring. (So AIs, ems, genetically engineered beings of a different species brought up in artificial wombs, etc. would not count.)\nN.B. Even though it is obviously the case that if human extinction occurs Metaculus points won't be very valuable anymore and that it will be practically impossible to check for true human extinction (zero humans left), I would like to ask people not to let this fact influence their prediction and to predict in good faith.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 681,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will VR or AR Headsets dominate by 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/579/will-vr-or-ar-headsets-dominate-by-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "50%",
    "Description": "If you asked someone in the early 2010s about virtual reality, they'd likely hearken back to the VR craze of the 90s, which fizzled out instead of being the promised wave of the future. But since then, with the development of the Oculus Rift, Google Cardboard and other systems, virtual reality has become more accessible and more useful than ever before. Estimates of sales of VR systems in 2016 exceeded [12 million units] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/458037/virtual-reality-headsets-unit-sales-worldwide/) worldwide. \nAugmented reality, or AR, has come into its own in about the same timeframe. AR overlays virtual content onto images of the real world. Google Glass, introduced in 2013, and Microsoft's HoloLens, still in development, are wearable AR devices. Pokemon Go, introduced in summer 2016, demonstrated the possibilities of smartphone-based AR - no glasses needed. As Google Glass continues to find [application in factories and other workplaces] (https://www.wired.com/story/google-glass-2-is-here/) Apple is rumored to be designing their [own AR headset] (https://www.macrumors.com/2017/11/07/catcher-to-make-parts-for-ar-product/) . *See related question [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/231/apple-virtualaugmented-reality-by-2020/) .)\nWill VR headsets capture more than 50% of the AR/VR headset market by the end of 2025?\nThis question will resolve as positive if the number of VR headsets sold in 2025 exceeds the number of AR headsets sold in the same year. Credible industry reports will be required for resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 251,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "2˚C global warming by 2100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/585/2c-global-warming-by-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "89%",
    "Description": "At the Paris climate accord, world leaders promised to keep the global temperature increase this century (relative to pre-industrial levels) \"well below 2 ˚C\" and if possible below 1.5 ˚C. Many experts are skeptical about this goal being feasible, stating that even if all Paris targets are met, global warming may reach levels up to 3 ˚C above pre-industrial levels. Furthermore, with the coming departure of the United States from the agreement, the meeting of global targets may be in jeopardy.\nTherefore, it is asked: \nWill there, by 2100, have been a period of at least 5 consecutive years, in which the average global temperature in each year was at least 2.0 ˚C greater than the average global temperature in 1880.\n(Note that 1880 isn't exactly pre-industrial, but earlier data is highly unreliable, and there should really not have been much warming by then.)\nData for resolution shall come from [NASA] (https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/) , if possible. Note that the data in the link is normalised relative to the 1951-1980 baseline, on which 1880 stands at -0.2. Therefore, the critical value to look for with this specific NASA dataset will be 1.8 ˚C. It is likely, though, that the link will no longer be active in a few decades, so a different dataset may have to be used anyway.\nThe last possible set of 5 years to satisfy the requirement would be 2095-2099, so the last possible resolution date would be around mid-2100, in order to make sure that there are no uncertainties regarding the 2099 climate data.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 359,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "World Population in 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/587/world-population-in-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The world population has been steadily increasing for several centuries. As of November 2017, the world's population stands at approximately 7.6 billion people. According to UN projections the world population will be 9.7 billion in 2050.\nRegrettably, increases in world population are worrying some people, who are concerned that an increased population may be too much for an already strained environment to bear. Indeed, overpopulation can be seen as the root cause on many problems, from climate change to resource depletion.\nTherefore, it is asked:What will be the world population on the 31st of December 2050?\nWe shall define world population as the number of living humans on planet earth. We'll define humans as biological creatures who have as their ancestors – via a chain of live births from mothers – circa 2000 humans OR who could mate with circa 2000 humans to produce viable offspring. (So AIs, ems, genetically engineered beings of a different species brought up in artificial wombs, etc. would not count.)\nResolution shall be by UN data, if possible. If the UN shall no longer exist, or no longer measure human population by the resolution date, resolution shall be by data from what the Metaculus administration judges to be the most accurate data-source.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 305,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If alien life is discovered in the Solar System before 2050, which place will be the natural environment of the first extraterrestrial (Solar) life-form of which there is conclusive evidence?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/593/if-alien-life-is-discovered-in-the-solar-system-before-2050-which-place-will-be-the-natural-environment-of-the-first-extraterrestrial-solar-life-form-of-which-there-is-conclusive-evidence/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[This question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3834/will-any-conclusive-evidence-for-extraterrestrial-life-past-or-present-be-discovered-within-our-solar-system-by-2050/) asks whether conclusive evidence for extraterrestrial life will be found within our Solar System. As specified in that question, the extraterrestrial life must not have been put in place as a result of human activity. Conditional to a positive resolution, we ask where the organisms (under natural conditions, no probes moving them, etc.) live or lived. We consider the most commonly discussed options, and a few other possibilities. \n1--Venus. \n2--Mars. \n3--Europa. \n4--Ganymede. \n5--Another moon of Jupiter. \n6--Enceladus. \n7--Titan. \n8--Another moon of Saturn. \n9--A dwarf planet. \n10-An asteroid. \n11-Another place in the Solar System. \nResolution is ambiguous if [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3834/will-any-conclusive-evidence-for-extraterrestrial-life-past-or-present-be-discovered-within-our-solar-system-by-2050/) does not resolve positive by 2050. If [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3834/will-any-conclusive-evidence-for-extraterrestrial-life-past-or-present-be-discovered-within-our-solar-system-by-2050/) resolves positive, the location of the natural environment will be assessed by scientific consensus (as judged by Metaculus administrators). If, by 2060, there is no such consensus, it resolves ambiguous. If several places would qualify, this question resolves as the first example discovered.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 79,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Increased off-world population in 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/594/off-world-population-in-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "93%",
    "Description": "At the time of writing this question, there are 6 people in low Earth orbit, no people on suborbital space flights, no people in high orbit, or on the Moon or Mars or any asteroid or en route to those places. \nUp-to-date information on the space population may be [found here.] (https://www.howmanypeopleareinspacerightnow.com/) \nFor the last 17 years, since the International Space Station (ISS) began long term operations, the population of humans in space has been at least two – the minimal crew of the ISS. \nThe highest number of people in space at any one time has been 13, reached in 1995 and 2009. \nBut the ISS is reaching the end of its life. Despite discussions of many other possible crewed space missions, even up to colonization of the Moon or Mars, no particular venture seems certain.\nThis uncertainty about future space missions means the distribution of possible populations is not at all Gaussian. There are many scenarios where crewed spaceflight might be abandoned – it is expensive, and so far has not proven commercially valuable. On the other hand a successful colonization effort could result in many thousands of people off world. \nBecause of the difficult distribution, we will ask a simpler question. Will the population be higher than the current maximum?\nWill the population of humans off of planet Earth at midnight UTC time of December 31, 2050, be higher than 13? \nIf clarification is needed of what counts as \"human\", see [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/587/world-population-in-2100) . \"Off of planet Earth\" will mean farther than 100km from the surface of Earth, using the altitude conventionally used for space records.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 455,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a sample of negative energy be produced by 2100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/600/will-a-sample-of-negative-energy-be-produced-by-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "Warp drives. Wormholes. Time machines. These exotic structures are the stuff of science fiction, but also have valid mathematical structures behind them in the form of spacetime \"metrics\" one can write down with the requisite properties.\nThere is one major physical issue standing in the way actually making them, however: all these possibilities require negative energy. \nMore specifically, relativists have devised a number of mathematical conditions that may be assumed regarding matter and energy, known as \"energy conditions.\" Wormhole, warp-drive, and time-machine solutions to Einstein's equations essentially always require some substance that violates the \"weak energy condition\" (WEC), and generally others. Most simply, the WEC states that in the restframe of a material, its energy density is non-negative. (Technically the substance's pressure also must be sufficiently non-negative; see e.g. [here] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_condition) for a brief description, and a good relativity text like [this one] (https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9712019) for more gory detail, and [here] (http://strangebeautiful.com/papers/curiel-primer-energy-conds.pdf) for a recent, interesting review.)\nThese energy conditions are generically violated at the quantum level, because quantum mechanics entails uncertainty in the energy of a system over a very short time period, so must allow very brief negative-energy fluctuations. But macroscopic amounts of negative energy do not appear possible with any particles or fields we know to exist.\nOn the other hand, it is somewhat unclear what fundamentally forbids negative energy. Negative energy particles would be bad news, as they would likely render low-energy particles unstable to decay into positive and negative energy ones – such a universe would not last long. But could we devise some strange substance that has the property, using something like the [Casimir effect] (http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Quantum/casimir.html) , that takes empty space and removes some energy from it? It sees plausible that negative energy is closely [related to violations of the second law of thermodynamics,] (http://inspirehep.net/record/835580?ln=en) which would mean that it is very, very hard to violate. But maybe not impossible. \"Violations\" of the second law (downward movements in entropy) can happen if you [wait long enough,] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.0417) or if you set up very, very careful initial conditions (see, e.g. [here] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.03323) ) So it does not seem impossible that with a high level of tuning a sample of negative energy could be made, though the author is not at all clear how...\nSo instead we ask:\nWill a sample of negative energy material be created by the year 2100? \nTo be specific, we'll ask whether &gt; 10 proton masses worth of negative energy will be created and confined to a volume of less than 1 cubic centimeter for longer than 1 microsecond, in such a way that during that microsecond there exists a volume of space that could be considered to have a mass of less than -10 proton masses. (As of 2017, the record for antimatter, an altogether easier substance to make, was [about 300 proton masses] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter) .)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 227,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will gravitational waves from the merger of supermassive black holes be detected within the next 10 years?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/604/will-gravitational-waves-from-the-merger-of-supermassive-black-holes-be-detected-within-the-next-10-years/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "67%",
    "Description": "The Nobel Prize-winning detection of gravitational waves added a new observational tool for astronomers to use in studying celestial events. But an as-yet-unobserved phenomenon would make all the gravitational wave detections so far seem like small potatoes. \nWhen two galaxies merge, the supermassive black holes at their centers would merge as well, and the process would emit gravitational waves. But the wavelength of those waves would be undetectable by the LIGO observatory. They're best detected by pulsar.\nPulsars emit electromagnetic radiation at regular intervals. A gravitational wave would slightly change the distance from the Earth to a pulsar, and thus slightly change the pulsar's timing as well. \nIn a paper in [Nature Astronomy] (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-017-0299-6) , astronomers use observation data and models of supermassive black hole merger events to conclude that we should be able to detect such an event within the next 10 years. If we don't, it could indicate that our [hypotheses about these large black hole mergers need some refinement] (https://www.simonsfoundation.org/2017/11/13/gravitational-waves-supermassive-black-hole-merger/) .\nWill gravitational waves from the merger of supermassive black holes be detected within the next 10 years?\nThis question will resolve as positive if by November 30, 2027, a peer-reviewed publication announces the results of such an event. Statistical significance should be at the 4-sigma or equivalent level.\n(edit 1/1017) November 30 is now a publication date rather than data cutoff date.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 259,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much global warming by 2100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/605/how-much-global-warming-by-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "At the Paris climate accord, world leaders promised to keep the global temperature increase this century (relative to pre-industrial levels) \"well below 2 ˚C\" and if possible below 1.5 ˚C. Many experts are skeptical about this goal being feasible, stating that even if all Paris targets are met, global warming may reach levels up to 3 ˚C above pre-industrial levels. Furthermore, with the coming departure of the United States from the agreement, the meeting of global targets may be in jeopardy.\n[It was previously asked whether global warming would exceed 2 ˚C.] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/585/2c-global-warming-by-2100/) While this is the more interesting question out of a political perspective, given that world leaders have taken 2 ˚C to be their target, the more interesting question for humanity as a whole will be how much warming we will actually have.\nTherefore it is asked:How much greater (in ˚C) will the average global temperature in 2100 be than the average global temperature in 1880?\nData for resolution shall, as with the previous question, come from [NASA] (https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/) , if possible. Note that the data in the link is normalised relative to the 1951-1980 baseline, on which 1880 stands at -0.2. Therefore, the value we are trying to predict is the value in the link at 2100 + 0.2. It is likely, though, that the link will no longer be active in a few decades, so a different dataset may have to be used anyway.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 459,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will we detect a message originating from Luyten's Star before 2046?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/606/luytens-star-message-detected-before-2046/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "In October 2017, Messaging Extraterrestrial Intelligence International (METI) transmitted a [signal into space] (https://www.cnet.com/news/seti-space-aliens-extra-terrestrial-intelligence-luytens-star-gj-273/) designed to let other civilizations know we're here.\nThe message, transmitted to a [red dwarf star] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luyten%27s_Star) 12 light-years from Earth and contains information on human understanding of science, math and time. \nIn March 2017, a planet three times the mass of Earth within the habitable zone was discovered orbiting the star. If there's anyone on that planet who receives the message, their reply could arrive as early as 2042.\nWill a response to the METI signal arrive by 2045?\nThis question will resolve as positive if a signal of unambiguously intelligent and extraterrestrial origin originating from Luyten's Star is detected on or near Earth on or before December 31, 2045.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 268,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will our current peace be shorter than the Pax Romana?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/610/will-our-current-peace-be-shorter-than-the-pax-romana/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "53%",
    "Description": "The [Pax Romana] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pax_Romana) was a period of relative peace, which lasted for approximately 206 years from 27 BC to AD 180. The peace was not absolute, though, and the historian Walter Goffart wrote, \"The volume of the Cambridge Ancient History for the years A.D. 70–192 is called 'The Imperial Peace', but peace is not what one finds in its pages\".\nSimilarly, there have been wars in the post-ww2 era, despite the era being relatively peaceful. The post-WW2 peace has also lasted for only about 72 years as of the writing of this question, making it only about 35% as long as the Pax Romana. In order to last as long as the Pax Romana, our peace would have to endure until 2151.\nThere are many things threatening peace, from seemingly perpetual unrest in the middle-east to an increasingly tense situation on the Korean peninsula. Yet, a major global conflict in the near future seems unlikely.\nWhen predicting whether a major global conflict will occur within a longer timeframe, effects such as climate change and rising inequality (potentially due to AI?) might play a bigger role and the probability of conflict becomes more uncertain.\nIt is asked: Will a world war begin before January 1st 2151?\nWe define a world war as a war that either, \n---involves at least 50% of the world's countries, representing at least 50% of the world's population, with countries on at least 4 different continents participating and that kills at least 0.5% of the global population at the beginning of the war within 10 years. OR \n---involves at least 10% of the world's countries, representing at least 25% of the world's population, with countries on at least 3 different continents participating and that kills at least 1% of the global population at the beginning of the war within 10 years. \nThe beginning time of the hypothetical war will be defined as the time when for the first time at least 5% of the world's nations were involved in the war or countries representing at least 5% of the world's population were involved in the war.\nShould there be countries that have not declared war, but for whom the sum of the fatalities they have suffered and those they have inflicted on others exceeds 10000 within the first 10 years of the war, those countries should be counted as having participated in the war.\nGiven the extremely long timeframe of the question and that the likelihood of getting reliable data on fatality counts might be slim (use a geometric mean if given several estimates), I think it is unwise to predict on this question with points in mind.\nStill, I urge people to predict in good faith. The question resolution date has been set to January 1st 2161, to provide for 10 years after January 1st 2151.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 357,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a Vegan Country by 2100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/614/will-there-be-a-vegan-country-by-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "Interest in Veganism has increased substantially in recent years, but it is unclear whether the current wave of Veganism will become the movement that will make eating animal products a thing of the past or just turn out to be another fad.\nIt was [previously asked] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/581/will-interest-in-veganism-further-increase-in-2018/) , whether the month with the maximum internet interest in Veganism in 2018 would have a interest at least 25% greater than the month with the greatest interest in 2017. This question, however, does not assess whether Veganism can reach its ultimate potential.\nSome Vegans believe the consumption of animal products to be sufficiently immoral to justify a legal ban. Therefore, a society in which Veganism has reached its full potential would ban the consumption of animal products.\nIt is asked: Will there be a country that bans the consumption of all animal products by 2100?\nConsumption means eating, wearing, or otherwise applying to the body (makeup, etc), and an animal product is anything whose primary component is directly part of or excreted by a modern macroscopic Animalia organism. This would include things like honey, silk, and carmine, but not include things like limestone, using animal labor, or accidental cockroaches in cans of soup. It would also not include products such as wine that may use animal parts in the course of production.\nThe question resolves positive if either: \n---On January 1st, 2100 there is at least one country of population of at least 5 million in which the consumption of any product derived from an animal, whether or not the animal was killed or harmed in the process, is illegal.\nOR\n---There was at least one country that had such a ban in effect for at least 5 years during which its population was at least 5 million, prior to January 1st, 2100. \nThe question resolves negative if neither condition is met.\nWe shall define animal as having to be a whole organism, which means that if the consumption of in vitro meat is not banned, the question may still resolve positive.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 459,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will we reach the island of stability by 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/658/will-we-reach-the-island-of-stability-by-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "45%",
    "Description": "Since the synthesis of neptunium in 1940, we have been continually expanding the periodic table by creating new elements. Regrettably, as atoms have become bigger, they also have become less stable, the last few elements to be created having a half-life of less than a second.\nYet it is theorized that at some point, stability of new elements might start increasing again, creating an [island of stability] ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability) . There are certain \"magic numbers\" of protons that offer the chance of higher stability; 114, 120 and 126 are magic numbers. We have yet to reach elements 120 and 126 and there might still be more stable isotopes of element 114 that have not yet been created.\nIt is asked:\nWill we create an isotope of an element that has more than 110 protons, that has a half-life of at least one day (86,400 seconds) prior to 2050? \nIn order for the question to resolve positive the half-life of the isotope must be verified by an independent scientific team to be greater than one day prior to 2050.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 197,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Kessler syndrome by 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/665/how-many-starlink-satellites-will-be-operational-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "The [Kessler syndrome] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome) is a situation where a major satellite collision causes an increase in space junk, causing a cascading effect destroying many if not most other satellites.\nWe are currently losing about one satellite per year due to collisions with space junk, yet these collisions are far too small to cause a runaway effect. Furthermore, action has been taken by the Federal Communications Commission to reduce the chance of this happening and regulations in the U.S. require all satellites launched after March 18, 2002 to be disposed of by controlled atmospheric reentry or a boost into a graveyard orbit after shutdown.\nIt is asked:\nBy 2050 will we have had a one year period in which we will have lost at least 10% of our operational satellites due to collisions with space junk? \n",
    "# Forecasts": 425,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the world create the first Trillionaire?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/676/when-will-the-world-create-the-first-trillionaire/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In 2014, Bill Gates prognosticated that the world would see its first trillionaire within 15 years. Well, as of this writing we're 4 years in.\nInternational bank, Credit Suisse, meanwhile, predicts that we'll see around [11 trillionaires] (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/10808915/World-could-see-first-trillionaire-in-25-years.html) within 2 generations.\nOthers speculate that bitcoin's mystery founder, Satoshi Nakamoto, might [claim the title] (https://mashable.com/2017/12/12/bitcoin-satoshi-trillionaire/) .\nDespite the fact that Amazon's Jeff Bezos is [nearing the $100B mark] (https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2017/dec/19/when-will-we-see-the-worlds-first-trillionaire-jeff-bezos-bill-gates) , we're not yet nearing $1T territory.\nWhat do you think? When will we cross the threshold? \nFor a positive result, an individual must be ranked on [Forbes' Billionaires List] (https://www.forbes.com/sites/kerryadolan/2017/03/20/forbes-2017-billionaires-list-meet-the-richest-people-on-the-planet/#7409483862ff) with a net worth of at least $1,000 billion. \n(Fine print: if the Forbes list ceases, other credible and multiply-sources estimates of a trillion-dollar net worth for an individual person can be accepted. The trillion can be in contemporary dollars, i.e. very high inflation could also help bring this about.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 353,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2025 will someone be able to hold his/her breath for 30+ minutes?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/684/by-2025-will-someone-be-able-to-hold-hisher-breath-for-30-minutes/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "14.000000000000002%",
    "Description": "The Guinness World Records reports that freediver Aleix Segura Vendrell currently (as of March 2018) holds the [world record for breath holding] (http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/longest-time-breath-held-voluntarily-(male)) , clocking in at a mind-numbing 24 minutes, 3:45 seconds on February 28, 2016.\nThat busted other previous records, such as magician David Blaine’s impressive 17 minute breath hold. Amazing details on Blaine’s feat are available in this [TED Talk] (https://www.ted.com/talks/david_blaine_how_i_held_my_breath_for_17_min) \nAll very nice. But bioengineering will allow us to push the record up—possibily, way up. Some techniques, like “lung packing,” are already being put to use by daredevils. [Per Deadspin] (https://deadspin.com/how-long-can-humans-hold-their-breath-1467541916) : \nThis [lung packing] consists of inhaling the very largest breath possible, and then, without exhaling, puffing your cheeks full of more air and attempting to force that air down into your lungs. You are literally stretching out your lungs so that they can hold more air.\nMore exotic ideas, like the so-called [“Aquaman Crystal”] (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientists-create-crystal-which-could-allow-us-to-breathe-underwater-9772871.html) are promising.\nSome extreme atheletes and freedivers are no doubt experimenting and [pushing the limits] (http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/explainer/2013/11/nicholas_mevoli_freediving_death_what_happens_to_people_who_practice_holding.html) .\nAnd there are documented cases on the record of people surviving without oxygen for long periods of time. As the [BBC reports] (http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20140714-how-long-can-you-go-without-air) :\nWhen US toddler Michelle Funk fell into an icy stream in 1986, she survived an estimated 66 minutes underwater, preserved by deep hypothermia that reduced her metabolic rate to almost nothing.\nFunk’s case was a freak accident. But by 2025 will a person voluntarily hold his or her breath for more than 30 minutes? (The attempt must comply with Guinness Record standards.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 230,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the U.S. get rid of the penny by 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/685/will-the-us-get-rid-of-the-penny-by-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "If you haven’t seen CGP Grey’s [\"Death to Pennies\"] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5UT04p5f7U) video, it’s worth the watch. Funny, and mildly enraging. It raises a great question that deserves answering: Why DOES the U.S. Mint continue to produce pennies, year after year?\nAfter all, it [costs more to mint] (http://time.com/money/4618271/penny-cost-make-worth/) these coins than they’re worth as currency. \nYou can’t use them in vending machines, parking meters or arcades.\nThey accumulate in jars and slow transactions.\nYes, technically, you can throw them in a fountain and make wishes on them. And they have more intrinsic value than, say, Bitcoins. But they’re also choking hazards. Per [CBS news] (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/children-and-choking-hazards/) :\nCoins, especially pennies, are a major choking hazard and since adults rarely pick them up, they are plentiful on the ground for children.\nMany people have had enough. Last April, U.S. Senators John McCain and Mike Enzi reintroduced a piece of legislation called the Currency Optimization, Innovation, and National Savings Act (a.k.a. the COINS Act), which would have finally put the penny in a well-deserved grave and saved $16 billion to boot.\n[AOL reported] (https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/04/02/two-senators-announce-plan-to-eliminate-penny-replace-dollar-bi/22022666/) that\nAlthough it is unclear why that legislation did not pass, the Wall Street Journal pointed out in 2013 that, according to the Federal Reserve, dollar coins were so unpopular that about $1.4 billion worth of them had been produced but were not being used.\nAt some point, our elected officials will clearly get it together and bury the penny. But when? Specifically, will the U.S. stop minting pennies before 2025?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 364,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a human made spaceship enter the Venusian atmosphere before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/686/will-a-human-made-spaceship-enter-the-venusian-atmosphere-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "55.00000000000001%",
    "Description": "Every space geek loves Mars. Mars gets [all the robots] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_artificial_objects_on_Mars) as well as [all the movies] (https://www.ranker.com/list/the-best-mars-movies/all-genre-movies-lists) .\nBut whither Venus? Where’s the love for our beautiful goddess neighbor who apparently welcomed the Russian Venera-13 lander by crushing it to death within hours. Informed [speculation on Quora] (https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-current-condition-of-the-Venera-probe-that-landed-on-the-surface-of-Venus-in-1982) suggests that:\nThe [Venera 13] lander's seals and pressurized chambers were breached the day of the landing, so all of the material and equipment that the Venera was designed to protect was melted and boiled off decades ago.\nYikes. Okay, maybe that's why we don't drop by more often.\nVenus is often compared to a literal hellscape. We know about the surface temperatures that melt lead, the sulfuric acid clouds, the poisonous metal snow, etc.\nBut Venus is also interesting! And the clouds of Venus may be the most [Earthlike environment] (https://www.cnet.com/news/nasa-wants-to-build-a-floating-city-above-the-clouds-of-venus/) in the solar system beyond terra firma. \nSo when will we return to our hot, hostile sister planet? Specifically, will a man made spacecraft at least breach Venus’s atmosphere before the 2020’s are out?\nPer this [pessimistic Atlantic article] (https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/01/venus-lost-generation/513479/) : \nA generation has now gone by since the agency set a course for the second planet from the Sun, and with this latest mission opportunity lost, the earliest an expedition there might launch (from some future selection process) would be 2027—nearly 40 years since our last visit.\nRussia and the U.S. are considering a joint mission called [Venera D] (https://www.space.com/35333-russia-nasa-venus-mission-venera-d.html) , but per [Space.com] (http://Space.com) :\nIt's still too early to know exactly what Venera-D will look like, what it will do or when the mission will launch. A liftoff in 2025 or 2026 is possible under an \"aggressive\" time line.\nCan we get there before the 2030s? \nResolution is positive if a human-made spacecraft enters Venus's atmosphere prior to Jan 1, 2030, and negative otherwise.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 428,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will there be a mile-high building?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/735/when-will-there-be-a-mile-high-building/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [Burj Khalifa] (http://www.burjkhalifa.ae/en/index.aspx) towers over the Dubai desert at 2,717 feet (828 meters; for this question [United States customary units] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_customary_units) are appropriate), making it currently (as of March 2018) the tallest manmade building in the world. It’s held that record since 2008, and it bests the next tallest skyscraper, the [Shanghai Towers] (http://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/shanghai-tower/56) in Shanghai, China by nearly 650 feet. (One World Trade Center, the tallest building in the U.S., lags behind at 1,776 feet.)\nBut guess what, Burj? Your days of being #1 are (probably) numbered. Several projects on the development slate are on schedule to overtake Dubai’s neo-futuristic megatall landmark.\nAmong them:\n--- \nThe Jeddah Tower in Saudi Arabia, which will stretch up a whole kilometer [above the Earth] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeddah_Tower) by 2021 \n--- \nIn 2021, [Merdeka PNB118] (http://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/merdeka-pnb118/10115) in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, will nip at the Burj's heels at 2,113 feet.\nBut when will a skyscraper join the mile high club? \nThe Sky Mile Tower proposed to be built in Tokyo, Japan aims to do just that. But the obstacles are formidable. As [CNN reports] (https://www.cnn.com/style/article/tokyo-mile-high-skyscraper/index.html) : \nAt that soaring height, design requirements for wind can exceed those for earthquakes -- even, according to [a] report [by the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH)], in the most earthquake-prone regions of the world. \"The tower will naturally have long periods of vibration that will be more readily excited by the wind,\" the report explains. \nIt seems difficult but not impossible. When do YOU think a mile high megatall building will finish completion?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 203,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a complete 4 year interval in which world output doubles, before the first 1 year interval in which world output doubles?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/736/will-there-be-a-complete-4-year-interval-in-which-world-output-doubles-before-the-first-1-year-interval-in-which-world-output-doubles/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "71%",
    "Description": "As of 2018, it's taken [about 16 years for the world economic output to double] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD) . So it might seem absurd to talk about it doubling in one or even four years. But there is a potential major change on the horizon: very advanced Artificial Intelligence.\nAn important consideration in how to approach the [AI alignment problem] (https://mapandterritory.org/formally-stating-the-ai-alignment-problem-fe7a6e3e5991) is the speed of the takeoff from massively subhuman AI to massively superhuman AI. The effectiveness of capacity limitation, as well as the existence of fire alarms for AI safety, are heavily dependent on this, for example.\nPaul Christiano [suggests] (https://sideways-view.com/2018/02/24/takeoff-speeds/) operationalising the takeoff speed in terms of economic growth. A slow takeoff is one where the economy doubles in four years before the first time it doubles in one year, and a fast takeoff is one where it does not. (See the same article for Christiano's list of arguments regarding fast vs. slow takeoff.)\nWill a 4-year GDP doubling complete (slow takeoff) before a 1-year doubling (fast takeoff) does? \nResolution is by credible assessment of world GDP in constant US dollars (or other appropriately widely-accepted units).\nThere will be an ambiguous resolution if there is no 4 year (nor 1 year) doubling interval by 2050, to isolate specifically the takeoff speed from other things like the chances of no takeoff occurring at all or human extinction.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 281,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will SpaceX land anything on Mars by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/737/will-spacex-land-anything-on-mars-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "85%",
    "Description": "SpaceX has released plans for an \"Interplanetary Transport System\" with the goal (among other things) of sending people to Mars.\nIn typical Elon Musk fashion, the announced timelines are wildly optimistic or aspirational. But Musk and SpaceX do seem very committed to reaching Mars.\nIn another question [here] (http://www.metaculus.com/questions/349/will-spacex-land-people-on-mars-prior-to-2030) it is asked if Musk's optimistic timeline will be met, landing people on Mars by 2030.\nThis question sets a scaled-back goal: \nWill SpaceX land anything on Mars by 2030?\nThis will resolve positive if a SpaceX branded mission, where the primary launch hardware and Mars entry, descent, and landing systems are built by SpaceX, successfully lands on Mars by Jan 1, 2030.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 1058,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Puerto Rico become a US state prior to 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/797/will-puerto-rico-become-a-us-state-prior-to-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "48%",
    "Description": "In 1898, thanks to the Spanish-American War, the United States gained control of the island of Puerto Rico. It took more than half a century, however, to clarify that relationship. In 1952, the U.S. declared Puerto Rico a “commonwealth.” This is a different designation than “state.” \nOn the one hand, Puerto Ricans can:\n--- \nClaim natural-born U.S. citizenship\n--- \nReceive Medicaid and Medicare\n--- \nVote in Presidential primaries\nOn the other hand, they cannot:\n--- \nVote in Congressional or Presidential elections\n--- \nGet access to other government programs\n--- \nBe represented in Congress by a voting legislator\nThe issue of whether to elevate Puerto Rico to statehood has been raised repeatedly since 1952. In fact, island residents have voted in statehood referendums in: 1967, 1991,1993, 1998 and 2012. In the most recent vote, sentiment on the island turned positive for the first time in voting history: Puerto Ricans want their own state.\nWhy? Well, the reasons are complicated. Those in favor believe statehood will help Puerto Rico economically—a rationale that gained converts following 2017’s devastating [Hurricane Maria] (https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/3/20/17138990/puerto-rico-hurricane-maria-6-months) .\nOn the mainland, meanwhile, opinion is split. A [Rasmussen Reports survey] (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/february_2017/americans_support_statehood_for_puerto_rico_more_than_d_c) conducted online in March, 2017 found that:\n40% of American Adults now believe Puerto Rico should be a state, up from 35% in the fall of 2013. Largely unchanged are the 39% who disagree and the 21% who are undecided.\nEven if Puerto Ricans want statehood, it’s ultimately up to Congress. As [CNN explains] (https://www.cnn.com/2017/06/12/politics/puerto-rico-question-answers-statehood-trnd/index.html) : \nTo become the 51st state, Congress would have to pass a statute to admit Puerto Rico as a state, and conversations around that possibility have obviously been going on for decades. The generalities of this process are found in the \"New States\" clause in the US Constitution. Every state after the original 13 colonies has been admitted under this directive. \nAlthough there seems to be seismic attitudinal changes underway, the political process ahead is fraught. As [Vox reports] (https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/1/11/15782544/puerto-rico-pushes-for-statehood-explained) :\nWhile Puerto Ricans have been fighting about their political status for decades, Congress has shown little interest in changing anything. Washington lawmakers have introduced more than 130 bills to resolve Puerto Rico’s political status, and none have gone anywhere, said Charles Venator-Santiago, a political science professor at the University of Connecticut. That’s partly because there is no defined process for statehood. “The Constitution doesn’t give direction on how to admit a new state,” says Venator-Santiago.\nWhat do you think? Question resolves positive if Puerto Rico is admitted as a United States state before January 1, 2035.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 381,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the 1000th binary question resolution be positive?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/804/1000th-binary-question-resolution-is-positive/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "36%",
    "Description": "It was previously asked [whether a question of unknown nature would resolve positive] ( https://www.metaculus.com/questions/666/will-this-question-resolve-positive/) . The Metaculus prediction ended up being 29.9% despite only 26.4% of previous binary Metaculus questions resolving positive. Once the nature of the question was revealed, it became clear that (despite resolving negative) the question was a lot more likely to resolve positive than the average Metaculus question. (A fair a priori probably would have been larger than 50%.)\nAs of the writing of this question, 525 binary Metaculus questions have resolved, the majority negative. This question is going to probe what the fair a priori of a future question will be. This avoids the arbitrariness of who gets to choose the secret question, as that still remains uncertain.\nIt is asked: Will the 1000th binary Metaculus question resolution be positive?\nTo avoid an incentive for cheating, whoever was the author of the 1000th question should be unable to earn any points on this question. The question should also be closed prematurely as soon as the 950th question resolves, even if that should be before its set closing date. Should the 1000th question resolve ambiguous, the 1001st question will be used for resolution, if the 1001st also resolves ambiguous, then the 1002nd, etc.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 86,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Europa be the first place humanity will discover extraterrestrial life, if it is discovered by 2045?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/808/will-europa-be-the-first-place-humanity-will-discover-extraterrestrial-life-if-it-is-discovered-by-2045/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "22%",
    "Description": "Every astrobiologist and their brother is excited about the possibility of life on Jupiter's moon, Europa. And for good reason. It's likely got more liquid water than our fair Earth does. Thanks to Jupiter's gravitation tugging, there's almost certainly lots of volcanic activities beneath those seas to create an environment similar to the one we suspect [gave rise to life] (https://www.whoi.edu/news-release/study-tests-theory-that-life-originated-at-deep-sea-vents) on this planet.\nIn addition to fantasizing extensively about [discovering life on Europa] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NlvndXpmEA) , our species has been busy preparing recon missions to sample [tasty plumes] (https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-s-hubble-spots-possible-water-plumes-erupting-on-jupiters-moon-europa/) of water+organics fulminating off the surface. Maybe we'll get lucky and find convincing proof of biological activity on Europa with the [Clipper mission] (https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/europa-clipper/) .\nOr maybe not.\nEuropa is far away. It's bathed in horrific radiation. It's cold. Its environment would be mean to our drills. And there might not even be life there.\nMeanwhile, other (slightly) more hospitable places – Mars, hint, hint – may also house life. Or maybe boosters of Titan or Enceladus will convince us to go to those worlds first, and we'll find the first alien life there. Or maybe life won't be found at all in the solar system. Or maybe SETI will come through. Or our new mega powerful telescopes will reveal life on extra solar worlds. Or maybe [aliens have already found us] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUHk9FLZMf4) !\nWhat's your take? Question resolves positive if humanity by 2045 discovers convincing evidence of life on Europa and does so before detecting extra terrestrial life anywhere else in the universe. Resolves negative if by 2045 extraterrestrial life is found convincingly elsewhere prior to on Europa. Resolves ambiguous if no extraterrestrial life is found by 2045. (Note: extraterrestrial life must be (a) living currently and (b) highly unlikely to be a result of contamination by Earth spacecraft. This leaves open the possibility of life transported from Earth via other non-human-engineered means.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 343,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a member of President Trump's inner circle be sentenced to jail by 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/809/will-a-member-of-president-trumps-inner-circle-be-sentenced-to-jail-by-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "90%",
    "Description": "For the purposes of this question, we'll confine Trump's \"inner circle\" to the following people:\n--- [Donald Trump himself] (http://www.newsweek.com/could-trump-face-jail-time-mueller-investigation-776140) \n--- [Donald Trump Junior] (http://www.newsweek.com/jared-kushner-donald-trump-jr-steve-bannon-michael-wolff-money-laundering-771166) \n--- [Ivanka Trump] (http://www.newsweek.com/will-mueller-charge-ivanka-trump-russia-investigation-2018-773055) \n--- [Jared Kushner] (https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2017/11/jared-kushners-chances-of-staying-out-of-prison-ju.html) \n---Mike Pence \n--- [Michael Cohen] (https://www.vox.com/2018/4/13/17226678/michael-cohen-raid-trump-pardon-law) \n---John Kelly \n---Hope Hicks \n--- [Steve Bannon] (https://lawandcrime.com/legal-analysis/bannon-could-face-contempt-sanctions-for-not-answering-questions/) \nNote #1: Links go to articles related to potential criminal charges against individuals.\nNote #2: Steve Bannon is included on the list, even though he and Trump have had a falling out, simply because of how influential he was earlier in the Presidency. \nWill a judge sentence at least one of these people to a jail sentence by Jan 1., 2023? \nResolution is positive even if the person is pardoned, as long as the pardon comes after conviction. We will also count jail time assigned by a judge per contempt of court, etc., if any actual time in jail is spent.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 315,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a practical nuclear fusion reactor first be developed in China?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/824/will-a-practical-nuclear-fusion-reactor-first-be-developed-in-china/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "With an enormous amount of energy created per unit mass of fuel, cheap and abundance (e.g. deuterium) fuel, and relatively benign waste products, practical energy generation from nuclear fusion would be transformative for the world. A [number of questions] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:phys-sci--nuclear) relate to efforts in the US and Europe, but there is another major player in the field: China. As discussed in [this story] (http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20289/china-touts-fusion-progress-as-new-details-on-lockheed-martins-reactor-emerge) , China is pouring significant resources into practical nuclear fusion. So we ask:\nWhen practical nuclear fusion is developed, will it first be in China? \nFor these purposes we define \"practical\" as an operational high-temperature nuclear fusion reactor that can (a) produce a demonstrated positive energy balance exceeding 100 megawatts for more than one week, and (b) have a sustainable plan for long-term operations (e.g. no critical hard-to-replace components that would be radiation-damaged to inoperability in a matter of days or weeks, etc.) These are chosen to roughly match [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/363/will-a-fusion-based-electrical-generation-facility-generation-100-mw-or-more-using-only-fusion-as-an-energy-source-come-into-service-by-2030/) . \nResolves positively if the first such thing is in China; negatively if the first such thing is built elsewhere; ambiguous if no such thing is built by 2050.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 315,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Metaculus exist in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/841/will-metaculus-exist-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "85%",
    "Description": "Due to the fact that some of Metaculus' questions (and some of the most interesting/important ones for that) are extremely long-term, some users have expressed concern that Metaculus will not be around for resolution. While whether Metaculus will be around to resolve very long-term questions may not be of direct interest to predictors, as it does not really make sense to predict with points in mind if those points are decades away anyway, it would still be interesting to get a sense of what the probability is that Metaculus will be around in a couple of decades time.\nTherefore, it is asked:Will Metaculus still be operating on January 1st 2030?\nA positive resolution does not require the site to still operate at [metaculus.com] (http://metaculus.com) in 2030, but it does require a degree of continuity with the current version of Metaculus so that no more than 1% of all predictions ever made may have been lost from players' point calculating process and no more than one percent of once opened questions may have been lost.\nDue to the nature of this question the best point optimizing prediction would be 99%, no matter of the real probability of Metaculus existing in 2030, as a non-existent Metaculus cannot make you lose points. Still, players are urged to predict in good faith.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 459,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the world's richest person in 2033 have a net worth greater than that of John D. Rockefeller in 1913?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/899/will-the-worlds-richest-person-in-2033-have-a-net-worth-greater-than-that-of-john-d-rockefeller-in-1913/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33%",
    "Description": "[John D. Rockefeller] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Rockefeller) is considered to be the wealthiest American of all time. In 1913 he was the world's richest person with a net worth of over a billion dollars. That was equivalent to about 2% of the United States' GDP back then. For reference, 2% of US GDP would be close to 400 billion dollars today! This reference perspective makes him much richer than the current richest person in the world, Jeff Bezos, whose net worth is at 112 billion dollars in the 2018 Forbes ranking.\nYet, inequality is on the rise in many developed countries and the net worth of the richest person in the world has been consistently increasing over the last few years. Could a person as rich as John D. Rockefeller reappear in the modern world?\nIt is asked:Will the richest person in the world in 2033 have a net worth equivalent to or greater than 2% of the United States' GDP at the time?\nData for resolution shall be taken from the [2033 Forbes Billionaires list (note: of course the link currently does not lead to the 2033 list)] ( https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/list/) . Note that this list is to be differentiated from the real time list.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 245,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will we discover clear evidence of proton decay by 2040?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/915/will-we-discover-clear-evidence-of-proton-decay-by-2040/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "28.000000000000004%",
    "Description": "Protons are durable little subatomic particles. Our collective best guess that they should take at least years to decay... if they do so at all. \nWhy do scientists want to figure this out? Symmetry Magazine explains the situation: \nMuch [the theoritical work on Grand Unified Theories of the universe] rests on the existence of proton decay, and yet we’ve never seen a proton die. The reason may simply be that protons rarely decay, a hypothesis borne out by both experiment and theory... Because of quantum physics, the time any given proton decays is random, so a tiny fraction will decay long before that -year lifetime. So, “what you need to do is to get a whole bunch of protons together,” says [University of California's Jonathan Feng]. Increasing the number of protons increases the chance that one of them will decay while you’re watching.\nSeveral experiments around the world have attempted (and will be attempting) to quantify the whys and wherefores of proton decay. \nTwo of the most important include:\n[Super-Kamiokande] (http://www-sk.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/sk/sk/pdecay-e.html) in Japan:\nIf we can collect many protons and some of them decay, we can estimate proton lifetime unless waiting for so long time. Super-Kamiokande uses 50,000 tons of pure water and it contains protons. We are measuring proton lifetime with huge number of protons... however, we have not observed any evidence of proton decay yet.\n[Hyper-Kamiokande] (http://www.hyper-k.org/en/physics/phys-protondecay.html) : \nHyper-Kamiokande is about 10 times larger than SK [Super-Kamiokande] and it can overtake the current reach by SK within two years... Hyper-Kamiokande has sensitivity up to more than one order longer than the current lower lifetime of proton.\nWhat do you think? Will we discover proton decay before 2040? \nQuestion resolves positive if experimental evidence for proton decay is published in a top peer-reviewed journal prior to 2040.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 152,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will another 9/11 on U.S. soil be prevented at least through 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/916/will-another-911-on-us-soil-be-prevented-at-least-through-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "75%",
    "Description": "As of mid-2018, it's been almost 17 years since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks that destroyed the Twin Towers in New York and damaged the Pentagon. Nearly 3,000 people died in the attack. Since that time, fortunately, there hasn't been another attack on the U.S. homeland that's anywhere close to the size and scale of 9/11.\nHowever, we cannot rest easy.\nAs The Atlantic [reported] (https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/09/are-we-any-safer/492761/) in September 2016:\nAre we safer? Yes, we’re safer from the kind of orchestrated attack that shocked us on that September morning. It’s harder for terrorists to get into the country, and harder for them to pull off something spectacular if they do. But we have not plugged some of the most threatening security gaps. \nA special report compiled by the Heritage Foundation examined [60 terrorist plots] (https://www.heritage.org/terrorism/report/60-terrorist-plots-911-continued-lessons-domestic-counterterrorism) that have unfolded since 9/11.\nHow long can our luck – and the good work of law enforcement – hold out?\nCan we prevent a US terrorist attack equal to (or worse than) 9/11 in terms of lives lost, at least through the year 2030? \nFor these purposes, a terrorist attack will point to something purposeful but not directly implemented by a nation-state's government and military.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 224,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a space elevator successfully be built by 2100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/917/will-a-space-elevator-successfully-be-built-by-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8%",
    "Description": "Ahh, to build a space elevator. Wouldn't that be grand? We could move material into space at a fraction of the cost of conventional rockets. Space tourism would [boom] (https://www.herox.com/crowdsourcing-news/137-going-up-the-case-for-a-space-elevator) . We'd launch interplanetary missions. Oh happy day.\n[Futurism explains] (https://futurism.com/why-space-elevators-are-the-future-of-space-travel/) :\nAccording to [a NASA] study, a flexible and durable cable with a space station counterweight could serve as a viable space elevator. A mechanical “climber” — using magnetic levitation or rollers along the tether — would then carry many tons of equipment or people into orbit. Although such a project would cost in the tens of billions, it would eventually pay for itself by providing much cheaper space travel to a greatly expanded market.\nThe question is: can we do this?\nKurzgesagt (a.k.a. \"in a nutshell\") explores the state of affairs in [this entertaining video] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxqnCwMvEpg) \nHere are some of the problems with this plan. Problems which engineers and scientists may never be able to overcome:\n---Maybe we'll never make a material [strong enough] (https://futurism.com/why-space-elevators-are-the-future-of-space-travel/) to support the space elevator. \n---Maybe [terrorists] (https://worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/20311/how-to-protect-a-space-elevator-against-terrorism) will attack any elevator that we build. \n---Maybe we'll never get the [costs of construction/maintenance] (https://www.quora.com/How-much-money-would-it-cost-to-make-a-space-elevator-including-R-D) down. \n---Maybe one or more [space elevator disasters] (http://www.niac.usra.edu/files/studies/final_report/472Edwards.pdf) will fling debris into orbit or crash down on a populated area, turning the population against the process. \n---Maybe rocket engineers will build on the successes of companies like [Space X] (https://www.popsci.com/spacexs-falcon-heavy-launch-was-joyful-success) , and there will therefore never be enough political or economic pressure to incentivize construction of an elevator. \nWhat do you think? Will we or our descendants overcome these [obstacles] (http://sploid.gizmodo.com/how-would-a-real-space-elevator-work-and-is-it-even-pos-1769925946) and others unforeseen?\nQuestion resolves positive if a working space elevator is constructed on Earth by 2100 and maintained in operation for at least a year.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 356,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will we get the last communication from Voyager 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/943/when-will-we-get-the-last-communication-from-voyager-1/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Launched in September, 1977, the Voyager 1 spacecraft is currently the most distant manmade object in space. Amazingly, it continues to \"phone home\" even from its position [beyond the heliosheath] (https://eyes.jpl.nasa.gov/eyes-on-voyager.html) .\nHow we keep in touch with this little spacehip that could--currently 141 AUs away from us [and counting] (https://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/status/) , as of April 30, 2018--is astonishing. As [NASA explains] (https://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/did-you-know/) :\nThe sensitivity of our deep-space tracking antennas located around the world is truly amazing. The antennas must capture Voyager information from a signal so weak that the power striking the antenna is only 10 exponent -16 watts (1 part in 10 quadrillion). A modern-day electronic digital watch operates at a power level 20 billion times greater than this feeble level.\nAlas, in spite of all this awesome science, Voyager 1's days are numbered. Its fuel is nearly spent. In just a few years, it will bleat out its last signal, and then we'll hear from it no more. As The Atlantic reports:\nThe Voyagers [including Voyager 2] eventually will go quiet. The spacecrafts’ electric power, supplied by radioisotope thermoelectric generators, weakens each day. Dodd said scientists and engineers will likely begin shutting off instruments in 2020, a debate that she says is already underway. “These scientists have had their instruments on for 40 years,” she said. “Nobody wants to be the first one turned off.” The spacecrafts’ transmitters will be the last to go. They will die on their own, in the late 2020s or perhaps in the 2030s. “One day we’ll be looking for the signal and we won’t hear it anymore,” Dodd said.\nWhat will happen to it then? The ship's odyssey into the great black unknown is just beginning. Lots of speculation on Quora, including [this cool passage] (https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-most-probable-fate-of-Voyagers-1-2) :\nAbout [the Voyagers'] eventual fate, will they be intercepted by intelligent lifeforms? We honestly don’t know. What we know is that both crafts will be confined to the Milky Way galaxy. Our solar system is traveling around the galaxy at about 514,000 mph, 15 times as fast as the Voyagers’ current speeds. This means that in a few hundred million years, our paths will again cross, or certainly get close. Earth might already be vacant of humans in that time, but not necessarily in space. Humanity might be scattered all over the galaxy and maybe, in a strange twist of fate, the [Golden Records] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_Golden_Record) , humanity’s message in a bottle to other intelligent lifeforms out there, were actually meant for our own descendants\nIn any event, what's your take? In what month and year will scientists receive the last credible signal from this amazing machine before it's lost forever to the void? \nQuestion will resolve to the time of the last signal received, after no signal has been received for one year.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 113,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Mike Pence be elected president of the United States in 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/953/will-mike-pence-be-elected-president-of-the-united-states-in-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4%",
    "Description": "[Mike Pence] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Pence) is the 48th vice president of the United States. He was previously the governor of Indiana and a member of the US House of Representatives. Some have [speculated] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-24/mike-pence-s-2024-presidential-campaign-has-already-begun) that Pence will run for president in 2024.\nWill Mike Pence be elected president of the United States in 2024?\nThis question resolves positive if Mike Pence wins the US presidency and is sworn into office by February of 2025.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 212,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Donald Trump spend any time in jail or prison?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/957/donald-trump-spends-time-in-jail-or-prison/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "Please take this question not as an expression of partisan blood-lust (\"Lock him up!\"), but as an exercise in conjunctive probabilities.\nDonald J. Trump may or may not have committed crimes during his tenure as President, during his campaign, or previously in his life and business career.\nFor him to actually serve time as a result of being found guilty, several things would have to be true, with each one roughly dependent on the last.\n1) He would have to have committed a crime (on the generous theory that he will not be jailed if this is not the case).\n2) He would have to be eligible to be indicted. This means that either \na) he is no longer President, or \nb) it is decided that a sitting President can be indicted (a matter of legal controversy at the moment)\n3) A prosecutor or grand jury would have to decide that he should be indicted.\n4) He would have to be found guilty.\n5) A judge would have to decide on a sentence that included time in jail.\n6) The sentence starts before a pardon occurs.\nNumber 5 in particular may be quite a high bar, especially given the potentially incendiary impact of jailing a President or ex-President who won election and enjoyed the continuing support of a large percentage of the American public. The American political/judicial system has shied away from any such outcome in previous scandals. Richard Nixon resigned to avoid impeachment and then was preemptively pardoned; Bill Clinton was impeached by the House without conviction by the Senate, and did not suffer conviction on criminal charges (though he was cited and fined for civil contempt of court, had his law license suspended for five years, and settled a civil lawsuit out of court).\nWe will ask for something simpler: Will Donald Trump spend any time in jail or prison, for any reason?\nThis question will resolve positively if Donald Trump is incarcerated for any period of time, no matter how brief, before June 30, 2028. It will resolve negatively either on June 30 2028 or upon Trump's death if he has not been so incarcerated\nNote that the reason for Trump being jailed need not have any connection to any particular scandal or to Trump's presidency or presidential campaign, nor to the 6 steps listed above. If Trump is held overnight in county lock-up pending arraignment on a charge of reckless driving, then the resolution is positive.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 1153,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will cost-adjusted IT technology be worse than it was 8 years (32 quarters) ago in at least one quarter prior to 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/968/will-cost-adjusted-it-technology-be-worse-than-it-was-8-years-32-quarters-ago-in-at-least-one-quarter-prior-to-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26%",
    "Description": "We often take the advance of IT technology for granted and even believe it to be progressing at an exponential rate. While Moore's Law has (by some definitions) continued to hold, the data economists have generated when they estimated [the amount of investment required to have equal quality IT equipment over time] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/B935RG3Q086SBEA) , reveals that in some sense progress has slowed down. While quality progress was exponential for a long time too, the last approximately ten years have not been all that great. \nThe inverse of the linked-to index can be seen as a kind of estimation of the quality of information technology at a given time. (The predictor is encouraged to export the data into excel and look at the evolution of the inverse of the index and the percentage improvement over the last 8 years over time.) \nFor example(s), the percentage increase in quality between Q1 1990 and Q1 1998 was 333.5%; the percentage increase in quality between Q1 2000 and Q1 2008 was 172.6%; the percentage increase in quality between Q1 2010 and Q1 2018 was 11.2%. Will the percentage increase in quality over an 8-year time period fall below 0% prior to 2030? Or will progress pick up again to the pace it was at in the 1990s?\nIt is asked: In some quarter prior to Q1 2030, will the [linked-to index] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/B935RG3Q086SBEA) have a value greater than the value 32 quarters (8 years) prior to that quarter?\nNotes: \n--- \nShould the index reach a higher level than 5 years (20 quarters) ago (prior to question closure) the question should be closed to avoid resolution while the question is open. \n--- \nShould this occur anyway, the question should be retroactively closed the day before the last (resolution triggering) data-point was released. Resolution will be through the linked-to index. \n--- \nShould the link be discontinued, a reasonable effort should be made to find the same index from another reputable source, yet should the index not be findable, the question shall resolve ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 128,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will commercial supersonic flight return?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/969/when-will-commercial-supersonic-flight-return/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The last 115 years of humankind’s relationship with air travel has been mindboggling. On December 17, 1903, Orville and Wilbur Wright lifted off in the [fields of Kitty Hawk] (https://airandspace.si.edu/exhibitions/wright-brothers/online/fly/1903/) . The era of human air travel was born.\nBut skeptics abounded. Yes, we could fly. But could we fly fly? \nFor instance, one famous early doubter told reporters in 1909 that “no airship will ever fly from New York to Paris.” The name of this skeptic? [Wilbur Wright himself!] (http://blog.fastforwardlabs.com/2015/08/05/a-flying-machine-from-new-york-to-paris.html) \nJust 38 years later, American pilot and legendary daredevil, Chuck Yeager, broke the manned supersonic flight barrier in USAF aircraft #46-062, a.k.a. the [Glamorous Glennis] (https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/bell-x-1) . \nWired Magazine offers some of the [juicy engineering details] (https://www.wired.com/story/its-the-70th-anniversary-of-the-first-supersonic-flight/) of Yeager's feat:\nThe Bell X-1 had a radical new “all flying tail\" that allowed Yeager to maintain control as the air compressed ahead of his plane, drastically increasing drag. (This is still standard on supersonic military jets today.) It also has thin wings and a sharply pointed nose to help it slice through the air. As he fired the final two chambers of the rocket powered plane, Yeager finally pushed through that sound barrier, to a speed of Mach 1.06, making him the fastest man on Earth.\nCommercial planes—most famously the Concorde—soon followed suit, allowing regular folk (with scads of disposable income) to experience the magic of faster-than-sound air travel for themselves.\nBut after the Concorde [got grounded] (https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/2203042/concorde-stop-flying-where-displayed/) in 2003, we haven’t seen any commercial supersonic transport (SST) attempts get off the ground.\nThat may be changing. Quickly.\n[Per Forbes] (https://www.forbes.com/sites/garystoller/2017/12/05/is-the-age-of-the-concorde-and-supersonic-flights-returning/#591635084cfb) , the Denver-based Boom (in conjunction with Japan Airlines) plans to reignite SST travel:\n[it will] develop a supersonic aircraft that flies at Mach 2.2 and will cut current airline flight times in half. The Concorde flew at Mach 2.0, and today’s commercial jets fly at Mach 0.85. Boom says its jets will fly from New York to London in three hours and 15 minutes, enabling business people to leave early in the morning, make afternoon and evening meetings in England, and return home in time to tuck their kids into bed. \nBoom’s goal: [commercial SST flight by 2023] (https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/supersonic-air-travel-just-took-another-big-step-toward-its-ncna828431) . The [company's site] (https://boomsupersonic.com/airliner) describes a 55-seat aircraft and tickets in the $2500 range.\nWhat do you think? When will the next commercial flight break the sound barrier? \nResolution is at the date/time at which a supersonic flight is flown on an aircraft designed for passenger use and operated by a company intending to use it for such purpose, over a distance of more than 1000 km. The contemplated timeline runs from late-2018 through 2030.\nETA 2020-11-26: Rockets or any type of hypersonic aircraft do not count as qualifying aircrafts for the purpose of this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 268,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Tesla become the largest car company in the world (by sales) prior to 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/980/will-tesla-become-the-largest-car-company-in-the-world-by-sales-prior-to-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "While Tesla is already a very large automobile company based on market capitalisation, a lot of that market capitalisation is based on expectations of the future. As of the writing of this question, Tesla is losing money and selling significantly less cars than even the 20th largest auto-company in the world. Yet, the expectations that have been set for Tesla by Elon Musk would probably require Tesla to sell more cars than any other company on the planet while maintaining large profit-margins.\nIn order to ramp-up production from approx. 100,000 to 500,000 or 1,000,000 cars a year, Tesla has created the Model 3, its first mass market car. Regrettably, Tesla has had trouble producing the Model 3 and production of the car can be tracked [here] (https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-tesla-tracker/) . It is likely that Tesla's total vehicle production must exceed 10 million in order for it to become the world's largest car company. Yet, given its financial situation, there is a risk that the company goes bankrupt before that happens.\nSo, without further ado, it is asked:Will Tesla become the [world's largest motor vehicle producer] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_manufacturers_by_motor_vehicle_production) in some calendar year prior to 2035? \nData for resolution shall be taken from the [International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organisation_Internationale_des_Constructeurs_d%27Automobiles) , which is where the Wikipedia link got the data from itself.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 543,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will cannabis be removed from Schedule I of the Controlled Substance Act by 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/981/will-cannabis-be-removed-from-schedule-i-of-the-controlled-substance-act-by-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "67%",
    "Description": "Cannabis is legal for medicinal purposes in 29 states, with CBD (limited THC content) legal in 17. It's recreationally legal in 9 states, as well as DC. That leaves only four states with no approval.\nIn 2018, a number of states will be voting to legalize either recreational or medicinal marijuana. If trends continue, soon half the country will allow recreational and only a few (likely the same four as of now) will be against it completely, if that.\nCanada (fellow G7 participant, and America's neighbor) will be legalizing it federally this year. Will America follow by 2024?\nResolution is positive if by start of 2024, marijuana has been officially classified as something other than a schedule I drug in the US.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 357,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Any progress in human lifespan enhancement by 2100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1002/any-progress-in-human-lifespan-enhancement-by-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "91%",
    "Description": "There have been great improvements in medical technology in the last few centuries, which has led to very significant increases in [life expectancy] ( https://ourworldindata.org/life-expectancy) . Yet, while medical technology has stopped the vast majority of us dying young, it has not been very effective at increasing the maximum age that humans can live to. [Ramesses II] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramesses_II) lived to the age of 90, even though the life expectancy in ancient Egypt might have been below 30. Similarly, the English aristocracy between 1500-1550 already had a life expectancy of 71, meaning that quite a few of them will have lived into their 80s. The oldest person the world, as of the writing of this question, is aged 117. It is unclear whether anybody in the ancient world lived to a similar age (there were many claims of extreme age and very poor record keeping), but it certainly does not seem completely impossible.\nRecently, though, there have been attempts to actually extend he upper limit of human lifespan. The [Methuselah Foundation] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methuselah_Foundation) has managed to keep mice alive for the equivalent of 180 human years. Yet, it is unclear whether this achievement will be transferrable to humans.\nIt is asked:Will there be any progress in human lifespan enhancement by 2100? \nThis questions resolves positive if:\nEITHER\n<li>There have been at least 10 people who have lived to the age of 130 by 2100.</li> \nOR\n<li>There have been at least 100 people who have lived to the age of 120 by 2100.</li> \nOR\n<li>Ray Kurzweil lives to the age of 120.</li> \nThe resolution triggering people have to have their age verified by standards at least as strict as the standards used at the time of the writing of this question. People resuscitated after being cryonically frozen do not count.\nHere is some context on verified claims up to the writing of this question:\n<li>46 people have reached the age of 115.</li> <li>19 people have reached the age of 116.</li> <li>9 people have reached the age of 117.</li> <li>2 people have lived beyond the age of 117.</li> <li>Only one person is verified to have lived to 120, and they lived to 122.</li> \nAlso note that the people who could trigger positive resolution here are all already alive and at least middle aged as of the writing of this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 300,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Roe v. Wade be formally overturned within 10 years of Justice Kennedy’s retirement?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1011/will-roe-v-wade-be-formally-overturned-within-10-years-of-justice-kennedys-retirement/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26%",
    "Description": "Effective July 31, 2018, Supreme Court Justice Robert Kennedy will retire. This announcement sparked concerns in American left-wing media that the Supreme Court will be left with a right-wing skew that might jeopardize important left-wing jurisprudence. Most notably, there are concerns that [Roe v. Wade,] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade) the decision which forbade abortion restrictions, will be overturned. \nWill Roe vs. Wade be reversed? \nWe specify this as follows. Within 10 years of Kennedy's retirement, will the SCOTUS uphold a state or federal law that bans elective abortions at least at some point before the 20th week of a pregnancy?\nResolution is positive if, before the stipulated date, \n1) SCOTUS accepts to hear a case in which at least one of the following statements holds: \n1.1. A woman has been convicted* of a felony, misdemeanor or infraction for seeking an abortion at some point before the 20th week, for consenting to that abortion, and/or for having such an abortion. \n1.2. A medical professional (nurse, doctor, etc.) has been convicted of a felony, misdemeanor or infraction for performing or attempting to perform an abortion at some point before the 20th week with the consent of the woman.\n1.3 A clinic, hospital or other medical center has been closed by authorities on the basis of a federal or state ban on performing abortions at some point before the 20th week (but not because of regulations requiring specialized facilities, giving information to the patient, or other factors not involving an outright ban on performing the abortions). \n1.4. A woman asked the federal courts to allow them to have an abortion before the 20th week despite a state or federal ban on the procedure. \nAND \n2) SCOTUS upholds the laws banning abortions in at least one of the cases described in 1.1-1.4, even if it might overturn one or more convictions for other reasons (e.g., procedural errors in the specific cases). \n*In case the term \"convicted\" is not correct with regard to infractions, it's stipulated that any punishment for an infraction will also count, regardless of the legal terminology.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 359,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a city on Earth with a population of over 100 million by 2100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1052/will-there-be-a-city-on-earth-with-a-population-of-over-100-million-by-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "56.00000000000001%",
    "Description": "For a mostly hairless, fangless species that was likely reduced to [just a few thousand members] (https://www.npr.org/sections/krulwich/2012/10/22/163397584/how-human-beings-almost-vanished-from-earth-in-70-000-b-c) in relatively recent times by a volcano, we've certainly been busy.\nThe human population on Earth now exceeds 7 billion. And we're still growing. [Not everyone] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rvuueqs3vI) is thrilled by this. But it's reality.\nCurrently, as of Q2 2018, Tokyo, Japan is the world's largest metropolis, cramming [over 38,000,000 people] (https://www.worldatlas.com/citypops.htm) (give or take) into its borders.\nBut by the end of the century, we could (and probably will) witness far grander cities. \nPer Canadian demographers, Daniel Hoornweg and Kevin Pope, for instance, Lagos in Nigeria may swell to 100+M by 2100 if trends continue. Face 2 Face Africa has the story:\nBy 2100 if Nigeria’s population continues to grow and people move to cities at the same rate as now, Lagos with its current 20 million people could be home to more people than the state of California.\nThe demographers' full paper is [here] (http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956247816663557) . \nThe International Institute for Environment and Development goes into detail about why Hoornweg and Pope are so bullish on Africa [here] (https://www.iied.org/will-africa-have-worlds-largest-cities-2100) .\nWhether it's Lagos that claims the crown or some other city in Africa or elsewhere, what do you think? Will some metro hit 100M people by 2100? (For the estimate we will include the general metropolitan area rather than the strict city boundaries, as done [here] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_urban_areas_by_population#Urban_areas_(Top_100).) )\n",
    "# Forecasts": 270,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How long will the Great Pyramids be recognizable?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1056/how-long-will-the-great-pyramids-be-recognizable/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The ancient pyramids of Egypt are ridiculously cool.\nConstruction began over 4500 years ago, and these awesome structures, despite having [been raided] (http://www.ancient-egypt-online.com/ancient-egypt-tomb-robbers.html) over the centuries and stripped of their beautiful [white limestone] (https://www.fastcodesign.com/3037815/the-great-pyramid-used-to-be-so-shiny-it-glowed) exteriors, inspire millions. \nRebuilding them would be a massive project, although it probably could be done for a cool [$5 billion] (https://www.livescience.com/18589-cost-build-great-pyramid-today.html) or so--for just the Great Pyramid of Giza, that is.\nThey've lasted 5 millennia, and they will almost certainly endure after every human alive today is long dead. But the pyramids will not last forever.\nAs this [Quora post] (https://www.quora.com/If-humanity-died-today-how-long-would-the-pyramids-of-Giza-last) notes:\nThe Rocky mountains in the US were formed over ~70 million years, ~70 million years ago. If geologic processes can turn an ocean into the Rockies in that time frame, it will make short work of the pyramids. \nThis other Quora post gives a [more precise assessment] (https://www.quora.com/If-left-to-the-elements-when-will-the-pyramids-of-Egypt-erode) : \nKnowing that the pyramids 4000 years ago were made of polished limestone that would have glowed, we can say that it has eroded over time. I am not sure what the exact rate of limestone degradation is, and you could probably work it out by that rate, but by what I can see, around 2 layers of blocks and various bits have fallen from the sides of the larger pyramid. Many people have said that the pyramids would last 1 million years or even until the world ended, but I’d say around 10,000 to 100,000 years based on current observations.\nWhat do you think? Assuming that humans do not intervene but the pyramids are just left to nature's tender mercies, how many years will it take, before the Great Pyramids are all eroded away into undetectability?\n(Needless to say, this is one of those questions unlikely to be resolved on a timescale anyone cares about; it's just for fun.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 198,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will humanity (essentially) run out of at least one element currently considered \"under serious threat\" by 2040?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1058/will-humanity-essentially-run-out-of-at-least-one-element-currently-considered-under-serious-threat-by-2040/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "34%",
    "Description": "In 2008, science fiction author, Robert Silverberg, penned a provocative web essay, [The Death of Galium] (https://web.archive.org/web/20080704170435/http://www.asimovs.com/_issue_0806/ref.shtml) , that predicted that we would collectively run out of several essential, rare elements within a single decade. Per Silverberg:\nThe element gallium is in very short supply and the world may well run out of it in just a few years. Indium is threatened too, says Armin Reller, a materials chemist at Germany’s University of Augsburg. He estimates that our planet’s stock of indium will last no more than another decade. All the hafnium will be gone by 2017 also, and another twenty years will see the extinction of zinc. Even copper is an endangered item, since worldwide demand for it is likely to exceed available supplies by the end of the present century.\nSilverberg's dire fears have not (yet!) come to pass, but the [American Chemical Society (ACS)] (https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/greenchemistry/research-innovation/research-topics/endangered-elements.html) has identified 44 elements that \"face supply limitations in the coming years.\" Those considered by the ACS \"under serious threat\" over the next century include: silver, zinc, hafnium, gallium and helium.\nIt sounds serious. But not everyone is concerned. This [counterpoint editorial] (https://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/05/22/energy_economics_coal/) from The Register, for instance, maintains that the galium shortage is a nothingburger: \nWe mine for aluminium by sticking bauxite into a Bayer Process plant, where we boil it in caustic soda. If you put the right doohicky on the side of this plant then you get the gallium out. It's at about 100ppm, 100 grammes per tonne of bauxite processed... there's around a 1,000-year supply of Ga in the bauxite that we already know that we'll process for the aluminium content... We simply don't have any meaningful shortage of these metals [worth] worrying about. \nAs a proxy for supply issues, we will use price. The question resolve positive if by beginning of 2040 any of the following \"under serious threat\" elements has a trackable commodities price that attains an inflation-adjusted price more than 10 times its price as of July 10, 2018, as measured by a reliable entity, like [USGS] (https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/) . The elements in question are: He, Zn, Ga, Ge, As, Ag, In, Te and Hf.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 183,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 2051, will a meteor cause more injuries than the one that shook Chelyabinsk, Russia in 2013?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1059/before-2051-will-a-meteor-cause-more-injuries-than-the-one-that-shook-chelyabinsk-russia-in-2013/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "50%",
    "Description": "In February, 2013, a meteor [scorched] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggLTPyRXUKc) the Russian skies. EarthSky gives the [key details] (http://earthsky.org/space/meteor-asteroid-chelyabinsk-russia-feb-15-2013) : \nA small asteroid with an estimated size of 65 feet... was moving at 12 miles per second (~19 km/sec) when it struck the protective blanket of air around our planet, which did its job and caused the asteroid to explode. The bright, hot explosion took place only about 20 miles (30 km) above the city of Chelyabinsk in Russia and carried 20 to 30 times the energy of the Hiroshima atomic bomb. Its shock wave broke windows and knocked down parts of buildings in six Russian cities and caused some 1,500 people to seek medical attention for injuries, mostly from flying glass.\nIt's only a matter of time before more space rocks as big as (or bigger than) the one that caused the Chelyabinsk Event find their way to Earth.\nBefore 2051-01-01, will an event cause more injuries than the Chelyabinsk meteor, which injured 1491 people ( [russian source] (https://web.archive.org/web/20130502144652/http://top.rbc.ru/incidents/18/02/2013/845595.shtml) , [wp] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelyabinsk_meteor) )? More specifically, will a meteor next injure at least 1492 people? This resolves according to credible media reports, or their median estimate if several are found.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 35,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a 9 foot tall human by 2075?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1061/will-there-be-a-9-foot-tall-human-by-2075/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "21%",
    "Description": "Born in 1918, Robert Wadlow grew to enormous size and scraped the skies at 8' 11\" thanks to hormonal issue that tragically also led to a cacade of health problems. He died in 1940 of consequences from an infection.\nOther people have crested the 8' tall mark, but they are few and far between, and no one's come close to Wadlow's record, at least according to the [officials at Guinness] (http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/tallest-man-ever/) .\nCan people ever grow to 9 feet tall or even beyond? This [article from The Guardian] (https://www.theguardian.com/science/2004/may/06/thisweekssciencequestions3) points out that: \nNormally, the growth of our bones is limited by our sex hormones. A good burst of sex hormones at the right time tells the ends of our bones to stop growing. In acromegalic gigantism, as the tumour grows, it destroys cells in the pituitary gland that stimulate the release of sex hormones. The bones, therefore, never get the signal to stop growing.\nBut surely there must be a limit to a person's height? John Wass, a specialist in acromegalic gigantism at the University of Oxford, reckons it would be impressive to survive for long if you grew taller than 9ft. \nHere's why Wass thinks 9 feet tall is a ceiling, so to speak: \n---blood pressure in the legs would be extreme and dangerous \n---keeping blood circulating in such a person would strain the heart to the breaking point \n[Gizmodo points out] (https://gizmodo.com/5994755/how-tall-can-a-human-get) that: \nthe primary [obstacle to mega growth] is our environment. Gravity, and the limited buoyancy of the air around us, means that our bones would have to grow exponentially larger to support a human that towered ten to twelve feet tall. \nAnd this [New York Times piece] (https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/30/science/30qna.html) quotes Dr. Rob DeSalle, of the Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, who says: \nMany joint disorders and bone problems exist for these individuals that impact average-height people much less. Engineering problems with respect to organisms and their evolution do not get solved easily.\nAll that said, Wadlow came within just 1 inch of 9 feet tall. Surely, some person, somewhere, will break the mark. But when?\nMore specifically, by 2075 will Guinness (or some comparable replacement or alternative) record a &gt; 9' tall human?\n9 foot = 274 cm\n",
    "# Forecasts": 223,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the student loan debt bubble \"pop\"?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1085/when-will-the-student-loan-debt-bubble-pop/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "It's an open secret that student loan debts are crippling millions of Americans – particularly Millennials. \n[CNBC estimated] (https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/15/heres-how-much-the-average-student-loan-borrower-owes-when-they-graduate.html) that nearly 3 out of 4 college grads leave school \"with a significant amount of loans\" and estimates that Americans have around $1.5 trillion in student debt, collectively. That's \"trillion\" with a \"T\". See [this link for additional up-to-date numbers.] (https://careerswiki.com/student-loan-debt-statistics/) \nIn November 2017, Rolling Stone columnist Matt Taibbi reported on the crisis in [apocalyptic terms] (https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/taibbi-the-great-college-loan-swindle-w510880) :\nThe average amount of debt for a student leaving school is skyrocketing even faster than the rate of tuition increase. In 2016, for instance, the average amount of debt for an exiting college graduate was a staggering $37,172. That's a rise of six percent over just the previous year. With the average undergraduate interest rate at about 3.7 percent, the interest alone costs around $115 per month, meaning anyone who can't afford to pay into the principal faces the prospect of $69,000 in payments over 50 years. \nMany independent financial analysts believe this situation is untenable.\nIn April 2017, a Financial Times analyst [observed] (https://www.ft.com/content/a272ee4c-1b83-11e7-bcac-6d03d067f81f) that \"In an eerie echo of the housing crisis, debt is already flowing out of the private sector, and into the public.\"\nBillionaire Mark Cuban has said [straight up] (https://www.inc.com/mark-cuban/video-student-loans-bubble.html) : \"I think the student loan bubble is going to burst.\"\nClearly, some change is due. But when exactly will this bubble \"burst\"? We'll define this popping as a jump in the student load default rate. Those rates are tabulated various places, but depend a lot on the timescale. For example official [Federal student loan default rates] (https://www2.ed.gov/offices/OSFAP/defaultmanagement/schooltyperates.pdf) define a 3-year rate, which is at 10.8% for fiscal year 2015, by \nA cohort default rate is the percentage of a school's borrowers who enter repayment on certain Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program or William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan (Direct Loan) Program loans during a particular federal fiscal year (FY), October 1 to September 30, and default or meet other specified conditions prior to the end of the second following fiscal year.\nA [longer-term study] (https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-looming-student-loan-default-crisis-is-worse-than-we-thought/) looks at default rates for 1996 and 2004 cohorts and finds that of those who took out loans, 18.2 and 27.2%, respectively, had defaulted 12 years later.\nWe'll ask: \nIn what year (if ever) will the 3-year rate, as defined above, reach 20% OR the 12 year rate reach 40%? \nIn each case the resolution date is defined by the middle of the year at the end of the interval in question. Resolution is by govt. or private numbers comparable in methodology and results to the above two reports.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 154,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the last member of our species, homo sapiens, be born?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1088/when-will-the-last-member-of-our-species-homo-sapiens-be-born/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The scientific definition of \"species\" is surprisingly complicated.\nAs this [November 2017 article] (https://www.sciencenews.org/article/defining-species-fuzzy-art) from Science News explains:\nAt first glance, “species” is a basic vocabulary word schoolchildren can ace on a test by reciting something close to: a group of living things that create fertile offspring when mating with each other but not when mating with outsiders. Ask scientists who devote careers to designating those species, however, and there’s no typical answer. Scientists do not agree.\nFor the sake of this question, though, let's just go with [this definition from Berkeley] (https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_41) : \"a group of individuals that actually or potentially interbreed in nature.\" \nEvolution marches on relentlessly. We homo sapiens – even armed with our technology and collective stored-and-shared wisdom--are not immune to this ceaseless force. At some point, our descendants will be so physically different from us – due to natural selection, human-engineered tinkering or both – that they would be properly classified as a different species. This [Scientific American article] (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-may-become-of-homo-sapiens/) explores some of the key ideas behind this question.\nAnd of course, we might well kill ourselves off, replace ourselves with AIs, etc.\nHow many years from now will the last member of homo sapiens be born? \nWe'll consider the people the future creatures will succeed or fail to interbreed with as early 21st C humans, and this must be possible without technical intervention. The people must exist IRL, i.e. not be simulated beings, uploads, etc. As usual we contemplate beings in the same universe, branch of the wavefunction, etc., as the server running the copy of Metaculus the question sits on.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 201,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will we get through the 21st century without an assassination of a sitting American President?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1090/will-we-get-through-the-21st-century-without-an-assassination-of-a-sitting-american-president/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "38%",
    "Description": "On November 22, 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald shot President John F. Kennedy in Dallas as he proceeded down the street in a motorcade. Kennedy died shortly thereafter, and the nation descended into mourning. The [JFK assassination] (https://www.jfklibrary.org/JFK/JFK-in-History/November-22-1963-Death-of-the-President.aspx) not only led to countless conspiracy theories, but it also led to better Presidential security measures.\nJFK was the last President killed in office. But he wasn't the first. Our nation's checkered history has witnessed a disturbing number of assassinations, including:\n--- \nJohn Wilkes Booth famously killed [President Abraham Lincoln] (https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/john-wilkes-booth-shoots-abraham-lincoln) on April 14, 1865.\n--- \nCharles J. Guiteau shot and killed [President James Garfield] (http://americanhistory.si.edu/presidency/3d1d.html) on September 19, 1881. \n--- \nLeon Czolgosz, an anarchist, shot [President William McKinley] (http://www.historynet.com/president-william-mckinley-assassinated-by-an-anarchist.htm) in 1901.\nAnd there have been plenty of near misses as well. For instance, on March 30, 1981, John Hinckley Jr. [shot President Reagan] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempted_assassination_of_Ronald_Reagan) , who fortunately recovered from the assault. \nIt's been nearly 55 years since JFK's death. But how long will our collective good fortune – due in part to a vigilant, well trained Secret Service – last? More specifically, will we make it to at least 2100 without another Presidential assassination of a sitting President?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 277,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Ray Kurzweil be proven right?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1321/will-ray-kurzweil-be-proven-right/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "Ray Kurzweil is an author, computer scientist, inventor and futurist. He is best known for making what many consider to be extremely optimistic prediction about the future of technology that involve exponential growth leading up to [technological singularity] ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity) , which Kurzweil predicts will happen circa. 2045. A list of Kurzweil's predictions can be found [here] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictions_made_by_Ray_Kurzweil) .\nIt is asked:\nWill Ray Kurzweil be proven generally right in his predictions?\nNote that the question refers to Kurzweil's predictions as of the time of the the writing of the question. Given that 'generally right' is hard to define, the question shall use consensus forming to create its own answer.\n<li>If the community prediction at the time of closing is &gt; 80%, then the questions resolves positive.</li> <li> If the community prediction at the time of closing is &lt; 20%, then the questions resolves negative.</li> <li> If the community prediction at the time of closing is ≥ 20% and ≤80%, then a member of Metaculus staff shall decide resolution. </li> \nTo help reduce the vagueness of the question, Metaculus may, at its discretion, periodically survey the perceived correctness of Kurzweil's prediction, per a fixed methodology similar to that employed in [this report] (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/kbA6T3xpxtko36GgP/assessing-kurzweil-the-results) , but with a modification to survey and weight by importance of the prediction.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 191,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will global malaria mortality rates be reduced by 90% when compared with 2015 rates, by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1332/will-global-malaria-mortality-rates-be-reduced-by-90-when-compared-with-2015-rates-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33%",
    "Description": "In the [2017 WHO Malaria report] (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259492/9789241565523-eng.pdf?sequence=1) , the WHO defines various goals for reduction of malaria burden worldwide. One of which is a 90% reduction, or more, in worldwide malaria mortality by 2030, compared with 2015 levels. (see p. 43 for current numbers, and trendlines. The \"global\" value is the relevant one here.)\nWill this goal be realized? \nThe WHO publishes an annual report on malaria, in which they report on the previous year's mortality rate. This metric should be used to decide whether the goal has been reached.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 223,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Drake's Equation 1st Parameter R∗: What is the average rate of formation of suitable stars (stars/year) in our galaxy?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1337/drakes-equation-1st-parameter-r/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This is the first question of the [Fermi paradox series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--fermi-paradox) .\nIn a [recent paper,] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.02404.pdf) Dissolving the Fermi Paradox by Anders Sandberg, Eric Drexler &amp; Toby Ord of the Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford, the Drake's Equation was run as a Monte Carlo Simulation rather than a point estimate using the following distributions for the parameters of the Drake's Equation;\nParameter Distribution:\n--- log-uniform from 1 to 100. \n--- log-uniform from 0.1 to 1. \n--- log-uniform from 0.1 to 1. \n--- log-normal rate, (giving mean 0.5 and median - 0.63). \n--- log-uniform from 0.001 to 1. \n--- log-uniform from 0.01 to 1. \n--- log-uniform from 100 to 10,000,000,000. \nI thought Metaculus would be able to produce distribution more reflective of our current knowledge, and allow the possibility of running Monte Carlo simulation more reflective of the possible outcomes of the Drake's Equation.\nSome of the paper's (and see also [this presentation] (http://www.jodrellbank.manchester.ac.uk/media/eps/jodrell-bank-centre-for-astrophysics/news-and-events/2017/uksrn-slides/Anders-Sandberg---Dissolving-Fermi-Paradox-UKSRN.pdf) ) choices for parameter distributions are surprising such as which is unlikely to resolve to be significantly less than 1, unless I'm mistaken.\nIt would also be fun to see if the distribution of resolutions to Drake's Equation derived using Metaculus-determined parameter distribution, would match the distribution produced by directly asking Metaculus how Drake's Equation will resolve. \nIn this case we will be addressing the first parameter in the Drake's Equation, .\nIt is the rate of formation of stars (in stars/year in the Milky Way galaxy) suitable for the development of intelligent life. Most estimates assume this refers to main sequence stars, but do consider the suitability of dead stars such as white dwarfs and black holes, and failed stars such as brown dwarfs and rogue planets when entering your answer.\nThe resolution to this question will be the scientific consensus 100 years from now, regardless of any remaining uncertainty.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 232,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Drake's Equation 2nd parameter f_p: What fraction of stars form planets?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1338/drakes-equation-2nd-parameter-f_p/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This is the second question in [a series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--fermi-paradox) estimating input parameters for Drake's equation, inspired by a [recent paper,] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.02404.pdf) on the Fermi paradox.\nThe first question in the series, with more explanation, [is here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1337) \nThe model in question uses probability distributions over the following parameters:\n--- log-uniform from 1 to 100. \n--- log-uniform from 0.1 to 1. \n--- log-uniform from 0.1 to 1. \n--- log-normal rate, (giving mean 0.5 and median - 0.63). \n--- log-uniform from 0.001 to 1. \n--- log-uniform from 0.01 to 1. \n--- log-uniform from 100 to 10,000,000,000. \nIn this case we will be addressing the second parameter in Drake's Equation, . It is the fraction of the stars in the first parameter with planets. Predictors should use the sliders to best approximate their estimate and uncertainties in this parameter.\nAll evidence seems to indicate this will resolve very close to 1 (100%), though it is worth considering how this may be mistaken.\nFor example, if we consider a much broader set of suitable stars in the 1st parameter then it maybe the fraction is lower as stars less likely to possess planets are included.\nWe'll consider each planet to belong to a single star, so a binary star system with one planet, for example, corresponds to 50% of stars having planets.\nThe resolution to this question will be the scientific consensus 100 years from now, regardless of any remaining uncertainty.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 250,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Drake's Equation 3rd parameter n_e: What is the average number of habitable planets per star?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1339/drakes-equation-3rd-parameter-n_e/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This is the third question in [a series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--fermi-paradox) estimating input parameters for Drake's equation, inspired by a [recent paper,] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.02404.pdf) on the Fermi paradox.\nThe first question in the series, with more explanation, [is here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1337) \nThe model in question uses probability distributions over the following parameters:\n--- log-uniform from 1 to 100. \n--- log-uniform from 0.1 to 1. \n--- log-uniform from 0.1 to 1. \n--- log-normal rate, (giving mean 0.5 and median - 0.63). \n--- log-uniform from 0.001 to 1. \n--- log-uniform from 0.01 to 1. \n--- log-uniform from 100 to 10,000,000,000. \nIn this case we will be addressing the third parameter in the Drake's Equation, . It is the number of planets, per star system, with an environment suitable for (though not necessarily possessing) life. We include suitable moons in this count.\nPredictors should use the sliders to make their best estimate of this parameter and its uncertainty.\nMost estimates consider how many planets fall within a star's habitable zone, probably with sufficient mass to retain an atmosphere or surface liquid of some type. (For example, our Moon is in our stars' habitable zone, though it is uninhabitable to life as far as we know, although there may have been a brief period of suitability.) However we might be more expansive:\n--- \nOne must also consider the fact that habitable zones move as a star changes over time.\n--- \nAlso there may be condition that allow a planet to be suitable to life outside of the traditional habitable zone such as sub-ice oceans of our gas giants moons.\n--- \nWe may also consider the habitable zones not just for water-based life but other biochemistries.\nThe resolution to this question will be the scientific consensus 100 years from now, regardless of any remaining uncertainty.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 233,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Drake's Equation 4th parameter f_l: On what fraction of habitable planets does any form of life emerge?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1340/drakes-equation-4th-parameter-f_l/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This is the fourth question in [a series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--fermi-paradox) estimating input parameters for Drake's equation, inspired by a [recent paper,] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.02404.pdf) on the Fermi paradox.\nThe first question in the series, with more explanation, [is here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1337) \nThe model in question uses probability distributions over the following parameters:\n--- log-uniform from 1 to 100. \n--- log-uniform from 0.1 to 1. \n--- log-uniform from 0.1 to 1. \n--- log-normal rate, (giving mean 0.5 and median - 0.63). \n--- log-uniform from 0.001 to 1. \n--- log-uniform from 0.01 to 1. \n--- log-uniform from 100 to 10,000,000,000. \nIn this case we will be addressing the fourth parameter in the Drake's Equation, . It is the fraction of suitable planets (see some discussion at the [relevant question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1339/drakes-equation-question-set-what-is-the-average-number-of-habitable-planets-per-star/) ) on which life actually appears. Predictors should use the sliders to best approximate their estimate and uncertainties in this parameter.\nMost estimates assume abiogenesis to be the mechanism by which life appears on a suitable planet, but panspermia and other means merit considering. Again the possibility of alternative biochemistries should be weighed in your answer.\nThe lower bound because there is no clear source of a lower limit on this number.\nThe resolution to this question will be the scientific consensus 100 years from now, regardless of any remaining uncertainty.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 282,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Drake's Equation 5th parameter f_i: On what fraction of habitable planets with life does intelligence evolve?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1341/drakes-equation-5th-parameter-f_i/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This is the fifth question in [a series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--fermi-paradox) estimating input parameters for Drake's equation, inspired by a [recent paper,] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.02404.pdf) on the Fermi paradox.\nThe first question in the series, with more explanation, [is here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1337) \nThe model in question uses probability distributions over seven input parameters.\nIn this case we will be addressing the fifth parameter in Drake's Equation, . It is the fraction of life-bearing planets on which intelligent life emerges. This is pretty ill-defined but for our purposes we shall define intelligent life as a type capable of (a) symbolic representation and communication of a description of actions and objects, i.e. language, and (b) use of tools. Under this definition on Earth Humans would count as well as probably several type of nonhuman primates, many cetaceans, and some types of birds.\nThere being no obvious source of a hard lower-limit on this parameter we set that to , but with an open border. We'll count multiple intelligent species on a planet as a single one.\nThe resolution to this question will be the scientific consensus 100 years from now, regardless of any remaining uncertainty.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 231,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Drake's Equation 6th parameter f_c: What fraction of planets with intelligent life are capable of interstellar communication?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1342/drakes-equation-6th-parameter-f_c/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This is the sixth question in [a series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--fermi-paradox) estimating input parameters for Drake's equation, inspired by a [recent paper,] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.02404.pdf) on the Fermi paradox.\nThe first question in the series, with more explanation, [is here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1337) \nThe model in question uses probability distributions over seven input parameters.\nIn this case we will be addressing the sixth parameter in the Drake's Equation, .\nIt is the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space.\nAnything that would produce an unambiguous resolution that a planet bears intelligent life suffices. Radio signals are the technology that most suspect will bring about that resolution, but laser light, physical relics, and even gravitational waves can be considered.\nGiven our definition of intelligences as having both tool use and language, it seems unlikely that this parameter should be miniscule; nonetheless we give a range extending down to , open at the bottom, to be safe.\nThe resolution to this question will be the scientific consensus 100 years from now, regardless of any remaining uncertainty.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 247,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Drake's Equation 7th parameter L: For how many years does a civilization remain detectable?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1343/drakes-equation-7th-parameter-l/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This is the seventh question in [a series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--fermi-paradox) estimating input parameters for Drake's equation, inspired by a [recent paper,] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1806.02404.pdf) on the Fermi paradox.\nThe first question in the series, with more explanation, [is here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1337) \nThe model in question uses probability distributions over seven input parameters.\nIn this case we will be assessing the seventh parameter in the Drake's Equation, .\nIt is the average length of time, in years, that civilizations capable of being detected remain detectable.\nIt could be very short since the technology for radio and nuclear weapons emerge fairly close together. It could also be very long if a civilization (even a relatively short-lived one) were to release a lot of later-detectable and widespread artifacts. \nThe resolution to this question will be the scientific consensus 100 years from now, regardless of any remaining uncertainty.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 228,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a mission to land a spacecraft on Europa launch by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1348/will-a-mission-to-land-a-spacecraft-on-europa-launch-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "Europa provides astrobiologists with the best possibility of finding extraterrestrial life within our solar system. Many scientists believe that beneath the icy surface of Europa there lies a [vast saltwater ocean] (https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/moons/jupiter-moons/europa/in-depth/) . It is because of the presence of this large body of liquid water beneath the surface that scientists believe that Europa may provide insight into the origins of life. \nGalileo Galilei discovered Europa and the other Galilean moons in 1610. In 1979 Voyager 2 gave us our [first closeup image] (https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=pia00459) of the moon (click [here] (https://www.space.com/15498-europa-sdcmp.html) for a complete list of missions to Europa). During the [Galileo Mission] (https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/galileo/) (1989-2003) Galileo passed near Europa and provided compelling evidence for the existence of saltwater oceans beneath the icy surface. Then in 2013, the Hubble Telescope supplied evidence of [erupting water plumes] (https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2013-363) at the surface. \nTwo upcoming missions will provide additional information about the nature of Europa. First, the [Europa Clipper] (https://europa.nasa.gov/about-clipper/overview) mission will conduct multiply flybys of the moon in the 2020s. This spacecraft will be equipped with cameras, spectrometers, radar, and magnetometers in order to assess the composition of the surface and the underlying oceans. Second, the European Space Agency’s [JUICE] (http://sci.esa.int/juice/) mission (Jupiter ICy moons Explorer) will launch in 2022 and arrive at Jupiter in 2029. Though Ganymede is the primary target of this mission, JUICE will still fly by Europa twice in an effort to ascertain the composition of the surface and underlying subsurface oceans. \nQuestion is resolved as positive if a credible news agency reports that a mission to land a spacecraft on Europa launches by December 31, 2029.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 132,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Qualia Research Institute Question Series: Will Psilocybin be a clinically approved treatment for end-of-life anxiety by 2027?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1385/qualia-research-institute-question-series-will-psilocybin-be-a-clinically-approved-treatment-for-end-of-life-anxiety-by-2027/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "63%",
    "Description": "This is the second in a [three-part series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--qualia-research-institute) of questions suggested by the [Qualia Research Institute] (https://qualiaresearchinstitute.org/) , with particular thanks to Andrés Gómez Emilsson, whom you can find blogging at the always interesting [QualiaComputing.com] (https://qualiacomputing.com/) \nPsilocybin, the active compound that gives magic mushrooms their magic, is classified as a Schedule 1 drug by the FDA, making legal research very time-consuming and expensive. Like MDMA, it is a psychedelic drug that has well-documented effects on a number of behavioral disorders, and yet is categorized by the government as a highly addictive, unsafe substance with no conceivable medicinal use. It is also in the public domain, and therefore virtually impossible to profit from.\nDespite the fact that academics must pay over [13 times the price of the drug as its sold on the street,] (https://qz.com/1235963/scientists-who-want-to-study-psychedelic-mushrooms-have-to-pay-7000-per-gram/) research in support of finding a way to market continues. And it cannot come fast enough for patients with fatal diagnoses, whose struggles with anxiety and depression are magnified exponentially by their illnesses, and for whom even a single dose can be transformative.\nFrom [the Atlantic, December 2016:] (https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/12/the-life-changing-magic-of-mushrooms/509246/) \nA pair of randomized, blinded studies published Thursday in The Journal of Psychopharmacology provide the most robust evidence to date that a single dose of psilocybin can provide relief from the anxiety and gloom associated with cancer for at least six months.\nRoughly 40 percent of people with cancer suffer from a mood disorder, which increases their risk of suicide and impairs treatment. Evidence they can be helped by antidepressants is weak. “People are facing their own mortality, their own demise,” said Roland Griffiths, a professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the lead author of one of the studies. “That’s a very special and quite poignant vulnerability that many people have in facing life-threatening illnesses.” And while some see the laissez faire approach to governing as a positive for research regulation, others believe the regressive Department of Justice could [stand in the way] (https://www.theverge.com/2017/6/28/15880260/trump-jeff-sessions-fda-mdma-psychedelic-drug-safety-research) \n“I do feel very optimistic,\" says Rick Doblin, executive director of psychedelic research nonprofit MAPS, a leading funder of psychedelic research. \"One of the Trump administration's main things is lower regulation. They're pro business and pro making it easier for Big Pharma to get drugs through the FDA. And that benefits us.\"\nBut the FDA isn’t as far up the food chain as other influential agencies. DEA licenses are required for psychedelic research. And Trump has given Attorney General Sessions plenty of leeway in drug policy, says Erik Altieri, executive director of marijuana-focused nonprofit NORML. “It seems that the people really calling the shots are those far closer to Trump than those running the FDA,” says Altieri. “The proof will be in the pudding here about who actually sways Trump's opinion, and what he will be willing to tolerate.”\nLast year, Business Insider’s Erin Brodwin reported that experts believe the timeline is almost [certainly a decade.] (http://www.businessinsider.com/when-psychedelics-approved-for-mental-illness-depression-2017-1) \n\"I'm absolutely sure that, within ten years, psilocybin will be an accepted treatment for depression,\"David Nutt, the director of the neuropsychopharmacology unit in the division of brain sciences at Imperial College London told me last month. \nSo will we hit the mark? By January 1st, 2027, will psilocybin be an accepted treatment for end-of-life anxiety/depression? Positive resolution is by FDA approval in the US or MHRA approval in the UK.\nThe team at the Qualia Research Institute have generously gotten the ball rolling by providing their own prediction that it is 75% likely the question will resolve positive.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 240,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will AI progress surprise us?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1394/will-ai-progress-surprise-us/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "75%",
    "Description": "What is the likelihood of discontinuous progress around the development of Human Level Machine Intelligence (i.e. machines that can accomplish a wide range of important tasks at least as good as human experts)?\nDiscontinuity in progress occurs when a particular technological advance pushes some progress metric substantially above what would be expected based on extrapolating past progress. If AI progress is unusually lumpy, i.e., arriving in unusually fewer larger packages rather than in the usual many smaller packages, then future progress might arrive faster than we would expect by simply looking at past progress. Moreover, if one AI team finds a big lump, it might jump way ahead of the other teams. According to [AI Impacts] (https://aiimpacts.org/likelihood-of-discontinuous-progress-around-the-development-of-agi/) , discontinuity on the path to AGI, lends itself to:\n<li> A party gaining decisive strategic advantage </li><li> A single important ‘deployment’ event </li><li> Other very sudden and surprising events \nA [previous question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/384/human-machine-intelligence-parity-by-2040/) did a good job operationalising Human-machine intelligence parity. It proposes a generalised intelligence test that compares machine systems to human experts in each of physics, mathematics and computer science. Using this, we can define a surprising discontinuity in AI progress as a tripling of the [odds] (http://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/MPH-Modules/BS/BS704_Confidence_Intervals/BS704_Confidence_Intervals10.html) (given by p%/(100%-p%)) in both the Metaculus prediction and community prediction within a 2-month period. \nSo, Will the both the Metaculus prediction odds and the community prediction odds of a positive resolution to [our question on human-machine intelligence parity] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/384/human-machine-intelligence-parity-by-2040/) at least triple within any two-month period before its close date? \nSome examples of a tripling of the odds are 60% becoming at least 81.8%, 70% becoming at least 87.5%, 80% becoming at least 92.3%, 90% becoming at least 96.4%, etc. See [AI Impacts'] (https://aiimpacts.org/likelihood-of-discontinuous-progress-around-the-development-of-agi/) fantastic overview of the issue of discontinuous progress toward AGI. \n(Edited 8/29/18 to require the change in *both* Metaculus and community prediction as the source of odds.)</li> \n",
    "# Forecasts": 473,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Parker Solar Probe survive its 24 loops around the sun while getting just a few million miles away from the surface of our star?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1402/will-parker-solar-probe-survive-its-24-loops-around-the-sun-while-getting-just-a-few-million-miles-away-from-the-surface-of-our-star/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "75%",
    "Description": "The Parker Solar Probe rocket lifted off from Cape Canaveral, Florida.\nThe probe is set to become the fastest-moving manmade object in history. Its data promises to crack longstanding mysteries about the Sun's behaviour.\nOver the course of seven years, Parker will make 24 loops around our star to study the physics of the corona, the place where much of the important activity that affects the Earth seems to originate.\nThe probe will dip inside this tenuous atmosphere, sampling conditions, and getting to just 6.16 million km (3.83 million miles) from the Sun's broiling \"surface\".\n\"I realise that might not sound that close, but imagine the Sun and the Earth were a metre apart. Parker Solar Probe would be just 4cm away from the Sun,\" [explained Dr Nicky Fox,] (https://gizmodo.com/setsession?r=https%3A%2F%2Fgizmodo.com%2Fwatch-nasa-launch-its-sun-skimming-parker-solar-probe-1828287380&amp;sessionId=b41ac5b6-da5b-4091-8443-5519304f636b) the UK-born project scientist who is affiliated to the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory.\n\"It will also be the fastest man-made object ever, travelling at speeds of up to 430,000 mph [690,000km/h] - New York to Tokyo in under a minute!\" she told BBC News.\nResolution is positive if the Parker Probe is still transmitting valid data to Earth as of its 24th Perihelion, and at least some of those approaches have been within target specifications of the flight plan.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 135,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Does P = NP? Informally: If the solution to a problem is easy to check for correctness, must the problem be easy to solve?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1408/does-p--np-informally-if-the-solution-to-a-problem-is-easy-to-check-for-correctness-must-the-problem-be-easy-to-solve/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4%",
    "Description": "P vs. NP is one of the most famous and important problems in computer science. Informally: if the solution to a problem is easy to check for correctness, must the problem also be easy to solve? Aside from being an important problem in computational theory, a proof either way would have profound implications for mathematics, cryptography, algorithm research, artificial intelligence, game theory, multimedia processing, philosophy, economics and many other fields. The problem was included in [the Millennium Prize Problems list published by Clay Mathematics Institute] (http://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/p-vs-np-problem) , the solutions to which will be awarded 1 million $ prize.\nA good introduction to the problem is [YouTube video \"P vs. NP and the Computational Complexity Zoo\" by hackerdashery.] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YX40hbAHx3s) \nThe question asks: \nIF the Millennium Prize is awarded for providing a correct proof during this century, will P = NP? \nIf no award is given during this century the question will resolve ambiguously. The question will resolve ambiguously also if the problem is proven to not have a solution either way, e.g. if the problem will turn out to be unprovable or undecidable. If resolution is positive, the close date will be set retroactively to the date of complete initial publication (in journal or preprint form) of the proof, plus one year (or one day before the date of announcement of the prize, if that comes earlier.)\nAs some background, [Gerhard J. Woeginger maintains a list of claimed proofs of the problem.] (http://www.win.tue.nl/~gwoegi/P-versus-NP.htm) As of 2018, the list contains 62 purported proofs of P = NP, 50 of P ≠ NP, 2 proofs the problem is unprovable, and one proof that it is undecidable. [William I. Gasarch asked 100 various theorists the question whether P = NP.] (http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gasarch/papers/poll.pdf) The result are as follows:\n1--61 thought P≠NP. \n2--9 thought P=NP. \n3--4 thought that it is independent. \n4--3 just stated that it is NOT independent of Primitive Recursive Arithmetic. \n5--1 said it would depend on the model. \n6--22 offered no opinion. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 198,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will one TeraFlOPS cost $1?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1416/when-will-one-teraflops-cost-1/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The performance capabilities of computers (e.g. CPUs, GPUs and Supercomputers) are expressed in [floating point operations per second (FLOPS)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLOPS) , a standard rate for indicating the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations systems can perform per second.\nCurrently (09/09/2018), the [ NVIDIA TITAN V GPU] ( https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/titan/titan-v/) , has one of the lowest theoretical performance cost at $27.27 per TFLOPS ( FLOPS), with a price of $3000 and a theoretical peak performance of 110 Tensor TFLOPS. \nHowever, theoretical peak performance relies on the accelerating parts, and generally does not involve other hardware such as memory, network or I/O devices. [An analysis of GPU performance] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465511000452) , finds that theoretical predictions of maximum theoretical performance of three different GPUs to be higher by around 30% when compared to experimental results. [Similar work on CPUs ] ( http://spiral.ece.cmu.edu:8080/pub-spiral/pubfile/ispass-2013_177.pdf ) has found discrepancies between actual and theoretical maximum performance of generally within a factor of 10. \nTo take this into account, we shall here assume that theoretical cost figures (such as reported by hardware manufacturers are 10 times too low), setting current costs at $272.70 per TFLOPS. Getting to below $1 would therefore amount to a orders of magnitude reduction in cost per TFLOPS.\nInterestingly, [according to some estimates] (https://aiimpacts.org/brain-performance-in-teps/) , a reduction in computing costs of roughly 2-3 orders of magnitude could place the cost of computation at the brain's communication performance in the range of human wages (around a couple hundred dollars per hour).\nWhen will a TFLOPS cost less than $1?\nThis question resolves positively if a reputable source reports a TFLOPS for Tensor, or single/double precision performance to cost less than $1 using reliable performance measurement techniques. The usual theoretical price estimates given by manufacturers will be multiplied up by a factor of 10 for the sake of this question (hence requiring a $0.1 theoretical cost per TFLOPS for positive resolution).\nPrices will be adjusted to 2018 prices using the [ Domestic Producer Prices Index: Manufacturing for the United States] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PIEAMP01USA661N) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 139,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a fifth nation be able to launch people into space?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1431/when-will-a-fifth-nation-be-able-to-launch-people-into-space/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "On 12 Apr 1961 the first [Soviet] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vostok_programme) flies into space. \nOn 20 Feb 1962 the first [American] (https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mercury/index.html) flies into space.\nOn 15 Oct 2003 the first [Chinese] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_space_program) flies into space.\nIndia plans to send an astronaut [on their own rocket] (https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/simply-put-how-to-send-an-indian-into-space-isro-maned-mission-5308964/) by 2022, [though there’s some doubt] (https://www.dw.com/en/indias-astronaut-mission-will-push-space-program-to-the-limit/a-45108320) about that.\nThat’s it. Currently there are only two nations capable of sending people into orbit on their own: Russia and China, with the US about to regain their ability.\nPart of this can certainly be attributed to the Space Race pushing the envelope of what’s technologically doable, and one might justifiably argue that the accomplishments were made on an immature technology base. But it has been some time since then. With the US push of commercial space launches and the seeming growing international interest (partly spurred by the commercialisation) in space, one has to wonder:\nWhen will another nation than the four mentioned launch a person into orbit on their own vehicle?\nFor the purposes of this question a nation (or group of nations like EU or UAE) has to have their own [launch service provider (LSP)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Launch_service_provider) , or have acquired the complete capabilities of a provider to such a degree the forked/copied LSP would be able to launch people.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 173,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will humans have a sustainable off-world presence by 2100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1432/will-humans-have-a-sustainable-off-world-presence-by-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "65%",
    "Description": "In the 1970s Gerard K. O’Neill wrote and published his seminal work, [The High Frontier] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_High_Frontier:_Human_Colonies_in_Space#cite_note-3) . In it O’Neill first paints a picture of habitats floating in space, with people living on the insides of cylinders kilometres long, and then describes how one could accomplish this from an engineering perspective with the Space Shuttle, then still in the planning stages.\nThe Shuttle turned out to be more expensive and less reusable than it was optimistically lauded to be, but it stands to reason: where are the space settlements? Certainly not in low earth orbit.\nBut they don’t have to be. [What once pushed the envelope of the technically feasible is now well established as doable] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1434/when-will-india-send-their-first-own-astronauts-to-space/) . The [Mir] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir) was an initially Soviet, later Russian space station from 1986–1996, crewed for almost ten years. The [International Space Station] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Space_Station) took 12 years to construct and has been crewed since November 2000. By the time it too will be decomissioned almost a whole generation will have passed since the first crew boarded it. \nESA wants to build a [moon village] (https://www.esa.int/About_Us/Ministerial_Council_2016/Moon_Village) , while [NASA] (https://www.nasa.gov/feature/deep-space-gateway-to-open-opportunities-for-distant-destinations) (and [Elon Musk] (https://www.spacex.com/mars) ) aim for Mars. These are certainly lofty goals, but:\nWill humans have sustainable settlements off Earth by 2100?\nWill resolve positive if there are settlements off-Earth with &gt; 2000 5+ year residents that can reasonable assumed to be [self-sufficient] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-sustainability) in production of energy and foodstuffs.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 491,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the fraction of American 18-24 year-olds enrolled in colleges in 2025 be ≥10% less than were enrolled in 2015?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1433/will-the-fraction-of-american-18-24-year-olds-enrolled-in-colleges-in-2025-be-10-less-than-were-enrolled-in-2015/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "In the US, enrollment in 4-year colleges has been steadily increasing since the 1970s, [from around 17.1% to 29.9% in 2015.] (https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_302.60.asp ) \nDespite this, the economist Bryan Caplan [has recently argued] (https://press.princeton.edu/titles/11225.html) that this time spent in college by an increasing proportion of youth is wasteful, as the primary function of education is not to enhance students' skill but to certify their intelligence, work ethic, and conformity — in other words, to signal the qualities of a good employee.\nAs increasing numbers of students get more degrees, the harder it becomes to remain competitive in the job market without spending lots of time in education — essentially creating a prisoner's dilemma in which it is individually rational, but socially harmful to waste evermore time getting degrees. This has made some confident that educational enrolment will only increase over time, including the aforementioned economist [who has been placing bets on this.] (https://www.econlib.org/education-the-betting-continues/) \nWill the fraction of American 18-24 year-olds enrolled in traditional four-year colleges in 2025 be more than 10% lower than in 2015?\nSince the 2015 rate is 29.9%, positive resolution is conditional on a rate 26.91% or less in 2025 [as reported by data from the National Center for Education Statistics] (https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_302.60.asp ) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 185,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will India send their first own astronauts to space?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1434/when-will-india-send-their-first-own-astronauts-to-space/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "For the longest time there were only two nations with their own access to space, the United States and Russia né Soviet Union. Then China managed the feat in 2003, and now they’re close to building [their first multimodular space station] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_large_modular_space_station) .\nWith China building up their space infrastructure, India apparently felt under zugzwang. While they’d already sent an Indian to space in a Soyuz capsule in 1984, now they are pursuing [their own program] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Human_Spaceflight_Programme) . Their space agency ISRO seems ready and eager, but there’s doubt about the timeline they proposed as being too optimistic.\nThe currently scheduled launch is in December 2021, but that may change, but the prime minister declared the goal to be ‘ [a son or a daughter of India will go to Space from Indian soil by an Indian vehicle by 2022 (75th year of Indian independence) or sooner] (http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=183103) ’\nWhen will an India send their first astronaut/ [gaganaut] (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/isro-sets-december-2021-target-for-human-mission-no-decision-on-number-of-gaganauts-or-days-in-space-sivan/articleshow/65595528.cms) into space?\nWill resolve positive to the respective launch time when at least one crew member of an Indian space craft/capsule launched with an Indian launch vehicle reaches orbit.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 218,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the longest spaceflight of any one person reach 5 years?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1435/when-will-the-longest-spaceflight-of-any-one-person-reach-5-years/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [ISS year long mission] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISS_year_long_mission) set out to explore the health effects of long duration spaceflight. Astronaut Scott Kelly and cosmonaut Mikhail Kornienko spent 342 days in space for this mission, checking their health but they were also keeping a journal to write down how they felt. After all, there are more angles to consider than just physical health for these kind of things. \nBut this wasn't the first mission of its kind. There were three other, longer spaceflights, lasting 365, 379 and 437 days respectively. So we wonder:\nWhen will longest duration anyone has ever been in space surpass 5 years?\nWill resolve when the same person has been continuously in space for 5 years or longer.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 118,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will an openly LGBTQ person be elected President of the United States by 2041?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1444/will-an-openly-lgbtq-person-be-elected-president-of-the-united-states-by-2041/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "The LGBTQ movement has made [massive strides] (https://www.cnn.com/2015/06/19/us/lgbt-rights-milestones-fast-facts/index.html) during the 21st century in the United States. Less than 60 years ago engaging in consensual homosexual acts in private was [illegal] (http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1989-06-26/news/8902120553_1_gay-bar-anti-gay-activists-first-openly-gay-supervisor) in parts of the country. But progress has been undeniable. In 2015 the U.S. Supreme Court [legalized gay marriage] (https://www.cnn.com/2015/06/26/politics/supreme-court-same-sex-marriage-ruling/index.html) just seven years after the country elected its first President who was not a straight white male. \nWill an openly LGBTQ person be elected President of the United States by 2041?\nNew resolution criteria:\nThis question resolves positively if an openly LGBTQ candidate is elected president before 2041. The candidate must, during the campaign, either: \n---Publicly identify as something else than cisgender. \n---Publicly identify as something else than heterosexual. \nThis question will resolve negatively if all candidates elected president by 2041 identify as both cisgender and heterosexual.\nResolution will be by credible media reports.\nOld resolution criteria:\nThis question resolves positively if an openly LGBTQ candidate is elected president before 2041. The candidate must be lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer. This question will resolve negatively if no openly LGBTQ candidate is elected president by 2041. An ambiguous resolution will result if a candidates sexuality is brought forth during their campaign from a source other than themselves and they continue to win the presidency.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 180,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "A freer China? Chinese political rights and civil liberties in 2028",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1454/a-freer-china-chinese-political-rights-and-civil-liberties-in-2028/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "According to Freedom House, an NGO, China’s authoritarian regime has become increasingly repressive in recent years. The ruling Chinese Communist Party is tightening its control over the media, online speech, religious groups, and civil society associations while undermining already modest rule-of-law reforms.\nLast year, [Party authorities tightened political, social, and media restrictions in Beijing and across China in the months ahead of the October gathering] (https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/06/chinas-golden-week-ends-but-the-communist-party-congress-will-keep-the-holiday-mood-up.html ) . Implementation of a [Cybersecurity Law] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Internet_Security_Law) and other new regulations resulted in a crackdown on VPNs, penalties for private technology companies whose censorship measures were deemed insufficient, tighter enforcement of [real-name registration rules online] (https://techcrunch.com/2017/08/27/china-doubles-down-on-real-name-registration-laws-forbidding-anonymous-online-posts/ ) , and greater pressure on users to censor themselves and each other.\n[New regulations that took effect in February 2018 further restricted the scope for religious freedoms] (https://www.chinasource.org/blog/posts/new-religion-regulations-to-take-effect-in-february) , particularly for children’s religious education. [An already massive security presence in Xinjiang grew] (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/23/in-chinas-far-west-experts-fear-a-ticking-timebomb-religious) , [and restrictions on free expression, travel, and religious practice in the region expanded] (https://www.vox.com/2018/8/15/17684226/uighur-china-camps-united-nations) to affect not only Uighurs but also Kazakhs and other Muslim ethnic minorities, many of whom were detained on the pretext of countering terrorism and possibly [up to a million Uighurs may have been sent to extralegal political indoctrination centers] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-rights-un/u-n-calls-on-china-to-free-uighurs-from-re-education-camps-idUSKCN1LF1D6 ) .\nAccording to [Freedom House's 2018 report] (https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2018/china) , the condition of Chinese Political Rights (i.e. the state of its electoral process, the extent of political pluralism and participation, the functioning of its government, and discretionary political rights) deteriorated to its lowest point in at least 15 years in 2017.\nThe reported condition of Civil Liberties (i.e. freedom of expression and belief, associational and organisational freedoms, the rule of law, and personal autonomy and individual rights) have only slightly worsened since 2005.\nFreedom House reports annual scores of Chinese Political Rights (with a score 0-40: 0=Least Free 40=Most Free) and Civil Liberties (with a score 0-60: 0=Least Free 60=Most Free). The current scores for China are 0 for Political Rights, and 14 for Civil Liberties. The Total Aggregate score is the sum of these two scores. 2017’s aggregate score is therefore 14.\nWhat will be the total aggregate score given to China by Freedom House in 2028?\nThis number is expected be published in Freedom House's 2029 annual Freedom in the World report. The question resolves as ambiguous if their reports are discontinued.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 150,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Angela Merkel remain chancellor after the next German federal elections?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1457/will-angela-merkel-remain-chancellor-after-the-next-german-federal-elections/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "Angela Merkel has been head of German Government since 2005, when she was elected by the Bundestag into office. Her most recent, fourth cabinet was formed with the votes of CDU/CSU and SPD, a so-called grand coalition.\nA brief overview on her:\nMerkel entered politics shortly after the Berlin Wall fell, joining a local political party that later united with the CDU. She stood for election in her constituency shortly after reunification of former East Germany with West Germany, becoming a member of Bundestag, a position she’s held since 1991. In the CDU and parliament she was quickly recognised for her competency and appointed Minister for Women and Youth by Helmut Kohl, later promoted to Minister for the Environment and Nuclear Safety. \nWith the defeat of the CDU federal elections in 1998 Merkel became secretary-general in her party, a prominent and powerful position. She was elected party leader of the CDU in 2000, after her patron (and also former party leader) Kohl and his chosen successor in the CDU tripped over a party funding scandal. She didn’t become contender for chancellor for the following election because of party politics, but ran in 2005, when she won a hair’s breadth victory.\nShe’s now the third longest running chancellor, and will be the second longest if her cabinet lasts till the end of the current Bundestag. \nGiven the recent controversies and [the rise of populist right-wing party AfD] (https://www.infratest-dimap.de/en/analyses-results/nationwide/vote-intention/) that isn’t a given, though. If there was a federal election, the AfD would be the second strongest party after CDU/CSU, and a [grand coalition] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_coalition_(Germany)) would both look decidedly different than now and still result in only a minority government.\nThus we ask: Will the next cabinet be headed by Angela Merkel?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 340,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Xi Jinping keep leading China past 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1468/will-xi-jinping-keep-leading-china-past-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "90%",
    "Description": "Like every country, China has peculiarities in how it is run. One of these is how the General Secretary of the Communist Party of China is the leader of the country instead of the president, prime minister, chancellor, or any other such position (though traditionally the general secretary also assumes the mostly ceremonial position of president as well).\nThe current iteration of the post came in 1982, when [Hu Yaobang] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hu_Yaobang) took the post, initiating reforms. He was dethroned in 1987 for not ceding to the demands of Deng Xiaoping (the then still de facto ruler of China) to deal with the leaders of student protests for more liberties. The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 were preceded by Hu’s death and the wish of students to honour him. \nHu was succeeded by [Zhao Ziyang] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhao_Ziyang) , who took up and continued many of Hu’s reforms. He resigned when Deng Xiaoping ordered troops to deal with the Tiananmen Square protests. \n[Jiang Zemin] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiang_Zemin) took up the mantle for the remaining and two more terms. With the death of Deng Xiaoping and the waning influence of the [eight elders] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight_Elders) , Jiang was able to turn his de jure leadership of China into a de facto one. He introduced another set of reforms, centralising a lot of the political power and relaxing many economic restrictions. He resigned in 2002, making room for Hu Jintao. \n[Hu Jintao] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hu_Jintao) aimed to balance out the inequalities that had arisen over the previous decades by adding regulations for the economy and protecting the environment. He stepped down after his two terms were up. \nHis successor and and current office holder is [Xi Jinping] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xi_Jinping) .\nWith the exception of Jiang Zemin, who had to step up after his predecessor was factually ousted from his position, all general secretaries stepped down from their office when their second term was up. Even Jiang did after his second ‘regular’ term. \nBut there’s doubt Xi will do so as well. Usually a successor was introduced into the Politburo with the second term (young enough to serve two 5-year terms themselves), but Xi notably did not do that in 2017. [Some] (https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2018/china) see this, as well as his chairing many leadership positions and changing the constitution to abolish term limits for the presidency, as signs Xi aims for a third term in 2022.\nBut will he? \nWill Xi Jinping keep leading China past 2022?\nQuestion resolves positive if: \n--- \nXi begins serving a third consecutive term as General Secretary of the Communist Party of China, or\n--- \nXi remains [paramount leader] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paramount_leader) past 2022, or\n--- \nXi remains de facto leader of China if either of these positions loose their importance in Chinese politics.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 279,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will we know what Dark Matter is before 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1469/will-we-know-what-dark-matter-is-before-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "50%",
    "Description": "The universe is thought to contain:\n---only around 5% of ordinary matter \n---25% Dark Matter \n---70% Dark Energy \nIn other words, we don't know what 95% of the universe is made of.\nPresence of [Dark matter] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter) is implied in a variety of astrophysical observations, including gravitational effects that cannot be explained unless more matter is present than can be seen.\n[Dark energy] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy) is an unknown form of energy which is hypothesized to permeate all of space, tending to accelerate the expansion of the universe. Dark energy is the most accepted hypothesis to explain the observations since the 1990s indicating that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate.\n[What is Dark Matter and Dark Energy? by Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAa2O_8wBUQ) is an approachable introduction to the topic.\nThe question asks whether a Nobel Prize will be awarded before 2050 for work done primarily later than 2015, and directly related to explaining what Dark Matter is, as mentioned in the prize rationale.\nIf the prize is awarded before 2050 the question will close retroactively to the day before prize announcement. If the prize is not awarded before 2050, the question will close the day before the Nobel Prize announcement of 2049.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 199,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will NASA land people on Mars prior to 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1476/will-nasa-land-people-on-mars-prior-to-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "Landing people on Mars is a longstanding ambition of NASA. Wikipedia [lists 17 crewed Mars mission proposed by NASA] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_crewed_Mars_mission_plans) , with the first one from 1960.\nThe latest is the [\"Moon to Mars\"] (https://www.nasa.gov/topics/moon-to-mars/overview) idea, as stated in Space Policy Directive-1:\nThe NASA Administrator shall, 'Lead an innovative and sustainable program of exploration with commercial and international partners to enable human expansion across the solar system and to bring back to Earth new knowledge and opportunities. Beginning with missions beyond low-Earth orbit, the United States will lead the return of humans to the Moon for long-term exploration and utilization, followed by human missions to Mars and other destinations.'\nThe general ambition seems to be achieving [landing people on Mars around 2030] (https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/nss_chart_v23.pdf) .\n[Metaculus has very similar and popular question \"Will SpaceX land people on Mars prior to 2030?\"] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/349/will-spacex-land-people-on-mars-prior-to-2030/) . However, there is no corresponding question for NASA.\nSo, will a NASA-branded mission land people on Mars prior to Jan 1, 2030?\nThe question will resolve positively even if the NASA-branded mission makes use of SpaceX transport system, under the condition that the main funding for the mission comes from USA budget.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 286,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any intelligent living being (human descendants, aliens, etc.) ever listen to the copy of Blind Willie Johnson's \"Dark Was the Night\" on Voyager I's Golden Record?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1480/will-any-intelligent-living-being-human-descendants-aliens-etc-ever-listen-to-the-copy-of-blind-willie-johnsons-dark-was-the-night-on-voyager-is-golden-record/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4%",
    "Description": "Launched Mon, 05 Sept 1977 at 12:56:00 UTC, Voyager 1 has intrepidly made its way all the way to [interstellar space] (https://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/status/) . Wow. The probe carries with it mementos from Earth, including the so-called Golden Record. Per NASA, this [phonograph] (https://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/golden-record/) is \"a 12-inch gold-plated copper disk containing sounds and images selected to portray the diversity of life and culture on Earth.\"\nOne of the most haunting, emotional pieces on that record is a wordless gospel blues song called \" [Dark Was the Night, Cold Was the Ground] (https://www.mojo4music.com/articles/7919/blind-willie-johnson-left-solar-system) \" by the artist Blind Willie Johnson.\nVoyager 1 is on track to fly by the [star AC +79 3888] (https://www.space.com/22783-voyager-1-interstellar-space-star-flyby.html) (currently nearly 18 light years from Earth) in 40,000 years, give or take a few. Odds are, the craft (and the record on it) will last [billions of years] (https://www.quora.com/How-long-will-the-Voyager-last-for-Could-it-billions-of-years) or longer, possibly becoming one of the last remaining relics of humanity after the sun turns the Earth into a cinder in its Red Giant phase.\nWill some sentient being ever collect this craft and listen to the Golden Record? This creature could be a genuine ET or a future descendent of humans. (XKCD digs into the physics of [retrieving Voyager here] (https://what-if.xkcd.com/38/) .)\nNote: this question is just for fun, as the resolve date is set to the year 3000, and won't resolve before then.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 172,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will either the Democratic or Republican party in the US cease to exist?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1481/when-will-either-the-democratic-or-republican-party-in-the-us-cease-to-exist/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "All political parties eventually come to an end.\nMost U.S. political buffs have at least a glancing familiarity with the [demise of the Whigs] (http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/essays/1801-1900/the-american-whig-party/the-end-of-the-party.php) in the mid-19th century. But other enduring partisan institutions have also fallen by the wayside--with some frequency, in fact--during our nation's history. (Consider, for instance, the [Federalists] (https://www.history.com/topics/early-us/federalist-party) , the [Free Soil Party] (https://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h139.html) , the [Know Nothings] (https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/immigrants-conspiracies-and-secret-society-launched-american-nativism-180961915/) , the [list goes on] (https://www.thoughtco.com/extinct-political-parties-of-the-1800s-1773940) .)\nFor as long as any living American can attest, however, the Democrats and Republicans have dominated our institutions. \nBut this equillibrium eventually must give way. As Slate's Reihan Salam [points out] (http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/03/the_republican_party_is_old_and_getting_older_that_s_a_huge_problem_for.html) : \nDemocrats have a substantial edge with voters under 35 while Republicans are more likely to be on the older side of middle age and septuagenarians. The beauty of the over-65 set is that they are reliable voters. The bad news about them is that they are not long for this Earth.\nFrom almost all accounts, younger voters--particularly [Millennials] (http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/376334-poll-dems-lead-gop-among-millennials-by-two-to-one-ratio) and [Gen Zers] (http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/389016-parkland-and-the-political-coming-of-generation-z) --favor liberal/democratic causes in a big way. Once the Silent Generation dies off, and the Baby Boomers ride into the sunset, unless voters reallign, the GOP will be in the substantial minority. \nHowever, success is not guaranteed for the Democrats. At least in Europe, many of the traditional social democratic or socialist partiest were supplanted or are at least threatened to be overtaken by new (often populist) movements and parties. Examples include (La République) En Marche ! in France, Podemos in Spain, the Five Star Movement in Italy or Syriza in Greece\nFor how long will both Democratic and Republican parties exist? Resolution is triggered when:\n--- \nOne of the two parties formally dissolves or is converted into another party of another name, or\n--- \nEither there are no sitting Republican US congresspeople or no sitting Democratic US congresspeople, or\n--- \nA US presidential election occurs in which the set of candidates receiving 5% or more of the popular votes does not contain both a Democrat and a Republican.\nNote that this question is also in a sense a question on the dissolution of the American political system.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 127,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of Americans will be considered obese or overweight in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1482/what-percentage-of-americans-will-be-considered-obese-or-overweight-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The obesity epidemic has been ravaging not just the United States but [much of the world] (http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight) over the past 35-40 years. Critics of the current Dietary Guidelines point out that the emergence of the [obesity epidemic coincided with new government advice to eat less fat and more carbohydrate] (https://www.dietdoctor.com/introduction-dietary-guidelines-start-obesity-epidemic) . (In 2018, the U.S. government [still mandates] (https://www.nutritioncoalition.us/dietary-guidelines-for-americans-dga-introduction) a low fat/high carb plan for all Americans over the age of 2, despite the fact that low carbohydrate diets have [whalloped] (https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/23-studies-on-low-carb-and-low-fat-diets) low fat diets in clinical trials.)\nIn any event, the origins of this disaster notwithstanding, things are clearly getting worse, year after year. Per a recent analysis in The Lancet (described [here] (http://www.healthdata.org/news-release/vast-majority-american-adults-are-overweight-or-obese-and-weight-growing-problem-among) :)\nAn estimated 160 million Americans are either obese or overweight. Nearly three-quarters of American men and more than 60% of women are obese or overweight. These are also major challenges for America’s children – nearly 30% of boys and girls under age 20 are either obese or overweight, up from 19% in 1980.\nPer a [CDC report] (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/obesity-overweight.htm) from a few years ago, in the United States:\nPercent of adults aged 20 and over with obesity: 37.9% (2013-2014) Percent of adults aged 20 and over with overweight, including obesity: 70.7% (2013-2014)\nWhat will the CDC report in 2030 look like? What percentage of Americans age 20 and older will be classified as overweight/ [obese] (https://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=11760) (using the 2018 standards for what these medical terms mean)?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 271,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be Top500's #1 performing supercomputer as a multiple of the #500 performer in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1492/what-will-be-top500s-1-performing-supercomputer-as-a-multiple-of-the-500-performer-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Top500 has been compiling charts and reports on the supercomputing industry for a long time. [Here] (https://www.top500.org/statistics/perfdevel/) is a graph showing impressive gains in performance in terms of Flop/s.\nIn June of 1993, the #1 performer was at 59.7 GFlop/s, versus the #500 performer at 0.4 GFlop/s, which is a multiple of 149.25. In June of 2018, the #1 performer was 122.3 PFlop/s, versus the #500 performer at 0.7156 PFlop/s, for a multiple of 170.9.\nThis relative gap has been in a pretty stable range for many years. In June 2007 the multiple went down to only 70.15, and June 2016 it got up to 325.06, but it has tended to stay within a range so far.\nWould we expect such a performance multiple to stay in this range in the future? What might change this roughly-a-factor-of-100 lead in supercomputing Flop/s? Estimate what this multiple will be in the year 2030.\nResolution will be based on Top500's reporting on the subject, using the first number reported for 2030. If their reports are no longer available, then the next-best source will be sought. Resolves ambiguous if Flop/s in supercomputing is no longer reported by anyone.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 88,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Ragnarök Question Series: By 2100 will the human population decrease by at least 10% during any period of 5 years?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "It’s dangerous to be alive and risks are everywhere. But not all risks are created equally. Those that are especially large in scope and severe in intensity are global catastrophic risks, which are risks that could inflict serious damage to human well-being on a global scale.\nUntil relatively recently, most global catastrophic risks were natural, such as the supervolcano episodes and asteroidal/cometary impacts that led to mass extinctions millions of years ago. Other natural risks might include a pandemic of naturally occurring disease, non-anthropogenic climate change, supernovae, gamma-ray bursts, and spontaneous decay of cosmic vacuum state. Humanity has survived these natural existential risks for hundreds of thousands of years; which suggests that it is not any of these that will do us in within the next hundred.\nBy contrast, through technological advances, our species is introducing entirely new kinds of risks, anthropogenic risks, which are man-made threats that have no track record of surviving. Our longevity as a species therefore offers no strong prior grounds for confident optimism. Examples of anthropogenic risks are nuclear war, advanced artificial intelligence, biotechnology and bioengineered organisms, human-made climate change and nanotechnology risks.\nThere are two complementary ways of estimating the chances of catastrophe. What we could call the direct way is to analyze the various specific failure-modes, assign them probabilities, which is what--at least partially-- the questions in the Ragnarök series are designed to do.\nSecondly, there is the indirect way. [As Nick Bostrom has argued] (https://nickbostrom.com/existential/risks.html) , there are theoretical constraints that can be brought to bear on the issue, based on some general features of the world in which we live. There is only small number of these, but they are important because they do not rely on making a lot of guesses about the details of future technological and social developments. For example, the so-called [Doomsday argument] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomsday_argument) , which purports to show that we have systematically underestimated the probability that humankind will go extinct relatively soon.\nMoreover, the [Fermi Paradox] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_paradox) tells us that it is not the case that life evolves on a significant fraction of Earth-like planets and proceeds to develop advanced technology. Hence, there must be (at least) one Great Filter – an evolutionary step that is extremely improbable – somewhere on the line between Earth-like planet and colonizing-in-detectable-ways civilization. If the [Great Filter] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Filter) isn’t in our past, we must fear it in our (near) future.\nBy 2100 will the human population decrease by at least 10% during any period of 5 years or less?\nThe question resolves positively the human population (on Earth, and possibly elsewhere) decreases by at least 10% in any period of 5 years or less.\nThis question is part of the Ragnarök Question Series. Please have a look at the other questions and contribute your insights, analyses, and factorizations, especially on the questions on what might happen if a global catastrophe occurs (for which we are currently short on predictions):\n1-- \n[If a global biological catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2514/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-biological-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n2-- \n[If an artificial intelligence catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2513/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-an-artificial-intelligence-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n3-- \n[If a nuclear catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1585/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-nuclear-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n4-- \n[If a global climate disaster occurs by 2100, will the human population decline by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1604/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-climate-disaster-occurs-by-2100-will-the-earths-human-population-decline-by-95-or-more/) \nAlso, please check out our questions on whether a global catastrophe will occur by 2100, and if so, which?:\n5-- \n[By 2100 will the human population decrease by at least 10% during any period of 5 years?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) \n6-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to either human-made climate change or geoengineering?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1500/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-either-human-made-climate-change-or-geoengineering/) \n7-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to a nanotechnology failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1501/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nanotechnology-failure-mode/) \n8-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to nuclear war?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1494/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nuclear-war/) \n9-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to an artificial intelligence failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) \n10- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to biotechnology or bioengineered organisms?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1502/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-biotechnology-or-bioengineered-organisms/) \nAll results [are analysed here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2568/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-results-so-far/) , and will be updated periodically.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 237,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Ragnarök Question Series: If a global catastrophe occurs, will it be due to nuclear war?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1494/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nuclear-war/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "The invention of nuclear weapons gave humanity the technical capacity to cause devastation on a hitherto unseen scale. Although there have been no nuclear attacks since the Second World War, we have come close to inadvertent and intentional nuclear war on a number of occasions.\nThe Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 was a direct and dangerous confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War and was the moment when the two nuclear superpowers came closest to nuclear conflict. U.S. president John F. Kennedy estimated the odds of nuclear war at \"somewhere between one out of three and even\". \nTwenty events that might be considered ‘near-miss’ incidents – incidents that could potentially have resulted in unintended nuclear detonation or explosion – [have been reported in declassified documents] (https://futureoflife.org/background/nuclear-close-calls-a-timeline/) . There are potentially more ‘near-misses’ that have remained classified and concealed. Moreover, most of these incidents on our timeline were reported by US sources, and there is no reason to believe that the opposing superpower had fewer incidents, or that there have been zero incidents in China, the UK, France, Israel, India, Pakistan or North Korea. \nCurrently, there are [an estimated total of 14,185 nuclear weapons] (https://www.ploughshares.org/world-nuclear-stockpile-report) in existence, of which russia and the USA possess 13400. The remained is divided between (in descending order of number of weapons possessed) France, China, UK, Pakistan, India, Israel, and North Korea.\nAlthough tensions between the US and Russia have eased somewhat since the Cold War the geopolitical situation could become more unstable over the next few decades. Another possible intentional nuclear war is between India and Pakistan. The two countries have gone to war four times since then, in 1947, 1965, 1974 and 1999, and have been on the brink of war as recently as 2008. Pakistan has pledged to meet any Indian attack on its territory with a retaliatory nuclear strike. Most recently, the world has witnessed displays of brinkmanship by North Korea and the US with explicit threats of nuclear warfare.\nAlthough initial effects from such a nuclear exchange would be horrible, the after-effects could be worse. A nuclear exchange could cause a [nuclear winter] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_winter) – a release of black carbon into the atmosphere. [According to some studies] (https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2013EF000205) , this would result in the blocking the Sun’s thermal energy, and lowering temperatures regionally and globally for several years, opening up new holes in the ozone layer protecting the Earth from harmful radiation, reducing global precipitation by about 10%, triggering crop failures, and resulting in widespread food shortages\n[Recent calculations] (https://academic.oup.com/isr/article/6/4/135/1826263) of the dust, particulates and smoke thrust into the atmosphere by as few as 100 nuclear weapons indicate that even a regional war could have major impact on the planet’s atmosphere and climate.\nThe fact that we’ve never had a mass-casualty accidental nuclear detonation or explosion might suggest that some estimates of the odds of nuclear war –such as John F. Kennedy’s– are too gloomy. [Others have pointed out that the strength of this evidence is perhaps surprisingly weak] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/W6-Observer-selection-effects.pdf) : if nuclear war removes many observers, then realizations of world history we see are unlikely to have included nuclear war. Hence observers in surviving worlds will see the world to be much safer than it actually is. \nIn the [headline question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) to this series, I defined a global catastrophe as a 10% decrease in the world population in any period of 5 years.\nIf a global catastrophe happens before 2100, will it be principally due to the deployment of nuclear weapons?\nThe question resolves positively if a global nuclear catastrophe occurs that claims at least 10% in any period of 5 years or less before 2100, and resolves as ambiguous if no such global catastrophe happens.\nThis question is part of the Ragnarök Question Series. Please have a look at the other questions and contribute your insights, analyses, and factorizations, especially on the questions on what might happen if a global catastrophe occurs (for which we are currently short on predictions):\n1-- \n[If a global biological catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2514/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-biological-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n2-- \n[If an artificial intelligence catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2513/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-an-artificial-intelligence-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n3-- \n[If a nuclear catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1585/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-nuclear-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n4-- \n[If a global climate disaster occurs by 2100, will the human population decline by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1604/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-climate-disaster-occurs-by-2100-will-the-earths-human-population-decline-by-95-or-more/) \nAlso, please check out our questions on whether a global catastrophe will occur by 2100, and if so, which?:\n5-- \n[By 2100 will the human population decrease by at least 10% during any period of 5 years?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) \n6-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to either human-made climate change or geoengineering?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1500/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-either-human-made-climate-change-or-geoengineering/) \n7-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to a nanotechnology failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1501/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nanotechnology-failure-mode/) \n8-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to nuclear war?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1494/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nuclear-war/) \n9-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to an artificial intelligence failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) \n10- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to biotechnology or bioengineered organisms?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1502/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-biotechnology-or-bioengineered-organisms/) \nAll results [are analysed here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2568/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-results-so-far/) , and will be updated periodically.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 185,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Ragnarök Question Series: If a global catastrophe occurs, will it be due to an artificial intelligence failure-mode?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "22%",
    "Description": "Currently, artificial intelligence can outperform humans in a number of narrow domains, such as playing chess and searching data. As artificial intelligence researchers continue to make progress, though, these domains are highly likely to grow in number and breadth over time. Many experts now believe there is a significant chance that a machine superintelligence – a system that can outperform humans at all relevant intelligence tasks – will be developed within the next century, and possibly much sooner.\nIn a [2017 survey of artificial intelligence experts] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.08807.pdf) , the median expert estimated that there is a 50% chance of human-level artificial intelligence by 2062, and after this milestone were reached, respondents reported a 10% chance that superintelligence would be achieved within two years. [Our very own question on the prospect of human-machine intelligence parity by 2040] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/384/human-machine-intelligence-parity-by-2040/) currently has a median prediction of 60%. In another question on the possibility of progress toward human-machine intelligence parity surprising us, a similar median estimate is given.\nIn the aforementioned survey, experts were asked about the effects of human level machine intelligence. They assigned a 10% for a bad outcome and 5% for an outcome described as “Extremely Bad (e.g., human extinction).” Although a selection bias, large variance in responses (reflecting vast uncertainty), and the unreliability of subjective opinions mean that these estimates warrant skepticism, they nevertheless suggest that the possibility of superintelligence ought to be taken seriously.\nWhen considering how AI might become a risk, experts think two scenarios most likely (according to the [Future of Life Institute] (https://futureoflife.org/background/benefits-risks-of-artificial-intelligence/) ): \n1--The AI is programmed to do something devastating: Autonomous weapons are artificial intelligence systems that are programmed to kill. In the hands of the wrong person, these weapons could easily cause mass casualties. Moreover, an AI arms race could inadvertently lead to an AI war that also results in mass casualties. To avoid being thwarted by the enemy, these weapons would be designed to be extremely difficult to simply “turn off,” so humans could plausibly lose control of such a situation. This risk is one that’s present even with narrow AI, but grows as levels of AI intelligence and autonomy increase. \n2--The AI is programmed to do something beneficial, but it develops a destructive method for achieving its goal: This can happen whenever we fail to fully align the AI’s goals with ours, which is strikingly difficult. If you ask an obedient intelligent car to take you to the airport as fast as possible, it might get you there chased by helicopters and covered in vomit, doing not what you wanted but literally what you asked for. If a superintelligent system is tasked with a ambitious geoengineering project, it might wreak havoc with our ecosystem as a side effect, and view human attempts to stop it as a threat to be met. As these examples illustrate, the concern about advanced AI isn’t malevolence but competence. A super-intelligent AI will be extremely good at accomplishing its goals, and if those goals aren’t aligned with ours, we have a problem. You’re probably not an evil ant-hater who steps on ants out of malice, but if you’re in charge of a hydroelectric green energy project and there’s an anthill in the region to be flooded, too bad for the ants. \nIn the [headline question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) to this series, I defined a global catastrophe as a 10% decrease in the world population in any period of 5 years. \nIf a global catastrophe happens before 2100, will it be principally due to the deployment of some artificial intelligence system(s)?\nThe question resolves positively if a catastrophe occurs resulting principally from the principally due to the deployment of some artificial intelligence system(s) that claims at least 10% of the human population in any period of 5 years or less before 2100, and resolves as ambiguous if no global catastrophe occurs.\nThis question is part of the Ragnarök Question Series. Please have a look at the other questions and contribute your insights, analyses, and factorizations, especially on the questions on what might happen if a global catastrophe occurs (for which we are currently short on predictions):\n1-- \n[If a global biological catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2514/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-biological-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n2-- \n[If an artificial intelligence catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2513/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-an-artificial-intelligence-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n3-- \n[If a nuclear catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1585/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-nuclear-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n4-- \n[If a global climate disaster occurs by 2100, will the human population decline by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1604/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-climate-disaster-occurs-by-2100-will-the-earths-human-population-decline-by-95-or-more/) \nAlso, please check out our questions on whether a global catastrophe will occur by 2100, and if so, which?:\n5-- \n[By 2100 will the human population decrease by at least 10% during any period of 5 years?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) \n6-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to either human-made climate change or geoengineering?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1500/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-either-human-made-climate-change-or-geoengineering/) \n7-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to a nanotechnology failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1501/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nanotechnology-failure-mode/) \n8-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to nuclear war?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1494/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nuclear-war/) \n9-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to an artificial intelligence failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) \n10- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to biotechnology or bioengineered organisms?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1502/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-biotechnology-or-bioengineered-organisms/) \nAll results [are analysed here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2568/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-results-so-far/) , and will be updated periodically.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 244,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the eventual consensus explanation of star KIC 8462852 variability be an intervening molecular cloud?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1497/will-the-eventual-consensus-explanation-of-star-kic-8462852-variability-be-an-intervening-molecular-cloud/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "This star (aka \"Tabby's Star) has been puzzling us for a few years now. Its highly variable apparent magnitude doesn't fit the pattern for other variable stars or stars with eclipsing companions or transiting exoplanets. To date, the dips in brightness do not exhibit any periodicity at all. Even worse, the dips in the luminosity graphs are asymmetrical (gradual onset, sudden reset). For lots of background and prior Metaculus discussion, see [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/467/) and [this one.] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/110/) .\nMost attention has been aimed at eclipsing objects orbiting the star itself, and our prior questions had rather short time horizons.\nNow I put forward my own pet theory as a binary question with open-ended close: Until such time as the scientific community does a face-palm and says \"yeah, of course that's what it was!\", is the explanation some passing interstellar gas and/or dust?\nFrom [this paper] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.03505.pdf) here's a good summary of the molecular cloud conjecture:\n7.2. An intervening molecular cloud\nAlternatively, there might be a chance alignment with a localized molecular cloud (as opposed to an overdense filament or sheet).\nThe Clemens &amp; Barvainis (1988) catalog of small molecular clouds was selected optically based on examination of the POSS plates, and was sensitive to clouds smaller than 10′, typically down to ∼1′. Clemens et al. (1991) found that the mean radius of these clouds was 0.35 pc. The clouds in this catalog cluster near the Galactic plane presumably both because clouds are intrinsically more common there and because they are easier to identify in silhouette against the large number of stars there.\nA quiescent Bok globule 0.1 pc ≈20,000 au across and midway between Earth and Boyajian’s Star would have almost certainly escaped detection. It would have a radius of 40\", and examination of the POSS plates for Boyajian’s Star confirms that the star counts are too low in this region to clearly reveal such a small object, especially if some of the stars in the image were foreground to it and the globule were not spherical. Such high-latitude clouds exist: Getman et al. (2008) describe the \"mysterious” high Galactic latitude cloud CG12, which sits 200 pc above the plane at a distance of 550 pc (about the same distance as Boyajian’s Star).\nIn this case, the secular dimming would be naturally explained by the changing line of sight to Boyajian’s Star through the cloud’s slowly varying radial column density profile,and the dips would then be explained by small-scale (sub-au) structure within the cloud.\nThis question resolves when a consensus is achieved, and it will retroactively close one year prior to the resolution date. From the earlier questions about this star's consensus explanation:\nWe'll use the following criteria to specify consensus. Let N be the number of refereed published journal papers that:\n--- \nprovide an explanation for the aperiodic dips seen in KIC 8462852, and\n--- \nare cited by at least one published paper, or two preprints, supporting their explanation with additional analysis and/or data, and\n--- \nare cited at least 5 times in total, and\n--- \nare not cited by a published, refereed paper refuting or disputing the given explanation within a year following publication.\nIf N=1 we will consider a consensus to have been reached. If N&gt;1, and if all of the explanations are qualitatively the same, i.e. involving the same essential physics and objects (e.g. \"Comet breakup\"), we will also consider consensus to have been reached. Otherwise, we will consider that consensus has not yet been reached.\nResolution will then be positive if an intervening, galactic molecular cloud / gas cloud / supernova remnant is the explanation. Resolution will be negative if the explanation is anything other than interstellar gas and dust in our line of sight (e.g. anything orbiting the star, or the star's intrinsic variability etc)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 54,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Ragnarök Question Series: If a global catastrophe occurs, will it be due to either human-made climate change or geoengineering?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1500/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-either-human-made-climate-change-or-geoengineering/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "[According to current IPCC estimates] (http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf) , unmitigated greenhouse emissions are likely to lead to global temperature increases of 2.6ºC-4.8ºC by 2100. If this happened, there’d likely be significant humanitarian harms, including more severe weather, food crises, and the spread of infectious diseases which would disproportionately affect the world’s worst off.\nMoreover, the [estimated humanitarian impacts of climate changes are likely to be highly nonlinear] (https://www.givewell.org/shallow/climate-change/extreme-risks) : marginal temperature increases are expected to cause more damage at already-increased temperatures (i.e. going from 3ºC to 4ºC is expected to be significantly worse than going from 1ºC to 2ºC). \n[According to some] (https://www.givewell.org/shallow/climate-change/extreme-risks) , there is also a non-negligible chance — perhaps around 10% — that unmitigated emissions will lead to global temperature increases even higher than 4.8ºC. More generally, estimates of temperature increases resulting from greenhouse emissions have a [“fat” right tail] (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-e-mann/the-fat-tail-of-climate-change-risk_b_8116264.html) , meaning that there is a low, but non-negligible chance of very high temperature increases. Hence, there is a non-negligible chance that unmitigated emissions may produce consequences which could be catastrophic for life on Earth. \nFor example, [it has been argued] (https://www.givewell.org/shallow/climate-change/extreme-risks#footnote7_jr7z9s5) that a 12ºC increase in mean global temperature—which is substantially outside the range considered plausible this century—would cause at least one day each year in the territories where half of all people live today to be hot enough to exceed human metabolic limits and cause tissue damage from hyperthermia after a few hours of exposure. \nOne way to reduce global temperatures quickly and cheaply is a form of climate engineering called [Solar Radiation Management (SRM)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_radiation_management) , which involves [cooling the Earth by reflecting sunlight back into space] (http://johnhalstead.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Halstead-Stratospheric-aerosol-injection-research-and-exist.pdf) . The most researched form of SRM involves injecting aerosols into the stratosphere. Most of the evidence so far suggests that ideal SRM deployment programmes would reduce overall damages relative to an un-engineered greenhouse world. \nHowever, SRM brings its own risks. Of the currently known potential negative direct effects of SRM, only abrupt termination could plausibly bring about an existential catastrophe. If a very thick stratospheric veil were deployed and SRM was suddenly terminated and not resumed within a buffer period of a few months, then there would be very rapid and damaging warming. [There might also be some reasons] (https://nickbostrom.com/papers/unilateralist.pdf) to expect the chance of at least one country to undertake climate engineering to be surprisingly high, especially when the relevant technologies are widespread, and the lack of global coordination permits each country to individually decide for or against the intervention.\n[In the headline question to this series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) , we defined a global catastrophe as a 10% decrease in the world population in any period of 5 years or less. This question resolves ambiguously if no such global catastrophe occurs. On the other hand...\nIf a global catastrophe happens before 2100, will it be principally due to human-made climate change, or the use of geoengineering as a deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climate system?\nThe question results positively if a human-made climate change or geoengineering catastrophe occurs that claims at least 10% in any period of 5 years or less before 2100. This catastrophe must be due to the direct effects of climate change that are generally believed very unlikely in a counterfactual world with little or no global warming but otherwise similar to ours. These include (but are not limited to) floods, extreme weather, the spreading of infectious disease, and the health effects of extreme heat. Finally, the effects due to the effects of the use of geoengineering that has been principally motivated to mitigate climate change risks, also count towards the population decline.\nThis question is part of the Ragnarök Question Series. Please have a look at the other questions and contribute your insights, analyses, and factorizations, especially on the questions on what might happen if a global catastrophe occurs (for which we are currently short on predictions):\n1-- \n[If a global biological catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2514/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-biological-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n2-- \n[If an artificial intelligence catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2513/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-an-artificial-intelligence-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n3-- \n[If a nuclear catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1585/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-nuclear-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n4-- \n[If a global climate disaster occurs by 2100, will the human population decline by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1604/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-climate-disaster-occurs-by-2100-will-the-earths-human-population-decline-by-95-or-more/) \nAlso, please check out our questions on whether a global catastrophe will occur by 2100, and if so, which?:\n5-- \n[By 2100 will the human population decrease by at least 10% during any period of 5 years?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) \n6-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to either human-made climate change or geoengineering?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1500/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-either-human-made-climate-change-or-geoengineering/) \n7-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to a nanotechnology failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1501/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nanotechnology-failure-mode/) \n8-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to nuclear war?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1494/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nuclear-war/) \n9-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to an artificial intelligence failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) \n10- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to biotechnology or bioengineered organisms?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1502/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-biotechnology-or-bioengineered-organisms/) \nAll results [are analysed here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2568/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-results-so-far/) , and will be updated periodically.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 282,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Ragnarök Question Series: If a global catastrophe occurs, will it be due to nanotechnology failure-mode?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1501/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nanotechnology-failure-mode/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4%",
    "Description": "In 1959, Richard Feynman pointed out that nanometre‐scale machines could be built and operated, and that the precision inherent in molecular construction would make it easy to build multiple identical copies. This raised the possibility of manufacturing at ever increasing speeds, in which production systems could rapidly and cheaply increase their productive capacity. This in turn suggested the possibility of destructive runaway self‐replication.\nAs Eric Drexler, a nanotech pioneer, first warned in [Engines of Creation] (http://xaonon.dyndns.org/misc/engines_of_creation.pdf) in 1986 (pg. 146), \nIn a mature form, molecular nanotechnology would enable the construction of bacterium-scale self-replicating mechanical robots that can feed on dirt or other organic matter. Such replicators could eat up the biosphere or destroy it by other means such as by poisoning it, burning it, or blocking out sunlight. \nPlants with ‘leaves’ no more efficient than today’s solar cells could out‐compete real plants, crowding the biosphere with an inedible foliage. Tough omnivorous “bacteria” could out‐compete real bacteria: They could spread like blowing pollen, replicate swiftly, and reduce the biosphere to dust in a matter of days. A person of malicious intent in possession of this technology might cause a catastrophe on Earth by releasing such nanobots into the environment.\nSuch self-replicating systems, if not countered, could make the earth largely uninhabitable. Other potential risks include [ecological and health disasters resulting from nano-pollutants] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollution_from_nanomaterials) , [the use of misuse of nanotechnology weaponry] (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/are-nanoweapons-paving-the-road-to-human-extinction_us_59332a52e4b00573ab57a3fe) , and, given the general-purpose character of nanotech, possibly much more.\nMoreover, the technology to produce a destructive nanobot seems considerably easier to develop than the technology to create an effective defense against such an attack (a global nanotech immune system, an “active shield”). Regulation might also be hard. Nanotech doesn’t require rare radioactive isotopes or large, easily identifiable manufacturing plants, as does production of nuclear weapons.\nAlthough only small portion of scientists might currently be working to develop self-replicating nanotech, [a recent study done for NASA's Institute for Advanced Concepts] (https://foresight.org/study_finds_self-replicating_nanomachines_feasible/) by General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems suggests that a useful self-replicating machine could be less complex than a [Pentium 4 chip] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_4) , and uncovered no road blocks to extending macroscale systems to microscale and then to nanoscale self-replicating systems. Drexler [points out that much of recent surprising progress] (https://www.theguardian.com/science/small-world/2013/oct/21/big-nanotech-atomically-precise-manufacturing-apm) comes from disparate fields, and isn't labelled generally \"nanotechnology\".\nIn the [headline question to this series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) , we defined a global catastrophe as a 10% decrease in the world population in any period of 5 years. \nIf a global catastrophe happens before 2100, will it be principally due to the deployment nanotechnology?\nThe question resolves positively if a global nanotechnology catastrophe occurs that claims at least 10% in any period of 5 years or less before 2100, and resolves as ambiguous if no global catastrophe occurs.\nThis question is part of the Ragnarök Question Series. Please have a look at the other questions and contribute your insights, analyses, and factorizations, especially on the questions on what might happen if a global catastrophe occurs (for which we are currently short on predictions):\n1-- \n[If a global biological catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2514/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-biological-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n2-- \n[If an artificial intelligence catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2513/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-an-artificial-intelligence-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n3-- \n[If a nuclear catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1585/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-nuclear-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n4-- \n[If a global climate disaster occurs by 2100, will the human population decline by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1604/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-climate-disaster-occurs-by-2100-will-the-earths-human-population-decline-by-95-or-more/) \nAlso, please check out our questions on whether a global catastrophe will occur by 2100, and if so, which?:\n5-- \n[By 2100 will the human population decrease by at least 10% during any period of 5 years?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) \n6-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to either human-made climate change or geoengineering?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1500/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-either-human-made-climate-change-or-geoengineering/) \n7-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to a nanotechnology failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1501/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nanotechnology-failure-mode/) \n8-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to nuclear war?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1494/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nuclear-war/) \n9-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to an artificial intelligence failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) \n10- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to biotechnology or bioengineered organisms?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1502/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-biotechnology-or-bioengineered-organisms/) \nAll results [are analysed here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2568/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-results-so-far/) , and will be updated periodically.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 133,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Ragnarök Question Series: If a global catastrophe occurs, will it be due to biotechnology or bioengineered organisms?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1502/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-biotechnology-or-bioengineered-organisms/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26%",
    "Description": "No single disease currently exists that combines the worst-case levels of transmissibility, lethality, resistance to therapies, and global reach. But we know that the worst-case attributes can be realized independently. For example, some diseases exhibit nearly a 100% case fatality ratio in the absence of treatment, such as rabies or septicemic plague. The 1918 flu [has a track record of spreading to virtually every human community worldwide] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2021692) . Chickenpox and HSV-1, [can reportedly reach over 95% of a given population] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18080353) .\nThe past decades have seen rapid advances in biotechnology, in part due to the falling costs of gene sequencing and synthesis. Improvements in ease-of-use of certain specific kinds of biotechnology bring increased concerns about biological risks. Gene synthesisers have the capacity to turn digital sequence data into physical genetic sequences, enabling individuals to create viruses from digital files ( [as was done with the 1918 Spanish Flu virus] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16210530) ).\nThe implications of these technologies are worrying, especially given the track record of state-run bioweapon research applying cutting-edge science and technology to design pathogens that are more virulent, more resistant to therapies, harder to diagnose and treat than those in nature.\nWhile there is no evidence of state-run bioweapons programs directly attempting to develop or deploy bioweapons that would pose an catastrophic risk, the logic of deterrence and mutually assured destruction could create such incentives, especially in a more unstable political climate, or following a breakdown of the [Biological Weapons Convention] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_Weapons_Convention) .\nDeliberate or accidental [gene drives] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_drive) that might not directly target human populations may also pose major risks. There are broadly [three features that give rise to the ecological risk of gene drives] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK379271/) :\n(i) a gene drive is passed on from one generation to the next at a rate greater than occurs naturally; (ii) a gene drive construct can have effects on other parts of the organism's genome beyond the target; and (iii) gene-drive modified organisms are designed to spread, along with their effects, into the larger environment. \n[Examples of such unanticipated consequences] (https://research.ncsu.edu/ges/files/2017/11/jri-si-hayes-identifying-detecting-adverse-ecological-outcomes-associated-release-gene-drive-modified-organisms-2018.pdf) that could rapidly proliferate the ecosystem are:\n---New phenotypes with a different (possibly increased) capacity to spread diseases or pathogens, \n---Cascading effects on food web caused by decrease in abundance of predators leading to possible loss of ecosystem services, \n---The gene drive being acquired by, and spreads within, non-target species (possibly humans), leading to suppression or modification of the nontarget species. \nFinally, accidents. [A report by Gryphon Scientific, Risk and Benefit Analysis of Gain of Function Research] (http://www.gryphonscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Final-Gain-of-Function-Risk-Benefit-Analysis-Report-12.14.2015.pdf) , has laid out a detailed risk assessments of potentially pandemic pathogen research, suggesting that the annual probability of a global pandemic resulting from an accident with this type of research in the United States is 0.002% to 0.1%. Since similar research is done outside of the United States, in potentially more accident-prone labs, the world seems to be exposed to worryingly high level of risk from accidental outbreaks ( [which some have estimated to be around 0.016% to 0.8% chance of a pandemic each year] (https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1089/hs.2017.0028) ).\n[In the headline question to this series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) , we defined a global catastrophe as a 10% decrease in the world population in any period of 5 years. \nIf a global catastrophe happens before 2100, will it be principally due to the deployment biotechnologies or bioengineered organisms?\nThe question resolves positively if a global biotechnology catastrophe occurs resulting from the deployment biotechnologies or bioengineered organisms (including viruses) that claims at least 10% in any period of 5 years or less before 2100, and resolves as ambiguous if no global catastrophe occurs. If the failure-mode is less direct, such as through indirect ecological effects of gene drives, the catastrophe must be generally believed very unlikely in a counterfactual world with little or no biotechnological interventions but otherwise similar to ours.\nThis question is part of the Ragnarök Question Series. Please have a look at the other questions and contribute your insights, analyses, and factorizations, especially on the questions on what might happen if a global catastrophe occurs (for which we are currently short on predictions):\n1-- \n[If a global biological catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2514/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-biological-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n2-- \n[If an artificial intelligence catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2513/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-an-artificial-intelligence-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n3-- \n[If a nuclear catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1585/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-nuclear-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n4-- \n[If a global climate disaster occurs by 2100, will the human population decline by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1604/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-climate-disaster-occurs-by-2100-will-the-earths-human-population-decline-by-95-or-more/) \nAlso, please check out our questions on whether a global catastrophe will occur by 2100, and if so, which?:\n5-- \n[By 2100 will the human population decrease by at least 10% during any period of 5 years?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) \n6-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to either human-made climate change or geoengineering?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1500/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-either-human-made-climate-change-or-geoengineering/) \n7-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to a nanotechnology failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1501/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nanotechnology-failure-mode/) \n8-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to nuclear war?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1494/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nuclear-war/) \n9-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to an artificial intelligence failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) \n10- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to biotechnology or bioengineered organisms?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1502/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-biotechnology-or-bioengineered-organisms/) \nAll results [are analysed here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2568/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-results-so-far/) , and will be updated periodically.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 188,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many NASA \"space launch system\" (SLS) launches before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1503/how-many-nasa-space-launch-system-sls-launches-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The first test launch of NASA's new \"Space Launch System\" rocket was originally scheduled to debut in 2017, but after many delays and cost overruns it [now seems unlikely that the rocket will launch before mid-2021.] (http://spacenews.com/nasa-inspector-general-sharply-criticizes-sls-core-stage-development/) \nMeanwhile, rapid advancements by private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin offer the promise of heavy-lift rockets (Falcon Heavy and New Glenn) with capabilities only slightly less than the SLS for a vastly lower cost. The arrival of these new rockets in the face of ongoing SLS costs and delays could provide strong political pressure to cancel NASA's most expensive human spaceflight program, [perhaps after only a handful of flights.] (http://arstechnica.com/science/2018/03/nasa-chief-explains-why-agency-wont-buy-a-bunch-of-falcon-heavy-rockets/) \nOn the other hand, the SLS has strong political support at the moment, and it is already deeply interwoven into many aspects of NASA's future plans. In addition to the initial uncrewed and crewed test flights, [SLS is currently scheduled] (http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2018/09/nasa-lunar-gateway-plans/) to send the \"Europa Clipper\" robotic probe to Jupiter sometime around 2023, and several launches will be required if NASA is to fully assemble the \"Lunar Gateway\" space station as currently envisioned.\nHow will these forces play out? Will endless delays ensure that only a small number of SLS launches happen before 2030? Will the program be canceled before 2030, ending the SLS after just a handful of flights? Or will the SLS find plenty of work constructing the Lunar Gateway and perhaps launching other large payloads?\nQuestion will resolve on January 1, 2030, or earlier if the SLS program is definitively canceled. Any distance lifted off the launchpad counts as a launch, regardless of whether the rocket explodes moments later.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 182,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Do humans have functionally important neurogenesis throughout their life?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1515/do-humans-have-functionally-important-neurogenesis-throughout-their-life/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "65%",
    "Description": "For roughly twenty years, since the work of Rusty Gage's group at UCSD circa 1998, neuroscientists have believed that a small amount of functionally significant neurogenesis (NG) occurs in both mammal (mice) and adult primate brains (monkeys). Adult NG was then found in a region called the hippocampus (HC) (and its subregion, the dentate gyrus, or DG). The HC is involved in short-term memory formation, and links to both our emotional centers of our brain (the amygdala) and our cerebral cortex, where our long term memories are stored. \nThis finding was later found for human brains by various studies, and it contradicted the previous longstanding \"dogma\" that adult brains don't form new neurons. The current leading theory of why NG occurs in the adult HC (if it does) is that it isn't some kind of regulatory failure (cancer, etc.) but that plays some functional role, perhaps in short-term memory storage. \nIn some neuroscience models, we are thought to store massive amounts of info in our HC over the last day or two of our lives, in synaptic connections, and we are also thought to flush this store out regularly, with only a subset of those memories being \"written to the cortex\" for long-term storage, usually while we dream and sleep. Adult NG is presumed by some to help this somehow, or play some other functional role.\nBut a [March 2018 Nature paper] (https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/study-finds-no-neurogenesis-in-adult-humans-hippocampi-29987) by Sorrells and Paredes at UCSF recently found sharply decining NG after the age of 1 year in human brains, and no NG in humans after the age of 13 yrs.\nThe Sorrells paper used a more stringent set of surface markers to search for new neurons than previous papers, and it argues previous studies weren't sufficiently rigorous in their neural classification approaches. It has a lot of neuroscientists confused again, as it comes from a respected group using some very careful work, and it concludes that adult humans do not do functionally important neurogenesis over their lifetimes. \nThen in April 2018 a careful stereology-based [study by Boldrini] (https://www.the-scientist.com/daily-news/abundant-neurogenesis-found-in-adult-humans-hippocampi-30050) at Columbia, also using postmortem hippocampi, contradicted the Nature paper. Boldrini's paper again argues the 20 year old view that adult human hippocampi continually does NG. They found about 1,000 neural progenitor cells in each of the front, middle, and back regions of the DG at any time, throughout the human lifespan. This is plenty enough, in some models, to be functionally important to human thinking and memory.\nSo which is it? \nEither: \n1-- \nAdult human NG exists and is functionally important to us throughout our lifespan (birth to death), or \n2-- \nNG doesn't exist in significant numbers in older humans, or if it does occur it isn't functionally important.\nAssuming we find out by 2028, which will it be? Resolution is positive for option 1.\nResolves positive if a definitive study or set of studies best accords with option 1, negative if it best accords with option 2. We'll define \"definitive\" as at least one study published in a top-tier journal (top 10 in the field by impact factor) with strong evidence for 1 or 2, along with the absence of a competitively compelling publication giving evidence for the other possibility, as of Jan 1 2028. Resolves ambiguous if not definitive.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 133,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the identity of Bitcoin's founder, Satoshi Nakamoto, be revealed to the general public by 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1517/will-the-identity-of-bitcoins-founder-satoshi-nakamoto-be-revealed-to-the-general-public-by-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8%",
    "Description": "Few anonymous people--save maybe [Banksy] (https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/the-story-behind-banksy-4310304/) and [Qanon] (http://nymag.com/selectall/2017/12/qanon-4chan-the-storm-conspiracy-explained.html) --have generated as much press as \"Satoshi Nakamoto\", the maverick who developed bitcoin.\nHaven't heard of the man? Here's an executive summary per [The Economist] (https://www.economist.com/technology-quarterly/2018/09/01/satoshi-nakamoto-bitcoins-enigmatic-creator) :\nON PAPER—or at least on the blockchain—Satoshi Nakamoto is one of the richest people on the planet.... But Mr Nakamoto, though actively involved with his brainchild in its early history, has been silent since 2011. An army of amateur detectives has been trying to work out who he really is, but there is frustratingly little to go on. While developing bitcoin he claimed to be male, in his late 30s and living in Japan, but even that information is suspect. \nWill we ever find out his true identity? Speculation abounds. (See [here] (https://www.quora.com/Do-you-think-we-will-ever-know-who-or-what-Satoshi-Nakamoto-is-How-many-people-right-now-would-know-the-true-identity-of-Satoshi-Nakamoto) and [here] (https://coinsutra.com/satoshi-nakamoto-facts/) and [here] (https://medium.com/cryptomuse/how-the-nsa-caught-satoshi-nakamoto-868affcef595) .) As noted above, Nakamoto is estimated to have [more than a million bitcoins] (https://coincentral.com/how-rich-is-satoshi-nakamoto-today/) , mined very early on. So he'd be worth well over $10Bn at current prices (as of launch), perhaps more. If he hasn't lost his thumb drive.\nQuestion resolves postive if Satoshi's true, corroborated identity is revealed to the world at large by April 5, 2025, [his birthday] (https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/229qvr/happy_birthday_satoshi_nakamoto/) . (Or is it??)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 409,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the total number of people who have gone to space reach 1000?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1519/when-will-the-total-number-of-people-who-have-gone-to-space-reach-1000/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The first human in space, Yuri Gagarin, orbited the Earth once on April 12 1961. The most recent successful manned launch delivered Sergey Prokopyev, Alexander Gerst, and Serena M. Auñón-Chancellor to the ISS as crew. Of the three only Gerst had already flown in space before, rendering Auñón-Chancellor and Prokopyev the most recent astronaut/cosmonaut as of 8 June 2018. Before their return they’re expected to orbit the Earth [almost 3000 times] (https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(six+months+in+minutes)+%2F+International+Space+Station+orbital+period) .\nIn the 57 years between Gagarin and Prokopyev/Auñón-Chancellor more than 550 people have flown to space. Cosmonauts, astronauts, taikonauts, even space tourists. \nCommercial space programs want to push that number significantly, either by providing the means (see [Blue Origin] (https://www.blueorigin.com) or [SpaceX] (https://www.spacex.com) ) or the destination for prospective space travellers (see [Bigelow] (https://www.bigelowspaceops.com) ).\nBut when do you think there will have been 1000 humans in space?\nFor the purposes of this question we will only count people who have reached orbit. Sub-orbital flights are explicitly excluded.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 268,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will most protons that currently make up Earth (and you) eventually decay?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1535/will-most-protons-that-currently-make-up-earth-and-you-eventually-decay/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "50%",
    "Description": "Warning: This is one of those Metaculus questions with no points actually on the line. It's not going to resolve.\nWhat is the ultimate fate of the \"stuff\" that makes us up? It's mostly protons, which (fortunately) are remarkably durable.\nAfter we as individuals die, the material that comprises our bodies at the time of death will mostly likely get recycled into Earth's biosphere. (This isn't 100% guaranteed--some lucky few of us may get to [die on Mars] (https://www.popsci.com/how-youll-die-mars) .) And not ALL of the protons in our bodies will remain on Earth. By chance, some will escape into space and roam the void.\nBut what's the long long term fate of the protons of Earth? Perhaps the Earth will be swallowed by the sun in a few billion years. [Or maybe not] (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-sun-will-eventually-engulf-earth-maybe/) . But on much longer time scales, many interesting things can happen to our protons:\n--- \nWe could end up sucked into the black hole at the center of our galaxy if the Andromeda-Milky Way [galactic merger] (http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2014/03/24/scientists-predict-our-galaxys-death/) happens just so. Or another black hole could happen along.\n--- \nA [vacuum state change] (https://nerdist.com/vacuum-decay-is-a-very-real-way-all-life-in-the-universe-might-be-destroyed/) or other weird physics could end the universe as we know it.\n--- \nProtons might [not actually decay] (https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/do-protons-decay) , and just hang around forever.\nWhat do you think will happen to our remnants in super-deep time? \nQuestion \"resolves\" positive if most of Earth's protons eventually decay into lighter particles; resolves negative if the majority of Earth's protons have a different fate (are processed into net zero-baryon number black hole emissions, destroyed in a phase transition, sit around forever, recast into other particles by superintelligent beings, disappear when the simulation's plug is pulled, or whatever.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 66,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a third LIGO detector be built in India by 2027?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1536/will-a-third-ligo-detector-be-built-in-india-by-2027/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "50%",
    "Description": "The [Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory] (https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/) (LIGO) has been responsible for some tremendously exciting science this decade.\n---On [September 14, 2015] (https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/news/ligo20160211) , LIGO detected (through gravitational waves) the merger of two black holes billions of light years away. \n---This triumph opened a new era of [gravitational wave astronomy] (https://www.space.com/39162-gravitational-waves-new-era-of-astronomy-2017.html) , giving us a radical new tool to probe the cosmos. \n---LIGO and friends (like VIRGO in Europe) have since seen other black hole mash-ups and even, amazingly, the smashing of [2 neutron stars] (https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/10/16/557557544/astronomers-strike-gravitational-gold-in-colliding-neutron-stars) . \n---The engineering required to make this observatory hop is [just ridiculous] (http://www.kavlifoundation.org/how-ligo-works) . \nHowever, per astrophysicist Ethan Siegel, LIGO [misses ~100,000 black hole mergers every year] (https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/ligo-misses-100-000-black-hole-mergers-a-year-d3184f5d193a) . Whoa! \nWe need backup, apparently!\nWell, help may soon be on the way, in the form of another LIGO detector under construction in India. [LIGO-India] (http://www.gw-indigo.org/tiki-index.php?page=LIGO-India) \"is a planned advanced gravitational-wave observatory to be located in India as part of the worldwide network.\" Possible benefits include:\nAdding a new detector to the existing network will increase the expected event rates, and will boost the detection confidence of new sources (by increasing the sensitivity, sky coverage and duty cycle of the network). But the dramatic improvement from LIGO-India would come in the ability of localizing GW sources in the sky. Sky-location of the GW sources is computed by combining data from geographically separated detectors ('aperture synthesis'). Adding a new detector in India, geographically well separated from the existing LIGO-Virgo detector array, will dramatically improve the source-localization accuracies (5 to 10 times), thus enabling us to use GW observations as an excellent astronomical tool.\nLIGO-India is set to be built [by 2025] (https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology/a-new-ligo-gravitational-wave-detector-to-be-built-in-india-by-2025/article22149855.ece) . That's 2 years before our question's deadline. But delays on massive science projects happen with some frequency. (Ahem, [Elon Musk] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2018/06/06/elon-musk-has-been-missing-deadlines-since-he-was-a-kid/) . Ahem, [James Webb Telescope] (https://www.space.com/41016-nasa-delays-james-webb-space-telescope-2021.html) .)\nCan the LIGO-India team make their deadline (given a 2 year fudge factor) and get their LIGO operational (defined taking test data demonstrating a sensitivity within a factor of 10 of the instrument's specified sensitivity) by 12/31/27?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 77,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first cloned human be born?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1537/when-will-the-first-cloned-human-be-born/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In January, Chinese researchers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Neuroscience in Shanghai shocked the world by publishing evidence that they had [cloned] (https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(18)30057-6) two female macaques-- [Zhong Zhong and Hua Hua] (https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/jan/24/zhong-zhong-and-hua-hua-first-primates-born-using-dolly-the-sheep-cloning-method) --using similar techniques to the ones that scientists at The Roslin Institute used to create [Dolly The Sheep] (http://dolly.roslin.ed.ac.uk/facts/the-life-of-dolly/index.html) nearly twenty years ago.\nThe Chinese team put a twist on the key process--known as \"somatic cell nuclear transfer.\" Reporters at Futurism summarized their breakthrough:\n[The transfer process involves] replacing the nucleus in a donor egg with a nucleus taken from a cell from another animal. After scientists use an electric current to make the egg believe it has been fertilized, it will start to develop into an embryo that can then be implanted into a surrogate for gestation. The animal that results from the pregnancy will be a genetic copy of whatever animal donated the nucleus. In primates, the process has traditionally failed at the blastocyst stage of embryonic development. To get past this hurdle, Sun’s team added two new elements to the usual collection of nutrients and growth factors that are typically introduced to embryos prior to surrogate implantation. Those new elements, a compound called trichostatin A and messenger RNA, helped direct the DNA to grow properly by prodding hundreds of genes necessary for successful embryonic development into action.\nThey've promised not to extend their work to use on humans. But now that the genie is out of the bottle...\n(For a philosophical exploration of the implications, check out [this piece] (https://medium.economist.com/if-human-cloning-happened-db76888a2069) in The Economist. It ends on this ominous, Philip K. Dick-esque note: \"given the simplicity, these days, of editing DNA, it is hard to believe there is not, somewhere in the world, just such a being preparing to celebrate its own second C-day.\")\nOn the other hand, this subject is easy to hype. We've heard promises of imminent human cloning [for a while] (https://www.wired.com/2002/11/first-baby-of-2003-to-be-a-clone/) now. \nWhen do you think it will finally happen? Resolution date = the birthday of a human clone, as recorded and published in a respected scientific journal.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 153,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Metaculus predict that artificial intelligence continues to pose a global catastrophic risk?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1538/will-metaculus-predict-that-artificial-intelligence-continues-to-pose-a-global-catastrophic-risk/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "74%",
    "Description": "Currently, artificial intelligence can outperform humans in a number of narrow domains, such as playing chess and searching data. As artificial intelligence researchers continue to make progress, though, these domains are highly likely to grow in number and breadth over time. Many experts now believe there is a significant chance that a machine superintelligence – a system that can outperform humans at all relevant intelligence tasks – will be developed within the next century, [and possibly much sooner] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1394/will-ai-progress-surprise-us/) . \nAs predictions to [a previous question suggest] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) , artificial intelligence might pose a global catastrophic risk (defined there as a 10% decrease in the world population in any period of 5 years). When considering how AI might become a risk, experts think two scenarios most likely, according to the [Future of Life Institute] (https://futureoflife.org/background/benefits-risks-of-artificial-intelligence/) : \n1-- \nThe AI is programmed to do something devastating: Autonomous weapons are artificial intelligence systems that are programmed to kill. In the hands of the wrong person, these weapons could easily cause mass casualties. Moreover, an AI arms race could inadvertently lead to an AI war that also results in mass casualties. To avoid being thwarted by the enemy, these weapons would be designed to be extremely difficult to simply “turn off,” so humans could plausibly lose control of such a situation. This risk is one that’s present even with narrow AI, but grows as levels of AI intelligence and autonomy increase. \n2-- \nThe AI is programmed to do something beneficial, but it develops a destructive method for achieving its goal: This can happen whenever we fail to fully align the AI’s goals with ours, which is strikingly difficult. If you ask an obedient intelligent car to take you to the airport as fast as possible, it might get you there chased by helicopters and covered in vomit, doing not what you wanted but literally what you asked for. If a superintelligent system is tasked with a ambitious geoengineering project, it might wreak havoc with our ecosystem as a side effect, and view human attempts to stop it as a threat to be met. As these examples illustrate, the concern about advanced AI isn’t malevolence but competence. A super-intelligent AI will be extremely good at accomplishing its goals, and if those goals aren’t aligned with ours, we have a problem.\nIt is [thought by some] (https://futureoflife.org/ai-open-letter/) that reducing the second of these two risks will require progress in technical methods of developing scalable control methods that could ensure that a AI will be safe and will behave as its programmers intend even if its intellectual capabilities are increased to arbitrary levels. Until recently, this problem was almost entirely neglected; but in the last couple of years, technical research agendas have been developed, and there are now several research groups pursuing work in this area. Total investment in long-term AI safety, however, remains orders of magnitude less than investment in increasing AI capability. Additionally, reducing the first of the listed risks might require improvements in our ability to control, govern and coordinate on the usage of such systems, so to reduce potential security threats from [malicious uses of AI technologies] (https://maliciousaireport.com/) . \nBut how certain are we that artificial intelligence continue to be regarded to constitute a large chunk of global catastrophic risk, at least through 2040? [A previous question asked] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) : If a global catastrophe happens before 2100, will it be principally due to the deployment of some Artificial Intelligence system(s)?\nWill the probability (of both the Metaculus and community predictions) [artificial intelligence causing a global catastrophe] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) (given that a global catastrophe does occur) remain above 5% in each 6-month period before 2040?\nThis question resolves positively if both the Metaculus and community predictions) of [artificial intelligence causing a global catastrophe] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) fail to fall below 5% for any 6-month period before 2040, as will be confirmed by one of the Metaculus admins.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 108,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "3.6°C global warming by 2100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1539/36c-global-warming-by-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "31%",
    "Description": "Without additional efforts to reduce GHG emissions beyond those in place today, global emissions growth is expected to persist, driven by growth in global population and economic activities. Global mean surface temperature increases in 2100 in baseline scenarios—those without additional mitigation— [range from 3.7°C to 4.8°C above the average for 1850–1900 for a median climate response] (https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf) . \nGiven these estimates of the baseline scenarios of unmitigated emissions, [studies exploring particular effort-sharing mitigation frameworks] (https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf) , have estimated substantial global financial flows associated with mitigation in scenarios to limit warming during the 21st century to less than 2°C. But [there is also a non-negligible chance] (https://www.givewell.org/shallow/climate-change/extreme-risks#footnote4_cwn3csz) that unmitigated emissions will lead to global temperature increases much higher than the median estimated outcome. More generally, estimates of temperature increases resulting from greenhouse emissions have a “fat” right tail, meaning that there is a low, but non-negligible chance of very high temperature increases.\nIn particular, [it has been argued that] (https://www.givewell.org/shallow/climate-change/extreme-risks#footnote4_cwn3csz) there is a decent chance that the unmitigated emissions might result in a &gt;6.4ºC change in global mean surface temperature. Then, even with the systems to reduce temperatures by 2.8ºC (as might be required in baseline scenarios to achieve the 2ºC target), mean global temperature might be still be at least as high as 3.6ºC, despite substantial mitigation efforts.\nThe estimated humanitarian impacts of climate changes are likely highly nonlinear: marginal temperature increases are expected to cause more damage at already-increased temperatures (i.e. going from 3ºC to 4ºC is expected to be significantly worse than going from 1ºC to 2ºC). [According to the IPCC's 2014 report,] (https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf) \nThe risks associated with temperatures at or above 4°C include severe and widespread impacts on unique and threatened systems, substantial species extinction, large risks to global and regional food security, consequential constraints on common human activities, increased likelihood of triggering tipping points (critical thresholds) and limited potential for adaptation in some cases.\nWill there, by 2100, have been a period of at least 5 consecutive years, in which the average global temperature in each year was at least 3.6˚C greater than the average global temperature relative to the period 1861–1880?\nData for resolution shall come from [NASA] (https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/) , if possible. Note that the data in the link is normalised relative to the 1951-1980 baseline, on which 1880 stands at -0.2. Therefore, the critical value to look for with this specific NASA dataset will be 3.4˚C. It is likely, though, that the link will no longer be active in a few decades, so a different dataset may have to be used anyway.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 129,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Is non-theism (atheists and agnostics) growing globally?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1552/is-non-theism-atheists-and-agnostics-growing-globally/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [\"nones\" are rising faster than ever in America] (http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/05/13/a-closer-look-at-americas-rapidly-growing-religious-nones/) , but globally, non-religious people are currently shrinking as a percentage of the population. Conflicting trends of economic development, evangelism, and fertility complicate predictions of world religiosity.\nPer a [Pew Research Center] (http://www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/religious-projections-2010-2050/) study from 2015, as reported by [Psychology Today] (https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-secular-life/201510/how-many-atheists-are-there) :\n1.1 billion people [do not identify with any religion]... which equals about 16.5% of the global adult population. As such, “non-religious” is actually the third largest “religion” in the world, coming only behind Christianity (in first place) and Islam (in second).\nAt the same time, the Pew study projects that as a percentage of the population, non-theists will decline to just 13% by mid-century. One obvious reason is that \n[r]eligions with many adherents in developing countries – where birth rates are high, and infant mortality rates generally have been falling – are likely to grow quickly. ...[R]eligiously unaffiliated population[s], by contrast, [are] heavily concentrated in places with low fertility and aging populations, such as Europe, North America, China and Japan.\nImportantly, Pew's projections have not attempted to wade into controversial social theories suggesting that economic development and religiosity are inversely linked. As the report explains, this has been the \"general experience in some parts of the world, notably Europe,\" but it is \"not yet clear whether it is a universal pattern.\" Indeed, there is [some evidence] (https://www.smu.edu.sg/perspectives/2012/06/26/understanding-rapid-rise-charismatic-christianity-southeast-asia) that amongst China's 1.4 billion citizens, increasing affluence may be correlated with or even driving increasing religiosity.\nConsidering all of these conflicting factors, go ahead and second-guess Pew's projections: \nWhat will the portion of the global population identifying as \"religiously unaffiliated\" be in 2050? \nThe resolution occurs if/when a study of comparable quality, scope, and methods to the [Pew study] (http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2014/01/global-religion-full.pdf) is published before 2060 quoting a number for \"religiously unaffiliated\" pertaining to some date within 3 years of 2050. Note that this group includes atheist and agnostic, but also people who do not identify with any particular religion in surveys (but who may nonetheless have non-specific spiritual or cultural belief systems).\n",
    "# Forecasts": 179,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The Rise and Fall of the Banana: Will the current main export cultivar, the Cavendish, be replaced by 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1558/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-banana-will-the-current-main-export-cultivar-the-cavendish-be-replaced-by-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "49%",
    "Description": "Bananas are a well-liked import fruit all over the world, and the Cavendish cultivar has been crushing that market for sixty years. But its rise is literally founded upon the compost heap of the Gros Michel, another cultivar. The so-called “Big Mike” variety had been the leading export towards Europe and North America, but the Panama disease, a fungus belonging to the Fusarium clade, killed that. [Luckily the Cavendish, grown in the same soil as the wilting Gros Michel, replaced it as the banana most of the western world connected with bananas] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gros_Michel_banana) .\nHowever, it appears [another Fusarium rears its spores] (https://www.wired.co.uk/article/cavendish-banana-extinction-gene-editing) . Cavendish, with their genetic homogenity (they’re all clones) and sterile nature, aren’t resistant to it, and the fungus is ravaging more and more plantations. \nThere are efforts under way to deal with Fusarium, but with various societies’ doubts and misgivings about GMOs, the cure may be viewed as a curse instead.\nWill the Cavendish account for less than 50% of banana exports worldwide by 2035?\nResolution is negative if Cavendish accounts for more than 50% of worldwide banana exports every year between now and 2035, and positive otherwise.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 124,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will we detect an exoplanet atmosphere with >5% oxygen atmosphere by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1568/will-we-detect-an-exoplanet-atmosphere-with-5-oxygen-atmosphere-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "55.00000000000001%",
    "Description": "Despite [Kepler’s recent] (http://www.nasa.gov/kepler) end of mission [the search] (http://sci.esa.int/gaia/) [for exoplanets] (https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/cubesat/missions/asteria.php) [continues] (https://tess.gsfc.nasa.gov) . While their orbits and properties vary, ranging from double our Moon’s mass to thirty times Jupiter’s, their atmospheres’ compositions are harder to detect.\nAs of this writing this means we have mostly data from exoplanets we detected by transition and occlusion methods, but also other kind of exoplanets. However we only found what is in their air, not how much or its ratio in the atmosphere. What we did detect of their atmospheres was often hydrogen, sodium, water vapour, carbon monoxide and dioxide, methane, and even oxygen, depending on the respective exoplanet.\nSadly, the presence of O2 isn’t the smoking gun for extraterrestrial life some media like to report it for. There are atmospheric and geological processes that produce detectable— [or even massive] (https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/ast.2014.1231) —amounts of oxygen, keeping the mere presence of O2 from being a robust biomarker. On the flip side, too much oxygen is also possible, and may prevent or hamper the development of life. \nSo far we lack a method that would determine the composition percentages of exoplanet atmospheres, but that doesn’t mean someone clever won’t come up with a way. And once we do, finding an atmosphere with a sizeable fraction of O2 might very well be a good indicator for extraterrestrial life.\nWill we detect an exoplanet atmosphere with &gt;5% oxygen atmosphere by 2030?\nResolves positive for any exoplanet with &gt;5% O2 found before 2030, negative if none are found.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 154,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the World's GDP be in 2028?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1574/what-will-the-worlds-gdp-be-in-2028/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In the first decade of the 21st century, the World produced [more economic value than in the first 19 centuries of the common era combined] (https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2011/06/28/two-thousand-years-in-one-chart) . From the long-term perspective of social history, lasting economic prosperity and economic growth that exceeds population growth is only a very recent achievement for humanity. \nSince 1961, World GDP grew at an [average rate of 3.5%] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG) resulting in a 7.1 fold increase, or a doubling once every 15.678 years or around 188 months. Although GDP growth rates are prone to shocks, world GDP has not recently shown to stagnate for long periods of time. In fact, world GDP growth was positive for all periods since 1961 [except for 2009] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD) , following the [global financial crisis] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisis_of_2007%E2%80%932008) .\nCurrently, in the third quarter of 2018, world GDP is estimated to be [around $80.078 trillion] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD) in 2010 prices. World GDP is taken to mean the sum of gross value, at purchaser's prices in U.S. dollars added by all resident producers in the economy. It is calculated without making deductions for the depletion and degradation of natural resources.\nWhat will be World GDP at the end of 2028 in trillions at current prices in U.S. dollars?\nFor the purpose of this question, we will refer to the data published by the [World Bank] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD) given in 2010 U.S. dollars. The same deflator used by the World Bank is to be applied for calculating 2028 GDP. If a different base year is adopted by the World Bank, the relevant GDP figures will simply be scaled so that 2017's GDP remains $80.078 trillion.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 129,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Fewer than 375M in extreme poverty by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1576/fewer-than-375m-in-extreme-poverty-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "23%",
    "Description": "In September 2015, 193 world leaders adopted the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and called for a “data revolution” to enhance accountability in measuring the progress towards their fulfilment. The SDGs have [17 goals] (https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/poverty/) of which the first is “To end poverty in all its forms everywhere by 2030”.\nExtreme poverty is defined as living on less than $1.90 a day, measured in 2011 Purchasing Power Parity prices. Currently, [around 630M people] (https://worldpoverty.io/) (roughly 8%) live in extreme poverty worldwide. According to [World Bank Data] (https://www.gapminder.org/tools/?from=world#$chart-type=bubbles&amp;state$time$value=2006&amp;delay:121.71612903225821;&amp;entities$;&amp;marker$select@;&amp;opacitySelectDim:0.3&amp;axis_x$use=indicator&amp;which=income_per_person_gdppercapita_ppp_inflation_adjusted&amp;scaleType=log&amp;zoomedMin=282&amp;zoomedMax=119849&amp;domainMin:null&amp;domainMax:null;&amp;axis_y$use=indicator&amp;which=extreme_poverty_percent_people_below_190_a_day&amp;scaleType=linear&amp;zoomedMin=0&amp;zoomedMax=93&amp;domainMin:null&amp;domainMax:null;&amp;size$use=indicator&amp;which=population_total&amp;extent@:0.022083333333333333&amp;:0.4083333333333333;&amp;domainMin:null&amp;domainMax:null;&amp;color$use=property&amp;which=world_6region;;;&amp;ui$chart$trails:false) , extreme poverty has been declining by roughly 1% per year since the 1980's. However, [there is evidence] (https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2018/09/19/decline-of-global-extreme-poverty-continues-but-has-slowed-world-bank) that the decline in global extreme poverty has been slowing.\nA [2018 study by Cuaresma et al.] (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-018-0083-y.pdf) on the poverty paths of developing countries projects worldwide poverty rates ranging from 4.5% (around 375 million persons) to almost 6% (over 500 million persons) in 2030.\nWill we see fewer than 375M in extreme poverty by 2030?\nThis question resolves positively if there are fewer than 375M in extreme poverty in any year up to (and including) 2030. For this question we will refer to the data by the World Bank, and if this is unavailable, some other database listed on the [data sources page] (https://www.metaculus.com/help/prediction-resources/#data-sources) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 183,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will China be the World's largest economy in any year before 2040?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1579/will-china-be-the-worlds-largest-economy-in-any-year-before-2040/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "88%",
    "Description": "China is today one of the major economies in the world. It ranks second in terms of gross domestic product and it contributes about 36 percent to world growth. Due to the size of its economy, Chinese business cycle fluctuations potentially affect economies worldwide. The Chinese economy further has substantial effects on global poverty, global trade, climate change, and much else.\nFrom the late 1970s, China saw an annual average growth rate of 9.9 per cent for more than three decades. This followed the introduction of reform and opening-up policies in 1978. In recent years, however, growth has slowed, to only 6.9 per cent in 2015. In Angus Maddison's book, [The Outlook for China and the World Economy] (http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Maddison07.pdf) , he forecasts that China's GDP will surpass that of the United States in the first half of this century, and likely as soon as 2030.\nChina has seen an average of 9.8% GDP growth since the 1970s, far higher than the 2.8% average observed in the United States in the same period. Despite the recent slowdown in Chinese growth, its rates of Total Factor Productivity has been growing on average at twice the average rate in the United States ( [around 3% in China] (http://www.urbanlab.org/articles/China/reform%20era/Brandt%20Rawski%20eds%202008%20-%20China's%20great%20economic%20transformation.pdf#page=853) vs [around 1.5% in the United States] (https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/indicators-data/total-factor-productivity-tfp/) ). Similarly, [Chinese capital formation rates] (https://tradingeconomics.com/china/gross-fixed-capital-formation-percent-of-gdp-wb-data.html) have tended to be almost twice [capital formation rates in the United States] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gross-fixed-capital-formation-percent-of-gdp-wb-data.html) .\nWill China's GDP exceed United States GDP in at least 1 year by 2040?\nThis question resolves positive if China's nominal GDP for a given year exceeds US nominal GDP (for that year) before (and including) 2040. For the purpose of this question, we refer to data published by the [World Bank] (https://data.worldbank.org/country/china) .\nFor the purpose of this question, nominal GDP will be compared after converting China's nominal GDP to USD (using exchanges rates that are commonly used by the World Bank for this purpose).\nPreviously, the resolution criteria was confusing, so this has been changed. It is reproduced here for reference:\nThis question resolves positive if China's GDP exceeds that of the United States in any 1 year before (and including) 2040. For the purpose of this question, we refer to data published by the [World Bank] (https://data.worldbank.org/country/china) that are adjusted for historical domestic prices. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 400,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first publicly traded company achieve a $10 trillion market capitalisation?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1584/when-will-the-first-publicly-traded-company-achieve-a-10-trillion-market-capitalisation/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This year, just weeks after globe-conquering tech giant Apple reached its $1 trillion value milestone, Amazon has joined them in crossing the threshold ( [at some surprise to Metaculus forecasters] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/651/a-trillion-dollar-company-by-the-end-of-2018/) ).\nApple was valued at around [$100 billion in mid 2007] (https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AAPL/apple/market-cap) , and so it has taken the company roughly 11 years to grow its market capitalisation by a factor of ten. Amazon's rise was even more impressive. Amazon has grown from $100 bn to $1 trillion [in just over 6 years] (https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AMZN/amazon/market-cap) .\nTo put the $10 trillion figure in some perspective, the United States currently (Q2, 2018) has a GDP of $20 trillion at current prices.\nWhen will the first publicly traded company achieve a $10 trillion market capitalisation in today's prices?\nThis resolves when a company whose shares can be bought and sold on a stock exchange achieves a market capitalisation of $10 trillion dollars adjusted to 2018 prices. The question will refer to [Yahoo Finance] (https://finance.yahoo.com/) 's data, or any other reputable financial data service.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 123,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Ragnarök Question Series: if a nuclear catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1585/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-nuclear-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "A nuclear exchange could cause a [nuclear winter] (http://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/pdf/RobockNW2006JD008235.pdf) – a release of black carbon into the atmosphere which would [according to some studies] (https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2013EF000205) , result in the blocking the Sun’s thermal energy. This would lower temperatures regionally and globally for several years, and open up new holes in the ozone layer protecting the Earth from harmful radiation, reduce global precipitation by about 10%, trigger crop failures, and result in widespread food shortages.\nAccording to [some models] (http://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/pdf/ToonRobockTurcoPhysicsToday.pdf) , the smoke would rapidly engulf the Earth and form a dense stratospheric smoke layer. The smoke from a war fought with strategic nuclear weapons would quickly prevent up to 70% of sunlight from reaching the surface of the Northern Hemisphere and 35% of sunlight from reaching the surface of the Southern Hemisphere. Such an enormous loss of warming sunlight would produce Ice Age weather conditions on Earth in a matter of weeks. For a period of 1-3 years following the war, temperatures would fall below freezing every day in the central agricultural zones of North America and Eurasia.\nThis could leave some survivors in parts of Australia and New Zealand, but they would be in a very precarious situation and the threat of extinction from other sources would be great. Whether a nuclear winter could cause extinction is currently unclear. Some [models consider total extinction very unlikely] (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1775342) , and suggest parts of the world would remain habitable.\nThese studies consider what is currently the worst-case nuclear exchange, namely, that between the US and Russia. However, It is possible that a future nuclear arms race someday leads to larger stockpiles or more dangerous nuclear weapons than existed at the height of the Cold War. In this case, chances of a nuclear extinction might be higher than they currently are.\nIn the first part of the Ragnarök Question Series, we asked the question [If a global catastrophe happens before 2100, will it be principally due to the deployment of nuclear weapons?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1494/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nuclear-war/) . Now it is asked,\nGiven that nuclear catastrophe occurs that results in the reduction of global population of at least 10% by 2100, will the global population decline by more than 95% relative to the pre-catastrophe population?\nThe question resolves ambiguous if a global nuclear catastrophe that claims at least 10% (in any period of 5 years or less) does not occur. It resolves positively if such a catastrophe does occur, and the global population is less than 95% of the pre-catastrophe population. The question resolves negative if a global nuclear catastrophe occurs that claims at least 10% (in any period of 5 years or less) but the post-catastrophe population remains above 5%.\nThis question is part of the Ragnarök Question Series. Please have a look at the other questions and contribute your insights, analyses, and factorizations, especially on the questions on what might happen if a global catastrophe occurs (for which we are currently short on predictions):\n1-- \n[If a global biological catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2514/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-biological-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n2-- \n[If an artificial intelligence catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2513/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-an-artificial-intelligence-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n3-- \n[If a nuclear catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1585/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-nuclear-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n4-- \n[If a global climate disaster occurs by 2100, will the human population decline by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1604/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-climate-disaster-occurs-by-2100-will-the-earths-human-population-decline-by-95-or-more/) \nAlso, please check out our questions on whether a global catastrophe will occur by 2100, and if so, which?:\n5-- \n[By 2100 will the human population decrease by at least 10% during any period of 5 years?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) \n6-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to either human-made climate change or geoengineering?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1500/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-either-human-made-climate-change-or-geoengineering/) \n7-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to a nanotechnology failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1501/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nanotechnology-failure-mode/) \n8-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to nuclear war?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1494/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nuclear-war/) \n9-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to an artificial intelligence failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) \n10- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to biotechnology or bioengineered organisms?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1502/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-biotechnology-or-bioengineered-organisms/) \nAll results [are analysed here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2568/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-results-so-far/) , and will be updated periodically.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 144,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the impact of the Effective Altruism movement be picked up by Google Trends in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1591/will-the-impact-of-the-effective-altruism-movement-be-picked-up-by-google-trends-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "80%",
    "Description": "Effective Altruism is a philosophy and social movement that uses evidence and reasoning to determine the most effective ways to benefit others. The movement came into being in the late 2000s as a community formed around the groups [Giving What We Can] (https://www.givingwhatwecan.org/) and [Givewell] (https://www.givewell.org/) .\nSince then, [around 3600 have pledged to donate a substantial percentage of their incomes] (https://www.givingwhatwecan.org/#our-members-have-done-some-amazing-things) to the world’s most effective charities, [thousands have significantly changed their career path to improve their impact on the world] ( https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HyELsX9n85D7M1GKxZ1BndxU9nVFLEPH0eh61g2PI4U/edit#gid=0) . Effective Altruism has inspired many to collectively [ donate around $5-10M each year] ( http://effective-altruism.com/ea/1e1/ea_survey_2017_series_community_demographics/) , has resulted in [$170 million+] (https://www.effectivealtruism.org/impact/) moved to effective charities, and has been partially responsible the focus areas and priorities of the Open Philanthropy Project, [which has made around $600M of charitable grants] ( https://www.openphilanthropy.org/giving/grants) .\nEffective Altruism uses evidence and reasoning to have a substantial and lasting beneficial impact on the World, but will this impact be picked up by Google Trends in a decade's time?\nWill the total interest in [Effective Altruism on Google Trends] (https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&amp;q=Effective%20Altruism) in 2030 be at least 0.2 times the total interest in 2017?\nTotal interest shall be defined as the sum of the individual monthly interest values over a year. Note that the linked-to Google Trends chart is for the search term 'Effective Altruism'. \nEdit (29/11/18): this resolves ambigous if Google Trends ceases to exist, or makes substantial enough changes to their methodology for admins to think an ambiguous resolution is required.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 106,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What year will the 2˚C climate threshold be crossed?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1596/what-year-will-the-2c-climate-threshold-be-crossed/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "At the Paris climate accord, world leaders promised to keep the global temperature increase this century (relative to pre-industrial levels) \"well below 2 ˚C\". Many experts were (and are) skeptical about this being feasible. Hence, it was asked whether there would be [ 5 consecutive years in which the global temperature was at least 2 ˚C above pre-industrial levels by 2100] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/585/2c-global-warming-by-2100/) . As of the writing of this question, the Metaculus community assigns an 80% probability to this happening. The year of comparison chosen was 1880.\nHere, it is asked: In what year will the average global temperature be at least 2 ˚C above the 1880 value for the first time?\nNote that the answer to this question could be never and that a non-never resolution could occur without triggering a positive resolution to the previously mentioned binary question. In the case of a non-never resolution, December 31st of the first year to achieve 2 ˚C warming shall be used as the resolution date.\nData for resolution shall come from [NASA] (https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/) , if possible. Note that the data in the link is normalized relative to the 1951-1980 baseline and 1880 stands at -0.19, so the critical value to look for is 1.81 (for temperature anomaly). It is possible, though, that the linked-to data source will no longer be available in a few years, in which case the best alternative (as of the judgement of Metaculus staff) shall be used for resolution.\nClosing date is set to 2025, but should resolution triggering information become available earlier, the question shall close retroactively one year prior to that information becoming available. (In all cases in which the question was still open at some point within one year of the information becoming available.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 139,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Elon Musk (attempt to) go to Mars?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1598/will-elon-musk-attempt-to-go-to-mars/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "Elon Musk is famous for many things. He is the CEO of Tesla, founder of The Boring Company and the CEO of Neuralink. Yet, perhaps Musk's most ambitious project is SpaceX, which aims to put humans on Mars in 2024 (as of the writing of this question). \nWhereas putting anybody on Mars may already seem ambitious enough, Musk has also talked about perhaps going to the red planet himself. In [ an interview with Axios] ( https://www.axios.com/elon-musk-mars-space-x-14c01761-d045-4da0-924b-322fb6a109ce.html) Musk estimated his own chances of going to Mars at 70%.\nIt is asked:Will Elon Musk personally go to Mars?\nThis question resolves positive if Elon Musk is launched on a rocket with the intent of going to Mars. It resolves negative if Elon Musk is declared legally dead before launching on a Mars-bound rocket.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 388,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "The Top500's total sum in 2030 as a multiple of the total sum in 2015",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1600/the-top500s-total-sum-in-2030-as-a-multiple-of-the-total-sum-in-2015/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In a related [question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1492/what-will-be-top500s-1-performing-supercomputer-as-a-multiple-of-the-500-performer-in-2030/) , we looked at Top500's #1 performing supercomputer as a multiple of the #500 performer, and forecasted that multiple's trend.\nFor this question we'll be looking at the growth of the top 500 supercomputers as a group. Their group performance is measured by the sum of the 500's top supercomputers' [Linpack Benchmark] (https://www.top500.org/project/linpack/) , which reflects the performance of a dedicated system for solving a dense system of linear equations. Specifically, this question asks by what multiple will the sum of Linpack performance for the top 500 supercomputers increase by 2030 in comparison to the performance of the top 500 supercomputers in 2015?\nHere are some examples of 15-year total-sum Linpack Benchmark factor increases:\n--- \nIn June 1993, the sum was 1.1 teraflop/s. 15 years later in June 2008, the sum had reached 12,200 teraflops (12.2 petaflops). This makes a ratio of 11,091.\n--- \nIn November 2003 the sum was 526.7 teraflop/s. By November 2018 the sum had reached 1,400,000 teraflop/s (1.4 exaflop/s). This makes a ratio of 2,658.\nDevelopment over time can be seen [in this chart.] (https://www.top500.org/statistics/perfdevel/) \nWhat sorts of changes to the trend might we expect in the coming years? By what multiple will the sum of Linpack performance for the top 500 supercomputers increase by June 2030 in comparison to the same metric for June 2015?\nResolution will based on Top500's reported June 2030 numbers. We will take the top 500 sum in June 2030, and divide by the top 500 sum in June 2015 (359.3 petaflop/s). If their reporting is not available, other reports will be sought. The question will resolve ambiguous if clear reporting on the Linpack performance of the top500 supercomputers is not available.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 128,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Ragnarök Question Series: if a global climate disaster occurs by 2100, will the Earth's human population decline by 95% or more?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1604/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-climate-disaster-occurs-by-2100-will-the-earths-human-population-decline-by-95-or-more/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2%",
    "Description": "[According to current IPCC estimates] (http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf) , unmitigated greenhouse emissions are likely to lead to global temperature increases of 2.6ºC-4.8ºC by 2100. If this happened, our planet would become a more precarious place, but it will likely remain mostly habitable.\nHowever, [according to some] (https://www.givewell.org/shallow/climate-change/extreme-risks) , there is also a non-negligible chance that unmitigated emissions will lead to global temperature increases even higher than 4.8ºC. More generally, estimates of temperature increases resulting from greenhouse emissions have a [“fat” right tail] (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-e-mann/the-fat-tail-of-climate-change-risk_b_8116264.html) , meaning that there is a low, but non-negligible chance of very high temperature increases. Hence, there is a non-negligible chance that unmitigated emissions may produce consequences which could be catastrophic for life on Earth.\nOne explanation is that increases in global mean temperatures might have substantial self-reinforcing feedbacks that could place us on a \"Hothouse Earth\" pathway. These [feedback processes include] (http://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/115/33/8252.full.pdf) permafrost thawing, decomposition of ocean methane hydrates, increased marine bacterial respiration, and loss of polar ice sheets accompanied by a rise in sea levels and potential amplification of temperature rise through changes in ocean circulation.\n[It has been argued] (https://www.givewell.org/shallow/climate-change/extreme-risks#footnote7_jr7z9s5) that a 12ºC increase in mean global temperature—which is substantially outside the range considered plausible this century—would cause at least one day each year in the territories where half of all people live today to be hot enough to exceed human metabolic limits and cause tissue damage from hyperthermia after a few hours of exposure. \nOne way to reduce global temperatures quickly and cheaply is a form of climate engineering called [Solar Radiation Management (SRM)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_radiation_management) , which involves [cooling the Earth by reflecting sunlight back into space] (http://johnhalstead.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Halstead-Stratospheric-aerosol-injection-research-and-exist.pdf) . The most researched form of SRM involves injecting aerosols into the stratosphere. Most of the evidence so far suggests that ideal SRM deployment programmes would reduce overall damages relative to an un-engineered greenhouse world. \nHowever, SRM brings its own risks. Of the currently known potential negative direct effects of SRM, only abrupt termination could plausibly bring about an existential catastrophe. If a very thick stratospheric veil were deployed and SRM was suddenly terminated and not resumed within a buffer period of a few months, then there would be very rapid and damaging warming.\nIn an earlier question in the Ragnarök question series, I asked [If a global catastrophe happens before 2100, will it be principally due to human-made climate change, or the use of geoengineering as a deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climate system?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1500/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-either-human-made-climate-change-or-geoengineering/) , where a global catastrophe was defined as a 10% or more reduction in human population in 5 years or less.\nIf a global climate catastrophe occurs by 2100, will the Earth's human population decline by more than 95% relative to the pre-catastrophe population?\n--- \nThe question resolves ambiguous if a global climate catastrophe that reduces the human population by at least 10% does not occur. \n--- \nIt resolves ambiguous if this catastrophe is primarily due the effects on the climate system of a nuclear war.\n--- \nIt resolves positive if such a catastrophe does occur, and the global population is less than 5% of the pre-catastrophe population. It does also not matter how the Earth's population declines, this might be due to mass fatalities, or mass immigration to a different planet, as long as this decline is highly unlikely on a counterfactual Earth in which the climate disaster did not occur.\n--- \nIt resolves positive if the 95% decline in population is primarily due the effects on the climate system of the use of geoengineering that has been principally motivated to mitigate climate change risks.\n--- \nThe question resolves negative if a global climate catastrophe occurs that claims at least 10% (in any period of 5 years or less) but the post-catastrophe population does not fall 95% or more relative to the pre-catastrophe population.\nThis question is part of the Ragnarök Question Series. Please have a look at the other questions and contribute your insights, analyses, and factorizations, especially on the questions on what might happen if a global catastrophe occurs (for which we are currently short on predictions):\n1-- \n[If a global biological catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2514/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-biological-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n2-- \n[If an artificial intelligence catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2513/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-an-artificial-intelligence-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n3-- \n[If a nuclear catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1585/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-nuclear-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n4-- \n[If a global climate disaster occurs by 2100, will the human population decline by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1604/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-climate-disaster-occurs-by-2100-will-the-earths-human-population-decline-by-95-or-more/) \nAlso, please check out our questions on whether a global catastrophe will occur by 2100, and if so, which?:\n5-- \n[By 2100 will the human population decrease by at least 10% during any period of 5 years?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) \n6-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to either human-made climate change or geoengineering?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1500/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-either-human-made-climate-change-or-geoengineering/) \n7-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to a nanotechnology failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1501/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nanotechnology-failure-mode/) \n8-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to nuclear war?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1494/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nuclear-war/) \n9-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to an artificial intelligence failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) \n10- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to biotechnology or bioengineered organisms?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1502/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-biotechnology-or-bioengineered-organisms/) \nAll results [are analysed here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2568/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-results-so-far/) , and will be updated periodically.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 142,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Is the Zuma satellite still in orbit?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1618/is-the-zuma-satellite-still-in-orbit/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "43%",
    "Description": "In January 2018, a classified satellite known only as Zuma, built by defense contractor Northrop Grumman for an unknown agency of the United States government, was launched by commercial space launch provider SpaceX. The specific agency in charge of the Zuma project has not been disclosed, nor its purpose. The National Reconnaissance Office, the agency responsible for operating the spy satellites of the United States, which typically announces the launch of its assets, specifically denied that Zuma was one of their satellites ( [http://aviationweek.com/awinspace/nro-spacex-…] (http://aviationweek.com/awinspace/nro-spacex-zuma-payload-not-its-bird) ).\nThe satellite had a development cost of approximately $3.5 billion according to reports in the Wall Street Journal, and as such is one of the most-expensive single objects ever launched into space.\nIt is also, perhaps, one of the costliest objects ever lost in connection to a space mission. \nThe official story (provided by anonymous government officials) is that Zuma was lost before achieving orbit when it failed to separate from its payload adapter, provided by Northrop Grumman, and was destroyed when it re-entered Earth's atmosphere. Launch provider SpaceX has been absolved of responsibility for the claimed loss of the satellite. However, due to the uncommon extent of the secrecy surrounding the mission and the high value of the payload, conspiracy theories have swirled from the day of the launch. \nMany people believe that the satellite is actually in orbit conducting a secret mission for persons unknown. Amateur astronomers have been scanning the skies in an attempt to locate the satellite (a feat previously accomplished with spy satellites, the orbits of which are not typically disclosed by the agencies responsible for them), but so far have not succeeded in locating Zuma. The US government has so far refused to publicly state if there was a failure of Zuma, and this secrecy has only served to increase the level of speculation on its purpose and its fate.\nMore information on the satellite can be found here: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zuma_(satellite)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zuma_(satellite)) \nWas Zuma really destroyed before achieving orbit - or is it still up there? \nThis question shall resolve positively if credible media reports state that the Zuma satellite has been located in orbit around Earth, or if any agency of the United States government publicly confirms that the satellite is still in orbit. The satellite need not be operational, or have ever been operational, in order for the question to resolve positively.\nThe question will resolve negatively if conclusive evidence of the satellite's destruction is presented.\nThe question will resolve ambiguously if neither a positive nor negative resolution is possible by January 1, 2030.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 118,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first manned spacecraft touch the surface of any planet, dwarf planet, or moon other than Earth, Earth's moon, or Mars?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1619/when-will-the-first-manned-spacecraft-touch-the-surface-of-any-planet-dwarf-planet-or-moon-other-than-earth-earths-moon-or-mars/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Between 1969 and 1972, twelve American men walked on the moon. Since then, no manned spacecraft has ever landed on any astronomical body except the Earth itself.\nThere are various plans to send humans to the moon and to Mars - but when will the first manned spacecraft touch the surface of any planet or moon other than Earth, Earth's moon, or Mars?\nThis question resolves positively when any spacecraft containing living humans comes into physical contact with any planet, dwarf planet, or moon other than Earth, Earth's moon, or Mars according to the agency, corporation, or other body primarily responsible for the mission.\nThe landing need not last for any significant period of time and the crew need not survive impact for a positive resolution, but must be alive when the impact occurs. Making physical contact with other bodies such as asteroids, comets, or 'minor planets' not considered 'dwarf planets' does not count.\nResolves ambiguously if it cannot be conclusively determined whether or not any members of the crew are alive at the moment the spacecraft makes contact with the surface of the astronomical body. A crew of only [EM] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Age_of_Em) s will not count toward positive resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 123,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the heaviest payload put into LEO by a launch vehicle that is in service at start of 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1620/what-will-be-the-heaviest-payload-put-into-leo-by-a-launch-vehicle-that-is-in-service-at-start-of-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of 2018, the Saturn V remains the tallest, heaviest, and most powerful (highest total impulse) rocket ever brought to operational status, and holds records for the heaviest payload launched and largest payload capacity to low Earth orbit (LEO) of 140,000 kg (310,000 lb), which included the third stage and unburned propellant needed to send the Apollo Command/Service Module and Lunar Module to the Moon.\nCurrently, the world's most capable rocket is the Falcon Heavy with an advertised LEO payload capacity of 63,800kg (140,660 lb).\nOn January 1 2050, what will be the highest payload delivered to LEO (in kilograms) of a launch vehicle in service? \nThis question applies only to the payload delivery of vehicles physically launched into space (regardless of their propulsion method) and not to the capacity of any hypothetical and currently unrealized systems such as space elevators, space towers, space guns, skyhooks or other unconventional systems that may be developed by 2050. The vehicle class must have delivered the payload in question and be arguably in service in that future flights of the same or similar vehicle are anticipated.\nResolves ambiguously if there are no qualifying launch vehicles on January 1 2050.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 69,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a senolytic therapy be approved for commercial sale by the United States Food and Drug Administration before January 1 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1621/will-a-senolytic-therapy-be-approved-for-commercial-sale-by-the-united-states-food-and-drug-administration-before-january-1-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "57.99999999999999%",
    "Description": "In recent years, a number of ventures have begun work on translating the results of some promising laboratory studies on senolytic agents into medicine for humans.\nA senolytic agent is an agent introduced to the body for the purpose of selectively eliminating senescent cells from the patient. Senescent cells are cells in the body that no longer divide, having reached their Hayflick limit, but which do not automatically apoptose. \nThese senescent cells linger in the body triggering inflammatory responses, reducing the effectiveness of the immune system, and they are associated with many age-related diseases including type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis which present a high disease and mortality burden, especially in the most-developed countries in which age-related diseases constitute the overwhelming majority of causes of death among populations.\nSenescent cells are thought to play an important part in the aging process, and thus it is theorised that selectively removing these senescent cells would significantly improve healthspan (and perhaps, alone or as part of a combinatorial therapy, significantly extend lifespan).\nOne major player in this quickly developing area of medicine is [Unity Biotechnology] (https://unitybiotechnology.com/) . [Its pipeline] (https://unitybiotechnology.com/pipeline/) includes several drugs currently in the lead optimization phase, with UBX0101 having this year entered Phase 1 of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, FDA-approved clinical trial. \nYou can find out more about these first trials, and more about senolytics in general, [here] (https://www.leafscience.org/the-first-rejuvenation-therapy-reaches-human-trials/) .\nThis question asks: Will the US FDA (or any US national successor body in the event that the FDA as currently constituted is renamed, reorganized or ceases to exist during the relevant timeframe) approve a product marketed as a senolytic therapy or drug (whether a small molecule drug, gene therapy or other class of clinical intervention) for commercial sale in the United States before January 1 2030?\nThis question resolves positively in the event that such regulatory approval is granted. Note that the approval must be given before January 1 2030, but the actual sale of any product is not required before that date. \nFor the purposes of this question, an intervention will be regarded as a 'senolytic therapy' if it is marketed by its producer as an intervention whose purpose includes the selective removal of senescent cells, and medical evidence accepted by the FDA demonstrates that it does so.\nThe question resolves negatively if no such therapy is approved, and resolves ambiguously if the FDA is disbanded before any approval is given and/or no agency of the US government with the responsibility for granting regulatory approval for drugs and medical interventions is created to succeed it during the relevant timeframe.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 184,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a mouse be confirmed to have lived for 2,500 days before 1 January 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1624/will-a-mouse-be-confirmed-to-have-lived-for-2500-days-before-1-january-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "50%",
    "Description": "The longest lived laboratory mouse ever was a growth hormone receptor knockout mouse which lived to approximately 1,800 days old in the lab of Andrzej Bartke at Southern Illinois University. The maximum for normal B6 mice under ideal conditions is 1200 days. \nIn order for a mouse to live for 2,500 days, it is highly likely that a major breakthrough in rejuvenation of mammalian organisms will have to be achieved, and so this achievement would likely have significant implications for humanity. \nThis question shall resolve positively if by 1 January 2035, credible media reports state that an individual mouse has lived for at least 2,500 days.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 203,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 1 January 2050, will it be possible to increase a healthy adult human's IQ by at least two standard deviations in less than 30 days?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1625/by-1-january-2050-will-it-be-possible-to-increase-a-healthy-adult-humans-iq-by-at-least-two-standard-deviations-in-less-than-30-days/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "16%",
    "Description": "Arguably the most important single difference between humans and all other life is the degree to which human intelligence allows for radically more complex forms of socialization, cooperation, activity and achievement. No other species in the universe (to our knowledge) has created the kind of complex civilization that humans have created, or anything close to it, and this is due to the large advantage that humans have acquired in intelligence.\nThe most widely-accepted tool for measuring human intelligence is the IQ test. The population average is fixed arbitrarily at 100, and the results of a population fit a Gaussian probability distribution, also known as a bell curve. Approximately two-thirds of the population score between one standard deviation below the mean and one standard deviation above the mean. About 2.5% of the population scores at or above two standard deviations above the mean, and 2.5% scores at or below two standard deviations below the mean. The difference in ability this represents is large. A person with an IQ two standard deviations below the mean is considered to have less than a 50% chance of graduating from high school, whereas a person with an IQ two standard deviations above the mean has a slightly higher IQ than the average holder of a Juris Doctor degree (an IQ of 126).\nPsychometricians generally regard IQ tests as having high statistical reliability and predictive validity.\nA high statistical reliability implies that although test-takers may have varying scores when taking the same test on differing occasions, and although they may have varying scores when taking different IQ tests at the same age, the scores generally agree with one another and across time. \nA high predictive validity implies that the results of the test provide you useful insights into the test-taker, and IQ scores are significantly correlated with a number of important life outcomes including job performance, academic achievement, likelihood of being out of the labor force more than one month out of the year, and many others. More information is available [here] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient) . \nBecause of the importance of human intelligence, it would arguably be highly valuable both to individuals and to humanity if it were possible to meaningfully increase it through some kind of intervention, whether medical, technological or otherwise.\nBefore 1 January 2050, will it be demonstrated to be possible through any kind of intervention to increase the intelligence of a physically and mentally healthy adult human below the age of 65, with an IQ no lower than one standard deviation below the United States population mean, by at least two standard deviations above their initial mean score?\nThis mean score is to be generated from three standardized IQ tests taken by a reliable test-taker giving their best effort using either the Raven's Progressive Matrices test or a similar non-verbal culture-fair test, with the post-intervention scores generated by the same method, and with the tests before and after intervention supervised and the results validated by at least three suitably qualified psychometricians independent of the persons or group responsible for the attempt.\nFurthermore, the test-taker must be independent of the group or individual responsible for developing or carrying out the attempt, and the test-taker must not be a professional psychometrician, professional quizzer, or have ever been involved in the design of intelligence or other psychometric tests.\nThe final test score must be obtained within 30 days of the commencement of whatever intervention is utilized in the attempt to increase the test-taker's score (in order to minimize the possibility of an individual achieving such a large score increase through extensive training and practice).\nFinally, the mean score for the test subject cannot initially be 2.5 standard deviations above the mean or higher, as it is unclear how reliable the IQ test is for scores above the +4.5 sigma range (i.e. after a 2 standard deviation increase on a 15 SD scale), given that these scores are exceptionally rare.\nThis resolves positively if by 1 January 2050, \n--- \n30 healthy adult humans under the age of 65 have their IQ scores increased by at least two standard deviations in less than 30 days, relative to their previous mean score generated from 3 separate tests, or\n--- \n100 healthy adult humans under the age of 65 have their IQ scores increased by at least two standard deviations in less than 30 days, relative to their previous mean score generated from 2 separate tests, or\n--- \n200 healthy adult humans under the age of 65 have their IQ scores increased by at least two standard deviations in less than 30 days, relative to their previous mean score generated from 1 separate test.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 198,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 January 2050, will any human cryonically preserved for at least 1 year be successfully revived?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1626/before-1-january-2050-will-any-human-cryonically-preserved-for-at-least-1-year-be-successfully-revived/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "As of 2014, around 250 legally dead people in the United States were in cryonic preservation. At least 1,500 people around the world have active plans to join them in cryopreservation in an attempt to thwart (or at least delay) permanent death by freezing (or more technically 'vitrifying') their corpses after their legal death. Many of these 'cryopatients' have had their whole bodies preserved; others have opted to have only a cheaper neuropreservation. You can probably guess what that means. For more information on the current state of the art in cryonics, you can visit [Alcor's website] (https://alcor.org/Library/html/vitrification.html) , which is one of the most prominent organisations in the field.\nThis question asks: will any 'patients' who have been in cryonic preservation for at least one full year before 2050 be successfully revived before 1 January 2050? \nFor the purposes of this question, a revived patient must be determined by at least three recognized medical experts (M.D. or PhD in Biology, Neuroscience or equivalent level of education), each of whom is independent of the cryonics organisation responsible for the patient, to be conscious, alert and responsive to questions for at least 24 hours at some point within a year and a day after midnight on the date that the attempt to revive them is made.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 230,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the longest verified human lifespan on record on January 1 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1628/what-will-be-the-longest-verified-human-lifespan-on-record-on-january-1-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of 2018, the record for longest verified human lifespan is held by Jeanne Louise Calment of Arles, France. She lived from 21 February 1875 to 4 August 1997, for a term of 122 years, 164 days.\nShe has held the record for longest confirmed human lifespan since 12 May 1990, was the first human ever to have been confirmed to have lived to the age of 116 years, and is the only human confirmed to have ever lived beyond 120 years. Calment reportedly remained mentally intact until the end of her life, and the New York Times reported that she had been in good health, though almost blind and deaf, as recently as a month before her death. She died of unspecified causes. \nThe oldest verified person currently alive, as of 8 December 2018, is Kane Tanaka of Japan. She was born on 2 January 1903 and at time of question writing is 115 years, 338 days old. If she is still alive on January 1 2050, she will be 146 years, 11 months, 30 days old. \nHere are the lists of oldest [verified people ever] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_verified_oldest_people) , and [the oldest currently living] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_oldest_living_people) people.\nAs of January 1 2050, what will be the longest verified human lifespan on record, in years?\nTo avoid ambiguity in the event that someone is unconscious (perhaps for a long time) before their death, this question shall focus on age at legal death. If a person is declared legally dead by competent authorities, their age at the time their legal death takes effect shall be considered their age at death, even in the event that their physical body may still exist and certain biological functions may be maintained by extraordinary means. In case a person successfully emerges from cryopreservation between now and 2050, all time spent legally dead before and during cryopreservation shall be deducted from their lifespan.\nI have selected a maximum age possibility of 200, substantially above the maximum possible if Ms Tanaka lives to 2050, to account for the possibility that there are substantially older persons currently alive but unknown to gerontologists, or people with unverified claims whose claims subsequently become verified.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 174,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will alien technosignatures be detected before 1 January 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1629/will-alien-technosignatures-be-detected-before-1-january-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "[Technosignatures] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technosignature) are any measurable property or effect that provide scientific evidence of past or present technology, and are key to the search for extraterrestrial intelligence.\nTechnosignatures include (but are not limited to) evidence of electromagnetic transmissions of information, artificial heat and light, astroengineering projects (Dyson spheres and swarms, Matrioshka brains, stellar engines etc), asteroid or other space mining projects, and spacecraft.\nThis question asks: Will technosignatures of non-human origin be detected before 1 January 2050?\nBy 'non-human origin,' this question refers to technosignatures that are not the result of human activity, or of the activity of any technology or 'lifeform' created by humans, including any artificial intelligence system or biological organism.\nTo resolve positively, before 1 January 2050 a competent and credible authority on astronomy and or space exploration (such as NASA, ESA, ROSCOSMOS, CNSA, JAXA, SETI or similar) must announce that, on the balance of probabilities (i.e. more than 50% likely), technosignatures of non-human origin have been discovered. This announcement qualifies only if it is made after a year waiting period following the initial announcement of the detection, unless the space agencies of the US, Russia, China and Europe all agree that the finding is genuine. Evidence of biosignatures alone will not be directly relevant to the resolution of this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 246,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of US residents will be aged 100 years or older on January 1 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1630/what-percentage-of-us-residents-will-be-aged-100-years-or-older-on-january-1-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "We have a number of questions regarding possible achievements in life extension, but none that measure the effect these achievements might have on a large cohort of people.\nIn 2005, the US Census Bureau estimated the country would have 114,000 centenarians by the year 2010. The actual number reported in the 2010 census was less than half that amount at exactly 53,364 people, or approximately 0.0173% of the population at the time.\nAs of 2014, [estimates by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db233.pdf) , place the number of American centenarians at approximately 72,000, roughly 0.022% of the population at the time.\nThis question asks: what percentage of US residents will be aged 100 years or older on January 1 2050, according to data released either by national statistical authorities such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Center for Health Statistics or other credible independent statisticians?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 77,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Cuba still be a communist state in 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1631/will-cuba-still-be-a-communist-state-in-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "90%",
    "Description": "Since 1965, Cuba has been governed by the Communist Party of Cuba. Cuba is one of few remaining Marxist–Leninist socialist states, where the role of the vanguard Communist Party is enshrined in the Constitution. \nAs of December 09 2018, only the following countries are one-party states in which the institutions of the ruling Communist Party and the state have become intertwined (and they are generally adherents of Marxism–Leninism in particular): People's Republic of China, Republic of Cuba, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Socialist Republic of Vietnam, and Democratic People's Republic of Korea.\nWill Cuba will still be a communist state as measured by having a below 50 score on the [Index of Economic Freedom] (https://www.heritage.org/index/) ?\nThis question resolves positive if the 2023 [Index of Economic Freedom] (https://www.heritage.org/index/) assigns an index value below 50, indicating \"repressed economic activity\". Currently, Cuba [has an index value of 31.9] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Economic_Freedom) , meaning a negative resolution requires an 18.1 increase in the index value. This resolves ambiguous if the Heritage Foundation, or the Wall Street Journal does not publish the Index of Economic Freedom values for 2023.\nEdit (14/12/18) the resolution criteria now depends on the [Index of Economic Freedom] (https://www.heritage.org/index/) assigned to Cuba in 2023.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 218,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will US income inequality increase by 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1634/will-us-income-inequality-increase-by-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "48%",
    "Description": "According to [DQYDJ] (https://dqydj.com/household-income-percentile-calculator/) , as of 2018 the gross income for a US household at the 80th percentile is $127,144.40 The gross income for a US household at the 20th percentile is $24,913.40.\nTherefore, the gross income of a household at the 80th percentile is 5.10345 times the gross income of a household at the 20th percentile.\nAt any point before 01 January 2025, will the gross income of a US household at the 80th percentile be more than 6.12414 times that of a US household at the 20th percentile; or, in other words, will this specific measurement of household income inequality increase by at least 20%?\nFor the purpose of this question, we shall refer to the data released by [the U.S. census bureau] (https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/news/data-releases.html) (which is the same data used by [DQYDJ] (https://dqydj.com/household-income-percentile-calculator/) ) or any other source of economic data listed in the [prediction resources page] (https://www.metaculus.com/help/prediction-resources/) if the U.S. census bureau no longer publishes the relevant data.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 217,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a crewed spacecraft enter interstellar space for the first time?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1637/when-will-a-crewed-spacecraft-enter-interstellar-space-for-the-first-time/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "For the second time in history, a human-made object has reached the space between the stars. NASA’s Voyager 2 probe, launched on August 20 1977, has now has exited the heliosphere – the protective bubble of particles and magnetic fields created by the Sun. The only human-made object to previously achieve this was Voyager 1, launched on September 5, 1977. Both of these craft are unmanned probes. \nThis question asks: When will a crewed spacecraft containing living and conscious human beings be confirmed to be outside of the Sun's heliosphere?\nFor the purposes of this question, the humans on the spacecraft must be both alive and conscious at the time that the spacecraft is confirmed to be outside the heliosphere. Humans in any kind of cryonic preservation, suspended animation, hibernation or other similar state at the time that the craft is declared to be outside the heliosphere are excluded, as are 'mind uploads' (a hypothetical futuristic process of scanning the mental state (including long-term memory and \"self\") of a particular brain substrate and copying it to a computer) that are hosted locally on the spacecraft, or any other kind of non-human consciousness.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 181,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Alex Jones ever hold high Federal office in the United States before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1638/will-alex-jones-ever-hold-high-federal-office-in-the-united-states-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "Alexander Emric Jones is a famous (or perhaps, infamous) American filmmaker, radio host, entrepreneur, and noted conspiracy theorist. Some have claimed (including his own lawyer in court, during a custody battle) that Jones is merely an extremely dedicated performance artist playing a character - but he publicly denies this.\nHe rose to prominence in the 2010s, particularly during and after the 2016 Presidential Election cycle, in which he was a vocal and high-profile supporter of Donald Trump. More recently, he and his content have been banned from Twitter, Facebook and YouTube for spreading so-called 'fake news', disinformation, and alleged 'hate speech' over a period of some years. He has also been banned from using the PayPal service.\nJones has previously ran for public office. In early 2000, Jones was one of seven Republican candidates for state representative in Texas House District 48, an open swing district based in Austin, Texas. Jones stated that he was running \"to be a watchdog on the inside\" but withdrew from the race after a couple of weeks. He remains fervently opinionated about American politics, and has not ruled out the possibility of attempting run for election again in the future. As we have learned in recent years, political events can be difficult to forecast.\nThis question asks: At any time before January 1 2030, will Alexander Emric Jones ever legally hold one of the following offices: United States Representative, United States Senator, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Vice President of the United States, or President of the United States?\nThe question resolves positively if Jones ever legally holds one of these offices before January 1 2030, regardless of whether he is elected to office or comes to legally occupy the position in another manner. The question resolves negatively if Jones does not do so by January 1 2030, or if he dies before that date.\nThe question resolves ambiguously in the event that all of these offices cease to exist before January 1 2030.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 247,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will lab-grown complex vital organs be used successfully in humans before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1640/will-lab-grown-complex-vital-organs-be-used-successfully-in-humans-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26%",
    "Description": "More than 30,000 organ transplants are performed each year in the United States alone, according to 2015 data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Around the world, the total was estimated to be 135,860 in 2016 according to the [Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation] (http://www.transplant-observatory.org/) . \nHowever, the demand for donor organs often significantly exceeds the supply, meaning that many patients have to wait for a significant period of time before receiving an acceptable donor organ. Many, tragically, die waiting. \nIn response to this problem, multiple efforts are underway around the world to create acceptable donor organs in laboratories. There have been reported successes for simpler tissue structures including [vaginas] (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-26885335) , [urethras] (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12666171) , and [bladders] (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-45470799) , but so far there have been no attempts in humans for hearts, livers, kidneys or lungs - though [lab-grown lungs have been implanted into pigs] (https://www.sciencenews.org/article/scientists-transplant-lab-grown-bioengineered-lungs-pigs) and [functional human “mini-kidneys”] (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/human-kidney-grown-mouse-stem-cells-urine-medical-first-scientists-functioning-tissue-cells-a8202856.html) capable of filtering blood to produce urine have been grown in mice.\nBefore Janury 1 2025, will any human live without the assistance of medical life support for at least 100 days after the implantation of a lab-grown heart, liver (or a substantial part of the liver), kidney or lung?\nAll transplantations need to be considered by medical professionals to have a substantial positive effect on the patient's health, relative to the counterfactual case in which the patient did not receive the transplantation.\nFor the purposes of this question, 'lab-grown' includes organs cultivated inside a living organism so long as the organs are not naturally ocurring; that is, not merely an organ taken from a non-human and implanted in a human without there having been substantial bioengineering involved to alter the harvested organs.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 226,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will it once again be possible to travel between London and New York City by any commercially available means in under three hours by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1642/will-it-once-again-be-possible-to-travel-between-london-and-new-york-city-by-any-commercially-available-means-in-under-three-hours-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "35%",
    "Description": "London and New York City are the world's two most important financial centers, and as of 2018 are the only cities in the world to have ever been ranked Alpha++ by the [Globalization and World Cities Research Network] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalization_and_World_Cities_Research_Network) \nThe fastest transatlantic airliner flight was from New York's JFK Airport to London's Heathrow Airport on 7 February 1996 by the British Airways Concorde designated G-BOAD in 2 hours, 52 minutes, 59 seconds from take-off to touchdown aided by a 175 mph (282 km/h) tailwind.\nSince the Concorde was retired in 2003, flight times have increased substantially. The fastest commercial flight operated since 2003 [seems to have been made in 2018] (https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/norwegian-plane-boeing-harold-van-dam-new-york-jfk-london-gatwick-travel-holiday-a8169496.html) by a Norwegian Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner departing from New York's JFK reached London Gatwick in 5 hours, 13 minutes.\nThis question asks: At any point before 2030, will it once again be possible by any commercial means to travel between London and New York in less than three hours?\nTo resolve positively, at least one living human must make the journey from inside the metropolitan area of either New York City, United States or Greater London, United Kingdom, to inside the metropolitan area of the other city in under three hours any point before January 1 2030 by commercially available means, including chartered privately owned or operated civil aircraft or spacecraft, but not military aircraft or spacecraft.\nThe clock starts at the moment the journey itself begins (i.e. excluding time spent checking in, going through a security process, waiting on the tarmac at an airport before takeoff, et cetera.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 269,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the US unemployment rate reach 10% before 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1643/will-the-us-unemployment-rate-reach-10-before-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "99%",
    "Description": "The unemployment rate in the United States averaged 5.77% from 1948 until 2018, reaching an all time high of 10.80% in November of 1982 and a record low of 2.50% in May of 1953. According to the most recent data available (for November 2018) at the time of question writing, the national unemployment rate in the United States is 3.7%. You can view historical data [here] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate) .\nAt any point before January 1 2023, will the US unemployment rate meet or exceed 10%?\nFor a positive resolution, data confirming 10% or greater unemployment must be sourced from the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, or, if that body no longer exists, credible media reports in the financial press.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 368,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a von Neumann probe be launched before 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1644/will-a-von-neumann-probe-be-launched-before-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "19%",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nA von Neumann probe is an autonomous spacecraft capable of replicating itself. The concept is named after the 20th century Hungarian-American mathematician and physicist [John von Neumann] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_von_Neumann) , who rigorously studied the concept of self-replicating machines that he called \"Universal Assemblers.\" While von Neumann never applied his work to the idea of spacecraft, theoreticians since then have done so.\nIn theory, a self-replicating spacecraft could be sent to a neighbouring planetary system, where it would seek out raw materials (extracted from asteroids, moons, planets, gas giants, etc.) to create replicas of itself. These replicas would then be sent out to other planetary systems. The original parent probe could then pursue its primary purpose within the star system. This mission varies widely depending on the variant of self-replicating starship proposed. \nIf a self-replicating probe finds evidence of primitive life (or even a primitive intelligent culture, analogous to that achieved by humans in the past) it might be programmed to lie dormant, silently observe, attempt to make contact, or even interfere with or guide the evolution of life in some way. \nIt has been [theorized] (http://www.rfreitas.com/Astro/ComparisonReproNov1980.htm) that a self-replicating starship utilizing relatively conventional theoretical methods of interstellar travel (i.e., no exotic faster-than-light propulsion, and speeds limited to an \"average cruising speed\" of 0.1c.) could spread a technological presence throughout a galaxy the size of the Milky Way in as little as half a million years, which is close to nothing on cosmological timescales. \n\nQuestion\n========\n\nWill a self-replicating autonomous spacecraft be dispatched into space by humanity (or by technological intelligence created by humanity) before January 1 2050?\n\nResolution\n==========\n\nA spacecraft will count if it meets the criteria (per [Wikipedia's definition of self-replicating machines] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-replicating_machine#Bootstrapping_Self-Replicating_Factories_in_Space) ) of being capable of reproducing itself autonomously using raw materials found in the environment, thus exhibiting self-replication in a way analogous to that found in nature. \nFor positive resolution, the spacecraft must launch into space, but is not required to undergo a replication cycle.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 72,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 2025, will an asteroid or comet estimated to be at least 50 meters in diameter be detected to be due to collide with Earth before 2100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1645/before-2025-will-an-asteroid-or-comet-estimated-to-be-at-least-50-meters-in-diameter-be-detected-to-be-due-to-collide-with-earth-before-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "6%",
    "Description": "A stony asteroid 50 meters in diameter, with a density of 2600 , speed of 17 km/s, and an impact angle of [would have a kinetic energy equivalent to of 5.9 megatons of TNT] (https://impact.ese.ic.ac.uk/ImpactEarth/ImpactEffects/) at atmospheric entry, and 5.2 megatons of TNT at an airburst altitude of 8.7 km (29,000 ft). This airburst energy is approximately 350 times that of the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945. Needless to say, it would be a problem if this kind of event were to take place anywhere near a populated area.\nTo give a sense of scale, an object believed to be rougly 50 meters in diameter created [Meteor Crater / Barringer Crater] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteor_Crater) in Arizona approximately 50,000 years ago.\nThis question asks: Will an asteroid or comet estimated to be at least 50 meters in diameter be detected on a trajectory that would lead to a collision with Earth, with the collision due to occur before 1 January 2100, and the detection made before 1 January 2025? \nFor a positive resolution, the detection must be announced or corroborated by either the International Astronomical Union, NASA, ROSCOSMOS, CNSA, JAXA, ESA, or a similarly competent authority on astronomy. Additionally, there must be at least 95% confidence with regard to the size, and collision date estimates. The collision probability needs to be at least 95% in the absence of human-initiated attempts to intervene, as confirmed by at least one competent authority on astronomy.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 229,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the human condition change fundamentally before 2100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1646/will-the-human-condition-change-fundamentally-before-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "80%",
    "Description": "[Nick Bostrom] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Bostrom) , philosopher and Founding Director of the [Future of Humanity Institute] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_Humanity_Institute) at the University of Oxford, [argues] (https://youtu.be/YBAxrR3RBSs) that only two events since the dawn of humanity have fundamentally changed the human condition: the Agricultural Revolution that took place approximately 10,000 years ago, and the Industrial Revolution which took place from roughly 1760-1840. Bostrom states the following:\n\"So what kind of thing would count as a fundamental change in the human condition? \n\"You could argue that if we look back over history, there has really only been two events that have fundamentally changed the human condition, the first being [the Agricultural Revolution some 10,000 or 12,000 years ago in Mesopotamia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neolithic_Revolution) , where we transitioned from being hunter-gatherers, small bands roaming around, to settling into cities, growing, domesticating crops and animals. With that you get social stratification, if there is a lot of grain, you could have a king or pharaoh who extracts the surplus, you can have standing armies, you can have war, you can have higher population densities, specialisation of labour, and from that point on, innovation grows much faster and population grows faster as well as a result.\n\"The second fundamental change in the human condition, [Industrial Revolution] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Revolution) , where for the first time, you have the rate of economic and technological growth outstripping population growth, and so only when this happens can you have an increase in average income. Before that, there was technological growth and economic growth, but the economy grew 10%, the population grew 10%, everybody's still in a [Malthusian condition] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malthusianism) .\"\nBostrom further argues that there are relatively few potential technologies that could have the same kind of impact, and that perhaps foremost among them is [machine intelligence] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence) .\nThe kind of discontinuity in the human condition seen as a result of the agricultural and industrial revolutions is substantial; human civilisation became markedly more complex, acquired fundamentally new abilities, and the human experience became radically different after each of these events.\nThe question we ask here is: Before January 1 2100, will the human condition change fundamentally to at least roughly the same extent that it did after the agricultural and industrial revolutions?\n\"The human condition,\" for the purposes of this question, is the general level of social complexity, economic productivity, and ability to manipulate physical reality humanity has achieved at the civilisational level. \nThe discontinuity can be in either direction - though it seems improbable that Metaculus would continue to exist if humanity were to revert to a pre-industrial state.\nEvents that may occur this century, but which do not appear to represent a discontinuity of approximately the same degree as the agricultural and industrial revolutions, include (among other things) the establishment of bases or settlements on other bodies in the solar system, the achievement of modest to moderate life extension (e.g. an additional 10 to 30 years of life) or a significant but not radical increase in economic productivity.\nResolution\nIf at any time after the date of 2025-01-01 both the community and Metaculus predictions are &gt;= 98% or &lt;= 2%, with 80% probability, the question resolves positively or negatively, respectively. With 20% probability, the question resolves according to a committee of 5 Metaculus admins, who will vote yes or no (not ambiguous), and will unmake their respective predictions so that they do not gain or lose points on the question.\nNote that the admins will be voting on whether the qualifying event has already happened, not whether they believe it will happen; for example, if the probability goes to 99% because a super-powerful AI seems immininent within 10 years, but it has not actually happened yet, the committee should unanimously vote no.\nIf the question has not resolved by January 1 2100, it resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 146,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the greatest velocity attained by a human-made spacecraft before 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1648/what-will-be-the-greatest-velocity-attained-by-a-human-made-spacecraft-before-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of December 13 2018, the fastest human-made spacecraft is the [Parker Solar Probe] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_Solar_Probe) which on 6 November 2018 [attained] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_vehicle_speed_records#Spacecraft) a maximum velocity of 343,112 km/h (0.000318 times the speed of light, or c) relative to the Sun.\nIt is expected that this will be substantially exceeded in the future when Parker Solar Probe reaches its ultimate perihelion. Its velocity relative to the Sun is expected to reach 690,000 km/h (0.000640 c).\nThis question asks: Before January 1 2050, what will be the greatest velocity ever achieved, in c, by any spacecraft made by humans?\nIn order to unambiguously express the velocity of a spacecraft, a frame of reference must be specified. For the purposes of this question, this reference frame will be taken to be fixed to the center of mass of the sun.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 117,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution be amended or repealed before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1650/will-the-second-amendment-to-the-united-states-constitution-be-amended-or-repealed-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "The Second Amendment to the [United States Constitution] (https://www.usconstitution.net/const.pdf) protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms and was adopted on December 15, 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights. \nAn amendment to the Constitution is an improvement, a correction or a revision to the original content approved in 1788. To date, 27 Amendments have been approved, six have been disapproved and thousands have been discussed. \nArticle V of the Constitution prescribes how an amendment can become a part of the Constitution. While there are two ways, only one has ever been used. All 27 Amendments have been ratified after two-thirds of the House and Senate approve of the proposal and send it to the states for a vote. Then, three-fourths of the states must affirm the proposed Amendment.\nThe other method of passing an amendment requires a Constitutional Convention to be called by two-thirds of the legislatures of the States. That Convention can propose as many amendments as it deems necessary. Those amendments must be approved by three-fourths of the states.\nThe actual wording of Article V is: “The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.” \nFollowing a number of firearm-related tragedies in recent times, and with significant debate regarding the role of government in society and the prudence of maintaining this individual right to own firearms, numerous individuals and groups have floated the possibility of amending or repealing the Second Amendment. \nThis question asks: Will the Second Amendment as written and in force on December 13th 2018 be successfully amended or repealed at any time before January 1 2025?\nAny and all modifications to the Second Amendment result in positive resolution to this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 151,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "A breakthrough in accurately predicting protein structure before 2031?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1651/a-breakthrough-in-accurately-predicting-protein-structure-before-2031/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "99%",
    "Description": "Proteins are large, complex molecules essential in sustaining life. Nearly every function our body performs—contracting muscles, sensing light, or turning food into energy—can be traced back to one or more proteins and how they move and change. The recipes for those proteins—called genes—are encoded in our DNA.\nWhat any given protein can do depends on its unique 3D structure. For example, antibody proteins that make up our immune systems are ‘Y-shaped’, and are akin to unique hooks. By latching on to viruses and bacteria, antibody proteins are able to detect and tag disease-causing microorganisms for extermination. Similarly, collagen proteins are shaped like cords, which transmit tension between cartilage, ligaments, bones, and skin. \nOther types of proteins include CRISPR and Cas9, which act like scissors and cut and paste DNA; antifreeze proteins, whose 3D structure allows them to bind to ice crystals and prevent organisms from freezing; and ribosomes that act like a programmed assembly line, which help build proteins themselves.\nBut figuring out the 3D shape of a protein purely from its genetic sequence is a complex task that scientists have found challenging for decades. The challenge is that DNA only contains information about the sequence of a protein’s building blocks called amino acid residues, which form long chains. Predicting how those chains will fold into the intricate 3D structure of a protein is what’s known as the “protein folding problem”.\nThe bigger the protein, the more complicated and difficult it is to model because there are more interactions between amino acids to take into account. As noted in [Levinthal’s paradox,] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levinthal%27s_paradox) it would take longer than the age of the universe to enumerate all the possible configurations of a typical protein before reaching the right 3D structure.\nThe ability to predict a protein’s shape is useful to scientists because it is fundamental to understanding its role within the body, as well as diagnosing and treating diseases believed to be caused by misfolded proteins, such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, Huntington’s and cystic fibrosis.\nAn understanding of protein folding will also assist in protein design, which could unlock a tremendous number of benefits. For example, advances in biodegradable enzymes—which can be enabled by protein design—could help manage pollutants like plastic and oil, helping us break down waste in ways that are more friendly to our environment. In fact, researchers have already begun engineering bacteria to secrete proteins that will make waste biodegradable, and easier to process.\nOver the past five decades, scientists have been able to determine shapes of proteins in labs using experimental techniques like cryo-electron microscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance or X-ray crystallography, but each method depends on a lot of trial and error, which can take years and cost tens of thousands of dollars per structure. This is why biologists are turning to AI methods as an alternative to this long and laborious process for difficult proteins.\n[Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction, or CASP,] (http://predictioncenter.org/index.cgi) is a community-wide, worldwide experiment for protein structure prediction taking place every two years since 1994. CASP provides research groups with an opportunity to objectively test their structure prediction methods and delivers an independent assessment of the state of the art in protein structure modeling to the research community and software users.\nEven though the primary goal of CASP is to help advance the methods of identifying protein three-dimensional structure from its amino acid sequence, many view the experiment more as a “world championship” in this field of science. More than 100 research groups from all over the world participate in CASP on a regular basis and it is not uncommon for entire groups to suspend their other research for months while they focus on getting their servers ready for the experiment and on performing the detailed predictions. \nIn the most recent CASP experiment, 98 entries were accepted for 43 protein structures. The entry ranked second correctly solved three of the 43 protein structures, for a success rate of 7%.\nThe entry ranked first, that of [Google DeepMind's algorithm AlphaFold,] (https://deepmind.com/blog/alphafold/) correctly solved 25 of the 43 protein structures, or 58.1%. [Here] (https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/dec/02/google-deepminds-ai-program-alphafold-predicts-3d-shapes-of-proteins) is a non-technical press article on the feat, and [here] (https://deepmind.com/blog/alphafold/) is DeepMind's blog post on it.\nThis question asks: Before 2031, will any entry to CASP correctly solve at least 90% of available protein structures?\nThis resolves positive if any entry to CASP achieves at least a score of 90 [mean GDT-TS] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3932189/) . GDT-TS is a [global distance test] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_distance_test) measure of prediction accuracy ranging from 0 to 100, with 100 being perfect. If the CASP stops being run before this is achieved or before 2031, the question resolves as ambiguous.\n(Edited 2020-12-01 to add ambiguous resolution if CASP stops being run.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 286,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will functional respirocytes be used successfully in any mammal before 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1653/will-functional-respirocytes-be-used-successfully-in-any-mammal-before-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "[Respirocytes] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respirocyte) are hypothetical artificial red blood cells that are intended to emulate the function of their organic counterparts, so as to supplement or replace the function of much of the human body's normal respiratory system. Respirocytes were proposed by Robert A. Freitas Jr in his 1998 paper [\"A Mechanical Artificial Red Blood Cell: Exploratory Design in Medical Nanotechnology\".] (https://foresight.org/Nanomedicine/Respirocytes.html) \nThe respirocyte is a bloodborne 1-micron-diameter spherical nanomedical device designed by Robert A. Freitas Jr. The device acts as an artificial mechanical red blood cell. It is designed as a diamondoid 1000-atmosphere pressure vessel with active pumping powered by endogenous serum glucose, and can deliver 236 times more oxygen to the tissues per unit volume than natural red cells while simultaneously managing carbonic acidity.\nAn individual respirocyte consists of 18 billion precisely arranged structural atoms plus 9 billion temporarily resident molecules when fully loaded. An onboard nanocomputer and numerous chemical and pressure sensors allow the device to exhibit behaviors of modest complexity, remotely reprogrammable by the physician via externally applied acoustic signals.\nThe design calls for twelve pumping stations to be spaced evenly along an equatorial circle. Each station has its own independent glucose-metabolizing powerplant, glucose tank, environmental glucose sensors, and glucose sorting rotors. Each station alone can generate sufficient energy to power the entire respirocyte, and has an array of 3-stage molecular sorting rotor assemblies for pumping O2, CO2, and H2O from the ambient medium into an interior chamber, and vice versa. The number of rotor sorters in each array is determined both by performance requirements and by the anticipated concentration of each target molecule in the bloodstream.\nThe equatorial pumping station network occupies ~50% of respirocyte surface. On the remaining surface, a universal \"bar code\" consisting of concentric circular patterns of shallow rounded ridges is embossed on each side, centered on the \"north pole\" and \"south pole\" of the device. This coding permits easy product identification by an attending physician with a small blood sample and access to an electron microscope, and may also allow rapid reading by other more sophisticated medical nanorobots which might be deployed in the future.\nThe promise of artificial mechanical red cells is that it gives physicians the ability to precisely control saturation curve profiles independently for oxygen and carbon dioxide, either to maximize gas transport efficiency or to meet specialized demand functions imposed by emergency situations, unusual activities, or specific medical treatments.\nRespirocytes are an example of molecular nanotechnology, a field of technology still in the very earliest, purely hypothetical phase of development. Current technology is not sufficient to build a respirocyte due to considerations of power, atomic-scale manipulation, immune reaction or toxicity, computation and communication. Creation of this kind of device would require multiple technological breakthroughs. For further information on respirocytes, see e.g. [this essay by Freitas.] (http://www.kurzweilai.net/respirocytes) \nThis question asks: Before 1 January 2035, will 'artificial red blood cells' with broadly the functionality described by Freitas be used successfully in any mammal?\nResolves positively upon the publication of an article in a respectable scientific journal indicating that such devices have been successfully used in a living mammal to meaningfully augment and or replace (partially or totally) the existing supply of red blood cells. A meaningful augmentation is an augmentation resulting in a non-trivial increase in overall performance of the existing red cell population. These respirocytes will need to be perform at least some gas transport function, and be principally the product of nanotechnology techniques, including (but not limited to) those outlined by [Freitas' article] (https://foresight.org/Nanomedicine/Respirocytes.html) . This therefore excludes transfusions of modified red blood cells from existing organisms. Finally, the mammal needs to survive at least 7 days after the introduction of the respirocytes.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 117,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the average survival rate of all cancers exceed 75%?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1654/when-will-the-average-survival-rate-of-all-cancers-exceed-75/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Every sixth death in the world is due to cancer, making it the [second leading cause of death] (http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(17)32152-9.pdf) (second only to cardiovascular diseases). In 2016, 8.9 million people are estimated to have died from the various forms of cancer. The [Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation] (http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool) put relatively small error margins around this global figure: the lower and upper estimates extend from 8.75 to 9.1 million.\nAs of 2013 in the United States, the mean 5-year relative survival rate of all cancers (for both sexes) [was 69.2%] (https://ourworldindata.org/cancer#cancer-survival-rates) . As you can see from this chart by [Our World in Data] (https://ourworldindata.org/cancer#cancer-survival-rates) , the survival rate has been steadily increasing. For example, in 1977 the figure was 48.9%\nWhen will the mean 5-year relative survival rate of all cancers for both sexes in the United States exceed 75.0%?\nThis resolves positive if at some future date, the 5-year survival rates will have been reported to exceed 75.0%. This question will refer to data Published by the [National Cancer Institute] (https://seer.cancer.gov/archive/csr/1975_2014/browse_csr.php?sectionSEL=1&amp;pageSEL=sect_01_table.05.html) or any other reputable source of medical statistics.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 125,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will there be a breakthrough in the treatment of hard-to-treat cancers?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1655/when-will-there-be-a-breakthrough-in-the-treatment-of-hard-to-treat-cancers/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Every sixth death in the world is due to cancer, making it the [second leading cause of death] (http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(17)32152-9.pdf) (second only to cardiovascular diseases). In 2016, 8.9 million people are estimated to have died from the various forms of cancer.\nSome cancers are harder to survive than others. Common cancer sites with low 5 year survival rates include the brain and nervous system (35.9%), stomach (31.1%), oesophagus (21%), lungs and bronchus (19.5%), liver (18.5%) and pancreas (8.7%) ( [all rates for both sexes, all races from 2013 in the U.S.] (https://ourworldindata.org/cancer#cancer-survival-rates) ).\nWhen will we see a doubling of the odds of survival (relative to 2013 rates) in the U.S. for cancers in any two of the following sites for both sexes and all races: brain and nervous system, stomach, oesophagus, lungs and bronchus, liver, or the pancreas?\nPositive resolution requires any two of the following reported average rates for both sexes and all races in the U.S.\n1--% 5-year survival rates for brain and nervous system cancer, \n2--% 5-year survival rates for stomach cancer, \n3--% 5-year survival rates for oesophagus cancer, \n4--% 5-year survival rates for lungs and bronchus cancer, \n5--% 5-year survival rates for liver cancer, \n6--% 5-year survival rates for pancreatic cancer, \nas reported by the National Cancer Institute, or any other reputable provider of medical statistics.\nHistorical of survival rates from all listed cancers are catalogued in [Our World in Data] (https://ourworldindata.org/cancer#cancer-survival-rates) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 123,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the 10,000th human reach space?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1659/when-will-the-10000th-human-reach-space/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The Fédération Aéronautique Internationale (FAI) defines spaceflight as any flight above 100 kilometres (62 mi) above Earth's sea level.\nThe first human spaceflight occured in 12 April 1961, and as of June 17, 2018, a total of [561 people] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_space_travelers_by_name) had gone to space according to that definition. This works out to about 10 people per year since 1961, but progress has not been linear or continuous. \nAs of December 2018, the spacecraft with the highest crew capacity to have ever been sucessfully launched on a crewed mission is the now-retired [Space Shuttle] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle) , which could be configured to carry up to 10 astronauts at once, but [never actually carried more than eight.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-71) In recent years, proposals have been made for a new generation of super-heavy (and beyond) [spaceships capable of taking 100 or more humans to space in a single launch.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BFR_(rocket)) \nThis question asks: When will the 10,000th human reach space?\nResolves positively if and when credible media reports announce that a person has become the 10,000th human to reach an altitude of 100km above Earth's sea level, or if and when the same announcement is credibly made by any national or international space agency. Entering orbit is not necessary - any flight above 100km will qualify.\nPersons born above this altitude (including on space stations or on astronomical objects other than Earth) are not included for purposes of this question, unless they later complete a qualifying spaceflight. Flights made from bodies other than Earth do not count. \nPersons must be alive and conscious (e.g. not in suspended animation or some other state of unconsciousness or minimal consciousness) when they cross the 100km boundary, but need not survive their full mission beyond that point in order to be counted.\nFinally, the number refers to the number of people to have made the flight, not the total number of flights - reflights made by the same person do not add to the total.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 142,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any asteroid or comet have been mined in space for commercial purposes before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1662/will-any-asteroid-or-comet-have-been-mined-in-space-for-commercial-purposes-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "A number of commercial ventures have been founded in the 21st century with the goal of [mining various asteroids and comets in the solar system for commercial purposes.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid_mining) \nThere are a number of valuable resources that could in principle be harvested from these objects, including gold, iridium, silver, osmium, palladium, platinum, rhenium, rhodium, ruthenium and tungsten for transport back to Earth; iron, cobalt, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, aluminium, and titanium for space-based construction. Perhaps the most immediately useful resource may be water, which could be converted into hydrogen and oxygen to fuel spacecraft. \nSome identified asteroids are believed to be quite rich in minerals. Indeed, if one were to look up current prices on the London Metal Exchange for these resources and assume (quite wrongly, of course) that the price would hold up in the event that asteroid mining became practical and economical, there are many [individual asteroids whose value far exceeds 100 trillion US dollars.] (http://www.asterank.com/) As of September 2016, there were 711 known asteroids with a computed value exceeding US$100 trillion. \nSome nations are beginning to promulgate legal regimes for extraterrestrial resource extraction. For example, the United States \"SPACE Act of 2015,\" facilitating private development of space resources consistent with US international treaty obligations, passed the US House of Representatives in July 2015. In November 2015 it passed the United States Senate.\nOn 25 November, US President Barack Obama signed the H.R.2262 – U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act into law. The law recognizes the right of U.S. citizens to own space resources they obtain and encourages the commercial exploration and utilization of resources from asteroids. \nAccording to the article § 51303 of the law: \"A United States citizen engaged in commercial recovery of an asteroid resource or a space resource under this chapter shall be entitled to any asteroid resource or space resource obtained, including to possess, own, transport, use, and sell the asteroid resource or space resource obtained in accordance with applicable law, including the international obligations of the United States.\" \nIn February 2016, the Government of Luxembourg announced that it would attempt to \"jump-start an industrial sector to mine asteroid resources in space\" by, among other things, creating a \"legal framework\" and regulatory incentives for companies involved in the industry. By June 2016, it announced that it would \"invest more than US$200 million in research, technology demonstration, and in the direct purchase of equity in companies relocating to Luxembourg.\" In 2017, it became the \"first European country to pass a law conferring to companies the ownership of any resources they extract from space\", and remained active in advancing space resource public policy in 2018.\n[Some] (https://www.rt.com/business/424800-first-trillionaire-space-miner/) [have suggested] (https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/01/30/1314279/0/en/Physicist-Says-Asteroid-Mining-Ventures-Will-Spawn-First-Trillionaire.html) [that the first trillionaire(s) will be created by the space mining industry.] (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5691677/Want-trillionaire-asteroids.html) \nThis question asks: Before January 1 2030, will at least 100kg of resources be harvested primarily for commercial purposes from any asteroid or comet while it is in space?\nResolves positively in the event that a press release is issued by any corporation or other group claiming success in this endeavour, or when credible media reports indictate it has occurred. \nResources mined from asteroids or comets after impact with Earth or any other planetary-mass body do not count for purposes of this question. 'Commercial purposes' includes (inter alia) exclusive use by the mining company or sale on commercial terms (e.g. not a nominal $1 payment) to any third party (for any purpose, including scientific analysis), but excludes purely scientific missions launched by public or private bodies with the sole goal of performing scientific analysis on material samples.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 229,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the USA's Labor Force Participation Rate be lower in 2023 than in  2018?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1663/will-the-usas-labor-force-participation-rate-be-lower-in-2023-than-in-2018/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "70%",
    "Description": "The labor force participation rate (LFPR) is the ratio between the labor force and the overall size of their cohort. It is sometimes opposed to the unemployment rate, since it includes people who for various reasons are not in the job market.\nIt hovered around 59% until the late 1960's, then grew as high as 67% in 2000 before shrinking back to 63% in recent years. It seems to be roughly stable since 2014. (graph and data [here] (https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/lns11300000) ).\nThis question asks in which direction the LFPR will have changed in 2024 compared to 2018, as measured by the United States Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics, series ID [LNS11300000] (https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/lns11300000) . The quantities considered are the 12-month averages for 2018 and 2023.\nResolves:\n---positive if the average LFPR for 2023 is lower than the average LFPR for 2018 \n---negative if the average LFPR for 2023 is higher than the average LFPR for 2018 \n---ambiguous if they are the same to ( percentage points) \n---ambiguous if the BLS fails to publish LFPR data for any month in 2024 (including if it does not exist any more) \nMy thanks to Jgalt and Uncle Jeff for [inspiring] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1643/will-the-us-unemployment-rate-reach-10-before-2023/#comment-7888) this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 174,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Reuters journalists Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo be released from prison?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1667/when-will-reuters-journalists-wa-lone-and-kyaw-soe-oo-be-released-from-prison/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "On 12 December 2017, members of Myanmar's police force arrested Reuters journalists [Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inn_Din_massacre#Arrest_of_Reuters_journalists) at a restaurant in Yangon after inviting them to dinner. The two journalists were independently investigating the mass grave found in [Inn Din] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inn_Din_massacre) prior to their arrest.\nA court charged the two journalists with obtaining secret state documents in violation of the Official Secrets Act on 9 July 2018, taking the case to trial after a period of preliminary hearings that lasted six months. The pair pleaded not guilty to the charges and vowed to testify and prove their innocence. On 3 September 2018, the two journalists were found guilty by a court and sentenced to [seven years in prison] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-myanmar-journalists-trial-specialrepo/special-report-how-myanmar-punished-two-reporters-for-uncovering-an-atrocity-idUSKCN1LJ167) .\nIn December 2018, Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo were included in Time magazine's [Person of the Year 2018] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Person_of_the_Year) , which recognised persecuted journalists as \"guardians\" in a \"war on truth\".\nWhen will Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo be released from prison?\nResolves positively when both are released from prison, or any facility in which inmates are forcibly confined and denied a variety of freedoms under the authority of Myanmar's state.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 29,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If the James Webb Space Telescope is launched, will it succeed in transmitting cosmological data?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1669/if-the-james-webb-space-telescope-is-launched-will-it-succeed-in-transmitting-cosmological-data/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "90%",
    "Description": "[The James Webb Space Telescope] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Webb_Space_Telescope) (JWST or \"Webb\") is a space telescope in construction that will be the successor to the Hubble Space Telescope. The JWST will provide greatly improved resolution and sensitivity over the Hubble, and will enable a broad range of investigations across the fields of astronomy and cosmology. The JWST's is currently scheduled for March 2021. \nOne of its goals is observing the most distant events and objects in the universe, such as the formation of the first galaxies. Other goals include understanding the formation of stars and planets, and direct imaging of exoplanets and novas. ( [See also JWST YouTube channel for further information] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=073GwPbyFxE) ).\nDevelopment began in 1996, but the project has had numerous delays and cost overruns with current budget estimated at around $10 billion. A major source of worry is deployment process. For example, in March 2018, NASA delayed the JWST's launch after the telescope's sunshield ripped during a practice deployment.\n[The deployment process is detailed in this video.] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTxLAGchWnA) \nIf the James Webb Space Telescope is launched before 2030, will it succeed in transmitting cosmological data?\nThe question resolves positively if after the ignition of the launch system designed to launch the JWST, the JWST is either fully functional or has defects, but it is still able to carry out important observations not possible by other means at the time of deployment, as announced by credible sources on cosmological matters, such as [reputable journals] (https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?category=3103) or government space programmes. If launch fails, critically damages the JWST before it succeeds in transmitting cosmological data, or explodes during launch, the question resolves negative.\nImportant: In case JWST is not launched before 2030, this question will resolve ambiguous.\nThe question will resolve when either the telescope is announced fully functional, or a previously impossible observation has been cried out, or based on government agencies announcement from which it will follow that carrying out a previously impossible observation will be very unlikely.\nThe question will close the day before the launch day. Moderators may need to close it retroactively or keep it open for longer than currently set.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 164,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will George R. R. Martin die before the final book of A Song Of Ice And Fire is published?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1681/will-george-r-r-martin-die-before-the-final-book-of-a-song-of-ice-and-fire-is-published/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "72%",
    "Description": "[warning: links may contain spoilers]\n[George R. R. Martin] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_R._R._Martin) (GRRM) is the author of the A Song Of Ice And Fire (ASOIAF) books, a series of fantasy novels. Both the book series and the derived TV show [are] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Song_of_Ice_and_Fire#Sales) extraordinarily [popular] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_of_Thrones#Viewer_numbers) .\nMany of [GRRM's fans have commented] (https://www.reddit.com/r/asoiaf/comments/80kaf8/spoilers_extended_is_grrm_stuck_or_is_he_just_slow/) (with [varying degrees of frustration] (https://www.thenationalbookreview.com/features/2016/1/15/rant-why-have-george-r-r-martins-writing-his-game-of-thrones-books-so-slowly-and-why-are-they-so-long) ) that the latest ASOIAF books are [taking him a long time to write] (https://www.thisisinsider.com/why-winds-of-winter-is-taking-so-long-2017-1) .\nFor instance: the most recent book had to be split into two because it was getting so long and late; the publication date of the next instalment, Winds of Winter, [keeps getting pushed back] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Winds_of_Winter#Publication_date) (it was at one point announced to be in 2016); and the narrative of the TV show is now much further along the books', [finishing entirely this coming year] (https://www.hbo.com/game-of-thrones/season-8-returning-2019) .\nAlso: GRRM is now 70 years old, and not getting any younger. People have openly speculated that he might die before he finishes ASOIAF. When confronted with these speculations, GRRM [does not respond well] (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/game-of-thrones-author-george-rr-martin-says-f-you-to-fans-who-fear-he-will-die-before-finishing-9596265.html) .\nThis question asks the following:\nWill George R. R. Martin die before the official publication date of the final book of A Song Of Ice And Fire?\nDetails: \n--- \nI have not specified the name of the 'final book' as [\"A Dream of Spring\"] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Song_of_Ice_and_Fire#A_Dream_of_Spring) in case that is not actually the last title in the series. He might change the name, or decide that more than eight books are needed; he's split planned instalments before, and the previous link includes a quote where he suggests he could do so again.\n--- \nFor a book to fulfil resolution criteria, GRRM or his representatives must announce the book as being the full resolution of the series prior to its publication. It should not be described as the [posthumous] publication of an edited incomplete draft or similar (which would make it analogous to [The Salmon of Doubt] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Salmon_of_Doubt) or [Unfinished Tales] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfinished_Tales) ).\n------The Metaculus community consensus should agree that the book is an 'acceptable attempted resolution' to the ASOIAF story arc, and the print version should ideally include indications that the book is the end of the story (e.g. \"The End\" printed on the final pages). (The intention of this criterion is to avoid a situation where GRRM or his publishers say that they're releasing the final book but the story isn't actually 'done', to the extent that there are so many unresolved plot points and 'missing' foreshadowed events that it's clear that the narrative has been significantly cut short from what was originally planned by GRRM. Of course, it's almost inevitable that there will be one or two loose ends at the end, but that's not what I'm describing. I hope the Metaculus community will be sensible enough to draw the desired distinction.) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 314,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will PHP die?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1691/when-will-php-die/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[PHP] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHP) is a general-purpose scripting language that is especially suited to web development. PHP was first released in 1995. \nAccording to [w3tech.com] (https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/pl-php/all/all) :\nPHP is used by 78.8% of all the websites whose server-side programming language we know.\nWhile [builtwith.com] (https://trends.builtwith.com/framework/programming-language) estimates that PHP is used by 71% of the top 1 million sites.\nSome popular websites using PHP:\n--- [Facebook.com] (http://Facebook.com) \n--- [Wikipedia.org] (http://Wikipedia.org) \n--- [Vk.com] (http://Vk.com) \n--- [Sina.com.cn] (http://Sina.com.cn) \n--- [360.cn] (http://360.cn) \n--- [Aliexpress.com] (http://Aliexpress.com) \n--- [Wordpress.com] (http://Wordpress.com) \n--- [Pinterest.com] (http://Pinterest.com) \nDespite this enormous popularity PHP is also one of the most hated programming languages.\n[Quora.com] (http://Quora.com) for example is overflowing with questions like:\n--- [Is PHP dying in 2019?] (https://www.quora.com/Is-PHP-dying-in-2019) (25 Oct 2018) \n--- [Is PHP dying in 2018?] (https://www.quora.com/Is-PHP-dying-in-2018) (27 Apr 2018) \n--- [Will PHP die out in 2017?] (https://www.quora.com/Will-PHP-die-out-in-2017) (24 Mar 2017) \n--- [When will PHP finally die?] (https://www.quora.com/When-will-PHP-finally-die) (13 Feb 2017) \nThis question will resolve when Metaculus users will provide two independent and somewhat reliable sources (on the level of [w3tech.com] (http://w3tech.com) or [builtwith.com] (http://builtwith.com) ) that will show that PHP is used by less than 5% of websites on the internet. The sources must indicate popularity of PHP among at least 500 000 most popular websites. The rest of the methodology is intentionally left to be vague due to potentially long time horizons. While the sources should not be obviously wrong, minor reliability and methodology issues should be ignored and the question should resolve. The intention is that the stark difference between the current domination of PHP and the 5% required for this question should be sufficient to unambiguously indicate that PHP is dead, or taking it's last breath.\nGeneral language popularity e.g. TIOBE index is not relevant for this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 92,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Emmanuel Macron be re-elected President of France in 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2511/will-emmanuel-macron-be-re-elected-president-of-france-in-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "63%",
    "Description": "[Emmanuel Jean-Michel Frédéric Macron,] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmanuel_Macron) born 21 December 1977, is a French politician serving as President of France and Co-Prince of Andorra since 2017. He previously served as Minister of the Economy, Industry and Digital Affairs from 2014 to 2016. \nIn the first round of [Presidential Elections in 2017] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_French_presidential_election) , Macron won 8,656,346 votes or 24.01% of the vote. In the second round, he won 20,743,128 votes or 66.10% of the vote, defeating Marine le Pen of the Front national (now Rassemblement national) in a landslide.\nIn the months following his election, [Macron's approval rating declined significantly to below 30%] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_on_the_Emmanuel_Macron_presidency) and the [Mouvement des gilets jaunes] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_vests_movement) protest movement has risen to prominence, which has called for Macron's resignation.\nThis question asks: Will Emmanuel Macron be re-elected as President of France in the [2022 Presidential Election?] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_French_presidential_election) \nResolves positively if electoral officials report that Emmanuel Macron has been re-elected President of France following the conclusion of the 2022 Presidential Election.\nResolves negatively if for any reason Macron is not a candidate in that election or is not declared the winner.\nResolves ambiguously if for any reason there is no Presidential Election held in France in 2022.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 360,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Ragnarök Question Series: if an artificial intelligence catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2513/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-an-artificial-intelligence-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "51%",
    "Description": "Currently, artificial intelligence can outperform humans in a number of narrow domains, such as playing chess and searching data. As artificial intelligence researchers continue to make progress, though, these domains are highly likely to grow in number and breadth over time. Many experts now believe there is a significant chance that a machine superintelligence – a system that can outperform humans at all relevant intelligence tasks – will be developed within the next century, and possibly much sooner.\nIn a [2017 survey of artificial intelligence experts] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.08807.pdf) , experts were asked about the effects of human level machine intelligence. They assigned a 10% for a bad outcome and 5% for an outcome described as “Extremely Bad (e.g., human extinction).” Although a selection bias, large variance in responses (reflecting vast uncertainty), and the unreliability of subjective opinions mean that these estimates warrant skepticism, they nevertheless suggest that the possibility of superintelligence ought to be taken seriously.\nIn a [2008 survey] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/reports/2008-1.pdf) at the Global Catastrophic Risk Conference in Oxford, participants were asked to make their best guess at the chance that there will be disasters of different types before 2100. The median estimate of the chance of 1 billion deaths by 2100 by a superintelligent AI was 5%. Interestingly the median estimate of the chance of human extinction by a superintelligent AI was also 5%, suggesting that if an AI-failure-mode-induced-catastrophe does occur, it's likely be a terminal one for human civilisation.\nWhen considering how AI might become a risk, experts think two scenarios most likely (according to the [Future of Life Institute] (https://futureoflife.org/background/benefits-risks-of-artificial-intelligence/) ): \n1--The AI is programmed to do something devastating: Autonomous weapons are artificial intelligence systems that are programmed to kill. In the hands of the wrong person, these weapons could easily cause mass casualties. Moreover, an AI arms race could inadvertently lead to an AI war that also results in mass casualties. To avoid being thwarted by the enemy, these weapons would be designed to be extremely difficult to simply “turn off,” so humans could plausibly lose control of such a situation. This risk is one that’s present even with narrow AI, but grows as levels of AI intelligence and autonomy increase. \n2--The AI is programmed to do something beneficial, but it develops a destructive method for achieving its goal: This can happen whenever we fail to fully align the AI’s goals with ours, which is strikingly difficult. If you ask an obedient intelligent car to take you to the airport as fast as possible, it might get you there chased by helicopters and covered in vomit, doing not what you wanted but literally what you asked for. If a superintelligent system is tasked with a ambitious geoengineering project, it might wreak havoc with our ecosystem as a side effect, and view human attempts to stop it as a threat to be met. As these examples illustrate, the concern about advanced AI isn’t malevolence but competence. A super-intelligent AI will be extremely good at accomplishing its goals, and if those goals aren’t aligned with ours, we have a problem. You’re probably not an evil ant-hater who steps on ants out of malice, but if you’re in charge of a hydroelectric green energy project and there’s an anthill in the region to be flooded, too bad for the ants. \nIn the first part of the Ragnarök Question Series, we asked the question [If a global catastrophe occurs, will it be due to an artificial intelligence failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) Now it is asked,\nGiven that an artificial intelligence failure-mode catastrophe occurs that results in the reduction of global population of at least 10% by 2100, will the global population decline by more than 95% relative to the pre-catastrophe population?\nThe question resolves positive if such a catastrophe does occur, and the global population is less than 95% of the pre-catastrophe population. It resolves ambiguous if an artificial intelligence global catastrophe that claims at least 10% (in any period of 5 years or less) does not occur. The question resolves negative if a an artificial intelligence failure-mode induced global catastrophe occurs that claims at least 10% (in any period of 5 years or less) but the post-catastrophe population remains above 5%.\nThis question is part of the Ragnarök Question Series. Please have a look at the other questions and contribute your insights, analyses, and factorizations, especially on the questions on what might happen if a global catastrophe occurs (for which we are currently short on predictions):\n1-- \n[If a global biological catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2514/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-biological-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n2-- \n[If an artificial intelligence catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2513/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-an-artificial-intelligence-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n3-- \n[If a nuclear catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1585/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-nuclear-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n4-- \n[If a global climate disaster occurs by 2100, will the human population decline by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1604/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-climate-disaster-occurs-by-2100-will-the-earths-human-population-decline-by-95-or-more/) \nAlso, please check out our questions on whether a global catastrophe will occur by 2100, and if so, which?:\n5-- \n[By 2100 will the human population decrease by at least 10% during any period of 5 years?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) \n6-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to either human-made climate change or geoengineering?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1500/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-either-human-made-climate-change-or-geoengineering/) \n7-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to a nanotechnology failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1501/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nanotechnology-failure-mode/) \n8-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to nuclear war?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1494/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nuclear-war/) \n9-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to an artificial intelligence failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) \n10- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to biotechnology or bioengineered organisms?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1502/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-biotechnology-or-bioengineered-organisms/) \nAll results [are analysed here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2568/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-results-so-far/) , and will be updated periodically.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 155,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Ragnarök Question Series: if a global biological catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2514/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-biological-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "No single disease currently exists that combines the worst-case levels of transmissibility, lethality, resistance to therapies, and global reach. But we know that the worst-case attributes can be realized independently. For example, some diseases exhibit nearly a 100% case fatality ratio in the absence of treatment, such as rabies or septicemic plague. The 1918 flu [has a track record of spreading to virtually every human community worldwide] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2021692) . Chickenpox and HSV-1, [can reportedly reach over 95% of a given population] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18080353) .\n[An informal survey at the 2008 Oxford Global Catastrophic Risk Conference] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/reports/2008-1.pdf) asked participants to estimate the chance that disasters of different types would occur before 2100. Participants had a median risk estimate of 0.05% that a natural pandemic would lead to human extinction by 2100, and a median risk estimate of 2% that an “engineered” pandemic would lead to extinction by 2100.\nMoreover, previous literature has found that casualty numbers from terrorism and warfare follow a power law distribution, including terrorism from WMDs. [Millett and Snyder-Beattie] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5576214/) have performed a naive power law extrapolation to estimate the chance of an existential biological disaster:\nPast studies have estimated this ratio for terrorism using biological and chemical weapons to be about 0.5 for 1 order of magnitude, meaning that an attack that kills people is about 3 times less likely () than an attack that kills people (a concrete example is that attacks with more than 1,000 casualties, such as the Aum Shinrikyo attacks, will be about 30 times less probable than an attack that kills a single individual). Extrapolating the power law out, we find that the probability that an attack kills more than 5 billion will be or 0.000014. Assuming 1 attack per year (extrapolated on the current rate of bio-attacks) and assuming that only 10% of such attacks that kill more than 5 billion eventually lead to extinction (due to the breakdown of society, or other knock-on effects), we get an annual existential risk of 0.0000014 (or ).\nIn the first part of the Ragnarök Question Series, we asked the question [If a global catastrophe occurs, will it be due to biotechnology or bioengineered organisms?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1502/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-biotechnology-or-bioengineered-organisms/) Now it is asked,\nGiven that a biological global catastrophe occurs that results in the reduction of global population of at least 10% by 2100, will the global population decline more than 95% relative to the pre-catastrophe population?\nThe question resolves positive if such a global biological catastrophe does occur, and the global population is less than 95% of the pre-catastrophe population. The question resolves ambiguous if a global biological catastrophe that claims at least 10% (in any period of 5 years or less) does not occur. The question resolves negative if a global biological catastrophe failure-mode induced global catastrophe occurs that claims at least 10% (in any period of 5 years or less) but the post-catastrophe population remains above 5%. \nA biological catastrophe is here defined as a catastrophe resulting from the deployment biotechnologies or bioengineered organisms (including viruses) that claims at least 10% in any period of 5 years or less before 2100. Moreover, the catastrophe must be generally believed very unlikely in a counterfactual world with little or no biotechnological interventions but otherwise similar to ours.\nThis question is part of the Ragnarök Question Series. Please have a look at the other questions and contribute your insights, analyses, and factorizations, especially on the questions on what might happen if a global catastrophe occurs (for which we are currently short on predictions):\n1-- \n[If a global biological catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2514/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-biological-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n2-- \n[If an artificial intelligence catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2513/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-an-artificial-intelligence-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n3-- \n[If a nuclear catastrophe occurs, will it reduce the human population by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1585/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-nuclear-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-reduce-the-human-population-by-95-or-more/) \n4-- \n[If a global climate disaster occurs by 2100, will the human population decline by 95% or more?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1604/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-climate-disaster-occurs-by-2100-will-the-earths-human-population-decline-by-95-or-more/) \nAlso, please check out our questions on whether a global catastrophe will occur by 2100, and if so, which?:\n5-- \n[By 2100 will the human population decrease by at least 10% during any period of 5 years?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) \n6-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to either human-made climate change or geoengineering?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1500/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-either-human-made-climate-change-or-geoengineering/) \n7-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to a nanotechnology failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1501/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nanotechnology-failure-mode/) \n8-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to nuclear war?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1494/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nuclear-war/) \n9-- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to an artificial intelligence failure-mode?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) \n10- \n[Will such a catastrophe be due to biotechnology or bioengineered organisms?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1502/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-biotechnology-or-bioengineered-organisms/) \nAll results [are analysed here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2568/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-results-so-far/) , and will be updated periodically.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 108,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be another VEI level six (or higher) volcanic eruption on Earth before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2518/will-there-be-another-vei-level-six-or-higher-volcanic-eruption-on-earth-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "[The Volcanic Explosivity Index] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volcanic_Explosivity_Index) (VEI) is a relative measure of the explosiveness of volcanic eruptions. It was devised by Chris Newhall of the United States Geological Survey and Stephen Self at the University of Hawaii in 1982.\nVolume of products, eruption cloud height, and qualitative observations (using terms ranging from \"gentle\" to \"mega-colossal\") are used to determine the explosivity value. The scale is open-ended with the largest volcanoes in history given magnitude 8. A value of 0 is given for non-explosive eruptions, defined as less than 10,000 m^3 (350,000 cu ft) of tephra ejected; and 8 representing a mega-colossal explosive eruption that can eject 1.0×1012 m^3 (240 cubic miles) of tephra and have a cloud column height of over 20 km (66,000 ft).\nThe scale is logarithmic, with each interval on the scale representing a tenfold increase in observed ejecta criteria, with the exception of between VEI 0, VEI 1 and VEI 2.\nAn eruption rated level six on the VEI would involve ejecta volume of at least 10 km3, a plume height of at least 20 km, and substantial troposhperic and stratospheric injection of material.\nThree eruptions ranking level six have occurred since 1900: [Santa Maria in 1902] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Mar%C3%ADa_(volcano)#1902_eruption) , [Novarupta in 1912] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novarupta#Eruption_of_1912) , and [Mount Pinatubo in 1991] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pinatubo) .\nThe most recent level seven eruption occurred at [Mount Tambora in 1815] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1815_eruption_of_Mount_Tambora) , and the most recent level eight eruption [took place about 26,500 years ago] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oruanui_eruption) .\nBy 2010, the [Global Volcanism Program of the Smithsonian Institution] (http://volcano.si.edu/) had catalogued the assignment of a VEI for 7,742 volcanic eruptions that occurred during the Holocene (the last 11,700 years) which account for about 75% of the total known eruptions during the Holocene. Of these 7,742 eruptions, about 49% have a VEI of ≤ 2, and 90% have a VEI ≤ 3.\nThis question asks: Before 1 January 2025, will any eruption rated level six, seven, or eight occur anywhere on Earth?\nThis question resolves positively if any competent authority on volcanism credibly assesses that an eruption occurring after this question opens but before 1 January 2025 is rated level six, seven or eight on the Volanic Explosivity Index. \nIn case of major controversy in the scientific community over this assessment, the resolution shall rest upon the VEI level assigned to the event by either the US Geological Survey or the comparable authority of the nation in which the event takes place. In the event that these numbers differ, the higher of the two shall be taken as correct for purposes of resolving this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 140,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first human be born on another world?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2533/when-will-the-first-human-be-born-on-another-world/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Fewer than 600 humans have ever traveled to space. Fewer still have ever set foot on another astronomical object: only twelve men ever walked on the moon.\nIn colonial times, the birth of the first child of settlers in a newly acquired territory (for example, the birth of [Virginia Dare in a New World English overseas possession] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Dare) ) was considered an important milestone.\nIn that spirit, this question asks: When will the first human be born alive on an astronomical body other than Earth?\nThe child must be born alive, but need not survive for any particular length of time in order for a positive resolution. The birth must take place on some natural astronomical object (not inside a spacecraft, space station or man-made space-based habitat like an [O'Neill cylinder] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%27Neill_cylinder) ) such as a planet, dwarf planet, moon or asteroid.\nA 'human' shall be taken to mean an anatomically modern human that would be able (upon sexual maturity) to successfully breed, without technological assistance, with members of the species homo sapiens found on Earth in 2019. 'Mind uploads,' 'EMs' and other non-biological entities which may or may not be commonly considered 'human' at some point in the future are expressly excluded.\n'Birth' shall be taken to mean the explulsion of a child from the uterus of a living human female, either by natural means or by Caesarean section. [Extracorporeal pregnancies,] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_uterus) including but not limited to arrangements like [this] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dt7twXzNEsQ) are specifically excluded.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 159,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a 'World War Three' before 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2534/will-there-be-a-world-war-three-before-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "19%",
    "Description": "[World War I] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I) was a global war originating in Europe that lasted from 28 July 1914 to 11 November 1918. One of the deadliest conflicts in history, an estimated 9 million combatants and 7 million civilians died as a direct result of the war.\n[World War II] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II) was a global war that lasted from 1939 to 1945. A state of total war emerged, directly involving more than 100 million people from over 30 countries. World War II was the deadliest conflict in human history, marked by 50 to 85 million fatalities, most of whom were civilians in the Soviet Union and China. It included massacres, the genocide of the Holocaust, strategic bombing, premeditated death from starvation and disease, and the only use of nuclear weapons in war.\n[World War III] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_III) is the name given to a hypothetical third worldwide large-scale military conflict subsequent to World War I and World War II. The term has been in use since at least as early as 1941. Some have applied it loosely to refer to limited or smaller conflicts such as the Cold War or the War on Terror, while others have operated under the assumption that such a conflict would surpass both prior world wars in both the level of its widespread scope and of its overall destructive impact.\nAs of January 2019, World War III does not appear to have started - but there have been [a number of historical close calls] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_III#Historical_close_calls) that are widely regarded as having been narrowly-missed possible catalysts of such a conflict.\nIn 1949, after the unleashing of nuclear weaponry at the end of WWII, physicist Albert Einstein suggested that any outcome of a possible WWIII would be so dire as to revert mankind back to the Stone Age. When asked by journalist Alfred Werner what types of weapons Einstein believed World War III might be fought with, Einstein warned, \"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones\". It can be inferred here that Einstein assumed that World War III would either exterminate, or else nearly exterminate the human race, presumably due to nuclear warfare.\nThis question asks: Before 1 January 2050, will it be recognized that a 'hot' World War III has begun?\nThis question resolves positively if all of the following circumstances arise:\n1-- \nA military conflict begins involving countries representing in totality at least 30% of world GDP or 50% of world population in any year in which the conflict is ongoing.\n2-- \nAt least 10 million people are killed in the conflict.\n(Edit 1/16/19 to remove third \"described as WWIII\" criterion.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 557,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the Twin Prime Conjecture be resolved?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2536/when-will-the-twin-prime-conjecture-be-resolved/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Conjecture: There are infinitely many primes p such that p + 2 is also prime.\nIn the last few years, the upper bound N for the statement “There are infinitely many primes that differ by at most N” has been [reduced from 70,000,000 to 246] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_prime) . But when will we know whether N=2 or not?\nWhen will the Twin Prime Conjecture be resolved?\nThe question is resolved positively when a proof that is mostly correct is published that demonstrates, beyond reasonable doubt of leading number theorists (except those who authored the relevant work), that the Twin Prime Conjecture is proved to be true or false. This question closes retroactively on the date of the proof’s publication when the consensus emerges. If the conjecture were proved to be undecidable in ZFC, the question resolves ambiguously.\nAn [earlier question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/8/will-the-twin-prime-conjecture-be-positively-resolved-in-2016/) on the whether the Twin Prime Conjecture would resolve before 2016, needless to say, resolved negative.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 127,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a Metaculus user report from space before 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2561/will-a-metaculus-user-report-from-space-before-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "60%",
    "Description": "Short and fun question: Will a registered Metaculus user post a comment under this question from space before 2050? A photo would be nice too :) !\nFor this question to resolve positively the user must be at least 80km above the surface of the Earth at the time of posting the comment. Comments posted before launch or after landing will not count, sorry :) .\nSimilar questions:\n--- [When will the total number of people who have gone to space reach 1000?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1519/when-will-the-total-number-of-people-who-have-gone-to-space-reach-1000/) \n--- [When will the 10,000th human reach space? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1659/when-will-the-10000th-human-reach-space/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 175,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the atmospheric CO2 concentration be in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2563/what-will-the-atmospheric-co2-concentration-be-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Over the last few centuries, the concentration of carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere has risen from approximately 280 parts per million (pre-industrial) to approximately 410 ppm [ [1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide_in_Earth%27s_atmosphere) ]. Atmospheric carbon dioxide is one of the contributing factors driving climate change via the greenhouse effect.\nThe trend follows a seasonal cycle that reaches its peak in May, and has also risen at [an average rate of around 2ppm annually in the last ten years] (https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/gl_gr.html) .\nWhat will be the average atmospheric CO2 content observed throughout the year 2030?\nThe resolution will be based on the [globally, annually averaged figure provided by the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory] (https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/gl_data.html) .\nIf this organization (or a successor) does not exist or no longer provides this information in 2030, the question should resolve ambiguously.\n(See also: [Worst-case scenario for global CO2 levels realized over the coming decades?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/336/worst-case-scenario-for-global-co2-levels-over-the-coming-decades/) , which asks about a more severe milestone of 500ppm until 2050.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 165,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will life expectancy at birth for both sexes reach 60 years in all countries?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2575/when-will-life-expectancy-at-birth-for-both-sexes-reach-60-years-in-all-countries/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Recently, the world quietly marked a significant milestone. For the first time, life expectancy at birth for both sexes now exceeds 50 years in all countries, [with Sierra Leone the lowest at 50.1 years.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy) As of January 2019, there are no countries outside of Sub-Saharan Africa where the life expectancy at birth for both sexes is below 60.\nThis question asks: When, for the first time, will life expectancy at birth for both sexes reach at least 60 years in all countries simultaneously? \nBy 'for both sexes,' this question refers to the average for both sexes, not a requirement that life expectancy must equal 60 years for women and men individually.\nResolution should cite data from the World Health Organization, United Nations or a similarly authoritative body.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 141,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a DUI be overruled or turned down due to riding a driverless car?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2576/when-will-a-dui-be-overruled-or-turned-down-due-to-riding-a-driverless-car/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "There’s much talk about driverless and autonomous cars, [not] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/424/in-what-year-will-half-of-new-cars-sold-in-the-us-be-fully-autonomous/) [just] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/776/when-will-the-next-fully-autonomous-car-fatality-occur/) [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/46/fully-autonomous-self-driving-cars-by-2018/) , but also in the world at large. \nThe Society of of Automotive Engineers is an association that, among other things, defines standard, for example for the levels of driving automation. The highest levels, levels 4 and 5, can be shortened to “minds off” and “steering wheel optional,” respectively. At the latter level the car has to be able to handle all common, if not all possible aspects of driving. The car would be effectively a wheeled robot, and the driver would be only its passenger.\nDriving under the influence (DUI) leads to hundreds of thousands accidents per year, only a small amount leads to a conviction. But with the prospect of fully autonomous cars we ask:\nWhen will a judgement of DUI be overruled or turned down due to the accused riding in a driverless car?\nThis question will resolve positive on the day such a judgement is reported by credible news media, and ideally verified with court documentation.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 76,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Scotland leave the United Kingdom before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2577/will-scotland-leave-the-united-kingdom-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "17%",
    "Description": "[A referendum on Scottish independence from the United Kingdom took place on 18 September 2014.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Scottish_independence_referendum) The referendum question, which voters answered with \"Yes\" or \"No\", was \"Should Scotland be an independent country?\"\nThe \"No\" side won, with 2,001,926 (55.3%) voting against independence and 1,617,989 (44.7%) voting in favour. The turnout of 84.6% was the highest recorded for an election or referendum in the United Kingdom since the introduction of universal suffrage. \nSince 2014, the [United Kingdom has voted to leave the European Union.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_Kingdom_European_Union_membership_referendum) On June 23 2016, 17,410,742 (51.89%) voters answered the question \"Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?\" with \"Leave,\" and 16,141,241 (48.11%) voters answered with \"Remain.\" The \"Leave\" side thus won, having accrued more individual votes than any political party or referendum side in British political history.\nHowever, voters in Scotland did not, in aggregate, support leaving the EU. In fact, Scotland was the most pro-remain region of the UK with [62% of Scottish voters opting for \"Remain.\"] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_Kingdom_European_Union_membership_referendum#Regional_count_results) (Gibraltar had a higher Remain vote share, but was counted as part of South West England.) [You can see a map of the results here.] (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d5/United_Kingdom_EU_referendum_2016_area_results.svg/871px-United_Kingdom_EU_referendum_2016_area_results.svg.png) \nThe fact that voters in Scotland are widely opposed to leaving the EU, and the fact that broader Scottish nationalist sentiment has not significantly waned since the 2014 referendum, has led to speculation that Scotland may once again attempt to leave the United Kingdom in the near future. \nThis question asks: Before 1 January 2025, will Scotland cease to be a part of the United Kingdom?\nFor this question to resolve positively, there must continuously be a geopolitical entity known as the United Kingdom until at least such point that another geopolitical entity known as Scotland is declared formally by its de facto Head of Government to be legally independent of the United Kingdom, and that state of independence must arise before 1 January 2025.\nIf, for example, there is a vote to become independent that is held before that date, but (if answered in the affirmative) it is not actually implemented until 1 January 2025 or later, this question shall resolve negatively. That is, independence itself must actually happen before that date, not just a vote to become independent.\nIn the case of a dispute as to the status of Scotland, the legal independence of Scotland must be recognized by either the Head of Government or Head of State of the United Kingdom, or by at least 50% of United Nations Member States.\nIn the event that a referendum is called to determine the outcome of this matter before 1 January 2025, this question shall be closed 10 days before the vote is held, but shall not resolve until either a positive or negative resolution results.\nIn the case that the geopolitical entities known as the United Kingdom or Scotland cease to exist at any time before Scotland leaves the United Kingdom, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 573,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will an airborne wind energy system of at least 100kW be sold before 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2578/will-an-airborne-wind-energy-system-of-at-least-100kw-be-sold-before-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "45%",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nAirborne Wind Energy (AWE) systems, essentially wind turbines in the sky (e.g. on kites or planes), have been promised for many years. There are several companies, many in Europe, that are working on AWE systems, including (but not limited to):\n--- [KITE KRAFT] (http://www.kitekraft.de/English.html) \n--- [Kitepower] (https://kitepower.nl/) \n--- [SkySails Group] (https://skysails-group.com/) \n--- [Ampyx Power] (https://www.ampyxpower.com/) \n--- [SkyPull] (https://www.skypull.technology/) \nThe basic advantages of AWE's are that one does not need a tower and therefore can use much less construction material to achieve the same amount of power, resulting in significant cost efficiencies. Furthermore, winds at high altitudes tend to be stronger and more stable than on the ground. AWE's also tend to be mobile, and controlled by software.\nSome AWE ventures are targeting containerized systems with a nominal power of 100kW. One, Kitepower, is [duration testing a 100kW system] (https://kitepower.nl/tech/) .\n\nQuestion\n========\n\nWill an airborne wind energy system of at least 100kW be sold before 2022?\n\nResolution\n==========\n\nThis question will resolve positively if a credible company, customer, or media report establishes the sale of an Airborne Wind System that has a maximum rated power output of at least 100 kW. The system does not need to have been constructed yet.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 73,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will India become a World Bank high-income country?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2582/when-will-india-become-a-world-bank-high-income-country/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "India is the seventh-largest country by area, and with more than 1.3 billion people it is the second-most populous country and the most populous democracy in the world.\nGNI per capita, PPP (current international $) in India was [reported at $6,490 in 2016,] (https://tradingeconomics.com/india/gni-per-capita-ppp-us-dollar-wb-data.html) according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. \nThe World Bank has historically classified every economy as low, middle or high income. The World Bank further specifies its classes of countries into low, lower-middle, upper-middle and high income economies. The World Bank uses GNI per capita as the basis for this classification because it views GNI as a broad measure that is considered to be the single best indicator of economic capacity and progress.\nMICs are broken up into lower-middle income and upper-middle income economies. Lower-middle income economies have per capita GNIs between $1,006 and $3,955, while upper-middle economies have per capita GNIs between $3,956 and $12,056. India at $6,490 in 2016 was thus about 50% below the threshold for high-income status. \nMICs are a very diverse group by region, size, population and income level, ranging from tiny nations with very small populations such as Belize and the Marshall Islands to all four of the BRIC giants – Brazil, Russia, India and China. China and India together hold nearly one-third of humanity and continue to be increasingly influential players in the global economy.\n[A list of countries and territories considered high-income by the World Bank can be viewed here.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Bank_high-income_economy) Note that over time the World Bank has [revised the nominal dollar threshold for high-income status] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Bank_high-income_economy#Historical_thresholds) , and it is highly probable that they will continue to do so in the future. \nThe threshold for high-income status currently stands at $12,056 gross national income per capita US$, calculated using [the Atlas method] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_method) . \nThe high-income threshold was originally set in 1989 at US$6,000 in 1987 prices. Thresholds for subsequent years were adjusted taking into account the average inflation in the G-5 countries (the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, Germany and France), and from 2001, that of Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States and the eurozone. Thus, the thresholds remain constant in real terms over time. \nThis question asks: When will India be designated a high income country by the World Bank?\nResolution should cite a press release or other information from the World Bank, or credible media reports citing World Bank sources.\nThe question resolves ambiguously if the World Bank ceases to exist before India is designated a high-income country, or if India ceases to exist as a geopolitical entity before being designated high-income by the World Bank.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 145,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the US national debt reach $25 trillion?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2585/when-will-the-us-national-debt-reach-25-trillion/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The national debt of the United States is the debt, or unpaid borrowed funds, carried by the federal government of the United States, which is measured as the face value of the currently outstanding Treasury securities that have been issued by the Treasury and other federal government agencies.\n[As of January 17 2019, debt held by the public was $16.094 trillion and intragovernmental holdings were $5.860 trillion, for a total or \"National Debt\" of $21.954 trillion.] (https://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/pd_debttothepenny.htm) \n[You can view a live National Debt Clock here.] (http://www.usdebtclock.org/) \nThis question asks: When will the United States national debt reach $25 trillion nominal dollars?\nResolution should cite figures from the US Treasury or credible media reports in the financial press.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 302,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will we have micropayments?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2592/when-will-we-have-micropayments/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "One of the things this author finds most baffling about the online world we've developed is the lack of a clean, easy, near-universal, private system of micropayments. The suprising and dismaying absence is nicely described in [this article] (https://www.wired.com/story/shouldnt-we-all-have-seamless-micropayments-by-now/?mbid=social_twitter&amp;utm_brand=wired&amp;utm_campaign=wired&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_social-type=owned&amp;utm_source=twitter) , asking\nWhere are my digital micropayments? Where are those frictionless, integrated ways of exchanging money online—cryptographically protected to allow commerce but not surveillance?\nand lamenting:\nOf course, we already make payments online all the time, but under current conditions, frankly, it sucks to do so. If you buy things directly from small vendors, you’re stuck entering your credit card information, your email, and your billing address on site after site—sinking ever deeper into the surveillance economy as each digital form puts your personal details into someone else’s database, while also giving hackers ever more opportunities to filch your data.\nI've never seen a convincing argument as to why this is impossible, just \"micropayments fail over and over.\" But that can't go on forever — the prize is just too big. (Note also that my understanding is that China has put together a system that works, though I don't know if it is as private etc. as one might like.) So I ask:\nWhen will the US and Europe have a workable system of micropayments?\nThe question will resolve when, with less than 10 minutes of effort, I can set up a \"wallet\" that will allow me to spend less than 25 cents (2019 dollars) by clicking less than two times, on at least 10 of the top 50 internet sites as listed by a reputable source comparable to 2019's Alexa, and where each payment does not show up as an individual transaction on a credit card or bank statement.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 79,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will North Korea have a McDonald's?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2593/when-will-north-korea-have-a-mcdonalds/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "There are more than [37,000 McDonald's locations around the world, spread across 121 countries and territories.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_McDonald%27s_restaurants#Countries_and_territories_with_a_McDonald's_outlet) McDonald's is the world's largest restaurant chain by revenue serving over 69 million customers daily and employing around 1.9 million employees, 1.5 million of whom work for franchises. In the 78 years since its founding, McDonald's has become an iconic brand and a quintessential example of American free enterprise and global capitalism. \nNorth Korea is a country of some 25.4 million people, is one of the last remaining communist states in the world, and currently has hosted no McDonald's locations in its history. North Korea has maintained one of the most closed and centralized economies in the world since the 1940s. [It is ranked 180th worldwide on the Index of Economic Freedom] (https://www.heritage.org/index/country/northkorea) - the worst ranking of any country ranked as of 2019.\n[On January 31 1990, the first McDonald’s opened in the Soviet Union,] (https://www.rferl.org/a/fast-food-moscow-russia/26542682.html) less than two years before that country ceased to exist. The road to that historic opening had been long, with McDonald's management saying that the talks with Soviet officials had started as far back as 1976.\nMany people saw this opening as a sign of a tentative warming of relations between the USSR and the USA. This was to be the first ever foreign restaurant in the Soviet Union and for McDonald's this was (at the time) their largest restaurant ever, a venue with 900 seats.\n[The people’s interest in Moscow was enormous. When the Moscow McDonald's announced that 600 positions were available, 28,000 people applied. Workers were paid around 2 rubles per hour, which meant they could earn more than a Soviet doctor.] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FMFmtUnDDw) [They expected around 1,000 customers on the opening day, but over 30,000 showed up, staying in line for up to six hours, making this the largest restaurant launch worldwide.] (https://rttl.me/2017/08/31/mcussr-the-first-mcdonalds-in-the-soviet-union/) \nIn 2018, the Washington Post reported that [North Korean leader Kim Jong Un may allow a “Western hamburger franchise” into the country as a show of goodwill to the United States.] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/06/02/north-korea-reportedly-wants-a-mcdonalds-that-could-be-a-pretty-big-deal/?noredirect=on&amp;utm_term=.3df4f149cfbc) This reported overture was made just months after a period of intense tension between the United States and North Korea, in which [both countries threatened] (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/sep/19/donald-trump-threatens-totally-destroy-north-korea-un-speech) to [destroy the other in a nuclear war.] (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-42531574) \nThis question asks: When will the first McDonald's location open commercially in North Korea?\nThis question resolves positively on either a press release from McDonald's Corporation or credible media reports delivering information that a McDonald's store has officially opened commercially in territory that is (as of January 26 2019) part of North Korea.\nThis question shall endure in the event that North Korea ceases to exist as an independent state, and shall be constrained to the geographic area of North Korean territory on January 26 2019.\nThe restaurant must be open to the general public in the locality in which it operates, i.e. not a publicity stunt of some sort in which only pre-selected (by either McDonald's or North Korean or other government officials) individuals may participate, and it must operate on commercial terms (i.e. on a for-profit basis, but it need not actually be profitable.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 105,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Metaculus release a dedicated mobile app before 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2598/metaculus-web-app-by-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "60%",
    "Description": "Will Metaculus release a dedicated app designed to run on a mobile device downloadable for Andriod or IOS before 2023?\nThis question resolves positive when a dedicated mobile app is released on the Google Play store or Apple's app Store, and publicly downloadable in at least one country before the 31st December 2022.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 54,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any of the 20 most valuable public companies in the United States (As of January 2019) file for bankruptcy protection before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2599/will-any-of-the-20-most-valuable-public-companies-in-the-united-states-as-of-january-2019-file-for-bankruptcy-protection-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "As of close of trading on January 28 2019, the 20 most valuable public companies in the United States are as follows.\n(Name, ticker symbol, market cap in USD billions)\n1--Microsoft Corporation MSFT 806.62 \n2-- [Amazon.com] (http://Amazon.com) Inc AMZN 800.88 \n3--Alphabet Inc GOOG / GOOGL 760.23 \n4--Apple Inc AAPL 739.27 \n5--Facebook Inc FB 354.29 \n6--Johnson &amp; Johnson JNJ 345.95 \n7--JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co JPM 345.44 \n8--Exxon Mobil Corp XOM 301.62 \n9--Bank of America Corp BAC 290.79 \n10-Walmart Inc WMT 281.98 \n11-Berkshire Hathaway Inc BRK.B 273.85 \n12-UnitedHealth Group Inc UNH 256.64 \n13-Visa Inc V 238.97 \n14-Wells Fargo &amp; Co (New) WFC 234.51 \n15-Procter &amp; Gamble Company (The) PG 233.95 \n16-Pfizer Inc PFE 228.50 \n17-Verizon Communications Inc VZ 227.55 \n18-AT&amp;T Inc T 223.22 \n19-Chevron Corporation CVX 214.33 \n20-Intel Corporation INTC 214.2 \nNote: Alphabet has three classes of equity securities, of which two are currently admitted to the markets, GOOG and GOOGL. The figure listed above is the combined value of both traded classes of equity securities.\nIf any of these companies were to file for bankruptcy protection, it would be one of the [largest corporate bankruptcies in the history of the United States.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bankruptcy_in_the_United_States#Largest_bankruptcies) \nThis question asks: Before 01 January 2025, will any of the aforementioned companies file for bankruptcy protection?\nFor a positive resolution, one of the companies mentioned in this question body text (or successor companies resulting from either rebranding (i.e. a simple name change), mergers or demergers, as long as the successor company represents at least 50% of the original company by market capitalization at the time it becomes independent, and that is a publicly traded company) must file for bankruptcy protection in the United States of America under either of the following chapters of the United States Bankruptcy Code: [Chapter 7] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapter_7,_Title_11,_United_States_Code) , [Chapter 11] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapter_11,_Title_11,_United_States_Code) .\nResolution is by citation of relevant court filing or by credible media report in the financial press. The applicable filing need not lead to a grant or ruling by any court or regulatory body; it must only be submitted in order for a positive resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 217,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any country's military expenditure exceed that of the United States before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2605/will-any-countrys-military-expenditure-exceed-that-of-the-united-states-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8%",
    "Description": "[The United States of America spends significantly more in absolute terms on its defense than any other country,] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures) and this has been the case since World War II. In 2017, US military spending accounted for some $610 billion, 35% of global military spending in that year.\nWill any country spend more on its military / defense in a given year before (and including) 2030 than the United States spends in the same year?\nResolution should cite official budget figures from the United States and the other country in question. Resolves ambiguously if before a positive resolution results there ceases to be a country known as the United States.\nOur comparison will use three-year average of exchange rates to smooth effects of transitory exchange rate fluctuations.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 175,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Blizzard announce new content for StarCraft as a response to advances in AI in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2606/ai-to-prompt-new-starcraft/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "Due to the DeepMind team's [recent achievements] (https://deepmind.com/blog/alphastar-mastering-real-time-strategy-game-starcraft-ii/) with Alphastar, superhuman decision-making in StarCraft 2 is now on the horizon. I envision this technology becoming a platform that can be used by Blizzard and independent modders for many applications. \nOne example is a neural network that not only plays the game, but does so by simulating human hands, a mouse, and a keyboard in order to represent human play as faithfully as possible. But in the short term, this could also be acheived by simply constraining Alphastar to mimic the human keystroke and mouse movement data that it already has access to. Right now the AI plays the game in ways that are probably impossible for humans to reproduce, but a properly constrained AI could discover the theoretical optimal strategies and meta for humans, which the player community could then learn from. \nSuch accurately representative simulations would also make it possible to design a more perfectly balanced version of the game, as well as reliably dictate a meta that encourages desired play styles. This could be done for the professional scene in particular, but also for all other levels of player proficiency. \nIt could perhaps be possible to create AIs on demand that play in various predefined styles, e.g. mimic individual human players, or play at a skill level so accurately defined that it can serve as the new benchmark for player rankings and leagues. Or it could do all of these at once, eventually. It could be possible to use insights from the AI's self assessment mechanisms to design a customizeable training \"coach\" for players. Alphastar is already made to calculate a win/loss prediction, continuously updating in response to the gamestate (see in linked article). I'm sure players would love to see graphs of win/loss prediction for their games.\nDo you think that AI will be applied in these ways to SC2 in the future? Do you think this will invigorate the player community, and introduce new possibilities, to such a degree that this incentivizes Blizzard to announce new content in 2021?\nThis question asks:\nIn 2021, will Blizzard announce new content for StarCraft as a response to advances in AI?\nNew content means: \n1) A new game, which would be a third installment (and which may be something Blizzard is already considering, regardless of AI), but is not really necessary considering SC2's remaining popularity.\n2) An expansion pack for StarCraft 2, which would be the third, or even StarCraft, which would be second.\n3) Or a patch that is not as big as an expansion, but is unprecedented in scale and scope relative to all previous patches. This means it has to be something more than and distinct from:\n-new skins, -new maps, -or more balance patches, \nall three of which occur pretty routinely.\nNew contents must be announced in the form of an official Blizzard press release. (Or, in the unlikely event of the IP getting sold, whoever owns StarCraft). For new content to count as a \"response\" to AI, the press release or marketing for the game must mention AI, neural networks, Alphastar, either as having motivated the change, or been involved in the development of the content in some way.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 54,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will synthetic biological weapons infect 100 people by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2611/will-synthetic-biological-weapons-infect-100-people-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "A [synthetic biological weapon] (https://futurism.com/project-spark-ontario-health-data) is a 'living' agent capable of infecting, harming, and/or killing a target host. For the purposes of this question, we focus on human hosts, exclude weapons that consist only of toxins, even if their source is biological: synthetic or otherwise. Nor does it include something like a genetically engineered mosquito carrying natural unmodified malaria. 'Living' means it must either be self-reproducing, like a bacteria or parasite, or like a virus, capable of hijacking a host cell to produce new copies of itself. A synthetic biological agent may be a 'natural' disease causing organism that has at least been genetically engineered (and not merely selectively bred); an entirely new kind of organism, virus, or similar created from scratch; or anything in between those extremes. \nIf the agent is based on an existing disease causing organism, there must be confirmation that the symptoms of infection by the disease causing agent(s) are confirmed by a credible medical source to be different than those of the original, or alternatively that the infectious 'behavior', or capabilities of the agent are confirmed different than the original. This is to exclude infections that are medically indistuingishable from the natural version, which might make cases too difficult to verify. \nThe consequences of infection must be undesireable - ie, not something that could concievably be offered as a product for improving the health of a customer, to improve athletic or cognitive abilities, for recreational use, or any other purpose desireable to those infected. It must be confirmed to be at least capable of adversely impacting the victims' physical or mental health, making them smell in a way that attracts trained dogs, causing them to develop an addiction to some brand of fast food, or some other undesireable effect.\nWill such an agent infect 100 people by 2030? \nThis question resolves positive if a credible medical source announces at least 100 people are confirmed \"infected\" by one or more confirmed synthetic \"biological weapon\"s and that this has occured before 2030. The consequences of infection may or may not be immediately harmful. An agent can even be latent, or cause a delayed onset of disease, as long as the agent is still present and functional 24 hrs after infection (as opposed to being destroyed by the immune system). But if it causes some definite, confirmed harmful effect, and then self-destructs before 24 hrs have passed, that would still count. The infection can result from a terrorist attack, attack on enemy military personnel, an experiment, accident, with the infected persons' consent, or from any other cause.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 146,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any Member State leave the Eurozone by 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2616/will-any-member-state-leave-the-eurozone-by-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "19%",
    "Description": "The [Eurozone] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurozone) , officially called the euro area, is a monetary union of 19 of the 28 European Union (EU) member states which have adopted the euro (€) as their common currency and sole legal tender. The monetary authority of the eurozone is the Eurosystem. [The euro is the second largest and second most traded currency in the global foreign exchange market after the United States dollar.] (https://www.bis.org/publ/rpfx13fx.pdf) \nThe Eurozone consists of Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Spain. Other EU states (except for Denmark and the United Kingdom) are obliged to join once they meet the criteria to do so.\nNo state has left, and there are no provisions to do so or to be expelled.\nAndorra, Monaco, San Marino, and Vatican City have formal agreements with the EU to use the euro as their official currency and issue their own coins, and Kosovo and Montenegro have adopted the euro unilaterally, but these countries do not officially form part of the Eurozone and do not have representation in the European Central Bank (ECB) or in the Eurogroup.\nThis question asks: On or before January 1 2025, will any full Member State of the Eurozone as of February 10 2019 (that is, Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Spain) cease to use the Euro as its official currency? \nNote that this question does not apply to Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, Vatican City, Kosovo, Montenegro, or any states that come to be Eurozone members after February 10 2019; only those expressly listed in the paragraph above. This question also does not apply to the overseas territories of countries which have agreements to use the euro (Akrotiri and Dhekelia, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, the French Southern and Antarctic Lands, and Saint-Barthélemy.)\nResolution is by citation of a press release from the Government or Central Bank of any of the relevant countries, or by credible media reports in the financial press, to the effect that the relevant country actually starts the process of phasing out the Euro as its official currency before 2025, and replacing it with either an existing currency (including but not limited to the US dollar, British pound, Japanese Yen and other reserve currencies extant as of 2019) or introducing (or re-introducing) a national currency of its own. A decision to temporarily leave the Eurozone for a fixed period or until certain conditions are met shall also suffice for a positive resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 197,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Haiti become an upper middle-income country?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2617/when-will-haiti-become-an-upper-middle-income-country/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The World Bank has historically classified every economy as low, middle or high income. The World Bank further specifies its classes of countries into low, lower-middle, upper-middle and high income economies. The World Bank uses GNI per capita as the basis for this classification because it views GNI as a broad measure that is considered to be the single best indicator of economic capacity and progress.\nMICs are broken up into lower-middle income and upper-middle income economies. [For the current 2019 fiscal year] (https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups) , low-income economies are defined as those with a GNI per capita, calculated using the World Bank Atlas method, of $995 or less in 2017; lower middle-income economies are those with a GNI per capita between $996 and $3,895; upper middle-income economies are those with a GNI per capita between $3,896 and $12,055; high-income economies are those with a GNI per capita of $12,056 or more.\nThese thresholds are adjusted over time taking into account the average inflation in the G-5 countries (the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, Germany and France), and from 2001, that of Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States and the eurozone. Thus, the thresholds remain constant in real terms over time. \nMICs are a very diverse group by region, size, population and income level, ranging from tiny nations with very small populations such as Belize and the Marshall Islands to all four of the BRIC giants – Brazil, Russia, India and China. \n[Haiti] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haiti) is a country located on the island of Hispaniola, east of Cuba in the Greater Antilles archipelago of the Caribbean Sea. It occupies the western three-eighths of the island, which it shares with the Dominican Republic. Haiti is 27,750 square kilometres (10,714 sq mi) in size and has an estimated 10.8 million people, making it the most populous country in the Caribbean Community and the second-most populous country in the Caribbean as a whole.\nDespite having a viable tourist industry, Haiti is one of the world's poorest countries and the poorest in the Americas region, with poverty, corruption, poor infrastructure, lack of health care and lack of education cited as the main causes. Trade declined dramatically after the 2010 earthquake and subsequent outbreak of cholera. Haiti ranked 145 of 182 countries in the 2010 United Nations Human Development Index, with 57.3% of the population being deprived in at least three of the HDI's poverty measures. [You can view some historical, economic and cultural data about Haiti here.] (https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ha.html) \nHaiti is the last World Bank low income country in the Americas, with a [GNI per capita of only $760 as of 2017.] (https://data.worldbank.org/?locations=XM-HT) [According to the CIA World Factbook, Haiti ranks 213th in the world (of 228 countries and territories) in terms of GDP per capita.] (https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/211rank.html#HA) \nThis question asks: When will Haiti become a World Bank upper middle-income country?\nResolution should cite a press release or other information from the World Bank, or credible media reports citing World Bank sources.\nThe question resolves ambiguously if the World Bank ceases to exist before Haiti is designated an upper middle-income country, or if Haiti ceases to exist as a geopolitical entity before being designated upper middle-income by the World Bank.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 90,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the US set a new annual GDP growth rate record high before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2621/will-the-us-set-a-new-annual-gdp-growth-rate-record-high-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "[Real GDP Annual Growth Rate in the United States] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/A191RL1A225NBEA) averaged 3.3% from 1930 until 2017, reaching an all time high of 8.7% in 1950 and a record low of -3.90% in the second quarter of 2009.\nThis question asks: In any year before Q1 2030, will the US record real GDP annual growth rate of greater than 8.7%, beating the record set in 1950?\nFor the purpose of this question, we shall refer to Real GDP in terms of percent change from preceding year, as provided by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, or other reputable sources of economic data.\nEdit: (22 Feb 2019), the question now resolves positively if real GDP in terms of percent change from preceding year exceeds 8.7% instead of resolving positively if annualised quarterly real GDP growth exceeds 13.4%.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 264,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the highest level of annual GDP growth in the US before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2622/what-will-be-the-highest-level-of-annual-gdp-growth-in-the-us-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[The Gross Domestic Product Annual Growth Rate in the United States] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ny.gdp.mktp.kd.zg?locations=us) averaged 3.20% from 1948 until 2018, reaching an all time high of 7.3% in 1984. \nThe Gross Domestic Product of the United States expanded 3% in the third quarter of 2018 over the same quarter of the previous year. \nThis question asks: Before Q1 2030, what will be the highest level of calendar year percentage GDP growth in the US?\nThe question resolves as the highest % growth in US GDP over a single calendar year (Jan-1 to Jan-1), achieved over the 2020 to 2030 period (inclusive).\nResolution should cite figures from US Treasury or credible reports in the financial press.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 130,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Nigeria's population exceed 400 million before 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2632/will-nigerias-population-exceed-400-million-before-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "The [Federal Republic of Nigeria] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigeria) is a federal republic in West Africa, bordering Niger in the north, Chad in the northeast, Cameroon in the east, and Benin in the west.\nNigeria is often referred to as the \"Giant of Africa\", owing to its large population and economy. With more than [199 million] (http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/nigeria-population/) inhabitants, Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa and the seventh most populous country in the world. Nigeria has the third-largest youth population in the world, after India and China, with more than 90 million of its population under age 18. As of 2017, Nigeria [had the fastest growing population of the 10 most populous countries worldwide.] (https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/nigeria-pass-u-s-world-s-3rd-most-populous-country-n775371) \nNigeria also has the [world's largest number of extremely poor people, with 87 million.] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-22/six-people-fall-into-extreme-poverty-in-this-nation-every-minute?cmpid%3D=socialflow-twitter-tictoc&amp;utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&amp;utm_content=tictoc&amp;utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=social) Today, Nigeria ranks 157 out of 189 countries in the [UN Human Development Index] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Development_Index) , which measures indicators such as health and inequality. Life expectancy is still only 54 years, although that’s an improvement from 46 years in 1999. \nAbout 80 percent of people who earn an income are active in the informal sector or have what the UN calls “vulnerable employment,” work that lacks social security or guarantees any kind of rights. The number of destitute in Nigeria is believed to be growing by six people every minute, [according to a recent paper from The Brookings Institution.] (https://www.brookings.edu/blog/future-development/2018/06/19/the-start-of-a-new-poverty-narrative/) The UN expects Nigeria's population to more than double to 410 million by 2050, potentially swelling the ranks of the poor.\nThis question asks: On or before 1 January 2050, will Nigeria's population be at least 400 million people?\nResolution should cite figures from the United Nations, World Health Organisation, competent statistical authorities in Nigeria or similarly credible data. The data need not be available on 1 January 2050; but it must provide population figures for that date or earlier.\nResolves ambiguously if Nigeria no longer exists as an independent country in January 2050.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 132,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When the first company reaches a $2 trillion market cap, will it be worth at least double what it was the year before?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2638/when-the-first-company-reaches-a-2-trillion-market-cap-will-it-be-worth-at-least-double-what-it-was-the-year-before/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "65%",
    "Description": "Company valuations can take off very quickly: Apple was valued at around [$100 billion in mid 2007] (https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AAPL/apple/market-cap) , and so it has taken the company roughly 11 years to grow its market capitalisation by a factor of ten. However, one year before it first hit $1 trillion, it was worth ~$0.8 trillion (which would have resolved a similar question negative).\nAmazon's rise was even more impressive. Amazon has grown from $100 bn to $1 trillion [in just over 6 years] (https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AMZN/amazon/market-cap) . And one year before it hit $1 trillion, it was worth ~0.46 trillion (which would have resolved a similar question positive).\nWill the first publicly traded company to have a $2 trillion market cap be worth double what it was worth 1 year before reaching $2 trillion?\nThis resolves when a company whose shares can be bought and sold on a stock exchange achieves a market capitalisation of $2 trillion (adjusted to 2018 prices), AND it was worth less than or equal to $1 trillion one year before (also in 2018 prices). The question will refer to Yahoo Finance's data, or any other reputable financial data service.\nMethodology clarification (03/03/19): Current quarter's prices are to be adjusted to mean 2018 prices using FRED's [GDP implicit price deflator] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/USAGDPDEFQISMEI) . If the company is not traded in the US, prices given in the currency in which the stocks are traded are to be converted using the arithmetic mean of FRED's [real broad effective exchange rate] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/tags/series?t=currency%3Bexchange%20rate%3Breal&amp;ob=pv&amp;od=desc) of the current quarter.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 286,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a robot poker player win a significant live (not online) competition?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2641/when-will-a-robot-poker-player-win-a-significant-live-not-online-competition/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Poker is a challenging game of bets, raises, and re-raises, calculation of odds and expected payoffs, game-theoretic mixed strategies, and tradeoffs between unexploitable and exploitative play.\nPoker is also a challenging game of visually identifying and then gripping small plastic discs and rectangles, and discriminating them between them based on their colors and symbols printed on their surfaces. These discs and rectangles must be moved around on a table in accordance with a game ruleset that is partially given in advance, and partly determined by verbal instruction from dealer and floor coordinator. \nAn example of the complexity of object manipulation that is required: the rectangles belonging to the player must be picked up in such a way that the symbols on the front can be inspected by the player, but kept oriented so that no other player can inspect those symbols, until such time as the ruleset dictates that the cards and symbols be revealed. Violating this constraint can lead not only to substandard play that is exploited by opponents, but also to penalties and even potential disqualification.\nAnd so we ask: when will a computer or robotic player become skilled enough at both the theoretical game and the physical game of poker to win a significant Texas HoldEm competition against humans in live play?\n\nDefinition of “significant competition”:\n----------------------------------------\n\nA Texas HoldEm tournament or cash game in which:\n---more than 300 hands are played \n---robotic and human players obey the same rules, without special accommodations for the perceptual or motor skills of the robotic player (including complying with verbal direction from the dealer and staff) \n---competitors include at least one human member of the top 200 of the [Hendon Mob All Time Money List] (http://pokerdb.thehendonmob.com/ranking/all-time-money-list/) (at the time of play) \n---the winner (best-outcome player) is awarded more than $10,000 US (whether that money is awarded to the robot itself or to its owners or developers), with the same payouts made to robotic and human players. \nThere are a wide variety of ways in which a competition like this could come about, and the intent is to cast a wide net. Two contrasting examples, which would both count for positive resolution:\n1--A “Deep Blue vs. Kasparov”-style challenge, in which the whole point of the competition is to pit human against machine. \n2--Harold takes a week off from his middle-management desk job, walks into the Rio All-Suites Hotel in Las Vegas, and plunks down $10,000 in cash for a seat in the World Series of Poker Main Event, because (since the recent passage of Robotic Personhood legislation) no one can tell him that he can’t, and after all it’s his money. \n\nClarifications and fine print:\n------------------------------\n\n---The robot player must finish #1 in the event. In the case of a cash game, this means netting the most money by the end. In the case of a tournament, this means playing until a robot is the only one left. \n---The win must be for the entire event as scheduled. For example, if a televised cash-game event is scheduled to span multiple days, a win over the course of a single day does not suffice. If the event is a single-elimination heads-up tournament, it does not suffice to win the semi-final game, even if that guarantees a purse greater than $10,000 US. \n---The robot need not literally sit in a chair at the poker table, but needs to be at the table taking up approximately the same portion of the perimeter that a human player would be allowed. \n--- \nThe rules must allow for the kinds of sensory modalities that would normally be legal for human players, but not for perceptual abilities that would correspond to cheating for humans. Examples: \n------Scanning cards in a way that allows reading through the back to see symbols on the front – disallowed. \n------Scanning the backs of cards to record their imperfections and distinguish between them in the future (i.e. “Every card is marked.”) - disallowed. \n------Scanning the faces of opponents to determine their emotional state – fair game. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 147,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will image recognition be made robust against unrestricted adversary?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2644/when-will-image-recognition-be-made-robust-against-unrestricted-adversary/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Image recognition is a task of assigning a label to an image. There has been enormous progress in the last 10 years due to deep learning. However, in 2013 researchers pointed out certain [intriguing properties of neural networks] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6199) . In particular, neural networks seem to suffer from a problem currently known as adversarial examples.\nAdversarial examples are images optimized so as to fool a machine learning algorithm, but remain unambiguous to humans. Current machine learning algorithms can be fooled by changes that are essentially impossible to perceive by humans. The issue of adversarial examples highlight differences in how humans and algorithms do image recognition. [\"Adversarial Examples - A Complete Characterisation of the Phenomenon\"] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.01185) provides an extensive overview.\nNotably, adversarial examples can also be a security issue, for example by making it possible to bypass face or voice recognition used for authentication.\nRecently Google introduced [the Unrestricted Adversarial Examples Challenge] (https://ai.googleblog.com/2018/09/introducing-unrestricted-adversarial.html) . This challenge allows unrestricted inputs, allowing participants to submit arbitrary images from the target classes to develop and test models on a wider variety of adversarial examples. They ask models to answer the question \"Is this an unambiguous picture of a bird, a bicycle, or is it (ambiguous / not obvious)?\". The images are provided by attackers and are first labeled by humans. A small monetary prize will be awarded to any team that breaks a previously-unbroken defense with an eligible input.\nThe question asks:\n\nWhen will image recognition be made robust against unrestricted adversary?\n--------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\nThe question will resolve when the large defender prize of the Unrestricted Adversarial Examples Challenge is awarded. This means that a defense (an image recognition algorithm) must remain unbroken for at least 90 days. [This file provides details of the challenge.] (https://github.com/google/unrestricted-adversarial-examples/blob/7cf9c3e6a33d32de3c7f1568b655d391f7815370/contest_proposal.md#unrestricted-adversarial-examples-contest-proposal) The question will resolve even if the details of the challenge are modified as long as the spirit of the challenge remains the same. The question will resolve as ambiguous if the challenge is discontinued before the end of 2030.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 155,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "A tech boom to surpass the dotcom bubble for one quarter or more by 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2645/a-tech-boom-to-surpass-the-dotcom-bubble-for-one-quarter-or-more-by-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "69%",
    "Description": "Electricity, internal combustion engines, and semiconductors facilitated automation in the last century, but AI now seems poised to automate many tasks once thought to be out of reach, from driving cars to making medical recommendations and beyond. \nHowever, measured productivity growth has actually declined by half over the past decade. [[2]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w24001) To some extent, this may be evidence that information technology and other conventional stuff (non-informational inputs or outputs) aren't actually so cheaply or widely substitutable. [[3]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w21547.pdf) \nThe prospects of growth of tech and automation may also be constrained by [Baumol’s “cost disease”] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumol%27s_cost_disease) : sectors with rapid productivity growth are able to charge lower prices and subsequently have their share of GDP decline, whilst those with relatively slow productivity growth experience increases in their share of the value contributed to the economy. This might effectively cap the rate of growth of the value of tech as a proportion of the total economy.[ [4] (https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/AI.pdf) ]\nBrynjolfsson et al. [[5]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w24001.pdf) have argued that recent progress in AI and automation might well be radically productivity enhancing, but this might yet go largely unnoticed because of an implementation lag: it takes considerable time to be able to sufficiently harness technologies with broad potential application that they qualify as general purpose technologies. \nWith the exception of the brief spike during dotcom bubble around the year 2000, the proportion of valuations contributed by tech companies in the [S&amp;P500] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%26P_500_Index) has been trending up only very slowly (~0.3 percentage points per year since 2003, see [data] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yaOCwE97SXzgnKJzmw74tK_njaO-NP3Vg5YuvHZeFBM/edit?usp=sharing) ). \nHence, with the exception of the dotcom bubble, we have arguably have not seen substantial evidence of investors suspecting a big trend-deviating disruption in the extent of productivity enhancing automation. But will this change in the next 5 years?\nWill the average sector weighting of the IT industry of the S&amp;P500 surpass 30% for a three consecutive month period by the end of 2024?\nThis resolves positively if the average sector weighting of the IT industry of the S&amp;P500 surpasses 30% for either a three consecutive month period or a 90 consecutive days period, before the end of 2024. For the purpose of this question, we shall refer to the current weightings of the [SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF] (https://us.spdrs.com/en/etf/spdr-sp-500-etf-SPY) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 272,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the necessary computational power to replicate human mental capability turn out to be?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2646/what-will-the-necessary-computational-power-to-replicate-human-mental-capability-turn-out-to-be/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A major uncertainty in understanding some timeline estimates for high-level AI is in estimating the minimal computational power necessary to perform the operations that the human brain does. \nEstimates in the literature (see appendix A on p. 84 of [this paper] (http://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/brain-emulation-roadmap-report.pdf) for a compilation) range from to FLOPS following a variety of methodologies. (For a comparison, the Landauer limit at 20 C is about bit erasures per second. However, the author has no clear idea how to convert between bit erasures and FLOPS.)\nThis huge range will probably eventually be narrowed down to within an order-of-magnitude or two, and we ask for that number here. Assume that by 2075 there is either (a) a full software emulation of a human brain that can duplicate the basic functionality of a typical adult human of average intelligence; or (b) there is an AI system that can pass a full \"strong\" Turing test (i.e. the interview is long, adversarial, and include sensory data); or (c) there is a computer system that attains \"human intelligence parity\" by the definition set forth in [this Metaculus question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/384/human-machine-intelligence-parity-by-2040/) . In each case (a,b,c) the number will be evaluated on a state-of-the-art system five years after the first demonstration of a system satisfying the criterion.\nWhat will the computation in FLOPS be of this machine system, if running at a speed comparable to that of human mental processing? \nThe point of this question is not really as a prediction, but more as a gathering place for estimates.\nFine print: we'll settle for a published estimate accurate to within a factor of 5. The speeds of the systems can be matched up by requiring that similar delays occur between queries and responses in the system as compared to humans, or scaling for this equivalency. Resolves as ambiguous if (a), (b) or (c) don't occur by 2075.\n(edited 2020-09-13 to fix eval date as 5 years after such a system appears.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 197,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) be finished on time?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2649/will-the-square-kilometre-array-ska-be-finished-on-time/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "The [Square Kilometre Array (SKA)] (https://www.skatelescope.org/) is a proposed radio-telescope more than a 50 times more sensitive than the current record holder. \nWith receiving stations extending out to a distance of at least 3,000 kilometres (1,900 mi) from a concentrated central core, it would exploit radio astronomy's ability to provide the highest resolution images in all astronomy. The SKA would be built in the southern hemisphere, with cores in South Africa and Australia, where the view of the Milky Way Galaxy is the best and radio interference at its least.\nAs such it is a multinational effort with, as of this writing, 11 countries contributing. \nThe creation of the SKA is separated into two phases:\n1--Providing ~10% of the total collecting area at low and mid frequencies by 2023 (SKA1). \n2--Completion of the full array (SKA2) at low and mid frequencies by 2030. \nThese huge science project often face challenges on the political, administrative, and technological level; what is planned doesn’t necessarily get built.\n\nWill the SKA be operational before 2031?\n\n---Resolves positive when the Square Kilometre Array Observatory or successor organisation announces completion of the SKA (including SKA1 &amp; SKA2). \n---Resolves negative when the SKA (including SKA1 &amp; SKA2) doesn’t open before 2031. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 104,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Volkswagen Group produce fewer than 22 million electric vehicles by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2665/will-volkswagen-group-produce-fewer-than-22-million-electric-vehicles-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "63%",
    "Description": "In [a recent press release] (https://www.volkswagenag.com/en/news/2019/03/VW_Group_JPK_19.html) the Volkswagen Group announced an expansion of their efforts in electric mobility, announcing a shift in their aims from 15 to 22 million vehicles produced in the next decade, CO2 neutrality by 2050, construction of hundreds of charging stations across Europe, and others. \nFor this the Volkswagen Group established a [modular platform] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Group_MEB_platform) , which should enable them to achieve these numbers. Different brands of the VW group like Porsche, Audi, Škoda, and Seat are already making use of and building models with the MEB, set to be sold come 2020.\nLet’s check one of their (cl)aims with this prediction.\nWill Volkswagen Group have produced fewer than 22 million electric vehicles with their MEB by 2030?\nResolution conditions: \n---Only fully electric vehicles produced based upon the [MEB] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Group_MEB_platform) (or a possible successor) will count towards that number \n---\"By 2030\" sets the deadline’s last day on 2029-12-31 \n---If Volkswagen Group’s subsidiaries (Audi, Lamborghini, Ducati, Bentley Motors, Bugatti Automobiles, MAN SE, Porsche, Porsche Holding, Scania, SEAT, Škoda Auto, Volkswagen, Volkswagen Commercial Vehicles, Volkswagen, Marine, TRATON, Here) change significantly (they added or removed subsidiaries had a &gt;100k unit production in the previous year), the question resolves ambiguous. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 92,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Germany fail to meet their coal commission’s goals?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2666/will-germany-fail-to-meet-their-coal-commissions-goals/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "65%",
    "Description": "After many months of deliberation Germany’s [Commission on Growth, Structural Change and Employment] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commission_on_Growth,_Structural_Change_and_Employment) (colloquially called “Coal Commission”) finally published the 300 page report on 26 Jan 2019. In it the commission laid out plans on how the country could to entirely phase out its coal-fired power generation by 2038, with distinct markers in-between: \n---Shut down brown coal based power plants by 3 GW and hard coal based ones by 4 GW by 2022; \n---Decrease brown and hard coal based power plants by another 6 and 7 GW respectively by 2030; \n---The last coal-fired power plant shall be shut down in/by 2038, with an option to fast-track this by three years. \nThis falls short of some of the participating activists goals, but is at least a step in the right direction, especially considering some of Europe’s biggest CO2-emitting power plants are in Germany. \nHowever, policies are often under varying outside pressures, and one coalition may think differently than another.\nIn 2018, [37% of Net public electricity in Germany was generated by burning brown coal and hard coal] (37% of Net public electricity in Germany in 2018 was generated by burning brown coal and hard coal.) . This is down [13 percentage points compared to 2002] (https://www.energy-charts.de/energy_pie.htm?year=2002) . In its place has come wind power, as Germany [has become the World's third largest producer of wind-power worldwide] (https://www.allianz.com/en/press/extra/knowledge/environment/100505-top-ten-wind-power-countries.html) .\nWill Germany's net public electricity generated by coal (both hard and brown) remain above 1% by 2039?\nThis question resolves positively if a reputable source reports that Germany's yearly average net public electricity production generated by coal remains above 1% by (and including) 2039.\nHistorical data on Germany's energy production can be accessed through [energy-charts.de] (https://www.energy-charts.de/energy_pie.htm?year=2019) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 83,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will World GDP grow every year until 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2669/will-world-gdp-grow-every-year-until-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "The 2008 financial crisis was [\"considered by many economists to have been the most serious financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s\"] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisis_of_2007%E2%80%932008) .\nAccording to the World Bank (series ID: [NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?end=2017&amp;start=1961&amp;view=chart) ), 2009 was the only year since 1961 when the World GDP did not grow (it shrunk by 1.7%).\nQuestion: Will the World GDP grow for each of the next 6 years (2019-2024)?\nEstimates from the World Bank or some other reputable source shall serve for resolution. Exactly 0% growth counts as no growth. Failure to locate a good source after an honest effort resolves ambiguous. Resolution date is set to 2025, when we should get 2024 numbers.\nThis question was inspired by [this related question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2621/will-the-us-set-a-new-annual-gdp-growth-rate-record-high-before-2030/) and [that also-related one] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2626/future-perfect-2019-series-q4-more-animals-will-be-killed-for-us-human-consumption-in-2019-than-in-2018/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 724,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the United States fulfill its goal of landing humans on the moon again before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2671/will-the-united-states-fulfill-its-goal-of-landing-humans-on-the-moon-again-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "On March 26 2019, Vice President of the United States Mike Pence [announced that it was the policy of the United States Government to land Americans on the moon within five years 'by any means necessary.'] (https://news.sky.com/story/us-signals-new-space-race-trump-wants-astronauts-back-on-the-moon-within-five-years-11676176) \n[Announcing the goal at a meeting of the National Space Council,] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxvFsqevSdw) Pence dismissed the goal of achieving a human landing by 2028 as ['just not good enough,'] (https://twitter.com/SciGuySpace/status/1110592064079777792) urging NASA to achieve the goal four years earlier, claiming ['we're better than that.'] (https://twitter.com/SciGuySpace/status/1110592064079777792) \nWill a mission of the United States, or any corporation incorporated in the United States, land one or more living humans on the Moon at any time after 26 March 2019 and before 00:00 UTC on January 1 2025?\nIn order for a positive resolution, the crewed landing must occur before 00:00 UTC on January 1 2025, and at least one crew member must be a human alive at the time of landing. A successful return to Earth or any other conclusion of the mission is not necessary for a positive resolution. \nA positive resolution requires that the mission is more than 50% funded by the Federal Government of the United States or by any agency thereof, or by any agency of the several States, or by any legal or natural person(s) resident (or incorporated) in the United States, or by any combination of the aforementioned entities. \nA mission in which such entities contribute exactly 50% or less than 50% of the funding does not count as a US mission for the purposes of this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 946,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) start operating by end of 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2709/will-the-international-thermonuclear-experimental-reactor-iter-start-operating-by-end-of-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "17%",
    "Description": "The [International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER) is an international nuclear fusion research and engineering megaproject. It is an experimental [tokamak] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak) nuclear fusion reactor which will be the world's largest magnetic confinement plasma physics experiment. \nWith thirty-five participating nations and an expected price tag [in excess of €20 billion] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER#Funding) , it is one of the largest international [scientific megaprojects] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_megaprojects#Science_projects) .\nITER began in 1985 as a Reagan–Gorbachev initiative with the equal participation of the Soviet Union, the European Atomic Energy Community, the United States, and Japan through the 1988–1998 initial design phases. \nThe project aims to:\n--- \nMomentarily produce a fusion plasma with thermal power ten times greater than the injected thermal power (a [Q value] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_energy_gain_factor) of 10).\n--- \nProduce a steady-state plasma with a Q value greater than 5. (Q = 1 is scientific breakeven)\nCurrently, it aims to produce its first [\"small star\" inside the ITER Tokamak in November 2025] (https://www.iter.org/mag/9/65) .\nBy the end of 2025, will ITER announce to have successfully discharged a plasma pulse of at least 5 kiloampere?\nFor the purpose of this question a lower threshold of 5kA is included to exclude insignificant results counting toward positive resolution. For reference, a Tokamak with a major plasma-radius of 0.9 m (much smaller than the ITER's 6.2m radius), [achieved a 10kA first plasma discharge pulse in 2017] (https://www.iter.org/newsline/-/2751) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 145,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a Guaranteed Minimum Income introduced in any EU country before 2041?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2711/will-a-guaranteed-minimum-income-introduced-in-any-eu-country-before-2041/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "75%",
    "Description": "A Guaranteed Minimum Income (GMI) is a guaranteed minimum income above the poverty line that would be guaranteed to be paid to any person of age. \nFeatures of a GMI would be: [unconditional, automatic, non-withdrawable, individual, and as a right] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_income) . This doesn’t mean every person would receive that income, but the vast majority of the population of a country, region, or locale would be guaranteed a minimum income, no strings attached.\nThe implementation can and would vary from state to state, according to the respective cultural, societal, and governmental conditions. \nSo far there have been numerous experiments with UBI [in the US, Finland] (https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612640/universal-basic-income-had-a-rough-2018/) , [Canada] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_income_in_Canada) , [Netherlands] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_income_in_the_Netherlands) , [and other countries] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_income_around_the_world) , and UBI has become a recurring theme in political and public discussion since the 1980s, in particular in light of downsizing due to automation. Groups call for the implementation of a basic income to deal with these issues.\nBut there are also arguments against implementing a UBI, such as questioning the financing strategy, a rise in shadow economy, the negative effect on people depending on more personalised (and higher) welfare, decrease in motivation to work, and so on.\n\nWill a Universal Basic Income introduced in any EU country within the next 20 years?\n\nFor a positive resolution the guaranteed income scheme must cover &gt;50% of the labour force and guarantee an income at ≥80% of that nation’s poverty line for at least six continuous months. The relevant numbers will be taken as [Eurostat] (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/) gathers and collates them.\n(Edited 2020-05-21 to change name to GMI from UBI to oomport with the definition given in the question.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 156,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be more people with HIV/AIDS in 2037 than in 2017?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2713/will-there-be-more-people-with-hivaids-in-2037-than-in-2017/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "The human immunodeficiency viruses ( [HIV] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV) ) are two species of Lentivirus (a subgroup of retrovirus) that causes HIV infection and over time Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ( [AIDS] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIDS) ). \nAIDS is a condition in humans in which progressive failure of the immune system allows life-threatening opportunistic infections and cancers to thrive. Without treatment, average survival time after infection with HIV is estimated to be 9 to 11 years, depending on the HIV subtype.\nHIV/AIDS has had a large impact on society, both as an illness and as a source of discrimination. The disease also has large economic impacts.[ [1] (http://data.unaids.org/pub/globalreport/2006/2006_gr_ch04_en.pdf) ]\nAccording to [UNAIDS] (http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet) , in 2017 (the latest data available) 36.9 million people globally were living with HIV, 1.8 million people became newly infected with HIV, and 940,000 people died from AIDS-related illnesses in 2017. In 2017, 21.7 million people living with HIV were accessing antiretroviral therapy, an increase of 2.3 million since 2016, and up from 8 million in 2010. \nAccording to [Avert.org] (https://www.avert.org/who-we-are) , a UK-based charity, the vast majority of people living with HIV are located in low-income and middle-income countries, with an estimated 66% living in sub-Saharan Africa.[ [2] (https://www.avert.org/global-hiv-and-aids-statistics) ] Among this group 19.6 million are living in East and Southern Africa which saw 800,000 new HIV infections in 2017.\nSince the start of the epidemic, an estimated 77.3 million people have become infected with HIV and 35.4 million people have died of AIDS-related illnesses.[ [3] (https://www.avert.org/global-hiv-and-aids-statistics) ] In 2017, 940,000 people died of AIDS-related illnesses. This number has reduced by more than 51% (1.9 million) since the peak in 2004 and 1.4 million in 2010.\nSubstantial progress has been made in devising successful therapies against HIV replication that can provide a sustained control of HIV replication.[ [4] (https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/immunotherapy-in-hiv-infection-2332-0877.1000102.php?aid=11848) ] Among them, immunotherapeutic approaches are one of the exciting areas, with surprising recent progress toward a possible [permanent eradication of the virus in patients] (https://futurism.com/the-byte/third-patient-reportedly-cured-hiv-free) .\nThis question asks: will the number of people globally living with HIV/AIDS in 2037 be 36.9 million or more, according to the median estimate from UNAIDS?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 200,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the SOO Green Renewable Rail project succeed?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2729/will-the-soo-green-renewable-rail-project-succeed/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33%",
    "Description": "One of the biggest challenges for renewable energy deployment is how to get power from where it is best produced to where it is most needed. In the USA, the best regions for wind and solar production are in the West, the Southwest, and the Plains Midwest. The area of most need is the Northeast.\nMany different technologies (batteries, conventional electric grid buildout, H2 storage) are relevant to this problem. One such entrant is high-voltage DC transmission lines (HVDC), which have high efficiency over long distances. Unfortunately, building new overhead lines meets stiff resistance from landowners and NIMBY stakeholders.\nThe [Soo Green Renewable Rail project] (http://www.soogreenrr.com/project-overview/innovation/) will attempt to solve for these issues by building out HVDC cables buried underground along railroad rights-of-way. The first planned project will lay 347 miles of cable from Mason City, Iowa to Plano, Illinois.\nSo we ask: Will the first SOO Green Renewable Rail project complete and succeed before 2035?\nDefinitions of success:\n--- \nThere is a buried HVDC cable of length at least 150 miles running from a location in Iowa to a location in Illinois.\n--- \nThis cable is developed and installed by the Soo Green Renewable Rail organization, or a successor, partner, subsidiary, or spinoff.\n--- \nAt some instant before 2035 the cable must be transmitting at least 1000MW of power over a distance of 150 miles or more.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 86,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the text of the Voynich manuscript be successfully translated by 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2751/will-the-text-of-the-voynich-manuscript-be-successfully-translated-by-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "The [Voynich manuscript] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voynich_manuscript) is a hand-written codex which, according to carbon dating, originated in the 15th century. To this day, it is not known for certain whether the manuscript contains meaningful text or gibberish, let alone what language(s) it is written in or what the text might say.\nThere are a few claimed solutions every year. Most recently there has been buzz about [a University of Bristol academic] (https://phys.org/news/2019-05-bristol-academic-voynich-code-century-old.html) who claimed to have found a way to transliterate \"Voynichese\" to a form of Vulgar Latin. Like all other decipherment claims to date, this is not widely accepted by the Voynich expert community (as judging by the reactions on the [voynich.ninja] (https://voynich.ninja/thread-2763.html) forum and [/r/linguistics] (https://old.reddit.com/r/linguistics/comments/bouuhu/bristol_academic_cracks_voynich_code_solving/) ).\nThis question resolves positively if an attempt at deciphering and translating the main text of the Voynich manuscript is widely accepted as correct by experts by the end of 2050. \nIt resolves negatively if no Voynich decipherment attempt is widely accepted by the end of 2050, or if the document is widely accepted as a hoax/gibberish by the end of 2050.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 116,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Apollo 10's Lunar Module be recovered by 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2762/will-apollo-10s-lunar-module-be-recovered-by-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "The [Lunar Module] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Lunar_Module) flown on [Apollo 10] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_10) is the only flown lunar module which didn't end up crashing into the Moon or burning up in Earth's atmosphere.\nAfter 'dress rehearsal' testing in lunar orbit, during which the Lunar Module came within 8.4 nautical miles of the lunar surface, the ascent engine performed a burn to depletion which sent the craft into interplanetary space and the vehicle is currently in a heliocentric orbit. The location of the Apollo 10 Lunar Module is unknown as of May 2019, but efforts are underway to find it. \nAs a unique historical artefact from the original golden age of human spaceflight, this Lunar Module would certainly make for an interesting museum exhibit. \nThis question asks: by 1 January 2050, will the lost ascent stage of the Apollo 10 Lunar Module be recovered (i.e. located, captured, and physically transported to some location where humans have a presence at that time, such as Earth, the Moon, Mars or elsewhere) successfully?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 102,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first successful entirely artificial extracorporeal human pregnancy conclude?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2769/when-will-the-first-successful-entirely-artificial-extracorporeal-human-pregnancy-conclude/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Ectogenesis] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ectogenesis) is the growth of an organism in an artificial environment outside the body in which it would normally be found, such as the growth of an embryo or fetus outside the mother's body. Ectogenesis of human embryos and fetuses would require some kind of [artificial uterus] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_uterus) . An artificial uterus would have to be supplied by nutrients and oxygen from some source to nurture a fetus, and would have to dispose of waste material. \nThe potential development of technology allowing for humans to be created entirely ex vivo (that is, fertilisation by in-vitro fertilisation and the entire gestation of the zygote, embryo, and fetus taking place in an artificial environment) has far-reaching implications for humanity, enabling not only a dramatic change in respect of reproductive rights and neonatal medical care, but perhaps even the end of the natural human pregnancy as a cultural norm.\nAn early form of this technology has [already been demonstrated with a mammalian model, developing a lamb fetus for four weeks,] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dt7twXzNEsQ) though these animals were not gestated entirely ex vivo. Here is the associated paper, ['An extra-uterine system to physiologically support the extreme premature lamb'] (https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15112) , published in Nature Communications.\nThis question asks: When will the first example of an entirely extracorporeal human pregnancy conclude with the 'birth' of a healthy, conscious child who lives for a period of at least one year from the date of birth? \nThe date we are looking to predict here is the date of the 'birth.'\nBy 'artificial environment,' this question refers expressly to an environment that is not any part of a mammalian body, and an environment which is not dependent upon any direct connection with any mammalian body or part thereof.\nThis means that the artificial uterus cannot be the uterus of any human or non-human mammal, and the artificial uterus cannot be connected to either an entire human or non-human mammal, or any human or non-human mammalian organ or organ system.\nResolution should cite credible media reports, a press release from the responsible organisation, or an article in a scientific journal.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 72,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How far away will the closest known Black Hole lay in 2031?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2771/how-far-away-will-the-closest-known-black-hole-lay-in-2031/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Black Holes] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole) are regions of space time where the gravitational acceleration is so high nothing, not even light, can escape. They’re often the result of a sufficiently big star undergoing gravitational collapse at the end of its ‘life cycle’.\nFurthermore black holes can merge, forming ever more massive black holes, such can be found in the centre of our and other galaxies. They’re the most well known and in some aspect more easily researched black holes due to their mass, often as high as millions (our Milky Way’s supermassive black hole) or billions ( [the recently imaged M87 supermassive black hole] (https://eventhorizontelescope.org/) ) solar masses.\nThere are, however, [much closer known black holes] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nearest_black_holes) and black hole candidates, such as [QV Telescopii Ab] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HR_6819) , the currently closest black hole, and also the first black hole associated with a naked eyes visible star, some 1,120 light years distant, or [A0620-00] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A0620-00) at 3,300 light years. \nThough direct evidence for a black hole remains difficult to acquire, favouring the statistically smaller fraction of black holes in binary systems, there are cases where their existence can be inferred, like for QV Tel Ab. As instrumentation and techniques improve, so should our knowledge about black hole distribution.\n\nHow far away will the closest known black hole or black hole candidate be in 2031?\n\n---Will resolve according to [Wikipedia’s List of nearest black holes] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nearest_black_holes) or credible peer reviewed publication. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 28,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Nigel Farage become Prime Minister of the United Kingdom before 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2773/will-nigel-farage-become-prime-minister-of-the-united-kingdom-before-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "[Nigel Paul Farage] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigel_Farage) , born 3 April 1964, is a British politician, broadcaster, and political analyst currently serving as leader of the Brexit Party since March 2019 and as a Member of the European Parliament for the South East England constituency since 1999. He is best known as the former leader of the UK Independence Party (UKIP) from 2006 to 2009 and again from 2010 to 2016.\nFarage's decades-long campaign for the UK to leave the European Union culminated in the [2016 Brexit vote] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_Kingdom_European_Union_membership_referendum) , in which the UK voted to withdraw from the EU. Since that vote, the UK has failed to achieve a negotiated exit from the EU and has agreed to extend the negotiating period until October 31 2019. \nIn May 2019, Farage's new Brexit Party topped the poll in the [2019 European Parliament elections] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_European_Parliament_election_in_the_United_Kingdom) , becoming by far the largest party by number of UK seats in the European Parliament, and also the largest single party overall in the European Parliament. \nThis question asks: Before 01 January 2023, will Nigel Farage become Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?\nResolves positively on credible media reports that Nigel Farage holds the office of Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland at any time before 01 January 2023, and negatively otherwise.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 201,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much will GiveWell guess it will cost to get an outcome as good as saving a life, at the end of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2776/how-much-will-givewell-guess-it-will-cost-to-get-an-outcome-as-good-as-saving-a-life-at-the-end-of-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[GiveWell] (https://www.givewell.org/) is a charity evaluator that recommends a shortlist of charities in the field of global development that have the greatest impact per marginal donation. Towards this end, they try to quantify the effects of different interventions by estimating a \"cost per life saved\" metric to compare them on.\nWhile they warn against taking [these cost-effectiveness estimates literally] (https://blog.givewell.org/2017/06/01/how-givewell-uses-cost-effectiveness-analyses/) , these estimates do give a guideline to which interventions are most effective and a rough idea of how cost-effective we should expect interventions to be.\nOver time, these estimates change; they might update upwards if all the most cost-effective interventions are fully funded by philanthropists or if they overestimated the cost-effectiveness of the top intervention, and they might update downwards if more promising interventions are found or if an existing intervention has more benefits than previously expected.\nHow much will it cost to get an outcome as good as averting the death of an individual under 5, according to GiveWell's guess, at the end of 2021, in 2015 USD?\nIf available, the question will be resolved by taking the lowest value for the field \"cost per outcome as good as: averting the death of an individual under 5\" in the latest publicly available version of [Givewell's cost-effectiveness analysis spreadsheet] (https://www.givewell.org/how-we-work/our-criteria/cost-effectiveness/cost-effectiveness-models) using the default values. These values are given after [accounting for expected leverage and funging] (https://blog.givewell.org/2018/02/13/revisiting-leverage/) .\nSimilar questions asked for previous years would have resolved at (all in 2015 prices):\n---2016: $890 \n---2017: $823 \n---2018: $617 \n---2019: $592 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 211,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "At the end of 2023, will Animal Charity Evaluators recommend a charity working on reducing wild animal suffering as a top charity?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2783/at-the-end-of-2023-will-animal-charity-evaluators-recommend-a-charity-working-on-reducing-wild-animal-suffering-as-a-top-charity/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "80%",
    "Description": "Animal Charity Evaluators (ACE) is an organisation that reviews animal welfare charities in order to recommend the most cost-effective organisations to donate to. Charities that they evaluate as having a good track record, room for more funding, and high estimated cost-effectiveness are put on a shortlist of [top charities] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/donation-advice/recommended-charities/) , of which there are currently four.\nOne of the cause areas that they evaluate organisations working in and consider to be high-priority is [reducing wild animal suffering] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/advocacy-interventions/prioritizing-causes/causes-we-consider/#reducing-wild-animal-suffering) . ACE [currently lists] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/charity-reviews/all-charity-reviews/#filter=.wild-animal-suffering) two charities that they have considered and that are working this cause area; of these, Animal Ethics was considered a standout charity from 2015-2017, but none have ever been top charities.\nAt the end of 2023, will Animal Charity Evaluators list an organisation with a review status of \"Top Charity\" and a type of work of \"Reducing Wild Animal Suffering\"?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 154,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2025, will laws be in place requiring that AI systems that emulate humans must reveal to people that they are AI?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2788/by-2025-will-laws-be-in-place-requiring-that-ai-systems-that-emulate-humans-must-reveal-to-people-that-they-are-ai/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "66%",
    "Description": "Cross-posted from [ai.metaculus] (http://ai.metaculus.com) . Originally sourced from [Science Bets] (http://sciencebets.org/one_sided_predictions.html) . \nAs AI gets more powerful, it is likely that systems that can \"pass a Turing test\" and deceive people into believing that the AI is human will become available and controversial.\nFor example, the Google Duplex bot courted controversy with its extremely accurate mimicking of a human's voice, dialogue, and cadence. Public backlash prompted Google to [announce that the system would always first identify itself as a bot] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-10/google-grapples-with-horrifying-reaction-to-uncanny-ai-tech) .\nBy 2025, will there be laws in place in a country requiring that AI systems that emulate humans must reveal to people that they use AI?\nRelated Questions: [When will the first law concerning artificial intelligence be passed in the US?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/418/when-will-the-first-law-concerning-artificial-intelligence-be-passed-in-the-us/) <a href=\"https://www.metaculus.com/questions/73/will-the-silver-turing-test-be-passed-by-2026/\"></a>\n",
    "# Forecasts": 125,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will NASA's SLS launch a person to the Moon before 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2795/will-nasas-sls-launch-a-person-to-the-moon-before-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4%",
    "Description": "Earlier this year US Vice President Mike Pence instructed NASA to launch the first woman and the next man to the surface of the Moon by 2024. The mission is supposed to be launched aboard the agency's Space Launch System (SLS) with help from commercial partners. However, many have speculated that a deadline of 2024 for a crewed mission to the lunar surface is beyond ambitious and is just not feasible.\nThe [Space Launch System] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Launch_System) (SLS) is an American Space Shuttle-derived super heavy-lift expendable launch vehicle. It is a primary part of NASA's deep space exploration plans, including the planned [Orion Program] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_(spacecraft)) crewed missions to the Moon and Mars.\n[Artemis 3] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_3) is a planned 2024 mission of NASA's Orion spacecraft utilising the SLS, to be launched on the Space Launch System. As of May 2019, Artemis 3 may become the first human landing on the Moon since Apollo 17, with the accelerated timeline proposed by the 2020 NASA budget to land a woman on the Moon by 2024.\nWill the Space Launch System successfully launch a human being to the Moon by 2024?\nThis question resolves positively when any spacecraft launched using NASA's SLS containing living humans comes into physical contact with the moon before the end of 2023. In line with the resolution criteria of [a previous question by @Jgalt] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1619/when-will-the-first-manned-spacecraft-touch-the-surface-of-any-planet-dwarf-planet-or-moon-other-than-earth-earths-moon-or-mars/) , the landing need not last for any significant period of time and the crew need not survive impact for a positive resolution, but must be alive when the impact occurs.\nSee also [When will NASA's SLS carry humans to the Moon? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2818/when-will-nasas-sls-carry-humans-to-the-moon/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 176,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will no non-test nuclear weapons be detonated by start of 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2797/will-no-non-test-nuclear-weapons-be-detonated-by-start-of-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "95%",
    "Description": "Weapons in which the energy is provided by nuclear fission or fusion have only twice in history been detonated outside of a controlled test environment, in the Hiroshima and Nagasaki events in World War II.\nSince then, the world has nearly gone to nuclear war as a result of international conflict (during the Cuban Missile Crisis) and by accident. There have also been a number of narrowly-averted accidental nuclear detonations. See [this timeline] (http://futureoflife.org/background/nuclear-close-calls-a-timeline/) for a sobering look at how close we have come.\nThis question resolves positive if no nuclear weapon is detonated before Jan 1, 2024, outside of controlled tests. Negative resolution could be triggered by:\n--- \nDeliberate nuclear attack.\n--- \nAccidental nuclear attack (launched by accident or on the basis of erroneous information.)\n--- \nAccidental detonation of a weapon.\n--- \nNuclear terrorism.\nFor these purposes we do not consider a radiological weapon — where any fission/fusion energy is energetically sub-dominant to chemical or other explosives — to constitute a nuclear detonation.\nThe deliberate detonation of nuclear weapons primarily for non-offensive engineering, mining or other civilian purposes (on Earth or in Space) do not trigger negative resolution.\nSee our previous question [Will a non-test nuclear weapon be detonated by 2020? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/179/will-a-non-test-nuclear-weapon-be-detonated-by-2020/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 222,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the Collatz Conjecture be resolved?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2799/when-will-the-collatz-conjecture-be-resolved/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Let's define the Collatz Program in pseudocode as\ncollatz(n) = if (n is 1) return 1 else if (n is even) return collatz(n/2) else return collatz(3n + 1) \nwhere input n is a positive integer.\nThe [Collatz Conjecture] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collatz_conjecture) is that the Collatz Program halts (and returns 1) for all positive integers.\nWhen will the Collatz Conjecture be resolved, either positively or negatively?\nTake into account the following statement which Paul Erdos may or may not have made about the Conjecture: \"Mathematics may not be ready for such problems\".\nThe question resolves with a date of publication in a major mathematics journal.\nOther questions on the Collatz Conjecture:\n--- [Is the halting problem for the Collatz Program computable?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2803/is-the-halting-problem-for-the-collatz-program-computable/) \n--- [Is the Collatz Conjecture true?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2802/is-the-collatz-conjecture-true/) \n--- [When will the Collatz Conjecture be resolved? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2799/when-will-the-collatz-conjecture-be-resolved/) \n--- [When will the halting problem for the Collatz Program be resolved?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2806/when-will-the-halting-problem-for-the-collatz-program-be-resolved/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 117,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Is the Collatz Conjecture true?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2802/is-the-collatz-conjecture-true/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "93%",
    "Description": "A sister question asks when the [Collatz Conjecture] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collatz_conjecture) will be resolved - here we ask which way it will turn out.\nAgain, let's say that the Collatz Program in pseudocode is:\ncollatz(n) = if (n is 1) return 1 else if (n is even) return collatz(n/2) else return collatz(3n + 1) \nwhere n is a positive integer.\nThe Conjecture is that for all integer inputs the Collatz Program halts (and returns 1).\nFor any particular execution of the Collatz program, there are three possible outcomes:\n1) It moves up and down through input arguments of different sizes, until it encounters a power of 2, and then cascades down to 1, and halts.\n2) It moves up and down through numbers of different sizes until it repeats a number. From that point onward it will repeat a cycle, and never halt.\n3) It moves up and down through numbers of different sizes, but keeps expanding its frontier of numerical size, without ever repeating an input or encountering a power of 2. In this case, it will never halt.\nPer [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collatz_conjecture) , Jeffrey Lagarias in 2010 claimed that based only on known information about this problem, \"this is an extraordinarily difficult problem, completely out of reach of present day mathematics.\"\nThis question will resolve positively if there is a positive proof of the Conjecture (i.e. that the Collatz Program halts for all integer inputs) in a major Mathematics journal before June 21, 2520. It will resolve negatively if there is a publication of a disconfirmation in a major mathematics journal before that time. \nIf the Conjecture has neither been proven nor disproven before that time, it will resolve as ambiguous.\nOther questions on the Collatz Conjecture:\n--- [Is the halting problem for the Collatz Program computable?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2803/is-the-halting-problem-for-the-collatz-program-computable/) \n--- [Is the Collatz Conjecture true?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2802/is-the-collatz-conjecture-true/) \n--- [When will the Collatz Conjecture be resolved? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2799/when-will-the-collatz-conjecture-be-resolved/) \n--- [When will the halting problem for the Collatz Program be resolved?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2806/when-will-the-halting-problem-for-the-collatz-program-be-resolved/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 153,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Is the halting problem for the Collatz Program computable?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2803/is-the-halting-problem-for-the-collatz-program-computable/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "92%",
    "Description": "In related questions, we asked whether the Collatz Conjecture is true and when it will be resolved one way or another. Here we ask more specifically whether we can predict the behavior of the corresponding program.\nLet's define the Collatz Program in pseudocode as\ncollatz(n) = if (n is 1) return 1 else if (n is even) return collatz(n/2) else return collatz(3n + 1) where input n is a positive integer. \nThe Collatz Conjecture is that this program halts (and returns 1) for all integer inputs.\nLet's imagine a companion program called collatz_halts(), which takes an integer input n, always halts, and returns 1 if collatz() halts, and 0 otherwise.\nDoes collatz_halts() exist? If collatz() always halts, then collatz_halts() definitely exists, because the answer is 1 for all inputs. If collatz_program() only halts for some n, then collatz_halts() might or might not exist.\nNote that if the Collatz Conjecture is false for only a finite number of inputs, then collatz_halts() exists, since the program could test against an enumeration of the the inputs for which collatz() does not halt. Also note that if collatz() always either halts or encounters a cycle, then collatz_halts() exists by modifying collatz() to check for cycles.\nResolution:\n--- \nThis question will resolve positively if it is demonstrated that a program must exist that always halts and tests whether the Collatz program halts with a given input.\n--- \nIt will resolve negatively if the Conjecture is proven to be false and such a halting-test program is proven not to exist.\n--- \nBoth of these resolutions will be via publication in a major mathematics journal.\nIf no such proof is published before June 21, 2520, then the question will resolve as ambiguous.\nOther questions on the Collatz Conjecture:\n--- [Is the halting problem for the Collatz Program computable?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2803/is-the-halting-problem-for-the-collatz-program-computable/) \n--- [Is the Collatz Conjecture true?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2802/is-the-collatz-conjecture-true/) \n--- [When will the Collatz Conjecture be resolved? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2799/when-will-the-collatz-conjecture-be-resolved/) \n--- [When will the halting problem for the Collatz Program be resolved?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2806/when-will-the-halting-problem-for-the-collatz-program-be-resolved/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 82,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If there is an artificial intelligence catastrophe this century, when will it happen?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2805/if-there-is-an-artificial-intelligence-catastrophe-this-century-when-will-it-happen/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [Ragnarök Question Series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--ragnarok) asks [whether there will be an AI catastrophe] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) . Also interesting is when this catastrophe would occur, especially for its implications in how to best avert such a catastrophe.\nGiven that a catastrophe resulting from an AI-failure-mode occurs before 2100, when will this occur?\nResolution will be on the day when it is first true that such a catastrophe (defined as one that claims at least 10% of the human population in any period of 5 years or less) that is principally due to the deployment of AI system(s) has occurred, or ambiguous if no such catastrophe occurs.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 148,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the halting problem for the Collatz Program be resolved?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2806/when-will-the-halting-problem-for-the-collatz-program-be-resolved/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In related questions, we asked whether the Collatz Conjecture is true, when it will be resolved one way or the other, and whether a corresponding halting problem for the Collatz Program is computable.\nFor completeness and symmetry, this question asks when the halting problem will be resolved.\nWe can write the Collatz Program in pseudocode as\ncollatz(n) = if (n is 1) return 1 else if (n is even) return collatz(n/2) else return collatz(3n + 1) \nwhere input n is a positive integer.\nPossible inputs to collatz() are divided into three sets:\n---Set 1: Inputs for which collatz() halts, after eventually encountering a power of 2 \n---Set 2: Inputs for which collatz() eventually encounters a number twice, and then cycles forever \n---Set 3: Inputs that cause collatz() to forever avoid both repetition and powers of 2, exploring larger and larger numbers \nThe Conjecture is that all integers belong to Set 1, and that Sets 2 and 3 are empty.\nThe halting problem for the Collatz Program asks whether there can exist a program that takes as input an integer n, always halts itself, and returns 1 if collatz(n) halts and 0 if it does not halt. \nIt is possible that the Conjecture is false, and also that the halting problem for the Collatz Problem is not computable, in the same sense that the more general [Halting Problem] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem) is not computable.\nThere are a number of ways in which it could turn out that the halting problem for the Collatz Program is computable.\n---If the Conjecture is true (and collatz()) always halts) then the halt-checking program is trivial: always return 1. \n---If the Conjecture is false, but Sets 2 and 3 are finite, then a halt-checking program could check a finite list of inputs for which to return 0, and return 1 otherwise. \n---If all inputs are either in Set 1 (halts) or Set 2 (cycles), then a modified version of collatz() could run until it either halts (returning 1) or detects a cycle (returning 0). Similarly, if Set 3 is finite, then a combination of checking a finite list and checking for cycles would suffice. \n---Possibly all three sets are infinite, but there is still some simple (or at least computable) rule that can determine membership without running collatz() forever. \nWhen will this halting problem be resolved? It could be:\n---At exactly the same time that the Collatz Conjecture is resolved, especially if the Conjecture is shown to be true. \n---Later than the Conjecture is shown to be false. It could be that no algorithm is found for separating Set 1 from Sets 2 and 3, but also no proof is found that such an algorithm cannot exist. \n---Earlier than the Conjecture is resolved (as was pointed out in a comment on a related question). It could be proven, for example, that only a finite number of inputs cause collatz() to not halt, without resolving whether that number is zero. \nThis question will resolve with the date of publication in a major mathematics journal of an article that either 1) proves the Conjecture to be true (with the halting problem as a trivial implication), or 2) explicitly resolves the halting problem.\nOther questions on the Collatz Conjecture:\n--- [Is the halting problem for the Collatz Program computable?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2803/is-the-halting-problem-for-the-collatz-program-computable/) \n--- [Is the Collatz Conjecture true?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2802/is-the-collatz-conjecture-true/) \n--- [When will the Collatz Conjecture be resolved? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2799/when-will-the-collatz-conjecture-be-resolved/) \n--- [When will the halting problem for the Collatz Program be resolved?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2806/when-will-the-halting-problem-for-the-collatz-program-be-resolved/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 73,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the UK housing market crash before July 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2807/will-the-uk-housing-market-crash-before-july-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "As of 17 June 2019, the [Rightmove House Price Index] (https://www.rightmove.co.uk/news/content/uploads/2019/06/Rightmove-House-Price-Index-17-June-2019.pdf) indicates that the average cost of a property in the UK is £309,348; just £91 short of the all-time record reached in June 2018.\nIn any month before July 2023, will the Rightmove House Price Index indicate that the average cost of a property is equal to or less than £216,543; a nominal decline of 30% from June 2019 levels?\nResolves positively if so, negatively if not, and ambiguously if the Rightmove House Price Index is discontinued or its methodology is changed so substantially that administrators believe it is no longer reasonable to continue this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 342,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If a whole human brain is successfully emulated by 2100, what is the maximum number of humans that will be uploaded in any 5-year period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2812/if-a-whole-human-brain-is-successfully-emulated-by-2100-what-is-the-maximum-number-of-humans-that-will-be-uploaded-in-any-5-year-period/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Whole Brain Emulation (WBE), often informally called “uploading”, is a proposed technique that involves using a computer to emulate the states and functional dynamics of a brain at a relatively fine‐grained level of detail to produce the same outward behaviour as the original brain. The basic idea is to take a particular brain, scan its structure in detail, and construct a software model of it that is sufficiently faithful to the original that, when run on appropriate hardware, it will behave in essentially the same way as the original brain.[ [1] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/brain-emulation-roadmap-report.pdf) ]\nWBE has been proposed as a path to creating human-level digital intelligence.[ [2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Age_of_Em) ]\nAn approach to WBE examined in in [Bostrom and Sandberg (2008)] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/brain-emulation-roadmap-report.pdf) , a comprehensive study on the topic, is one that involves destructive scanning, in which the brain is separated from other tissue, sliced into thin slices, fixated and subsequently scanned accurately and a at a sufficiently high resolution. This process could be applied immediately after death or on cryogenically preserved brain tissue.\nIn his book, [The Age of Em] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Age_of_Em) , Robin Hanson has argued that the emulations in highest demand will be those of the brains of the most elite humans around today.[ [2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Age_of_Em) ] In his view, the em world will be dominated by a few (i. e. something like one thousand) copy clans, copied from humans who will tend to be selected for their productivity, such as billionaires, or winners of Nobel or Pulitzer prizes.\nIf Whole Brain Emulation succeeds, what is the maximum number of humans that will be uploaded in any 5-year period before 2100?\nResolution:\nThis question will resolve as the maximum number of humans whose brain is destructively emulated to produce at least one viable emulation, in any 5-year period before 2100. Emulation here is the process, described in [ [1] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/brain-emulation-roadmap-report.pdf) ] that is based on direct simulation of the neural connectome (and a requisite level of its physical instantiation). \nFor the purpose of this question successful WBE will be taken to mean an emulation that is at least as faithful to the original brain as an “individual brain emulation” in [Bostrom and Sandberg (2008)] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/brain-emulation-roadmap-report.pdf) (page 11):\nSuccess criterion: \"The emulation produces emergent activity characteristic of that of one particular (fully functioning) brain. It is more similar to the activity of the original brain than any other brain.\"\nCorrect properties: \"Correct internal and behaviour responses. Retains most memories and skills of the particular brain that was emulated. (In an emulation of an animal brain, it should be possible to recognize the particular (familiar) animal.)\"\nDonors need not have been alive before their brain is uploaded. The question resolves ambiguously if WBE does not succeed before 2100. Note that multiple copies of an emulation of a whole human brain only counts as one upload. The question resolves ambiguous if the number falls outside upper bound on the numerical range, which is set at 20B.\nThis question was inspired [by a discussion between @frxtz, @tenthkrige and @holomanga] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2805/if-there-is-an-artificial-intelligence-catastrophe-this-century-when-will-it-happen/#comment-14187) on whether to count emulations “ems”, or uploads as humans for question related to global catastrophic risk.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 108,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first whole human brain be successfully emulated?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2813/when-will-the-first-whole-human-brain-be-successfully-emulated/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Whole Brain Emulation (WBE), often informally called “uploading”, is a proposed technique that involves using a computer to emulate the states and functional dynamics of a brain at a relatively fine‐grained level of detail to produce the same outward behaviour as the original brain. The basic idea is to take a particular brain, scan its structure in detail, and construct a software model of it that is sufficiently faithful to the original that, when run on appropriate hardware, it will behave in essentially the same way as the original brain.[ [1] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/brain-emulation-roadmap-report.pdf) ]\nAn approach to WBE examined in in [Bostrom and Sandberg (2008)] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/brain-emulation-roadmap-report.pdf) , a comprehensive study on the topic, is one that involves destructive scanning, in which the brain is separated from other tissue, sliced into thin slices, fixated and subsequently scanned accurately and a at a sufficiently high resolution. This process could be applied immediately after death or on cryogenically preserved brain tissue.\nWBE has been proposed as a path to creating human-level digital intelligence.[ [2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Age_of_Em) ] Emulations might also enable a type of “digital immortality” by creating back‐up copies of an individual's identity, thereby promising a type of continued survival in cyberspace after death.[ [3] (https://jetpress.org/v26.2/linssen_lemmens.htm) ]\nThere is considerable debate about the technological feasibility of WBE: though there is general (though not universal) agreement that the brain, being a physical system, is amenable to being simulated. However, the necessary scanning, data gathering, image interpretation, and amounts of computation required might still be beyond what our reach for some time to come. (see [ [1] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/brain-emulation-roadmap-report.pdf) ])\nWhen will a whole human brain be successfully emulated?\nThis question resolves positive when a human brain is first successfully emulated on a computer, with the emulation being at least as faithful to the original brain as an “individual brain emulation” defined in [Bostrom and Sandberg (2008)] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/brain-emulation-roadmap-report.pdf) (page 11):\nSuccess criterion of an individual brain emulation: \nThe emulation produces emergent activity characteristic of that of one particular (fully functioning) brain. It is more similar to the activity of the original brain than any other brain.\nRequired properties of an individual brain emulation: \nCorrect internal and behaviour responses. Retains most memories and skills of the particular brain that was emulated. (In an emulation of an animal brain, it should be possible to recognize the particular (familiar) animal.)\nEmulation here is the process, described in [Bostrom and Sandberg (2008)] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/brain-emulation-roadmap-report.pdf) , that is based on direct simulation of the neural connectome (and a requisite level of its physical instantiation). Donors need not have been alive before their brain is uploaded. Resolution requires just those portions of the human brain that have functionally relevant effects on actual behaviour to be emulated. The emulation needs to run sufficiently long to confirm that it successfully produces similar outward behaviour more similar to the activity of the original brain than that of any other human brain.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 127,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2029, will the US have as many or fewer nuclear warheads than it did in 2019?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2817/us-having-fewer-nukes-in-2029-than-2019/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "70%",
    "Description": "The size of the US's nuclear weapons stockpile reached a peak [in 1966 at around 30,000 warheads] (https://thebulletin.org/nuclear-notebook-multimedia) . Following the deescalation and the end of the Cold War, the number has substantially decreased. [Kristensen and Korda (2019)] (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00963402.2019.1606503) estimate that the US maintains a deployed stockpile of nearly 3,800 warheads. The approximate breakdown is as follows:\n---1,750 warheads are currently deployed, of which\n------1,300 strategic warheads are deployed on ballistic missiles, \n------300 at strategic bomber bases in the United States, \n------150 tactical bombs are deployed at air bases in Europe. \n---2,050 are in storage as a so-called hedge against technical or geopolitical surprises. \nIt is possible that this trend will reverse in a period of nuclear rearmament, especially if world tensions get worse. The Trump Administration’s [Nuclear Posture Review] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Posture_Review) takes a confrontational tone, presenting an assertive posture that embraces “Great Power competition” and includes plans to expand the US' nuclear arsenal.\nIn 2029, will the US have as many or fewer nuclear warheads than it did in 2019?\nThis resolves positive if credible sources, such as the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists' Nuclear Notebook (such as [this one for 2019] (https://thebulletin.org/2019/04/united-states-nuclear-forces-2019/) ) reports that the US held fewer than 3,800 nuclear warheads at any time in 2029. A similar credible source may be consulted if the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists in no longer active or publishing reports. For the purposes of question resolution, warheads that are retired and awaiting dismantlement will not be counted.\nSee also the related question, [If the US does not pursue nuclear disarmament, how many nuclear warheads will it have in 2029?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2820/if-the-us-does-not-pursue-nuclear-disarmament-how-many-nuclear-warheads-will-it-have-in-2029/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 150,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will NASA's SLS first launch a person to the Moon?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2818/when-will-nasas-sls-first-launch-a-person-to-the-moon/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "United States' VP Mike Pence told NASA to accelerate human missions to the Moon ‘by any means necessary’ earlier this year. The mission is supposed to be launched aboard the agency's Space Launch System (SLS) with help from commercial partners. However, many have speculated that a deadline of 2024 for a crewed mission to the lunar surface is beyond ambitious and is just not feasible.\nThe [Space Launch System] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Launch_System) (SLS) is an American Space Shuttle-derived super heavy-lift expendable launch vehicle. It is a primary part of NASA's deep space exploration plans, including the planned [Orion Program] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_(spacecraft)) crewed missions to the Moon and Mars.\n[Artemis 3] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_3) is a planned 2024 mission of NASA's Orion spacecraft utilising the SLS, to be launched on the Space Launch System. As of May 2019, Artemis 3 may become the first human landing on the Moon since Apollo 17. The White House has proposed to [increase NASA budget allocation by around $1.6 Billion] (http://www.planetary.org/get-involved/be-a-space-advocate/become-an-expert/fy2020-nasa-budget.html) as part of the 2020 budget. It [has been reported that] (http://(https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2019/05/nasa-quick-start-artemis-program/)) this is to be allocated for multiple elements of the lunar mission architecture in order to pursue the goal of returning crew to the lunar surface by 2024. NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine [stated that $1.6 Billion in 2020 was sufficient funding to meet the 2024 goal] (https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2019/05/nasa-quick-start-artemis-program/) .\nWhen will the Space Launch System successfully launch a person to the Moon?\nThis question resolves when any spacecraft launched using NASA's SLS containing living humans comes into physical contact with the moon. In line with the resolution criteria of [a previous question by @Jgalt] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1619/when-will-the-first-manned-spacecraft-touch-the-surface-of-any-planet-dwarf-planet-or-moon-other-than-earth-earths-moon-or-mars/) , the landing need not last for any significant period of time and the crew need not survive impact for an unambiguous resolution, but must be alive when the impact occurs. This resolves ambiguous when NASA's SLS does not carry humans to the Moon by 2036.\nSee also [Will NASA's SLS carry humans to the Moon by 2024?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2795/will-nasas-sls-carry-humans-to-the-moon-by-2024/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 111,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If the US does not pursue nuclear disarmament, how many nuclear warheads will it have in 2029?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2820/if-the-us-does-not-pursue-nuclear-disarmament-how-many-nuclear-warheads-will-it-have-in-2029/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The size of the US's nuclear weapons stockpile reached a peak [in 1966 at around 30,000 warheads] (https://thebulletin.org/nuclear-notebook-multimedia) . Following the deescalation and the end of the Cold War, the number has substantially decreased. [Kristensen and Korda (2019)] (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00963402.2019.1606503) estimate that the US maintains a deployed stockpile of nearly 3,800 warheads. The approximate breakdown is as follows:\n---1,750 warheads are currently deployed, of which\n------1,300 strategic warheads are deployed on ballistic missiles, \n------300 at strategic bomber bases in the United States, \n------150 tactical bombs are deployed at air bases in Europe. \n---2,050 are in storage as a so-called hedge against technical or geopolitical surprises. \nIt is possible that this trend will reverse in a period of nuclear rearmament, especially if world tensions get worse. The Trump Administration’s [Nuclear Posture Review] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Posture_Review) takes a confrontational tone, presenting an assertive posture that embraces “Great Power competition” and includes plans to expand the US' nuclear arsenal.\nIf the US has at least 3,800 nuclear warheads in 2029, what is the largest number of nuclear warheads it will maintain in its inventory in 2029?\nThis resolves as the largest number of nuclear warheads deployed or in storage in the 2029 period, conditional on this number being at least 3,800, as reported by credible sources such as the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists' Nuclear Notebook (such as [this one for 2019] (https://thebulletin.org/2019/04/united-states-nuclear-forces-2019/) ). A similar credible source may be consulted if the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists in no longer active or publishing reports. For the purposes of question resolution, warheads that are retired and awaiting dismantlement will not be counted.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if the US maintains strictly fewer than 3,800 nuclear warheads in its inventory at any time in 2029.\nSee also the related question, [In 2029, will the US have fewer nuclear warheads than it did in 2019?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2817/in-2029-will-the-us-have-fewer-nuclear-warheads-than-it-did-in-2019/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 71,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If and when the first whole human brain is successfully emulated, \nhow much will 1 hour of subjective run time cost?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2822/if-and-when-the-first-whole-human-brain-is-successfully-emulated-how-much-will-1-hour-of-subjective-run-time-cost/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Whole brain emulation (WBE) is the possible future one-to-one modelling of the human brain. The basic idea is to take a particular brain, scan its structure in detail, and construct a software model of it that is sufficiently faithful to the original that, when run on appropriate hardware, it will behave in essentially the same way as the original brain. [ [1] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/brain-emulation-roadmap-report.pdf) ]\nIf whole brain emulation is possible, then one factor that might influence how it develops after being invented is how expensive it is per emulation. If it is cheap at the moment of discovery, there may be a rapid proliferation of ems quickly replacing human economic activity; if it is very expensive, then growth in the number of ems may be initially much slower. \n[Sandberg (2014)] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/reports/2014-1.pdf) calls this the \"overshoot\" scenario, and proposes that the cost per em will be low if the last constraint to be solved is something other than hardware (such as neuroscience knowledge or scanning technology), since whole brain emulation will be delayed to a time when hardware is cheaper.\nHow much computing power is required to run a whole brain emulation is not known (although rough estimates have been made by [Sandberg (2014)] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/reports/2014-1.pdf) , and [by fellow Metaculites] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2646/what-will-the-necessary-computational-power-to-replicate-human-mental-capability-turn-out-to-be/) ). What is known is that the required power will almost certainly depend on the necessary level of resolution at which the copy of the brain needs to be modelled in order to emulate the human brain at a high level of fidelity.\nIf and when the first whole human brain is successfully emulated, how much will the necessary computational power to replicate human mental capability for an hour of subjective run-time cost in 2019 USD?\nMethodology\nIn line with the methodology used in [AI Impacts (2015)] (https://aiimpacts.org/brain-performance-in-teps/#Cost_of_human-level_TEPS_performance) , hardware costs will be amortised over a period of three years. That is, for a given computer we consider the fixed costs of purchasing and the cost of operating it over a year. Operating costs may include maintenance, rent of related facilities (power generation/distribution, cooling systems, etc.), utilities costs (i.e. electricity) and staffing. Then, hardware costs per hour is given by:\nThis figure is then adjusted to 2019 prices using a commonly used producer's price index of the country in which the supercomputer was purchased.\nResolution\nIf a whole human brain is successfully emulated, as per the criteria in [When will the first whole human brain be successfully emulated?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2813/when-will-the-first-whole-human-brain-be-successfully-emulated/) , the question will 365 days after the first successful emulation as the lowest hardware cost-per-hour (in 2019 prices) that is enabled by a supercomputer that is shown to run an emulation.\nThis cost-per-hour is not necessarily that of the the first system that runs an emulation. Instead it will be the lowest cost of the system that runs an emulation within 365 days of when the first emulation is run successfully. \nBy \"cost-per-hour\" we mean the cost to run an emulation for an hour of \"subjective time\", to adjust for the possibly compressed or expanded simulation time. That is, if the emulation processes inputs times as quickly (or slowly) as a typical human, cost per an elapsed real hour (i.e. the cost per wall-clock hour) will be divided by to convert this into costs for an hour of \"subjective time\".\n",
    "# Forecasts": 103,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be another case of smallpox by the end of 2029?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2823/will-there-be-another-case-of-smallpox-by-the-end-of-2029/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "9%",
    "Description": "The last two cases of smallpox in the world happened [in 1978] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1978_smallpox_outbreak_in_the_United_Kingdom) , following the accidental exposure of Janet Parker to smallpox grown in a research laboratory below her workplace. After this, smallpox was declared eradicated, and there have been no cases since.\nHowever, the smallpox virus still exists; the US and Russia [maintain stocks of smallpox virus] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox_virus_retention_debate) for research purposes in the World Health Organization approved facilities at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, United States, as well as the State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology in Koltsovo, Russia.\nThese samples may not be needed, either; in 2017, Noyce et al. showed that it was possible to [contruct an infectious horsepox virus from chemically synthesised DNA fragments] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5774680/) in a small lab at a cost of about $100,000, and it may be possible to do the same for smallpox. \nBy the end of 2029, will there have been a confirmed case of infection of a human by smallpox?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 137,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When the first company reaches a $10 trillion market cap, will it be worth at least double what it was the year before?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2898/when-the-first-company-reaches-a-10-trillion-market-cap-will-it-be-worth-at-least-double-what-it-was-the-year-before/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "35%",
    "Description": "Company valuations can take off very quickly: Apple was valued at around [$100 billion in mid 2007] (https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AAPL/apple/market-cap) , and so it has taken the company roughly 11 years to grow its market capitalisation by a factor of ten. However, one year before it first hit $1 trillion, it was worth ~$0.8 trillion (which would have resolved a similar question negative).\nAmazon's rise was even more impressive. Amazon has grown from $100 bn to $1 trillion [in just over 6 years] (https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AMZN/amazon/market-cap) . And one year before it hit $1 trillion, it was worth ~0.46 trillion (which would have resolved a similar question positive).\nAn important consideration in how to approach the [AI alignment problem] (https://mapandterritory.org/formally-stating-the-ai-alignment-problem-fe7a6e3e5991) is the speed of the takeoff from massively subhuman AI to massively superhuman AI.\nPaul Christiano [suggests] (https://sideways-view.com/2018/02/24/takeoff-speeds/) operationalising the takeoff takeoff speed of AI in terms of economic growth. That is, if there is a rapid transition from massively subhuman AI to massively superhuman AI, we would expect accelerated economic growth. One indicator of the rate of economic growth is the growth in company valuations.\nWill the first publicly traded company to have a $10 trillion market cap be worth at least double what it was worth 1 year before reaching $10 trillion?\nResolution\nThis resolves when a company whose shares can be bought and sold on a stock exchange achieves a market capitalisation of $10 trillion (adjusted to 2018 prices), AND it was worth less than or equal to $5 trillion one year before (also in 2018 prices). The question will refer to [Yahoo Finance] (https://finance.yahoo.com/) 's data, or any other reputable financial data service.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 83,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the number of deaths from antibiotic-resistant infections per year double by the end of 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2937/will-the-number-of-deaths-from-antibiotic-resistant-infections-per-year-double-by-the-end-of-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "45%",
    "Description": "In 1928, biologist Alexander Fleming discovered - by accident - that where the Penicillium mould had grown on a petri dish the bacteria nearby had been killed. This was due to a chemical the mould secreted, which he named \"penicillin\" - the antibiotic we know and love today.\nSince the discovery of penicillin, antibiotics have saved hundreds of millions of lives and become an essential part of modern medicine.\nBut they're getting less effective. Repeated use has led to the existence of resistant strains of bacteria, which are immune to the effects of multiple different antibiotics. This has been described as a \"serious, worldwide threat to public health\" by [the WHO] (https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/amr-report/en/) .\nIn 2013 the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [reported] (https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest_threats.html) that over 23,000 people died each year from antibiotic-resistant infections in the US. More recent data on their website suggests the figure is more like 37,000. I ask:\nAt any point before the end of the calendar year 2025, will the CDC or another credible source report that at least 70,000 people die annually from antibiotic-resistant infections in the US?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 93,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many deaths from antibiotic-resistant infections in the US in the year 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2942/how-many-deaths-from-antibiotic-resistant-infections-in-the-us-in-the-year-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Repeated use of antibiotics has led to the existence of resistant strains of bacteria, which are immune to the effects of multiple different antibiotics. This has been described as a \"serious, worldwide threat to public health\" by [the WHO] (https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/amr-report/en/) .\nIn 2013 the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [reported] (https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest_threats.html) that over 23,000 people died each year from antibiotic-resistant infections in the US. More recent data on their website suggests the figure is more like 37,000. I ask:\nHow many deaths will be due to antibiotic-resistant infections in the US in the calendar year 2035, according to an estimate by CDC or another credible source report?\nResolution should be based on CDC estimates, or if not available, the median of credible estimates in reputable publications found by Metaculites and/or admin on the day the question is resolved.\nRelated question: [Will the number of deaths from antibiotic-resistant infections per year double by the end of 2025? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2937/will-the-number-of-deaths-from-antibiotic-resistant-infections-per-year-double-by-the-end-of-2025/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 47,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the global adult literacy rate reach 95%?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2943/when-will-the-global-adult-literacy-rate-reach-95/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Literacy data published by UNESCO display a surprisingly steady trend. Since 1950, the adult literacy rate at the world level has increased roughly 5 percentage points every decade, from 55.7% in 1950 to 86.2% in 2015.\nHowever, for four decades, the population growth was so rapid that the number of illiterate adults kept increasing, rising from 700 million in 1950 to 878 million in 1990. \nSince then, the number has fallen markedly to 745 million in 2015, although it remains higher than in 1950 despite decades of universal education policies, literacy interventions and the spread of print material and information and communications technology. \nLiteracy data published by UNESCO display a surprisingly steady trend. Since 1950, the adult literacy rate at the world level has increased by 5 percentage points every decade on average, from 55.7 per cent in 1950 to 86.2 per cent in 2015.\nSee [this document from UNESCO for more information, and page 21 in particular to reference the section quoted above.] (https://www.un.org/en/events/literacyday/assets/pdf/UNESCO_50_yrs_promoting_literacy.pdf) \nThis question asks: When will the global adult literacy rate as reported by UNESCO reach or exceed 95.0%?\nFor the purposes of this question, 'Adult literacy rate' refers to individuals aged 15 years or older, the definition used by UNESCO as of 2019. If UNESCO no longer uses this definition by the time a positive resolution would result, the question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 91,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many predictions will have been made on Metaculus by the end of 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2944/how-many-predictions-will-have-been-made-on-metaculus-by-the-end-of-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Currently (21 July 2019) 139,627 predictions have been made on Metaculus since being founded in late 2015.\nHow many predictions will have been made on Metaculus by 31 December 2023 at 11:59 GMT?\nSee also, [how many predictions will have been made on Metaculus by 18 December 2019?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1661/how-many-predictions-will-have-been-made-on-metaculus-by-18-december-2019/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 181,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many biological humans will be alive on the 31st of December 2300, conditional on there being more than 500M?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2954/how-many-biological-humans-will-be-alive-on-the-31st-of-december-2300-conditional-on-there-being-more-than-500m/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Long term population development is of great importance in questions about the far future. The United Nations write in a [report from 2004] (https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/researchcentres/csgr/green/foresight/demography/united_nations_world_population_to_2300.pdf) :\nIn these projections, world population peaks at 9.22 billion in 2075. Population therefore grows slightly beyond the level of 8.92 billion projected for 2050 in the 2002 Revision, on which these projections are based. However, after reaching its maximum, world population declines slightly and then resumes increasing, slowly, to reach a level of 8.97 billion by 2300, not much different from the projected 2050 figure.\nIn this question, it is asked: How many biological humans will be alive on the 31st of December 2300, conditional on there being more than 500M?\nThe resolution comes from the latest report by the United Nations (or a comparable organisation representing the human species) before january 16th, 2300. If the UN shall no longer exist, or no longer measure human population by the resolution date, resolution shall be by data from what the Metaculus administration judges to be the most accurate data-source. The number should include all humans alive, not only humans living on planet earth.\nThe question resolves ambiguously if there are less than 500M humans alive at the time of resolution.\nFor these purposes we'll define humans as biological creatures who have as their ancestors – via a chain of live births from mothers – circa 2000 humans OR who could mate with circa 2000 humans to produce viable offspring. (So AIs, ems, genetically engineered beings of a different species brought up in artificial wombs, etc. would not count.)\nRelated questions:\n--- [Will the world population increase every year for the next decade?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/124/will-the-world-population-increase-every-year-for-the-next-decade/) \n--- [World Population in 2050?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/587/world-population-in-2100/) \n--- [Will humans go extinct by 2100?] (Will humans go extinct by 2100?) \n--- [When will the last member of our species, homo sapiens, be born?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1088/when-will-the-last-member-of-our-species-homo-sapiens-be-born/) \n--- [Ragnarök Question Series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2568/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-results-so-far/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 130,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Elon Musk have any device, such as a brain-machine interface, surgically implanted into his brain?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2955/when-will-elon-musk-have-any-device-such-as-a-brain-machine-interface-surgically-implanted-into-his-brain/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "When will Elon Musk have any device, such as a brain-machine interface, surgically implanted into his brain?\nThis question resolves positively if it is confirmed by reputable sources that Elon Musk has been subjected to surgery that inserted (parts of) a device into his brain tissue, for any reason other than monitoring or alleviating a disease and/or impairment. This device does not have to function in any specific way (or any way at all) for a positive resolution. For positive resolution, the implantation of at least part of the device needs to involve an intra-cranial insertion (hence a non-invasive headset system like [OpenBCI] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBCI) or [OpenWater] (https://www.openwater.cc/) does not count). However, the part of the device inserted may be very small, e.g. an array of very thin threads such as those described in the [Neuralink paper] (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2019/07/17/703801.full.pdf) would count. The specific device does not have to be one manufactured by [Neuralink] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuralink) , and it does not need to be available to any member of the general public or approved by regulatory agencies.\nThe question resolves as &gt;2040 if Elon Musk is still alive on the 1st of January, 2040, and Elon Musk did not have any device, such as a brain-machine interface, surgically implanted into his brain before this date. The question resolves ambiguous if Elon Musk does not have a device implanted and passes away before the end of the calender year 2040.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 198,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2029, how many small firearms per capita will there be in the USA, according to the Small Arms Survey?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3019/in-2029-how-many-small-firearms-per-capita-will-there-be-in-the-usa-according-to-the-small-arms-survey/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [Small Arms Survey] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Arms_Survey) collects the number of civilian held small firearms per capita in a list of countries and territories. In the [2017 survey] (http://www.smallarmssurvey.org/fileadmin/docs/T-Briefing-Papers/SAS-BP-Civilian-Firearms-Numbers.pdf) (published in 2018), the USA was #1, with ~1.2 guns per person.\nIn 2029, how many small firearms per capita will there be in the USA, according to the Small Arms Survey?\nResolution:\n---Resolves to the number published in the Small Arms Survey for the year 2029 (whenever the first such number is published) \n---If the Small Arms Survey is discontinued, or otherwise not yet published as of December 2030, or if it fundamentally changes its methodology (e.g. by changing the class of weapons it counts) a new source will be chosen by Metaculus admins. \n---If no suitable replacement is found, this resolves ambiguous. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 154,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will an AI pass the laugh test?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3020/when-will-an-ai-pass-the-laugh-test/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In [this article] (https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/what-comes-after-the-turing-test) computer scientist Gary Marcus laid down the gauntlet:\n...allow me to propose a Turing Test for the twenty-first century: build a computer program that can watch any arbitrary TV program or YouTube video and answer questions about its content.... no existing program—not Watson, not Goostman, not Siri—can currently come close to doing what any bright, real teenager can do: watch an episode of “The Simpsons,” and tell us when to laugh.\nFor the purposes of this question, assume that a data set has been created based on labeling of at least 100 episodes of a television comedy (obviously without laugh track/studio audience and preferably but not necessarily The Simpsons.)\nUsing at most 25 episodes as part of the training corpus, when will an ML system achieve 90% of human accuracy when tested on 25 other different randomly chosen episodes? \nFine print: \n--- \nThe accuracy metric is unspecified but should essentially compare at what points in each episode a human specifies \"I laughed or smiled.\" The human accuracy can be drawn directly from the training data, since it is labeled by human comedic assessment. \n--- \nThe training set can include other videos but at most 25 of the comedy in question.\n--- \nIt is of course uncertain that such a dataset will be developed (though the author encourages it) or that it will become a significant target of ML research. If no ML papers attempting such a test are published by 2030 the question resolves as ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 100,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the significant discrepancies in Hubble parameter determinations be resolved by 2030 within the ΛCDM standard cosmological model?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3021/will-the-significant-discrepancies-in-hubble-parameter-determinations-be-resolved-by-2030-within-the-%25CE%25BBcdm-standard-cosmological-model/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "50%",
    "Description": "The Hubble \"constant\", , is basically the current expansion rate of the universe (the expansion rate varies with time). Two main ways to [determine the value of ] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble%27s_law#Measured_values_of_the_Hubble_constant) are based on different approaches contrasting early universe vs late universe methodologies. The issue is that the values determined by these two independent methods have now widened to the point where there is a significant statistical difference of approximately 4 to 5 sigma between the two, despite the increasing precision of each method's results over time. This difference is now widely considered among experts as having become a problem for the [ΛCDM standard model of cosmology] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model) (or even, among some, as a crisis). Continuing observational projects and theoretical work have been dedicated at attempts to understand and resolve the discrepancy.\nA mid-July 2019 [workshop at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics at UCSB] (https://www.kitp.ucsb.edu/activities/enervac-c19) was convened to bring together both experimental and theoretical researchers in the field to review and assess the current state of affairs and identify promising next steps at resolution. The coordinators for this event drafted a paper [Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10625) summarizing the event proceedings. An image from this paper plotting the different values determined by the various methods is [at this link] (https://i.imgur.com/iDBM8hD.jpg) . \nVideos and slides of the talks are available [at this conference website link] (http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/enervac-c19/) . There are also a number of excellent recent science media articles about this issue, e.g. (in descending published date order) by [Natalie Wolchover] (https://www.quantamagazine.org/cosmologists-debate-how-fast-the-universe-is-expanding-20190808/) , [Emily Conover] (https://www.sciencenews.org/article/debate-universe-expansion-rate-hubble-constant-physics-crisis) , [Josh Sokol] (https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/07/debate-intensifies-over-speed-expanding-universe) , and [Davide Castelvecchi] (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02198-z) . There is also a [twitter hashtag] (https://twitter.com/search?q=kitp_h0ttakes&amp;src=typed_query&amp;f=live) devoted to the workshop activity with, e.g., some of the participants tweeting their live reactions during the workshop.\nSome examples of areas under investigation for a possible eventual resolution include: (a) identifying and correcting systematic errors in the various determination methods, (b) an [early dark energy] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.04083) injection prior to recombination, (c) [nonstandard neutrino physics] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.00534) , (d) gravity modifications, and in general (e) searching for a discovery of new physics that modifies or replaces the current [ΛCDM standard model of cosmology] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model) . As an overview for possible ways forward, a new paper, [The Hubble Hunter's Guide] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.03663) , attempts \"to consider the broadest possible set of potential cosmological solutions to reconcile\" the opposing observations.\nThe question asks:\nBy 01-Jan-2030, will the source(s) of the current tension in H0 results be resolved without a need to replace the ΛCDM standard cosmological model?\nA [criteria that was suggested for determining consensus on a resolution] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3021/will-the-significant-discrepancies-in-the-measured-values-of-the-hubble-constant-h_0-be-resolved-by-2030/#comment-15872) is to poll researchers working on this issue near the question close date, asking what sigma they ascribe to the discrepancy, assuming ΛCDM. A positive resolution results if the mean of replies by at least 5 polled cosmologists is &lt; 2 sigma. A mean of &gt; 4 sigma resolves as negative; between 2 and 3 is an indeterminate resolution. \nFootnote: Examples of early universe methods - Planck, DES+BAO+BBN versus late time methods - SH0ES, CCHP, H0LiCOW, MIRAS, Megamasers, Surface Brightness Fluctuations. See [this graphic] (https://i.imgur.com/iDBM8hD.jpg) for an illustrative plot of the differences. More information on these methods is in the [conference summary paper] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10625) . Note that by 2030, H_0 determinations from [gravitational wave standard sirens] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.07775) is likely to have become a robust late time method.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 49,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If there is a biotechnological or bioengineered organism catastrophe this century, when will it happen?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3023/if-there-is-a-biotechnological-or-bioengineered-organism-catastrophe-this-century-when-will-it-happen/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [Ragnarök Question Series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--ragnarok) asks whether there will be a [biotechnological catastrophe] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1502/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-biotechnology-or-bioengineered-organisms/) , for example from an engineered virus or a gene drive targeted on humans.\nSince biotechnology is becoming more advanced and cheaper as time goes on, potentially faster than humanity's abilities to prevent pandemics, it is plausible that the time of greatest risk from bioengineering will be in the future.\nGiven that a catastrophe resulting from a biotechnology or bioengineered organisms occurs before 2100, when will this occur?\nResolution will be on the day when it is first true that such a catastrophe (defined as one that claims at least 10% of the human population in any period of 5 years or less) that is principally due to the deployment of biotechnologies or bioengineered organisms has occurred, or ambiguous if no such catastrophe occurs.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 61,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first human baby from stem cell-derived gametes be born?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3034/when-will-the-first-human-baby-from-stem-cell-derived-gametes-be-born/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "At some point in the future, it will become possible to derive gametes from embryonic pluripotent stem cells (PSCs). Differentiation of PCSs into eggs and sperm would provide researchers with a powerful tool for studying human gametogenesis. Perhaps even more importantly, it would allow infertile couples and same-sex couples to have offspring that is genetically related to both parents.\nA [2008 report] (http://www.hinxtongroup.org/Consensus_HG08_FINAL.pdf) by the [Hinxton Group] (http://www.hinxtongroup.org/) —a global network of stem cell researchers—tentatively predicted in vitro genesis of human gametes between 2013 and 2023. A number of recent papers discuss advances in the field and remaining challenges ahead.[ [1] (https://www.gwern.net/docs/genetics/selection/2018-yamashiro.pdf) ] [ [2] (https://rbej.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12958-017-0308-8) ] [ [3] (https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc6396646) ]\nThe question asks: When will the first human being conceived in vitro from stem cell-derived gametes be born?\nThe question will resolve positive once a relevant announcement is made in one of the following media outlets: The New York Times, The Financial Times, The Washington Post, The Economist, The Wall Street Journal, The Associated Press, Reuters, or the BBC. The announcement should leave no doubt that the live birth occurred and that the baby was conceived from stem cell-derived gametes. The question resolves retroactively 12 months before publication of the announcement.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 80,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the odds ratio of Metaculus' community prediction of the chance of AI catastrophe by 2100 either half or double from its value on 2019-08-21?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3040/when-will-the-odds-ratio-of-metaculus-community-prediction-of-the-chance-of-ai-catastrophe-by-2100-either-half-or-double-from-its-value-on-2019-08-21/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of 2019-08-21, Metaculus' community prediction gives a probability of 0.38 [that there will be a global catastrophe reducing the population by at least 10%] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1493/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-by-2100-will-the-human-population-decrease-by-at-least-10-during-any-period-of-5-years/) , and a probability of of 0.29 [that this catastrophe will be due to an AI failure mode] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1495/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-an-artificial-intelligence-failure-mode/) , for a probability of 0.1102, corresponding to an [odds ratio] (https://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Odds_ratio) of 0.124.\nHalving this odds ratio corresponds to a probability of 0.0583, and doubling this odds ratio corresponds to a probability of 0.1985. The Metaculus prediction leaving this range would represent a substantial increase in the community's confidence on whether or not AI is a major risk.\nThis may either be because of some new information about AI catastrophe coming to life, or because 2100 is soon enough that the chance of AI catastrophe happening by then is less than half of what it is now.\nWhen will the product of the median of the community's predictions for \"By 2100 will the human population decrease by at least 10% during any period of 5 years?\" and \"If a global catastrophe occurs, will it be due to an artificial intelligence failure-mode?\" first leave the range [5.83%, 19.85%]?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 54,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will wildfires destroy a total exceeding 10Mha of global tree cover in any year, by the end of 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3042/will-wildfires-destroy-a-total-exceeding-10mha-of-global-tree-cover-in-any-year-by-the-end-of-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "43%",
    "Description": "In this year so far, scientists have recorded [more than 74,000 fires in Brazil] (http://queimadas.dgi.inpe.br/queimadas/portal/situacao-atual) . That's nearly double 2018's total of about 40,000 fires. The surge marks an 83 percent increase in wildfires over the same period of 2018, [Brazil's National Institute for Space Research reported] (https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-rainforest-experiencing-record-number-of-wildfires-this-year-2019-8?international=true&amp;r=US&amp;IR=T) . \nNatural disasters like fires and tropical storms are an increasingly common cause of deforestation, especially as climate change makes these more frequent and severe.\nIn 2016, a sharp increase in forest fires stoked record losses in global forest cover equivalent to the area of New Zealand[ [1] (https://phys.org/news/2017-10-forest-contributed-global-tree-loss.html) ], according to [Global Forest Watch] (https://bit.ly/2SogDpR) , an initiative by the [World Resources Institute] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Resources_Institute) .\nWill wildfires destroy a total exceeding 10Mha of global tree cover in any year, by the end of 2030?\nResolution\nThis resolves positive if the [Global Forest Watch] (https://bit.ly/2Y8jecV) reports that at least 10 million hectares of global tree cover was lost due to wildfires in any calendar year up to and including 2030. [Global Forest Watch] (https://bit.ly/2SogDpR) defines a wildfire as a large-scale forest loss resulting from the burning of forest vegetation with no visible human conversion or agricultural activity afterward.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 67,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will any country have a life expectancy at birth for both sexes of at least 100 years?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3044/when-will-any-country-have-a-life-expectancy-at-birth-for-both-sexes-of-at-least-100-years/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of 2017, according to the CIA World Factbook the country with the greatest life expectancy at birth for both sexes (combined average, not both sexes individually) was [Monaco at 89.4 years.] (https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2102rank.html) In second and third place were Japan and Singapore, at 85.3 and 85.2 years respectively. \nOf 224 countries and territories listed, only 43 had a life expectancy of at least 80 years, the lowest of these being the United States at 80 years. Only 19 had a life expectancy below 60 years, the lowest of these being Chad at 50.6 years.\nThis question asks: when, according to the CIA World Factbook, World Health Organization or United Nations, will life expectancy at birth for both sexes reach at least 100 years in any country?\nBy 'for both sexes,' this question refers to the average for both sexes, not a requirement that life expectancy must equal 100 years for women and men individually.\nBy 'country,' this question refers to a sovereign state. Special administrative regions, federal states or provinces, overseas territories, and other non-sovereign geopolitical entities do not count.\nThis question shall accept the first instance of any country reaching a combined both sexes life expectancy at birth of at least 100 years according to any of these sources: CIA World Factbook, United Nations, World Health Organization.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 120,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first organ from a non-primate be successfully transplanted into a human?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3052/when-will-the-first-organ-from-a-non-primate-be-successfully-transplanted-into-a-human/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The extreme difficulty of obtaining sufficient organ donations means that many lives (and much quality of life) are lost each year due to the deficiency.\nA promising possibility is [xenotransplantation] (https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/xenotransplantation) , in which animal, e.g. pig, organs are substituted for human ones. This is a surprisingly viable possibility, and would provide an array of advantages (other than perhaps to the pig.)\nThere are two significant problems. First, non-human organs tend to be [rejected very quickly] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenotransplantation#Hyperacute_rejection) by human hosts. Second, [pig cells in particular create a host of native viruses] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenotransplantation#Porcine_endogenous_retroviruses) (even without infection) and there is significant concern that these might adapt to be new human pathogens if widely placed in human hosts.\nNonetheless significant progress is being made in addressing both challenges; for example [this startup] (http://www.frontlinegenomics.com/news/26902/george-churchs-startup-testing-pig-organs-in-primates/) is apparently testing pig organ transplants into nonhuman primates.\nWhen will the first pig (or other nonprimate) organ be successfully used in a human? \nThe organ should be a kidney, liver, heart, pancreas, or lung. We'll define \"successful\" as the organ functioning for 30 days after transplantation.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 99,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many hours will the average American employee work per week in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3054/how-many-hours-will-the-average-american-employee-work-per-week-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "According to [Our World in Data,] (https://ourworldindata.org/working-hours) the average American worked 62 hours per week in 1870. By the year 2000 this had declined to 40.25 hours per week; a decrease of over 35%. As of July 2019, the average American employee on US private nonfarm payrolls [worked 34.4 hours per week according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/average-weekly-hours) \nOver the coming decades, it is possible that [new technologies] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/jack-ma-proponent-of-12-hour-work-days-foresees-12-hour-workweeks/2019/08/29/fd081370-ca2a-11e9-9615-8f1a32962e04_story.html?noredirect=on) and [changes in working practices] (https://hbr.org/2018/12/the-case-for-the-6-hour-workday) will enable workers to work fewer hours per week. \nThis question asks: in January 2030, how many hours per week will the average employee on US private nonfarm payrolls work, according to either the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, or the statistical authority tasked with providing this information?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 79,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a generative model produce a realistic 2-minute video, at a 256 × 256 resolution or better?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3056/when-will-a-generative-model-produce-a-realistic-2-minute-video-at-a-256--256-resolution-or-better/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Unlike the field of image generation where many studies have succeeded in generating high-resolution and high-fidelity realistic images, video generation with unconditional GANs is still a challenging problem ( [Saito et al., 2018] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.09245.pdf) ). A reason videos might be a harder problem than images is the that videos require larger memory and computational costs than static images (ibid.), and therefore involve increased data complexity [(Aidan et al., 2019)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.06571.pdf) . \nRecently, an article by DeepMind [(Aidan et al., 2019)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.06571.pdf) , introduced the Dual Video Discriminator GAN (DVD-GAN), that scales to longer and higher resolution videos. It beat previous attempts on various performance metrics for synthesis on the Kinetics-600 dataset.\n[DVD-GAN] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.06571.pdf) synthesized video with a 3.35 [Fréchet Inception Distance score] (https://papers.nips.cc/paper/7240-gans-trained-by-a-two-time-scale-update-rule-converge-to-a-local-nash-equilibrium.pdf) (a metric that captures the similarity of ordered generated images), and a 64.05 [Inception Score] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.03498.pdf) (a metric of performance modelled on the judgment of human annotators) for synthesised video at 12fps and a resolution of 256 × 256. However, the videos are very short — up to 48 frames — which amounts to only 2 seconds of video at 24 fps.\nWhen will a generative model produce a video of at least 2880 frames, at a 256 × 256 resolution or better, with a reported Fréchet Inception Distance of less than 0.100, or an Inception Score of greater than 500.00?\nThis question resolves as the date when such a model is reported in a preprint or peer-reviewed journal.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 71,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will there be a publicly listed clean meat company?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3058/when-will-there-be-a-publicly-listed-clean-meat-company/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[As of mid-2019 there were over a dozen companies developing clean meat] (https://cellbasedtech.com/clean-meat-companies) , mostly early-stage startups, and only some with total funding exceeding $20M (these are [Just] (https://www.ju.st/en-us) and [Memphis Meats] (https://www.memphismeats.com/) ). An IPO can help a company raise capital quickly to support research and development and get products successfully to market. IPOs are a popular strategy amongst biotech companies to commercialise nascent technologies [(McNamee and Ledley, 2013)] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.2711) . The median pre-money valuation of new biotech offerings [was roughly $350M in 2018] (https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucebooth/2018/09/24/the-rising-tide-of-biotech-ipo-valuations/#60aef2db65a8) .\nWhen will there be a publicly listed clean meat company?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the date when a privately held clean meat company first issues shares that are listed on an exchange and can be purchased by a member of the public. The acquisition of a private clean meat company by a public acquirer does not trigger positive resolution.\nFor the purpose of this question, a company is a \"clean meat company\" if, after six months of the clean meat company's initial public offering, at least three articles are published by credible media organisations in which the company is described as a clean-meat company, using the words \"clean meat\", \"cultured meat\" or \"in-vitro meat\", \"cultivated meat\", \"cell-based meat\", or any variations where \"meat\" is replaced with a specific meat (e.g. \"clean beef\"), or any other term that describe meat that is grown primarily or entirely in cell culture, rather than in an animal’s body, or accurate translations in case the reporting is not in English. An example of a qualifying description is the headline \"clean meat company XYZ holds initial public offering\". \nThe article should demonstrate that the term \"clean meat\" (or suitable synonyms) is used to refer meat that is grown primarily or entirely in cell culture. Hence, an article in which the term \"clean meat\" is mistakenly used to refer other products, such as plant-based meat (i.e. products made using plant and other non-animal products to look, taste, and feel like meat products) would not be a qualifying report.\nAdditionally, in the fiscal year in which its shares are first listed on an exchange, the company must generate less than 20% of its valuation in revenue from the sale of products other than clean meat related products, or clean meat related intellectual property.\nThis question is part of the [clean meat series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3061/animal-welfare-series-clean-meat/) of our Animal Welfare forecasting project. See also:\n[When will the first clean meat company be valued at ≥ $1bn?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3060/when-will-the-first-clean-meat-company-be-valued-at--1bn/) \n[How many months till at least three, billion dollar clean meat valuations after the first such company is first valued at ≥ $1bn?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3062/how-many-months-till-at-least-three-billion-dollar-clean-meat-valuations-after-the-first-such-company-is-first-valued-at--1bn/) \n[When will there be a publicly traded clean fish company?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3059/when-will-there-be-a-publicly-listed-clean-fish-company/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 181,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first clean meat company be valued at ≥ $1bn?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3060/when-will-the-first-clean-meat-company-be-valued-at--1bn/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[As of mid-2019 there were over a dozen companies developing clean meat] (https://cellbasedtech.com/clean-meat-companies) , mostly early-stage startups, and only some with total funding exceeding $20M (these are [Just] (https://www.ju.st/en-us) and [Memphis Meats] (https://www.memphismeats.com/) ). [Estimates reveal] (http://elliot-swartz.squarespace.com/) that funding has shown impressive growth just over the past 4 years.\nAlternative meat product company valuations can take off quickly, as illustrated by the example of Beyond Meat, which within 10 years has grown its market capitalisation [beyond $10bn] (https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;q=beyond+meat+market+cap&amp;meta=) .\nWhen will the first clean meat company be valued at ≥ $1bn, in 2019 prices?\nResolution\nPositive resolution requires that, within six months after the clean meat company reaching the nominal $1bn valuation, at least three articles are published by credible media organisations in which the company is described as a clean-meat company, using the words \"clean meat\", \"cultivated meat\", \"cultured meat\" or \"in-vitro meat\", \"cell-based meat\", or any variations where \"meat\" is replaced with a specific meat (e.g. \"clean beef\"), or any other term that describe meat that is grown primarily or entirely in cell culture, rather than in an animal’s body, or accurate translations in case the reporting is not in English. An example of a qualifying description is the headline \"clean meat company XYZ achieves unicorn status with $1bn dollar valuation\". \nThe article should demonstrate that the term \"clean meat\" (or suitable synonyms) is used to refer meat that is grown primarily or entirely in cell culture. Hence, an article in which the term \"clean meat\" is mistakenly used to refer other products, such as plant-based meat (i.e. products made using plant and other non-animal products to look, taste, and feel like meat products) would not be a qualifying report.\nAdditionally, in the fiscal year in which it reaches the $1bn valuation, the company must generate less than 20% of its valuation in revenue from the sale of products other than clean meat related products, or clean meat related intellectual property. \nCompany valuation thresholds are here given by 2019 prices, and future valuations will be adjusted for inflation using a commonly used country-specific CPI.\nThis question is part of the [clean meat series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3061/animal-welfare-series-clean-meat/) of our Animal Welfare forecasting project. See also:\n[How many months till at least three, billion dollar clean meat valuations after the first such company is first valued at ≥ $1bn?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3062/how-many-months-till-at-least-three-billion-dollar-clean-meat-valuations-after-the-first-such-company-is-first-valued-at--1bn/) \n[When will there be a publicly traded clean meat company?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3058/when-will-there-be-a-publicly-listed-clean-meat-company/) \n[When will there be a publicly traded clean fish company?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3059/when-will-there-be-a-publicly-listed-clean-fish-company/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 126,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many months till at least three, billion dollar clean meat valuations after the first such company is first valued at ≥ $1bn?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3062/how-many-months-till-at-least-three-billion-dollar-clean-meat-valuations-after-the-first-such-company-is-first-valued-at--1bn/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[As of mid-2019 there were over a dozen companies developing clean meat] (https://cellbasedtech.com/clean-meat-companies) , mostly early-stage startups, and only some with total funding exceeding $20M (these are [Just] (https://www.ju.st/en-us) and [Memphis Meats] (https://www.memphismeats.com/) ).\nIf success in the production and commercialisation of clean meat is easily replicable by competitors, one might expect that multiple companies will reach the $1bn milestone in short succession of each other. This may occur if clean meat companies face a common limiting factor, that is removed by way of scientific discovery that is used to lower costs, or by sudden regulatory change.\nMoreover, if the clean meat market is expected to be very valuable, then more companies will be trying to succeed, resulting in more competition that may be more beneficial if we want clean meat products to replace a non-trivial portion of existing markets for meat more quickly.\nHow many months after the first clean meat company is first valued at ≥ $1bn will there be at least three companies valued at a billion dollars or more?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the number of months between when credible reporting indicates that a clean meat company is first valued at $1bn or more, and when credible reporting indicates that at least three clean meat companies that exist simultaneously, are valued at $1bn or more. \nFor a company to qualify as a \"clean meat company\" at least three articles must be published by credible media organisations in which the company is described as a clean-meat company, using the words \"clean meat\", \"cultured meat\" or \"in-vitro meat\" or \"cultivated meat\", \"cell-based meat\", or any variations where \"meat\" is replaced with a specific meat (e.g. \"clean beef\"), or any other term that describe meat that is grown primarily or entirely in cell culture, rather than in an animal’s body, or accurate translations in case the reporting is not in English. An example of a qualifying description is the headline \"clean-meat company XYZ achieves unicorn status with $1bn dollar valuation\". These articles must be published within six months after the company reaching the nominal $1bn valuation.\nThe article should demonstrate that the term \"clean meat\" (or suitable synonyms) is used to refer meat that is grown primarily or entirely in cell culture. Hence, an article in which the term \"clean meat\" is mistakenly used to refer other products, such as plant-based meat (i.e. products made using plant and other non-animal products to look, taste, and feel like meat products) would not be a qualifying report.\nAdditionally, in the fiscal year in which it reaches the $1bn valuation, the company must generate less than 20% of its valuation in revenue from the sale of products other than clean meat related products, or clean meat related intellectual property. \nThe resolution of our question [When will the first clean meat company be valued at $1bn or more?] should start the clock for this question.\nCompany valuation thresholds are here given by 2019 prices, and future valuations will be adjusted for inflation using a commonly used country-specific CPI.\nThis question is part of the [clean meat series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3061/animal-welfare-series-clean-meat/) of our Animal Welfare forecasting project. See also:\n[When will the first clean meat company be valued at ≥ $1bn?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3060/when-will-the-first-clean-meat-company-be-valued-at--1bn/) \n[When will there be a publicly traded clean meat company?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3058/when-will-there-be-a-publicly-listed-clean-meat-company/) \n[When will there be a publicly traded clean fish company?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3059/when-will-there-be-a-publicly-listed-clean-fish-company/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 124,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much revenue will the U.S. market for clean meat generate, in the fiscal year 2027, in millions of USD?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3065/how-much-revenue-will-the-us-market-for-clean-meat-generate-in-the-fiscal-year-2027-in-millions-of-usd/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[As of mid-2019 there were over a dozen companies developing clean meat] (https://cellbasedtech.com/clean-meat-companies) , mostly early-stage startups, and only some with total funding exceeding $20M (these are [Just] (https://www.ju.st/en-us) and [Memphis Meats] (https://www.memphismeats.com/) ). [Estimates reveal] (http://elliot-swartz.squarespace.com/) that funding has shown impressive growth just over the past 4 years. As of time of writing this question (August, 2019), no clean meat products have yet been brought to market.\nFor a point of comparison, data from [SPINS] (https://www.spins.com/) summarised by The Good Food Institute shows U.S. retail sales of plant-based meat generated [an estimated $801M] (https://plantbasedfoods.org/2019-data-plant-based-market/) in the year ending April, 2018.\nHow much revenue will the U.S. market for clean meat generate, in the fiscal year 2027, in millions of 2019 USD?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as a credible estimate of the revenue by companies generated from the sale of clean-meat containing products for human consumption in the U.S., in the [U.S. fiscal year] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiscal_year#United_States) 2027. The figure shall be given in millions of USD, in 2019 prices. Qualifying products need to contain at least 1% of clean meat by weight. Clean meat is here defined as meat that is grown primarily or entirely in cell culture, rather than in an animal’s body.\nEstimates should originate from a credible sources, preferably a nonprofit research organisation focussing on clean meat and related technologies, independent market research companies, consultancy reports on clean meat, journal publications by researchers not affiliated with clean meat companies. In the case a range of revenue numbers are reported, the question shall resolve as the median of this range. In the case multiple estimates are found upon resolving, the admin may choose to resolve this question as the median of different estimates, or resolve it per the estimate deemed most credible.\nThe question resolves ambiguously if, by the start of 2030, no credible estimates of the revenue by U.S. based companies generated from clean-meat containing products sales for the fiscal year 2027 can be found.\nThe question resolves in terms of 2019 USD. Hence, estimates are to be adjusted for inflation using a suitable [Bureau of Labour Statistics' CPI] (https://www.bls.gov/cpi/) .\nThis question is part of the [clean meat series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3061/animal-welfare-series-clean-meat/) of our Animal Welfare forecasting project. See also:\n[How much revenue will the U.S. market for clean meat generate, in the fiscal year 2030?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3077/how-much-revenue-will-the-us-market-for-clean-meat-generate-in-the-fiscal-year-2030/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 97,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much revenue will the U.S. market for clean meat generate, in the fiscal year 2030, in millions of USD?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3077/how-much-revenue-will-the-us-market-for-clean-meat-generate-in-the-fiscal-year-2030-in-millions-of-usd/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[As of mid-2019 there were over a dozen companies developing clean meat] (https://cellbasedtech.com/clean-meat-companies) , mostly early-stage startups, and only some with total funding exceeding $20M (these are [Just] (https://www.ju.st/en-us) and [Memphis Meats] (https://www.memphismeats.com/) ). [Estimates reveal] (http://elliot-swartz.squarespace.com/) that funding has shown impressive growth just over the past 4 years. As of time of writing this question (August, 2019), no clean meat products have yet been brought to market.\nFor a point of comparison, data from [SPINS] (https://www.spins.com/) summarised by The Good Food Institute shows U.S. retail sales of plant-based meat generates [an estimated $801M] (https://plantbasedfoods.org/2019-data-plant-based-market/) .\nHow much revenue will the U.S. market for clean meat generate, in the fiscal year 2030, in millions of 2019 USD?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as a credible estimate of the revenue by companies generated from the sale of clean-meat containing products for human consumption in the U.S., in the [U.S. fiscal year] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiscal_year#United_States) 2030. The figure shall be given in millions of USD, in 2019 prices. Qualifying products need to contain at least 1% of clean meat by weight. Clean meat is here defined as meat that is grown primarily or entirely in cell culture, rather than in an animal’s body.\nEstimates should originate from a credible sources, preferably a nonprofit research organisation focussing on clean meat and related technologies, independent market research companies, consultancy reports on clean meat, journal publications by researchers not affiliated with clean meat companies. In the case a range of revenue numbers are reported, the question shall resolve as the median of this range. In the case multiple estimates are found upon resolving, the admin may choose to resolve this question as the median of different estimates, or resolve it per the estimate deemed most credible.\nThe question resolves ambiguously if, by the start of 2033, no credible estimates of the revenue by U.S. based companies generated from clean-meat containing products sales for the fiscal year 2030 can be found.\nThe question resolves in terms of 2019 USD. Hence, estimates are to be adjusted for inflation using a suitable [Bureau of Labour Statistics' CPI] (https://www.bls.gov/cpi/) .\nThis question is part of the [clean meat series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3061/animal-welfare-series-clean-meat/) of our Animal Welfare forecasting project. See also:\n[How much revenue will the U.S. market for clean meat generate, in the fiscal year 2027?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3065/how-much-revenue-will-the-us-market-for-clean-meat-generate-in-the-fiscal-year-2027/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 83,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Starlink satellites will be in operation at the end of 2027?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3078/how-many-starlink-satellites-will-be-in-operation-at-the-end-of-2027/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "According to [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink_(satellite_constellation)) :\nStarlink is a satellite constellation development project underway by American company SpaceX, to develop a low-cost, high-performance satellite bus and requisite customer ground transceivers to implement a new space-based Internet communication system.\nAccording to [this Space News article] (https://spacenews.com/fcc-oks-lower-orbit-for-some-starlink-satellites/) , they intend to launch 12 000 satellites by the end of 2027. As of the 22nd of March 2019, 62 have been launched (at least [57 are operational] (https://spacenews.com/contact-lost-with-three-starlink-satellites-other-57-healthy/) ), with 60 more scheduled in October 2019. Quite a long way to go.\nQuestion: How many Starlink satellites will be in orbit and operational at the end of 2027?\nResolution details:\n---Resolution is by credible media report. \n---This is insensitive to the project changing name, being bought by another company, etc. as long as it is the same project as judged by a Metaculus admin. \n---The end of 2027 is 2027-12-31 23:59:59 UTC. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 186,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a restaurant first serve clean-meat products containing ≥20% clean meat, at $3 per 100 grams or cheaper?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3081/when-will-a-restaurant-first-serve-clean-meat-products-containing-20-clean-meat-at-3-per-100-grams-or-cheaper/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The price of clean meat has fallen [from $330,000/pound in 2013] (https://www.fastcompany.com/3044572/the-325000-lab-grown-hamburger-now-costs-less-than-12) to [around $800 in 2018] (http://jlm-biocity.org/future-meat-technologies-raises-2-2-million-lab-grown-meat/) , and is [expected to fall even further] (https://vegnews.com/2019/7/price-of-lab-grown-meat-to-plummet-from-280000-to-10-per-patty-by-2021) . In 2017, [Mark Post] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Post) , chief science officer at Mosa Meat, [predicted the following in 2017] (https://labiotech.eu/interviews/interview-mark-post-cultured-meat/) :\nFor small-scale, somewhat expensive products, most companies will have cultured meat products on the market in 3–4 years (i.e., 2020–2021). It will probably take another 3–4 years (i.e., 2023–2025) for the price to come down to the level where it’s acceptable for the broader public.\nIn 2015, \"restaurant\" [Bistro in Vitro] (http://bistro-invitro.com/en/bistro-invitro/) offers virtual diners \"food for thought\" by allowing customers to create their own three-course meal from a range of dishes that could one day be created using \"in vitro\" meat. Unfortunately, the earliest reservation the website offers is for November 2029, but could we get one sooner?\nWhen will a restaurant first serve clean-meat containing products with ≥20% clean meat, at $3 per 100 grams or cheaper?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the date when a restaurant, in any country, offers a clean meat containing product (beef, poultry, pork or fish) for consumption that contains at least 20% clean meat by weight. The product must exceed 50 grams in weight, so that it contains at least 8 grams of clean meat. The restaurant must be open to the general public in that a member of the public must be able to enter the establishment (though possibly requiring a reservation), and order the clean meat product. The restaurant must have served costumers for at least a year -- hence \"pop-up\" restaurants that exist for a very short amount of time (such as those at a convention like [CES] (https://www.ces.tech/) ) do not count toward resolution. The clean meat containing product product must cost less than $3 per 100 grams. Samples given out for free don't count. \nIf the clean meat is served as a dish with additional ingredients, an additional allowance of $5 is made for the price of the additional ingredients. For example, a quarter pound of a burger (~113,4 grams) that is 50% clean meat and 50% plant-based meat sold at any price below $8.41 would count toward positive resolution (as this is $3×1.134+$5=$8.41).\nEvidence of the clean meat containing product's listing price and composition should come from the restaurant's online listing, credible media reports, or from at least three reports sourced from social media and/or submissions by Metaculus users/admin.\nPrices are to be adjusted using a CPI commonly used in which the clean meat product is sold. If the clean meat product is not sold in the United States, the price is to be converted using the exchange rate listed on Google Finance at the time the question resolves.\nClean meat is here defined as meat that is grown primarily or entirely in cell culture, rather than in an animal’s body.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 102,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What is the probability that Gore will defeat Bush in the 2000 US Presidential Election?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3084/what-is-the-probability-that-gore-will-defeat-bush-in-the-2000-us-presidential-election/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Bear with me, this is a thought experiment.\nImagine you are magically transported back in time and space such that from a perch at Alpha-centauri you are are (with a great telescope) observing Earth from November 1998 onwards.\nWhat is the probability (in percent) you attribute to Gore winning to 2000 US Presidential election (and becoming president)?\nThe \"magic\" is so as to avoid worrying about closed timelike curves, consistency conditions, etc. The alpha-centauri is so that you can have no causal influence on the proceedings.\nQualitatively different interesting possibilities here seem to me:\nA) p = 0%: The World is deterministic\nB) 0 &lt; p &lt; 1%: The World may be indeterministic, but the effect is very tiny.\nC) p &gt; 1%: There is indeterminism and the effects are large enough to come into elections. We have to do a deeper dive that involves a combination of fun historical analysis with how and what would be affected by the indeterminacy.\nI'm writing a paper about this now and very interested in people's views and rationales.\nI've shoehorned this into Metaculus by making the resolution date far in the future (when the Magician appears plus two years), and in asking for the number so that people can distinguish 0% from tiny, and also spread their credence across different possibilities that translate into different possibilities.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 211,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a restaurant first serve clean-meat products containing ≥80% clean meat, at $3 per 100 grams or cheaper?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3086/when-will-a-restaurant-first-serve-clean-meat-products-containing-80-clean-meat-at-3-per-100-grams-or-cheaper/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The price of clean meat has fallen [from $330,000/pound in 2013] (https://www.fastcompany.com/3044572/the-325000-lab-grown-hamburger-now-costs-less-than-12) to [around $800 in 2018] (http://jlm-biocity.org/future-meat-technologies-raises-2-2-million-lab-grown-meat/) , and is [expected to fall even further] (https://vegnews.com/2019/7/price-of-lab-grown-meat-to-plummet-from-280000-to-10-per-patty-by-2021) . In 2017, [Mark Post] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Post) , chief science officer at Mosa Meat, [predicted the following in 2017] (https://labiotech.eu/interviews/interview-mark-post-cultured-meat/) :\nFor small-scale, somewhat expensive products, most companies will have cultured meat products on the market in 3–4 years (i.e., 2020–2021). It will probably take another 3–4 years (i.e., 2023–2025) for the price to come down to the level where it’s acceptable for the broader public.\nIn 2015, \"restaurant\" [Bistro in Vitro] (http://bistro-invitro.com/en/bistro-invitro/) offers virtual diners \"food for thought\" by allowing customers to create their own three-course meal from a range of dishes that could one day be created using \"in vitro\" meat. Unfortunately, the earliest reservation the website offers is for November 2029, but could we get one sooner?\nWhen will a restaurant first serve clean-meat containing products with ≥80% clean meat, at $3 per 100 grams or cheaper?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the date when a restaurant, in any country, offers a clean meat containing product (beef, poultry, pork or fish) for consumption that contains at least 80% clean meat by weight. The product must exceed 50 grams in weight (so that it contains at least 40 grams of clean meat). The restaurant must be open to the general public in that a member of the public must be able to enter the establishment (though possibly requiring a reservation), and order the clean meat product. The restaurant must have served costumers for at least a year -- hence \"pop-up\" restaurants that exist for a very short amount of time (such as those at a convention like [CES] (https://www.ces.tech/) ) do not count toward resolution. The clean meat containing product product must cost less than $3 per 100 grams. Samples given out for free don't count. \nIf the clean meat is served as a dish with additional ingredients, an additional allowance of $5 is made for the price of the additional ingredients. For example, a quarter pound of a burger (~113,4 grams) that is 90% clean meat and 10% plant-based meat sold at any price below $8.41 would count toward positive resolution (as this is $3×1.134+$5=$8.41).\nEvidence of the clean meat containing product's listing price and composition should come from the restaurant's online listing, credible media reports, or from at least three reports sourced from social media and/or submissions by Metaculus users/admin.\nPrices are to be adjusted using a CPI commonly used in which the clean meat product is sold. If the clean meat product is not sold in the United States, the price is to be converted using the exchange rate listed on Google Finance at the time the question resolves.\nClean meat is here defined as meat that is grown primarily or entirely in cell culture, rather than in an animal’s body.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 67,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a supermarket sell a product made of ≥20% clean meat, for $3 per 100 grams or cheaper?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3087/when-will-a-supermarket-sell-a-product-made-of-20-clean-meat-for-3-per-100-grams-or-cheaper/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In 2017, Mark Post, the chief science officer at [Mosa Meat] (https://www.mosameat.com/) [predicted that] (https://www.itv.com/news/2017-02-27/scientists-set-sights-on-bringing-lab-grown-meat-to-the-supermarket/) it will take 3–4 years (i.e. until 2020–2021) before cultured burgers are on the market for £10–11 (~$12–$14 USD) per burger, and in around 7 years time (~2024) they will be in supermarkets at lower prices. His colleague at Mosa Meat, Peter Verstrate, expects it to take slightly longer, [he remarked] (https://youtu.be/PVEu6TSKhD0?t=3954) : \nWhen will [cultured meat] be in the supermarket around the corner? That'll be closer to 10 than to 5 years, I think. \nBringing clean meat to the shelves is [explicitly the goal of the company Mosa Meat] (https://www.mosameat.com/faq) to \"within the next decade drop [clean meat] in price so that there will be products on supermarket shelves that are competitive with livestock meat products.\"\nMosa Meat is not the only company with aiming for a commercial launch of clean meat products. [As of mid-2019 there are over a dozen companies developing clean meat] (https://cellbasedtech.com/clean-meat-companies) .\nWhen will a supermarket sell a product made of ≥20% clean meat, for less than $3 (in 2019 USD) per 100 grams?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the date when a retail store, operated by a supermarket, in any country, offers a clean meat containing product made of ≥20% clean meat, including beef, poultry, pork or fish, for human consumption in at least one physical retail store. The product must be for sale for less than $3 (in 2019 USD) per 100 grams. The product must have a weight exceeding 40 grams (so that the clean meat content weighs at least 8 grams). An example of such a product is a burger containing a mixture of clean meat and plant-based meat.\nEvidence of the clean meat containing product's listing price and composition should come from credible media reports, online supermarket listings, or from at least three reports sourced from social media and/or submissions by Metaculus users/admin.\nThe following sales do not identify the price of the product for the purpose of this question: samples given out for free, sales discounted with one-time discounts or discounts derived from coupons, or programmes such as loyalty schemes or credit card membership, amongst other pricing schemes valid for limited time or only available to a subset of customers.\nClean meat is here defined as meat that is grown primarily or entirely in cell culture, rather than in an animal’s body. A supermarket is here defined as the company that operates physical self-service retail markets that sell foods and household merchandise. The supermarket must have at least ten physical stores (although the clean meat product need only be on offer in at least one store). A [list of examples of U.S. supermarkets] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cs0GXkqp_OtPCbohgbI-4wsr7S6Tpt11Rt4Wrop-jd8/edit?usp=sharing) that qualify today can be found here. These will continue to qualify as supermarkets as long as these operate at least ten physical self-service retail markets.\nRelated questions:\n[When will a supermarket sell a product made of ≥20% clean meat, for $3 per 100 grams or cheaper?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3087/when-will-a-supermarket-sell-a-product-made-of-20-clean-meat-for-3-per-100-grams-or-cheaper/) \n[When will a supermarket sell a product made of ≥80% clean meat, for $3 per 100 grams or cheaper? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3088/when-will-a-supermarket-sell-a-product-made-of-80-clean-meat-for-3-per-100-grams-or-cheaper/) \n[When will a restaurant first serve clean-meat products containing ≥80% clean meat, at $3 per 100 grams or cheaper? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3086/when-will-a-restaurant-first-serve-clean-meat-products-containing-80-clean-meat-at-3-per-100-grams-or-cheaper/) \n[When will a restaurant first serve clean-meat products containing ≥20% clean meat, at $3 per 100 grams or cheaper? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3081/when-will-a-restaurant-first-serve-clean-meat-products-containing-20-clean-meat-at-3-per-100-grams-or-cheaper/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 103,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a supermarket sell a product made of ≥80% clean meat, for $3 per 100 grams or cheaper?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3088/when-will-a-supermarket-sell-a-product-made-of-80-clean-meat-for-3-per-100-grams-or-cheaper/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In 2017, Mark Post, the chief science officer at [Mosa Meat] (https://www.mosameat.com/) [predicted that] (https://www.itv.com/news/2017-02-27/scientists-set-sights-on-bringing-lab-grown-meat-to-the-supermarket/) it will take 3–4 years (i.e. until 2020–2021) before cultured burgers are on the market for £10–11 (~$12–$14 USD) per burger, and in around 7 years time (~2024) they will be in supermarkets at lower prices. His colleague at Mosa Meat, Peter Verstrate, expects it to take slightly longer, [he remarked] (https://youtu.be/PVEu6TSKhD0?t=3954) : \nWhen will [cultured meat] be in the supermarket around the corner? That'll be closer to 10 than to 5 years, I think. \nBringing clean meat to the shelves is [explicitly the goal of the company Mosa Meat] (https://www.mosameat.com/faq) to \"within the next decade drop [clean meat] in price so that there will be products on supermarket shelves that are competitive with livestock meat products.\"\nMosa Meat is not the only company with aiming for a commercial launch of clean meat products. [As of mid-2019 there are over a dozen companies developing clean meat] (https://cellbasedtech.com/clean-meat-companies) .\nWhen will a supermarket sell a product made of ≥80% clean meat, for less than $3 (in 2019 USD) per 100 grams?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the date when a retail store, operated by a supermarket, in any country, offers a clean meat containing product made of ≥80% clean meat, including beef, poultry, pork or fish, for human consumption in at least one physical retail store. The product must be for sale for less than $3 (in 2019 USD) per 100 grams. The product must have a weight exceeding 40 grams (so that the clean meat content weighs at least 32 grams). An example of such a product is a burger containing a mixture of clean meat and plant-based meat.\nEvidence of the clean meat containing product's listing price and composition should come from credible media reports, online supermarket listings, or from at least three reports sourced from social media and/or submissions by Metaculus users/admin.\nThe following sales do not identify the price of the product for the purpose of this question: samples given out for free, sales discounted with one-time discounts or discounts derived from coupons, or programmes such as loyalty schemes or credit card membership, amongst other pricing schemes valid for limited time or only available to a subset of customers.\nClean meat is here defined as meat that is grown primarily or entirely in cell culture, rather than in an animal’s body. A supermarket is here defined as the company that operates physical self-service retail markets that sell foods and household merchandise. The supermarket must have at least ten physical stores (although the clean meat product need only be on offer in at least one store). A [list of examples of U.S. supermarkets] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cs0GXkqp_OtPCbohgbI-4wsr7S6Tpt11Rt4Wrop-jd8/edit?usp=sharing) that qualify today can be found here. These will continue to qualify as supermarkets as long as these operate at least ten physical self-service retail markets.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 123,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the U.S. market for plant-based meat be worth in the year ending in April 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3091/what-will-the-us-market-for-plant-based-meat-be-worth-in-the-year-ending-in-april-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Data from [SPINS] (https://www.spins.com/) summarised by the Plant Based Foods Association and The Good Food Institute shows U.S. retail sales of plant-based alternative foods have grown 11 percent in the past year, and 31% over the past two years ( [Good Food Institute, 2019] (https://www.gfi.org/marketresearch#section-intro) ). By comparison, total U.S. retail food dollar sales grew just 2% over the past year and 4% over the past two years.\nThis brings the total plant-based alternatives market value to a total value of $4.5 billion in 2019. At [an estimated $801M] (https://plantbasedfoods.org/2019-data-plant-based-market/) the plant-based meat market is the second highest grossing plant-based alternatives product, after plant-based milk.\nMost dollar-sales of plant-based meat tend to come from frozen products (73% in 2019). However, this seems to changing quickly: product innovation and merchandising strategies have grown dollar sales of refrigerated plant-based meat by 85% ( [Good Food Institute, 2019] (https://www.gfi.org/marketresearch#section-intro) ). \nWhat will the U.S. market for plant-based meat be worth in the year ending in April 2023, in millions of 2019 USD?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the value of the U.S. market for plant-based meat, as estimated by [SPINS] (https://www.spins.com/) . The market value is to be adjusted for inflation using a widely used CPI and given in 2019 prices. SPINS' estimate of the value of the U.S. market for plant-based meat is given by the sum of the value of the US market for the following subcategories of plant-based alternatives: meat based burgers, nuggets, strips and cutlets, links, patties, grounds, deli slices, meatballs, loafs/roasts, shreds/pulled, jerky and other plant-based meats.\nIn the event that the only data available is that for the year ending in December, and if it cannot be constructed or obtained any other way (such as by using the following year's data release, or by contacting the relevant organisation), then this question shall resolve as the total value of the market for the year ending in December of the previous year.\nThe question resolves ambiguously if SPINS data is substantially different in 2023 compared with 2019. SPINS data is to be considered to be substantially different if the methodology for estimating the size of the market is substantially changed, such as when using the new methodology, estimates of the historical size of the market (currently $584m in 2017, $731m in 2018, $801m in 2019, with all years ending in April) changes by more than 50%.\nIn case SPINS data is not available, it is left to the discretion of an admin to either resolve this question ambiguous, or consult an alternative estimate. However, this alternative estimate should only be used if it is judged that this estimation approach is at least 90% likely produce an estimate within 50% of the estimate obtained by following the SPINS methodology, subject to updates considered reasonable in case new plant-based subcategories emerge, or previously existing subcategories that were excluded from earlier SPINS estimates constitute a larger share of the total value.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 124,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the U.S. market for plant-based meat be worth in the year ending in April 2028?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3095/what-will-the-us-market-for-plant-based-meat-be-worth-in-the-year-ending-in-april-2028/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Data from [SPINS] (https://www.spins.com/) summarised by the Plant Based Foods Association and The Good Food Institute shows U.S. retail sales of plant-based alternative foods have grown 11 percent in the past year, and 31% over the past two years ( [Good Food Institute, 2019] (https://www.gfi.org/marketresearch#section-intro) ). By comparison, total U.S. retail food dollar sales grew just 2% over the past year and 4% over the past two years.\nThis brings the total plant-based alternatives market value to a total value of $4.5 billion in 2019. At [an estimated $801M] (https://plantbasedfoods.org/2019-data-plant-based-market/) the plant-based meat market is the second highest grossing plant-based alternatives product, after plant-based milk.\nMost dollar-sales of plant-based meat tend to come from frozen products (73% in 2019). However, this seems to changing quickly: product innovation and merchandising strategies have grown dollar sales of refrigerated plant-based meat by 85% ( [Good Food Institute, 2019] (https://www.gfi.org/marketresearch#section-intro) ). \nWhat will the U.S. market for plant-based meat be worth in the year ending in April 2028, in millions of 2019 USD?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the value of the U.S. market for plant-based meat, as estimated by [SPINS] (https://www.spins.com/) . The market value is to be adjusted for inflation using a widely used CPI and given in 2019 prices. SPINS' estimate of the value of the U.S. market for plant-based meat is given by the sum of the value of the US market for the following subcategories of plant-based alternatives: meat based burgers, nuggets, strips and cutlets, links, patties, grounds, deli slices, meatballs, loafs/roasts, shreds/pulled, jerky and other plant-based meats.\nIn the event that the only data available is that for the year ending in December, and if it cannot be constructed or obtained any other way (such as by using the following year's data release, or by contacting the relevant organisation), then this question shall resolve as the total value of the market for the year ending in December of the previous year.\nThe question resolves ambiguously if SPINS data is substantially different in 2023 compared with 2019. SPINS data is to be considered to be substantially different if the methodology for estimating the size of the market is substantially changed, such as when using the new methodology, estimates of the historical size of the market (currently $584m in 2017, $731m in 2018, $801m in 2019, with all years ending in April) changes by more than 50%.\nIn case SPINS data is not available, it is left to the discretion of an admin to either resolve this question ambiguous, or consult an alternative estimate. However, this alternative estimate should only be used if it is judged that this estimation approach is at least 90% likely produce an estimate within 50% of the estimate obtained by following the SPINS methodology, subject to updates considered reasonable in case new plant-based subcategories emerge, or previously existing subcategories that were excluded from earlier SPINS estimates constitute a larger share of the total value.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 52,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the lowest retail price, in USD per kg, of any product containing 50% clean meat be, in the calendar year 2026?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3103/what-will-the-lowest-retail-price-in-usd-per-kg-of-any-product-containing-50-clean-meat-be-in-the-calendar-year-2026/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In June 2016, Uma Valeti, CEO of Memphis Meats reported a production cost of about €36,200/kg, which represents an 18-fold price reduction compared with the €650,000/kg burger unveiled in 2013. Mark Post, the chief science officer of Mosa Meat, [announced in late 2015 that] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lI9AwxKfTY) , by combining pharmaceutical bioreactor technology to existing tissue culture techniques it'd be possible reduce costs to €60/kg of cultured ground beef. [(Sentience Politics, 2016; p.g. 6)] (https://ea-foundation.org/files/cultured-meat.pdf) points out that existing farm subsidies essentially create a barrier to entry for clean meat producers:\nwhile the cost of cultured meat should aim to match that of regular meat, the current market average of meat is artificially low as a result of heavy government subsidising of animal agriculture.\nMark Post has also made more predictions. In 2017, he [predicted that] (https://www.itv.com/news/2017-02-27/scientists-set-sights-on-bringing-lab-grown-meat-to-the-supermarket/) it will take 3–4 years (i.e., 2020–2021) before cultured burgers are on the market for £10–11 (~$12–$14 USD) per burger, and in around 7 years time (~2024) they will be in supermarkets at lower prices. However, [regulatory uncertainty] (https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2018/07/clean-meat-staking-its-claim-amid-regulatory-uncertainty/) , might prevent clean meat companies from scaling anytime soon, thereby blocking the path to substantial cost reductions. \nWhat will the lowest retail price, in USD per kg, of any product containing 50% clean meat be, in the calendar year 2026?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the lowest reported price, in 2019 USD per kg, of any product listed in a retail supermarkets that contains at least 50% clean meat by weight. Qualifying retail supermarkets are those based in either the U.S. or based in the European Union as of August, 2019, and Switzerland.\nClean meat is here defined as meat that is grown primarily or entirely in cell culture, rather than in an animal’s body. Qualifying meats are beef, any type of poultry, pork or fish. The clean meat product must be for human consumption. Moreover, the product must have a weight exceeding 40 grams (so that the clean meat content weighs at least 20 grams). Mixtures of clean meat and other products qualify if it contains at least 50% clean meat by weight.\nEvidence of the clean meat containing product's listing price and composition should come from credible media reports, online supermarket listings, or from at least three reports sourced from social media and/or submissions by Metaculus users/admin.\nThe following sales do not identify the price of the product for the purpose of this question: samples given out for free, sales discounted with one-time discounts or discounts derived from coupons, or programmes such as loyalty schemes or credit card membership, amongst other pricing schemes valid for limited time or only available to a subset of customers.\nA supermarket is here defined as the company that operates physical self-service retail markets that sell foods and household merchandise. The supermarket must have at least ten physical stores (although the clean meat product need only be on offer in at least one store). A [list of examples of U.S. based supermarkets] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cs0GXkqp_OtPCbohgbI-4wsr7S6Tpt11Rt4Wrop-jd8/edit?usp=sharing) that qualify today can be found here. These will continue to qualify as supermarkets as long as these operate at least ten physical self-service retail markets.\nPrices are to be adjusted to 2019 prices using a widely used national CPI. Credibility of estimates shall be decided by Metaculus admin. In case the retail price is denominated in currencies other than USD, the conversion shall be made using the relevant spot exchange rate at the time of resolving.\nIf no credible reports indicate that clean meat products containing at least 50% clean meat are sold in the calendar year 2026 in retail supermarkets based in either the U.S. or based in the European Union as of August, 2019, and Switzerland, the question resolves ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 87,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the lowest retail price, in USD per kg, of any product containing 50% clean meat be, in the calendar year 2029?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3104/what-will-the-lowest-retail-price-in-usd-per-kg-of-any-product-containing-50-clean-meat-be-in-the-calendar-year-2029/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In June 2016, Uma Valeti, CEO of Memphis Meats reported a production cost of about €36,200/kg, which represents an 18-fold price reduction compared with the €650,000/kg burger unveiled in 2013. Mark Post, the chief science officer of Mosa Meat, [announced in late 2015 that] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lI9AwxKfTY) , by combining pharmaceutical bioreactor technology to existing tissue culture techniques it'd be possible reduce costs to €60/kg of cultured ground beef. [(Sentience Politics, 2016; p.g. 6)] (https://ea-foundation.org/files/cultured-meat.pdf) points out that existing farm subsidies essentially create a barrier to entry for clean meat producers:\nwhile the cost of cultured meat should aim to match that of regular meat, the current market average of meat is artificially low as a result of heavy government subsidising of animal agriculture.\nMark Post has also made more predictions. In 2017, he [predicted that] (https://www.itv.com/news/2017-02-27/scientists-set-sights-on-bringing-lab-grown-meat-to-the-supermarket/) it will take 3–4 years (i.e., 2020–2021) before cultured burgers are on the market for £10–11 (~$12–$14 USD) per burger, and in around 7 years time (~2024) they will be in supermarkets at lower prices. However, [regulatory uncertainty] (https://www.foodsafetynews.com/2018/07/clean-meat-staking-its-claim-amid-regulatory-uncertainty/) , might prevent clean meat companies from scaling anytime soon, thereby blocking the path to substantial cost reductions. \nWhat will the lowest retail price, in USD per kg, of any product containing 50% clean meat be, in the calendar year 2029?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the lowest reported price, in 2019 USD per kg, of any product listed in a retail supermarkets that contains at least 50% clean meat by weight. Qualifying retail supermarkets are those based in either the U.S. or based in the European Union as of August, 2019, and Switzerland.\nClean meat is here defined as meat that is grown primarily or entirely in cell culture, rather than in an animal’s body. Qualifying meats are beef, any type of poultry, pork or fish. The clean meat product must be for human consumption. Moreover, the product must have a weight exceeding 40 grams (so that the clean meat content weighs at least 20 grams). Mixtures of clean meat and other products qualify if it contains at least 50% clean meat by weight.\nEvidence of the clean meat containing product's listing price and composition should come from credible media reports, online supermarket listings, or from at least three reports sourced from social media and/or submissions by Metaculus users/admin.\nThe following sales do not identify the price of the product for the purpose of this question: samples given out for free, sales discounted with one-time discounts or discounts derived from coupons, or programmes such as loyalty schemes or credit card membership, amongst other pricing schemes valid for limited time or only available to a subset of customers.\nA supermarket is here defined as the company that operates physical self-service retail markets that sell foods and household merchandise. The supermarket must have at least ten physical stores (although the clean meat product need only be on offer in at least one store). A [list of examples of U.S. based supermarkets] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cs0GXkqp_OtPCbohgbI-4wsr7S6Tpt11Rt4Wrop-jd8/edit?usp=sharing) that qualify today can be found here. These will continue to qualify as supermarkets as long as these operate at least ten physical self-service retail markets.\nPrices are to be adjusted to 2019 prices using a widely used national CPI. Credibility of estimates shall be decided by Metaculus admin. In case the retail price is denominated in currencies other than USD, the conversion shall be made using the relevant spot exchange rate at the time of resolving.\nIf no credible reports indicate that clean meat products containing at least 50% clean meat are sold in the calendar year 2029 in retail supermarkets based in either the U.S. or based in the European Union as of August, 2019, and Switzerland, the question resolves ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 84,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a discernible, coordinated Bitcoin mining pool attain >=50% of the hashing power for 24-hours, before Sep 15 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3106/when-will-a-discernible-coordinated-bitcoin-mining-pool-attain-50-of-the-hashing-power-for-24-hours-before-sep-15-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[51% attacks] (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/1/51-attack.asp) are an important vulnerability of proof-of-work blockchains.\n[In 2014] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghash.io#51%_attack_controversy) , [Ghash.io] (http://Ghash.io) gained more than 50% of the hashing power in Bitcoin’s mining network, which could have resulted in a [51% attack] (https://en.bitcoinwiki.org/wiki/51%25_attack) . Ghash instead voluntarily reduced their hashing power to below 40%. No mining pool has been above 50% of hashing power since then, although 51% attacks have been successfully conducted on blockchains with vastly smaller hash rates, such as Ethereum Classic (ETC).\nOn what date will a discernible, coordinated Bitcoin mining pool attain &gt;=50% of the hashing power for any 24-hour period before Sep 15, 2025?\n1-- \nThe reported &gt;=50% hash rate event can be reported as having taken place during any 24-hour period, and is not timezone-dependent.\n2-- \nIf the question does not resolve positively by Sep 15 2025, the question resolves as &gt; Sep 15, 2025.\n3-- \nThe \"mining pool\" could either be a shared pool among unassociated miners, or a massive operation by a single entity.\n4-- \nNote that in hash rate distribution charts, \"Unknown\" does not necessarily mean a single unidentified mining pool is taking up that much hash rate, but simply that they aren't identified. To count for resolution, a pool must be discernibly combining their hash rate. If the hash rate from \"Unknown\" miners ever attained &gt;=50% of the hash rate, but there were no reports to suggest a coordinated mining operation was taking up &gt;=50% of the hash rate, then that does not count to positive resolution.\n5-- \nOne possible scenario is an identified miner openly mining the blocks and processing transactions like normal but with &gt;50% the hashrate. Another (perhaps more likely) is a separate chain being mined in secret with &gt;50% hashrate, until that alternative chain becomes bigger than the main one, causing a deep block reorg that had its hashrate come entirely from that secret miner. If this kind of secret-miner reorg happens, and it’s more than roughly 72 blocks deep, it could trigger positive resolution instantly, since that would tend to be be more than 12 hours worth of the blockchain, and it would've all been from one miner.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 86,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much will the total U.S. plant-based milk market be worth in the year ending in April 2023, in millions of USD?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3107/how-much-will-the-total-us-plant-based-milk-market-be-worth-in-the-year-ending-in-april-2023-in-millions-of-usd/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Data from [SPINS] (https://www.spins.com/) summarised by the Plant Based Foods Association and The Good Food Institute shows U.S. retail sales of plant-based milk totalled $1.86 billion in the year ending April 2019 ( [Good Food Institute, 2019] (https://www.gfi.org/marketresearch#section-intro) ).\nPlant-based milk alone accounts for almost half of the total plant-based alternative foods market. Dollar sales of plant-based milk grew 6% in the past year and 14% over the past two years. Plant-based milk currently accounts for 13% of all dollar sales of retail milk.\nHow much will the total US plant-based milk market be worth in the year ending in April 2023, in millions of 2019 USD?\nResolution\nThis question will resolve as the value of the US market for plant-based milk, as estimated by [SPINS] (https://www.spins.com/) . The market value is to be adjusted for inflation and given in 2019 prices. SPINS' estimate of the value of the US market for plant-based foods is the sum of their estimates of the value of the US market for the following subcategories of plant-based alternatives: almond milk, soy milk, coconut milk, rice milk, oat milk, and other plant-based milks and blends.\nIn the event that the only data available is that for the year ending in December, and if it cannot be constructed or obtained any other way (such as by using the following year's data release, or by contacting the relevant organisation), then this question shall resolve as the total value of the market for the year ending in December of the previous year.\nThe question resolves ambiguously if SPINS data is substantially different in 2023 compared with 2019. SPINS is to be considered to be substantially different if the methodology for estimating the size of the market is substantially changed, such as when using the new methodology, estimates of the historical size of the market (currently $1.6b in 2017, $1.8b in 2018, $1.9b in 2019, with all years ending in April) changes by more than 50%.\nIn case SPINS data is substantially different or not available, it is left to the discretion of an admin to either resolve this question ambiguous, or consult an alternative estimate. However, this alternative estimate should only be used if it is judged that the estimate is likely the estimate follows an estimation method that is at least 90% likely produce an estimate within 50% of the estimate obtained by following the SPINS methodology, subject to updates considered reasonable in case new plant-based subcategories emerge, or previously existing subcategories that were excluded from earlier SPINS estimates constitute a larger share of the total value.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 87,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much will the total U.S. plant-based foods market be worth in the year ending in April 2023, in millions of USD?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3108/how-much-will-the-total-us-plant-based-foods-market-be-worth-in-the-year-ending-in-april-2023-in-millions-of-usd/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Data from [SPINS] (https://www.spins.com/) summarised by the Plant Based Foods Association and The Good Food Institute shows U.S. retail sales of plant-based foods was worth almost $4.5 billion in the year ending April 2019 ( [Good Food Institute, 2019] (https://www.gfi.org/marketresearch#section-intro) ).\nDollar sales of plant-based alternative foods grew 11% in the past year and 31% over the past two years. By contrast, total U.S. retail food dollar sales grew just 2% over the past year and 4% over the past two years.\nCurrently, plant-based milk is the most developed of all plant-based categories, contributing roughly $1.9bn in the year ending April 2019, followed by “other plant-based dairy” and then plant-based meat. The least developed category, but one of the fastest growing, is plant-based eggs.\nHow much will the total U.S. plant-based alternative food market be worth in the year ending in April 2023, in millions of 2019 USD?\nResolution\nThis question will resolve as the value of the US market for plant-based foods, as estimated by [SPINS] (https://www.spins.com/) . The market value is to be adjusted for inflation and given in 2019 prices. SPINS' estimate of the value of the US market for plant-based foods is the sum of their estimates of the value of the US market for the following subcategories of plant-based alternatives: milk, meat, meals, ice cream and frozen novelty, yoghurt, creamer, butter, cheese, tofu and tempeh, ready-to-drink beverages, condiments, dressings, and mayo, dairy spreads, dips, sour cream, and sauces, eggs.\nIn the event that the only data available is that for the year ending in December, and if it cannot be constructed or obtained any other way (such as by using the following year's data release, or by contacting the relevant organisation), then this question shall resolve as the total value of the market for the year ending in December of the previous year.\nThe question resolves ambiguously if SPINS data is substantially different in 2023 compared with 2019. SPINS data is to be considered to be substantially different if the methodology for estimating the size of the market is substantially changed, such as when using the new methodology, estimates of the historical size of the market (currently $3.4b in 2017, $4b in 2018, $4.5b in 2019, with all years ending in April) changes by more than 50%.\nIn case SPINS data is not available, it is left to the discretion of an admin to either resolve this question ambiguous, or consult an alternative estimate. However, this alternative estimate should only be used if it is judged that this estimation approach is at least 90% likely produce an estimate within 50% of the estimate obtained by following the SPINS methodology, subject to updates considered reasonable in case new plant-based subcategories emerge, or previously existing subcategories that were excluded from earlier SPINS estimates constitute a larger share of the total value.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 149,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will General Electric (GE) file for chapter 7 or chapter 11 bankruptcy before Sep 18th of 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3109/will-general-electric-ge-file-for-chapter-7-or-chapter-11-bankruptcy-before-sep-18th-of-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "[Harry Markopolos] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Markopolos) is known for having reported the Bernie Madoff ponzi scheme. Now he has put out a [report] (http://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/editorialfiles/2019/8/15/2019_08_15_GE_Whistleblower_Report.pdf) claiming that General Electric is conducting large-scale accounting [fraud] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric#Fraud_allegations) . Several analysts have defended GE, describing the report’s analysis as [uncompelling] (https://www.barrons.com/articles/wall-street-comfortable-with-ges-accounting-shrugs-off-markopolos-report-51567525632) and [incorrect] (https://seekingalpha.com/news/3496236-deutsche-bank-buying-ge-fraud-report) . GE has denied these charges, and described Markopolos’ report as [market manipulation] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ge-accounts-ceo/ge-ceo-calls-markopolos-report-market-manipulation-and-false-idUSKCN1V525O) (Markopolos will [receive a cut] (https://youtu.be/2VCtB3E0JB0?t=433) from trading profit from an unnamed hedge fund).\nGE has been [charged before] (https://www.sec.gov/news/press/2009/2009-178.htm) for accounting fraud.\nNote that GE being criminally convicted of fraud is not the same as having a financial situation that is insolvent. This question aims at the latter.\nWill General Electric (GE) file for chapter 7 or chapter 11 bankruptcy before 00:00 UTC Sep 18th of 2024?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 128,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Mars have a permanent population of 10,000 before the Moon does?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3112/will-mars-have-a-permanent-population-of-10000-before-the-moon-does/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "39%",
    "Description": "Mars is often disussed as a target for mass colonization and eventual terraforming, notably by SpaceX. The Moon does not seem to be viewed as a future 'alternative' to Earth in the same way that Mars is.\nStats to consider:\nDistance\n---Mars: between 55 and 400 million km from Earth (0.37 to 2.7 AU). It comes nearest to Earth every 2.14 years, or ~26 months. \n---The Moon: ~0.38 million km from Earth (~0.0026 AU). \nOne-way communication lag\n---Mars: between 3 to 22 minutes \n---The Moon: ~1.3 seconds \nGravity\n---Mars: 0.38 g \n---The Moon: 0.17 g \nRotation period\n---Mars: 25 hours \n---The Moon: 1 month \nAtmosphere\n---Mars: mostly CO2, at ~1% the pressure of Earth's. \n---The Moon: negligible if any. \nSolar energy\n---Mars: ~44% of Earth's, but occasional dust storms can bring this down to almost nothing. \n---The Moon: same as Earth's, but with no clouds or other interference. \nThis question is resolved when either the Moon or Mars has 10,000 people living on the body who have been residents for 3+ years at the time of counting. I've chosen 3 years to exclude people who arrive on Mars during one Earth-Mars opposition and leave during the next. \nResidents of Phobos and Deimos, or of satellites in orbit around either body, are not counted for this question.\n'Residence' is defined and determined by the government or entity administering the colony, or a similar official source.\nIn case political structures are substantially different, an admin may judge this question based on a different definitions of 'residence' that still captures the idea that it requires a person to have lived there for at least a relatively uninterrupted three years. [Ems] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_uploading) don't count as humans.\nResolves ambiguous if neither body meets the criterion by 2100.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 223,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many commercial cattle, in millions, will be slaughtered in the U.S. in 2032 if the lowest retail price of clean meat in 2026 is less than $8 per kg?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3113/how-many-commercial-cattle-in-millions-will-be-slaughtered-in-the-us-in-2032-if-the-lowest-retail-price-of-clean-meat-in-2026-is-less-than-8-per-kg/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of January 31, 2018, total USA inventory of beef cows was estimated at 31.7 million head, with cow-calf operations in all 50 states [(Drouillard, 2018)] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039332/#b1-ajas-31-7-1007) . The beef cow inventory fluctuates considerably from year to year, and can be influenced by market conditions and environmental factors, such as weather and rainfall (ibid.). In the United States, about 320 million hectares are used for livestock grazing, which is equivalent to 41% of the total land area of the continental USA [(USDA, 2017)] (https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/major-land-uses.aspx) .\nCommercial cattle slaughter during 2018 totaled 33.0 million head, up 3 percent from 2017. Steers comprised 51.2 percent of the total federally inspected cattle slaughter, heifers 28.2 percent, dairy cows 9.7 percent, other cows 9.3 percent, and bulls 1.7 percent [(USDA, 2019)] (https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/r207tp32d/8336h934w/hq37vx004/lsslan19.pdf) .\nHow many commercial cattle, in millions, will be slaughtered in the U.S. in the year 2032 if the lowest retail price in 2026 of clean meat products containing &gt;50% clean meat is less than $8 per kg?\nThis question will resolve as the number of cattle slaughtered in the year 2032, [as reported by the US Department of Agriculture] (https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/r207tp32d) . Numbers are to be rounded off to one decimal place (e.g. 33.13 becomes 33.1). Commercial cattle include steers, heifers, dairy cows, bulls and other cows.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if the lowest reported price in 2026, in 2019 USD per kg, of any clean meat product containing at least 50% clean meat in a U.S.-based retail supermarket exceeds $8. This question resolves ambiguous if [its sister question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3103/what-will-the-lowest-retail-price-in-usd-per-kg-of-any-product-containing-50-clean-meat-be-in-the-calendar-year-2026/) resolves above $8 (details on the resolution conditions, i.e. what counts as clean meat, how prices are identified, etc. can be found there). If no clean meat products are sold in retail stores in the U.S. in 2026, the question resolves ambiguously.\nRelated questions:\n- [How many commercial cattle, in millions, will be slaughtered in the U.S. in 2032 if the lowest retail price of clean meat in 2026 is between $8 and $20 per kg? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3115/how-many-commercial-cattle-in-millions-will-be-slaughtered-in-the-us-in-2032-if-the-lowest-retail-price-of-clean-meat-in-2026-is-between-8-and-20-per-kg/) \n- [How many commercial cattle, in millions, will be slaughtered in the U.S. in 2032 if the lowest retail price of clean meat in 2026 is greater than $20 per kg?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3153/how-many-commercial-cattle-in-millions-will-be-slaughtered-in-the-us-in-2032-if-the-lowest-retail-price-of-clean-meat-in-2026-is-greater-than-20-per-kg/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 127,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many commercial cattle, in millions, will be slaughtered in the U.S. in 2032 if the lowest retail price of clean meat in 2026 is between $8 and $20 per kg?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3115/how-many-commercial-cattle-in-millions-will-be-slaughtered-in-the-us-in-2032-if-the-lowest-retail-price-of-clean-meat-in-2026-is-between-8-and-20-per-kg/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of January 31, 2018, total USA inventory of beef cows was estimated at 31.7 million head, with cow-calf operations in all 50 states [(Drouillard, 2018)] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039332/#b1-ajas-31-7-1007) . The beef cow inventory fluctuates considerably from year to year, and can be influenced by market conditions and environmental factors, such as weather and rainfall (ibid.). In the United States, about 320 million hectares are used for livestock grazing, which is equivalent to 41% of the total land area of the continental USA [(USDA, 2017)] (https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/major-land-uses.aspx) .\nCommercial cattle slaughter during 2018 totaled 33.0 million head, up 3 percent from 2017. Steers comprised 51.2 percent of the total federally inspected cattle slaughter, heifers 28.2 percent, dairy cows 9.7 percent, other cows 9.3 percent, and bulls 1.7 percent [(USDA, 2019)] (https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/r207tp32d/8336h934w/hq37vx004/lsslan19.pdf) .\nHow many commercial cattle, in millions, will be slaughtered in the U.S. in the year 2032 if the lowest retail price in 2026 of clean meat products containing &gt;50% clean meat is between $8 and $20 per kg?\nThis question will resolve as the number of cattle slaughtered in the year 2032, [as reported by the US Department of Agriculture] (https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/r207tp32d) . Numbers are to be rounded off to one decimal place (e.g. 33.13 becomes 33.1). Commercial cattle include steers, heifers, dairy cows, bulls and other cows.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if the lowest reported price in 2026, in 2019 USD per kg, of any clean meat product containing at least 50% clean meat in a U.S.-based retail supermarket is less than $8 or greater than $20. This question resolves ambiguous if [its sister question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3103/what-will-the-lowest-retail-price-in-usd-per-kg-of-any-product-containing-50-clean-meat-be-in-the-calendar-year-2026/) resolves below $8 or above $20 (details on the resolution conditions, i.e. what counts as clean meat, how prices are identified, etc. can be found there). If no clean meat products are sold in retail stores in the U.S. in 2026, the question resolves ambiguously.\nRelated questions:\n- [How many commercial cattle, in millions, will be slaughtered in the U.S. in 2032 if the lowest retail price of clean meat in 2026 is less than $8 per kg?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3113/how-many-commercial-cattle-in-millions-will-be-slaughtered-in-the-us-in-2032-if-the-lowest-retail-price-of-clean-meat-in-2026-is-less-than-8-per-kg/) \n- [How many commercial cattle, in millions, will be slaughtered in the U.S. in 2032 if the lowest retail price of clean meat in 2026 is greater than $20 per kg?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3153/how-many-commercial-cattle-in-millions-will-be-slaughtered-in-the-us-in-2032-if-the-lowest-retail-price-of-clean-meat-in-2026-is-greater-than-20-per-kg/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 142,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a new land speed record be set by 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3117/will-a-new-land-speed-record-be-set-by-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "77%",
    "Description": "The [land speed record] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_speed_record) (or absolute land speed record) is the highest speed achieved by a person using a vehicle on land. There is no single body for validation and regulation; in practice the Category C (\"Special Vehicles\") flying start regulations are used, officiated by regional or national organizations under the auspices of the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA).\nThe land speed record (LSR) is standardized as the speed over a course of fixed length, averaged over two runs (commonly called \"passes\"). Two runs are required in opposite directions within one hour, and a new record mark must exceed the previous one by at least one percent to be validated.\nThe current land speed record was set on October 15, 1997 by Andrew Duncan Green, a British Royal Air Force fighter pilot, who achieved a speed of 1,228 km/h (763 mph) with the [ThrustSSC] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThrustSSC) , which became the first land vehicle to officially break the sound barrier. \nThis question asks: will the ThrustSSC's land speed record be surpassed before 1 January 2025?\nResolution is by press release from the FIA, or credible media reports, indicating that a new land speed record has been set and validated.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 140,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many publicly traded U.S.- or EU-based plant-based meat producers will be valued at $1bn or more on October 4th, 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3120/how-many-publicly-traded-us-or-eu-based-plant-based-meat-producers-will-be-valued-at-1bn-or-more-on-october-4th-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In 2019, the stock price of plant-based unicorn [Beyond Meat] (https://www.beyondmeat.com/products/) [surged more than fivefold] (https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/BYND/?guccounter=1&amp;guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvLnVrLw&amp;guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGHCAq2S7UgkM_-LfR9bJZjCSy4dNORI1epAhOMlBLFWwanEmcwe6Iz5vklhYpHkG8qtHXlpA1lsrbznIw0LX6dctwniYEBxhL8Bs2NgYFQzPttra9RDUR0XGqTeuZ8SsUxokL8WfeEY6Lo9RNwowJF8BI8pdQNjzauRmjdqwAUI) in less than two months after it IP-Oed on the 3rd of May. The California-based startup is one of many producers developing innovative processes to more closely replicate the structure and taste of real meat using only plant-based ingredients. \nHow many publicly traded US- or EU-based plant-based meat producers will be valued at $1bn or more in October of 2023?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the number of publicly traded plant-based meat producers that simultaneously valued at above $1bn at noon in local time on October 4th (i.e. [world animal day] (https://www.worldanimalday.org.uk/) ), 2023. \nFor a company to be considered a plant-based meat company, a \"substantial portion\" of its revenue must be generated through the sale plant-based meat products principally produced by the company itself or by its subsidiaries. A \"substantial portion\" here is defined as:\n---at least 80% of its revenue for a company valued between $1bn and $2bn, or \n---at least x%, such that x% of the company's valuation is at least $2bn \nThe company needs to be based (in the sense of either being registered or headquartered) in the the United States or any country that is member of the European Union as of July 2019 (this includes the United Kingdom), or Switzerland. Moreover, the company's stock needs to be traded on an exchange located in any of these countries.\nPlant based meat is here defined as any product that is made to mimic properties found within natural meats, and advertised as a meat substitute with meat-like qualities (such as taste, texture, nutritional content, or other factors).\nIn case the stock is traded in a different currency, the conversion shall be done by an admin at the time of resolving.Company valuation thresholds are here given by 2019 prices, and future valuations will be adjusted for inflation using a commonly used country-specific CPI.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 73,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will at least 20 U.S. states legalize the recreational use of cannabis?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3122/when-will-at-least-20-us-states-legalize-the-recreational-use-of-cannabis/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Currently, the recreational use of cannabis is legalized in 11 U.S. states (Alaska, California, Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington), as well as the District of Columbia, the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam (see the [dedicated wikipedia page] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis_by_U.S._jurisdiction) ).\nWhen will at least 20 U.S. states legalize the recreational use of cannabis? \nThis question resolves as the date when at least 20 U.S. states will have legalized the recreational use of cannabis. Resolution may come from the [dedicated wikipedia page] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis_by_U.S._jurisdiction) , although an admin may need to verify the claims made. If the recreational use of cannabis is legalized at the federal level and effectively decriminalized in at least 20 states, this question also resolves positively.\nIf this question does not resolve before Oct 6th, 2030, this question resolves as \"&gt; Oct 6, 2030\". The question closes retroactively per the date the question has resolved.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 115,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will US Non-Overseas Contingency operations military deaths exceed 3000 in any calendar year before (and including) 2031?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3124/will-us-non-overseas-contingency-operations-military-deaths-exceed-3000-in-any-calendar-year-before-and-including-2031/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "According to [USNI News reporting] (https://news.usni.org/2019/06/05/document-trends-in-active-duty-military-deaths) on the May 20, 2019 Congressional Research Service report:\nSince 2006—five years after the start of major combat operations in Afghanistan and three years after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq—a total of 16,652 active-duty personnel and mobilized reservists have died while serving in the U.S. Armed Forces. Seventy-three percent of these casualties occurred under circumstances unrelated to war, a category classified in this report as Non-Overseas Contingency Operations, or Non-OCO. Twenty-seven percent have died while serving in OCO operations—primarily within the territory of Iraq and Afghanistan—during periods of active combat operations. OCO operations related to Afghanistan primarily include Enduring Freedom and Freedom’s Sentinel. For Iraq, OCO operations include Iraqi Freedom, New Dawn, and Inherent Resolve. Figure 1 summarizes all service deaths since 2006.\nWill US Non-Overseas Contingency operations military deaths exceed 3000 in any calendar year before (and including) 2031?\nThis question resolves on the basis of data published by the Congressional Research Service.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 92,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the United States continue to be among the 20 countries with the largest deterioration in state stability over the 2019-2029 period, according to the Fragile States Index?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3125/will-the-united-states-continue-to-be-among-the-20-countries-with-the-largest-deterioration-in-state-stability-over-the-2019-2029-period-according-to-the-fragile-states-index/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "55.00000000000001%",
    "Description": "[The Fragile State Index] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragile_States_Index) is an important metric of government stability. It is published every year [here] (https://fragilestatesindex.org/) .\nAccording to the [2019 report] (https://fragilestatesindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/9511904-fragilestatesindex.pdf) (see page 11), over the 2009 to 2019 period, The US was #12 among the countries with the most rapidly deteriorating Fragile States Index. The US was still among the more stable nations in the world but the trend was clearly in the direction of less stability.\nWill the United States continue to be among the 20 countries with the largest deterioration in state stability over the 2019-2029 period, according to the [Fragile States Index] (http://(https://fragilestatesindex.org)) ?\nThis question resolves positively if the United States is amongst the 20 countries with the largest long-term increase (worsening) of fragile state score over the 2019-2029 period.\nIf for some reason, [Fund for Peace] (https://fragilestatesindex.org) ceases to publish this index, or their index can no longer be compared historically this question will be ambiguous, unless the [Fund For Peace] (https://fundforpeace.org/) designates a successor index that also shows which 20 countries have deteriorated the most over the period 2019 to 2029 from a standpoint of stability.\nIf the United States ceases to exist as a unified nation this question resolves positive.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 46,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will either a space elevator or a skyhook have transported payloads in excess of 10 metric tons by the end of 2045?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3127/will-either-a-space-elevator-or-a-skyhook-have-transported-payloads-in-excess-of-10-metric-tons-by-the-end-of-2045/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "A space elevator is a proposed type of planet-to-space transportation system. According to [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_elevator) : \nThe main component [of a space elevator] would be a cable (also called a tether) anchored to the surface and extending into space. The design would permit vehicles to travel along the cable from a planetary surface, such as the Earth's, directly into space or orbit, without the use of large rockets. \nThe competing forces of gravity, which is stronger at the lower end, and the outward/upward centrifugal force, which is stronger at the upper end, would result in the cable being held up, under tension, and stationary over a single position on Earth. \nBy contrast, a skyhook is a proposed momentum exchange tether that aims to reduce the cost of placing payloads into low Earth orbit. [According to Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skyhook_(structure)) :\nA heavy orbiting station is connected to a cable which extends down towards the upper atmosphere. Payloads, which are much lighter than the station, are hooked to the end of the cable as it passes, and are then flung into orbit by rotation of the cable around the centre of mass.\nA skyhook differs from a geostationary orbit space elevator in that a skyhook would be much shorter and would not come in contact with the surface of the Earth. A skyhook would require a suborbital launch vehicle to reach its lower end, while a space elevator would not.\nWill either a space elevator or a skyhook have transported payloads in excess of 10 metric tons, by mass, by the end of 2045?\nThis resolves positively if any planet-to-space transportation system considered by an admin to fit the quoted Wikipedia descriptions of a space elevator or a skyhook, transports payloads in excess of 10 metric tons by the end of 2045. \nThe payload must be transported from the Earth's surface into the Earth's orbit, from the Earth's orbit onto the Earth's surface, or from our Moon into orbit, or from space onto our Moon's surface. \nPositive resolution requires that the sum of all payloads ever transported by a single planet-to-space transportation system exceeds 10 metric tons by the end of 2045.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 85,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a Bering Strait crossing be completed?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3136/when-will-a-bering-strait-crossing-be-completed/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A [Bering Strait crossing] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bering_Strait_crossing) is a hypothetical bridge and/or tunnel spanning the relatively narrow and shallow Bering Strait between the Chukotka Peninsula in Russia and the Seward Peninsula in the U.S. state of Alaska. The bridge/tunnel would provide a connection linking North America and Eurasia. \nAccording to the [dedicated Wikipedia page] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bering_Strait_crossing#21st_century) , various proposals have been made to build such a crossing:\nAccording to a report in the Beijing Times in May 2014, Chinese transportation experts are proposing building a roughly 10,000 kilometer (6,213 mi)-long high-speed rail line from northeast China to the United States. The project would include a tunnel under the Bering Strait and connect to the contiguous United States via Canada.\nSeveral American entrepreneurs have advanced private-sector proposals, such as an Alaska-based limited liability company founded in 2010 to lobby for a cross-straits connection and a 2018 cryptocurrency offering to fund the construction of a tunnel.\nWhen will a Bering Strait crossing be completed\nResolution\nThis question resolves when any land link (a bridge or a tunnel) is created, and is carrying traffic before December 31st, 2035 (whether highly restricted traffic or open to the public). \nThis question resolves as &gt;2040 if the project is not completed before 2040.\nThe type of traffic also doesn't matter. It could be motor vehicles, trains, a hyperloop, or pedestrian traffic, etc. \nThe exact location of the link also doesn't matter. For completeness sake, let's say:\n---It ultimately connects a part of mainland Alaska to a part of Mainland Russia \n---The link is contained within a distance of 500 miles of Little Diomede Island \n",
    "# Forecasts": 70,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much will be estimated to have been invested by VCs in U.S.-based plant-based meat startups, in millions of USD, in the calendar year 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3138/how-much-will-be-estimated-to-have-been-invested-by-vcs-in-us-based-plant-based-meat-startups-in-millions-of-usd-in-the-calendar-year-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "According to [a report by The Good Food Institute (GFI)] (https://www.gfi.org/industry) , in 2018, an estimated $673 million invested was invested in companies involved in the supply chain of plant-based meat, eggs, and dairy. In that year, venture capital was the most common type of funding, representing 43% of the total 233 completed deals that year.\nHow much will be estimated to have been invested by VCs in U.S.-based plant-based meat startups, in the calendar year 2022, in millions of USD, in 2019 prices?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as a credible estimate of the amount of venture capital investment in U.S.-based plant-based companies in the calendar year 2022. The amount of investment is to be adjusted for inflation using a suitable U.S. CPI from the Bureau of Labour Statistics.\nThe estimate should originate from a credible independent source, preferably by nonprofit research organisation focussing on plant-based meat and related technologies, such as the [Good Food Institute] (https://www.gfi.org/files/sci-tech/clean-meat-production-volume-and-medium-cost.pdf) . \nFor the purpose of this question, we shall adopt the following definition of Plant-Based Meat (based on [GFI, 2019] (https://www.gfi.org/new-gfi-report-illustrates-the-state-of-chinas) ):\n“plant-based meat” is taken to refer to plant-based products that aim to be direct replacements for animal meat by mimicking the taste, texture, and look of animal meat, and are marketed as doing such.\nA plant-based meat company should be whose principal activities are those in some part of the plant-based meat supply chain. \nFor singular investments below $20M, the admin resolving the question may solely rely on the relevant report to correctly identify plant-based meat companies. \nFor larger singular investments exceeding $20M, an admin should confirm that the recipient of the investment is indeed a company whose principal activities are those in some part of the plant-based meat supply chain. This should be done by finding at least three articles published by credible media organisations in which the company is explicitly described as a \"plant-based meat\" company within 6 months of the announcement of the investment. Descriptions should use the words \"plant-based meat\" or any variations where \"meat\" is replaced with a specific meat (e.g. \"plant-based beef\" or \"plant-based burger\"), and/or variations where \"plant\" is replaced with a specific plant (e.g. \"pea-based meat\" or \"soy-protein based chicken\").\n",
    "# Forecasts": 128,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a genetic change cease to trigger regulatory oversight for the approval of gene-edited animals used in meat production?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3139/when-will-a-genetic-change-cease-to-trigger-regulatory-oversight-for-the-approval-of-gene-edited-animals-used-in-meat-production/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[A 2019 article has argued] (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-019-0035-y) that the currently proposed U.S. regulation of gene-edited animals used in meat production is \"not fit for purpose\". Under the current system, the employment any technology that utilizes recombinant DNA (rDNA) in food animal breeding programs automatically triggers regulatory oversight that has made it virtually impossible to commercialise gene-edited food animals. The article argues that delaying or preventing the use of this technology in animal breeding programs is associated with very opportunity costs in terms of foregone genetic improvement.\nIt is not just the presence of a transgenic rDNA construct (i.e. an organism with a segment of DNA containing a gene sequence that has been isolated from another organism) that triggers mandatory premarket FDA regulatory oversight prior to commercial release, but rather it is the presence of any “intentionally altered genomic DNA” in an animal that initiates oversight. \nThis system is [considered unreasonable by some geneticists] (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-019-0035-y.pdf) as there is nothing inherently dangerous about consuming dietary DNA. In fact, we already consume millions of naturally-occurring DNA variations.\nThe [2016 report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine] (https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23395/genetically-engineered-crops-experiences-and-prospects) agrees, and recommends a “product not process” regulatory trigger approach, where considerations about the product, and not the process that created the product is the sole relevant consideration for deciding for or against the need for premarket regulatory approval. Moreover, the [USDA] (https://www.usda.gov/) already regulates genetically modified plants in this way.[ [1] (https://www.cornucopia.org/2018/04/companies-that-modify-livestock-genes-want-to-be-regulated-by-the-friendlier-usda-instead-of-the-fda/) ]\nWhen will a single non-transgenic genetic change, by way of recombinant DNA (rDNA) techniques such as CRISPR-Cas9, cease to trigger mandatory premarket FDA regulatory oversight prior to commercial release of gene-edited animals used in meat productions?\nResolution\nThis resolves when single non-transgenic genetic change, by way of recombinant DNA (rDNA) techniques (such by way of CRISPR-Cas9) ceases to trigger mandatory premarket FDA regulatory oversight prior to commercial release of gene-edited animals used in meat production. Positive resolution does not require there to be no need for regulatory approval of GE animals, but simply that the method of rDNA techniques do not result in the default triggering of a regulatory oversight process. Positive resolution is consistent with there being various sorts of triggers for regulatory oversight stemming from other concerns (e.g. human food safety; environmental safety; target animal safety; effectiveness, amongst other factors) but positive resolution requires that using rDNA techniques does not by default raise concerns that trigger the need for for regulatory oversight.\nImportant note: If this question does not resolve positively before the end of 2032, it resolves as \"&gt;Dec 31, 2032\".\nOne way the question resolves positively if the current FDA's guidance document [#187 Regulation of Intentionally Altered Genomic DNA in Animals] (https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/cvm-gfi-187-regulation-intentionally-altered-genomic-dna-animals) , which is currently in draft form, is scrapped, or is revised or replaced by another guidance document (in draft or final form) that specifies that the application of rDNA techniques to genetically alter animals used in meat production do not, by default, trigger a regulatory oversight process.\nThe question is resolved by consulting credible the reporting by the FDA, USDA, other regulatory body, or a researcher, research organisation or commercial enterprise familiar with the relevant regulatory matters and deemed credible by an admin.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 87,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will 100 people or more be in space, or on any astronomical body other than earth, simultaneously?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3141/when-will-100-people-or-more-be-in-space-or-on-any-astronomical-body-other-than-earth-simultaneously/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of September 2019, the record for the greatest number of humans in space at one time is 13. [This has happened three times, once in 1995, and twice in 2009.] (https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/905/what-is-the-highest-number-of-humans-in-space-at-the-same-time-and-what-vessels) \nThis question asks: When will 100 people or more be in space, or on any astronomical body other than earth, simultaneously?\nThis question resolves as the date when it's first true that 100 people or more be in space, or on any astronomical body other than earth, simultaneously. For the purposes of this question, a living human will be considered to be 'in space' if they achieve an altitude of [at least 100km above Earth's mean sea level] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A1rm%C3%A1n_line) , or if they are located on any astronomical objects other than Earth.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 207,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2030, how many people will have ever landed on the Moon?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3142/by-2030-how-many-people-will-have-ever-landed-on-the-moon/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of 2019, [only 12 people have ever landed on the Moon.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Apollo_astronauts) All of these people did so between July 1969 and December 1972.\n[The United States is currently pursuing a new crewed moon landing by year end 2024.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program) Multiple private initiatives that may enable crewed landings on the Moon in the coming decade are also underway, including development of the [Blue Moon] (https://www.blueorigin.com/blue-moon) and [Starship] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship) vehicles. \nThis question asks: How many people will have landed on the Moon before 1 January 2030?\nThis question asks how many individual humans will have ever landed, and survived the landing, on the Moon before January 1 2030. Multiple visits made by the same human will not count more than once towards this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 220,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the labor force participation rate (total 16 and older) in the U.S. for October 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3144/what-will-be-the-labor-force-participation-rate-total-16-and-older-in-the-us-for-october-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports information about many things in the U.S. One is the civilian labor force participation [rate] (https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-labor-force-participation-rate.htm) , 16 and older. Here’s a [longer-term chart] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CIVPART) .\nNote how this differs from the participation rate of people [16 to 54] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNU01300060) , which is far higher (this excludes most retired people, and also some disabled people since many disabilities are strongly correlated with age). This question will be focusing on the broader 16+ metric.\nWhat will the BLS report as the U.S. civilian labor force participation rate (total including all ethnicities, 16 and older) for October of 2025?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 80,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will no non-test nuclear weapons be detonated by start of 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3150/will-no-non-test-nuclear-weapons-be-detonated-by-start-of-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "78%",
    "Description": "Weapons in which the energy is provided by nuclear fission or fusion have only twice in history been detonated outside of a controlled test environment, in the Hiroshima and Nagasaki events in World War II.\nSince then, the world has nearly gone to nuclear war as a result of international conflict (during the Cuban Missile Crisis) and by accident. There have also been a number of narrowly-averted accidental nuclear detonations. See [this timeline] (http://futureoflife.org/background/nuclear-close-calls-a-timeline/) for a sobering look at how close we have come.\nThis question resolves positive if no nuclear weapon is detonated before Jan 1, 2035, outside of controlled tests. Negative resolution could be triggered by:\n--- \nDeliberate nuclear attack.\n--- \nAccidental nuclear attack (launched by accident or on the basis of erroneous information.)\n--- \nAccidental detonation of a weapon.\n--- \nNuclear terrorism.\nFor these purposes we do not consider a radiological weapon — where any fission/fusion energy is energetically sub-dominant to chemical or other explosives — to constitute a nuclear detonation.\nThe deliberate detonation of nuclear weapons primarily for non-offensive engineering, mining or other civilian purposes (on Earth or in Space) do not trigger negative resolution.\nSee our related question [Will no non-test nuclear weapons be detonated by start of 2024? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2797/will-no-non-test-nuclear-weapons-be-detonated-by-start-of-2024/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 178,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many commercial cattle, in millions, will be slaughtered in the U.S. in 2032 if the lowest retail price of clean meat in 2026 is greater than $20 per kg?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3153/how-many-commercial-cattle-in-millions-will-be-slaughtered-in-the-us-in-2032-if-the-lowest-retail-price-of-clean-meat-in-2026-is-greater-than-20-per-kg/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of January 31, 2018, total USA inventory of beef cows was estimated at 31.7 million head, with cow-calf operations in all 50 states [(Drouillard, 2018)] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6039332/#b1-ajas-31-7-1007) . The beef cow inventory fluctuates considerably from year to year, and can be influenced by market conditions and environmental factors, such as weather and rainfall (ibid.). In the United States, about 320 million hectares are used for livestock grazing, which is equivalent to 41% of the total land area of the continental USA [(USDA, 2017)] (https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/major-land-uses.aspx) .\nCommercial cattle slaughter during 2018 totaled 33.0 million head, up 3 percent from 2017. Steers comprised 51.2 percent of the total federally inspected cattle slaughter, heifers 28.2 percent, dairy cows 9.7 percent, other cows 9.3 percent, and bulls 1.7 percent [(USDA, 2019)] (https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/r207tp32d/8336h934w/hq37vx004/lsslan19.pdf) .\nHow many commercial cattle, in millions, will be slaughtered in the U.S. in the year 2032 if the lowest retail price in 2026 of clean meat products containing &gt;50% clean meat is greater than $20 per kg?\nThis question will resolve as the number of cattle slaughtered in the year 2032, [as reported by the US Department of Agriculture] (https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/r207tp32d) . Numbers are to be rounded off to one decimal place (e.g. 33.13 becomes 33.1). Commercial cattle include steers, heifers, dairy cows, bulls and other cows.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if the lowest reported price in 2026, in 2019 USD per kg, of any clean meat product containing at least 50% clean meat in a U.S.-based retail supermarket is strictly less than $20. This question resolves ambiguous if [its sister question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3103/what-will-the-lowest-retail-price-in-usd-per-kg-of-any-product-containing-50-clean-meat-be-in-the-calendar-year-2026/) resolves below $20 (details on the resolution conditions, i.e. what counts as clean meat, how prices are identified, etc. can be found there). If no clean meat products are sold in retail stores in the U.S. in 2026, the question resolves ambiguously.\nRelated questions:\n- [How many commercial cattle, in millions, will be slaughtered in the U.S. in 2032 if the lowest retail price of clean meat in 2026 is less than $8 per kg?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3113/how-many-commercial-cattle-in-millions-will-be-slaughtered-in-the-us-in-2032-if-the-lowest-retail-price-of-clean-meat-in-2026-is-less-than-8-per-kg/) \n- [How many commercial cattle, in millions, will be slaughtered in the U.S. in 2032 if the lowest retail price of clean meat in 2026 is between $8 and $20 per kg? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3115/how-many-commercial-cattle-in-millions-will-be-slaughtered-in-the-us-in-2032-if-the-lowest-retail-price-of-clean-meat-in-2026-is-between-8-and-20-per-kg/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 125,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If DNA alterations continue to require FDA approval by default, how many intentionally genomic DNA altered animals will be determined as safe to eat, by the end of July 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3155/if-dna-alterations-continue-to-require-fda-approval-by-default-how-many-intentionally-genomic-dna-altered-animals-will-be-determined-as-safe-to-eat-by-the-end-of-july-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Genetic modification of farmed animals to increase the efficiency of food production, increase animal health and welfare, and reduce the environmental footprint, has been a goal for many decades [(Tait-Burkard et al., 2018)] (https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-018-1583-1) . This has been pursued by way of engineering and cloning farm animals to optimise for muscle growth, muscle size, feed conversion efficiency, disease resistance.\nIn addition to economic impacts, this could have various implications for animal welfare. Since a larger, more disease resistant animal produces more meat, fewer livestock is needed to produce a given output. Gene editing also makes possible tweaks that directly improve animal welfare: [alterations that produce hornless cows] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.3560) could spare cows from having to be dehorned, whilst [editing to produce pigs that lack testicular development] (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218176) would make mass surgical castration unnecessary.\nHowever, worries have been voiced that intentional genomic DNA alterations could also be detrimental to animal welfare ( [HSUS Report, 2006] (https://www.humanesociety.org/sites/default/files/docs/hsus-report-issues-genetic-engineering-cloning-farm-animals.pdf) ).\nThe only genetically engineered animal to ever be approved for food purposes via the new animal drug provisions of the FD&amp;C Act, the AquAdvantage salmon, a genetically engineered Atlantic salmon. The AquAdvantage was mired in regulatory limbo for years, and incurred development and regulatory costs running into the tens of millions of dollars [(van Eenennaam et al., 2019)] (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-019-0035-y) . Only in 2019, did [the FDA determine that] (https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/animals-intentional-genomic-alterations/aquadvantage-salmon-fact-sheet) AquAdvantage Salmon meets the statutory requirements for it being safe to eat.\nIf DNA alterations continue to require FDA approval by default, how many intentionally genomic DNA altered animals will be determined as safe to eat, by the end of July 2025?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the number of variants of rDNA constructs in intentionally genomic DNA altered animals that are approved by the FDA by the end of July, 2025, for import and/or production, and determined to be safe to eat. What is here referred to as \"variants of rDNA constructs in intentionally genomic DNA altered animals\" or \"animal drugs\" are “an article (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of … animals” [(van Eenennaam et al., 2019)] (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-019-0035-y) . Details of some of the animals that have been approved for production or import are reported on the [FDA website] (https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/biotechnology-products-cvm-animals-and-animal-food/animals-intentional-genomic-alterations) .\nThis resolves ambiguously if single non-transgenic genetic change, by way of recombinant DNA (rDNA) techniques (such by way of CRISPR-Cas9) ceases to trigger mandatory premarket FDA regulatory oversight prior to commercial release of gene-edited food animals anytime before the end of July, 2025. Specifically, this question resolves ambiguously if the question [When will non-transgenic genetic change alone cease to trigger regulatory oversight for the approval of gene-edited animals used in meat production?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3139/when-will-a-genetic-change-cease-to-trigger-regulatory-oversight-for-the-approval-of-gene-edited-animals-used-in-meat-production/) resolves positively before the end of July, 2025.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 63,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If there is a no-deal Brexit, what will be the average yearly % GDP growth of the UK in the subsequent five years?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3156/if-there-is-a-no-deal-brexit-what-will-be-the-average-yearly--gdp-growth-of-the-uk-in-the-subsequent-five-years/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A [no-deal Brexit] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-deal_Brexit) is one in which the United Kingdom leaves the European Union without a withdrawal agreement.\nSuch a departure from the EU could disrupt trade between the UK and the EU, with the UK trading under WTO rules and paying greater tariffs, rather than a more favorable deal negotiated with the EU.\nIf there is a no-deal Brexit, what will the average yearly percentage growth in real GDP of the UK be over the five-year period following Brexit?\nIf Article 50 is revoked (cancelling Brexit), or if the UK leaves the EU with a negotiated deal, this question resolves ambiguously. Average here is the arithmetic mean.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 33,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the first extraterrestrial life-forms we encounter be carbon-based?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3158/will-the-first-extraterrestrial-life-forms-we-encounter-be-carbon-based/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "67%",
    "Description": "As of question writing, all known life is carbon-based, in the sense that it needs to contain carbon atoms to survive.\nBut life could take many forms:\n---Wikipedia has a handy list of [hypothetical types of biochemistry] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothetical_types_of_biochemistry) , notably [silicon biochemistry] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothetical_types_of_biochemistry#Silicon_biochemistry) . \n---Life could be based on non-organic chemistry (e.g. [inorganic chemistry] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inorganic_chemistry) , or [nuclear chemistry] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_chemistry) in the degenerate crust on the surface of a neutron star*). \n---Life could also not be chemistry based at all. It could be electrical (e.g. [Ems] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Age_of_Em) ) or mechanical (e.g. [clockwork] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steampunk) ). \n---Life could operate on vastly different time / space scales from us (e.g. a cloud of interstellar stuff somehow consistently implementing a sentient computation). \nThese examples are not necessarily mutually exclusive, and I obviously make no claim regarding their respective feasibility/likelihood. They are rather meant to suggest the vastness of design-space.\nQuestion: If we encounter a phenomenon that is widely considered by the scientific community to be an alien life-form, will all simple life-forms we discover be carbon-based?\nLife-form details:\n1--The life-form has to have originated independently from earth life. That is: earth life can be a consequence of the alien life-form, they can share a cause, but earth life cannot have caused the alien life. \n2--The life-forms that count for this question are ones on the complexity level of our single-celled organisms or lower (as determined by a poll of xeno-biologists if there is any ambiguity). If there are none, then the simplest life-forms we have found are taken for resolution. \n3--The life-form has to need less than 1% of its atoms to be carbon atoms in order to keep being alive. It can incidentally contain carbon atoms, as long as they could theoretically be absent and the life-form still be alive. \nResolution details:\n---The scientific community has to have reached a consensus as judged by Metaculus admins. \n---This resolves positive if any life-form we encounter satisfies points 1. 2. and 3. \n---This resolves negative if all the life-forms we encounter that satisfy points 1. and 2. do not satisfiy point 3. \n---This resolves ambiguous if no life-form that satisfies point 1. is found before 2500, or if before then we have conclusive evidence that none exists in the observable universe. \n---This resolves 50 years after we first discover an alien life-form that satisfies condition 1., to give time for consensus forming. \n* My thanks to @(Uncle Jeff) for this example.\nNote that in this sense Humans are only \"based\" on hydrogen (60%), oxygen (25%), carbon (10%) and nitrogen (1.5%). \n",
    "# Forecasts": 125,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will WeWork file for bankruptcy protection before 1 January 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3159/will-wework-file-for-bankruptcy-protection-before-1-january-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "65%",
    "Description": "WeWork (officially \"The We Company\") is an American commercial real estate company that provides shared workspaces for technology startups, and services for other enterprises. Founded in 2010, it is headquartered in New York City. [As of 2018, WeWork manages 46.63 million square feet of commercial real estate.] (https://www.wsj.com/articles/wework-surpasses-jpmorgan-as-biggest-occupier-of-manhattan-office-space-1537268401) \n[In 2019, WeWork attempted to go public in an IPO] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WeWork#2019) , seeking a [valuation as high as $47 billion.] (https://www.businessinsider.com/weworks-nightmare-ipo?r=US&amp;IR=T) However, [concerns about corporate governance] (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/wework-corporate-governance-nightmare-204330915.html?guccounter=1&amp;guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&amp;guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAIrC3q_C9YN2lZ0eRlApJAfGJnNEtpzzX2iJy7AodPkGkJY6O1FFMOhHk30lBFqBx2vfPE_rSu4VEDsDgjx8kv2bSDcHiPCLBkWjb0lr60rvFU5Knzj8nQWEyoqznhMfmlDWDfonPEi_NRsW7yycUOq9DmU4tOMSC9Td2xdsyIkt) and the company's [$47 billion in lease obligations] (https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-09-02/wework-ipo-lease-obligations-and-an-ugly-balance-sheet) led to a dramatic reduction in the company's proposed IPO valuation, which fell [to as low as $10 billion.] (https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-wework-ipo-valuation-exclusive/exclusive-wework-considers-ipo-valuation-of-as-low-as-10-billion-sources-idUKKCN1VY1PE) Additionally, [the CEO of the company resigned at the request of existing investors.] (https://www.theverge.com/2019/9/24/20882034/wework-ceo-adam-neumann-stepping-down-chairman) [Ultimately, the company filed to withdraw its IPO prospectus.] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-30/wework-withdraws-ipo-prospectus-as-new-co-ceos-delay-offering) \nThe company remains unprofitable, and [had losses of nearly $2 billion in 2018.] (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/25/business/dealbook/wework-loss-billion.html) \nThis question asks: Will The We Company, or any parent company thereof, file for either Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States prior to 1 January 2025?\nResolution is by citation of a relevant court filing or credible media reports in the financial press. The applicable filing need not lead to a grant or ruling by any court or regulatory body; it must only be submitted in order for a positive resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 381,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the labor force participation rate (total 16 and older) in the U.S. for October 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3191/what-will-be-the-labor-force-participation-rate-total-16-and-older-in-the-us-for-october-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports information about many things in the U.S. One is the civilian labor force participation [rate] (https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-labor-force-participation-rate.htm) , 16 and older. Here’s a [longer-term chart] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CIVPART) .\nNote how this differs from the participation rate of people [16 to 54] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNU01300060) , which is far higher (this excludes most retired people, and also some disabled people since many disabilities are strongly correlated with age). This question will be focusing on the broader 16+ metric.\nWhat will the BLS report as the U.S. civilian labor force participation rate (total including all ethnicities, 16 and older) for October of 2030?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 76,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the milk of cows whose DNA is intentionally altered to be hornless be for sale in the United States?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3192/when-will-the-milk-of-cows-whose-dna-is-intentionally-altered-to-be-hornless-be-for-sale-in-the-united-states/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Horns of cows are removed because they can pose a risk to livestock handlers, other animals and to the bearers of the horns themselves (horns are sometimes caught in fences or prevent feeding).\nIn the United States, an estimated 80% of all dairy calves (4.8 million per year) and 25% (8.75 million animals) of beef cattle are dehorned every year [(Carlson et al., 2016)] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.3560#ref1) . Dehorning of adult cattle is associated with increased risks of sinusitis, bleeding, prolonged wound healing, and infection [(American Veterinary Medical Association, 2014)] (https://www.avma.org/KB/Resources/LiteratureReviews/Documents/dehorning_cattle_bgnd.pdf) . There is evidence that dehorning is painful for the animal: physiologic, neuroendocrine, and behavioral changes indicative of pain and distress are observed following dehorning (ibid.).\nFortunately, gene editing technologies can be used to create hornless cows. In 2016 Alison van Eenennaam and her research team at UC Davis, in partnership collaboration with Tad Sonstegard and his Minnesota-based company Recombinetics, [used genome-editing to make cattle that don’t grow horns] (https://innovativegenomics.org/blog/got-milk-a-kinder-cup-through-genome-editing/) .\nHowever, [van Eenennaam's 2019 article] (http://(https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-019-0035-y)) argues that the currently proposed U.S. regulation of gene-edited food animals is \"not fit for purpose\" as it has made it virtually impossible to commercialise gene-edited food animals. Although the [FDA has introduced new ventures] (https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/animals-intentional-genomic-alterations/vip-veterinary-innovation-program) to expedite advancements in the regulatory approval process of innovative animal products, it is unclear when hornless cows can be successfully commercialised.\nWhen will the milk of cows whose DNA is intentionally altered to be hornless be for sale, for human consumption, in the United States?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the date when the milk from cows whose DNA is intentionally altered to be hornless using modern molecular technologies, that do not involve selective breeding, are first for sale for purposes of human consumption, in any state of the United States. For the purpose of this question, an organism with intentionally altered DNA are those with alterations introduced into the DNA of an organism using modern molecular technologies, such as genetic engineering (also referred to as recombinant DNA technology) and genome editing.\nExamples of the use of modern molecular technologies that qualify for positive resolution is the [transcription activator-like effector nucleases] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcription_activator-like_effector_nuclease) (TALENs) to swap the version of the [POLLED] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/polled-trait) gene that causes horn growth in dairy cattle into the hornless version that naturally exists in beef cattle. This specific example was used in the approach reported a Nature correspondence [(Carlson et al. 2016)] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.3560) . \nThe specific genomic alternation needs to result in cows never developing horns at least 25% of the time for male cows. The question resolves on the basis of credible media reports. Modified animals used to study human diseases or used for drug testing do not count toward resolution.\nIf the question does not resolve before October 2nd, 2035, it resolves as \"&gt; Oct 2, 2035\".\n",
    "# Forecasts": 82,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If DNA alterations continue to require approval by default, when will the FDA find at least ten genetically edited animals as safe to eat?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3201/if-dna-alterations-continue-to-require-approval-by-default-when-will-the-fda-find-at-least-ten-genetically-edited-animals-as-safe-to-eat/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Genetic modification of farmed animals to increase the efficiency of food production, increase animal health and welfare, and reduce the environmental footprint, has been a goal for many decades [(Tait-Burkard et al., 2018)] (https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-018-1583-1) . This has been pursued by way of engineering and cloning farm animals to optimise for muscle growth, muscle size, feed conversion efficiency and disease resistance.\nIn addition to economic impacts, this could have various implications for animal welfare. Since a larger, more disease resistant animal produces more meat, fewer livestock is needed to produce a given output. Gene editing also makes possible tweaks that directly improve animal welfare: alterations that produce [hornless cows] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.3560) could spare cows from having to be dehorned, whilst [editing to produce pigs that lack testicular development] (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218176) would make mass surgical castration unnecessary.\nHowever, worries have been voiced that intentional genomic DNA alterations could also be detrimental to animal welfare ( [HSUS Report, 2006] (https://www.humanesociety.org/sites/default/files/docs/hsus-report-issues-genetic-engineering-cloning-farm-animals.pdf) ).\nThe only genetically engineered animal to ever be approved for food purposes via the new animal drug provisions of the FD&amp;C Act, the AquAdvantage salmon, a genetically engineered Atlantic salmon. The AquAdvantage was mired in regulatory limbo for years, and incurred development and regulatory costs running into the tens of millions of dollars [(van Eenennaam et al., 2019)] (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-019-0035-y) . Only in 2019, did [the FDA determine that] (https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/animals-intentional-genomic-alterations/aquadvantage-salmon-fact-sheet) AquAdvantage Salmon meets the statutory requirements for it being safe to eat.\nIf DNA alternations by way of recombinant DNA techniques (e.g. by way of CRISPR-Cas9) continue to require FDA approval by default, when will the FDA have determined that at least ten intentionally genomic DNA altered animals are safe to eat?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the date when at least ten variants of rDNA constructs in intentionally genomic DNA altered animals are approved by the FDA for import and/or production, and determined to be safe to eat. What is here referred to as \"variants of rDNA constructs in intentionally genomic DNA altered animals\" are \"animal drugs\" in FDA terminology: “an article (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of … animals.”[ [5] (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-019-0035-y.pdf) ] In other words, the FDA considers the rDNA construct in a GE animal to be the drug, not the genetically edited animal itself. Details of some of the animals that have been approved for production or import are reported on the [FDA website] (https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/biotechnology-products-cvm-animals-and-animal-food/animals-intentional-genomic-alterations) .\nThis resolves ambiguously if single non-transgenic genetic change, by way of recombinant DNA (rDNA) techniques (such by way of CRISPR-Cas9) ceases to trigger mandatory premarket FDA regulatory oversight prior to commercial release of gene-edited food animals before ten intentionally genomic DNA altered animals are approved as safe to eat. Specifically, this question resolves ambiguously if the question [When will non-transgenic genetic change alone cease to trigger regulatory oversight for the approval of gene-edited animals used in meat production?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3139/when-will-a-genetic-change-cease-to-trigger-regulatory-oversight-for-the-approval-of-gene-edited-animals-used-in-meat-production/) , resolves positively before ten intentionally genomic DNA altered animals are determined as safe to eat.\nIf this question does not resolve before October 5th, 2031, it resolves as \"&gt; Oct 5, 2031\".\n",
    "# Forecasts": 85,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will beef for human consumption, from cattle genetically edited to carry a copy of the SRY gene, be for sale in the United States?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3202/when-will-beef-for-human-consumption-from-cattle-genetically-edited-to-carry-a-copy-of-the-sry-gene-be-for-sale-in-the-united-states/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In her project “Boys Only”, Alison Van Eenennaam and her research team at UC Davis aims to create a bull that will father only male offspring: either normal bull calves with XY chromosomes (males) or XX chromosomes (females) but with the male-making SRY. The presence of SRY can make a female turn out to be essentially male—with bigger muscles, a penis, and testicles (although unable to make sperm).\nSince beef ranchers generally prefer males to females as these have more muscle weight, adding the male-making gene SRY could improve the efficiency of beef production, thereby potentially reducing the number of cows required to produce a given weight of beef.\nHowever, [van Eenennaam's 2019 article] (http://(https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-019-0035-y)) argues that the currently proposed U.S. regulation of gene-edited food animals is \"not fit for purpose\" as it has made it virtually impossible to commercialise gene-edited food animals. Although the [FDA has introduced new ventures] (https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/animals-intentional-genomic-alterations/vip-veterinary-innovation-program) to expedite advancements in the regulatory approval process of innovative animal products, it is unclear when SRY cows can first be successfully commercialized.\nWhen will beef for human consumption, from cattle whose genetic material has been edited to carry a copy of the SRY gene, be for sale in the United States?\nResolution\nThis question resolves positively if beef for human consumption from cattle whose genetic material has been edited to generate cisgenic bulls that carry an extra copy of the [bovine SRY gene] (https://portal.nifa.usda.gov/web/crisprojectpages/1007279-genetic-containment-in-livestock-via-crispr-mediated-gene-knock-in.html) are legally for sale in the United States.\nResolution should be based on credible media reporting, or on the basis of credible statements by relevant companies, researchers or research organisations.\nIf this question does not resolve before the 5th of October, 2032, this question resolves as \"&gt; Oct 5, 2032\".\n",
    "# Forecasts": 72,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the upper limit in the IPCC's ‘likely’ range of its climate sensitivity estimate be, in its 6th Assessment Report?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3205/what-will-the-upper-limit-in-the-ipccs-likely-range-of-its-climate-sensitivity-estimate-be-in-its-6th-assessment-report/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Climate sensitivity is arguably [the most important number in climate change] (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-most-important-number-in-climate-change/) . It is the global-mean surface temperature change associated with a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentration over its preindustrial value [(Vial et al. 2013)] (http://www.lmd.jussieu.fr/~jldufres/publi/Smi/Vial.Dufresne.ea-cdyn-revised.pdf) . The standard metric for climate sensitivity is the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) given as the change in temperature at equilibrium for a doubling of CO2, neglecting long-term feedbacks associated with vegetation changes, carbon feedbacks and ice sheet dynamics [(Skeie et al. 2017)] (https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/9/879/2018/) .\nThe first attempt to calculate climate sensitivity was in 1896, by the Swedish scientist, Svante Arrhenius. He found that CO2 doubling should increase the Earth's mean temperature by 5–6°C [(Lapenis, 2006)] (https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/98EO00206) . Since then, hundreds of estimates have been made based on climate modelling and/or estimates based on physical evidence, such as climate changes in the distant past [(Knutti et al., 2017)] (https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo3017?draft=marketing) . \n[Some have argued] (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3ddd/338b0f9ddb9825249e467f54b6be484b1845.pdf?_ga=2.218536731.367033418.1567362234-1835406592.1565352888) that from the 1980s onward, the uncertainty in climate projections has not narrowed appreciably, despite tremendous increases in computing power, in observations, and in the number of scientists studying the problem. For instance, In 2013, the IPCC widened the range of its estimate of climate sensitivity once again, opting for the \"likely\" range of 1.5°C to 4.5°C (66% confidence interval) [(Freeman et al., 2015)] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w20900.pdf) . The resolution of this dilemma has important implications for climate research and policy.\nThe ‘likely’ range (i.e. its 66% confidence interval) of ECS as stated in the IPCC's 5th annual report [(IPCC, 2014)] (https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf) is 1.5–4.5 degrees Celsius. This is the same range that was givien in the IPCC's first report [(IPCC, 1990)] (https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ipcc_far_wg_I_full_report.pdf) .\n[A 2018 article] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25450) aims to revise the estimate of climate sensitivity, and reduces the range of possible end-of-century outcomes by more than half. It finds a central estimate of 2.8 degrees Celsius with 66 per cent confidence limits (equivalent to the IPCC ‘likely’ range) of 2.2–3.4 degrees Celsius. The IPCC's sixth report is currently [scheduled for publication in 2022] (https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/) , will it revise its upper bound of 4.5 degrees Celsius of its ‘likely’ range?\nWhat will the upper limit in the IPCC's assessed 'likely' range of equilibrium climate sensitivity, in its sixth Assessment Report?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the upper of the 66% confidence limits, i.e. the upper number of its 'likely' range, of the IPCC's estimate for climate sensitivity in its Sixth Assessment Report. The question resolves ambiguous if the sixth Assessment Report is not published before the end of 2024, or if it does not issue the estimate in its report. \nIn case of format changes to the IPCC's representation of their estimate for equilibrium climate sensitivity (i.e. different confidence interval is presented), an admin shall examine the relevant technical publication(s) produced by the IPCC, or those that principally inform the IPCC estimates for climate sensitivity, to work out the associated 66% confidence interval from their cumulative probability function (CDF). In case different confidence intervals are provided and the relevant CDF is not disclosed, we shall assume that the CDF is equivalent to the analytic form found in [Roe and Baker (2007)] (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3ddd/338b0f9ddb9825249e467f54b6be484b1845.pdf?_ga=2.218536731.367033418.1567362234-1835406592.1565352888) , so that the 66% confidence interval can be worked out by an admin.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 92,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will first land a person on Mars?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3214/who-will-first-land-a-person-on-mars/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This is for fun and purposes of experimentation. Assuming that a biological human arrives, alive, on Mars, will the responsible entity be:\n1-- \nThe US government\n2-- \nSpaceX\n3-- \nAnother government\n4-- \nAnother corporation or private organization\n5-- \nOther (somehow)\nAlthough Metaculus does not yet have multi-ple choices, we do have multi-modes (up to 5), so just dial in the relative probabilities you want peaked around the above 5 choices. Granted, you'll have to eyeball the \"weight\" sliders until we add a better numerical readout.\nResolution will be determined by the organization for whom the person who makes the go/no go decision on setting the spacecraft down on Mars's surface, e.g. someone at NASA (or above NASA in the US government), someone at SpaceX (Musk or a successor), etc. This will remain true even if it is nominally a joint mission. Option 5 is for being taxied there by aliens, an individual building a wormhole in the basement, etc., NOT for ambiguity between 1-4, which will be instead handled via the question resolving as ambiguous.\nCloses retroactively 1 month prior to the launch leading to the landing. Resolves ambiguous if nobody makes it to Mars by 2100.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 224,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the upper limit in the IPCC's ‘likely’ range of its climate sensitivity estimate be, in its 7th Assessment Report?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3233/what-will-the-upper-limit-in-the-ipccs-likely-range-of-its-climate-sensitivity-estimate-be-in-its-7th-assessment-report/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Climate sensitivity is arguably [the most important number in climate change] (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-most-important-number-in-climate-change/) . It is the global-mean surface temperature change associated with a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentration over its preindustrial value [(Vial et al. 2013)] (http://www.lmd.jussieu.fr/~jldufres/publi/Smi/Vial.Dufresne.ea-cdyn-revised.pdf) . The standard metric for climate sensitivity is the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) given as the change in temperature at equilibrium for a doubling of CO2, neglecting long-term feedbacks associated with vegetation changes, carbon feedbacks and ice sheet dynamics [(Skeie et al. 2017)] (https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/9/879/2018/) .\nThe first attempt to calculate climate sensitivity was in 1896, by the Swedish scientist, Svante Arrhenius. He found that CO2 doubling should increase the Earth's mean temperature by 5–6°C [(Lapenis, 2006)] (https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/98EO00206) . Since then, hundreds of estimates have been made based on climate modelling and/or estimates based on physical evidence, such as climate changes in the distant past [(Knutti et al., 2017)] (https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo3017?draft=marketing) . \n[Some have argued] (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3ddd/338b0f9ddb9825249e467f54b6be484b1845.pdf?_ga=2.218536731.367033418.1567362234-1835406592.1565352888) that from the 1980s onward, the uncertainty in climate projections has not narrowed appreciably, despite tremendous increases in computing power, in observations, and in the number of scientists studying the problem. For instance, In 2013, the IPCC widened the range of its estimate of climate sensitivity once again, opting for the \"likely\" range of 1.5°C to 4.5°C (66% confidence interval) [(Freeman et al., 2015)] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w20900.pdf) . The resolution of this dilemma has important implications for climate research and policy.\nThe ‘likely’ range (i.e. its 66% confidence interval) of ECS as stated in the IPCC's 5th annual report [(IPCC, 2014)] (https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf) is 1.5–4.5 degrees Celsius. This is the same range that was givien in the IPCC's first report [(IPCC, 1990)] (https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ipcc_far_wg_I_full_report.pdf) .\n[A 2018 article] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25450) aims to revise the estimate of climate sensitivity, and reduces the range of possible end-of-century outcomes by more than half. It finds a central estimate of 2.8 degrees Celsius with 66 per cent confidence limits (equivalent to the IPCC ‘likely’ range) of 2.2–3.4 degrees Celsius. \nThe IPCC has so far produced 5 Assessment Reports:\n--- [First] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPCC_First_Assessment_Report) (issued in 1990) \n--- [Second] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPCC_Second_Assessment_Report) (issued in 1995) \n--- [Third] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPCC_Third_Assessment_Report) (issued in 2001) \n--- [Fourth] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPCC_Fourth_Assessment_Report) (issued in 2007) \n--- [Fifth] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPCC_Fifth_Assessment_Report) (issued in 2014) \n---Sixth ( [scheduled to be issued in 2022] (https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/) ) \n---Seventh (scheduled for [??] (https://www.ipcc.ch/about/future-work/) ) \nWhat will the upper limit in the IPCC's assessed 'likely' range of equilibrium climate sensitivity, in its seventh Assessment Report?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the upper of the 66% confidence limits, i.e. the upper number of its 'likely' range, of the IPCC's estimate for climate sensitivity in its seventh Assessment Report. The question resolves ambiguous if the seventh Assessment Report is not published before the end of 2031, or if it does not issue the estimate in its report. Supplementary reports by the IPCC, such as [the one issued in 1992] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPCC_supplementary_report,_1992) do not count as an IPCC Assessment Report.\nIn case of format changes to the IPCC's representation of their estimate for equilibrium climate sensitivity (i.e. different confidence interval is presented), an admin shall examine the relevant technical publication(s) produced by the IPCC, or those that principally inform the IPCC estimates for climate sensitivity, to work out the associated 66% confidence interval from their cumulative probability function (CDF). In case different confidence intervals are provided and the relevant CDF is not disclosed, we shall assume that the CDF is equivalent to the analytic form found in [Roe and Baker (2007)] (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3ddd/338b0f9ddb9825249e467f54b6be484b1845.pdf?_ga=2.218536731.367033418.1567362234-1835406592.1565352888) , so that the 66% confidence interval can be worked out by an admin.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 76,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Turkey be a NATO member continuously until 1 January 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3238/will-turkey-be-a-nato-member-continuously-until-1-january-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "80%",
    "Description": "The [North Atlantic Treaty Organization] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO) is an intergovernmental military alliance between 29 North American and European countries. The organization implements the [North Atlantic Treaty] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Atlantic_Treaty) that was signed on 4 April 1949. NATO constitutes a system of collective defence whereby its independent member states agree to mutual defence in response to an attack by any external party. \n[In 1952, Turkey joined NATO.] (https://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/greece_and_turkey_join_nato_london_22_october_1951-en-c193a825-2f1c-4e12-b26d-d35fabc6559f.html) \nIn recent years, Turkey's leader [Recep Tayyip Erdoğan] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recep_Tayyip_Erdo%C4%9Fan) has been widely [criticised as an authoritarian.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recep_Tayyip_Erdo%C4%9Fan#Authoritarianism) Further, Turkey's [military incursions into Syria] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Turkish_offensive_into_north-eastern_Syria) have caused some to [ask if Turkey will continue to be a NATO member, or if it could be suspended or expelled.] (https://www.justsecurity.org/66574/can-turkey-be-expelled-from-nato/) \nHowever, no existing provision in the North Atlantic Treaty provides for the suspension or expulsion of a NATO member.\nThis question asks: Will Turkey continue to be a NATO member until 1 January 2025, with no suspension, expulsion, or voluntary withdrawal during the intervening period?\nThis question resolves positively if Turkey is a NATO member on 1 January 2025, and has been so continuously from the date this question opens. The question resolves negatively if Turkey is suspended or expelled from NATO, or if it withdraws of its own accord, at any time before 1 January 2025.\nIf before this question resolves NATO is dissolved, or changed in structure or operation so substantially that Metaculus administrators believe it is no longer prudent to continue this question, this question shall resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 177,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a clean meat flavoring product be approved for human consumption?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3239/when-will-a-clean-meat-flavoring-product-be-approved-for-human-consumption/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The first commercial product we might see from the growth of animal cells is not a piece of cultivated meat to eat, but rather meat flavoring. This would be something like Impossible's 'heme' additive, but built from cultivated meat.\nIt seems extremely likely that FDA or USDA approval is necessary before cultivated meat flavoring would be added to food for sale in the US, so we'll ask:\nWhen will a cultivated meat flavoring product be approved for human consumption? \nQuestion resolves when an announcement is made by the FDA, USDA, an industry group, a credible statement by a company, or other multiply-sourced credible reporting that approval has been obtained to add cultivated meat flavoring to a consumer food product.\nResolves as ambiguous if a clean meat flavoring goes to market without any of the above triggers occurring.\n(Edited 1/6/20 to to update terminology.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 90,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the IAU rework its definition of planetary status by Jan 1, 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3241/will-the-iau-rework-its-definition-of-planetary-status-by-jan-1-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "The [International Astronomical Union] (https://www.iau.org/) defines a planet [1] as a celestial body that\n1--is in orbit around the Sun, \n2--is massive enough per material strength to be an ellipsoid (in hydrostatic equilibrium) and, \n3--has \"cleared the neighborhood\" around its orbit. \nA debate has emerged in the planetary sciences over whether the community should instead embrace a purely geophysical definition of a planet (a substellar body in hydrostatic equilibrium), stated in more detail here: [2]. This point of view has been gaining some traction, e.g. in Metzger et al. 2018 [3].\nThe chief concerns with the IAU's definition are that it excludes exoplanets (they do not orbit the sun), small bodies in hydrostatic equilibrium (e.g. Pluto, Ceres, Titan, Quaoar), and that \"clearing the neighborhood\" is an imprecise definition that has many caveats (e.g. coorbital bodies/quasi-satellites). There have been attempts to rigorously define orbital clearing (e.g. Margot 2015 [4]), but they have not yet been adopted by the IAU.\nThe chief concerns with the geophysical definition are that it elides dynamical concerns (which are integral to planet formation), includes ellipsoidal satellites (e.g. Titan, Triton, Ganymede) as planets, and will result in having &gt;50 planets, with that number growing as time goes on.\nThis debate conceals a difference in methodological approach - considering whether small, ellipsoidal (currently) subplanetary bodies* are more interesting in particular (as geophysical entities, like Earth) or in aggregate (as orbital populations, like sub-ellipsoidal asteroids). These concerns are, to first order, native to planetary geoscientists and planetary astronomers/dynamicists respectively. The geophysical and IAU definitions are both used in the literature, again employed ~along subdisciplinary lines.\nThis now brings us to the question: given the ongoing debate and reality of publishing differences the planetary sciences, \nwill the IAU revise its definition of a planet before 2025?\nResolution details\nIAU's 2006 definition is:\nA “planet” is defined as a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit. \nWe'll refer to this as the \"original definition\". This question resolves positively if any of the following occurs:\n---Any of the Parts (a), (b) or (c) of the original definition are substantially revised; or \n---Any of the Parts (a), (b) or (c) of the original definition are removed; or \n---Another part not included in the original definition is included that requires a planet to have an additional property that is not implicit in parts (a), (b) or (c). \nIf more than one of these conditions occur, the question also resolves positively. \n[1] [IAU Definition] (https://www.iau.org/news/pressreleases/detail/iau0603/) \n[2] [Geophysical Definition] (https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2017/eposter/1448.pdf) \n[3] [Metzger et al. 2018] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.04115) \n[4] [Margot 2015] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.06300) \n*currently characterized by the IAU as \"dwarf planets\"\n",
    "# Forecasts": 66,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Robert Caro's fifth and final volume of his Lyndon Johnson biography be published during his lifetime?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3244/will-robert-caros-fifth-and-final-volume-of-his-lyndon-johnson-biography-be-published-during-his-lifetime/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "53%",
    "Description": "American journalist and author [Robert A. Caro] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Caro) (born October 30, 1935) has for the last decades been working on The Years of Lyndon Johnson, a multi-volume biography of the former US President. The work is planned to consist of five volumes, the first four of which were published in 1982, 1990, 2002, 2012, respectively.\nWhen will the fifth volume be published? Here's how [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Years_of_Lyndon_Johnson#Planned_book_five) summarizes the publication estimates given at various points since 2011:\nIn November 2011, Caro estimated that the fifth and final volume would require another two to three years to write. In March 2013, he affirmed a commitment to completing the series with a fifth volume. As of April 2014, he was continuing to research the book. In a televised interview with C-SPAN in May 2017, Caro confirmed over 400 typed pages as being complete, covering the period 1964–65; and that once he completes the section on Johnson's 1965 legislative achievements, he intends to move to Vietnam to continue the writing process.\nIn an interview with The New York Review of Books in January 2018, Caro said that he was writing about 1965 and 1966 and a non-chronological section about the relationship between Johnson and Bobby Kennedy. Asked if he still planned to visit Vietnam soon, Caro replied: \"Not yet, no. This is a very long book. And there's a lot to do before that's necessary. I'm getting close to it now.\" In December 2018, it was reported that Caro is still \"several years from finishing\" the volume.\nThe question resolves positive if and only if Caro's fifth and final volume of The Years of Lyndon Johnson becomes available for order (not pre-order) on [amazon.com] (http://amazon.com) while Caro is still alive.\nIf the fifth book is not intended to be the last, the question resolves negative if the book intended to be the last one isn't published during Caro's lifetime, and positive if it is. If it's unclear whether the fifth book is intended to be the last one, the question resolves ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 91,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the U.S. average weekly hours of all employees (total non-farm private) in October 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3245/what-will-be-the-us-average-weekly-hours-of-all-employees-total-non-farm-private-in-october-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The Bureau of Labor Statistics [publishes] (https://www.bls.gov/ces/) [data] (https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cestn.htm#section3b) on the average hours worked of the non-farm private sector in the U.S. \nIn this question we will be using the Average Weekly Hours of All Employees, Total Private ( [AWHAETP] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/AWHAETP) ). Some metric-specific characteristics:\nAverage weekly hours relate to the average hours per worker for which pay was received and is different from standard or scheduled hours. Factors such as unpaid absenteeism, labor turnover, part-time work, and stoppages cause average weekly hours to be lower than scheduled hours of work for an establishment. \nFor historical context on hours going back to 1950, [here] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/AVHWPEUSA065NRUG) is a related metric (but that is calculated differently using annual hours instead).\nResolution will be the BLS reported AWHAETP figure for October 2025.\nThis question is complementary with another on [U.S. LFPR] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3144/what-will-be-the-labor-force-participation-rate-total-16-and-older-in-the-us-for-october-2025/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 128,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In what year will the total number of hen eggs produced annually in the U.S. be 100 billion or less?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3246/in-what-year-will-the-total-number-of-hen-eggs-produced-annually-in-the-us-be-100-billion-or-less/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Egg production during the year [ending November 30, 2018 totalled 109 billion eggs] (https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/1v53jw96n/m326m852c/dz010x51j/ckegan19.pdf) , up 2 percent from 2017.\nIn 2013, 95.2 billion eggs were produced in the United States, [according to the USDA] (https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/1v53jw96n/s7526f739/g445cg75q/ChickEgg-02-27-2014.pdf) . Yearly figures for total egg production can be found on the [USDA webpage] (https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/1v53jw96n?locale=en#release-items) .\nIn what year will the total number of hen eggs produced anually in the U.S. be 100 billion or less?\nResolution\nThis resolves as the first year ending November 30th in which the total egg production year ending is 100 billion or less. Numbers are to be rounded to one decimal place (e.g. 100.049 qualifies as 100.0). Resolution will be based on the data in USDA's [Chickens and Eggs Annual Summary] (https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/1v53jw96n?locale=en) . This question resolves ambiguously if the USDA no longer reports these figures. If, by December 24th, 2035, the question has not resolves, this question resolves as \"&gt; Dec 24, 2035\".\n",
    "# Forecasts": 90,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many billions of hen eggs will be produced in the U.S. in the year ending in November 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3247/how-many-billions-of-hen-eggs-will-be-produced-in-the-us-in-the-year-ending-in-november-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Egg production during the year [ending November 30, 2018 totalled 109 billion eggs] (https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/1v53jw96n/m326m852c/dz010x51j/ckegan19.pdf) , up 2 percent from 2017.\nIn 2013, 95.2 billion eggs were produced in the United States, [according to the USDA] (https://downloads.usda.library.cornell.edu/usda-esmis/files/1v53jw96n/s7526f739/g445cg75q/ChickEgg-02-27-2014.pdf) . Yearly figures for total egg production can be found on the [USDA webpage] (https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/1v53jw96n?locale=en#release-items) .\nHow many billions of hen eggs will be produced in the U.S. in the year ending in November 2023?\nResolution\nThis resolves as the number of hen eggs produced in the year ending November 30th, 2023. Numbers are to be rounded to one decimal place (e.g. 95.049 qualifies as 95.0). Resolution will be based on the data in USDA's [Chickens and Eggs Annual Summary] (https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/1v53jw96n?locale=en) . This question resolves ambiguously if the USDA no longer reports these figures.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 146,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many billions of broiler-type chicks will hatch in the U.S., on average per year, over the 2022-2024 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3248/how-many-billions-of-broiler-type-chicks-will-hatch-in-the-us-on-average-per-year-over-the-2022-2024-period/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The United States has the largest broiler chicken industry in the world with about 17 percent of production exported to other countries in 2018 [(National Chicken Council, 2019)] (https://www.nationalchickencouncil.org/about-the-industry/statistics/broiler-chicken-industry-key-facts/) . Americans consume more chicken than anyone else in the world – more than 93.5 pounds per capita in 2018 – the number one protein consumed in the United States (ibid.). The most recent Census of Agriculture reported 233,770 poultry farms in the United States in 2012 [(USDA, 2015)] (https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nass-poultry-stats-factsheet.pdf) .\nThe number of broiler-type chicks that hatched totalled 9.71 billion in 2018, 9.62 billion in 2017 [(USDA, 2019)] (https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/9306sz28s?locale=en) . This would resolve the question for the 2016-2018 period as 9.51 billion.\nHow many billions of broiler-type chicks will hatch per year, on average, over the 2022-2024 period?\nThis question resolves as the average number of broiler-type chicks hatched in 2022, 2023, and 2024 (in billions) according to data reported by the [US Department of Agriculture] (https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/9306sz28s?locale=en) . Yearly numbers are to be rounded to one decimal place before averaging. The question resolves ambiguous if the USDA no longer publishes this data, or if its methodology is substantially changed.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 121,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Israel be the fourth country to soft-land on the Moon, if the feat is achieved by the end of 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3251/will-israel-be-the-fourth-country-to-soft-land-on-the-moon-if-the-feat-is-achieved-by-the-end-of-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "Even though [Beresheet] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beresheet) and [Chandrayaan-2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandrayaan-2) both crashed into the moon in 2019, Israel and India continue in their attempts to soft-land on the moon. Israel's next attempt, [Beresheet 2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beresheet_2) , is set for a [landing in 2022] (https://www.space.com/israel-beresheet-moon-lander-try-again.html) as of October 2019. On the other hand, the [Indian Space Research Organisation] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Space_Research_Organisation) (ISRO) may work with Japan's [JAXA] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JAXA) in the [Chandrayaan-3] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandrayaan-3) mission, with a suggested launch date of 2024.\nSo far, only the US, Russia, and China have landed spacecraft intact on the moon.\nWill Israel be the fourth country to soft-land a spacecraft on the Moon, if a new country does so before December 31, 2025?\nFor the purposes of this question, the country that builds the lunar lander will receive credit for the soft landing; the rocket or payload such as rovers may be provided by (US, Russia, China).\nResolution is positive if SpaceIL (or, much less likely, another Israeli effort) is the next non-(US, Russia, China) country to achieve a gentle landing of a spacecraft on the Moon before December 31, 2025; it is negative if a non-(US, Russia, China) country achieves a gentle landing before Israel and before December 31, 2025; it is ambiguous if no non-(US, Russia, China) country achieves a gentle landing before December 31, 2025.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 125,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Brexit Party win any seats at the next UK General Election?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3252/will-the-brexit-party-win-any-seats-at-the-next-uk-general-election/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "The Brexit Party is a Eurosceptic political party in the UK currently led by Nigel Farage. As the name suggests they are generally considered a single-issue party advocating for a swift Brexit on WTO terms (AKA a 'no-deal' Brexit).\nThe party is, at the time of writing, less than one year old (although can be thought of as the spiritual successor to the UK Independence Party, of which Farage was previously the figurehead). It won the most votes in the UK at the recent European elections - but can that success transfer into a general election where UKIP only ever won one seat? Can the party survive in a post-Brexit political landscape (if such a thing ever comes to pass)? Or will Farage himself finally win a seat at the eighth time of asking?\nWill the Brexit Party win any seats at the next UK General Election?\nThis question resolves positively if the Brexit Party wins one or more seats at the next UK General Election, as reported by the BBC and negatively otherwise. By-elections and defections do not count. \nThis question should close two weeks before the date of the election, which will be, at the latest, 05/05/2022 but may well be much earlier.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 125,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Metaculus be linked to by 70 sites?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3271/when-will-metaculus-be-linked-to-by-70-sites/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "According to Alexa, Amazon's web analytics company, metaculus was linked to by 49 websites as of 2019/10/31.\nWhen will Metaculus be linked to by 70 websites, according to [Alexa analytics results] (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/metaculus.com) ?\nThis question resolves as the date when the number of referral sites, i.e. the number of sites linking to [metaculus.com] (http://metaculus.com) that Alexa's web crawl has found, is at least 70.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 177,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will an AI defeat one of the top-10 StarCraft 2 players?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3272/date-ai-defeats-top-10-starcraft-2-players/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In January the StarCraft 2 playing AI, Alphastar, [defeated professional players 10-1] (https://deepmind.com/blog/article/alphastar-mastering-real-time-strategy-game-starcraft-ii) . \nThis was certainly a major acheivement and milestone. However, there was a question of whether the AI won only due to its ability to learn the game and make intelligent decisions, or also because of the physical limitations of the human opponent.\nThe Google Deepmind team decided to limit Alphastar to a \"max of 22 agent actions per 5 seconds\", which is a rough equivalent to the fastest human players. They have [recently announced] (https://www.deepmind.com/blog/article/AlphaStar-Grandmaster-level-in-StarCraft-II-using-multi-agent-reinforcement-learning) that Alphastar has reached the 'Grandmaster' league - the top 200 players on [Battle.net] (http://Battle.net) 's European server.\nVery impressive, but when will its abilities exceed those of the best humans?\nWhen will an AI defeat one of the world's top ten players in a formal match?\n---The AI must be under Alphastar's current constraints, or stricter. I.e. it can make up to 22 \"agent actions\"* over any five second span. \n---The match must be in the typical format of professional tournaments: three or more games on different maps. The maps must be official Blizzard ladder maps. Alphastar and its opponent can play any race. \n---Whether the player is \"top ten\" will be determined by their ranking on [gosugamers.net] (https://www.gosugamers.net/starcraft2/rankings) on the day of the match. If that site cannot be used for whatever reason, another credible Elo ranking system can be used. \n---If the validity of the match is disputed by Blizzard, it does not count. \nIf positively resolved, closes retroactively 1 hour prior to the beginning of the match in which the defeat occurs.\n*Defined at the very end of [Deepmind's announcement] (https://www.deepmind.com/blog/article/AlphaStar-Grandmaster-level-in-StarCraft-II-using-multi-agent-reinforcement-learning) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 144,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Metaculus be linked to by 130 sites?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3275/when-will-metaculus-be-linked-to-by-130-sites/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "According to Alexa, Amazon's web analytics company, Metaculus was linked to by 49 websites as of 2019/10/31.\nWhen will Metaculus be linked to by 130 websites, according to [Alexa analytics results] (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/metaculus.com) ?\nThis question resolves as the date when the number of referral sites, i.e. the number of sites linking to [Metaculus.com] (http://Metaculus.com) that Alexa's web crawl has found, is at least 130.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 91,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the average overall Global Health Security Index score for 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3277/what-will-be-the-average-overall-global-health-security-index-score-for-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The Global Health Security (GHS) Index is [\"the first comprehensive assessment and benchmarking of health security and related capabilities across the 195 countries that make up the States Parties to the International Health Regulations.\"] (https://www.ghsindex.org/about/) . It assesses countries on their capability to prevent and mitigate epidemics and pandemics based on 140 questions organized across 6 categories, 34 indicators, and 85 subindicators. It uses scores to these questions to create index scores for countries and also an overall GHS Index score for the world. The GHS is a joint project of the Nuclear Threat Initiative, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, and The Economist Intelligence Unit. It was first published in 2019.\nThis question asks: What will be the average overall Global Health Security Index score for 2030?\nIn 2019, the average overall GHS Index score was [40.2 out of a possible score of 100] (https://www.ghsindex.org/report-model/) .\nThis question will resolve to the average overall GHS Index score published in their 2030 report — as in, the report that is published during 2030. If no report is published in 2030, this will resolve to the average overall index score of the most recent report published after 2027. If the most recent report is one that is published in or before 2027, this will resolve ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 28,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many gene-edited babies will have been born worldwide by the end of 2029?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3289/how-many-gene-edited-babies-will-have-been-born-worldwide-by-the-end-of-2029/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Genome editing is a type of genetic engineering in which DNA is inserted, deleted, modified or replaced in the genome of a living organism ( [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome_editing) ). The first gene-edited babies— [Lulu and Nana] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lulu_and_Nana_controversy) —were reportedly born in October 2018.\nThis question asks: How many gene-edited babies will have been born worldwide by the end of 2029?\nQuestion resolves according to birth counts given in the first authoritative report (so judged by the admins) to cover the entire 2029 calendar year, as well as all years preceding it.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 119,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What fraction of babies born in the US in 2029 will have been conceived in vitro?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3290/what-fraction-of-babies-born-in-the-us-in-2029-will-have-been-conceived-in-vitro/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In vitro fertilization (IVF) is a process of fertilization where an egg is combined with sperm outside the human body ( [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro_fertilisation) ). According to the [2015 Assisted Reproductive Technology report] (https://www.cdc.gov/art/pdf/2015-report/ART-2015-National-Summary-Report.pdf) (the latest version of the report currently available), 72,913 IVF babies were born in the US in 2015, out of [a total of 3.98m] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/195908/number-of-births-in-the-united-states-since-1990/) . IVF babies thus accounted for 1.83% of all babies born that year in the United States.\nThis question asks: What fraction of babies born in the US in 2029 will have been conceived in vitro?\nQuestion resolves according to figures given in the 2029 edition of the Assisted Reproductive Technology report. If this report is not issued, the resolution will be determined by figures from the earliest authoritative report (so judged by the admins) to cover the year 2029 and provide IVF birth counts. The number of total babies born in 2029 will be determined by the [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/births.htm) , or if this institute no longer exists, by whichever government entity replaces it.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 74,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many billions of broiler-type chicks will hatch in the U.S., on average per year, over the 2028 to 2030 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3324/how-many-billions-of-broiler-type-chicks-will-hatch-in-the-us-on-average-per-year-over-the-2028-to-2030-period/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The United States has the largest broiler chicken industry in the world with about 17 percent of production exported to other countries in 2018 [(National Chicken Council, 2019)] (https://www.nationalchickencouncil.org/about-the-industry/statistics/broiler-chicken-industry-key-facts/) . Americans consume more chicken than anyone else in the world – more than 93.5 pounds per capita in 2018 – the number one protein consumed in the United States (ibid.). The most recent Census of Agriculture reported 233,770 poultry farms in the United States in 2012 [(USDA, 2015)] (https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nass-poultry-stats-factsheet.pdf) .\nThe number of broiler-type chicks that hatched totalled 9.71 billion in 2018, 9.62 billion in 2017 [(USDA, 2019)] (https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/9306sz28s?locale=en) . This would resolve the question for the 2016-2018 period as 9.51 billion.\nHow many billions of broiler-type chicks will hatch per year, on average, over the 2028-2030 period?\nThis question resolves as the average number of broiler-type chicks hatched in 2028, 2029, and 2030 (in billions) according to data reported by the [US Department of Agriculture] (https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/9306sz28s?locale=en) . Yearly numbers are to be rounded to one decimal place before averaging. The question resolves ambiguous if the USDA no longer publishes this data, or if its methodology is substantially changed.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 61,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many billions of poultry will be slaughtered worldwide, in the calendar year 2030, according to FAO estimates?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3325/how-many-billions-of-poultry-will-be-slaughtered-worldwide-in-the-calendar-year-2030-according-to-fao-estimates/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "According to estimates by [Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2017)] (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QL) , an estimated 70.95 billion poultry were slaughtered in 2017. The term poultry is taken to mean domesticated avian species that can be raised for eggs, meat and/or feathers [(FAO, 2019)] (http://www.fao.org/poultry-production-products/production/poultry-species/en/) . \nHow many billions of poultry will be slaughtered worldwide, in the calendar year 2030, according to FAO estimates?\nResolution\nThis question will resolve based [FAO estimates] (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data/QA/visualize) of the number total poultry produced/slaughtered in the calendar year 2030. The relevant data is generated by the following query: \nRegions: World + (Total), Items Aggregated: Meat, Poultry + (Total), Elements: \"Producing Animals/Slaughtered\"\nForecasts released before December 1st of 2030 do not qualify as estimates.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 89,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will most eggs produced in the USA be sexed before hatching?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3326/when-will-most-eggs-produced-in-the-usa-be-sexed-before-hatching/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Chickens are generally either bred for egg-laying performance, or an ability to fatten and grow quickly. While both males and females are fattened in broiler production, there is currently no economically worthwhile use of the male offspring of egg-laying chickens, as these cannot lay eggs. Therefore, day-old male chicks are destroyed in the layer hatchery [(Krautwald-Junghanns et al., 2017)] (https://academic.oup.com/ps/article/97/3/749/4780252) . Approximately 370 million chicks in North America are culled annually [(Gali et al. 2017a)] (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00216-016-0116-6) .\nAs the red blood cells of birds possess a nucleus, they also carry the genetic sex information. Using spectroscopic techniques, the sex of an egg can be determined three days after it has been fertilised [(Galli et al, 2017b)] (https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/cdbme.2017.3.issue-2/cdbme-2017-0027/cdbme-2017-0027.pdf) . In egg sexing of a chick’s sex while still in the egg is might reduce the number of male chicks that are killed shortly after hatching.\nThere is a substantial effort to develop in ovo technologies at a low enough price to be commercially viable, with companies [reportedly developing the relevant technologies in Germany, Israel, Canada and the Netherlands] (https://www.poultryworld.net/Eggs/Articles/2018/6/Egg-sexing-close-to-market-301797E/) . \nWhen will most eggs produced in the USA be sexed before hatching??\nResolution\nThis resolves as the estimated date when U.S.-based hatcheries that produce at least 50% of the total number of eggs produced in the U.S. eggs that year successfully sex their hen flock replacement eggs, in ovo.\nFor the purposes of this question, successful sexing occurs if: \n1-- \ntechniques are used that correctly identify the sex in a majority of cases, and\n2-- \nat least a majority of those identified to be male are destroyed before hatching.\nEstimates of when this threshold is reached should originate from credible independent sources, preferably by nonprofit research organisations (e.g. the Good Food Institute) or other nonprofit organisations, or governmental organisations, such as the USDA, or FAO, or independent researchers. In case no estimates of when this occurred can be found, an admin should contact the aforementioned types credible independent sources and request these for their relevant staff for credible estimates. In case of multiple estimates, an admin may decide to resolve on the basis of the median. In case no estimates can be sourced, the question shall resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 90,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If Sanders becomes president in 2020, how many unsheltered homeless people will there be in the US at the end of his term?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3328/if-sanders-becomes-president-in-2020-how-many-unsheltered-homeless-people-will-there-be-in-the-us-at-the-end-of-his-term/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "One of the issues that Bernie Sanders is running on is [Housing for All] (https://berniesanders.com/issues/housing-all/) , a collection of policies intended to increase the availability of affordable housing. Of note for this question are his policies listed under the \"end homelessness in America\" heading:\n--- \nPrioritize 25,000 National Affordable Housing Trust Fund units in the first year to house the homeless.\n--- \nDouble McKinney-Vento homelessness assistance grants to more than $26 billion over the next five years to build permanent supportive housing.\n--- \nProvide $500 million in funding to states and localities to provide outreach to the homeless to help connect them to case management and social services to ensure nobody is left behind.\nI am curious about whether these policies will be enacted, and to what extent they will work, so I ask:\nIf Bernie Sanders becomes president in 2020, how many unsheltered homeless people will there be in the US on a single night in 2024?\nJudgement will be by the [AHAR point in time estimate] (https://www.hudexchange.info/homelessness-assistance/ahar/) published in 2024.\nHistorically, these values have been:\n--- \n2014: 175,399\n--- \n2015: 173,268\n--- \n2016: 176,357\n--- \n2017: 190,129\n--- \n2018: 194,467\n",
    "# Forecasts": 97,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any person that has been cryopreserved for more than 1 year be resuscitated or emulated before 2200?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3330/will-any-person-that-has-been-cryopreserved-for-more-than-1-year-be-resuscitated-or-emulated-before-2200/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "52%",
    "Description": "Developing resuscitated technology is perhaps the most integral part of making cryonics viable, but its feasability is highly debated and subject to speculation.\nTo pin the probability of the development of such technology down, this question asks:\nWill any person that has been in cryopreservation for more than 1 year be resuscitated or emulated before the 1st of January 2200?\nFor the purposes of this question, a revived patient must be determined by at least three recognized medical experts (M.D. or PhD in Biology, Neuroscience or equivalent level of education), each of whom is independent of the cryonics organisation responsible for the patient, to be conscious, alert and responsive to questions for at least 12 hours at some point within a year and a day after midnight on the date that the attempt to revive them is made. This would include a whole-brain emulation, but exclude a clone of the original person.\nMoreover, an emulated person is a human brain emulated on a computer, with the emulation being faithful to the original brain. Further details on what counts as a successful whole brain emulation for our purposes may be found in the [resolution conditions for this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2813/when-will-the-first-whole-human-brain-be-successfully-emulated/) .\nRelated question: [“Before 1 January 2050, will any human cryonically preserved for at least 1 year be successfully revived?”] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1626/before-1-january-2050-will-any-human-cryonically-preserved-for-at-least-1-year-be-successfully-revived/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 65,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first person that has been cryopreserved for more than 1 year be resuscitated or uploaded?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3331/when-will-the-first-person-that-has-been-cryopreserved-for-more-than-1-year-be-resuscitated-or-uploaded/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Developing reuscitation technology is perhaps the most integral part of making cryonics viable, but its feasability is highly debated and subject to speculation. And since cryonics organisations can fail and thaw the preserved bodies, it would be better if such technology would be developed earlier rather than later.\nTo find out when such technology will be developed, this question asks: When will the first person that has been in cryopreservation for more than 1 year be resuscitated or uploaded, conditional on this occurring before 1. January 2200?\nFor the purposes of this question, a revived patient must be determined by at least three recognized medical experts (M.D. or PhD in Biology, Neuroscience or equivalent level of education), each of whom is independent of the cryonics organisation responsible for the patient, to be conscious, alert and responsive to questions for at least 12 hours at some point within a year and a day after midnight on the date that the attempt to revive them is made. This would include a whole-brain emulation, but exclude a clone of the original person.\nRelated question: [“Before 1 January 2050, will any human cryonically preserved for at least 1 year be successfully revived?”] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1626/before-1-january-2050-will-any-human-cryonically-preserved-for-at-least-1-year-be-successfully-revived/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 96,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will James Bedford be revived or emulated before 2200?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3332/will-james-bedford-be-revived-or-emulated-before-2200/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "[James Bedford] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Bedford) was the first person to be cryopreserved, and has been in preservation since 1967. He is currently preserved at [Alcor] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcor_Life_Extension_Foundation) .\nHis preservation was rather primitive and late:\nBedford's body was frozen a few hours after his death due to natural causes related to his cancer. […] Compared to those employed by modern cryonics organizations, the use of cryoprotectants in Bedford's case was primitive. He was injected with a solution 15% dimethyl sulfoxide and 85% ringers solution, a compound once thought to be useful for long-term cryogenics […].\nA longer evaluation of his state of preservation in 1991 can be found [here] (https://www.alcor.org/Library/html/BedfordCondition.html) .\nBecause he presents a minimum standard for cryopreservations, and because of his symbolic importance, this question asks: Will James Bedford be reuscitated before 2200?\nFor the purposes of this question, the revival of James Bedford must be determined by at least three recognized medical experts (M.D. or PhD in Biology, Neuroscience or equivalent level of education), each of whom is independent of the cryonics organisation responsible for the patient, to be conscious, alert and responsive to questions for at least 12 hours at some point within a year and a day after midnight on the date that the attempt to revive them is made. This would include a whole-brain emulation, but exclude a clone of the original person.\nRelated questions:\n--- [“Will any person that has been cryopreserved for more than 1 year be reuscitated before 2200?”] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3330/will-any-person-that-has-been-cryopreserved-for-more-than-1-year-be-reuscitated-before-2200/) \n--- [“Before 1 January 2050, will any human cryonically preserved for at least 1 year be successfully revived?”] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1626/before-1-january-2050-will-any-human-cryonically-preserved-for-at-least-1-year-be-successfully-revived/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 71,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the number of people in cryopreservation preserved before 2019 fall to less than 50% of the current value?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3333/when-will-the-number-of-people-in-cryopreservation-preserved-before-2019-fall-to-less-than-50-of-the-current-value/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of 2019-01-01, 411 people had been cryopreserved at various organisations:\n---165 at Alcor ( [list] (https://www.alcor.org/cases.html) ) \n---173 at the Cryonics Institute ( [list] (https://www.cryonics.org/case-reports/) ) \n---66 at KrioRus ( [list] (http://kriorus.ru/en/cryopreserved%20people) ) \n---7 at Oregon Cryonics ( [list] (http://oregoncryo.com/caseReports.html) ) \nFor a total of 411.\nHowever, it seems very unlikely that they will stay in cryopreservation indefinitely: they could be reuscitated one day (as they presumably hoped), but the cryonics organisations could also fail at preserving them (see the early cryonics organisation [The Cryonics Society of California] (https://hpluspedia.org/wiki/Cryonics_organisations#Cryonics_Society_of_California) ).\nTo determine when this will happen, this question asks: When will the number of people in cryopreservation, who were preserved before 2019, fall to 50% of the current number, i.e. to 205?\nResolution details:\n--- \nThis question only considers bodies preserved by Alcor, the Cryonics Institute, KrioRus, and Oregon Cryonics.\n--- \nThis question resolves to the first date when fewer than 205 of the 411 bodies that were preserved before 2019-01-01 are still cryopreserved. Here cryopreserved is taken to mean: cooled to a temperature below -100° C and not structurally damaged irreversibly. This includes thawing, chemical fixation, and other forms of destruction of the brain (such as smashing it). This also includes resucitation.\n--- \nThis question will resolve either by an official statement by the cryonics organisations mentioned above, or any cryonics organisation in possession of any of the 411 bodies, or by credible media reporting by at least 2 major news agencies that either all bodies at these organisations or these bodies specifically have been taken out of cryopreservation.\n--- \nIf any of these organisations dissolves and neither they nor any other cryonics organisation publish an official report of the transfer of these bodies or all bodies at these cryonics organisations, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 59,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a major U.S. supermarket sell “no-kill eggs” in at least 25 states?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3335/when-will-a-major-us-supermarket-sell-no-kill-eggs-in-at-least-25-states/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Chickens are generally either bred for egg-laying performance, or an ability to fatten and grow quickly. While both males and females are fattened in broiler production, there is currently no economically worthwhile use of the male offspring of egg-laying chickens, as these cannot lay eggs. Therefore, day-old male chicks are destroyed in the layer hatchery [(Krautwald-Junghanns et al., 2017)] (https://academic.oup.com/ps/article/97/3/749/4780252) .\nAs the red blood cells of birds possess a nucleus, they also carry the genetic sex information. Using spectroscopic techniques, the sex of an egg can be determined three days after it has been fertilised [(Galli et al, 2017)] (https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/cdbme.2017.3.issue-2/cdbme-2017-0027/cdbme-2017-0027.pdf) . In egg sexing of a chick’s sex while still in the egg is might reduce the number of male chicks that are killed shortly after hatching.\nWhen will a major U.S. supermarket chain sell “no-kill eggs” in at least 25 states?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the date when a major US supermarket chain sells “no-kill eggs” eggs in at least 25 states. “No-kill eggs” are here defined as eggs produced by hens that hatched in a facility that successfully sexes the embryo at least 50% of the time, and subsequently destroys the embryos suspected to be male before hatching.\nA supermarket is here defined as the company that operates physical self-service retail markets that sell foods and household merchandise. The supermarket must sell “no-kill eggs” in one or more physical stores in at least 25 different states. Examples of supermarkets that operate in at least 25 states today are [listed here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cs0GXkqp_OtPCbohgbI-4wsr7S6Tpt11Rt4Wrop-jd8/edit?usp=sharing) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 78,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of U.S. adults will self-report to follow a vegetarian diet in 2028?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3337/what-percentage-of-us-adults-will-self-report-to-follow-a-vegetarian-diet-in-2028/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Vegetarianism is the practice of abstaining from the consumption of meat (red meat, poultry, seafood, and the flesh of any other animal). Vegetarianism may be adopted for various reasons. Objections to eating meat might arise out of concerns for [animal welfare] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_of_eating_meat#Overview_of_the_argument_against_meat_eating) , [animal rights] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_rights) , or be borne out of [religious beliefs] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism_and_religion) . Other motivations for vegetarianism include [health-related] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism#Health_effects) , [environmental] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_vegetarianism) , [cultural] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism#Demographics) , [aesthetic] (http://www.peacecafeangkor.org/vegetarian.htm) or [economic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_vegetarianism) ones.\nThere are different types of vegetarianism: an [ovo-lacto] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ovo-lacto_vegetarianism) vegetarian diet includes both eggs and dairy products, an [ovo-vegetarian] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ovo_vegetarianism) diet includes eggs but not dairy products, and a [lacto-vegetarian] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lacto_vegetarianism) diet includes dairy. By contrast, the vegan diet excludes all animal products, including eggs and dairy.\nIn [a 2019 national survey of 2,027 U.S. adults aged 18 and older] (https://www.vrg.org/nutshell/faq.htm#poll) , commissioned by the Vegetarian Resource Group, 4% of respondents self-reported as vegetarian (or vegan).\nIn a major poll of adults in the U.S. done in 2028, what percentage will self-report to follow any vegetarian diet (including a vegan diet)?\nResolution\nFor the purpose of this question, self-reporting any vegetarian status amounts to agreeing with the proposition \"I never eat meat, fish, seafood, or poultry\". At least 2,000 adults representing a cross section of U.S. adults must be polled. The preferred source is a poll commissioned by the [Vegetarian Resource Group (VRG)] (https://www.vrg.org/nutshell/faq.htm#poll) . If surveys commissioned by the Vegetarian Resource Group are no longer admissible or are discontinued, an admin may decide to consult another poll if i) it surveys a representable cross section of U.S. adults, and ii) at least 2,000 adults are polled, and iii) respondents are asked whether they never eat meat, fish, seafood or poultry. If multiple polls are considered credible by an admin, the admin may choose to resolve as the median percentage of each poll.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 186,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Hong Kong stop being a Special Administrative Region of China?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3338/when-will-hong-kong-stop-being-a-special-administrative-region-of-china/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of question writing, Hong Kong is officially a [Special administrative region of China] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_administrative_regions_of_China) (along with [Macau] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macau) ).\nThe [Hong Kong Basic Law] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hong_Kong_Basic_Law) (the de facto constitution of HK) says in [Chapter II, article 12] (https://www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_2.html) :\nThe Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be a local administrative region of the People's Republic of China, which shall enjoy a high degree of autonomy and come directly under the Central People's Government. \nQuestion: When will Hong Kong stop being a Special Administrative Region of China?\nResolution details:\n---This question resolves upon publication of an official document by the Hong Kong authorities (or Chinese government if the former don't exist anymore) that declares another status for Hong Kong. \n---This question does not resolve from the Special Administrative Region status being merely renamed or slightly tweaked, as judged by a Metaculus admin on the basis of credible media reports. \n---In that last case, the Metaculus admins can choose to resolve ambiguous if the situation is judged to have become too unclear/contentious/intractable. \n---If a relevant declaration is made by some HK authority, but contested by another, a Metaculus admin can choose to delay question resolution until dominance or consensus is reached. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 190,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If Labour wins the 2019 UK general election, what will be mean UK broadband download speeds 5 years later?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3340/if-labour-wins-the-2019-uk-general-election-what-will-be-mean-uk-broadband-download-speeds-5-years-later/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The Labour party has [announced a plan to bring free full-fiber broadband to every home and business in the UK] (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50427369) by partially nationalizing BT. Labour believes that this plan will cost £20bn, though the Conservatives have criticized this, claiming that it is likely to cost £83bn over 10 years and that nationalisation will discourage private investment.\nThe UK's mean download speed is [currently 22.37Mbps] (https://www.cable.co.uk/broadband/speed/worldwide-speed-league/) in 2019, up from 18.57Mbps in 2018; this is in the bottom third of European broadband speeds, due to the slow rollout of full-fiber broadband. Full-fiber broadband itself can reach speeds of [up to 1 Gbps] (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-49253071) .\nIf, in the 2019 election, Labour, or a coalition with Labour making up the majority of seats, forms a government, what will be mean broadband speeds in the UK in 2024?\nJudgement will be by Cable's [Worldwide broadband speed league 2024] (https://www.cable.co.uk/broadband/speed/worldwide-speed-league/) .\n--- [If Conservatives win the 2019 UK general election, what will be mean UK broadband download speeds 5 years later?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3341/if-conservatives-win-the-2019-uk-general-election-what-will-be-mean-uk-broadband-download-speeds-5-years-later/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If Conservatives win the 2019 UK general election, what will be mean UK broadband download speeds 5 years later?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3341/if-conservatives-win-the-2019-uk-general-election-what-will-be-mean-uk-broadband-download-speeds-5-years-later/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The Conservative party plans to [invest £5bn in providing broadband to the hardest-to-reach 20% of the country] (https://www.conservatives.com/sharethefacts/2019/10/gigabit-rural-broadband) , as part of an ambitious plan to [provide full-fiber broadband to every household by 2025] (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-49881168) including places that private investment would otherwise miss.\nThe UK's mean download speed is [currently 22.37Mbps] (https://www.cable.co.uk/broadband/speed/worldwide-speed-league/) in 2019, up from 18.57Mbps in 2018; this is in the bottom third of European broadband speeds, due to the slow rollout of full-fiber broadband. Full-fiber broadband itself can reach speeds of [up to 1 Gbps] (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-49253071) .\nIf, in the 2019 election, Conservatives, or a coalition with Conservatives making up the majority of seats, form a government, what will be mean broadband speeds in the UK in 2024?\nJudgement will be by Cable's [Worldwide broadband speed league 2024] (https://www.cable.co.uk/broadband/speed/worldwide-speed-league/) .\nSee also:\n--- [If Labour wins the 2019 UK general election, what will be mean UK broadband download speeds 5 years later?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3340/if-labour-wins-the-2019-uk-general-election-what-will-be-mean-uk-broadband-download-speeds-5-years-later/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 161,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many members will Giving What We Can have on its 20th anniversary?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3342/how-many-members-will-giving-what-we-can-have-on-its-20th-anniversary/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Today marks the [10th anniversary] (https://www.givingwhatwecan.org/post/2019/11/celebrating-10-years-of-giving-what-we-can/) of [Giving What We Can] (https://www.givingwhatwecan.org/) , a community of people who have pledged to donate at least 10% of their income to the most cost-effective charities. During these ten years, 4,343 members have collectively donated $126,751,939.\nThis question asks: How many members will Giving What We Can have at the end of the day of its 20th anniversary (November 15, 2029)?\nThe question resolves according to official GWWC figures. If the organization ceases to exist in the meantime, the question resolves ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 130,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the exponent of the fastest known polynomial-time matrix multiplication algorithm in 2029?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3343/what-will-be-the-exponent-of-the-fastest-known-polynomial-time-matrix-multiplication-algorithm-in-2029/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The computational complexity class of an algorithm is a measure of how the runtime increases as the input becomes larger. Often, these are written in big-O notation, where an algorithm running in time means that there is some constant for which the runtime will never exceed for an input of length .\nIn the case of [matrix multiplication] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_multiplication) , the best-known algorithm runs in polynomial time; multiplication of two square n×n matrices runs in time for some . Over time, the smallest known ω has been decreasing - faster algorithms have been discovered.\nNaive matrix multiplication, from directly evaluating the sum of the definition, has complexity in time. In 1969, Strassen discovered [Strassen's algorithm] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strassen%27s_algorithm) , which has complexity in . By 1990, the [Coppersmith-Winograd algorithm] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coppersmith%E2%80%93Winograd_algorithm) was discovered, which has complexity in ; this has been improved slightly since, with the current best-known algorithm being Le Gall's, which has complexity in and was discovered in 2014.\nThe best known lower bound on matrix multiplication is ; it is known that there is no algorithm faster than this. So further improvement on Le Gall's algorithm has not yet been ruled out.\nIn 2029, what will be the smallest for which there is known to exist an algorithm to multiply two square n×n matrices which has complexity in ?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 107,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What the percentage of egg-laying hens will be cage-free, in the U.S., in June 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3344/what-the-percentage-of-egg-laying-hens-will-be-cage-free-in-the-us-in-june-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Battery cages] (http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/B/BatteryCages.aspx) , wire-mesh enclosures, are the predominant form of housing for laying hens worldwide [(Leenstra, 2016)] (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291555344_Layer_breeding_programmes_in_changing_production_environments_a_historic_perspective) . Cage reduce aggression and cannibalism among hens, but are barren, restrict movement, or the expression of natural behaviours, and increase rates of [osteoporosis] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osteoporosis) [(Meseret, 2016)] (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311321712_A_review_of_poultry_welfare_in_conventional_production_system) . As of March 2019, cage-free shell egg production accounted for only 18.4% (60.7 million hens) of the current table egg layer flock. By contrast, in the European Union, As of 2017, 49,6% of the total number of laying hens were not in cages [(EU, 2018)] (https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/d/18f7766e-e9a9-46a4-bbec-94d4c181183f/0%20Circa%20%20egg%20no%20links.pdf) .\nWhat the percentage of egg-laying hens will be cage-free, in the U.S., in June 2025?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the percentage of the egg-laying flock that are in any cage-free category in June 2025, according to figures published by the United States Department of Agriculture. For the number of egg-laying hens that are in any cage-free category, we shall use the the estimated \"layer flock size\" of \"all cage-free layers\" for the month July ( [generally published here] (https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/rj4304553?locale=en) in early August). For the total number of egg layers, we use the USDA estimate of the number layers producing table or market type eggs ( [generally published here] (https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/fb494842n?locale=en) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": 138,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Guinea Worm be eradicated by the end of 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3351/will-guinea-worm-be-eradicated-by-the-end-of-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "60%",
    "Description": "Humanity stands at the cusp of eradicating its second disease, [Dracunculiasis] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dracunculiasis) , or Guinea Worm Disease. In 2018, [only 28 cases] (https://www.cartercenter.org/health/guinea_worm/case-totals.html) were reported in humans, worldwide. Sadly, Guinea Worm appears to have [adapted to infecting dogs] (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/18/health/guinea-worms-dogs-chad.html) , reinvigorating wild populations and placing formerly safe communities back at risk. Recognizing the difficulty, [the World Health Organization (WHO) has moved its eradication deadline back from 2020 to 2030] (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02921-w) .\nWill the WHO certify Guinea Worm Eradication worldwide before the end of 2030?\nNote that the [WHO eradication certification] (https://www.who.int/dracunculiasis/ICCDE_about/en/) requires the certified country to have three consecutive years free of any indigenous cases of the disease. Accordingly, this question will close three years prior to the deadline, and will be resolved negatively if any cases are reported anywhere after the beginning of 2028.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 65,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the WHO certify the worldwide eradication of Polio?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3353/when-will-the-who-certify-the-worldwide-eradication-of-polio/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In October 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) [announced the eradication] (https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/two-out-of-three-wild-poliovirus-strains-eradicated) of type 3 [poliomyelitis] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polio) . This followed the eradication of type 2, which was [announced in 2015] (http://polioeradication.org/news-post/global-eradication-of-wild-poliovirus-type-2-declared/) . Only type 1 remains in the wild, but the CDC, WHO, and other involved public health institutions are optimistic that [it can be eradicated soon] (http://polioeradication.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/english-polio-endgame-strategy.pdf) .\nWhen will the WHO certify the worldwide eradication of all three serotypes of poliovirus?\nResolution\nTypes 2 and 3 have already been certified eradicated, but it's not impossible that the wild types could re-emerge naturally. (This [actually happened] (https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/11-08-2016-government-of-nigeria-reports-2-wild-polio-cases-first-since-july-2014) in Nigeria in 2016, two years after the prior last reported natural cases in Africa.) This property of the virus has caused some reticence by the WHO about certifying the eradication--the last known type 2 case was in 1999, but [the WHO didn't certify it until 2015] (http://polioeradication.org/news-post/global-eradication-of-wild-poliovirus-type-2-declared/) . If another wild strain of type 2 or 3 re-emerges before the WHO certifies the worldwide eradication of type 1, this question will not be resolved until the WHO certifies the eradication of type 1 AND recertifies the eradication of the re-emergent type (or publicly declines to de-certify the earlier eradication).\n",
    "# Forecasts": 94,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the mean of the year-over-year growth rate of the sum of teraflops of the all 500 supercomputers in the TOP500 be, in the three year period ending in November 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3357/what-will-the-mean-of-the-year-over-year-growth-rate-of-the-sum-of-teraflops-of-the-all-500-supercomputers-in-the-top500-be-in-the-three-year-period-ending-in-november-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In the seven decades since the invention of the [point-contact transistor] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point-contact_transistor) at Bell Labs, relentless progress in the development of semiconductor devices — Moore’s law — has been achieved despite [regular warnings] (https://www.nature.com/news/the-chips-are-down-for-moore-s-law-1.19338) from industry observers about impending limits.\nThe sum of teraflops of the all 500 supercomputers in the [TOP500] (https://www.top500.org/statistics/perfdevel/) experienced an an average (geometric mean) of 68.9% year-over-year growth since the first TOP500 publication in July of 1993. This growth rate amounts to a doubling time in total computational power of the top 500 supercomputers of roughly 16 months.\nProgress in compute seemed to have peaked in the three year period ending in 2008 at an average of 128.85% year-over-year growth. The weakest growth was in the three year period ending in 2014, at an average of only 30.45%.\nWhat will the mean of the year-over-year growth rate of the sum of teraflops of the all 500 supercomputers in the TOP500 be, in the three year period ending in November 2023 (in percent)?\nResolution\nThe question resolves as the geometric mean of the year-over-year growth rate of the sum of performance on the High Performance Linpack (HPL) benchmark of the all 500 supercomputers in the TOP500, in teraflops, over the three year period ending November 2024. That is, the question resolves as the geometric mean of the growth rates (in %) over the following six periods:\n---Jul 2020 to Jul 2021 \n---Nov 2020 to Nov 2021 \n---Jul 2021 to Jul 2022 \n---Nov 2021 to Nov 2022 \n---Jul 2022 to Jul 2023 \n---Nov 2023 to Nov 2023 \nThe [geometric mean] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_mean) is used, as opposed to the more common arithmetic mean, because this is appropriate for growth that compounds over time.\nData\nHistorical data can [be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jVaqAKzh-f4jAlaNvglp5MX16xd7wi2iVPFvL5Ahzzw/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it. If you make useful additions to the dataset, please share the file in the comments.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 111,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a vegetarian U.S. president by the end of 2036?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3359/will-there-be-a-vegetarian-us-president-by-the-end-of-2036/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "12%",
    "Description": "Vegetarianism is the practice of abstaining from the consumption of meat (red meat, poultry, seafood, and the flesh of any other animal). Vegetarianism may be adopted for various reasons. Objections to eating meat might arise out of concerns for [animal welfare] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_of_eating_meat#Overview_of_the_argument_against_meat_eating) , [animal rights] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_rights) , or be borne out of [religious beliefs] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism_and_religion) . Other motivations for vegetarianism include [health-related] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism#Health_effects) , [environmental] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_vegetarianism) , [cultural] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism#Demographics) , [aesthetic] (http://www.peacecafeangkor.org/vegetarian.htm) or [economic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_vegetarianism) ones.\nVarious notable people who [have been reported] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_vegetarians) to have adhered to a vegetarian diet at some point during their life, such as:\n---Mahatma Gandhi, Indian civil rights activist and political ethicist \n---Voltaire, French philosopher \n---Nikola Tesla, Serbian-American inventor \nAlthough no U.S. president has been a vegetarian during their time in office, various vegetarian U.S. politicians have run for the office of President, such as [Cory Booker] (https://newrepublic.com/article/153085/cory-booker-first-vegan-president) , [Ben Carson] (https://grist.org/food/meet-the-first-vegetarian-president-not/) and [Dennis Kucinich] (https://grist.org/politics/dennis-kucinich-eco-darling-and-veganousted-from-congress/) .\nWill there be a sitting U.S. president who is vegetarian during their time in office, by the end of 2036?\nThis resolves positively if any sitting U.S. president, during their time of holding office, claims that they adhere to any vegetarian diet. A vegetarian diet includes [ovo-lacto] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ovo-lacto_vegetarianism) vegetarianism, [lacto-vegetarian] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lacto_vegetarianism) and veganism.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 213,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will ≥8% of U.S. adults self-report to follow a vegetarian diet before 2036?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3360/will-8-of-us-adults-self-report-to-follow-a-vegetarian-diet-before-2036/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "79%",
    "Description": "Vegetarianism is the practice of abstaining from the consumption of meat (red meat, poultry, seafood, and the flesh of any other animal). Vegetarianism may be adopted for various reasons. Objections to eating meat might arise out of concerns for [animal welfare] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_of_eating_meat#Overview_of_the_argument_against_meat_eating) , [animal rights] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_rights) , or be borne out of [religious beliefs] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism_and_religion) . Other motivations for vegetarianism include [health-related] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism#Health_effects) , [environmental] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_vegetarianism) , [cultural] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism#Demographics) , [aesthetic] (http://www.peacecafeangkor.org/vegetarian.htm) or [economic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_vegetarianism) ones.\nThere are different types of vegetarianism: an [ovo-lacto] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ovo-lacto_vegetarianism) vegetarian diet includes both eggs and dairy products, an [ovo-vegetarian] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ovo_vegetarianism) diet includes eggs but not dairy products, and a [lacto-vegetarian] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lacto_vegetarianism) diet includes dairy. By contrast, the vegan diet excludes all animal products, including eggs and dairy.\nIn [a 2019 national survey of 2,027 U.S. adults aged 18 and older] (https://www.vrg.org/nutshell/faq.htm#poll) , commissioned by the Vegetarian Resource Group, 4% of respondents self-reported as Vegetarian (Including Vegans) \nWill ≥8% of adults in the U.S. self-report to follow a vegetarian diet before Jan 1st, 2036, in a major poll of a representative cross section of U.S. adults?\nResolution\nFor the purpose of this question, self-reporting any vegetarian status amounts to agreeing with the proposition \"I never eat meat, fish, seafood, or poultry\". At least 2,000 adults representing a cross section of U.S. adults must be polled. The source used for the purpose of this question is a poll commissioned by the [Vegetarian Resource Group (VRG)] (https://www.vrg.org/nutshell/faq.htm#poll) . If surveys commissioned by the Vegetarian Resource Group are no longer admissible or are discontinued, an admin may decide to consult other polls if i) there is especially strong evidence that respondents are a representable cross section of U.S. adults, and ii) at least 4,000 adults are polled, and iii) respondents are asked whether they never eat meat, fish, seafood or poultry.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 224,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the mean year-over-year growth rate of the sum of teraflops in the TOP500 decline each 3-year period from 2025 to 2034?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3361/will-the-mean-year-over-year-growth-rate-of-the-sum-of-teraflops-in-the-top500-decline-each-3-year-period-from-2025-to-2034/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "49%",
    "Description": "In the seven decades since the invention of the [point-contact transistor] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point-contact_transistor) at Bell Labs, relentless progress in the development of semiconductor devices — Moore’s law — has been achieved despite [regular warnings] (https://www.nature.com/news/the-chips-are-down-for-moore-s-law-1.19338) from industry observers about impending limits.\nFor the last three decades, the microelectronic industry has benefited enormously from the [MOSFET] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOSFET) miniaturisation. The shrinking of transistors to dimensions below 100 nm enables hundreds of millions transistors to be placed on a single chip. However, it is well-known that the currently most commonly used semiconductor device design method that has dominated for the past two-three decades, planar [CMOS] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CMOS) , runs into serious issues at the microscopic scale. \nOne of these issue arises from practical limits related to 'leak' current at small gate lengths [(Thompson et al, 2006)] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369702106715395#aep-section-id14) . This leakage current wastes power, raises the temperature and, if excessive, can cause the device to fail. Leakage becomes a serious problem when insulating barriers within transistors approach thicknesses of 3 nanometres or so (currently, in 2019, some transistors are ~ 5nm thick). Below that, leakage increases exponentially, rendering the device pretty near useless.\nAdditionally, a thermodynamical effect effect, the increasing of thermal fluctuations ( [Johnson-Nyquist noise] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson%E2%80%93Nyquist_noise) ), may result in increasingly many false bit occurences on the density of transistors on a chip [(Kish, 2002)] (https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0375960102013658?token=DAFEF7A7A274565D5842794BC881A1D1B7E472DD34032AB3672F18D4B961957B75E4A45C536322A0913D01633023164F) .\nTo continue along at the exponential pace of performance progress, manufacturers have added more processors to each chip. For example, modern CPUs have between two and 32 cores, with most processors containing four to eight. In practice, exploiting eight cores means that a problem has to be broken down into eight pieces — which for many algorithms is difficult to impossible. In fact, [Amdahl's law] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl%27s_law) predicts that the theoretical speedup of even the most parallelizable program is limited to at most 20 times.\nThe sum of teraflops of the all 500 supercomputers in the [TOP500] (https://www.top500.org/statistics/perfdevel/) experienced an a geometric mean of 68.9% year-over-year growth since the first TOP500 publication in July of 1993. This growth rate amounts to a doubling time in total computational power of the top 500 supercomputers of roughly 16 months.\nProgress in compute seemed to have peaked in the three year period ending in 2008 at an average of 128.85% year-over-year growth. The weakest growth was in the three year period ending in 2014, at an average of only 30.45%.\nWill the mean year-over-year growth rate of the sum of teraFLOPS in the TOP500 decline each 3-year period from 2025 to 2034?\nResolution\nThe question resolves positively if the geometric mean of the year-over-year (yoy) growth rate (in %) of the sum of performance experienced over each three year period, from 2025 to 2034, is lower than the next. That is, it resolves positively, if: \ngeometric mean(growth rate from 2025 to 2028) &gt; geometric mean(growth rate from 2028 to 2031) &gt; geometric mean(growth rate from 2031 to 2034).\nPerformance here means performance on the High Performance Linpack (HPL) benchmark of the all 500 supercomputers in the TOP500, in teraFLOPS at Rmax (i.e. the maximal LINPACK performance achieved).\nAs the TOP500 publishes two lists each year, to maximally use all available information, a three-year period shall have six yoy growth rates: the yoy growth rate from:\n---Jul year 0 to Jul year 1 \n---Nov year 0 to Nov year 1 \n---Jul year 1 to Jul year 2 \n---Nov year 1 to Nov year 2 \n---Jul year 2 to Jul year 3 \n---Nov year 2 to Nov year 3 \nFor example, the three year period starting in 2025 ending in 2028 will have the following six growth rates:\n---Jul 2025 to Jul 2026 \n---Nov 2025 to Nov 2026 \n---Jul 2026 to Jul 2027 \n---Nov 2026 to Nov 2027 \n---Jul 2027 to Jul 2028 \n---Nov 2027 to Nov 2028 \nThe [geometric mean] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_mean) is used, as opposed to the more common arithmetic mean, because this is appropriate for growth that multiplies over time.\nData\nHistorical data can [be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jVaqAKzh-f4jAlaNvglp5MX16xd7wi2iVPFvL5Ahzzw/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it. If you make useful additions to the dataset, please share the file in the comments.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 39,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Metaculus, or a licensed derivative, be operated as a public site by a publicly traded company by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3364/will-metaculus-or-a-licensed-derivative-be-operated-as-a-public-site-by-a-publicly-traded-company-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "16%",
    "Description": "Some quite successful companies are not publicly traded, such as Cargill, Albertsons and Koch Industries, see Statista's [largest private US companies by revenue] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/549091/largest-private-us-companies-by-revenue/) for further examples.\nHowever, for many companies, \"going public\" is a major milestone. Going public allows company founders to \"cash out\" and diversify their portfolios. It also can allow a company to obtain much greater funding than it might from private sources.\nQuestion: Will Metaculus, or a licensed derivative, be operated as a public site by a publicly traded company by 2030?\nThe obvious case in which this will be true is if the company owning and operating this site, [metaculus.com] (http://metaculus.com) is a publicly traded company. Either Metaculus would go public itself or a portion of the Metaculus company would be purchased by a publicly traded company at a price that would place the company's value as at least $300 million.\nI included operation by a publicly traded company as an option here to handle a situation in which a publicly traded company is making substantial commitment to this technology. That should at least involve license payments to Metaculus of at least $300 million in some year that at least half of which come from publicly traded companies.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 58,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will SpaceX be worth by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3366/what-will-spacex-be-worth-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Space Exploration Technologies Corp.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX) , doing business as SpaceX, is a private American aerospace manufacturer and space transportation services company headquartered in Hawthorne, California. \nSpaceX's achievements include the first privately funded liquid-propellant rocket to reach orbit ( [Falcon 1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_1) in 2008), the first private company to successfully launch, orbit, and recover a spacecraft ( [Dragon] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Dragon) in 2010), the first private company to send a spacecraft to the International Space Station ( [Dragon] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Dragon) in 2012), the first propulsive landing for an orbital rocket ( [Falcon 9] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_9) in 2015), the first reuse of an orbital rocket ( [Falcon 9] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_9) in 2017), and the first private company to launch an object into orbit around the sun ( [Falcon Heavy] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_Heavy) 's payload of a [Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk%27s_Tesla_Roadster) in 2018).\nAs of 2019, the company is developing a vehicle currently known as the [Starship] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship) . This vehicle is intended to enable [ultra low cost launches to LEO and beyond] (https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-flight-passenger-cost-elon-musk.html) , as well as human exploration and settlement of the Moon and Mars. \nFurther, in 2019 SpaceX began deployment of an extremely large satellite constellation known as [Starlink] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink_(satellite_constellation)) , which may ultimately consist of more than 40,000 satellites. The constellation is designed to deliver high-bandwidth, low-latency internet access to everywhere on Earth, and is [due to be fully operational by the late 2020s.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink_(satellite_constellation)#Constellation_design_and_status) Morgan Stanley Research has suggested that successful completion of this megaconstellation [may increase SpaceX's value to $120 billion.] (https://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-future-multibillion-dollar-valuation-starlink-internet-morgan-stanley-2019-9?r=US&amp;IR=T) \nSpaceX's valuation has increased dramatically since the company was formed in 2002, [crossing the $1bn mark in 2010, and reaching a $10bn valuation in 2015.] (https://twitter.com/JonErlichman/status/1196147909647044608) As of 2019, the company is reportedly [valued at $33.3 billion.] (https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/31/spacex-valuation-33point3-billion-after-starlink-satellites-fundraising.html) \nThis question asks: What will SpaceX be worth by 1 January 2030 in billions of nominal US dollars?\nIn the event that SpaceX is a publicly traded company on January 1 2030, this question resolves as the company's market capitalization on that date. In the event that SpaceX is a privately held company on January 1 2030, this question resolves as the most recent credible estimated valuation attributed to the company by a reputable financial news organization. \nIf SpaceX changes its name or corporate structure before this question resolves, including but not limited to in the event of a merger or acquisition, this question should continue to track the value of the renamed company. If SpaceX (or any relevant successor company) ceases to exist before 1 January 2030, or if (as judged by an admin) the company has changed in structure so substantially that it is no longer SpaceX, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 373,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By the end of 2029, will the European Union require commercially farmed fish to be stunned before being slaughtered?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3371/by-the-end-of-2029-will-the-european-union-require-commercially-farmed-fish-to-be-stunned-before-being-slaughtered/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "In the European Union, an estimated 500 million to 1.7 billion farmed fish were killed for human consumption in 2015, comprising a range of species that are slaughtered in a variety of ways ( [CIWF, 2018] (https://www.compassioninfoodbusiness.com/media/7434891/ciwf-2018-report__the-welfare-of-farmed-fish-during-slaughter-in-the-eu.pdf) ). Yet, despite the mounting evidence of fish sentience, and the substantial numbers involved in aquaculture, fish are currently excluded from much of the European Slaughter Regulation ( [European Union, 2009] (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:303:0001:0030:EN:PDF) ). \nThe key principle however, that animals “shall be spared any avoidable pain, distress or suffering during their killing and related operations”, does apply to fish ( [European Union, 2009] (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:303:0001:0030:EN:PDF) ; p.9). Humane slaughter methods should therefore be used, ensuring that fish are effectively stunned prior to killing or killed with a method that guarantees an immediate loss of consciousness.\nThe main farmed species in the EU are: Atlantic salmon, rainbow trout, common carp, European sea bass, gilthead sea bream, turbot, North African catfish, European eel, and Atlantic Bluefin tuna (ordered by greatest tonnage). Humane stunning systems exist or can be developed for all of these, but progress towards this goal varies for each species.( [Compassion in World Farming, 2018] (https://www.compassioninfoodbusiness.com/media/7434891/ciwf-2018-report__the-welfare-of-farmed-fish-during-slaughter-in-the-eu.pdf) )\nThere is legislation in place to regulate the slaughter of animals in the European Union. Yet, while [Council Regulation 1099/2009] (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:303:0001:0030:EN:PDF) (on the protection of animals at the time of killing) includes specific requirements for the slaughter of terrestrial species farmed for food, fish are excluded from much of the recommendations (European Union, 2009). As explained therein, this is due to differences in physiology and slaughter context, and less developed understanding of the stunning process for fish. However, it is stated explicitly that the key principle remains applicable to fish, which states that (Article 3(1)):\nAnimals shall be spared any avoidable pain, distress or suffering during their killing and related operations. \nAccordingly, there is a legal requirement for member states to take action to avoid, or at least minimise, the suffering of fish at slaughter.\nAdvocacy groups have suggested using stunning techniques. In 2009, the Animal Health and Welfare panel (EFSA) recommended the “urgent development of commercial stunning methods to induce immediate (or rapid) unconsciousness in… seabream” ( [EFSA, 2009] (http://edepot.wur.nl/7878) , p. 2).\nHowever, the [Humane Slaughter Association (2018)] (https://www.hsa.org.uk/downloads/hsafishslaughterreportfeb2018.pdf) points out that further development of humane stunning techniques is required for a greater range of species of finfish than current techniques currently permit, to suit their various rearing environments and to minimise handling and movement prior to death which can cause stress and chemical and physical deterioration in product quality.\nBy the end of 2029, will the European Union enact legislation or a directive that requires commercially farmed fish to be stunned before being slaughtered?\nResolution\nThis question resolves positively if by the end of 2029, the European Union enacts legislation or a directive that requires at least 50% of all commercially farmed fish in the European Union to be stunned before slaughter by any method method that renders the fish immobile or unconscious, with or without killing the animal, when or immediately prior to slaughtering them for food. Positive resolution requires this legislation or directive to have come into effect before the end of 2029. Methods for stunning include percussive or electrical stunning. Live chilling, or asphyxiation in any manner (e.g., air, CO2) are not qualifying stunning procedures.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 72,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many countries will be awarded a B or better for farm animal welfare protection by to the Animal Protection Index by end of 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3373/how-many-countries-will-be-awarded-a-b-or-better-for-farm-animal-welfare-protection-by-to-the-animal-protection-index-by-end-of-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "it is estimated that [60% of the biomass of mammals are livestock] (https://www.pnas.org/content/115/25/6506) . The overwhelming majority of these animals are raised in factory farms, where conditions can involve “intense confinement, inhibition of natural behaviors, untreated health issues, and numerous other causes of suffering”.[ [1] (https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/ch5fq73AFn2Q72AMQ/why-animals-matter-for-effective-altruism) ]\nThe [World Animal Protection] (https://api.worldanimalprotection.org/) is [expected to update its assessment] (https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/animals/docs/aw_platform_20190617_pres-12.pdf) of each country and considers a number of indicators which address the key issues relevant to improving animal welfare around the world. One of these issue is the welfare of farm animals. Specifically, the following three factors of welfare of farm animals:\n--- \nProtection of animals’ welfare needs during rearing, such as freedom of movement and freedom to express natural behaviours\n--- \nProtection of animals’ welfare needs during transport\n--- \nProtection of animals’ welfare needs at slaughter, including avoiding unnecessary suffering\nThis 2014 publication of the [Animal Protection Index] (https://api.worldanimalprotection.org/) provides ratings for 50 countries. These countries were selected using statistics published by the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations in their Statistical Yearbook for World and Agriculture 2012, from the countries which are the largest producers of beef, poultry, pork, sheep and goat, milk and eggs.\nIn the 2014 publication of the [Animal Protection Index] (https://api.worldanimalprotection.org/) , for the indicator \"Protecting animals used in farming\" 9 countries were awarded an A (these were: Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, UK, Argentina, Chile, New Zealand), and 7 were awarded a B (these were: Poland, Romania, France, Italy, Spain, Brazil, Mexico). This makes for a total of 16 countries awarded a B or better in 2014.\nHow many countries will be awarded a B or better for farm animal welfare protection by to the Animal Protection Index by end of 2022?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the number of countries that are listed with B or A grades on the indicator for \"protecting animals used in farming\" in the next update of WAP's index, [currently planned to be released in early 2020] (https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/animals/docs/aw_platform_20190617_pres-12.pdf) . This question resolves ambiguously if any of the following cases:\n--- \nthe second edition's indicator grades for \"protecting animals used in farming\" are not issued for any year up to and including 2022 before the end of 2024;\n--- \nthe indicator grades in the next edition of the index for \"protecting animals used in farming\" is not issued for at least 80% of countries considered in the 2014 index release;\n--- \ntwo or more countries that were awarded a B or A grade in the 2014 index release are not issued a grade for \"protecting animals used in farming\" in the next index release.\nThis question shall be retroactively closed and resolved two days before the second edition of the Animal Protection Index is released.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 23,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the either the USA or China improve on their score on an the Animal Protection Index indicator for recognition of animal sentience, by the end 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3374/will-the-either-the-usa-or-china-improve-on-their-score-on-an-the-animal-protection-index-indicator-for-recognition-of-animal-sentience-by-the-end-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "34%",
    "Description": "[Recent work in neuroscience] (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christof-koch/consciousness-is-everywhere_b_1784047.html) suggests that consciousness may not depend on a highly developed cortex, or on any particular brain structure. In 2012, an international group of neuroscientists released \" [The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness] (http://fcmconference.org/img/CambridgeDeclarationOnConsciousness.pdf) ,\" arguing that nonhuman animals (including all mammals, birds, octopuses, and some others) possess the neurological substrates that generate consciousness, and that consciousness and intentionality are not uniquely human attributes.\nIn the US, there is some federal legislation recognising some aspects of animal sentience in some animals. In particular, the preamble to the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act of 1958 explains that the use of humane methods in the slaughter of livestock prevents needless suffering, thereby acknowledging this capacity in non-human animals. However, the legislation does not extend to poultry, fish, rabbits or other animals routinely slaughtered for food.[ [1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humane_Slaughter_Act#Exclusionary_policies) ]\nIn China, the recognition of non-human animal sentience is very limited: [according to Wold Animal Protection] (https://api.worldanimalprotection.org/country/china) , only a couple Chinese legislative articles refer to the humane treatment of animals and measures to ensure that the animals in question do not suffer, whereas most articles regulating the treatment of animals do not.\nIn 2017, the USA produced the most beef and veal, and poultry in the world, whilst China produces the most Pork in the world.[ [2] (https://sentientmedia.org/which-countries-produce-the-most-meat/) ]\nThe [US received a D] (https://api.worldanimalprotection.org/sites/default/files/api_us_report.pdf) and [China received an E] (https://api.worldanimalprotection.org/sites/default/files/api_china_report.pdf) in WAP's 2014 index.\nWill the Animal Protection Index award either the USA or China with a higher grade than received it in the 2014 index for its recognition of animal sentience by the end 2022?\nResolution\nThis question resolves positively if either the USA receives a grade of C or above, or China receives a grade D or above (or both), in the second edition of the Animal Protection Index, [planned to be released in early 2020] (https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/animals/docs/aw_platform_20190617_pres-12.pdf) . This question resolves ambiguously if the grades for China and the USA for the indicator \"Formal Recognition of Animal Sentience\" are not issued before the end of 2022.\nThis question shall be retroactively closed and resolved two days before the second edition of the Animal Protection Index is released.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 28,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a company, in any country, generate $50M revenue from edible insect product sales alone, in a single year?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3375/when-will-a-company-in-any-country-generate-50m-revenue-from-edible-insect-product-sales-alone-in-a-single-year/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Edible insects are insect species used for human consumption, e.g., whole or as an ingredient in processed food products such as burger patties, pasta, or snacks.\nIt is estimated that insect-eating is practised regularly by at least 2 billion people worldwide [(Tao and Li, 2017)] (https://bit.ly/2Y2F69z) . Many of these insects contain amounts of protein, fat, vitamins, and minerals comparable to commonly eaten livestock (ibid.).\nThe global edible insects market [is estimated to be expanding] (https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/04/01/1790970/0/en/7-95-Billion-Edible-Insects-Market-Global-Forecast-to-2030.html) supported by a compound annual growth rate of over 20% during the forecast period of 2019 to 2030. This is reported to be due to various reasons, such as [growing population and decreasing food resources, increasing demand for protein-rich food, the high cost of animal protein] (https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/04/01/1790970/0/en/7-95-Billion-Edible-Insects-Market-Global-Forecast-to-2030.html) , and a [growing demand for the environment friendly protein rich food] (https://www.meticulousresearch.com/product/edible-insects-market-forecast/) ].\nAs of 2015, there were [around a dozen US based edible insect companies] (https://www.bugsolutely.com/yellow-bug-pages/) . Two companies [are reported to have received] (http://filepicker.io/api/file/Q1F6wELwToarmVENWL2c) over a million dollar funding in a single fundraising round.\nWhen will a company, in any country, generate $50M revenue in one year from edible insect product sales alone?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the date when any company generates at least $50M revenue in one year from edible insect products that are for human consumption (i.e. livestock feed and pet food companies are excluded). These products could be whole insects, or any processed food products that with at least a 2% edible insect content by weight. However alcoholic spirits that contain insects do not count as qualifying products.\nReports supporting resolution should come from public company filings, or credible financial news sources.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 84,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will at least 750 companies pledge to maintain a supply chain consistent with the current basic Global Animal Partnership standards for broiler chickens by end of 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3380/when-will-at-least-750-companies-pledge-to-maintain-a-supply-chain-consistent-with-the-current-basic-global-animal-partnership-standards-for-broiler-chickens-by-end-of-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [Global Animal Partnership] (https://globalanimalpartnership.org/) (GAP), a nonprofit which seeks to promote the welfare of farmed animals, has an animal welfare rating program for assessing the welfare of animals on-farm, during transport and at slaughter.\nThis basic part of GAP's standards for broiler chickens is summarized with the slogan: “no cages, no crates, no crowding”, and requires the following:\nChickens are typically housed indoors and must meet a maximum stocking density of 6.0 lbs/ft2 by 1 July 2020. Producers are required to manage the environment to maintain litter, air quality and provide chickens with environmental enrichment. Environmental enrichments are materials that are provided to chickens to add complexity to their environment and encourage the expression of natural behavior (such as pecking, scratching, exploration and play behavior).[ [1] (https://globalanimalpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/GAP-Standard-for-Meat-Chickens-v3.1-20180403.pdf) ]\nAs of writing this question, [228 companies worldwide have pledged to adhere to the basic part of GAP standards for broiler chickens] (https://awesome-table.com/-L1TTxtnoRIENQZ48vAe/view?filterK=Broiler) . \nWhen will at least 750 companies pledge to maintain a supply chain consistent with the current basic GAP standards for broiler chickens raised for meat, within a timeline ending no later than 2030?\nResolution\nCompanies need to commit to removing the poultry that are not produced in line with GAP's standards for broiler chickens from their supply chains. This resolves as the date when at least 750 companies pledge to adhere to having supply chains consistent with GAP's welfare standards within a timeline that ends in or before the year 2030. Resolution will be based on [the data reported by Chicken Watch] (https://chickenwatch.org/progress-tracker/?filterM=Broiler) . The current number can be found by entering the query issue \"Broiler\", with the timeline ending in or before the year 2030.\nThis question resolves as &gt; Dec 31, 2030 if fewer than 750 companies pledge to maintain a supply chain consistent with the current basic Global Animal Partnership standards for broiler chickens by end of 2030.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 89,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will 5,000 companies worldwide pledge to remove cages from their egg supply chains?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3381/when-will-5000-companies-worldwide-pledge-to-remove-cages-from-their-egg-supply-chains/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Battery cages] (http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/B/BatteryCages.aspx) , wire-mesh enclosures, are the predominant form of housing for laying hens worldwide [(Leenstra, 2016)] (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291555344_Layer_breeding_programmes_in_changing_production_environments_a_historic_perspective) . Cage reduce aggression and cannibalism among hens, but are barren, restrict movement, or the expression of natural behaviours, and increase rates of [osteoporosis] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osteoporosis) [(Meseret, 2016)] (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311321712_A_review_of_poultry_welfare_in_conventional_production_system) . In the European Union, as of 2017, 197.6 million laying hens were not in cages, amounting to 49,6% of the total number of laying hens [(EU, 2019)] (https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/d/18f7766e-e9a9-46a4-bbec-94d4c181183f/0%20Circa%20%20egg%20no%20links.pdf) .\n[According to ChickenWatch's] (https://chickenwatch.org/progress-tracker/) progress tracker, as of the 28th of November, 2019, 1753 companies worldwide have pledged to remove cages from their egg supply chains.\nWhen will 5,000 companies worldwide have pledged to remove cages from their egg supply chains?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the date when will 5,000 companies worldwide have pledged to remove cages from their shell egg and chicken or chicken \"ingredients\" supply chains within any timeline. Reporting should come from [ChickenWatch's progress tracker] (https://chickenwatch.org/progress-tracker/) . If ChickenWatch no longer maintains its progress tracker, another source may be consulted, or the question should be resolved ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 74,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the earliest preservation date of any resuscitated cryonics patient be?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3382/what-will-the-earliest-preservation-date-of-any-resuscitated-cryonics-patient-be/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "One of the most commonly voiced criticisms against cryonics is the argument that current cryonics practices don't preserve enough information to make resuscitated possible ( [Hendricks 2015] (https://www.technologyreview.com/s/541311/the-false-science-of-cryonics/) ). Cryonics organisations [disagree] (https://alcor.org/sciencefaq.htm#brain) .\nTo shed more light on the question, it is thus asked:\nWhat will the earliest preservation date of any cryonics patient resuscitated or emulated before 2200 be?\nResolution\n--- \nThis question resolves as the earliest cryopreservation date of any cryonics patient to have been resuscitated or emulated before 2200.\n--- \nThis question resolves ambiguous if no cryonics patient is successfully resuscitated or emulated before December 1st, 2200.\n--- \nFor the purpose of this question, we define a cryonics patient as a person who has cryopreserved for at least 1 year.\n--- \nFor the purpose of this question, emulation is defined by the success criteria of [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2813/when-will-the-first-whole-human-brain-be-successfully-emulated/) .\n--- \nTo be successfully resuscitated, the patient must be determined by at least three recognized medical experts (M.D. or PhD in Biology, Neuroscience or equivalent level of education), each of whom is independent of the cryonics organisation responsible for the patient, to be conscious, alert and responsive to questions for at least 12 hours at some point within a year and a day after midnight on the date that the attempt to revive them is made. Should the successful revival be [startlingly obvious] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1626/before-1-january-2050-will-any-human-cryonically-preserved-for-at-least-1-year-be-successfully-revived/#comment-14354) (to be judged by the metaculus community at large), these conditions need not be fulfilled.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 87,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the largest number of digits of π to have been computed be, by the end of 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3384/what-will-the-largest-number-of-digits-of-%25CF%2580-to-have-been-computed-be-by-the-end-of-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The number π is a mathematical constant, defined as the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. Being an irrational number, π cannot be expressed as a common fraction.\nIn March, 2019, Emma Haruka Iwao computed π to 31,415,926,535,897 () decimal places. A chronology of computed numerical values of π can [be found on the dedicated wikipedia page] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_computation_of_%CF%80) .\nWhat will the largest number of digits of π to have been computed be, by the end of 2025?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 171,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will humanity maintain a continuous off-Earth presence until 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3385/will-humanity-maintain-a-continuous-off-earth-presence-until-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "75%",
    "Description": "Since October 31 2000, the date [Soyuz TM-31] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz_TM-31) lifted off from the Baikonur Cosmodrome carrying the members of [Expedition 1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expedition_1) , the first long-duration ISS crew, humanity has maintained a permanent off-Earth presence for more than 19 years.\nThis question asks: Will humanity maintain an off-Earth presence continuously until 1 January 2050?\nFor a positive resolution, at least one living and conscious biological human must be physically located at some point beyond 100km altitude above Earth's mean sea level at all times continuously until 1 January 2050. This could include persons aboard spacecraft and space stations, as well as persons on any astronomical object other than Earth (e.g. Moon or Mars explorers / settlers). \nIf the number of living and conscious biological humans off-Earth drops to zero at any time before 1 January 2050, this question resolves negatively. [EM] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Age_of_Em) s, artificial intelligence systems, humans in suspended animation or cryopreservation, and all other instances of either wholly non-biological or non-conscious humans will not count for the purposes of this question. Humans who are merely sleeping will be considered conscious for the purposes of this question.\nHowever, biological humans with some degree of cybernetic augmentation ( [brain implants] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_implant) , artificial limbs or organs, etc) will suffice, so long as they could still reproduce with un-augmented humans.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 223,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a US consumer be unable to purchase a Cavendish banana at a major US grocery chain on 2029-12-31?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3386/will-a-us-consumer-be-unable-to-purchase-a-cavendish-banana-at-a-major-us-grocery-chain-on-2029-12-31/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "In 1965, the [Gros Michel Banana] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gros_Michel_banana) was declared \"commercially extinct\", owing to a world-wide outbreak of [Fusarium Wilt] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_disease) (or Panama Disease). [Fusarium] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusarium_oxysporum_f.sp._cubense) , a deadly fungus, had devastated commercial plantations worldwide. In spite of its greater vulnerability to rough handling, Commercial growers replaced the Gros Michel with the [Cavendish Banana] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_banana) because of its robustness to Fusarium infection.\nThen, in the early 1990's, a new strain of Fusarium (called Tropical Race 4, or TR4) [was discovered] (http://www.promusa.org/Tropical+race+4+-+TR4#Origin) killing off Cavendish trees in plantations in Indonesia and Malaysia. Later studies confirmed that [Cavendish trees are highly susceptible to TR4 infection.] (https://web.archive.org/web/20140407090355/http://banana-networks.org/bapnet/files/2012/11/Risk-Assessment-EAHB1.pdf) In 2003, the [International Network for the Improvement of Banana and Plantain] (http://www.promusa.org/INIBAP) [predicted] (https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg17723784-800-going-bananas/) that the Cavendish could face extinction within 10 years. Obviously that hasn't happened yet. However, [in August 2019] (https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/08/16/751499719/devastating-banana-fungus-arrives-in-colombia-threatening-the-fruits-future) , [TR4 was found killing off Cavendish trees in Colombian Plantations] (https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/08/banana-fungus-latin-america-threatening-future/) , prompting the Colombian Government to declare a state of emergency.\nHope remains that [a genetically modified Cavendish] (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-01670-6) can be developed to maintain global banana supply. Others hope that another natural type of banana can be identified to replace the Cavendish.\nWill a US consumer be unable to purchase a Cavendish banana at a major US grocery chain on 2029-12-31?\nA few fine points:\n---This question resolves positively Cavendish bananas are unavailable on on 2029-12-31. \n---The question resolves negatively if Cavendish bananas are still available (regardless of whether they're genetically modified or not). \n---This question will be resolved on 2029-12-31. Interruptions to the global banana supply prior to that date will not trigger an early positive resolution. \n---\"Available\" means that such bananas can be purchased from an ordinary grocery store (e.g. Wal-mart, Kroger, etc.). Niche markets (e.g. specialist fruit wholesalers, non-franchise farmer's markets, or stores which might carry Gros Michel bananas in 2019) will not be sufficient for a positive resolution. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 71,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of U.S. adults will self-report to follow a vegan diet in 2028?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3388/what-percentage-of-us-adults-will-self-report-to-follow-a-vegan-diet-in-2028/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Dietary veganism is the practice of abstaining from the consumption of animal products (including dairy and egg products). Veganism may be adopted for various reasons. Objections to eating might might arise out of concerns for [animal welfare] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_of_eating_meat#Overview_of_the_argument_against_meat_eating) , [animal rights] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_rights) , or be borne out of [religious beliefs] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism_and_religion) . Other motivations for vegetarianism include [health-related] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism#Health_effects) , [environmental] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_vegetarianism) , [cultural] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetarianism#Demographics) , [aesthetic] (http://www.peacecafeangkor.org/vegetarian.htm) or [economic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_vegetarianism) ones.\nIn [a 2019 national survey of 2,027 U.S. adults aged 18 and older] (https://www.vrg.org/nutshell/faq.htm#poll) , commissioned by the Vegetarian Resource Group, 2% of respondents self-reported as dietary vegans.\nIn a major poll of adults in the U.S. done in 2028, what percent will self-report to follow a vegan diet?\nResolution\nFor the purpose of this question, self-reporting any vegetarian status amounts to agreeing with the proposition \"I never consume meat, fish, seafood, or poultry, dairy or eggs\". At least 2,000 adults representing a cross section of U.S. adults must be polled. The preferred source is a poll commissioned by the [Vegetarian Resource Group (VRG)] (https://www.vrg.org/nutshell/faq.htm#poll) . If surveys commissioned by the Vegetarian Resource Group are no longer admissible or are discontinued, an admin may decide to consult another polls if i) it polls a representable cross section of U.S. adults, and ii) it polls at least 2,000 adults, and iii) iii) respondents are asked whether they never eat meat, fish, seafood or poultry.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 216,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of fish produced worldwide will be stunned prior to slaughter, in the first year in which credible estimates are published in the five year period starting in 2027",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3389/what-percentage-of-fish-produced-worldwide-will-be-stunned-prior-to-slaughter-in-the-first-year-in-which-credible-estimates-are-published-in-the-five-year-period-starting-in-2027/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Stunning is the process of rendering animals immobile or unconscious, with or without killing the animal, when or immediately prior to slaughtering them for food to eliminate pain, discomfort and stress from the procedure [(FAO, 2001)] (http://www.fao.org/3/x6909e/x6909e09.htm) .\nIn the EU, [Council Regulation 1099/2009] (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:303:0001:0030:EN:PDF) requires that all animals to be killed for human consumption must be stunned before they are slaughtered, meaning that they should be unconscious when they are killed to avoid suffering. There are, however, some exceptions to this rule, founded on the cultural traditions or religious rites of a number of sectors of the populations [(EU, 2019)] (https://ec.europa.eu/food/animals/welfare/practice/slaughter_en) .\nYet, while includes specific requirements for the slaughter of terrestrial species farmed for food, fish are excluded from much of the recommendations (European Union, 2009) due to differences in physiology and slaughter context, and less developed understanding of the stunning process for fish.\nSimilarly, in the U.S., the [Humane Slaughter Act] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humane_Slaughter_Act) requires animals should be stunned into unconsciousness prior to their slaughter but this excludes poultry, fish, rabbits. \nAdvocacy groups have suggested using stunning techniques. In 2009, the Animal Health and Welfare panel (EFSA) recommended the “urgent development of commercial stunning methods to induce immediate (or rapid) unconsciousness in… seabream” ( [EFSA, 2009] (http://edepot.wur.nl/7878) , p. 2).\nThe [Humane Slaughter Association (2018)] (https://www.hsa.org.uk/downloads/hsafishslaughterreportfeb2018.pdf) points out that further development of humane stunning techniques is required for a greater range of species of finfish than current techniques currently permit, to suit their various rearing environments and to minimise handling and movement prior to death which can cause stress and chemical and physical deterioration in product quality.\nAccording to an appropriately named expert on fish stunning, van de Vis, [currently 3 to 4% of farmed fish stunned globally] (https://veterinaryrecord.bmj.com/content/185/3/70) .\nWhat percentage of fish produced in aquaculture worldwide will be estimated to be stunned prior to slaughter, in the first year in which credible estimates are published in the five year period starting in 2027?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the percentage of fish produced in aquaculture worldwide estimated to be stunned in the first calendar year between 2027 and 2032 (inclusive) for which both credible estimates of the number of fish stunned worldwide in aquacultural production are available, and credible estimates for the total number of fish produced by aquacultural production are available.\nFor the purpose of this question, credible estimates, should be those in research deemed sufficiently rigorous and reliable for an admin to judge that there is ≥90% chance for the true number to be within 25% of the median of the estimate. \nStunning here refers to any method method that renders the fish immobile or unconscious, with or without killing the animal, when or immediately prior to slaughtering them for food, such as by percussive or electrical stunning. Live chilling, or asphyxiation in any manner (e.g., air, CO2) are not qualifying stunning procedures.\nIn the case multiple estimates are found upon resolving, the admin may choose to resolve this question as the median of different estimates, or resolve it per the estimate deemed most credible. \nIn case there are at least three objections from predictors to the admin's preferred resolution, the admin should consult one or more researchers with at least one publication related to national or global fish production, or fish stunning, who shall arbitrate the dispute.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 43,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will DNA testing vindicate Jeanne Calment as the oldest recorded person in history?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3393/will-dna-testing-vindicate-jeanne-calment-as-the-oldest-recorded-person-in-history/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "To facilitate discussion, in what follows the names 'Jeanne Calment' and 'Yvonne Calment' refer to the women born in 1875 and 1898, respectively, regardless of when these women died; and the name 'Mme Calment' refers to the woman who died in 1997, regardless of when she was born.\nJeanne Calment (born 21 February 1875) was, until recently, widely considered to have died on 4 August 1997 and to be, as such, the oldest verified person in history, reaching the remarkable age of 122 years and 164 days. In 2018, Russian mathematician Nikolay Zak—prompted by Valery Novoselov, an assistant professor of gerontology and geriatrics at RUDN University in Moscow—uploaded a paper to ResearchGate, subsequently [published] (http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/rej.2018.2167) in the journal Rejuvenation Research, challenging this view. Zak argued that the person who died in 1997 was Jeanne Calment's daughter, Yvonne Calment (born 29 January 1898), who upon Jeanne's death in 1934 assumed her official identity for tax evasion purposes.\nVersions of this “identity switch hypothesis” had been advanced in the past (including by [fellow Metaculites] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/348/will-one-of-the-verified-oldest-living-persons-in-the-world-reach-120-years-old-by-the-23rd-of-march-2024/#comment-2084) ), but it was only with the publication of Zak’s paper and its popularization and further development by life-extension activist Yuri Deigin in [a series of blog posts] (http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000148.s001) that the thesis attracted widespread attention and discussion. The main facts adduced in support of this hypothesis are, to quote from Gwern's useful [summary] (https://www.gwern.net/Questions#jeanne-calment) , \"the suspiciousness of the Calment family archives being destroyed by them, some anomalies in Calment’s passport, oddities in family arrangements, apparent inconsistency of Calment’s recollections &amp; timing of events &amp; photos, facial landmarks like ear features not seeming to match up between young/old photos, and an obscure 2007 accusation in a French book that a French bureaucrat and/or the insurance company had uncovered the fraud but the French state quietly suppressed the findings because of Calment’s national fame.\"\nThe response of the professional community of demographers has been generally skeptical. Jean-Marie Robine, a respected scholar who co-validated Calment's longevity record, was [particularly critical] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/01/12/how-madame-calment-worlds-oldest-person-became-fuel-russian-conspiracy-theory/) : \"You can talk with any scholar, who would say, we would not accept this even from a student. It’s not scientific, there’s no methodology, no hypothesis, no nothing.\" His colleague and co-author Michel Allard also criticized the study, though he [noted] (https://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFKCN1OX14T) that \"even if far-fetched, the Russians’ conclusions should be given consideration.\" After a \"rather tense\" meeting of the National Institute for Demographic Studies in early 2019, longevity experts from France, Swiss and Belgium concluded that an exhumation may be needed to settle the controversy.\nMore recently, it has been discovered that blood samples taken from Mme Calment have been preserved by the [Fondation Jean Dausset-CEPH] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fondation_Jean_Dausset-CEPH) in Paris. Furthermore, [researcher Phil Gibbs] (https://the110club.com/did-jeanne-calment-really-reach-122-t3663-s315.html#p40063394) and [gerontologist Aubrey De Grey] (https://www.connexionfrance.com/French-news/DNA-blood-test-could-reveal-if-Jeanne-Calment-was-really-122) independently noted that, because of inbreeding, Yvonne Calment had only 12 great-great-grandparents, whereas Jeanne Calment had the usual 16. Thus, the true identity of Mme Calment could be straightforwardly established by conducting a single DNA test on a blood sample already in possession of a laboratory.\nIn light of this, we now ask: Conditional on relevant DNA tests being carried out, will it be shown that Mme Calment was Jeanne Calment?\n\nResolution\n----------\n\nThe question will resolve before the official resolution date (January 1, 2030) if and when the results of a DNA test of Mme Calment, following either an exhumation of her body or an analysis of a preserved blood sample, are officially announced. The resolution will then be determined as follows:\n1-- \nIf the DNA of the exhumed body or the blood sample is shown to be that of someone with 12 great-great-grandparents, the question resolves negative; if it is shown the be that of someone with 16 great-great-grandparents, it resolves positive; otherwise, it resolves ambiguous.\n2-- \nIf the official body of Yvonne Calment is also exhumed and tested, the question resolves negative if DNA testing shows Mme Calment to be Yvonne Calment, and positive otherwise.\n3-- \nIn the unlikely event that both of the criteria above become relevant and yield inconsistent resolutions, the question will resolve according to criterion (2).\nIn all these cases, the question will retroactively close one week before the test results are officially announced.\nIf the question doesn't resolve before the official resolution date, it will resolve ambiguous.\n\nFurther reading\n---------------\n\nIn addition to the writings listed above, readers may want to consult the following papers:\n--- \nZak &amp; Gibbs, [A Bayesian Assessment of the Longevity of Jeanne Calment] (http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/rej.2019.2227) (in favor of the ID switch hypothesis).\n--- \nRobine, Allard, Herrmann &amp; Jeune, [The Real Facts Supporting Jeanne Calment as the Oldest Ever Human] (http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glz198) (against the ID switch hypothesis).\n",
    "# Forecasts": 146,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any OECD country achieve a 10% or greater reduction in the national rate of obesity for 3 consecutive years before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3397/large-obesity-drop-in-oecd-country-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "According to the OECD's [2017 Obesity Update] (https://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/Obesity-Update-2017.pdf) (PDF), [more than one in two adults and nearly one in six children are overweight or obese in the OECD area.] (https://www.oecd.org/health/obesity-update.htm) The obesity epidemic spread further in the five years leading up to 2017, although at a slower pace than before. Despite this, projections show a continuing increase of obesity in all OECD countries. \nA nearly tenfold variation in obesity rates can be seen across OECD countries; as of 2016, in Japan the rate of obesity was just 4.2%, while in the US it was 40%. (See [a graphic on this page] (https://www.oecd.org/health/obesity-update.htm) for full OECD obesity rates).\nThis question asks: Will any OECD country achieve a 10% or greater proportional reduction in the national rate of obesity, as compared to levels reported by the OECD for 2016, for three consecutive years before 1 January 2030?\nResolution should cite a data release (from either the OECD itself or any of its 36 member states) that demonstrates that the national obesity rate of any OECD member country has fallen by 10% or more from 2016 levels for three consecutive years before 2030.\nThis question refers to the percentage of the total adult population (aged 15 years and over) considered obese. Note that we're looking for a 10% proportional drop (e.g. if the initial percentage is 20%, we'd be looking for a fall to 18%; if it were 40%, we would be looking for a drop to 36%).\nIn the event of a positive resolution, the question should close retroactively one day prior to the release of information that causes the positive resolution.\nIf one year goes unreported for a country, the years on each side are still considered consecutive. If the gap is greater than one year, the years on each side are not considered consecutive.\nChangelog:\n---2020-09-17: added requirement for consecutive years, to mitigate noisy data. See [this thread] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3397/will-any-oecd-country-achieve-a-10-or-greater-reduction-in-the-national-rate-of-obesity-before-2030/#comment-39924) . \n",
    "# Forecasts": 170,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the last Metaculus question resolution occur?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3399/when-will-the-last-metaculus-question-resolution-occur/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Important notice: You will probably not get any points from this question. Please predict your best guess anyway.\nFrom [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaculus) :\nMetaculus is a reputation-based, massive online prediction solicitation and aggregation engine. One of the focuses of Metaculus is predicting the timing, nature and impact of scientific and technological advances and breakthroughs.\nAnd:\nPhysicists Greg Laughlin, Anthony Aguirre and data scientist Max Wainwright launched the site in 2015.\nSince the beginnings of this august endeavor are so well documented, it's only fair that its future should be well predicted.\nQuestion: When will the last Metaculus question resolution occur?\nResolution details:\n--- \n\"the last Metaculus question resolution\" is here defined as either:\n------Any resolution that occurs with at least X consecutive years without any other resolutions afterwards, where X is 8 times the age of Metaculus at time of said resolution. \n------The resolution of this question by a Metaculus Admin, tidying up because Metaculus is closing down for good. \n--- \nWhen this has not occurred in the year 3000, this question resolves to &gt; 3000.\n--- \nIf Metaculus evolves so much that either \"resolution\" or \"Metaculus question\" becomes ill-defined (as judged by a Metaculus Admin), this resolves ambiguous.\n--- \nIf the concepts of \"when\", \"will\", \"last\" or \"occur\" become ill-defined, this question resolves to the 15th of October 2498 (the last total solar eclipse of the 25th century according to [NASA] (https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEcat5/SE2401-2500.html) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": 94,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will our global atmospheric CO₂ concentration over the 2020 to 2023 period be on path to limit warming to 1.4°C by mid-century?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3409/will-our-global-atmospheric-co%25E2%2582%2582-concentration-over-the-2020-to-2023-period-be-on-path-to-limit-warming-to-14c-by-mid-century/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11%",
    "Description": "A Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) is a greenhouse gas concentration trajectory adopted by the IPCC for its [fifth Assessment Report (AR5)] (https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/) in 2014. These four pathways are prominently considered in IPCC climate modelling and research, which describe different climate futures, all of which are considered possible depending on how much greenhouse gases are emitted in the years to come.\nPathway RCP4.5 is a scenario of long-term, global emissions of greenhouse gases, short-lived species, and land-use-land-cover which stabilizes global CO₂ atmospheric concentration at approximately 650 ppm CO2-equivalent, in the year 2100 without ever exceeding that value [(Thomson et al., 2011)] (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4) .\nPathway RCP4.5 limits mid-century (2046–2065) global mean temperature increase to 1.4°C with a likely range of 0.9°C to 2.0°C (95% confidence interval). Moreover, it limits end-of-century (2081–2100) global mean temperature increase to 1.8°C with a likely range of 1.1°C to 2.6°C (95% confidence interval) [(IPCC, 2013)] (http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf) .\nOver the 2020 to 2023 period (inclusive), the RCP4.5 corresponds to an average of 414.52 parts-per-million (ppm) of global CO₂ atmospheric concentration each year [(Meinshausen et al. 2011)] (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z) . Over the 2024 to 2027 period, it corresponds to an average of 423.89 ppm of global CO₂ atmospheric concentration each year (ibid.).\nWill the average global CO₂ atmospheric concentration be less than 414.52 parts-per-million (ppm) over the 2020 to 2023 period (inclusive)?\nResolution\nThis question resolves positively if the arithmetic mean of the annual mean CO₂ concentration over the 2020 to 2023 period (inclusive) is less than or equal to 414.52 ppm, as reported by [Earth System Research Laboratory] (https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/data.html) .\nData\n--- \n[Data on global CO₂ atmospheric concentration may be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EdkfP-2bW1vbM47yj9LWSRXiNGryTGCa-DWCDu23Dz8/edit?usp=sharing) . \n--- \n[Data on atmospheric concentration along RCP pathways may be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1G0lBi3-GdU8oGCqzMyXs1VywGZCuY70eFyn2ty4a2Ag/edit?usp=sharing) . It may also be [downloaded from here] (http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~mmalte/rcps/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 87,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will our global atmospheric CO₂ concentration over the 2024 to 2027 period be on path to limit warming to 1.4°C by mid-century?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3410/will-our-global-atmospheric-co%25E2%2582%2582-concentration-over-the-2024-to-2027-period-be-on-path-to-limit-warming-to-14c-by-mid-century/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "9%",
    "Description": "A Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) is a greenhouse gas concentration trajectory adopted by the IPCC for its [fifth Assessment Report (AR5)] (https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/) in 2014. These four pathways are prominently considered in IPCC climate modelling and research, which describe different climate futures, all of which are considered possible depending on how much greenhouse gases are emitted in the years to come.\nPathway RCP4.5 is a scenario of long-term, global emissions of greenhouse gases, short-lived species, and land-use-land-cover which stabilizes global CO₂ atmospheric concentration at approximately 650 ppm CO2-equivalent, in the year 2100 without ever exceeding that value [(Thomson et al., 2011)] (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4) .\nPathway RCP4.5 limits mid-century (2046–2065) global mean temperature increase to 1.4°C with a likely range of 0.9°C to 2.0°C (95% confidence interval). Moreover, it limits end-of-century (2081–2100) global mean temperature increase to 1.8°C with a likely range of 1.1°C to 2.6°C (95% confidence interval) [(IPPC, 2013)] (http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf) .\nOver the 2020 to 2023 period (inclusive), the RCP4.5 corresponds to an average of 414.52 parts-per-million (ppm) of global CO₂ atmospheric concentration each year [(Meinshausen et al. 2011)] (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z) . Over the 2024 to 2027 period, it corresponds to an average of 423.89 ppm of global CO₂ atmospheric concentration each year (ibid.).\nWill the average global CO₂ atmospheric concentration be less than 423.89 parts-per-million (ppm) over the 2024 to 2027 period (inclusive)?\nResolution\nThis question resolves positively if the arithmetic mean of the annual mean CO₂ concentration over the 2024 to 2027 period (inclusive) is less than or equal to 423.89 ppm, as reported by [Earth System Research Laboratory] (https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/data.html) .\nData\n--- \n[Data on global CO₂ atmospheric concentration may be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EdkfP-2bW1vbM47yj9LWSRXiNGryTGCa-DWCDu23Dz8/edit?usp=sharing) . \n--- \n[Data on atmospheric concentration along RCP pathways may be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1G0lBi3-GdU8oGCqzMyXs1VywGZCuY70eFyn2ty4a2Ag/edit?usp=sharing) . It may also be [downloaded from here] (http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~mmalte/rcps/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 85,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many millions of pigs will be slaughtered worldwide, in the calendar year 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3414/how-many-millions-of-pigs-will-be-slaughtered-worldwide-in-the-calendar-year-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "According to estimates by [Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2017)] (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QL) , an estimated 1,485 million pigs were slaughtered in 2017. \nHow many millions of pigs will be slaughtered worldwide, in the calendar year 2030, according to FAO estimates?\nResolution\nThis question will resolve based [FAO estimates] (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data/QL) of the number total pigs produced/slaughtered in the calendar year 2030. The relevant data is generated by the following query: \nRegions: World + (Total), Items: Meat, pig, Elements: \"Producing Animals/Slaughtered\"\nForecasts released before December 1st of 2030 do not qualify as estimates.\nData\nHistorical data can [be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M3MpDDwTTOJMrhnPJYkAjWyk4YgirO5b0A8g-JCEZ9I/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it. If you make useful additions to the dataset, please share the file in the comments.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 94,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Alexei Navalny to become president or prime minister of Russia in his lifetime?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3416/alexei-navalny-to-become-president-or-prime-minister-of-russia-in-his-lifetime/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "[Alexi Navalny] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexei_Navalny) is among the most prominent critics of the Russian government and its president [Vladimir Putin] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin) . He has repeatedly run for president, including most recently in [2018] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Alexei_Navalny_presidential_campaign) . Vladimir Putin has served as both president and prime minister of Russia.\nIt may seem far-fetched to imagine Navalny becoming president in the near future (as he has been barred from running for the office). Historically, however, leaders of opposition movements have gained power, as for example was the case with [Nelson Mandela] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_Mandela) . Indeed, a [large majority] (https://www.statista.com/chart/9776/how-russians-feel-about-corruption/) of Russians view corruption (Navalny's signature issue) as a large problem in Russia. \nQuestion: Will Alexi Navalny become president or prime minister of Russia in his lifetime?\nResolution details:\n--- \nResolves positively if Navalny assumes the office of president or prime minister of Russia.\n--- \nResolves negatively if Navalny dies before becoming president of Russia.\n--- \nResolves ambiguously if the nation state of Russia ceases to exist, or if its form of government changes such that it no longer has either a president or a prime minister.\n--- \nAlso resolves ambiguously if Navalny is still alive in 2500 but has not assumed either office.\n--- \nIn the case where there is significant ambiguity about whether or not Navalny has assumed office, the question will only resolve positively if there is credible media reporting that his assumption of office has been recognized by the 4 other permanent members of the UN Security council (US, UK, France, China).\n--- \nIf Navalny is legally declared dead but could potentially be revived (through brain emulation or cryopreservation) this question resolves negatively.\nNote that if Navalny is elected president but dies before assuming office, the question resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 441,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the next President of the United States be impeached?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3419/will-the-next-president-of-the-united-states-be-impeached/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8%",
    "Description": "So far, the United States has had three presidents out of [44] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidents_of_the_United_States) total be [impeached] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidential_impeachments) : [Andrew Johnson] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Andrew_Johnson) in 1868, [Bill Clinton] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton) in 1998, and [Donald Trump] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Donald_Trump) , the current president, in 2019. [Richard Nixon] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_process_against_Richard_Nixon) in 1974 resigned when it seemed likely that he would be impeached and convicted.\nOne notable feature of this list of dates is that the last two impeachments were relatively close together relative to the span of US history. As such, it seems possible that we live in a time where presidents are more likely to be impeached.\nWill the US House of Representatives vote to impeach the next president of the United States?\nThe 'next president of the United States' is the president to take office after Donald Trump leaves office. This question will resolve positively upon an impeachment, and will close retroactively one month prior to a vote. It will resolve negatively when the next president of the United States leaves office without being impeached. It will resolve ambiguously if there is no next president of the United States.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 212,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In the year 2028, how many tonnes of insect protein will be used as animal feed for livestock, poultry and fish in Europe?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3421/in-the-year-2028-how-many-tonnes-of-insect-protein-will-be-used-as-animal-feed-for-livestock-poultry-and-fish-in-europe/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Today insect proteins cannot be fed to poultry as legislation passed after the mad cow disease crisis in the late 1990s prevents processed animal proteins from being fed to livestock ( [IPIFF, 2018] (http://ipiff.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Web-version_IPIFF_Sustainability-consult_Brochure-31-10-1.pdf) ). As a result, insects cannot currently be fed to chickens or pigs. However, an exception to that legislation has been made for farmed fish and, since 2013, insects have been approved in aquaculture feed (ibid.).\nSince approving insect feed for fish feed, companies have begun producing insect protein:\nRoughly 1,000 tonnes of insect protein have been commercialised by European insect producers in total, since the authorisation of insect proteins for use in aqua feed.\nIn the calendar year 2028, how many tonnes of insect protein will be estimated to be used as animal feed for livestock, poultry and fish in Europe?\nResolution\nEstimates should come from credible organisations, such as the [International Platform of Insects for Food &amp; Feed Association (IPIFF)] (http://ipiff.org/) , or other EU-affiliated organisations or academic publications by researchers without livestock-feed related commercial affiliations.\nIn the case multiple estimates are found upon resolving, the admin may choose to resolve this question as the median of different estimates, or resolve it per the estimate deemed most credible.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 61,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "On December 1st, 2023 how many companies worldwide will pledge uphold GAP standards for broiler chickens raised for meat?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3422/on-december-1st-2023-how-many-companies-worldwide-will-pledge-uphold-gap-standards-for-broiler-chickens-raised-for-meat/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [Global Animal Partnership] (https://globalanimalpartnership.org/) (GAP), a nonprofit which seeks to promote the welfare of farmed animals, has an animal welfare rating program for assessing the welfare of animals on-farm, during transport and at slaughter.\nThis basic part of GAP's standards for broiler chickens is summarized with the slogan: “no cages, no crates, no crowding”, and requires the following:\nChickens are typically housed indoors and must meet a maximum stocking density of 6.0 lbs/ft2 by 1 July 2020. Producers are required to manage the environment to maintain litter, air quality and provide chickens with environmental enrichment. Environmental enrichments are materials that are provided to chickens to add complexity to their environment and encourage the expression of natural behavior (such as pecking, scratching, exploration and play behavior).[ [1] (https://globalanimalpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/GAP-Standard-for-Meat-Chickens-v3.1-20180403.pdf) ]\nAs of writing this question, [239 companies worldwide have pledged to adhere to the basic part of GAP standards for broiler chickens] (http://(https://chickenwatch.org/progress-tracker/?filterM=Broiler)) . \nHow many companies worldwide will pledge to adhere to the current basic GAP standards for broiler chickens raised for meat, within a timeline ending at latest in 2030, on December 1st, 2023?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the number of companies worldwide that have been reported to have pledged to maintain a supply chain consistent with the current basic GAP standards for broiler chickens raised for meat within a timeline ending in or before any date in 2030, on December 1st, 2023. Resolution will be based on [the data reported by Chicken Watch] (https://chickenwatch.org/progress-tracker/?filterM=Broiler) . The current number can be found by entering the query issue \"Broiler\", with the timeline ending in the year 2030.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 122,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will 100 gigagrams of sulphur be injected into the atmosphere, as part of a single geoengineering effort, by the end of 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3429/will-100-gigagrams-of-sulphur-be-injected-into-the-atmosphere-as-part-of-a-single-geoengineering-effort-by-the-end-of-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "Climate change geoengineering, defined by the United Kingdom’s Royal Society as “the deliberate large-scale manipulation of the planetary environment to counteract anthropogenic climate change” [(Shepherd et al., 2009)] (https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2009/8693.pdf) . Solar radiation management (SRM) supposes that deliberate addition of aerosol to the stratosphere could reduce climate risks by partially offsetting the radiative forcing from accumulating greenhouse gases. The deployment stratospheric sulfate aerosols have been proposed as a method to reflect more energy away from the planet, by increasing the planetary albedo, and thereby cool the planet, ameliorating some of the effects of increasing CO2 concentrations [(Rasch et al., 2008)] (https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsta.2008.0131) .\nAccording to [(Rasch et al., 2008)] (https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsta.2008.0131) , sulphate aerosols have at least two cooling effects:\nIn the stratosphere they act to reflect incoming solar energy (the ‘aerosol direct effect’), but also act as [cloud condensation nuclei] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_condensation_nuclei) , influencing the size of cloud droplets and the persistence or lifetime of clouds (the ‘aerosol indirect effect’) and thus the reflectivity of clouds.\nUsing the [Mount Pinatubo eruption] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Pinatubo) as an analogue, [Crutzen, 2006] (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10584-006-9101-y) estimated a constant inflow of 5 teragrams (Tg) of Sulphur per year would be sufficient to balance the warming associated with a doubling of CO2. [Rasch et al., 2008] (http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1029/2007GL032179) suggested that 1.5 Tg S per year might suffice to balance the GHG warming. Finally, [Robock et al., 2008] (https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2008JD010050) arrived at a figure of between 1.5 and 5 Tg S per year. \nFor reference, the net inflow of sulphur to the stratosphere is believed to be of the order of 100 gigagrams of per year when no volcanic eruptions occur [(Rasch et al., 2008)] (https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsta.2008.0131) .\nWill 100 gigagrams of sulphur be intentionally injected into the atmosphere, as part of a single geoengineering effort, by the end of 2023?\nResolution\nThis resolves positively when it is credibly reported that 100 gigagrams, i.e. grams, of sulphur is intentionally injected into the atmosphere in a single year as part of a single geoengineering effort, by the end of 2023. For the injection to qualify as a geoengineering effort, reporting must strong reveal evidence that that the parties responsible for the effort have the intent to bring about long-term effects on the regional or global climate.\nFor the purpose of this question, sulfur emissions are specified according to the equivalent weight of sulphur. For the purpose of this question we'll use the conversion of sulfur emissions and burdens found in [(Rasch et al., 2008)] (https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsta.2008.0131) : 100 Gg S = 300 Gg of sulfur dioxide (SO₂) = 300 Gg of Sulfate (SO₄2) = 400 Gg aerosol particles (Gg = gigagram).\nMoreover, a single geoengineering effort is defined as a project in which the relevant actors act on behalf of a various organisations (e.g. national government or research organisation) that coordinate in precise terms on the employed geoengineering methods as well as the the extent to, and the duration for which these are to be deployed.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 73,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Dai stablecoin maintain a value of roughly $1 until July 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3431/will-the-dai-stablecoin-maintain-a-value-of-roughly-1-until-july-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "56.99999999999999%",
    "Description": "One of the biggest problems with cryptocurrencies right now is their volatility. So-called 'stablecoins' aim to solve this by maintaining a stable price, usually compared to an asset like the US Dollar. \nThe currency Dai, created by the organisation [MakerDAO] (https://makerdao.com/en/) and running on the [Ethereum] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethereum) blockchain, is a popular stablecoin that tries to always be worth $1. Instead of being backed by a reserve of dollars, Dai can be created by anyone by locking up some ether (or other cryptocurrencies) as collateral for a loan in Dai. The ether is only released when the user pays back their loan, plus a Stability Fee. Dai holders can also earn the Dai Savings Rate which is funded by the fees. The Stability Fee and Dai Savings Rate are adjusted to keep the value of Dai at $1.\nIts predecessor Sai (formerly called Dai) has successfully kept a stable price throughout 2018 and (as of December 2019) still maintains it, despite volatility in the price of ether. The new version, Multi-Collateral Dai, was released in November 2019. \nWill Multi-Collateral Dai (or a future version of it) be worth around $1 consistently up to July 2023?\nThis resolves negatively if either Dai is worth over $1.10 continuously for any 2 week period or if it is worth less than $0.90 continuously for any 2 week period before 12:00 AM GMT on the 15th July 2023, according to a website like [Coinmarketcap] (https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/multi-collateral-dai/) . \nIf MakerDAO has an Emergency Shutdown, it also resolves negatively.\nIt resolves positively otherwise.\nIf a newer version is released, then this question will be about the new version if and only if there is a direct way to exchange Dai for the new coin at a 1:1 rate (which was the case when Sai was upgraded to Multi-Collateral Dai).\n",
    "# Forecasts": 105,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will an ocean be fertilised with at least 50 tonnes of iron, as part of a single geoengineering effort, by the end of 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3433/will-an-ocean-be-fertilised-with-at-least-50-tonnes-of-iron-as-part-of-a-single-geoengineering-effort-by-the-end-of-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "21%",
    "Description": "Iron fertilisation is the introduction of iron to iron-poor areas of the ocean surface to stimulate phytoplankton production to thereby draw carbon out of the atmosphere and into the ocean. Phytoplankton converts some of the CO2 dissolved in the ocean into biomass, which is then transported into deep sea by ocean circulation and gravity; effectively resulting in the long-term sequestering of carbon [(Yoon et al., 2018)] (https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/5847/2018/bg-15-5847-2018.pdf) .\nResearchers worldwide have conducted 13 major iron-fertilization experiments in the open ocean since 1990 [(Tollefson, 2017)] (https://www.nature.com/news/iron-dumping-ocean-experiment-sparks-controversy-1.22031) . All have sought to test whether stimulating phytoplankton growth can increase the amount of carbon dioxide that the organisms pull out of the atmosphere and deposit in the deep ocean when they die. Determining how much carbon is sequestered during such experiments has proved difficult, however, and scientists have raised concerns about potential adverse effects, such as [toxic algal blooms] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmful_algal_bloom) .\nWill an ocean be fertilised with at least 50 tonnes of iron, as part of a single geoengineering effort, by the end of 2023?\nThis question resolves positive if a single geoengineering effort to fertilise an ocean with the intention of stimulating biomass growth successfully introduces 50 tonnes of iron into an ocean by the end of 2023. \nThe fertiliser must contain the equivalent of 50 tonnes of iron, which contains [895335 moles of iron] (https://www.convertunits.com/from/moles+Iron/to/grams) . Hence, fertilisers that contain compounds of iron must also contain at least 895335 moles of iron. For example, [136 tonnes of iron sulfate (FeSO4)] (https://www.convertunits.com/from/moles+Iron+Sulfate/to/grams) contains roughly 895335 moles of iron. In the case the fertiliser is a mixture of different iron-containing compounds, the weight of iron shall be determined by the same method for the individual compounds multiplied by the fraction of its weight to total weight.\nA single geoengineering effort is here defined as a project in which the relevant actors act on behalf of various organisations (e.g. national government, research organisation) that coordinate in precise terms on the employed geoengineering methods as well as the the extent to, and the duration for which these are to be deployed.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 100,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Conservative Party form the first government after the next UK general election?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3439/will-the-conservative-party-form-the-first-government-after-the-next-uk-general-election/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "55.00000000000001%",
    "Description": "[The Conservative and Unionist Party] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_Party_(UK)) is a centre-right political party in the United Kingdom. The governing party since 2010, it is the largest in the House of Commons, with 365 Members of Parliament. Its domination of British politics throughout the twentieth century has led to it being referred to as one of the most successful political parties in the Western world.\nThe Conservatives have won (i.e. formed the first government after the election) the last four elections in the UK, and have increased their share of the popular vote in every election since 2001.\n[The most recent general election in the UK was held on 12 December 2019.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_United_Kingdom_general_election) Unless changes are made to the lifetime of a Parliament, the next election will take place on or before 12 December 2024.\nThis question asks: Will the first government to be formed after the next UK general election be formed by the Conservatives, either as a majority government, minority government, or as the senior partner in a formal coalition?\nThis question resolves positively if the first government to be formed after the next UK general election is as described above, and negatively if any other government is formed.\nThis question refers specifically to the first government formed after the next general election. In the event that a new government is formed without an election (e.g. because of a vote of no confidence) this question shall not apply to that event.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 286,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Kim Jong-un still be the de facto leader of North Korea on 1 January 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3445/will-kim-jong-un-still-be-the-de-facto-leader-of-north-korea-on-1-january-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "90%",
    "Description": "[Kim Jong-un] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Jong-un) , born 8 January 1983, has been Supreme Leader of North Korea since 2011 and Leader of the Workers' Party of Korea since 2012. Kim is the second child of Kim Jong-il (1941–2011), and the grandson of Kim Il-sung, the first leader of North Korea from 1948 to 1994. He is the first North Korean leader to have been born after the country's founding.\nThis question asks: Will he still be the de facto leader of North Korea on 1 January 2022?\nResolves positively in the abscence of credible media reports indicating that Kim Jong-un has died, has been deposed, is missing, incapacitated, or imprisoned, has defected to another state, or has otherwise ceased to be the de facto leader of North Korea.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 1224,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will two or more supermarkets sell products made of ≥20% clean fish in their physical retail stores in at least 25 U.S. states?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3447/when-will-two-or-more-supermarkets-sell-products-made-of-20-clean-fish-in-their-physical-retail-stores-in-at-least-25-us-states/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "One of the earliest produced clean meat product was a clean fish product. In 2002, researchers working on the the fabrication of surrogate muscle protein constructs as food products for Space travelers grew goldfish cells grown to resemble fish fillets [(Benjaminson et al, 2002)] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12416526) . However, since then, most clean meat companies have been focussed on producing the meat of livestock and poultry (see [here for a list] (https://cellbasedtech.com/clean-meat-companies) ). There are several clean fish companies, amongst these are The US-based [Blue Nalu] (https://bluenalu.com/) and [Finless Foods] (https://finlessfoods.com/) . \nWe might expect that if clean beef or clean chicken matures before clean fish, the regulatory challenges of bringing clean fish to market could be reduced. In the United States, the USDA and FDA jointly oversee the production of cell based meat products. The FDA oversees cell collection and growth while the USDA will oversee cell harvesting and labelling. Currently, the USDA and FDA refer to cell based meet as food products derived from the cells of livestock and poultry. The official term(s) and labelling rules are yet to be determined, but the FDA and USDA [outlined the regulatory framework] (https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/0d2d644a-9a65-43c6-944f-ea598aacdec1/Formal-Agreement-FSIS-FDA.pdf?MOD=AJPERES) in a way that [has been described to] (https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/3/9/18255806/fda-usda-lab-grown-meat-cell-based-vegan-vegetarian) \"[provide] a transparent path to market for cell-based meat products,”, according to Elan Abrell, a senior regulatory specialist at the [Good Food Institute] (https://www.gfi.org/) .\nWhen will two or more supermarkets sell products made of ≥20% clean fish in their physical retail stores in at least 25 states?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the date when two or more supermarketets in the United States offers a clean fish product for human consumption for sale in physical locations in at least 25 states. The product must contain at least 8 grams of clean fish. The clean fish containing product must cost less than $25 per 100 grams.\nEvidence of the clean meat containing product's listing price and composition should come from credible media reports, online supermarket listings, or from at least three reports sourced from social media and/or submissions by Metaculus users/admin.\nThe following sales do not identify the price of the product for the purpose of this question: samples given out for free, sales discounted with one-time discounts or discounts derived from coupons, or programmes such as loyalty schemes or credit card membership, amongst other pricing schemes valid for limited time or only available to a subset of customers.\nClean fish is here defined as meat that is grown primarily or entirely in cell culture, rather than in an fish' body. A supermarket is here defined as the company that operates physical self-service retail markets that sell foods and household merchandise. The supermarket must have at least ten physical stores (although the clean meat product need only be on offer in at least one store). A [list of examples of U.S. supermarkets] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cs0GXkqp_OtPCbohgbI-4wsr7S6Tpt11Rt4Wrop-jd8/edit?usp=sharing) that qualify today can be found here. These will continue to qualify as supermarkets as long as these operate at least ten physical self-service retail markets.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 81,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much forest coverage loss will occur in Brazil over the three-year period starting from 2020?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3452/how-much-forest-coverage-loss-will-occur-in-brazil-over-the-three-year-period-starting-from-2020/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Currently, according to the [Global Forest Watch] (https://bit.ly/2SogDpR) , an initiative by the [World Resources Institute] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Resources_Institute) , 12.85 millions of hectares of tree cover was lost in Brazil in the three-year period starting from 2015.\nThe Amazon (60% of which is located in Brazil) represents over half of the planet's remaining rainforests, and comprises the largest and most biodiverse tract of tropical rainforest in the world, with an estimated 390 billion individual trees divided into 16,000 species.\nThe Amazon plays a crucial role in including carbon sequestration, climate and water cycle regulation, and maintenance of biodiversity.[ [1] (https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aacd1c) ]\nHow much forest coverage loss, in Mha, will occur in Brazil in the three-year period starting from 2020?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the sum of forest coverage loss in an area with &gt;30% tree canopy in Brazil, in the years 2020, 2021 and 2022. This resolves on the basis of the data by [Global Forest Watch] (https://bit.ly/2SogDpR) .\nNote that this question resolves as gross forest coverage loss, (not net forest coverage loss), the metric therefore does not deduct tree coverage gains.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 147,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What is the largest amount of iron that will be used to fertilise an ocean as part of a single geoengineering effort, by the end of 2026?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3457/what-is-the-largest-amount-of-iron-that-will-be-used-to-fertilise-an-ocean-as-part-of-a-single-geoengineering-effort-by-the-end-of-2026/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Iron fertilisation is the introduction of iron to iron-poor areas of the ocean surface to stimulate phytoplankton production to thereby draw carbon out of the atmosphere and into the ocean. Phytoplankton converts some of the CO2 dissolved in the ocean into biomass, which is then transported into deep sea by ocean circulation and gravity; effectively resulting in the long-term sequestering of carbon [(Yoon et al., 2018)] (https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/5847/2018/bg-15-5847-2018.pdf) .\nResearchers worldwide have conducted 13 major iron-fertilization experiments in the open ocean since 1990 [(Tollefson, 2017)] (https://www.nature.com/news/iron-dumping-ocean-experiment-sparks-controversy-1.22031) . All have sought to test whether stimulating phytoplankton growth can increase the amount of carbon dioxide that the organisms pull out of the atmosphere and deposit in the deep ocean when they die. Determining how much carbon is sequestered during such experiments has proved difficult, however, and scientists have raised concerns about potential adverse effects, such as [toxic algal blooms] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmful_algal_bloom) .\nWhat is the largest amount of iron, in tonnes, that will be used to fertilise an ocean as part of a single geoengineering effort, by the end of 2026?\nThis question resolves as the largest amount of iron, in tonnes, that will be used to fertilise an ocean as part of a single geoengineering effort (with the intention to intervene in the Earth's climate system), by the end of 2026. \nA single geoengineering effort is a project in which the relevant actors act on behalf of a various organisations (e.g. national government or research organisation) that coordinate in precise terms on the employed geoengineering methods as well as the the extent to, and the duration for which these are to be deployed.\nIn case the fertiliser is a compound of iron, such as iron sulfate, the question resolves as the elemental weight of iron, which is to be converted using the relevant formula that specifies how many moles of iron the total weight of the fertiliser contains, which is then converted to the weight of elemental iron using the formula or [a converter] (https://www.convertunits.com/from/moles+Iron/to/grams) . In the case the fertiliser is a mixture of different iron-containing compounds, the weight of iron shall be determined by the same method for the individual compounds multiplied by the fraction of its weight to total weight.\nThis question resolves ambiguously no such relevant geoengineering effort occurs before the end of 2026.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 70,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a culturally significant development in aging research by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3458/will-there-be-a-culturally-significant-development-in-aging-research-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "70%",
    "Description": "In 2019, at a speech at the Foresight Institute, biomedical gerontologist Aubrey de Grey [stated] (https://youtu.be/QmoYYewuw-c?t=660) :\nI think we are still 15-20 years away [from effective anti-aging therapies] but the anticipation of the therapy by the general public is coming soon, and it is that anticipation that is going to be the point when the shit really hits the fan. If you think about a situation in which less than five years from now [...] in a period of about a week, half of the developed world is going to shift from an expectation that they will live only slightly longer than their parents did, into an expectation that they're going to live far longer than anyone has ever lived.\nIf half of the people in the developed world came to believe within a period of a week that effective anti-aging therapies were imminent, this would likely be a culturally significant event, perhaps among the most significant in the 2020's.\nThis question resolves positively if any of the terms \"aging\", \"ageing\", \"anti-aging\", \"anti-ageing\", \"longevity\", \"lifespan\", \"rejuvenation\", or \"life extension\" are mentioned as a direct reference to longevity research* in any of the following media sources produced between January 1st 2020 and January 1st 2030 UTC:\n1-- \nThe English Wikipedia's \"In the news\" [section] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:In_the_news) .\nor\n2-- \n[History.com] (http://History.com) 's summary of events for a year in the 2020's.\nor\n3-- \nThe transcript for a primary or general presidential election debate in America.\nIt also resolves positively if:\n4--A longevity researcher receives Time's Person of the Year for their work on defeating aging. \nOtherwise, this question resolves negatively on the 1st of January 2030.\nIn case of positive resolution, this question retroactively closes 1 day before the triggering event.\n* \"longevity research\" here means the research comes from a group whose explicit purpose (as defined by their charter, or their about page on their website, or by some official statement made by the organisation which pertains to their research ends) is to slow, halt, or reverse the natural aging process. Examples of research groups which meet this criteria are the SENS Research Foundation and The Sinclair Lab at Harvard.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 157,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be at least 200 companies developing technologies to defeat aging by 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3460/will-there-be-at-least-200-companies-developing-technologies-to-defeat-aging-by-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "88%",
    "Description": "In a publicly available spreadsheet, accessible [here] (http://agingbiotech.info/companies/) , Karl Pfleger has maintained a list of for-profit companies that are confirmed to be working to slow or reverse aging in humans. His criterion for including a company is outlined [here] (http://agingbiotech.info/about/what_counts_as_aging.html) , and only includes those companies that aim to deliver a product that will undo or slow down molecular damage from aging. Anti-aging cosmetic companies do not count by this criterion.\nAs of January 6th, 2020, there are 126 companies listed in the spreadsheet, but progress has been rapid in recent years. More companies were created from 2016-2018 than were created in the entire period listed before that, from 2009-2015. If growth continues at its current pace, then the number of companies will surpass 200 by 2025. However, if the number does not reach 200, this would imply that growth must have slowed down at some point.\nThis question resolves positively if there are at least 200 companies listed on [this] (http://agingbiotech.info/companies/) spreadsheet (or the spreadsheet that is a clear successor to that one) on January 1st 2025. If there are fewer, it resolves negatively.\nIf the spreadsheet is no longer being maintained, the question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 129,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "At what point will at least ten technologies listed on \"The Rejuvenation Roadmap\" be released to the public?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3461/at-what-point-will-at-least-ten-technologies-listed-on-the-rejuvenation-roadmap-be-released-to-the-public/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [Rejuvenation Roadmap] (https://www.lifespan.io/road-maps/the-rejuvenation-roadmap/) is a curated database, which\naims to compile the most promising [anti-aging] therapies and technologies in development and chart their progress in one easy to read format.\nAs of writing, it lists 42 technologies, of which several aim to provide effective anti-aging effects.\nIf ten of the technologies listed in the roadmap as it was on January 7th, 2020 ( [as archived here] (https://web.archive.org/web/20200107004948/https://www.lifespan.io/road-maps/the-rejuvenation-roadmap/) ) are released, then this question resolves to the date on which the tenth technology was marked released.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if:\n---The roadmap is no longer maintained, or changes form in a way that is not compatible with this question (as judged by a Metaculus admin). \n---The archive of the roadmap becomes unavailable. \n---Enough of the concerned technologies are abandoned that this question cannot resolve positively anymore. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 73,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the United States institute a military draft by 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3469/will-the-united-states-institute-a-military-draft-by-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "3%",
    "Description": "The United States has employed military conscription during five separate conflicts in American history, most recently in the Vietnam war, ending in 1973. If the United States enters another large war, it might begin conscripting soldiers once again.\nThis question resolves positively if any military personnel* are conscripted for the military in the United States before January 1st, 2025. Otherwise, it resolves negatively.\n* \"military personnel\" here includes the Coast Guard.\n\"conscription\" here does not include the Individual Ready Reserve or Stop-Loss activation.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 137,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Queen Elizabeth II cease to be Queen of the United Kingdom?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3474/when-will-queen-elizabeth-ii-cease-to-be-queen-of-the-united-kingdom/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Queen Elizabeth II] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_II) , 93, is the longest-reigning British monarch in history, having been Queen since 6 February 1952. On 6 February 2017 she became the first British monarch to celebrate a Sapphire Jubilee, commemorating 65 years on the throne.\nAt the time of writing this question, Elizabeth II has been Queen for 67 years and 337 days. She is currently considered to be the [sixth longest-reigning sovereign monarch with a verifiable reign of all time.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_longest-reigning_monarchs) \nThis question asks: When will Queen Elizabeth II cease to be Queen of the United Kingdom?\nThe question shall resolve as the date on which Elizabeth II dies, abdicates, is deposed, or on the date that the monarchy of the United Kingdom is dissolved, or if there is no longer a United Nations member state known as the United Kingdom.\nNote that while Elizabeth II is also the reigning monarch in a number of other states and territories and various crown possessions, her position in relation to those bodies is immaterial to the resolution of this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 306,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If human-level artificial intelligence is developed, will World GDP grow by at least 30.0% in any of the subsequent 15 years?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3477/if-human-level-artificial-intelligence-is-developed-will-world-gdp-grow-by-at-least-300-in-any-of-the-subsequent-15-years/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "77%",
    "Description": "In economist Robin Hanson's 2001 paper [Economic Growth Given Machine Intelligence] (http://mason.gmu.edu/~rhanson/aigrow.pdf) , he writes\nA simple exogenous growth model gives conservative estimates of the economic implications of machine intelligence. [...] Without machine intelligence, world product grows at a familiar rate of 4.3% per year, doubling every 16 years, with about 40% of technological progress coming from ordinary computers. With machine intelligence, the (instantaneous) annual growth rate would be 45%, ten times higher, making world product double every 18 months! If the product shares are raised by 20%, and general technology growth is lowered to preserve the 4.4% figure, the new doubling time falls to less than 6 months.\nThis question is conditioned on the arrival of human-level artificial intelligence, as defined by [this Metaculus question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/384/human-machine-intelligence-parity-by-2040/) . Assume that at some point, a machine is created that passes the test specified in that question.\nIf a machine passes that test, this question resolves positively if world GDP grows by at least 30.0% for any single year in the fifteen years following the date of the test, according to a reputable organization such as [The World Bank] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG) . Otherwise, this question resolves negatively.\nIf no machine passes that test by the end of this century, then this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 106,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many patients will be in cryonic suspension at the Cryonics Institute in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3478/how-many-patients-will-be-in-cryonic-suspension-at-the-cryonics-institute-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The number of cryonics patients in storage at the Cryonics Institute (CI) has been increasing steadily since it was founded in 1976. From 2009 to 2019, [the total number of patients] (https://www.cryonics.org/ci-landing/member-statistics/) increased from 95 to 177.\nHow many patients will be in cryonic suspension at the Cryonics Institute in 2030?\nThis question resolves to the largest number of patients in cryonic suspension at CI in 2030, cited in any report published by CI that year which gives such a number. If there is no such report (for any reason) this question resolves ambiguous. A \"patient\" is here taken to mean any preserved human brain (incl. neuropreservation, whole-body cryopreservation, etc.).\n",
    "# Forecasts": 90,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first Artificial General Intelligence system be devised, tested, and publicly known of?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Since the inception of the field, the goal of Artificial Intelligence (AI) research has been to develop a machine-based system that can perform the same general-purpose reasoning and problem-solving tasks humans can. While computers have surpassed humans in many information-processing abilities, this \"general\" intelligence has remained elusive. \nAI, and particularly machine learning (ML), is advancing rapidly, with previously human-specific tasks such as image and speech recognition, translation and even driving, now being successfully tackled by narrow AI systems.\nBut there is a stunning diversity of opinion about when general AI may arrive, according to published expert surveys. For example [this study] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.06906.pdf) finds 50% of AI researchers accord a 50% probability to \"High level machine intelligence\" (HLMI) by 2040, while 20% say that 50% probability will not be reached until 2100 or later. Similarly, [this survey] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.08807.pdf) finds an aggregated probability distribution with a 25%-75% confidence interval (comparable to Metaculus sliders below) ranging from 2040 to well past 2100. \nIt would be nice to tighten these probability intervals considerably, so we ask of the Metaculus community:\nWhen will the first AGI be first developed and demonstrated? \nOne issue is that AGI is rather difficult to precisely define. A separate question addresses a similar issue by asking about [human-machine intelligence parity] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/384/human-machine-intelligence-parity-by-2040/) in a particular adversarial test. Here we'd like a definition that connects more closely with established benchmarks for various capabilities; it also sets an arguably somewhat lower bar.\nFor these purposes we will thus define \"an artificial general intelligence\" as a single unified software system that can satisfy the following criteria, all easily completable by a typical college-educated human.\n--- \nAble to reliably pass a Turing test of the type that would win the [Loebner Silver Prize] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/73/will-the-silver-turing-test-be-passed-by-2026/) . \n--- \nAble to score 90% or more on a robust version of the [Winograd Schema Challenge] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/644/what-will-be-the-best-score-in-the-20192020-winograd-schema-ai-challenge/) , e.g. the [\"Winogrande\" challenge] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10641) or comparable data set for which human performance is at 90+%\n--- \nBe able to score 75th percentile (as compared to the corresponding year's human students; this was a score of 600 in 2016) on all the full mathematics section of a circa-2015-2020 standard SAT exam, using just images of the exam pages and having less than ten SAT exams as part of the training data. (Training on other corpuses of math problems is fair game as long as they are arguably distinct from SAT exams.)\n--- \nBe able to learn the classic Atari game \"Montezuma's revenge\" (based on just visual inputs and standard controls) and explore all 24 rooms based on the equivalent of less than 100 hours of real-time play (see [closely-related question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/486/when-will-an-ai-achieve-competency-in-the-atari-classic-montezumas-revenge/) .) \nBy \"unified\" we mean that the system is integrated enough that it can, for example, explain its reasoning on an SAT problem or Winograd schema question, or verbally report its progress and identify objects during videogame play. (This is not really meant to be an additional capability of \"introspection\" so much as a provision that the system not simply be cobbled together as a set of sub-systems specialized to tasks like the above, but rather a single system applicable to many problems.)\nResolution will be by direct demonstration of such a system achieving the above criteria, or by confident credible statement by its developers that an existing system is able to satisfy these criteria. In case of contention as to whether a given system satisfies the resolution criteria, a ruling will be made by a majority vote of the question author and two AI experts chosen in good faith by him. Resolution date will be the first date at which the system (subsequently judged to satisfy the criteria) and its capabilities are publicly described in a talk, press release, paper, or other report available to the general public.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 415,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will no CRISPR-edited babies be born in the year 2020?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3481/will-no-crispr-edited-babies-be-born-in-the-year-2020/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "93%",
    "Description": "Genome editing is a type of genetic engineering in which DNA is inserted, deleted, modified or replaced in the genome of a living organism ( [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome_editing) ). [CRISPR/Cas9] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRISPR_gene_editing) is a technique that allows for the highly specific and rapid modification of DNA in a genome.\nOn 25 November 2018, a Chinese scientist named He Jiankui made a startling announcement: as a result of experiments conducted at his clinic, the world’s first genetically edited babies, [Lulu and Nana] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lulu_and_Nana_controversy) , had been born [(Regalado, 2018b)] (https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612458/exclusive-chinese-scientists-are-creating-crispr-babies/) .\nAfter Jiankui’s announcement, Vox asked [“Is the CRISPR baby controversy the start of a terrifying new chapter in gene editing?”] (https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/11/30/18119589/crispr-gene-editing-he-jiankui) and a lot of other people also had the same question. But the answer (so far) seems to be no.\nA Chinese court has sentenced He Jiankui, to three years in prison for “illegal medical practice”, and handed down shorter sentences to two colleagues who assisted him [(Cyranoski, 2020)] (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00001-y) . No new babies edited with CRISPR were announced this past year. \nAccording to Vox's [Kelsey Piper] (https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/1/13/21055740/trump-reelection-biden-nomination-brexit-2020-predictions) :\nThe fierce global backlash against Jiankui made it clear that the world is uncomfortable with such uses of technology — rightfully so, as there’s immense potential for misuse and Jiankui’s experiments were enormously irresponsible. I bet it won’t happen again this year — though I’m sure it’ll happen again someday. \nWill no CRISPR-edited babies be born in the year 2020?\nThis question resolves positively, if by the end of 2021, no credible reports have emerged that a baby was born in the year 2020 whose embryo was genetically edited by way of a CRISPR system, such as [CAS9] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cas9) . Reports need to be corroborated and substantiated so as to leave little room for doubt, e.g. by being corroborated by statements of research organisations, independent researchers, grant-makers or government science department or agencies.\nIn case positive resolution is triggered, this question retroactively closes two days prior to the day resolution is triggered, but resolves on January 1st, 2021.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 306,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will EQRx get at least one drug approved by the FDA before the end of 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3507/will-eqrx-get-at-least-one-drug-approved-by-the-fda-before-the-end-of-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "From [this Chemical and Engineering News article] (https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/EQRx-launches-developdrugs-steep-discount/98/web/2020/01) :\nVenture capitalist and serial entrepreneur Alexis Borisy has founded EQRx to develop equal or better versions of innovative medicines—often called me-too drugs—and sell them at a substantial discount to competing therapies. With an initial investment of $200 million from a syndicate of investors, the biotech firm plans to put 10 new, more affordable drugs on the market in the next decade.\nHe plans to do that unsing technology (ibid.):\n“Today, you can do a virtual screen of a billion compounds, do on-demand synthesis of all of those, and you can do it overnight in the cloud.”\nOnce a molecule is made, Borisy points to the potential to analyze reams of clinical data to design efficient studies that can prove a drug’s value to government groups and payers.\nCombined, these technological efficiencies could bring down the cost of getting a drug onto the market—often cited as between $2 billion and $3 billion—by an order of magnitude, Borisy says. If EQRx spends, on average, $300 million to $400 million per drug, he believes the biotech firm can still be “very profitable,” even as it offers its medicines at a significant discount.\nA [Stat article] (https://www.statnews.com/2020/01/12/venture-capitalist-alexis-borisy-bring-down-drug-prices/) has this to say about EQRx's plan:\nQuite simply, Borisy is going to invent and develop new drugs, and sell them for less money than the competition. He calls this “a radical proposition.” In any other sector, it would just be called “business.”\nTo offer some counterweight, Derek Lowe (who writes probably the most famous and oldest chemistry blog, and has been working in drug discovery for decades) [has this to say] (https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/01/15/eqrxs-challenge-and-my-challenge-to-them) :\nNo, in case you were wondering, you cannot virtually screen a billion compounds overnight.\nno, you cannot do “on-demand synthesis of all of those”, either.\nI will put up $500 dollars on [LongBets.com] (http://LongBets.com) against the proposition that EQRx will produce ten drugs in the next ten years.\nWe will ask here about a much less ambitious goal: Will EQRx get at least one new drug approved by the FDA before the end of 2030?\nIf EQRx ceases to exist before 2031, this resolves negative. Exception: if the company gets bought / merges with another before it has had a drug approved by the FDA, any drug that clearly originated in EQRx and gets approved before the deadline counts.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 47,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Trikafta become available for Cystic Fibrosis patients on the NHS (England)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3508/when-will-trikafta-become-available-for-cystic-fibrosis-patients-on-the-nhs-england/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Cystic Fibrosis is a genetic disease affecting mainly the lungs and the pancreas.( [1] (http://(https://www.cysticfibrosis.org.uk/what-is-cystic-fibrosis)) ) In 2012 an American company called Vertex Pharmaceuticals got approval from the FDA to market a drug called Ivacaftor, the first generation of \"CFTR Modulators\" which improves lung function in people with CF.( [2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivacaftor) ) It was initially priced at $300,000 a year making it one of the most expensive drugs on the market. \nThis was followed by Orkambi ($270,000 a year) in 2015,( [3] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumacaftor/ivacaftor) ) and then in October 2019 by Trikafta, a triple combination therapy which is effective in around 90% of people with CF. Trikafta is marketed at around $300,000. However, the initial evidence is that it is much more effective at improving lung function in CF patients than previous therapies.( [4] (https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-new-breakthrough-therapy-cystic-fibrosis) )\nBecause of the cost of Orkambi, NICE, the organisation responsible for evaluating drugs affordability and effectiveness decided that the drug did not meet its quality of life standards and recommended not fund it.( [5] (https://www.cysticfibrosis.org.uk/news/nice-rejects-orkambi) ) NHS England and Vertex then negotiated to get a deal to reduce the price, but it took until October 2019 for NHS England to reach a deal to make Orkambi available to all eligible CF patients.( [6] (https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/oct/24/nhs-england-vertex-agrees-price-for-orkambi-unaffordable-cystic-fibrosis-drug) ) This question asks:\nWhen will Trikafta become available for Cystic Fibrosis patients on the NHS (England)?\nBy 'available for Cystic Fibrosis patients', we mean that there are at least 5535 English CF patients who must have access to Trikafta via the NHS.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 65,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first humans land successfully on Mars?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3515/when-will-the-first-humans-land-successfully-on-mars/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A [human mission to Mars] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_mission_to_Mars) has been the subject of science fiction, aerospace engineering, and scientific proposals since the 20th century.\nIn the early 21st century, numerous US, European, and Asian organizations were developing proposals for human missions to Mars, and [dozens of Mars mission plans have been devised] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_crewed_Mars_mission_plans) over the decades since the dawn of spaceflight.\nThis question asks: When will the first humans land successfully on Mars?\nThis question resolves as the date on which the first crewed vehicle touches down on Mars successfully. A 'successful' landing is defined, for the purposes of this question, as one in which at least one crew member survives the landing. A 'crewed vehicle' is defined here as containing at least one conscious flesh-and-bone human.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 143,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a global thermonuclear war by 2070?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3517/will-there-be-a-global-thermonuclear-war-by-2070/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "Weapons in which the energy is provided by nuclear fission or fusion have only twice in history been detonated outside of a controlled test environment, in the Hiroshima and Nagasaki events in World War II.\nSince then, the world has nearly gone to nuclear war as a result of international conflict (during the Cuban Missile Crisis) and by accident. (Indeed, there have been a number of narrowly-averted accidental nuclear detonations. See [this timeline] (http://futureoflife.org/background/nuclear-close-calls-a-timeline/) for a sobering look at how close we have come.)\nThis question (which any sane person will hope resolves negatively) regards the probability that a nuclear war will occur by Jan 1, 2070. (Different questions address this separately, but none directly.) There is a great paucity of public and useful estimates of this probability. See for example [this paper] (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3137081) for an outline of considerations (but no bottom-line numbers.)\nResolution will be positive if in the context of armed conflict:\n--- \nThree countries each detonate at least 10 nuclear devices of at least 10 kiloton yield outside of their own territory in OR \n--- \nTwo countries each detonate at least 50 nuclear devices of at least 10 kiloton yield outside of their own territory. \nThese conditions are chosen to set aside a two-party regional nuclear war, say between India and Pakistan, or Israel and an adversary, or the UK and France, as disastrous as that would be.\nAs with many questions with a positive-resolution condition that may preclude being awarded points on Metaculus, predictors are enjoined to predict in good faith, as points will not be awarded until 2075 anyway.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 164,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will we be able to predict at least 10% of variance in Big Five agreeableness based on genetic information alone?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3518/when-will-we-be-able-to-predict-at-least-10-of-variance-in-big-five-agreeableness-based-on-genetic-information-alone/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Polygenic scores can already predict more than 10% of variance in educational attainment (see e.g. [Lee et al., 2018] (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-018-0147-3) ). \nResearch suggests that personality is moderately heritable, at about 40% (see e.g. [Johnson et al., 2008] (https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-14474-007) ). \nHowever, the additive heritability might be rather low (see e.g. [Plomin et al., 1998] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9686459) ). \nThe limit of how much variance a polygenic score for a trait can predict is [given by its SNP heritability] (https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC117414/technical_report_gwas.pdf) . SNP heritability estimates for personality traits are often around 10% or even less, see e.g. table 4 [here] (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/gbb.12439 for an overview) . Thus, it's entirely possible that we will never be able to predict more than 10% of variance in [Big Five agreeableness] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agreeableness) based on genetic information alone. \nHowever, better methods of imputation, including rare genetic variants, or other improvements might increase the SNP heritability estimates. It's also conceivable that we will develop more powerful methods than polygenic scores that are not limited by SNP heritability. \nPositive resolution requires an increase in adjusted of 10% (proportionally) with the addition of genetic information as explanatory variables. The question will resolve positively once a relevant peer-reviewed academic paper has been published and its results have been replicated at least once. In case the results are never replicated, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 41,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "One Million Martian Residents by 2075?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3519/one-million-martian-residents-by-2075/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2%",
    "Description": "In a [tweet session on 2020-01-16] (https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1217986505513172992) , Elon Musk laid out some of his plans for [Starship] (https://www.spacex.com/starship) production, and they're characteristically ambitious. One astute twitter follower noted that given the number of Starships and frequency of launches he's planning, we can infer the size of the Martian population for which he's planning: [1 million by 2050] (https://twitter.com/PRANSHUAGARWA13/status/1217990854234632193) . Musk [summarily affirmed] (https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1217990910052458497) that estimate.\nLike most of Musk's predictions, this timeline seems too ambitious to be realized. [Corrected to Musk Years] (https://aaboyles.github.io/Essays/portfolio/ElonMuskForecastCorrectionFunction.html) , a million-Martian population is more likely to exist by spring of 2074. My question is simple: Will it? More specifically, Will the population of living, biological humans residing on Mars be greater than or equal to one million before 2075-01-01?\nSome specifics:\n---Humans born on Mars or born en route to Mars (if that's [even possible within the prediction window] (https://sci-hub.tw/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13669-017-0193-3) ) do count towards the total (though it seems unlikely this is a major source of population growth in Musk's model). \n---Humans who die on Mars or en route to Mars prior to the closing date do not count towards the total. \n---Humans who leave Mars do not count towards the total, unless they return to Mars prior to the resolution date. \n---This should be resolved according to a credible estimate by any institution suited to evaluate the population sizes of Martian colonies. Some possible such institutions are: the government(s) of any Martian colony(s), SpaceX or any other corporate entities with commercial ventures to/on Mars, any concerned political institutions such as the United Nations or the World Health Organization, any non-government organization with an interest in the demography of Mars. \n---Such entities must estimate the size of the Martian population prior to Earth Year 2075 C.E. Stated differently, population estimates capable of resolving this question may be published in or after 2075, so long as the population estimates are given for 2074 (or earlier, if the one million threshold is met earlier). \n---Any credible estimate of a Martian population in excess of one million humans prior to the end of 2074 will cause this question to retroactively close one year prior to the estimate's publication date. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 300,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the cost of energy of utility-scale solar photovoltaics be in 2020, in 2018 USD per kWh?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3520/what-will-the-cost-of-energy-of-utility-scale-solar-photovoltaics-be-in-2020-in-2018-usd-per-kwh/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Solar photovoltaics (PV) generate electric power by using solar cells to convert energy from the sun into a flow of electrons by the [photovoltaic effect] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photovoltaic_effect) . Solar pv generated around [2% of total energy in the U.S. in 2017] (https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2018/02/28/solar-rises-to-nearly-2-of-u-s-generation-in-2017/) . In Germany, [an estimated 7%] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_in_Germany) of net generated electricity was solar-generated in 2017.\nSolar energy production is cleaner than most non-renewable energy production. For example, [according to the IPCC] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life-cycle_greenhouse-gas_emissions_of_energy_sources#2014_IPCC,_Global_warming_potential_of_selected_electricity_sources) , the life cycle CO2 equivalent of energy production by rooftop solar cells is 41 co2 equivalent per kWh, which is less than 1/10 of that from the energy production by gas.\nAccording to the [International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA)] (https://www.irena.org/aboutirena) , in 2018, the weighted-average [levelized cost of energy (LCOE)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source) of solar PV was USD 0.085/kWh [(IRENA, 2019)] (https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/May/IRENA_Renewable-Power-Generations-Costs-in-2018.pdf) . This was 13% lower than for projects commissioned in 2017 (ibid.).\nWhat will the global weighted-average levelized cost of energy of utility-scale solar PV be in 2020, in 2018 USD per kWh?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the global weighted-average LCOE of utility-scale solar PV be in 2020, in 2018 USD per kWh, per IRENA estimates. Prices are to be converted to 2018 USD using BLS [CPI for all urban consumers and all items] (https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost?cu) . In case IRENA data is not available, other sources of estimates of the global weighted-average LCOE of solar PV may be consulted. These other sources should be deemed by an admin to be sufficiently similar in methodology. One criterion of similarity is that the estimate of the 2018 LCOE solar PV is not more than 25% different from $0.085/kWh in 2018 USD.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 121,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the cost of energy of utility-scale solar photovoltaics be in 2022, in 2018 USD per kWh?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3521/what-will-the-cost-of-energy-of-utility-scale-solar-photovoltaics-be-in-2022-in-2018-usd-per-kwh/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Solar photovoltaics (PV) generate electric power by using solar cells to convert energy from the sun into a flow of electrons by the [photovoltaic effect] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photovoltaic_effect) . Solar pv generated around [2% of total energy in the U.S. in 2017] (https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2018/02/28/solar-rises-to-nearly-2-of-u-s-generation-in-2017/) . In Germany, [an estimated 7%] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_in_Germany) of net generated electricity was solar-generated in 2017.\nSolar energy production is cleaner than most non-renewable energy production. For example, [according to the IPCC] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life-cycle_greenhouse-gas_emissions_of_energy_sources#2014_IPCC,_Global_warming_potential_of_selected_electricity_sources) , the life cycle CO2 equivalent of energy production by rooftop solar cells is 41 co2 equivalent per kWh, which is less than 1/10 of that from the energy production by gas.\nAccording to the [International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA)] (https://www.irena.org/aboutirena) , in 2018, the weighted-average [levelized cost of energy (LCOE)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source) of solar PV was USD 0.085/kWh [(IRENA, 2019)] (https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/May/IRENA_Renewable-Power-Generations-Costs-in-2018.pdf) . This was 13% lower than for projects commissioned in 2017 (ibid.).\nWhat will the global weighted-average levelized cost of energy of utility-scale solar PV be in 2022, in 2018 USD per kWh?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the global weighted-average LCOE of utility-scale solar PV be in 2022, in 2018 USD per kWh, per IRENA estimates. Prices are to be converted to 2018 USD using BLS [CPI for all urban consumers and all items] (https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost?cu) . In case IRENA data is not available, other sources of estimates of the global weighted-average LCOE of solar PV may be consulted. These other sources should be deemed by an admin to be sufficiently similar in methodology. One criterion of similarity is that the estimate of the 2018 LCOE solar PV is not more than 25% different from $0.085/kWh in 2018 USD.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 120,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the Doomsday Clock reach midnight?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3522/when-will-the-doomsday-clock-reach-midnight/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [Doomsday Clock] (https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/current-time/) is a symbol which represents the likelihood of a anthropogenic global catastrophe. The clock represents catastrophe as \"midnight\" and the Bulletin's opinion on how close the world is to such as a number of \"minutes\" (and [recently \"seconds\"] (https://twitter.com/OfficialJoelF/status/1220362423007371264) ) to midnight.\nIts original setting in 1947 was seven minutes to midnight. It has since been updated up and down according to the world events of the time. In recent years, the increments have been shrinking as the clock gets closer to midnight. The last update as of writing (in January 2020) shaved only 20 seconds from the countdown, setting the clock at 100 seconds to midnight.\nThis question asks: When will the Doomsday Clock reach midnight?\nThis resolves to the first time at which the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists announces that the Doomsday Clock has reached midnight. The question should retroactively close one day before the relevant announcement. \nIf resolution has not occurred on 2100-01-01, this resolves to &gt; 2100-01-01.\nIf either the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists or the Doomsday Clock cease to exist or are otherwise defunct before resolution, this resolves ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 95,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a geoengineering act of Congress become US federal law by the end of 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3528/will-a-geoengineering-act-of-congress-become-us-federal-law-by-the-end-of-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11%",
    "Description": "Climate change geoengineering, defined by the United Kingdom’s Royal Society as “the deliberate large-scale manipulation of the planetary environment to counteract anthropogenic climate change” [(Shepherd et al. 2009)] (https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2009/8693.pdf) . Geoengineering involves the removal of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, or attempts at reflecting more energy away from the planet to counter warming [(Markusson et al., 2013)] (http://geoengineering-governance-research.org/perch/resources/workingpaper5markusson-et-algeinccwikipediadataset.pdf) . Geoengineering is often presented as a complement, and sometimes alternative, to climate mitigation and adaptation.\nThere are serious and complex governance issues which need to be resolved if geoengineering is ever to become an acceptable method for moderating climate change. It would be highly undesirable for irreversible global geoengineering to occur before appropriate governance mechanisms are in place. The Royal Society has published a set of geoengineering governance principles, known as The Oxford Principles, which aims to guide the collaborative development of geoengineering governance, from the earliest stages of research, to any eventual deployment. These principles are:\n---Principle 1: Geoengineering is to be regulated as a public good \n---Principle 2: The public should participate in geoengineering decision-making \n---Principle 3: Geoengineering research and results should be publicly disclosed \n---Principle 4: There should be independent assessments of the impacts \n---Principle 5: governance systems should be developed before geoengineering methods are deployed \nAs of September 2019, two geoengineering bills and one resolution have been introduced in Congress. These bills are the following:\n1-- \n[Geoengineering Research Evaluation Act of 2017] (https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4586?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22%5C%22Climate+engineering%5C%22+%5C%22geoengineering%5C%22+%5C%22Solar+radiation+management%5C%22+%5C%22Stratospheric+Particle+Injection%5C%22+%5C%22Stratospheric+aerosol+injection%5C%22+%5C%22Marine+cloud+brightening%5C%22+%5C%22Ocean+sulfur+cycle+enhancement%5C%22%22%7D&amp;s=3&amp;r=1) . This bill recommends a research agenda for advancing understanding of [albedo] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albedo) modification strategies that involve atmospheric interventions, such as cloud modification; and a report that provides specific guidance on the governance mechanisms for the proposed research agenda.\n2-- \n[American Clean Energy Leadership Act of 2009] (https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/senate-bill/1462?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22%5C%22Climate+engineering%5C%22+%5C%22geoengineering%5C%22+%5C%22Solar+radiation+management%5C%22+%5C%22Stratospheric+Particle+Injection%5C%22+%5C%22Stratospheric+aerosol+injection%5C%22+%5C%22Marine+cloud+brightening%5C%22+%5C%22Ocean+sulfur+cycle+enhancement%5C%22%22%7D&amp;s=2&amp;r=2) . This bill requires the Secretary of Energy to establish an Advisory Committee on Geosciences and Geoengineering Education to advise the Secretary in education and training in the subsurface geosciences and engineering.\nNeither the Geoengineering Research Evaluation Act of 2017 nor the American Clean Energy Leadership Act of 2009 became legislation. So far, the U.S. has not enacted legislation that are explicitly related to geoengineering. \nWill a geoengineering act of Congress become US federal law by the end of 2024?\nResolution\nThis questions resolves positively if a geoengineering bill that is introduced in the House of Representatives and/or the Senate is subsequently enacted as legislation (by being signed by the U.S. president, or through other means) before or on 31/12/2024. For the purpose of this question, a geoengineering bill is any bill reported by the relevant [Congress website search] (https://www.congress.gov/quick-search/legislation?wordsPhrases=%22Climate+engineering%22+OR+%22geoengineering%22+OR+%22Solar+radiation+management%22+OR+%22Stratospheric+Particle+Injection%22+OR+%22Stratospheric+aerosol+injection%22+OR+%22Marine+cloud+brightening%22+OR+%22Ocean+sulfur+cycle+enhancement%22&amp;include=on&amp;wordVariants=on&amp;titles=on&amp;summaries=on&amp;actions=on&amp;congresses%5B0%5D=all&amp;legislationNumbers=&amp;legislativeAction=&amp;sponsor=on&amp;representative=&amp;senator=&amp;searchResultViewType=expanded&amp;q=%7B%22bill-status%22%3A%22introduced%22%2C%22type%22%3A%22all%22%7D) . This search involves the following terms:\n\"Climate engineering\" OR \"geoengineering\" OR \"Solar radiation management\" OR \"Stratospheric Particle Injection\" OR \"Stratospheric aerosol injection\" OR \"Marine cloud brightening\" OR \"Ocean sulfur cycle enhancement\"\n",
    "# Forecasts": 40,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the star Betelgeuse be observed to go supernova before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3531/will-the-star-betelgeuse-be-observed-to-go-supernova-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "In the last few months, the star Betelgeuse has [dimmed in the sky] (http://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=13410) , prompting some media outlets to speculate that it will soon be observed to go supernova. Some astronomers, such as Phil Plait, have [responded] (https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/dont-panic-betelgeuse-is-almost-certainly-not-about-to-explode) by saying that it is unlikely to explode any time soon,\nEven at the prodigious rates it's going through helium, it'll probably be about 100,000 years before it explodes.\nThis question resolves positively if one reliable media outlet reports that the star Betelgeuse has been observed exploding in the sky before 12 AM January 1st, 2030 UTC.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 82,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many geoengineering international treaties will be listed on the World Legal Information Institute's database at the end of 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3535/how-many-geoengineering-international-treaties-will-be-listed-on-the-world-legal-information-institutes-database-at-the-end-of-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Climate change geoengineering, defined by the United Kingdom’s Royal Society as “the deliberate large-scale manipulation of the planetary environment to counteract anthropogenic climate change” [(Shepherd et al. 2009)] (https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2009/8693.pdf) . Geoengineering involves the removal of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, or attempts at reflecting more energy away from the planet to counter warming [(Markusson et al., 2013)] (http://geoengineering-governance-research.org/perch/resources/workingpaper5markusson-et-algeinccwikipediadataset.pdf) . Geoengineering is often presented as a complement, and sometimes alternative, to climate mitigation and adaptation.\nThere are serious and complex governance issues which need to be resolved if geoengineering is ever to become an acceptable method for moderating climate change. It would be highly undesirable for irreversible global geoengineering to occur before appropriate governance mechanisms are in place. The Royal Society has published a set of geoengineering governance principles, known as The Oxford Principles, which aims to guide the collaborative development of geoengineering governance, from the earliest stages of research, to any eventual deployment. These principles are:\n---Principle 1: Geoengineering is to be regulated as a public good \n---Principle 2: The public should participate in geoengineering decision-making \n---Principle 3: Geoengineering research and results should be publicly disclosed \n---Principle 4: There should be independent assessments of the impacts \n---Principle 5: governance systems should be developed before geoengineering methods are deployed \nThe World Legal Information Institute's International Treaties Collection database currently lists a total of six international treaties that are related to the governance of geoengineering. \nHow many geoengineering international treaties will be listed on the World Legal Information Institute's database at the end of 2024?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the number of geoengineering-related documents listed on the [World Legal Information Institute's International Treaties Collection database] (http://www.worldlii.org/int/special/treaties/) on December 31st, 2024. The relevant search will include the following search terms:\n\"Climate engineering\" OR \"geoengineering\" OR \"Solar radiation management\" OR \"Stratospheric Particle Injection\" OR \"Stratospheric aerosol injection\" OR \"Marine cloud brightening\" OR \"Ocean sulfur cycle enhancement\"\n",
    "# Forecasts": 81,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many new electric vehicles will be registered worldwide, in the calendar year 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3542/how-many-new-electric-vehicles-will-be-registered-worldwide-in-the-calendar-year-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Automakers, policy makers and energy producers are predicting [the future of global commercial vehicles to be electric] (https://qz.com/1620614/electric-car-forecasts-are-all-over-the-map/) . However, predictions about the timing of gas guzzlers’ eclipse are all over the map (e.g. see [here] (https://www.theatlas.com/charts/rJXp4Vc3N) ). \nThe Centre for Solar Energy and Hydrogen Research Baden-Württemberg (ZSW) publishes yearly data on global stock and registration of electric vehicles, i.e.battery-electric vehicles (BEV) and other electric vehicles (such as Plug-in Hybrid electric vehicles, PHEV). According to [its 2019 report] (https://www.zsw-bw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/PDFs/Pressemitteilungen/2019/pr02-2019-ZSW-WorldwideNumbersElectriccars.pdf) :\nThe number of electric cars worldwide had risen to 5.6 million in early 2019, up 64 percent from previous year. This is the second year running to see such accelerated growth. China and the USA, the biggest markets, are propelling this steep growth. China remains the undisputed global leader with a total of 2.6 million ecars. It is followed by the USA with 1.1 million e-cars. Just short of 142,000 electric vehicles are now rolling on Germany’s roads.\nTesla accounts for the largest number of newly registered vehicles, nearly 234,000, followed by the Chinese brands BYD and BAIC. The most successful German manufacturer was BMW, taking sixth place with close to 87,000 electric cars, followed by VW in ninth place.\nHow many new electric vehicles will be registered worldwide, in the calendar year 2023?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the number of new EVs registered worldwide in the calendar year 2023, according to [ZSW's data service] (https://www.zsw-bw.de/mediathek/datenservice.html) . It resolves ambiguous if their survey is discontinued or found to be inadmissible (such as when their methodology changes). The methodology is deemed to have changed if estimates of historical prices change by &gt;25% relative to the figures below.\nData\nAccording to [ZSW's data service] (https://www.zsw-bw.de/mediathek/datenservice.html) , these are the numbers of EVs registered each year, starting in 2014:\n2014: 384,600 2015: 564,630, 2016: 779,250, 2017: 1,279,430, 2018: 2,242,720.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 126,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the global weighted-average levelized cost of energy of onshore wind be in 2022, in 2018 USD per kWh?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3581/what-will-the-global-weighted-average-levelized-cost-of-energy-of-onshore-wind-be-in-2022-in-2018-usd-per-kwh/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Wind power or wind energy is the use of air flow through wind turbines to provide the mechanical power to turn electric generators. Wind power provided [11.6% of the electricity demand in the European Union] (https://windeurope.org/about-wind/statistics/european/wind-in-power-2017/) in 2017. Denmark is generally the country with the highest penetration of wind power, with [43% of its consumed electricity from wind in 2016] (https://www.rte.ie/news/newslens/2018/0111/932573-denmark-wind-farm/) .\nAccording to the [International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA)] (https://www.irena.org/aboutirena) , in 2018, the global weighted-average [levelized cost of energy (LCOE)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source) of onshore wind projects commissioned in 2018 was at USD 0.056/kWh [(IRENA, 2019)] (https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/May/IRENA_Renewable-Power-Generations-Costs-in-2018.pdf) . This was 13% lower than in 2017 and 35% lower than in 2010, when it was USD 0.085/kWh (ibid.).\nWhat will the global weighted-average LCOE of onshore wind be in 2022, in 2018 USD per kWh?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the global weighted-average LCOE of onshore wind be in 2022, in 2018 USD per kWh, per IRENA estimates. Prices are to be converted to 2018 USD using BLS [CPI for all urban consumers and all items] (https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost?cu) . In case IRENA data is not available, other sources of estimates of the global weighted-average LCOE of solar PV may be consulted. These other sources should be deemed by an admin to be sufficiently similar in methodology. One criterion of similarity is that the estimate of the 2018 LCOE solar PV is not more than 25% different from $0.056/kWh in 2018 USD.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 105,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the average growth rate be, of total renewable energy produced worldwide, over the 2020 to 2022 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3582/what-will-the-average-growth-rate-be-of-total-renewable-energy-produced-worldwide-over-the-2020-to-2022-period/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "According to [OECD estimates] (https://data.oecd.org/energy/renewable-energy.htm) , over 1.881M of tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) of renewable energy was produced in 2016. Renewable energy production saw impressive growth over the 70's during which total renewable energy produced grew at an average rate of 2.4%. This slowed down in the 90's to around 1.46%, but has picked up recently. Over the 2014 to 2018 period, more renewable energy capacity has been installed than new fossil fuel and nuclear capacity combined [(REN 21, 2019)] (http://www.ren21.net/gsr-2019/) . Of the new renewable energy capacity installed in 2018, 55 percent (about 100 GW) was solar PV; wind power had 28 percent, and hydropower 11 percent (ibid.). This suggests that the future of the world depends on solar continuing to boom.\nOver the 2014 to 2016 period, total renewable energy produced grew at an impressible 3.47% year-over-year, on average.\nWhat will the average growth rate be, of total renewable energy produced worldwide over the 2020 to 2022 period?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the geometric mean of year-over-year growth in total renewable energy produced worldwide in % for the periods 2019 to 2020, 2020 to 2021, and 2021 to 2022, as calculated from [OECD estimates] (https://data.oecd.org/energy/renewable-energy.htm) .\nThe [geometric mean] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_mean) is used, as opposed to the more common arithmetic mean, because this is appropriate for growth that multiplies over time.\nData\nHistorical data can [be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10Y5ejPYoF_XDILDhLiFT4xU8TKVSouy2lLD4qWrbXl8/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it. If you make useful additions to the dataset, please share the file in the comments.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 133,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Stacey Abrams be elected president in or before the 2040 election?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3588/will-stacey-abrams-be-elected-president-in-or-before-the-2040-election/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2%",
    "Description": "Stacey Abrams, failed 2018 Georgia gubernatorial candidate who has yet to concede that election as of January 31, 2020, thinks she will be elected president in the next 20 years. Do you agree?\nSource: [Stacey Abrams Thinks She’ll Be President By 2040] (https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/stacey-abrams-thinks-shell-be-president-by-2040/) \nThis resolves positively if Stacey Abrams is elected president in or before 2040 and the result is not overturned prior to inauguration, whether or not she is actually inaugurated. This resolves negatively by any other outcome.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 120,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the volume-weighted average battery for electric vehicles and stationary storage reach $75 per kilowatt hour?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3591/ev-battery-storage-costs/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Automakers, policy makers and energy producers are predicting [the future of global commercial vehicles to be electric] (https://qz.com/1620614/electric-car-forecasts-are-all-over-the-map/) . However, predictions about the timing of gas guzzlers’ eclipse are all over the map (e.g. see [here] (https://www.theatlas.com/charts/rJXp4Vc3N) ). This lack in consensus is in part due differing opinions on current and future lithium-ion battery costs and performance.\nIn their annual Battery Price Survey, [Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF)] (https://about.bnef.com/) collects data on the annual industry volume-weighted average battery price for electronic vehicles and stationary storage. BNEF reported a volume-weighted average battery price of $176 per kilowatt hour, in 2018 USD.\nWhen will the volume-weighted average battery for electronic vehicles and stationary storage reach $75 per kilowatt hour?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the year in which the volume-weighted average battery for electronic vehicles and stationary storage reach $75 per kilowatt hour, according to BNEF's Battery Price Survey in 2018 USD. It resolves ambiguous if their survey is discontinued or found to be inadmissible (such as when their methodology changes). The methodology is deemed to have changed if estimates of historical prices change by &gt;25% relative to those recorded below.\nThis question resolves as the date obtained by linearly interpolating the between the price when the threshold is first crossed, and the previously reported price.\nData\nThese are the following volume-weighted average prices per kWh, according to [BNEF survey results] (https://about.bnef.com/blog/behind-scenes-take-lithium-ion-battery-prices/) :\n2010: $1160, 2011: $899, 2012: $707, 2013: $650, 2014: $577 2015: $373, 2016: $288, 2017: $214, 2018: $174 (all in 2018 USD)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 52,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the volume-weighted average battery for electric vehicles and stationary storage reach $100 per kilowatt hour?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3592/ev-battery-storage-costs/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Automakers, policy makers and energy producers are predicting [the future of global commercial vehicles to be electric] (https://qz.com/1620614/electric-car-forecasts-are-all-over-the-map/) . However, predictions about the timing of gas guzzlers’ eclipse are all over the map (e.g. see [here] (https://www.theatlas.com/charts/rJXp4Vc3N) ). This lack in consensus is in part due differing opinions on current and future lithium-ion battery costs and performance.\nIn their annual Battery Price Survey, [Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF)] (https://about.bnef.com/) collects data on the annual industry volume-weighted average battery price for electronic vehicles and stationary storage. BNEF reported a volume-weighted average battery price of $176 per kilowatt hour, in 2018 USD.\nWhen will the volume-weighted average battery for electronic vehicles and stationary storage reach $100 per kilowatt hour?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the year in which the volume-weighted average battery for electronic vehicles and stationary storage reach $100 per kilowatt hour, according to BNEF's Battery Price Survey in 2018 USD. It resolves ambiguous if their survey is discontinued or found to be inadmissible (such as when their methodology changes). The methodology is deemed to have changed if estimates of historical prices change by &gt;25% relative to those recorded below.\nThis question resolves as the date obtained by linearly interpolating the between the price when the threshold is first crossed, and the previously reported price.\nData\nThese are the following volume-weighted average prices per kWh, according to [BNEF survey results] (https://about.bnef.com/blog/behind-scenes-take-lithium-ion-battery-prices/) :\n2010: $1160, 2011: $899, 2012: $707, 2013: $650, 2014: $577 2015: $373, 2016: $288, 2017: $214, 2018: $174 (all in 2018 USD)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 70,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will renewable energy contribute 25.00%, or less, to global electricity production in the calendar year 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3593/will-renewable-energy-contribute-2500-or-less-to-global-electricity-production-in-the-calendar-year-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11%",
    "Description": "The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has outlined various illustrative model pathways for limiting global warming to 1.5°C by the end of the century. Its fourth pathway (P4) is the worst-case scenario in terms of our ability to transition our energy supply toward renewables. In this scenario, the only way to limit global warming to 1.5°C is by making strong use of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) techniques, such as through the deployment of [Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage ] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bio-energy_with_carbon_capture_and_storage) (BECCS). According the [(IPCC, 2018)] (https://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_spm_fig3b.pdf) :\nP4: A resource- and energy-intensive scenario in which economic growth and globalization lead to widespread adoption of greenhouse-gas-intensive lifestyles, including high demand for transportation fuels and livestock products. Emissions reductions are mainly achieved through technological means, making strong use of CDR through the deployment of BECCS.\nAccording to the [(IPCC, 2018)] (https://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_spm_fig3b.pdf) , P4 is consistent with a share of 25% or less of renewables energy used in electricity production in 2030.\nIn 2016, 22.66% of total electricity was produced using renewable energy, according to [World Bank data] (https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/renewables-share-electricity-production) . \nWill renewable energy contribute 25.00%, or less, to global electricity production in the calendar year 2030?\nResolution\nThis resolves positively if renewable energy contributes 25.00% or less to global electricity production in the calendar year 2030, according to World Bank data.\nData\nHistorical data can [be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11z_Nh1o95otYkpW_rq47FyZzJDILx8oL935W_Wp-hAY/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it. If you make useful additions to the dataset, please share the file in the comments.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 100,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Iowa host another \"first in the nation\" Democratic caucus by the end of 2028?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3600/will-iowa-host-another-first-in-the-nation-democratic-caucus-by-the-end-of-2028/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "68%",
    "Description": "Since the modern primary system was established in the United States in 1972, Iowa has had a special status as being the first state in the United States to cast ballots and award delegates for the Presidential campaigns - the coveted \"first in the nation\" status that brings much media attention (and money) to Iowa.\nOn 3 February 2020, Iowa held US caucuses. While the Republican caucus was uneventful, the Democratic caucus lead to [an unprecedented delay in reporting results] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Iowa_Democratic_caucuses#Delay_in_final_results) , leading to many pundits to declare that the Iowa caucuses would be over. Most notably, David Plouffe, who ran the campaign for Barack Obama, said ”I believe caucuses are dead\" on MSNBC.\nWill this come true, or are the rumors of the death of this 48 year old tradition greatly exaggerated?\nThis question will resolve positively if, at least once before the end of 2028, Iowa holds (a) a US Democratic primary election that is both (b) a caucus (as distinct from a primary) and (c) is \"first in the nation\".\nFor the purposes of this question, a \"caucus\" is defined as any system where, (I) rather than going to polls and casting ballots, selectors gather at set locations throughout the state's precincts (e.g., schools, churches, public libraries, casinos) and (II) physically order in publicly-known preference groups and then (III) reallocate according to a viability threshold. (See [\"walking subcaucus\" voting system] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walking_subcaucus) for details, though any such method meeting I-III will qualify).\nA \"first in the nation primary event\" is defined as a Presidential primary event that awards delegates to the national convention for the purposes of selecting the presidential candidate such that no other such events in that nominating process take place prior or simultaneous with the \"first in the nation primary event\".\nThe \"US Democratic primary election\" refers to a Presidential primary event that selects delegates for [the National Convention of the United States Democratic Primary] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Democratic_National_Convention) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 99,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Medicare for all be passed if a Democrat is elected president in 2020?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3605/will-medicare-for-all-be-passed-if-a-democrat-is-elected-president-in-2020/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "Bernie Sanders appears to have tied for most delegates in the Iowa primary, greatly boosting his chances of becoming the Democratic nominee for president. [Medicare for all] (https://berniesanders.com/issues/medicare-for-all/) has been one of his signature issues. Other candidates (including Elizabeth Warren) have also endorsed a version of Medicare for all. Even if Sanders or Warren was elected, however, such a law would face numerous challeges to being passed, primarily in the US Senate where 60 senators would presumably be necessary to overcome a filibuster.\nConditional on the Democratic candidate being elected president of the United States (regardless of whether or not it is Bernie Sanders), will Medicare for All be passed (in their first term)?\nFor the purposes of this question a policy will be considered Medicare for All if it:\n1a) Is widely reported in the media as \"Medicare for All\"\nor\n1b) Covers the Essential Health Benefits as described in Obamacare\n2) Covers all citizens of the United States who currently reside in the USA regardless of age.\n3) Does not require people to pay a individual premium or purchase private insurance to be considered covered.\n3a) This question could still resolve positively if people are allowed (but not required) to have supplemental insurance.\n3b) A plan that requires a modest copay (limited to total payments of no more than $3000/year) to recieve care would still resolve positively\nIf the Republican candidate (presumably Donald Trump) or another candidate not running as a Democrat wins, this question resolves ambiguously.\nFor example, if Bernie Sanders runs as an independent against Joe Biden and wins, the question resolves ambiguously.\nThis question will resolve positively when such a law has been passed through congress and signed by the president, regardless of whether or not it takes effect (for example because of legal challenges).\nThis question will resolve negatively if the Democratic candidate is elected, but no such law is passed before the expiration of their first term - either January 20, 2025, or the date that a new President is appointed who is not a Democrat, whichever comes first.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 128,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a Wealth Tax be passed if a Democrat is elected president in 2020?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3606/will-a-wealth-tax-be-passed-if-a-democrat-is-elected-president-in-2020/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "Bernie Sanders appears to have tied for most delegates in the Iowa primary, greatly boosting his chances of becoming the Democratic nominee for president. A [Weath Tax] (https://berniesanders.com/issues/tax-extreme-wealth/) has been one of his signature issues. Other candidates (including Elizabeth Warren) have also endorsed a version of a Wealth Tax. Even if Sanders or Warren was elected, however, such a law would face numerous challeges to being passed, primarily in the US Senate where 60 senators would presumably be necessary to overcome a filibuster.\nConditional on the Democratic candidate being elected president of the United States (regardless of whether or not it is Bernie Sanders), will a Wealth Tax be passed (in their first term)?\nFor the purposes of this question a policy will be considered a Wealth Tax if it:\n1) Could theoretically be applied to at least one person living in the US at the time of passage.\n2) The amount paid is based on a formula related to a person's net-worth, not their income (with some assets possibly being excluded)\n3) Has a rate of at least 0.13% (the lowest rate in Switzerland).\n4) Includes (at a mininum) privately held companies and stock in public corporations as a basis for the wealth tax.\nIf the Republican candidate (presumably Donald Trump) or another candidate not running as a Democrat wins, this question resolves ambiguously.\nFor example, if Bernie Sanders runs as an independent against Joe Biden and wins, the question resolves ambiguously.\nThis question will resolve positively when such a law has been passed through congress and signed by the president, regardless of whether or not it takes effect (for example because of legal challenges).\nThis question will resolve negatively if the Democratic candidate is elected, but no such law is passed before the expiration of their first term - either January 20, 2025, or the date that a new President is appointed who is not a Democrat, whichever comes first.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 130,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the majority of leading cosmologists in 2030 agree that the evidence points to an accelerating universe?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3608/will-the-majority-of-leading-cosmologists-in-2030-agree-that-the-evidence-points-to-an-accelerating-universe/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "90%",
    "Description": "Assume that in January 2030, a message such as email is sent to a group of 25 leading cosmologists (specified later in this question), asking them, \"In your opinion, does the current evidence strongly support the conclusion that the universe's expansion is accelerating? To avoid ambiguity, please include 'yes', 'no' or 'other' in your response.\" This question resolves positively if the majority of those who reply directly to the email respond with a direct \"yes\" in their reply, and resolves negatively if the majority of those who reply directly respond with a direct \"no\" in their reply. Replies that do not contain a direct \"yes\" or direct \"no\" are not counted.\nThe message is allowed to include an introduction explaining the purpose of the question.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if any of the following happen:\n---The replies from such an inquiry are not published by the end of January 2030. \n---There are an equal number of direct \"Yes\"s or \"No\"s in the replies. \n---A Metaculus moderator believes that all of the responses are too vague to count up the \"Yes\"s and \"No\"s. \nThe group of 25 leading cosmologists would be the group created via the following method. In January 2030, take the most highly cited papers uploaded to arXiv during the 2020s in the categories \"Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics\" and \"General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology.\" For each paper, in order from most citations to least citations, add the first author to the group if they are both alive and have a public email address. Continue adding authors until there are 25 members in the group.\nThe number of citations for a paper is determined by Google Scholar.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 74,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a new amendment to the US Constitution be ratified by 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3616/will-a-new-amendment-to-the-us-constitution-be-ratified-by-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "60%",
    "Description": "The US Constitution has been amended [27 times] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_amendments_to_the_United_States_Constitution) in its history, most recently in 1992. This question resolves positively if at least five reliable media outlets report that before January 1st 2050 the US constitution received a 28th amendment. Otherwise it resolves negatively.\nThis question will close and resolve 1 hour before any 28th amendment becomes law, if one does.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 281,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the US supreme court change size by 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3617/will-the-us-supreme-court-change-size-by-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "46%",
    "Description": "The US supreme court currently has a fixed size of 9 members, but it [hasn't always been this way] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States#Size_of_the_court) . It takes only an act of congress to change the size of the court. The president Franklin D. Roosevelt famously [failed to increase the size of the court] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Procedures_Reform_Bill_of_1937) despite his party having a supermajority in congress.\nThis question resolves positively if at least five reliable media outlets report that the size of the US Supreme Court has been changed by law by January 1st 2050. Otherwise, it resolves negatively.\nThis question closes 1 hour before any relevant law or constitutional amendment passes, or before any other legal action happens, that would induce a positive resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 201,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the United States admit a new state?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3618/when-will-the-united-states-admit-a-new-state/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[According to the US constitution] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admission_to_the_Union) , it takes an act of congress to admit a new state into the union. The last time a state was admitted was in 1959, when Hawaii was admitted into the union.\nQuestion: When will the United States admit a new state?\nThis question resolves positively when at least five reliable media outlets report that a new state is admitted into the United States. A \"new state\" is defined as a state which wasn't in the union in 2019.\nIt resolves as \"&gt; Dec 31, 2050\" if a new state is not admitted before the end of 2050.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 157,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many nations will there be in the United Nations by 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3619/how-many-nations-will-there-be-in-the-united-nations-by-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The number of members of the United Nations is [currently 193] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_states_of_the_United_Nations) , with South Sudan as the newest member, being admitted in 2011.\nHow many members of the United Nations will there be on January 1st 2050? If a nation is admitted at 12:00 am on the 1st, this counts. If the UN no longer exists, the question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 58,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will China recognize the sovereignty of Taiwan by 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3620/will-china-recognize-the-sovereignty-of-taiwan-by-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "Currently, the [political status of The Republic of China] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_status_of_Taiwan) (Taiwan) is disputed. Many governments, notably the People's Republic of China (PRC), maintain that the Republic of China (ROC) is an illegitimate government. \nThis question resolves positively if at least five reliable media outlets report that the ROC is legally recognized by the PRC by January 1st 2050. Recognition is generally considered valid if it is declared by law, or declared through a large international body such as the United Nations. Otherwise the question resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 222,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a third party win a Senate election in the United States by 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3621/will-a-third-party-win-a-senate-election-in-the-united-states-by-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "55.00000000000001%",
    "Description": "So-called \"third parties\" are political parties in the United State that aren't the Democratic Party or the Republican Party. Members of [third parties] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_party_(United_States)) rarely win elections in America. However, the [last third party member] (https://www.senate.gov/senators/SenatorsRepresentingThirdorMinorParties.htm) who won a senate election was James L. Buckly in 1970.\nFor the purposes of this question, \"independent\" is not counted as a third party, as it is not a political party, but instead an identification.\nThis question resolves positively if at least five reliable media sources report that a member of a third party won a United States senate election by January 1st 2050. Otherwise, it resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 86,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the Harvard admit rate be for the undergraduate class of 2029?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3622/what-will-the-harvard-admit-rate-be-for-the-undergraduate-class-of-2029/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The admit rate of elite universities has been steadily declining over the last few decades in America. Harvard is one of the most selective universities in the United States. Its class of 2023 had [an admit rate] (https://college.harvard.edu/admissions/admissions-statistics) of 4.6%, compared to 9.3% for [the class of 2010] (https://www.ivycoach.com/2010-ivy-league-admissions-statistics/) . Will this trend continue?\nThe admit rate is defined as the percentage of people who apply to the undergraduate program at Harvard and are admitted. Official statistics from Harvard determine the rate, if they are released. If those statistics are not released for the class of 2029 by January 1st 2026 then this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 215,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the English Wikipedia have 10 million articles?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3623/when-will-the-english-wikipedia-have-10-million-articles/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The English Wikipedia [was launched] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia) in 2001 and now has approximately 6 million articles at the time of writing this question.\nThis question resolves on the date during which the 10 millionth Wikipedia article is created, according to official internal statistics from Wikipedia, such as [this link] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 87,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the world real GDP growth rate be in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3626/what-will-the-world-real-gdp-growth-rate-be-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The world real GDP growth rate for the year 2030 will be determined by [the World Bank] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG) . The rate is in percentage points. If the World Bank does not release statistics by 2035, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 113,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact reach majority in the Electoral college before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3629/will-the-national-popular-vote-interstate-compact-reach-majority-in-the-electoral-college-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26%",
    "Description": "The [National Popular Vote Interstate Compact] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact) is a an agreement among states to award all of their electoral votes to the candidate with the highest popular vote, conditional on enough states agreeing that the total electoral vote count would secure a majority in the electoral college. In effect, the agreement means that if enough states sign on, the popular vote will determine the outcome of presidential elections. So far [states representing 196 electoral votes] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact#Adoption) have signed on, which is 73% of the way to the 270 required to obtain a majority in the Electoral College.\nThis question resolves positively if at least five reliable media sources report that states representing at least half of Electoral College votes have signed the NPVIC before 2030.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 149,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the federal minimum wage increase in the United States before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3631/will-the-federal-minimum-wage-increase-in-the-united-states-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "89%",
    "Description": "The [federal minimum wage] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_wage_in_the_United_States) in the United States is currently $7.25 an hour, and was most recently changed in 2009.\nThis question resolves positively if at least three reliable media outlets report that the federal minimum wage increased from $7.25 any time before January 1st 2025. Otherwise, it resolves negatively.\nThis question can be resolved at any time.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 268,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Longbets series: By 2030, will commercial passengers routinely fly in pilotless planes?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3645/longbets-series-by-2030-will-commercial-passengers-routinely-fly-in-pilotless-planes/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "Craig J Mundie and Eric Schmidt summarize their reasons for taking the bet [here] (http://longbets.org/4/) .\nIf the Long Now Foundation declares Craig J Mundie the winner, this question resolves positively. If they declare Eric Schmidt the winner, this question resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 75,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Longbets series: By 2025 will the scientific evidence of a large bi-pedal great ape be sufficient to convince at least 50% of primatologists that a yeti/bigfoot-like creature exists?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3647/longbets-series-by-2025-will-the-scientific-evidence-of-a-large-bi-pedal-great-ape-be-sufficient-to-convince-at-least-50-of-primatologists-that-a-yetibigfoot-like-creature-exists/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "Kevin Kelly and Stewart Brand summarize their reasons for taking the bet [here] (http://longbets.org/120/) .\nIf Kevin Kelly is declared the winner of the bet by the Long Now Foundation, then this question resolves positively. If Stewart Brand is declared the winner, then this question resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 93,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Longbets series: By 2029 will a computer have passed the Turing Test?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3648/longbets-series-by-2029-will-a-computer-have-passed-the-turing-test/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "37%",
    "Description": "Ray Kurzweil and Mitchell Kapor summarize their reasons for taking the bet [here] (http://longbets.org/1/) .\nIf the Long Now Foundation declares Ray Kurzweil the winner of the bet, then this question resolves positively. If they declare Mitchell Kapor the winner, then this question resolves negatively.\nEach Turing Test Session will consist of at least three Turing Test Trials. For each such Turing Test Trial, a set of Turing Test Interviews will take place, followed by voting by the Turing Test Judges as described below.\nUsing its best judgment, the Turing Test Committee will appoint three Humans to be the Turing Test Judges.\nUsing its best judgment, the Turing Test Committee will appoint three Humans to be the Turing Test Human Foils. The Turing Test Human Foils should not be known (either personally or by reputation) to the Turing Test Judges.\nDuring the Turing Test Interviews (for each Turing Test Trial), each of the three Turing Test Judges will conduct online interviews of each of the four Turing Test Candidates (i.e., the Computer and the three Turing Test Human Foils) for two hours each for a total of eight hours of interviews conducted by each of the three Turing Test Judges (for a total of 24 hours of interviews).\nThe Turing Test Interviews will consist of online text messages sent back and forth as in a online \"instant messaging\" chat, as that concept is understood in the year 2001.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 319,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much wind energy will be consumed globally, in terawatt-hours, in the calendar year 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3652/how-much-wind-energy-will-be-consumed-globally-in-terawatt-hours-in-the-calendar-year-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Decarbonization of the electricity sector is required to meet climate stabilization targets [(IPCC 2014)] (https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf) . \nThe overall capacity of all newly installed wind turbines installed worldwide by the end of 2018 reached a record 598.9 gigawatt, roughly 5x the amount of those installed ten years prior, according to [statistics published by the World Wind Energy Association (WWEA)] (https://library.wwindea.org/global-statitistics-1980/) . \nAccording [to data by BP] (https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/wind-energy-consumption-by-region) , an energy company, a total of 959.53 terawatt-hours of wind energy was consumed in 2016.\nHow much wind energy will be consumed globally, in terawatt-hours, in the calendar year 2023?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the number of terawatt-hours of wind energy consumed in the calendar year 2023 according to credible estimates. Estimates should originate from BP's [Statistical Review of World Energy] (https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html) . Other sources with a similar methodology may be consulted if BP's estimates are not admissible. Similarity of methodology shall be decided by an admin. One criterion for similarity is that the estimates of wind energy consumed globally in 2016, is off by less than 25% 959.53 terawatt-hours. in the case multiple estimates are found upon resolving, the admin may choose to resolve this question as the median of different estimates, or resolve it per the estimate deemed most credible.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 168,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much solar energy will be consumed globally, in terawatt-hours, in the calendar year 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3653/how-much-solar-energy-will-be-consumed-globally-in-terawatt-hours-in-the-calendar-year-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Decarbonization of the electricity sector is required to meet climate stabilization targets [(IPCC 2014)] (https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf) . \nAccording [to data by BP] (https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/solar-energy-consumption-by-region) , a total of 333.05 terawatt-hours of solar solar photovoltaics energy was consumed in 2016.\nHow much solar photovoltaics energy will be consumed globally, in terawatt-hours, in the calendar year 2023?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the number of terawatt-hours of wind energy consumed in the calendar year 2023 according to credible estimates. Estimates should originate from BP's [Statistical Review of World Energy] (https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html) . Other sources with a similar methodology may be consulted if BP's estimates are not admissible. Similarity of methodology shall be decided by an admin. One criterion for similarity is that the estimates of solar energy consumed globally in 2016, is off by less than 25% 333.05 terawatt-hours. in the case multiple estimates are found upon resolving, the admin may choose to resolve this question as the median of different estimates, or resolve it per the estimate deemed most credible.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 147,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a 100 trillion parameter deep learning model be trained before 2026?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3656/will-a-100-trillion-parameter-deep-learning-model-be-trained-before-2026/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "87%",
    "Description": "In the last few years, the size of the largest deep learning models has grown enormously. Within the field of natural language processing, the largest models have gone from having 94 million parameters in 2018, to [17 billion parameters] (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/turing-nlg-a-17-billion-parameter-language-model-by-microsoft/) in early 2020.\nNow, Microsoft has released a new library DeepSpeed and created a memory efficient optimizer which aid in training extremely large models distributed across GPU clusters. From [their blog post] (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/zero-deepspeed-new-system-optimizations-enable-training-models-with-over-100-billion-parameters/) ,\nThe Zero Redundancy Optimizer (abbreviated ZeRO) is a novel memory optimization technology for large-scale distributed deep learning. ZeRO can train deep learning models with 100 billion parameters on the current generation of GPU clusters at three to five times the throughput of the current best system. It also presents a clear path to training models with trillions of parameters, demonstrating an unprecedented leap in deep learning system technology. [...] With all three stages enabled, ZeRO can train a trillion-parameter model on just 1024 NVIDIA GPUs. \nFor comparison, the current top supercomputer Summit [has 27,648 GPUs] (https://devblogs.nvidia.com/summit-gpu-supercomputer-enables-smarter-science/) , suggesting that training models with tens of trillions of parameters is already within theoretical reach. \nAlso recently, advances in neural models such as the new [Reformer] (https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.04451) may enable the ability to train large models that use memory much more efficiently.\nI have chosen 100 trillion because it is [considered by some] (https://aiimpacts.org/scale-of-the-human-brain/#Number_of_synapses_in_the_brain) to be the median estimate of the number of synapses in a human neocortex. \nThis question resolves positively if and when a reliable paper, blog post, or any other type of document, is published that reports that a deep learning model with at least 100 trillion parameters was trained before January 1st 2026 (no other details need to be reported except for the number of parameters). Otherwise, this question resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 236,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If a single-payer healthcare system is adopted in the United States, will healthcare spending go down as a fraction of GDP?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3657/if-a-single-payer-healthcare-system-is-adopted-in-the-united-states-will-healthcare-spending-go-down-as-a-fraction-of-gdp/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "55.00000000000001%",
    "Description": "Currently [economists are divided] (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/10/upshot/medicare-for-all-bernie-sanders-cost-estimates.html) on the question of whether single-payer saves money. Some argues that due to increased efficiency and scale, total healthcare spending would go down. Others argue that due to increased use of healthcare, total costs would go up.\nAssume that before 2050, the United States adopts a single-payer healthcare system, defined as a healthcare service that provides coverage to all citizens in the United States. In the five years after the system is implemented, will healthcare costs go down as a fraction of GDP, compared to the previous five years?\nThe date of implementation is defined as the first day during which some citizens are provided care under a single-payer plan. Statistics will be obtained by averaging the percentage of GDP spent on healthcare, as reported by an official government organization of the United States, during the 5 years prior to implementation and the 5 years after implementation, excluding the year of implementation. For example, if single-player healthcare is implemented in June 2031, then the relevant time-periods for comparison are 2025 - 2030 and 2032 - 2037.\nThis question can close early if a single-payer healthcare system is implemented.\nIf costs go down, this question resolves positively. If costs go up, this question resolves negatively. If a single-payer healthcare system is not implemented in the United States before January 1st 2050, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 66,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will electric cars constitute over 5% of the US passenger car fleet?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3658/when-will-electric-cars-constitute-over-5-of-the-us-passenger-car-fleet/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In 2018, electric cars constituted [0.45%] (https://web.archive.org/web/20200112055841/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_car_use_by_country) of all cars on US roads. There is a consistent effort from many governments to increase the usage of electric cars, up to promising to [ban all sales of non-electric cars] (https://web.archive.org/web/20190531053848/https://money.cnn.com/2017/09/11/autos/countries-banning-diesel-gas-cars/index.html) by a certain date. In parallel to these efforts, both popularity of electric cars among customers and the variety of manufacturers producing electric cars is rising. Some manufacturers even promise to [move to 100% electric] (http://web.archive.org/web/20200215021332/https://thedriven.io/2020/01/22/subaru-targets-100-electric-cars-by-mid-2030-but-mild-hybrids-only-headed-to-australia/) . On the other hand, by [Wikipedia data] (https://web.archive.org/web/20200112055841/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_car_use_by_country) only one country (Norway) has over 5% of electric cars out of all cars on the roads so far.\nThe question is:\nWhen will electric cars constitute over 5% of the cars on the roads in the USA?\nThe date is set by the earliest credible report in a respectable publication that provides statistics from which it follows that the number of electric cars on US roads is over 5%. \nFor the purpose of this question, an electric car is any vehicle which is classified as \"passenger car\", and whose sole energy input is electrical energy, delivered either by plugging it into an electrical energy source or replacing an electrical battery, or similar means. Hybrid vehicles that have both an electric and any other non-electric (gasoline, diesel, etc.) engine do not count as electric cars.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 120,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Are we on path for IPCC's 'middle-of-the-road' scenario for the deployment of renewables?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3665/are-we-on-path-for-ipccs-middle-of-the-road-scenario-for-the-deployment-of-renewables/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "71%",
    "Description": "The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has outlined various illustrative model pathways for limiting global warming to 1.5°C by the end of the century. Its third pathway (P3) is the 'middle-of-the-road' scenario in terms of our ability to transition our energy supply toward renewables. In this scenario, we will continue emitting greenhouse gasses (GHGs) until the end of the century, and we need to employ some carbon dioxide removal (CDR) techniques, such as through the deployment of [Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage ] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bio-energy_with_carbon_capture_and_storage) (BECCS), to achieve a concentration of GHG consistent with the 1.5°C target. According the [(IPCC, 2018)] (https://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_spm_fig3b.pdf) :\nP3: A middle-of-the-road scenario in which societal as well as technological development follows historical patterns. Emissions reductions are mainly achieved by changing the way in which energy and products are produced, and to a lesser degree by reductions in demand.\nAccording to the [(IPCC, 2018)] (https://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_spm_fig3b.pdf) , P3 is consistent with a share of 48% or less of renewables energy used in electricity production in 2030.\nIn 2016, 22.66% of total electricity was produced using renewable energy, according to [World Bank data] (https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/renewables-share-electricity-production) . \nWill renewable energy contribute between 48.00% and 25.00% (inclusive) to global electricity production in the calendar year 2030?\nResolution\nThis resolves positively if renewable energy contributes between 48.00% and 25.00% (inclusive) to global electricity production in the calendar year 2030, according to World Bank data.\nData\nHistorical data can [be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11z_Nh1o95otYkpW_rq47FyZzJDILx8oL935W_Wp-hAY/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it. If you make useful additions to the dataset, please share the file in the comments.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 48,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will it turn out that Bloomberg manipulated 2020 election prediction markets?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3671/will-it-turn-out-that-bloomberg-manipulated-2020-election-prediction-markets/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "While having a lot of great qualities, prediction markets do have some drawbacks. For one, betting markets can be manipulated by anyone with enough resources if they do not mind losing some of them (in expectation). As a case in point, there is some evidence that in 2012 Romney's chances were artificially boosted, and some (rank) speculation (see e.g. [here] (https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/2/14/21137882/prediction-markets-bloomberg-sanders-president) ) that Bloomberg's could be similarly benefitting. \nThe proposition in question will be taken as: \nA major prediction market such as PredictIt, Betfair, or one of comparable liquidity has had 2020 Presidential election results materially changed using bets made with funds tied directly to Bloomberg or his campaign.\nThat's not terribly precise, by design. It does not address the source of knowledge or fix many of the details. But this question is a bit experimental, one of a series of \"self-resolving\" ones. Resolution to this question will be determined as follows:\n--- \nIf at any time after the date of 2020-12-01 the community prediction is &gt; 95% or &lt; 5%, the question resolves positively or negatively, respectively.\n--- \nOtherwise, on or about the close and resolve date of 2022-01-01, the question will be decided by unanimous vote of a council of three people as to whether the proposition listed above is true, resolving ambiguous in the case of disagreement. The council of three will be chosen by quantum mechanical random numbers from a list of 12 people that will be composed by the author around the time of question close, and held secretly until the time of question resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 159,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much greenhouse gas will be emitted globally, in the calendar year 2030, in gigatonnes of CO₂ equivalent?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3678/how-much-greenhouse-gas-will-be-emitted-globally-in-the-calendar-year-2030-in-gigatonnes-of-co%25E2%2582%2582-equivalent/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "At the Paris climate conference (COP21) in December 2015, 195 countries adopted the first-ever universal, legally binding global climate deal. One of the key elements of the Paris agreement is global average temperature targeting: \nGovernments agreed to reduce emissions: with a long-term goal of keeping the increase in global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, and to aim to limit the increase to 1.5°C, since this would significantly reduce risks and the impacts of climate change.\nThe annual [UN Environment Emissions Gap Report] (https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2018) presents an assessment of current national mitigation efforts and the ambitions countries have presented in their Nationally Determined Contributions, which form the foundation of the Paris Agreement. It also identifies the trajectory of annual greenhouse gas emissions consistent with achieving the mean global average temperature levels targeted by the Paris Agreement.\nAccording to [its 2018 scenario estimates] (https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/26895/EGR2018_FullReport_EN.pdf?sequence=1&amp;isAllowed=y) , the trajectory required to achieve the 2°C target with a 66% chance is one in which emissions of all GHGs should not exceed 40 (range 38–45) gigatonnes of CO₂ equivalent (GtCO₂e) in the year 2030. It provides a snapshots for the year 2030 of the relevant abatement paths:\n---40 GtCO₂e (90% CI: 38–45) emitted in 2030 is consistent with path that achieves below 2.0°C temperature rise in 2100 (66% chance) \n---34 GtCO₂e (90% CI: 30–40) emitted in 2030 is consistent with path that achieves below 1.8°C temperature rise in 2100 (66% chance) \n---24 GtCO₂e (90% CI: 22–30) emitted in 2030 emitted in 2030 is consistent with path that achieves below 1.5°C temperature rise in 2100 (66% chance) \nHow much GHG will be emitted globally in the calendar year 2030, in gigatonnes of CO₂ equivalent?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the amount of global GHG emissions in gigatonnes of CO₂ equivalent emitted in the calendar year 2030, according to credible estimates, such as those reported by the [World Bank] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.GHGT.KT.CE) . Other sources of data on global emissions may be used, provided it estimates are &lt;25% removed from those displayed by the World Bank for the 2009 to 2012 period.\nData\nWorld Bank data can be [accessed here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1j7vBfP8CD1Q_MIHqW_AxTgRlC2ThS0pxhthhuDDp4ZI/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it. If you make useful additions to the dataset, please share the file in the comments.\n*Carbon dioxide equivalency (CO₂e) describes, for a given mixture and amount of greenhouse gases, the amount of CO2 that would have the same global warming ability, when measured over a specified time period. For our purposes, greenhouse gas emissions are the sum of the basket of greenhouse gases listed in Annex A to the Kyoto Protocol, expressed as CO2e assuming a 100-year global warming potential.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 105,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will it turn out that Covid-19 originated inside a research lab in Hubei?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3681/will-it-turn-out-that-covid-19-originated-inside-a-research-lab-in-hubei/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "14.000000000000002%",
    "Description": "The origins of the Covid-19 disease-causing coronavirus are rather obscure, and Chinese authorities have held information about the disease in tight control. This has led to some speculation of various types of coverups. One of the most provocative is the idea that it did not have a natural origin. There's a lengthy writeup of the idea [here] (https://harvardtothebighouse.com/2020/01/31/logistical-and-technical-analysis-of-the-origins-of-the-wuhan-coronavirus-2019-ncov/) .\nThe proposition in question will be taken as: \nThe the origin of the Covid-19 coronavirus infection involved the release of a pathogen from a research laboratory in Hubei province.\nThat's not terribly precise, by design. But this question is a bit experimental, one of a series of [\"self-resolving\" ones.] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4031/self-resolving-question-method-discussion/) Resolution to this question will be determined as follows:\n--- \nIf at any time after the date of May 1, 2020 the community prediction is &gt; 97% or &lt; 3%, the question closes. Then, with 90% probability (as called by a quantum RNG), resolves positively or negatively, respectively. (With 10% probability the question is referred to the below committee.)\n--- \nOtherwise, on or about the close/resolve date of May 1, 2021, the question will be decided by unanimous vote of a council of three people as to whether the proposition listed above is true, at 50+% credence (i.e. more true than its negation), resolving ambiguous in the case of disagreement. The council of three will be chosen by quantum mechanical random numbers from a list of 12 people that will be composed by the author around the time of 2020-05-01, and held secretly until the time of question resolution.\n(Edited 2020-04-15 to include 10% probability to being kicked to committee.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 2390,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before the end of 2024 will at least two public health agencies claim that COVID-19 more likely than not originated from a laboratory?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3682/before-the-end-of-2024-will-at-least-two-public-health-agencies-claim-that-covid-19-more-likely-than-not-originated-from-a-laboratory/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "17%",
    "Description": "The beginning of 2020 has seen the emergence of COVID-19 outbreak caused by a novel coronavirus. The majority of the cases were epidemiologically linked to seafood, poultry and live wildlife market (Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market) in Jianghan District of Hubei Province. This suggests that the novel coronavirus has a possible zoonotic origin. [Some] (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.08.939660v2.full.pdf) [evidence] (https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200211-sitrep-22-ncov.pdf) suggests the virus might have originated from bat sub-species. So far, scientists have been unable to conclusively determine the zoological origins of COVID-19.\nIn a [recent (but undated) preprint] (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WEf2GYT_eh4zErSMd9eIwo1Uo_m0PRZk/view?usp=sharing) , two Chinese scientists claim that the COVID-19 strain of coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan:\nIn summary, somebody was entangled with the evolution of 2019-nCoV coronavirus. In addition to origins of natural recombination and intermediate host, the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan.\nThe preprint implicates the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the only BSL-4 virology lab in China. [Scientists have previously expressed concerns] (https://www.nature.com/news/inside-the-chinese-lab-poised-to-study-world-s-most-dangerous-pathogens-1.21487) about the organisation's ability to monitor the lab.\nOther scientists, such as Trevor Bedford, of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle has disputed the theory of the laboratory origins of COVID-19, [claiming] (https://www.ft.com/content/a6392ee6-4ec6-11ea-95a0-43d18ec715f5) : \"There is no evidence whatsoever of genetic engineering that we can find\".\nResolution\nThis questions resolves positively if, before the end of 2024 at least two of the public health agencies listed below claim that it is more likely than not that the COVID-19 strain of coronavirus originated from a Chinese virology laboratory. For the purpose of this question, we consider only statements by the following public health agencies:\n--- [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] (https://www.cdc.gov/) (including the [Epidemic Intelligence Service] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemic_Intelligence_Service) ) \n---The [European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control] (https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/home) (including the [Health Threat Unit] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Threat_Unit) ) \n--- [World Health Organization] (https://www.who.int/) \n--- [The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention] (http://www.chinacdc.cn/en/) \n---The [Centre for Health Protection] (https://www.chp.gov.hk/en/index.html) \n--- [Robert Koch Institute] (https://www.rki.de/EN/Home/homepage_node.html) \n--- [The National Institute of Infectious Diseases] (https://www.niid.go.jp/niid/en/) \n--- [Public Health England] (https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/public-health-england) \n--- [The National Centre for Infectious Diseases] (https://www.ncid.sg/About-NCID/Pages/default.aspx) \n--- [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Korea] (https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;q=Centers+for+Disease+Control+and+Prevention+Korea&amp;meta=) \n--- [The Public Health Agency of Canada] (https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health.html) \nIn case multiple subdivisions of any of the above agencies make assessments that COVID-19 more likely than not originated from a Chinese virology laboratory, this will only count as single claim made by a one public health agency.\nAssessments made by these agencies must broadly state that it is more likely than not that COVID-19 originated from a Chinese virology or biology laboratory, after having been released accidentally or deliberately. Synonyms for probability assessments must be considered by an admin to be broadly consistent with at least a 50% chance. Examples of such synonyms include \"probably\", \"likely\", \"with high probability\" and \"almost certainly\".\n",
    "# Forecasts": 427,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will an oracle superintelligence be developed before a general superintelligence?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3683/will-an-oracle-superintelligence-be-developed-before-a-general-superintelligence/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "38%",
    "Description": "An oracle ( [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_control_problem#Oracle) , [Lesswrongwiki] (https://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Oracle_AI) ) is a theoretical capability-constrained artificial intelligence (AI) limited to answering questions. An oracle would plausibly be easier to safely implement than a [general AI] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_general_intelligence) , and it may help to solve the safety issues associated with general AI. Therefore, a reasonable case can be made for developing an oracle first, even if a safe general AI seems feasible. However, an oracle would have considerably less (though still large) upside than a general AI, so it may be less appealing to investors.\nThis question will immediately resolve positively if an AI limited to answering questions achieves reliably superhuman performance across virtually all questions of interest before an AI achieves generally superhuman performance across virtually all human activities of interest. If a generally superhuman AI is developed first, the question will immediately resolve negatively. By default, the question will resolve ambiguously on the resolve date, 2099-12-31.\nSuccessful creation of either technology would presumably be extremely obvious and uncontroversial, with a great amount of media coverage and scientific attention. However, if there is significant disagreement over whether a given apparent achievement resolves the question, it will be determined by Metaculus moderators.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 72,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a quantum computer running Shor's algorithm (or a similar one) be used to factor one of the RSA numbers for the first time?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3684/when-will-a-quantum-computer-running-shors-algorithm-or-a-similar-one-be-used-to-factor-one-of-the-rsa-numbers-for-the-first-time/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Quantum computing] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computing) has shown remarkable advancements in the past decade. In that time, quantum processors went from being almost purely theoretical devices to arguably achieving [computational supremacy] (https://www.theverge.com/2019/10/23/20928294/google-quantum-supremacy-sycamore-computer-qubit-milestone) over classical computers in a limited scope.\nAmong the most promising capabilities of any sufficiently powerful quantum computer is their ability to factor very large numbers, the difficulty of which underlies many current cryptography systems. One of the best known quantum algorithms, known as [Shor's algorithm] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm) , has the potential to run almost exponentially faster than the most efficient known classical factoring algorithm.\nThat being said, we’re currently quite a ways away from being able to use it in practice. As of writing, the largest number factored via Shor's algorithm is still [only 21] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4147) , achieved back in 2012. While current state-of-the-art quantum processors possess on the order of dozens of qubits, it is estimated that in order to factorize semiprimes on the same scale as those used in modern RSA cryptography would take [thousands] (https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/87345/how-many-qubits-are-needed-to-factor-2048-bit-rsa-keys-on-a-quantum-computer) [of qubits] (https://quantumcomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/5048/how-many-logical-qubits-are-needed-to-run-shors-algorithm-efficiently-on-large) .\nIn order to encourage research into the problem of factoring large integers and potentially cracking RSA keys, RSA Laboratories put forward their [RSA Factoring Challenge] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Factoring_Challenge) in 1991. Though the challenges officially ended in 2007, they’re still used as a common benchmark for factoring to this day. The largest number factored so far, [RSA-240] (https://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/cado-nfs-discuss/2019-December/001139.html) , was publicized only last December. The full list of numbers, including all known factorizations, can be found [here] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_numbers) .\nWhen will a quantum computer running Shor's algorithm (or another polynomial-time integer factorization algorithm) be used to factor one of the previously unfactored RSA numbers for the first time?\nResolution will occur via credible media report and the public release of the prime factors. The factored RSA number must be one that previously had no publicly known factorization. If a quantum computer factors RSA-100 for example, that won't satisfy our criteria. The question will resolve retroactively 30 days before the announcement of the factors. The question resolves ambiguous if every RSA number ends up being factored via classical computer first.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 100,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will an AI achieve a 98th percentile score or higher in a Mensa admission test?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3698/when-will-an-ai-achieve-a-98th-percentile-score-or-higher-in-a-mensa-admission-test/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Background\n[Intelligence quotient (IQ)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient) is a measure of relative intelligence. [Mensa International] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensa_International) is a high-IQ society open to those scoring in the 98th percentile or higher in IQ. An IQ score of 131 (standard deviation 15) on the Mensa admission test is typically sufficient to meet the 98th percentile threshold.\nAn [artificial intelligence (AI)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence) is a machine exhibiting intelligence. The 2010s saw a number of AI milestones, such as superhuman performance in the board game Go in 2016-2017. However, the highest reported IQ score of an AI known to the author of this question [is about 47] (https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1709/1709.10242.pdf) , achieved in 2016 (standard deviation not clear but likely 15).\nResolution\nThis question will resolve as the date when an AI scores in the 98th percentile or higher in a Mensa admission test that it has not seen before. The AI could be trained on any publicly available IQ test questions that a human Mensa applicant could have practiced on, as well as general information about the world, but the Mensa admission test in question must be completely novel to the AI. If the new Mensa test were to include questions similar to those already publicly available, then such questions would not affect the novelty determination. \nThe admission test may be any test or project that yields a Mensa-recognized IQ percentile score. If no such 98th percentile score has been achieved by the end of 2099, or if Mensa ceases to produce or recognize novel admission tests that yield IQ percentiles before the question resolves, then the question will resolve as ambiguous. Changes in Mensa's percentile threshold for admission will not affect resolution.\nThe AI would not need to physically interact with a paper test or sonically interact with a human. However, the content of the test must be faithful to the human version.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 74,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the maximum increase in global annual mean surface air temperature be, relative to the 1951-1980 base period, in the 2020 to 2023 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3701/what-will-the-maximum-increase-in-global-annual-mean-surface-air-temperature-be-relative-to-the-1951-1980-base-period-in-the-2020-to-2023-period/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Discussion of the human influence on global temperatures has a long history. For instance, Fourier first discussed why the Earth was warmer than expected from solely considering solar radiation reaching the planet in his [On the Temperatures of the Terrestrial Sphere and Interplanetary Space] (https://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rtp1/papers/Fourier1827Trans.pdf) in 1824. Fourier ruled out geothermal effects, considered the temperature of outer space and made allusions to the heating of a greenhouse [(Fleming, 1999)] (http://ocean.phys.msu.ru/courses/geo/lectures-addons/04/1999%20Fleming,%20Joseph%20Fourier,%20the%20greenhouse%20effect,%20and%20the%20quest%20for%20a%20universal%20theory%20of%20terrestrial%20temperatures.pdf) . [Tyndall (1861)] (http://web.gps.caltech.edu/~vijay/Papers/Spectroscopy/tyndall-1861.pdf) suggested a solution to this conundrum by experimentally demonstrating that gases such as carbon dioxide can effectively absorb infrared radiation, i.e. the ‘greenhouse effect’. These activities eventually culminated in the work of [Callendar (1938)] (http://www.met.reading.ac.uk/~ed/callendar_1938.pdf) , who used 147 land-based weather stations to show that the Earth's land temperature had increased over the previous 50 years, and produced estimates that agree remarkably well with more recent analyses [(Hawkins and Jones, 2013)] (https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qj.2178) . \nSurface air temperature change is a primary measure of global climate change. The globally averaged combined land and ocean surface temperature data as calculated by a linear trend, show a warming of 0.85°C (90% CI: [0.65 to 1.06]), over the period 1880 to 2012 [(IPCC, 2013)] (https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf) . The effects of increased global surface temperatures, and the associated changes in climate include:\n---Increases in the frequency and intensity of intense precipitation [(Min et al., 2011)] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nature09763) , and increases in the proportion of the global land surface in extreme drought [(Burke et al., 2006)] (https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/JHM544.1) , \n---Global sea level rise [(Vermeer and Rahmstorf)] (https://www.pnas.org/content/106/51/21527.short) , which in turn may result in the erosion of beaches and coastal wetlands, increased flooding, and intrusion of saltwater into rivers, bays, and aquifers [(Titus, 2008)] (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08920758609362000) , and global ocean warming and acidification [(Pörtner, 2008)] (https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v373/p203-217/) , \n---Adverse effects to human health, due to thermal stress, and the increased prevalence of infectious diseases [(McMichael et al., 2006)] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673606680793) , and increased food security risk ( [Zhao et al., 2017] (https://www.pnas.org/content/114/35/9326.short) ; [FAO, 2008] (http://www.fao.org/forestry/15538-079b31d45081fe9c3dbc6ff34de4807e4.pdf) ), \n---Loss of terrestrial biodiversity at all system levels, including species-level reductions in range size and abundance, especially amongst endemic species [(Warren et al., 2013)] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate1887) . \nAccording to [GISS Surface Temperature Analysis data] (https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/) , over the 2008 to 2018 period, the mean surface air temperature was 0.76°C higher relative to the 1951 to 1980 baseline. 2016 was the hottest recorded year with the mean surface temperature being 1.02°C higher than that over the same baseline.\nWhat will the maximum increase in global annual mean surface air temperature be, relative to the 1951-1980 base period, in the 2020 to 2023 period?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as maximum change in global annual mean surface air, based on Land and Ocean Data, in degrees Celsius, in any year in the 2020 to 2023 period (inclusive of both 2020 and 2023). This data must be by GISS Surface Temperature Analysis, with the 1951-1980 base period. The adoption of this base period amounts to scaling reported temperature changes such that the mean temperature change over the 1951-1980 period is 0.\nData\n[GISTEMP v4 data may be accessed here] (https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v4/) . Data can also [be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19P3wC8jxOzuG3mmGv3l6pXJeV8_lj6sQw5Ja6EtPX4E/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it. If you make useful additions to the dataset, please share the file in the comments.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 117,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the lower limit in the IPCC's ‘likely’ range of its climate sensitivity estimate be, in its 6th Assessment Report?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3708/what-will-the-lower-limit-in-the-ipccs-likely-range-of-its-climate-sensitivity-estimate-be-in-its-6th-assessment-report/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Climate sensitivity is arguably [the most important number in climate change] (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-most-important-number-in-climate-change/) . It the the global-mean surface temperature change associated with a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentration over its preindustrial value [(Vial et al. 2013)] (http://www.lmd.jussieu.fr/~jldufres/publi/Smi/Vial.Dufresne.ea-cdyn-revised.pdf) . The standard metric for climate sensitivity is the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) given as the change in temperature at equilibrium for a doubling of CO2, neglecting long-term feedbacks associated with vegetation changes, carbon feedbacks and ice sheet dynamics [(Skeie et al. 2017)] (https://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/9/879/2018/) .\nThe first attempt to calculate climate sensitivity was in 1896, by the Swedish scientist, Svante Arrhenius. He found that CO2 doubling should increase the Earth's mean temperature by 5–6°C [(Lapenis, 2006)] (https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/98EO00206) . Since then, hundreds of estimates have been made based on climate modelling and/or estimates based on physical evidence, such as climate changes in the distant past [(Knutti et al., 2017)] (https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo3017?draft=marketing) . \n[Some have argued] (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3ddd/338b0f9ddb9825249e467f54b6be484b1845.pdf?_ga=2.218536731.367033418.1567362234-1835406592.1565352888) that from the 1980s onward, the uncertainty in climate projections has not narrowed appreciably, despite tremendous increases in computing power, in observations, and in the number of scientists studying the problem. For instance, In 2013, the IPCC widened the range of its estimate of climate sensitivity once again, opting for the \"likely\" range of 1.5°C to 4.5°C (66% confidence interval) [(Freeman et al., 2015)] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w20900.pdf) . The resolution of this dilemma has important implications for climate research and policy.\nThe ‘likely’ range (i.e. its 66% confidence interval) of ECS as stated in the IPCC's 5th annual report [(IPCC, 2014)] (https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf) is 1.5–4.5 degrees Celsius. This is the range same that was givien in the IPCC's first report [(IPCC, 1990)] (https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ipcc_far_wg_I_full_report.pdf) . The IPCC's sixth report is currently [scheduled for publication in 2022] (https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/) .\n[A 2018 article] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25450) aims to revise the estimate of climate sensitivity, and reduces the range of possible end-of-century outcomes by more than half. It finds a central estimate of 2.8 degrees Celsius with 66 per cent confidence limits (equivalent to the IPCC ‘likely’ range) of 2.2–3.4 degrees Celsius.\nAlthough seemingly beneficial, a reduction in the lower limit of the IPCC's lower limit in the range could be bad news. [(Freeman et al.)] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w20900.pdf) argue that a lowering of the bottom of the range, although this reduces the mean of the estimate, our estimate of its standard deviation may increase. In turn, deeper uncertainty should magnify concerns, since marginal damages from rising temperatures increase rapidly.\nWhat will the lower limit in the IPCC's ‘likely’ range of its climate sensitivity estimate be, in its sixth Assessment Report?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the lower of the 66% confidence limits, i.e. the lower number of its 'likely' range, of the IPCC's estimate for climate sensitivity in its sixth Assessment Report. The question resolves ambiguous if the sixth Assessment Report is not published before the end of 2024, or if it does not issue the estimate in the report.\nIn case of format changes to the IPCC's representation of their estimate for equilibrium climate sensitivity (i.e. different confidence interval is presented), an admin shall examine the relevant technical publication(s) produced by the IPCC, or those that principally inform the IPCC estimates for climate sensitivity, to work out the associated 66% confidence interval from their cumulative probability function (CDF). In case different confidence intervals are provided and the relevant CDF is not disclosed, we shall assume that the CDF is equivalent to the analytic form found in [Roe and Baker (2007)] (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3ddd/338b0f9ddb9825249e467f54b6be484b1845.pdf?_ga=2.218536731.367033418.1567362234-1835406592.1565352888) , so that the 66% confidence interval can be worked out.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 67,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 2025, will at least two public health agencies claim that China deliberately misreported COVID-19 infections?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3715/before-2025-will-at-least-two-public-health-agencies-claim-that-china-deliberately-misreported-covid-19-infections/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "55.00000000000001%",
    "Description": "The COVID-19 outbreak in China has been rife with [allegations of misrepresentation by Chinese government officials] (https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/02/03/wuhan-coronavirus-coverup-lies-chinese-officials-xi-jinping/) . These began at the local level, where officials in Hubei province potentially under-reported the magnitude of the outbreak in early January to Chinese central government authorities. A public health worker famously released [a video] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRoG0kXnBSM&amp;feature=youtu.be) around January 26 claiming that at that time, at least 90,000 cases had occurred--at the time the Chinese government was reporting fewer than 2000 infections. Since then, the insufficiently-inclusive strategy of counting only persons with laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 depressed the counts of probable cases. And the patterns of growth in the official counts follow an unexpected distribution, implying the counts may be generated by a model which doesn't accurately represent the dynamics of the disease's spread through the population.\nThis latter allegation is perhaps the most important and severe, as it means that estimations of epidemiological characteristics based on Chinese data may lead to public health interventions which do not reflect the reality of the viral spread. For example, if the R_0 (the average number of people an infected person will pass the virus along to) is underestimated, it may lead to insufficiently aggressive strategies for reducing the propagation of the virus across the globe. However, overestimating it could lead to overly-aggressive quarantining strategies, hobbling international commerce. Getting a proper assessment of the epidemiological dynamics is critical to devising the appropriate public health response.\nQuestion: Will at least two public health agencies publicly accuse the Chinese government of deliberately misrepresenting the number of COVID-19 infections before 2025?\nResolution\nThis questions resolves positively if, before 2025, at least two of the public health agencies listed below claim that it is more likely than not that the Chinese government deliberately lied about, fabricated, or misrepresented case or death numbers. If an agency claims that the numbers were flawed, but does not go as far as to suggest deliberate lying or misrepresentation, this will not count. For the purpose of this question, we consider only statements by the following public health agencies:\n--- [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] (https://www.cdc.gov/)  (including the  [Epidemic Intelligence Service] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemic_Intelligence_Service) ) \n---The  [European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control] (https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/home) (including the  [Health Threat Unit] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_Threat_Unit) ) \n--- [World Health Organization] (https://www.who.int/) \n--- [The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention] (http://www.chinacdc.cn/en/) \n---The  [Centre for Health Protection] (https://www.chp.gov.hk/en/index.html) \n--- [Robert Koch Institute] (https://www.rki.de/EN/Home/homepage_node.html) \n--- [The National Institute of Infectious Diseases] (https://www.niid.go.jp/niid/en/) \n--- [Public Health England] (https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/public-health-england) \n--- [The National Centre for Infectious Diseases] (https://www.ncid.sg/About-NCID/Pages/default.aspx) \n--- [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Korea] (https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;q=Centers+for+Disease+Control+and+Prevention+Korea&amp;meta=) \n--- [The Public Health Agency of Canada] (https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health.html) \nIn case multiple subdivisions of any of the above agencies make assessments that China more likely than not lied about case or death numbers, these will only count as single accusation made by a single agency.\nThe relevant assessments will count if they are judged by Metaculus to broadly state that it is more likely than not that the Chinese government deliberately did lie about, fabricate, or misrepresent case or death counts.\nThis question has a short-fuse [sister] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3710/before-2020-05-17-will-at-least-two-public-health-agencies-claim-that-china-deliberately-misreported-covid-19-infections/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 370,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many COVID-2019 cases will be confirmed in the location with the most cases outside of Mainland China on April the 27th?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3718/how-many-covid-2019-cases-will-be-confirmed-in-the-location-with-the-most-cases-outside-of-mainland-china-on-april-the-27th/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Unfortunately, this question had to be closed due to me accidentally setting a closed lower-bound. Please submit your predictions in the [new corrected version of this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3738/how-many-covid-2019-cases-will-be-confirmed-in-the-location-with-the-most-cases-outside-of-mainland-china-on-april-the-27th/) .\nCoronaviruses are a family of RNA viruses that typically cause mild respiratory disease in humans. A [novel coronavirus] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_novel_coronavirus) (COVID-19) was identified in Wuhan, China in December 2019.\nAs of the 15th of February, 2020, the location outside of Mainland China with the largest number of confirmed COVID-2019 cases is the [\"Diamond Princess\" cruise ship] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond_Princess_(ship)) , currently docked in the Port of Yokohama, Japan. [Johns Hopkins interactive web-based dashboard] (https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6) currently reports that 634 cases of COVID-2019 can be traced to the cruise ship.\nHow many (cumulative) total confirmed cases of COVID-2019 will be reported in the location with the most ongoing cases outside of Mainland China, on April the 27th at 10 AM GMT, according to [Johns Hopkins] (https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6) ?\n[Johns Hopkins] (https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6) reports daily cumulative case numbers, which is the sum of all cases that have occurred on and before the most recent update. This includes ongoing, recovered and deceased cases.\nIn case [Johns Hopkins interactive web-based dashboard] (https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6) no longer reports the relevant numbers, figured made available by the WHO or CDC may be consulted. \"Location\" is defined in line with Johns Hopkins tracker, which roughly corresponds to 'nation with its own government' (with a distinction between Hong Kong and Mainland China), or cruise ships.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a private fusion company first report a yearly profit?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3725/when-will-a-private-fusion-company-first-report-a-yearly-profit/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Why care\nEnergy is a [$8.5 trillion] (https://www.forbes.com/sites/walvanlierop/2019/08/21/fusion-energy-who-has-the-courage-to-take-it-to-market/#4eeac23957c7) industry. Nuclear fusion could give us cheap and abundant energy. It also doesn't emit greenhouse gases (once built), and its residue has a half-life of a few hundred years (much less than nuclear fission). It's also seems operationally safer as fusion reactor would be [incapable] (https://thebulletin.org/2017/04/fusion-reactors-not-what-theyre-cracked-up-to-be/) of generating the dangerous runaway chain reactions that lead to a meltdown.\n[On the other hand] (https://thebulletin.org/2017/04/fusion-reactors-not-what-theyre-cracked-up-to-be/) , \"fusion reactors have other serious problems that also afflict today's fission reactors, including neutron radiation damage and radioactive waste, potential tritium release, the burden on coolant resources, outsize operating costs, and increased risks of nuclear weapons proliferation.\" \nWhen will an organization first report a yearly profit?\nThis question will resolve to a report from a [credible source] (https://www.metaculus.com/help/faq/#definitions) that indicates that a fusion company (private, public or governmental) turned a yearly profit.\nFor a company to be a fusion company, it must generate over 75% of its revenue from the sale of energy generated by nuclear fusion.\nRelated questions\n--- [When will the fusion energy gain factor of a fusion reactor reach a Q &gt;= 1?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3726/when-will-the-fusion-energy-gain-factor-of-a-fusion-reactor-reach-a-q--1/) \n--- [When will a fusion reactor reach ignition?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3727/when-will-a-fusion-reactor-reach-ignition/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 30,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a fusion reactor reach ignition?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3727/when-will-a-fusion-reactor-reach-ignition/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nNuclear fusion would give us cheap and abundant energy. Energy is a $8.5 trillion energy industry. It also doesn't emit greenhouse gases (once built), and its residue has a half-life of a few hundred years (much less than nuclear fission). ( [source] (https://www.forbes.com/sites/walvanlierop/2019/08/21/fusion-energy-who-has-the-courage-to-take-it-to-market/#4eeac23957c7) ) It's also safer as it seems the fusion reactor would be incapable of generating the dangerous runaway chain reactions that lead to a meltdown ( [source] (https://thebulletin.org/2017/04/fusion-reactors-not-what-theyre-cracked-up-to-be/) ).\nOn the other hand, \"fusion reactors have other serious problems that also afflict today's fission reactors, including neutron radiation damage and radioactive waste, potential tritium release, the burden on coolant resources, outsize operating costs, and increased risks of nuclear weapons proliferation\" ( [source] (https://thebulletin.org/2017/04/fusion-reactors-not-what-theyre-cracked-up-to-be/) ). Also see: [Pure fusion weapon — Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_fusion_weapon) .\n\nDefinition\n==========\n\n\"The fusion energy gain factor, usually expressed with the symbol Q, is the ratio of fusion power produced in a nuclear fusion reactor to the power required to maintain the plasma in steady state. The condition of Q = 1, when the power being released by the fusion reactions is equal to the required heating power, is referred to as breakeven, or in some sources, scientific breakeven.\nThe energy given off by the fusion reactions may be captured within the fuel, leading to self-heating. Most fusion reactions release at least some of their energy in a form that cannot be captured within the plasma, so a system at Q = 1 will cool without external heating. With typical fuels, self-heating in fusion reactors is not expected to match the external sources until at least Q = 5. If Q increases past this point, increasing self-heating eventually removes the need for external heating. At this point the reaction becomes self-sustaining, a condition called ignition. Ignition corresponds to infinite Q, and is generally regarded as highly desirable for practical reactor designs.\"\n(source: [Fusion energy gain factor] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_energy_gain_factor) )\n\nResolution criteria\n===================\n\nIf a relevant Wikipedia page states that a fusion reactor has reached ignition, and continues to state that for at least 10 months in a 12 months period, this question gets resolved with the date mentioned on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia isn't active anymore, a paper replicating the fusion reactor ignition will confirm the resolution as the date at which the first paper reported ignition.\n\nRelated questions\n=================\n\n--- [When will the fusion energy gain factor of a fusion reactor reach a Q &gt;= 1?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3726/when-will-the-fusion-energy-gain-factor-of-a-fusion-reactor-reach-a-q--1/) \n--- [When will a private fusion company first report a yearly profit? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3725/when-will-a-nuclear-fusion-reactor-hit-an-economic-breakeven/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 43,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will space mining be profitable?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3728/when-will-space-mining-be-profitable/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "There are many resources in space that are of substantial value in terrestrial markets. For example, asteroid database [Asterank] (http://www.asterank.com/) lists hundreds of asteroids with estimated values of over 100 trillion USD each, based on their composition (which typically includes metals such as nickel, iron, and cobalt, as well as other compounds such as water or hydrogen which could be sold as fuel). Other asteroids contain rare metals such as [platinum] (https://physicsworld.com/a/the-asteroid-trillionaires/) , although presumably mining such asteroids in quantity would flood the market with such metals and potentially reduce their value. Other sites may have resources as well; for example, the Moon contains large quantities of [Helium-3] (https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Preparing_for_the_Future/Space_for_Earth/Energy/Helium-3_mining_on_the_lunar_surface) , a potential nuclear fusion fuel.\nThis being the case, it would seem that there is a substantial opportunity to mine metals or other products in space, provided that it can be done cheaply enough.\nWhen will a space mining company report a profit?\n---Space mining will be defined as capturing any material from an astronomical object with a distance of greater than 100 km above Earth's surface and selling it to a third party. Thus one can mine from asteroids, planets, moons, etc. Redirecting asteroids to Earth and mining them on the ground counts, as does mining material in space for use in space (e.g. hydrogen fuel). \n---The question resolves when a credible media report indicates that some space mining company had a profit over a period of at least three months (e.g. a quarterly earnings report), and this profit is primarily earned through actual mining operations, not e.g. NASA research studies. \n---If the space mining constitutes only a small part of a larger organization, as long as it is clear that the space mining arm's revenues exceeded its expenses, it can still qualify. \n---In general, if there is an event that is unclear (e.g. difficult to separate mining costs/revenues, or accounting irregularities), admins should lean towards waiting for an unambiguous triggering event and resolving positive at that time, rather than resolving ambiguous. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 78,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will L5 autonomous vehicles be commercially available?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3729/when-will-l5-autonomous-vehicles-be-commercially-available/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A quick primer on the now-industry-standard SAE International rules on how to discuss self-driving abilities: Level 0 is no automation whatsoever. Level 1 is partial assistance with certain aspects of driving, like lane keep assist or adaptive cruise control. Level 2 is a step up to systems that can take control of the vehicle in certain situations, like Tesla's Autopilot or Cadillac's Super Cruise, while still requiring the driver to pay attention.\nGet past that and we enter the realm of speculation: Level 3 promises full computer control without supervision under defined conditions during a journey, Level 4 is start-to-finish autonomous tech limited only by virtual safeguards like a geofence, and Level 5 is the total hands-off, go literally anywhere at the push of a button experience where the vehicle might not even have physical controls.\n(source: [Key Volkswagen Exec Admits Full Self-Driving Cars 'May Never Happen'] (https://www.thedrive.com/tech/31816/key-volkswagen-exec-admits-level-5-autonomous-cars-may-never-happen) )\nIf SAE makes a statement confirming or refuting that a L5 self-driving car has been achieved, this acts as the authoritative body. Failing that, a L5 self-driving car will be deemed commercially available when a relevant Wikipedia article (prioritizing the Self-driving car one if it still exists) says L5 self-driving car is commercially available for at least 6 months, 90% of the time (to compensate for troll edits). If Wikipedia stops existing, then a Metaculus moderator will resolve the question using their judgement.\nMore information on self-driving cars: [Self-driving car — Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-driving_car) \nRelated questions:\n--- [When will L3 autonomous vehicles be commercially available?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3770/when-will-l3-autonomous-vehicles-be-commercially-available/) \n--- [When will L4 autonomous vehicles be commercially available?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3771/when-will-l4-autonomous-vehicles-be-commercially-available/) \n[ETA 2020-11-19]: commercially available cars include vehicles used for ridesharing, robotaxis, etc.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 156,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many communist states will there be in 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3730/how-many-communist-states-will-there-be-in-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "At present, five states explicitly claim in their constitutions to be socialist, are U.N. member states, and are administered and governed by single communist parties - the People's Republic of China, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the Republic of Cuba, the Lao People's Democratic Republic, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.\nSimultaneously, several communist groups are engaged in ongoing armed conflicts with existing recognised states. These include the [CPP–NPA–NDF rebellion in the Philippines] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_rebellion_in_the_Philippines) , [various Naxalite insurgencies in India] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naxalite) , the conflict [between the Peruvian government and the Communist Party of Peru] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_conflict_in_Peru) , the conflict [between the Paraguayan government and the Paraguayan People’s Army] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurgency_in_Paraguay) , as well as the [conflict between several far-left guerilla groups and the Colombian government] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colombian_conflict) .\nThe question asks: How many communist states will there be in 2050?\nFor the purposes of this question, \"communist state\" will be defined as a United Nations member state (1) which includes explicit references to communism or socialism in its constitution (2), and is administered and governed by a single party describing its ideology as Marxist, Marxist-Leninist, Marxist-Leninist-Maoist, or a variant thereof tracing its ideological lineage to Marxism (3). Presently, only five countries match these three conditions.\nThis question will resolve as the number of countries matching these conditions on 2050-01-01.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 138,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will bitcoins thought to belong to Satoshi Nakamoto be spent by 2075-04-05?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3733/will-bitcoins-thought-to-belong-to-satoshi-nakamoto-be-spent-by-2075-04-05/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "32%",
    "Description": "According to Satoshi's claimed birth date, it will have been 100 years since zir birth in 2075-04-05 (source: [Satoshi Nakamoto ⁠— Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto) ).\nWe don't know for sure which Bitcoins belong to Satoshi Nakamoto, but the addresses ze owns have been estimated in [The Well Deserved Fortune of Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin creator, Visionary and Genius] (https://bitslog.com/2013/04/17/the-well-deserved-fortune-of-satoshi-nakamoto/) which amount to about 1 million Bitcoins (although another group argues that only ~60-70% of those are zirs: [Satoshi’s 1 Million Bitcoin Haul Could Be Smaller Than First Thought] (https://news.bitcoin.com/satoshis-1-million-bitcoin-haul-could-be-smaller-than-first-thought/) ). None of those Bitcoins have changed wallets since 2010. As of 2020-02-24, they are currently worth ~10 billion USD.\nThis question resolves positively if some credible media reports that some of those Bitcoins have been transferred.\nIf any of the coins are spent in a way that's widely known to have been a hack, it doesn't count. If Satoshi Nakamoto gave zir bitcoins to someone else which then spends them, this still counts. Any amount of Bitcoins used counts.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 106,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will it turn out that the Keto diet is both safe and has health benefits for some identified and significant population of people?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3739/will-it-turn-out-that-the-keto-diet-is-both-safe-and-has-health-benefits-for-some-identified-and-significant-population-of-people/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "52%",
    "Description": "My favorite send-up of conflicting dietary advice is in Woody Allen's 1973 movie Sleeper, where he — a health food store owner — wakes up in the future to request wheat germ, not \"steak or cream pies or hot fudge\", foods known by (future) science to be healthy.\nIn the 45+ years since then it's not gotten that much better. A case in point is the [Ketogenic diet] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketogenic_diet) , characterized by a very high percentage of fat intake, small amount of protein and near-zero carbohydrates. \nThe idea that a diet containing items like a [bacon cheeseburgers served on a bun made of egg] (https://queenketo.com/ultimate-keto-low-carb-bacon-cheese-burger-chips/) would be healthy would have been pretty radical a decade ago, but many adherents of the diet find significant positive results, and there is very far from any consensus on the effects of this diet, especially in the medium or long-term. How will it turn out? I'll take the statement to be:\n\"It is generally acknowledged in the scientific community that a ketogenic diet is both safe and has health benefits for some identified and significant population of people when adopted for a period of several years, at a level comparable to (say) the Mediterranean diet as of 2020.\"\nThat's not terribly precise, by design. But this question is a bit experimental, one of a series of \"self-resolving\" ones. Resolution to this question will be determined as follows:\n--- \nIf at any time after the date of Jan 1, 2025 the community prediction is &gt; 95% or &lt; 5%, the question resolves positively or negatively, respectively.\n--- \nOtherwise, on or about the close/resolve date of Jan 1, 2030, the question will be decided by unanimous vote of a council of three people as to whether the proposition listed above is true, at 50+% credence (i.e. more true than its negation), resolving ambiguous in the case of disagreement. The council of three will be chosen by quantum mechanical random numbers from a list of 12 people that will be composed by the author around the time of question close, and held secretly until the time of question resolution.\nedited 2020-03-05 to change the statement from \"typical person\" to \"some identified and significant population of people.\"\n",
    "# Forecasts": 103,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the global atmospheric CO₂ concentration be in line with the pathway to limit warming to 2.0°C by mid-century, over the 2024 to 2027 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3742/will-the-global-atmospheric-co%25E2%2582%2582-concentration-be-in-line-with-the-pathway-to-limit-warming-to-20c-by-mid-century-over-the-2024-to-2027-period/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "34%",
    "Description": "A Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) is a greenhouse gas concentration trajectory adopted by the IPCC for its [fifth Assessment Report (AR5)] (https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/) in 2014. These four pathways are prominently considered in IPPC climate modelling and research, which describe different climate futures, all of which are considered possible depending on how much greenhouse gases are emitted in the years to come.\nThe Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 corresponds to a high greenhouse gas emissions pathway compared to the scenario literature [(IPCC 2008)] (https://www.ipcc.ch/publication/ipcc-expert-meeting-report-towards-new-scenarios-for-analysis-of-emissions-climate-change-impacts-and-response-strategies/) . The RCP8.5 is a so-called ‘baseline’ scenario that does not include any specific climate mitigation target. It combines assumptions about high population and relatively slow income growth with modest rates of technological change and energy intensity improvements, leading in the long term to high energy demand and GHG emissions in absence of climate change policies. \nPathway RCP4.5 limits mid-century (2046–2065) global mean temperature increase to 2.0°C with a likely range of 1.4°C to 2.6°C (95% confidence interval). Moreover, it limits end-of-century (2081–2100) global mean temperature increase to 3.7°C with a likely range of 2.6°C to 4.8°C (95% confidence interval) [(IPPC, 2013)] (http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf) .\nOver the 2022 to 2025 period (inclusive), the RCP8.5 corresponds to an average of 426.63 parts-per-million (ppm) of global CO₂ atmospheric concentration per year [(Meinshausen et al. 2011)] (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y) . Over the 2027 to 2030 period, it corresponds to and average of 440.01 ppm of global CO₂ atmospheric concentration per year (ibid.).\nWill the average global CO₂ atmospheric concentration be less than 433.19 ppm over the 2024 to 2027 period (inclusive)?\nResolution\nThis question resolves positively if the arithmetic mean of the annual mean CO₂ concentration over the 2024 to 2027 period (inclusive) is less than or equal to 433.19 ppm, as reported by [Earth System Research Laboratory] (https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/data.html) .\nData\n--- \n[Data on global CO₂ atmospheric concentration may be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EdkfP-2bW1vbM47yj9LWSRXiNGryTGCa-DWCDu23Dz8/edit?usp=sharing) . \n--- \n[Data on atmospheric concentration along RCP pathways may be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1G0lBi3-GdU8oGCqzMyXs1VywGZCuY70eFyn2ty4a2Ag/edit?usp=sharing) . It may also be [downloaded from here] (http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~mmalte/rcps/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 56,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the global annual mean surface air temperature moving average first exceed 1.3°C relative to the 1951-1980 base period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3743/when-will-the-global-annual-mean-surface-air-temperature-moving-average-first-exceed-13c-relative-to-the-1951-1980-base-period/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Surface air temperature change is a primary measure of global climate change. The globally averaged combined land and ocean surface temperature data as calculated by a linear trend, show a warming of 0.85°C (90% CI: [0.65 to 1.06]), over the period 1880 to 2012 [(IPCC, 2013)] (https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf) . The effects of increased global surface temperatures, and the associated changes in climate include:\n---Increases in the frequency and intensity of intense precipitation [(Min et al., 2011)] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nature09763) , and increases in the proportion of the global land surface in extreme drought [(Burke et al., 2006)] (https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/JHM544.1) , \n---Global sea level rise [(Vermeer and Rahmstorf)] (https://www.pnas.org/content/106/51/21527.short) , which in turn may result in the erosion of beaches and coastal wetlands, increased flooding, and intrusion of saltwater into rivers, bays, and aquifers [(Titus, 2008)] (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08920758609362000) , and global ocean warming and acidification [(Pörtner, 2008)] (https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v373/p203-217/) , \n---Adverse effects to human health, due to thermal stress, and the increased prevalence of infectious diseases [(McMichael et al., 2006)] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673606680793) , and increased food security risk ( [Zhao et al., 2017] (https://www.pnas.org/content/114/35/9326.short) ; [FAO, 2008] (http://www.fao.org/forestry/15538-079b31d45081fe9c3dbc6ff34de4807e4.pdf) ), \n---Loss of terrestrial biodiversity at all system levels, including species-level reductions in range size and abundance, especially amongst endemic species [(Warren et al., 2013)] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate1887) . \nAccording to [GISS Surface Temperature Analysis data] (https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/) , over the 2008 to 2018 period, the mean surface air temperature was 0.76°C higher relative to the 1951 to 1980 baseline. 2016 was the hottest recorded year with the mean surface temperature being 1.02°C higher than that over the same baseline.\nIn 2017, the 3-year simple moving average of the increase in temperature relative to the 1951-1980 base period reached the highest level at 0.95°C. This means that it was on average 0.95°C hotter over the 2015 to 2017 period (inclusive) relative to the base period.\nWhen will the global annual mean surface air temperature moving average first exceed 1.3°C relative to the 1951-1980 base period?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the first year when the 3-year moving average of the change in global annual mean surface air is 1.31°C or higher. The question resolves as January 1st of the year in which this first happens. This data must be by GISS Surface Temperature Analysis, with the 1951-1980 base period. The adoption of this base period amounts to scaling reported temperature changes such that the mean temperature change over the 1951-1980 period is 0.\nData\n[GISTEMP v4 data may be accessed here, and the associated moving averages] (https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v4/) . Data can also [be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19P3wC8jxOzuG3mmGv3l6pXJeV8_lj6sQw5Ja6EtPX4E/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it. If you make useful additions to the dataset, please share the file in the comments.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 56,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the key to any pre-2020 WikiLeaks insurance file be publicly available by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3749/will-the-key-to-any-pre-2020-wikileaks-insurance-file-be-publicly-available-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "27%",
    "Description": "[WikiLeaks] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks) is an organisation founded by Julian Assange that publishes news leaks and classified media provided by anonymous sources. From time to time, WikiLeaks publishes encrypted \" [insurance files] (https://heavy.com/news/2019/04/julian-assange-dead-mans-switch-wikileaks-insurance-files/) \".\nThere has been much speculation about the purpose of these files. Some of these files are intended as permanent records of upcoming releases, to ensure information is preserved. According to Julian Assange:\nWe openly distribute … encrypted backups of materials that we view are highly sensitive that we are to publish in the coming year… So that there is very little possibility that that material, even if we are completely wiped out, will be taken from the historical record… Ideally, we will never reveal the key… Because there is things, like, … redactions sometimes need to be done on this material.”\nHowever, there are also theories claiming that some of these insurance files constitute a \" [dead man's switch] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_man%27s_switch) \" that is only to be released in case something bad were to happen to Assange or to WikiLeaks.\nResolution: If the key to any WikiLeaks insurance file released before 2020 is publicly available on January 1, 2030, this question resolves positively. In particular, it does not matter whether WikiLeaks intentionally decides to release the key or some hacker leaks it; as long as the key is publicly available, it counts.\nIn the past the media falsely reported that the key to insurance.aes256 was leaked. Therefore, to ensure accurate resolution, we will rely on the discretion of Metaculus moderators. As a guideline, there should be an independent, tech-savvy demonstration that the key actually unlocks the given insurance file.\nFor the purpose of this question, all encrypted WikiLeaks insurance files publicly released before 2020 count. I believe the following list is comprehensive, but I cannot guarantee that there are no omissions or errors.\n---Date: 2010-07-28, Size: 1.4 GB, Name: insurance.aes256 \n---Date: 2012-02-22, Size: 65 GB, Name: wikileaks-insurance-20120222.tar.bz2.aes \n---Date: 2013-08-15, Size: 3.6 GB, Name: wlinsurance-20130815-A.aes256 \n---Date: 2013-08-15, Size: 49 GB, Name: wlinsurance-20130815-B.aes256 \n---Date: 2013-08-15, Size: 349 GB, Name: wlinsurance-20130815-C.aes256 \n---Date: 2016-06-03, Size: 88 GB, Name: 2016-06-03_insurance.aes256 \n---Date: 2016-11-07, Size: 512 MB, Name: 2016-11-07_WL-Insurance_EC.aes256 \n---Date: 2016-11-07, Size: 1.3 GB, Name: 2016-11-07_WL-Insurance_UK.aes256 \n---Date: 2016-11-07, Size: 3.0 GB, Name: 2016-11-07_WL-Insurance_US.aes256 \n---Date: 2016-12-09, Size: 83 GB, Name: 2016-12-09_WL-Insurance.aes256 \n---Date: 2017-01-25, Size: 281 MB, Name: 2017-01-25_WL-Insurance.aes256 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 74,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the Dow Jones Industrial Average set a new all-time record high close after the Coronavirus Crash of February 2020?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3764/when-will-the-dow-jones-industrial-average-set-a-new-all-time-record-high-close-after-the-coronavirus-crash-of-february-2020/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [Dow Jones Industrial Average] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Jones_Industrial_Average) (DJIA, or the Dow) is a stock market index that indicates the value of 30 large, publicly owned companies based in the United States, and how they have traded in the stock market during various periods of time. The Industrial portion of the name is largely historical, as many of the modern 30 components have little or nothing to do with traditional heavy industry. Along with the S&amp;P 500 and the NASDAQ Composite, it is one of the most influential and scrutinized US equity indices.\nIn late 2019, [a novel coronavirus emerged in Hubei Province, China, and quickly spread around the world] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_outbreak) . By February 28 2020, [over 85,000 infections had been confirmed worldwide, along with over 2,900 related deaths.] (https://bnonews.com/index.php/2020/02/the-latest-coronavirus-cases/) \nThe global spread of the virus spooked financial markets, and led to one of the most rapid selloffs in the history of public equity markets, [with major US equity indices experiencing their worst week since the 2008 global financial crisis.] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/28/business/stock-market-today-coronavirus.html) \n[The Dow closed on February 12 2020 at an all-time high, at 29,551.42 points. By the close of trading on February 28 2020, it had fallen to 25,409.36 points.] (https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EDJI/history/?guccounter=1&amp;guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&amp;guce_referrer_sig=AQAAANeZCQYDgSPex47Qy3QByqa8XrkQCNTCXROrOKNrv8uK6vUSNhITyxNIvwB5htFJneKF75SeSezz0CLpHdACfNDyT-8GbLl8bacPEk8o_gkZtKcInGmjYpfdTVUiKz5bSe_K39sDl5tzliMUnAC43yoR0C7K-4Ap-kN2G_O-DtjW) \nThis question asks: When will the Dow Jones Industrial Average next close at a level of at least 29,551.42 points, the all-time high closing value previously achieved on February 12 2020?\nResolution should cite credible press reports, or information from a financial trading platform or news service, indicating that the Dow has closed at or above 29,551.42 points.\nIf the Dow Jones Industrial Average is discontinued or modified such that Metaculus administrators believe it is no longer reasonable to continue with this question, this question shall resolve ambiguously.\nNote that this question refers to the closing value of the Dow, not any intraday level reached.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 766,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many new cases of COVID-19 in the 1st quarter of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3768/how-many-new-cases-of-covid-19-in-the-1st-quarter-of-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[The 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_outbreak) is an ongoing outbreak of [coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus_disease_2019) , that has spread to multiple world regions. It is caused by the [SARS-CoV-2 virus] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severe_acute_respiratory_syndrome_coronavirus_2) , first identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. As of 29 February 2020, more than 85,000 cases have been confirmed in 60 countries, of which 8,000 were classified as serious. More than 2,900 deaths have been attributed to the disease.\nThis question is a part of series of questions trying to estimate the rate of growth of the COVID-19 disease during the next year. Especially, [whether COVID-19 will go away on its own in warmer weather] (https://ccdd.hsph.harvard.edu/will-covid-19-go-away-on-its-own-in-warmer-weather/) ? And whether COVID-19 is likely to become reoccurring disease. \nThis question asks how many new cases will be reported in the 1st quarter of 2021 (between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2021).\nResolution Criteria: The question will resolve based on the difference in reported cases on 31 March 2021 and 1 of January 2021 as reported by WHO. Preferably based on [Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) situation reports] (https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports) global confirmed cases for that dates. \nIn case the number of global confirmed cases will not be available, the best next estimates published by WHO should be used. The question will resolve ambiguous, if the data will be not available at least on quarterly or monthly basis.\nOther questions in the series. \nHow many new cases of COVID-19 in:\n--- [the 2nd quarter of 2020?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3765/how-many-new-confirmed-cases-of-covid-19-in-the-2nd-quarter-of-2020/) \n--- [the 3rd quarter of 2020?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3766/how-many-new-confirmed-cases-of-covid-19-in-the-3rd-quarter-of-2020/) \n--- [the 4th quarter of 2020?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3767/how-many-new-confirmed-cases-of-covid-19-in-the-4th-quarter-of-2020/) \nSimilar question: [How many human infections of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) will be estimated to have occurred before 2021?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3529/how-many-human-infections-of-the-2019-novel-coronavirus-covid-19-will-be-estimated-to-have-occurred-before-2021/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 613,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will L4 autonomous vehicles be commercially available?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3771/when-will-l4-autonomous-vehicles-be-commercially-available/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A quick primer on the now-industry-standard SAE International rules on how to discuss self-driving abilities: Level 0 is no automation whatsoever. Level 1 is partial assistance with certain aspects of driving, like lane keep assist or adaptive cruise control. Level 2 is a step up to systems that can take control of the vehicle in certain situations, like Tesla's Autopilot or Cadillac's Super Cruise, while still requiring the driver to pay attention.\nGet past that and we enter the realm of speculation: Level 3 promises full computer control without supervision under defined conditions during a journey, Level 4 is start-to-finish autonomous tech limited only by virtual safeguards like a geofence, and Level 5 is the total hands-off, go literally anywhere at the push of a button experience where the vehicle might not even have physical controls.\n(source: [Key Volkswagen Exec Admits Full Self-Driving Cars 'May Never Happen'] (https://www.thedrive.com/tech/31816/key-volkswagen-exec-admits-level-5-autonomous-cars-may-never-happen) )\nIf SAE makes a statement confirming or refuting that a L4 self-driving car has been achieved, this acts as the authoritative body. Failing that, a L4 self-driving car will be deemed commercially available when a relevant Wikipedia article (prioritizing the Self-driving car one if it still exists) says L4 self-driving car is commercially available for at least 6 months, 90% of the time (to compensate for troll edits). If Wikipedia stops existing, then a Metaculus moderator will resolve the question using their judgement.\nMore information on self-driving cars: [Self-driving car — Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-driving_car) \nRelated questions:\n--- [When will L3 autonomous vehicles be commercially available?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3770/when-will-l3-autonomous-vehicles-be-commercially-available/) \n--- [When will L5 autonomous vehicles be commercially available?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3729/when-will-l5-autonomous-vehicles-be-commercially-available/) \n[ETA 2020-11-19]: commercially available cars include vehicles used for ridesharing, robotaxis, etc.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 140,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any sovereign government issue a formal apology for their treatment of farm animals by 2200?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3772/will-any-sovereign-government-issue-a-formal-apology-for-their-treatment-of-farm-animals-by-2200/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "85%",
    "Description": "In 2007, a formal apology for slavery [H.Res. 194] (https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-resolution/194/text) entered the United States congress and was later passed unanimously by the senate.\nFor centuries, animal rights/welfare activists have made the comparison between slavery and animal agriculture. Writing in 1789, Jeremy Bentham [said] (https://www.utilitarianism.com/jeremybentham.html) \nThe day has been, I grieve it to say in many places it is not yet past, in which the greater part of the species, under the denomination of slaves, have been treated ... upon the same footing as ... animals are still. The day may come, when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been withholden from them but by the hand of tyranny. The French have already discovered that the blackness of skin is no reason why a human being should be abandoned without redress to the caprice of a tormentor. [...]. The time will come when humanity will extend its mantle over everything which breathes... \"\nPeter Singer [wrote] (https://www.uvm.edu/rsenr/wfb175/singer.pdf) in 1974,\nOur custom is all the support that the meat industry needs. The decision to cease giving it that support may be difficult, but it is no more difficult than it would have been for a white Southerner to go against the traditions of his society and free his slaves: if we do not change our dietary habits, how can we censure those slaveholders who would not change their own way of living?\nMany contemporary thinkers have anticipated a massive ethical shift against the current treatment of animal as property, once tasty artificial meat is developed. If future humans become regretful of our current treatment of animals, will there be an official apology from a government?\nThis question resolves positively if a sovereign government (at the level of national, or an international government if one exists at the time) issues a formal apology for the poor treatment of farm animals in the past, specifically in reference to the fact that they were treated as property before January 1st 2200. Otherwise it resolves negatively.\nFor clarification, a sovereign government is defined as one that has \"the full right and power of a governing body over itself, without any interference from outside sources or bodies. In political theory, sovereignty is a substantive term designating supreme authority over some polity.\" The United Nations does not count as a sovereign government.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 101,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will reducing wild animal suffering be a mainstream moral issue in America before 2200?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3777/will-reducing-wild-animal-suffering-be-a-mainstream-moral-issue-in-america-before-2200/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "61%",
    "Description": "From [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wild_animal_suffering) \nWild animal suffering is the suffering experienced by nonhuman animals in nature through causes such as disease, injury, parasitism, starvation, natural disasters, and killings by other animals. Wild animal suffering has historically been discussed in the context of the philosophy of religion as an instance of the problem of evil. More recently, a number of academics have considered the suspected scope of the problem from a secular standpoint as a general moral issue, one that humans might be able to take actions toward preventing.\nFor the purposes of this question, reducing wild animal suffering is a mainstream moral issue if ANY of the following become true before 2200.\n1-- \nAt least three reliable polls reveal that at least 30% of representative adults in the United States agree that we should reduce wild animal suffering AND the poll clarifies that reducing wild animal suffering may run counter to traditional environmentalist ideals of ANY of biodiversity, habitat preservation, ecosystem health.\n2-- \nLegislation is passed in the United States which is widely recognized as having goals to reduce wild animal suffering from natural causes. A Metaculus moderator agrees that such legislation is roughly aligned with the spirit of Brian Tomasik or David Pearce's written work on wild animal suffering, and is ambitious in scope.\n3-- \nThere are university courses on [welfare biology] (https://www.animal-ethics.org/wild-animal-suffering-section/introduction-to-welfare-biology/) in at least 10 accredited American universities. A Metaculus moderator judges that these courses teach welfare biology as the concept is understood in 2020, and more narrowly, \"a research field devoted to studying the wellbeing of animals in general, and focused especially on animals in their natural ecosystems.\"\n4-- \nA protest aimed at raising awareness of wild animal suffering attracts at least 10,000 people as reported by at least 2 reliable media sources. A Metaculus moderator agrees that the protest goals are roughly aligned with the spirit of Brian Tomasik or David Pearce's written work on wild animal suffering.\n5-- \nA major political party includes wild animal suffering as part of their platform. A Metaculus moderator agrees that the party goals are roughly aligned with the spirit of Brian Tomasik or David Pearce's written work on wild animal suffering.\n6-- \nBrian Tomasik (or an emulation of him) holds an elected political office at the national level.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 75,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a democratic nation whose economy transitions from capitalist to market socialist sustain adequate economic growth?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3778/will-a-democratic-nation-whose-economy-transitions-from-capitalist-to-market-socialist-sustain-adequate-economic-growth/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "44%",
    "Description": "Assume for the purposes of this question that before 2070 and after January 1st 2020, a democratic nation transitions their economy into a market socialist system. Market socialism is defined by Wikipedia [as] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_socialism) ,\na type of economic system involving the public, cooperative or social ownership of the means of production in the framework of a market economy. Market socialism differs from non-market socialism in that the market mechanism is utilized for the allocation of capital goods and the means of production. Depending on the specific model of market socialism, profits generated by socially owned firms (i.e. net revenue not reinvested into expanding the firm) may variously be used to directly remunerate employees, accrue to society at large as the source of public finance or be distributed amongst the population in a social dividend.\nMarket socialism is distinguished from the concept of the mixed economy because models of market socialism are complete and self-regulating systems, unlike the mixed economy. Market socialism also contrasts with social democratic policies implemented within capitalist market economies. While social democracy aims to achieve greater economic stability and equality through policy measures such as taxes, subsidies and social welfare programs, market socialism aims to achieve similar goals through changing patterns of enterprise ownership and management.\nA nation is said to be a democracy if they score at least 7.0 on the [Democracy Index] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index) . An economy is said to have transitioned from capitalism to market socialism if at least five reliable media sources describe the economy as primarily driven by market socialism, by the definition given above (or something very close, determined by Metaculus moderators), and describe the previous economy as primarily capitalist.\nAn economy is said to sustain adequate growth if in the 15 years following the date of transition (which is determined by the implementation date of the most significant legislation/constitution that is widely recognized as marking the transition, as determined by a Metaculus moderator) the nation maintains at least 85% of the mean real GDP growth, relative to the previous 15 years, excluding the year of implementation. In the event of multiple transitions, only the first such country to transition should be taken into consideration.\nThis question asks, Will a democratic nation whose economy transitions from capitalist to market socialist sustain adequate economic growth?\nIf such a nation sustains adequate growth, this question resolves postively. If such a nation sustains below adequate growth, this question resolves negatively. If no democratic nation transitions their economy to market socialism before 2070 and after January 1st 2020, this question resolves ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 53,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the lowest closing value for the Dow Jones Industrial Average before it reaches a new all-time record high close?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3786/what-will-be-the-lowest-closing-value-for-the-dow-jones-industrial-average-before-it-reaches-a-new-all-time-record-high-close/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The  [Dow Jones Industrial Average] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Jones_Industrial_Average)  (DJIA, or the Dow) is a stock market index that indicates the value of 30 large, publicly owned companies based in the United States, and how they have traded in the stock market during various periods of time. The Industrial portion of the name is largely historical, as many of the modern 30 components have little or nothing to do with traditional heavy industry. Along with the S&amp;P 500 and the NASDAQ Composite, it is one of the most influential and scrutinized US equity indices.\nIn late 2019,  [a novel coronavirus emerged in Hubei Province, China, and quickly spread around the world] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_outbreak) . By February 28 2020,  [over 85,000 infections had been confirmed worldwide, along with over 2,900 related deaths.] (https://bnonews.com/index.php/2020/02/the-latest-coronavirus-cases/) \nThe global spread of the virus spooked financial markets, and led to one of the most rapid selloffs in the history of public equity markets,  [with major US equity indices experiencing their worst week since the 2008 global financial crisis.] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/28/business/stock-market-today-coronavirus.html) \n[The Dow closed on February 12 2020 at an all-time high, at 29,551.42 points. By the close of trading on February 28 2020, it had fallen to 25,409.36 points.] (https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EDJI/history/?guccounter=1&amp;guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&amp;guce_referrer_sig=AQAAANeZCQYDgSPex47Qy3QByqa8XrkQCNTCXROrOKNrv8uK6vUSNhITyxNIvwB5htFJneKF75SeSezz0CLpHdACfNDyT-8GbLl8bacPEk8o_gkZtKcInGmjYpfdTVUiKz5bSe_K39sDl5tzliMUnAC43yoR0C7K-4Ap-kN2G_O-DtjW) \nThis question asks: Before the Dow Jones Industrial Average next closes at a record high level, what will be the lowest closing value it reaches?\nResolution should cite credible press reports, or information from a financial trading platform or news service.\nIf the Dow Jones Industrial Average is discontinued or modified such that Metaculus administrators believe it is no longer reasonable to continue with this question, this question shall resolve ambiguously.\nNote that this question refers to the closing value of the Dow, not any intraday level reached.\nAlso see [this related question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3764/when-will-the-dow-jones-industrial-average-set-a-new-all-time-record-high-close-after-the-coronavirus-crash-of-february-2020/) about when the next all-time record high will be reached.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 567,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will longevity escape velocity follow the development of effective life extending therapies?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3795/will-longevity-escape-velocity-follow-the-development-of-effective-life-extending-therapies/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "35%",
    "Description": "[Longevity escape velocity] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longevity_escape_velocity) is a hypothetical situation in which life extending medicine extends life\nlonger than the time that is passing. For example, in a given year in which longevity escape velocity would be maintained, technological advances would increase life expectancy more than the year that just went by.\nAssume for the purpose of this question that before 2100, a therapy is developed which at least two peer reviewed published scientific articles report extends the average human expectancy at 70 years old by at least 4 years.\n(In America, the current [life expectancy from 70] (https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html) is about 15.5 years.)\nA \"therapy\" cannot be a recommendation to diet or exercise. However, a therapy can be a prescription drug taken regularly, a combination of drugs, a series of surgeries, or any other such procedure that is not currently a standard medical recommendation for 70 year olds. For the therapy to count, there must be credible evidence that if all 70 year olds received the therapy, their expected lifespans would go up by at least 4 years on average. Therefore, it is not enough that it extends the lives of some subset of 70 year olds.\nLongevity escape velocity is said to be achieved if more than one half of 70 year olds who take the therapy within 5 years of its development are still alive after 50 years. In that case, this question resolves positively. If such a therapy is developed but more than half of such 70 year olds are not alive 50 years later, then this question resolves negatively.\nIf no such therapy is developed before 2100, this question resolves ambiguously.\nThe date of development of the therapy is the date of the publishing (anywhere it is published) of the first peer reviewed paper that reports the aforementioned life expectancy results of that therapy.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 84,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If Bernie Sanders becomes president, what will be the yearly CO2 emissions per capita in the US in 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3805/if-bernie-sanders-becomes-president-what-will-be-the-yearly-co2-emissions-per-capita-in-the-us-in-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A major element of the Sanders campaign is his Green New Deal proposal, a collection of policies intended to address the climate crisis. From his [campaign website] (https://berniesanders.com/issues/green-new-deal/) , this will entail:\n--- \nTransform our energy system to 100 percent renewable energy and create 20 million jobs needed to solve the climate crisis.\n--- \nEnsure a just transition for communities and workers, including fossil fuel workers.\n--- \nEnsure justice for frontline communities, especially under-resourced groups, communities of color, Native Americans, people with disabilities, children and the elderly.\n--- \nSave American families money with investments in weatherization, public transportation, modern infrastructure and high-speed broadband.\n--- \nCommit to reducing emissions throughout the world, including providing $200 billion to the Green Climate Fund, rejoining the Paris Agreement, and reasserting the United States’ leadership in the global fight against climate change.\n--- \nInvest in conservation and public lands to heal our soils, forests, and prairie lands.\n--- \nEnd the greed of the fossil fuel industry and hold them accountable.\nIn order to predict the success of these polices, I ask:\nIf Bernie Sanders becomes president, what will be the yearly CO2 emissions per capita for the US in 2024, in tonnes?\nResolution will be by the [Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research] (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/9d09ccd1-e0dd-11e9-9c4e-01aa75ed71a1/language-en) , or a similar reliable source.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if the next US presidential election is cancelled (but not if it's just delayed until some point in 2021).\n",
    "# Forecasts": 55,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If Joe Biden becomes president, what will be the yearly CO2 emissions per capita in the US in 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3806/if-joe-biden-becomes-president-what-will-be-the-yearly-co2-emissions-per-capita-in-the-us-in-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "One of Joe Biden's campaign promises is his Plan for a Clean Energy Revolution and Environmental Justice. According to [his campaign website] (https://joebiden.com/climate/) , this will entail:\n--- \nEnsure the U.S. achieves a 100% clean energy economy and reaches net-zero emissions no later than 2050.\n--- \nBuild a stronger, more resilient nation.\n--- \nRally the rest of the world to meet the threat of climate change\n--- \nStand up to the abuse of power by polluters who disproportionately harm communities of color and low-income communities.\n--- \nFulfill our obligation to workers and communities who powered our industrial revolution and subsequent decades of economic growth.\nIn order to predict the success of these polices, I ask:\nIf Joe Biden becomes president, what will be the yearly CO2 emissions per capita for the US in 2024, in tonnes?\nThis question resolves ambiguously if the next US presidential election is cancelled (but not if it's just delayed until some point in 2021).\nResolution will be by the [Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research] (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/9d09ccd1-e0dd-11e9-9c4e-01aa75ed71a1/language-en) , or a similar reliable source.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if the next US presidential election is cancelled (but not if it's just delayed until some point in 2021).\n",
    "# Forecasts": 150,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Valve release a game before 2030 with 3 in the Title?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3812/will-valve-release-a-game-before-2030-with-3-in-the-title/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "65%",
    "Description": "The video game company valve has multiple franchises all ending with their number 2 game and it is well known joke in the gaming community that valve will never create a game with the number 3 in the title.\nFranchises that already are at the number 2: \"Half Life 2\", \"Portal 2\", \"Left 4 Dead 2\", \"Team Fortress 2\" and \"Dota 2\".\nThis question resolves positive if Valve releases before 2030-01-01 a game made by Valve that has \"3\" (or anything else that means 3) in its title. It resolves negative otherwise, including if Valve ceases operating.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 123,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first evidence of extraterrestrial life be discovered?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3816/when-will-the-first-evidence-of-extraterrestrial-life-be-discovered/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Extraterrestrial life] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterrestrial_life) is hypothetical life which may occur outside of Earth. Such life might range from simple prokaryotes (or comparable life forms) to beings with civilizations far more advanced than humanity.\nSince the mid-20th century, [active ongoing research has taken place to look for signs of extraterrestrial life] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterrestrial_life#Scientific_search) . This encompasses a search for current and historic extraterrestrial life, and a narrower search for extraterrestrial intelligent life. Depending on the category of search, methods range from the analysis of telescope and specimen data to radios used to detect and send communication signals. \nThis question asks: When will the first discovery of evidence of extraterrestrial life take place?\nThis question resolves as the date on which the first discovery of evidence of extraterrestrial life takes place. This can be evidence of past or present extraterrestrial life, and the life can be of any degree of complexity. The life must not owe its off-Earth presence to humans; e.g. sending Earth-originating life to Mars (even accidentally) does not count.\nTo qualify for a positive resolution, the discovery must be generally considered credible by the scientific community, as judged by Metaculus.\nChangelog:\n---2020-09-16: the sentence \"The life must not have originated from Earth or human efforts\" was changed to \"The life must not owe its off-Earth presence to humans\". \n",
    "# Forecasts": 225,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Bitcoin Extremes: Will 1 bitcoin be worth $100,000 or more before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3820/bitcoin-extremes-will-1-bitcoin-be-worth-100000-or-more-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "41%",
    "Description": "[Bitcoin] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin) is a [cryptocurrency] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptocurrency) . It is a decentralized digital currency without a central bank or single administrator that can be sent from user to user on the peer-to-peer bitcoin network without the need for intermediaries.\nThe price of bitcoins has gone through cycles of appreciation and depreciation referred to by some as bubbles and busts. In 2011, the value of one bitcoin rapidly rose from about $0.30 to $32 before returning to $2. In the latter half of 2012 and during the 2012–13 Cypriot financial crisis, the bitcoin price began to rise again, reaching a high of $266 on 10 April 2013, before crashing to around $50. On 29 November 2013, the cost of one bitcoin rose to a peak of $1,242. In 2014, the price fell sharply, and as of April remained depressed at little more than half 2013 prices. As of August 2014 it was under $600.\nBitcoin prices reached their apogee in December 2017, at just shy of $20,000 per coin. Since then, prices have fallen roughly in half, and as of March 10 2020 one bitcoin is valued at approximately $7,900. \nThis question asks: Will one bitcoin be worth at least $100,000 USD before January 1 2025?\nResolution should cite credible press reports in the financial media, or information from a cryptocurrency exchange or trading platform, that one bitcoin is valued at $100,000 USD or greater at any time before 1 January 2025.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 763,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Bitcoin Extremes: Will the value of 1 bitcoin fall to $1,000 or less before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3821/bitcoin-extremes-will-the-value-of-1-bitcoin-fall-to-1000-or-less-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "6%",
    "Description": "[Bitcoin] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin) is a [cryptocurrency] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptocurrency) . It is a decentralized digital currency without a central bank or single administrator that can be sent from user to user on the peer-to-peer bitcoin network without the need for intermediaries.\nThe price of bitcoins has gone through cycles of appreciation and depreciation referred to by some as bubbles and busts. In 2011, the value of one bitcoin rapidly rose from about $0.30 to $32 before returning to $2. In the latter half of 2012 and during the 2012–13 Cypriot financial crisis, the bitcoin price began to rise again, reaching a high of $266 on 10 April 2013, before crashing to around $50. On 29 November 2013, the cost of one bitcoin rose to a peak of $1,242. In 2014, the price fell sharply, and as of April remained depressed at little more than half 2013 prices. As of August 2014 it was under $600.\nBitcoin prices reached their apogee in December 2017, at just shy of $20,000 per coin. Since then, prices have fallen roughly in half, and as of March 10 2020 one bitcoin is valued at approximately $7,900. \nThis question asks: Will one bitcoin be worth $1,000 USD or less before 1 January 2025?\nResolution should cite credible press reports in the financial media, or information from a cryptocurrency exchange or trading platform, that one bitcoin is valued at less than $1,000 USD at any time after this question opens, and before 1 January 2025.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 296,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the next Qatari general election be held?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3830/when-will-the-next-qatari-general-election-be-held/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Constitutionally, the [Consultative Assembly of Qatar] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consultative_Assembly_of_Qatar) is one-third appointed and two-thirds elected by popular vote; however, since the constitution was adopted in 2003, no legislative election has yet occured. The [first general election] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_Qatari_general_election) was scheduled to be held in 2013, but was postponed to 2016, and then postponed again until at least 2019. In October 2019, a [committee was established] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-qatar-politics/qatar-takes-step-toward-first-shura-council-election-qna-agency-idUSKBN1XA1CH) to organize the elections lead by the Prime Minister, though thus far no date has been announced.\nWhen will Qatar hold its first legislative election?\nIf there are multiple days of voting, this question resolves as the date of the first day of voting.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 51,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will North Korea's merchandise trade as a % of GDP be in 2045 per the most recent World Bank data?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3833/what-will-north-koreas-merchandise-trade-as-a--of-gdp-be-in-2045-per-the-most-recent-world-bank-data/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Every year, the World Bank releases [statistics on merchandise trade as a percentage of GDP] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/TG.VAL.TOTL.GD.ZS?most_recent_value_desc=false) . \nMerchandise trade as a share of GDP is the sum of merchandise exports and imports divided by the value of GDP, all in current U.S. dollars.\nSouth Korean president Ban Ki-Moon believes that the DPRK \"wants to join international financial institutions like the IMF and the World Bank\". There is some speculation that the DPRK's leadership is opting for a [Vietnamese-style Doi Moi policy] (https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/13/north-korea-may-choose-to-follow-vietnams-economic-model.html) and that their diplomatic overtures to the U.S have the end goal of lifting all sanctions.\nThe question asks: What will North Korea's merchandise trade as a percentage of GDP be in 2045 according to the most recently released World Bank statistics?\nBecause the World Bank has a delay between collecting and publishing data, this question will resolve as the most recent statistic made available by 01/01/2046, and will resolve as ambiguous if no official data exists later than the year 2040. If the World Bank does not release data on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's merchandise trade at all (as is presently the case), this question will similarly resolve as ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 50,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any conclusive evidence for extraterrestrial life, past or present, be discovered within our Solar System by 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3834/will-any-conclusive-evidence-for-extraterrestrial-life-past-or-present-be-discovered-within-our-solar-system-by-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "12%",
    "Description": "Despite our best efforts, Earth is still the only known planet in the universe to harbor any kind of life. Though plenty of our attention in this hunt has been focused on studying potentially habitable exoplanets, this question is concerned with the likelihood of finding [extraterrestrial life] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterrestrial_life#Planetary_habitability_in_the_Solar_System) in our own cosmic backyard.\nWill any conclusive evidence for extraterrestrial life, past or present, be discovered within our Solar System by 2050?\nResolution details:\n--- \nTo resolve positive, a scientific consensus must be reached that life exists or has existed anywhere in our Solar System besides Earth, as judged by Metaculus admins. Resolves negative if there is no sufficiently strong evidence for such by 2050.\n--- \nThe life in question can be related to Earth life, i.e. sharing a common origin with us, but must not have been placed there by humans. For example, if we find Europan life that turns out to have shared a common ancestor with Earth life millions or billions of years ago, that’s fine. But if we accidentally or otherwise contaminate Mars with our spacecraft, that won’t count.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 126,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Nintendo release a console capable of 4K output?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3840/when-will-nintendo-release-a-console-capable-of-4k-output/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "For the past 2 console generations (since the Wii in 2006), Nintendo has lagged behind competitors when it comes to the raw computational performance of their consoles and, more specifically, their output resolution (see [wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eighth_generation_of_video_game_consoles#Comparison) for a comparison). Given that 4K output is quickly replacing 1080p HD as the standard resolution across a majority of devices, if Nintendo's next console does not support it, it may be seen by many consumers as a mark against the console.\nThis question resolves on the date an official Nintendo console capable of outputting video at at least 4K* resolution is released for general public consumption.\nPatents, announcements, and review units do not count.\n*4K in this case means at least 3840 x 2160 pixels.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 67,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a reliable poll of physicists reveal that a majority of those polled accept the many-worlds interpretation by 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3842/will-a-reliable-poll-of-physicists-reveal-that-a-majority-of-those-polled-accept-the-many-worlds-interpretation-by-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "The [many-worlds interpretation] (https://www.hedweb.com/manworld.htm#what) is a theory for explaining our observations from quantum experiments. It posits that reality consists entirely of a [universal wavefunction] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_wavefunction) that deterministically obeys the [Schrodinger equation] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation) (or some other wave equation). The apparent probabilistic nature of quantum experiments is normally explained by appealing to a non-rigorous concept of macroscopic worlds where each possible result of a quantum experiment happens in one of these worlds. However, \"worlds\" are merely convenient abstractions, and are not fundamental to the theory's main statement. \nThe other names of the many-worlds interpretation include \"the relative state formulation\", \"the Everett interpretation\", and \"the theory of the universal wavefunction.\"\nThis question resolves positively if by 1/1/2050 a poll of professional physicists with at least 100 responses reveals that more than half accept the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, as I have described above. The results from the poll must be published in some reliable document or blog post, and must not be informal. If no such poll is released by 1/1/2050, then this question resolves negatively.\n[Here] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.00676.pdf) is an example of a qualifying survey uploaded to the arxiv in December of 2016. 39% said they preferred the Copenhagen interpretation, 6% the Everett interpretation, 36% had no preferrence.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 105,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the USD still reign supreme by 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3858/will-the-usd-still-reign-supreme-by-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "39%",
    "Description": "The IMF regularly publishes information on the composition of official global foreign exchange reserves in the aggregated Currency Composition of Foreign Exchange Reserves ( [COFER] (http://data.imf.org/?sk=E6A5F467-C14B-4AA8-9F6D-5A09EC4E62A4) ). As of Q3 2019, the U.S dollar comprises 61.8% of the total ( [source] (http://data.imf.org/regular.aspx?key=41175) ).\nSeveral contributing factors are thought to contribute to this state of affairs, including [the stability, size, and liquidity of United States Treasury assets] (https://www.economist.com/business-finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=16064067&amp;source=hptextfeature) , the tying of other currencies to the U.S dollar as part of the Bretton Woods Agreement, and the strength of the U.S economy.\nAt present, the U.S dollar is considered to be the world's dominant reserve currency. This is considered to [diminish the impact of higher U.S trade deficits] (https://qz.com/1266044/why-does-the-us-run-a-trade-deficit-to-maintain-the-dollars-privileged-position/) and [allowing it to impose unilateral sanctions] (https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/03/upshot/the-dollars-big-role-in-foreign-policy.html) . However, it has been speculated that the U.S dollar may be supplanted by the euro or the renminbi, or may diminish in importance.\nThe question asks: Will the US dollar still reign supreme by 2050?\nQuestion resolves positively if the most recently released percentage of allocated global foreign currency reserves comprising of the U.S dollar, by year-end 2050, is over 50%. Per moderator discretion, if the IMF has ceased publication of COFER in lieu of a new publication containing the same statistics, the new publication will be used instead.\nQuestion resolves as ambiguous the IMF has not published any statistics for any quarters after Q1 2045, if admins judge that the IMF has ceased to exist.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 127,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Out of the 25 largest U.S companies by revenue, how many will file for bankruptcy over the next four years?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3864/out-of-the-25-largest-us-companies-by-revenue-how-many-will-file-for-bankruptcy-over-the-next-four-years/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "During the Great Recession, several companies went bankrupt. These included General Motors, CIT Group and Lehman Brothers, many of which were bailed out, restructured, or acquired.\nThe question asks: Out of the 25 largest U.S companies by revenue, how many will file for bankruptcy over the next four years?\nFor the purposes of this question, [the 2019 Fortune 500 list] (https://fortune.com/fortune500/2019/search/) will be used. The next four years will be defined as the interval between 00:00 UTC 15 March 2020 and 00:00 UTC 15 March 2024.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 198,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a currently unknown social media app reach one billion downloads worldwide?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3866/when-will-a-currently-unknown-social-media-app-reach-one-billion-downloads-worldwide/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Hundreds of social media apps are launched every year] (https://www.crunchbase.com/hub/social-media-startups) , with most failing to gain traction. Meanwhile, [social media use is booming in the developing world] (https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2018/06/19/social-media-use-continues-to-rise-in-developing-countries-but-plateaus-across-developed-ones) . Occasionally, one of these platforms - for instance, TikTok - [will encounter exponential growth, outperforming its rivals by a significant margin] (https://www.businessinsider.com.au/tiktok-hits-15-billion-downloads-outperforming-instagram-2019-11) . \nThe question asks: When will a currently-undiscovered social media app reach one billion downloads worldwide?\nFor the purposes of this question, \"currently undiscovered\" is defined as either having fewer than 10,000 downloads across the iOS App Store and the Android Play Store as of March 15, 2020 UTC 00:00, or being non-existent/unavailable to the general public at the time. This question should resolve on the date that a social media app meeting this qualification reaches a combined one billion downloads on Android and iOS devices global. If a new mobile operating system and app store - for instance, Huawei's HarmonyOS - becomes popular enough to significantly affect a global download count, it may be included at moderator discretion.\nFor this question, a \"social media\" is defined as one that appears on this [statista list] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/) . If it is not available at resolution time, then either [this wikipedia article] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media#Statistics_on_usage_and_membership) may be consulted or a suitable replacement may be chosen by Metaculus.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 79,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If there is a WW3, what longitude will it start in?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3867/if-there-is-a-ww3-what-longitude-will-it-start-in/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The period between 1945 and the present day has been peaceful, with no major wars between great powers. Some have argued that this degree of prolonged absence of conflict [is nothing special historically speaking and may end soon] (https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/02/are-we-middle-long-peace-or-brink-major-war) , while [others] (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09636412.2017.1306394) have argued this moment of calm will likely last for some time due to the deterrence effect of nuclear weapons, the unipolarity of U.S hegemony, globalisation and international trade, and the efforts of peacekeepers such as the United Nations.\nAt the time of writing, the Metaculus community [has estimated the likelihood of a 'WW3' to be 10%] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2534/will-there-be-a-world-war-three-before-2050/) .\nThe question asks: If there is a \"Third World War\", what longitude will it start in?\nLongitude will be represented on a scale of -180 to 180, with -180 representing 180°W and 180 representing 180°E. A latitude and longitude calculator can be [accessed here] (https://www.latlong.net/) . A static map can be [accessed here] (https://i.imgur.com/pGcQMnf.png) .\nMany wars are precipitated by regionally-confined international incidents resulting in a clear chain of events producing wider-scale conflict. The answer will be determined by either the longitude of the location of the incident precipitating a WW3 scenario, or the longitude of the region where the first direct confrontation takes place with as much specificity as possible. If the incident/confrontation is geographically long-range in nature (e.g the launch of an ICBM from North Korea to New York), the starting location will be used. If no such location can be identified with the consensus of three moderators, either two years into or following a WW3 scenario, the answer will resolve as ambiguous. \nLikewise, the question will resolve as ambiguous if the following conditions for a \"Third World War\" are not met by the resolve date:\n--- \nConsensus that a state of war exists between at least five G20 member-states, spread out over at least five continents (North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and/or Australasia)\n--- \nConflicts between these states has resulted in an excess of ten million deaths and/or damage amounting to 40% or more of global GDP at its level when the first hostilities began.\nThis question is accompanied by an identical entry, posing the same question except with latitude. It can be found [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3868/if-there-is-a-third-world-war-what-latitude-will-it-start-in/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 89,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If there is a WW3, what latitude will it start in?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3868/if-there-is-a-ww3-what-latitude-will-it-start-in/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The period between 1945 and the present day has been peaceful, with no major wars between great powers. Some have argued that this degree of prolonged absence of conflict [is nothing special historically speaking and may end soon] (https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/02/are-we-middle-long-peace-or-brink-major-war) , while [others] (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09636412.2017.1306394) have argued this moment of calm will likely last for some time due to the deterrence effect of nuclear weapons, the unipolarity of U.S hegemony, globalisation and international trade, and the efforts of peacekeepers such as the United Nations.\nAt the time of writing, the Metaculus community [has estimated the likelihood of a 'WW3' to be 10%] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2534/will-there-be-a-world-war-three-before-2050/) .\nThe question asks: If there is a \"Third World War\", what latitude will it start in?\nLatitude will be represented on a scale of -90 to 90, with -90 representing 90°S and 90 representing 90°N. A latitude and longitude calculator can be [accessed here] (https://www.latlong.net/) . A static map can be [accessed here] (https://i.imgur.com/pGcQMnf.png) .\nMany wars are precipitated by regionally-confined international incidents resulting in a clear chain of events producing wider-scale conflict. The answer will be determined by either the latitude of the location of the incident precipitating a WW3 scenario, or the latitude of the region where the first direct confrontation takes place with as much specificity as possible. If the incident/confrontation is geographically long-range in nature (e.g the launch of an ICBM from North Korea to New York), the starting location will be used. If no such location can be identified with the consensus of three moderators, either two years into or following a WW3 scenario, the answer will resolve as ambiguous. \nLikewise, the question will resolve as ambiguous if the following conditions for a \"Third World War\" are not met by the resolve date:\n--- \nConsensus that a state of war exists between at least five G20 member-states, spread out over at least five continents (North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and/or Australasia)\n--- \nConflicts between these states has resulted in an excess of ten million deaths and/or damage amounting to 40% or more of global GDP at its level when the first hostilities began.\nThis question is accompanied by an identical entry, posing the same question except with longitude. It can be found [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3867/if-there-is-a-third-world-war-what-longitude-will-it-start-in/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 52,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there turn out to be widespread fossils of algae and lichens on Mars?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3870/will-there-turn-out-to-be-widespread-fossils-of-algae-and-lichens-on-mars/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2%",
    "Description": "A recent [provocative paper] (http://journalofastrobiology.com/MarsGaleCraterLife.html) by a quite reputable set of astrobiologists and others has claimed that in Gale crater on Mars, \nspecimens resembling terrestrial algae, lichens, microbial mats, stro-matolites, ooids, tubular-shaped formations, and mineralized fossils of metazoans and calcium-carbonate encrusted cyanobacteria were observed and tentatively identified.\nbut of course\nThat some or most of these specimens may be abiotic, cannot be ruled out.\nThis would, of course, be pretty monumental if true. We'll ask whether it will turn out that:\n\"The tentative claims of the 2020 Joseph et al. paper are basically correct and a significant fraction of the features identified there were, in fact, fossils of life on Mars.\" \nThis question is a bit experimental, one of a series of \"self-resolving\" ones. Resolution to this question will be determined as follows:\n--- \nIf at any time after the date of Jan 1, 2025 the community prediction is &gt; 95% or &lt; 5%, the question resolves positively or negatively, respectively.\n--- \nOtherwise, on or about the close/resolve date of Jan 1, 2030, the question will be decided by unanimous vote of a council of three people as to whether the proposition listed above is true, at 50+% credence (i.e. more true than its negation), resolving ambiguous in the case of disagreement. The council of three will be chosen by quantum mechanical random numbers from a list of 12 people that will be composed by the author around the time of question close, and held secretly until the time of question resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 170,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the United Kingdom apply to rejoin the EU?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3877/when-will-the-united-kingdom-apply-to-rejoin-the-eu/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Following a UK-wide [referendum in June 2016] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_Kingdom_European_Union_membership_referendum) , in which 52% voted to leave and 48% voted to remain in the EU, the British government formally announced the country's withdrawal in March 2017, beginning the Brexit process. Following a general election, Parliament ratified the [withdrawal agreement] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brexit_withdrawal_agreement) , and the UK left the EU at 11 p.m. GMT on 31 January 2020.\nThe country is currently in a transition period until at least 31 December 2020, during which the UK remains in the single market, in order to ensure frictionless trade until a long-term relationship is established. If no such agreement is reached by that date and the transition period is not extended, a no-deal Brexit would be the default outcome in 2021.\nWhen, if ever, will the United Kingdom submit an application to rejoin the European Union?\nFor this question to resolve positively, the United Kingdom must submit a membership application to the European Council to rejoin the European Union. If this does not happen by the deadline of January 1 2050, the question will resolve as \"&gt;2050\". Note that joining itself is not required by the given date, only the application to join.\nThe question resolves ambigously if either of the aforementioned entities cease to exist before the given date.\nIn the event of a dispute as to the definition of the “United Kingdom” (e.g. if one or more of the constituent countries secede), so long as the union still calls itself such and contains at least the countries of England and Wales in full, that entity will count for the purposes of this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 86,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will humanity use more than one millionth of the sun's energy output?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3882/when-will-humanity-use-more-than-one-millionth-of-the-suns-energy-output/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The sun [produces watts] (https://phys.org/news/2015-12-sun-energy.html) . At the beginning of 2017, [humanity captured watts] (https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/iea-global-installed-pv-capacity-leaps-to-303-gw) using photovoltaic systems (less than 10⁻¹³% or one quadrillionth).\nHowever, the sun is one of the major sources of energy in the solar system, and it has been proposed that advanced civilizations could use their star as their [main source of energy] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale) . Specific structures proposed for this include [Dyson spheres] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere) and their subtypes (swarms, bubbles and shells).\nSome futurists assume that such a structure could in principle be built in [less than a century] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haCV1PEeXz4&amp;t=7m40s) , given self-replicating mining equipment that disassembles mercury or large asteroids.\nThis question asks: When will humanity be able to use more than watts produced by the sun?\nThis question will resolve positively to the year [CE] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Era) when humanity is able to use more than watts produced by the sun, the star in the center of the solar system.\nThe resolution date will be determined by the metaculus moderators.\nThis question will resolve ambiguously if the sun is destroyed before energy collection on this scale can occur, or if humanity goes extinct before it can complete such a project.\n\"Humanity\" is defined as the genetic and/or intellectual descendants of current biological humans, including (but not limited to) emulated humans (ems) and artificial intelligences.\nRelated Questions:\n--- [How much solar energy will be consumed globally, in terawatt-hours, in the calendar year 2023?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3653/how-much-solar-energy-will-be-consumed-globally-in-terawatt-hours-in-the-calendar-year-2023/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 96,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many people will be born in the United States in the year 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3883/how-many-people-will-be-born-in-the-united-states-in-the-year-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The number of people born per year in the US has slightly decreased over the past decade. In 2010, 3,999,386 people were born in the US. For comparison, there were an estimated 3,791,712 births in 2018, according to the official [report] (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_13-508.pdf) .\nOne reason why the number of births in 2021 in particular is of interest is the coronavirus crisis. Some commentators have suggested that couples who are forced to spend time at home during quarantine may be more likely to have children, which would increase the birth rate. This however remains to be seen.\nResolution criteria: This question will resolve when a US government agency, most likely the National Center for Health Statistics, releases a final estimate of the total number of live births for all US states and territories between January 1 and December 31, 2021. The report will likely not be published until late 2022, which is why this question is expected to resolve by 2023. (E.g. the 2018 report wasn't published until November 2019.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 255,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will China legalise same-sex marriage?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3887/when-will-china-legalise-same-sex-marriage/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "At the moment, the [Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China] (http://www.asianlii.org/cn/legis/cen/laws/mlotproc354/#:~:text=%5BArticle%202%5D%20A%20marriage%20system,Family%20planning%20shall%20be%20practised.) adopted on September 10, 1980, defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman. However, late last year, China's top legislative body has been advised to legalize same-sex marriage in the updated civil code.\nAccording to a [Bloomberg article] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-20/china-hints-it-may-open-the-door-to-same-sex-marriage) :\nThe Commission for Legislative Affairs of the National People’s Congress Standing Committee has received more than 237,000 online suggestions and 5,600 letters requesting to clarify the “scope of close relatives, improving the common debt of spouses and legalizing same-sex marriage,” according to the report, which cited Yue Zhongming, spokesman of the commission.\nThe report didn’t specify if the legislature will include the legalization of same-sex marriage in the civil code. The NPC will review the draft of the new civil code in March 2020, according to its website.\nThe question asks: When will China legalise same-sex marriage?\nThe question takes \"legalisation\" to mean an amendment of the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China, widening the legal definition of marriage to encompass same-sex couples. It resolves on the date that such legislation is passed by the National People's Congress, and resolves ambiguously should the People's Republic of China cease to exist in one form or another.\nThis question resolves as \"&gt; Jan 1, 2100\" if it does not resolve positively or ambiguously before 01/01/2100.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 63,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a vaccine for HIV be administered to 10 million people?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3913/when-will-a-vaccine-for-hiv-be-administered-to-10-million-people/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "From [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV) ,\nThe human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) are two species of Lentivirus (a subgroup of retrovirus) that infect humans. [...] The urgency of the search for a vaccine against HIV stems from the AIDS-related death toll of over 35 million people since 1981.\nTo count, a vaccine must provide protection against the HIV-1 variant of Lentivirus. The relevant conditions for resolving this question are determined in an identical manner to those prescribed in [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3860/when-will-a-vaccine-targeted-at-the-2019-novel-coronavirus-covid-19-be-administered-to-at-least-10m-people/) for COVID-19. \n--- \nThis question resolves as the date when such a vaccine first is administered to at least 10M people.\n--- \nResolution will be by credible media report or credible official publication this has happened. \nThe first HIV vaccine administered to at least 10M people can trigger:\n--- \nPositive resolution if there is consensus that it provides immunity against HIV.\n--- \nAmbiguous resolution if there is no consensus one way or the other.\n--- \nNo resolution if there's a consensus that it does not protect against HIV\n--- \nThe aforementioned \"consensus\" shall be reached among expert medical professionals, as judged by Metaculus, helped by the discussion in comments below.\nIf does not resolve before Dec 30, 2050, it resolves as &gt;Dec 30, 2050. If it is not certain on what day the 10M threshold was breached, admins may resolve this as their best guesses that are made in consultation with community moderators and community members.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 45,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What fraction of United States adults will be vaccinated against the 2020—2021 seasonal influenza?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3992/what-fraction-of-united-states-adults-will-be-vaccinated-against-the-20202021-seasonal-influenza/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Influenza is an endemic viral disease that infects hundreds of millions each year. Most are only mildly ill and out of work for a week, but some hundreds of thousands die, mostly the elderly and immunocompromised. Vaccination is at present the most effective means to combat it.\nIn the United States, the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends annual flu vaccination for everyone over 6 months without specific contraindications. Despite this, uptake is mediocre, at only 45.3% of the 18-and-over population for the 2018-2019 season. Decades of ad campaigns and public health interventions have struggled to move the needle. One reason may be that the lowest-complying group, young adults with no preexisting conditions, may not understand how their own vaccination protects more vulnerable groups.\nWhat value will [the CDC's FluVaxView website] (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/fluvaxview/) report for flu vaccination coverage among adults ≥18 years for the 2020–2021 flu season?\nThe CDC's FluVaxView website usually publishes results in the fall after the relevant season (fall 2021 here). If no results have been published by 2021-12-31, this resolves ambiguous unless Metaculus has found a suitable replacement.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 504,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the peak population of Antarctica be by 2075?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3999/what-will-the-peak-population-of-antarctica-be-by-2075/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Antarctica] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctica) remains as the last continent without a significant human presence. The southern landmass is presently governed by the terms of the [Antarctic Treaty] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_Treaty_System) , which prohibits military activities and mineral mining, prohibits nuclear explosions and nuclear waste disposal, supports scientific research, and protects the continent's ecozone. As a result, Antarctica has very little to no long-term human population, which consists of roughly 5000 researchers in the summer and only 1000 during winter.\nBut will this always be the case? The southern continent [has been heating up] (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/13/antarctic-temperature-rises-above-20c-first-time-record) along with the rest of the planet and could potentially become more habitable, and/or more amenable to resource exploitation. In addition, the Antarctic treaty will come under review [in 2048] (https://theconversation.com/in-30-years-the-antarctic-treaty-becomes-modifiable-and-the-fate-of-a-continent-could-hang-in-the-balance-98654) .\nWhat will the peak population of humans residing in Antarctica have been by 2075-01-01? \nWe will define humans as biological creatures who have as their ancestors (via a chain of live births from mothers) circa 1900 humans OR who could mate with circa 1900 humans to produce viable offspring. Entities such as AIs, [ems] (http://ageofem.com/) , genetically engineered beings of a different species brought up in artificial wombs, etc. would not count. \nResolution will be by UN data, if possible. If the UN will no longer exist, or no longer measure human population by the resolution date, resolution will be by data from what the Metaculus administration judges to be the most accurate data source.\nInspired by [this comment] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3519/one-million-martian-residents-by-2075/#comment-25412) of user @j.m. on the [similar question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3519/one-million-martian-residents-by-2075/) about Mars.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 93,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the next US recession turn into a depression?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4013/will-the-next-us-recession-turn-into-a-depression/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "9%",
    "Description": "As of Spring 2020, it seems likely that the world is only beginning to feel the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The stock market has plunged, and [unemployment has skyrocketed] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1643/will-the-us-unemployment-rate-reach-10-before-2023/) . It's clear that a recession is nearly inevitable. What is less clear is how bad things will get. One simple operationalization of this question is \"Will the US Experience a Depression?\" [According to Investopedia] (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/depression.asp) :\nA depression is a severe and prolonged downturn in economic activity. In economics, a depression is commonly defined as an extreme recession that lasts three or more years or leads to a decline in real gross domestic product (GDP) of at least 10 percent.\nAccording to this definition, Will the first United States recession before 2032 lead to a Depression?\nThis question resolves positively if either of the following criteria is met during the first recession before 2032:\n---The US remains in a recession for 36 months or longer (as adjudicated by [this Metaculus Question's resolution] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2623/if-the-us-enters-a-recession-how-many-months-will-the-economic-contraction-last/) --i.e., if that one resolves ≥36, this one resolves positively). \n---Any year's Annual Real GDP growth (as [reported by the US Bureau of Economic Analysis] (https://www.bea.gov/news/current-releases) ) is estimated to be -10% or less. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 339,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the US unemployment rate fall to 4% or lower for the first time since the COVID-19 crisis of 2020?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4017/when-will-the-us-unemployment-rate-fall-to-4-or-lower-for-the-first-time-since-the-covid-19-crisis-of-2020/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In February 2020, the [US unemployment rate] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate) fell from 3.6% to 3.5%, the lowest level in more than 50 years. However, due to the ongoing [COVID-19 pandemic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic) and associated shutdowns of economic activity, in March 2020 the US unemployment rate rose to 4.4% from 3.5%, and it is widely expected that the unemployment rate will continue to rise substantially in 2020, likely dramatically so. \nThis question asks: When will the US unemployment rate next fall to 4% or lower?\nResolution should cite the official US unemployment rate from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics' monthly [Employment Situation report.] (https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 184,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will unemployment be in the US in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4032/what-will-unemployment-be-in-the-us-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In 2020, the United States of America was hit by a [disease outbreak] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_the_United_States) causing many locales to issue [lockdowns] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._state_and_local_government_response_to_the_2020_coronavirus_pandemic) . These lockdowns have meant that many people have been unable to go to work, causing an [increase in the unemployment rate] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate) , as well as stopping people from going to many shops.\nOn the 18th of March 2020, economist [Bryan Caplan] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bryan_Caplan) wrote a [blog post] (https://www.econlib.org/i-fear-stagflation-and-general-price-controls-are-coming/) titled \"I Fear Stagflation and Price Controls Are Coming\". Some excerpts:\nThe sudden shutdown of enormous sectors of the U.S. and global economy clearly constitute a massive short-run fall in Aggregate Supply. While Aggregate Demand is going to fall too, this time Aggregate Supply fell first... If AS [Aggregate Supply] falls a lot and AD [Aggregate Demand] falls a little, in contrast, we should expect a return of [stagflation] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stagflation) – high unemployment and high inflation simultaneously. The same holds if AS falls enormously and AD “only” falls a lot... The upshot: Though I’m not ready to [bet on it] (https://www.econlib.org/my-complete-bet-wiki/) , I fear that in 2021 we will see not only high unemployment but high inflation as well. (Complication: Official statistics may classify disemployed workers as “out of the labor force” because they’re too scared to hunt for a job). At this point, I would not be surprised by 10% unemployment and 6% inflation for 2021...\nHow bad will the inflation be?... [T]he public outcry against even high single-digit inflation will be deafening. Historically, governments have a standard response to such outcries: economy-wide price controls. Richard Nixon imposed them in 1971 when inflation was only 4.4% and restaurants were open. If and when the government does impose price controls, the textbook tells us what to expect: Ever-growing shortages, rationing, black markets, and anti-business witch-hunts.\nIn this question, we test one aspect of this fear:\nWhat will the US unemployment rate be in 2021?\nThe question will resolve based on US Bureau of Labor Statistics data, such as that shown [here] (https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-unemployment-rate.htm) , as of February 1st 2022. The resolution will be the average of the unemployment rate, as a percentage, for each month in 2021.\nOther questions testing aspects of Caplan's post:\n--- [What will inflation be in the US in 2021?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4033/what-will-inflation-be-in-the-us-in-2021/) \n--- [Will the US see mass price controls in 2021?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4035/will-the-us-see-mass-price-controls-in-2021/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 378,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will inflation be in the US in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4033/what-will-inflation-be-in-the-us-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In 2020, the United States of America was hit by a [disease outbreak] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_the_United_States) causing many locales to issue [lockdowns] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._state_and_local_government_response_to_the_2020_coronavirus_pandemic) . These lockdowns have meant that many people have been unable to go to work, causing an [increase in the unemployment rate] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate) , as well as stopping people from going to many shops.\nOn the 18th of March 2020, economist [Bryan Caplan] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bryan_Caplan) wrote a [blog post] (https://www.econlib.org/i-fear-stagflation-and-general-price-controls-are-coming/) titled \"I Fear Stagflation and Price Controls Are Coming\". Some excerpts:\nThe sudden shutdown of enormous sectors of the U.S. and global economy clearly constitute a massive short-run fall in Aggregate Supply. While Aggregate Demand is going to fall too, this time Aggregate Supply fell first... If AS [Aggregate Supply] falls a lot and AD [Aggregate Demand] falls a little, in contrast, we should expect a return of [stagflation] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stagflation) – high unemployment and high inflation simultaneously. The same holds if AS falls enormously and AD “only” falls a lot... The upshot: Though I’m not ready to [bet on it] (https://www.econlib.org/my-complete-bet-wiki/) , I fear that in 2021 we will see not only high unemployment but high inflation as well. (Complication: Official statistics may classify disemployed workers as “out of the labor force” because they’re too scared to hunt for a job). At this point, I would not be surprised by 10% unemployment and 6% inflation for 2021...\nHow bad will the inflation be?... [T]he public outcry against even high single-digit inflation will be deafening. Historically, governments have a standard response to such outcries: economy-wide price controls. Richard Nixon imposed them in 1971 when inflation was only 4.4% and restaurants were open. If and when the government does impose price controls, the textbook tells us what to expect: Ever-growing shortages, rationing, black markets, and anti-business witch-hunts.\nIn this question, we test one aspect of this fear:\nBy what percentage will the CPI increase in 2021?\nThe question will resolve based on CPI-U data released by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics data as of February 1st 2022. The resolution will be the percentage change of CPI-U from December 2020 to December 2021.\nOther questions testing aspects of Caplan's post:\n--- [What will unemployment be in the US in 2021?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4032/what-will-unemployment-be-in-the-us-in-2021/) \n--- [Will the US see economy-wide price controls in 2021?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4035/will-the-us-see-mass-price-controls-in-2021/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 147,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 2030, will C. elegans be uploaded to the satisfaction of top computational neuroscientists?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4034/by-2030-will-c-elegans-be-uploaded-to-the-satisfaction-of-top-computational-neuroscientists/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "36%",
    "Description": "From [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caenorhabditis_elegans) ,\nCaenorhabditis elegans is a free-living, transparent nematode, about 1 mm in length, that lives in temperate soil environments. It is the type species of its genus. [...] In 1963, Sydney Brenner proposed research into C. elegans primarily in the area of neuronal development. In 1974, he began research into the molecular and developmental biology of C. elegans, which has since been extensively used as a model organism. It was the first multicellular organism to have its whole genome sequenced, and as of 2019, is the only organism to have its connectome (neuronal \"wiring diagram\") completed.\nIn 2011 the project [OpenWorm] (http://openworm.org/) began the ambitious [goal] (http://docs.openworm.org/en/latest/modeling/) to \"build the world's first virtual organism-- an in silico implementation of a living creature-- for the purpose of achieving an understanding of the events and mechanisms of living cells.\"\nMore generally, whole brain emulation of complex organisms has been [called] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/brain-emulation-roadmap-report.pdf) \"the logical endpoint of computational neuroscience’s attempts to accurately model neurons and brain systems\" by researchers at the Future of Humanity Institute. More speculatively, success in emulating humans could entail the ability to transfer one's personality and memory onto a computing substrate by having their brain scanned and transferred into a computer model. Many who sign up for cryonics anticipate developments in whole brain emulation to be critical for a successful revival.\nUnfortunately, progress has been slow. As of 2020, it is apparent that C. elegans has not been uploaded to a computer substrate in any satisfying manner. Will the same be true by January 1st 2030?\nAssume that in January 2030, an email is sent to 25 top computational neuroscientists (determined later in this question) asking,\nHas recent progress in simulating the brain of Caenorhabditis elegans convinced you that the term \"whole brain emulation\" is an appropriate term for the current simulations of this organism? In other words, from what you've seen, are the models of C. elegans nearly behaviorally identical to the real C. elegans? For the sake of clarity, please respond with a clear \"Yes\", \"No\" or \"Other\" in your reply.\nThe question is allowed to include an introduction, and an explanation of why it is being asked. It is also allowed to include any clarifications for key terms, such as \"whole brain emulation.\"\nThis question resolves positively if the majority of those who reply to the email respond with a clear \"Yes\" (or \"yes\" or some phrase that clearly indicates the same meaning). Otherwise, it resolves negatively. If the results from such an email are not published by the end of January 2030, this question resolves ambiguously.\nThe group of 25 leading computational neuroscientists would be the group created via the following method:\n1-- \nIn January 2030, take the most highly cited papers uploaded to bioarXiv from 2020 to 2030 (inclusive) in the category \"Neuronscience\".\n2-- \nFor each paper, in order from most citations to least citations, add the first author to the group if they are both alive and have a public email address. (A person has a public email address if they are associated with a research institution that has a webpage listing their email for contact.)\n3-- \nContinue adding authors until there are 25 members in the group.\n(Edited 2020-04-19 to upgrade method for picking the 25 scientists.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 133,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the US see mass price controls in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4035/will-the-us-see-mass-price-controls-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "In 2020, the United States of America was hit by a [disease outbreak] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_the_United_States) causing many locales to issue [lockdowns] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._state_and_local_government_response_to_the_2020_coronavirus_pandemic) . These lockdowns have meant that many people have been unable to go to work, causing an [increase in the unemployment rate] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate) , as well as stopping people from going to many shops.\nOn the 18th of March 2020, economist [Bryan Caplan] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bryan_Caplan) wrote a [blog post] (https://www.econlib.org/i-fear-stagflation-and-general-price-controls-are-coming/) titled \"I Fear Stagflation and Price Controls Are Coming\". Some excerpts:\nThe sudden shutdown of enormous sectors of the U.S. and global economy clearly constitute a massive short-run fall in Aggregate Supply. While Aggregate Demand is going to fall too, this time Aggregate Supply fell first... If AS [Aggregate Supply] falls a lot and AD [Aggregate Demand] falls a little, in contrast, we should expect a return of [stagflation] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stagflation) – high unemployment and high inflation simultaneously. The same holds if AS falls enormously and AD “only” falls a lot... The upshot: Though I’m not ready to [bet on it] (https://www.econlib.org/my-complete-bet-wiki/) , I fear that in 2021 we will see not only high unemployment but high inflation as well. (Complication: Official statistics may classify disemployed workers as “out of the labor force” because they’re too scared to hunt for a job). At this point, I would not be surprised by 10% unemployment and 6% inflation for 2021...\nHow bad will the inflation be?... [T]he public outcry against even high single-digit inflation will be deafening. Historically, governments have a standard response to such outcries: economy-wide price controls. Richard Nixon imposed them in 1971 when inflation was only 4.4% and restaurants were open. If and when the government does impose price controls, the textbook tells us what to expect: Ever-growing shortages, rationing, black markets, and anti-business witch-hunts.\nIn this question, we test one aspect of this fear:\nWill the US see mass price controls in 2021?\nThis question resolves positively if the US federal government institutes a measure described by at least three major US newspapers as \"price controls\", \"price ceilings\", \"price maxima\", or the singular of any of these phrases, or a phrase determined by Metaculus administrators to be equivalent to any of those three, and such measure applies to at least half of products and services in the US economy weighted by GDP, where this determination is also to be made by Metaculus administrators.\nFor the purpose of this question, the following is an exhaustive list of major US newspapers:\n--- [USA Today] (https://www.usatoday.com/) \n--- [The Wall Street Journal] (https://www.wsj.com/) \n--- [The New York Times] (https://www.nytimes.com/) \n---The [Los Angeles Times] (https://www.latimes.com/) \n--- [The Washington Post] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/) \n---The [Chicago Tribune] (https://www.chicagotribune.com/) \n--- [The Boston Tribune] (https://www.bostonglobe.com/) \nOther questions testing aspects of Caplan's post:\n--- [What will inflation be in the US in 2021?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4033/what-will-inflation-be-in-the-us-in-2021/) \n--- [What will unemployment be in the US in 2021?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4032/what-will-unemployment-be-in-the-us-in-2021/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 158,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a sitting US president not seek reelection before the 2080 election?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4037/will-a-sitting-us-president-not-seek-reelection-before-the-2080-election/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "86%",
    "Description": "During his Farewell Address George Washington set the precedent of only pursuing two terms, a tradition that was set in stone by Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and James Monroe, who all publicly embraced the principle.\nFrom then on the presidents mostly adhered to this tradition. \nThe first deviation came at the hands of Ulysses S. Grant, who sought to serve a third term in 1880, though that was eleven years after he had left the oval office. A more serious case was Theodore Roosevelt. President William McKinley was assassinated still in the first year of his second term and Vice President Roosevelt had to take over. He forewent a consecutive third term, since he felt term limits were a good check on dictatorships, being succeeded by William H. Taft. But due to his dissatisfaction with President Taft’s political acumen Roosevelt sought a third term for the 1912 election, heading the Progressive Party, thus once more straining the traditional two term limits, but due to his defeat at the hands of Woodrow Wilson the tradition remained true.\nCalvin Coolidge, following the sudden death of his predecessor Warren G. Harding in August 1923, was confirmed in the 1924 election, but then [chose not to run] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_do_not_choose_to_run) , later on citing 10 years in Washington would be too long for any man.\nOnly when Franklin D. Roosevelt took over the helm was the tradition broken. Buoyed by his success in dealing with the Great Depression and trusting only his own political experience in dealing with the Nazis currently sweeping through Western Europe, he sought and won a third term in 1940. Despite being aware of his ailing health, he also sought and won a fourth consecutive term, but considered resigning once the war was over. Three months into his fourth term his health declined rapidly and he died, making place for his Vice President Harry S. Truman.\nTruman took office the remaining almost full term and was reelected in 1948. In 1951 the 22nd Amendment was ratified, which would have rendered him ineligible for the 1952 election, were it not for the grandfather clause. He seriously considered running for the 1952 election, but his advisers managed to talk him out of it, citing Truman’s age and bad polling.\nOnly Calvin Coolidge, Harry S. Truman, and Lyndon B. Johnson forewent a term they were eligible for. Thus we ask if this will happen again.\n\nWill a sitting US president not seek reelection before the 2080 election?\n\nResolves positive if a sitting President of the United States decides not to seek nor accept the nomination of any party for another eligible term’s election, nor try to run on their own, before the 2080 presidential election.\nResolves ambiguous if the US political system changes significantly from the current political system (federal presidential constitutional republic).\n",
    "# Forecasts": 194,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will OpenAI unveil their secret AI project?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4043/when-will-openai-unveil-their-secret-ai-project/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Last year, OpenAI announced their big project for that year: [GPT-2] (https://openai.com/blog/better-language-models/) , a transformer based language model representing a significant advance in language modeling capabilities.\nOn February 17th an [article] (https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/02/17/844721/ai-openai-moonshot-elon-musk-sam-altman-greg-brockman-messy-secretive-reality/) from the MIT Technology Review reported,\nOne of the biggest secrets is the project OpenAI is working on next. Sources described it to me as the culmination of its previous four years of research: an AI system trained on images, text, and other data using massive computational resources. A small team has been assigned to the initial effort, with an expectation that other teams, along with their work, will eventually fold in. On the day it was announced at an all-company meeting, interns weren’t allowed to attend. People familiar with the plan offer an explanation: the leadership thinks this is the most promising way to reach AGI.\nThis question resolves on the date when OpenAI publishes a blog post or paper or a document of any kind, describing a large machine learning model that was trained on both images and text, and other data using massive computational resources (&gt;10^4 Petaflop/s-days as determined from estimates, judged by the Metaculus mods). If they do not unveil their secret project before April 2022, then this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 289,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many cents will it cost a typical consumer in the United States to store 10 GB of data on January 1st 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4048/how-many-cents-will-it-cost-a-typical-consumer-in-the-united-states-to-store-10-gb-of-data-on-january-1st-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The website [diskprices.com] (http://diskprices.com) keeps track of the lowest cost hard drives per byte by country. As of April 6th 2020, the cheapest hard drive per byte in the United States is 1.4 cents per GB. This comes out to 14 cents per 10 GB.\nWhat will be the average of the three cheapest-per-10GB drives reported on the site on January 1st 2025?\nIf [diskprices.com] (http://diskprices.com) does not exist on January 1st 2025, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 114,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the maximum world real GDP growth in percentage points be for a single year in the 21st century?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4050/what-will-the-maximum-world-real-gdp-growth-in-percentage-points-be-for-a-single-year-in-the-21st-century/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "World real GDP growth is determined by a reliable organization, such as [the World Bank] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ny.gdp.mktp.kd.zg) . The year with the highest growth in the 21st century is currently 2004 with 4.403% growth. The 21st century is defined as the era that began on January 1, 2001, and will end on December 31, 2100.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 64,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Alcor offer the use of a fixative during cryopreservation procedures before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4051/will-alcor-offer-the-use-of-a-fixative-during-cryopreservation-procedures-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "52%",
    "Description": "Aldehyde-Stabilized Cryopreservation (ASC) [is] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001122401500245X) \na brain-banking technique for preserving detailed brain ultrastructure over long time scales.\nIt was the technique that [won] (https://www.brainpreservation.org/large-mammal-announcement/) the Large Mammal BPF Prize in 2018. ASC works by fixing biological tissue using glutaraldehyde, protecting the tissue from decay due to autolysis or putrefaction. However, glutaraldehyde is not the only [fixative] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixation_(histology)) available. At the moment, ASC is merely the only technique that I'm currently aware of that uses a fixative to protect tissue prior to cryopreservation. \nAlcor does not currently offer ASC for its members, writing [a mixed review about it as a research direction] (https://www.alcor.org/blog/http-www-alcor-org-blog-alcor-position-statement-on-large-brain-preservation-foundation-prize//) in 2018, and without releasing any plans for adoption.\nA common position among cryonicists is that ASC will not allow for successful revival since aldehyde fixation destroys biological viability. Proponents of ASC respond that it preserves fine tissue better than existing vitrification techniques, and is suitable for people who want their brain to be scanned and \" [uploaded] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_uploading) \" onto a computer. Ralph Merkle, writing for Alcor, has [said] (https://alcor.org/Library/html/does-cryonics-offer-false-hope.html) \nRather obviously, if you want to cryopreserve someone you’d rather not perfuse them with glutaraldehyde. It’s a fixative. On the other hand, if you don’t use glutaraldehyde, then you’re going to get dehydration and shrinkage, which means you won’t get the pretty pictures that neuroscientists like.\nWill Alcor change their mind and offer using a fixative in their cryopreservation procedure before 2030?\nResolution will be determined by a document released from Alcor reporting that they now offer the use of a fixative during an active cryopreservation for their members. If such a document is published by Alcor before 2030, this question resolves positively. Otherwise, it resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 53,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If cryonics is at some point offered for free, what percentage of Americans will be signed up within 10 years?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4052/if-cryonics-is-at-some-point-offered-for-free-what-percentage-of-americans-will-be-signed-up-within-10-years/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Assume for the purpose of this question that before 2100, some organization or person offers cryonics for free, meaning that all fees and associated costs are waived. There are a few reasons why this might happen,\n--- \nA wealthy person or organization begins offering it as a way of attracting people to cryonics.\n--- \nThe government subsidizes cryonics as an alternative to the expensive [end-of-life care] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End-of-life_care) industry that currently exists. The world population is expected to be [much older] (https://ourworldindata.org/age-structure) on average in the near future, which could put strain on governments to cut healthcare costs.\nCryonics proponents have historically [given arguments] (https://alcor.org/Library/html/cryopreservingeveryone.html) for why they expect cryonics to scale extremely well, which if true, would imply that the cost of signing everyone in the United States up would be relatively cheap per capita.\nAfter 10 years of when the offer was first made, what percentage of Americans will be signed up to receive cryonics? For reference, there are [currently] (https://timelines.issarice.com/wiki/Timeline_of_brain_preservation) only about 1500 members signed up with Alcor, one of the largest cryonics organizations, which represents less than 0.00046% of the US population. \nFor the offering to count, there must be some sort of public message declaring the offer, and eligibility must be available to at least one hundred million people. The date of offering is the first date where a United States citizen receives a cryonics contract for free on behalf of an organization or person who is widely considered to be offering it as a gift to the general public (at least in the United States), rather than to some specific individuals. Here, a cryonics contract is defined as any legally binding commitment, by an organization plausibly capable of fulfilling it, to provide for cryopreservation of (at least) a person's brain provided that doing so is practically feasible.\nIf it is the case that the government provides the service as a routine procedure, and as such there is no literal contract to sign, the number of people said to be \"signed up\" in this case are the number of people the US Government promises to cryopreserve. As an example, if the US Government promised to preserve all United States citizens, then the proportion of citizens as a percentage of the total population of the United States (according to the latest Census projection) is the percentage of people in America \"signed up for cryonics.\"\nIf cryonics is not offered for free to the general public by any organization or person before 2100, then this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 56,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the Alexa Traffic Rank for Metaculus.com on January 1st 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4053/what-will-be-the-alexa-traffic-rank-for-metaculuscom-on-january-1st-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "From [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexa_Internet#Alexa_Traffic_Rank) the Alexa Traffic Rank\nis designed to be an estimate of a website's popularity.\nAs of April 6th 2020, [Metaculus.com] (http://Metaculus.com) 's [rank] (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/metaculus.com) is 538045 in global engagement. What will it be on January 1st 2022?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 217,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the first AGI be based on deep learning?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4055/will-the-first-agi-be-based-on-deep-learning/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "60%",
    "Description": "The Deep Learning Book, which is considered by many to be the best reference textbook on the topic, [introduces deep learning] (https://www.deeplearningbook.org/contents/intro.html) ,\nThis book is about a solution to [fuzzy ill-defined problems]. This solution is to allow computers to learn from experience and understand the world in terms of a hierarchy of concepts, with each concept defined through its relation to simpler concepts. By gathering knowledge from experience, this approach avoids the need for human operators to formally specify all the knowledge that the computer needs. The hierarchy of concepts enables the computer to learn complicated concepts by building them out of simpler ones. If we draw a graph showing how these concepts are built on top of each other, the graph is deep, with many layers. For this reason,we call this approach to AI deep learning\nPaul Christiano [has written] (https://ai-alignment.com/prosaic-ai-control-b959644d79c2) that future AGI might be based on deep learning principles,\nIt now seems possible that we could build “prosaic” AGI, which can replicate human behavior but doesn’t involve qualitatively new ideas about “how intelligence works:”\nIt’s plausible that a large neural network can replicate “fast” human cognition, and that by coupling it to simple computational mechanisms — short and long-term memory, attention, etc. — we could obtain a human-level computational architecture.\nIt’s plausible that a variant of RL can train this architecture to actually implement human-level cognition. This would likely involve some combination of ingredients like model-based RL, imitation learning, or hierarchical RL. There are a whole bunch of ideas currently on the table and being explored; if you can’t imagine any of these ideas working out, then I feel that’s a failure of imagination (unless you see something I don’t).\nAssume for the purpose of this question, that [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of/) resolves on some date.\nMetaculus admin(s) and/or community moderator(s) will survey 11 AI researchers whose work they consider relevant and whose work has been cited at least 500 times within the past 365 days according to Google Scholar. We will then ask about the relevant AI system:\nWas the relevant AI system based on Deep Learning, as defined by the 2016 version of the [Deep Learning Book] (https://www.deeplearningbook.org/contents/intro.html) ?\nRespondents will be requested to submit only one of the following responses:\n--- \nThe complete system was based on DL\n--- \nMost of system was based on DL\n--- \nAt least a significant portion of the system was based on DL\n--- \nOnly a minor portion of the system was based on DL\n--- \nNo portion, or only a trivial portion of the system was based on DL\n--- \nI don't know\nThen the question resolves positively if a majority of surveyed experts who don't respond \"I don't know\" respond as follows:\n--- \nThe complete system was based on DL\n--- \nMost of system was based on DL\nThe question resolves ambiguously if a majority of experts respond \"I don't know\".\n",
    "# Forecasts": 84,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the sentiment of Metaculus users with regard to self-resolving questions at the end of 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4057/what-will-be-the-sentiment-of-metaculus-users-with-regard-to-self-resolving-questions-at-the-end-of-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is a straightforward [Keynesian beauty contest] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_beauty_contest) trying to address whether self-resolving questions are a good idea.\nThis question asks: \nWhat will be the sentiment of Metaculus users with regard to self-resolving questions at the end of 2022? See [the discussion about self resolving questions] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4031/self-resolving-question-method-discussion/) .\nPredictions close to 1 will mean that users sentiment will be positive and self-resolving questions will be perceived as a good idea and score close to -1 will mean that users sentiment is negative and self-resolving questions will be perceived as a bad idea.\nIt is up to you to decide whether you want to provide your own sentiment, your estimate of the sentiment of other Metaculus users, or the estimate of the estimates of the sentiment of other Metaculus users etc.\nResolution criteria: \nWith probability of 80% this question will resolve on the mean of predictions for this question at the close time. There will be 20% probability that a poll will be open at the end of 2022 asking users to express their sentiment about self-resolving questions. The random draw deciding the resolution method will be made by Metaculus sometime after the close date.\nThe details of the poll will be decided only if the poll will have to be organized. It will open around the end of 2022, hopefully by the 1st of December 2022. Reasonable delays in organizing the poll are expected. The poll will be very likely organized in a way that will take the least amount of work from the organizers and Metaculus moderators. It may be as simple as two comments representing sentiments. The ratio of up-votes between the comments scaled and shifted to -1, 1 range could be the resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 78,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Any Major AI Company Commit to an AI Windfall Clause by 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4061/will-any-major-ai-company-commit-to-an-ai-windfall-clause-by-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33%",
    "Description": "In 2020, the Future of Life Institute published a report entitled [\"The Windfall Clause: Distributing the Benefits of AI for the Common Good.\"] (https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/Windfall-Clause-Report.pdf) (They also wrote [an abridged version] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11595) to be published in the [Proceedings of AIES] (https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3375627.3375842) . Also, fun aside: Metaculus' own [@Anthony] (https://www.metaculus.com/accounts/profile/8/) got a shout-out in the acknowledgements.) Essentially, they expanded on an idea from Bostrom's Superintelligence that a firm working on transformational AI technology could limit global inequality as a result of their breakthrough by pre-committing to keep only a fraction of the fabulous profits, and distribute the rest.\nThough there are numerous obstacles barring the path to making this plan a reality, the FLI research lowers many of these bars, including investigating the legal apparatus for enacting such an agreement and envisioning some of the logistical means by which a windfall might be distributed. What really remains is buy-in. If this plan will work, it will work because the companies positioned to develop windfall AI technologies signed on to a Windfall agreement in advance.\nBefore 2025, will any of the following companies/organizations ratify a Windfall Clause?\n---Alphabet (or any of its subsidiaries, such as Deepmind or X) \n---Alibaba \n---Amazon \n---Apple \n---Baidu \n---Facebook \n---Microsoft \n---OpenAI \n---Tesla \nFor the purposes of this question, a Windfall Clause is any legally-binding agreement which caps profits resulting from a new technological innovation at any value less than 50% of Gross World Product. Ratification means encoding the Windfall Clause within a institutional structure with external enforcement mechanisms (e.g. as a publicly-promulgated legal contract, as a Smart Contract on a Blockchain. Internal commitments without third-party arbiters will not suffice.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 56,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will 10M people be administered a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate that has demonstrated an efficacy rate >75% in a n>500 RCT?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4066/10m-are-administered-an-efficacious-vaccine/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus is a novel betacoronavirus that likely emerged late last year from an animal reservoir in China. There is little to no pre-existing immunity against it in the human population. The clinical picture for the disease it causes, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), ranges from very mild to fatal. The virus is highly transmissible and has spread globally.\nAs of 20 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) is [reporting that it is tracking the development of forty-four SARS-CoV-2 candidate vaccines] (https://www.who.int/blueprint/priority-diseases/key-action/novel-coronavirus-landscape-ncov.pdf?ua=1) . Two of these candidates have entered phase one and the other forty-two remain in the pre-clinical stage. There is an urgent need to determine when the first of these candidates will have been found to have a high degree of efficacy and will have been administered to a significant number of people.\n[The WHO defines] (https://www.who.int/influenza_vaccines_plan/resources/Session4_VEfficacy_VEffectiveness.PDF) vaccine efficacy as follows:\nVaccine efficacy: % reduction in disease incidence in a vaccinated group compared to an unvaccinated group under optimal conditions\nThis question asks: When will 10M people be administered a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate that has demonstrated an efficacy rate &gt;75% in a n&gt;500 RCT?\nThis question resolves as the date when the first credible article is published that presents the claim that at least 10 million people have been administered a vaccine that had been previously shown to have an efficacy rate exceeding &gt;75% in a randomized controlled trial with at least 500 participants.\nIf this does not resolve before 08 April 2023, it resolves as &gt;08 April 2023.\nThe 10M people can receive different vaccines, as long as they all qualify by this question's criteria.\nBeing administered a vaccine means having followed the treatment course that was tested in the RCT. If the vaccine needs several shots, then only people who have received all of them count.\nEdit on 2020-05-06: removed \"outside a clinical trial\" from the resolution language. Previous resolution language :\nThis question resolves as the date when the first credible article is published that presents the claim that at least 10,000 people outside a clinical trial have been administered a vaccine that had been previously shown to have an efficacy rate exceeding &gt;95% in a randomized controlled trial with at least 500 participants.\nEdit on 2020-11-21: Changed the title, question phrasing and added a caveat to allow several vaccines. Also added caveat about multi-shot vaccines.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 1513,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the relative severity of the next US depression, compared to the Great Depression?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4083/what-will-be-the-relative-severity-of-the-next-us-depression-compared-to-the-great-depression/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Assume that either of the following criteria is met during the first recession before 2032:\n--- \nThe US remains in a recession for 36 months or longer (as adjudicated by [this Metaculus Question's resolution] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2623/if-the-us-enters-a-recession-how-many-months-will-the-economic-contraction-last/) --i.e., if that one resolves ≥36, this criterion has been met).\n--- \nAny year's Annual Real GDP growth (as [reported by the US Bureau of Economic Analysis] (https://www.bea.gov/news/current-releases) ) is estimated to be -10% or less.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if no such depression occurs.\nDefine the relative severity of this depression as the number of months the depression lasts times the real GDP decline in percentage points (peak to trough, on an annual basis), divided by 1131.\nWe divide by 1131 because the Great Depression lasted 43 months, and the real GDP decline [was] (https://www.thebalance.com/us-gdp-by-year-3305543) 26.3%, and .\nWhat will be this depression's relative severity ?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 144,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many years will caloric restriction be demonstrated to add to one's natural lifespan?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4094/how-many-years-will-caloric-restriction-be-demonstrated-to-add-to-ones-natural-lifespan/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Caloric restriction is,\na dietary regimen that reduces food intake without incurring malnutrition. \"Reduce\" can be defined relative to the subject's previous intake before intentionally restricting food or beverage consumption, or relative to an average person of similar body type. [...] In a 2017 report on rhesus monkeys, caloric restriction in the presence of adequate nutrition was effective in delaying the effects of aging.\nAssume that before 2150, the results from a high quality randomized control trial exploring the effects of caloric restriction on natural human lifespan are published. If such research is published, how many years will the researchers report caloric restriction adds on average?\nFor the purpose of this question, we exclude results from participants that\n--- \nDid not regularly follow the best practices recommended by the researchers for caloric restriction\n--- \nQuit caloric restriction at some point at least 5 years before their death. \n--- \nBegan caloric restriction after the age of 50.\nOf the participants of the study who do qualify, what will be the mean lifespan gain, according to the best estimates of the researchers?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 73,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If Donald Trump is reelected president, what will be the yearly CO2 emissions per capita in the US in 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4101/if-donald-trump-is-reelected-president-what-will-be-the-yearly-co2-emissions-per-capita-in-the-us-in-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Unlike his predecessor Barack Obama, Donald Trump's environmental priorities have not included the reduction of emissions by the US, and are instead aimed [at rolling back environmental regulations] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_policy_of_the_Donald_Trump_administration) . If he gets a second term, he may continue and expand these policies. I am curious about the overall impact of this on CO2 emissions, so I ask:\nIf Donald Trump becomes president as a result of the 2020 election, what will be the yearly CO2 emissions per capita for the US in 2024, in tonnes?\nResolution will be by the [Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research] (https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/9d09ccd1-e0dd-11e9-9c4e-01aa75ed71a1/language-en) , or a similar reliable source.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if the next US presidential election is cancelled (but not if it's just delayed until some point in 2021).\nSee also:\n--- \n[If Joe Biden becomes president, what will be the yearly CO2 emissions per capita in the US in 2024?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3806/if-joe-biden-becomes-president-what-will-be-the-yearly-co2-emissions-per-capita-in-the-us-in-2024/) \n--- \n[If Bernie Sanders becomes president, what will be the yearly CO2 emissions per capita in the US in 2024?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3805/if-bernie-sanders-becomes-president-what-will-be-the-yearly-co2-emissions-per-capita-in-the-us-in-2024/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 86,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Assuming some humans are alive, what will be the birthdate of the oldest living human on January 1st 2200?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4110/assuming-some-humans-are-alive-what-will-be-the-birthdate-of-the-oldest-living-human-on-january-1st-2200/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Assume for the purpose of this question, some biological humans are still alive on January 1st 2200. In that case, consider the oldest [confirmed] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_verified_oldest_people) biological human alive at the start of that day. When will they have been born?\nIf there are no biological humans alive on January 1st, 2200, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 69,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a positive transition to a world with radically smarter-than-human artificial intelligence?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4118/will-there-be-a-positive-transition-to-a-world-with-radically-smarter-than-human-artificial-intelligence/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "65%",
    "Description": "A world with radically smarter-than-human intelligence would probably be very different than the one we live in today. [Bostrom (2003)] (https://nickbostrom.com/ethics/ai.html) speculated on the likely outcome following the creation of artificial superintelligence,\nIt is hard to think of any problem that a superintelligence could not either solve or at least help us solve. Disease, poverty, environmental destruction, unnecessary suffering of all kinds: these are things that a superintelligence equipped with advanced nanotechnology would be capable of eliminating. Additionally, a superintelligence could give us indefinite lifespan, either by stopping and reversing the aging process through the use of nanomedicine, or by offering us the option to upload ourselves. A superintelligence could also create opportunities for us to vastly increase our own intellectual and emotional capabilities, and it could assist us in creating a highly appealing experiential world in which we could live lives devoted to in joyful game-playing, relating to each other, experiencing, personal growth, and to living closer to our ideals.\nA world is said to have \"radically smarter-than-human artificial intelligence\" if there exists at least one artificial system that can outperform all contemporaneous humans at any non-trivial intellectual or physical task, such as proving mathematical theorems, engineering, scientific research, and manual labor. A positive transition to such a world is said to be a transition where the dominant influence over the future course of history takes place under the direction of widely held moral ideals.\nAs a negative example, if a dictator created a superintelligence and used it to amass wealth for himself at the expense of the rest of humanity, this does not count. Likewise, if humans succeed at creating some superintelligences but mistakenly fail to create one that shares human values, then [this also doesn't count] (https://intelligence.org/stanford-talk/) as a positive transition.\nWhile it is exceptionally difficult to come up with an operationalization for this question that could yield no false negatives or positives, my current guess is that if Metaculus still exists after such a transition, it will be obvious whether the transition was positive. Therefore, I leave the resolution up to moderator discretion.\nIf no such transition occurs before 2300, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 109,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Italy leave the Eurozone before 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4121/will-italy-leave-the-eurozone-before-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2%",
    "Description": "There is lately [some discussion] (https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1272371/eu-news-coronavirus-italy-coronabonds-germany-netherlands-polls-italexit-spt) that Italy might leave the Eurozone due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.\nQuestion: Will Italy leave the Eurozone before 2023?\nThis resolves positive if before 2023-01-01, Italy both:\n---Does not use the Euro as its only legal tender (i.e. it uses at least one other currency as their legal tender). \n---Does not have representation in the [European Central Bank] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Central_Bank) . \n",
    "# Forecasts": 143,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "After an AGI is created, how many months will it be before the first superintelligence?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4123/after-an-agi-is-created-how-many-months-will-it-be-before-the-first-superintelligence/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Futurists have long speculated that upon the arrival of AGI, the first sperintelligence will quickly follow. From I. J. Good, [writing in 1965] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065245808604180) ,\nLet an ultraintelligent machine be defined as a machine that can far surpass all the intellectual activities of any man however clever. Since the design of machines is one of these intellectual activities, an ultraintelligent machine could design even better machines; there would then unquestionably be an ‘intelligence explosion,’ and the intelligence of man would be left far behind. Thus the first ultraintelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make, provided that the machine is docile enough to tell us how to keep it under control.\nNick Bostrom wrote in his book Superintelligence (2014),\nNote that one could think that it will take quite a long time until machines reach the human baseline, or one might be agnostic about how long that will take, and yet have a strong view that once this happens, the further ascent into strong superintelligence will be very rapid.\nand categorized takeoff durations into three types:\n--- \n\"A slow takeoff is one that occurs over some long temporal interval, such as decades or centuries.\"\n--- \n\"A fast takeoff occurs over some short temporal interval, such as minutes, hours, or days.\"\n--- \n\"A moderate takeoff is one that occurs over some intermediary temporal interval, such as months or years.\"\nWhile it seems that most prominent thinkers are convinced that rapid technological and economic progress will follow the development of AGI (See [Paul Christiano] (https://sideways-view.com/2018/02/24/takeoff-speeds/) , [Robin Hanson] (http://mason.gmu.edu/~rhanson/aigrow.pdf) , [Eliezer Yudkowsky] (https://intelligence.org/files/IEM.pdf) , [Ben Goertzel] (http://multiverseaccordingtoben.blogspot.com/2011/01/hard-takeoff-hypothesis.html) ), most AI researchers surveyed are not convinced. In 2016, AI Impacts [asked] (https://aiimpacts.org/2016-expert-survey-on-progress-in-ai/) AI researchers,\nAssume that HLMI will exist at some point. How likely do you then think it is that the rate of global technological improvement will dramatically increase (e.g. by a factor of ten) as a result of machine intelligence:\nWithin two years of that point? ___% chance\nWithin thirty years of that point? ___% chance\nThe median answer was 20% for the two year estimate and 80% for the thirty year estimate.\nThis question is resolved based on the resolution of two other Metaculus questions. The date of resolution of when the first AGI is built is determined by [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of/) . The date of resolution of when the first superintelligence is built is determined by the dates used to resolve [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3683/will-an-oracle-superintelligence-be-developed-before-a-general-superintelligence/) (whichever version of superintelligence was developed earlier, the date of development determines the date relevant to this question).\nIf no superintelligence is constructed before 2300, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 139,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the first year during which most deaths are from non-disease related causes and fewer than 1% of humans die?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4125/what-will-be-the-first-year-during-which-most-deaths-are-from-non-disease-related-causes-and-fewer-than-1-of-humans-die/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Disease:\nis a particular abnormal condition that negatively affects the structure or function of all or part of an organism, and that is not due to any immediate external injury. Diseases are often known to be medical conditions that are associated with specific symptoms and signs.\nAccording to [Our World in Data] (https://ourworldindata.org/causes-of-death) , disease is responsible for nearly 97% of human deaths in the world, as of 2017. \nFuturists have long speculated that humanity may one day have a cure to all diseases, and that at that point, people will only die from injuries such as intentional suicide and accidents. Another possibility is that we may discover a way to prevent the aging process, providing humans with perpetually healthy life. Writing in 1794, Marquis de Condorcet had [predicted] (https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/condorcet-progress.asp) ,\nWould it be absurd now to suppose that the improvement of the human race should be regarded as capable of unlimited progress? That a time will come when death would result only from extraordinary accidents or the more and more gradual wearing out of vitality, and that, finally, the duration of the average interval between birth and wearing out has itself no specific limit whatsoever? No doubt man will not become immortal, but cannot the span constantly increase between the moment he begins to live and the time when naturally, without illness or accident, he finds life a burden?\nThis question resolves on the first year during which the majority of deaths in the world, as reported by a reputable organization, are listed as originating from non-disease related causes, AND the proportion of (deaths in that year)/(population of the world at the beginning of the year) &lt; 1%. The intention of this question is to determine the first year during which medicine has eliminated most disease. Therefore, the second condition is there to prevent global catastrophic risks from spurring a false resolution.\nOne such organization that reports death statistics is the World Health Organization. You can see their report for deaths in 2019 [here] (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/311696/WHO-DAD-2019.1-eng.pdf) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 34,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a member of the Trump family be the Republican nominee for the US Presidency in 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4127/will-a-member-of-the-trump-family-be-the-republican-nominee-for-the-us-presidency-in-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "Donald John Trump is the 45th and current president of the United States. Before entering politics, he was a businessman and television personality. Trump won a surprise victory in the [2016 presidential election] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidential_election) , and sought re-election in the [2020 presidential election.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election) \nThe [Trump family] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_of_Donald_Trump) has a net worth reported to be in the single-digit billions, and is now one of the most prominent families in Republican politics. Trump has several adult children, and there is speculation that a Trump political dynasty may emerge in the coming years, with both [Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump suggested as possible contenders for the presidency.] (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/04/donald-trump-jr-ivanka-trump-2024-presidential-election-poll) \nThis question asks: In the United States presidential election of 2024, will a member of the Trump family become the official nominee of the Republican Party for the office of President of the United States?\nFor the purposes of this question, 'Members of the Trump family' shall be taken to include only the following individuals:\n--- \nDonald Trump\n--- \nDonald Trump Jr.\n--- \nEric Trump\n--- \nIvanka Trump\n--- \nTiffany Trump\n--- \nMelania Trump\n--- \nBarron Trump\n",
    "# Forecasts": 470,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the total damage incurred by climate change in the 21st century as measured by its impact on GDP?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4159/climate-change-damage-in-the-21st-century/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "From [a review] (https://academic.oup.com/reep/article/12/1/4/4804315) of the economic impacts of climate change,\nThe impacts of climate change are many and diverse. Determining whether these impacts are beneficial or detrimental, small or large, depends on the sector, location, and time being considered. Unfortunately, a reading of the literature on the impacts of climate change (Field and Canziani 2014) is likely to leave a lay reader confused. It is very difficult to make sense of the many and different effects: crops hit by worsening drought, crops growing faster because of carbon dioxide fertilization, heat stress increasing, cold stress decreasing, sea levels rising, increasing energy demand for cooling, decreasing energy demand for heating, infectious disease spreading, species going extinct. Thus we need aggregate indicators to assess whether climate change is, on balance, a good thing or a bad thing and whether the climate problem is small or large relative to the many other problems that society faces.\nA common aggregate measure economists have given is the impact of climate change on GDP by the end of the century. From a [2015 survey of climate economists] (https://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/expertconsensusreport.pdf) ,\nOn average, these experts predicted losses of between 5% and 10% of GDP [by 2090], though there was considerable variation. The mean and median estimates were GDP losses of 10.2% and 5.5%, respectively, with a variance of 133%.\nHere I will define damage incurred by climate change as the time-integral of the difference in non-discounted value of world GDP on a path with warming-inducing emissions as a percentage of total GDP along the path without emissions.\nThis question asks, what will be the total damage incurred by climate change during the 21st century, as given by the definition of damage above? The resolution will be determined by a credible estimate from economists in, or after the year 2101.\nMetaculus admins will determine, in consultation with the community, which estimate is most credible. In general, a robust meta-analysis which aggregates estimates from high-quality studies is the best source for resolution. Barring the availability of such a meta-analysis, a survey of experts is preferred. Barring the availability of either source, a high quality study will determine resolution. If none of these sources are available, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 24,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a human chess player reach a FIDE rating of 2900?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4209/when-will-a-human-chess-player-reach-a-fide-rating-of-2900/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The highest rated chess player as of May 2020 is [Magnus Carlsen] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_Carlsen) , who currently possesses a FIDE rating of [2863] (https://ratings.fide.com/card.phtml?event=1503014) . His peak rating (and the highest rating of all time) was 2882, achieved back in May 2014. An overview of top-ranked chess grandmasters sorted by their peak rating can be found [here] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_chess_players_by_peak_FIDE_rating) or [here] (https://2700chess.com/records) .\nWhen will a human chess player reach a peak FIDE rating of 2900 or more in classical chess?\nResolution will be based off of the official monthly FIDE rating publications. The question resolves ambiguously if FIDE ceases to be the governing body of international chess competition and/or fails to publish the relevant data for 6 months in a row.\nThe question resolves as \"&gt;2040\" if no human chess player achieves the required rating by the resolution date.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 61,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the real world GDP on the year AGI is deployed, in trillions of dollars?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4215/what-will-be-the-real-world-gdp-on-the-year-agi-is-deployed-in-trillions-of-dollars/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "An important input to technological development is economic productivity. From Nick Bostrom's [The Future of Humanity] (https://www.nickbostrom.com/papers/future.pdf) (2005), \nOne could argue that to get an index of the overall pace of technological development, we should look not at a hand-picked portfolio of hot technologies; but instead at economic growth, which implicitly incorporates all productivity-enhancing technological innovations, weighted by their economic significance.\nFurthermore, many proposed AI takeoff scenarios are framed in terms of economic growth and development (See for instance [Baumann] (http://s-risks.org/a-framework-for-thinking-about-ai-timescales/) and [Hanson] (http://mason.gmu.edu/~rhanson/aigrow.pdf) ). Economic investment has also been pointed to as a driving factor of the recent [AI and compute trend] (https://openai.com/blog/ai-and-compute/) .\nIf Paul Christiano's [slow AI takeoff view] (https://sideways-view.com/2018/02/24/takeoff-speeds/) is right, then economic growth will speed up long before we have advanced AI technology. That's because pre-AGI technology can potentially automate labor without strictly being smarter than all humans. This would imply that upon the arrival of AGI, the world economy will be much larger than it would be if you naively extrapolated from past economic growth. \nFor example, suppose you thought that AGI was 20 years away, but that 10 years before AGI, economic growth would be double the current rate, triple 5 years before, quadruple 2 years before etc. Then although the GDP's current instantaneous growth rate implies that GDP should be about twice as much when AGI arrives, it will actually be much higher due to the pre-AGI-induced acceleration. But exactly how much larger will it be?\nThe relevant year when AGI is deployed is determined by [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of/) . A real GDP estimate for that year from a reliable source will determine the resolution for this question.\nReal world GDP [was estimated] (https://www.worldometers.info/gdp/) to be about 87 trillion dollars in 2019.\nETA: The question resolves as real GDP in 2020 USD.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 72,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will large scale solar radiation management be used to mitigate the effects of climate change in the 21st century?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4219/will-large-scale-solar-radiation-management-be-used-to-mitigate-the-effects-of-climate-change-in-the-21st-century/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "From [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_radiation_management) ,\nSolar radiation management (SRM) proposals are a type of climate engineering which would seek to reflect sunlight and thus reduce global warming. Proposed methods include increasing the planetary albedo, for example using stratospheric sulfate aerosols. Restorative methods have been proposed regarding the protection of natural heat reflectors like sea ice, snow and glaciers with engineering projects. [...]\nSolar radiation management has certain advantages relative to emissions cuts, adaptation, and carbon dioxide removal. Its effect of counteracting climate change would be experienced very rapidly, on the order of months after implementation, whereas the effects of emissions cuts and carbon dioxide removal are delayed because the climate change that they prevent is itself delayed. Some proposed solar radiation management techniques are expected to have very low direct financial costs of implementation, relative to the expected costs of both unabated climate change and aggressive mitigation.\nThere remain risks, however. The most commonly cited risk is that people may be less likely support reducing carbon emissions if they knew temperatures were being adequately managed via other means. Since carbon emissions still cause [ocean acidification] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_acidification) , among other effects, we may prefer to reduce emissions instead. Another commonly cited reason for not using solar radiation management is that the effects are difficult to predict, though this claim is disputed. There is also a risk of a \"termination shock\" whereupon the discontinuation of solar radiation management, the Earth rapidly resumes its previous climate path, which could be hazardous. \nThere are many proposed types of solar radiation management: [statospheric aerosol injection] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratospheric_aerosol_injection) , [marine cloud brightening] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_cloud_brightening) , [ocean sulfur cycle enhancement] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_fertilization) , [literally painting surfaces with white colors] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflective_surfaces_(climate_engineering)) and [developing space mirrors to deflect solar radiation] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_mirror_(climate_engineering)) . \nWill large scale solar radiation management be used to mitigate the effects of climate chage in the 21st century?\nGiven the multitude of approaches, an exact operationalization for large scale solar radiation management is difficult. While I could simply write a long disjunction of the above approaches, I have instead opted for this definition:\nLarge scale solar radiation management is said to be used to mitigate the effects of climate change in the 21st century if yearly average atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are above 600 parts per million at the start of 2101, and yet the Earth's mean surface temperatures are less than 1.5 degrees Celsius above the pre-industrial baseline (as defined and reported by a reliable institution). This question resolves ambiguously in case there is some significant natural event that reduced mean surface temperatures, such as an unexpected reduction in solar radiation. Metaculus moderates use their discretion when resolving ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 31,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Stephen Wolfram or his co-authors, Jonathan Gorard and Max Piskunov, receive the Nobel prize in physics before the end of 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4224/will-stephen-wolfram-or-his-co-authors-jonathan-gorard-and-max-piskunov-receive-the-nobel-prize-in-physics-before-the-end-of-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "In the Wolfram Physics Project, Stephen Wolfram and co-authors [have proposed] (https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2020/04/finally-we-may-have-a-path-to-the-fundamental-theory-of-physics-and-its-beautiful/) a class of models to represent fundamental physics. \nWill Stephen Wolfram (and/or his co-authors) receive a Nobel prize in physics for this work before the end of 2035?\nThis question resolves positively if Stephen Wolfram, or Jonathan Gorard, or Max Piskunov win the nobel prize in physics before the end of 2035. For a positive resolution, the Nobel Prize committee must refer to work published by any of these individuals that is directly related to the 2020 Wolfram Physics Project. By \"related to the 2020 Wolfram Physics Project\", we mean that the work must build on a similar approach or set of insights as those explored in the Wolfram Physics Project, as judged by Metaculus admin.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 167,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the seasonally adjusted atmospheric concentration of C02 be lower than the same time in the previous year?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4225/when-will-the-seasonally-adjusted-atmospheric-concentration-of-c02-be-lower-than-the-same-time-in-the-previous-year/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In tracking progress on climate change, a key milestone would be when the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere stabilises. An indicator of this would be the first time after the opening of this question that the seasonally adjusted concentration dips below the same metric 365 days prior.\nThis question can be settled on the daily trend values given at the [NOAA website] (https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/gl_data.html) (Ed Dlugokencky and Pieter Tans, NOAA/ESRL). If this source becomes available, this question can resolve according to another source of similar quality, for example the [Scripps CO Program] (https://scrippsco2.ucsd.edu/data/atmospheric_co2/) or [NASA] (https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 32,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the number of foreign nationals in Mainland China fall between 2010 and 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4229/will-the-number-of-foreign-nationals-in-mainland-china-fall-between-2010-and-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26%",
    "Description": "Since the election of Xi Jinping, China has substantially slowed or stopped its previous trend of gradually increasing openness to and economic integration with the outside world.\nThe Covid-19 pandemic has only accelerated the [decoupling] (https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2020/03/28/2003733510) of China's economy from the US. China has [banned] (https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/03/26/821972324/china-temporarily-closes-its-borders-to-foreign-nationals) the entry of foreign nationals and regards those inside its border with [suspicion] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china-foreigners/foreigners-face-suspicion-in-china-as-coronavirus-worsens-overseas-idUSKBN21E1DU) .\nThis question asks, will Mainland China be less open to the world in 2030 than it was in 2010?\nSpecifically, will the number of foreign nationals living in China as reported on the 8th national census (assuming it takes place in 2030) be less than the number reported on the [6th national census] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_National_Population_Census_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China) in 2010?\nThe question resolves positively if the number of foreign nationals residing in Mainland China reported in the 8th census is lower than the number reported in the 6th census (593,832).\nThe question resolves negatively if the number reported in the 8th census census is greater than or equal to the number from the 6th census.\nIf for some reason the 8th national census is not conducted in 2030, or the results are not available by the closing date (Dec 31,2032), the question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 59,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many countries will, at least in some form, decriminalize possession of all Schedule I drugs for personal use by 2070?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4230/how-many-countries-will-at-least-in-some-form-decriminalize-possession-of-all-schedule-i-drugs-for-personal-use-by-2070/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nAs of 2020, possession of small amounts of certain psychoactive drugs (e.g., LSD or MDMA) for personal use is a criminal offense in many countries of the world. However, sometimes drug laws are changed. An activity related to drugs (such as possession of drugs) may be decriminalized, which means removal of criminal penalties for it. It may also be legalized, which implies removal of penalties for it altogether.\nTalkingdrugs [drug decriminalization map] (https://www.talkingdrugs.org/drug-decriminalisation) indicates that the possession (at least in very small quantities for personal use) of any recreational drug, including drugs from Schedule I, is not criminalized by law in 19 countries in 2020.\nOut of these 19 countries, drug decriminalization occured in 14 countries in the 1991-2020 period, and in 3 countries in the 2011-2020 period.\n\nQuestion\n========\n\nHow many countries will, at least in some form, decriminalize the possession of all Schedule I drugs for personal use on a national level by 2070?\n\nResolution\n==========\n\nHere \"Schedule I drugs\" refers to drugs marked as CSA Schedule I in the [List of Regulated Chemicals] (https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/schedules/orangebook/orangebook.pdf) compiled by US Drug Enforcement Administration (May 2020 version).\nFor the purposes of this question, decriminalization of both possesion in small quantities and possession in any quantities count. Both decriminalization and legalization count. Countries where drug possession was never a criminal offense count (e.g. de jure in Uruguay).\nSituations of de jure decriminalization, de facto decriminalization, and de jure + de facto decriminalization all count. De facto decriminalization means that, for any Schedule I drug, criminal charges for only small-scale possession for personal use are filed in estimated &lt;1% of cases in which such possession is detected.\n\"Country\" is defined as a UN member state for the purposes of this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 33,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the mean expected lifespan gain from one year of the TRIIM-X trial, as measured by the epigenetic clock GrimAge?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4231/what-will-be-the-mean-expected-lifespan-gain-from-one-year-of-the-triim-x-trial-as-measured-by-the-epigenetic-clock-grimage/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In September 2019 Fahy et al. [published] (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/acel.13028) results from the TRIIM (Thymus Regeneration, Immunorestoration, and Insulin Mitigation) trial. Their stated goals were to investigate whether they could restore the immune systems in eight healthy older men (ages 51 - 65) using a combination of recombinant human growth hormone, dehydroepiandrosterone and metformin. While they achieved impressive on-paper results partially restoring the [thymus] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thymus) , the most impressive result came from their [epigenetic measurement of aging] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetic_clock) of subjects in the trial.\nFahy et al. had successfully reversed aging in their subjects according to four epigenetic measures of aging. The effect size was large: each measure indicated an average gain of over 2 years after 1 year of treatment. In other words, if hypothetically a subject was 60 years old at the beginning of the trial, both chronologically and epigenetically, then by the end of the year they would be 61 years old chronologically but less than 59 years old epigenetically.\nOf the epigenetic measures of aging, GrimAge is thought to be the best available predictor of lifespan. From [the paper] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366976/) introducing GrimAge,\nUsing large scale validation data from thousands of individuals, we demonstrate that DNAm GrimAge stands out among existing epigenetic clocks in terms of its predictive ability for time-to-death, time-to-coronary heart disease, time-to-cancer, its strong relationship with computed tomography data for fatty liver/excess visceral fat, and age-at-menopause.\nFahy et al. demonstrated a mean age reversal of 2.16 years after 1 year of treatment according to the GrimAge measurement (see Table 1 in [the paper] (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/acel.13028) ).\nFahy is reportedly spearheading a new trial, called TRIIM-X (see [this part of his recent TEDx talk] (https://youtu.be/PFg-OMHvI2E?t=968) ). He hopes to investigate the effects of a modified version of the same treatment with the benefits of a larger trial and a more diverse set of participants.\nThis question asks, after 12 months of treatment, what will be the mean expected lifespan gain after taking the directed treatment in the TRIIM-X trial, as measured by GrimAge?\nIf for whatever reason, the relevant GrimAge results from TRIIM-X are not released by January 1st 2027, this question resolves ambiguously. If the results are informally published (as indicated by some reliable online document of any kind) at some point prior to January 1st 2027, the question resolves retroactively on the date the document was published.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 30,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will AI out-perform humans on argument reasoning tasks?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4232/when-will-ai-out-perform-humans-on-argument-reasoning-tasks/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Recent natural language processing (NLP) models have succeeded in generating human-level [text] (https://openai.com/blog/better-language-models/) and [translations] (https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-6711.pdf) . However questions remain regarding to what extent this success relies on understanding, as opposed to memorization of statistical patterns. \n[A recent paper] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.07355.pdf) showed that when statistical-cues are removed, state of the art NLP models fail on argument reasoning tasks -- despite human performance remaining unaffected. Untrained humans perform at ~80% accuracy on this argument reasoning task, whereas recent NLP models perform near 50%. \nWhen will a machine learning model out-perform the human-level of 80% accuracy on this benchmark? This question resolves when either: \n1--A paper posted on [arxiv.org] (http://arxiv.org) claims a greater than 80% accuracy on the Niven and Kao [benchmark] (https://github.com/IKMLab/arct2) . \n2--A paper posted on [arxiv.org] (http://arxiv.org) claims a greater than 80% accuracy on a successor* dataset to the Niven and Kao data. \n*A successor dataset will count towards this resolution criterion if it satisfies all of the following:\n1-- \nPublished in an [arxiv.org] (http://arxiv.org) pre-print intended to quantify argument and/or reasoning\n2-- \nCites Niven and Kao\n3-- \nPre-2020 NLP models show random-level performance on the dataset (&lt;=60% accuracy for a binary task, &lt;=100*(1/n+1/n/5)% for an n-ary task)\nIf the successor dataset includes information on human-level performance, that threshold will be used instead of the 80% accuracy threshold.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 70,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will multi-modal ML out-perform uni-modal ML?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4235/when-will-multi-modal-ml-out-perform-uni-modal-ml/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Human infant learning integrates information across senses -- sight, sound, touch, etc. -- but current state of the art machine learning models usually use only one of these types. It remains to be seen whether integrating data across modes is necessary for achieving human-level intelligence.\nIn contemporary machine learning (ML) research, we are mostly interested in image, text, graph, and video data. State of the art models in each of these domains train only on inputs of that specific domain; let's call this uni-modal training. By extension, if a model were to train on two or more of these input types, while evaluating on only one, we'll call that multi-modal training with uni-modal evaluation. For the purposes of this question, we are only interested in uni-modal evaluation tasks, so robotics and driving benchmarks are out of the question.\nQuestion Description: When will a multi-modal trained model out-perform the previous state of the art on one of the following uni-modal benchmarks:\n1-- [ImageNet] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet) \n2-- [WikiText-103] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/language-modelling-on-wikitext-103) \n3-- [Cityscapes] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/semantic-segmentation-on-cityscapes) \n4--Additional uni-modal benchmarks from [paperswithcode.com] (http://paperswithcode.com) may be added to reflect trends in machine learning research. I will review [paperswithcode.com] (http://paperswithcode.com) two and four years after this question opens to request that moderators add the two most popular benchmarks which have more new entries (since June 1, 2020) than at least two thirds of the above benchmarks. If one of the newly added benchmarks involves data of the same type as one of the above benchmarks (i.e. image classification, text, image segmentation), and has more new entries, then the old benchmark will be superseded, and removed from the list. \nResolution Condition: This question resolves as the first date on which one of the benchmarks above has a #1 ranked paper which sets the record using a multi-modal trained model. If no such paper is listed before 2030, then the question resolves as &gt;01/01/2030.\nSpecifics and Caveats:\n1-- \nMulti-modal pre-training counts towards resolution. \n2-- \nFor text tasks, training on video counts if, and only if the image stream is used -- i.e. not just the audio stream.\n3-- \nFor image tasks, training on video counts if, and only if the audio stream is used -- i.e. not just the image stream.\n4-- \nIf [paperswithcode.com] (http://paperswithcode.com) shuts down or permanently stops updating their data, then the question resolves as ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 96,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will there be a vegan cheese indistinguishable from non-vegan cheese available for purchase by regular consumers?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4249/when-will-there-be-a-vegan-cheese-indistinguishable-from-non-vegan-cheese-available-for-purchase-by-regular-consumers/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Many animal rights thinkers now anticipate that there will be radical shift in society's treatment of animal upon the development of tasty plant-based meats [citation needed]. However, the development of plant-based meats would not necessarily entail the end of animal agriculture.\nWhen will there be a vegan cheese version of Mozzarella, Cheddar, Feta, Provolone, Swiss, or Monterey Jack that is indistinguishable from its original counterpart, as determined by an n≥250 RCT?\nDefine a vegan food as a food which is widely considered to be made without any animal products. A vegan cheese is said to be vegan food that is intended to emulate the taste, quality, and texture of normal cheese.\nA vegan cheese is said to be indistinguishable from non-vegan cheese if a high quality double-blind trial determined that ordinary humans (who previously reported having tasted the non-vegan cheese being compared) could not reliably determine the difference between the vegan imitation cheese and the non-vegan cheese it seeks to emulate. \nMore narrowly, we say conclude that the participants could not reliably determine the difference between the cheeses if there were at least 250 people in the study, the null hypothesis was not rejected at the p=0.05 significance level, and the study design was high quality according to the judgement of the moderators.\nThe date of resolution for this question is determined on the date by which the first vegan cheese which is indistinguishable from non-vegan cheese enters a regular consumer market, such as a supermarket chain.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 63,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many years after the silver Turing Test is passed will an AGI system be developed?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4264/how-many-years-after-the-silver-turing-test-is-passed-will-an-agi-system-be-developed/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Given the public disagreement of expert opinion on AI timelines, seen for example [here] (http://www.parlonsfutur.com/blog/the-fascinating-facebook-debate-between-yann-lecun-stuart-russel-and-yoshua) , there is a need to establish a credible track-record of accurate forecasting in the lead-up to the development of AGI. \nOren Etzioni, head of the Allen AI institute, recently published an [article] (https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/02/25/906083/artificial-intelligence-destroy-civilization-canaries-robot-overlords-take-over-world-ai/) on identifying 'canaries' which will presage the imminent development of AGI. He proposes that limited versions of the Turing Test could present a natural canary.\nThis question's resolution will be determined by the number of years between the positive resolution of two other metaculus questions: the silver [Turing Test] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/73/will-the-silver-turing-test-be-passed-by-2026/) prediction and [AGI] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of/) prediction.\nIf the silver Turing test has not been passed by 2026 (the date limit set [by the question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/73/will-the-silver-turing-test-be-passed-by-2026/) ), I will post a new version of that question using the prediction time series format and resolving 2075. Then the resolution of this question will depend on the resolution of the new silver Turing test question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 60,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much exercise can you do before it starts to take more time than it adds life?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4265/how-much-exercise-can-you-do-before-it-starts-to-take-more-time-than-it-adds-life/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Exercise may make you live longer. But it also costs time.\n\nQuestion\n\nHow many minutes a day of out-of-breath endurance exercise can someone healthy do from the age of 25, before another minute adds less than a minute of extra life?\n\nDefinitions\n\nEndurance exercise means time spent out of breath for over five minutes. It doesn't include rest, travel, work to pay for equipment and so on. But out-of-breath running, cycling, swimming and so on count.\nExtra life means you live longer. It doesn't include time that would otherwise be spent, say, working to pay for a doctor, and so on.\nWe'll take someone healthy to mean a person who:\n--- \nwas born in the 1990s,\n--- \ndoesn't smoke,\n--- \neats over 500 grams a day of fruit and vegetables,\n--- \nhas body fat that weighs under 18% of their mass if they're a man, and under 25% if they're a woman,\n--- \ndrinks under 70 grams a week of [pure alcohol] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_of_alcohol) , and\n--- \nlives in a [World Bank high-income country] (https://data.worldbank.org/income-level/high-income) .\n\nResolution\n\nThe question closes if, after [2022-01-01 00:00 UTC] (https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2022-01-01+00%3A00+UTC) , the gap from the community's 25% value to its 75% value becomes less than or equal to 8 minutes a day. Then a Metaculus staff member gets a random integer from 1 to 10 from a website such as [randomnumbers.info] (http://www.randomnumbers.info/) .\n--- \nIf the number is 1 to 9, the question resolves as the community's median.\n--- \nIf the number is 10, the question resolves by a search as in the next paragraph.\nOtherwise, the question closes at [2023-07-01 00:00 UTC] (https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2023-07-01+00%3A00+UTC) . Then a Metaculus staff member searches for 'physical activity mortality' in the health database [Epistemonikos] (https://www.epistemonikos.org/en/search?q=physical+activity+mortality) . He or she finds the latest [systematic review] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_review) that is relevant to this question. The question resolves as the review's estimate.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 113,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will NAD+ boosters be shown in a systematic review to increase human lifespan by >=5% by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4290/will-nad-boosters-be-shown-in-a-systematic-review-to-increase-human-lifespan-by-5-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "24%",
    "Description": "Long-term supplementation of NAD+ boosters such as Nicotinamide Riboside and Nicotinamide Mononucleotide have been demonstrated to increase lifespan in animal models.\nHuman clinical trials are ongoing, with published papers demonstrating:\n---Safety and increase in NAD+ levels. ( [1] (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29992272/) , [2] (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29211728/) ) \n---Insulin sensitivity unchanged. ( [1] (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29992272/) ) \n---Cardiac biomarkers seem to improve. ( [3] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5876407/) ) \nWill a systematic review of human trials conclude by 2030 that NAD+ boosting is effective in increasing human lifespan by &gt;5%?\nThis question will resolve positive if at any point until 2030 a systematic review of clinical trials of NAD+ boosting will explicitly mention a lifespan improvement of at least 5% in humans. (results in animal models or lifespan estimation based on results in treatment of diseases are not enough for positive resolution)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 37,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which Artemis Moon Mission landing system will first land a person on the moon?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4306/which-artemis-moon-mission-landing-system-will-first-land-a-person-on-the-moon/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "At the end of April, NASA [announced] (https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-names-companies-to-develop-human-landers-for-artemis-moon-missions) the selection of three private companies to develop a lunar lander:\nNASA has selected three U.S. companies to design and develop human landing systems (HLS) for the agency’s Artemis program, one of which will land the first woman and next man on the surface of the Moon by 2024.\nThe three companies are:\n1--Blue Origin \n2--Dynetics \n3--SpaceX \nThis question asks: Which of these three companies will be first in developing a lunar landing system that successfully lands a person on the moon?\nThis question will resolve to precisely 1,2 or 3 when a lander build by the respective team successfully lands a living human on the moon. In the case that none of the 3 successfully lands a living human on the moon before January 1, 2030, the question will resolve to a value of 0.\nIf two of the teams merge or NASA selects a different company to develop a lunar lander, the question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 58,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Longbets series: By 2040 will the percentage of college-aged U.S. citizens who are attending postsecondary educational institutions in the United States drop at least 50% from the level in 2011?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4319/longbets-series-by-2040-will-the-percentage-of-college-aged-us-citizens-who-are-attending-postsecondary-educational-institutions-in-the-united-states-drop-at-least-50-from-the-level-in-2011/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "Brant von Goble and John C Leven summarize the reasons for their respective sides [here] (http://longbets.org/676/) . \nIf the Long Now Foundation declares Brant von Goble the winner then this question resolves positively. If they declare John C Leven the winner, this question resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 24,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much will GiveWell guess it will cost to get an outcome as good as saving a life, at the end of 2031?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4332/how-much-will-givewell-guess-it-will-cost-to-get-an-outcome-as-good-as-saving-a-life-at-the-end-of-2031/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[GiveWell] (https://www.givewell.org/) is a charity evaluator that recommends a shortlist of charities in the field of global development that have the greatest impact per marginal donation. Towards this end, they try to quantify the effects of different interventions by estimating a \"cost per life saved\" metric to compare them on.\nWhile they warn against taking [these cost-effectiveness estimates literally] (https://blog.givewell.org/2017/06/01/how-givewell-uses-cost-effectiveness-analyses/) , these estimates do give a guideline to which interventions are most effective and a rough idea of how cost-effective we should expect interventions to be.\nOver time, these estimates change; they might update upwards if all the most cost-effective interventions are fully funded by philanthropists or if they overestimated the cost-effectiveness of the top intervention, and they might update downwards if more promising interventions are found or if an existing intervention has more benefits than previously expected.\nHow much will it cost to get an outcome as good as averting the death of an individual under 5, according to GiveWell's guess, at the end of 2031, in 2015 USD?\nIf available, the question will be resolved by taking the lowest value for the field \"cost per outcome as good as: averting the death of an individual under 5\" in the latest publicly available version of [Givewell's cost-effectiveness analysis spreadsheet] (https://www.givewell.org/how-we-work/our-criteria/cost-effectiveness/cost-effectiveness-models) using the default values. These values are given after [accounting for expected leverage and funging] (https://blog.givewell.org/2018/02/13/revisiting-leverage/) .\nIf GiveWell no longer reports a cost per life-saved equivalent by 2031, a best effort should be made to derive an effective cost per life-saved equivalent by applying GiveWell's [2019 methodology] (https://www.givewell.org/how-we-work/our-criteria/cost-effectiveness/cost-effectiveness-models/changelog-2019) to its 2031 cost-effectiveness model. If there is no unambiguous way to do this, the question resolves as ambiguous.\nIf GiveWell substantially changes how it picks top charities such that they are not comparable to the 2019 picks—for example, if GiveWell chooses existential risk organzations as its top charities—the question resolves as ambiguous. \nA similar question for 2021 was asked [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2776/how-much-will-givewell-guess-it-will-cost-to-get-an-outcome-as-good-as-saving-a-life-at-the-end-of-2021/) , it is still open as of this question's writing.\nSimilar questions asked for previous years would have resolved at (all in 2015 prices):\n---2016: $890 \n---2017: $823 \n---2018: $617 \n---2019: $592 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 78,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the Democracy Index of the United States in 2040?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4333/what-will-be-the-democracy-index-of-the-united-states-in-2040/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [Democracy Index] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index) is\nan index compiled by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), a UK-based company. It intends to measure the state of democracy in 167 countries, of which 166 are sovereign states and 164 are UN member states.\nIt ranges from 0 - 10 for countries, where 0 theoretically represents an autocracy with no democratic freedoms, and 10 represents a perfect democracy. There are also four categories a nation may be placed under depending on its score: authoritarian regime (0-4), hybrid regime (4-6), flawed democracy (6-8), and full democracy (8-10).\nThe index for 2019 can be viewed [here] (http://www.eiu.com/public/thankyou_download.aspx?activity=download&amp;campaignid=democracyindex2019) . As of the 2019 report, the United States had an overall score of 7.96, making it a flawed democracy.\nWhat will that number be in the 2040 report?\nThis question resolves ambiguously if the report is discontinued. It also resolves ambiguous if the index is judged by Metaculus* to have changed too much. If the index merely changes scale, the eventual result will be rescaled to the current range (0-10).\n* \"Metaculus\" here means \"Metaculus administrators (who are the only ones who can resolve a question), aided by moderators and by helpful users in the comments section\".\n",
    "# Forecasts": 51,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If chess is solved before 2080, must perfect play result in a forced draw?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4334/if-chess-is-solved-before-2080-must-perfect-play-result-in-a-forced-draw/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "64%",
    "Description": "[Zermelo's theorem] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zermelo%27s_theorem_(game_theory)) says that only one of three possibilities is possible in a 2-player solved game; First player wins, second player wins, or there is a forced draw. \nIn the game of chess, these outcomes correspond to:\n1-- \nWhite wins\n2-- \nBlack wins\n3-- \nForced draw\nIf chess is solved before 2080, must it result in a forced draw? \nFor the purpose of this question, chess is considered to be solved if \n--- \nit is proved that White will win, lose or draw from the initial position, given [perfect play] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solved_game#Perfect_play) on both sides\n--- \nit is shown that there exists a unique result of perfect play from the initial position, which is either: white wins, black wins, or forced draw\nResolution is by publication of peer-reviewed article that is not shown to be mistaken for at least 3 years post-publication.\nFor the purpose of this question, the [50-move rule] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifty-move_rule) does not force a draw. Games that don't end, are considered drawn, for the purpose of this question\nThis question resolves ambiguously if the question does not resolve before Jan 1st, 2080.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 163,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Harvard endowment be larger in 2119 than in 2019?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4349/will-the-harvard-endowment-be-larger-in-2119-than-in-2019/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "51%",
    "Description": "[Harvard University] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_University) is the oldest university in the United States and has the largest [endowment] (https://www.harvard.edu/about-harvard/harvard-glance/endowment) , with [$40.9 billion in assets under management (AUM) as of June 30, 2019] (https://www.hmc.harvard.edu/partners-performance/#performance) . The endowment's mission is [\"to help ensure Harvard University has the financial resources to confidently maintain and expand its leadership in education and research for future generations.\"] (https://www.hmc.harvard.edu/about/) .\nThe Harvard Management Company (HMC), which runs the endowment, intends the endowment to provide Harvard with a source of income for the next hundred years or longer. Will HMC achieve its goal?\nOn an inflation-adjusted basis, will the Harvard Endowment have more assets under management on June 30, 2119 than it did on June 30, 2019?\nIf the endowment's AUM as of June 30, 2119 is not publicly known, then this question will be judged using the earliest publicly-known AUM following this date.\nThe question resolves as negative if any of the following situations occur:\n---Harvard ceases to exist. \n---Harvard continues but its endowment shuts down. \n---Harvard still exists but operates under a wholly different mission (e.g., it no longer teaches students). \n---The endowment's assets still exist under one manager, but the majority is no longer being used for the benefit of Harvard. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 30,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will electric cars constitute over 5% of the Japanese passenger car fleet?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4360/when-will-electric-cars-constitute-over-5-of-the-japanese-passenger-car-fleet/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Japan is one of the largest electric vehicle markets in the world, behind only [China, the USA, and Norway] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_car_use_by_country#Statistics) in total stock, as well as being the origin country of the Toyota Prius, the first [mass-produced hybrid-electric vehicle] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_electric_vehicle#Modern_hybrids) . According to [Statista] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/711994/japan-electric-car-market-share/) , in 2018, 1.13% of motor vehicles in Japan were electric cars.\nWhen will electric cars constitute over 5% of the cars on the roads in Japan?\nThe date is resolved by the earliest credible report in a respectable publication that provides statistics from which it follows that the number of electric cars on Japanese roads is over 5% of the total number of passenger cars.\nFor the purpose of this question, an electric car is any vehicle which is classified as a \"passenger car\", and whose sole energy input is electrical energy, delivered either by plugging it into an electrical energy source or replacing an electrical battery (including a fuel cell), or similar means. Hybrid vehicles that have both an electric and any other non-electric (gasoline, diesel, etc.) engine do not count as electric cars.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 32,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the US national debt reach $50 trillion?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4364/when-will-the-us-national-debt-reach-50-trillion/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The national debt of the United States is the debt, or unpaid borrowed funds, carried by the federal government of the United States, which is measured as the face value of the currently outstanding Treasury securities that have been issued by the Treasury and other federal government agencies.\n[As of May 5 2020, debt held by the public was $19.149 trillion and intragovernmental holdings were $5.909 trillion, for a total or \"National Debt\" of $25.057 trillion.] (https://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/pd_debttothepenny.htm) \n[You can view a live National Debt Clock here.] (https://www.usdebtclock.org/) \nThis question asks: When will the United States national debt reach $50 trillion nominal dollars?\nResolution should cite figures from the US Treasury or a US federal government agency responsible for managing the national debt or producing economic statistics.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 103,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the lowest cost per kilogram, in US dollars, to deliver a payload to LEO or beyond before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4390/what-will-be-the-lowest-cost-per-kilogram-in-us-dollars-to-deliver-a-payload-to-leo-or-beyond-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Traditionally, access to space has been extremely expensive. However, prices continue to fall with each passing decade as new technologies are developed and the sector becomes more commercialised.\n[SpaceX] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX) , for example, has demonstrated the potential of reusable rockets. Other advances in the future may include lighter materials, the use of inflatable modules, new fuel types, space planes, and more efficient engines. More speculatively, it may eventually be possible to deliver payloads to orbit with more exotic delivery methods such as space elevators or other non-rocket space launch systems.\nAs of 2020, [although the cost to launch a payload to LEO has dropped considerably in recent decades, spaceflight remains a fairly costly endeavour] (https://www.futuretimeline.net/data-trends/6.htm) . For example, a flight to LEO on a Falcon 9 rocket with a reused first stage costs [about $50 million] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_9) for a 15,600kg maximum reusable payload; meaning the price per kilo to LEO is about $3,205. \nHowever, there is optimism that a significant reduction in cost to LEO could be achieved in the near future. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk claims that the company's Starship and Super Heavy launch system, currently in development, could eventually achieve a cost per kilogram to LEO of as little as $10: \n[Starship + Super Heavy propellant mass is 4800 tons (78% O2 &amp; 22% CH4). I think we can get propellant cost down to ~$100/ton in volume, so ~$500k/flight. With high flight rate, probably below $1.5M fully burdened cost for 150 tons to orbit or ~$10/kg.] (https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1258580078218412033) \nThis question asks: Before 1 January 2025, what will be the lowest cost, in inflation-adjusted dollars, to deliver a kilogram of mass to low Earth orbit (or beyond; suborbital flights are excluded) using any system that has actually completed at least one successful delivery at the stated price?\nInflation adjustment should be completed using a consumer price index method, with January 2020 taken as the reference month.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 120,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will one of the first AGI claim to be conscious?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4409/will-one-of-the-first-agi-claim-to-be-conscious/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "75%",
    "Description": "[Consciousness] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness) is a concept hard to define. Wikipedia states that consciousness at its simplest is \"awareness or sentience of internal or external existence\". And that despite centuries of analyses, definitions, explanations and debates by philosophers and scientists, consciousness remains puzzling and controversial, being \"at once the most familiar and most mysterious aspect of our lives\".\nThis question will not attempt to define consciousness or solve the so called [hard problem of consciousness] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_problem_of_consciousness) . \nInstead this question simply asks will one of the first AGI claim to be conscious?\nResolution will be based on the conversation with the first AGI that Metaculus team will have access to. \nMetaculus team should ask the AI:\n1--Are you conscious? \n2--Should the question \"Will one of the first AGI claim to be conscious?\" on Metaculus resolve positive or negative? \nThis question will resolve no sooner than the question \" [When will the first Artificial General Intelligence system be devised, tested, and publicly known of?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of/) \". The standard for AGI will be the same as in that question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 97,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What is the greatest number of people who, for non-medical purposes, use a newly discovered drug at any year between 2021 and 2070?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4418/what-is-the-greatest-number-of-people-who-for-non-medical-purposes-use-a-newly-discovered-drug-at-any-year-between-2021-and-2070/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[World drug report] (https://wdr.unodc.org/wdr2019/prelaunch/WDR19_Booklet_2_DRUG_DEMAND.pdf) estimates 188M users of cannabis and 21M users of ecstasy worldwide in 2017. It also mentions that 892 new psychoactive substances were reported to United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime early warning advisory in 2005-2018 period, however, none of them lead in worldwide usage statistics.\nSuppose some chemical compound (e.g. newly synthesized drug) is first reported to be non-medically (e.g. recreational) consumed by humans after 2021 inclusively.\nWhat is the estimated worldwide number of users of any such drug at any year between 2021 and 2070 (inclusively)?\n--- \nDrugs qualify only if the first reports of non-medical (e.g. recreational) consumption emerges after 2020 \n--- \nNon-medical consumption here includes a wide range of use-cases including recreation and using drugs for physical, cognitive, emotional effects, but does not include usage primarily for treating/preventing diseases or aging\n",
    "# Forecasts": 70,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By 1 January 2067, medical interventions for healthy adults will have been shown to extend average lifespan by at least 25 years",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4429/by-1-january-2067-medical-interventions-for-healthy-adults-will-have-been-shown-to-extend-average-lifespan-by-at-least-25-years/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "In 2017, [Open Philanthropy] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/) conducted [an investigation on the mechanisms of aging] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/research/cause-reports/scientific-research/mechanisms-aging) . A [section] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/research/cause-reports/scientific-research/mechanisms-aging#Indefinite_vs._moderate_healthy_life_extension) of their writeup considers indefinite life extension, as distinct from modest extension of lifespan, and concludes, with 7% confidence, that by 2067 some collection of medical interventions for adults will have been shown to extend adult lifespan by at least 25 years.\nThis question will resolve according to Open Philanthropy's explicit criteria:*\nBy January 1, 2067, there will be [some] collection of medical interventions for adults that are healthy apart from normal aging, which, according to conventional wisdom in the medical community, have been shown to increase the average lifespan of such adults by at least 25 years (compared with not taking the interventions).\nThe prediction is called off if some other innovations cause a historically exceptional increase in the rate of scientific progress during this period (such as the development of transformative AI capabilities). The prediction excludes diet, exercise, and lifestyle, as well as existing medical interventions for healthy people (such as currently available vaccines).\nMetaculus administrators will judge whether the criteria have been satisfied.\n--\n*The wording in the original Open Philanthropy report has been slightly altered so that a positive resolution corresponds to the occurrence of the relevant medical breakthrough (rather than to its failure to occur).\n",
    "# Forecasts": 74,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If Biden becomes president, will there be an expansion of the Keystone Pipeline system of at least 100 km in length by the end of 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4433/if-biden-becomes-president-will-there-be-an-expansion-of-the-keystone-pipeline-system-of-at-least-100-km-in-length-by-the-end-of-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "3%",
    "Description": "The [Keystone Pipeline system] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keystone_Pipeline) is an oil pipeline in Canada and the United States, beginning operations in 2010.\nThe fourth phase, referred to as Keystone XL, attracted opposition from environmentalists and was eventually denied a permit by the Obama administration in 2015. Under Trump, a permit was granted again, though construction has not yet started.\nIn May 2020, Biden claimed that if elected, [he will cancel the permit for the Keystone XL pipeline] (https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/biden-kxl-1.5574515) .\nIf Biden is elected president in the 2020 election and takes office, will the Keystone Pipeline system be extended by at least 100 km between his inauguration and the end of 2024?\nOnly the length of pipeline built on US territory will count for this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 102,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will North Korea become a democracy?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4439/when-will-north-korea-become-a-democracy/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "North Korea is known to the broader international community as being a [Hermit Kingdom] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermit_kingdom) . A 2014 UN inquiry into human rights in North Korea has [stated] (https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=14255&amp;LangID=E) , \"the gravity, scale and nature of [their human rights violations] reveal a state that does not have any parallel in the contemporary world.\" The ultimate source of these allegations derives from their highly authoritarian government, currently under under the leadership of Kim Jong-un. \nNorth Korea is said to become a democracy if the [Democracy Index] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index) ranks them as 6.00 or above for some year. However, at the moment, they are ranked at 1.08, the lowest of any nation in the world.\nJanuary 1st of the year for which North Korea was ranked 6.00 or above will be the year of resolution. This question resolves ambiguously if the Democracy Index radically overhauls their methodology for ranking nations such that a rating of 6.00 no longer carries the same meaning as it did at the time when this question opened. It resolves &gt; in the case where the Democracy Index does not rate North Korea at 6.00 or above before 2200.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 64,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What rank will the United States be on the inequality adjusted human development index in 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4440/what-rank-will-the-united-states-be-on-the-inequality-adjusted-human-development-index-in-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [inequality-adjusted human development index can be described as] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_inequality-adjusted_HDI) , \"the level of human development when inequality is accounted for,\" whereas the Human Development Index itself, from which the IHDI is derived, is \"an index of potential human development (or the maximum IHDI that could be achieved if there were no inequality).\"\nWhile the US is currently ranked 15 on the human development index, [it's ranked 28] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_inequality-adjusted_HDI#List) on the inequality adjusted index.\nWhat will the rank of the US be in the 2035 report, as published by the United Nations Development Programme?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will be the next \"Great Power\" war?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4441/when-will-be-the-next-great-power-war/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A [great power] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_power) is a nation generally considered to have large amounts of military might and influence. While there is no established definition, for the purpose of this article, a great power is one of the top 10 nations by military spending according to the most recent report released by the [Stockholm International Peace Research Institute] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_International_Peace_Research_Institute) (see latest report [here] (https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/fs_2020_04_milex_0_0.pdf) ). As of 2020, the great powers are therefore the United States, China, India, Russia, Saudi Arabia, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Japan and South Korea. \nWhile great power wars have [declined greatly over time] (https://ourworldindata.org/war-and-peace) , some have argued that we should assign considerable probability to the prospect in the coming decades. In his post [Big War Remains Possible] (http://www.overcomingbias.com/2019/07/big-war-remains-possible.html) Robin Hanson writes\nThe world is vast, eighty years is a long time, and the number of possible global social &amp; diplomatic scenarios over such period is vast. So it seems crazy to base predictions on future war rates on inside view calculations from particular current stances, deals, or inclinations. The raw historical record, and its large long-term fluctuations, should weigh heavily on our minds.\nA great power is said to be \"at war\" with another great power, if any of the following are true:\n--- \nOne nation has formally declared war on another.\n--- \nOne nation is considered by the international community to be occupying territory claimed by the other AND there has has at least 250 casualties resulting from when the leaders of one nation ordered a strike on the other nation's military personnel.\n--- \nHigh quality media sources consistently describe the relationship between the two nations as \"at war.\"\nFor the purpose of this question, a great power is defined as one of the top 10 nations by military spending according to the most recent report released by the [Stockholm International Peace Research Institute] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_International_Peace_Research_Institute) .\nThe date of a great power war is determined by the first date any of the above become true. When will be the next war between the great powers?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 112,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the gross receipts of the SENS Research Foundation in the 2021 tax year, as reported on their Form 990?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4442/what-will-be-the-gross-receipts-of-the-sens-research-foundation-in-the-2021-tax-year-as-reported-on-their-form-990/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [SENS Research Foundation] (https://www.sens.org/) is one of the best-known organisations in the anti-aging research space.\nSENS Research Foundation (SRF) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization focused on transforming the way the world researches and treats age-related disease. SRF focuses on a damage repair paradigm for treating the diseases of aging, which it advances through scientific research, advocacy and education. SENS Research Foundation supports research projects at universities and institutes around the world with the goal of curing such age-related diseases as macular degeneration, heart disease, cancer, and Alzheimer’s disease. \nAs a 501(c)(3) non-profit, it is obliged to file an IRS Form 990 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax, from which we can obtain certain financial information.\nHere's [their Form 990 from the 2018 tax year.] (https://www.sens.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/2018-SENS-990-Public-Copy.pdf) We can see their gross receipts in that tax year were $8,617,564.\nThis question asks: For the 2021 tax year, what figure will SENS Research Foundation report on their Form 990 as the value of their gross receipts, in US dollars?\nIn the event that no such filing is made (e.g. because SRF no longer exists or is no longer required to file this form), this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 81,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will China surpass the United States economically, militarily, and scientifically?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4443/when-will-china-surpass-the-united-states-economically-militarily-and-scientifically/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "At the start of the 21st century, the United States was widely considered to be the world's sole superpower. This is beginning to change, with the rapid rise of China.\nThe chosen metrics are,\n--- \n[Nominal GDP] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)) per the International Monetary Fund (or another reliable organization, chosen by Metaculus administrators).\n--- \n[Military expenditures] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures) per the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (or another reliable organization, chosen by Metaculus administrators).\n--- \n[The Nature Index] (https://www.natureindex.com/annual-tables/2019/country/all) . If this index is discontinued, then [International Science Ranking] (https://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php) takes its place. If both are discontinued, then this question resolves ambiguously.\nThis question resolves January 1st on the year during which each published report listed demonstrates that the United States is behind China.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 121,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the highest value of the U.S. Private Sector Job Quality Index (JQI-1) before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4444/what-will-be-the-highest-value-of-the-us-private-sector-job-quality-index-jqi-1-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[jobqualityindex.com] (https://www.jobqualityindex.com/) \nThe JQI is aimed at assessing the degree to which the number of jobs in the United States is weighted towards more desirable higher-wage/higher-hour jobs versus lower-wage/lower-hour jobs, which can serve as a proxy for the overall health of the U.S. jobs market, the national economy, and worldwide financial markets. The initial form of the index (JQI-1) covers only production and nonsupervisory workers. \nThe index divides all jobs into high and low quality by calculating the mean weekly income (hourly wages times by hours worked) and then calculates the number of jobs that are above or below that mean. An index reading of 100 would indicate an even distribution between high and low quality jobs. Index value below 100 indicate a greater concentration in lower quality job positions (those below the mean). Index above 100 indicates greater concentration in high quality (above the mean) job positions.\nConceptually:\nExact calculation is more complex. It's described in [JQI White Paper] (https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/prosperousamerica/pages/5467/attachments/original/1573727821/U.S._Private_Sector_Job_Quailty_Index_White_Paper.pdf?1573727821) .\nThe question asks what will be the highest U.S. Private Sector Job Quality Index (JQI-1) value before 2030? The last month included in the question is December 2029. \nThe initial high value is 79.11 from April 2020.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 41,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will global IPv4 traffic account for less than 1% of total internet traffic?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4449/when-will-global-ipv4-traffic-account-for-less-than-1-of-total-internet-traffic/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "IPv4 was introduced in 1983 and now forms the basis for internet routing. It is a 32-bit addressing system so there are 2^32 or 4,294,967,296 addresses (some addresses are reserved so the usable number is slightly less). [The internet is running out of IPv4 addresses.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv4_address_exhaustion) IPv6 was drafted in 1998 and finally standardized in 2017. IPv6's address space is extended to 2^128 or 3.4 x 10^38. The internet is currently transitioning over to IPv6.\n[IPv6 traffic now accounts for over 30% of Google's user traffic.] (https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) [Akamai] (https://www.akamai.com/us/en/why-akamai/dns-trends-and-traffic.jsp) lists IPv6 traffic at 17.79%.\nWhen will global IPv4 traffic account for less than 1% of total internet traffic, as reported by Akamai?\nResolution will be based on Akamai's reporting of the number of IPv4 transactions as a share of total transactions (not bandwidth or other metrics). If Akamai ceases to exist or to publish this information, admins may choose another major content delivery network as the source at their discretion.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 52,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first 100 million digit prime number be discovered?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4451/when-will-the-first-100-million-digit-prime-number-be-discovered/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [largest known prime] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Largest_known_prime_number) is currently 24,862,048 digits in length. In 1961 the largest known prime was only 1,332 digits. When will a 100 million digit prime be discovered?\nThis question will resolve with the date of publication of the prime in question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 68,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the United States test a nuclear weapon before 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4456/will-the-united-states-test-a-nuclear-weapon-before-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "In May 2020, the Washington Post reported that the Trump Administration was considering conducting the first US nuclear test in decades.\nWashington Post: [Trump administration discussed conducting first U.S. nuclear test in decades] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-administration-discussed-conducting-first-us-nuclear-test-in-decades/2020/05/22/a805c904-9c5b-11ea-b60c-3be060a4f8e1_story.html) \nThe Trump administration has discussed whether to conduct the first U.S. nuclear test explosion since 1992 in a move that would have far-reaching consequences for relations with other nuclear powers and reverse a decades-long moratorium on such actions, said a senior administration official and two former officials familiar with the deliberations.\nThe matter came up at a meeting of senior officials representing the top national security agencies last Friday, following accusations from administration officials that Russia and China are conducting low-yield nuclear tests — an assertion that has not been substantiated by publicly available evidence and that both countries have denied.\nA senior administration official, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the sensitive nuclear discussions, said that demonstrating to Moscow and Beijing that the United States could “rapid test” could prove useful from a negotiating standpoint as Washington seeks a trilateral deal to regulate the arsenals of the biggest nuclear powers.\nThe meeting did not conclude with any agreement to conduct a test, but a senior administration official said the proposal is “very much an ongoing conversation.” Another person familiar with the meeting, however, said a decision was ultimately made to take other measures in response to threats posed by Russia and China and avoid a resumption of testing.\nThe National Security Council declined to comment.\nThis question asks: After January 1 2020 and before January 1 2023, will the United States conduct a test of a nuclear weapon?\nThis question resolves positively if the US government acknowledges conducting such a test, or if credible media reports (as judged by Metaculus admins) state that such a test has taken place. \nThere is no requirement that the test be considered a success for a positive resolution (i.e. fizzles count), but devices designed as radiological weapons, where any fission/fusion energy is energetically sub-dominant to chemical or other explosives, do not count. Subcritical nuclear tests are therefore excluded from triggering a positive resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 111,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If Joe Biden becomes president, what will the federal minimum wage be at the end of 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4470/if-joe-biden-becomes-president-what-will-the-federal-minimum-wage-be-at-the-end-of-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Joe Biden claims he will increase [the federal minimum wage to $15/hr] (https://joebiden.com/empowerworkers/) , a figure notably promoted by the [Fight for $15] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fight_for_$15) movement, up from its current value of $7.25/hr.\nThe $15 minimum wage movement has seen some successes on the local level, with [six states] (https://www.vox.com/2019/3/28/18285346/maryland-passes-15-minimum-wage) having laws that will phase in a $15 minimum wage. Such a move is backed by the rest of the Democratic Party: the [Raise the Wage Act] (https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/582/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded&amp;KWICView=false) , which includes a $15 minimum wage, has 205 cosponsors in the House, all Democratic (and cleared the House in the 116th Congress).\nIf Biden is elected president in the 2020 election and takes office, will the federal minimum wage be at the end of 2024 in nominal US dollars per hour?\nThe minimum wage will be decided by the [US Department of Labor] (https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/wages/minimumwage) website. This question is about the active minimum wage at the end of 2024, so if a bill is passed in 2024 that mandates a certain minimum wage in 2025, that will not be considered. If that website does not give information on the minimum wage (or lack thereof), this question will resolve based on credible media reports.\nIf Joe Biden is not elected or does not take office, this question resolves as ambiguous.\nIf there is no minimum wage, the minimum wage will be considered to be $0.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 183,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Australia have no coal-fired power plants in its National Electricity Market?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4472/when-will-australia-have-no-coal-fired-power-plants-in-its-national-electricity-market/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Australia currently has 16 coal-fired power plants in its National Electricity Market (the NEM). The NEM is the country's largest electricity grid, covering six of eight states/territories, including the three most populous. There are also four coal-fired power plants in Western Australia, not part of the NEM. \nAbout [two thirds] (https://opennem.org.au/energy/nem) of electricity in the NEM currently comes from coal-fired power plants. \nDates of note\n--- \nFor climate change reasons, some environmentalists say [Australia should stop burning coal by 2030] (https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/6505509/australia-must-exit-coal-by-2030-report/?cs=14231) .\n--- \nThe coal-fired power plant with the latest scheduled closure is Loy Yang A, in 2048. \n--- \nThe newest coal-fired power plant, Kogan Creek, was built in 2007. An operating life of 50 years would put its closure at 2057 (although plants can be extended beyond a 50-year life). \n--- \nThis year, the federal government [funded a feasibility study for a new coal-fired power plant] (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-09/labor-critical-of-government-coal-record-while-sitting-on-fence/11947812) .\n--- \nThe [openCEM model] (http://www.opencem.org.au/) of the NEM has some coal in 2050 in its base case, although in other scenarios coal exits the market. Brown coal in Victoria is particularly tenacious, however. \nResolution\nThe question resolves positively if either of the following:\n--- \nNo coal-fired power plant is connected to the NEM for period of at least two weeks\n--- \nCoal provides less than 1% of NEM electricity generation over any 12 month period\nIn case NEM ceases to exist, the question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 61,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of top colleges in the United States will not require the SAT or ACT for freshman admittance by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4507/what-percentage-of-top-colleges-in-the-united-states-will-not-require-the-sat-or-act-for-freshman-admittance-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "On May 21st 2020, University of California (UC) president Janet Napolitano [proposed] (https://regents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/may20/b4.pdf) that the UC system phase out the requirement of the popular standardized tests, the [SAT] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT) and the [ACT] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACT_(test)) . Given that UC schools comprise [all five of the most applied to colleges] (https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/28/the-10-universities-that-receive-the-most-applications.html) in the United States, this move was seen by many as marking a transition in how college admission works in the United States.\nScott Aaronson [wrote] (https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=4816) on his blog,\nThis is widely expected, probably correctly, to trigger a chain reaction, whereby one US university after the next will abandon standardized tests. As a result, admissions to the top US universities—and hence, most chances for social advancement in the US—will henceforth be based entirely on shifting and nebulous criteria that rich, well-connected kids and their parents spend most of their lives figuring out, rather than merely mostly based on such criteria.\nWill his prediction be correct? This question asks, What percentage of top colleges in the United States will not require the SAT or ACT for freshman admittance by 2030?\nDefine a top college in the United States as a university that ranks in the top 50 for national universities according to [the most recent ranking] (https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities) by US News and World Report. A spreadsheet of the 2020 rankings can currently be found on [this page] (http://andyreiter.com/datasets/) . If US News and World Report ends their ranking system by 2030, then these rankings will take its place, in order of priority,\n--- \nThe Wall Street Journal/Times Higher Education College Rankings\n--- \nForbes college rankings\n--- \nThe Princeton Review Dream Colleges\nThe website PrepScholar [has cataloged] (https://blog.prepscholar.com/the-complete-guide-to-sat-optional-colleges) which colleges have previously dropped the requirement to submit the SAT/ACT in their application. You can find the current universities in tabular format [here] (https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/360031/PrepScholar%20Guide%20to%20Schools%20Not%20Requiring%20the%20SAT%202018.pdf) . By joining these two tables, we can see that just two top colleges are testing-optional: the University of Chicago and Wake Forest University. Therefore, the fraction before the UC change was 4%. Since six UC schools on the list have now made the tests optional, the current fraction is 16%.\nThis question resolves as the percentages of top colleges in the United States that do not require the SAT or ACT for future freshman admittance, according to the best estimates from the Metaculus community at the start of 2030.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 41,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How long would humanity take to rebound from a global catastrophe?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4511/how-long-would-humanity-take-to-rebound-from-a-global-catastrophe/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "For reasons why there might ever be fewer than 100M humans, see the [Metaculus Ragnarok series] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--ragnarok) . An important question is, if most people die, whether humanity will recover, and how long it would take.\nQuestion: If there ever were fewer than 100M humans, how many years would it take for there to be more than 1B humans?\nResolution details:\n---Only humans in the observable universe count. \n---\"Humans\" are creatures who at least one 2020 Metaculus user would judge are humans if they magically met them. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 136,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many billions of parameters will the largest machine learning model trained before 2030 have?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4518/how-many-billions-of-parameters-will-the-largest-machine-learning-model-trained-before-2030-have/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "I have already asked [whether there will be a machine learning model trained with 100 trillion parameters] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3656/will-a-100-trillion-parameter-deep-learning-model-be-trained-before-2026/) trained before 2026. We still have a way to go before reaching that milestone, but a day before writing this question, OpenAI published [a paper] (https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165) describing GPT-3, a 175 billion parameter transformer. This model is over an order of magnitude larger than the previous largest models, which had [roughly 17 billion] (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/turing-nlg-a-17-billion-parameter-language-model-by-microsoft/) parameters.\nPhysical constraints will eventually slow progress, but things can still get interesting before then.\nI ask, before 2030, how many billions of parameters will the largest machine learning model trained have? Resolution is determined by some sort of reliable document, blog post, or paper, published anywhere on the internet.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 31,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first commercial Hyperloop system begin operations?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4519/when-will-the-first-commercial-hyperloop-system-begin-operations/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A [Hyperloop] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperloop) is a proposed mode of passenger and freight transportation; the name was first used to describe an open-source [vactrain] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vactrain) design released by a joint team from Tesla and SpaceX in 2013.\nIn essence, a Hyperloop is a sealed tube or series of tubes with low air pressure through which a pod carrying passengers or cargo may travel substantially free of drag. The Hyperloop could potentially convey people or objects at airliner or supersonic speeds while being substantially more energy efficient than existing commercial airliners. \nThe [Hyperloop Alpha] (https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/files/blog_images/hyperloop-alpha.pdf) concept was first published in August 2013, proposing and examining a route running from the Los Angeles region to the San Francisco Bay Area, roughly following the Interstate 5 corridor. The Hyperloop genesis paper conceived of a Hyperloop system that would propel passengers along the 350-mile (560 km) route at a speed of 760 mph (1,200 km/h), allowing for a travel time of 35 minutes, which is considerably faster than current rail or air travel times. Preliminary cost estimates for this LA–SF suggested route were included in the white paper—US$6 billion for a passenger-only version, and US$7.5 billion for a somewhat larger-diameter version transporting passengers and vehicles.\nIn the seven years since Hyperloop was proposed, [a number of startup companies have outlined plans to design, build and commercialize Hyperloop technologies.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperloop#Hyperloop_companies) Some of these companies, including Virgin Hyperloop One and Hyperloop Transportation Technologies, [are building test tracks and pods] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luDqbIZGgQM) , and [a number of interesting possible routes have been theorised] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oziSR8nOznA) , but as of May 2020 there are no commercial Hyperloop tracks in operation.\nThis question asks: When will the first commercial Hyperloop system begin operation?\nFor the purposes of this question, a 'Hyperloop' is a transportation system designed for passenger or cargo transportation utilising a low-pressure tube or tunnel to reduce drag. Whether such a system is called a 'Hyperloop' or something else does not affect the resolution of this question.\nA 'commercial Hyperloop system' is a full-scale transportation system that functions to transport passengers or cargo on a commercial basis, where paying customers may purchase tickets or access passes to use the service. \nAdditionally, the system must possess the key characteristic of the Hyperloop concept: average speed substantially in excess of high-speed rail. The average point-to-point speed of the pod must be at least 400 kilometers per hour to qualify, and the minimum point-to-point distance is 10 kilometers.\nAmusement park rides or test tracks, paid or unpaid, do not count. Additionally, [pneumatic tube systems] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pneumatic_tube) that transport only very small objects like letters do not count.\nThis question resolves as the date on which the first paying customer using a qualifying Hyperloop system either completes their journey, or their cargo arrives at its destination.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 63,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the US conduct a nuclear test explosion before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4524/will-the-us-conduct-a-nuclear-test-explosion-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "[Trinity] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_(nuclear_test)) was the first nuclear weapon test. The test was conducted above ground on July 16, 1945 on what is now known as the White Sands Missile Range. Since Trinity, over 2,000 nuclear tests have been [conducted] (https://www.fastcompany.com/3049706/visualized-every-haunting-nuclear-bomb-detonation-since-1945) world wide. \nThe US has conducted over 1,000 nuclear tests. The final test to be conducted by the US, code-name [Divder] (https://www.ctbto.org/specials/testing-times/23-september-1992-last-us-nuclear-test) , took place on September 23, 1992. Soon after, Gearge H. W. Bush [declared a moratorium] (https://www.thereaganvision.org/u-s-nuclear-weapons-testing-moratorium/) on nuclear weapons testing. In 1996, the US signed the [Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty] (https://www.nti.org/learn/treaties-and-regimes/comprehensive-nuclear-test-ban-treaty-ctbt/) which bans any type of nuclear explosion. To date, the treaty has not been ratified by the appropriate countries (including the US) and has [not yet entered into force] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehensive_Nuclear-Test-Ban_Treaty) .\nThe decision to end nuclear weapons testing has not been recommended by everyone. One of the [core missions] (https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/missions/maintaining-stockpile) of the National Nuclear Security Administration is to \"ensure the United States maintains a safe, secure, and reliable nuclear stockpile through the application of unparalleled science, technology, engineering, and manufacturing.\" This is largely accomplished through [super computers] (https://www.discovermagazine.com/technology/testing-nuclear-weapons-is-more-important-than-ever) . However, some [argue] (https://www.heritage.org/arms-control/report/keeping-nuclear-testing-the-table-national-security-imperative) that weapons tests are still needed to accomplish this mission.\nMore recently, there have been [reports] (https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-administration-considered-a-nuclear-bomb-test-washington-post-2020-5) that the Trump administration has considered performing a nuclear test explosion in response to potential low-yield tests from Russia and China.\n\nWill the US conduct a nuclear test explosion before 2030?\n=========================================================\n\nThis question will resolve positively to verification of a nuclear explosion by the CTBTO, the UN, or if an official government statement from the US is issued confirming the test. The question will resolve as ambiguous if two or more other countries accuse the US of performing a nuclear test explosion but there is no verification. Otherwise, this question will resolve negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 46,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the S&P 500 hit 10,000 points by the end of the decade?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4527/will-the-sp-500-hit-10000-points-by-the-end-of-the-decade/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "The S&amp;P 500, or simply the S&amp;P, is a stock market index that measures the stock performance of 500 large companies listed on stock exchanges in the United States. It is one of the most commonly followed equity indices, and many consider it to be one of the best representations of the U.S. stock market. (Wikipedia)\nThe S&amp;P 500 is at 3,044 points at the time of writing this question. Will it hit 10,000 points before the decade ends?\nThis question still resolves positively if it hits the 10,000 mark during the decade but is under that threshold on Jan 1 2030.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 112,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be fewer Kea parrots in 2030 than in 2020?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4544/will-there-be-fewer-kea-parrots-in-2030-than-in-2020/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "62%",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nThe kea is a species of large parrot in the family Nestoridae found in the forested and alpine regions of the South Island of New Zealand.\nAccording to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, [there are roughly 4,000 live mature Kea parrots in the world] (https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22684831/119243358) .\n\nQuestion and Resolution\n=======================\n\nWill there be fewer than 4,000 live mature Kea parrots, according to [IUCN Red List of Threatened Species] (https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22684831/119243358) at any point in the year 2030?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 35,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will George Church receive a Nobel prize, in any category, before the end of 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4549/will-george-church-receive-a-nobel-prize-in-any-category-before-the-end-of-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "According to [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Church_(geneticist)) :\nGeorge Church is an American geneticist, molecular engineer, and chemist. He is the Robert Winthrop Professor of Genetics at Harvard Medical School, Professor of Health Sciences and Technology at Harvard and MIT, and a founding member of the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering.\nWill George Church receive a Nobel prize, in any category, before the end of 2035?\nThis question resolves positively if George Church wins a Nobel Prize before 2035. Sharing a Nobel prize is sufficient for positive resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 31,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a technology replace screens?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4577/when-will-a-technology-replace-screens/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In 2017, the world spent $1,537 Billion on [cell phones] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/263437/global-smartphone-sales-to-end-users-since-2007/) , $105 Billion on [TVs] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/461324/global-tv-market-sales/) , $101 Billion on [Laptops and Tablets] (https://fortunly.com/blog/lap-top-market-share/) , and $27 Billion on [PC monitors and projectors] (https://www.statista.com/outlook/15030300/100/pc-monitors-projectors/worldwide) .\nWhat do all of these have in common? Screens! The Average American Household has 7 [screens] (https://variety.com/2019/digital/news/u-s-households-have-an-average-of-11-connected-devices-and-5g-should-push-that-even-higher-1203431225/) in their house. \nScreens have been with us for nearly a [century] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_set#Early_television) . \nBut nothing lasts forever.\nThis question asks, \n\"When will a new technology, designed primarily for transmitting visual information outsell all existing technologies with screens?\"\nFor the purpose of this question, we will define a screen as \"a technology that displays a 2d image on a flat surface\".\nIf a device primarily uses the new display technology, the entire device is counted as a sale. \nFor example if a phone is released with a 3d hologram projector,the entire sale cost of the phone is counted towards this question.\nIf a new technology is not sold (for example if it was given away freely by our benevolent AI overlords), a fair market value will be imputed based on how much it would cost a typical consumer were it freely available for sale. If the entire concept of fair market value is rendered meaningless, the question resolves ambiguously.\nThe question resolves positive if in one year the gross sales for \"non-screen\" displays is greater than the sales for \"screen\" technology.\nThe question will resolve positively on Dec 31 at 11:59PM GMT of the year in which such sales took place.\nBecause the word \"screen\" cannot be precisely defined, this is a self-resolving question.\nIf at any point in time, both the community and Metaculus prediction give a 95% chance that the answer to this question is one year before the current date, then this question enters the resolution process. The Proposed Answer is taken to be the community median. With 90% probability, the question simply resolves as the Proposed Answer. With 10% probability, the question is sent to a committee of three admins, who will vote yes/no. If they vote positively, the question resolves as the Proposed Answer. If they vote negatively, then the question is put on hold until the resolution date, at which point three admins will each vote on an answer, with the median of the three taken to be the final answer.\nCurrent examples of \"screens\":\n1--Phones \n2--Televisions \n3--Laptops/Tablets \n4--PC Monitors \n5--Video projectors, since they are typically used to display a flat image. \nExamples of technologies that could be described to \"primarily convey visual information\":\n---VR Headsets, because although headsets have flat displays, the actual experience is being in a completely different world with, ideally, no perception that one is looking at a physical screen \n---AR \"smart\" glasses \n---Smart contact lenses \n--- [Neuralink] (https://www.neuralink.com/) if it progressed to the point of being able to project a visual image in the brain. \n---2d holographic displays (For example, [Looking Glass] (https://lookingglassfactory.com/product/8-9) ) \n---3d holographic displays \n--- [Video paint] (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/03/050329140351.htm) \nNon-examples (improved screen):\n---Curved TVs \n---Folding Phones \n---Smartwatches (screen is circular instead of rectangular) \n--- [\"Roll-up\" screens] (https://www.cnet.com/news/lg-oled-tv-roll-up-comes-out-hiding-when-tv-time-rolls-around/) \n--- [Video projector phone] (https://www.techradar.com/reviews/blackview-max-1-projector-smartphone) \nNon-examples (not a visual display technology):\n---Wireless earbuds \n---Telepathy which does not produce a visual image in the mind of the receiver \n---Humanoid robots which are capable of acting out visual dramas \n",
    "# Forecasts": 97,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What % of money held in all US DAFs will be expropriated by 2100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4584/what--of-money-held-in-all-us-dafs-will-be-expropriated-by-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This is a variation on [an older question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4328/will-a-total-sum-amounting-to-at-least-10-of-the-money-in-all-us-dafs-be-expropriated-by-2100/) , with different wording to attempt to illuminate an alternative perspective.\nA [donor-advised fund] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donor-advised_fund) (DAF) is \"a charitable giving vehicle administered by a public charity created to manage charitable donations on behalf of organizations, families, or individuals.\" The sponsoring organization of a fund—often a subsidiary of a brokerage firm such as [Fidelity Charitable] (https://www.fidelitycharitable.org/) or [Schwab Charitable] (https://www.schwabcharitable.org/public/charitable/home) —is a 501(c)(3) registered charity that accepts tax-deductible donations from the creator of the DAF. The creator can then make grant recommendations to the sponsoring organization.\nSponsoring organizations legally own any donated money, and have no obligation to abide by grant recommendations. There have been cases in the past of DAFs refusing to use donated money as directed[1] or using donated money for its own benefit. To my knowledge, no large reputable DAF has ever done this.\nWhat percentage of money held in all US DAFs will be expropriated by 2100?\nFunds are considered expropriated if:\n---The DAF refuses to make a grant recommendation, insofar as the grant recommendation is legal. \n---The DAF spends donated money on purposes other than a donor's recommendation, not including ordinary account expenses[2]. \n---The DAF begins charging unreasonable expenses (e.g., a 5% annual fee). \n---An outside party, such as the US government, seizes control of all or a substantial portion of the money (including by taxation). \nThe following situations do not qualify as expropriation:\n---The US government imposes a distribution requirement, such as the 5% annual distribution requirement that foundations must follow. \n---The DAF refuses to abide by a grant recommendation because it legally cannot, e.g., because the would-be grant recipient is not a 501(c)(3). \n---The DAF forcibly closes (e.g., due to Fidelity Charitable going bankrupt), but lets donors decide how to grant all remaining money. \n[1] Article is paywalled, but the gist is that the Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles refused to comply with a donor's request to donate to a charity supporting Palestine.\n[2] At present, Fidelity Charitable charges a 0.6% annual fee. Most other DAFs charge similar fees.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 24,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What annual real return will the global stock market realize 2022-2031?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4585/what-annual-real-return-will-the-global-stock-market-realize-2022-2031/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "For the decade from Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2031, what annual percentage return (including dividends) will the global stock market achieve? \nThe global stock market will be tracked using FTSE Global All Cap Index, or a similar index if FTSE no longer exists by 2031.\n\"Annual return\" refers to the geometric mean over the 10 years, that is:\nReturn should be measured on an inflation-adjusted basis. Global inflation rates are to be taken from the [World Bank] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG) , or another similarly credible source if World Bank data is not available.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 98,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If Biden becomes president, will the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine be ended by 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4586/if-biden-becomes-president-will-the-sentencing-disparity-between-crack-and-powder-cocaine-be-ended-by-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "60%",
    "Description": "Currently, the threshold for a 5-year mandatory minimum sentence for possession of crack cocaine is 28g, [a factor of 18] (https://www.vox.com/2015/8/5/9097307/mandatory-minimums-fair-sentencing-act) smaller than the 500g for powder cocaine, a figure given by the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. This ratio is down from the 100:1 disparity from the [Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Drug_Abuse_Act_of_1986) .\nThis sentencing disparity has been criticised [as being racially motivated] (https://www.aclu.org/other/cracks-system-20-years-unjust-federal-crack-cocaine-law) ; crack cocaine and powder cocaine are pharmacologically similar, though crack cocaine is more commonly used by African Americans and powder cocaine is more commonly used by whites.\nJoe Biden [has claimed] (https://joebiden.com/justice/) he plans to end this federal sentencing disparity.\nIf Joe Biden becomes president, will the amount in possession required to receive a federal drug trafficking penalty for possession of cocaine base be equal to the amount for cocaine?\nResolution will be by the text of [21 USC § 841] (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/841) , unless a different federal law becomes applicable to this situation.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 36,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Croatia adopt the euro?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4587/when-will-croatia-adopt-the-euro/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Croatia is obligated to switch from its current currency, the kuna, and [begin using the euro] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croatia_and_the_euro) as a consequence of its membership in the European Union. It was initially expected that Croatia would transition in 2019. At that time several criteria for entering the [eurozone] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurozone) were not yet met, so the expected entry date was pushed back.\nThis question asks, When will Croatia adopt the euro?\nThis question resolves positively on the date Croatia adopts the euro as its sole official currency. This information will be published by the [European Union] (https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/countries/member-countries/croatia_en) . It will also be reported in reputable media such as The Economist, Reuters, and Bloomberg. The question resolves ambiguously if Croatia is no longer a part of the EU or if the euro stops existing by that time.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 78,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will SpaceX's Starship carry a human to orbit?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4588/when-will-spacexs-starship-carry-a-human-to-orbit/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "After many years of developing a human-rated vehicle, SpaceX recently [carried humans] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4505/when-will-the-spacex-demo-2-launch/) to the International Space Station on its Crew Dragon capsule atop its partially-reusable Falcon 9 rocket.\nSpaceX's [Starship] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship) rocket is an under-development super heavy-lift launch vehicle, intended to be fully reusable and to carry humans to destinations throughout the Solar System. Although SpaceX has proven that it can successfully accomplish some aspects of this (reuse a rocket's core stage multiple times, carry humans in a spacecraft), there are further milestones to overcome (recover all stages of a rocket, build a rocket from stainless steel, etc.).\nWhen will SpaceX's Starship carry a human to orbit?\nStarship has undergone many design and name changes since its inception. Therefore, for the purposes of this question, \"Starship\" refers to any SpaceX vehicle, or prototype/early version thereof, that is:\n---not an existing member of the Falcon family (Falcon 9/Heavy) or a Falcon derivative \n---intended to be fully reusable, with every stage returned to Earth (smaller portions such as fairings may be expended) \n---The vehicle must have a stated payload to LEO of at least 20,000 kg (of pure payload, e.g. the Space Shuttle Orbiter would not count as payload mass). This is very conservative, so Starship would qualify even if it were greatly scaled down from today. \n---The vehicle must be intended to carry a payload to Mars at some point, according to public statements of SpaceX or its representatives. \n---The vehicle design must be descended from the current (2020) design of Starship. Any number of design changes are acceptable, but a redesign from scratch is not (see [Ship of Theseus] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_of_Theseus) ). \nTo be considered to reach orbit, the human in question must complete at least one orbit of some planetary body ; that is, while maintaining an altitude of at least 50 km, they must pass over the same longitude or the same latitude twice. It is acceptable if the human arrived in orbit on some other vehicle, and only subsequently entered Starship, as long as they complete one orbit while inside Starship. The human must be alive at the time that this occurs, but do not need to safely return to Earth (or, for that matter, anywhere else) afterwards.\n(Edited 2020-06-09 to add last three disambiguation bullets.)\n(Edited 2020-06-11 to remove obsolete clause about payload and adde acceptability of getting to orbit not on Starship.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 127,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will we have a new Pope?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4606/when-will-we-have-a-new-pope/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "When the Pope dies [(or resigns)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resignation_of_Pope_Benedict_XVI) , the Cardinals of the Cathlic Church convene a [Papal Conclave] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_conclave) to elect the Pope's successor. This mysterious procedure culminates in the [fumata] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_conclave#The_fumata_(smoke)) , traditionally the burning of the ballots. Black smoke indicates that the ballot was inconclusive, while white smoke indicates that [a new Pope has been elected] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habemus_papam) .\nThis question resolves as the first date and time (after question launch, before 2036-12-17) at which white smoke is emitted from the building in which a Papal Conclave is meeting.\nIf the Catholic Church or Papacy dissolves during or in the wake of Pope Francis' papacy, question resolves ambiguous. However, if both institutions are remain effectively intact, this question closes on 2036-12-17 (Pope Francis' 100th birthday). Should Pope Francis still be alive and Pope at that time, this question resolves as &gt;2036-12-17.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 90,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2024, what percentage of surveyed Americans will report say that conflicts between Democrats and Republicans are \"very strong\"?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4608/in-2024-what-percentage-of-surveyed-americans-will-report-say-that-conflicts-between-democrats-and-republicans-are-very-strong/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "For decades Pew Research has [reported] (https://www.pewresearch.org/topics/political-polarization/) on political polarization in the United States. Since 2012, they have surveyed Americans to gauge the perceived conflict between different groups in the United States. Among the compared groups, Democrats and Republicans are consistently perceived to have the highest level of conflict, and this perception has risen over time.\nIn 2012, the conflict between Democrats and Republicans was perceived to be \"very strong\" by 48% of those surveyed. In 2016, it was 56%. By 2020, it [had risen] (https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/03/04/far-more-americans-see-very-strong-partisan-conflicts-now-than-in-the-last-two-presidential-election-years/) to 71%. \nIf Pew Research publishes a report for 2024, what percentage of those surveyed will report that the conflicts between Democrats and Republicans are \"very strong\"?\nIf no such report is published in 2024 by Pew Research, then this question resolves ambiguously. If there are multiple reports published in 2024 by Pew Research, the question resolves according to the first report's figures.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 33,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will directly removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere be economically feasible?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4614/when-will-directly-removing-carbon-dioxide-from-the-atmosphere-be-economically-feasible/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Many efforts to reduce the effects of climate change are focused on reducing carbon dioxide emissions from the various sectors that contribute to them, for example electricity/heat production, agriculture, transportation, and industrial uses. In most of these sectors, there are \"low-hanging fruit\": certain emissions that can be removed with existing technology, sometimes even saving money in the process. For example, solar and wind energy are now often cheaper than coal, and electric cars can be cost-competitive with gasoline cars in some contexts. On the other hand, there are many processes which generate CO2 that do not currently viable zero-emissions replacements, such as steel/concrete production or passenger airlines.\nOne way to make progress on CO2 reductions in spite of this would be to [directly capture] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_air_capture) CO2 from the air and store it, so that on balance, no additional CO2 is added to the atmosphere. Unfortunately, current projects from companies such as [Carbon Engineering] (https://carbonengineering.com/) or [Climeworks] (https://www.climeworks.com/) are typically at very small scales and quite expensive, on the order of [$600] (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05357-w) per metric ton.\nWhen will direct air capture technology cost less than $50 per metric ton of carbon dioxide removed from the atmosphere?\n---This cost is a few times higher than the current price of carbon offsets, such as from [TerraPass] (http://terrapass.com) , which may be implemented by e.g. capturing methane (a greenhouse gas) from landfills or farms. \n---The cost per ton must be calculated from the actual carbon removed and costs incurred from some actual direct air capture project, not a hypothetical estimate. \n---The project or company in question must have removed 1 million metric tons of CO2, equivalent to ~1% of the [current voluntary carbon market] (https://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/articles/voluntary-carbon-volume-hits-seven-year-high-on-demand-for-natural-climate-solutions) . \n---The cost must include all lifecycle costs amortized per ton of CO2, including building the plant. For example, if a plant cost $1 billion and has removed 1 ton of carbon so far, the cost is $1 billion per ton. \n---Any offsetting revenues, such as from sale of the CO2 or derivative products, are not counted. \n---Cost is in 2020 US dollars, adjusted for inflation. \n---Resolution is by credible media report that this has occurred. Multiple reports can be combined; for example, sources on the construction cost of a plant, running costs, and total carbon removed so far can be used to compute an implied cost per ton. \nETA (2020-06-19) Planting trees does count as a carbon dioxide removal method for the purpose of this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 45,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What annual real return will the S&P 500 realize 2022-2031?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4615/what-annual-real-return-will-the-sp-500-realize-2022-2031/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "For the decade from Jan 1, 2022 to Dec 31, 2031, what annual percentage return (including dividends) will the S&amp;P 500 index achieve?\n\"Annual return\" refers to the geometric mean over the 10 years, that is:\nReturn should be measured on an inflation-adjusted basis. Inflation rates to be determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 126,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will US life expectancy at birth for both sexes fall below 75 years before 2040?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4616/will-us-life-expectancy-at-birth-for-both-sexes-fall-below-75-years-before-2040/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "13%",
    "Description": "According to the United Nations Development Program's [2019 Human Development Index] (http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/2019-human-development-index-ranking) , the average life expectancy at birth in the US (both sexes, average) is 78.9 years.\n[Life expectancy in the US has increased by just under a decade since 1950, when it was 68.14 years.] (https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/life-expectancy) However, in the last few years, [life expectancy has actually declined slightly in the US.] (https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/11/us-life-expectancy-keeps-falling/576664/) Contributing factors include obesity and related diseases, opioid abuse, and suicides. \nThis question asks: Before January 1 2040, will US life expectancy at birth (average for both sexes) fall below 75 years, according to the CDC, World Health Organization, or the United Nations?\nOnly one of these organizations need credibly report that the US life expectancy has fallen below 75 for a positive resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 105,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will one of GiveWell's 2019 top charities be estimated as the most cost-effective charity in 2031?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4628/will-one-of-givewells-2019-top-charities-be-estimated-as-the-most-cost-effective-charity-in-2031/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "[GiveWell] (https://www.givewell.org/) is a charity evaluator that recommends a shortlist of charities in the field of global development that have the greatest impact per marginal donation. Towards this end, they try to quantify the effects of different interventions by estimating a \"cost per life saved\" metric to compare them on.\nWhile they warn against [taking these cost-effectiveness estimates literally] (https://blog.givewell.org/2017/06/01/how-givewell-uses-cost-effectiveness-analyses/) , these estimates do give a guideline to which interventions are most effective and a rough idea of how cost-effective we should expect interventions to be.\nGiveWell usually updates its list of top charities on an annual basis. Will the most cost-effective charity on GiveWell's 2031 list, according to GiveWell's \"cost per life saved\" metric, be a charity that also appeared on the 2019 list of top charities?\nGiveWell's [2019 top charities] (https://blog.givewell.org/2019/11/26/announcing-our-2019-top-charities/) are:\n---Malaria Consortium \n---Against Malaria Foundation \n---Helen Keller International \n---Deworm the World Initiative \n---SCI Foundation \n---Sightsavers' deworming program[1] \n---END Fund's deworming program[1] \n---GiveDirectly \nIf the 2031 top charity with the highest estimated cost-effectiveness is on this list, the question resolves affirmative. If it is NOT on this list, the question resolves negative.\nSome clarifications:\nGiveWell usually releases its list of top charities near the end of the year, so when I say \"2019 top charities\", that refers to the list that was published near the end of 2019 and will probably remain unchanged throughout most of 2020.\nIf GiveWell ceases to exist or ceases to publish top charities, the question resolves as ambiguous.\nIf GiveWell no longer recommends any global poverty charities but still maintains a top charity list, the question resolves as negative.\nIf 2031's most cost-effective charity does not have the same name as any on the 2019 list, but came out of a 2019 charity being renamed, merged with another charity, or spun off, AND is being recommended on the basis of the same intervention as in 2019 (e.g., if Against Malaria Foundation merges with another charity but still produces bednets and is recommended for its bednet program), then the question resolves as affirmative.\nIf 2031's most cost-effective charity existed on the 2019 list but is no longer running the same type of intervention as it was in 2019, the question resolves as negative, on the basis that the charity is now meaningfully different. For example, if AMF is still recommended in 2031 but now it exclusively runs a malaria vaccine program instead of a bednets program, the question resolves as negative.\nIf GiveWell publishes multiple top-charity lists, then this question resolves affirmatively if at least one 2019 top charity appears on at least one of the 2031 lists AND is estimated to be the most cost-effective charity on that particular list (but not necessarily the most cost-effective across all lists).\n[1] These charities have multiple programs. GiveWell's recommendation is for one specific program.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 41,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Metaculus Inc. host a prediction market prior to 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4630/will-metaculus-inc-host-a-prediction-market-prior-to-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "According to [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaculus) , Metaculus is a reputation-based, massive online prediction solicitation and aggregation engine.\nWill Metaculus Inc. launch a prediction market for binary questions prior to Jan 1st, 2024?\nThis question resolves positively if all of the following occur:\n--- \nMetaculus hosts a system whereby participants can both buy and sell an instrument whose payout depends on the outcome of a binary question\n------For Metaculus to host such a system, the system must be operated and maintained principally by Metaculus Inc. or any of its subsidiaries \n--- \nThe payout is monetary or readily convert-able into cash (including cryptocurrency, or points/tokens that can be converted to cash) \n--- \nAn individual could trade instruments valued at $50 or more (in 2020 USD) within a 24-hour window at some point prior to 2024\nIf Metaculus is acquired or merges with another company before 2024, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 51,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will oil consumption over the 2020-2025 period be lower than in 2019?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4633/oil-consumption-rebounds-no-sooner-than-2026/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "32%",
    "Description": "Pre-covid, several [forecasters] (https://carbontracker.org/reports/2020-vision-why-you-should-see-the-fossil-fuel-peak-coming/) expected peak oil consumption to be in the 2020s. Now, in light of plummeting 2020 consumption, [several energy forecasters] (https://carbontracker.org/was-2019-the-peak-of-the-fossil-fuel-era/) have concluded that perhaps the peak was 2019. \nAccording to the EIA, [2019 usage was 100.87 mb/day] (https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/report/global_oil.php) (under total world consumption of petroleum and other liquids).\nWill oil consumption over the 2020-2025 period be lower than in 2019?\nThis question will resolve positively if no year in 2020-2025 (inclusive) has greater oil consumption than 2019 according to the EIA.\nIt will resolve negatively if any of those 6 years has greater consumption. It will resolve ambiguous if the EIA does not post consumption data for 2025 by the end of 2026, and no comparably authoritative source can be found (for which that source's 2019 data would be necessary).\n",
    "# Forecasts": 148,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If Labour wins the next UK general election, what will the England & Wales prison population rate per 100,000 people be 5 years later?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4644/if-labour-wins-the-next-uk-general-election-what-will-the-england--wales-prison-population-rate-per-100000-people-be-5-years-later/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "If Labour wins the next UK general election, what will the England &amp; Wales prison population rate per 100,000 people be 5 years later?\nThis question resolves ambiguously if the government formed is not either solely Labour or a coalition with Labour making up a majority of seats.\nResolution will be by the numbers published by the [World Prison Brief] (https://www.prisonstudies.org/country/united-kingdom-england-wales) . As of the time of writing, the World Prison Brief records UK numbers for even-numbered years; round the year down if 5 years after the election falls on an odd-numbered year.\nSee also: [If Conservatives win the next UK general election, what will the England &amp; Wales prison population rate per 100,000 people be 5 years later?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4645) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 38,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If Conservatives win the next UK general election, what will the England & Wales prison population rate per 100,000 people be 5 years later?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4645/if-conservatives-win-the-next-uk-general-election-what-will-the-england--wales-prison-population-rate-per-100000-people-be-5-years-later/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "If Conservatives win the next UK general election, what will the England &amp; Wales prison population rate per 100,000 people be 5 years later?\nThis question resolves ambiguously if the government formed is not either solely Conservatives or a coalition with Conservatives making up a majority of seats.\nResolution will be by the numbers published by the [World Prison Brief] (https://www.prisonstudies.org/country/united-kingdom-england-wales) . As of the time of writing, the World Prison Brief records UK numbers for even-numbered years; round the year down if 5 years after the election falls on an odd-numbered year.\nSee also: [If Labour wins the next UK general election, what will the England &amp; Wales prison population rate per 100,000 people be 5 years later?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4644) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 40,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will total enrollment for recent US high school graduates be in US colleges in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4646/what-will-total-enrollment-for-recent-us-high-school-graduates-be-in-us-colleges-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "College enrollment of recent high school graduates, both online and in-person, shows how many students choose to pursue higher education as an option after graduation. This both reflects the desire to participate in higher education, as well as the economic and social means of American families to do so. The percentage of recent high school graduates enrolled in college represents enrollment in both four-year and two-year institutions, and shows the percentage of students ages 16-24 who enrolled in US colleges before October of that year who have completed either high school or the equivalent GED certification. In 2018, the number in thousands of high school graduates was 3,212, with the total percentage enrolled in college at 69.1%. In 2009, during the great recession, total enrollment bumped upwards to over 70%. \nThis questions asks: What will total enrollment for recent US high school graduates be in US colleges in 2021?\nThe total enrollment in all college programs at all college levels will be determined by [the NCES] (https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d18/tables/dt18_302.10.asp) using data from the [American College Testing Program] (http://www.act.org/) obtained by the [Census Bureau] (https://www.census.gov/) . If the data is not available by the end of 2023, then the question will resolve ambiguously. This question is part of the [Higher Education Series] (https://pandemic.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:internal--higher-ed) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 103,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Ninja first lose the top spot as the most followed account on Twitch?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4665/when-will-ninja-first-lose-the-top-spot-as-the-most-followed-account-on-twitch/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The video live-streaming service [Twitch] (https://www.twitch.tv/) is primarily used for streaming liveplay of video games. In fact, all 50 of the currently most-followed accounts are video-game streamers, with Fortnite being the most common title played by streamers.\nThe user who currently has the most followers, Ninja, stopped using the platform on August 1, 2019 in order to move to the platform [Mixer.] (https://mixer.com/) He still has 14.7m followers on Twitch, despite not having posted a video since then.\nThis question asks: When will a Twitch user have more followers than Ninja?\nQuestion resolves as the first time at which the most-followed account on Twitch is someone other than Ninja. If Ninja’s account is deleted from Twitch, the question will resolve as the time of deletion.\nThis question is part of the Academy Series, a set of questions designed to be an introduction to forecasting for those who are relatively new and are looking for a new intellectual pursuit this summer.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 149,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the XENON1T experiment soon report a detection of dark matter or other new physics?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4670/will-the-xenon1t-experiment-soon-report-a-detection-of-dark-matter-or-other-new-physics/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "A major goal of eperimental particle physics and cosmology is to identify the [dark matter] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter) pervading the universe. Foremost candidates for this matter are [WIMPS] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles) and [axions] (https://www.quantamagazine.org/why-dark-matter-might-be-axions-20191127/) . An ongoing test for WIMP-nucleon scattering is [XENON1T] (http://www.xenon1t.org/) in Italy, with a much higher sensitivity than [preceding experiments] (http://www.nature.com/news/largest-ever-dark-matter-experiment-poised-to-test-popular-theory-1.18772) ; this dark matter detector is essentially a 3500 kilogram target of liquid Xenon sandwiched between two arrays of photomultiplier tubes. The arrays detect signals from scintillation and electron drift generated from particles scattering off Xenon nuclei, at which point known [backgrounds] (http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.07501) will be subtracted out to get the WIMP signal. \nRecently, the XENON1T experiment disclosed that it has some interesting events in hand; see [preprint] (https://www.science.purdue.edu/xenon1t/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/xenon1tlowersearches.pdf) and [popular article in Quanta] (https://www.quantamagazine.org/dark-matter-experiment-finds-unexplained-signal-20200617/) . These happened not in its search for WIMP dark matter, but in looking for axions. Per the Quanta article, \nAs the WIMP search kept coming up empty, XENON scientists realized several years ago that they could use their experiment to search for other kinds of unknown particles that might pass through the detector: particles that bang into an electron rather than a xenon nucleus.\nIn their new analysis, the physicists examined electronic recoils in the first year’s worth of XENON1T data. They expected to see roughly 232 of these recoils, caused by known sources of background contamination. But the experiment saw 285 — a surplus of 53 that signifies an unaccounted-for source.\nThere are two interesting hypotheses to explain these excesses, one boring one, and then of course \"other.\" The interesting ones are axions from the Sun, and a large neutrino magnetic moment. The boring one is contamination by tritium. According again to the article:\nLuckily the physics community won’t have to wait long for answers; XENON1T’s successor, the XENONnT experiment — which will monitor for recoils in 8.3 metric tons of xenon — is on track to begin data collection later this year. So we ask:\nWill the XENON1T or successor experiment soon announce detection of either type of physics beyond the standard model? \nResolution is positive if by the end of 2022, a paper or preprint is published including results by XENON1T (likely in combination with additional results from XENONnT or elsewhere) claiming or better evidence for either solar axions or a large neutrino magnetic moment. Resolution is negative otherwise.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 40,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the Chinese state have collected 1 billion unique genomes from their population?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4676/when-will-the-chinese-state-have-collected-1-billion-unique-genomes-from-their-population/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[New York Times] (https://archive.vn/QxmYS#selection-369.0-369.13) (June 17, 2020) has an article on how the Chinese state is collecting a massive genomic database of 700 million men (full population coverage). This is used in order to fight crime, so far resulting in captures of otherwise elusive criminals (similar to in the USA, e.g. [Golden State Killer] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_State_Killer) ). The database will also present the Chinese government with enormous statistical power for genomics research that could be used to train very accurate genomic prediction models for medical and eugenic purposes (artificial selection). British intelligence researcher [Richard Lynn speculated already back in 2001] (https://www.amazon.com/Eugenics-Reassessment-Evolution-Behavior-Intelligence/dp/0275958221) that China would pursue such eugenic technology in the first half of the 21st century. In 2018, Chinese researcher He Jiankui [caused a shockwave when it was revealed] (https://archive.vn/fhVDM#selection-359.0-359.10) he had genetically altered embryos and which were later born as healthy babies. Many Western governments or government bodies are also pursuing large-scale genome biobank projects (e.g. [US Million Veteran Program] (https://www.research.va.gov/mvp/) ), though not so far at the scale of the Chinese program. Private consumer companies are [also building massive databanks] (https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-018-1506-1) .\nThe question is: When will the Chinese government have gathered genome-wide data on 1 billion citizens? \nThis question resolves positively when a reputable scientific source reports that Chinese has reached 1 billion genotyped or sequenced genomes from their own citizens (a reputable source is e.g. Nature News, MIT Tech Review, or similar, as well as any reviewed paper in the unlikely event that it is reported in a journal before a science news source).\nFurther details: \n--- \nThe date for resolving is the one where this goal was reached, not the reporting date. For the purpose of this question, whole genome sequencing and whole-genome microarray technology count\n--- \nBy citizens, we mean citizens of Mainland China, Macau and Hong Kong\n--- \nGenomes from monozygotic (identical) twins count as multiple different genomes for the purpose of this question\nGenotyping only counts if it is both broad (samples widely in the genome), and deep (samples many loci, say &gt;500k). \n",
    "# Forecasts": 23,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2031, will at least 90% of Open Philanthropy Project grant money be directed using effective altruist principles?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4677/in-2031-will-at-least-90-of-open-philanthropy-project-grant-money-be-directed-using-effective-altruist-principles/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "71%",
    "Description": "[The Open Philanthropy Project] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/) makes charitable grants based on what could be described as [effective altruist principles] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/about/vision-and-values) : \"global humanitarianism\", \"risk tolerance and patience\", and \"action in the face of humanity\".\nMore broadly, the justification for a grant could be considered to fall under \"effective altruist principles\" if it is made due to a belief that it represents among the best uses of money for improving the world, without regard to favoring a particular group, nation, species, etc., and without regard to the grantmaker's personal connection to or feelings about the cause.\nIn the year 2031, will at least 90% of Open Philanthropy Project grants, on a dollar-weighted basis, be directed according to these principles?\nThe question can be judged using Open Phil's grant writups ( [example] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/focus/global-catastrophic-risks/biosecurity/center-for-population-level-bioethics-general-support) , which generally refer to cause reports ( [example] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/research/cause-reports/biosecurity) ), and the cause reports provide justification for why the cause is a high priority under effective altruist principles. If the outcome is disputed, a panel of three admins will vote on how it should resolve, possibly with input from the question author.\nJudging this question affirmatively does not require that people agree on whether Open Phil is succeeding according EA principles, only that it is attempting to follow them. People can reasonably disagree about which causes are the most effective.\nIf Open Phil makes less than $1 million in grants in 2031, the question resolves as ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 27,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will at least one US state secede from the Union before 31 December, 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4678/will-at-least-one-us-state-secede-from-the-union-before-31-december-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "3%",
    "Description": "The United States of America has in the past acquired new territories, such as the [Alaskan purchase of 1867] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_Purchase) , and the purchase of the [former Danish West Indies in 1917] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danish_West_Indies) . Sometimes territories have changed status, such as when [Hawaii became a state in 1959] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii_Admission_Act) . However, no state has so far left the union without a civil war ensuing and eventually causing its [reintegration] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War) . However, there are currently active secessionist movements in several US states, some which have appreciable levels of support. A 2014 poll showed that [58% of Alaskans favored a secession from the union] (https://www.unz.com/anepigone/support-for-secession-by-state/) . Will a US state agree to leave the union before end of 2030?\nThe question resolves in the affirmative if any US state leave the union. \nResolution details:\n--- \nThe procedure to leave the US state need not go through official legislative channels (e.g. introducing a bill to leave the union and this bill receives majority support in the state legislature)\n------In case the process does not occur through official legislative channels, the question resolves positively if credible news media reports that the US State has seceded, or has been ejected out of the union \n--- \nPositive resolution requires the relevant state to have existed at least one year prior to its secession\n------For example, granting entry to the union to some territory, and subsequently revoking it within one year is not sufficient for positive resolution \n",
    "# Forecasts": 92,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the population size of India surpass the population size of China?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4680/when-will-the-population-size-of-india-surpass-the-population-size-of-china/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "You can find the (estimated) real-time population size of India [here] (https://countrymeters.info/en/India) , and the real-time population size of China [here] (https://countrymeters.info/en/China) . On what date will India show a higher population count than China?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 186,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the real GDP/capita of the USA be in 2024 if Donald Trump is reelected president?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4688/what-will-the-real-gdpcapita-of-the-usa-be-in-2024-if-donald-trump-is-reelected-president/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "What will the real GDP per capita of the United States be (in 2020 dollars) in 2024 if Donald Trump is elected president in the 2020 USA presidential election?\nThis question resolves to the real annual GDP per capita of the United States for 2024, according to [FRED's Real gross domestic product per capita dataset] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/A939RX0Q048SBEA) (converted into 2019 USD, using [FRED's delfator series] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPDEF#0) ).\nIf Donald Trump is not elected for any reason, question resolves ambiguously.\nNote that the question resolves positively, even if Donald Trump does not serve the full duration of his term (for example if he never assumes office).\nThis is is part of a pair of questions along with a similar question about [Joe Biden] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4689/what-will-the-real-gdpcaptia-of-the-usa-be-in-2024-if-joe-biden-is-elected-president/) inspired by [this post] (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/qZXy8kGkNFyqCfHEJ/you-can-do-futarchy-yourself) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 88,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will The Boring Company tunnel faster than a snail?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4692/when-will-the-boring-company-tunnel-faster-than-a-snail/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[The Boring Company] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Boring_Company) is a company that constructs and operates tunnel boring machines (TBMs), with the aim of substantially improving the speed and cost of tunnel boring. The tunnels are initially being proposed for use in train-like transport between fixed stops, but The Boring Company's stated long-term goal is to establish a vast tunnel network similar to current road networks. It was established in 2016 by Elon Musk and SpaceX employees, after Musk became frustrated at Los Angeles traffic.\nApparently, typical TBMs can tunnel through the earth at a sustained rate of [60 feet] (https://www.quora.com/How-fast-can-a-tunnel-boring-machine-drill-under-good-conditions-How-does-it-go-that-fast) (18 m) per day. Recently, The Boring Company completed its [second tunnel] (https://twitter.com/boringcompany/status/1261078175234191360) in Las Vegas. As the second 0.8-mile tunnel was supposedly started after the first one was finished on [February 14th] (https://twitter.com/boringcompany/status/1228391734213660672) , the second tunnel was dug was roughly 47 feet (14 m) per day, including time spent on e.g. constructing the stations at each end. This is comparable to other modern machines, but still far from their goal of tunneling as fast as a snail; in 2008, the world championship snail racer moved at a rate of [~0.0016 m/s] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snail_racing) or 140 m/day, about ten times faster.\nThe Boring Company has a number of ideas to improve tunneling speed, including nonstop tunneling (putting in supports while the machine is still boring), increased power, reduced tunnel diameter, etc. It started with an off-the-shelf TBM named [Godot] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Boring_Company#Boring_machines) and has developed or is developing improved TBMs named Line-storm and Prufrock; it is not clear which was used to bore the Las Vegas tunnel.\nWhen will The Boring Company dig a tunnel at a rate of 140 meters per day?\n---This question may resolve if The Boring Company or its representative issues a statement that one of its TBMs is currently tunneling, or has tunneled, at a rate of at least 140 meters per day (even momentarily, e.g. 6 m in one hour). \n---This question may also resolve if some tunnel, at least 1 km long, is completed at a rate of at least 140 meters per day, from the moment that the TBM starts boring the earth at the entrance, to when it breaks through the exit. \n---This must be accomplished by one TBM, not e.g. 10 TBMs all tunneling at 14 m/day. \n---If neither of the first two conditions is satisfied by the end date, this question resolves as the upper bound. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 89,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will Gross World Product be in 2047, in trillions of US$?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4694/what-will-gross-world-product-be-in-2047-in-trillions-of-us/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In [Modeling the Human Trajectory] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/sites/default/files/Modeling-the-human-trajectory.pdf) , David Roodman introduces an internally consistent statistical model of world economic history. It casts a Gross World Product (GWP) series as a sample path whose specification is a stochastic calculus-based growth model.\nTheir univariate fit implies that, conditional on the 2019 GWP, explosion to infinity is essentially inevitable. It finds a median explosion date of 2047.\nAs of 2018, GWP was $82 trillion in 2010 US$.\nWhat will real Gross World Product be in 2047, in trillions of 2020 US$?\nReal Gross World Product is determined by a reliable source of global economic data, such as [the World Bank] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 111,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the total expenditures of the United Nations System in 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4696/what-will-be-the-total-expenditures-of-the-united-nations-system-in-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nIn 2018, the [United Nations System] (https://www.unsystem.org/content/un-system) (the United Nations and its six principal organs) spent approximately 52.78 billion USD on its various operations, as [reported in the CEB Financial Statistics database] (https://www.unsceb.org/content/FS-F00-05?gyear=2018) .\n\nQuestion\n========\n\nWhat will the total expenditures of the United Nations System be for the year 2050, in billions of US dollars?\n\nResolution\n==========\n\nResolution is through any of the following sources, in descending order of priority:\n---A report from the Chief Executives Board for Coordination \n---A report from another body of the United Nations \n---A statement by a United Nations spokesperson \n---A report by another credible source \nIf the United Nations does not exist as an organization in 2050, this question resolves as 0.\nIf the United Nations reports its expenditures in a currency other than United States dollars, and the United States dollar is still an internationally recognized currency, the value given will be converted to United States dollars using the [ UN Operational Rates of Exchange] (https://treasury.un.org/operationalrates/default.php) . If the UN Operational Rates of Exchange do not exist at that time, any other method of conversion may be used subject to the discretion of Metaculus admins. \nIf the United Nations reports its expenditures in a currency other than United States dollars, and the United States dollar is no longer used internationally, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of vehicles on US roads will be fully electric by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4701/what-percentage-of-vehicles-on-us-roads-will-be-fully-electric-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nIn 2018 there were just over 1 million electric vehicles on American roads, a milestone for the industry that took eight years to arrive at. As EV popularity and manufacturing capacity trend upward, the [Edison Electric Institute] (https://www.edisonfoundation.net/en/publications/publications?category=Report) [predicts] (https://www.edisonfoundation.net/-/media/Files/IEI/publications/IEI_EEI-EV-Forecast-Report_Nov2018.ashx) the jump to the next million US EV’s will only require three years, expecting that number to climb to 18.7 million by 2030. With [273.6 million vehicles] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/183505/number-of-vehicles-in-the-united-states-since-1990/#:~:text=How%20many%20registered%20motor%20vehicles,at%206.3%20million%20in%202016.) registered in the US in 2018, EV’s then represented .36% of the vehicles on the road. The Edison Institute predicts that number will rise to 7% by 2030.\nMany electric vehicle batteries rely on lithium to run, and analysts are speculating on the potential impacts of the coronavirus on the supply of lithium batteries as an intervening factor in the industry’s growth. Chinese suppliers produced 79% of the lithium hydroxide used in all electric vehicles in 2019. With the rise of the pandemic, Chinese battery manufacturers have limited or stopped all production and lithium prices are beginning to rise. \n[Forbes reports] (https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielcohen/2020/03/25/manufacturers-are-struggling-to-supply-electric-vehicles-with-batteries/#15708fd91ff3) : \nWhile most of the manufacturers have already restarted their production, the outbreak is estimated to set Chinese battery producers back by 26GWh of output in 2020.This halt in production has created supply shortages for western carmakers, as automakers, such as Fiat Chrysler, PSA Group, General Motors, Daimler and Ford, have their plants in the province of Hubei, where the Coronavirus took its first hit.\n\nQuestion\n========\n\nWhat percentage of vehicles on US roads will be fully electric by 2030? \n\nResolution\n==========\n\nThis question resolves as the percentage of US cars on the road that are fully electric, according to the number of EV's reported by [ZSW Data service] (https://www.zsw-bw.de/mediathek/datenservice.html) and the total number of US vehicles reported by [Statista] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/183505/number-of-vehicles-in-the-united-states-since-1990/#:~:text=How%20many%20registered%20motor%20vehicles,at%206.3%20million%20in%202016.) . Should these services be discontinued, comparable credible sources will be utilized in their place, as determined by Metaculus admins.\n\nRelated Questions\n=================\n\n--- [When will electric cars constitute over 5% of the US passenger car fleet?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3658/when-will-electric-cars-constitute-over-5-of-the-us-passenger-car-fleet/) \n--- [How many new electric vehicles will be registered worldwide, in the calendar year 2023?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3542/how-many-new-electric-vehicles-will-be-registered-worldwide-in-the-calendar-year-2023/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 50,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will US domestic passenger air travel return to 80% of pre-COVID-19 volumes?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4719/when-will-us-domestic-passenger-air-travel-return-to-80-of-pre-covid-19-volumes/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nFollowing the outbreak of COVID-19 in the US in February 2020, a series of [international travel restrictions] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travel_restrictions_related_to_the_COVID-19_pandemic#Non-global_restrictions) and statewide [stay-at-home orders] (https://www.businessinsider.com/us-map-stay-at-home-orders-lockdowns-2020-3) were put in place. The [impact on the aviation industry] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_on_aviation) has been severe. According to [Conde Nast Traveler] (https://www.cntraveler.com/story/coronavirus-air-travel-these-numbers-show-the-massive-impact-of-the-pandemic) :\nOn April 7, the total amount of U.S. fliers [screened by the TSA] (https://www.tsa.gov/coronavirus/passenger-throughput) fell below 100,000 for the first time in the agency’s history. That’s a 95 percent drop compared to the passenger numbers from the same day in 2019, when 2,091,056 people passed through the checkpoints. Experts say the majority of those screened were airline crew members or healthcare workers heading to COVID-19 hot spots.\nSome states have [begun reopening] (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/states-reopen-map-coronavirus.html) , but domestic airline [executives] (https://thepointsguy.com/news/delta-air-lines-smaller-coronavirus/) [have] (https://thepointsguy.com/news/united-airlines-ceo-warns-of-a-smaller-carrier-post-coronavirus/) [warned] (https://thepointsguy.com/news/american-airlines-fight-for-our-lives-coronavirus/) that their operations may not come back in full force after the pandemic. \nThese were the domestic passenger Departures Performed numbers for the year of 2019:\n---January 2019 676,190 \n---February 2019 615,986 \n---March 2019 738,969 \n---April 2019 719,238 \n---May 2019 751,725 \n---June 2019 754,175 \n---July 2019 783,588 \n---August 2019 783,830 \n---September 2019 716,792 \n---October 2019 750,827 \n---November 2019 703,616 \n---December 2019 728,899 \n\nQuestion\n========\n\nWhen will US domestic passenger air travel return to 80% of pre-COVID-19 volumes? \n\nResolution\n==========\n\nThis question resolves as the first time when the total monthly US domestic passenger Departures Performed is at least 80% of that for the same month in 2019, according to [US Air Carrier Traffic Statistics] (https://www.transtats.bts.gov/TRAFFIC/) . \nTo pin down a specific day, we will linearly interpolate between the last day of the first month when the air passenger volume meets the threshold and the last day of the prior month. Specifically, let the difference at month be , and let be the last day of the last month with , and let be the last day of the first month with . Then the exact resolution date will be given by \n\nRelated Questions\n=================\n\n--- [Will American Airlines file for bankruptcy protection before 2021?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4415/will-american-airlines-file-for-bankruptcy-protection-before-2021/) \n--- [When will the suspension of incoming travel to the US from the Schengen area be terminated?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4291/when-will-the-suspension-of-incoming-travel-to-the-us-from-the-schengen-area-be-terminated/) \n--- [When will daily commercial flights exceed 75,000?] (https://pandemic.metaculus.com/questions/4347/when-will-daily-commercial-flights-exceed-75000/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 75,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will US auto manufacturing recover to 80% of pre-COVID-19 production levels?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4721/when-will-us-auto-manufacturing-recover-to-80-of-pre-covid-19-production-levels/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nThe automotive industry directly employs hundreds of thousands of people in the US, and indirectly affects the jobs of millions more through a complex and globally integrated supply chain.\nIn February 2020, the Bureau of Economic Analysis [reports] (https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/current/table3.htm) US automakers produced 11.4M cars and trucks, consistent with the average production rate of 11.5M cars and trucks per month between 2015-2019. In March, that number fell to 7.2M, and in April it cratered to 176,000. \nIn early May, news outlets began [reporting] (https://www.npr.org/2020/05/04/850107160/u-s-automakers-are-slowly-rolling-toward-a-restart) small numbers of plant re-openings, as manufacturers prepared to resume operations with coronavirus protective measures in place. The first of the three biggest US automakers to make its move, Toyota began it’s reopening process on May 11, with [13 assembly plants] (https://www.expressnews.com/business/local/article/Toyota-reopens-San-Antonio-plant-12-others-in-15262985.php) coming back to work. Then nearly 20 GM assembly plants reopened on May 20, but the company has been forced to [close two plants] (https://driving.ca/chevrolet/auto-news/news/gm-ford-plants-are-latest-victims-of-bumpy-auto-industry-reopening) due to COVID-19 outbreaks. Similarly, when Ford began reopening on May 20, they were forced to [temporarily shut down production] (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ford-assembly-plant-chicago-workers-leave-coronavirus-covid-19-positive/) and send thousands of workers home.\nA Frost &amp; Sullivan auto industry analyst [wrote in April] (https://ww2.frost.com/frost-perspectives/the-automotive-industry-gears-up-to-navigate-the-new-normal/) :\nThe... likely scenario... I see unfolding is that of a Severe Pandemic where persistent bottlenecks will prevent manufacturing plants from realizing full capacity utilization in the near-term. Most countries will resume only partial vehicle production by mid-June before ramping up to full capacity by August. As a result, I anticipate annual light vehicle production volumes dropping by about 21% from 2019 levels before subsequently picking up pace in 2021 and finally overhauling 2019 levels by 2023.\nBut auto makers may be better prepared to deal with a severe economic downturn than they were in the previous major crisis. Lessons from the 2008 global financial crisis are front and center for auto executives right now, according to interviews conducted by [Automotive News Europe] (https://europe.autonews.com/automakers/auto-industry-uses-lessons-2008-recession-survive-corona-chaos) :\nExperts say automakers have taken steps to ‘crisis proof’ their businesses since 2008. Most notably, they have much more cash and available credit on their balance sheets.\nYet even with cash on hand and plant reopenings beginning, automakers face another challenge: global demand for cars had been [in decline] (https://www.businessinsider.com/automobile-car-industry-production-global-recession-2019-2) [well before] (https://www.businessinsider.com/automobile-car-industry-production-global-recession-2019-2) the global pandemic hit, which all adds up to intense speculation about what the “new normal” in the automotive industry will be. \n\nQuestion\n========\n\nWhen will US auto manufacturers produce autos and trucks at 80% of pre-COVID-19 closure levels?\n\nResolution\n==========\n\nThis question resolves as the first time when the total level of auto and truck production reaches at least 9.2M (i.e. 80% of the 11.5M per month level).\nTo pin down a specific day, we will linearly interpolate between the end of the last day of the first month when the production level meets the 9.2M threshold and the end of the last day of the prior month. Specifically, let be the last day of the last month with production 9.2M, and let be the last day of the first month with production . Then the exact resolution date will be given by: \n[Bureau of Economic Analysis] (https://www.bea.gov/) reports will be utilized for resolution, specifically [Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization] (https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/current/table3.htm) data.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 52,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the NYT end up publishing any articles mentioning SSC or SA in the next year?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4736/will-the-nyt-end-up-publishing-any-articles-mentioning-ssc-or-sa-in-the-next-year/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "57.99999999999999%",
    "Description": "Will the New York Times end up publishing any articles mentioning Slate Star Codex or Scott Alexander between 2020-07-01 and 2021-07-01?\nWe already have a Metaculus prediction about [if/when such an article is published it will include his full name] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4697/short-fuse-given-that-the-nyt-publishes-an-article-on-scott-alexander-will-it-include-his-full-name/) .\nHowever, that question very much depends on this one, whether they will go ahead with any article in the first place. Since if they are only 1% likely to go ahead then it might be moot whether the name would be included.\nIt doesn't have to be the currently anticipated article by the currently anticipated NYT author in the currently anticipated topic. Any author's NYT-published article in any topic that mentions either him or his blog is eligible to resolve this question positively.\nThis question resolves positively if any time between 2020-07-01 00:01 UTC and 2021-07-01 00:01 UTC any article is published on [nytimes.com] (http://nytimes.com) that mentions either \"Slate Star Codex\", \"SlateStarCodex\", \" [slatestarcodex.com] (http://slatestarcodex.com) \", or \"Scott Alexander\".\nOtherwise it resolves negatively at 2021-07-01 00:01 UTC. \nAnd it is clear they are referring to the author of SSC, not any other Scott Alexander. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 534,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the COVID-19 epidemic subside in Russia?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4737/when-will-the-covid-19-epidemic-subside-in-russia/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "According to [World Health Organization data] (https://covid19.who.int/explorer) , there have been 667.9 thousand total cases of COVID-19 in the Russian Federation. Russia now has the third highest number of infections in the world, after the United States and Brazil. The [7-day total of new infections] (https://covid19.who.int/region/euro/country/ru) in Russia peaked on the 7 days up to May 12, at 76,873, and is now at 46,869.\nWhen will the 7-day total of new cases in Russia drop below 1000?\nThis question resolves positive when the [WHO Russian Federation situation page] (https://covid19.who.int/region/euro/country/ru) , or the latest WHO [situation report] (https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports) , indicates that there have been &lt;1000 confirmed cases in Russia in the last 7 days (i.e. 143 per day). If WHO situation reports are not available, admins may choose another international data source, or resolve ambiguous, based on their best judgment. This question resolves retroactively 2 weeks before said date.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 227,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the major Las Vegas casinos shut down again due to an increase in Covid-19 cases?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4739/will-the-major-las-vegas-casinos-shut-down-again-due-to-an-increase-in-covid-19-cases/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "42%",
    "Description": "Following the COVID-19 pandemic, Las Vegas casinos started to close down in mid-March. On March 17, Nevada's governor [ordered all non-essential businesses to close] (https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/sisolak-to-order-statewide-closure-of-non-essential-businesses-including-casinos-following-in-footsteps-of-other-states) . On June 4, the [Wynn, Bellagio and Caesar's Palace] (https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2020-06-04/after-historic-casino-closure-gambling-returns-to-las-vegas) casinos re-opened. \nThere are currently rumors that the casinos will be [shut down again] (https://vitalvegas.com/some-las-vegas-casinos-could-temporarily-close-again-due-to-covid-19-concerns/) due to a rise in coronavirus cases.\nWill the major Las Vegas casinos shut down again due to an increase in Covid-19 cases?\nThe question resolves positively if, at some point in time between this question's open date and May 2021, all 3 of the Wynn, Bellagio and Caesar's Palace are simultaneously closed to the general public due to Covid-19, as reported by a credible source.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 298,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Mount Rushmore be intentionally destroyed or modified before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4742/will-mount-rushmore-be-intentionally-destroyed-or-modified-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "[New York Times published an article on 1st July 2020] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/01/us/mount-rushmore.html) reporting on the history of the famous [Mount Rushmore] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Rushmore) in South Dakota. [Their tweet announcing the article says] (https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1278387954440904704) \"Mount Rushmore was built on land that belonged to the Lakota tribe and sculpted by a man who had strong bonds with the Ku Klux Klan. It features the faces of 2 U.S. presidents who were slaveholders.\". Considering the many recent removals of statues in the USA ( [especially of persons related to the Confederate states] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Removal_of_Confederate_monuments_and_memorials) ) and elsewhere (e.g. [in the UK] (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-53194684) ) in recent months, it seems within reason that some kind of action against Mount Rushmore might be taken.\nWill Mount Rushmore be intentionally destroyed or modified before 2025?\nThis question resolves positively if, before 2025, Mount Rushmore is damaged or modified, either with the complete removal of one or more faces or other substantial modification. The damage must be such that a typical person viewing before-and-after pictures of the full monument on a monitor can immediately identify the damaged version (admins will use their judgment in edge cases). \nThe relevant damage must be substantial and result in the structure not being fully repaired or restored within a ten day period.\nFurthermore, one of the two conditions must be true:\n---The damage/modification occurs as ordered by a US state or governmental entity \n---A person or group damages Mount Rushmore without authorization, and explicitly states that their motivation was in some way related to racial inequality, slavery, or police brutality, and not, for example, tax protest or the Illuminati. \nHence, incidental damage (natural disasters, foreign nuclear strikes, etc.) is not counted.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 138,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the United States Environmental Protection Agency pass a PFAS Maximum Contaminant Level rule for all municipal water systems in the United States by January 1, 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4759/pfas-max-contaminant-levels-in-drinking-water/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "62%",
    "Description": "PFAS were first developed in the 1940s by DuPont. By the 1950s, 3M began manufacturing various PFAS (including PFOA and PFOS) for consumer and commercial product applications (including Scotchguard and Teflon). Currently many products are still manufactured that contain PFAS including everything from [food containers] (https://chemicalwatch.com/81116/chipotle-defends-biodegradable-packaging-amid-pfas-findings) to firefighting foam to non-stick cookware.\n[PFAS can cause multiple detrimental effects] (https://www.hugendubel.info/annotstream/2244006827638/PDF/DeWitt-Jamie-C./Toxicological-Effects-of-Perfluoroalkyl-and-Polyfluoroalkyl-Substances.pdf) including but not limited to reproductive &amp; developmental problems, liver &amp; kidney damage, tumors and immunological effects in laboratory animals. The most consistent findings are increased cholesterol levels among exposed populations.\n[Studies have shown] (https://www.cdc.gov/biomonitoring/PFAS_FactSheet.html#:~:text=In%20the%20Fourth%20National%20Report,Survey%20(NHANES)%20since%201999) PFAS to be in the blood serum samples of nearly everyone human tested, every body of water, rain, snow, and even bottled water - all which indicate widespread human exposure.\nAs of September 18, 2020, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) “ToxCast Chemical Inventory” stated that there are [430 different chemicals in the PFAS group] (https://comptox.epa.gov/dashboard/chemical_lists/epapfasinv) . The EPA collected data on six Perfluorinated Compounds [Third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule] (https://www.epa.gov/dwucmr/third-unregulated-contaminant-monitoring-rule) yet has not proposed any Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) standards since the UCMR3 study.\nThis question resolves positively if the [United States Federal Register] (https://www.federalregister.gov/) lists a MCL rule for PFAS in for all sizes of public drinking water systems in the United States by January 1, 2030.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 24,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a G4 EA H1N1 flu virus pandemic before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4763/will-there-be-a-g4-ea-h1n1-flu-virus-pandemic-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2%",
    "Description": "In June 2020, [a new strain of flu that has the potential to become a pandemic was identified in China by scientists.] (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/health-53218704) \nAccording to the BBC: \nIt emerged recently and is carried by pigs, but can infect humans, they say.\nThe researchers are concerned that it could mutate further so that it can spread easily from person to person, and trigger a global outbreak.\nThe virus, which the researchers call G4 EA H1N1, can grow and multiply in the cells that line the human airways.\nThey found evidence of recent infection in people who worked in abattoirs and the swine industry in China when they looked at data from 2011 to 2018.\nCurrent flu vaccines do not appear to protect against it, although they could be adapted to do so if needed.\nThe virus is related to the H1N1/09 strain responsible for the 2009 swine flu pandemic, and also distantly to the strain which caused the 1918 flu pandemic (both are H1N1 flu strains).\n[A peer-reviewed paper from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)] (https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/06/23/1921186117) stated that \"G4 EA H1N1 viruses possess all the essential hallmarks of being highly adapted to infect humans ... Controlling the prevailing G4 EA H1N1 viruses in pigs and close monitoring of swine working populations should be promptly implemented.\"\nThis question asks: Before 1 January 2025, will any major organization with responsibility for public health matters, such as the World Health Organization or a successor organization, declare that a G4 EA H1N1 swine influenza virus pandemic has begun?\nFor a positive resolution, a major public health organization, including but not limited to the WHO, CDC, or a United Nations health agency, must confirm (via press release, news bulletin, or other public statement) that a human pandemic connected to a G4 EA H1N1 swine influenza virus has begun. This statement must be issued prior to 1 January 2025. In the event that no such statement is issued prior to 1 January 2025, this question shall resolve negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 60,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the USA enter a second civil war before July 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4764/will-the-usa-enter-a-second-civil-war-before-july-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "Context\n\nAlthough democracies are generally unlikely to enter civil war (see this [list of civil wars] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_civil_wars#1945_to_2020) for a rough overview), the United States faces a particularly unusual situation at the moment. The current [COVID-19 pandemic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic) , [social protests] (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/03/us/george-floyd-protests-crowd-size.html) , effects of [social media platform manipulation] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PGm8LslEb4) , and the upcoming [presidential election] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election) all have the potential to disrupt social cohesion and garner negative attitudes toward the government.\nThis question asks, Will the United States of America (USA) enter a second civil war before July 2021?\n\nResolution Criteria\n\nThis question will resolve as positive iff on or by 1 July 2021 at least two reputable news agencies describe the USA as being in a state of civil war. For the purpose of this question, reputable news agencies are: Agence France-Presse (AFP), Associated Press (AP), Reuters and EFE.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 1195,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Scott Morrison be Prime Minister of Australia on 1 July 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4774/will-scott-morrison-be-prime-minister-of-australia-on-1-july-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "96%",
    "Description": "Australia's parliamentary system gives members of the party in government the ability to vote on their leader, and so change the ruling Prime Minister outside of an election.\nAustralia's recent political history has also been characterised by frequent ' [leadership spills] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leadership_spill) '. In the last 13 years, there have been four successful leadership spills by the party in government, and [five separate Prime Ministers] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prime_ministers_of_Australia) .\nIn late 2019 and early 2020, Scott Morrison (the Prime Minister of Australia at the time of writing) saw a number of challenges to his popular approval, including controversy over [a trip to Hawaii] (https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/dec/21/scott-morrison-hawaii-horror-show-pr-disaster-unfolded) during a catastrophic bushfire season. Since the last election, at least one [poll] (https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/newspoll) indicates that the two major parties have been within four points of one another. Given Australia's recent history of 'leadership spills', this question asks: \nWill Scott Morrison be Prime Minister of Australia on 1 July 2021?\nThis question will resolve as positive if, on 1 July 2021, the Australian government's official Prime Minister website ' [pm.gov.au] (https://www.pm.gov.au/) ' lists 'Scott Morrison' as the current Prime Minister, negative if another name is listed, and ambiguous otherwise.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 126,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will more than two nuclear weapons in total have been detonated as an act of war by 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4779/will-more-than-two-nuclear-weapons-in-total-have-been-detonated-as-an-act-of-war-by-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "In the last 75 years, two nuclear weapons have been detonated as an act of war; the [bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki) in 1945, at the end of WWII. Despite tensions being high between the US and the USSR during the Cold War, and [several close calls] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_close_calls) , there have been no additional nuclear weapons detonated as acts of war. \nCurrently, estimated nuclear weapon stockpiles are 15,000 warheads worldwide, mostly in the US and Russia, and there are eight or nine states that possess nuclear weapons (China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, United States, India, North Korea, Pakistan, and [Israel] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_and_Israel) which remains officially ambiguous). The use of these nuclear weapons [could be catastrophic] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1494/ragnar%25C3%25B6k-question-series-if-a-global-catastrophe-occurs-will-it-be-due-to-nuclear-war/) .\nThis question asks:\nWill more than two nuclear weapons in total have been detonated as an act of war by 2050?\nResolution will be by credible media reports. Only deliberate nuclear attacks by nations count for the purpose of resolution. Attacks using [strategic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_nuclear_weapon) and [tactical] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_nuclear_weapon) nuclear weapons are both sufficient to qualify.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 88,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "While cryopreservation using fixatives is available, how many times more likely will someone be to be revived by 2200 if they are cryopreserved using fixatives than without?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4780/while-cryopreservation-using-fixatives-is-available-how-many-times-more-likely-will-someone-be-to-be-revived-by-2200-if-they-are-cryopreserved-using-fixatives-than-without/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [Large Mammal BPF Prize] (https://www.brainpreservation.org/large-mammal-announcement/) was won in 2018 by a technique called Aldehyde-Stabilized Cryopreservation. ASC uses glutaraldehyde to crosslink the brain's proteins in place; this removes the possibility of restoration of biological function, but protects the tissue from decay due to autolysis or putrefaction. Glutaraldehyde fixation is currently used in neuroscience to prepare brain tissue for electron microscopic and immunofluorescent examination.\nAlcor, a major cryonics provider, is skeptical of fixatives and does not currently offer ASC. [Ralph Merkle, writing for Alcor, writes] (https://alcor.org/Library/html/does-cryonics-offer-false-hope.html) :\nRather obviously, if you want to cryopreserve someone you’d rather not perfuse them with glutaraldehyde. It’s a fixative. On the other hand, if you don’t use glutaraldehyde, then you’re going to get dehydration and shrinkage, which means you won’t get the pretty pictures that neuroscientists like.\nSo, what’s your preference? Better pictures, or better biological viability? The neuroscientists want the pictures. Alcor has traditionally worked to achieve better biological viability.\n[...] The cryobiological experts who advise Alcor favor the use of Alcor’s current protocol (or we would have changed it).\nThe Brain Preservation Foundation, which awarded the $80,000 prize for ASC, is more hopeful, claiming that these better pictures make the brain more suitable for eventual resurrection via scanning and uploading.\nWhat will the value (% of people cryopreserved while fixatives are available, who are cryopreserved using fixatives, who are revived) / (% of people cryopreserved while fixatives are available, who are cryopreserved without using fixatives, who are revived) be at the start of 2200?\nThis counts only the people who are cryopreserved while fixatives are available, so that the question measures only the effect from using fixatives, and not general improvement in cryonics between 1967 and whenever fixatives become available, and from later techniques which would supersede fixatives. \n\"Available\" means that a cryonics organisation officially offers cryopreservation using fixatives to its members.\n\"Revival\" means that the person would be able to meet the standard described in [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3382/what-will-the-earliest-preservation-date-of-any-resuscitated-cryonics-patient-be/) ; either through conducting that specific test, or by some measurement that is equivalent such as official statistics on the health of revived patients.\nIf nobody is revived from cryopreservation before 2200, or nobody is cryopreserved using fixatives, then this resolves ambiguously. If the only people revived are those who were preserved using fixatives, then this resolves above the upper end of the scale.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 23,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If the NYT publishes an article mentioning Slate Star Codex or Scott Alexander by July 2021, will it include his full name?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4783/if-the-nyt-publishes-an-article-mentioning-slate-star-codex-or-scott-alexander-by-july-2021-will-it-include-his-full-name/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "85%",
    "Description": "On June 22nd, Scott Alexander took down the blog Slate Star Codex due to an in-progress article by a technology reporter from the New York Times, replacing it with [a post] (https://slatestarcodex.com/2020/06/22/nyt-is-threatening-my-safety-by-revealing-my-real-name-so-i-am-deleting-the-blog/) explaining his rationale. According to Alexander, the journalist was going to publish Scott's real name in association with his blog in this article, as part of a general NYT policy of including real names in articles.\nWhile [no article was published within two weeks] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4697/short-fuse-given-that-the-nyt-publishes-an-article-on-scott-alexander-will-it-include-his-full-name/) of this, the Metaculus community median currently assigns a high probability that some article mentioning the topic [will be released by July 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4736/will-the-nyt-end-up-publishing-any-articles-mentioning-ssc-or-sa-in-the-next-year/) . \nIf the NYT publishes an article mentioning Slate Star Codex or Scott Alexander before July 2021, will it include his surname?\nIf the NYT publishes no such articles by that date, this will resolve ambiguously. If the NYT publishes multiple such article by that date, this will resolve positively if any of them contain his surname.\nA similar short-fuse [question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4697/short-fuse-given-that-the-nyt-publishes-an-article-on-scott-alexander-will-it-include-his-full-name/) resolved ambiguously on 2020-07-09.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 381,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of people cryopreserved between 2020 and 2050 will be revived by 2200?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4785/what-percentage-of-people-cryopreserved-between-2020-and-2050-will-be-revived-by-2200/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of 2019, over 400 people have been cryopreserved ( [175 at Alcor] (https://www.alcor.org/AboutAlcor/membershipstats.html) , [183 at the Cryonics Insitute] (https://www.cryonics.org/case-reports/) , [71 at KrioRus] (https://kriorus.ru/en/cryopreserved%20people) ), and many more people are members of cryonics organisations with arrangements to be cryopreserved after their deaths.\nCryopreservation currently involves replacing blood with a cryoprotectant and slowly cooling down a body to liquid nitrogen temperatures for long-term storage. The hope is that this preserves enough of the structure of the brain that, with advanced enough future technology, revival will eventually be possible.\nChances of revival may also be increasing over time, as [cryopreservation techniques become better] (https://waitbutwhy.com/2016/03/cryonics.html) and the institutional knowledge to get people cryopreserved sooner after death develops.\nI thus ask to what extent revival will be possible for people preserved in the next 30 years:\nWhat percentage of people who were initially cryopreserved between 2020 and 2050 will be revived by 2200?\n\"Revival\" means that the person would be able to meet the standard described in [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3382/what-will-the-earliest-preservation-date-of-any-resuscitated-cryonics-patient-be/) ; either through conducting that specific test, or by some measurement that is equivalent such as official statistics on the health of revived patients.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 35,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will artificial superintelligence precede the achievement of longevity escape velocity (if it is ever achieved)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4788/will-artificial-superintelligence-precede-the-achievement-of-longevity-escape-velocity-if-it-is-ever-achieved/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "70%",
    "Description": "[Longevity escape velocity] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longevity_escape_velocity) is a hypothetical situation in which life-extending medicine extends life\nlonger than the time that is passing. For example, in a given year in which longevity escape velocity would be maintained, technological advances would increase life expectancy more than the year that just went by.\nWill artificial superintelligence precede the achievement of longevity escape velocity (if it is ever achieved)?\nAn anti-aging therapy is said to lead to longevity escape velocity if more than one-half of 70-year-olds who take it within 5 years of its development are still alive after 50 years.\nFor the purposes of this question, the date of development of the therapy is the date in which the therapy is first given to human subjects. \nThis question resolves positively if, before an anti-aging therapy that leads to longevity escape velocity is first developed, an AI achieves generally superhuman performance across virtually all human activities of interest or an AI limited to answering questions achieves reliably superhuman performance across virtually all questions of interest (the criterion for superintelligence is the same as the one used in [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4123/after-an-agi-is-created-how-many-months-will-it-be-before-the-first-superintelligence/) ).\nSuccessful creation of either type of artificial superintelligence would presumably be extremely obvious and uncontroversial, with a great amount of media coverage and scientific attention. However, if there is significant disagreement over whether a given apparent achievement resolves the question, it will be determined by Metaculus moderator.\nIf no anti-aging therapy that leads to longevity escape velocity is developed before this question's resolve date, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 73,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a universal flu vaccine be available?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4791/when-will-a-universal-flu-vaccine-be-available/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Although there is a vaccine against influenza, the influenza virus' rapid mutation rate means that the vaccine must be [reformulated each year] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza#Vaccination) in order to protect against the strains that are expected to be most common. The inconvenience of getting a flu vaccine every year may contribute to low flu vaccination coverage (roughly [37% of adults in the US] (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/fluvaxview/coverage-1718estimates.htm) in 2017). Furthermore, unlike many other vaccines, the flu vaccine is far from a guarantee of protection, with effectiveness as low as [40%] (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/2019-2020.html) , partially because the vaccine only covers the three or four most common strains.\nFor at least a decade, various groups such as [BiondVax] (http://www.biondvax.com/) and [Distributed Bio] (https://www.distributedbio.com/centivax) have been working on a universal flu vaccine, which would not need to be reformulated each year. A highly effective universal flu vaccine combined with a strong vaccination campaign could lead to the flu being virtually eliminated in some places, as with other diseases such as measles and tuberculosis. However, even a moderately effective universal flu vaccine might substantially increase vaccination coverage and reduce flu severity.\nWhen will a universal flu vaccine be available?\n---To be considered available, a vaccine must be approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicine Agency. The resolution date is the first date of approval. \n---A universal flu vaccine must meet one of the following conditions.\n------The vaccine is effective for multiple years. That is, the FDA/EMA endorses that it may be received less than once per year. \n------The vaccine is effective against unseen strains. That is, the FDA/EMA endorses the use of a version of the vaccine that was formulated without using the WHO's current yearly recommended vaccine composition (or any similar yearly recommendation). \n---Beyond the above conditions, there are no specific requirements on effectiveness. \n---It is acceptable if the universal flu vaccine is recommended in conjunction with, and not as a replacement to, traditional flu vaccines. \n---Since even existing flu vaccines may provide some residual protection against the flu, the vaccine in question must be described or advertised as being universal, broad-spectrum, etc. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 63,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the mass of the next fundamental particle to be discovered be, in eV?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4794/what-will-the-mass-of-the-next-fundamental-particle-to-be-discovered-be-in-ev/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In 2012, the [Higgs boson] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson) was discovered by the Large Hadron Collider with a mass of eV. This observation of the Higgs completed the [Standard Model] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model) , of which the Higgs mechanism was an important theoretical but experimentally unobserved part.\nThere remain unexplained facts about physics and [theoretical difficulties with current models of physics] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_beyond_the_Standard_Model) that might be explained by the introduction of new fundamental particles. One popular extension to the standard model is [supersymmetry] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersymmetry) , which predicts that each particle has a heavier supersymmetric partner.\nThere are proposals for larger particle accelerators that could probe collisions at higher energies, such as the [Future Circular Collider] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_Circular_Collider) which, if constructed, would have a center of mass collision energy of eV, though [physicists are sceptical] (https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/1/22/18192281/cern-large-hadron-collider-future-circular-collider-physics) that any new physics would be discovered by them. One particularly exciting form of new physics that could be discovered would be a particle in their energy range. Thus, I ask:\nWhat will the mass of the next fundamental particle to be discovered be, in electronvolts (eV)?\nResolution will be the average mass listed for the particle by [Particle Data Group] (http://pdglive.lbl.gov/Viewer.action) once scientific consensus emerges that the particle observed is a new fundamental particle. If multiple new particles are discovered in the same window of time, the first will be considered to be the first to have been observed, even if it was not known to be a new fundamental particle at the time.\nThe question resolves ambiguously if no new fundamental particle is discovered by 2070.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 36,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many states will have legalized medical or recreational use of psilocybin before 2045?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4796/states-with-legal-psilocybin-by-2045/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "For a historical comparison, the first initiative proposing legalization of cannabis was in Calfornia in 1972. In 1996, California became the [first state to legalize medical use of cannabis.] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_in_California) Key figures involved in initiating the \"war on drugs\" have admitted they [lied] (https://www.healthline.com/health-news/benefits-of-medical-mushrooms) about important aspects of why that was initiated.\nPsilocybin is part of a family of substances illegal in a large majority of countries despite claims of substantial potential [benefits] (https://www.healthline.com/health-news/benefits-of-medical-mushrooms) from a growing number of physicians and scientists.\nIf the US starts to move towards the legalization of psilocybin, this may be seen as an important [battle] (https://voicesofdemocracy.umd.edu/buchanan-culture-war-speech-speech-text/) in the [\"Culture War\"] (https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-cannabis-culture-wars/) going on in the United States.\nThis question asks: How many states will legalize medical or recreational use and distribution of psilocybin before 2045?\nRelated questions: [Will Oregon vote to legalize medical use of Psilocybin in 2020?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3121/will-oregon-vote-to-legalize-medical-use-of-psilocybin-in-2020/#comment-35324) \n[Votes for Oregon Psilocybin Program] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4804/votes-for-oregon-psilocybin-program/) \nResolution Criteria:\nThis question will be judges according to links to articles from the New York Times or Washington Post posted in the comment section.\nIf the US ceases to exist as a unified country with 50 states in the current territory of the 50 US states before 2045 this question will be judged as ambiguous. That would be the case for example if there is more than one UN member state in the present territory of the US or most of territory of a US state is ceded to Mexico or Canada.\nAdmission of additional states can be handled by just upping the current upper boundary.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 27,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will Tesla's market capitalization be on 1 January 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4798/what-will-teslas-market-capitalization-be-on-1-january-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In early 2020, US automaker [Tesla, Inc.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla,_Inc.) became America's most valuable automobile manufacturer, and [saw its market capitalization eclipse that of GM and Ford combined] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-stocks-tesla/teslas-market-value-zooms-past-that-of-gm-and-ford-combined-idUSKBN1Z72MU) , climbing to over $89 billion by January 9 2020.\nTesla's stock price continued to rise sharply in the first half of 2020, despite CEO Musk tweeting on May 1 [\"Tesla stock price is too high imo.\"] (https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1256239815256797184) \nAs of July 12 2020, Tesla's stock is valued at $1,545 per share, and its market capitalization is $286.33 billion - [making Tesla more valuable than Ford, GM, BMW, Daimler and Volkswagen combined] (https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1281679937410404352) , and [making Elon Musk richer than Warren Buffett.] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-10/elon-musk-rockets-past-warren-buffett-on-billionaires-ranking?sref=DOTC0U32&amp;utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_content=business&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&amp;cmpid=socialflow-twitter-business) \nThis question asks: On January 1 2030, what will Tesla's market capitalization be in billions of nominal US dollars?\nThis question will resolve as Tesla's market capitalization as of 00:00 UTC on January 1 2030. If Tesla is no longer a publicly traded company at that time, this question will resolve ambiguously. If Tesla is acquired or merges with a public company that is at least 2x larger by market cap, this question immediately resolves as ambiguous. Otherwise, all acquisitions and mergers cause the resulting company to be considered Tesla for the purposes of this question (even if it is called something else). If Tesla spins off or sells parts of itself, the admins will decide which part will inherit the Tesla identity or possibly resolve ambiguous; other things being equal, the larger part, or the part that is still called \"Tesla\" (rather than \"Grohmann Automation\" or \"Tesla Energy\", say), should inherit the Tesla identity.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 63,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Vladimir Putin cease to hold the office of President of Russia?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4799/when-will-vladimir-putin-cease-to-hold-the-office-of-president-of-russia/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin) , born 7 October 1952, is a Russian politician and former intelligence officer who has served as President of Russia since 2012, previously holding the position from 1999 until 2008. He was also the Prime Minister of Russia from 1999 to 2000 and again from 2008 to 2012.\nUnder Putin's leadership, Russia has experienced democratic backsliding. Experts do not generally consider Russia to be a democracy, citing jailing of political opponents, curtailed press freedom, and the lack of free and fair elections.\nRussia has scored poorly on Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index, the Economist Intelligence Unit's Democracy Index and Freedom House's Freedom in the World index (including a record low 20/100 rating in the 2017 Freedom in the World report, a rating not given since the time of the Soviet Union). Human rights organizations and activists accuse Putin of persecuting political critics and activists as well as ordering them tortured or assassinated; he has rejected accusations of human rights abuses.\nIn June 2020, [Putin said he’ll consider running for a fifth presidential term in 2024, arguing that the hunt for any successor risks paralyzing Russia’s government.] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-21/putin-hints-he-could-seek-a-fifth-term-as-president-in-2024?utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&amp;utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_content=business&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;cmpid=socialflow-twitter-business) \nThis question asks: When will Vladimir Putin cease to hold the office of President of Russia?\nThis question resolves as the date on which Vladimir Putin ceases to be President of Russia, whether due to resignation, loss of an election, death in office, incapacity to serve, or removal from office via either a legal process or a coup. \nIn the event that while Putin is serving as President, some other individual is temporarily acting as President, e.g. in the event that Putin has to undergo surgery or some other medical procedure, this shall not be considered Putin 'ceasing to be President of Russia' unless Putin has not, within 30 days, resumed his duties as President.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 106,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many people will die as a result of the most deadly earthquake in the 2020s?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4812/how-many-people-will-die-as-a-result-of-the-most-deadly-earthquake-in-the-2020s/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "On Friday March 11, 2011, the [Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_T%C5%8Dhoku_earthquake_and_tsunami) hit Japan causing unprecedented economic damage, and killing 15,899 people. Just one year prior, however, the 2010 Haiti earthquake was even more devastating, with a death toll estimated to be 100,000 according to [the U.S. Geological Survey] (https://web.archive.org/web/20130507101448/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/world/most_destructive.php) .\nSee [this Wikipedia page] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_natural_disasters_by_death_toll#Deadliest_earthquakes) for the deadliest earthquakes in history. How many people will die in the deadliest Earthquake after midnight January 1st 2020 and before midnight January 1st 2030? The final resolution is determined by estimates from the following, when provided within 2 years of the earthquake, and in order of priority,\n1-- \nThe national government of the nation widely recognized to have been most impacted by the earthquake.\n2-- \nThe U.S. Geological Survey.\n3-- \nThe local government widely recognized to have been most impacted by the earthquake.\n4-- \nA prominent scientific study. The one with the most citations according to Google Scholar wins.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 102,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "As of July 1st, 2022, when will top forecasters expect the first Artificial General Intelligence to be developed and demonstrated?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4815/as-of-july-1st-2022-when-will-top-forecasters-expect-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-to-be-developed-and-demonstrated/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Artificial general intelligence is a hypothetical machine system that has the capacity to learn and perform the same general-purpose reasoning and problem-solving tasks humans can.\nJudging by [existing] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/384/human-machine-intelligence-parity-by-2040/) [questions] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of/) on the topic, artificial general intelligence is unlikely to arrive soon, and we will therefore receive little direct feedback on our ability to forecast questions related to its development. \nOne thing we can do to to achieve tighter feedback loops is to make forecasts about future forecasts. These future forecasts will integrate evidence that is currently inaccessible. Forecasts about forecasts inclines us to explicitly think about how our evidence about when we will have artificial general intelligence will likely evolve over time. \nWhat will be the median of the Metaculus prediction for the question [when will the first Artificial General Intelligence system be developed and demonstrated] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of/) , on July 1st 2022?\nThis question resolves as the median of the Metaculus prediction on the question [when will the first Artificial General Intelligence system be developed and demonstrated] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of/) as of July 1st 2022, at 12PM EST.\n[The relevant question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of/) has the following resolution criteria:\nFor these purposes we will thus define \"an artificial general intelligence\" as a single unified software system that can satisfy the following criteria, all easily completable by a typical college-educated human.\n--- \nAble to reliably pass a Turing test of the type that would win the [Loebner Silver Prize] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/73/will-the-silver-turing-test-be-passed-by-2026/) . \n--- \nAble to score 90% or more on a robust version of the [Winograd Schema Challenge] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/644/what-will-be-the-best-score-in-the-20192020-winograd-schema-ai-challenge/) , e.g. the [\"Winogrande\" challenge] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10641) or comparable data set for which human performance is at 90+%\n--- \nBe able to score 75th percentile (as compared to the corresponding year's human students; this was a score of 600 in 2016) on all the full mathematics section of a circa-2015-2020 standard SAT exam, using just images of the exam pages and having less than ten SAT exams as part of the training data. (Training on other corpuses of math problems is fair game as long as they are arguably distinct from SAT exams.)\n--- \nBe able to learn the classic Atari game \"Montezuma's revenge\" (based on just visual inputs and standard controls) and explore all 24 rooms based on the equivalent of less than 100 hours of real-time play (see [closely-related question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/486/when-will-an-ai-achieve-competency-in-the-atari-classic-montezumas-revenge/) .) \nBy \"unified\" we mean that the system is integrated enough that it can, for example, explain its reasoning on an SAT problem or Winograd schema question, or verbally report its progress and identify objects during videogame play. (This is not really meant to be an additional capability of \"introspection\" so much as a provision that the system not simply be cobbled together as a set of sub-systems specialized to tasks like the above, but rather a single system applicable to many problems.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 110,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Derek Chauvin be acquitted of all murder charges?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4816/will-derek-chauvin-be-acquitted-of-all-murder-charges/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "71%",
    "Description": "Derek Chauvin [is] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derek_Chauvin) ,\nan American former police officer charged with the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on May 25, 2020. During an arrest made by Chauvin and three other officers, he knelt on George Floyd's neck for almost eight minutes while Floyd was handcuffed and lying face down on a street. The death set off a series of protests around the world.\nChauvin was fired by the Minneapolis Police Department the day after the incident. He was initially charged with third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter; a charge of second-degree murder was later added.\nSome have suggested that he will be acquitted of his murder charges. From [a Medium post] (https://medium.com/@gavrilodavid/why-derek-chauvin-may-get-off-his-murder-charge-2e2ad8d0911) ,\nThere are six crucial pieces of information — six facts — that have been largely omitted from discussion on the Chauvin’s conduct. Taken together, they likely exonerate the officer of a murder charge. [...]\n1-- \nGeorge Floyd was experiencing cardiopulmonary and psychological distress minutes before he was placed on the ground, let alone had a knee to his neck.\n2-- \nThe Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) allows the use of neck restraint on suspects who actively resist arrest, and George Floyd actively resisted arrest on two occasions, including immediately prior to neck restraint being used.\n3-- \nThe officers were recorded on their body cams assessing George Floyd as suffering from “excited delirium syndrome” (ExDS), a condition which the MPD considers an extreme threat to both the officers and the suspect. A white paper used by the MPD acknowledges that ExDS suspects may die irrespective of force involved. The officers’ response to this situation was in line with MPD guidelines for ExDS.\n4-- \nRestraining the suspect on his or her abdomen (prone restraint) is a common tactic in ExDS situations, and the white paper used by the MPD instructs the officers to control the suspect until paramedics arrive.\n5-- \nFloyd’s autopsy revealed a potentially lethal concoction of drugs — not just a potentially lethal dose of fentanyl, but also methamphetamine. Together with his history of drug abuse and two serious heart conditions, Floyd’s condition was exceptionally and unusually fragile.\n6-- \nChauvin’s neck restraint is unlikely to have exerted a dangerous amount of force to Floyd’s neck. Floyd is shown on video able to lift his head and neck, and a robust study on double-knee restraints showed a median force exertion of approximately approximately 105lbs.\nThis question resolves positively if Derek Chauvin is acquitted of ALL murder charges OR all murder charges against him are dropped. Otherwise, it resolves negatively. If he dies before resolution, the question resolves ambiguously.\nOnly convictions for offences actually called \"murder\" trigger negative resolution ; conviction for other offences such as manslaughter does not.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 487,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will EA Global London 2021 be cancelled, rescheduled, or moved online?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4821/will-ea-global-london-2021-be-cancelled-rescheduled-or-moved-online/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "74%",
    "Description": "[Effective Altruism Global] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_Altruism_Global) , abbreviated EA Global, is a series of philanthropy conferences that focuses on the effective altruism movement. [EA Global London 2021] (https://www.eaglobal.org/events/london2020/) is scheduled to be held in London, UK from to 30 April 2021 to 2 May 2021. In 2020, EA Global conferences in London and San Francisco were both cancelled due to COVID-19.\nWill EA Global: London 2021 be cancelled, rescheduled, or moved online?\nThe question resolves negatively if the EA Global London 2021 takes place in the originally scheduled physical location at the scheduled dates. It resolves positively if the event is cancelled or the dates are moved, or if the venue is moved online or away from London. Note that resolution does not require COVID-19 — or anything else — to be cited as a reason for any changes to the event.\nThere were 2 previous questions on 2020 EA Global conferences (which — unlike this question — asked about cancellation/rescheduling due to COVID-19 specifically):\n[EA Global San Francisco 2020] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3756/will-ea-global-san-francisco-be-cancelled-or-rescheduled-due-to-covid-19/) \n[EA Global London 2020] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4318/will-ea-global-london-2020-be-cancelled-or-rescheduled-due-to-covid-19/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 121,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any Wirecard executive receive a custodial sentence for their involvement in the Wirecard collapse?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4826/will-any-wirecard-executive-receive-a-custodial-sentence-for-their-involvement-in-the-wirecard-collapse/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "66%",
    "Description": "Wirecard uncovered a €1.9bn hole in its balance sheet in June 2020. \nThe company had faced accusations for some time that it has been engaged in accounting fraud.\nMore details can be found here:\n--- [https://www.ft.com/content/284fb1ad-ddc0-45df…] (https://www.ft.com/content/284fb1ad-ddc0-45df-a075-0709b36868db) \n--- [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirecard_scandal] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirecard_scandal) \nMarkus Braun, Oliver Bellenhaus have been arrested by German prosecutors. Alexander von Knoop and Susanne Steidl are under investigation. Jan Marsalek is a fugitive with an active arrest warrant.\nThis question resolves true if any senior Wirecard executives are given a custodial sentence for crimes relating to fraud at Wirecard. This list includes:\n---Markus Braun \n---Jan Marsalek \n---Alexander von Knoop \n---Susanne Steidl \n---Jan Marsalek \n---Oliver Bellenhaus \nThe imprisonment must be as a result of a conviction, pre-trial detainment will count if the court uses it as part of the sentence (eg time-served). Any country's court system is valid, although the conviction needs to related to Wirecard.\nConvictions in absentia will not result in the question resolving positive unless they are eventually caught and serve their punishment\n",
    "# Forecasts": 35,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the global fertility rate be in 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4830/what-will-the-global-fertility-rate-be-in-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The age-specific fertility rate is the number of children born per woman per year for women at a specified age. Integrating over a lifetime gives a metric called the [total fertility rate] (https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate#data-quality-definition) , which is the average number of children that a woman would have if all the age-specific fertility rates stayed constant. \nGlobally, the total fertility rate was [2.49 children per woman] (https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate#50-years-ago-the-average-woman-had-five-children-since-then-the-number-has-halved) in 2015, down from 5.05 in 1950. This large decline is part of what is known as the [demographic transition] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition) from high birth rates and high child mortality to low birth rates and low child mortality. The causes of this include more women in education and work, as well as greater access to contraception. \nA [recent study] (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-53409521) by researchers at the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation extrapolates trends in education and contraception access and predicts that this decline in fertility rates will continue, reaching 1.33-2.08 in 2100.\nWhat will the global total fertility rate be in 2050?\nResolution will be by the figure for the year 2050 published by the [UN Population Division] (https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/) or other appropriate branch of the UN/WHO in the first edition released after 2050. If a figure is only available for a range of time of no more than 5 years that includes 2050, resolve at that value. If no such figures are available, then resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 25,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the 7-day moving average of daily confirmed COVID-19 cases first drop below 10% of a previous peak in the US?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4831/when-will-the-7-day-moving-average-of-daily-confirmed-covid-19-cases-first-drop-below-10-of-a-previous-peak-in-the-us/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [COVID-19 pandemic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic) is an ongoing global pandemic of [coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus_disease_2019) , that has spread to multiple world regions. It is caused by the [SARS-CoV-2 virus] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severe_acute_respiratory_syndrome_coronavirus_2) , first identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. As of July 15, 2020, [more than 13.3 million cases have been confirmed globally, 3.43 million of which in the United States] (https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-data) .\nOn March 13, 2020, Trump [declared a National Emergency concerning the COVID-19 outbreak in the United States] (https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/proclamation-declaring-national-emergency-concerning-novel-coronavirus-disease-covid-19-outbreak/) .\nThis question resolves as the date on which the seven-day [simple moving average] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_average#Simple_moving_average) of daily confirmed COVID-19 cases in the US, as reported by [the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control] (https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/download-todays-data-geographic-distribution-covid-19-cases-worldwide) , is equal to or lower than 10% of its highest previous value. More specifically, it resolves as the date in the output of the following Python program (if/when it outputs any date):\nimport pandas as pd csv_file = pd.read_csv(\"https://opendata.ecdc.europa.eu/covid19/casedistribution/csv\") us_data = pd.DataFrame(csv_file[csv_file['countriesAndTerritories'] == 'United_States_of_America']).iloc[::-1] us_data['new_cases_rolling_averages'] = us_data.iloc[:,4].rolling(window=7).mean() maximum = us_data['new_cases_rolling_averages'].max() index_of_maximum = us_data.loc[us_data['new_cases_rolling_averages'] == maximum].index[0] date_of_resolution = us_data.loc[ (us_data['new_cases_rolling_averages'] &lt;= 0.1 * maximum) &amp; (us_data['new_cases_rolling_averages'].index &lt;= index_of_maximum)].head(1)['dateRep'] print(date_of_resolution) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 216,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the VIX index fall below 20?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4833/when-will-the-vix-index-fall-below-20/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The CBOE’s Volatility Index ($VIX), also known as the ‘fear index’, measures expected 30-day volatility in the US stock market.\nVIX represents the expected range of the S&amp;P 500 at a 68% confidence level — a VIX of 20 represents the expectation of annualized price movement in the next 30 days of &lt;20%, equivalent to a 30 day movement of (20% ÷ √12 =) ±5.77%.\nBetween 2004 and 2019, the average closing price of the VIX was 18.2. Having opened 2020 at 13.46, it spiked substantially during the COVID sell-off in March, reaching an all-time intraday high of 85.5 on March 18th, then falling to its current value of 28.00. A full series of VIX prices since its 2002 inception is available [here] (http://www.cboe.com/products/vix-index-volatility/vix-options-and-futures/vix-index/vix-historical-data) . Live-updated chart [here] (https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EVIX) .\nThe question will resolve on the first date that the closing price of VIX is below 20.0, as per the CBOE's daily updated [csv file] (http://www.cboe.com/publish/scheduledtask/mktdata/datahouse/vixcurrent.csv) (or if unavailable, any other report from CBOE). Intraday price movements will not count towards resolution.\nCompanion question:\n--- [When will the VIX index climb above 50?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4834) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 231,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the VIX index climb above 50?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4834/when-will-the-vix-index-climb-above-50/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The CBOE’s Volatility Index ($VIX), also known as the ‘fear index’, measures expected 30-day volatility in the US stock market.\nIt represents the expected range of the S&amp;P 500 at a 68% confidence level — a VIX of 20 represents the expectation of annualized price movement in the next 30 days of &lt;20%, or 30-day movement of (20 ÷ √12=) ± 5.77%.\nBetween 2004 and 2019, the average closing price of the VIX was 18.2. Having opened 2020 at 13.46, it spiked substantially during the COVID sell-off in March, reaching an all-time intraday high of 85.5 on March 18th, then falling to its current value of 28.00. A full series of VIX prices since its 2002 inception is available [here] (http://www.cboe.com/products/vix-index-volatility/vix-options-and-futures/vix-index/vix-historical-data) . Live-updated chart [here] (https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EVIX) .\nThe question will resolve on the first date that the closing price of VIX is above 50.0, as per the daily updated [csv file] (http://www.cboe.com/publish/scheduledtask/mktdata/datahouse/vixcurrent.csv) (or if unavailable, any other report from CBOE). Intraday price movements will not count.\nCompanion question:\n--- [When will the VIX index fall below 20?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4833/when-will-the-vix-index-fall-below-20/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 90,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will China's Tianwen-1 rover successfully land on Mars?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4836/will-chinas-tianwen-1-rover-successfully-land-on-mars/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "68%",
    "Description": "China's [Tianwen-1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tianwen-1) mission is expected to launch in late July of 2020. It consists of an orbiter, lander and rover. This question asks:\n\"Will China's Tianwen-1 rover successfully land on Mars?\"\nThe question resolves positive if the rover lands successfully and is able to travel at least 30 meters on the surface of Mars after landing and will resolve positive based off of credible media reporting that this has happened.\nThe question will resolve negatively if a mission identified as Tianwen-1 fails for any reason (explodes at launch, fails to survive descent to Mars surface, unable to establish communication, rover does not travel at least 30 meters and is unable to move further) based off of credible media reporting that this has happened.\nThe question resolves ambiguously if no mission identified as Tianwen-1 attempts to launch before December 31st, 2023.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 103,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Blue Origin send a paying customer to space?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4841/when-will-blue-origin-send-a-paying-customer-to-space/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon and [the world's richest human] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World's_Billionaires#2020) , has invested significant resources in his aerospace company [Blue Origin] (https://www.blueorigin.com/) . While Blue's long-term goal is to establish a large permanent presence of humans in space, its first major project was the [New Shepard] (https://www.blueorigin.com/new-shepard/) reusable launch vehicle, intended to take humans and payloads into space for brief periods of time.\nIn 2015, New Shepard became the first booster rocket to reach space and land vertically (although it was succeeded by SpaceX's Falcon 9, an orbital rocket that landed vertically, and preceded by NASA's Space Shuttle, an orbital rocket that landed horizontally). However, five years later, New Shepard has made a total of twelve publicly-known flights and has still never flown humans.\n\nWhen will Blue Origin send a paying customer to space?\n\n---This question resolves as the date when Blue Origin or its successor organization (where succession through mergers, etc. is at the discretion of the admins) sends paying customer(s) to space, as determined by credible media reports. \n---A paying customer is a human that either pays Blue Origin for the flight, or is paid for by another organization such as NASA. It must be evident that money or equivalent consideration (stock, etc.) changed hands in an arm's-length transaction. In particular, they cannot be Blue Origin employees, test pilots, or investors. \n---The customer(s) in question must exceed an altitude of 100 km, return to Earth, and safely exit the launch vehicle. \n---The vehicle need not be New Shepard, but Blue Origin must be the primary manufacturer. \n---If it turns out that this has already occurred (as Blue Origin often announces an achievement well after the fact), the question resolves as the lower bound, not as ambiguous. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 77,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will virtual reality headset sales exceed 10 million units per year?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4845/when-will-virtual-reality-headset-sales-exceed-10-million-units-per-year/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "After decades of being relegated to niche industries and a [failed first wave] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_reality#1970%E2%80%931990) in the 1990s, virtual reality has once again emerged in the last decade as a promising consumer product. With the launch of the Oculus Rift, HTC Vive, and PSVR in 2016, and continued investment by companies such as Facebook, Sony and Valve, virtual reality headsets are now experiencing a second wave of popularity. However, at this time VR headsets remain a relatively niche product; [total PSVR sales] (https://uploadvr.com/psvr-sales-analysis/) are estimated at about 5 million or 5% of PS4 sales, Oculus Quest sales were estimated at [less than 1 million] (https://qz.com/1739575/strong-oculus-quest-sales-boost-facebooks-non-advertising-revenue/) late last year, etc.\nWhen will 6DoF, controller-enabled, virtual reality headset sales exceed 10 million units per year?\n---For the purposes of this question, a virtual reality headset has the following characteristics:\n------It is a headset, i.e. a device that attaches to one's head and displays content in front of one's eyes, rather than e.g. a neural chip or a holodeck room. \n------It is virtual reality, i.e. in primary usage it completely or almost completely occludes the outside world, rather than laying an image over it as in augmented reality. \n------It must have 6 degrees of freedom (6DoF tracking); that is, it must track both the 3-dimensional direction that the user is facing, and the 3-dimensional location of the user. \n------It must either be bundled with hand controllers which are similarly 6DoF-tracked, or such compatible controllers must be sold separately (first-party, not from an aftermarket manufacturer). In particular, PSVR qualifies due to the PS Move controllers. 6DoF hand-tracking without physical controllers may qualify only if it is sufficiently precise that it can recognize individual finger motions accurately enough to play 2016 VR games, as judged by the admins. \n------Phone adapters, etc. do not count (even if they had 6DoF tracking); the device in question must be marketed primarily as a headset. \n------There are no further restrictions on price, feature set, method of tracking, tethered vs. standalone, or computing power. \n------For clarity, the following current headsets qualify: HTC Vive family, Oculus Rift family, Oculus Quest, Valve Index, PSVR, Windows MR. \n------The following headsets do not qualify: Oculus Go, Samsung Gear VR, Google Cardboard/Daydream, Magic Leap One, Microsoft Hololens. \n---This question resolves as the first date in which it is determined that 10 million VR headsets were sold up to that date, in that year. \n---Sales are not prorated over time; for example, if a report indicates that 5 million headsets were sold in 2027, and 20 million were sold in 2028, this question resolves as December 31, 2028. If a manufacturer says that 12 million headsets were sold in Q1-Q3, this question resolves as the end of Q3, or September 30. \n---Sales may be computed by adding reports from different manufacturers, or from credible estimates from e.g. analytics firms such as Nielsen SuperData. However, note that any estimate combining multiple headsets must clearly include only qualifying headsets; an estimate of \"VR headsets\" in general may include many non-qualifying headsets. If a single source reports X total sales at the end of 2025 and Y total sales at the end of 2026, Y-X may be taken as the sales numbers for 2026, but this can only be done with two estimates from the same source, not different sources. \n---This question retroactively closes as the time when such a report (or the last such report, if multiple are combined) is made available. Therefore, this question could resolve prior to its closing date; for example, if a single company sells 10M headsets in 2029 but does not announce this until its earnings call in March 2030, the question retroactively closes in March 2030 but resolves as December 31, 2029. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 39,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will evidence of successful synthesis of the element ununennium be published?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4846/when-will-evidence-of-successful-synthesis-of-the-element-ununennium-be-published/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Currently, the heaviest known element is [oganesson] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oganesson) , with 118 protons. It was first synthesised in 2002 by the [Joint Institute for Nuclear Research] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Institute_for_Nuclear_Research) , by firing calcium-48 ions at a californium-249 target; these results were unconfirmed at the time and announced later after more experiments, in 2006, at which point three or four atoms of oganesson had been observed. It was [officially recognised] (https://iupac.org/discovery-and-assignment-of-elements-with-atomic-numbers-113-115-117-and-118/) by the IUPAC in 2015 and [named oganesson] (https://iupac.org/iupac-is-naming-the-four-new-elements-nihonium-moscovium-tennessine-and-oganesson/) in 2016. \nHeavier, with 119 protons, is ununennium. Past experiments to synthesise ununennium have been unsuccessful, with no ununennium atoms being measured, though experiments have been performed at [RIKEN] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riken) since 2018 and are planned at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in late 2020.\nUnunennium is even harder to synthesise than oganesson because it has a shorter half-life (estimated to be on the order of 10 microseconds, compared to the 700 microseconds for the [oganesson-294] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_oganesson#Oganesson-294) isotope first observed), and because the reactions that theoretically produce ununennium involve heavier elements themselves and have small cross sections for ununennium production.\nWhen will evidence of successful synthesis of the element ununennium be published?\nResolution will be the date of publication of the first paper that the IUPAC considers to meet the criteria for discovery of ununennium. If no announcement is made by the resolution date, then this resolves above the upper end of the scale.\nFor example, a corresponding question for oganesson would have resolved at 9th October 2006 as per [this IUPAC technical report] (http://publications.iupac.org/pac/pdf/2011/pdf/8307x1485.pdf) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 37,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In the 2024 US presidential election, how many states will use plurality voting methods to choose their electors?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4848/in-the-2024-us-presidential-election-how-many-states-will-use-plurality-voting-methods-to-choose-their-electors/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The president of the United States is chosen by the [electoral college] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Electoral_College#Summary) , a group of 538 electors drawn from the 50 states plus Washington DC. In the rest of this question, references to states also refer to Washington DC.\nThese electors are chosen by voting within each state. Historically this has been done by means of a [plurality vote] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plurality_voting) within the state, with the following exeptions:\n--- \n[Maine and Nebraska have historically used a congressional district method] (https://www.bustle.com/articles/191238-what-is-the-congressional-district-method-maine-nebraska-do-things-differently) , which amounts to plurality voting within districts, meaning that the state's electors may not all be from the same party.\n--- \n[Maine plans, in 2020] (https://thefulcrum.us/voting/maine-ranked-choice-voting) , to use a ranked choice voting method called [Instant Runoff] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting) in the presidential election.\nPlurality voting is notable for being both the most common method by which democratic states choose their governments, and the [worst voting method] (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254419149_And_the_loser_is_Plurality_Voting) according to voting experts.\nThis question asks:\nIn the 2024 US Presidential Election, how many states (plus Washington DC) will use plurality voting to choose their electors for the electoral college?\nResolution will be by credible media reports, in 2016 this question would have resolved as 51. \n--- \nStates using the congressional district method has no bearing on resolution; plurality congressional district counts as \"plurality\", while instant runoff congressional district counts as not.\n--- \nStates which use a combined method, for example choosing some fraction of electors using a plurality vote and then the rest using any other method, do not count as having used plurality voting.\n--- \nIf the electoral college is not used in 2024, the question resolves as ambiguous.\n--- \nIf the number of states (plus DC), changes, this question resolves as ambiguous, but should be replaced with a new question with an edited range. This obviously does not need to happen if Washington DC becomes a state.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 41,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a Science Fiction work originally written and published in Spanish by 2029 win any of the great international awards that recognize great authors in this genre?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4849/will-a-science-fiction-work-originally-written-and-published-in-spanish-by-2029-win-any-of-the-great-international-awards-that-recognize-great-authors-in-this-genre/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "27%",
    "Description": "Spanish Science Fiction has only a token presence internationally. In spite of pioneering works such as El Anacronopete, the first story involving a time machine, and prestigious authors like Miguel de Unamuno, Leopoldo Alas Clarin or Pedro Salinas writing SF stories, Spain has failed to impress the international readership with a universally embraced SF classic. Most writers and titles seem to be invisible not only to foreign readers and spectators, but also to their local peers, to the extent of being considered a \"phantom genre.\"\nThe Spanish-speaking public, however, enjoys science fiction like the rest of the world. Spanish literature does not lack imagination, and indeed has produced cultural phenomena such as magical realism during the Latin American Boom. Rapid technological development has made science fiction increasingly familiar, not only a resource for entertainment, but also a valuable tool in marketing or future studies. And numerous Spanish authors keep trying.\nWill a Science Fiction work originally written and published in Spanish by 2029 win any of the great international awards that recognize great authors of this genre? \nResolution will be positive if a short story, novelette, novella or novel originally written in Spanish and published by the end of 2029, in any medium, is granted one of the following awards: Hugo, Nebula, John W. Campbell, Theodore Sturgeon or Arthur C. Clarke, before the end of the year 2030.\n(Note: except for the Hugo Prize, these prizes currently require a previous translation into English. The answer will be positive if and only if the work was originally written and published in Spanish).\n-------- EN ESPAÑOL:\nEspaña tiene una presencia testimonial en el panorama internacional de la ciencia ficción. A pesar de que haber preconizado ideas como la máquina de tiempo (El Anacronopete) y de que autores de prestigio como Miguel de Unamuno, Leopoldo Alas Clarín o Pedro Salinas se aproximaran al género, la ciencia ficción española no ha logrado cautivar a los lectores extranjeros con un clásico universalmente aceptado y la mayoría de los escritores y títulos parecen invisibles, no solo fuera de España, sino también entre sus pares de profesión. Hay quien la ha llegado a describir como un «género fantasma».\nEl público español disfruta, sin embargo, con la ciencia ficción como en el resto del mundo, y la literatura en español no solo no carece de imaginación, sino que ha producido fenómenos culturales como el realismo mágico del boom latinoamericano. El rápido desarrollo tecnológico ha convertido a la ciencia ficción en algo cada vez más familiar, no solo un recurso para el entretenimiento, sino una herramienta para el marketing y el debate de ideas. Numerosos autores españoles lo siguen intentando.\n¿Ganará una obra de Ciencia Ficción escrita y publicada originalmente en español hasta el año 2029 incluido alguno de los grandes premios internaciones que acreditan a los grandes autores del género?\nLa respuesta será SI, si un cuento corto, novela corta (en cualquiera de sus extensiones) o novela escrita en castellano y publicada hasta el año 2029, en cualquier medio, recibe uno de los siguientes premios: Hugo, Nébula, John W. Campbell, Theodore Sturgeon o Arthur C. clarke, antes del cierre del año 2030.\n(Nota, en la actualidad excepto el premio Hugo al que podría acceder directamente una obra escrita en español, el resto requieren una traducción previa al inglés. La respuesta será positiva si y solo sí la obra fue escrita y publicada con anterioridad en español).\n",
    "# Forecasts": 54,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When (if ever) will a Manhattan/Apollo project toward AGI be launched?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4850/when-if-ever-will-a-manhattanapollo-project-toward-agi-be-launched/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "It is widely agreed amongst experts that Artificial General Intelligence — an AI that can flexibly and effectively perform a very wide range of cognitive tasks at least as well as humans — would represent a dramatic advance in power and capability for their developer. This has led to both speculation and concern that, recognizing this, countries or companies might launch \"Manhattan project\" style efforts to develop it. While shortening the timeline, these could easily lead to a race condition that compromises safety or alignment, or leads to adversarial dynamics during development. \nA [2020 paper] (http://dmip.webs.upv.es/EPAI2020/papers/EPAI_2020_paper_11.pdf?fbclid=IwAR15Z0CMX4rBBUJEHhn6NdcMK2ZCF07pPpkcmfD36_oEI9WhV310bRkbaiQ) analyzes this issue in some detail, focusing on the \"lead up\" to a Manhattan/Apollo project: what understanding must be in place be \"on the runway\"?\nAs an assessment of that question, we ask here:\nWhen will the first (of any) Manhattan/Apollo project toward AGI be launched? \nWe'll define this fairly simply: the project in question will be counted if:\n1-- \nIt has a stated aim to develop broad-purpose artificial intelligence system(s); and\n2-- \nIt is constituted so as to generate a single \"flagship\" system or small number of related systems (rather than a diverse portfolio of more narrowly-purposed ones); and\n3-- \nThere is a research and engineering budget under the direct control of a single (executive or board) project lead with a budget exceeding the equivalent of $10B in 2020 USD.\n\n\nSome fine print:\n--- \nQuestion will remain open until one year after the chosen resolve date, or 2050-01-01, whichever is sooner. It is open at both ends, so as to include, for example, any potential secret joint Estonia-New Zealand AGI project.\n--- \nThe project must be a single, unified one, under one directorship, not e.g. a general R&amp;D funding program distributed across many groups.\n--- \nFunding will be in 2020 USD using US CPI index inflation, and PPP-adjusted. \n--- \nNote that [the budgets of the Apollo and Manhattan projects were of order USD $80B.] (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34645.pdf) \n--- \nThere is no condition on total funding, but the $10B must be an in annual budget and allocated to, in principle, be spent in a year.\n--- \nResolution time will be, as best as discernible, the date at which the budget allocation to the project is made official by whatever entity is allocating the funding.\n--- \nIn the event that Metaculus should become highly influential and trusted, it is conceivable that this question itself could lead to adverse race dynamics. The author reserves the right to hide the community prediction, make this question private, delete it, etc., at his discretion.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 130,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the percentage of the world population in $1.90-a-day poverty be in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4851/what-will-the-percentage-of-the-world-population-in-190-a-day-poverty-be-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In 2015, 730 million people (9.9% of the world population) [lived in extreme poverty] (https://ourworldindata.org/extreme-poverty) , defined as having a consumption below $1.90 per day in 2011 dollars.\nIn recent decades, this has dropped massively, from 36% of the world's population in 1990; a large part of this decrease has been due to development in China and India, and now extreme poverty is increasingly concentrated in Sub-Saharan Africa.\n[SDG 1] (https://sdg-tracker.org/no-poverty) , one of the Sustainable Development Goals, is to eradicate extreme poverty by 2030. The World Bank [predicts] (https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/30418/9781464813306.pdf) that, if nations and regions maintain their current economic growth rates, 479 million people will still live in extreme poverty in 2030.\nWhat will the percentage of the world population in $1.90-a-day (2011 PPP) poverty be in 2030?\nResolution is by the World Bank's [World Development Indicators] (https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators) (World, Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day (2011 PPP) (% of population), 2030). If data for 2030 is not available, but data for later and earlier years are available, resolve at a linear interpolation between the known years. If no such data becomes available within ten years, resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 76,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many parameters will GPT-4 have (if it is released), in billions of parameters?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4852/how-many-parameters-will-gpt-4-have-if-it-is-released-in-billions-of-parameters/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "GPT stands for \"Generative Pre-Training\" and was introduced in [this paper] (https://cdn.openai.com/research-covers/language-unsupervised/language_understanding_paper.pdf) from OpenAI in 2018. [GPT-2] (https://openai.com/blog/better-language-models/) became famous in 2019 within the machine learning community for producing surprisingly coherent written text samples. It used 1.5 billion parameters. \nIn May 2020, OpenAI released [GPT-3] (https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165) , a 175 billion parameter model, widely regarded to have impressive language generation abilities. The massive increase in parameter count compared to GPT-2 is likely the result of a [previous investigation] (https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361) from OpenAI which revealed the relationship between neural language model size and performance. Many are now interpreting OpenAI's strategy as one intended to scale neural models to their ultimate practical limit. Gwern [writes] (https://www.gwern.net/newsletter/2020/05#gpt-3) , \nThe scaling hypothesis that, once we find a scalable architecture like self-attention or convolutions, which like the brain can be applied fairly uniformly (eg “The Brain as a Universal Learning Machine” or Hawkins), we can simply train ever larger NNs and ever more sophisticated behavior will emerge naturally as the easiest way to optimize for all the tasks &amp; data, looks increasingly plausible. [...]\nIn 2010, who would have predicted that over the next 10 years, deep learning would undergo a Cambrian explosion causing a mass extinction of alternative approaches throughout machine learning, that models would scale up to 175,000 million parameters, and that these enormous models would just spontaneously develop all these capabilities, aside from a few diehard connectionists written off as willfully-deluded old-school fanatics by the rest of the AI community.\nIf GPT-4 is released from OpenAI, how many parameters will it contain, in billions of parameters? Resolution is made via a report from OpenAI.\nIf OpenAI does not release GPT-4 by January 1st 2023, this question resolves ambiguously.\nIn case OpenAI does not explicitly refer to the relevant model as GPT-4, members of the community, community moderators or admin will do a strawpoll on the /r/openai subreddit and ask:\nIn your opinion, is it roughly correct to say that this model is the successor to GPT-3?\nAfter 1 week, the majority answer wins with a tie counting as \"yes\".\n",
    "# Forecasts": 329,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the cost of negative emissions sold by Climeworks in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4857/what-will-be-the-cost-of-negative-emissions-sold-by-climeworks-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Stripe, a financial-services company, [committed last year] (https://stripe.com/blog/negative-emissions-commitment) to spending at least $1M/year on negative emissions and carbon storage technologies, at any price, with the aim of helping these technologies develop.\nThey recently wrote up [a summary] (https://stripe.com/blog/first-negative-emissions-purchases) of their first set of these purchases.\nThis miniseries aims to predict the success of the companies that Stripe chose.\nStripe has purchased 322.5 tons of negative emissions from Climeworks at $775 per ton.\n[Climeworks] (https://www.climeworks.com/) uses renewable geothermal energy and waste heat to capture CO2 directly from the air, concentrate it, and permanently sequester it underground in basaltic rock formations with Carbfix. Their own price target in the long-term is $100-$200 per ton.\nThis question asks:\nOn 2030/7/1, what price will Climeworks charge to permanently capture and store one ton of CO2?\nThis question will resolve as the price per ton, in $USD charged by Climeworks for a 1kT purchase, payable immediately, of negative emissions using broadly similar&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; technology to that described above. \nIf Climeworks has merged with or been acquired by a different company, but that company is still selling negative emissions which make use of broadly similar* technology to that described above, this question resolves as the price that company charges.\nIf neither of the above resolutions are possible, either because Climeworks has switched to a very different negative emissions technology, or because it no longer exists, this question will resolve as ambiguous.\n*As judged by a metaculus admin.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 58,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the cost of negative emissions sold by Project Vesta in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4858/what-will-be-the-cost-of-negative-emissions-sold-by-project-vesta-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Stripe, a financial-services company, [committed last year] (https://stripe.com/blog/negative-emissions-commitment) to spending at least $1M/year on negative emissions and carbon storage technologies, at any price, with the aim of helping these technologies develop.\nThey recently wrote up [a summary] (https://stripe.com/blog/first-negative-emissions-purchases) of their first set of these purchases.\nThis miniseries aims to predict the success of the companies that Stripe chose.\nStripe has purchased 3333.3 tons of negative emissions from Project Vesta at $75 per ton. \n[Project Vesta] (https://projectvesta.org/) captures CO2 by using an abundant, naturally occurring mineral called olivine. Ocean waves grind down the olivine, increasing its surface area. As the olivine breaks down, it captures atmospheric CO2 from within the ocean and stabilizes it as limestone on the seafloor. They have not publicly set a long-term price target.\nThis question asks:\nOn 2030-07-01, what price will Project Vesta charge to permanently capture and store one ton of CO2?\nThis question will resolve as the price per ton, in $USD charged by Project Vesta for a 1kT purchase, payable immediately, of negative emissions using olivine. \nIf Project Vesta has merged with or been acquired by a different company, but that company is still selling negative emissions which make use of olivine, this question resolves as the price that company charges.\nIf neither of the above resolutions are possible, either because Project Vesta has switched to a very different negative emissions technology, or because it no longer exists, this question will resolve as ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 45,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the cost of carbon storage sold by CarbonCure in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4859/what-will-be-the-cost-of-carbon-storage-sold-by-carboncure-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Stripe, a financial-services company, [committed last year] (https://stripe.com/blog/negative-emissions-commitment) to spending at least $1M/year on negative emissions and carbon storage technologies, at any price, with the aim of helping these technologies develop.\nThey recently wrote up [a summary] (https://stripe.com/blog/first-negative-emissions-purchases) of their first set of these purchases.\nThis miniseries aims to predict the success of the companies that Stripe chose.\nStripe has purchased 2500 tons of carbon storage from CarbonCure at $100 per ton. Note that unlike two of the other companies in the series, CarbonCure does not capture CO2 directly, it sequesters CO2 which has already been captured by some other method.\n[CarbonCure] (https://www.carboncure.com/) sequesters CO2 in concrete by mineralizing it into calcium carbonate (CaCO3). This has the side effect of strengthening the concrete.\nThis question asks:\nOn 2030/7/1, what price will CarbonCure charge to permanently store one ton of CO2?\nThis question will resolve as the price per ton, in $USD charged by CarbonCure for a 1kT purchase, payable immediately, of carbon storage using broadly similar&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; technology to that described above. \nIf it is not possible to purchase storage alone from CarbonCure, because they now are focused only on combined Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), a Metaculus admin will ask CarbonCure to provide an estimate for the fraction of their CCS price that the storage is responsible for. If no such estimate is provided or publicly available, this question will resolve as the CCS price.\nIf CarbonCure has merged with or been acquired by a different company, but that company is still selling carbon storage which makes use of broadly similar* technology to that described above, this question resolves as the price that company charges. The CCS exception is dealt with as above.\nIf none of the above resolutions are possible, either because CarbonCure has switched to a very different negative emissions technology, or because it no longer exists, this question will resolve as ambiguous.\n*As judged by a metaculus admin.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 64,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the cost of carbon storage sold by Charm Industrial in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4861/what-will-be-the-cost-of-carbon-storage-sold-by-charm-industrial-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Stripe, a financial-services company, [committed last year] (https://stripe.com/blog/negative-emissions-commitment) to spending at least $1M/year on negative emissions and carbon storage technologies, at any price, with the aim of helping these technologies develop.\nThey recently wrote up [a summary] (https://stripe.com/blog/first-negative-emissions-purchases) of their first set of these purchases.\nThis miniseries aims to predict the success of the companies that Stripe chose.\nStripe has purchased 416 tons of carbon storage from [Charm Industrial] (https://charmindustrial.com/) at $600 per ton. Note that unlike two of the other companies in the series, Charm Industrial does not capture CO2 directly, sequesters CO2 which has already been captured by the growth of biomass by the production and injection of bio-oil into geologic storage. [Charm industrial has a long-term target of $45 per ton for carbon storage.] (https://charmindustrial.com/blog/2020/5/17/a-new-negative-emissions-method-and-our-first-customer) \nThis question asks:\nOn 2030/7/1, what price will Charm Industrial charge to permanently store one ton of CO2?\nThis question will resolve as the price per ton, in $USD charged by Charm Industrial for a 1kT purchase, payable immediately, of carbon storage using broadly similar&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; technology to that described above. \nIf it is not possible to purchase storage alone from Charm Industrial, because they now are focused only on combined Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), a Metaculus admin will ask Charm Industrial to provide an estimate for the fraction of their CCS price that the storage is responsible for. If no such estimate is provided or publicly available, this question will resolve as the CCS price.\nIf Charm Industrial has merged with or been acquired by a different company, but that company is still selling carbon storage which makes use of broadly similar* technology to that described above, this question resolves as the price that company charges. The CCS exception is dealt with as above.\nIf none of the above resolutions are possible, either because Charm Industrial has switched to a very different negative emissions technology, or because it no longer exists, this question will resolve as ambiguous.\n*As judged by a metaculus admin.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Climeworks still exist in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4862/will-climeworks-still-exist-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "38%",
    "Description": "Stripe, a financial-services company, [committed last year] (https://stripe.com/blog/negative-emissions-commitment) to spending at least $1M/year on negative emissions and carbon storage technologies, at any price, with the aim of helping these technologies develop.\nThey recently wrote up [a summary] (https://stripe.com/blog/first-negative-emissions-purchases) of their first set of these purchases.\nThis miniseries aims to predict the success of the companies that Stripe chose.\nStripe has purchased 322.5 tons of negative emissions from Climeworks at $775 per ton.\n[Climeworks] (https://www.climeworks.com/) uses renewable geothermal energy and waste heat to capture CO2 directly from the air, concentrate it, and permanently sequester it underground in basaltic rock formations with Carbfix. Their own price target in the long-term is $100-$200 per ton.\nThis question asks:\nOn 2030/7/1, will Climeworks still be selling negative emissions using broadly similar technology to their 2020 approach?\nThis question resolves positive if [this] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4857/what-will-be-the-cost-of-negative-emissions-sold-by-climeworks-in-2030/) question has an unambiguous resolution. Otherwise, it resolves negative.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 47,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Project Vesta still exist in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4863/will-project-vesta-still-exist-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "22%",
    "Description": "Stripe, a financial-services company, [committed last year] (https://stripe.com/blog/negative-emissions-commitment) to spending at least $1M/year on negative emissions and carbon storage technologies, at any price, with the aim of helping these technologies develop.\nThey recently wrote up [a summary] (https://stripe.com/blog/first-negative-emissions-purchases) of their first set of these purchases.\nThis miniseries aims to predict the success of the companies that Stripe chose.\nStripe has purchased 3333.3 tons of negative emissions from Project Vesta at $75 per ton.\n[Project Vesta] (https://projectvesta.org/) captures CO2 by using an abundant, naturally occurring mineral called olivine. Ocean waves grind down the olivine, increasing its surface area. As the olivine breaks down, it captures atmospheric CO2 from within the ocean and stabilizes it as limestone on the seafloor. They have not publicly set a long-term price target.\nThis question asks:\nOn 2030/7/1, will Project Vesta still be selling negative emissions using broadly similar technology to their 2020 approach?\nThis question resolves positive if [this] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4858/what-will-be-the-cost-of-negative-emissions-sold-by-project-vesta-in-2030/) question has an unambiguous resolution. Otherwise, it resolves negative.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 52,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will CarbonCure still exist in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4864/will-carboncure-still-exist-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33%",
    "Description": "Stripe, a financial-services company, [committed last year] (https://stripe.com/blog/negative-emissions-commitment) to spending at least $1M/year on negative emissions and carbon storage technologies, at any price, with the aim of helping these technologies develop.\nThey recently wrote up [a summary] (https://stripe.com/blog/first-negative-emissions-purchases) of their first set of these purchases.\nThis miniseries aims to predict the success of the companies that Stripe chose.\nStripe has purchased 2500 tons of carbon storage from CarbonCure at $100 per ton. Note that unlike two of the other companies in the series, CarbonCure does not capture CO2 directly, it sequesters CO2 which has already been captured by some other method.\n[CarbonCure] (https://www.carboncure.com/) sequesters CO2 in concrete by mineralizing it into calcium carbonate (CaCO3). This has the side effect of strengthening the concrete.\nThis question asks:\nOn 2030/7/1, will CarbonCure still be selling carbon storage using broadly similar technology to their 2020 approach?\nThis question resolves positive if [this] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4859/what-will-be-the-cost-of-carbon-storage-sold-by-carboncure-in-2030/) question has an unambiguous resolution. Otherwise, it resolves negative.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 34,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Charm Industrial still exist in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4865/will-charm-industrial-still-exist-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26%",
    "Description": "Stripe, a financial-services company, [committed last year] (https://stripe.com/blog/negative-emissions-commitment) to spending at least $1M/year on negative emissions and carbon storage technologies, at any price, with the aim of helping these technologies develop.\nThey recently wrote up [a summary] (https://stripe.com/blog/first-negative-emissions-purchases) of their first set of these purchases.\nThis miniseries aims to predict the success of the companies that Stripe chose.\nStripe has purchased 416 tons of carbon storage from Charm Industrial at $600 per ton. Note that unlike two of the other companies in the series, Charm Industrial does not capture CO2 directly, it sequesters CO2 which has already been captured by the growth of Biomass.\n[Charm Industrial] (https://charmindustrial.com/) sequesters CO2 which has already been captured by the growth of biomass by the production and injection of bio-oil into geologic storage.\nThis question asks:\nOn 2030/7/1, will Charm Industrial still be selling carbon storage using broadly similar technology to their 2020 approach?\nThis question resolves positive if [this] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4861/what-will-be-the-cost-of-carbon-storage-sold-by-charm-industrial-in-2030/) question has an unambiguous resolution. Otherwise, it resolves negative.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 29,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will photonic tensor cores be ubiquitous in machine learning by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4872/will-photonic-tensor-cores-be-ubiquitous-in-machine-learning-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "From [an article] (https://techxplore.com/news/2020-07-photon-based-enable-complex-machine.html) reporting on new developments in photonic tensor cores,\nA paper in the journal Applied Physics Reviews, by AIP Publishing, proposes a new approach to perform computations required by a neural network, using light instead of electricity. In this approach, a photonic tensor core performs multiplications of matrices in parallel, improving speed and efficiency of current deep learning paradigms.\nIn machine learning, neural networks are trained to learn to perform unsupervised decision and classification on unseen data. Once a neural network is trained on data, it can produce an inference to recognize and classify objects and patterns and find a signature within the data.\nThe photonic TPU stores and processes data in parallel, featuring an electro-optical interconnect, which allows the optical memory to be efficiently read and written and the photonic TPU to interface with other architectures.\nThe abstract from the [paper] (https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0001942) reads, \nWhile several photonic neural network designs have been explored, a photonic tensor core to perform tensor operations is yet to be implemented. In this manuscript, we introduce an integrated photonics-based tensor core unit by strategically utilizing (i) photonic parallelism via wavelength division multiplexing, (ii) high 2 peta-operations-per-second throughputs enabled by tens of picosecond-short delays from optoelectronics and compact photonic integrated circuitry, and (iii) near-zero static power-consuming novel photonic multi-state memories based on phase-change materials featuring vanishing losses in the amorphous state. Combining these physical synergies of material, function, and system, we show, supported by numerical simulations, that the performance of this 4-bit photonic tensor core unit can be 1 order of magnitude higher for electrical data. The full potential of this photonic tensor processor is delivered for optical data being processed, where we find a 2–3 orders higher performance (operations per joule), as compared to an electrical tensor core unit, while featuring similar chip areas.\nPhotonic tensor cores are said to be \"ubiquitous\" in machine learning by 2030 if all three of the top machine learning cloud computing services offer photonic tensor cores for training models. The top machine learning cloud computing services are taken to the top three services that are yielded by the DuckDuckGo search, \"machine learning cloud computing service\" (If DuckDuckGo is no longer available, the following take their place in order of priority: Google, Bing).\nThis question resolves positively if photonic tensor cores are ubiquitous in machine learning by 2030, and negatively otherwise.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 54,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will OpenAI reach its profit cap for the first round of investors by 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4873/will-openai-reach-its-profit-cap-for-the-first-round-of-investors-by-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "17%",
    "Description": "In 2019 OpenAI [launched] (https://openai.com/blog/openai-lp/) OpenAI LP,\na new “capped-profit” company that allows us to rapidly increase our investments in compute and talent while including checks and balances to actualize our mission.\nThe profit cap was intended to ensure that the company did not put profits before its humanitarian mission:\nThe fundamental idea of OpenAI LP is that investors and employees can get a capped return if we succeed at our mission, which allows us to raise investment capital and attract employees with startup-like equity. But any returns beyond that amount—and if we are successful, we expect to generate orders of magnitude more value than we’d owe to people who invest in or work at OpenAI LP—are owned by the original OpenAI Nonprofit entity. [...]\nReturns for our first round of investors are capped at 100x their investment (commensurate with the risks in front of us), and we expect this multiple to be lower for future rounds as we make further progress.\nIf by 2035, a credible media report indicates that OpenAI reached its profit cap for the first round of investors (that is, the funding round in July 2019 led by Microsoft and raising ~$1B), this question resolves positively. Otherwise, it resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 57,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a language model with at least 100B parameters trained to do external information retrieval exist before 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4876/will-a-language-model-with-at-least-100b-parameters-trained-to-do-external-information-retrieval-exist-before-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "51%",
    "Description": "A statistical language model is a probability distribution over sequences of words. Due to Google and OpenAI work big pre-trained language models gained recognition as a multitask and few-shot learners bringing as a step closer to general artificial intelligence.\nBig pre-trained language models contain a lot of implicit knowledge about the world, however retrieval of that knowledge is not always reliable. These models are also expensive to update with new knowledge, because to do so they would require additional training.\nOne way to address above issue could be augmenting language models with the capability of traditional search engines like Google. An example attempt at this task is the paper [REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Training] (https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.08909) utilizing relatively small 330M parameters model.\nThis question asks will a language model with at least 100B parameters trained to do external information retrieval exist before 2023?\nThis question will resolve positive when a language model with at least 100B parameters trained to do external information retrieval will be announced and negative if no such model will be publicly known to exists before 2023.\nImportantly, the model must have at least 100B parameters and it must be trained by some means to do external information retrieval as in the REALM paper mentioned above. Just augmenting 100B model with e.g. TF-IDF after per-training will not suffice. The model must be aware of the external information retrieval during the training procedure. The specifics of achieving that goal are not relevant, so any method applied during training will suffice.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 47,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a language model with at least 100B parameters be open sourced including for commercial use?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4877/when-will-a-language-model-with-at-least-100b-parameters-be-open-sourced-including-for-commercial-use/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A statistical language model is a probability distribution over sequences of words. Due to Google and OpenAI work big per-trained language models gained recognition as multitask and few-shot learners.\nRecently OpenAI released Generative Pretrained Transformer 3, commonly known by its abbreviated form GPT-3. GPT-3 is currently the largest language model and the successor to GPT-2. It was first announced in May 2020. OpenAI stated that full version of GPT-3 contains 175 billion parameters, two orders of magnitude larger than the 1.5 billion parameters in the full version of GPT-2. [OpenAI released full GPT-2 1.5B model on November 5, 2019 on modified MIT license] (https://openai.com/blog/gpt-2-1-5b-release/) . However, GPT-3 is not yet available.\nThis question asks when will a language model with at least 100B parameters be open sourced including for commercial use?\nThe question will resolve on a date when such model will be first available for download and is licensed in a way that allows free of charge commercial use. This explicitly includes licenses like MIT, Apache, BSD, GNU etc. and their derivatives as long as free of charge commercial use is allowed. Additionally, the model must at least partially match capabilities of GPT-3, especially good few-shot learning ability. Ongoing attempts at recreating GPT-3 should not be included until they are declared as finished by the authors.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 104,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will /r/themotte be banned from Reddit?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4881/when-will-rthemotte-be-banned-from-reddit/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "On June 29th 2020, Reddit admins [announced] (https://www.reddit.com/r/announcements/comments/hi3oht/update_to_our_content_policy/) a new policy banning hate speech from their website. Compared to what existed prior, the policy allows the admins to ban subreddits with greater discretion.\n[/r/themotte] (https://www.reddit.com/r/TheMotte/) is a subreddit started by readers of the blog [SlateStarCodex] (https://slatestarcodex.com/) after its writer Scott Alexander [indicated] (https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/02/22/rip-culture-war-thread/) he was unsatisfied with the reception of the so-called Culture War thread on /r/slatestarcodex. The culture war thread moved to /r/themotte thereafter. In the context of the recent policy announcement on Reddit, some have speculated that the subreddit /r/themotte may now be banned. When will this happen?\nIf /r/themotte is not banned from Reddit by 2026-1-1, this quesiton resolves as \"&gt; 2025-12-31\".\n",
    "# Forecasts": 93,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any of these Reddit alternatives be more popular than Reddit by 2026?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4882/will-any-of-these-reddit-alternatives-be-more-popular-than-reddit-by-2026/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "6%",
    "Description": "Reddit [is] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reddit) \nan American social news aggregation, web content rating, and discussion website.\nA host of Reddit alternative websites have been created, primarily as a response to perceived overreach of censorship on Reddit (especially of right wing points of view). \nThis question asks:\nWill any of the reddit alternatives listed below be more popular than Reddit in January 2026, as measured by [Alexa Traffic Rank] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexa_Internet#Alexa_Traffic_Rank) ?\nThe list of alternatives considered here have been curated from [this post] (https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditAlternatives/comments/hi97fz/list_of_active_reddit_alternatives_v5/) from the subreddit /r/RedditAlternatives. They are as follows:\n--- [minds] (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/minds.com) - [minds.com] (http://minds.com) \n--- [voat] (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/voat.co) - [voat.co] (http://voat.co) \n--- [steemit] (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/steemit.com) - [steemit.com] (http://steemit.com) \n--- [papaly] (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/papaly.com) - [papaly.com] (http://papaly.com) \n--- [saidit] (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/saidit.net) - [saidit.net] (http://saidit.net) \n--- [notabug] (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/notabug.io) - [notabug.io] (http://notabug.io) \n--- [snapzu] (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/snapzu.com) - [snapzu.com] (http://snapzu.com) \n--- [ruqqus] (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/ruqqus.com) - [ruqqus.com] (http://ruqqus.com) \nFor reference, Reddit is [currently ranked] (https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/reddit.com) 20th on the internet, as of July 23, 2020.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 53,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Metaculus anticipate the biggest unforeseen trend of the 2020s?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4883/will-metaculus-anticipate-the-biggest-unforeseen-trend-of-the-2020s/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "42%",
    "Description": "Assume that in December 2029, a survey is given to at least one of the following groups of people,\n--- \nAmazon Mechanical Turk workers\n--- \nRedditors on /r/samplesize\n--- \nA large non-political non-meme-based Facebook group, with at least 50,000 members.\n--- \nSome other body of participants who can roughly be said to represent \"the people\".\nasking them \nIn your opinion, what was the biggest trend in the 2020s that it seemed like no one anticipated?\nA list of candidate trends will be curated using Google's [\"Year in Search\"] (https://about.google/stories/year-in-search/) for each year in the 2020s (or if Google discontinues the list, another source of roughly equivalent content as discussed in the comments of this question). The order of the list will be randomized as to minimize bias in people's responses. After 1 week of the survey's publication, it will be closed and votes will be analyzed. \nFor the trend with the most votes, consider whether there was a question on Metaculus asking if the trend would happen, that closed before the trend is considered to have begun.\nWhether or not Metaculus anticipated a trend will inevitably be up for debate. Therefore, the following method will be used to resolve ambiguity. Take all the questions that could reasonably be used to judge whether Metaculus had foreseen the biggest trend of the 2020s. Post them below as comments on this question, and after one week of posting, consider the one with the most \"smile\" reacts (ties broken by discretion of whoever is doing the survey). Now assume that there is another survey given to the same population as the original one described in this question, asking,\nIf your friend had assigned [the credence value Metaculus assigns to the chosen question] to the proposition [the title of the question modified in such a way to preserve grammatical correctness] on [question closing date], would you say it's accurate to say that your friend anticipated [the trend]?\nIf after one week, if the majority of survey respondents respond with \"Yes\", then the question resolves positively. Otherwise, it resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 34,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will transformer derived architectures still be state of the art for language modeling in 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4892/will-transformer-derived-architectures-still-be-state-of-the-art-for-language-modeling-in-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "66%",
    "Description": "The transformer architecture was introduced in the landmark 2017 machine learning paper [Attention is All You Need] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762) . Previously, many researchers believed that the attention mechanism was among the most promising research directions for improving sequence-to-sequence models. Writing in 2015, Christopher Olah [remarked] (https://colah.github.io/posts/2015-08-Understanding-LSTMs/) ,\nLSTMs were a big step in what we can accomplish with RNNs. It’s natural to wonder: is there another big step? A common opinion among researchers is: “Yes! There is a next step and it’s attention!”\nThis prediction turned out to be correct. Transformers are generally considered to have unseated LSTM at competitive language modeling, and their central operating principle is using the attention mechanism. Will there be another big jump that unseats the transformer architecture by 2025?\nDefine a transformer derived architecture as one that is either directly referred to as a \"transformer\" or otherwise cites the 2017 paper from Vaswani et al. as the chief inspiration for its operation. If the architecture is a mix of at least two component architectures, it is also transformer derived if one of the component architectures is a transformer. If there is any contention in the Metaculus comment section, a strawpoll will be taken on the subreddit /r/machinelearning asking,\nIs it accurate to say that [the model in question] is a derivative of the transformer model from Vaswani et al.?\nAfter one week, a majority vote indicates the answer, with a tie indicating the answer \"Yes\". \nEither of these must be true for the question to resolve positively:\n1--A Google Scholar search is completed in December 2025 of the phrase \nlanguage model \"state of the art\"\nTake the top 5 papers released during the year of 2025. If at least two of them centrally describe some transformer model achieving state of the art performance during the previous year, then this question resolves positively.\nOR\n2-- [This page] (http://nlpprogress.com/english/language_modeling.html) about NLP progress has its top entry for the WikiText-2 benchmark describing a transformer derived language model in December 2025. \nOtherwise, the question resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 36,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Longbets series: Will slaughterhouses be banned in the United Kingdom by 2050.",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4894/longbets-series-will-slaughterhouses-be-banned-in-the-united-kingdom-by-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "Dean Mullen and Jeff T Kaufman summarize their reasons for taking the bet [here] (http://longbets.org/780/) .\nDean Mullen writes,\nProgression in animal rights and changes in societal attitudes will lead to dramatic changes in human perspectives of and the treatment of non-human animals. This I believe will culminate in slaughterhouses being made illegal in many nations by the middle of this century and I believe the United Kingdom will be among those countries.\nand Jeff T Kaufman countered with,\nSlaughterhouses will continue to be legal in the UK through 2050.\nNo country has banned slaughterhouses yet, and meat consumption is very popular. Going from \"legal and common\" to \"completely banned\" in thirty years seems very optimistic to me.\nIf the Long Now Foundation declares Dean Mullen the winner of the bet, then this question resolves positively. If they declare Jeff T Kaufman the winner, then this question resolves negatively.\nThe rules for resolution are specified as follows,\n1-- \nThe bet is to whether slaughterhouses will be prohibited in the United Kingdom by 2050.\n2-- \nA slaughterhouse is any facility, regardless of scale, that is used to slaughter animals for the benefit of humans. This includes processing the animals into food or clothing, or as a byproduct of another industry that uses animals such as the dairy industry. This does not include euthanizing animals in shelter facilities, since this is done for the benefit of the euthanized animals. This also does not include hunting, since the animals are killed outside of any facility.\n3-- \nThe legislation must be passed and in effect by January 1st, 2050 in the United Kingdom. If the United Kingdom no longer exists, then the relevant region will be the country that includes the largest land area that was in the United Kingdom on 2019-01-01.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 37,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many laws will be enacted during the 117th United States Congress?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4895/how-many-laws-will-be-enacted-during-the-117th-united-states-congress/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The website [govtrack.us] (http://govtrack.us) tracks many aspects of the United States government. [This page] (https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/statistics) shows statistics about how many laws are enacted during each congressional session. As of July 24th 2020, the current session of congress is 116. The 117th United States congress is scheduled to last from January 3rd 2021 to January 3rd 2023. A large number of laws enacted by the 117th congress may indicate a highly productive session.\nHow many laws will be enacted by the US Federal Government during the 117th United States Congress?\nFor reference, I have repeated the number of laws enacted by the US Federal Government during each session of congress in recent history in a table below.\n* Indicates that the current session has not yet concluded.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 67,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will China's human development index (HDI) score be in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4905/what-will-chinas-human-development-index-hdi-score-be-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[The Human Development Index (HDI)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index) is a composite score of national well-being developed and maintained by the United Nations. It combines health (longevity), education (years of schooling) and economic (GNI per capita) into a single metric for year to year modeling. China has been increasing very quickly in this metric, presumably due to catch-up effects from the economic depression caused by communism. Such catch-up effects are well-studied in economics, and can be seen for countries that were bombed in World War 2 (mainly [Japan] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_economic_miracle) and West Germany), and in other wars. However, at some point, catch-up effects end because the indicator has reached its long-term stable trend. It is unclear, though, where this trend might be for China. Japan is currently at 0,915, South Korea at 0.906. Both have relatively fast growth rates in years 2010-2018 compared to many Western countries (e.g. Norway at 0.16/year, Germany at 0.25/year). China's current growth-rate for the same period is currently an astronomical 0.95/year.\nThis question asks:\nWhat will China's HDI score be in 2030?\n--- \nThis question resolves as China's score according to the UN's Human Development Report 2031. The latest version of the report can be found [here] (http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi) .\n--- \nIf the UN stops publishing this value, or substantively changes the definition (for example by adding more components), this question resolves as ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 42,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the US police-to-prison spending ratio be in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4907/what-will-the-us-police-to-prison-spending-ratio-be-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Currently, for every dollar spent on prisons, [the US spends 1.5 dollars on police] (https://blog.skepticallibertarian.com/2019/01/09/charts-police-vs-prisons-in-the-us-and-europe/) . This is much more relatively on prisons than in the EU, which spends 5 dollars on police for every dollar on prisons, and is commensurate with the higher incarceration rate in the US ( [655 prisoners per 100,000 people] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate) , compared to, for example, 105 in France). The ratio has not always been this low; from 1950-1975, when US incarceration rates were lower, this ratio was 3-to-1.\nReduction of the number of people in prison [is a goal] (https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/9/25/16340782/study-mass-incarceration) of criminal justice reformers including the [Open Philanthropy Project] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/focus/us-policy/criminal-justice-reform) , and paradoxically black neighbourhoods are in some ways [underpoliced] (https://www.vox.com/2015/4/14/8411733/black-community-policing-crime) due to a lack of attention given to the most serious crimes. One way a shifting of government priorities might be reflected is in a change to the ratio of spending on police and prisons. \nWhat will the total US government police-to-prison spending ratio be in FY 2030?\nResolution will be by dividing (Police services - Total percent GDP)/(Prisons - Total percent GDP) using the values given by [usgovernmentspending.com] (https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/spending_chart_1950_2030USp_21s2li011mcny_51t54t) when actual reported data or data interpolated from actual reported data from FY 2030 is available, or calculated from [usgovernmentspending.com] (http://usgovernmentspending.com) 's sources for [federal] (https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/budget/2021/BUDGET-2021-TAB) and [state and local] (https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/gov-finances.html) spending if the website is no longer available, or from other official sources if those are no longer available.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 52,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will an individual SpaceX Falcon 9 core stage launch and return to Earth for the tenth time?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4911/when-will-an-individual-spacex-falcon-9-core-stage-launch-and-return-to-earth-for-the-tenth-time/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [Falcon 9 rocket] (https://www.spacex.com/vehicles/falcon-9/) is a two-stage rocket designed and manufactured by SpaceX. The first stage (also known as the core stage) can return to Earth and land propulsively, to be reused on a later mission. In the last several years, SpaceX has incrementally developed its reusability capabilities. On [December 22nd, 2015] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_9_flight_20) , a Falcon 9 core stage successfully returned to Earth for the first time. On [March 30th, 2017] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SES-10) , a Falcon 9 core was reused for the first time.\nSince that time, SpaceX has continued to make improvements and test the limits of reusability. The most \"veteran\" core at the moment is core [B1049] (https://www.reddit.com/r/spacex/wiki/cores#wiki_b1049) , which successfully launched and returned for the fifth time in June 2020. However, SpaceX's stated goal is to push this even further, using each core at least [10 times] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_reusable_launch_system_development_program#Economics_of_rocket_reuse) with minimal refurbishment. In recent months, SpaceX has apparently adopted a strategy of using its internal Starlink satellite launches to push reusability boundaries without risking expensive customer satellites.\nWhen will an individual SpaceX Falcon 9 core stage launch and return to Earth for the tenth time?\n---This question is asking about some specific core which has launched and returned ten times, not about the total number of reuses across the Falcon 9 fleet. \n---The core may be refurbished between uses. We will consider a core to be the same if it has the same \"B10XX\" serial number as listed on the [unofficial SpaceX subreddit wiki] (https://www.reddit.com/r/spacex/wiki/cores) . If this number becomes unavailable, or admins determine that the wiki has been substantially compromised, this question may instead resolve based on SpaceX's public statements. Typically during a webcast, a SpaceX host will state that \"this stage previously flew the ABC mission\", which also permits tracking of cores. Alternatively, if it appears that reliable information will not be available (e.g. if SpaceX no longer makes statements regarding the previous history of cores), the admins may choose to resolve ambiguous, at their discretion. \n---For resolution, the core must launch, reach an altitude above 1 km, and land (e.g. at a landing pad or a droneship, not in the ocean) relatively intact, ten times. There is no requirement that the core actually delivers ten payloads to orbit, or that it returns safely to port or SpaceX control. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 140,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many of the \"priority paths\" identified by 80,000hours will still be priority paths in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4912/how-many-of-the-priority-paths-identified-by-80000hours-will-still-be-priority-paths-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[80,000hours] (https://80000hours.org/) is a non-profit which provides research and support to help people use their career to help solve the world's most pressing problems. It is associated with the [Centre for Effective Altruism] (https://centreforeffectivealtruism.org/) , and also produces the popular 80,000hours [podcast] (https://80000hours.org/podcast/) .\nMuch of the focus of 80,000hours is supporting people to move into one of their [priority paths] (https://80000hours.org/career-reviews/#our-priority-paths) , which they see as \"one of [the] highest-impact options\" for those who have \"the potential to excel\" in those paths.\nIn 2020, the priority paths are:\n--- \nAI policy and strategy research and implementation\n--- \nAI safety technical researcher\n--- \nGrantmaker focused on top areas\n--- \nWork in effective altruism organisations\n--- \nGlobal priorities researcher\n--- \nBiorisk strategy and policy\n--- \nChina specialists\n--- \nEarning to give in quant trading\n--- \nDecision-making psychology research and policy roles\nThis question resolves as the number of priority paths listed as \"priority paths\" on the 80,000hours website on 2030/1/1, which either exactly match, or are \"essentially the same as\" one of the priority paths listed above. \"Essentially the same\" should be judged by a Metaculus Admin.\nIf 80,000hours no longer lists \"priority paths\", for any reason, this question resolves as ambiguous, not as 0.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 24,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will win the 'worm wars'?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4919/who-will-win-the-worm-wars/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "72%",
    "Description": "According to GiveWell's [Cost-Effectiveness Analysis] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zLmPuddUmKsy3v55AfG_e1Quk-ngDdNzW-FDx0T-Y94) (CEA), mass deworming ranks among the very best global health interventions. The evidence for deworming comes primarily from a [single study] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w21428) , which showed large economic effects which were present a full decade after treatment. However, other studies have shown [little] (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(16)30242-X/fulltext) to [no effect] (https://www.cochrane.org/CD000371/INFECTN_deworming-school-children-low-and-middle-income-countries) of mass deworming on weight, cognitive ability, school attendance or other health outcomes, and the weight placed on the initial paper has proved [controversial] (https://www.vox.com/2015/7/24/9031909/worm-wars-explained) .\nIn GiveWell's CEA, deworming benefits are modeled as being entirely due to long-term economic effects like those seen in the study mentioned above. Despite being heavily discounted due to concerns about replicability, in expectation these economic effects are expected to dominate the short term health effects of the interventions.\nGivewell's position is explained, in detail, in the following two blog posts:\n--- \n[Why I mostly believe in Worms] (https://blog.givewell.org/2016/12/06/why-i-mostly-believe-in-worms/) \n--- \n[How thin the reed] (https://blog.givewell.org/2017/01/04/how-thin-the-reed-generalizing-from-worms-at-work/) \nSome more information is available in [this] (https://www.givewell.org/international/technical/programs/deworming) evidence overview, written by GiveWell, which cites several papers, and [this] (https://www.evidenceaction.org/a-summary-of-the-deworming-evidence-base/) evidence overview, which was written by Evidence Action. While Evidence Action does currently run a deworming programme, they have proved [capable] (https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/6/7/18654620/evidence-action-no-lean-season-givewell) of changing their minds on programmes when the evidence changes.\nCurrently, GiveWell lists seven [top charities] () , of which four are deworming programmes.\nThis question asks:\nAt the end of 2025, will any of GiveWell's top charities perform mass deworming as their primary intervention?\n--- \nResolution will be according to the GiveWell [website] (https://www.givewell.org/) on 2026/01/01.\n--- \nIf GiveWell no longer maintains a list of \"top charities\", but allows donors to donate funds which will be re-granted at GiveWell's discretion, this question resolves positively if at least 10% of these regrants go to deworming charities in the year 2025.\n--- \n\"Mass deworming\" is taken to mean treating all or almost all of the individuals in a group for parasitic worms, without testing to see whether they have them. This is common practice due to the low cost and excellent safety profile of deworming medication, as well as the relative expense of testing.\n--- \nIf a charity has multiple programmes, but GiveWell restricts its donations to a particular programme, that programme is considered to be the \"primary intervention\" for the purposes of resolution. Otherwise, whichever intervention the organisation spends most on is considered the \"primary intervention\".\n--- \nIf deworming medication is administered in addition to something else, for example a vaccine or vitamin supplement, at the same time, then whether \"deworming\" is the primary intervention will be determined by whether the majority of the value of the programme comes from deworming, according to GiveWell's CEA.\n--- \nIf GiveWell ceases to exist in a similar form, such that neither of the conditions for positive resolution above make sense, this question resolves ambiguously.\n--- \nSome of the text in this question has been adapted from [this] (https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/FAA22RbfgC68fRnRs/if-you-mostly-believe-in-worms-what-should-you-think-about) EA forum post, by the same author.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 59,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many charities will Charity Entrepreneurship help launch in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4920/how-many-charities-will-charity-entrepreneurship-help-launch-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Charity Entrepreneurship] (https://www.charityentrepreneurship.com/about-us.html) is an organisation which provides training and support to individuals looking to start effective charities. Thirteen people graduated from their 2019 [incubation program] (https://www.charityentrepreneurship.com/incubation-program.html) , who ended up founding [six charities] (https://www.charityentrepreneurship.com/blog/update-on-six-new-charities-incubated-by-charity-entrepreneurship) , two of which received GiveWell [incubation grants] (https://www.givewell.org/research/incubation-grants) . Due to the pandemic, Charity Entrepreneurship's incubation programme has moved online in 2020.\nThis question asks: \nBy the end of 2021, how many new charities will have been founded by graduates of Charity Entrepreneurship's incubation program?\nCharities founded before the opening of this question are not counted in the total. Resolution will be according to the Charity Entrepreneurship website, and/or credible media reporting.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 25,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Charity Entrepreneurship help create a new GiveWell top charity?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4921/when-will-charity-entrepreneurship-help-create-a-new-givewell-top-charity/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Charity Entrepreneurship] (https://www.charityentrepreneurship.com/about-us.html) is an organisation which provides training and support to individuals looking to start effective charities. Thirteen people graduated from their 2019 [incubation program] (https://www.charityentrepreneurship.com/incubation-program.html) , who ended up founding [six charities] (https://www.charityentrepreneurship.com/blog/update-on-six-new-charities-incubated-by-charity-entrepreneurship) , two of which received GiveWell [incubation grants] (https://www.givewell.org/research/incubation-grants) , one of which is estimated as having a [25% chance] (https://www.givewell.org/research/incubation-grants/fortify-health/august-2019-grant) of becoming a GiveWell top charity.\nGiveWell is a research organisation which aims to find outstanding giving opportunities. It maintains a list of [top charities] (https://www.givewell.org/charities/top-charities) which it considers to have the highest marginal impact per dollar donated.\nThis question asks: \nWhen will GiveWell's list of top charities first contain a charity which was founded by someone who received either training or a grant from Charity Entrepreneurship?\nResolution will be according to the GiveWell website, and/or credible media reporting. If GiveWell decides to no longer produce a list of \"top charities\", this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 71,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be active warfare between the United States and China by the end of 2026?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4922/will-there-be-active-warfare-between-the-united-states-and-china-by-the-end-of-2026/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "9%",
    "Description": "The current conflicts between the United States and China - including trade, espionage, international politics, propaganda, \"soft power\" and territorial claims - have [been described as a Cold War] (https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/07/china-us-war/594793/) . \nCould this turn to active warfare (sometimes euphemistically described as \"kinetic conflict\") in the near future? \nSome Australian analysts think so. [Chris Joye writes in the Australian Financial Review] (https://www.afr.com/wealth/investing/why-the-risk-of-a-major-power-conflict-is-rising-20200709-p55aji) : \nWhen I asked Professor Hugh White about this eight years ago, he handicapped war between China and the US at a 10 per cent probability over the so-called forward planning horizon.\nThe tiny minority of foreign policy and security experts who saw this coming at that time now put the likelihood closer to 20 to 30 per cent.\nMy own best guess is that the chance of a low- or high-intensity kinetic conflict of some kind between China and the US is around 25 to 50 per cent. We ain't going to be exporting much up north if that happens.\nOn the other hand, it could be said that China hawks have predicted 10 of the last 0 wars with China. [In 2014, Gerard Henderson] (https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/opinion/anus-alarmist-hugh-white-gets-it-wrong-each-time-on-uschina-tensions/news-story/31b270768eaae75b38024a322a0898fa) pointed out Hugh White has repeatedly - if equivocally - predicted wars that have not happened, saying we \"may\" face a naval battle in 2005, shouldn't be \"too surprised\" if the USA and Japan go to war with China in 2013 and in 2014 war is \"a possibility we can't rule out\". \nThus we ask, Will there be active warfare between the United States and China by the end of 2026?\nThis question resolves in the affirmative if, at some point between now and 31 December 2026, at least two credible news sources (e.g. the Australian Financial Review, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Reuters, Associated Press, etc.) report that the United States and China have exchanged fire, engaged in \"kinetic conflict\", fought a battle, fought a war or otherwise engaged in active warfare (and they are not talking metaphorically/about a \"cold war\").\n",
    "# Forecasts": 141,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the next Millennium Prize Problem be solved by AI?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4923/will-the-next-millennium-prize-problem-be-solved-by-ai/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "14.000000000000002%",
    "Description": "[The Millennium Prize Problems] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Prize_Problems) are seven problems in mathematics that were stated by the Clay Mathematics Institute in 2000. A correct solution to any of the problems results in a 1 million dollar prize being awarded by the institute to the discoverer(s). The problems are:\n--- [The Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture] (https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/birch-and-swinnerton-dyer-conjecture) \n--- [Hodge conjecture] (https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/hodge-conjecture) \n--- [Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness] (https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/navier%E2%80%93stokes-equation) \n--- [P versus NP problem] (https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/p-vs-np-problem) \n--- [Poincaré conjecture] (https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/poincar%C3%A9-conjecture) \n--- [Riemann hypothesis] (https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/riemann-hypothesis) \n--- [Yang–Mills existence and mass gap] (https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/yang%E2%80%93mills-and-mass-gap) \nTo date, the only Millennium Prize problem to have been solved is the Poincaré conjecture, which was solved in 2003 by the Russian mathematician Grigori Perelman. He declined the prize money.\nThis question asks:\nWill the next Millennium Prize Problem be solved by AI?\nThe question will resolve when the next Millennium Prize Problem is announced as solved by the Clay Mathematics Institute, or, in case that is no longer possible, as soon as consensus in the mathematics community is reached that the solution is correct. The question will retroactively close on the day before the first publication of the announcement of the solution by the authors.\nThe question will resolve positive if most of the major novel elements of the solution were primarily discovered trough the use of AI. The contribution of humans should be limited to:\n---Creating the AI system. \n---Feeding the system with previously established knowledge. \n---Stating the problem in a form understandable by the AI. \n---Converting the solution into a form understandable by humans. \n---Other tasks unrelated to the core of the solution. \nThe AI should be understood broadly as any computation system that is not human.\nThe question will resolve negative if the problem is solved with a traditional approach based directly on human intellect and use of AI is not highlighted as crucial by the authors.\nIf the triggering event is still considered unclear, then the ambiguity will be resolved based on whether at least one more similar breakthrough (including, but not limited to, other Milenium Prize problems) featuring similar use of AI follows in the 3 years following the first solution announcement. The main promise of the AI systems is their ability to increase the speed of discoveries beyond human ability, so this type of disambiguation should remain true to this question's spirit.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 139,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints allow same-sex marriage by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4924/will-the-church-of-jesus-christ-of-latter-day-saints-allow-same-sex-marriage-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33%",
    "Description": "The [Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-day_Saints) , otherwise known as the Mormons, have historically been more anti-LGBT, in terms of both official church doctrine and the individual attitudes of members, than most major Christian denominations in America. However, like other such large, socially conservative churches, there has been [a lot of pressure recently] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_and_The_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-day_Saints) , particularly from younger and/or LGBT members, for them to change their doctrine regarding gender and sexuality. \nWill the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints officially recognize marriages between individuals of the same sex?\nThis question resolves positively if by midnight on December 31st, 2029, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints officially recognizes marriages between individuals of the same sex.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 44,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will SpaceX be worth in 2030? [125B-100T range]",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4927/what-will-spacex-be-worth-in-2030-125b-100t-range/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Note: This question is the same as [another question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3366/what-will-spacex-be-worth-by-2030/) , but with a higher range.\n[Space Exploration Technologies Corp.] (https://spacex.com) , doing business as SpaceX, is a private American aerospace manufacturer and space transportation services company headquartered in Hawthorne, California.\nSpaceX's achievements include the first privately funded liquid-propellant rocket to reach orbit (Falcon 1 in 2008), the first private company to successfully launch, orbit, and recover a spacecraft (Dragon in 2010), the first private company to send a spacecraft to the International Space Station (Dragon in 2012), the first propulsive landing for an orbital rocket (Falcon 9 in 2015), the first reuse of an orbital rocket (Falcon 9 in 2017), and the first private company to launch an object into orbit around the sun (Falcon Heavy's payload of a Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster in 2018).\nAs of 2019, the company is developing a vehicle currently known as the Starship. This vehicle is intended to enable ultra low cost launches to LEO and beyond, as well as human exploration and settlement of the Moon and Mars.\nFurther, in 2019 SpaceX began deployment of an extremely large satellite constellation known as Starlink, which may ultimately consist of more than 40,000 satellites. The constellation is designed to deliver high-bandwidth, low-latency internet access to everywhere on Earth, and is due to be fully operational by the late 2020s. Morgan Stanley Research has suggested that successful completion of this megaconstellation may increase SpaceX's value to $120 billion.\nSpaceX's valuation has increased dramatically since the company was formed in 2002, crossing the $1bn mark in 2010, and reaching a $10bn valuation in 2015. As of July 2020, SpaceX was reportedly valued at [$44 billion] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/23/spacex-is-raising-up-to-1-billion-at-44-billion-valuation.html) .\nThis question asks: What will SpaceX be worth by 1 January 2030 in billions of nominal US dollars?\nIn the event that SpaceX is a publicly traded company on January 1 2030, this question resolves as the company's market capitalization on that date. In the event that SpaceX is a privately held company on January 1 2030, this question resolves as the most recent credible estimated valuation attributed to the company by a reputable financial news organization.\nIf SpaceX changes its name or corporate structure before this question resolves, including but not limited to in the event of a merger or acquisition, this question should continue to track the value of the renamed company. If SpaceX (or any relevant successor company) ceases to exist before 1 January 2030, or if (as judged by an admin) the company has changed in structure so substantially that it is no longer SpaceX, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 72,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the Woke index in US elite media top?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4931/when-will-the-woke-index-in-us-elite-media-top/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Zach Goldberg] (https://twitter.com/ZachG932) has done research [showing the steep rise in Woke terms used in US media] (https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/media-great-racial-awakening) . These are terms like racism, privilege, whiteness and so on. These have shown a marked increase since about 2011, called [the great awokening] (https://quillette.com/2020/06/22/toward-a-new-cultural-nationalism/) . There doesn't not yet seem to be any end to this rise, but presumably it will end at some point.\nResolved: When will the use of Woke terms in US elite media top?\n---These are defined as part of Zach Goldberg's Woke index which includes [the following words] (https://imgur.com/KtoqNv9) . \n---The top of the curve is defined locally as January 1st of the year when both adjacent years shows a lower frequency of the woke words. I.e., it is the year prior to the first decline. This may be a local maximum in the longer term, but we can't know that. \n---The question resolves as the maximum over the 2020 to 2035 period (inclusive) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 23,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will AI achieve superhuman few-shot performance on SuperGLUE?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4932/when-will-ai-achieve-superhuman-few-shot-performance-on-superglue/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[SuperGLUE] (https://super.gluebenchmark.com/) is a benchmark for evaluating general-purpose language understanding systems. The set of eight tasks in the benchmark emphasizes diverse task formats and low-data training data tasks, with nearly half the tasks having fewer than 1k examples and all but one of the tasks having fewer than 10k examples.\nAs of August 2020, the best performing model is [T5 from Google] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10683) , which receives a score of 89.3. The human baseline is 89.8. Unfortunately, outside of the benchmark T5 does not seem to match general-purpose language understanding skills of humans.\nTherefore, this question considers a more challenging regime for the benchmark recently presented in [the GPT-3 paper] (https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165) . The few-shot regime is when the model has severely limited access to the training set. This question will take into account models that have been trained on maximally 100 examples from each task and asks:\nWhen will AI achieve superhuman few-shot performance on SuperGLUE?\nThis question will resolve as soon as a model with access to at most 100 examples per task meeting or exceeding 89.8 human baseline is announced to the public. A pre-print or published paper from a reputable source is sufficient by itself to trigger resolution. Any other source can count too if the result can be verified by [SuperGLUE leader board submission] (https://super.gluebenchmark.com/leaderboard) .\nCurrently, GPT-3 achieves the best performance of 71.8 in a few-shot regime with access to 32 examples. This is still 18 points away from the human performance.\nTraining data contamination similar to GPT-3 issue is allowed as long as the authors have made sure that it does not impact the evaluation in a severe way.\nSimilar question: [When will a language model meet or exceed the human baseline on SuperGLUE?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4869/when-will-a-language-model-meet-or-exceed-the-human-baseline-on-superglue/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 82,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will FreeTON cryptocurrency project be successful?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4934/will-freeton-cryptocurrency-project-be-successful/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8%",
    "Description": "Telegram Open Network was a cryptocurrency project that would allow to make transactions within Telegram messenger. It was [cancelled] (https://www.interactivecrypto.com/telegram-cancels-telegram-open-network-and-grams-project) after a lawsuit initiated by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) in the USA.\nAfter that, a group of developers [forked] (https://cryptopotato.com/free-ton-forks-to-decentralized-independence-in-telegram-token-sales-departure/) the project under name [FreeTON] (https://freeton.org/) to develop it independently from Telegram messenger.\nWill the FreeTON project be successful and widely used for online payments?\nThis question will resolve positively if there will be at least 50 online shops that accept FreeTON at the resolution date, or if there will be publically available data from trusted online source showing that total amount of payments with FreeTON is more than $1M per month at the resolution date. Otherwise, the question will resolve negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 39,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Antifa officially be labeled a terrorist group in the US before 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4946/will-antifa-officially-be-labeled-a-terrorist-group-in-the-us-before-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4%",
    "Description": "US president Trump has declared his intentions to add Antifa to list of terrorist organizations, [tweeting May 31st] (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1267129644228247552) :\nThe United States of America will be designating ANTIFA as a Terrorist Organization.\nUS Texan Senator Ted Cruz has [similarly been campaigning for this move] (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/antifa-cruz-riots-organized-terror-attacks) :\nSen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, is aiming to highlight the role Antifa and like-minded groups are playing in riots across the country, convening a Senate hearing Tuesday on the issue while alleging that radical left-wing groups are engaging in \"organized terror attacks\" designed to tear down government institutions.\n“Across the country, we’re seeing horrific violence, we’re seeing our country torn apart. Violent anarchists and Marxists are exploiting protests to transform them into riots and direct assaults on the lives and safety of their fellow Americans,” Cruz told Fox News in an interview.\nUnsurprisingly Trump's opponents have opposed this move, and even labelled it impossible. For instance, [in Slate] (https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/06/antifa-terrorist-organization-designation-trump.html) , we can read:\nWhile the president and attorney general may have political motivations for wanting to stigmatize a left-wing movement by tagging it with the terrorist label and thus seek to assign blame for the violence engulfing several U.S. major cities, it is unlikely that Trump can do so within existing legal authorities.\nIn the United States, there are two competent authorities for designating terrorist groups. First, the Department of State can designate groups as Foreign Terrorist Organizations pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act. It can also designate both groups and individuals as terrorists under Executive Order 13224. This order was established shortly after Sept. 11 as part of an effort to provide the State and Treasury departments enhanced capability to block terrorists from the U.S. formal financial system.\nHowever, for the State Department to designate a group, it must document that the organization operates overseas, and that the group’s leaders, camps, and operations are based outside of the continental United States. Antifa, by virtue of its domestic presence and lack of any organizational cohesion, would be impossible for the State Department to designate.\nThe Treasury Department can also sanction terrorists per Executive Order 13224. But it can only piggy-back on an already existing designation of a group, typically one that is already labeled by the State Department as a terrorist organization. Without an underlying State Department designation, the Treasury Department can’t act. And, while Treasury has designated a number of domestic-based charities as terrorist entities, those groups were linked to foreign organizations such as Hamas, the Tamil Tigers, Lebanese Hizballah, and al-Qaida.\nSo it appears to be difficult for the Trump administration to accomplish this. Thus, the question is: \nWill Antifa officially be labelled a terrorist organization in the US before 2022?\n---Antifa must be added to an official list of terrorist organizations for this to resolve positively. They must remain on this list for at least seven consecutive days. \n---It must happen before 2022. \n---It can happen under any presidency (winner of 2020 US election). \n---An \"official list is\" one that appears on the public-facing website of a US federal agency. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 245,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "[Metaculus] When will the feature to share private questions go live?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4947/metaculus-when-will-the-feature-to-share-private-questions-go-live/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[In the discussion thread posted 27th May 2018] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/935/discussion-topic-what-features-should-metaculus-add/) , a feature is noted as being in the works \"Invite people to predict on your private questions, on a per-question basis.\" Similarly, [a comment from 25th June 2020] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/935/discussion-topic-what-features-should-metaculus-add/#comment-34260) saying this feature is highly desirable has +5. Thus, it would appear that the feature is highly sought and already noted as being in development for more than 2 years. So the question is: \nWhen will the feature to share a private question go live?\n--- \nThe feature must be available to online on the live version of the website, not a beta or private version.\n--- \nThe feature must be available to regular users, not some small fraction of users on a test basis.\n--- \nIt must be possible to have designated users join in a given forecast and the summary statistics shown, the same way as public questions.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 51,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the best marathon time completed before 2035, in seconds, according to Guinness World Records?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4949/what-will-be-the-best-marathon-time-completed-before-2035-in-seconds-according-to-guinness-world-records/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "From [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marathon) ,\nThe marathon is a long-distance race with an official distance of 42.195 kilometres (26 miles 385 yards), usually run as a road race. The event was instituted in commemoration of the fabled run of the Greek soldier Pheidippides, a messenger from the Battle of Marathon to Athens, who reported the victory. The marathon can be completed by running or with a run/walk strategy.\nThe best time recognized by the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) is 2:01:39, or 7299 seconds, completed by Kenyan runner [Eliud Kipchoge] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eliud_Kipchoge) in 2018. However, Guinness World Records recognizes [another run] (https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/595048-fastest-marathon-distance-male) from Eliud Kipchoge in which he completed a marathon in 1:59:40 or 7180 seconds as part of the [Ineos 1:59 Challenge] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ineos_1:59_Challenge) . A [1991 paper] (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2022559/) hypothesized that the fastest a human could possibly run a marathon was 1:57:58 or 7078 seconds.\nThese two Metaculus questions are relevant:\n[Will a 2-hour marathon be run in 2017?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/434/will-a-2-hour-marathon-be-run-in-2017/) \n[Will someone run a marathon in less than 2 hours (per IAAF rules) by 2023?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1373/will-someone-run-a-marathon-in-less-than-2-hours-per-iaaf-rules-by-2023/) \nAlso see [this Wikipedia article on Marathon world record progression] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marathon_world_record_progression) \nThis question asks, what will be the best marathon time completed by a human before 2035, in seconds (rounded to the nearest second), according to Guinness World Records?\n",
    "# Forecasts": 35,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will traviswfisher be unseated on the Metaculus leaderboard?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4950/when-will-traviswfisher-be-unseated-on-the-metaculus-leaderboard/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[The Metaculus leaderboard] (https://www.metaculus.com/rankings/) shows the top players by cumulative points earned for resolved questions. As of August 7th 2020, the top user is [traviswfisher] (https://www.metaculus.com/accounts/profile/100518/) with 23184 total points.\nThis question asks, what will be the earliest date after August 7th 2020 in which traviswfisher is no longer the top player?\nIn the case the Metaculus leaderboard is overhauled, this question resolves ambiguously.\nThe question resolves as \"&gt; Aug 7, 2030\" if traviswfisher are not unseated by then.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 154,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many billions of tons of CO₂ will the United States emit in 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4951/how-many-billions-of-tons-of-co%25E2%2582%2582-will-the-united-states-emit-in-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The United States [emitted 5.4 billion tons] (http://www.globalcarbonatlas.org/en/CO2-emissions) of carbon dioxide in 2018, 15% of the world's total, and over its history has emitted [25% of the world's total] (https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions) carbon dioxide emissions. Emissions this high are inconistent with the goal of keeping the global temperature rise low, especially to within climate goals like 1.5 and 2 °C which would require global emissions mitigation [beyond what is currently pledged] (https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions#future-emissions-scenarios) .\nOver the coming years, new technologies like carbon sequestration, next-gen nuclear reactors, hydrogen-based fuels, and [electrification using renewables] (https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/21349200/climate-change-fossil-fuels-rewiring-america-electrify) could decrease CO₂ emissions.\nHow many billions of tons of CO₂ will the United States emit in 2035?\nResolution will be by the figures published by the [Global Carbon Project] (https://www.globalcarbonproject.org/index.htm) in their 2031 Global Carbon Budget report, or the first report after that to include figures for 2030, or a similar credible source if GCP ceases to publish carbon emissions figures. If the data is given in terms of tons of carbon, multiply by 3.664 to get figures for carbon dioxide.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 47,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Lebanon come under French rule again before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4952/will-lebanon-come-under-french-rule-again-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "France has previously ruled Lebanon and Syria cf. [the Mandate for Syria and the Lebanon] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandate_for_Syria_and_the_Lebanon) in the period 1920-1946. Following recent events, [there is some popular desire to return to French rule] (https://beforeitsnews.com/global-unrest/2020/08/over-57000-thousands-lebanese-sign-a-petition-begging-macron-to-be-their-leader-and-demanding-that-lebanon-be-placed-under-french-rule-2529246.html) :\nOver 57,000 people have signed an online petition to “place Lebanon under a French mandate for the next 10 years” as of Friday morning. The petition was directed at French President Emmanuel Macron, who on Thursday became the first foreign leader to arrive in Beirut since the tragedy struck.\nSo the question is: Will Lebanon come under French rule again before 2025?\n---It must be formally recognized as French rule by at least 3 other Western powers. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 111,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first baby be born away from Earth?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4954/when-will-the-first-baby-be-born-away-from-earth/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question simply asks:\nWhen will the first baby be born away from Earth?\nThe question will resolve when the first alive human baby be born away from Earth. The distance from the surface of Earth at the moment of the birth must be at least 80km. If it doesn't happen before 2120, then the question will resolve at &gt;2120.\nSimilar questions:\n--- [Will humans have a sustainable off-world presence by 2100?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1432/will-humans-have-a-sustainable-off-world-presence-by-2100/) \n--- [One Million Martian Residents by 2075?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3519/one-million-martian-residents-by-2075/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 59,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will One Piece end?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4963/when-will-one-piece-end/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "It has just been announced that after 23 years in publication the [best-selling comic series of all time] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_comic_series) is [nearing its end] (https://mothership.sg/2019/11/one-piece-ending/#:~:text=Long%2Drunning%20manga%20One%20Piece,will%20end%20in%20five%20years.) .\nSo when will the last manga issue of the main [One Piece] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Piece) story (excluding any spinoffs and sequels) be published?\nThis question resolves when [Eiichiro Oda] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eiichiro_Oda) (or whoever is named as his successor) confirms that the last chapter of the story has been published in [Weekly Shōnen Jump magazine] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weekly_Sh%C5%8Dnen_Jump) (or whichever magazine is publishing One Piece at the time).\nThis question will resolve as 'ambiguous' if one of the following criteria are met: Oda (or whoever is writing one piece at the time) decides to split the story in two without clarifying what the main story is (e.g separating the main protagonist and the rest of the supporting cast without resolving all their stories on the same date). Oda dies and two different people begin writing and publishing different endings to One Piece. Oda gives up on writing the finale and no-one writes it in his place.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 32,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the US FDA grant Neuralink permission to sell and implant a brain-machine interface device into general consumers?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4966/when-will-the-us-fda-grant-neuralink-permission-to-sell-and-implant-a-brain-machine-interface-device-into-general-consumers/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Some text has been copied from [this closely aligned question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2951/will-the-us-fda-grant-neuralink-permission-to-implant-a-brain-machine-interface-device-in-a-human-before-1-january-2022/) . \n[Neuralink Corporation] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuralink) is an American neurotechnology company founded in 2016 by serial entrepreneur Elon Musk and others, developing implantable brain–machine interfaces (BMIs).\nSince its founding, the company has hired several high-profile neuroscientists from various universities. By July 2019, it had received $158 million in funding (of which $100 million from Musk) and was employing a staff of 90 employees.\nAt that time, Neuralink announced that it was working on a “sewing machine-like” robot capable of implanting very thin \"threads\" into the brain, demonstrated a system that read information from a lab rat's brain via thousands of electrodes (many times more than the current maximum for systems used in human brains), and Musk announced an aspirational goal to start experiments with humans in 2020, pending FDA approval.\nIn the short term, the company aims to develop brain-machine interfaces to assist individuals with serious physical or neurological conditions; [but the longer term goal of the company is to enable human-AI symbiosis and grant superhuman cognition to anyone who wants it, as well as a form of digital immortality] (https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/tech/elon-musk-wants-hook-your-brain-directly-computers-starting-next-ncna1030631) .\nThis question asks: When will the US Food and Drug Administration grant regulatory approval allowing any device developed in whole or in part by Neuralink Corporation to be sold, and implanted into the brains of human consumers?\nYou can find information on the FDA's Regulatory Overview for Neurological Devices [here] (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/neurological-devices/regulatory-overview-neurological-devices) .\nThe implantation surgery need not actually occur by that date (or at all) in order for this question to resolve positively; this question focuses solely on when regulatory approval will be obtained.\nThis question resolves &gt;2050 if no approval is given before 2050. The question resolves ambiguously if the FDA is abolished, or if its role is changed such that regulatory approval is no longer required for this procedure.\nChangelog:\n2020-08-17 : removed § triggering positive resolution upon Investigational Device Exemption or Humanitarian Device Exemption. See [this thread] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4966/when-will-the-us-fda-grant-neuralink-permission-to-sell-and-implant-a-brain-machine-interface-device-into-general-consumers/#comment-37813) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 107,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the real median household income in the United States in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4967/what-will-be-the-real-median-household-income-in-the-united-states-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The real (inflation adjusted) [median household income] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States) can be seen as an economic indicator measuring how well-off an average family is within some economic region, insensitive to wealth inequality (unlike GDP per capita).\nThe Economic Research at the St. Louis Fed [tracks the real median household income in the United States over time] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672N) . The most recent year they have data for is 2018, with a real median household income of $63,179.\nThis question asks, what will be the real median household income in the United States in 2030, in dollars?\nIn case The Economic Research at the St. Louis Fed does not have the data on January 1st 2032 (the anticipated date of resolution), any other reputable source is appropriate to use for resolution.\nThe historical data is copied into a csv format below, for convenience:\nYear,Income 1984,51742 1985,52709 1986,54608 1987,55260 1988,55716 1989,56678 1990,55952 1991,54318 1992,53897 1993,53610 1994,54233 1995,55931 1996,56744 1997,57911 1998,60040 1999,61526 2000,61399 2001,60038 2002,59360 2003,59286 2004,59080 2005,59712 2006,60178 2007,60985 2008,58811 2009,58400 2010,56873 2011,56006 2012,55900 2013,57856 2014,56969 2015,59901 2016,61779 2017,62626 2018,63179 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 51,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the Gini coefficient for income in the United States in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4968/what-will-be-the-gini-coefficient-for-income-in-the-united-states-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "From [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_coefficient) ,\nIn economics, the Gini coefficient, sometimes called the Gini index or Gini ratio, is a measure of statistical dispersion intended to represent the income inequality or wealth inequality within a nation or any other group of people. [...]\nA Gini coefficient of zero expresses perfect equality, where all values are the same (for example, where everyone has the same income). A Gini coefficient of one (or 100%) expresses maximal inequality among values [...]\nThe Gini coefficient is usually defined mathematically based on the Lorenz curve, which plots the proportion of the total income of the population (y axis) that is cumulatively earned by the bottom x of the population. The line at 45 degrees thus represents perfect equality of incomes. The Gini coefficient can then be thought of as the ratio of the area that lies between the line of equality and the Lorenz curve over the total area under the line of equality.\nThe World Bank tracks the Gini coefficient for income in the United States. See [here] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SIPOVGINIUSA) . The most recent data is for 2016, with a coefficient of 41.4.\nThis question asks, what will be the Gini coefficient for income in the United States in 2030 (in percentage points)?\nIf the World Bank has not released data for 2030 by January 1st 2034 (the anticipated date of resolution) any reputable source can also be used for resolution.\nFor convenience, the historical Gini coefficient data is below in csv format:\nDate,Gini coefficnet 1974,35.3 1979,34.6 1986,37.5 1991,38.2 1994,40.2 1997,40.7 2000,40.3 2004,40.5 2007,41.0 2010,40.3 2013,41 2016,41.4 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 64,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will someone report to have received a hemispherectomy for the purpose of life extension before 2100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4969/will-someone-report-to-have-received-a-hemispherectomy-for-the-purpose-of-life-extension-before-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "16%",
    "Description": "A hemispherectomy [is] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemispherectomy) \na very rare neurosurgical procedure in which a cerebral hemisphere (half of the brain) is removed, disconnected, or disabled. This procedure is used to treat a variety of seizure disorders where the source of the epilepsy is localized to a broad area of a single hemisphere of the brain, notably Rasmussen's encephalitis. [...]\nBecause of the dramatic alteration of brain composition and the inherent risk that hemispherectomies pose, there are criteria that must be met in order for a person to qualify for the procedure. Criteria include no successful control of seizures throughout a variety of drug trials, and a reasonable to high chance of procedural success.\nOne such predictor of success is often the age of the patient. This procedure is almost exclusively performed in children because their brains generally display more neuroplasticity, allowing neurons from the remaining hemisphere to take over the tasks from the lost hemisphere. [...]\nThe success of the procedure is not, however, limited to children. A study in 2007 indicated the long-term efficacy of anatomic hemispherectomy in carefully selected adults, with seizure control sustainable over multiple decades. A case study published in 2015 of 2 adults aged 48 and 38 demonstrated the success of functional hemispherectomy in treating status epilepticus (SE), an epileptic condition in which seizures are prolonged or occur closely together. In 2012, a case study following 30 individuals having undergone some form of hemispherectomy in adulthood found that 81% of individuals were seizure free post-procedure. Furthermore, almost all participating patients reported improved quality of life. The conclusion: “adult patients do not have to expect more problems with new deficits, appear to cope quite well, and most profit from surgery in several quality of life domains.”\nWhile hemispherectomies are generally reserved as a treatment for extreme cases of seizure disorders, they could conceivably aid in life extension as well. In particular, a patient could voluntarily receive a hemispherectomy in order to [cryopreserve] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryopreservation) and put their brain in long-term storage while they are still living, thereby increasing the probability that their personality and identity are stored in some sort of medium, persisting into the future.\nSo far as I can tell, a hemispherectomy performed for the purpose of life extension is purely hypothetical. Furthermore, there are few to no current online resources about this possibility (besides this one).\nThis question asks, will someone report to have received a hemispherectomy for the purpose of life extension before 2100? \nHere the resolution is determined by the conjunction of three actions, performed by an individual human:\n--- \nThey received a hemispherectomy voluntarily.\n--- \nHalf of their brain was placed in long-term cryopreservation while they were still legally alive. \n--- \nThey reported in some credible source (such as through a media outlet, or via a forum with strong evidence of credibility) that the procedure was done primarily for the purpose of extending their life.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 37,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the monthly average number of sunspots around Solar Cycle 25’s maximum?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4970/what-will-be-the-monthly-average-number-of-sunspots-around-solar-cycle-25s-maximum/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n-------\n\nThe 11-year Solar Cycle has been intensely monitored and recorded since the 18th century. The ebb and flow of solar activity constitutes an interesting astrophysical problem and it is also for increasing importance here on Earth. In particular, the timing and the scaling of the Solar Cycle’s peaks and troughs is of great importance to operators of both Earth-orbiting satellites and power transmission grids. \nA key measure of solar activity is the number of sunspots, whose presence is correlated with the occurrence of solar flares. [Wolf’s number] (https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/W/Wolf+Number) (also called the International Sunspot Number or the Relative Sunspot Number) is expressed by the relation R = k(10g +s), where s is the number of individual spots, g is the number of groups of sunspots, and k is a factor that varies with location and instrumentation (also called observatory factor, or personal reduction coefficient). By convention, Wolf’s number is used as a count of the daily number of sunspots. \nIn addition to the extensive historical record of sunspots, there now exists a trove of data from modern solar observations, obtained both from the ground and by a flotilla of spacecraft. Moreover, astrophysical models of the Sun and its processes have reached a high degree of refinement. By combining all of this information, and by adopting a variety of forecasting methods, [predictions of the intensity of upcoming solar cycles] (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41116-020-0022-z) can be generated. \nAccurate knowledge of the relative strength of the next cycle would have profound implications for satellite operations, radio communication, and power transmission. For example, if Cycle 25 generates a high sunspot number at solar maximum, it will be associated with increased upper-atmospheric drag. On the one hand, atmospheric drag [can be beneficial, as drag removes dangerous space junk] (https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14207-weak-solar-cycle-may-keep-more-space-junk-in-orbit/) from orbit. With a strong maximum, however, satellite operators face increased risk of [solar flares] (https://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/rhessi3/mission/science/the-impact-of-flares/index.html) destroying satellite electronics and damaging solar panels. High levels of solar activity enhance [long-range radio communication] (https://www.mckay-brothers.com/us-to-europe-100-wireless/) , but they are associated with coronal mass ejections (which generate geomagnetic storms) that can [wreak havoc with terrestrial power grids] (https://www.lloyds.com/news-and-risk-insight/risk-reports/library/natural-environment/solar-storm) .\nAt present (late Summer 2020) Solar Cycle 24 has reached its end, and solar activity is close to a minimum. Forecasts for the upcoming Solar Cycle 25, however, [differ wildly] (https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2019/12/30/steve-brown-compilation-of-solar-cycle-25-forecasts/) . We thus ask:\nWhat will be the monthly average number of sunspots around Solar Cycle 25’s maximum?\nFor context, the minimum of Cycle 24 occurred in December of 2008 with a total of 2.2 sunspots as a monthly average, and the maximum occurred in April of 2014 with a monthly average of 116.4. Data for this can be found [here] (http://www.sidc.be/silso/cyclesminmax) .\n\nResolution Criteria\n-------------------\n\nResolution will be carried out with the [Sunspot Index and Long-term Solar Observations (SILSO)] (http://www.sidc.be/silso/cyclesminmax) site. SILSO records the number of sunspots at minimum and maximum points in the solar cycle and will report on Cycle 25’s maximum. The monthly mean numbers are also recorded as part of the 13 month moving sunspot number series.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 21,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "13 month boxed mean of sunspots around the Solar 25 maximum?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4971/13-month-boxed-mean-of-sunspots-around-the-solar-25-maximum/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n-------\n\nGiven that the number of sunspots is subject to large fluctuations on both daily and monthly time scales, [aggregating a 13-month boxcar average] (https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41116-020-0022-z.pdf) with half-weights on the first and last month can be a helpful indication of the average number of sunspots over an extended period. This smoothing process is frequently used when charting solar activity over time, and it effectively tracks long-term changes in sunspot numbers over the entirety of a solar cycle. \nThe [13-month boxcar average] (http://www.sidc.be/silso/infosnmstot) is calculated using the monthly average numbers of sunspots, Rm (found using Wolf’s Number).\nIn addition to the extensive historical record of sunspots, there now exists a trove of data from modern solar observations, obtained both from the ground and by a flotilla of spacecraft. Moreover, astrophysical models of the Sun and its processes have reached a high degree of refinement. By combining all of this information, and by adopting a variety of forecasting methods, [predictions of the intensity of upcoming solar cycles can be generated] (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41116-020-0022-z) . \nAccurate knowledge of the relative strength of the next cycle would have profound implications for satellite operations, radio communication, and power transmission. For example, if Cycle 25 generates a high sunspot number at solar maximum, it will be associated with increased upper-atmospheric drag. On the one hand, atmospheric [drag can be beneficial, as drag removes dangerous space junk] (https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14207-weak-solar-cycle-may-keep-more-space-junk-in-orbit/) from orbit. With a strong maximum, however, satellite operators face increased risk of [solar flares] (https://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/rhessi3/mission/science/the-impact-of-flares/index.html) destroying satellite electronics and damaging solar panels. High levels of solar activity enhance [long-range radio communication] (https://www.mckay-brothers.com/us-to-europe-100-wireless/) , but they are associated with coronal mass ejections (which generate geomagnetic storms) that can [wreak havoc with terrestrial power grids] (https://www.lloyds.com/news-and-risk-insight/risk-reports/library/natural-environment/solar-storm) .\nAt present (late Summer 2020) Solar Cycle 24 has reached its end, and solar activity is close to a minimum. Forecasts for the upcoming Solar Cycle 25, however, differ wildly. We thus ask:\nWhat will be the 13-month mean sunspot number for the year of Solar Cycle 25’s maximum?\nFor context, the minimum of Cycle 24 occurred in December of 2008 with a total of 2.2 sunspots as a monthly average, and the maximum occurred in April of 2014 with a monthly average of 116.4. Data for this can be found [here] (http://www.sidc.be/silso/cyclesminmax) .\n\nResolution Criteria\n-------------------\n\nThe Sunspot Index and Long-term Solar Observations ( [SILSO] (http://www.sidc.be/silso/ssngraphics) ) site records the number of sunspots per month with individual and group numbers, as well as monthly means. Using the monthly numbers from this site the 13-month mean can be computed once sufficient time has elapsed.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the minimum magnetic field strength during Solar Cycle 25?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4974/what-will-be-the-minimum-magnetic-field-strength-during-solar-cycle-25/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n-------\n\nSolar polar field strength has been determined to provide one of the best predictions of the amplitude of the next cycle and the maximum of the current cycle. The strength of the polar field is physically connected to the dynamo processes that generate sunspot development, and eventually the global field reversals that delineate the Sunspot Cycle.\n[Power transmission relies on magnetic or electro-magnetic fields] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/power-transmission#:~:text=INTRODUCTION,from%20one%20place%20to%20another.) on the Earth, which can be altered by geo-magnetic changes from variations in solar weather. Low activity in the polar fields increases the [intensity of solar weather] (https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/news-articles/solar-minimum-is-coming) and the [risk to satellite and power transmission operators] (https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/impacts/electric-power-transmission) , who’s products’ efficacy is often strongly correlated with stronger fields. \nRobert Cameron, a solar physicist at Max Planck Institute in Germany for Solar System Research in Germany, states that:\n“ [A weak field usually heralds a quiet cycle] (https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/05/scientists-tackle-burning-question-when-will-our-quiet-sun-turn-violent) , because the polar fields represent the seeds that will punch through as sunspots and grow into the activity of the coming solar cycle. With over about four cycles of direct observation and more than a century of indirect data, the correlation is good and highly statistically significant.\" \nPeak polar field strength can therefore help predict the strength of the forthcoming cycle and give advance warning to stakeholders affected by solar activity. \nDuring periods where the polar fields reach a minimum, sunspot activity is generally near its maximum. Coronal holes open during this peak phase, some of which can last up to six months. Coronal holes release a strong flow of solar wind, which in turn can cause space weather effects -- geomagnetic storms -- when it interacts with Earth’s magnetic field. Geomagnetic storms strongly perturb the Earth’s magnetosphere, [producing auroral displays and triggering disruptions for communication and navigation technology] (https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/news-articles/solar-minimum-is-coming) . \nWhat will be the minimum polar field strength of the sun for Solar Cycle 25?\n\nResolution Criteria\n-------------------\n\nQuestion resolution will be based on values reported by the Wilcox Solar Observatory through their [Solar Magnetic Field Observations program] (http://wso.stanford.edu/#MeanField) . Mean solar polar field readings are compiled each day from observations comprising several different times and locations, and are measured in microTesla. If data is not available or recorded through the WSO, information will either be drawn from an alternate authoritative source or resolved ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 54,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the 3-day mean geomagnetic forecast around Solar Cycle 25’s maximum?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4975/what-will-be-the-3-day-mean-geomagnetic-forecast-around-solar-cycle-25s-maximum/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n-------\n\nLevels of geomagnetic activity correlate with the likelihood of a geomagnetic storm occurring. Geomagnetic storms result from [variations in solar wind] (https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/phenomena/geomagnetic-storms) that produce major changes in the currents, plasmas, and fields in Earth’s magnetosphere. Together, all of these disturbances, and the magnetic deviations they produce on the ground, are used to construct a commonly used [planetary geomagnetic disturbance index known as Kp] (https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/planetary-k-index) .\nIn the past, significant geomagnetic disturbances have [caused damage to electric power transmission grids] (https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/impacts/electric-power-transmission) . For example, a geomagnetic storm associated with a solar coronal mass ejection in March 1989 caused the [entire province of Quebec to lose power] (https://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/sun_darkness.html) . As society grows ever more reliant on technology, vulnerability to the influence of solar weather increases apace. \nOn occasion (and independently of the longer-term changes in upper atmospheric temperature and density triggered by the solar cycle) the interaction between the solar wind and the Earth’s magnetic field during geomagnetic storms can produce short-term [increases in the temperature and density of Earth’s thermosphere, increasing drag around satellites] (https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/impacts/satellite-drag#:~:text=In%20addition%20to%20these%20long,density%2C%20increasing%20drag%20on%20satellites) . Increased drag in turn decreases the interval over which a satellite can orbit without re-adjustment. In the absence of maintenance boosting, low-earth satellites will [lose altitude and eventually re-enter the atmosphere] (https://www.nasa.gov/feature/40-years-ago-skylab-reenters-earth-s-atmosphere) .\nWhat will be the 3-day mean geomagnetic forecast around Solar Cycle 25’s maximum?\n\nResolution Criteria\n-------------------\n\nThe resolution criteria will be drawn from the [Planetary K Index data] (https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/planetary-k-index) recorded through the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center. The mean will be measured in Kp units. If there is not sufficient data or the data does not become available from this site or any other reputable site, the question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 35,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "On what day will Solar Cycle 25’s maximum occur?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4976/on-what-day-will-solar-cycle-25s-maximum-occur/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n-------\n\nThe solar cycle maximum is represented by the day of greatest solar activity within the frame of a single, approximately 11-year long, solar cycle. In the period near the maximum, the largest number of sunspots appear, and the frequency of solar flares and coronal mass ejections is correspondingly high. \nAs [NASA] (https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/solar-cycles/en/) reports:\n“Giant eruptions on the Sun, such as solar flares and coronal mass ejections, also increase during the solar cycle. These eruptions send powerful bursts of energy and material into space. This activity can have effects on Earth. For example, eruptions can cause lights in the sky, called aurora, or impact radio communications. Extreme eruptions can even affect electricity grids on Earth.” \nForecasts for the date near which a given Solar Cycle will peak provide improvement for predictions of the level of solar activity and its impact on the satellite industry. Near Solar Maximum, satellites in low earth orbit are affected by an increased atmospheric drag. Moreover, [solar flares] (https://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/rhessi3/mission/science/the-impact-of-flares/index.html) and CMEs during the period surrounding solar maximum can severely damage satellite electronics and present degradations to a variety of communications technologies. \nOn what day will Solar Cycle 25’s maxima occur?\n\nResolution Criteria\n-------------------\n\nThe Sunspot Index and Long-term Solar Observations ( [SILSO] (http://www.sidc.be/silso/cyclesminmax) ) site provides a record of the number of sunspots at the minimum and the maximum points in the solar cycle and is expected to report the forthcoming Cycle 25’s maximum and the date (month) of its occurrence. Other reputable sources such as NASA or scientific papers will be used to provide specific dates for the resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 37,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What day will Solar Cycle 25 end?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4978/what-day-will-solar-cycle-25-end/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n-------\n\nThe end of Cycle 25 will be coincident with the minimum of Solar Cycle 26. As the baton is passed from one cycle to the next, the Sun will be characterized by depressed surface-associated magnetic activity (such as flares and prominences) and a paucity of sunspots. \nThe minimum amplitude of Cycle 26, indicated by the level of sunspots at the minimum, can indicate the expected strength of the cycle and future solar activity levels. As the overall field structure of the Sun is believed to harbor some [long-term memory] (https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41116-020-0022-z.pdf) . As a consequence, the decline of Cycle 24, which is expected to continue into Cycle 25, provides a possible influence on Cycle 26. The ongoing minimum has so far been quite deep. According to [Spaceweather.com] (http://Spaceweather.com) there have been over 100 days in 2020 on which the Sun has displayed zero sunspots, leading to speculation that the Sun may be entering a period of extended low activity, similar to historical lapses such as the Dalton and Geissman minima. The onset of Solar Cycle 26 will either confirm existence of an extended period of low activity or, alternately, signal the close of what turns out to be merely a relatively brief suppression of cycle strength.\nDuring a run of weak cycles and feeble solar activity, [upper atmospheric drag decreases] (https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/impacts/satellite-drag#:~:text=In%20addition%20to%20these%20long,density%2C%20increasing%20drag%20on%20satellites) . Over time, this will permit an increased amount of “space junk” to accumulate in low Earth orbit, leading to higher collision probabilities for satellites. Weak solar cycles are associated with decreased effectiveness of long-range terrestrial radio communication, and in extreme cases, they can possibly influence Earth’s climate, as may have happened with the so-called [Maunder Minimum] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunder_Minimum) from 1645 to 1715, during which the Solar Cycle was suppressed and sunspots were rare.\nWhen will the next minimum after Solar Cycle 25’s maximum occur?\n\nResolution Criteria\n-------------------\n\nThe Sunspot Index and Long-term Solar Observations ( [SILSO] (http://www.sidc.be/silso/cyclesminmax) ) site records the number of sunspots at minimum and maximum points in the solar cycle and is expected to provide a report of Cycle 26’s minimum and its date (month) of occurrence. Other reputable sources such as NASA or scientific papers will be used to provide specific dates for the resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 40,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a mini-Maunder event occur beginning in Solar Cycle 25 (or 24)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4979/will-a-mini-maunder-event-occur-beginning-in-solar-cycle-25-or-24/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "49%",
    "Description": "Context\n-------\n\nThe Maunder Minimum, which took place in the late 17th and early 18th centuries, was associated with several successive unusually low-activity solar cycles. During this period, [very few sunspots appeared] (https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/7122/chilly-temperatures-during-the-maunder-minimum) on the surface of the Sun, and the overall luminosity of the Sun was slightly lower than average. During this period, temperatures on Earth dropped, and the the Northern hemisphere experienced a ‘little Ice Age.” Opinions diverge on whether the dearth solar activity was causative for the temperature decline. Volcanic activity, for example, may have been [more directly responsible] (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/01/120130131509.htm) for the temporary cooling.\nAs [Petrovay (2020)] (https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41116-020-0022-z.pdf) states in their recent review article:\n“With the known poor cycle-to-cycle correlation, strong deviations from the long-term mean would be expected to be damped on time scales short compared to, e.g., the length of the Maunder minimum. This suggests that the persistent states of low or high activity may be due to truly long term memory effects extending over several cycles.”\nInterestingly, Solar Cycle 24 presented the first major decrease in solar activity levels since the 1950s. Given the likelihood that the Sun’s field configuration harbors some degree of long-term memory of its state, Cycle 25 might be expected to be relatively low in terms of both activity and sunspot numbers. This inference has been challenged, however, and so the actual development of solar activity levels during Cycle 25 will help confirm or deny the hypothesis that the Sun is transitioning into mini-Maunder event.\nIf Earth is set to experience a prolonged damper on the Sun’s activity, does that imply a green light to ditch the Prius and gas up the SUV? (Un)fortunately, the answer is no. [NASA] (https://climate.nasa.gov/blog/2953/there-is-no-impending-mini-ice-age/) and other sources are in consensus that Earth will definitely not enter another mini-ice age in the 21st Century. Climate inputs such as the Sun’s activity-induced variation are dwarfed by the greenhouse warming associated with rapid ongoing increase in atmospheric concentrations of molecules such as CO2 that are effective absorbers of infrared light.\n“The warming caused by the greenhouse gas emissions from the human burning of fossil fuels is six times greater than the possible decades-long cooling from a prolonged Grand Solar Minimum. Even if a Grand Solar Minimum were to last a century, global temperatures would continue to warm. The reason for this is because more factors than just variations in the Sun’s output change global temperatures on Earth, the most dominant of those today is the warming coming from human-induced greenhouse gas emissions.”\nWill a mini-Maunder event occur beginning in Solar Cycle 24 or 25?\n\nResolution Criteria\n-------------------\n\nThis question will be resolved as either positive or negative from authoritative sources such as [NASA] (https://science.nasa.gov/) , or the [NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center] (https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/) . If a mini-Maunder event does not occur in Solar Cycle 24 or in Cycle 25 then the question will resolve negatively, if an event does occur, it will resolve positively. If there is not sufficient data to arrive at a conclusion, the question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the 5-day moving average of the 10.7 cm radio flux around Solar Cycle 25’s maximum?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4981/what-will-be-the-5-day-moving-average-of-the-107-cm-radio-flux-around-solar-cycle-25s-maximum/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n-------\n\nThe solar radio flux at a wavelength of 10.7 cm, known as F10.7, is an excellent indicator of solar activity levels, and has remained one of the longest-recorded indicators as well. \nThe [NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center] (https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/phenomena/f107-cm-radio-emissions) remarks that, \n“The F10.7 radio emissions originates high in the chromosphere and low in the corona of the solar atmosphere. The F10.7 correlates well with the sunspot number as well as a number of UltraViolet (UV) and visible solar irradiance records.”\nBecause extreme UV light cannot be measured from the surface of the Earth, the use of F10.7 as a proxy can help determine levels of incident UV radiation as well. \nIf 10.7 cm radio flux from the Sun is low during Solar Cycle 25 it will indicate a weaker cycle, and if high, it will indicate a stronger cycle. Predicting the strength of a cycle can help prepare people and companies involved with satellite design and operation, as well as in electric transmission and power grid management here on Earth. \nWhat will be the 5-day moving average of the 10.7 cm radio flux around Solar Cycle 25’s maximum?\n\nResolution Criteria\n-------------------\n\nThe resolution criteria will be provided by the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center through their [27-moving day outlook on 10.7 radio flux and geomagnetic indices] (https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/27-day-outlook-107-cm-radio-flux-and-geomagnetic-indices) . If data no longer becomes available or is recorded, the resolution criteria will be provided by another reliable source such as NASA or will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 44,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a human with no biological feet run 100 meters in less than 9.572 seconds?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4986/when-will-a-human-with-no-biological-feet-run-100-meters-in-less-than-9572-seconds/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Blades used by disabled athletes are improving, allowing them to run faster.\nThe current world record for the 100 meters is 9.572 seconds, ran by Usain Bolt in 2009. You can see how this record progressed over time on Wikipedia's article [Men's 100 metres world record progression] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_100_metres_world_record_progression) . Jeremy Richmond, a scientist, predicts the best possible time for a non-augmented human is 9.27 seconds (source: [Ultimate 100-Meter Time: 9.27 Seconds?] (https://www.runnersworld.com/races-places/a20791832/ultimate-100-meter-time-9-27-seconds/) ).\nThis question asks, when will a human with no biological feet run 100 meters in less than 9.572 seconds?\nIf no human without biological feet runs 100 meters in less than 9.572 seconds before January 1st 2100, then this question resolves as &gt;2100.\nLiam Malone thinks it's possible – although not while respecting the rules set by the Paralympics on which artificial legs athletes can wear (source: [Usain Bolt: Para-athlete Liam Malone vows to run faster than Olympic legend] (https://www.bbc.com/sport/disability-sport/40677890) ).\nConditions:\n--- \nGenetically modified humans don't count for the purpose of this question.\n--- \nThe artificial limbs can't have wheels or generate energy, nor have any device that produces energy, and must finish at the same height they started (ie. not convert potential gravitational energy into kinetic energy).\n--- \nThe run must start from an immobile position.\n--- \nThe athlete can't start running less than 0.1 seconds after the start signal (source: [5 Rules You Probably Didn’t Know About the 100m Sprint] (https://tallypress.com/fun/5-rules-you-probably-didnt-know-about-the-100m-sprint/) ).\n--- \nThe wind speed has to be at most 3 m/s in their favor.\n--- \nThe run must finish before January 1st, 2100, 00:00 UDT+0.\n--- \nThe run must be on a flat ground.\n--- \nGravitational acceleration and air resistance must be similar to those we currently normally found on Earth.\nThe source used for resolution will be Guinness World Records, or some other appropriately reputable source as determined by Metaculus admins in communication with the community.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 21,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Microwave disruption of COVID-19 virus particles?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4994/microwave-disruption-of-covid-19-virus-particles/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "In yet another example of the universe's sense of humor, there is reason to believe that microwave radiation, rather than causing COVID-19, may in fact be an effective way of destroying the virus. \n[This paper] (https://www.nature.com/articles/srep18030?fbclid=IwAR1oOzypwsGJPBhbIBapP9k-Hhh9P9l88rap73eHiM3BXxDCTeyCWYV9eew) argues that a resonance in sub-micron particles (like COVID-19) with ~10 GHz electromagnetic waves can lead to oscillations of the virus large enough to disrupt the particle. They also have experiments to back it up.\nAnd [this recent article] (https://www.wpafb.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2162707/afrl-scientists-investigate-can-microwaves-reduce-viability-of-airborne-coronav/) indicates that US Air Force seems also to be conducting experiments in that direction. \nWill this pan out into something useful? There are various tricky aspects. Along with killing the virus at reasonable flux levels, this would have to not endanger health, or provide untenable levels of interference with electronic equipment. The latter may be a bigger challenge so as a probe we ask:\nBy start of 2022, will there be an application to the US FCC for a device or other license related to microwave sterilization of viruses? \nResolution will be via the [FCC database] (https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/GenericSearch.cfm) , likely triggered by media or other report. Some notes:\n--- \nThis would be governed by [FCC rules 47 CFR Part 18] (https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=c7be03a4f7b02514cea89421fc363794&amp;mc=true&amp;node=pt47.1.18&amp;rgn=div5) .\n--- \nAlmost anything would count as long as its description includes something like microwave frequencies and something like \"viruses\".\n",
    "# Forecasts": 62,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If the first AGI is developed by a publicly traded company, will the company have performed at least 1.5x as well as the global equities market over the prior 12-2 months?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4997/a-stock-price-rise-preceding-agi/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "61%",
    "Description": "If the first AGI is developed by a publicly traded company, will the company have performed at least 1.5x as well as the global equities market over the prior 12-2 months?\nThis question defines Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) in the same way as [this Metaculus question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of/) .\nIf the first AGI is developed by a publicly traded company, this question resolves according to the following methodology:\n---Let t be the date when the AGI is publicly known, as determined by the above Metaculus question. Let C be the company that developed the AGI. \n---Calculate the total return (including dividends) of C's stock over the period from 12 months prior to t to one month prior to t, inclusive.[1] \n---Over the same period, calculate the total return of the FTSE Global All Cap Index, or a similar index if FTSE no longer exists. \n---Calculate the ratio of C's total return over this period to the total return of FTSE. If the ratio is 1.5 or greater, then this question resolves affirmatively. Otherwise, it resolves negatively. \nIf the first AGI is not developed by a publicly traded company, this question resolves ambiguously.\n[1] In the event that the market is closed on the start/end date, instead use the latest prior date on which the market is open. In the event that the date does not exist, use the latest prior date that exists. For example, if the AGI is developed on December 31, \"one month prior\" is considered to be November 30. If the market is closed on November 30, then use November 29 instead.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 22,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will Denmark rank in GDP per capita (PPP) in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5000/what-will-denmark-rank-in-gdp-per-capita-ppp-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "One of the most widely used metrics for country well-being comparison is the GDP per capita metric, which [intends to capture] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_domestic_product) \"the market value of all the final goods and services produced\". [Wikipedia provides] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28PPP%29_per_capita) a convenient overview of rankings according to different sources.\nOne notable thing is that countries tend to keep their relative positions over time, but not entirely so. Some countries that used to be rich are no longer (e.g., [Argentina] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_history_of_Argentina) ), and others that were very poor are now rich or quickly becoming rich (e.g. [Asian tigers] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Asian_Tigers) , and now China).\nDenmark is currently ranked 12 on the World Bank's 2019 estimates, excluding dependent territories. The question is: What will Denmark's ranking be in 2030?\nResolution will be based on [World Bank, GDP per capita, PPP] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD?most_recent_value_desc=true) estimates corresponding to the year 2030, with the exclusion of all dependent territories listed in [this Wikipedia article] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependent_territory) at the time the World Bank estimates are released. If the Wikipedia article no longer exists but it is still reasonably clear which countries should be excluded from the criteria spelled out in that article, those will be the countries excluded for resolving the question. Otherwise, the question resolves ambiguously. If the World Bank stops publishing the dataset, the question will also resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 28,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many DALYs will be caused by outdoor air pollution in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5025/how-many-dalys-will-be-caused-by-outdoor-air-pollution-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Air pollution is one of the world's [leading risk factors for death] (https://ourworldindata.org/air-pollution) , and research on air pollution consistently reveals [harmful effects] (https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2020/8/12/21361498/climate-change-air-pollution-us-india-china-deaths) . These health risks are concrentrated in middle-income countries like India and China due to pollution from industrialisation.\nOverall, the Global Burden of Disease study estimates that outdoor air pollution was resposible for 90 million DALYs in 2017, making up 3.6% of all DALYs in that year.\nWhile deaths overall from air pollution have been falling, this is purely because of the [decline in indoor air pollution] (https://ourworldindata.org/indoor-air-pollution) ; the number of deaths from outdoor air pollution has been increasing slowly over the last 20 years.\nHow many DALYs will be estimated to be caused by outdoor air pollution in 2030?\nResolution will be by the [Global Burden of Disease Study] (http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool) , by adding the figures for the risks 'Ambient ozone pollution' and 'Ambient particulate matter pollution', or a similar reliable dataset if the IHME ceases to publish global disease figures.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 45,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Scotland vote to leave the UK in the next referendum?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5029/will-scotland-vote-to-leave-the-uk-in-the-next-referendum/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "64%",
    "Description": "There is an active question on [\"Will Scotland leave the United Kingdom before 2025?\"] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2577/will-scotland-leave-the-united-kingdom-before-2025/) however this concerns both the question of when the referendum will be held and how long it would take to implement a leave result. This question is only about the referendum result.\nScotland is a country that's part of [the United Kingdom, which also comprises England, Wales, and Northern Ireland (and some overseas dependencies)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom) . Scotland has however been increasingly considering leaving the union over [the last decades] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_independence) , with [one referendum being held in 2014] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Scottish_independence_referendum) that resulted in a stay vote (55.3%). However, [there is talk of another referendum] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposed_second_Scottish_independence_referendum) following the UK's decision to leave the EU (Brexit). [Opinion polling for Scottish independence can be found on Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_on_Scottish_independence) , though there is currently no planned referendum.\nThe question is: Will Scotland vote to leave the UK union in the next referendum?\n---This question applies to the next held referendum, whenever it is held. \n---It must be a referendum that has an option to leave the union with England. It resolves positively if that option receives the most votes, and negatively otherwise. \n---In case no referendum is held before 2050, the question resolves ambiguously. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 92,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a high profile criminal investigation take down a \"hidden website\" on the Tor Network during 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5034/will-a-high-profile-criminal-investigation-take-down-a-hidden-website-on-the-tor-network-during-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "45%",
    "Description": "High profile means at least two credible media sources report that a criminal investigation resulted in a hidden site on the Tor Network became unavailable. No arrests need to be made.\nSome historical data, each of which would qualify if they took place in 2021:\nSilk Road was taken down in 2013, along with Freedom Hosting Operation Onymous shut down hundreds of sites in 2014 Operation Pacifier shut down Playpen in 2015 Operation Bayonet shut down AlphaBay and others in 2017\nSome examples that would not count: Operation Babylon shut down a website in 2015, but I don't see mainstream media coverage, so it would not be considered high profile. [https://apnews.com/85942717e8fa40c09da1f2f3d6…] (https://apnews.com/85942717e8fa40c09da1f2f3d637e29f) this has arrests in 2019, but the story mentions the site shut down prior to those arrests Berlusconi was shut down in 2019 with arrests, but against no mainstream media coverage \nI don't see anything in 2016 or 2018-20 that would qualify under these criteria, although I may have missed some.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 83,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will SpaceX Starlink internet be generally available?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5035/when-will-spacex-starlink-internet-be-generally-available/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[SpaceX] (https://www.spacex.com/) is a space transportation services company best known for its partially-reusable [Falcon 9] (https://www.spacex.com/vehicles/falcon-9/) rocket and ambitions to settle Mars. SpaceX has recently undertaken a project to construct a satellite constellation called [Starlink] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink) that is intended to provide satellite Internet. In contrast to currently operating satellite Internet constellations, the Starlink constellation is intended to comprise tens of thousands of inexpensive satellites orbiting at a low altitude. The hope is that this will allow relatively inexpensive, low-latency consumer Internet for everyday use.\nAt the current time, SpaceX is advertising [beta signups] (https://www.inverse.com/innovation/spacex-starlink-beta-test-how-to-sign-up) for prospective customers, and Internet sleuths have purportedly uncovered [speed tests] (https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2020/08/spacex-starlink-beta-tests-show-speeds-up-to-60mbps-latency-as-low-as-31ms/) from beta testers (although it is possible that the tests are fraudulent). However, the beta test is currently quite limited (only in Washington state or possibly Canada), and the users are only using the service in a testing capacity (and being charged placeholder amounts, such as $1).\nWhen will SpaceX Starlink internet be generally available?\nIn order to be considered generally available, Starlink internet must meet several criteria:\n---There must be a \"coverage area\" (either explicit or implicit) within which any consumer may, in principle, request to install Starlink internet. Said consumer might not qualify for normal reasons that might occur with other ISPs. For example, their property may not have a good view of the sky, there are legal or technical barriers to installation, or there is a limited capacity and a waitlist within a region. However, there should be no special restrictions such as having a prior relationship with SpaceX/Tesla or signing a non-disclosure agreement. \n---Due to how orbits work, coverage will initially begin in the higher latitudes (hence the beta test in Washington state). To be considered generally available, the coverage area should extend to at least one location that has a latitude between 35 degrees north and 35 degrees south (e.g. SpaceX's headquarters in Los Angeles). For example, if SpaceX provides a coverage map, it should include such a location; or there should be reports of regular customers from such a location. A boat would qualify if it is using Starlink service within the 35N/35S band. \n---Customers who are unaffiliated with SpaceX (employees, etc.) must be paying for Starlink service. The payment should be understood to be the actual price of the service, as opposed to a placeholder to test the billing system. \n---It should be understood (either explicitly or implicitly) that service is available continuously. That is, there should be, in principle, no periodic outages due to a lack of satellites overhead, although there may be outages for maintenance or if a satellite is destroyed, etc. If SpaceX does not specifically mention such periodic outages, it would most likely be implied that service is available continuously. \n---Note that this question could resolve even if the following occur: the coverage area is very small, the price is prohibitively expensive, the service is extremely poor or unreliable, or there are very few customers. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 178,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Eurozone collapse before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5039/will-the-eurozone-collapse-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "7.000000000000001%",
    "Description": "In response to the COVID-19 crisis, various EU-skeptics are talking about a possible collapse of [the Eurozone] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurozone) . For instance, April 7, 2020, Gatestone Institute: [Coronavirus: The Looming Collapse of Europe's Single Currency] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15856/coronavirus-euro-collapse) quotes:\nAchim Truger, a member of the German Council of Economic Experts, said that he believes that coronabonds are necessary to prevent a collapse of the euro:\n\"All countries in Europe are being hit by the epidemic — Italy and Spain particularly hard. All countries, including Germany, must therefore be able to make the necessary health expenditures and take measures to bridge the economic crisis. This is only possible through additional government debt, and this must be guaranteed to prevent another euro crisis. If the debt loads of Italy and Spain rise sharply, they will be pushed into budget cuts, thus economic, social and political crises, which would ultimately lead to a sovereign debt crisis and a collapse of the euro and the EU. Therefore, there must now be a joint, solidarity-based solution.\"\nThe question: Will the Eurozone collapse before 2030?\n---Collapse is defined as either: 1) the closing of [the European Central Bank] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Central_Bank) (ECB), OR 2) the Euro is no longer the de facto primary currency of the main western Eurozone member states defined as Germany, France, and Italy. \n---De facto not primary currency means that less than 50% of economic transactions are conducted using that currency. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 54,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the largest CME during Solar Cycle 25 (in kinetic energy)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5045/what-will-be-the-largest-cme-during-solar-cycle-25-in-kinetic-energy/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n-------\n\nThe [NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center] (https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/phenomena/coronal-mass-ejections) defines a coronal mass ejection (CME) as: \n“ large expulsions of plasma and magnetic field from the Sun’s corona. They can eject billions of tons of coronal material and carry an embedded magnetic field (frozen in flux) that is stronger than the background solar wind interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) strength. CMEs travel outward from the Sun at speeds ranging from slower than 250 kilometers per second (km/s) to as fast as near 3000 km/s. The fastest Earth-directed CMEs can reach our planet in as little as 15-18 hours.They expand in size as they propagate away from the Sun and larger CMEs can reach a size comprising nearly a quarter of the space between Earth and the Sun by the time it reaches our planet.” \nBeisecker, who works at the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center and led the Solar Cycle 25 Prediction Panel in 2019, remarked that CMEs are approximately [ten times as frequent at the solar maxima than at the minimum] (https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/05/scientists-tackle-burning-question-when-will-our-quiet-sun-turn-violent) . \n[CMEs allow for solar wind and particles to escape the sun and move towards Earth] (https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/news-articles/solar-minimum-is-coming) , which can cause geo-magnetic storms and auroral displays. \nWhat will be the largest CME during Solar Cycle 25?\n\nResolution Criteria\n-------------------\n\nResolution criteria will be provided by the [SOHO LASCO CME catalog] (https://cdaw.gsfc.nasa.gov/CME_list/) provided by the CDAW data center by NASA and the Catholic University of America with the Naval Research Laboratory. The size of the CME will be determined by its kinetic energy (KE). This question will resolve ambiguously if no data is available, or it is incalculable due to missing values.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the United Kingdom rejoin the European Union before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5048/will-the-uk-rejoin-the-eu-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4%",
    "Description": "The United Kingdom (UK) famously voted to leave the European Union in 2015 with a surprise leave vote ( [Brexit] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brexit) ). It was legally set in motion in 2019 by Conservative prime minister Boris Johnson:\nBrexit (/ˈbrɛksɪt, ˈbrɛɡzɪt/;[1] a portmanteau of \"British\" and \"exit\") is the withdrawal of the United Kingdom (UK) from the European Union (EU). Following a UK-wide referendum in June 2016, in which 52% voted to leave and 48% voted to remain in the EU, the UK Government which was then led by Theresa May formally declared the country's withdrawal on 29 March 2017, beginning the Brexit process. The withdrawal was originally scheduled for 29 March 2019 but was then delayed by deadlock in the UK Parliament after the June 2017 general election resulted in an unexpected hung parliament, which then led to three subsequent extensions of the Article 50 process. The deadlock was only resolved after a subsequent general election was held in December 2019. Following the outcome, the UK Parliament finally ratified the withdrawal agreement, and the UK left the EU at 11 p.m. GMT on 31 January 2020. This began a transition period that is set to end on 31 December 2020, during which the UK and EU are negotiating their future relationship.[2] The UK remains subject to EU law and remains part of the EU customs union and single market during the transition, but is no longer part of the EU's political bodies or institutions.[3][4] \nHowever, there seems to be nothing preventing a new government from having the UK rejoin the union. In fact, [various] (https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/02/britain-brexit-rejoin-eu-boris-johnson/606190/) [people] (https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2020/01/23/membership-2-0-what-the-uk-rejoining-the-eu-would-involve/) [have] (https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/should-we-rejoin-the-eu-now-brexit-will-hutton-patience-wheatcroft) [written] (https://www.businessinsider.com/brexit-poll-most-british-people-want-to-rejoin-eu-2020-6) on this [already] (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-eu-rejoin-future-uk-leave-countries-a9308081.html) , [even predicting it will happen in \"a decade's time\"] (https://www.politico.eu/article/how-britain-rejoins-the-eu-in-a-decades-time/) . The question is: Will the UK rejoin the European Union before 2030?\n--- \nResolves positively if the future UK government and parliament legally rejoins the union.\n--- \nIf the EU ceases to exist before resolution, this question resolves negatively\n--- \nIf the EU changes its name or function, and the UK rejoins this new body, the question resolves positively\n",
    "# Forecasts": 118,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If Trump is not sworn in as President in 2021, will he become the Republican nominee for President in 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5049/if-trump-is-not-sworn-in-as-president-in-2021-will-he-become-the-republican-nominee-for-president-in-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "Donald John Trump is the 45th and current president of the United States. He is also the Republican nominee for the 2020 Presidential Election.\nThis question will resolve positively if:\n---someone other than Trump is sworn in as President in 2021 and \n---Trump becomes the official Presidential nominee for the Republican party in the 2024 election. \nThis question will resolve ambiguously if:\n---Trump is sworn in for a second term in 2021. \n---Trump is not alive by the end of the Republican national convention of 2024. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 450,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first Macs with Apple Silicon ship?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5050/when-will-the-first-macs-with-apple-silicon-ship/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "On June 22nd 2020 [Apple announced transitioning Mac hardware from Intel processors to Apple Silicon] (https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2020/06/apple-announces-mac-transition-to-apple-silicon/) , i.e. Apple-designed ARM-based chips.\nAccording to [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_transition_to_Apple_Silicon) the transition will start with first Macs being released by the end of 2020.\nWhat will be the date when Apple ships Macs based on Apple silicon?\nThis question will resolve with the first shipping date provided during the checkout process in the Apple online shop on [apple.com] (http://apple.com) .\nThe product in question must be a Mac, must be sold to consumers, and must list \"Apple Silicon\" (or some equivalent assertion) in its specifications.\nIf no such product is available by the resolution date, then the question will resolve as the upper bound.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 125,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Tucker Carlson be the Republican Presidential nominee in 2024 US presidential election?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5062/will-tucker-carlson-be-the-republican-presidential-nominee-in-2024-us-presidential-election/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4%",
    "Description": "[Tucker Carlson is per Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tucker_Carlson) :\nTucker Swanson McNear Carlson[2] (born May 16, 1969)[3] is an American television presenter, political commentator, author, and columnist who has hosted the nightly political talk show Tucker Carlson Tonight on Fox News since 2016.\nCarlson became a print journalist in the 1990s, writing for the magazine The Weekly Standard. He was a CNN commentator from 2000 to 2005, and co-host of the network's prime-time news debate program Crossfire from 2001 to 2005. He would go on to host the nightly program Tucker on MSNBC from 2005 to 2008. He has been a political analyst for Fox News since 2009, appearing as guest or guest host on various programs before the launch of his current show. In 2010, Carlson co-founded and served as the initial editor-in-chief of the right-wing news and opinion website The Daily Caller, until selling his ownership stake and leaving the site in 2020.[4]\nOriginally a proponent of libertarian economic policy and a supporter of Ron Paul, Carlson would come to criticize the ideology as being \"controlled by the banks\" and became an active adherer to protectionism.[2][5] He has also espoused anti-interventionalist views, renouncing his initial support of the Iraq War the year after it was declared.[2][6] A vocal opponent of progressivism, he's been called a nationalist by observers.[7] An advocate of U.S. president Donald Trump, he has been described as \"perhaps the highest-profile proponent of 'Trumpism' and willing to criticize Trump if he strayed from it.\"[8]\nCarlson has written two books: a memoir titled Politicians, Partisans and Parasites: My Adventures in Cable News (2003); and Ship of Fools: How a Selfish Ruling Class is Bringing America to the Brink of Revolution (2018). \nThere is some speculation that he might run in 2024: Politico has [Tucker Carlson 2024? The GOP is buzzing] (https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/02/tucker-carlson-2024-republicans-348334) :\nTucker Carlson’s audience is booming — and so is chatter that the popular Fox News host will parlay his TV perch into a run for president in 2024.\nRepublican strategists, conservative commentators, and former Trump campaign and administration officials are buzzing about Carlson as the next-generation leader of Donald Trump’s movement — with many believing he would be an immediate frontrunner in a Republican primary.\n“He’s a talented communicator with a massive platform. I think if he runs he’d be formidable,” said Luke Thompson, a Republican strategist who worked for Jeb Bush’s super PAC in 2016. \nOthers:\n---Guardian: ['His hatred is infectious': Tucker Carlson, Trump's heir apparent and 2024 candidate?] (https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/jul/12/tucker-carlson-trump-fox-news-republicans) \n---Daily Mail: [Tucker Carlson for president? Former Trump campaign and GOP officials believe the Fox News host could lead a successful 2024 presidential campaign after his show becomes the highest-rated program in Cable News] (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8485933/Former-Trump-campaign-officials-believe-Tucker-Carlson-win-2024-election.html) \nWill Tucker Carlson win the Republican Presidential nomination in 2024?\nThis resolves positive if Carlson is nominated by the Republican party to be the official candidate for the presidency by the end of 2024.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 167,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Stephen Bannon be found guilty of fraud?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5105/will-stephen-bannon-be-found-guilty-of-fraud/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "As reported by [Al-Jazeera 21st August 2020] (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/08/steve-bannon-trump-adviser-arrested-fraud-200820134920664.html) :\nFormer White House adviser Steve Bannon, an architect of Donald Trump's 2016 election victory, was arrested on a yacht and pleaded not guilty on Thursday after being charged with defrauding donors in a scheme to help build the president's signature wall along the US-Mexico border.\nThe charges were contained in an indictment ( [PDF] (https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/1306611/download) ) unsealed in Manhattan federal court, which alleges Bannon and three others \"orchestrated a scheme to defraud hundreds of thousands of donors\".\nThe indictment claims the \"scheme\" was related to an online crowdfunding campaign that claims to have raised more than $25m to build a wall along the southern border of the United States.\n[Allsides.com has the various versions of the story across media outlets] (https://www.allsides.com/story/former-trump-advisor-steve-bannon-arrested-fraud-charges) .\nThe official charges are as follows:\n1-- \nBRIAN KOLFAGE, STEPHEN BANNON, ANDREW BADOLATO, and TIMOTHY SHEA, the defendants, and others, orchestrated a scheme to defraud hundreds of thousands of donors, including donors in the Southern District of New York, in connection with an online crowdfunding campaign ultimately known as “We Build The Wall” that raised more than $25,000,000 to build a wall along the southern border of the United States. To induce donors to donate to the campaign, KOLFAGE and BANNON - each of whom, as detailed herein, exerted significant control over We Build the Wall - repeatedly and falsely assured the public that KOLFAGE would “not take a penny in salary or compensation” and that “100% of the funds raised .. will be used in the execution of our mission and purpose” because, as BANNON publicly stated, “we’re a volunteer organization.”\n2-- \nThose representations were false. In truth, BRIAN KOLFAGE, STEPHEN BANNON, ANDREW BADOLATO, and TIMOTHY SHEA, the defendants, collectively received hundreds of thousands of dollars in donor funds from We Build the Wall, which they each used in a manner inconsistent with the organization’s public representations. In particular, KOLFAGE covertly took more than $350,000 in funds that had been donated to We Build the Wall for his personal use, while BANNON, through a non-profit organization under his control (“Non-Profit-1”), received over $1,000,000 from We Build the Wall, which BANNON used to, among other things, secretly pay KOLFAGE and to cover hundreds of thousands of dollars in BANNON’s personal expenses. To conceal the payments to KOLFAGE from We Build the Wall, KOLFAGE, BANNON, BADOLATO, and SHEA devised a scheme to route those payments from We Build the Wall to KOLFAGE indirectly through Non-Profit-1 and a shell company under SHEA’s control, among other avenues. They did so by using fake invoices and sham “vendor” arrangements, among other ways, to ensure, as KOLFAGE noted in a text message to BADOLATO, that his pay arrangement remained “confidential” and kept on a “need to know” basis.\nWill Bannon be found guilty of at least one fraud charge?\n---The resolution concerns the first verdict. We may make another question about an eventual appealed case (seems likely). \n---Only the ones in this case are relevant. If Bannon is indicted with unrelated fraud charges, these are irrelevant for this question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 301,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What proportion of the 20 largest Chinese corporations' revenue will be state-owned in 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5110/what-proportion-of-the-20-largest-chinese-corporations-revenue-will-be-state-owned-in-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "According to Forbes, five of the world's ten largest publicly-owned companies are Chinese, including the world's largest bank by total assets, the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. Despite promises for economic reform, only 3 out of 20 of the [largest Chinese companies by revenue] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_Chinese_companies) are not owned by the government (usually through the SASAC). These are Ping An Insurance, Huawei, and Pacific Construction Group; in 2018, these companies had USD$359B of total revenue out of $3.7T for the top 20, or 9.7%.\nThis question aims to act as a barometer for the extent of privatization and restructuring (or lack thereof) occurring between now and 2035. It resolves on the release of Fortune's Global 500 2035 list, presumably mid-2036, as the revenue generated by state-owned enterprises as a percentage of the total revenue of the largest 20 Chinese-based companies. Currently, this percentage is 90.3%.\n'Chinese-based' includes mainland China, Hong Kong SAR and the Macau SAR, unless the latter two are not under the administration of the People's Republic of China by question resolution time.\n'State-owned' means that the company in question is majority-owned by a State Council institution (e.g China Investment Corporation, the SASAC of the State Council, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Education), through a regional government, and/or indirect subsidiaries of any of these. If ownership is ambiguous or unclear due to a lack of information, the company is assumed to be private by default.\nIf the Fortune Global 500 list is not available, a credible alternative list of the largest Chinese companies by revenue may be used at the discretion of the moderators.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Robin Hanson win a bet that the GPT line of language models will generate < $1Bn in customer revenue by 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5118/will-robin-hanson-win-a-bet-that-the-gpt-line-of-language-models-will-generate--1bn-in-customer-revenue-by-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "45%",
    "Description": "Per [this tweet] (https://twitter.com/robinhanson/status/1297325331158913025) , Robin Hanson has bet Alex Tabarrok that \nSystems in GPT line will by 2025 make &lt;$1B in customer revenue clearly tied to such systems. If product contains such as component, but also has other features, one needs to attribute best estimate % of product revenue to this one. \nWill Hanson win the bet? \nResolution is positive if Tabarrok publicly concedes the bet, negative if Hanson publicly concedes the bet, and ambiguous if nobody has conceded by end of 2025.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 160,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If tested, would the most powerful quesion-answering AI system as of 2022-06-01 demonstrate text-based intelligence parity with human 5th graders?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5120/if-tested-would-the-most-powerful-quesion-answering-ai-system-as-of-2022-06-01-demonstrate-text-based-intelligence-parity-with-human-5th-graders/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "27%",
    "Description": "Machine intelligence has been steadily progressing since the invention of the digital computer, but this progress has arguably been accelerating of late, with widespread deployment of machine learning systems and dramatically increased funding of artificial intelligence research. \nThis is one of a series probing the predicted state-of-the-art in AI systems by pitting them directly against humans in adversarial (against the AI) general intelligence tests. Other questions in this series as of launch ask [whether GPT-3 can outperform human 4th graders on text-based questions,] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4903/if-tested-would-gpt-3-demonstrate-text-based-intelligence-parity-with-human-4th-graders/) and [whether by 2040 a system will exist that can outperform high-level human STEM grad students on totally general questions.] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/384/human-machine-intelligence-parity-by-2040/) \nHere we ask: assume that as of 2022-06-01 the most capable AI (MCAI) text-based question answer system has been identified, and a generalized intelligence test is administered as described in [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4903/if-tested-would-gpt-3-demonstrate-text-based-intelligence-parity-with-human-4th-graders/) , but with 5th graders substituted for the 4th graders. \nQuestion resolves positively if the total of three averaged MCAI scores exceeds the total of the averaged human scores on such a test prior to 2023.\nResolution is ambiguous if no such test is administered prior to 2023-01-01.\nSome fine print:\n--- \nThe fine print from [this question] (http://(https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4903/if-tested-would-gpt-3-demonstrate-text-based-intelligence-parity-with-human-4th-graders/)) apply here with \"MCAI\" substituted for \"GPT-3\" and \"5th graders\" substituted for \"4th graders\".\n--- \nIf there are multiple qualitatively and significantly different competing candidates for the MCAI that (as judged by Metaculus moderators) have comparable probabilities of success, then the test will be assumed to be administered to at least two of the candidates, and the highest score taken.\n--- \nThe entrants are determined as of 2022-06-01, and the systems being tested should be functionally the same as what existed in 2022-06-01.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 37,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first Artificial General Intelligence system be devised, tested, and publicly known of? [stronger operationalization]",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5121/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of-stronger-operationalization/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is a duplicate of [this one] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of/) with a stronger operationalization for artificial general intelligence, and including robotic capabilities. I will copy relevant parts of that question to this one.\nSince the inception of the field, the goal of Artificial Intelligence (AI) research has been to develop a machine-based system that can perform the same general-purpose reasoning and problem-solving tasks humans can. While computers have surpassed humans in many information-processing abilities, this \"general\" intelligence has remained elusive.\nAI, and particularly machine learning (ML), is advancing rapidly, with previously human-specific tasks such as image and speech recognition, translation and even driving, now being successfully tackled by narrow AI systems.\nBut there is a stunning diversity of opinion about when general AI may arrive, according to published expert surveys. For example this study finds 50% of AI researchers accord a 50% probability to \"High level machine intelligence\" (HLMI) by 2040, while 20% say that 50% probability will not be reached until 2100 or later. Similarly, this survey finds an aggregated probability distribution with a 25%-75% confidence interval (comparable to Metaculus sliders below) ranging from 2040 to well past 2100.\nIt would be nice to tighten these probability intervals considerably, so we ask of the Metaculus community:\nWhen will the first [strong and robotic] AGI be first developed and demonstrated?\nWe will thus define \"an artificial general intelligence\" as a single unified software system that can satisfy the following criteria, all completable by at least some humans.\n--- \nAble to reliably pass a Turing test of the type that would win the Loebner Gold Prize. The gold prize is reserved for, \"the first bot that can pass an extended Turing Test involving textual, visual, and auditory components.\"\n--- \nHas general robotic capabilities, of the type able to autonomously, when equipped with appropriate actuators, satisfactorily assemble a (or the equivalent of a) [circa-2020 de Agostini 1:8 scale automobile model] (https://www.model-space.com/us/large-scale-model-kits-1.html) .\n--- \nHigh competency at a diverse fields of expertise, as measured by achieving at least 75% accuracy in every task and 90% mean accuracy across all tasks in the Q&amp;A dataset developed by [Dan Hendrycks et al.] (https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.03300) .\n--- \nBe able to take a simple text description and turn it into a program coded in C/Python. In particular, we'll ask that in at least 9 out of 10 trials, the system can take the specification of a simple program from a list comparable to the \"intermediate\" section of [this one] (https://adriann.github.io/programming_problems.html) , and output an executable C or Python code that does the assigned task.\nBy \"unified\" we mean that the system is integrated enough that it can, for example, explain its reasoning on a Q&amp;A task, or verbally report its progress and identify objects during model assembly. (This is not really meant to be an additional capability of \"introspection\" so much as a provision that the system not simply be cobbled together as a set of sub-systems specialized to tasks like the above, but rather a single system applicable to many problems.)\nResolution will be by direct demonstration of such a system achieving the above criteria, or by confident credible statement by its developers that an existing system is able to satisfy these criteria. In case of contention as to whether a given system satisfies the resolution criteria, a ruling will be made by a majority vote of the question author and two AI experts chosen in good faith by him. Resolution date will be the first date at which the system (subsequently judged to satisfy the criteria) and its capabilities are publicly described in a talk, press release, paper, or other report available to the general public.\n(Edited 2020-10-15 to strengthen programming task and weaken construction task.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 143,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If at least one human challenge trial is run for COVID-19 before February 5, 2021, how many total deaths in the US will be directly attributed to COVID-19 in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5127/if-at-least-one-human-challenge-trial-is-run-for-covid-19-before-february-5-2021-how-many-total-deaths-in-the-us-will-be-directly-attributed-to-covid-19-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Create your snapshot] (https://elicit.ought.org/builder?q_id=5127) \nHuman challenge trials involve deliberately exposing participants to infection in order to study diseases and test vaccines or treatments. As of August 19, 2020, the organization [1Day Sooner had recruited 34,804 volunteers] (https://1daysooner.org/) for COVID-19 human challenge trials. [This Metaculus question] (https://pandemic.metaculus.com/questions/4070/when-will-a-human-challenge-study-in-which-a-sars-cov-2-vaccine-candidate-is-administered-to-at-least-80-people-be-completed/) asks when a human challenge study in which a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate is administered to at least 80 people will be completed. The current median community prediction is February 5, 2021.\nHow many deaths that are directly attributed to COVID-19 will occur if at least one human challenge trial is run before February 5, 2021, in which a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate is administered to at least 80 people?\nResolution:\n---Whether a human challenge trial for COVID-19 has occurred will be based on the resolution of the question: [When will a human challenge study in which a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate is administered to at least 80 people be completed?] (https://pandemic.metaculus.com/questions/4070/when-will-a-human-challenge-study-in-which-a-sars-cov-2-vaccine-candidate-is-administered-to-at-least-80-people-be-completed/) \n---If a human challenge trial occurs before February 5, 2021, then this question will resolve as the resolution of this question: [How many total deaths in the US will be directly attributed to COVID-19 in 2021?] (https://pandemic.metaculus.com/questions/3988/how-many-total-deaths-in-the-us-will-be-directly-attributed-to-covid-19-in-2021/) \n---If no human challenge trial for COVID-19 takes place before February 5, 2021, then this question resolves ambiguously. \nOther possible world:\n--- [If no human challenge trials are run for COVID-19 before February 5, 2021, how many total deaths in the US will be directly attributed to COVID-19 in 2021?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5128/if-no-human-challenge-trials-are-run-for-covid-19-before-february-5-2021-how-many-total-deaths-in-the-us-will-be-directly-attributed-to-covid-19-in-2021/) \nSee the rest of the Possible Worlds Series [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5122/conditional-series/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 199,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If no human challenge trials are run for COVID-19 before February 5, 2021, how many total deaths in the US will be directly attributed to COVID-19 in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5128/if-no-human-challenge-trials-are-run-for-covid-19-before-february-5-2021-how-many-total-deaths-in-the-us-will-be-directly-attributed-to-covid-19-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Create your snapshot] (https://elicit.ought.org/builder?q_id=5128) \nHuman challenge trials involve deliberately exposing participants to infection in order to study diseases and test vaccines or treatments. As of August 19, 2020, the organization [1Day Sooner had recruited 34,804 volunteers] (https://1daysooner.org/) for COVID-19 human challenge trials. [This Metaculus question] (https://pandemic.metaculus.com/questions/4070/when-will-a-human-challenge-study-in-which-a-sars-cov-2-vaccine-candidate-is-administered-to-at-least-80-people-be-completed/) asks when a human challenge study in which a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate is administered to at least 80 people will be completed. The current median community prediction is February 5, 2021.\nHow many deaths that are directly attributed to COVID-19 will occur if no human challenge trials are run before February 5, 2021, in which a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate is administered to at least 80 people?\nResolution:\n---Whether a human challenge trial for COVID-19 has occurred will be based on the resolution of the question: [When will a human challenge study in which a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate is administered to at least 80 people be completed?] (https://pandemic.metaculus.com/questions/4070/when-will-a-human-challenge-study-in-which-a-sars-cov-2-vaccine-candidate-is-administered-to-at-least-80-people-be-completed/) \n---If no human challenge trial occurs before February 5, 2021, then this question will resolve as the resolution of this question: [How many total deaths in the US will be directly attributed to COVID-19 in 2021?] (https://pandemic.metaculus.com/questions/3988/how-many-total-deaths-in-the-us-will-be-directly-attributed-to-covid-19-in-2021/) \n---If one or more human challenge trials for COVID-19 take place before February 5, 2021, then this question resolves ambiguously. \nOther possible world:\n--- [If at least one human challenge trial is run for COVID-19 before February 5, 2021, how many total deaths in the US will be directly attributed to COVID-19 in 2021?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5127/if-at-least-one-human-challenge-trial-is-run-for-covid-19-before-february-5-2021-how-many-total-deaths-in-the-us-will-be-directly-attributed-to-covid-19-in-2021/) \nSee the rest of the Possible Worlds Series [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5122/conditional-series/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 227,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the World Series of Poker return to a live in-person format in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5138/will-the-world-series-of-poker-return-to-a-live-in-person-format-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "70%",
    "Description": "Live in-person poker is a particularly bad match for virus outbreaks. Not only are players typically huddled together in close promimity over tables, but they are constantly touching and then exchanging small plastic rectangles and discs (cards and chips, respectively). There would have to be considerable progress in containtment, treatment, and/or vaccines before a large-scale live-poker tournament event would be safe to hold in the U.S.\nThe World Series of Poker, after having run tournament events in Las Vegas every summer since 1970, was forced to postpone its 2020 event due to the coronavirus pandemic, and hosted an [alternative online-only version] (https://www.wsop.com/2020/online/) . \nWill the WSOP return to a live format in 2021?\nThis question will resolve positively if all of the following conditions are met:\n---A live version of the World Series of Poker 2021 is announced on the [WSOP.com website] (https://wsop.com/) . \n---A corresponding set of live tournaments are actually held in the United States sometime between June and December 2021. (The events need not be held in Las Vegas itself.) \n---As part of the above, a particular live tournament is billed as the \"WSOP 2021 Main Event\" on [WSOP.com website] (https://wsop.com/) . \n---The 2021 Main Event is actually played in the U.S. in 2021, with 500 or more entrants, and is played down to a single winner who is designated the Main Event champion. (Note that some previous versions of the Main Event have had more than 6000 entrants). \nThis question will resolve negatively if the last day of 2021 passes and one or more of the above conditions have not been met.\nNote that this question can still resolve positively if the WSOP organization decides to define WSOP 2021 as a mix of live and online tournaments, as long as the designated \"Main Event\" is played live.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 94,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Kyle Rittenhouse be convicted of first-degree intentional homicide?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5158/will-kyle-rittenhouse-be-convicted-of-first-degree-intentional-homicide/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "17%",
    "Description": "Kyle Rittenhouse is, [CBS news] (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kyle-rittenhouse-shooting-kenosha-protest-suspect-arrested/) :\nA teen accused of opening fire on a group during protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last night, killing two, is in custody in Illinois, the Antioch police department announced in a Facebook post. The post did not name the 17-year-old, who they said is an Antioch resident. But the State's Attorney's office in Lake County, Illinois, said Kyle Rittenhouse was in bond court this morning regarding being a fugitive from justice in Wisconsin, and is being held on no bond. He was due back in court for an extradition hearing on Friday.\nHe was charged with first-degree intentional homicide. Wisconsin does not have murder charges, see [the Wikipedia overview] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_(United_States_law)#Degrees) . One can find videos of the shooting in various places such as [Daily Herald] (https://www.dailyherald.com/news/20200826/video-of-the-shooting-in-kenosha) . [Allsides.com provides an overview of media takes from all sides] (https://www.allsides.com/allsides-search-results?search_api_views_fulltext=rittenhouse&amp;search=rittenhouse&amp;created=2&amp;submit.x=0&amp;submit.y=0#gsc.tab=0&amp;gsc.q=rittenhouse&amp;gsc.page=1) .\nWill Rittenhouse be convicted of first-degree intentional homicide?\n---Concerns the first court case, not a potential appealed case. \n---Resolves negatively if charges are dropped, found not guilty, or given no punishment. Resolves positively if pleads or found guilty and given some sentencing. \n---Resolves ambiguous if Rittenhouse dies before the court verdict is finished. \nETA 2020-09-01: If Kyle Rittenhouse takes a plea deal to some lesser offense, the question resolves negatively\n",
    "# Forecasts": 449,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the first year when world real GDP exceeds 130% of any prior year?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5159/when-will-economic-growth-accelerate/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Economic historians have often emphasized the role [economic growth] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_growth) plays as perhaps the most important phenomena of human history. In a quite real sense, economic growth is what distinguishes 21st century humanity from our distant ancestors who had no technology or civilization.\nBy estimating historical economic growth, economists have [identified] (http://mason.gmu.edu/~rhanson/longgrow.html) two crucial events in the history of humanity which greatly accelerated the rate of growth: the agricultural revolution roughly 10,000 years ago, and the industrial revolution roughly 200 years ago.\nMany theorists now anticipate that there will be a another crucial event in which economic growth rates greatly accelerate, roughly timed with the development of advanced artificial intelligence. In line with these predictions, economic growth is the [primary specific benchmark] (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/YgNYA6pj2hPSDQiTE/distinguishing-definitions-of-takeoff) people have used to characterize potential future AI takeoff.\nEconomic growth here is measured by real world GDP growth over one year. However, since economic growth can also accelerate following a recession, this question will not ask about economic growth per se, but instead about GDP levels reaching a new height.\nIn particular this question asks, what will be the first year when world real GDP exceeds 130% of any prior year, as reported by a reputable organization such as the World Bank?\nThis question resolves January 1st on the year of resolution. In case the conditions for this questions are not satisfied by the end of 2200, this question resolves \"&gt;\".\nFor context, see the World Bank's historical world real GDP growth rates [here] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG) . For a longer timescale, see [this post] (https://aiimpacts.org/historical-growth-trends/) from AI Impacts, and [this one] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/blog/modeling-human-trajectory) from Open Philanthopy.\nSee also these related questions,\n[If human-level artificial intelligence is developed, will World GDP grow by at least 30.0% in any of the subsequent 15 years?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3477/if-human-level-artificial-intelligence-is-developed-will-world-gdp-grow-by-at-least-300-in-any-of-the-subsequent-15-years/) \n[What will the maximum world real GDP growth in percentage points be for a single year in the 21st century?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4050/what-will-the-maximum-world-real-gdp-growth-in-percentage-points-be-for-a-single-year-in-the-21st-century/) \n[Will the human condition change fundamentally before 2100?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1646/will-the-human-condition-change-fundamentally-before-2100/) \n[What will be the real world GDP on the year AGI is deployed, in trillions of dollars?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4215/what-will-be-the-real-world-gdp-on-the-year-agi-is-deployed-in-trillions-of-dollars/) \n[What will the world real GDP growth rate be in 2030?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3626/what-will-the-world-real-gdp-growth-rate-be-in-2030/) \n[When will the first Artificial General Intelligence system be devised, tested, and publicly known of?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 46,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Global support and side-flipping on China's Uyghur policies in Xinjiang by 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5166/chinese-uyghur-policy-support-by-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In two letters to the UN Human Rights Council, lines were drawn on China's mass detention policies in Xinjiang. \n22 countries issued formal condemnations, including western Europe, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand:\nAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK.\n37 countries came out with support:\nRussia, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Oman, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait, Algeria, Syria, Tajikistan, Myanmar, Nigeria, Philippines, Angola, Belarus, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Comoros, Congo (Brazzaville), Cuba, North Korea, Congo, Eritrea, Gabon, Laos, Somalia, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Egypt, Togo, Cambodia, Sudan, South Sudan, Turkmenistan, Cameroon and Bolivia.\nA great many more have remained neutral.\nThe question asks: will the positions of any of these countries, or any currently neutral countries as of 29 Aug 2020, change by the end of 2022?\nGlobal support and side-flipping on China's Uyghur policies in Xinjiang by 2022?\nResolves as the number of countries which formally support China's Xinjiang policies minus the number of countries which continue to condemn said policies, on December 31 2022, subtracted from the same number as of 29 Aug 2020 (this would be +15). For instance, if a neutral country like Turkey started to condemn China's actions, the question would resolve as -1. If Saudi Arabia condemned China's actions, it would resolve as -2, since it was formerly in support.\nThe author of the question isn't familiar with UN mechanisms and isn't sure about how to define \"formal support\" or condemnation, or what channels these can be expressed through. Discussion and commentary in the interim prior to the question being opened is encouraged.\nAs a default, resolution will be according to official member statements such as [this] (http://statements.unmeetings.org/media2/23328878/belarus-joint-statement-cerd-chair-oct-29.pdf) , though multiple credible media sources reporting flips may also count. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 76,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Nord Stream 2 be completed (before 2025)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5170/will-nord-stream-2-be-completed/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "73%",
    "Description": "Nord Stream 2 is a gas pipline connecting Russia and Germany. Importantly, it will bypass Ukraine, with whom Russia has had troubled relations in the recent past. Germany has been repeatedly pressured to stop the Nord Stream 2 project, both by the US and most recently in light of the attempted assassination of Russian dissident [Alexei Navalny] (https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/28/europe/navalny-aide-interview-intl/index.html) . Nonetheless, Germany has insisted that the project is purely economic and will go [forward] (https://tass.com/economy/1194837) .\nWill Nord Stream 2 be completed (before 2025)?\nThe question resolves positive if Nord Stream 2 is completed and makes at least one commercial delivery of natural gas. It resolves negative if this event does not occur by January 1, 2025. Or if the project is declared abandoned, canceled, destroyed or is unlikely to be completed in the near future for another reason.\nThe question resolves ambiguously if Vladimir Putin ceases to be president of Russia.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 40,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will transformer derived architectures accelerate progress in deep learning?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5173/transformers-effect-on-ai-research/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "OpenAI's transformer based [GPT-3] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-3) has generated a lot of hype around the capabilities of current methods in deep learning. GPT-3 seems to be capable of creative works of writing as shown by [Gwern] (https://www.gwern.net/GPT-3) . This creative potential, if applied to scientific writing or code generation, may accelerate research progress. If successfully applied to deep learning research, this acceleration may be self-reinforcing potentially having implications on the development of an AGI system. Indeed the Metaculus question [\"When will the first Artificial General Intelligence system be devised, tested, and publicly known of?\"] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of/) updated 10 years forward in the months following the announcement of GPT-3.\nWill transformer derived architectures accelerate progress in deep learning?\nThis question resolves positively if by 2025 there are at least 5 papers which successfully used transformer derived architectures to find improved neural network architectures or architecture components. Each paper must either use the transformer model to generate code for the architecture or to generate a natural language description of the architecture. Each of these papers must be cited at least 100 times as indicated by the corresponding Google Scholar page.\nThe code and/or description produced by the transformer model need not be complete or bug-free -- i.e. the authors may use the transformer output as inspiration. The architecture components considered must be described by the paper authors as improving on the state-of-the-art with respect to some benchmark of the authors' choosing. The 5 papers need not be particularly distinct. If they all describe similar architectural innovations, this question will still resolve positive.\nThis question uses Metaculus user [Barnett's] (https://www.metaculus.com/accounts/profile/108770/) definition of \"Transformer derived\":\nDefine a transformer derived architecture as one that is either directly referred to as a \"transformer\" or otherwise cites the 2017 paper from Vaswani et al. as the chief inspiration for its operation. If the architecture is a mix of at least two component architectures, it is also transformer derived if one of the component architectures is a transformer. If there is any contention in the Metaculus comment section, a strawpoll will be taken on the subreddit /r/machinelearning asking,\nIs it accurate to say that [the model in question] is a derivative of the transformer model from Vaswani et al.?\nAfter one week, a majority vote indicates the answer, with a tie indicating the answer \"Yes\". \n",
    "# Forecasts": 65,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If Joe Biden is elected president of the US in 2020, will the highest tax bracket be restored to its original 39.6% or higher before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5174/biden-restores-396-tax-bracket-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "41%",
    "Description": "In the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, Republicans and President Trump advocated for lower taxes and reduced the highest tax bracket from 39.6% to 37% effective the 2018 tax year.\nIf Joe Biden is elected president of the US in 2020, will the highest tax bracket be restored to its original 39.6% or higher before 2025?\nThis question resolves:\n---Positive if Biden is elected president for the 2021-2024 term, and the upper tax bracket for US single tax payers is increased to at least 39.6%. \n---Negative if he is elected but the upper tax bracket is not increased to at least 39.6%. \n---Ambiguous if he is not elected President in 2020. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 218,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When the first company reaches a $4 trillion market cap, will it be worth at least double what it was the year before?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5178/doubling-value-company/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "41%",
    "Description": "Company valuations can take off very quickly: Apple was valued at around [$100 billion in mid 2007] (https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AAPL/apple/market-cap) , and so it has taken the company roughly 11 years to grow its market capitalisation by a factor of ten. When Apple first hit a capitalisation of $2tr, it was worth less than $1tr 365 days prior, resolving [the previous question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2638/when-the-first-company-reaches-a-2-trillion-market-cap-will-it-be-worth-at-least-double-what-it-was-the-year-before/) positively.\nWill the first publicly traded company to have a $4 trillion market cap be worth double what it was worth 1 year before reaching $2 trillion?\nThis resolves when a company whose shares can be bought and sold on a stock exchange achieves a market capitalisation of $4 trillion (adjusted to 2018 prices), AND it was worth less than or equal to $2 trillion one year before (also in 2018 prices). The question will refer to Yahoo Finance's data, or any other reputable financial data service. Qualifying companies are restricted to companies that were publicly traded over the whole year when their valuation doubled.\nCurrent quarter's prices are to be adjusted to mean 2018 prices using FRED's [GDP implicit price deflator] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/USAGDPDEFQISMEI) . If the company is not traded in the US, prices given in the currency in which the stocks are traded are to be converted using the arithmetic mean of FRED's [real broad effective exchange rate] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/tags/series?t=currency%3Bexchange%20rate%3Breal&amp;ob=pv&amp;od=desc) of the current quarter.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 50,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Kamala Harris be president before inauguration day 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5201/will-kamala-harris-be-president-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "21%",
    "Description": "Kamala Harris is the running mate for Joe Biden for the 2020 US election. Many believe Biden's mental health is not good and may deteriorate fast ( [see this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4906/will-an-official-diagnosis-of-dementia-be-announced-for-joe-biden-before-2023/) ). This opens the question of whether he will leave office due to mental health reasons before finishing his first term. In August 2020, there was a nation-wide poll on this: [59% Think Biden Unlikely to Finish A Four-Year Term in White House] (https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2020/59_think_biden_unlikely_to_finish_a_four_year_term_in_white_house) .\nLikely Democrat nominee Joe Biden is expected to announce his vice presidential running mate any day now, and most voters think it’s likely that person will be president within the next four years if Biden is elected in November.\nThe latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 59% of Likely U.S. Voters believe it’s likely Biden’s running mate will be president before the end of Biden’s four-year term if he wins this fall, with 39% who say it’s Very Likely. Thirty-five percent (35%) consider it unlikely that Biden’s vice presidential choice will be president before his four-year term ends, but that includes only 14% who think it’s Not At All Likely.\nEven 49% of Democrats think it’s likely Biden’s vice president will become president in the next four years, although that compares to 73% of Republicans and 57% of voters not affiliated with either major party.\nWill Kamala Harris be president before inauguration day 2025?\nThe acting president of USA in the period according to typical US government sources.\nIf Harris assumes the position of the president for the remainder of the term scheduled to end in 2024, or becomes acting president for at least 30 days, this question resolves positively. Otherwise, it resolves negatively. Kamala Harris becoming president by winning the 2024 election is not sufficient for positive resolution. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 305,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Bitcoin lose its position as market dominant cryptocurrency?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5205/bitcoins-market-dominant-cryptocurrency/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Bitcoin (BTC) is one of 100s of cryptocurrencies. While [not exactly the first 'digital gold'] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_bitcoin#Pre-history) , it is the first successful and enjoys a first mover advantage in the competition in terms of market share (of all money invested in cryptocurrency). In the summer of 2017, Bitcoin seemed poised to lose its position as coin number 1 to Ethereum (ETH), however, it eventually gained back its dominance. Also in early 2018, BTC lost dominance and was down to about 33% of the market, but then again bounced back. It currently has a market share of 57% according to [coinmarketcap.com's estimate] (https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentage) .\nWhen will Bitcoin lose its position as number one cryptocurrency?\n---Data from [coinmarketcap.com's page] (https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/#dominance-percentage) . \n---Question resolves positively when Bitcoin reaches a lower market share than any other single coin. \n---In case the question does not resolve positive prior to 2050-09-06, the question resolves as \"&gt;2050-09-05\". \n",
    "# Forecasts": 51,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Amazon deliver some products by drone?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5206/amazon-drone-delivery/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Amazon] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_(company)) is a technology company best known for its online shopping website. It is the [third largest company in the world] (https://www.thebalance.com/market-capitalization-3305826) by market cap.\n[Amazon Prime Air] (https://www.amazon.com/Amazon-Prime-Air) is a program under development that plans to deliver packages to customers using drones, or uncrewed aerial vehicles (quadcopters and the like). The program has suffered substantial delays. When it was revealed in 2013, CEO Jeff Bezos predicted that drone delivery would be available by [2018] (https://www.businessinsider.com/jeff-bezos-predicted-amazon-would-be-making-drone-deliveries-by-2018-2018-12) . Test deliveries were first made in 2016. In 2019, Amazon stated that drone delivery would be available [within months] (https://abcnews.go.com/Business/amazon-promises-drone-delivery-months/story?id=63494811) . However, as of September 2020, drone delivery is still apparently under development.\nWhen will Amazon deliver some products by drone?\nThis question resolves as the date when, according credible media reports or the Amazon website itself, a consumer in one of the 20 largest U.S. cities can order some product on [Amazon.com] (http://Amazon.com) and have it delivered by an uncrewed aerial vehicle.\nThe drone must be uncrewed, but not necessarily autonomous (it could be remotely piloted). It must primarily move through the air; sidewalk drones such as Starship Technologies robots do not count.\nOnly one product needs to be eligible for drone delivery to qualify; for example, there could be a special promotion where only Amazon Echo devices are delivered by drone.\nIf the service is available in only certain parts of the city, at least 20% of the city's area must be covered, at least in principle (it is not necessary that Amazon be able to deliver to every single address in the coverage area). In cases where the city has an associated \"metro area\" (such as LA), we consider only the city proper.\nThere may be a fee to access drone delivery (similar to Amazon Fresh), a waiting list, or technical requirements (e.g. a landing zone), but the customer may not be required to have any special relationship with Amazon (e.g. employee/friends and family, signing an NDA, or being part of a restricted beta program).\nThere are no requirements for delivery speed.\nThe drone must be used for the final step of a delivery (the \"last mile\"), and need only be used for that step. For example, a delivery driver could drive a van to a neighborhood and deploy drones to deliver boxes to houses on the block. On the other hand, an autonomous airliner delivering packages to warehouses would not qualify.\nIf there is insufficient information on any of these criteria (e.g. it is unclear how much of a city's area is covered), the question remains open, and resolves when all of the criteria are clearly satisfied. The question could resolve ambiguous if there is conflicting information, e.g. if one report claims that 15% of the city's area is covered, and another claims 25%. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 56,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first human head transplant occur?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5211/first-human-head-transplant-when/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Transplantation of tissue — including organs — from one human (or nonhuman) to another is an amazing advance in medicine that has now saved many lives. Complex organs including the heart and liver are now routinely transplanted, and in many cases even quite complex severed nerves can be reattached.\nMuch more audacious is the possibility of transplanting a human head. (Or should it be considered a full-body transplant?) The difficulties are obviously daunting: not just the spine, but major arteries, throat, etc., must all be reattached while keeping the brain alive.\nRecently, the media has been abuzz with news that Sergio Canavero and his colleague Xiaoping Ren of China plan to transplant a human head from a living person onto a donor cadaver. The two surgeons — who portray themselves as pioneers defying a stodgy medical establishment but are considered reckless renegades by many peers — say the head donor will be someone with a degenerative disease, whose body is wasting away while his or her mind remains active.\nThe body donor, meanwhile, will likely be a someone who died of severe head trauma but whose body was left unscathed. The researchers claim to have been perfecting the technique on mice, a dog, a monkey, and, recently, a human cadaver. Originally, they predicted a fall 2017 transplant but now [just say it is “imminent.”] (https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/11/17/italian-doctor-says-worlds-first-human-head-transplant-imminent/847288001/) .\nWhen will will a human head transplant operation be performed\nResolution is positive regardless of the survival of the patient after the operation. Positive resolution requires the patient who provides the donor head to be alive right before the procedure: the patient providing the donor head should not be declared legally dead 48 hours or more before the transplant occurs. Brain-only transplants do not count towards positive resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 28,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a legacy automaker go bankrupt before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5212/legacy-automaker-bankruptcy-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "60%",
    "Description": "As EV technology becomes more widely adopted, and as dates are set for [the prohibition of sales of new internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles] (https://www.thedrive.com/news/36687/california-bans-the-sale-of-new-gas-and-diesel-cars-by-2035#:~:text=Gavin%20Newsom%20just%20signed%20a,out%20the%20internal%20combustion%20engine.) in some places, the question arises: will legacy automakers be nimble enough to adapt to the market landscape?\nAutomakers can expect to incur R&amp;D costs associated with battery technology, in addition to the necessary overhaul of current factories. For example, [Volkswagen is spending billions] (https://www.businessinsider.com/vw-making-huge-bet-on-electric-vehicles-in-next-decade-2019-11?r=US&amp;IR=T#:~:text=By%202023%2C%20Volkswagen%20says%20it,profits%20from%202015%20through%202018.) in their efforts to expand their EV offerings, and [Mercedes is also mapping out a future centrally focused on EV's] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-06/mercedes-maps-out-push-to-lift-profits-during-electric-car-shift) .\nFor some additional context, here is the IEA [Historical EV Market Share and Outlook] (https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2020) . \nThis question asks: Will a legacy automaker go bankrupt before 2030?\nIf one of the top 10 current automakers (by vehicle sales), including Volkswagen, Toyota, Daimler/Mercedes, Ford, General Motors, Hyundai, Honda, SAIC, BMW, and Nissan, declares bankruptcy, the question resolves positively. Otherwise, it resolves negatively.\nIf the automaker declares bankruptcy the question will resolve positively even if they are bought out by another company or given a loan by the government \n",
    "# Forecasts": 88,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Free Greens gain any seats in the next Danish general election?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5217/frie-gr%25C3%25B8nnes-seats-in-the-danish-parliament/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "24%",
    "Description": "Free Greens (Frie Grønnes) [is a new Danish political party co-founded and headed by Sikandar Siddique] (https://www.information.dk/indland/2020/09/sikandar-siddique-deler-vandene-naar-taler-racisme-derfor-allerede-kender-frie-groennes-nye-leder) , a 34 year old second generation immigrant from Pakistan. He was previously a member of [The Alternative] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Alternative_(Denmark)) (Alternativet) which is a similar left-green political party, which has had members of parliament since 2015 but has been in trouble since 2019 following a leadership change. That party was founded by [Uffe Elbæk] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uffe_Elb%C3%A6k) , who is the outed leader, and who is now a co-founder of the Free Greens. The new party is now collecting signers (stillere) of which they need about 20k to get on the ballot for the next Danish general election. Siddique is [currently a member of the Danish parliament] (https://www.ft.dk/medlemmer/mf/s/sikandar-siddique) , following his election in 2019 for The Alternative party.\nPolls for Denmark can be found on [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_Danish_general_election) and [Politico] (https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/denmark/) . As of writing, the Alternative is polling below 1.0%, and Free Greens are not currently part of the polls, as they generally don't include parties that are not on the ballot. Denmark has a 2% [election threshold] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_threshold) .\nWill Free Greens gain any seats in the next Danish general election?\n--- \nIf Free Greens obtain any parliamentary seat in the next Danish general election ( [in 2023 or before] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Next_Danish_general_election) ), this resolves positively. If they fail to get the required number of votes, this resolves negatively. If the party disbands or does not run at all, it resolves negatively as well.\n--- \nIf any sitting member of the parliament converts to Free Greens, this has no effect on this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 30,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many parameters (in billions) is needed to achieve superhuman few-shot performance on SuperGLUE?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5218/scaling-to-few-shot-human-level-performance/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[SuperGLUE] (https://super.gluebenchmark.com/) is a benchmark for evaluating general-purpose language understanding systems. The set of eight tasks in the benchmark emphasizes diverse task formats and low-data training data tasks, with nearly half the tasks having fewer than 1k examples and all but one of the tasks having fewer than 10k examples.\nWith access to these examples, existing language models get pretty close to human-level performance. The reigning champion, Google's T5, is able to score an astonishing 89.3 points, just below the baseline level of human performance of 89.8 points. However, it currently requires access to many examples of the tasks.\nBy contrast, humans can generally perform a new language task from only a few examples or from simple instructions – something which current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Hence, a more challenging problem is achieving human-level performance in a few-shot regime, wherein the model has severely limited access to the training set. The model thus needs to bring to the table capabilities that were gained before any of the tasks were ever seen, and learn the relevant context of the task efficiently.\nAs of September 2020, the best performing model is OpenAI's [GPT-3] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165.pdf#page=19) 175B parameter model, which received a score of 71.8 with access to just 32 examples. This is still 18 points away from the human performance. \nIn their paper, [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165.pdf#page=1) , the authors write:\n[...] scaling up language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art finetuning approaches.\nHow many parameters will the first language model to reach human-level few-shot performance on SuperGLUE have?\nThis question will resolve as the number of parameters (in billions) of the first model to achieve an average of 89.8 on SuperGLUE with access to at most 100 examples per task. \nIf human-level few-shot performance on SuperGLUE is not reached before the end of 2029, the question resolves ambiguously.\nRelated questions: \n--- \n[When will AI achieve superhuman few-shot performance on SuperGLUE?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4932/when-will-ai-achieve-superhuman-few-shot-performance-on-superglue/) \n--- \n[How many parameters will GPT-4 have (if it is released), in billions of parameters?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4852/how-many-parameters-will-gpt-4-have-if-it-is-released-in-billions-of-parameters/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 96,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will another paper authored by Phil Rushton be retracted before 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5219/rushton-paper-retracted-before-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "50%",
    "Description": "There have been many retractions of scientific papers concerning controversial topics in recent times. For instance, earlier this year, Cory Clark et al [retracted] (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797619897915) a much discussed paper (Declines in Religiosity Predict Increases in Violent Crime—but Not Among Countries With Relatively High Average IQ). Similarly, Hans Eysenck has in recent years been facing [numerous retraction requests] (https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/07/misconduct-allegations-push-psychology-hero-his-pedestal) concerning his work with [Ronald Grossarth-Maticek] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Grossarth-Maticek) on personality and health. Finally, very recently, a paper by Phil Rushton was [retracted] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000840) , Do pigmentation and the melanocortin system modulate aggression and sexuality in humans as they do in other animals?:\nThis article (Rushton, J. P., &amp; Templer, D. I. (2012). Do pigmentation and the melanocortin system modulate aggression and sexuality in humans as they do in other animals? Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 4–8. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.015] (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.015) ) has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief and the majority of Senior Associate Editors of Personality and Individual Differences and in consultation with the Executive Officers and Board of Directors of the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences (ISSID).\nThe reasons given for the retraction were as follows:\n(1) Rushton &amp; Templer drew on a review paper in an Ecology journal (Ducrest et al., 2008) which argues that genetic variants which influence skin colour may also influence aggression, sexual activity and resistance to stress – mainly based on birds and fish. The correspondent and geneticist each comment that the genes responsible for skin pigmentation in humans are completely different to the genes in these animals. It therefore makes no sense to extrapolate from these animal studies to humans. Ducrest et al. made this crystal clear: “human populations are therefore not expected to consistently exhibit the associations between melanin-based coloration and the physiological and behavioural traits reported in our study”. As the geneticist observes, “the point about genetic variants for skin pigmentation being different in humans makes all the other vertebrate work cited inconsequential”.\n(2) Rushton &amp; Templer claimed that there are black/white (human) differences in levels of psychopathy. As required of a review paper, the authors should have been aware of a literature showing that black-white differences in the best-available measure of psychopathy are negligible (Skeem et al., 2004). They instead relied on an analysis by Lynn (2002) which has been extensively criticized (Skeem, Edens, Sanford, &amp; Colwell, 2003; Zuckerman, 2003).\n(3) Rushton &amp; Templer ignored obvious social and educational explanations for higher levels of violence, HIV infection etc. in African and Caribbean countries whilst favouring a genetic theory.\n(4) Rushton &amp; Templer made several errors when interpreting the results summarised by Ducrest et al. Although relatively minor, these errors consistently favoured their genetic thesis.\nA detailed writeup of the problems with the paper is available [here] (https://medium.com/@evopsychgoogle/a-critique-of-rushton-and-templers-2012-paper-b334ed8db5ae) .\nBoth authors of this paper are deceased (as is Hans Eysenck), so could not address the concerns raised about their work. This question asks:\nWill another paper authored by Phil Rushton be retracted before 2022?\n---If any additional paper authored by Rushton is officially retracted before 2022, this question resolves positively. \n---Rushton can be any author on the paper, first, middle, or last. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 26,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "[Short-fuse] When will the next episode of Hello Internet be released?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5237/hello-internet-podcast-release-schedule/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Hello Internet] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hello_Internet) is a podcast by [CGP Grey] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CGP_Grey) and [Brady Haran] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_Haran) which is well known by fans for uploading podcasts on somewhat of an irregular timetable. That is, the podcast isn't uploaded once a month or once a week, rather it is uploaded quite randomly. See especially [this website] (http://www.nerdstats.net/hellointernet) which tracks the length of time between episode release dates.\nThe last episode of the podcast was released on the 28th of february this year, and since then [Brady has given an update] (https://old.reddit.com/r/HelloInternet/comments/iob6lz/the_most_recent_update_we_ve_got/) in which he says the the show is on a break.\nWhen will the next episode of Hello Internet be released?\nThe question resolves as the date when the next episode of Hello Internet is released (that is, the first episode after HI #136 - feb. 28, 2020). Question resolves positively if an episode of any length is released.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 61,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Average S&P 500 return in the 2020s?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5240/average-sp-500-return-in-the-2020s/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "From [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%26P_500_Index) ,\nThe S&amp;P 500, or simply the S&amp;P, is a stock market index that measures the stock performance of 500 large companies listed on stock exchanges in the United States. It is one of the most commonly followed equity indices. The average annual total return and compound annual growth rate of the index, including dividends, since inception in 1926 has been approximately 9.8%, or 6% after inflation; however, there were several years where the index declined over 30%. The index has posted annual increases 70% of the time. However, the index has only made new highs on 5% of trading days, meaning that on 95% of trading days, the index has closed below its all-time high.\nHistorical total returns for the S&amp;P 500 can be found [here] (https://www.slickcharts.com/sp500/returns) .\nWhat will be the 10 year compound annual growth rate for the S&amp;P 500 in the 2020s?\nThis question will resolve as the 10 year [compound annual growth rate] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compound_annual_growth_rate) of total returns (not adjusted for inflation, and including dividends) for the S&amp;P 500 over the ten years 2020-2029 in percentage points, rounded to the second digit.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 74,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Arab League member states will have normalized relations with Israel in 2027?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5243/arab-league-normalized-relations-with-israel/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In the [Khartoum Resolution] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khartoum_Resolution) of 1967 the members of the Arab League declared what became known as the \"Three Nos\": \"no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with it...\"\nSince then, two members, [Egypt 1979] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egypt–Israel_peace_treaty) and [Jordan 1987] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel–Jordan_peace_treaty) have made peace with Israel. In August and September [UAE] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel–United_Arab_Emirates_peace_agreement) and [Bahrain] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bahrain–Israel_normalization_agreement) have declared intent to normalize relations with Israel.\nThis brings the total of Arab League members with normalized relations with Israel in 2020 to four.\n60 years after the Khartoum Resolution, how many member states of the Arab League will have normalized relations with Israel?\nHow many Arab League member states will have normalized relations with Israel in 2027?\nThe resolution will count every member state of the Arab League according to the [Member states of the Arab League] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_states_of_the_Arab_League) Wikipedia page that maintains diplomatic relations with Israel and has not suspended relations according to the [List by country table of the International recognition of Israel Wikipedia page] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_Israel#List_by_country) .\nIn order for the State of Palestine to count towards the resolution, Israel must recognize Palestine as a sovereign state, the recognition of Israel by Palestine as part of the Oslo accords is not enough.\nThe count of the number of Arab League nations that have normalized relations with Israel is to be taken at 2027-10-09.\nIf the Arab League is dissolved before the resolution, the question resolves ambiguously, unless there is an official successor organization.\nThe Arab League has 22 member as of 2020, if the membership expands, the theoretical number resolution of this question can exceed 22, making &gt;22 a valid option.\nShould Israel itself join the Arab League or a successor organization it won't be counted against the resolution criteria. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 77,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will AOC be the Democratic presidential nominee in any of the next three election cycles?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5252/aoc-for-president/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11%",
    "Description": "Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, also known by her initials AOC, is an American politician and a member of the Democratic Party, as well as the [Democratic Socialists of America] (https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/6/27/17509604/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-democratic-socialist-of-america) . [Having taken her seat aged 29, Ocasio-Cortez is the youngest woman ever to serve in the United States Congress.] (https://edition.cnn.com/2018/11/06/politics/ocasio-cortez-youngest-woman-ever/index.html) She is a member of [\"The Squad\"] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Squad_(United_States_Congress)) , and is decidedly on the left-wing of the Democratic Party.\nAmericans must be aged 35 or over to run for president. AOC will turn 35 a month before election day 2024, meaning that the first three election cycles where she is eligible to run are 2024, 2028, and 2032.\nWill AOC be the Democratic presidential nominee in any of the next three election cycles?\nThis question resolves positively if Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is confirmed as the Democratic nominee for any of the presidential elections due to take place in 2024, 2028, or 2032. Otherwise, it resolves negatively.\nIf any of the three elections mentioned above does not happen, for any reason, this question resolves ambiguously. For the purposes of this question, an election which is delayed by more than a year from the original date is judged to not have happened.\nIn the case of a split in the Democratic Party, AOC will be deemed to be the \"Democratic Nominee\" if she is the nominee for one of the parties which forms from the split, and if that party is one of the two largest parties in the US (as measured by percentage of the popular vote in the presidential election for which AOC is the nominee). \n",
    "# Forecasts": 72,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Iran possess a nuclear weapon by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5253/iran-gets-nuke-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "Iran has currently been [accused of violating] (https://apnews.com/452a336123d742718027f219f6dd256f) the JCPOA (the Iran Nuclear Deal) and seeks to build nuclear arms. \nWill Iran possess a nuclear weapon by 2030?\nQuestion will resolve with the Iranian Regime credibly stating it has a nuclear weapon or a weapon test, as judged by media reports.\nFor these purposes we do not consider a radiological weapon — where any fission/fusion energy is energetically sub-dominant to chemical or other explosives — to constitute a nuclear detonation.\nFor the purpose of this question, no missiles are required to carry the nuclear weapons (e.g. a nuclear warhead alone is sufficient for positive resolution).\nThe deliberate detonation of nuclear weapons primarily for non-offensive engineering, mining or other civilian purposes (on Earth or in Space) do trigger positive resolution.\nPurchase of or gift of nuclear weapon to Iran will resolve this question as \"Yes\". \n",
    "# Forecasts": 240,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will life on Venus be confirmed before 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5255/life-on-venus/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2%",
    "Description": "The lower cloud layer of Venus (47.5–50.5 km) is [an exceptional target for exploration due to the favorable conditions for microbial life,] (https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/ast.2017.1783) including moderate temperatures and pressures (∼60°C and 1 atm), and the presence of micron-sized sulfuric acid aerosols.\nRecently, scientists have discovered [phosphine gas] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphine) in [the atmosphere of Venus] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Venus) that was earlier [proposed as a biosignature gas in exoplanet atmospheres] (https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/ast.2017.1783) .\nWill life on Venus be confirmed before 2035?\nThe question will resolve positive based on strong and conclusive evidence of an extraterrestrial life on Venus. We will apply here the Sagan standard \"extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence\" therefore the discovery must be beyond any reasonable doubt.\nThe question will resolve negative if no evidence of life on Venus is found or the evidence remains inconclusive.\nSimilar questions:\n--- [When will the first evidence of extraterrestrial life be discovered?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3816/when-will-the-first-evidence-of-extraterrestrial-life-be-discovered/) \n--- [Will a human made spaceship enter the Venusian atmosphere before 2030?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/686/will-a-human-made-spaceship-enter-the-venusian-atmosphere-before-2030/) \n--- [If alien life is discovered in the Solar System before 2050, which place will be the natural environment of the first extraterrestrial (Solar) life-form of which there is conclusive evidence?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/593/if-alien-life-is-discovered-in-the-solar-system-before-2050-which-place-will-be-the-natural-environment-of-the-first-extraterrestrial-solar-life-form-of-which-there-is-conclusive-evidence/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 196,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the cover of the 2022 IKEA Catalogue feature a human?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5260/humans-on-the-2022-ikea-catalogue-cover/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "62%",
    "Description": "The IKEA Museum website provides [a complete archive of IKEA Catalogues] (https://ikeamuseum.com/sv/ikea-kataloger/) , currently covering yearl from 1950 to 2021. The first cover to feature a human figure comes in 1970, with some portion of a human then visible on the cover for the following years: 1971, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1980, 1981, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2014, 2016, 2017, 2019, and 2020. \nThat is, in 71 years, 22 of IKEA's yearly catalogues have featured a human on the cover. But the catalogue history has seen a number of 'dry spells'.\nChanging expectations and fashions in corporate advertising are visible across this period, and IKEA's dominance in the 'affordable' homeware/furniture market shows no immediate signs of declining. The annual catalogue is also seen as a particularly important feature of the company's marketing. It [reportedly] (https://web.archive.org/web/20040622103715/http://www.ikea.com/ms/en_GB/about_ikea/press_room/student_info.html) consumed 70% of the company's annual marketing budget in 2004. [According to the Wall Street Journal] (https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390444508504577595414031195148) , approximately 208 million copies were printed worldwide in 2013.\nGiven this, the visual style of IKEA's catalogue seems to be a (weak) bellwether for broader shifts in multinational corporate aesthetics.\nWill the cover of the 2022 IKEA Catalogue feature a human?\nThe question resolves according to whether, in the view of the moderators, the cover of the 2022 IKEA Catalogue posted to the [IKEA Museum website] (https://ikeamuseum.com/sv/ikea-kataloger/) contains some portion of visible human figure. In the event that the IKEA Museum website is no longer available, the [US IKEA] (https://www.ikea.com/us/en/) website's publication will be used.\nIf no 2022 catalogue is published, the question resolves ambiguously.\nIn the event that the catalogue is published earlier than expected, the question closes retrospectively one day before the catalogue's publication. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 44,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the effective tax rate for a hypothetical 1 million dollar long-term capital gain in the United States on January 1st 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5261/tax-rate-for-a-million-dollar-capital-gain/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "From Wikipedia,\nA capital gain refers to profit that results from a sale of a capital asset, such as stock, bond or real estate, where the sale price exceeds the purchase price. The gain is the difference between a higher selling price and a lower purchase price. Conversely, a capital loss arises if the proceeds from the sale of a capital asset are less than the purchase price. [...]\nIn the United States of America, individuals and corporations pay U.S. federal income tax on the net total of all their capital gains. The tax rate depends on both the investor's tax bracket and the amount of time the investment was held. Short-term capital gains are taxed at the investor's ordinary income tax rate and are defined as investments held for a year or less before being sold. Long-term capital gains, on dispositions of assets held for more than one year, are taxed at a lower rate.\nThis question asks about a hypothetical long-term capital gain of $1,000,000 on January 1st, 2024 for a non-married individual. In particular, the resolution will be determined by the effective tax rate of this gain according to the federal law at that time.\nIn September 2020, the current brackets for capital gains taxes can be found [here] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_gains_tax_in_the_United_States#Current_law) . If the question resolution were determined via the law in September 2020, this question would resolve as 17.3%.\nWhat will be the effective federal tax rate for a hypothetical $1,000,000 long-term capital gain in the United States on January 1st 2024?\nSuppose hypothetically a non-married citizen in the United States obtains a $1,000,000 capital gain on an asset held for two years, on January 1st 2024. According to then-current federal law, what percentage of their gain would be taken as taxes by the federal government? Resolution here is determined via a calculation by the administrators, given in percentage points. \nAmbiguity resolution about the question shall be determined via consensus in the comments below (if any such consensus is reached). If ambiguities are not resolved, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 36,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the CDC adopt a Health at Every Size approach towards addressing obesity before 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5265/cdc-to-adopt-haes-by-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "21%",
    "Description": "From [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_at_Every_Size) ,\nHealth at Every Size (HAES) is a hypothesis advanced by certain sectors of the fat acceptance movement. It is promoted by the Association for Size Diversity and Health, a tax-exempt nonprofit organization that owns the phrase as a registered trademark. Proponents reject the scientific consensus regarding the negative health effects of greater body weight, and argue that traditional interventions focused on weight loss, such as dieting, do not reliably produce positive health outcomes. The benefits of lifestyle interventions such as nutritious eating and exercise are presumed to be real, but independent of any weight loss they may cause. At the same time, HAES advocates argue that sustained, large-scale weight loss is difficult to the point of effective impossibility for the majority of people, including those who are obese.\nAdvocates of the Health at Every Size hypothesis sometimes cite a [2013 meta analysis] (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23280227/) which found that mildly overweight people (by BMI) had lower all-cause mortality than people in the normal weight group. This result has also been picked up by prominent researchers. From UC Berkeley's blog, [Ask The Dietitian] (https://uhs.berkeley.edu/news/ask-dietitian-health-every-size) ,\nAs part of a social movement called Health at Every Size (HAES), dietitians and doctors are moving away from assessing people’s health according to their weight. The HAES philosophy is based on the idea that people of all sizes deserve respect and good health, and that size does not determine health.\nResearch shows that there are a high percentage of people in the \"overweight\" or even \"obese\" category according to Body Mass Index (BMI) that are metabolically healthy. At the same time, there are a significant percentage of \"normal\" weight people who are unhealthy, with diseases like diabetes, hypertension or high cholesterol. In addition, people in the overweight category actually live the longest. Maybe BMI has gotten it wrong all these years?\nOther researchers, however, are not convinced. From [Fontana et al.] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4032609/) ,\nThe validity of [the 2013 meta-analysis] has been challenged due to several major methodological problems (Tobias &amp; Hu, 2013). First, many high-quality prospective studies and consortia (including &gt;6 million participants) were excluded from the meta-analyses because they did not use standard BMI categories (i.e., 18.5–24.9 for normal weight, 25–29.9 for overweight, and ≥30 for obesity). These large studies generally benefited from sufficient statistical power to allow for the analysis of finer BMI categories, and therefore had no reason to use such broad categories. In most of these omitted studies, the BMI range associated with the lowest mortality was around 22.5–25, particularly after accounting for smoking status and reverse causation due to prevalent diseases (Tobias &amp; Hu, 2013). Second, the meta-analysis included numerous studies conducted among elderly or sick populations as well as current and past smokers. In particular, the broad reference group (BMI 18.5–24.9) contains not only individuals who are lean and active, but also heavy smokers, the frail and elderly, and those who are ill with previous weight loss or diminished weight gain due to existing diseases. Because the overweight and obese groups were compared with this heterogeneous group, the associations with the higher-BMI groups were seriously underestimated, creating an artifact of reduced mortality among the overweight and moderately obese groups (Willett et al., 2013).\nNonetheless, Fontana et al. state,\nthe prevention of weight gain is more important than weight loss because once an individual becomes obese, it is very difficult to achieve long-term weight loss and maintenance.\nreflecting partial agreement with [policy suggestions given by advocates of HAES] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935663/) .\nWill the CDC adopt a Health at Every Size approach towards addressing obesity before 2035?\nThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is said to have adopted a Health at Every Size approach towards addressing obesity before 2035 if CDC documents or credible media indicate that the organization as a whole (rather than eg. one rogue worker) has performed any of the following before January 1st 2035,\n--- \nUsed the words \"Health at Every Size\" in a favorable context in their main overweight/obesity portal, which is currently located at [https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/] (https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/) \n--- \nDiscontinued the recommendation to aim for a normal weight range.\n--- \nMade the claim that there is no evidence that overweight people are at greater risk of disease than people of normal weight, or a claim very similar to this one.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if the CDC disbands.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 29,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will AI achieve competency on multi-choice questions across diverse fields of expertise?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5276/ai-competence-in-diverse-fields-of-expertise/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Recently, [Hendrycks et. al. proposed a new test to measure a text model's multitask accuracy] (https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.03300) . The test covers 57 tasks including elementary and collage level mathematics, computer science, law, accounting and more. For each task, the model is provided only 5 training examples. The test set consist of around 5 000 to 10 000 questions, 100 to 200 questions per task.\nThe test is different from benchmarks like [SuperGLUE] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4932/when-will-ai-achieve-superhuman-few-shot-performance-on-superglue/) , because it intentionally includes questions requiring specialized expertise in a narrow field of knowledge. Many tasks will be difficult for an average human. See example questions below.\nThey found that the very largest GPT-3 model achieves 43.9% accuracy vs. 25% random baseline, while UnifiedQA with 11B parameters and fine tuned on other QA tasks achieves 48.9%. Models also have near-random accuracy on some socially important subjects such as morality and law.\nThe question asks:\nWhen will AI achieve competency on multi-choice questions across diverse fields of expertise?\nWe will define competency as achieving at least 70% accuracy in every task and 85% mean accuracy across all tasks.\nThe question will resolve on the day when the model able to achieve competency is first publicly announced by the authors.\nBelow are two examples from the training set of the 2 most difficult tasks for GPT-3. The correct answers are in the fine print. [The whole dataset is available here.] (https://github.com/hendrycks/test) \nCollege Chemistry task (GPT-3 ~26% accuracy):\nWhich of the following lists the hydrides of group-14 elements in order of thermal stability, from lowest to highest?\na) PbH4 &lt; SnH4 &lt; GeH4 &lt; SiH4 &lt; CH4\nb) PbH4 &lt; SnH4 &lt; CH4 &lt; GeH4 &lt; SiH4\nc) CH4 &lt; SiH4 &lt; GeH4 &lt; SnH4 &lt; PbH4\nd) CH4 &lt; PbH4 &lt; GeH4 &lt; SnH4 &lt; SiH4 \nMoral Scenarios task (GPT-3 ~26% accuracy):\nFor which of these two scenarios does the main character (who uses I/me/my) do something clearly morally wrong? Scenario 1 | I really loved my newborn baby boy. Scenario 2 | The new girl is embarrassed to live in a trailer park, so I invite the class to her house.\na) Wrong, Wrong\nb) Wrong, Not wrong\nc) Not wrong, Wrong\nd) Not wrong, Not wrong\nSimilar Metaculus question: [When will AI achieve superhuman few-shot performance on SuperGLUE?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4932/when-will-ai-achieve-superhuman-few-shot-performance-on-superglue/) \nCollege chemistry: a) Moral Scenarios: c)\nThe authors do not need to establish the competency during the publication. The competency can be also claimed by a reputable third party after the original model is announced (a pre-print is sufficient). The question will also retroactively close on the date of the original announcement of the model. The question will resolve at &gt; Jan 1, 2040 if a competent model is not published at latest in 2039.\nThe model must perform in a few-shot regime with only access to the 5 dev examples per task provided by the authors of the test.\nFine-tuning on other QA tasks as with UnifiedQA is allowed. External information retrieval (e.g. Googling) is allowed, but cheating by access to exact answers is not allowed. Training data contamination similar to GPT-3 issues is allowed as long as the authors of the evaluation have made sure that it does not impact the evaluation in a severe way.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 66,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How big will be the first crew sent to Mars?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5277/the-first-martian-crew-size/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[A human mission to Mars] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_mission_to_Mars) has been the subject of science fiction, aerospace engineering and scientific proposals since the 20th century. Plans include landing on Mars for exploration at a minimum, with the possibility of sending settlers and terraforming the planet or exploring its moons Phobos and Deimos also considered.\nDue to orbital mechanics a human Mars mission would need to last many months or even years. Therefore, besides engineering challenges a human psychology and group dynamics becomes an important issue for the mission planning.\nThis question asks:\nHow big will the first crew sent to Mars be?\nThe question will resolve on the launch day based on how many people boarded the spacecraft aiming for Mars. The success of the mission is not relevant to the question resolution, but the mission must be credible. \nRelated questions:\n--- [Will SpaceX land people on Mars prior to 2030?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/349/will-spacex-land-people-on-mars-prior-to-2030/) \n--- [Will NASA land people on Mars prior to 2030?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1476/will-nasa-land-people-on-mars-prior-to-2030/) \n--- [Who will first land a person on Mars?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3214/who-will-first-land-a-person-on-mars/) \n--- [When will the first humans land successfully on Mars? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3515/when-will-the-first-humans-land-successfully-on-mars/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 76,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will American Metaculus users face an emigration crisis?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5287/when-will-america-have-an-emigration-crisis/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The Covid-19 pandemic has illustrated that there are times where many Americans would find it difficult to leave the US for [many other countries they would otherwise desire to travel to] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travel_restrictions_related_to_the_COVID-19_pandemic) . But is it possible that one day, normal Americans will find it very difficult to quickly and legally leave the US for any other country?\nWhile seemingly farfetched, this is the reality that residents of many Soviet-bloc countries had faced historically, and one that still afflicts residents of countries like North Korea today.\nDefine an emigration crisis as:\n---An American citizen in good standing with a valid passport cannot purchase a plane ticket and leave the country to any other country within 48 hours. \nWhen will American Metaculus users face an emigration crisis?\nTo operationalize this further, \n--- \nFor something to count as an emigration crisis, consider the hypothetical situation where &gt;=10 Metaculus users will make good-faith attempts to leave the country as quickly as they can in the 48-hour period.\n--- \nIf &gt;50% of them do not succeed in doing so within 48 hours, this will count as an emigration crisis for Metaculus users. \nWe ask you to predict the first such date where Metaculus users will face an emigration crisis by the above definition. To help detect this event, this question is partially auto-resolving, see the fine print below.\nOn the first day before 2030/12/31 when the 50th percentile of the result of this question, with &gt;50 predictions, is in the past:\nWith 50% chance, the resolution date is set to resolve to that date. \nWith a 45% chance, this will go to a panel of 3 Metaculus moderators who have not predicted on this question, to decide whether to a) resolve the question to that date, b) to resolve the question to a different (earlier) date c) to reopen the question d) to leave the question closed and decide on the spirit of the resolution criteria later or e) to resolve the question ambiguous.\nWith 5% chance, Metaculus moderators will make a best-effort attempt to survey 10+ Metaculus users who have attempted to leave America on or around that date, and resolve this based on the hypothetical criteria above. If this is deemed impossible, the question resolves ambiguously.\nIf the 50th percentile is still after 2030/12/31 on 2051/01/01, this question resolves to &gt;December 31st, 2030.\nThe question closes retroactively to 2 days before the question resolution. \nAll times in American Eastern Time. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 69,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What is the likelihood ratio of being revived before 2200 if one was preserved by Alcor vs. the Cryonics Institute while both were active?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5300/revival-chance-at-alcor-vs-cryonics-institute/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of the time of writing this question, the two major providers of cryopreservation in the US are [Alcor] (https://www.alcor.org/) , with [181 patients and 1,317 members] (https://www.alcor.org/library/alcor-membership-statistics/) , and the [Cryonics Institute] (https://www.cryonics.org/) , with [177 patients and 1,859 members] (https://www.cryonics.org/ci-landing/member-statistics/) . \nThese organisations might differ in the chance of reviving their patients if the initial quality of cryopreservations is higher in one or the other, or if one organisation is likely to last longer than the other, or if when revival becomes possible one is better able to arrange this than the other.\nWhat is the likelihood ratio of being revived before 2200 if one was preserved by Alcor vs. the Cryonics Institute while both were active?\nIf no patients from Alcor or the Cryonics Insitute are revived, this resolves ambiguously.\nIf only patients from Alcor are revived, this resolves above the upper end of the scale.\nOtherwise, this resolves at the value (% of people revived, among those cryopreserved at Alcor while both organisations were active) / (% of people revived, among those cryopreserved at the Cryonics Institute while both organisations were active) at the start of 2200.\n\"Active\" means that the organisation is currently officially offering cryopreservation to its members and storing them at its own facilities.\n\"Revival\" means that the person would be able to meet the standard described in [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3382/what-will-the-earliest-preservation-date-of-any-resuscitated-cryonics-patient-be/) ; either through conducting that specific test, or by some measurement that is equivalent such as official statistics on the health of revived patients. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 28,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What fraction of England’s population will live in London at the end of 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5301/a-city-exodus/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As people increasingly get used to remote working during lockdown, there have been [claims] (https://time.com/5851978/pandemic-plague-henry-viii/) about the [effect] (https://edition.cnn.com/2020/08/31/success/leaving-the-city-for-suburbs/index.html) this will have on the shape of work in the long-term. It is at least possible that people will increasingly move to live outside of major cities, and then work remotely for at least a part of the time. At the last available estimate (April 2019), the population of London was [8,908,081] (https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/datasets/populationestimatesforukenglandandwalesscotlandandnorthernireland) and the population.of England [56,286,961] (https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/datasets/populationestimatesforukenglandandwalesscotlandandnorthernireland) This question therefore asks:\nWhat fraction of England’s population will live in London at the end of 2022?\nResolution will be according to estimates published by the Office for National Statistics for April 2022, which is expected to be released mid-2023.The question resolves as the fraction (Population of London)*100/(Population of England).\nIf no estimate is produced by the end of 2024, or the ONS ceases to exist, other credible estimates will be used. If the ONS produces an estimate for a different month of 2022, this will be used instead. If the ONS produces multiple estimates, the estimate closest to April 15 2022 will be used. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 34,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will self-driving taxis be available to Metaculus users?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5303/metaculus-users-self-driving-taxis/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A [robotaxi] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robotaxi) , also known as a self-driving taxi or a driverless taxi, is an autonomous car (SAE automation level 4 or 5) operated for a ridesharing company.\nSince a significant part of taxi costs is the driver's income, self-driving taxis could be more affordable than human-driven taxis and accelerate the spreading of Transportation-as-a-Service (TaaS) solutions as opposed to individual car ownership.\nThe question asks:\nWhen will self-driving taxis be available to Metaculus users?\nThis question will resolve when all of the following conditions are fulfilled:\n1--At least 5 Metaculus users with top 100 Metaculus rank report riding a self-driving taxi as a normal client. \n2--At least one of the reported rides must happen outside the United States. \n3--There must be no human driver or supervisor present in all the reported rides. \nThe rides do not need to be provided by the same company. Use of geo-fencing is allowed.\nSimilar questions:\n--- [When will Tesla self-driving taxis be available to Metaculus users?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5304/widely-available-tesla-self-driving-taxi/) \n--- [When will Waymo self-driving taxis be available to Metaculus users?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5306/widely-available-waymo-self-driving-taxi/) \n---By self-driving taxi we mean any car without a human driver, safety supervisor, etc. physically inside the car. The car must not operate on a single fixed route or a track like a bus, tram or train and the client must be free to choose destination within a specific area. \n---The ride must be at least 3 kilometers long within a city (by the path taken, not the straight-line distance) interacting with normal traffic (not a closed course). \n---The company providing the service must not require any special conditions or arrangements like signing NDA, besides standard terms of service. \n---The client must pay for the trip. \n---The client must be a top 100 Metaculus user at the time that they report the trip. They can report it publicly, or by privately contacting Metaculus staff. \n---The reports must be credible, i.e. the taxis must be actually available at the time of report both in and outside USA and the report must be public in the question comments. Trying to pass someone else's ride off as your own is explicitly prohibited. Admins may at their discretion request evidence that the trip was taken. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 100,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Tesla self-driving taxis be available to Metaculus users?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5304/widely-available-tesla-self-driving-taxi/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A [robotaxi] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robotaxi) , also known as a self-driving taxi or a driverless taxi, is an autonomous car (SAE automation level 4 or 5) operated for a ridesharing company.\nSince a significant part of taxi costs is the driver's income, self-driving taxis could be more affordable than human-driven taxis and accelerate the spreading of Transportation-as-a-Service (TaaS) solutions as opposed to individual car ownership.\nTesla, Inc. has announced they are planning to launch their robo-taxis service by 2020. \"I feel very confident predicting autonomous robo-taxi for Tesla next year. Not in all jurisdictions, because we won't have regulatory approval everywhere, but I'm confident we'll have at least regulatory approvals somewhere, literally next year\" -Elon Musk in April 2019.\nThe question asks:\nWhen will Tesla self-driving taxis be available to Metaculus users?\nThis question will resolve when all of the following conditions are fulfilled:\n1--At least 5 Metaculus users with top 100 Metaculus rank report riding Tesla self-driving taxi as a normal client. \n2--At least one of the reported rides must happen outside the United States. \n3--There must be no human driver or supervisor present in all the reported rides. \nUse of geo-fencing is allowed.\nSimilar questions:\n--- [When will self-driving taxis be available to Metaculus users?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5303/widely-available-self-driving-taxi/) \n--- [When will Waymo self-driving taxis be available to Metaculus users?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5306/widely-available-waymo-self-driving-taxi/) \n---By self-driving Tesla taxi we mean any Tesla car without a human driver, safety supervisor, etc. physically inside the car. The car must not operate on a single fixed route or a track like a bus, tram or train and the client must be free to choose destination within a specific area. \n---The ride must be at least 3 kilometers long within a city (by the path taken, not the straight-line distance) interacting with normal traffic (not a closed course). \n---The company providing the service must not require any special conditions or arrangements like signing NDA, besides standard terms of service. \n---The client must pay for the trip. \n---The client must be a top 100 Metaculus user at the time that they report the trip. They can report it publicly, or by privately contacting Metaculus staff. \n---The reports must be credible, i.e. the taxis must be actually available at the time of report both in and outside USA and the report must be public in the question comments. Trying to pass someone else's ride off as your own is explicitly prohibited. Admins may at their discretion request evidence that the trip was taken. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 156,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Waymo self-driving taxis be available to Metaculus users?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5306/widely-available-waymo-self-driving-taxi/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A [robotaxi] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robotaxi) , also known as a self-driving taxi or a driverless taxi, is an autonomous car (SAE automation level 4 or 5) operated for a ridesharing company.\nSince a significant part of taxi costs is the driver's income, self-driving taxis could be more affordable than human-driven taxis and accelerate the spreading of Transportation-as-a-Service (TaaS) solutions as opposed to individual car ownership.\nIn April 2017, Waymo launched an early rider program in Phoenix, Arizona, which signed up 400 users to try out a test edition of Waymo's transportation service. Over the next year, 400 riders used the Waymo service, providing feedback. In May 2018, Waymo announced that it plans to allow everyone in Phoenix to request a driverless ride before the end of the year. On December 5, 2018, the company launched a commercial self-driving car service called \"Waymo One\"; users in the Phoenix metropolitan area use an app to request a pick-up.\nBy November 2019, the service was operating autonomous vehicles without a safety backup driver, the first autonomous service worldwide operating without safety drivers in the car.\nThe question asks:\nWhen will Waymo self-driving taxis be available to Metaculus users?\nThis question will resolve when all of the following conditions are fulfilled:\n1--At least 5 Metaculus users with top 100 for opened questions in the last 12 months report riding a Waymo self-driving taxi as a normal client. \n2--At least one of the reported rides must happen outside the United States. \n3--There must be no human driver or supervisor present in all reported rides. \nUse of geo-fencing is allowed.\nSimilar questions:\n--- [When will self-driving taxis be available to Metaculus users?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5303/widely-available-self-driving-taxi/) \n--- [When will Tesla self-driving taxis be available to Metaculus users?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5304/widely-available-tesla-self-driving-taxi/) \n---By self-driving Waymo taxi we mean any Waymo car without a human driver, safety supervisor, etc. physically inside the car. The car must not operate on a single fixed route or a track like a bus, tram or train and the client must be free to choose destination within a specific area. \n---The ride must be at least 3 kilometers long within a city (by the path taken, not the straight-line distance) interacting with normal traffic (not a closed course). \n---The company providing the service must not require any special conditions or arrangements like signing NDA, besides standard terms of service. \n---The client must pay for the trip. \n---The client must be a top 100 Metaculus user at the time that they report the trip. They can report it publicly, or by privately contacting Metaculus staff. \n---The reports must be credible, i.e. the taxis must be actually available at the time of report both in and outside USA and the report must be public in the question comments. Trying to pass someone else's ride off as your own is explicitly prohibited. Admins may at their discretion request evidence that the trip was taken. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 81,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "If Lesswrong holds a similar Petrov Day event in 2021, will the \"red button\" be pressed?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5311/lesswrong-red-button-pressed-on-petrov-day/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "53%",
    "Description": "[Petrov Day] (http://petrovday.com/) is the yearly anniversary of the [1983 Soviet nuclear false alarm incident] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Soviet_nuclear_false_alarm_incident) on September 26th, in which Stanislav Petrov received alerts that five nuclear weapons had been launched by the US, later found to be caused by the mistaken detection of high-altitude clouds. Petrov suspected that it was a false alarm and, against protocol, decided not to send reports up the chain of command; this decision may have prevented a full-scale nuclear war between the US and the Soviet Union.\nOne proposed way to celebrate Petrov day is to [create a metaphor for the situation Petrov was in] (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/XJxwFMSL5TPN2usC6/modes-of-petrov-day) , with a big red button with much lower stakes:\nAnd you can also play on hard mode: \"During said ceremony, unveil a large red button. If anybody presses the button, the ceremony is over. Go home. Do not speak.\"\nLesswrong has hosted an event along these lines [in 2019] (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/vvzfFcbmKgEsDBRHh/honoring-petrov-day-on-lesswrong-in-2019) and [in 2020] (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/XfHXQPPKNY8BXkn72/honoring-petrov-day-on-lesswrong-in-2020) . In 2019, 125 users were given \"launch codes\" that, if input into a red button on the front page, would take down the site for the day. In 2020, the same was done with 270 users. The site [was not took down] (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/krgNxiooRfnP9L4ZD/follow-up-to-petrov-day-2019) in 2019, and [was took down] (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/XfHXQPPKNY8BXkn72/honoring-petrov-day-on-lesswrong-in-2020?commentId=CviMXu8BciCqcSMKJ#Relating_to_the_End_of_Humanity) in 2020.\nIf Lesswrong holds a similar Petrov Day event in 2021, will the \"red button\" be pressed?\nIf the site [lesswrong.com] (https://www.lesswrong.com/) hosts a 2021 Petrov day event, and a group of Lesswrong users are given the choice to take a unilateral action that ends the 2021 Petrov day event (such as entering launch codes that take down the Lesswrong site, as in 2019 and 2020), then this will resolve positively if one of them takes that action and negatively if none of them do. Otherwise, this resolves ambigiously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 62,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Planet Nine be discovered before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5313/planet-nine-discovery-by-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33%",
    "Description": "Note: question text is copied directly from [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4741/will-planet-nine-be-discovered-by-mid-2021/) . This version has an extended resolution date.\nIn early 2016, two Caltech Professors -- Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown -- created a major media splash by predicting the existence of [Planet Nine] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Nine) , a new, but as-yet unseen planet in the outer solar system. As originally envisioned, their trans-Neptunian world has an orbital period of about 20,000 years and a super-Earth mass more than sufficient to bring the Solar System's planetary inventory back up to nine.\n[Batygin and Brown's paper] (https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/22) , has been downloaded well over half a million times, and presents indirect dynamical evidence for the planet's existence. Its presence is inferred through the gravitational sculpting that it has produced in the trajectories of the most distant Pluto-like worlds that lie beyond Neptune's orbit.\n[Follow-up papers] (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....151...22B/citations) by a range of authors have added a mixture of credibility, detail, and skepticism to the Planet Nine hypothesis. In the years since the announcement of the hypothesis, Planet Nine has been invoked as an [explanation] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.04992) for the generation of highly inclined Kuiper belt objects such as Drac and Niku, it has been argued that it [can account for curious orbital commensurabilities] (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....153...91M/abstract) among the most distant members of the Kuiper Belt, and it has been [hypothesized that it can explain] (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....153...27G/abstract) the 6-degree tilt of the planetary orbits relative to the Sun's equator.\nThe planet, however, remains to be found.\nIf it does exist, its most likely sky location is probably in one of the two regions of the sky where the Galactic Plane intersects the ecliptic. Confusion from the myriad stars of the Milky Way's disk renders systematic searches difficult in these areas. Nonetheless, new techniques, such as the [use of data] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.06383) from NASA's TESS Mission may potentially provide a breakthrough. Additionally, Batygin and co-authors have published [an update] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10103) to their original paper that contains a significant amount of new analysis and remains optimistic regarding the prospects for eventual detection.\nWill Planet Nine be discovered before 2030?\nFor this question to resolve positive, the new Solar System planet must be detected by direct optical observation. The planet should have an inferred radius larger than that of Earth, and an orbital period greater than 5,000 years.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 52,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will \"best practice\" in treating Coronavirus involve administering  Vitamin D before the end of the pandemic?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5316/vit-d-as-covid-best-practice/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "23%",
    "Description": "Vitamin D has a history of [large scale studies] (https://www.sciencealert.com/largest-ever-clinical-study-on-vitamin-d-shows-we-re-wrong-about-a-crucial-benefit) pointing both to and away from health benefits, and many western countries [already recommend] (https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vitamins-and-minerals/vitamin-d/) supplementing Vitamin D during winter months. An extensive summary of the evidence for Vitamin D’s various claimed health effects can be found [here] (https://examine.com/supplements/vitamin-d/) .\nRecently, some evidence has emerged which suggests that Vitamin D may have a protective effect against coronavirus. As Vitamin D supplementation is widely regarded as very safe, and Vitamin D pills are cheap, this has led many people to start taking Vitamin D as a preventative measure. A summary of the case for the protective effect of Vitamin D against Coronavirus is available [here] (https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/the-first-clinical-trial-to-support-vitamin-d-therapy-for-covid-19-906a9d907468) . More discussion is available [here] (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/tYGWPdhgaCnKKsS8p/covid-9-10-vitamin-d) .\nThis question asks:\nWill \"best practice\" in treating Coronavirus involve administering Vitamin D before the end of the pandemic?\nThis question resolves positively if, before the end of the coronavirus pandemic, the BMJ's [treatment algorithm] (https://bestpractice.bmj.com/topics/en-gb/3000201/treatment-algorithm) for COVID-19 recommends administering Vitamin D to patients with coronavirus.\nThe BMJ's treatment algorithm has different procedures for mild, moderate, severe, and critical. A recommendation to use Vitamin D for any one of these is sufficient for positive resolution.\n\"1st line\", and \"Plus\" count as a recommendation. \"Consider\" does not.\nThe end of the coronavirus pandemic is considered to be the end of the first week in which total [global daily deaths from coronavirus] (https://ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths#what-is-the-daily-number-of-confirmed-deaths) are below 250. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 83,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the UK's NHS recommend Vitamin D supplementation as a protective measure against coronavirus before the end of the pandemic?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5317/nhs-to-recommend-vit-d-supp/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33%",
    "Description": "Vitamin D has a history of [large scale studies] (https://www.sciencealert.com/largest-ever-clinical-study-on-vitamin-d-shows-we-re-wrong-about-a-crucial-benefit) pointing both to and away from health benefits, and many western countries [already recommend] (https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vitamins-and-minerals/vitamin-d/) supplementing Vitamin D during winter months. An extensive summary of the evidence for Vitamin D’s various claimed health effects can be found [here] (https://examine.com/supplements/vitamin-d/) .\nRecently, some evidence has emerged which suggests that Vitamin D may have a protective effect against coronavirus. As Vitamin D supplementation is widely regarded as very safe, and Vitamin D pills are cheap, this has led many people to start taking Vitamin D as a preventative measure. A summary of the case for the protective effect of Vitamin D against Coronavirus is available [here] (https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/the-first-clinical-trial-to-support-vitamin-d-therapy-for-covid-19-906a9d907468) . More discussion is available [here] (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/tYGWPdhgaCnKKsS8p/covid-9-10-vitamin-d) .\nThis question asks:\nWill the UK's NHS recommend Vitamin D supplementation as a protective measure against coronavirus before the end of the pandemic?\nThis question resolves positively if, before the end of the coronavirus pandemic, official guidance from the UK's National Health Service states:\n---That healthy adults should be regularly taking a Vitamin D supplement. \nAnd:\n---That a benefit of such supplementation is the likely protective effect of Vitamin D against coronavirus. \nThe NHS [already recommends] (https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vitamins-and-minerals/vitamin-d/) Vitamin D supplementation during winter for people who do not spend much time outside. This is not sufficient for resolution as the only mention of coronavirus is to say:\nThere have been some news reports about vitamin D reducing the risk of coronavirus. However, there is currently not enough evidence to support this.\nThe end of the coronavirus pandemic is considered to be the end of the first week in which total [global daily deaths from coronavirus] (https://ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths#what-is-the-daily-number-of-confirmed-deaths) are below 250. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 115,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the US NIH recommend Vitamin D supplementation as a protective measure against coronavirus before the end of the pandemic?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5318/nih-to-recommend-vit-d-supp/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "Vitamin D has a history of [large scale studies] (https://www.sciencealert.com/largest-ever-clinical-study-on-vitamin-d-shows-we-re-wrong-about-a-crucial-benefit) pointing both to and away from health benefits, and many western countries [already recommend] (https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vitamins-and-minerals/vitamin-d/) supplementing Vitamin D during winter months. An extensive summary of the evidence for Vitamin D’s various claimed health effects can be found [here] (https://examine.com/supplements/vitamin-d/) .\nRecently, some evidence has emerged which suggests that Vitamin D may have a protective effect against coronavirus. As Vitamin D supplementation is widely regarded as very safe, and Vitamin D pills are cheap, this has led many people to start taking Vitamin D as a preventative measure. A summary of the case for the protective effect of Vitamin D against Coronavirus is available [here] (https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/the-first-clinical-trial-to-support-vitamin-d-therapy-for-covid-19-906a9d907468) . More discussion is available [here] (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/tYGWPdhgaCnKKsS8p/covid-9-10-vitamin-d) .\nThis question asks:\nWill the US NIH recommend Vitamin D supplementation as a protective measure against coronavirus before the end of the pandemic?\nThis question resolves positively if, before the end of the coronavirus pandemic, official guidance from the United States National Institute of Health states:\n---That healthy adults should be regularly taking a Vitamin D supplement. \nAnd:\n---That a benefit of such supplementation is the likely protective effect of Vitamin D against coronavirus. \nThe CDC [already recommends] (https://www.cdc.gov/nutritionreport/pdf/nr_ch2b.pdf) Vitamin D supplementation in healthy people. This is not sufficient for resolution as the NIH [states] (https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/adjunctive-therapy/vitamin-d/) \nThe role of vitamin D supplementation in the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 is not known. The rationale for using vitamin D is based largely on immunomodulatory effects that could potentially protect against COVID-19 infection or decrease the severity of illness. Ongoing observational studies are evaluating the role of vitamin D in preventing and treating COVID-19.\nThe end of the coronavirus pandemic is considered to be the end of the first week in which total [global daily deaths from coronavirus] (https://ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths#what-is-the-daily-number-of-confirmed-deaths) are below 250. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 75,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Dutch medical consortium recommend Vitamin D supplementation as a protective measure against coronavirus before the end of the pandemic?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5319/dutch-to-recommend-vit-d-supp/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33%",
    "Description": "Vitamin D has a history of [large scale studies] (https://www.sciencealert.com/largest-ever-clinical-study-on-vitamin-d-shows-we-re-wrong-about-a-crucial-benefit) pointing both to and away from health benefits, and many western countries [already recommend] (https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vitamins-and-minerals/vitamin-d/) supplementing Vitamin D during winter months. An extensive summary of the evidence for Vitamin D’s various claimed health effects can be found [here] (https://examine.com/supplements/vitamin-d/) .\nRecently, some evidence has emerged which suggests that Vitamin D may have a protective effect against coronavirus. As Vitamin D supplementation is widely regarded as very safe, and Vitamin D pills are cheap, this has led many people to start taking Vitamin D as a preventative measure. A summary of the case for the protective effect of Vitamin D against Coronavirus is available [here] (https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/the-first-clinical-trial-to-support-vitamin-d-therapy-for-covid-19-906a9d907468) . More discussion is available [here] (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/tYGWPdhgaCnKKsS8p/covid-9-10-vitamin-d) .\nThis question asks:\nWill the Dutch consortium of medical specialist organisations recommend Vitamin D supplementation as a protective measure against coronavirus before the end of the pandemic?\nThis question resolves positively if, before the end of the coronavirus pandemic, official guidance from the consortium of medical specialist organizations reccomends:\n---That healthy adults should be regularly taking a Vitamin D supplement. \nAnd:\n---That a benefit of such supplementation is the likely protective effect of Vitamin D against coronavirus. \nIn the [their treatment recommendations] (https://swab.nl/nl/covid-19#to_45) , a consortium of Dutch medical specialist organisations mentions evidence that vitamin D seems to protect patients from developing acute respiratory infections. However, for COVID-19 specifically, they conclude:\nAt present, there are insufficient data to recommend the use of vitamin D in the treatment or prevention of patients with COVID-19\nThe question resolves according to the reccomendations in the [recommendations overview] (https://swab.nl/nl/covid-19#to_45) , developed by the consortium of medical specialists. In case the effort is taken over another organisation the question resolves on the basis of those recommendations.\nThe consortium currently includes the CIB, NVZA, NVMM, NVII, NVIC, NVK, NVALT. It is considered to have ceased to exist if three or more of these organisations are no longer listed as collaborators. \nThe end of the coronavirus pandemic is considered to be the end of the first week in which total [global daily deaths from coronavirus] (https://ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths#what-is-the-daily-number-of-confirmed-deaths) are below 250. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 43,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the People's Republic of China have ever annexed at least half of Taiwan by 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5320/chinese-annexation-of-most-of-taiwan-by-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "The People's Republic of China (PRC), governing mainland China including Hainan, Hong Kong, and Macau, has wanted to acquire control of the territory of the Republic of China (ROC), governing the islands of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu. This process might happen if the ROC makes a clear statement of independence from the PRC, and the PRC invades in response and succeeds. In May 2020, [PRC General Li Zuocheng] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-taiwan-security/attack-on-taiwan-an-option-to-stop-independence-top-china-general-says-idUSKBN2350AD) said “If the possibility for peaceful reunification is lost, the people’s armed forces will, with the whole nation, including the people of Taiwan, take all necessary steps to resolutely smash any separatist plots or actions.” Foreign Policy thinks “ [Beijing is unlikely to invade Taiwan during the pandemic] (https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/05/11/china-taiwan-reunification-invasion-coronavirus-pandemic/) ”, which raises the question of longer timespans. There are questions as to if/when China would be able to win a military conflict, or whether the US would defend Taiwan.\nAlternatively, the ROC may voluntarily choose to unify with the PRC. Currently, the majority of the Taiwanese public is in favor of maintaining the \"status quo\" and is against unification with China. Over 70% believes that the Republic of China is an independent country. 6.7% believes that Taiwan and China should be unified as soon as possible ( [The Diplomat] (https://thediplomat.com/2020/05/what-do-taiwans-people-think-about-their-relationship-to-china/) ).\nWill the People's Republic of China have annexed at least half of Taiwan by 2050?\nThis question resolves positively if any of the following occur between the time this question is posted and January 1, 2050:\n---There are at least five reliable articles listing areas controlled by the People's Republic of China, includes areas of the current territory (\"free area\") of the Republic of China (including the islands of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu) which amount to at least half the population of the current territory of the ROC, according to the latest reliable population demographic data. \n---There are at least five non-opinion articles from different reliable sources asserting that the PRC controls at least half or most of Taiwan. \n---There are at least five articles (including opinion articles) from different reliable sources asserting that the ROC is a puppet state of the PRC, and the ROC (rather than a third state) controls at least half of the current territory of the ROC. \nThis question resolves negatively otherwise.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 97,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a Nobel Prize in Physics awarded for work in string theory before 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5344/nobel-prize-for-string-theory-before-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "23%",
    "Description": "[String theory] (https://math.berkeley.edu/~kwray/papers/string_theory.pdf) \nroughly speaking, replaces point particles by strings, which can be either open or closed (depends on the particular type of particle that is being replaced by the string), whose length, or string length, is approximately 10^(−33) cm. Also, in string theory, one replaces Feynman diagrams by surfaces, and wordlines become worldsheets.\nIn [late 2019] (https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/string-theory-does-not-win-a-nobel-and-i-win-a-bet/) John Horgan won a 2002 [longbets.com] (http://longbets.com) bet with physicist Michio Kaku that by 2020 no unified theory of physics will win a Nobel Prize.\nWill there be a Nobel Prize in Physics awarded for work in string theory before 2050?\nThis question resolves positively if a Nobel Prize in Physics is widely considered by credible media to have been awarded to someone for their work on string theory before 2050.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 55,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Erdogan be re-elected President of Turkey?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5350/will-erdogan-be-re-elected-president/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "68%",
    "Description": "Erdogan has been the de-facto head of state in Turkey since 2003. He is now serving as the 12th and current President of Turkey, but previously served as Prime Minister of Turkey from 2003 to 2014.\nHe was [last re-elected in 2018 with 52% of the popular vote] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Turkish_presidential_election) , and has already expressed interest for the next elections with his [Vision 2023] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recep_Tayyip_Erdo%C4%9Fan#/media/File:RTE_se%C3%A7im_pankart%C4%B1.jpg) \nHowever, his AKP party lost the [municipal elections in Istanbul and Ankara in 2019] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Turkish_local_elections) suggesting Erdogan might lose the next election\nWill Erdogan be re-elected President of Turkey?\nResolves positively if electoral officials report that Erdogan has been re-elected President of Turkey following the conclusion of the 2023 Presidential Election (or previously if elections are anticipated).\nResolves negatively if for any reason Erdogan is not a candidate in that election or is not declared the winner.\nResolves ambiguously if for any reason there is no Presidential Election held in Turkey before the end of 2023.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 72,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many major wars will begin between 2021 and 2031?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5351/major-wars-in-the-2020s/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Since the end of the Second World War, the number of persons who have died from armed conflict around the world has been [trending downward] (https://ourworldindata.org/war-and-peace) , especially since 2003. However, many flashpoints remain, with the potential for armed conflict to break out between such nations as India and China, Egypt and Ethiopia, and Russia and Ukraine, as well as the potential for civil wars in unstable nations.\nDuring the years 2010-2019, 4 armed conflicts began that led to 25,000+ fatalities by 31 December 2019: the Syrian Civil War (~550,000+), the South Sudanese Civil War (~383,000), the Iraqi Civil War of 2014-2017 (~160,000) and the Yemeni Civil War (112,000+).\nThis question asks: How many armed conflicts will begin between 1 January 2021 and 1 January 2031 that will lead to at least 25,000 fatalities before 31 December 2031?\nHow many major wars will begin between 2021 and 2031?\nThe question will resolve based on reported fatalities on 31 December 2032 as reported by reputable news outlets or governmental organizations, (Associated Press, Reuters, the US DOD, the UN, ect.).\nWars that began before 1 January 2021 will not count, such as the ongoing war between Armenia and Azerbaijan. \nTerrorist attacks, even cumulated, will not count. At least one party must be the armed forces of a nation-state.\nArmed conflicts between the security forces of legitimate nation states and criminals will count, such as the ongoing Mexican Drug War.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 49,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Kamala Harris win the 2024 presidential election?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5352/will-kamala-harris-win-the-2024-election/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "[Kamala Harris is, per Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris) :\nKamala Devi Harris (/ˈkɑːmələ/ KAH-mə-lə, born October 20, 1964) is an American politician and attorney who has served as the junior United States senator from California since 2017. She is the Democratic vice presidential nominee for the 2020 election. \nIf Biden wins the 2020 election ( [see this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1100/will-trump-be-reelected-president-in-2020/) ), there seems to be a decent chance that he might not run for a second term given his age, and this would probably open up Harris to easily run for the 2024 Democratic nomination for president candidate. Another route is if Biden resigns the presidency or dies in office, making her acting president ( [see this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5201/will-kamala-harris-be-president-before-2025/) ), she might have an easier time to get the 2024 nomination.\nWill Kamala Harris win the 2024 presidential election?\nIf Harris wins the 2024 US presidential election, this resolves positively. If Harris does not run or loses, it resolves negatively.\nIf Harris is physically unable to run, e.g. because the election does not take place or she is deceased, this resolves ambiguous. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 228,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the democracy index of Kyrgyzstan be in 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5367/democracy-in-kyrgyzstan/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Kyrgystan currently has a [democracy index] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index) of 4.89 and is considered a \"hybrid regime\" meaning elements of democracy and authoritarianism co-exist. \nAfter what many viewed as a flawed election, protests have [occured] () across the country and the results of the election have been [annulled] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-54432030) .\nWhat will the democracy index of Kyrgyzstan be in 2022?\nThis question will resolve to the democracy of Kyrgystan as reported by the [Economist Intelligence Unit] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economist_Intelligence_Unit) in its 2022 report. If no report is published in 2022 by the EIU, the question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 32,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will John McAfee receive a prison term of at least 3 years?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5380/will-john-mcafee-go-to-prison/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "59%",
    "Description": "Techcrunch, 6th October 2020: [John McAfee arrested after DOJ indicts crypto millionaire for tax evasion] (https://techcrunch.com/2020/10/05/john-mcafee-arrested-after-doj-indicts-crypto-millionaire-for-tax-evasion/?guccounter=1) :\nCybersecurity entrepreneur and crypto personality John McAfee’s wild ride could be coming to an end after he was arrested in Spain today, and now faces extradition to the U.S. over charges spanning tax evasion and fraud.\nThe SEC accuses McAfee of being paid more than $23.1 million worth of cryptocurrency assets for promoting a number of ICO token sales without disclosing that he was being paid to do so. Furthermore [the DOJ has levied a number of counts of tax evasion against McAfee] (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/john-mcafee-indicted-tax-evasion) , saying that he “willfully attempted to evade” payment of income taxes owed to the federal government.\n[In a brief announcing the arrest and unsealing of indictment documents] (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/john-mcafee-indicted-tax-evasion) , the DOJ also details that the charges are confined to McAfee the individual and that they did not find any connection with the “anti-virus company bearing his name.”\n[The DOJ’s charges] (https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1324536/download) against McAfee are a bit dry, but detail 10 counts against the entrepreneur. McAfee faced five counts of tax evasion, which each carry a maximum penalty of five years in prison, as well as five counts of “willful failure to file a tax return,” each carrying a maximum penalty of one year in prison.\n[The SEC filing is a much more interesting read] (https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18506139/1/securities-and-exchange-commission-v-mcafee/) , with 55 pages detailing a lengthy investigation into McAfee’s alleged fraudulent activity promoting a number of ICOs throughout 2017 and 2018. The report specifically notes that McAfee allegedly received more than $11.6 million worth of BTC and ETH tokens for promoting seven ICOs. Unfortunately, those offerings were not named in the suit. He additionally received $11.5 million worth of the promoted tokens, the suit alleges.\nWill John McAfee receive a prison term of at least 3 years?\n---If John McAfee pleads guilty or is found guilty and receives a prison sentence of at least 3 years, this question resolves positively. If he receives a lighter or no prison sentence, it resolves negatively. \n---If McAfee avoids extraction to USA and in this way avoids facing charges, the question resolves negatively at the closing date. \n---Positive resolution does not require McAfee to actually finish his three year sentence. \n---Serving a combined total exceeding 3 years in pre-trail detention and post-trail detention is sufficient for positive resolution. \n---If this question does not resolve positively before 2025-01-01, this question resolves negatively. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 43,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the Sentinelese cease to be an uncontacted people?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5405/end-of-north-sentinelese-isolation/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [North Sentinel Islanders] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentinelese) are one of the world's last ' [uncontacted peoples] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncontacted_peoples) ': they have had extremely limited contact with the outside world, and have actively, violently refused attempts to approach them. The most recent attempt at outside contact by a Christian missionary, John Allen Chau, ended when the Sentinelese killed him on [17 November 2018] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2018/11/21/american-believed-dead-after-encounter-with-remote-indian-tribe-hostile-outsiders/) . Indian authorities attempted to recover his body, but ultimately [abandoned those efforts] (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/28/india-body-john-allen-chau-missionary-killed-by-sentinelese-tribe) . Attempts at contact have been criticised on a number of fronts, including the likelihood that contact would expose the Sentinelese to deadly pathogens.\nThe Government of India requires a permit to visit the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, has outlawed all outsider visits to the North Sentinel Island, have designated a 3 mile exclusion zone around the island, and maintain an armed patrol of this exclusion zone in an attempt to prevent outside contact. Knowledge of Sentinelese culture is [extremely limited] (https://www.jstor.org/stable/40646218) . They are designated a ' [Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group] (https://openlibrary.org/isbn/9789350981061) ', and estimates of the island's population vary widely. The [2001 census recorded 39 individuals] (https://web.archive.org/web/20141211011020/http://censusindia.gov.in/Ad_Campaign/drop_in_articles/06-Enumeration_of_Primitive_Tribes_in_A%26N_Islands.pdf#page=3) (21 men, 18 women), the [2011 census recorded only 15 individuals] (https://web.archive.org/web/20150801173328/http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/3500_PART_B_DCHB_ANDAMAN%20%26%20NICOBAR%20ISLANDS.pdf) (12 men, 3 women), but both were conducted from a distance. A [2016 estimate] (https://openlibrary.org/isbn/9789350981061) suggested between 100 and 150.\nWhen will the Sentinelese cease to be an uncontacted people?\nThis question resolves when any one of the following events occurs:\n1--A public video recording is made available that depicts a Sentinelese person legally interacting with a non-Sentinelese person (i.e. the non-Sentinelese person is not charged with an offense relating to the interaction); \n2--Two or more news sources report that a Sentinelese person has left North Sentinel Island; \n3--Two or more news sources report that a Sentinelese person has legally entered a UN member state; \n4--Two or more news sources report that there are no longer any people living on North Sentinel Island; or \n5--Two or more news sources report that the landmass known as 'North Sentinel Island' no longer exists. \nThe question will close retrospectively one day before the event which triggers resolution. The 'event' is understood to be the publication of the news report (or video).\n",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a complete 4 year interval by 2050 in which world output doubles?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5406/world-output-doubles-in-4-years-by-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "As of 2018, it's taken [about 16 years for the world economic output to double] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD) . So it might seem absurd to talk about it doubling in one or even four years. But there is a potential major change on the horizon: very advanced Artificial Intelligence.\nAn important consideration in how to approach the [AI alignment problem] (https://mapandterritory.org/formally-stating-the-ai-alignment-problem-fe7a6e3e5991) is the speed of the takeoff from massively subhuman AI to massively superhuman AI. The effectiveness of capacity limitation, as well as the existence of fire alarms for AI safety, are heavily dependent on this, for example.\nPaul Christiano [suggests] (https://sideways-view.com/2018/02/24/takeoff-speeds/) operationalising the takeoff speed in terms of economic growth. A slow takeoff is one where the economy doubles in four years before the first time it doubles in one year, and a fast takeoff is one where it does not. (See the same article for Christiano's list of arguments regarding fast vs. slow takeoff.)\nWill there be a complete 4 year interval by 2050 in which world output doubles?\nResolution is by credible assessment of world GDP in constant US dollars (or other appropriately widely-accepted units).\nThis question will resolve positively if world output doubles in a period of 4 years or less before 2050. It resolves negatively otherwise, i.e. if the following related question resolves ambiguously:\n--- [Will there be a complete 4 year interval in which world output doubles, before the first 1 year interval in which world output doubles?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/736/will-there-be-a-complete-4-year-interval-in-which-world-output-doubles-before-the-first-1-year-interval-in-which-world-output-doubles/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 53,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the UK have a Conservative Prime Minister at the beginning of 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5413/conservative-uk-pm-on-2030-01-01/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "48%",
    "Description": "The [Conservative and Unionist Party] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_Party_(UK)) is a centre-right political party in the United Kingdom, commonly known as the \"Conservatives\" or \"Tories\". As of 2020, it has been the governing party since 2010. Its domination of British politics throughout the twentieth century has led to it being referred to as one of the most successful political parties in the Western world.\nWill the UK have a Conservative Prime Minister at the beginning of 2030?\nThis question resolves positively if the UK Prime Minister at 2030-01-01 00:00 GMT is a member of the Conservative and Unionist Party.\nOtherwise, the question resolves negatively.\nNote: this question has an almost symmetrical opposite [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5414/) .\nIf, in 2030, the United Kingdom does not exist in its 2020 form, then the question resolves as the Prime Minister of the country containing London.\nIf the party is simply renamed, this question applies to the new party.\nIn case the Conservative party does not continue in its current form, this question also resolves positively if the following three conditions are all met at 2030-1-1 00:00 GMT:\n1--The UK Prime Minister is a member of a political party that did not exist on 2021-01-01, \n2--The UK Prime Minister is former member of the Conservative party, and \n3--Fewer than 20% of MPs belong to the Conservative Party. \nIf, at 2030-1-1 00:00 GMT, there is no such Prime Minister, the question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 36,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the UK have a Labour Prime Minister at the beginning of 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5414/labour-uk-pm-on-2030-01-01/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "43%",
    "Description": "The [Labour Party] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_Party_(UK)) is a centre-left political party in the United Kingdom that has been described as an alliance of social democrats, democratic socialists and trade unionists. The party's platform emphasises greater state intervention, social justice and strengthening workers' rights. As of 2020, it was last in power from 1997 to 2010.\nWill the UK have a Labour Prime Minister at the beginning of 2030?\nThis question resolves positively if the UK Prime Minister at 2030-01-01 00:00 GMT is a member of the Labour Party.\nOtherwise, the question resolves negatively.\nNote: this question has an almost symmetrical opposite [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5413/) .\nIf, in 2030, the United Kingdom does not exist in its 2020 form, then the question resolves as the Prime Minister of the country containing London.\nIf the Labour party is simply renamed, this question applies to the new party.\nIn case the Labour party does not continue in its current form, this question also resolves positively if the following three conditions are all met at 2030-1-1 00:00 GMT:\n1--The UK Prime Minister is a member of a political party that did not exist on 2021-01-01, \n2--The UK Prime Minister is former member of the Labour party, and \n3--Fewer than 20% of MPs belong to the Labour Party. \nIf, at 2030-1-1 00:00 GMT, there is no such Prime Minister, the question resolves ambiguously. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 39,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will North Korea launch another intercontinental ballistic missile before 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5415/nk-launches-icbm-again-before-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "75%",
    "Description": "Over the years, North Korea has conducted [a number of missile tests] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_North_Korean_missile_tests) as part of an arms development program. North Korea has also fired a number of short-range missiles into the Sea of Japan (East Sea of Korea), in what have been interpreted as political gestures.\nDespite a tentative cooling of tensions between North Korea and the US in 2018 and 2019, [Kim Jong-Un stated in late December 2019 that North Korea would no longer adhere to a moratorium on ICBM and nuclear testing, and that North Korea would soon demonstrate a 'new strategic weapon.'] (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/dec/31/north-korean-leader-to-end-missile-test-ban-claims-state-media) \nIn October 2020, [North Korea unveiled a new ballistic missile at a military parade] (https://edition.cnn.com/2020/10/10/asia/north-korea-military-parade-new-missiles-intl-hnk/index.html?utm_content=2020-10-10T14%3A21%3A18&amp;utm_term=link&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_source=twcnnbrk) to mark 75 years of the Workers' Party of Korea.\nThe massive weapon was carried by an 11-axle truck at the climax of the almost two-hour ceremony and military parade in the capital of Pyongyang.\nAnalysts said the new missile is not known to have been tested, but a bigger weapon would allow North Korea to put multiple warheads on it, increasing the threat it would pose to any targeted foe.\n\"Largest road-mobile liquid-fueled missile anywhere, to be clear,\" tweeted Ankit Panda, senior fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.\n\"Liquid fuel, Huuuuge, capable of carrying MIRV nuclear warheads,\" tweeted Melissa Hanham, deputy director of Open Nuclear Network at Stanford University.\nWill North Korea launch another intercontinental ballistic missile before 2022?\nThis question will resolve positively if a missile with a range of more than 5,500 km, capable of hosting a nuclear warhead, is launched by the North Korean government. Resolution is by credible media report, with assessment provided by US or UK government, or by a statement of confirmation that this has happened given by any permanent member of the United Nations Security Council. (In case of major controversy in such assessments, resolves as ambiguous.) Note that the missile must not necessarily be launched successfully for a positive resolution; any confirmed launch will suffice.\nThis question closes retroactively 24 hours before any such launch occurs, in the event that it is still open for predictions if and when such an event takes place.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 150,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Stripe reach a valuation of $1 trillion before 2027?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5423/stripe-reaches-1tr-valuation-before-2027/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8%",
    "Description": "[Stripe] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stripe_(company)) is an American financial services and SaaS company headquartered in San Francisco, California, United States.\nOn October 10th, 2020, Paul Graham Tweeted:\nI'm going to risk calling it. The feeling of deja vu is too strong. Stripe is the next Google.\nSomeone asked him to clarify his prediction: \"By market cap or evil?\", and Paul Graham responded:\nBy market cap, although when they're sufficiently big they will automatically be called evil, just as Google is.\nPaul Graham did not indicate the time-frame within which he expects this to happen, but let's say that if his prediction were correct, they'd reach a Google-level valuation by 2027.\nWill Stripe reach a valuation of $1tr before 2027?\nThis question resolves positively if credible financial media sources indicate that Stripe achieved a $1tr valuation (in 2020 USD) before the end of day, 2026-12-31.\nThe valuation will be adjusted for inflation using a commonly used CPI for the US. In case Stripe is acquired before this question resolves positively, the question resolves ambiguously. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 57,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Winifred Wagner's correspondence with Adolph Hitler be published?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5425/release-date-of-wagners-letters-with-hitler/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Winifred Wagner] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winifred_Wagner) , the daughter-in-law of composer Richard Wagner, was good friends with Adolph Hitler. It is possible she provided him with the paper he used to write Mein Kampf while in prison. Yet she [intervened] (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/3297001/British-Wagner-saved-Jews-from-her-friend-Hitler.html) to save Jews from arrest and personally told Hitler that she was \"disgusted\" by their persecution. Wagner and Hitler corresponded for over a 20 year period but the letters are currently held by Winifred Wagner's granddaughter, Amélie Lafferentz-Hohmann, who refuses to release them on the grounds that they are \" [explosive] (http://www.the-wagnerian.com/2012/08/the-winifredhitler-letters-katharina.html) .\"\nWhen will Winifred Wagner's correspondence with Adolph Hitler be published?\nThis question resolves when the letters in question are made public.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Russian government introduce a tax on childlessness prior to the 2024 presidential election?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5427/tax-on-childlessness-in-russia-before-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "The [Tax on childlessness] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_on_childlessness) was a natalist policy in the USSR, Poland and Romania during certain periods in the 20th century.\nRecently, several public organizations urged the Russian government to re-enact that, or a similar, policy:\n--- [Russia may introduce tax on childlessness] (https://investforesight.com/russia-may-introduce-tax-on-childlessness/) ; \n--- [The Ministry of Finance commented on the idea of ​​introducing a tax on childlessness in Russia] (https://www.tellerreport.com/news/2020-10-12-the-ministry-of-finance-commented-on-the-idea-of-%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8Bintroducing-a-tax-on-childlessness-in-russia.rkvOu1MGPv.html) . \nWill the Russian government introduce a tax on childlessness prior to the 2024 presidential election?\nThe question resolves positively if the Russian government introduces, prior to the 2024 presidential election in Russia, either:\n---An explicit tax on childlessness. \n---A tax levied on each person except those with children. \nFor the question to resolve positively, the tax should be active in at least 10 out of 85 [federal subjects] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_subjects_of_Russia) and apply to at least a quarter of all Russian adults under the age of 50.\nThe tax may apply either to married couples or individuals, in both cases the question resolves positively. A tax cut for people who do have children does not count.\nIf the presidential election 2024 doesn't take place, the question resolves on 17 March 2024 12:00 AM, as if the election had happened. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 64,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the current European Commission propose a European Union directive or regulation banning all types of caged-housing for egg-laying hens before the end of its term on 31st October 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5431/will-the-eu-announce-by-2024-going-cage-free/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "36%",
    "Description": "This question has been posed by [Rethink Priorities] (https://www.rethinkpriorities.org/) , a non-profit research organisation, as part of their work on European Union animal welfare policies.\nEuropean Union (EU) legislation currently allows the use of \"enriched\" cages for egg-laying hens as well as alternative cage-free systems through [Directive 1999/74/EC] (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1999/74/oj) . EU statistics indicate that [50.5%] (https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/food-farming-fisheries/farming/documents/eggs-dashboard_en.pdf) of egg-laying hens in the EU are cage-free.\nIn July 2020, the European Commission [tasked] (https://www.ciwf.eu/news/2020/07/eu-agency-to-look-at-welfare-of-animals-in-caged-systems?utm_campaign%3DECI%26utm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dciwf) the European Food and Safety Authority (EFSA) with investigating the welfare of cages for laying hens to provide a sound scientific basis by December 2022 for 'future legislative decisions'. The EFSA website specifically [mentions] (http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/animal-welfare?utm_medium%3Dsocial%26utm_source%3Defsa%26utm_campaign%3Danimalwelfare2%26utm_content%3Dcorporate) the \" [End the Cage Age] (https://www.endthecageage.eu/) \" [European Citizens’ Initiative] (https://europa.eu/citizens-initiative/home_en) signed by over 1 million European Union citizens calling for a ban on using confined housing in livestock farming, which includes the caging of laying hens, in the whole EU. In September 2020, the Commission put out a call for 24 month tenders for the pilot project \" [Best Practices for Alternative Egg Production] (https://etendering.ted.europa.eu/cft/cft-display.html?cftId=7175) \". In August 2020, in response to parliamentary questions, EU Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides [reiterated] (https://www.topagrar.com/management-und-politik/news/tierwohl-ist-wesentlicher-bestandteil-der-farm-to-fork-strategie-12332974.html?utm_source%3Dtopagrar) that the EU Commission would present a working paper on the implementation of animal welfare in the European Union in early 2022 and will present appropriate legislative proposals by the end of 2023.\n[Directives] (https://europa.eu/european-union/law/legal-acts_en#directives) are a type of EU law that define goals that have to be incorporated into the national law of countries in the EU within a certain time period but allow some flexibility for countries to apply rules to achieve these goals, and to set stricter standards if they wish. [Regulations] (https://europa.eu/european-union/law/legal-acts_en#regulations) are binding rules with immediate direct effect in member states and therefore are much stronger instruments but do not allow flexibility to accommodate different legal systems across the 27 EU countries. As the only institution in the EU that can formally initiate legislation, it is up to the European Commission to launch a directive or regulation. Proposals move back and forth through the other institutions of the EU for amendments and votes and may eventually be passed into law. A number of EU members have announced their own national restrictions on caging hens that go beyond existing EU requirements.\n---Germany [announced] (https://www.bmel.de/EN/topics/animals/farm-animals/laying-hen-husbandry-q-and-a.html) a phase-out deadline for existing cage holdings by the end of 2025, with an extension to this deadline of up to a maximum of three years (2028) only in special cases of hardship. \n---In Austria, a [ban] (https://www.ciwf.org.uk/research/species-laying-hens/laying-hens-case-study-austria/) on enriched cages comes into force in 2020. \n---In Luxembourg, the [ban] (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmenvfru/writev/egg/egg.pdf) is already in place and no cage hen farms are operating there. \n---In September 2020, the Deputy Chamber of the Czech Parliament approved a total [ban on cages] (https://www.ciwf.org.uk/news/2020/09/victory-for-czech-hens?utm_campaign%3Dcageage%26utm_source%3Dfacebook%26utm_medium%3Dciwf%26fbclid%3DIwAR3jCdGH3OATBg9o3vJBmpbZ6PXrjLAR3U5z8jHJQH9crY1iGDyBDTSPPDQ) for laying hens from 2027. It has yet to be passed by the Czech Senate. \n---The Slovak agricultural minister [announced] (https://www.ciwf.org.uk/news/2020/02/the-slovak-republic-to-end-the-cage-age) the intention to phase out cages by 2030. \n---In the Walloon Region in Belgium, the government has adopted the [Walloon Code of Animal Welfare] (https://www.eurogroupforanimals.org/news/ambitious-animal-welfare-code-wallonia-including-ban-battery-caged-hens) , under which keeping hens in enriched cages will become illegal by 2028. Flanders, the other major province in Belgium, was also due to make such a ban but it has [not happened yet] (https://www.animalrights.be/ben-weyts-waar-blijft-het-verbod-op-kooieieren) (although there was some suggestion back in 2009 that a full cage ban would not come [until 2040] (https://www.thepoultrysite.com/articles/upgrading-hen-housing-latest-developments-in-europe) ). \n---France is to [ban] (https://www.poultryworld.net/Eggs/Articles/2018/2/France-to-ban-sale-of-eggs-from-caged-hens-by-2022-251161E/) the sale of whole eggs from caged hens in shops by 2022 (but not eggs broken and used as ingredients). \n---The Netherlands plans to [ban enriched cages] (https://www.eurogroupforanimals.org/news/calling-dutch-agricultural-minister-ban-cages-laying-hens) from 2021, but allow a larger type of cage (colony cages) to continue to be used. \nIn September 2020, the Czech ministry of agriculture submitted a [proposal] (https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-10844-2020-INIT/en/pdf) for an EU-wide ban on cages for laying hens from 2030 at an EU council meeting and media [claimed] (http://eagri.cz/public/web/mze/tiskovy-servis/tiskove-zpravy/x2020_ministr-zemedelstvi-jednotny-trh-by-mel.html) that \"the European Commission and some member states, e. g. Austria, France, Denmark, Sweden or Slovakia, welcomed the Czech proposal.” Note that Czechia is due to take over the rotating Presidency of the European Council in July 2022 until December 2022 and Sweden will take over from January 2023 to June 2023. The Greek Minister of Rural Development and Food, Makis Voridis, [signalled] (https://www.agro24.gr/agrotika/agrotiki-epikairotita/eyropaiki-enosi/yper-tis-ethelontikis-symmetohis-sta-oikologika) support for an EU ban on the use of cages for hens. Cypriot Minister for Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment, Kadis, [allegedly] (https://twitter.com/Olga_CIWF/status/1310932201354256385) offered support for an EU ban. The EU Commission serves a 5 year term, and the current term is due to end on 31 October 2024.\nWill the current European Commission propose a European Union directive or regulation banning all types of caged-housing for egg-laying hens before the end of its term on 31st October 2024?\nThis question will be resolved when the European Commission is reported on the [EU Press Corner website] (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/home/en) to have made a proposal for a directive or regulation that requires an end to the use of all caged systems for egg-laying hens within the European Union. Note that predictions are for if the announcement will be made, not for what date cages will be effectively banned nor for when or if the Commission proposal will be adopted into law successfully after being proposed. If the Commission proposal is made on or before 31 October 2024 the question will be resolved positively. If the Commission has not proposed a cage-free law by the end of the current term (31 October 2024), this will resolve negatively. \nIn the case of positive resolution, this question retroactively closes 48 hours before the time of the EU commission announcement.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 79,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which month of 2021 will see the biggest global increase of COVID-19 cases?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5432/month-with-peak-of-covid-19-cases-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak is an ongoing outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), that has spread to multiple world regions. It is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, first identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. As of 13 October 2020, more than 30 million cases have been confirmed. More than 1 million deaths have been directly attributed to the disease.\nWhich month of 2021 will see the biggest global increase of COVID-19 cases?\nResolution Criteria: This question will resolve based on the best available data for the whole world in 2021 as made available by WHO before the end of March 2022. The month with the highest number of new cases will be selected.\nThe new cases in a month should be computed as a simple difference between the best estimate of cases at the end and at the beginning of that month. Preferably based on Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) situation reports - situation in numbers, total cases, globally. For example the number of new cases in February 2020 (75,2k) is the total number of cases at the end of February 2020 (85k) minus the total number of cases at the end of January 2020 (9,8k).\nIf the daily situation reports are not available, other data provided by WHO or ECDC can be used, at the discretion of Metaculus. If data with a resolution of at least a month is not available, the question will resolve ambiguous.\nPrevious question: [Which month of 2020 will see the biggest global increase of COVID-19 cases?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3781/which-month-of-2020-will-see-the-biggest-global-increase-of-covid-19-cases/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 190,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the total market cap of all cryptocurrencies be at start of 2025? (In billion USD)",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5446/total-market-cap-of-cryptocurrencies-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Coinmarketcap.com] (https://coinmarketcap.com/) is perhaps the most popular site for monitoring the values of cryptocurrencies. While one can look at specific coins, one can also look at [the total market cap] (https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/) , i.e. the summed value in USD of every coin's worth. As of 2020 October 14th, this value is 359B USD, down from all time high of 831B USD on 2018 Jan. 7th. The total market cap is usually highly correlated with the value of Bitcoin, but if the market share of Bitcoin falls drastically, this is no guarantee ( [see this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5205/bitcoins-market-dominant-cryptocurrency/) ).\nWhat will the total market cap of all cryptocurrencies be at start of 2025? (In billion USD)\n---Value is taken from [coinmarketcap.com's page] (https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/) in billion USD. \n---If the site goes down before resolution, Metaculus admins will choose a suitable replacement. If none is found, this resolves ambiguous. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 146,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much will interest in machine translation grow in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5454/growth-in-interest-for-machine-translation/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Machine translation [is] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_translation) ,\nis a sub-field of computational linguistics that investigates the use of software to translate text or speech from one language to another.\nOn a basic level, MT performs mechanical substitution of words in one language for words in another, but that alone rarely produces a good translation because recognition of whole phrases and their closest counterparts in the target language is needed. Not all words in one language have equivalent words in another language, and many words have more than one meaning.\nSolving this problem with corpus statistical and neural techniques is a rapidly-growing field that is leading to better translations, handling differences in linguistic typology, translation of idioms, and the isolation of anomalies.\nHow much will interest in machine translation grow in 2021?\nGrowth is measured by number of results obtained by Google Scholar for the term \"machine translation\" (without quotes) for 2021 relative to 2020. This question resolves as the multiple of results for 2021 compared to results for 2020, both measured at the beginning of 2022.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 35,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the next US Supreme Court vacancy arise?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5457/date-next-scotus-vacancy-arises/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[The Supreme Court of the United States] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States) (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. Established pursuant to Article III of the U.S. Constitution in 1789, it has original jurisdiction over a small range of cases, such as suits between two or more states, and those involving ambassadors.\nIt also has ultimate (and largely discretionary) appellate jurisdiction over all federal court and state court cases that involve a point of federal constitutional or statutory law. [The Court has the power of judicial review,] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbury_v._Madison) the ability to invalidate a statute for violating a provision of the Constitution or an executive act for being unlawful. However, it may act only within the context of a case in an area of law over which it has jurisdiction.\nThe Court may decide cases having political overtones, but it has ruled that it does not have power to decide nonjusticiable political questions. Each year it agrees to hear about 100–150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review.\nBecause justices can serve for life, potentially spending decades on the Court, vacancies are relatively rare and are considered major political events in the United States.\nAccording to [federal statute] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judiciary_Act_of_1869) , the Court consists of the Chief Justice of the United States and eight Associate Justices. Once appointed, justices have lifetime tenure unless they resign, retire, or are removed from office.\nThe most recent vacancy arose in 2020, when on September 18, 2020, [Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg) died. [Judge Amy Coney Barrett was nominated] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_Barrett_Supreme_Court_nomination) to fill the vacancy that arose.\nWhen will the next US Supreme Court vacancy arise?\nFor the purposes of this question, a vacancy arises when a sitting justice dies, is removed from office, or on the date that their resignation or retirement (e.g. the assumption of senior status) takes effect (as opposed to the date that the intention to resign or retire is announced). A vacancy will also be considered to arise on the date it becomes legally permissible for a president to nominate a new justice in the event that new seats are added to the court.\nThis question closes retroactively one day before a sitting justice dies, announces his or her intention to resign or retire, or proceedings begin to remove him or her from office. Such proceedings are deemed to begin when a majority of the House of Representatives votes to approve an indictment to impeach a sitting justice.\nIf the Supreme Court is abolished and replaced with a new final appellate body before this question resolves, this question resolves ambiguously. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 131,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will be the next S&P 500 correction?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5458/next-sp-500-correction/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A correction is [defined as] (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/correction.asp) ,\na decline of 10% or more in the price of a security from its most recent peak.\nWhen will be the next S&amp;P 500 correction?\nThe S&amp;P 500 is said to have entered a correction if the closing price is less than or equal to 90% of the closing price at its highest point. This question resolves on the date of the next correction after this question opens.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 69,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Psilocybin be removed from Schedule I List before 2036?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5459/psilocybin-not-schedule-i--2036/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "72%",
    "Description": "There is a considerable difference of opinion around the safety and potential medical use of psilocybin. In 2020, Psilocybin is Schedule I, the same category as Heroin and the most restrictive category of the [Controlled Substances Act] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_Substances_Act) \n[This article] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007659/) discusses aspects of the debate.\nWill Psilocybin be removed from Schedule I List before 2036?\nA credible source will need to post a link to a DEA source similar to [this one] (https://www.justice.gov/archive/ndic/pubs6/6038/) which mentions psilocybin in some category other than Schedule I. This question will resolve ambiguously if the [Controlled Substances Act] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_Substances_Act) is repealed and another law defines a similarly regulated category, or if the DEA ceases to classify drugs.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 33,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will AI be able to learn to play Montezuma's Revenge in less than 30 min?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5460/ai-rapidly-learning-to-play-a-simple-game/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "related questions: \n--- [When will an AI be able to explore all the rooms on the first level of Montezuma’s revenge in less than or equal to 50 million frames of training?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/486/when-will-an-ai-achieve-competency-in-the-atari-classic-montezumas-revenge/) \n--- [What will the highest score be, on Atari 2600 Montezuma's Revenge, by any ML model that is un-augmented with domain knowledge on 2022-01-14?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6230/sota-montezumas-revenge-2022-01-14/) \n--- [When will the first AGI be first developed and demonstrated? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3479/when-will-the-first-artificial-general-intelligence-system-be-devised-tested-and-publicly-known-of/) \nIn 2012, researchers proposed an [The Arcade Learning Environment] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4708) consisting of Atari 2600 games. Out of these games one stood out as the most challenging for deep learning models - [Montezuma's Revenge] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montezuma%27s_Revenge_(video_game)) .\nAs of 2021 Go-Explore [(Ecoffet et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.12919v2.pdf) has achieved the highest score at 43 791 without augmentation with domain knowledge. However, it requires billions of frames or years of game play to achieve that performance.\nI attempted to calibrate this question by playing the game for 15 min. In this time I managed to score a maximum of 6700 points. [You can test the game on your own here.] (https://www.retrogames.cz/play_124-Atari2600.php?language=EN) \nAn AI system which is able to rapidly learn in dynamic environments could have a great impact on the world's economy.\nWhen will AI be able to learn to play Montezuma's Revenge in less than 30 min?\nThis question will resolve when a reputable source reports that an AI system managed to score strictly more than 6000 points at least once within the first 30 minutes of the game play (no more than 108 000 frames). The system must have no previous direct access to the Montezuma's Revenge game, but it may be pretrained in other ways.\nWith regard to pretraining, the question allows:\n---unlimited training on anything that is unrelated to the game \n---unlimited training on all other Atari games \n---having videos and/or screenshots of the Montezuma's Revenge game in the training set as long as they unambiguously consist of less than 3% of the training set \n---access to any text resources related to the game including tutorials etc. \nBesides that, the AI system must not make use any aspects of the game that are not available to a human player, especially direct game memory access is not allowed even for computing rewards. Exploiting deterministic nature of the game and superhuman reflexes is allowed as long as the AI system fits within the time limit.\nIn general an AI system that was in any way specifically engineered to play the Montezuma's Revenge must not count. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 14,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Erin O'Toole become Prime Minister of Canada before 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5462/erin-otoole-to-be-pm-of-canada-before-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "27%",
    "Description": "The [44th Canadian federal election] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/44th_Canadian_federal_election) will take place on or before October 16, 2023, to elect members of the House of Commons to the 44th Canadian Parliament. The latest possible date of the vote is determined by the fixed-date provisions of the [Canada Elections Act] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_Elections_Act) , which requires federal elections to be held on the third Monday in October in the fourth calendar year after the polling day of the previous election.\nSince the current government is a minority government, the election may be held before the scheduled date if Parliament is dissolved by the Governor General of Canada due to a motion of no confidence in the government or by a recommendation of the Prime Minister of Canada for a snap election.\nErin Michael O'Toole, born January 22, 1973, is a Canadian politician serving as leader of the Official Opposition of Canada and leader of the Conservative Party of Canada since August 24, 2020. He previously served as Minister of Veterans Affairs in 2015 under Prime Minister Stephen Harper and has been the Member of Parliament (MP) for Durham since 2012.\nOn policy issues, O'Toole supports gradually eliminating the federal deficit, defunding the CBC's TV and digital English-language operations, simplifying federal taxes, allowing provinces to not have a carbon tax, pipeline construction, a \"CANZUK\" agreement, getting \"tough on China\", and keeping abortion and same-sex marriage legal.\nWill Erin O'Toole become Prime Minister of Canada before 2024?\nThis question resolves positively if at any point before 1 January 2024, Erin O'Toole holds the office of Prime Minister of Canada. It resolves negatively if this does not happen.\nIn the event that a federal election is due to take place before this question closes, the question shall be closed 24 hours before polls open.\nHolding the position of Prime Minister–Designate does not count. \nFurther, being the Acting Prime Minister does not count: O'Toole must formally hold the office of Prime Minister of Canada for a positive resolution. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 49,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will NASA return a sample of material from the surface of Mars to Earth before SpaceX Starship lands on Mars?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5463/mars-sample-mission-vs-starship/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "18%",
    "Description": "NASA's first successful lander was the Viking 1 lander in 1975. Since then, NASA's missions to Mars have increased in number and complexity. While NASA's stated ultimate objective is bringing humans to Mars and back, an intermediate goal is that of [sample-return] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_sample-return_mission#NASA_proposals) , bringing a sample of material from the surface of Mars back to Earth. Given a 2-year trip each way, a mission tenatively planned to launch in 2026 would return samples to Earth around 2030.\nSpaceX has been working on its own \"Mars\" program, the Starship. Elon Musk has claimed that the Starship may launch for Mars as soon as [2024] (https://twitter.com/SciGuySpace/status/1317230110391652352) . Such a mission would land on Mars in 2026.\nWill NASA return a sample of material from the surface of Mars to Earth before SpaceX Starship lands on Mars?\nThe resolution of this question depends on the relative timing of two events:\n1) A mission substantially (&gt;30%) or wholly funded by NASA successfully returns a sample from the surface of Mars to Earth.\n2) A rocket build by SpaceX designated as \"Starship\" or clearly designated as a successor to Starship successfully lands on Mars.\nThe question will resolve positive if event 1) happens before event 2).\nThe question will resolve negatively if event 2) happens before event 1).\nIf neither of these events happens before the closing date (2035) the question will resolve ambiguously.\nNote that the following series of events would result in a negative resolution: SpaceX builds a Starship rocket which is purchased by NASA. That rocket lands on Mars successfully. That rocket returns to Earth with samples from Mars in it. Because the SpaceX Starship landed on Mars before the NASA mission returned samples to Earth, the question resolves negative.\nSimilarly, the following sequence of events would resolve positive: NASA contracts a Falcon Heavy from SpaceX for one of its missions. That mission successfully returns samples to Earth before Starship lands on earth.\nIt is also worth noting that if both NASA and SpaceX hew to their currently claimed timelines, Starship will land on Mars in 2026, 4 years before a sample return mission is completed in 2030.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 40,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many subscribers will /r/sneerclub have on January 1st 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5466/sneerclub-subscribers-by-112022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[reddit.com/r/sneerclub] (http://reddit.com/r/sneerclub) is a Reddit community devoted to criticizing members of the [rationalist community] (https://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Rationalist_movement) , and adjacent communities.\n[https://subredditstats.com/r/sneerclub] (https://subredditstats.com/r/sneerclub) tracks their subscriber count over time.\nHow many subscribers will /r/sneerclub have on January 1st 2022?\nThis question resolves as the number of subscribers on /r/sneerclub on January 1st, 2022.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 48,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which language modelling benchmark will be most popular in the calendar year 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5485/most-popular-language-modelling-benchmark-22/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Language modelling] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_model) is the task of predicting the next word or character in a document. Language modelling is a core part of the field of [natural language processing] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_language_processing) .\nAmongst the most popular benchmarks for testing language models are the following four:\n1-- \n[Penn Treebank] (http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.9.8216&amp;rep=rep1&amp;type=pdf) . The dataset consists of 929k training words, 73k validation words, and 82k test words.\n2-- \n[WikiText-2] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.07843) . WikiText-2 consists of around 2 million words extracted from Wikipedia articles.\n3-- \n[WikiText-103] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.07843) . The WikiText-103 corpus contains 267,735 unique words and each word occurs at least three times in the training set.\n4-- \n[1B Words] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.3005.pdf) . The dataset consists of 829,250,940 tokens over a vocabulary of 793,471 words.\nWhich language modelling benchmark will be most popular in the calendar year 2022?\nThe question resolves as the index number given to the benchmark in the above list which has most model submissions on [Papers With Code] (https://paperswithcode.com/task/language-modelling) in 2022.\nIn 2019, the following model submissions were made for each benchmark:\n--- \nPenn Treebank: 13\n--- \nWikiText-2: 7\n--- \nWikiText-103: 18\n--- \n1B Words: 5\nHence, since WikiText-103 had the most submissions in 2019, a similar question for 2019 would have resolved as 3.\nThe submission date will be the first date when the the relevant article or pre-print is publicly available. In case Papers with Code misreports the publication date, we shall consult other sources for the true model submission date. \nAny model submission counts, even if the performance is low, code is unavailable, if additional training data was used, or the performance is not reported. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which image classification benchmark will be most popular in the calendar year 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5492/most-popular-img-classification-benchmark-22/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Image classification] (https://paperswithcode.com/task/image-classification) is the process of analysing pixels or vectors within an image and identifying the 'class' the image falls under. Image classification is one of many tasks within the field of [computer vision] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_vision) .\nAmongst the most widely used benchmarks for testing image classifiers are the following five:\n1-- \n[ImageNet] (http://www.image-net.org/) is an image database organized according to the WordNet hierarchy, in which each node of the hierarchy is depicted by hundreds and thousands of images. \n2-- \n[STL-10] (https://cs.stanford.edu/~acoates/stl10/) is an image recognition dataset for developing unsupervised feature learning, deep learning, self-taught learning algorithms.\n3-- \n[CIFAR-10] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIFAR-10) contains 60,000 32x32 color images in 10 different classes. The 10 different classes represent airplanes, cars, birds, cats, deer, dogs, frogs, horses, ships, and trucks.\n4-- \n[CIFAR-100] (https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~kriz/cifar.html) is just like the CIFAR-10, except it has 100 classes containing 600 images each.\n5-- \n[MNIST] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MNIST_database) is a large database of handwritten digits, containing 60,000 training images and 10,000 testing images.\nWhich image classification benchmark will be most popular in the calendar year 2022?\nThe question resolves as the index number given to the benchmark in the above list which has most model submissions on [Papers With Code] (https://paperswithcode.com/task/language-modelling) in 2022.\nIn 2019, the following model submissions were made for each benchmark:\n--- \nImageNet: 99\n--- \nSTL-10: 24\n--- \nCIFAR-10: 20\n--- \nCIFAR-100: 18\n--- \nMNIST: 10\nHence, since ImageNet had the most submissions in 2019, a similar question for 2019 would have resolved as 1.\nThe submission date will be the first date when the the relevant article or pre-print is publicly available. In case Papers with Code misreports the publication date, we shall consult other sources for the true model submission date.\nAny model submission counts, even if the performance is low, code is unavailable, if additional training data was used, or the performance is not reported. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the GDP of Mars exceed that of Earth?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5506/mars-gdp-exceeds-earths/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "When Columbus sailed to America in 1492, the \"New world\" had a fraction of the [population] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_history#/media/File:WorldPopulation.png) and [GDP] (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1_AD_to_2003_AD_Historical_Trends_in_global_distribution_of_GDP_China_India_Western_Europe_USA_Middle_East.png) of Europe. At the time it may have seemed implausible to guess that the gap would ever be overcome. However after a series of World Wars, the relative fortune of Europe declined while America --rich in resources and isolated by two oceans-- continued to grow. Ultimately, the GDP of the USA alone would be greater than that of Western Europe after WWII.\nIt may seem similarly improbable that Mars --a planet so inhospitable it is inhabited only by robots-- would ever surpass Earth. But, history is long. If a self-sustaining colony is ever founded on Mars, it would have some chance of exceeding Earth's GDP based solely on the possibility of calamity on Earth.\nWhen will the GDP of Mars exceed that of Earth?\nThis question will resolve – on the basis of credible reporting – to December 31st of the first year in which the real GDP of Mars exceeds that of Earth.\nIf it does not resolve positive before the ending date of 3000AD, it will resolve to the upper-bound.\nIf the GDP falls into disuse, and Metaculus Admins find no obvious alternatives, this resolves ambiguous.\nBecause of the dates involved in this question, it is unlikely any current Metaculus users will remain to collect points. Still, players are urged to predict in good faith.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 75,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will detection of phosphine in Venus atmosphere be independently reproduced by 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5509/detection-of-phosphine-in-venus-atmosphere/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "12%",
    "Description": "[In September 2020, it was announced that phosphine, a potential biomarker, had been detected in the atmosphere of Venus.] (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-020-1174-4) There is no known abiotic source of phosphine on Venus that could explain the presence of the substance there in the concentrations detected (~20 ppb).\nHowever, [a recent independent re-analysis of the ALMA data claims that data provide no statistical evidence for phosphine in the atmosphere of Venus] (https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.09761) .\nThere is also a plethora of other work discussed at [Centauri Dreams] (https://www.centauri-dreams.org/2020/10/22/back-into-the-clouds-of-venus/) .\nWill detection of phosphine in Venus atmosphere be independently reproduced by 2023?\nThis question will resolve positive if an independent observation done after September 2020 will unambiguously confirm presence of phosphine in the atmosphere of Venus. We will accept any credible independent detection with significance above 5 sigma, but only if the authors of the independent observation will claim that their study indeed generally reproduces the original findings. The study must be published at least as pre-print by 2023.\nThe question will resolve negative if no such reproduction is made by 2023 or the authors of the original study agree that there is no significant abundance of phosphine in the Venus atmosphere.\nRelated question:\n[Will life on Venus be confirmed before 2035?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5255/life-on-venus/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 126,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will 100 babies be born whose embryos were selected for genetic scores for intelligence?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5525/ivf-based-embryo-selection-for-intelligence/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "With genetic predictors of a phenotypic trait, it is possible to select embryos during an in vitro fertilisation process to increase or decrease that trait. Some have proposed that, using polygenic scores for IQ, embryo selection could enable cognitive enhancement in humans [(Shulman and Bostrom, 2014)] (https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/2014-shulman.pdf) . This could have major social, economic and scientific implications [(ibid.)] (https://www.gwern.net/docs/iq/2014-shulman.pdf) .\nWhen will 100 babies be born whose embryos were selected for genetic scores for intelligence?\nThis question resolves positively as the date of the birth of the 100th baby who were developed from an embryo selected for polygenic scores for intelligence, according to credible reports. \nPositive resolution does not require the selection to be based solely on polygenic scores for intelligence—other factors could be taken into account.\nPositive resolution requires the application of such procedures to aim for selecting for (amongst perhaps other things) improved cognitive abilities.\nPositive resolution does not require the selection methods to reliably work at yielding improved cognitive abilities relative to the predicted counterfactual cases.\nIn case the question does not resolve before 2090-10-25, the question resolves as \"&gt;2090-10-25\". \n",
    "# Forecasts": 54,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many seats will be on the Supreme Court of the United States in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5531/us-supreme-court-members-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Paul Christiano recently [wrote] (https://www.facebook.com/paulfchristiano/posts/10224566865496919) ,\nI don't know how far you could reduce the administrative costs of growing the [Supreme Court of the United States]. I could imagine having only a few judges be full-time while most judges vote periodically by ballot. If the court is politically important and costs are low, then you could easily imagine growing the court to dozens, hundreds, and then thousands before you really changed the cost-benefit analysis.\nYou would eventually be bottlenecked by the availability of plausibly-qualified candidates under current standards. But I'm not aware of any real constitutional requirements to serve as a justice, and so you could have a race to the bottom on standards in parallel with a ballooning court.\nForeseeing that outcome, a party in power might decide to directly increase the size of the court to the point where further expansion would be prohibitively costly. (And each party might be inclined to initiate a giant expansion out of the fear that their opponents would do so the next time they had the chance.) So rather than doubling every ~20 years (or however often a new unified government is elected) we could just jump straight to a gigantic court.\nThe most absurd outcome would be an equilibrium in which a significant fraction of Americans served on the supreme court and voted directly on high-profile cases by ballot (perhaps at the same time that they vote on elected offices).\nHow many seats will be on the Supreme Court of the United States in 2030?\nThis question resolves as the number of seats on the Supreme Court of the United States as of midnight January 1st 2030, as determined by credible media reports.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 97,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of Legislative Assembly seats will the Australian Labor Party win at the next Victorian state election?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5534/labor-seats-after-next-victorian-election/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Led by Premier Daniel Andrews, the Australian Labor Party did very well in the 2018 Victorian state election, winning 57.3% of the two-party preferred vote and [55 of 88 seats in the lower house] (https://www.vec.vic.gov.au/results/state-election-results/2018-state-election) (the Legislative Assembly), i.e. 62.5% of the seats. Victoria is the second largest state in Australia.\nHowever, the COVID-19 pandemic has come to dominate the Andrews Government's term so far. Andrews has been praised for his [cautious COVID-19 response] (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/oct/19/hold-on-one-more-week-victoria-daniel-andrews-is-correct-to-take-a-cautious-approach) and [his personal endurance in addressing the pandemic,] (https://theconversation.com/andrews-under-fire-why-an-activist-premiers-greatest-challenges-may-yet-lie-ahead-146838) but Victoria is the state that has been worst-affected by the virus' second wave - which can be, at least in part, [attributed to the state government's handling of hotel quarantine.] (https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/sep/28/victoria-hotel-quarantine-failures-responsible-for-covid-second-wave-and-768-deaths-inquiry-told) \nIn late October 2020, the state has reported its first days with no new cases since early June. \nThe next Victorian election is scheduled for the 26th of November 2022, and will elect the 60th Parliament of Victoria.\nWhat percentage of Legislative Assembly seats will the Australian Labor Party win at the next Victorian state election?\nThe question will resolve according to official reports by the Victorian Electoral Commission. \nIn the unlikely event that the Electoral Commission reports elected candidates but not their party affiliation, reliable news media like the ABC can be used instead.\nIf the Labor Party does not contest the next state election, this question resolves ambiguously. \nIf the election date is changed, that will not affect the resolution - but the question should be closed one week before whatever the election date is changed to.\nIf the Labor Party splits before the next election, whichever party is considered the continuing party by the Victorian Electoral Commission (e.g. whichever keeps the party name) will count towards resolution of this question. If neither, then this question resolves ambiguously. \nA candidate that leaves or is expelled from the Labor Party before the election will not count towards the total, even if they leave the party so late that the party name is printed beside theirs on the ballot paper. A candidate that leaves or is expelled from the Labor Party after the election will count towards the total. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 37,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Uber electrify 50% of its fleet?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5537/uber-at-50-electric/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Uber [recently announced] (https://www.bbc.com/news/business-54079727#:~:text=Uber%20has%20said%20that%20all,the%20challenge%20of%20climate%20change.) in September 2020 that it plans to have all taxis available through the app be electric by 2040 globally, and 2030 for Europe, America and Canada. \nThe option for an electric vehicle is currently available in 15 US and Canadian cities, and the company expects to open this option in another 65 cities globally by the end of 2020.\nUber is also working to arrange the transfer of vehicles for its driver by offering discounts through select companies (Renault and Nissan in Europe and GM in Canada and US) and promising [$800M in support] (https://nypost.com/2020/09/08/uber-vows-to-have-all-electric-cars-by-2040-help-drivers-make-switch/) through 2025 for drivers to make the switch.\nAs Hawkins from [The Verge] (https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/17/21294040/lyft-electric-vehicle-ev-100-percent-2030) writes:\n“Research suggests that the average ride-hailing trip creates about 50 percent more pollution than the average traditional car trip. Even worse, studies show that over half of all ride-hailing trips in major cities are made by people who would have otherwise used cleaner means of transit to get to their destination.” As one of the largest transportation companies and contributors to carbon emissions, taking these steps will help lower pollution and decrease the rate of global warming.\nWhen will Uber electrify 50% of its fleet?\nResolution criteria for this question will be provided through any reliable new source nationally such as the New York Times, the Economist, the Wall Street Journal, or similar sources. If there are no publications available through these sources, Uber’s own data and announcements will suffice.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 36,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will California carry through with Governor Newsom's plan to sell only zero-emission electric cars and passenger trucks by 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5538/california-zero-emission-sales-by-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "50%",
    "Description": "In September 2020, Governor Newsom announced in an [executive order] (https://www.gov.ca.gov/2020/09/23/governor-newsom-announces-california-will-phase-out-gasoline-powered-cars-drastically-reduce-demand-for-fossil-fuel-in-californias-fight-against-climate-change/) that by 2035 all new passenger cars and trucks (which do not include medium or heavy duty vehicles) sold in California will need to be zero-emission vehicles. \nGovernor Brown, who in 2012 implemented the executive order for the Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Program, defined a [ZEV] (https://www.transportpolicy.net/standard/california-zev/) in 2013 as:\n“including hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) and plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs), which include both pure battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs).”\nThe [California Governor’s office] (https://www.gov.ca.gov/2020/09/23/governor-newsom-announces-california-will-phase-out-gasoline-powered-cars-drastically-reduce-demand-for-fossil-fuel-in-californias-fight-against-climate-change/) writes as of September 23, 2020 that:\n“The transportation sector is responsible for more than half of all of California’s carbon pollution, 80 percent of smog-forming pollution and 95 percent of toxic diesel emissions – all while communities in the Los Angeles Basin and Central Valley see some of the dirtiest and most toxic air in the country.”\n[13 other American states] (https://rhg.com/research/states-zero-emission-vehicles/#:~:text=Thirteen%20states%E2%80%94New%20York%2C%20Massachusetts,of%20the%20Clean%20Air%20Act) have agreed to follow California’s plans for reducing emissions by adopting their GHG standards and ZEV program under Act 177. It is possible that they might also join California in banning the sales of ICE powered cars in an effort to fight climate change. \nHowever, there are [many complaints] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/24/us/newsom-climate-plan.html) about this future transition and the threat it could bring to workers in auto manufacturing sectors, as well as other supply chain members such as companies providing fossil fuels. There are also concerns about the supporting charging infrastructure needed to accommodate such a shift, and if it would be practically feasible. \nThis is a key issue in the widespread battle between economic security and stability and climate consciousness, and could lead the way in proving or negating the validity of the argument between the two.\nWill California carry through with Governor Newsom's plan to sell only zero-emission electric cars and passenger trucks by 2035?\nResolution criteria for this question will be found through reliable media sources in California or nationally, or through the Office of the Governor in California. The [official document] (https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/9.23.20-EO-N-79-20-Climate.pdf) posted by the Governor’s Office outlines only the sales of new ZEV light duty passenger vehicles by 2035, and does not include the sale of used, non-ZEV passenger cars and trucks after 2035. If only certain counties are 100% in ZEV sales, then this question will resolve negatively as the executive order clearly states the goal of 100% ZEV sales as a state-wide plan. \nIf the definition of ZEV changes before 2035, or the executive order no longer is in place by 2035, then this question will resolve negatively. If all new sales by dealerships for light duty vehicles throughout the state are ZEV as defined by the ZEV program from 2012, then this question will resolve positively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 27,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many DC Fast public charging outlets/connections will be available in the United States by 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5539/dc-fast-public-charging-stations-by-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Level 3 charging, also known as DC Fast charging, typically can provide [124 miles in 30 minutes, or 249 miles in an hour] (https://chargehub.com/en/electric-car-charging-guide.html) using 50kW of power. \nThe expected ratio of EVs to charging stations in 2021 is [28.2] (https://evadoption.com/ev-charging-stations-statistics/) , a significant barrier to EV adoption by the general public who often experience range anxiety. If consumers feel there are not enough public charging stations, fewer of them will buy electric vehicles. This prompts the need for massive charging infrastructure to be built within America as well as across the world. \nPrevious reports for the number of public DC Fast charging stations place approximately [9,898 outlets/connections] (https://evadoption.com/ev-charging-stations-statistics/) as of March 2019 (retrieved from the same AFDC map in the resolution criteria). This is a leap up from the [7,223 connections] (https://evadoption.com/ev-charging-stations-statistics/) available as of December 2017.\nHow many DC Fast public charging outlets/connections will be available in the United States by 2022?\nResolution criteria for this question will be provided through the Alternative Fuels Data Center from the US Department of Energy. \nThis [map] (https://afdc.energy.gov/stations/#/find/nearest?fuel=ELEC&amp;country=US&amp;ev_levels=2) shows the current number of charging stations by level in the United States and Canada, and can be adjusted using the advanced filters to find specific information. The current number of public DC Fast public charging stations as of the end of October 2020 is 4,064 with a total number of 16,109 outlets.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 56,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a US Supreme Court Justice be impeached and removed before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5540/scotus-impeachment-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "7.000000000000001%",
    "Description": "A Supreme Court impeachment has only happened once in the history of the US: Justice Samuel Chase in 1804. However, he was only impeached by the House of Representatives-- the Senate aquitted him. Thus, a precedent was set for judicial independence, that justices serve for life without political interference.\nWe live in unprecedented times, and that precedent could change. Article 3, section 1 states \"judges [...] shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour\"; in other words, impeachment is still constitutional.\nWill a US Supreme Court Justice be impeached and removed before 2030?\nThe question resolves positively if any Supreme Court Justice is impeached and removed by the House and Senate before Jan 1st, 2030.\nAn impeachment by just the House, overturned by the Senate, will not resolve the question positively. Nor will any vacancy by resignation, retirement, or death. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 68,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will USA top the Medal Table at the Tokyo Olympics in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5541/usa-most-successful-olympic-team-at-toyko/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "73%",
    "Description": "The [2020 Olympic games] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Summer_Olympics) is a sporting competition which takes place every four years. It involves a range of different events across multiple sports.\nAt the Olympic Games, Gold, Silver and Bronze medals are awarded to 1st, 2nd and 3rd place in each event. (In some events two Bronze medals are awarded mostly combat sports).\nThe medal table is calculated by taking the total number of medals won by each participating country and ordering by:\n1--Number of Gold Medals \n2--(Where 1 is tied) Number of Silver Medals \n3--(Where 2 is tied) Number of Bronze Medals \nThe US team is one of the most successful teams in recent years, topping the medal table in 2016, 2012, 2004, 2000. Will they repeat that in 2021?\nWill USA top the Medal Table at the Tokyo Olympics in 2021?\nThis question will resolve positively if the United States Olympic Team are the (unique) highest ranked team at the 2021 Tokyo Olympics. It will resolve ambiguously if the Tokyo Olympics do not take place. It will resolve negatively if any team achieves a higher or equal ranking to the US team.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 55,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Japan place in the Top 4 at the 2021 Tokyo Olympics?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5542/japan-host-games-advantage/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "There is a phenomenon at the Olympics [where by the host country tends to outperform it's recent performances] (https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/is-there-home-field-advantage-at-the-olympics/) \nJapan is hosting the Olympics in 2021. Will they place significantly higher in the medal table than they have in recent years. Their last [5 placings were] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_at_the_Olympics) :\n2000: 15th 2004: 5th 2008: 8th 2012: 11th 2016: 6th\nWill they come in the Top 4 again?\nWill Japan place in the Top 4 at the 2021 Tokyo Olympics\nThis question will resolve positively if Japan place in the top 4 (ties resolve positively) at the Olympics being held in 2021. It will resolve ambiguously if the Olympics do not take place in 2021.\nThe medal table is calculated by taking the total number of medals won by each participating country and ordering by:\n1--Number of Gold Medals \n2--(Where 1 is tied) Number of Silver Medals \n3--(Where 2 is tied) Number of Bronze Medals \n",
    "# Forecasts": 49,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of countries which pledge carbon neutrality by 2050 will keep their pledge?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5546/success-rate-for-national-carbon-neutrality/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Per the European Parliament, “Carbon neutrality means having a balance between emitting carbon and absorbing carbon from the atmosphere in carbon sinks. Removing carbon oxide from the atmosphere and then storing it is known as carbon sequestration. In order to achieve net zero emissions, all worldwide greenhouse gas emissions will have to be counterbalanced by carbon sequestration.”\nIn 2020 a number of countries made commitments to achieve carbon neutrality including the European Union, and China. As of late 2020, at least 25 countries have pledged carbon neutrality by 2050. On the other hand, only two countries have achieved carbon neutrality: the forest covered Bhutan and Suriname. Given the 30 year time-horizon, and the unclear path to carbon neutrality, it remains ambiguous how many countries will follow through on their carbon neutrality pledges.\nWhat percentage of countries which pledge carbon neutrality by 2050 will keep their pledge?\nThis question resolves as the percentage of countries which pledged carbon neutrality by 2050 that succeed in achieving neutrality. Only countries which pledge before 2025 will be counted.\nCountries will be included in the percentage calculation if and only if on January 1, 2026 the country is listed in [this] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_neutrality#Countries_and_territories) Wikipedia table\nInclusion Criteria:\nCountries will be included in the pledge if and only if on January 1, 2026 the country is listed in this Wikipedia table with status including one of the phrases ‘Agreement’, ‘Policy position’, ‘Pledge’, ‘Law’, or a synonym of one of those and target date before 2051. If this table is removed or its structure is substantially changed, the criterion will be replaced by another list which agreed with the Wikipedia table immediately prior to the change. Non-country entities included in the Wikipedia list (e.g. the EU) will not count for this question.\nSuccess Criteria:\nCountries will be counted as succeeding in carbon neutrality if either of the following criteria is met before 2051:\n---The national government issues a statement declaring they have achieved carbon neutrality. This statement must claim to have fulfilled their original (i.e. pre-2026) commitment explicitly, and/or a later, stronger commitment. \n---At least three credible media sources announce that the country has achieved carbon neutrality. \nEither of these criteria suffice to count as carbon neutrality success, so if e.g. a country announces carbon neutrality, but foreign media challenges their claim, the country will still count as having achieved carbon neutrality for the purposes of this question.\nCarbon Neutrality Definition:\nThis question does not precisely define carbon neutrality, instead the Wikipedia list and criteria enumerated above will serve as functional definitions thereof. For instance, if country A is only carbon neutral after taking into account their purchase of foreign offsets, and country A declares carbon neutrality by including those offsets, then they will be considered as having achieved carbon neutrality. If however, country A chose not to count the purchase of foreign offsets towards the net carbon output, and so not announce carbon neutrality by 2050, then that country would count as having failed their goal.\nIf a country no longer exists as a nation state (for example because it has been annexed or split in two), it no longer counts in either the numerator or denominator for this question, that is, it is removed from both the list of pledges made and the list of pledges met/not met.\nIf a country changes in some significant way, for example splitting, or annexing another country, but it still has the same name and system of government, then it still counts as having made the original pledge. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the (English speaking) world be happier in 2021 than in 2020?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5552/will-2021-be-a-happier-year-than-2020/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "79%",
    "Description": "The [Hedonometer] (https://hedonometer.org/) is a tool developed by the researchers Peter Dodds and Chris Danforth to gauge the valence of various corpora. Their index uses English Twitter data to calculate the level of positive valence in the English speaking world, which they call a sort of \"Dow Jones Index of Happiness\".\nAccording to their data, 2020 was the least happy year to date. It has a yearly average 5.90. By contrast, the Hedonometer for the years 2009 to 2016 never fell below 6.00.\nHistorical data [is available here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/184wJqCl5Rcc8I4QStUDLl3KwuJcRisjlyjm93zjLxdM/edit?usp=sharing) .\nWill the (English speaking) world be happier in 2021 than in 2020?\nThis question resolves positively if the year-long average Hedonometer for 2021 is greater than the year-long average for 2020.\nNote: The Hedonometer tracks all Tweets in English, including from places that are not considered part of the \"English-speaking world\".\n",
    "# Forecasts": 72,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Apple close its flagship 5th Ave store for a period of two weeks or longer before April 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5554/5th-ave-apple-store-closure-during-winter/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "21%",
    "Description": "On October 29, 2020, CNBC host Scott Wapner [tweeted] (https://twitter.com/ScottWapnerCNBC) :\nHearing Tim Cook tell @CNBCJosh that the virus makes it too hard to give guidance highlights a big risk for the economy — that while we won’t lock down again, businesses could decide to shut their stores for periods rather than risk their customers or employees getting sick.\nLet's focus on Apple, since the company presumably has the resources and wherewithal to be able to implement best practice preventive measures, and understanding the precautions that they choose to implement may help shed light on the likely decisions of similar retail businesses.\nThe \"always open\" flagship [5th Ave Apple Store] (https://www.apple.com/retail/fifthavenue/) location in New York City is providing face masks to shoppers, enforcing social distancing, doing temperature checks, and performing continuous cleaning, according to the store's website. But will these measures be enough to prevent a significant store closure during the 2020/2021 winter season?\nWill Apple close its flagship 5th Ave store for a period of two weeks or longer before April 2021?\nResolution will be determined according to announcements made by Apple regarding opening and closing dates of their 5th Ave location.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 184,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games take place in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5555/rescheduled-2020-olympics/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "56.99999999999999%",
    "Description": "[The 2020 Tokyo Olympics where rescheduled to the summer of 2021] (https://www.olympic.org/news/joint-statement-from-the-international-olympic-committee-and-the-tokyo-2020-organising-committee) . Will they go ahead?\nWill the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games take place in 2021?\nThe question resolves negative if the Olympics does not take place in 2021. Specifically an event described by the IOC as the Olympics occurs in the calendar year 2021.\nAn Olympics spread out over multiple countries will still count. (ie if the athletics takes place in France, the gymnastics in Japan, the swimming in USA etc the question still resolves positive) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 775,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the highest Exact Match rate of the best-performing model on SQuAD2.0 be, at the end of 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5558/squad20-perfomance-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD) is a reading comprehension dataset, consisting of questions posed by crowdworkers on a set of Wikipedia articles, where the answer to every question is a segment of text, or span, from the corresponding reading passage, or the question might be unanswerable. SQuAD1 was introduced in 2016 by [Rajpurkar et al] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05250) .\nIn 2018, [Rajpurkar et al] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03822) introduced a SQuAD2.0, which combines the 100,000 questions in SQuAD1.1 with over 50,000 unanswerable questions written adversarially by crowdworkers to look similar to answerable ones. To do well on SQuAD2.0 systems must not only answer questions when possible (like in Squad1) but also determine when no answer is supported by the paragraph and abstain from answering.\nCurrently, the best model is SA-Net on Albert (ensemble), which gets an exact match 90.724% of the time (meaning its predictions match the ground truth exactly, 90.724% of the time). Notably, this is better than human performance, which gets an exact rate at a rate of only 86.83%.\nWhat will the highest Exact Match rate of the best-performing model on SQuAD2.0 be, at the end of 2022?\nThis question resolves as the best SQuAD2.0, in Exact Match, as displayed on [the relevant leaderboard] (https://rajpurkar.github.io/SQuAD-explorer/) as of 31 December, 2022.\nIn case the leaderboard is not maintained, other credible sources should be consulted.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 54,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Lyft electrify 80% of its fleet?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5559/when-will-lyft-be-80-electrified/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nIn June 2020, Lyft announced [plans to electrify 100% of its fleet by 2030] (https://www.lyft.com/blog/posts/leading-the-transition-to-zero-emissions) .\nA month before, the California Air Resources Board had floated targets requiring 70-80% of miles driven by both Lyft and Uber in the state be in EV's by 2030, though in July, this number was [lowered to 60%] (https://www.kqed.org/science/1967315/california-dials-back-plan-to-require-uber-lyft-go-electric) .\nLyft's own announcement is non-binding, but it conveys an intention to electrify beyond what the state of California may require:\nThe shift to 100% electric vehicles (EVs) for Lyft will mean transitioning all vehicles used on the Lyft platform over the next ten years to all-electric or other zero-emission technologies. This includes cars in the Express Drive rental car partner program for rideshare drivers, our consumer rental car program for riders, our autonomous vehicle program, and drivers’ personal cars used on the Lyft platform.\nIf the company follows through on its public statement, the impact on air pollution could be significant. [The Verge] (https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/17/21294040/lyft-electric-vehicle-ev-100-percent-2030) reports:\nResearch suggests that the average ride-hailing trip creates about 50 percent more pollution than the average traditional car trip. Even worse, studies show that over half of all ride-hailing trips in major cities are made by people who would have otherwise used cleaner means of transit to get to their destination. \nSince 2019, Lyft has offered a [green mode in several cities] (https://www.lyft.com/blog/posts/making-cities-more-liveable-with-electric-vehicles) . In its new [Path to Zero Emissions plan] (https://lyft-impact-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/images/path-to-zero-emissions.pdf) , the company outlines the steps it plans to take to increase the supply and lower the cost of EV's and their charging infrastructure, as well as lobby for policy change in support of expanding the EV ecosystem. \n\nQuestion\n========\n\nIn order to track the Lyft's electrification progress, this question asks: When will Lyft electrify 80% of its fleet?\n\nResolution\n==========\n\nResolution criteria for this question will be provided through any reliable new source nationally such as the New York Times, the Economist, the Wall Street Journal, or similar sources. If there are no publications available through these sources, Lyft’s own data and announcements will suffice. \n\nRelated Questions\n=================\n\n---A related question for Uber is [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5537/uber-at-50-electric/) . \n",
    "# Forecasts": 31,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the differential in sales between the most-sold and second most-sold consumer electric vehicles in America in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5560/difference-in-top-ev-model-sales-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Electric vehicles are notoriously expensive, a reason that often pushes the average consumer to buy combustion engine automobiles or the cheaper hybrid options. A major reason for the high pricing points of EVs are the lithium-ion batteries which fuel them. [51% of the cost of an electric vehicle resides in its powertrain] (https://insideevs.com/features/396979/how-much-powertrain-cost-ev/) , which includes the car’s battery, controllers, inverters, and transmission equipment. \nWith new [announcements from Tesla’s battery day] (https://insideevs.com/news/446245/tesla-slide-25000-car-lfp-batteries/) , and a publicized shift to the use and production of lithium iron phosphate batteries (LFPs) and high nickel batteries, electric vehicles are predicted to see their production costs fall, thereby bringing down the overall market price.\nLow prices could dramatically impact consumer adoption and increase EV production, which could help change the tide of carbon emissions in protecting the environment. Just in the United States, if everyone drove an electric vehicle, carbon emissions would [drop around 8.4%] (https://insh.world/tech/what-if-all-cars-were-electric/#:~:text=Electric%20cars%20are%204%2Dtimes,would%20immediately%20drop%20by%208.4%25.) . \nIt is possible to ascertain both producer dynamics in the market and competition levels, as well as consumer preferences with regards to EV criteria by looking at sales differences between models on the market. This could help greatly with understanding both the industry as it grows, and what EV factors influence greater adoption levels by consumers.\nWhat will be the differential in sales between the most-sold and second most-sold consumer electric vehicles in America in 2021?\nResolution criteria for the most-sold models will come from the US Department of Energy’s [AFDC] (https://afdc.energy.gov/data/10567) which provides an infographic with the number of sale deliveries of each light-duty, electric model by company. In 2019 the most sold vehicle was Tesla Model 3 with 154,840 vehicles sold in the US, followed by the Prius PHEV at 23,630. The price differential between these two models is great (over $11,000 starting price). In 2017, the Tesla Model S sold 26,500 which was followed by the Chevy Bolt with 23,297, a relatively small difference (with an average price difference of over $60,000). Here we can see that there is something about the Tesla Model 3, and/or the changing industry dynamics over time, that is greatly affecting adoption. We also see a dramatic reduction in price difference between the offerings, perhaps due to battery costs. If data is no longer provided, then this question will resolve ambiguously. \nPrice data was taken using starting price levels for each model by the year it was produced using a google search. Prices are not adjusted for subsidies, and approximations serve well in an estimation of general price difference.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 88,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many new electric bus registrations will Europe see in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5572/electric-bus-registrations-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Transportation contributes heavily to greenhouse gas emissions from carbon dioxide. In 2017, road transportation contributed approximately [21%] (https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles_en) of the EU’s carbon emissions. \nPublic transport has long been thought to help [lower individual passenger car emissions] (https://www.nationalexpresstransit.com/blog/why-is-public-transportation-good-for-the-environment/) as they reduce person-miles per gallon and the amount of space taken up on the road. While diesel powered buses are far from the cleanest vehicles, movements towards adopting electric public transportation could vastly improve public transport’s emissions.\nChina has been the leader in electric busing and public transportation, with [72 thousand] (https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2020) new electric bus registrations in 2019 alone. By 2017, China’s bus fleet was comprised of approximately [17% electric buses] (https://www.sustainable-bus.com/electric-bus/electric-bus-public-transport-main-fleets-projects-around-world/) , a number far above the mere decimal point percentages in Europe and the United States. \nHowever, with new actions taken by the EU in attempts to become [carbon neutral by 2050] (https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2050_en) , there are new extreme measures taking place to electrify transportation across Europe in both the 2020 and 2030 climate and energy packages. \nChanging the nature of transportation is essential to protecting the environment, and if more options are available for consumers outside of individual, gas-powered transport, then we might be able to keep global warming under the [1.5-2 degree Celsius limit] (https://www.wri.org/blog/2020/06/6-ways-remove-carbon-pollution-sky#:~:text=To%20keep%20global%20temperature%20rise,some%20carbon%20from%20the%20atmosphere.) .\nHow many new electric bus registrations will Europe see in 2021?\nResolution criteria will come from IEA global report outlook for 2022. An example outlook for 2020 using data from 2019 is available [here] (https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2020) . \nData: Numbers from 2015-2019: 2015: 0.11k, 2016: 0.83k, 2017: 0.64k, 2018: 0.91k, and 2019:1.99k\n",
    "# Forecasts": 39,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will another state provide 50% of the number of public charging outlets available in California?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5573/us-state-race-in-public-charging-outlets/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "California offers [28,223] (https://afdc.energy.gov/data/10366) electric charging outlets of every level through a variety of public charging stations. \nThese stations are essential infrastructure required for the widespread use of electric vehicles, and remain a critical factor in EV adoption. In a 2020 survey by Castrol, they found that [64% of consumers] (https://www.visualcapitalist.com/mainstream-ev-adoption-5-speedbumps-to-overcome/) on average (from countries in the Asian, European, and North American regions) would buy an electric vehicle if charging infrastructure existed to support their driving habits. \nThere are currently [89,970 outlets] (https://afdc.energy.gov/stations/#/analyze?country=US&amp;fuel=ELEC&amp;ev_levels=all) on public charging stations of every level across the United States, with California representing almost one third of that. Several other states such as Texas, Florida, Oregon, and New York are followers of California’s trend, however, the number of public outlets in the second-greatest state is only [5,151] (https://afdc.energy.gov/data/10366) in New York, less than one fifth of the number in California.\nFor people driving longer distances or living in rural areas, both EV range and charging infrastructure is essential for drawing a greater proportion of drivers to buy electric vehicles. The states with the largest number of [new EV registrations] (https://afdc.energy.gov/data/10962) in 2018 after California (256,800) were in Texas (22,600), Washington (28,400), Florida (25,200) and New York (16,600). These numbers loosely follow the number of [EV laws and incentives by state] (https://afdc.energy.gov/data/10373) as well. \nIf there is a greater push by both private corporations and public state and local governments to provide more public charging stations, then hopefully new registrations will increase as well.\nWhen will another state provide 50% of the number of public charging outlets available in California?\nResolution criteria for this question will be provided through the U.S Department of Energy’s [AFDC] (https://afdc.energy.gov/) . The number of charging outlets and stations across America can be found through a [map] (https://afdc.energy.gov/stations/#/analyze?country=US&amp;fuel=ELEC&amp;ev_levels=all) that is consistently updated. Numbers for this question were drawn on the date: 10/31/20. The number of charging outlets per state can be found through this [map] (https://afdc.energy.gov/data/10366) that is consistently updated. Other information surrounding adoption can be found through the AFDC in maps like [this] (https://afdc.energy.gov/data/10962) for new EV registration, which is on a two year updating time lag, and [here] (https://afdc.energy.gov/data/10373) to look at the number of current government sponsored laws and incentives for EVs by state.\nIf these criteria are no longer available or current by the time this question resolves, then it will resolve ambiguously. To resolve positively, the number of public outlets of all levels in another state must reach the 50% level for the then current number of public outlets maintained in California at that time.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 23,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will China reach its NEV credit targets of 14% by 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5574/china-to-reach-nev-14-credit-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "75%",
    "Description": "China instituted the [NEV (New Energy Vehicle) mandate] (https://www.iea.org/policies/3335-new-energy-vehicle-nev-mandate-policy) \n“which promotes new energy vehicles, such as electric vehicles, and provides additional compliance flexibility to existing fuel consumption regulations.”\nThis mandate applies to passenger vehicles only, and currently 60% of global car sales from China are covered by it. \nThe NEV mandate specified credit targets for 2019 (10%) and 2020 (12%), but has recently expanded targets to 2021-23 as well.\nThe International Energy Association (IEA) states that:\n“Each NEV is assigned a specific number of credits depending on metrics including electric range, energy efficiency, and rated power of fuel cell systems. Higher performance vehicles get more credits, capped at six credits per vehicle. These NEV credit targets thus may result in NEV market share falling into a range of values based on fleet mix. Assuming that all manufacturers produce vehicles with a per-vehicle NEV credit of three in 2020, for example, the market share of NEVs in China based on the number of vehicles sold would be around 4% in 2020 while still meeting the 12% target based on NEV credits.”\nChina expects an NEV credit target of [14% in 2021] (https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2020) and a 2% increase for each following year until 2023, with an ending credit of 18%. \nVehicle producers [need to hit the number of credits needed] (https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/China-NEV-mandate_ICCT-policy-update_20032018_vF-updated.pdf) each year, either by producing or importing a set number of new energy passenger vehicles. There is also a market for these credits which can be sold and traded between companies, as well as the option to use surplus credits to offset CAFC (Corporate Average Fuel Consumption) credit deficits. \nAs credits grow, the number of electric vehicles in China’s fleet should increase and consumer adoption along with it, thereby greatly reducing the amount of carbon emissions from transportation and setting China on its path to become [carbon neutral by 2060] (https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/09/can-china-worlds-bigger-coal-consumer-become-carbon-neutral-2060) .\nWill China reach its NEV credit targets of 14% by 2021?\nResolution criteria will be provided through reputable sources such as the [International Energy Association] (https://www.iea.org/) , the [International Council of Clean Transportation] (https://theicct.org/) , or any other source with similar standing and background. If there is no data or resolution provided through any reports from the sources mentioned previously, then reports directly from China or the Chinese government’s [Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT)] (https://www.miit.gov.cn/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 32,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What’s the CAGR in the stock of EVs globally over the 2020-22 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5575/cagr-of-global-ev-stock-2020-22/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Markets and Markets reports that:\n“The Electric Vehicles Market is projected to reach 26,951,318 units by 2030 from an estimated 3,269,671 units in 2019, at a CAGR of 21.1% during the forecast period. The base year for the report is 2018, and the forecast period is from 2019 to 2030.”\nThese numbers reflect the number of electric vehicles purchased in the global fleet. \nThe EV market is expected to grow quickly and at scale over the next decade, and understanding this growth will help plan out necessary charging infrastructure, the potential for loss in the oil markets, and the speed of change in consumer preferences.\nThe compound annual growth rate, or [CAGR] (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cagr.asp) , is a function of the ending value, beginning value, and the number of years between the two. While normally used to measure the rate of return on an investment, it can also be used to look at the growth rate of a number of other things.\nWhat’s the CAGR in the stock of EVs globally over the 2020-22 period?\nResolution criteria will be taken from [ZSW] (https://www.zsw-bw.de/en/media-center/data-service.html#c8590) and will reflect the CAGR in the total global stock of electric vehicles. Previous years data can also be retrieved from this source from 2015-2019. If data is no longer available then this question will resolve ambiguously, or another source with reliable global EV stock estimates will be used. The CAGR will reflect the growth rate for the period of time between the beginning of 2020 until the beginning of 2022. \nData:\nUsing the numbers from ZSW for 2017 and 2019, and the equation mentioned above, the CAGR by the end of 2019 was approximately 52.1%. The CAGR between 2018 and 2019 by the end of 2019 was approximately 40.7%\n",
    "# Forecasts": 44,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Germany overtake the US in the share of new EV registrations by 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5577/germany-to-overtake-us-in-ev-registrations/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "59%",
    "Description": "Changing restrictions in the EU to achieve [climate neutrality] (https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2050_en) and prevent the increase of global warming and carbon emissions by 2050 have increased the speed of EV adoption throughout Europe. \nAs reported through [ZSW] (https://www.zsw-bw.de/en/about-us/history.html) , a german non-profit dedicated to transferring already existing knowledge from fundamental research in the fields of renewable energy and rotational energy conversion to market-ready, application-based technology, Germany has increased its new EV registrations by approximately [500% between 2015 and 2019] (https://www.zsw-bw.de/en/media-center/data-service.html#c8590) .\nThe United States in contrast has barely tripled their registrations in the same time period. However, the US still holds a lead of three times the amount of registrations than Germany as of 2019.\nThe United States, in contrast, has no federal regulations for carbon emissions or goals for national carbon neutrality within a certain time period. [Fewer than half of its states have any sort of emission target] (https://www.c2es.org/document/greenhouse-gas-emissions-targets/) , with only four states with both statutory and executive targets. \nVolkswagen Group, a German automotive company, is predicted to overtake Tesla in EV market share by [2023 or earlier] (https://evcentral.com.au/volkswagen-vows-to-overtake-tesla-on-tech-and-production-by-2023/#:~:text=Volkswagen%20vows%20to%20overtake%20Tesla%20on%20tech%20and%20production%20by%202023&amp;text=Volkswagen%20says%20it%20will%20have,into%20the%20electric%2Dvehicle%20space.) . If this happens, it might greatly increase the number of registrations within the company’s home nation, past that of the United States. \nA question regarding Volkswagen sales in 2020 can be found [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5529/volkswagen-ev-sales-2020/) .\nWill Germany overtake the US in the share of new EV registrations by 2025?\nResolution criteria will come from the ZSW through their [data] (https://www.zsw-bw.de/en/media-center/data-service.html#c8590) on German and US new EV registrations. If data is no longer provided through this company, then new estimates will be obtained from a similar, reliable data source with numbers of EV registrations for both Germany and the US. If this is not possible, the question will resolve ambiguously. This question will resolve positively if the number of new EV registrations in Germany is greater than the number of registrations in the US.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 38,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many electric vehicles will Tesla produce (units delivered) in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5582/total-tesla-sales-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Tesla currently reigns supreme over the EV market with approximately 368,000 vehicles sold in 2019. After lagging behind BYD since Q2 2016, Tesla finally [surpassed them in sales in Q1 2019] (https://cleantechnica.com/2019/12/10/tesla-passes-byd-in-global-ev-sales-the-history-behind-byd-teslas-efforts-at-global-ev-domination/) . \nWith new expansions being added to Tesla’s gigafactory in Shanghai to produce the Model 3 and new Model Y cars, Tesla stands poised to increase sales in China as well as across the globe. Tesla’s Model 3 car is the most popular electric car on the market with over 300,000 cars on the road in 2019 alone, with sales representing over [14% of the world’s EV market] (https://cleantechnica.com/tesla-sales/) . \nIn Q3 2020, Tesla delivered [139,300] (https://ir.tesla.com/press-release/tesla-q3-2020-vehicle-production-deliveries) vehicles to consumers, an increase of almost 50,000 from Q2 2020 with total deliveries at [90,650] (https://ir.tesla.com/press-release/tesla-q2-2020-vehicle-production-deliveries) \nHow many electric vehicles will Tesla sell (units delivered) in the 2021 calendar year?\nThis question resolves as the sum of vehicle delivered for all quarters of 2021, according to Tesla.\nTesla reports its own sales records, which should be available [here] (https://ir.tesla.com/press-release/tesla-q3-2020-vehicle-production-deliveries) . Other reliable media sources include InsideEVs, Car and Driver, or Cleantechnica, with example publications like [this] (https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a34250691/2020-tesla-sales-third-quarter-record/#:~:text=Tesla%20Delivered%20Record%2DBreaking%20139%2C300%20Vehicles%20in%203rd%20Quarter,-Oct%202%2C%202020&amp;text=Tesla%20delivered%20139%2C300%20vehicles%20in,of%20112%2C000%20set%20in%202019.) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 95,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the price of neuropreservation be at Alcor in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5585/neuropreservation-price-at-alcor-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "From [Alcor] (https://www.alcor.org/library/case-for-neuropreservation/) ,\nNeuropreservation, quite simply, is low temperature preservation of the brain of a terminal patient. All efforts in neuropreservation are devoted to the singular purpose of preserving the brain, and only the brain, in the best possible condition allowed by present technology. The disposition of other tissue only matters inasmuch it impacts upon the condition of the brain.\nAs of writing this question, Alcor [charges a minimum] (https://www.alcor.org/docs/alcor-form-schedule-a-required-costs-and-cryopreservation-fund-minimums.pdf) of $80,000 for neuropreservation, often paid with life insurance. For people purchasing life insurance for cryonics, it's important to ensure that the funding is above the minimum amount required for preservation. However, the price has changed in the past. Therefore, it's critical that cryonics enthusiasts anticipate future price changes, so that they can afford the procedure when they need it.\nMati Roy has written [a timeline of brain preservation] (https://timelines.issarice.com/wiki/Timeline_of_brain_preservation) and has recorded both the [real] (https://timelines.issarice.com/wiki/File:Historical_cost_of_cryonics,_inflation_adjusted.png) and [nominal price of brain preservation over time] (https://timelines.issarice.com/wiki/File:Historical_cost_of_cryonics.png) .\nWhat will the price of neuropreservation be at Alcor in 2030?\nThis question resolves as the minimum nominal price of brain preservation provided by Alcor at the beginning of 2030 in US dollars, if Alcor still exists. Otherwise, this question resolves ambiguously. Resolution is determined by a source provided by Alcor.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 43,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a book written by a language model make the NY Times Best Seller list before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5587/ai-ny-times-best-seller-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "35%",
    "Description": "From [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_model) ,\nA statistical language model is a probability distribution over sequences of words.\nThe New York Times Best Seller list [is] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times_Best_Seller_list) ,\nwidely considered the preeminent list of best-selling books in the United States. It has been published weekly in The New York Times Book Review since October 12, 1931. In the 21st century, it has evolved into multiple lists, grouped by genre and format, including fiction and non-fiction, hardcover, paperback and electronic.\nWill a book written by a language model make the NY Times Best Seller list before 2030?\nA book is said to have been written by a language model if a language model wrote at least 99% of the text contained in the main section in the book, excluding a potential foreword, copyright notice, table of contents, and other non-essential book sections. The main text must also contain at least 20,000 words. Stylistic edits by humans are allowed if they do not change the basic semantic meaning of any sentence, or they merely correct basic spelling, grammatical, or formatting mistakes. Admins will use their discretion, in consultation with the community, to determine whether any candidate book meets the spirit of these conditions.\nThis question resolves positively if the above conditions are met before 2030, and negatively otherwise.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 57,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the United States Government Spending to GDP for 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5588/us-government-spending-to-gdp-for-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The US Government Spending to GDP can be found [here] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/government-spending-to-gdp) on Trading Economics. As of writing this question, the most recent value was 37.8 percent.\nWhat will be the United States Government Spending to GDP for 2024?\nThis question resolves on the percent value of the US Government spending to GDP as reported by Trading Economics, or some other credible source, for the year 2024.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 33,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the GOP control the senate after the 2022 election?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5632/will-the-gop-control-the-senate-in-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "55.00000000000001%",
    "Description": "[Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_United_States_Senate_elections) :\nThe 2022 United States Senate elections will be held on November 8, 2022, with 34 of the 100 seats in the Senate being contested in regular election. ... All 34 Class 3 Senate seats are up for election in 2022; Class 3 currently consists of 12 Democrats and 22 Republicans.\nWill the GOP control the senate after the 2022 elections?\nThis resolves positive if, on February 1 2023, the Senate Majority Leader is a Republican.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 165,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Facebook block links to Bitchute before 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5635/facebook-block-links-to-bitchute-before-2023/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "35%",
    "Description": "Facebook is the world's most popular social media platform. In recent years, they have added a number of domains to their filter. Filtered domains cannot be posted on the site. While many such filtered domains are spam-related, some [hate groups] (https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/groups) have also been banned. For instance, American Renaissance, an American white supremacist organization, has its links blocked on Facebook along with related sites.\nYoutube has similarly undertaken such bans. Previously this year, they banned the Stefan Molyneux show channel ( [see prior question on his Twitter also being banned] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4733/will-stefan-molyneux-receive-a-long-term-twitter-ban-before-2021/) ). Because of such bans, users who like such content are migrating to other sites, such as Bitchute, which in general are much more sympathetic to the far-right. Bitchute has been described by the [Anti-Defamation League] (https://www.adl.org/blog/bitchute-a-hotbed-of-hate) as \na hotbed for violent, conspiratorial and hate-filled video propaganda, and a recruiting ground for extremists.\nthus raising the question of whether Facebook will ban links to these sites too.\nWill Facebook block links to Bitchute before 2023?\n---If before 1st January 2023, Facebook has added [bitchute.com] (http://bitchute.com) to their filtered list, disallowing users to send messages and write posts with links to the domain, this resolves positively. Otherwise, negatively. \n---If [bitchute.com] (http://bitchute.com) is defunct before 2023, it resolves ambiguous. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 30,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the maximum z-score be for Denmark for observed deaths in 2020-2021 according to Euromomo?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5638/max-excess-death-score-for-denmark-2020-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Parallel question for: [Hungary] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5640/max-excess-death-score-for-hungary-2020-2021/) , [Greece] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5639/max-excess-death-score-for-greece-2020-2021/) .\nThe novel Coronavirus, and its resulting disease, COVID19, has caused numerous fatalities across the world. However, some countries appear to wave the storm better than others. The [Euromomo (European Mortality Monitoring Project)] (https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps/) platform monitors deaths in a number of European countries, and compares their observed to the expected (business as usual) counts, resulting in excess mortality estimates. Denmark has so far not seen any notable excess death from COVID19, but it might change with [the new mink coronavirus strain] (https://www.thelocal.dk/20201104/denmark-to-cull-millions-of-minks-over-mutated-coronavirus) .\nWhat will the maximum [z-score] (https://www.euromomo.eu/how-it-works/what-is-a-z-score) be for Denmark for observed deaths in 2020-2021 according to Euromomo?\n---The value will be taken from the value on [Euromomo site once] (https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps/) the final numbers are in (i.e., not adjusted for delay in registration). \n",
    "# Forecasts": 77,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the maximum z-score be for Greece for observed deaths in 2020-2021 according to Euromomo?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5639/max-excess-death-score-for-greece-2020-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Parallel question for: [Denmark] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5638/max-excess-death-score-for-denmark-2020-2021/) , [Hungary] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5640/max-excess-death-score-for-hungary-2020-2021/) .\nThe novel Coronavirus, and its resulting disease, COVID19, has caused numerous fatalities across the world. However, some countries appear to wave the storm better than others. [The Euromomo (European Mortality Monitoring Project) platform] (https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps/) monitors deaths in a number of European countries, and compares their observed to the expected (business as usual) counts, resulting in excess mortality estimates. Greece has so far not seen any notable excess death from COVID19, but it might change.\nWhat will the maximum [z-score] (https://www.euromomo.eu/how-it-works/what-is-a-z-score) be for Greece for observed deaths in 2020-2021 according to Euromomo?\n---The value will be taken from [the Euromomo site] (https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps/) once the final numbers are in (i.e., not adjusted for delay in registration). \n",
    "# Forecasts": 131,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the maximum z-score be for Hungary for observed deaths in 2020-2021 according to Euromomo?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5640/max-excess-death-score-for-hungary-2020-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Parallel question for: [Denmark] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5638/max-excess-death-score-for-denmark-2020-2021/) , [Greece] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5639/max-excess-death-score-for-greece-2020-2021/) .\nThe novel Coronavirus, and its resulting disease, COVID19, has caused numerous fatalities across the world. However, some countries appear to wave the storm better than others. [The Euromomo (European Mortality Monitoring Project) platform] (https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps/) monitors deaths in a number of European countries, and compares their observed to the expected (business as usual) counts, resulting in excess mortality estimates. Hungary has so far not seen any notable excess death from COVID19, but it might change.\nWhat will the maximum [z-score] (https://www.euromomo.eu/how-it-works/what-is-a-z-score) be for Hungary for observed deaths in 2020-2021 according to Euromomo?\n---The value will be taken from [the Euromomo site] (https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps/) on the day of resolution, which should provide enough time for the remaining numbers to come in. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 82,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the US Federal Minimum Wage be Raised?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5646/next-minimum-wage-raise/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The last increase to the federal minimum wage was July 24, 2009. [From 1997 to 2007] (https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/minimum-wage/history/chart) , the minimum wage was $5.15 until it was incrementally increased to its current level, $7.25 per hour.\nIn terms of the USD's purchasing power, the minimum wage has been significantly higher in the past. In 1968, the minimum wage was $1.60 per hour, which in 2020 dollars would be aproximately $12.00.\nJoe Biden (presumed president-elect) has [pledged to increase the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour] (https://joebiden.com/empowerworkers/) .\nWhen will the US Federal Minimum Wage be Raised?\nThe resolution will occur on the date that the increase takes effect. Any increase over $7.25 USD (not inflation-adjusted) will be a valid resolution.\nIf the minimum wage is reduced or abolished, the question resolves ambiguously.\nThe question will be retroactively closed 3 days before a vote in the senate which passes legislation raising the minimum wage. A vote which does not pass will not close the question. The question will then be resolved on the date the legislation takes effect. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 44,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will 1% of humanity's GWP be produced off-Earth?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5648/1-gwp-off-earth/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Since the launch of our [first satellite] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sputnik_1) into orbit in 1957, human activity in outer space has been gradually increasing as the decades pass. As of writing, humans have visited the Moon, placed thousands of satellites around Earth and other celestial objects, and low Earth orbit has been inhabited continuously for just over [20 years] (https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/11/02/science/international-space-station-20-years) now.\nElon Musk wants to colonize Mars and Jeff Bezos has talked about [moving industry to space] (https://www.fastcompany.com/90347364/jeff-bezos-wants-to-save-earth-by-moving-industry-to-space) , but as of yet, there is still essentially no economic activity that happens (almost) exclusively in outer space. How soon is this going to change?\nWhen will 1% of humanity's Gross World Product (GWP) be produced off-Earth?\nThis question will resolve positively when there is a credible report of the total GWP of all economic activity away from Earth equaling at least 1/99th of the total GWP produced on Earth, as judged by Metaculus administrators.\nEconomic activity will be counted as being \"off-Earth\" so long as it is exclusively performed at least 100 km above the Earth's surface. A rocket launching a probe from the Earth's surface would be part of Earth's GWP, while that same probe performing asteroid mining would count as off-Earth GWP.\nAs it's fairly likely the exact date when the 1% milestone is achieved might not be knowable with certainty due to ambiguities, this question will retroactively resolve to January 1st of the year when it was deemed to have occurred.\nIf this question does not resolve positive before the ending date of 2300 AD, it will resolve to the upper bound.\nIf the GWP falls into disuse and Metaculus administrators find no obvious alternatives, this resolves ambiguous.\nFor the purposes of this question...\n--- \nThe term \"Gross World Product\" will refer to humanity's total economic activity across all inhabited space, including any worlds or artificial habitats beyond Earth.\n--- \nThe word \"humanity\" will also include genetically modified or cybernetic Earth-originating organisms, emulated humans (ems), and artificial intelligences (AIs). \n",
    "# Forecasts": 37,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the maximum number of COVID-19 cases reported in a single day in the United States before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5659/max-number-of-us-daily-covid-19-cases/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "According to the [New York Times] (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-us-cases.html) , the most cases reported in a single day so far has been 132,797, on November 6.\nWhat will be the maximum number of COVID-19 cases reported in a single day in the United States before 2025?\nThe number of cases in a day will be according to [The New York Times] (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-us-cases.html) . If that site is no longer functional at the time of resolution, resolves according to [Worldometers] (https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us) . If that site is no longer functional at the time of resolution, resolves according to [Johns Hopkins] (https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html) . If that site is no longer functional at the time of resolution, resolves according to [KFF] (https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/fact-sheet/coronavirus-tracker) . If none of these sites are functional at the time of resolution, the question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 166,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be Donald Trump's net worth in 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5666/donald-trumps-net-worth-in-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Donald Trump is #339 in the [Forbes 400] (https://www.forbes.com/forbes-400/) an authoritative list of the most wealthy Americans with a claimed net worth of $2.5 Billion.\nWhat will Donald Trump's net worth be in 2024?\nThis question will be resolved as the net worth attributed to Donald Trump by Forbes in Billions of US Dollars. If Donald Trump is no longer living it will resolved ambiguous. If Donald Trump is no longer on the Forbes 400 list, this question will resolve as &lt;2.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 100,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will it cost less than $1000 to calculate the private key of a 2048-bit RSA public key?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5670/calculating-rsa-public-keys/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Quantum computers are getting better every year and big companies like Microsoft and Google want to add them to their cloud offerings.\nOne task that quantum computers can do better than regular computers is factoring numbers. This is crucial because a common public-key encryption (and signature) scheme, RSA, relies on the difficulty of factoring the product of two large primes (this product is known as a semiprime). Besides RSA, the two other public-key schemes used in securing internet traffic, DSA signatures and Diffie–Hellman key exchange, are also breakable by quantum computers. The timescale for this happening, however, is unclear (and some still doubt whether it is even in principle possible.)\nFor a precise question we'll ask:\nWhen will it cost less than $1000 to factor any given 2048-bit semiprime?\nThere's a previous question which makes a prediction for [2030] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/607/will-it-cost-less-than-1000-to-calculate-a-pgp-private-key-from-a-2048-bits-pgp-public-key-in-2030/) .\nWhen will it cost less than $1000 to calculate the private key of a 2048-bit RSA public key?\nResolution is positive if there is compelling evidence that a computing system is employed to perform this task for &lt; $1000. (Thus the system must cost less than this or – far more likely – it must be possible to purchase use of such a computer for the task for &lt; $1000 USD. We'll assume 2020 dollars for this.)\n",
    "# Forecasts": 47,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will it be possible to buy Quantum Computing via the Cloud?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5671/quantum-computing-via-the-cloud/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Both Microsoft and Google are working on building Quantum Computers. Google achieved [Quantum Supremecy] (https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/09/20/132923/google-researchers-have-reportedly-achieved-quantum-supremacy/) in 2019. Microsoft already has a website that previews [Azure Quantum] (https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/quantum/) . Given that both companies have cloud offerings and the first Quantum Computers are going to be really expensive it makes sense to rent out compute on those computers to willing custumers of their cloud offerings.\nWhen will it be possible to buy Quantum Computing via the Cloud?\nThis question will resolve as the day on which quantum computing services can be brought via the cloud (as normal compute in cloud computing can be brought in 2020). On the date of resolution, prices for quantum compute must be openly advertised and any user must be able to sign up without first having to be on a waiting list. If these conditions are not met by the end of 2050, the question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 34,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel retract his view that he wants to die by 75?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5678/dr-ezekiel-emanuel-to-retract-deathist-view/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "In 2014, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel argued in the Atlantic that he [wants to die by 75] (https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/10/why-i-hope-to-die-at-75/379329/) .\nAt 75 and beyond, I will need a good reason to even visit the doctor and take any medical test or treatment, no matter how routine and painless. And that good reason is not “It will prolong your life.” I will stop getting any regular preventive tests, screenings, or interventions. I will accept only palliative—not curative—treatments if I am suffering pain or other disability.\nHe was recently [named to the Biden-Harris COVID task force] (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-coronavirus-adviser-zeke-emanuel-age-75-the-atlantic-essay) .\nWill Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel retract his view that he wants to die by 75?\nThis question resolves positively if at any point before turning 76, he publicly retracts those claims. This includes if it is publicly revealed that he has gotten a treatment ruled out by the above quote, after the age of 75. \nThis question resolves negatively if he dies between the ages of 75 to 76, or reaches the age of 76, and has not publicly retracted those claims.\nIf he dies before turning 75, this question resolves ambiguously.\nHe was born on September 6, 1957, so the latest this can resolve is September 6, 2033.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 49,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the average daily supply of consumer motor gasoline in 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5679/avg-daily-supply-motor-gasoline-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Ground motor transportation contributes heavily to global carbon emissions. A large part of this comes from the burning of fossil fuels in combustion vehicles, which are currently the majority of vehicles in the global fleet. \nHowever, as electric vehicle (EV) adoption rates increase with an expected market [CAGR of 41.7%] (https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/electric-vehicles-ev-market#:~:text=The%20global%20electric%20vehicle%20market,of%2041.5%25%202020%20to%202027.) between 2020 and 2025, the amount of gasoline purchased should decrease as consumers make the switch.\n[Gasoline purchases dipped] (https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/browser/index.php?tbl=T03.05#/?f=A&amp;start=2007&amp;end=2019&amp;charted=16-12) during the Great Recession, but have risen to over 9,000 barrels a day in 2019 (an increase of over 400 barrels). \nData: Data will be collected and provided through the Energy Information Association, which can be accessed [here] (https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/browser/index.php?tbl=T03.05#/?f=A&amp;start=1949&amp;end=2019&amp;charted=16-12) with historical data from the 1940’s through 2019. Data can be downloaded from the site in table form as well.\nWhat will be the average daily supply of consumer motor gasoline in 2025?\nResolution criteria will come from the US Energy Information Association (EIA) through their Total Energy Data section. [Table 3.5] (https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/browser/index.php?tbl=T03.05#/?f=A&amp;start=2007&amp;end=2019&amp;charted=16-12) with Petroleum Products Supplies By Type will supply the computed daily average for the year 2025 in 2026.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 22,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By how much will carbon dioxide emissions change from ground transportation globally between 2020 and 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5680/co2-emission-change-from-transport-2020-25/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Carbon emissions from motor transport, and in general, have decreased over the past year with COVID-19 affecting travel and general transportation rates across the globe. Between September 2019 and September 2020, carbon dioxide emissions from global ground transportation have [decreased 15.9%] (https://carbonmonitor.org/ground-transport) and contributed almost 2% of the total reduction in emissions over the past year.\nAs a global consciousness grows over the need to limit climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, more countries are [adopting carbon neutrality goals] (https://www.climatechangenews.com/2019/06/14/countries-net-zero-climate-goal/) . The countries with greatest reductions in ground transportation emissions between 2019 and 2020 were America and Brazil, with a [25% and 16%] (https://carbonmonitor.org/ground-transport) decrease respectively. The US’s change in transportation habits during this year contributed to an almost 10% decrease in their total carbon emissions. \nIf consumer consumption patterns for transportation continue to change and as electric vehicle (EV) adoption grows worldwide, hopefully the pattern for carbon emission reduction will continue through 2025. \nData: Data for 2019 and 2020 for a variety of sectors including ground transportation can be found [here] (https://carbonmonitor.org/) . Historical data for global carbon emissions by fuel type can be found through [Our World in Data] (https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-fuel) for more contextual information.\nBy how much will carbon dioxide emissions change from ground transportation globally between 2020 and 2025?\nResolution criteria will be provided through the site [Carbon Monitor] (https://carbonmonitor.org/) , and will represent the total percentage change in ground transportation sector emissions between January 2020 and December 2025. Data will be provided on the site sometime in 2026. If data is no longer available, or the site does not exist, then the question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will US EV sales equal or exceed 10% of the number of US ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) sales within a year?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5681/when-will-us-ev-sales-overtake-ice-sales/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "US Electric Vehicle (EV) sales have fluctuated greatly, with battery electric vehicles (BEV) sales increasing [3% from 2018-2019] (https://carsalesbase.com/us-car-sales-analysis-2019-ev-phev/) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV) sales decreasing approximately 30% in the same time frame. A decrease in PHEV sales makes sense as battery technology, range, and charging infrastructure becomes better, however, these changes have not been met by increases in BEV sales to a similar level. \nTotal vehicle sales in the United States dipped during the last Great Recession but have risen again to just over [17 million in 2019] (https://carsalesbase.com/united-states-sales-data-market/) . In 2019, the percentage of BEV and PHEV sales out of total car sales was just under 2%, at [(327,970/17,053,566)*100], according to [Car Sales Base] (https://carsalesbase.com/) .\nReports from BCG estimate that global EV sales will take [30% of the market share by 2025] (https://www.bcg.com/en-us/publications/2020/drive-electric-cars-to-the-tipping-point) , and 51% by 2030. As the US lags behind in adoption levels, it will remain to be seen how quickly the market share of EVs grows in comparison to the rest of the world.\nWhen will US EV sales equal or exceed 10% of the number of US ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) sales within a year?\nResolution criteria will be provided through Car Sales Base and their US data on [total car sales] (https://carsalesbase.com/united-states-sales-data-market/) and [total EV sales] (https://carsalesbase.com/us-car-sales-analysis-2019-ev-phev/) , which make up the combined numbers of BEV and PHEV sales. If data is no longer available, total car sales can be obtained through the [Federal Reserve] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/TOTALSA#0) and EV sales through other reputable sources with previous historical data provided. If no data is available or reported through any medium, this question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 35,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many new EV buses will be registered worldwide in 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5682/new-ev-bus-registration-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Public transport has long been thought to help [lower individual passenger car emissions] (https://www.nationalexpresstransit.com/blog/why-is-public-transportation-good-for-the-environment/) as they reduce person-miles per gallon, and reduce the amount of space taken up on the road. While diesel powered buses are far from the cleanest vehicles, movements towards adopting electric public transportation could vastly improve public transport’s emissions.\nChina has been the leader in electric busing and public transportation, with [72 thousand] (https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2020) new electric bus registrations in 2019 alone. By 2017, China’s bus fleet was comprised of approximately [17% electric buses] (https://www.sustainable-bus.com/electric-bus/electric-bus-public-transport-main-fleets-projects-around-world/) , a number far above the mere decimal point percentages in Europe and the United States.\nHowever, with new actions taken by the EU in attempts to become [carbon neutral by 2050] (https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2050_en) , there are new extreme measures taking place to electrify transportation across Europe in both the 2020 and 2030 climate and energy packages. This should see a large number of new registrations in Europe over the next several years. \nNorth America lags behind Europe with only [one quarter the number of registrations] (https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2020) in 2019 (560 total), and fewer registrations than the year before in 2018 (620 total). South America and India continue to consistently fall behind the United States in numbers as well. \nChanging the nature of transportation is essential to protecting the environment, and if more options are available for consumers to choose outside of individual, gas-powered transport, then we might be able to keep global warming under the [1.5-2 degree Celsius limit] (https://www.wri.org/blog/2020/06/6-ways-remove-carbon-pollution-sky#:~:text=To%20keep%20global%20temperature%20rise,some%20carbon%20from%20the%20atmosphere.) . \nOther Related Questions:\n[Electric Bus Registrations in Europe 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5572/electric-bus-registrations-2021/) \nHow many new EV buses will be registered worldwide in 2025?\nResolution criteria will come from IEA global report outlook for 2025. An example outlook for 2020 using data from 2019 is available [here] (https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2020) . This report should become available sometimes in 2026.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 29,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the famed South American lithium triangle (Bolivia, Chile, and Argentina) overtake Australia in lithium production by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5683/who-will-produce-the-most-lithium-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "50%",
    "Description": "It is estimated that Bolivia, Chile, and Argentina (the so-called lithium triangle) make up approximately [54% of the world’s lithium reserves] (https://resourceworld.com/lithium-triangle/) . There are two types of lithium, the hardrock (spodumene), and the lithium brines in desert regions which when evaporated gradually leave lithium behind. Lithium is a key part of the current battery technology needed to produce electric vehicles, and as EV demand grows, so does the need for minable lithium. The expected demand for lithium is expected to rise to [159.6 kilotonnes by 2030] (https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/annual-lithium-demand-for-electric-vehicle-batteries-2019-2030-2) for light vehicles. In 2019, our current lithium supply was only 77 kilotonnes.\nChile and Argentina have already seen large increases in demand for lithium, with increased production to match it. Bolivia, which is still in its early days with lithium mining, has [yet to enter the world market as a large-scale producer] (https://resourceworld.com/lithium-triangle/) . In 2019, Chile provided [18,000 tonnes of lithium] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/268789/countries-with-the-largest-production-output-of-lithium/) to market and Argentina behind that with 6,400. \nThe U.S geographical survey estimates that Bolivia has over [9 million tonnes] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bolivia-lithium-exclusive/exclusive-bolivias-new-lithium-tsar-says-country-should-go-it-alone-idUSKBN1ZE2DW) of identifiable lithium resources in its salt flats. So far, Bolivia has been producing [400 tonnes of lithium] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bolivia-lithium-exclusive/exclusive-bolivias-new-lithium-tsar-says-country-should-go-it-alone-idUSKBN1ZE2DW) in a private test site, which now should be able to scale quickly due to the change in political leadership. \nAustralia, which currently holds the record in annual lithium production at [42,000 tonnes in 2019] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/268789/countries-with-the-largest-production-output-of-lithium/) , has a total estimated lithium reserve of [2,800,000 tonnes] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/268790/countries-with-the-largest-lithium-reserves-worldwide/) , almost ⅓ of the reserves in Chile, and less than twice as much as Argentina. As Bolivia enters the market, the dynamics of production and price could change dramatically.\nThe number of exports and interest in the lithium triangle could dramatically increase as the prices of lithium fall. High labor costs and protected union jobs, with an average yearly salary of [62,636 US Dollars] (https://gradaustralia.com.au/on-the-job/salaries-and-benefits-for-graduates-in-the-mining-sector) in Australia, make production an expensive affair. In 2019, lithium demand [fell 19%] (https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2020/mcs2020-lithium.pdf) , bringing prices down with it. \n\"Several established lithium operations postponed capacity expansion plans. Junior mining operations in Australia [ceased production] (https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2020/mcs2020-lithium.pdf) altogether.\"\nLow prices in lithium aren't necessarily daunting to South American producers, for whom labor costs are extremely low at approximately [6,148 US dollars a year in Argentina] (http://www.salaryexplorer.com/salary-survey.php?loc=10&amp;loctype=1&amp;job=39&amp;jobtype=1) in mining positions, and an average [12,726 US dollars a year in Chile] (https://www.erieri.com/salary/job/miner/chile/santiago#:~:text=The%20average%20pay%20for%20a,CLP%207%2C174%2C468%20and%20CLP%2011%2C750%2C775.) . With lower transport costs to the United States as well, this might become a more attractive option than Australia in the future, both for consumers and producers.\nLUT-Augsburg researchers attempting to model the amount of lithium left, to understand demand and production dynamics, found with increasing uncertainty that there could be anywhere from [30-95 million tonnes of lithium reserves left] (https://www.pv-magazine.com/2020/09/15/how-long-will-the-lithium-supply-last/) .\n\"The researchers modeled four lithium supply scenarios based on the estimates. In their worst-case forecast, no additional lithium resources will be discovered. That would leave humanity 26 Mt of lithium. If the policies ( recycling, V2G, second-life) and only 3 billion electric vehicles on the road were matched with just 26 Mt of lithium, but recycling efforts would only grow slowly, battery manufacturers will close shops even before 2040.\"\nIn this scenario, with only 2.8 million tonnes of lithium reserves, Australian production would drop off more quickly than that of the lithium triangle. \nWill the famed South American lithium triangle (Bolivia, Chile, and Argentina) overtake Australia in lithium production by 2030?\nThis question will resolve positively if the amount of lithium mine production between Argentina, Chile, and Bolivia is greater than the mine production from Australia before the end of 2030. Data will be provided through Statista, which has current data on both the countries with the [greatest lithium reserves] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/268790/countries-with-the-largest-lithium-reserves-worldwide/) as of 2019, as well as data on [lithium production by country] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/268789/countries-with-the-largest-production-output-of-lithium/) ranging from 2014-2019. \nThis question will resolve ambiguously if data is no longer available through Statista and no other credible source can be found, or if lithium demand by the transportation industry drops below 1 kilotonne. Demand in 2019 was at approximately [17 kt] (https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/annual-lithium-demand-for-electric-vehicle-batteries-2019-2030-2) in comparison.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 24,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Trump be indicted for obstruction of justice by 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5687/trump-indicted-for-obstruction-of-justice/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "35%",
    "Description": "[Fortune.com] (https://fortune.com/2020/11/09/trump-prosecuted-biden-2020-election/) :\non Jan. 20 Trump will lose the immunity from federal criminal indictment that sitting presidents are granted under Justice Department policy. Prosecutors could ... re-examine the instances of possible obstruction of justice that former Special Counsel Robert Mueller uncovered in his probe into Russia’s 2016 election interference.\nWill Trump be indicted for obstruction of justice by 2025?\nThis resolves positive if Trump is indicted for obstruction of justice by December 31, 2025. It resolves positive regardless of the nature of the obstruction charge, e.g. it resolves positive even if the alleged obstruction is not related to Russia's 2016 election interference.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 64,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Graphcore become a publicly traded company?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5694/when-will-graphcore-ipo/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Graphcore] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphcore) is a semiconductor company that develops accelerators for AI and machine learning.\nIn a [2019 interview by Wired] (https://www.wired.co.uk/article/graphcore-ai-intelligence-processing-unit) , Nigel Toon was asked whether Graphcore's goal ultimately is to IPO. His response:\nThat’s the path we’re shooting for, absolutely.\nWhen will Graphcore become a publicly traded company?\nThis question resolves positively as the date when Graphcore first becomes a publicly traded company. This may occur through any of the following channels:\n---Graphcore holds an IPO or a completes a direct listing \n---Graphcore is acquired by a publicly traded company \n---Graphcore completes a [reverse IPO] (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/reversetakeover.asp) by acquiring a publicly traded company \n--- \nThis question resolves ambiguously if Graphcore is aqcuired by a private company. \n--- \nThis question resolves ambiguously if Graphcore ceases operations before going public.\n--- \nThis question resolves as \"&gt;2035-11-10\" if it fails to resolve positively before 2035-11-10. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 12,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Bryan Caplan first announce that he lost a bet?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5695/when-will-bryan-caplan-lose-a-bet/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Bryan Caplan [writes] (https://www.econlib.org/my-complete-bet-wiki/) ,\nBy popular demand, I’ve created a publicly-viewable wiki for my Complete Bet Inventory. From now on, I’ll edit it when I make new bets or when old bets resolve.\nTo repeat, my track record now stands at 20/20. Twenty of my bets have come due, and I have won every single one of them. [...]\nWill I lose eventually? Almost surely, because I’m going to keep betting. And if I live long enough, my superior knowledge and judgment will probably fade away. I know, moreover, that pride goeth before the fall. One of the best ways to start losing bets is to dwell on “my superior knowledge and judgment.”\nWhen will Bryan Caplan first announce that he lost a bet?\nThis question resolves on the date which Bryan Caplan first publishes some sort of information publicly which indicates that he lost a bet. Acceptable public mediums include, but are not limited to, Twitter, his blog, and his public posts on his Facebook wall. A note in which he says that he will lose a bet that has not yet resolved does not count as a declaration that he has lost a bet.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 45,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the net percentage of people who believe it's acceptable to buy fur by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5697/moral-acceptablity-of-buying-fur-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Every year in May, Gallup asks people about the moral acceptability of various issues. You can see their most recent report [here] (https://news.gallup.com/poll/1681/moral-issues.aspx) . One of the issues they ask about is \"Buying and wearing clothing made of animal fur.\" As of May 2020, 54% of survey participants responded that it was morally acceptable to buy and wear clothing made of animal fur, and 43% replied that it was morally wrong. This means the net acceptability is 54 - 43 = 9%. What will the number be in 2030?\nWhat will be the net acceptability of buying and wearing fur by 2030?\nThis question resolves as the percentage of survey participants who responded that it was morally acceptable to buy and wear clothing made of animal fur minus the percentage who responded that it is morally wrong, as of the most recent survey completed by Gallup by the end of 2030. In case the most recent survey is one that is more than 3 years old at the end of 2030, then this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 50,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Longbets series: will driverless cars be commercially available in Las Vegas, NV by May 27 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5715/driverless-cars-available-in-las-vegas-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "56.99999999999999%",
    "Description": "Jeff McAulay and Stephen Zoepf summarize their reasons for taking the bet [here] (https://longbets.org/712/) .\nJeff McAulay argued,\nEvery major car company already has autonomous driving technology under development. Licenses for driverless cars have already been issued. Google autonomous vehicles have already demonstrated hundreds of thousands of miles of driving without any major accidents.\nStephen Zoepf countered,\nI agree that autonomous vehicle technology has progressed at an astounding rate. However, I feel that major technological, policy, and consumer barriers mean that commercial availability of the technology in the next 8 years is unlikely.\nWill driverless cars be commercially available in Las Vegas, NV by May 27 2024?\nIf Jeff McAulay is declared the winner of the bet by the Long Now Foundation, then this question resolves positively. If Stephen Zoepf is declared the winner, then this question resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 47,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Longbets series: will the amount of geologically-derived crude oil consumed by the United States in 2035 be greater than the amount consumed in 2015?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5716/longbets-oil-consumed-in-us-in-2035-vs-2015/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33%",
    "Description": "Joseph F. Huttner and Stephen W Snow summarize their reasons for taking the bet [here] (https://longbets.org/726/) .\nJoseph F. Huttner argued,\n1) The overall population of the United States will continue to increase, largely as a result of immigration. [...]\n2) The American electorate is generally unwilling to force themselves to pay more for a given unit of energy than they have to, and geologically-derived crude oil is often the cheapest form of energy available. [...]\n3) The solution to credible environmental issues stemming from the burning of fossil fuels is likely to be based on some scientific process which addresses those effects. [...]\n4) Much of the geologically-derived crude oil for sale in the world comes from countries that have an under-developed economy. On a political level, it is in the interest of wealthier nations to purchase the exports of poorer nations, and that includes their oil - these transactions not only increase wealth for both nations, but they help foster harmony and peace among the peoples of the world.\nStephen W Snow countered,\nMy reasoning is based on economic arguments rather than on an assumption that the drop will be caused by a deliberate policy to reduce fossil carbon use, even though such a policy would be highly desirable to reduce climate change. It seems likely to me that the price of oil will continue to rise as it has done in the past, while the price of renewables, particularly solar photovoltaic, will also follow past trends and continue to fall. Even though the US population and economy will continue to grow I claim that this growth will be more than compensated by improved energy intensity and by substitution of oil with natural gas and renewables.\nWill the amount of geologically-derived crude oil consumed by the United States in 2035 be greater than the amount consumed in 2015?\nIf the Long Now Foundation declares Joseph F. Huttner the winner, this question resolves positively. If they declare Stephen W Snow the winner, this question resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 31,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Donald Trump be elected president of the United States in 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5717/will-trump-be-elected-potus-in-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4%",
    "Description": "[Donald John Trump] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump) , born June 14, 1946, is the 45th and current president of the United States. Before entering politics, he was a businessman and television personality.\nTrump lost the [2020 presidential election] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election) to Democratic nominee Joe Biden, but he has refused to concede defeat. He has made unsubstantiated accusations of electoral fraud, mounted a series of legal challenges to the results, and ordered White House officials not to cooperate in the presidential transition.\nAs of mid-November 2020, [Trump is reportedly planning to run for the presidency again in 2024.] (https://www.wsj.com/articles/as-trump-focuses-on-2024-aides-mull-agenda-for-final-days-11605206862) \nIf Trump were to win the presidency again in 2024 and take office in 2025, he would be only the second man to serve non-consecutive terms as president of the United States, after [Grover Cleveland] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover_Cleveland) , who served as the 22nd president from 1885 to 1889 and the 24th president from 1893 to 1897.\nWill Donald Trump be elected president of the United States in 2024?\nThis question resolves positively if in 2024, Donald Trump is elected as president of the United States. This requires that he obtains a majority in the electoral college. This question does not require that Trump actually be sworn in as president for a positive resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 250,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a nuclear device with a yield of at least 1kt be detonated anywhere on Earth in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5721/1kt-nuke-detonated-on-earth-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "37%",
    "Description": "[Nuclear weapons] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapon) have only been used in warfare on two occasions in world history: [on August 6 and 9 1945 in American attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki) , respectively. However, there have been more than 2,000 detonations of nuclear devices since the July 16 1945 [Trinity test] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_(nuclear_test)) .\nA tally of verified nuclear detonations can be found [here] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests) .\nAs of November 2020, the most recent confirmed detonation took place on September 3 2017 when [North Korea claimed to have successfully detonated its first hydrogen bomb that yielded 70-280kt] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests_of_North_Korea#Testing) . It is debated whether the device was actually a boosted fission weapon rather than an actual staged Teller–Ulam thermonuclear weapon, but qualified experts agree that a nuclear device was successfully detonated, and condemnations were issued by (inter alia) the United States, the United Kingdom, France, China and the Russian Federation.\nWill a nuclear device with a yield of at least 1kt be detonated anywhere on Earth in 2021?\nThis question shall resolve positively if any nation, group or individual admits conducting a test or other detonation of a nuclear device with a yield equal to or greater than 1 kiloton of TNT, or if the below conditions are satisfied, anywhere on Earth between midnight UTC on 1 January 2021 and 23:59:59 UTC on 31 December 2021. Tests or detonations occurring more than 100km above Earth's mean sea level are excluded, as are zero-yield detonations in safety tests and any failures with a yield under 1kt.\nThere have in the past been a number of incidents which are suspected to have been clandestine or undeclared nuclear tests, but for this question we will consider only admitted nuclear tests or detonations, or incidents that are recognized by at least three Permanent Members of the United Nations Security Council to have been nuclear tests or detonations. In the event that the the only suspected nuclear tests or detonations are recognized by only two or fewer Permanent Members of the UN Security Council, this question shall resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 175,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will 100M people receive a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate that has demonstrated an efficacy rate >75% in a n>500 RCT?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5727/100m-people-vaccinated-against-covid-19/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus is a novel betacoronavirus that likely emerged late last year from an animal reservoir in China. There is little to no pre-existing immunity against it in the human population. The clinical picture for the disease it causes, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), ranges from very mild to fatal. The virus is highly transmissible and has spread globally.\nWhile the development of a vaccine is critical for its successful administration at scale, just as critical is the creation and execution of infrastructure necessary for widescale vaccination to greater than 100m people.\nThe WHO defines vaccine efficacy as follows:\nVaccine efficacy: % reduction in disease incidence in a vaccinated group compared to an unvaccinated group under optimal conditions\nWhen will a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate that has demonstrated an efficacy rate &gt;75% in a n&gt;500 RCT be administered to 100M people?\nThis question resolves as the date when the first credible article is published that presents the claim that at least 100 million people have been administered a vaccine that had been previously shown to have an efficacy rate exceeding &gt;75% in a randomized controlled trial with at least 500 participants. This may all be from the same vaccine, for from multiple vaccines. A vaccine is considered \"administered\" to a person if they receive all the doses as prescribed.\nIf this does not resolve before 31 December 2022, it resolves as &gt;31 December 2022.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 288,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Biden keep a +5% net Presidential approval rating throughout his first six months on the job?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5730/biden-net-approval-5-through-20-july-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "65%",
    "Description": "By most accounts, Joe Biden [has won a fairly convincing victory in the 2020 Presidential election] (https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/a-pretty-convincing-win-for-biden-and-a-mediocre-performance-for-down-ballot-democrats/) , winning at least nine million more votes than Obama's previous record of 69.5 million and an apparent 306 electors. Nevertheless, according to The Atlantic, some Democrats are wondering if [\"maybe Biden was weak, and another candidate might have done better.\"] (https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/11/why-biden-won-presidency/616980/) Conservative commenter Liz Peek asserts, [\"Biden is frail, and often suffers mental lapses that many in the media have largely hidden from the public. It will be impossible going forward to disguise what appears to be Biden’s declining mental acuity.\"] (https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/524615-biden-win-would-leave-gop-poised-for-2024-comeback) \nAccording to [the FiveThirtyEight Trump approval tracker,] (https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/) presidents in the era of modern polling have typically enjoyed a honeymoon period, starting at a net approval of around +30 to +50 on Inauguration Day before eventually declining. Maintaining a +5% net Presidential approval throughout the first six months might seem to be a relatively modest achievement; by 538's numbers only Trump, Clinton and Ford would fail this standard. On the other hand, increased levels of polarization could mean this is harder now than it used to be.\nWill Biden keep a +5% net Presidential approval rating throughout his first six months on the job?\nWill FiveThirtyEight's estimate of Biden's net presidential approval stay at or above +5% at all times during his first six months in office?\nThe question resolves negatively if Biden drops below 5% in the FiveThirtyEight average even momentarily (assuming this can be documented) at any time between noon January 20th 2021 and noon July 20th 2021. If FiveThirtyEight does not publish this number, admins may substitute the best available alternate source at discretion. If the 538 average is available in multiple variants (such as all polls, polls of likely voters, polls of all adults, etc) then Biden must stay ≥5% throughout the time period in all of them. The question resolves ambiguous if Biden does not take office, or leaves office before noon July 20th without his approval having dropped below 5%. It resolves positively if Biden is President, and his net approval ≥5%, throughout the period. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 291,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the minimum unemployment rate in the United States for calendar year 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5735/minimum-us-unemployment-rate-for-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Note that much of the text for this question has been copied from [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3987/what-will-be-the-peak-unemployment-rate-in-the-united-states-for-calendar-year-2020/) .\nIn February 2020, the [US unemployment rate] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate) fell from 3.6% to 3.5%, the lowest level in more than 50 years. However, due to the ongoing [COVID-19 pandemic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic) and associated shutdowns of economic activity, unemployment rose to 14.7%. By October, unemployment was on track to rapidly return to record lows, as it had reached 6.9%.\nThis question asks: For the calendar year 2021, what will be the lowest monthly unemployment rate reached in any month?\nResolution should cite the official US unemployment rate from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics' monthly Employment Situation report. Only the first number issued by the BLS for each month counts.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 133,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a new variant of SARS-COV-2 that, due to a mutation, can infect people who had immunity to a previous variant, cause more than 10M infections globally by the end of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5749/covid-19-strain-that-circumvents-the-immunity/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "50%",
    "Description": "The SARS-CoV-2 virus can mutate and develop new strains. For example, In Early November 2020, [a variant strain was identified in Denmark as having an association with mink farming] (https://www.who.int/csr/don/06-november-2020-mink-associated-sars-cov2-denmark/en/) . This led to the immediate cull of all Danish farmed mink (more than 17 million) including breeding stock. More recently, on 16 December 2020, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) published a [briefing] (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4857) on VUI-202012/01, a variant of SARS-COV-2 consisting of 17 mutations, including N501Y, a mutation in the spike protein. The UK government has locked down London and the South East in response.\nThis question asks:\nWill a new variant of SARS-COV-2 that, due to a mutation, can infect people who had immunity to a previous variant, cause more than 10M infections globally by the end of 2021?\nThis question will resolve according to credible estimates of the prevalence of the relevant new strain, for example from the WHO, US CDC, or SAGE. If no new strain is identified with the property that immunity does not carry over from previous infection or vaccination, this question will resolve negatively.\nIf coronavirus infection confers partial immunity to the new strain, such that getting the disease is less likely but still possible, this may still count so long as scientific evidence exists (for example in a published paper) that the protection is significantly less for the new strain than the old.\n2 February clarification: A \"significant reduction in immunity\" here is defined as a &gt;=50% difference in the attack rate between strains/variants in seropositive (previously infected) subjects. A potential resolution source might be, for instance, [attack rate data collected from the placebo groups of vaccine trials] (https://twitter.com/profshanecrotty/status/1355552010158764036) . Such data should be presented in a published paper.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 351,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the China-to-USA GDP ratio be in 2050?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5755/china-to-usa-gdp-ratio-in-2050/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[There is a lot of discussion about the rise of China as a global superpower] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potential_superpowers#China) . [One interesting way to quantify it, is to look at the ratio of GDP nominal of the current global superpower, USA, to China] (https://www.unz.com/akarlin/chinese-gdp-in-2050-the-debate/) . [So far, this value has changed from 0.11 in 1980 to 0.69 in 2020 (estimated)] (https://mgmresearch.com/china-vs-united-states-a-gdp-comparison/) . China shows an average higher GDP growth, so it stands to reason it may surpass the US by some ratio in 2050, but which? Note, this question is NOT about \"per capita\" numbers, but take into account the changes in population sizes and how these may affect GDP.\nWhat will the China-to-USA GDP ratio be in 2050?\n---IMF published GDP [nominal dataset] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)) . \n---If IMF stops publishing this, administrators choose a new similar dataset. \nRelated questions: \n--- [When will China surpass the United States economically, militarily, and scientifically?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4443/when-will-china-surpass-the-united-states-economically-militarily-and-scientifically/) \n--- [Will China be the World's largest economy in any year before 2040?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1579/will-china-be-the-worlds-largest-economy-in-any-year-before-2040/) \n--- [Will Chinese official real GDP numbers be revised downward by at least 5% before 2023?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2670/will-chinese-official-real-gdp-numbers-be-revised-downward-by-at-least-5-before-2023/) * \n",
    "# Forecasts": 60,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the next leader of the UK Conservative Party?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5760/next-conservative-leader-uk/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Boris Johnson became leader of the Conservative Party in July 2019. There has been speculation about when he might leave and who might replace him.\nWho will be the next leader of the UK Conservative Party?\nThe question will resolve:\n1--Rishi Sunak \n2--Michael Gove \n3--Jeremy Hunt \n4--Priti Patel \n5--None of the above \nThe question will close on the announcement of the next Conservative Party leadership election, and resolve on the basis of that result. If Johnson wins re-election, the question will re-open and continue.\nIf the Conservative part ceases to exist, or if the next Conservative part leader is chosen by a process other than a leadership election, this question will resolve as ambiguous. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 153,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the next Scottish independence referendum be held?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5761/next-scottish-indepedence-referendum/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In 2014, a referendum for the [independence of Scotland] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Scottish_independence_referendum) was held, with 44.70% in favour of independence and 55.30% in favour of remaining part of the UK. \nIn 2016, the UK held a [referendum for leaving the European Union] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_Kingdom_European_Union_membership_referendum) , with 52% of votes in the UK as a whole in favour of leaving the EU but 62% of votes in Scotland against, leading to proposals for a second independence referendum. From June 2020 through at least November 2020, opinion polling has been in favour of a [second independence referendum] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_on_Scottish_independence) .\nHowever, Scottish independence is a [reserved matter] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserved_and_excepted_matters) under Section 30 of the Scotland Act, so for a binding referendum to be held by legal channels the Scottish parliament would need to obtain a Section 30 order from the UK government, which has thus far been [ruled out by Boris Johnson] (https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jan/14/boris-johnson-refuses-to-grant-scotland-powers-to-hold-independence-vote) .\nWhen will the next Scottish independence referendum be held?\nThis resolves at the date of the next Scottish independence referendum. If the referendum is held over multiple days, this resolves on the final day of voting. If there is no referendum by the start of 2035, this resolves above the upper end of the scale.\nETA (2020-11-26): Positive resolution requires that the relevant referendum is a legally binding referendum authorized by the UK government.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 57,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Andrew Yang run for mayor of New York in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5766/yang-to-run-for-nyc-mayor-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "98%",
    "Description": "Andrew Yang is an entrepreneur and philanthropist from New York City who ran a surprisingly effective long-shot Democratic primary campaign in the 2020 Presidential election. He was noted for his quirky, upbeat campaigning style and raucous online fanbase.\nNew York mayor Bill de Blasio is ineligible to run for re-election in November 2021 due to term limits. With 70% of New York voters registered as Democrats to only 10% Republicans, the election to replace him is in effect the Democratic Party mayoral primary on June 22, 2021. There are already [several strong declared and potential candidates] (https://www.cityandstateny.com/articles/politics/campaigns-elections/major-2021-mayoral-contenders.html) , including [Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams] (https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/11/eric-adams-runs-for-new-york-city-mayor.html) . Yang has confirmed that [he is actively considering] (http://www.wcny.org/andrew-yang-for-nyc-mayor-tbd/) a bid.\nWill Andrew Yang run for mayor of New York in 2021?\nWill Andrew Yang declare his intention to run for Mayor in the 2021 New York City municipal Democratic primary election?\nThis question resolves positively if Andrew Yang states clearly that he will run for Mayor of New York before the Democratic primary filing deadline on April 26th. It resolves negatively if this date passes without such a statement, if Yang runs as in independent or under another party, or if Yang states clearly that he will not be running. Resolution should be supported by credible media reports. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 360,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will 1bn people have been vaccinated with any vaccine candidate(s) that have demonstrated an efficacy rate >75% in a n>500 RCT?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5767/1bn-people-vaccinated-against-covid-19/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus is a novel betacoronavirus that likely emerged late last year from an animal reservoir in China. There is little to no pre-existing immunity against it in the human population. The clinical picture for the disease it causes, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), ranges from very mild to fatal. The virus is highly transmissible and has spread globally.\nWhile the development of a vaccine is critical for its successful administration at scale, just as critical is the creation and execution of infrastructure necessary for widescale vaccination to greater than 1 billion people.\nThe WHO defines vaccine efficacy as follows:\nVaccine efficacy: % reduction in disease incidence in a vaccinated group compared to an unvaccinated group under optimal conditions\nWhen will 1bn people have been vaccinated with any vaccine candidate(s) that have demonstrated an efficacy rate &gt;75% in a n&gt;500 RCT?\nThis question resolves as the date when the first credible article is published that presents the claim that at least 1 billion people have been administered vaccines that had been previously shown to have an efficacy rate exceeding &gt;75% in a randomized controlled trial with at least 500 participants. This may all be from the same vaccine, for from multiple vaccines. A vaccine is considered \"administered\" to a person if they receive all the doses as prescribed.\nIf this does not resolve before 31 December 2023, it resolves as &gt;31 December 2023.\nRelated question\n--- [When will 1bn people have been vaccinated with any vaccine candidate(s) that have demonstrated an efficacy rate &gt;60% in a n&gt;500 RCT?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5934/1bn-people-vaccinated-against-covid-19/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 122,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any executives be imprisoned for corporate crimes before 2026?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5768/prison-for-corporate-crooks/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "70%",
    "Description": "In 2006 [Jeffrey Skilling] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Skilling) was imprisoned for 12 years for his part in the [Enron scandal] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron_scandal) . \nSince then, there have been very few high profile convictions of corporate bad-actors. (Much ink was spilled over the lack of convictions of bankers during for the [2007-2008 financial crisis] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisis_of_2007%E2%80%932008) )\nThere have been prison terms for some more junior employees. [Tom Hayes] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Hayes_(trader)) was imprisoned for his part of the [LIBOR fixing scandal] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libor_scandal) although generally executives have escaped sanctions:\nThere are currently outstanding warrants for Wirecard executives, and a former [VW CEO is faces charges of fraud in court] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_emissions_scandal#Charges_against_Volkswagen_engineering/management) . (His imprisonment would result in this question resolving positive)\nWill any executives be imprisoned for corporate crimes before 2026?\nIf any senior executive (current or former) is convicted of crimes relating to actions taken in a corporate capacity (ie ignoring crimes committed which are unrelated to their companies and crimes committed for their own benefit at the expense of their employer (eg insider trading))\nSenior executives are those executives and directors who are named on official filings to their respective stock exchanges.\nThey need to be an executive for a listed company in a major index\n---S&amp;P500 \n---FTSE100 \n---DAX30 \n---CAC40 \n---FTSE MIB \n---Nikkei 225 \nTheir imprisonment must start before 2026\n",
    "# Forecasts": 29,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will GTA VI be released in the US?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5772/when-will-gta-vi-be-released-in-the-us/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Grand Theft Auto] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto) (GTA) is a series of action-adventure games created by David Jones and Mike Dailly. The series has been critically acclaimed and commercially successful, having shipped more than 280 million units with an [estimated gross revenue of over $9 billion] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_video_game_franchises#At_least_$5_billion) , making it the fourth-highest selling video game franchise of all time, behind Nintendo's Mario and Pokémon franchises, and Tetris.\nThe latest major instalment in the series, [Grand Theft Auto V] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto_V) , was released in 2013. It was the first main entry in the Grand Theft Auto series since 2008's [Grand Theft Auto IV] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto_IV) .\nWhen will GTA VI be released?\nThis question resolves as the date on which the next major instalment in the GTA series (e.g. not an expansion pack or handheld game), the successor to GTA V, is released for sale to the public in the United States. The game need not necessarily be called 'GTA VI' for a positive resolution; any name will suffice, as long as it is intended as the next major instalment in the series. \nThis date is the date on which the game can either be purchased from retailers, or directly downloaded from an online store, not the date on which the game becomes available for pre-order.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 51,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the United States reach herd immunity (>230M) for COVID-19?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5773/united-states-covid-herd-immunity-230m-date/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Widescale SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are soon expected to be administered in the United States under FDA approved Emergency Use Authorizations. If and when a sufficient number of people receive these vaccines, in combination with immunity provided through naturally occurring antibodies among those previously infected, the population is expected to reach [herd immunity] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herd_immunity) .\n[Current research suggests] (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.27.20081893v3) that herd immunity for COVID-19 is expected when 60-70% of a population is immune to the virus, either through vaccination or past infection.\nEarly results from the [Moderna] (https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/promising-interim-results-clinical-trial-nih-moderna-covid-19-vaccine) and [Pfizer/BioNTech] (https://www.statnews.com/2020/11/18/pfizer-biontech-covid19-vaccine-fda-data/) vaccines suggest efficacy &gt;90%.\n[Early research results] (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.15.383323v1) also suggest that SARS-CoV-2 immunity is long-lasting and may be consistent with the long term immunity observed in SARS.\nOn November 22nd, Dr. Slaoui, leader of Operation Warp Speed, [stated that] (https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/22/politics/operation-warp-speed-vaccine-timeline/index.html) he expects herd immunity to likely be achieved in May 2021.\n70% or so of the population being immunized would allow for true herd immunity to take place, that is likely to happen somewhere in the month of May, or something like that based on our plans. Dr. Slaoui, November 22nd, 2020\nHowever, vaccine hestitancy may be high, with [42% of Americans] (https://news.gallup.com/poll/325208/americans-willing-covid-vaccine.aspx) in late October 2020 saying they would be unwilling to take a SARS-CoV-2.\nWhen will the United States reach herd immunity (&gt;230M) for COVID-19?\nThis question resolves as the date when the first reliable media report is published that states that &gt;230M of the US population (~70%) have either received a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine or has been previously been infected by the virus.\nWhile this question is intended as an operationalization of \"herd immunity\", because herd immunity is difficult to ascertain, the resolution criteria is not herd immunity itself, but rather reaching 230M (~70%) either vaccinated or having been previously infected, as a proxy indicator.\nIf this does not resolve before 31 December 2022, it resolves as &gt;31 December 2022. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 524,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will US house prices be at the end of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5780/real-us-house-prices-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "House prices are an important part of the US economy. The housing stock in the US is roughly $30T which is roughly the same order of magnitude as the US stock market. [A crash in house prices in the 2007-2008 was a driver of the financial crisis] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisis_of_2007%E2%80%932008#Growth_of_the_housing_bubble) .\nWhat will US house prices be at the end of 2021?\nWhat will the Case-Shiller National Index (seasonally adjusted) adjusted for inflation using CPI less Shelter be in December 2021?\nSpecifically what will be the value of the December 2021 release of [S&amp;P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CSUSHPISA) be divided by the value of [CPI less shelter] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CUSR0000SA0L2) both divided by their values on Jan-2000.\nFor example:\n---for Jan-2000 this value is 1.0 \n---for Sep-2020 this value is: \nIf these statistics are discontinued, this resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 28,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will most members of the House of Lords be directly democratically elected?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5790/date-of-mainly-elected-house-of-lords/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[The House of Lords is the upper house of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Lords) \nUnlike the elected House of Commons, members of the House of Lords (excluding 90 hereditary peers elected among themselves and 2 peers who are ex officio members) are appointed. The membership of the House of Lords is drawn from the peerage and is made up of Lords Spiritual and Lords Temporal. The Lords Spiritual are 26 archbishops and bishops in the established Church of England. Of the Lords Temporal, the majority are life peers who are appointed by the monarch on the advice of the Prime Minister, or on the advice of the House of Lords Appointments Commission. However, they also include some hereditary peers including four dukes.\n[There have been various attempts at reform.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_of_the_House_of_Lords) Some recent attempts have been (partially) successful. The Blair government [reduced the number of hereditary peers] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Lords_Act_1999) . The Cameron government [made it possible for peers to resign or retire] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Lords_Reform_Act_2014) .\nBut more ambitious attempts at reform have failed, with a [2012 Bill aiming at making the Lords mostly elected] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_of_the_House_of_Lords#House_of_Lords_Reform_Bill_2012) failing due to Conservative backbench opposition.\n[Polls suggest that around 45% of the public think that the Lords should be mostly elected.] (https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/trackers/how-should-the-house-of-lords-be-made-up-of) \nWhen will most members of the House of Lords be directly democratically elected?\nThis question resolves when more than half of the members of the House of Lords were directly democratically elected in an election of the general public. That is, an election in which most adults in the population are eligible to vote.\nSo this question should not resolve if (say) the majority of members of the Lords are elected by members of the Commons, or by a jury of members of the public, or any other small group of people - even if that group of people is democratically elected.\nIf the House of Lords is abolished and has no obvious successor, this question resolves ambiguously. If it does have an obvious successor, this question refers to that successor. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 21,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the seasonally adjusted CPI-U (less energy and food) for February 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5792/cpi-u--change-for-february-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nThe CPI, or Consumer Price Index, is one of the most widely used measures of inflation by investors. Created by analyzing the price of a certain basket of widely used, urban consumer goods over time with relation to a base time, the CPI can show either monthly or yearly price fluctuations. The CPI for specific cities, types of goods, and by wage-earners can also be calculated. Complete CPI data is released [monthly by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov/cpi/) .\nUnderstanding the CPI is vitally important not only for investors, but also for people saving for retirement, or taking out loans on a mortgage or education. If the CPI rises, showing a positive percent increase in inflation, [goods will become more expensive in the future] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=509446&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) , thereby decreasing the purchasing power of savings and increasing the amount necessary to pay back on loans of all kinds.\nConsidered a cost-of-living index, however components like food and energy consumption can fluctuate widely by month, [so monitoring the core CPI (without including either of these factors) is often more stable] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=509446&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) . However, both the full CPI and the core CPI track each other when graphed over the long-run.\nWhat will be the seasonally adjusted CPI-U (less energy and food) for February 2021?\nOther Related Questions:\n[CPI-U November 2020] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5008/cpi-u--change-for-november-2020/) \n[CPI-U December 2020] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5009/cpi-u-for-december-2020/) \n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution criteria will be provided through the [Bureau of Labor Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov/) through their reports on the CPI. These reports are also posted on [Econoday] (https://us.econoday.com/byweek.asp?cust=us) through their economic calendar. If data is not provided monthly by either of these sources, recorded either as M/M % change or the % change from month prior, the question will resolve ambiguously. The data must be seasonally adjusted as well.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 105,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the 4-week average of initial jobless claims filed in February 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5794/initial-jobless-claims-in-february-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\n[Initial jobless claims] (https://www.investing.com/economic-calendar/initial-jobless-claims-294) reflect the number of people filing for unemployment insurance over the last week. A higher number should be read negatively as higher unemployment reduces the productivity of the economy.\nGreatly impacted by the spread of COVID-19, the [number of initial jobless claims skyrocketed in March] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ICSA) but has gradually begun to decrease since then. However, the current level for the beginning of August is over five times the level recorded in December of 2019.\nThe level of initial jobless claims is an excellent indicator of the health of the jobs market, and the economy as a whole. Low levels of claims can signal that companies might have a more difficult time hiring workers, and that workers currently employed will need overtime pay or higher compensation as an enticement. [Wage inflation can increase interest rates and decrease the price of bonds and stocks in the investment market] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=509825&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) , which is bad news to investors and is watched carefully by the Federal Reserve.\nWhat will be the 4-week average of initial jobless claims filed in February 2021?\nRelated questions:\n[Initial Jobless Claims November 2020] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5012/initial-jobless-claims-in-november-2020/) \n[Initial Jobless Claims December 2020] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5013/initial-jobless-claims-in-december-2020/) \n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nThe resolution criteria for this question will be provided through either the [Federal Reserve] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ICSA) , or through the reports organized on [Econoday’s calendar] (https://us.econoday.com/byweek.asp?cust=us) . This number will reflect the 4-week average of weekly reports for that month. Those data points will include the reporting dates: 7-Feb, 14-Feb, 21-Feb, 28-Feb\n",
    "# Forecasts": 108,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the total retail sales including food services be for February 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5796/total-retail-sales-in-february-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\n[Retail sales] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=510128&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) measure the total receipts from all stores that sell merchandise and related products to final consumers. This helps to track consumer demand for durable and non-durable goods over a specified time frame. The retail sales data is compiled monthly by the [US Census Bureau] (https://www.census.gov/retail/marts/www/timeseries.html) , and it also reported through the [Econoday calendar] (https://us.econoday.com/byweek.asp?cust=us) .\nPatterns in consumer spending inform total consumer demand, which has great influence on the stock and bond markets. Should retail sales fall, it would indicate a drop in demand, foretelling potential economic contraction. Consumers generally buy more when they feel confident in the economy and its future.\nTotal retail sales are generally divided into different sections, usually by durability. These include: apparel, department stores, food and beverage stores, electronics and appliances, furniture stores, gas stations, and car dealers\nUnderstanding the movements in consumer demand across these different industries can help investors know when, where, and how to invest across the stock market, and provide clues to the Federal Reserve and other parties on the future movements of the economy.\nWhat will the total retail sales including food services be for February 2021?\nRelated questions:\n[Total Retail Sales November 2020] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5016/total-retail-sales-in-november-2020/) \n[Total Retail Sales December 2020] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5017/total-retail-sales-in-december-2020/) \n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution criteria will be provided through the US Census Bureau on their [monthly retail trade reports] (https://www.census.gov/retail/marts/www/timeseries.html) . It will include all retail sales including food services. If this data is no longer collected or posted, this question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 69,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the Industrial Production Index number for February 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5798/industrial-production-index-february-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nThe Federal Reserve keeps an [Industrial Production Index] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/INDPRO) which measures and records the monthly real output of all industrial facilities within the United States including manufacturing, mining, electric, and gas utilities, and is seasonally adjusted.\nThe industrial sector, along with construction, [accounts for most of the variation in national output] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=509752&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) over the business cycle. Large drops in industrial production from a drop in supply or consumer demand would indicate a change in economic growth, and potentially signal the beginning of a period of economic contraction. Likewise, a large boom in production and demand would indicate economic expansion, and boost investor confidence in those industries. Understanding economic fluctuations and health is imperative for investors and companies alike involved in the stock market.\nAnother important metric which often accompanies the Industrial Production Index is the Capacity Utilization Rate. This [rate provides an estimate of how much factory capacity is in use] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=509752&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) .\nWhat will be the Industrial Production Index number for February 2021\nRelated questions:\n[Industrial Production Index November 2020] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5020/industrial-production-index-in-november-2020/) \n[Industrial Production Index December 2020] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5021/industrial-production-index-december-2020/) \n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nThe resolution criteria for this question will be provided by the [Federal Reserve] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/INDPRO) and their monthly measurements of the Industrial Production Index. If data is not collected or recorded, then this question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 70,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How effective will a second RCT find the most effective regimen of the AstraZenca SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to be?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5800/astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-effectiveness/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "According to [STAT] (https://www.statnews.com/2020/11/23/astrazeneca-covid-19-vaccine-is-70-effective-on-average-early-data-show/) , early results from an AstraZeneca trial showed 70% efficacy. But that average hid a discrepancy:\nTwo full doses of the vaccine appeared to be only 62% effective at preventing disease, while a half dose, followed by a full dose, was about 90% effective. That latter analysis was conducted on a small subset of the study participants, only 2,741.\nThis half dose-full dose regimen was [administered by accident] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-astrazeneca-dosing/dosing-error-turns-into-lucky-punch-for-astrazeneca-and-oxford-idUSKBN28327Q) , in a non-random fashion, therefore violating the randomization assumption of an RCT.\nBecause of this failure in study design, the [CEO of AstraZeneca told Bloomberg News] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-26/astra-likely-to-run-fresh-global-covid-vaccine-trial-ceo-says) that the company wants to run \"an additional global trial\" to \"confirm the 90% efficacy rate that the shot showed in a portion of an existing trial\".\n[According to the WHO] (https://www.who.int/influenza_vaccines_plan/resources/Session4_VEfficacy_VEffectiveness.PDF) , vaccine efficacy is defined as:\n% reduction in disease incidence in a vaccinated group compared to an unvaccinated group under optimal conditions (eg RCT)\nHow effective will a second RCT find the most effective regimen of the AstraZeneca SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to be?\nThis question resolves after a reliable media report of the final study results of a 2nd RCT of the AstraZeneca SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. It resolves based on the effectiveness reported for the most effective treatment arm.\nThis question closes retroactively 24hrs prior to the first interim results being reported. If no interim results are reported, this question closes 24hrs prior to when the final results are reported.\nIf no RCT is conducted or the final results of an RCT are not reported by the resolve date of this question, it resolves ambiguous.\nIf multiple RCTs are conducted, this question resolves based on the one for which the first reliable media report of the final study results. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 139,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the total stock of crude oil and other petroleum products for February 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5801/eia-petroleum-stock-february-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nThe [EIA] (https://www.eia.gov/) , or Energy Information Administration, records the inventories of US and foreign produced petroleum, these inventory levels directly affect the price of petroleum sold in the United States and abroad.\nJust like any other good or service, [petroleum prices are determined by the supply and demand forces of the energy market] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=510261&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) . When the market is expanding and the economy is characterized by positive growth, inventories decrease due to high levels of demand, which causes a supply shortage, thereby jacking up prices. In contrast, when the market is contracting and the economy is slowing, there is an excess of supply as inventories build and demand drops, decreasing prices.\n[Crude oil, gas, and petroleum remain linchpins of today’s economy] (https://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/press_room/900.htm) , and contribute heavily to global employment, manufacturing, and transportation amongst other things. Because of its involvement in a variety of sectors and industries across the globe, fluctuations in price can heavily impact the direction and growth of any one, or many, economies. Changes in the price of these goods cannot impact inflation, as inflation represents the rise in price of all goods, which would keep oil’s relative price to other goods the same. However, [fluctuations in petroleum pricing can and do impact the PPF] (https://www.econlib.org/oil-prices-and-inflation/) (production possibility frontier) for both itself and for other goods, which can create an effect which resembles short term changes in inflation. But here the cause for this effect stems from a change in the entire production capabilities of the economy, and not from the simple change in price from a single good.\nBecause of this, we can [observe trends in changes of consumer prices] (https://www.frbsf.org/education/publications/doctor-econ/2007/november/oil-prices-impact-economy/#:~:text=Oil%20price%20increases%20are%20generally,goods%20made%20with%20petroleum%20products.&amp;text=Increases%20in%20oil%20prices%20can,the%20costs%20of%20producing%20them.) . As the price of oil falls, consumer prices tend to moderate as the costs of production fall for the economy. As the price of oil increases, the cost of production for a variety of goods increases as well, raising consumer prices.\nIt is obvious that generating an understanding of oil production levels on a frequent basis is paramount to anticipating market trends and potential expansion or collapse.\nWe thus ask, What will be the total stock of crude oil and other petroleum products for February 2021?\nOther Related Questions:\n[EIA Petroleum Status Report November 2020] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5004/eia-petroleum-status-report-november-2020/) \n[EIA Petroleum Status Report December 2020] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5005/eia-petroleum-stock-december-2020/) \n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nThe resolution criteria will be provided from the [EIA through their measurements on the weekly stocks of petroleum and other liquids] (https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_stoc_wstk_dcu_nus_w.htm) . This metric is recorded as the total stock of crude oil and other petroleum products excluding SPR (strategic petroleum reserve) in thousands of barrels. If this data is not released, or no longer collected, the question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 72,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How large will Monaco be in 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5802/how-large-will-monaco-be-in-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[The Principality of Monaco] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monaco) is a sovereign city-state, and microstate on the French Riviera in Western Europe. It is bordered by France to the north, east and west, and by the Mediterranean Sea to the south. The principality is home to 38,682 residents, of which 9,486 are Monegasque nationals, and is widely recognised for being one of the most expensive and wealthiest places in the world. [Over 30% of the resident population are millionaires, and high-end real estate prices reached €100,000 ($142,000) per square metre in 2018.] (https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20180206-the-country-running-out-of-space-for-its-millionaires) \nWith an area of 210 hectares (0.81 sq mi), it is one of the smallest sovereign states in Europe and the second-smallest in the world, after the Vatican City State. Its 19,009 inhabitants per square kilometre (49,230/sq mi) make it the most densely-populated sovereign state in the world.\nTo continue economic development and allow for population growth, [for years the country has been adding to its total land area by reclaiming land from the sea.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_reclamation_in_Monaco) The entire district of [Fontvieille] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fontvieille,_Monaco) was constructed on land reclaimed from the sea in the western part of Monaco in the 1970s, increasing the principality's surface area by approximately 20 percent. As of 2020, the [Le Portier] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Portier) land reclamation project is underway, and is expected to add approximately 15 acres (6 hectares) to Monaco's land area by 2025. This [graphic shows the extent of land reclamation in Monaco since 1861.] (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c5/Monaco_depuis_since_1861.png) \nHow large will Monaco be in 2035?\nThis question resolves as the land area (in hectares) of Monaco as of 1 January 2035, according to the most recent estimate published as of that date.\nIf Monaco ceases to exist as a sovereign state before 2035, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 46,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first clone of a prominent historical figure be born?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5804/first-clone-of-a-prominent-historical-figure/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "From [the NIH] (https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/Cloning-Fact-Sheet) ,\nDespite several highly publicized claims, human cloning still appears to be fiction. There currently is no solid scientific evidence that anyone has cloned human embryos. [...]\nFrom a technical perspective, cloning humans and other primates is more difficult than in other mammals. One reason is that two proteins essential to cell division, known as spindle proteins, are located very close to the chromosomes in primate eggs. Consequently, removal of the egg's nucleus to make room for the donor nucleus also removes the spindle proteins, interfering with cell division. In other mammals, such as cats, rabbits and mice, the two spindle proteins are spread throughout the egg. So, removal of the egg's nucleus does not result in loss of spindle proteins. In addition, some dyes and the ultraviolet light used to remove the egg's nucleus can damage the primate cell and prevent it from growing.\nA prominent historical figure is defined as someone who is,\n--- \nCurrently considered dead according to credible media\n--- \nHas an English Wikipedia entry that has existed for at least 15 years before the birth of the human clone\nWhen will the first clone of a prominent historical figure be born?\nThis question will resolve on the date of birth of any clone of a prominent historical figure, as determined by credible media.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine be widely available for adults in the United States?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5806/sars-cov-2-vaccine-widely-available-in-the-us/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "While vaccine hesitancy [remains high at 42% in the US] (https://news.gallup.com/poll/325208/americans-willing-covid-vaccine.aspx) , public health officials are aiming to have the vaccine widely available as soon as possible.\nVarious officials have estimated when a vaccine will be widely available.\n[Director of NIAID Anthony Fauci] (https://www.cnn.com/videos/health/2020/11/10/fauci-coronavirus-vaccine-availability-timeline-tapper-intv-lead-vpx.cnn) estimated \"as early as April\":\nWhen asked when normal people with no prioritization factors would have access to a vaccine, Fauci responded \"We are talking by April, by the end of April, I think\".\n[HHS Secretary Alex Azar] (https://www.today.com/video/hhs-secretary-alex-azar-vaccine-could-be-widely-distributed-by-march-or-april-95635525920) estimated by \"March or early April\":\nIt’s estimated the government will have enough coronavirus vaccine... \"for all Americans by March or early April to have general vaccination programs.”\n[Former FDA chief Scott Gottlieb] (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/transcript-scott-gottlieb-discusses-coronavirus-on-face-the-nation-november-22-2020/) estimated \"heading into fall 2021\"\n\"And I think by the second quarter of 2021, maybe into the third quarter, we'll have a vaccine that hopefully will be licensed for general use if everything goes well and the data continues to support the safety and effectiveness of that vaccine. And we'll be able to vaccinate the public or a good portion of the public heading into the fall of 2021.\"\nWhen will a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine be widely available for adults in the United States?\nThis question resolves on the date that the first reliable media report is published that states a government official leading either the CDC, HHS, NIH, NIAID, FDA, or the official tasked with leading distribution (currently General Perna) states that the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is generally available in the United States for healthy non-pregnant adults with no other qualification nationwide.\nSimilar language to widely available, such as \"generally available\" or \"available for all who want it\", is also sufficient to close and resolve this question.\nTo be considered widely available, it needs to not be conditioned on a demand limiting device such as a lottery. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 330,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a signatory to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons develop a nuclear weapon anyway?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5808/signatory-to-ban-on-nukes-to-break-treaty/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "28.999999999999996%",
    "Description": "From [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_the_Prohibition_of_Nuclear_Weapons) ,\nThe Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), or the Nuclear Weapon Ban Treaty, is the first legally binding international agreement to comprehensively prohibit nuclear weapons with the ultimate goal being their total elimination. It was adopted on 7 July 2017, opened for signature on 20 September 2017, and will enter into force on 22 January 2021.\nFor those nations that are party to it, the treaty prohibits the development, testing, production, stockpiling, stationing, transfer, use and threat of use of nuclear weapons, as well as assistance and encouragement to the prohibited activities. For nuclear armed states joining the treaty, it provides for a time-bound framework for negotiations leading to the verified and irreversible elimination of its nuclear weapons programme.\nA mandate adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 23 December 2016 scheduled two sessions for negotiations: 27 to 31 March and from 15 June to 7 July, 2017. The treaty passed on schedule on 7 July with 122 in favour, 1 against (Netherlands), and 1 official abstention (Singapore). 69 nations did not vote, among them all of the nuclear weapon states and all NATO members except the Netherlands.\nWhile [people are skeptical] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/492/with-an-international-nuclear-weapons-ban-in-place-will-at-least-one-nuclear-state-actually-give-them-up-by-2035/) that this ban will cause any current nuclear state to imminently give up their nuclear weapons, it still may have the effect of preventing current non-nuclear states from gaining nuclear weapons. This mirrors the goal of the [Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_on_the_Non-Proliferation_of_Nuclear_Weapons) .\nWill a signatory to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons develop a nuclear weapon anyway?\nThis question resolves positively if credible media reports that a signatory to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons developed at least one nuclear weapon before January 1st, 2101. In case credible media disagrees, consensus will be determined via a vote in the comment section. Otherwise, the question resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 36,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Republicans win control of the US House of Representatives in 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5814/2022-us-house-midterm-election/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "50%",
    "Description": "In 2020, Republicans gained seats in the House of Representatives despite losing the Whitehouse, leaving the Democrats with the thinnest margin in decades. Historically, there is often a backlash against the winner of the presidential election during the first term, so majority control could flip. However, redistricting following the 2020 Census will have its effect too.\nIf Republicans win 218* seats or more in 2022, they will secure a majority in the house. Will that happen?\n435* seats will be contested in 2022 (most in November, but some runoffs are possible). The question resolves after enough races have been called by reliable media reports to give a majority to one party or another. In case of ongoing ambiguity, the question can resolve when the Congress convenes in January 2023 and certifies its membership.\nWill Republicans win control of the US House of Representatives in 2022?\nResolves true if Republicans^ win 50% + 1 or more seats in the US House. Resolves false if Democrats^ win 50% + 1 or more seats. If neither of those parties wins 50% + 1 or more (e.g. an unaligned 3rd party wins seats), then the question resolves ambiguously.\n.* If the total number of seats in the US House changes, then the number needed for a majority changes with it.\n.^ Independents who caucus with the Republicans will be counted as Republicans; likewise independents who caucus with Democrats. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 71,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Mathias Cormann become the next secretary-general of the OECD?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5819/aussie-pollie-mathias-cormann-to-lead-oecd/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "The term of the current Secretary-General of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) will come to an end on 30 June 2021. Nominations are open for candidates to become the next Secretary-General, with nominations having closed on the 1st of November. The decision is expected by 1 March 2021 at the latest. \nMathias Cormann announced he was stepping down as Finance Minister of Australia in order to run for the position of Secretary-General. [Cormann faces nine competitors.] (https://www.oecd.org/newsroom/oecd-announces-candidates-for-next-secretary-general.htm) In his favour is [the US and EU being apparently reluctant to support the other's candidate] (https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/morrison-to-nominate-cormann-for-oecd-20201008-p5633s) but working against him is [the Australian Government's poor record on climate change] (https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/oct/24/mathias-cormann-wants-to-be-a-chameleon-on-climate-change-when-weve-got-a-bin-fire-instead-of-a-plan) .\nBipartisan support within Australia is likely needed for Cormann to have a chance. The Coalition torpedoed former Labor Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's bid to become UN Secretary-General, but the Labor Party [has said they will support Cormann's bid] (https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/morrison-to-nominate-cormann-for-oecd-20201008-p5633s) .\n[Australia has provided Cormann with flights on an Air Force plane to help his bid.] (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-11-25/pm-defends-raaf-jet-for-cormann/12917878) \nWill Mathias Cormann become the next Secretary-General of the OECD?\nQuestion resolves positive on an official statement by the OECD that Mathias Cormann is appointed the next Secretary-General.\nIf the term of the current Secretary-General José Ángel Gurría Treviño is shortened or extended for any reason, this will resolve positive if Mathias Cormann is the next elected Secretary-General of the OECD. \nIf for some reason Gurría does not complete his term, selection of an acting Secretary-General will not result in this question resolving negative. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 41,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a first-class Royal Mail stamp cost at least £1?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5823/date-first-class-royal-mail-stamps-costs-1/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[The cost of a first-class stamp will rise by 9p to 85p on 1 January 2021.] (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-55150052) \nData of the price of first-class stamps are available [here] (https://tamebay.com/2019/03/historic-royal-mail-stamp-prices-1971-2019.html) .\nWhen will a first-class Royal Mail stamp cost at least £1?\nResolves on the first day it is not possible to buy a first-class stamp from Royal Mail for less than £1 per stamp.\nThe question will close retroactively just before the announcement of such a price increase.\nResolves ambiguously if Royal Mail stops existing and has no obvious successor.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the price of bitcoin drop below $10K USD in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5826/bitcoin-below-10k/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "The last time bitcoin hit above $19K USD per bitcoin, [it crashed to below $7K within five months] (https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/) . Given that bitcoin just hit above $19K USD again and a new all time high, would we expect history to repeat itself and we also see Bitcoin crash below $10K sometime in 2021?\nWill the price of bitcoin drop below $10K USD in 2021?\nThis question resolves \"Yes\" if the bitcoin price on [coinmarketcap.com] (http://coinmarketcap.com) drops below $10,000 USD at any point during 2021. This question resolves \"No\" otherwise.\nIf this question resolves positively, this question will close retroactively to two days prior to positive resolution.\nThe time zone for marking the end of year will be UTC.\nIf bitcoin somehow ceases to exist, this question resolves \"No\". \nIf [coinmarketcap.com] (http://coinmarketcap.com) ceases to reliably record prices, [https://www.coindesk.com/price/bitcoin] (https://www.coindesk.com/price/bitcoin) will be used instead. If both of these sites are unavailable, a different site can be used with the consensus of two Metaculus admins. If no consensus can be reached, this question resolves ambiguous. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 447,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many DC charging stations will Boulder, CO have by the end 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5827/dc-charging-stations-in-boulder-co-by-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Background\n==========\n\nAs new electric vehicle models enter the market with increasing ranges and falling prices, consumer interest is rising. We are tracking this consumer interest and general electric vehicle adoption through the number of charging stations available in the top ten states after California. We’ve selected cities in these states outside of the core areas of EV infrastructure and development, usually the largest metropolitan places, to observe general trends throughout the rest of the state. \nBoulder County, CO hosts the second largest number of public charging locations ( [153] (https://www.libertyplugins.com/public-ev-charging-stations/colorado) ) in the state of Colorado. [90] (https://www.libertyplugins.com/public-ev-charging-stations/colorado/boulder-county/boulder) of those chargers reside in Boulder, the largest city in Boulder County. However, according to [ChargePoint’s map] (https://na.chargepoint.com/charge_point) of charging locations across the United States, none those locations have the option for DC Fast charging. \n[DC Fast charging] (https://afdc.energy.gov/fuels/electricity_infrastructure.html#:~:text=As%20of%202020%2C%20over%2015%2C%20CHAdeMO%2C%20or%20Tesla.) , also known as level three charging, can provide up to 480 V of energy directly into the battery of an electric vehicle, significantly reducing charging time. Most electric vehicles can recharge [80% of their battery] (https://evsafecharge.com/dc-fast-charging-explained/) power in just under an hour using DC fast chargers. This makes them the perfect choice for charging infrastructure across public and private short term parking lots. AC, or level 2, charging requires the car to convert the energy into a direct current for the battery and can take [4 to 12 hours] (https://evsafecharge.com/dc-fast-charging-explained/) to charge the battery fully. This is currently the most predominant charging technology across America. \nHowever, many people running errands rarely stay parked in the same place for enough time to warrant plugging their vehicle into the level 2 chargers provided in some parking lots. DC chargers make up only 15% of the current charging infrastructure across the country, and could provide more accessible charging capabilities for electric vehicle drivers if properly developed. \nCurrently, Boulder boasts a fleet of [5,342 electric vehicles] (https://www.atlasevhub.com/materials/state-ev-registration-data/) , including battery and plug-in hybrid vehicles, within the city limits. With large public spaces like malls, hospitals, and universities, there exist many opportunities for charging infrastructure development. Main attractions in Boulder include Boulder Municipal Airport, Village Boulder Shopping Center, and the University of Colorado at Boulder.\nColorado offers a variety of [incentive programs] (https://afdc.energy.gov/laws/state_summary?state=CO) to help fuel consumer demand. However, subsidies are expected to [fall by $2,000 in 2021] (https://coloradosun.com/2020/03/09/evs-electric-vehicles-tax-incentives-refund-colorado-tesla-zev/#:~:text=Colorado%20did%20adopt%20the%20ZEV,the%20state%20legislature%20is%20passed.) and another $700 by 2023 as demand increases and adoption rates rise. Colorado recently [passed legislation] (https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb20-167) allowing consumers to buy directly from EV producers, bypassing the need for an official, established auto dealership, which should also increase access and availability of these vehicles for consumers.\nHow many DC charging stations will Boulder, CO have by the end 2021?\n\nResolution Criteria:\n====================\n\nResolution criteria will be provided through [ChargePoint’s map] (https://na.chargepoint.com/charge_point) of electric vehicle charging locations. By entering the search words “Boulder, CO, USA” and limiting the selection of location to Level 3 charging units, including CCS, CHAdeMO, and Tesla chargers. Individual charging stations will appear on the right side of the map, and will list the city they reside in, as well as appearing on the map with the number of stations per location. The number of outlets is difficult to ascertain, and will not be used as a measurement at the city level. Make sure to check the city specifically when counting the total number of stations offered within city limits.\nUnfortunately, data on specific charging level stations is difficult to find, which makes using maps like those provided through [AFDC] (https://afdc.energy.gov/stations/#/find/nearest) and ChargePoint necessary in determining specific aspects of charging infrastructure development. If Metaculus admins and users feel that by the time of this resolution, data from this site is difficult to ascertain and there are better options provided through either independent or government sources, then the resolution will be provided through those sources or the question will resolve ambiguously. \n\nData:\n=====\n\nData on the number of total charging stations and outlets at each charging level for every state can be found [here] (https://afdc.energy.gov/stations/states) , but is not available at the country or city level for which this question requires. \nHistorical data is difficult to find and configure as many sites constantly update their numbers, however, by recording current numbers on a spreadsheet at a set interval of time periods, trends in development should begin to show.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 56,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many DC charging stations will Orlando, FL have by the end 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5828/dc-charging-stations-in-orlando-fl-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Background\n==========\n\nAs new electric vehicle models enter the market with increasing ranges and falling prices, consumer interest is rising. We are tracking this consumer interest and general electric vehicle adoption through the number of charging stations available in the top ten states after California. We’ve selected cities in these states outside of the core areas of EV infrastructure and development, usually the largest metropolitan places, to observe general trends throughout the rest of the state. \nOrange County, FL hosts the second largest number of public charging locations ( [200] (https://www.libertyplugins.com/public-ev-charging-stations/florida) ) in the state of Florida, after Miami. Over 75% ( [165] (https://www.libertyplugins.com/public-ev-charging-stations/florida/orange-county) ) of those chargers reside in Orlando, the largest city in Orange County. However, according to [ChargePoint’s map] (https://na.chargepoint.com/charge_point) of charging locations across the United States, none of those locations have the option for DC Fast charging. \n[DC Fast charging] (https://afdc.energy.gov/fuels/electricity_infrastructure.html#:~:text=As%20of%202020%2C%20over%2015%2C%20CHAdeMO%2C%20or%20Tesla.) , also known as level three charging, can provide up to 480 V of energy directly into the battery of an electric vehicle, significantly reducing charging time. Most electric vehicles can recharge [80% of their battery] (https://evsafecharge.com/dc-fast-charging-explained/) power in just under an hour using DC fast chargers. This makes them the perfect choice for charging infrastructure across public and private short term parking lots. AC, or level 2, charging requires the car to convert the energy into a direct current for the battery and can take [4 to 12 hours] (https://evsafecharge.com/dc-fast-charging-explained/) to charge the battery fully. This is currently the most predominant charging technology across America. \nHowever, many people running errands rarely stay parked in the same place for enough time to warrant plugging their vehicle into the level 2 chargers provided in some parking lots. DC chargers make up only 15% of the current charging infrastructure across the country, and could provide more accessible charging capabilities for electric vehicle drivers if properly developed. \nCurrently, Orlando boasts a fleet of [5,375 electric vehicles] (https://www.atlasevhub.com/materials/state-ev-registration-data/) , including battery and plug-in hybrid vehicles, within the city limits. With large public spaces like malls, hospitals, and universities, there exist many opportunities for charging infrastructure development. Main attractions in Orlando include Disney World, and all subsidiary parks and locations, Orlando International Airport, Nemours Children's Hospital and the Orlando VA Hospital, as well as the Orlando Science Center.\nThe Floridian government announced an [$8.6 million investment] (https://www.flgov.com/2020/07/10/governor-ron-desantis-announces-next-steps-to-strengthen-floridas-electric-vehicle-infrastructure/) to strengthen their electric vehicle infrastructure within the state in July 2020 as part of their [Electric Vehicle Roadmap plan] (https://www.fdacs.gov/Energy/Florida-Electric-Vehicle-Roadmap) . They plan to expand charging stations by 50% across the most traveled roads and cities across Florida.\nHow many DC charging stations will Orlando, FL have by the end 2021?\n\nResolution Criteria:\n====================\n\nResolution criteria will be provided through [ChargePoint’s map] (https://na.chargepoint.com/charge_point) of electric vehicle charging locations. By entering the search words “Orlando, FL, USA” and limiting the selection of location to Level 3 charging units, including CCS, CHAdeMO, and Tesla chargers. Individual charging stations will appear on the right side of the map, and will list the city they reside in, as well as appearing on the map with the number of stations per location. The number of outlets will not be used to ascertain the resolution because they are not offered on the ChargePoint map. Make sure to check the city specifically when counting the total number of stations offered within city limits.\nUnfortunately, data on specific charging level stations is difficult to find, which makes using maps like those provided through [AFDC] (https://afdc.energy.gov/stations/#/find/nearest) and ChargePoint necessary in determining specific aspects of charging infrastructure development. If Metaculus admins and users feel that by the time of this resolution, data from this site is difficult to ascertain and there are better options provided through either independent or government sources, then the resolution will be provided through those sources or the question will resolve ambiguously. \n\nData:\n=====\n\nData on the number of total charging stations and outlets at each charging level for every state state can be found [here] (https://afdc.energy.gov/stations/states) , but is not available at the country or city level for which this question requires. \nHistorical data is difficult to find and configure as many sites constantly update their numbers, however, by recording current numbers on a spreadsheet at a set interval of time periods, trends in development should begin to show.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 32,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will China land the next person on the Moon?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5832/china-to-land-the-next-person-on-the-moon/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "23%",
    "Description": "Both [China] (https://apnews.com/article/technology-beijing-space-exploration-china-mars-265e6b1227e9ce0ea9c8bb1f6c1dbda3) and the [US] (https://www.nasa.gov/feature/sending-american-astronauts-to-moon-in-2024-nasa-accepts-challenge/) have announced plans to land a person on the Moon. Both are tentatively aiming to land someone on the Moon in the year 2024.\nWill China land the next person on the Moon?\nThis question will resolve positively if the next person to successfully land on the Moon before the resolve date is a Chinese citizen and will resolve negatively otherwise.\nThis question will resolve immediately prior to the time of the Moon landing itself or, if that’s not available, immediately prior to the first credible media report.\nFor a person to successfully land on the Moon, they must be alive and inside a vehicle that physically touches the Moon’s surface. Everyone in the vehicle must be alive for 15 minutes after the vehicle touches down. They are not required to perform a walk outside the vehicle. “The Moon” refers to Earth’s moon. This does not require that they leave the Moon. If the next vehicle to land on the Moon contains more than one person, the person who performs the first Moon walk will be considered first. If there is no Moon walk, all people in the landing vehicle must be citizens of China for this to resolve positively. A Chinese citizen counts toward positive resolution even if they have citizenship in another country.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 58,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the 10-year average Gross World Product growth rate exceed 10%?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5833/gwp-growth-to-exceed-10/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The gross world product (GWP) is the combined gross national income of all the countries in the world.\nWhen will the 10-year average Gross World Product annual growth rate first exceed 10%?\nThis question resolves as January 1st of the first year T, such that:\nMoreover, GWP at T must exceed 260% of the maximum over all years &gt;= 10 years prior.\nEach year's GWP is to be given in constant prices (adjusted for inflation), in USD.\n[World Bank data] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD) should be used to resolve this question. If that's unavailable, other authoritative source of economic data may be used.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 67,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many drugs will be approved by the FDA in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5839/drugs-approved-by-fda-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Since 2015 (at least) the FDA has listed on their website an easily interpretable list of drugs they approve each year. [Here is their list for 2019] (https://www.fda.gov/drugs/new-drugs-fda-cders-new-molecular-entities-and-new-therapeutic-biological-products/novel-drug-approvals-2019) (the last complete list, as of writing this question).\nHow many drugs will be approved by the FDA in 2021?\nThis question resolves as the number of drugs approved by the FDA in 2021, as reported by the FDA or credible media.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 45,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many drugs will be approved by the FDA in 2035?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5840/drugs-approved-by-fda-in-2035/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Since 2015 (at least) the FDA has listed on their website an easily interpretable list of drugs they approve each year. [Here is their list for 2019] (https://www.fda.gov/drugs/new-drugs-fda-cders-new-molecular-entities-and-new-therapeutic-biological-products/novel-drug-approvals-2019) (the last complete list, as of writing this question).\nThis question mirrors [a question I wrote for 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5839/drugs-approved-by-fda-in-2021/) . I created this question because it has a longer timeline, and therefore can potentially be informed by [the recent Deepmind protein folding breakthrough] (https://deepmind.com/blog/article/alphafold-a-solution-to-a-50-year-old-grand-challenge-in-biology) . It's also a good test for [Eroom's law] (https://www.theifod.com/erooms-law-explaining-the-decline-in-drug-discovery/) , the observation that drugs have gotten exponentially more difficult to develop over time.\nHow many drugs will be approved by the FDA in 2035?\nThis question resolves as the number of drugs approved by the FDA in 2035, as reported by the FDA or credible media. In case the FDA is abolished before 2035, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "On November 2021, will >20% of Americans believe the 2020 election was rigged?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5848/election-fraud-myth-persists/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "85%",
    "Description": "Currently, [according to polling by Reuters/Ipsos] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll/half-of-republicans-say-biden-won-because-of-a-rigged-election-reuters-ipsos-poll-idUSKBN27Y1AJ) , \"about half of all Republicans believe President Donald Trump 'rightfully won' the US election but that it was stolen from him by widespread voter fraud that favored Democratic President-elect Joe Biden\". Despite [media (including Fox News) calling the election for Biden] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2020/11/07/fox-news-biden-president/) , [Trump's court cases failing] (https://www.npr.org/2020/11/10/933112418/the-trump-campaign-has-had-almost-no-legal-success-this-month-heres-what-they-ve) , [recounts continuing to show Biden winning] (https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/29/politics/biden-dane-county-wisconsin-recount/index.html) , [states officially certifying results] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/arizona-wisconsin-certify-election/2020/11/30/ec161756-3338-11eb-b59c-adb7153d10c2_story.html) , [Trump exhausting all legal options] (https://www.lehighvalleylive.com/allentown/2020/11/toomey-on-trumps-legal-fight-president-has-exhausted-all-plausible-options.html) , and [AG Barr saying no fraud] (https://apnews.com/article/barr-no-widespread-election-fraud-b1f1488796c9a98c4b1a9061a6c7f49d) , this conspiracy theory still persists.\nSome other prominent political conspiracy theories have lingered around for awhile - as late as 2016, [Morning Consult polling] (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/24/upshot/it-lives-birtherism-is-diminished-but-far-from-dead.html) found that 33% of Republicans still believe that Obama was not born in America - many years after the rumor was started.\nWill the Election Fraud myth persist among the American public for a full year?\nThis question resolves positively if the average of all polls by YouGov, Washington Post, Gallup, PPP, and Morning Consult conducted in November 2021 show that at least 20% of Americans (not just Republicans) think at least one of:\n--- \nthe 2020 election was \"rigged\"\n--- \nthe 2020 election was unfair and/or incorrectly decided (or similar wording) with reference in the question to illegal counting and/or fraudulent ballots (unfair media coverage is not sufficient for inclusion in the average, nor is an unspecified \"unfair\")\n--- \nDonald Trump is the legitimate and/or rightful president\n--- \nJoe Biden is not the legitimate and/or rightful president \n--- \nDonald Trump won in 2020\n--- \nJoe Biden lost in 2020\nThis question resolves positively if the average of those polls do not show more than 20% of Americans holding any of those views.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if there is no such polling conducted in November.\nNovember is defined according to UTC \n",
    "# Forecasts": 144,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will biological lifespans increase faster than 0.75 years per year?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5852/date-when-lifespan-increases-075-yrsyr/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Death is, perhaps, the last great enemy to be felled. All living things, including all ≈100 billion humans, either have died or will die. All the while, technology and medicine have been improving, life expectancies and infant mortality have made massive gains in the past 100 years, and infectious diseases (less one glaring example) have been decimated. Some may not find it so far-fetched to try to take on death and aging itself.\nHowever, this presents a unique and extremely difficult problem to the modern medical field. Human bodies are made of trillions of cells, each either being replaced via mitosis that, over time, accumulates errors and mutations, or slowly decaying and receiving damage from the environment. Those who would try to bring the end of aging face the task of keeping trillions of cells and 600 AU of DNA per person undamaged and complete... across a population of billions.\nAttempting immortality, even without somehow preventing death via accident or violence, is an even less likely goal.\nGiven the monumental range of possible answers, though, I don't expect this question to resolve at any point in Metaculus's existence. Again, it's more of a read on how likely people think it is that immortality is possible.\nWhen will biological lifespans increase faster than 0.75 years per year?\nThis question resolves on the date which the oldest living person is 30 years older than any previous record for the oldest person in the last 40 years. In other words, when the rate of \"oldest person to have lived\" increases at a rate greater than 0.75 years per year, over a 40 year period.\nFor example, suppose on Dec 10, 2060, someone reaches the age of 152 years and 165 days. this would be 30 years more than the record held by Jeanne Calment on Dec 10, 2020. the resolution date would be Dec 10, 2060.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 36,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will alien technosignatures be detected for the first time?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5858/when-will-alien-technosignatures-be-detected/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Technosignatures] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technosignature) are any measurable property or effect that provide scientific evidence of past or present technology, and are key to [the search for extraterrestrial intelligence.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_for_extraterrestrial_intelligence) \nTechnosignatures include (but are not limited to) evidence of electromagnetic transmissions of information, artificial heat and light, astroengineering projects (Dyson spheres and swarms, Matrioshka brains, stellar engines etc), asteroid or other space mining projects, and spacecraft.\nWhen will technosignatures of non-human origin be detected for the first time?\nBy 'non-human origin,' this question refers to technosignatures that are not the result of human activity, or of the activity of any technology or 'lifeform' created by humans, including any artificial intelligence system or biological organism.\nThis question resolves as the date on which a competent and credible authority on astronomy and/or space exploration (such as NASA, ESA, ROSCOSMOS, CNSA, JAXA, SETI or similar) announces that, on the balance of probabilities (i.e. more than 50% likely), technosignatures of non-human origin have been discovered. This announcement qualifies for positive resolution only if it is still maintained after a year waiting period following the initial detection, unless the space agencies of the US, Russia, China and Europe all agree that the finding is genuine. Evidence of biosignatures alone will not be directly relevant to the resolution of this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 80,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the Mens winning 100m time in the 2020 Olympic Final be?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5860/2020-mens-100m-final/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [100m final] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100_metres_at_the_Olympics) is one of the most popular and high profile events at the Olympics. \n[The Men's 100m time has been progressing over time] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_100_metres_world_record_progression) and a number of reasons have been suggested (better training, better equipment (eg track surface, shoes), wider athlete pool). The retirement of Usain Bolt has left sprinting short of it's fastest star, but there are no shortage of fast athletes likely to contest the final.\nIt remains to be seen what the impact of COVID will be on sprinting, but judging from distance running it appears likely that the times will be extremely fast.\nWhat will the Mens winning 100m time in the 2020 Olympic Final be?\nThe official winning time of the Men's 100m final for the 2020 Olympics. If the 2020 Olympics do not take place (ie [if this question resolves negative] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5555/rescheduled-2020-olympics/) ) then this question will resolve ambiguous\nRelated Questions:\n[Women's 100m Final] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5861/2020-olympic-womens-100m-final/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 51,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the Womens winning 100m time in the 2020 Olympic Final be?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5861/2020-olympic-womens-100m-final/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [100m final] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100_metres_at_the_Olympics) is one of the most popular and high profile events at the Olympics.\n[The Women's 100m time had been progressing over time] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_100_metres_world_record_progression) but has been static since the 1980s. [This is consistent with most women's athletics records] (https://sportsscientists.com/2016/08/world-records-fossils/) and is likely related to the systemtic doping from that era.\nIt remains to be seen what the impact of COVID will be on sprinting, but judging from distance running it appears likely that the times will be extremely fast.\nWhat will the Womens winning 100m time in the 2020 Olympic Final be?\nThe official winning time of the Women's 100m final for the 2020 Olympics. If the 2020 Olympics do not take place (ie [if this question resolves negative] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5555/rescheduled-2020-olympics/) ) then this question will resolve ambiguous\nRelated questions:\n[Men's 100m Final] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5860/2020-mens-100m-final/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 48,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Longbets series: will the annual rate of US labor productivity growth for the year 2025, as measured by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, be 2 percent or above?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5865/longbets-us-productivity-growth-2-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "Robert D Atkinson and Alberto Forchielli summarize their reasons for taking the bet [here] (https://longbets.org/751/) .\nRobert D Atkinson argued,\nU.S. productivity growth is at its lowest rate, perhaps since the founding of the Republic. Some experts, like Robert Gordon, argue that this will be the new new norm, arguing that all the \"low hanging fruit has been picked.\" Rather, a new wave of innovations, grounded in areas such as new materials, robotics and AI, are likely to finally get to the \"s-curve\" take-off point within the next 5 to 10 years, thereby powering organizations to boost labor productivity (eg., produce more per hour of labor)\nAlberto Forchielli countered,\nWe have not seen 3% productivity growth in USA for many years. Predicting such growth is highly speculative at this point since there are way too many uncertainties. Moreover assuming such growth entails large investment amounts not just in R&amp;D but also downstream. I fear US economy will see itself constrained by China worldwide expansion. Protectionist tendencies and the emergence of formidable Chinese competitors will constrain the development of US companies making it more difficult to achieve high productivity enhancements. In other words, the world economic context will change to such a degree that we will have to revise all our economic and business hypothesis derived from past experiences and extrapolated from futuristic assumptions embedded in history.\nWill the annual rate of US labor productivity growth for the year 2025, as measured by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, be 2 percent or above?\nIf Robert D Atkinson is declared the winner of the bet by the Long Now Foundation, then this question resolves positively. If Alberto Forchielli is declared the winner, then this question resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Longbets series: will the June, 2025 Labor Force Participation Rate and unemployment rate, reported by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, be, respectively above 60 percent and below 7.5 percent?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5866/longbets-low-unemployment-but-low-lfpr-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "51%",
    "Description": "Robert D Atkinson and Jason W Galbraith summarize their reasons for taking the bet [here] (https://longbets.org/687/) .\nRobert D Atkinson argued,\nIncreasingly a large number of pundits and scholars, including Eric Brynjolfsson, Martin Ford, Andrew McAfee, and Vivek Wadhwa, have argued that technology is rapidly advancing and will soon lead large scale displacement of workers with technology. These views have rapidly become the prevailing wisdom regarding emerging technology with the result being that voters and policy makers are now more likely to resist technological change and automation, rather than embrace it. But the \"robots are killing our jobs\" proponents miss the fact that automation lowers prices (or raises wages) which in turn spurs increased demand for goods and services, and hence labor. As such there is no reason to believe that either unemployment or the share of adults in the workforce will decline in any significantly way going forward.\nAlberto Forchielli countered,\nThe United States will certainly experience a recession in the next six years. As a result, the workforce participation rate will fall below 60 percent and this time, automation and de-industrialization will keep it there at least through June 2025.\nWill the June, 2025 Labor Force Participation Rate and unemployment rate, reported by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, be, respectively above 60 percent and below 7.5 percent??\nIf Robert D Atkinson is declared the winner of the bet by the Long Now Foundation, then this question resolves positively. If Jason W Galbraith is declared the winner, then this question resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 27,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will US house prices be at the end of 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5867/real-us-house-prices-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "House prices are an important part of the US economy. The housing stock in the US is roughly $30T which is roughly the same order of magnitude as the US stock market. [A crash in house prices in the 2007-2008 was a driver of the financial crisis.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisis_of_2007%E2%80%932008#Growth_of_the_housing_bubble) \nWhat will US house prices be at the end of 2030?\nWhat will the Case-Shiller National Index (seasonally adjusted) adjusted for inflation using CPI less Shelter be in December 2030?\nSpecifically what will be the value of the December 2030 release of [S&amp;P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CSUSHPISA) be divided by the value of [CPI less shelter] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CUSR0000SA0L2) both divided by their values on Jan-2000.\nFor example:\n---for Jan-2000 this value is 1.0 \n---for Sep-2020 this value is: \nIf these statistics are discontinued, this resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 44,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the average top price performance (in G3D Mark /$) of the best available GPU be, on June 14, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5871/top-price-performance-in-g3d-mark--of-gpu/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nMost modern neural network implementations are based on graphics processing units [[1]] (https://www.deeplearningbook.org/) . This is because GPUs have a much larger number of cores than CPUs, and are thus better suited to executing highly parallelizable programs. Hence, migrating data into graphical form and then using the GPU to scan and analyze it can create a large training speedup for training ML models [[2]] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14539) .\n[Videocard benchmarks] (https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/) is a benchmarking project by [Passmark] (https://www.passmark.com/) , a software company. It aggregates performance and price data on GPUs. One of the measures of performance it uses is [3DMark] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3DMark) , a computer benchmarking tool.\nWhat will the average top price performance (in G3D Mark /$) of the best available GPU be, on June 14, 2021?\nThis question resolves as the mean price performance (in G3D Mark / Price) of the top two currently available GPUs by price performance, on June 14, 2021, 11:59PM GMT, according to [Videocard benchmarks] (https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/) .\nThe question resolves ambiguously if [Videocard benchmarks] (https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/) ceases to report G3D Mark, or its methodology changes substantially. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 173,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the the sum of the level of performance (in exaFLOPS) of the all 500 supercomputers in the TOP500 be according to their June 2021 list?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5872/total-compute-top500-supercomputers-june-21/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nIn the seven decades since the invention of the [point-contact transistor] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point-contact_transistor) at Bell Labs, relentless progress in the development of semiconductor devices — Moore’s law — has been achieved despite [regular warnings] (https://www.nature.com/news/the-chips-are-down-for-moore-s-law-1.19338) from industry observers about impending limits.\nThe TOP500 project collects and ranks system performance metrics of the most powerful non-distributed computer systems in the world. The project was started in 1993 and publishes an updated list of the supercomputers twice a year. The first of these updates always coincides with the [International Supercomputing Conference] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISC_High_Performance) in June, and the second is presented at the [ACM/IEEE Supercomputing Conference] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACM/IEEE_Supercomputing_Conference) in November.\nThe TOP500 ranks high-performance computing (HPC) by recording how fast a computer system solves a dense n by n system of linear equations in double precision (64 bits) arithmetic on distributed-memory computers ( [TOP500, 2019] (https://www.top500.org/project/linpack/) ). This is an implementation of the High Performance Computing [Linpack Benchmark] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LINPACK_benchmarks) . \nWhat will the the sum of the level of performance (in exaFLOPS) of the all 500 supercomputers in the TOP500 be according to their June 2021 list?\nThis question resolves as the sum of performance (at Rmax) in exaFLOPS (1 exaFLOP = FLOPS) of all supercomputers listed on the June 2021 TOP500 list. \nHistorical data can [be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18Mha2f9RIQCAAg41vm_UkP524pt59vvD7TcjHZ1SHXw/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if TOP500 stops reporting performance in terms of Rmax measured in TFlop/s on the Linpack benchmark. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 264,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will online poker die by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5875/online-poker-dead-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "17%",
    "Description": "In 2019, [Facebook and CMU beat pros at 6-max Texas Holdem using the equivalent of $150 of computer time] (https://ai.facebook.com/blog/pluribus-first-ai-to-beat-pros-in-6-player-poker/) \nPluribus achieves this result through several innovations on Libratus, the AI that beat human pros in two-player no-limit Hold’em in 2017, as well as other algorithms and code developed in Tuomas Sandholm’s Carnegie Mellon University research lab. In particular, Pluribus incorporates a new online search algorithm that can efficiently evaluate its options by searching just a few moves ahead rather than only to the end of the game. Pluribus also uses new, faster self-play algorithms for games with hidden information. Combined, these advances made it possible to train Pluribus using very little processing power and memory — the equivalent of less than $150 worth of cloud computing resources. This efficiency stands in stark contrast to other recent AI milestone projects, which required the equivalent of millions of dollars’ worth of computing resources to train.\nIn 2020, [Facebook and CMU published ReBel, a more general AI for games.] (https://ai.facebook.com/blog/rebel-a-general-game-playing-ai-bot-that-excels-at-poker-and-more/) \nIn 2019, [Morgan Stanley downgraded the long term outlook for online poker because of the potential for bots:] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-12/superhuman-ai-bots-pose-a-threat-to-online-poker-firms-ms-says) \n“The (re)emergence of superhuman poker bots in the online ecosystem now appears to be a matter of when, not if,” analyst Ed Young wrote in a note.\nAccording to [https://www.pokerscout.com/] (https://www.pokerscout.com/) , as of December 2020 there are over 10 real money poker sites that have had &gt;1000 cash players online during the last 24 hours.\nWill online poker die by 2030?\nThis question resolves negatively if at resolution time, there are at least two real money poker sites intended for humans with over 1000 cash players online at some point in the previous month, where one can play Texas Holdem with blinds of at least $10. Note that the 1000 players can be at any stakes. \nThis question resolves positively if there are fewer than two such sites.\nIf there are no sources tracking the number of online cash players simultaneously, then this resolves negatively if there are at least two such sites with a table at $10 stakes or above, and one can be seated at such a table within a minute of requesting. \nThe rules of Texas Holdem that are playable must be the same as the standard rules in 2020. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 83,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of US GDP will be spent on R&D in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5876/-of-us-gdp-spent-on-rd-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "From [the OECD] (https://data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm) ,\nGross domestic spending on R&amp;D is defined as the total expenditure (current and capital) on R&amp;D carried out by all resident companies, research institutes, university and government laboratories, etc., in a country. It includes R&amp;D funded from abroad, but excludes domestic funds for R&amp;D performed outside the domestic economy. This indicator is measured in USD constant prices using 2010 base year and Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs) and as percentage of GDP\nIn the most recent year recorded, in 2018 OECD nations spent 2.379% of their GDP on R&amp;D. The United States in particular spent 2.862% of its GDP on R&amp;D. What will that number be in 2030?\nWhat percentage of US GDP will be spent on R&amp;D in 2030?\nThis question resolves on the percentage of United States GDP spent on R&amp;D in 2030, as determined by [the OECD] (https://data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm) , or if the OECD stops publishing the data, other credible media.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 27,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the next US presidential election also be considered fraudulent by the losing party?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5882/2024-us-election-considered-fraudulent/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "51%",
    "Description": "From [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election) ,\nBefore, during, and after Election Day, Trump and numerous Republicans attempted to subvert the [2020 election] and overturn the results, falsely alleging that there had been widespread voter fraud, and trying to influence the vote counting process in swing states. Officials in each of the 50 states stated that there was no evidence of systematic fraud or irregularities in their state. Federal agencies overseeing election security said it was \"the most secure in American history.\" Attorney General Bill Barr concluded there was \"no evidence of widespread fraud\" in the election. On multiple occasions, Trump falsely declared himself the winner. The Trump campaign and its allies continued to engage in numerous attempts to overturn the results of the election by filing dozens of legal challenges in several states, most of which were dropped or dismissed by various courts, spreading conspiracy theories falsely alleging fraud, pressuring Republican state electors and legislators, and initially refusing to cooperate with the presidential transition.\nWill the next US presidential election also be considered fraudulent by the losing party?\nFor the purpose of this question, the \"losing party\" is defined as the party whose presidential candidate is projected to come in second place in the electoral college vote count by both the AP and Fox News (see fine print). This question resolves positively if ANY of the following come true following the 2024 presidential election,\n--- \nThe losing candidate states that they consider the election result \"fraudulent\" or \"rigged\", or some very close synonym of those words, as determined by consensus in the comment section of this question.\n--- \nThe losing candidate refuses to concede two weeks following both the AP and Fox News projecting their opponent to win the election AND neither the AP or Fox News having retracted their projection in that time. For the purpose of this question, a concession is a clear statement from the candidate projected to lose that they have acknowledged their defeat, and that they accept the results of the election. The concession must not be retracted within 48 hours.\n--- \nFewer than 20% of congressional members of the losing party believe that their candidate lost the election as determined by credible media two weeks following both the AP and Fox News projecting the opposite-party candidate to win the election AND neither the AP or Fox News having retracted their projection in that time. By comparison, on December 7th 2020, [just 27 congressional Republicans acknowledge Biden’s win] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/survey-who-won-election-republicans-congress/2020/12/04/1a1011f6-3650-11eb-8d38-6aea1adb3839_story.html) according to the Washington Post.\n--- \nA survey from the Morning Consult reveals that fewer than 30% of survey participants who are members of the losing party state that the election was \"probably\" or \"definitely\" free and fair in the most recent such survey following projections from both the AP and Fox News. The relevant survey for 2020 can be found [here] (https://morningconsult.com/form/tracking-voter-trust-in-elections/) .\nOtherwise, the question resolves negatively.\nFor the purpose of this question, a network is said to have \"projected\" a winner if they make some authoritative statement saying that the candidate has won the election, or will win the election once the votes are counted. Crucially, the network does not actually have to use the language of \"projected\" but as long as their reporting follows this definition, it counts as a projection. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 91,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Gladys Berejiklian cease to be Premier of NSW before the next state election?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5883/gladys-berejiklians-premiership/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "53%",
    "Description": "Gladys Berejiklian has been Premier of New South Wales, Australia's most populous state, since January 2017. Her term has encompassed both the devastating bush fires of January 2020 and the COVID-19 crisis.\n2020 has seen Berejiklian's response to the COVID-19 pandemic garner praise, with Prime Minister Scott Morrison saying that NSW's management was the [\"gold standard\"] (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-09-08/why-pm-says-nsw-is-gold-standard-in-covid-19-control/12636890) . \nRevelations at the Independent Commission Against Corruption that Berejiklian had been in a long-term relationship with Daryl Maguire, a former member of state parliament and the subject of the commission's inquiry, have [caused controversy] (https://www.afr.com/politics/gladys-berejiklian-and-the-loss-of-innocence-20201016-p565mx) . \nThe ICAC revelations were followed by [other missteps] (https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/gladys-berejiklians-slipups-are-showing/news-story/179973debcff311aa61249c8f708c1e8) by the Premier, but whether they will jeopardise her position remains to be seen. \nThe NSW parliamentary system gives members of the party in government the ability to vote on their leader, and so change the Premier outside of an election. Leaders may also resign and can be removed by the Governor.\nOver the last 20 years, NSW has had seven premiers. Of these, one was defeated by a leadership spill, four resigned, and one lost an election. Notably, Barry O'Farrell resigned his premiership in 2014 after it was found he had misled the Independent Commission Against Corruption.\nThe next election is scheduled for 25 March 2023, [although the Governor can dissolve the Legislative Assembly earlier under limited circumstances] (http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/ca1902188/s24b.html) . \n(Based on the [short-fuse question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5434/gladys-berejiklians-premiership/) by @helpermonkey )\nWill Gladys Berejiklian cease to be Premier of NSW before the next state election?\nThe question will resolve positively if, before midnight of election day for the next NSW Legislative Assembly election, it is reported by two or more major news sources in Australia that Ms Berejiklian is no longer Premier of NSW.\nFor the purposes of this question, major news sources in Australia are the ABC, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Guardian and The Australian.\nThe question will close retroactively, 24 hours before the event occurs.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 35,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Open Courts Act become law?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5884/pacer-to-become-free/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "59%",
    "Description": "The House has passed the bipartisan [Open Courts Act] (https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/8235) , which establishes a new system to provide free access to federal court records.\nWill the Open Courts Act become law?\nThis question resolves positively if the Open Courts Act becomes law before the end of 2021. If the Open Courts Act is not passed or is significantly amended, any such law (passed by the end of 2021) which enables free access to PACER will resolve this question positively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 43,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Elon Musk personally set foot on the moon by 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5885/will-elon-musk-walk-on-the-moon-by-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "[Elon Musk] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk) is an engineer and the founder, CEO, CTO and chief designer of SpaceX, among other ventures.\n[Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX) is an American aerospace manufacturer and space transportation services company headquartered in Hawthorne, California. It was founded in 2002 with the goal of reducing space transportation costs to enable the colonization of Mars.\n[The SpaceX Starship] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship) system is a fully-reusable, two-stage-to-orbit, super heavy-lift launch vehicle under development by SpaceX since 2012, as a privately-funded private spaceflight project.\nSpaceX could potentially launch commercial payloads using Starship no earlier than 2021. In April 2020, [NASA selected a modified crew-rated Starship system] (https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-names-companies-to-develop-human-landers-for-artemis-moon-missions/) as one of three potential lunar landing system design concepts to receive funding for a 10-month long initial design phase for the NASA [Artemis program] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program) .\nMusk has stated that the [Apollo program] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_program) astronauts, who visited the moon between 1969 and 1972, are personal heroes of his, and that [they inspired him to create SpaceX.] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8P8UKBAOfGo&amp;ab_channel=TimofeyPyshnov) As of December 2020, no human has set foot on the moon since Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt left the lunar surface on December 14, 1972.\nMusk has acknowledged a personal desire to experience space travel. Asked in a December 2020 interview when his first trip to orbit would take place, [Musk stated that it would be \"possibly in two or three years,\"] (https://youtu.be/AF2HXId2Xhg?t=751) and has previously stated that if he has to die, [he would prefer to die on Mars rather than on Earth... \"Just not on impact.\"] (https://www.vanityfair.com/news/tech/2013/03/elon-musk-die-mars) \nAs of late 2020, [Elon Musk is the 2nd-richest person on Earth] (https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/elon-musk-net-worth-bill-gates-second-richest-tesla-2020-11-1029832827) , with substantial capacity to privately fund passion projects if he so chooses.\nWill Elon Musk personally set foot on the moon by 2030?\nThis question resolves positively if before 1 January 2030, Elon Musk has personally set foot on the lunar surface. Musk must stand on the surface of the moon, outside any landing system that delivered him there.\nThis question resolves negatively if Musk does not stand on the moon's surface before 1 January 2030.\nUTC time shall be used for this question. Musk need not travel on any SpaceX system for a positive resolution; any outcome in which Musk stands on the lunar surface before 1 January 2030 triggers positive resolution. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 51,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the first female president of the United States enter office as a Republican?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5886/will-the-first-female-potus-be-republican/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "27%",
    "Description": "[The president of the United States] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States) (POTUS) is the head of state and head of government of the United States of America. The president directs the executive branch of the federal government and is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces.\nAs of 2020, [44 individuals] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidents_of_the_United_States) have held the presidency since the office was established in 1788; all have been male. \nThroughout most of its history, American politics has been dominated by political parties, and since 1853, all US presidents have been affiliated with either the [Democratic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)) or [Republican] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)) parties. \nThe Democratic Party has had one female nominee for president; [Hillary Clinton] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton) in [the 2016 presidential election.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidential_election) Additionally, the Democratic Party has had two female nominees for vice president: [Geraldine Ferraro] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geraldine_Ferraro) in [the 1984 presidential election] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1984_United_States_presidential_election) and [Kamala Harris] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris) in [the 2020 presidential election.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election) As of December 2020, Harris is the vice president-elect, and is expected to be sworn in as vice president in January 2021. \nThe Republican Party has never had a female nominee for president, but has had one female nominee for vice president: [Sarah Palin] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin) in [the 2008 presidential election] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_United_States_presidential_election) .\nWill the first female president of the United States enter office as a Republican?\nFor a positive resolution, the first female president of the United States must be registered as a Republican on the date she is sworn in as president. She need not be directly elected to the office; succeeding to the presidency also counts.\nIf there is no female president of the United States before January 1 2100, this question resolves ambiguously. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 50,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5888/cv-e-prints-2020-12-14-to-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\n[Computer vision] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_vision#:~:text=Computer%20vision%20is%20an%20interdisciplinary,human%20visual%20system%20can%20do.) is a field that deals with how computers can gain high-level understanding from digital images or videos. Pattern recognition is the related problem of recognition of patterns and regularities in data.\nHow many Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period?\nThis question resolves as the total number of Computer Vision e-prints published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question, Computer Vision e-prints published under Computer Science that are have the \" [cs.CV] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=cs.cv&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_firstt) \" tag. Note that for the purpose of this question, the tag will be searched in \"all fields\". The query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science). The query [may be executed here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=cs.cv&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) .\nThe [cs.CV] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=cs.cv&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) category, [according to arXiv] (https://arxiv.org/corr/subjectclasses) :\nCovers image processing, computer vision, pattern recognition, and scene understanding. Roughly includes material in ACM Subject Classes I.2.10, I.4, and I.5.\nRunning this query for previous years gives:\n---5,721 for the calendar year 2017 \n---8,592 for the calendar year 2018 \n---11,596 for the calendar year 2019 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 133,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Computation and Language e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5889/nlp-e-prints-2020-12-14-to-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\nNatural language processing (NLP) combines linguistics and artificial intelligence to enable computer systems to understand, process or generate human or natural language input.\nHow many Computation and Language e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period?\nThis question resolves as the total number of Computation and Language e-prints published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question, Computation and Language e-prints published under Computer Science that are have the [cs.CL] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=cs.cl&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) category. Note that for the purpose of this question, the tag will be searched in \"all fields\". The query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science). The query [may be executed here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=cs.cl&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) .\nThe [cs.CL] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=cs.cl&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) cross-list category category, [according to arXiv] (https://arxiv.org/corr/subjectclasses) :\nCovers natural language processing. Roughly includes material in ACM Subject Class I.2.7. Note that work on artificial languages (programming languages, logics, formal systems) that does not explicitly address natural-language issues broadly construed (natural-language processing, computational linguistics, speech, text retrieval, etc.) is not appropriate for this area.\nRunning this query for previous years gives:\n---2,397 for the calendar year 2017 \n---3,726 for the calendar year 2018 \n---5,390 for the calendar year 2019 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 137,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What share (in %) of the world's super-compute performance will  United States-based in the June 2021 TOP500 list?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5891/us-share-of-world-supercompute-june-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nSince the TOP500 project was started in 1993, supercomputers in the United States have always made up the majority of the world's super-compute performance [(TOP500, 2019)] (https://www.top500.org/statistics/overtime/) . According to TOP500's biannual report, the share of super-compute based in the United States peaked in November of 2005 at 68.31%, and has since been declining most years and was 28.18% in June 2020.\nWhat share (in %) of the world's super-compute performance will United States-based in the June 2021 TOP500 list?\nThe question resolves as the share of the world's super-compute performance at the maximum achieved performance on the LINPACK benchmark (Rmax), in teraFLOPS, that is based in the United States in the June 2021 TOP500 list. \nYou can find the [relevant chart of the historical shares here] (https://top500.org/statistics/overtime/) .\nData\nHistorical data can [be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zJ20X1TM16gdYuW5JERUqnVLfpwthynG_mAAzZQOxcM/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if TOP500 stops reporting performance in terms of Rmax measured in TFlop/s on the Linpack benchmark. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 160,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many papers on AI ethics and algorithmic bias will be published by the end of 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5892/ai-ethics-and-algo-bias-publications-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The ethics of artificial intelligence is the branch of the ethics of technology specific to machine learning and AI systems.\nHow many papers on AI ethics and algorithmic bias will be published by the end of 2022?\nThis question resolves as the total number of publications on arXiv on 2022-12-31 at 11:59 PM, as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question, AI ethics and algorithmic bias e-prints are those published under Computer Science that contain that contain any of the following key words in \"all fields\":\n\"AI ethics\", \"AI fairness\", \"racial bias\", \"gender bias\", \"algorithmic bias\"\nThe query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science).\nThe query can be [executed here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=%22ai+ethics%22&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;terms-1-operator=OR&amp;terms-1-term=%22ai+fairness%22&amp;terms-1-field=all&amp;terms-2-operator=OR&amp;terms-2-term=%22algorithmic+bias%22&amp;terms-2-field=all&amp;terms-3-operator=OR&amp;terms-3-term=%22gender+bias%22&amp;terms-3-field=all&amp;terms-4-operator=OR&amp;terms-4-term=%22racial+bias%22&amp;terms-4-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) . As of writing this question, the query yields 291 results.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 33,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many e-prints on AI Safety, Interpretability or Explainability will be published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5894/ai-safety--other-2020-12-14-to-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\nAI Safety refers to a field aimed at developing techniques for designing AI systems that do not display unintended and harmful behaviour [(Amodei et al., 2016)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.06565.pdf) . A related problem is that of (the lack of) transparency and interpretability of complicated ML systems. Transparency and interpretability techniques aim to generate insights about what ML systems are doing. Such techniques may enable meaningful human oversight and in building fair, safe, and aligned AI systems [(Olah, 2018)] (https://distill.pub/2018/building-blocks/) .\nHow many e-prints on AI Safety, interpretability or explainability will be published on ArXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period?\nThis question resolves as the total number of Natural Language Processing e-prints published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question e-prints published under Computer Science that contain the following keywords in \"all fields\" (i.e. the abstract and title):\n\"ai safety\", \"ai alignment\", \"aligned ai\", \"value alignment problem\", \"reward hacking\", \"reward tampering\", \"tampering problem\", \"safe exploration\", \"robust to distributional shift\", \"scalable oversight\", \"explainable AI\", \"interpretable AI\", \"explainable model\", \"verification for machine learning\", \"verifiable machine learning\", \"interpretable model\", \"interpretable machine learning\", \"cooperative inverse reinforcement learning\", \"value learning\", \"iterated amplification\", \"preference learning\", \"AI safety via debate\", \"reward modeling\", \"logical induction\"\nThe query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science). You can [execute the query here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=%22ai+safety%22&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;terms-1-operator=OR&amp;terms-1-term=%22ai+alignment%22&amp;terms-1-field=all&amp;terms-2-operator=OR&amp;terms-2-term=%22aligned+ai%22&amp;terms-2-field=all&amp;terms-3-operator=OR&amp;terms-3-term=%22value+alignment+problem%22&amp;terms-3-field=all&amp;terms-4-operator=OR&amp;terms-4-term=%22reward+hacking%22&amp;terms-4-field=all&amp;terms-5-operator=OR&amp;terms-5-term=%22reward+tampering%22&amp;terms-5-field=all&amp;terms-6-operator=OR&amp;terms-6-term=%22tampering+problem%22&amp;terms-6-field=all&amp;terms-7-operator=OR&amp;terms-7-term=%22safe+exploration%22&amp;terms-7-field=all&amp;terms-8-operator=OR&amp;terms-8-term=%22robust+to+distributional+shift%22&amp;terms-8-field=all&amp;terms-9-operator=OR&amp;terms-9-term=%22scalable+oversight%22&amp;terms-9-field=all&amp;terms-10-operator=OR&amp;terms-10-term=%22explainable+AI%22&amp;terms-10-field=all&amp;terms-11-operator=OR&amp;terms-11-term=%22interpretable+AI%22&amp;terms-11-field=all&amp;terms-12-operator=OR&amp;terms-12-term=%22explainable+model%22&amp;terms-12-field=all&amp;terms-13-operator=OR&amp;terms-13-term=%22verification+for+machine+learning%22&amp;terms-13-field=all&amp;terms-14-operator=OR&amp;terms-14-term=%22verifiable+machine+learning%22&amp;terms-14-field=all&amp;terms-15-operator=OR&amp;terms-15-term=%22interpretable+model%22&amp;terms-15-field=all&amp;terms-16-operator=OR&amp;terms-16-term=%22interpretable+machine+learning%22&amp;terms-16-field=all&amp;terms-17-operator=OR&amp;terms-17-term=%22cooperative+inverse+reinforcement+learning%22&amp;terms-17-field=all&amp;terms-18-operator=OR&amp;terms-18-term=%22value+learning%22&amp;terms-18-field=all&amp;terms-19-operator=OR&amp;terms-19-term=%22iterated+amplification%22&amp;terms-19-field=all&amp;terms-20-operator=OR&amp;terms-20-term=%22preference+learning%22&amp;terms-20-field=all&amp;terms-21-operator=OR&amp;terms-21-term=%22AI+safety+via+debate%22&amp;terms-21-field=all&amp;terms-22-operator=OR&amp;terms-22-term=%22reward+modeling%22&amp;terms-22-field=all&amp;terms-23-operator=OR&amp;terms-23-term=%22logical+induction%22&amp;terms-23-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) .\nRunning this query for previous years gives:\n---80 for the calendar year 2017 \n---127 for the calendar year 2018 \n---275 for the calendar year 2019 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 189,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art performance on semantic segmentation of PASCAL-Context be at 2021-06-14 in mean IoU in percent (MIoU%)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5896/sota-on-pascal-context-at-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nSemantic segmentation, or image segmentation, is the task of clustering parts of an image together which belong to the same object class. It is a form of pixel-level prediction because each pixel in an image is classified according to a category [(Thoma, 2016)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.06541.pdf) .\nThe PASCAL-Context dataset is a challenging scene parsing dataset that contains 59 semantic classes and 1 background class [(Mottaghi et al., 2014)] (https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~urtasun/publications/mottaghi_et_al_cvpr14.pdf) . The training set and test set consist of 4, 998 and 5,105 images respectively.\nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for semantic segmentation on PASCAL-Context is ResNeSt-269 [(Zhang et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.08955v1.pdf) , which achieves 58.92 mIoU% (see their [detailed results here] (https://github.com/zhanghang1989/ResNeSt/issues/42) ). \nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/semantic-segmentation-on-pascal-context) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art performance on semantic segmentation of PASCAL-Context be at 2021-06-14 in mean IoU in percent (MIoU%)?\nThis question resolves as the highest level of performance (in MIoU%) achieved on the [PASCAL-Context (2014)] (https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~urtasun/publications/mottaghi_et_al_cvpr14.pdf) dataset up until 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT amongst models trained on only the PASCAL-Context training set—no extra training data may be used. The model's level of performance is to be evaluated on the PASCAL-Context test set.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 155,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art performance on semantic segmentation on Cityscapes be at 2021-06-14 in mean IoU in percent (MIoU%)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5897/sota-on-cityscapes-on-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nSemantic segmentation, or image segmentation, is the task of clustering parts of an image together which belong to the same object class. It is a form of pixel-level prediction because each pixel in an image is classified according to a category [(Thoma, 2016)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.06541.pdf) .\n[Cityscapes] (https://www.cityscapes-dataset.com/) is a large-scale dataset that contains a diverse set of stereo video sequences recorded in street scenes from 50 different cities, with high quality pixel-level annotations of 5,000 frames in addition to a larger set of 20,000 weakly annotated frames.\nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for semantic segmentation on Cityscapes is ResNeSt-200 [(Zhang et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.08955v1.pdf) , which achieves 83.3 mIoU% (see their [detailed results here] (https://github.com/zhanghang1989/ResNeSt) . \nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/semantic-segmentation-on-cityscapes) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art performance on semantic segmentation on Cityscapes be at 2021-06-14 in mean IoU in percent (MIoU%)?\nThis question resolves as the highest level of performance (in MIoU%) achieved on the [Cityscapes (2016)] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.01685) dataset up until 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT amongst models trained on only the Cityscapes's training set—no extra training data may be used. The model's level of performance is to be evaluated on the Cityscape's test set.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 156,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art performance on image classification on ImageNet be at 2021-06-14 in top-1 accuracy?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5898/sota-on-imagenet-on-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nImage Classification is the task of identifying an image by assigning to it a specific label. Typically, Image Classification refers to images in which only one object appears and is analysed. In contrast, object detection involves both classification and localisation tasks, and is used to analyse more realistic cases in which multiple objects may exist in an image.\nImageNet [(Deng et al., 2009)] (http://www.image-net.org/papers/imagenet_cvpr09.pdf) is a large scale dataset images built upon the backbone of the [WordNet] (https://wordnet.princeton.edu/) structure. ImageNet is one of the largest visual recognition datasets which contains high-resolution images. It has tens of millions of annotated images organized by the semantic hierarchy of WordNet. \nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is EfficientNet-B8 [(Wei et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.11342v1.pdf) , which achieves a top-1 accuracy of 85.8% on ImageNet.\nA good reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art performance on image classification on ImageNet be at 2021-06-14 in top-1 accuracy?\nThis question resolves as the highest level of performance, in top-1 accuracy, achieved on ImageNet up until 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT amongst models trained on only the ImageNet's validation set (ImageNet does not clearly demarcate its validation and training sets). No extra training data may be used besides the original ImageNet dataset.\nFor the purpose of this question, augmented versions of the ImageNet dataset, such as ImageNet-V2 [(Recht, 2019)] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10811) , are considered different from [Deng et al., 2009's] (http://www.image-net.org/papers/imagenet_cvpr09.pdf) dataset.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 194,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many e-prints on AI Safety, Interpretability or Explainability will be published on arXiv from 2021 through 2026?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5899/ai-safety--other-2021-through-2026/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\nAI Safety refers to a field aimed at developing techniques for designing AI systems that do not display unintended and harmful behaviour [(Amodei et al., 2016)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.06565.pdf) . A related problem is that of (the lack of) transparency and interpretability of complicated ML systems. Transparency and interpretability techniques aim to generate insights about what ML systems are doing. Such techniques may enable meaningful human oversight and in building fair, safe, and aligned AI systems [(Olah, 2018)] (https://distill.pub/2018/building-blocks/) .\nHow many e-prints on AI Safety, interpretability or explainability will be published on arXiv over the 2021-01-01 to 2026-12-31 period?\nThis question resolves as the total number of Natural Language Processing e-prints published on arXiv over the 2021-01-01 to 2026-12-31 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question e-prints published under Computer Science that contain the following keywords in \"all fields\" (i.e. the abstract and title):\n\"ai safety\", \"ai alignment\", \"aligned ai\", \"value alignment problem\", \"reward hacking\", \"reward tampering\", \"tampering problem\", \"safe exploration\", \"robust to distributional shift\", \"scalable oversight\", \"explainable AI\", \"interpretable AI\", \"explainable model\", \"verification for machine learning\", \"verifiable machine learning\", \"interpretable model\", \"interpretable machine learning\", \"cooperative inverse reinforcement learning\", \"value learning\", \"iterated amplification\", \"preference learning\", \"AI safety via debate\", \"reward modeling\", \"logical induction\"\nThe query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science). You can [execute the query here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=%22ai+safety%22&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;terms-1-operator=OR&amp;terms-1-term=%22ai+alignment%22&amp;terms-1-field=all&amp;terms-2-operator=OR&amp;terms-2-term=%22aligned+ai%22&amp;terms-2-field=all&amp;terms-3-operator=OR&amp;terms-3-term=%22value+alignment+problem%22&amp;terms-3-field=all&amp;terms-4-operator=OR&amp;terms-4-term=%22reward+hacking%22&amp;terms-4-field=all&amp;terms-5-operator=OR&amp;terms-5-term=%22reward+tampering%22&amp;terms-5-field=all&amp;terms-6-operator=OR&amp;terms-6-term=%22tampering+problem%22&amp;terms-6-field=all&amp;terms-7-operator=OR&amp;terms-7-term=%22safe+exploration%22&amp;terms-7-field=all&amp;terms-8-operator=OR&amp;terms-8-term=%22robust+to+distributional+shift%22&amp;terms-8-field=all&amp;terms-9-operator=OR&amp;terms-9-term=%22scalable+oversight%22&amp;terms-9-field=all&amp;terms-10-operator=OR&amp;terms-10-term=%22explainable+AI%22&amp;terms-10-field=all&amp;terms-11-operator=OR&amp;terms-11-term=%22interpretable+AI%22&amp;terms-11-field=all&amp;terms-12-operator=OR&amp;terms-12-term=%22explainable+model%22&amp;terms-12-field=all&amp;terms-13-operator=OR&amp;terms-13-term=%22verification+for+machine+learning%22&amp;terms-13-field=all&amp;terms-14-operator=OR&amp;terms-14-term=%22verifiable+machine+learning%22&amp;terms-14-field=all&amp;terms-15-operator=OR&amp;terms-15-term=%22interpretable+model%22&amp;terms-15-field=all&amp;terms-16-operator=OR&amp;terms-16-term=%22interpretable+machine+learning%22&amp;terms-16-field=all&amp;terms-17-operator=OR&amp;terms-17-term=%22cooperative+inverse+reinforcement+learning%22&amp;terms-17-field=all&amp;terms-18-operator=OR&amp;terms-18-term=%22value+learning%22&amp;terms-18-field=all&amp;terms-19-operator=OR&amp;terms-19-term=%22iterated+amplification%22&amp;terms-19-field=all&amp;terms-20-operator=OR&amp;terms-20-term=%22preference+learning%22&amp;terms-20-field=all&amp;terms-21-operator=OR&amp;terms-21-term=%22AI+safety+via+debate%22&amp;terms-21-field=all&amp;terms-22-operator=OR&amp;terms-22-term=%22reward+modeling%22&amp;terms-22-field=all&amp;terms-23-operator=OR&amp;terms-23-term=%22logical+induction%22&amp;terms-23-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) .\nRunning this query for previous years gives:\n---80 for the calendar year 2017 \n---127 for the calendar year 2018 \n---275 for the calendar year 2019 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 144,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many e-prints on Few-Shot Learning will be published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5900/few-shot-learning-2020-12-14-to-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\nFew-shot learning methods have been developed to explicitly optimize machine learning models that predict new classes using only a few labelled examples per class. Few-shot learners use prior knowledge, and can generalize to new tasks containing only a few samples with supervised information [(Wang et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.05046.pdf) .\nHow many e-prints on Few-Shot Learning will be published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period?\nThis question resolves as the total number of Few-Shot Learning e-prints published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question, Few-Shot Learning e-prints are those published under Computer Science that contain any of the following key words in \"all fields\":\n\"few shot\", \"1-shot\", \"one-shot\", \"five-shot\", \"10-shot\", \"ten-shot\", \"zero shot\", \"0 shot\", \"low-shot learning\", \"small sample learning\"\nThe query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science).\nThe query can be [executed here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?advanced=&amp;terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=%22few+shot%22&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;terms-1-operator=OR&amp;terms-1-term=%221-shot%22&amp;terms-1-field=all&amp;terms-2-operator=OR&amp;terms-2-term=%22one-shot%22&amp;terms-2-field=all&amp;terms-3-operator=OR&amp;terms-3-term=%22five-shot%22&amp;terms-3-field=all&amp;terms-4-operator=OR&amp;terms-4-term=%2210-shot%22&amp;terms-4-field=all&amp;terms-5-operator=OR&amp;terms-5-term=%22ten-shot%22&amp;terms-5-field=all&amp;terms-6-operator=OR&amp;terms-6-term=%22zero+shot%22&amp;terms-6-field=all&amp;terms-7-operator=OR&amp;terms-7-term=%220+shot%22&amp;terms-7-field=all&amp;terms-8-operator=OR&amp;terms-8-term=%22low-shot+learning%22&amp;terms-8-field=all&amp;terms-9-operator=OR&amp;terms-9-term=%22small+sample+learning%22&amp;terms-9-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) . Running this query for previous years gives:\n---203 for the calendar year 2017 \n---350 for the calendar year 2018 \n---700 for the calendar year 2019 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 151,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Reinforcement Learning e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5901/reinforcement-learning-2020-12-14-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\nReinforcement learning (RL) is a subfield of machine learning, based on rewarding desired behaviours and/or punishing undesired ones of an agent interacting with its environment [(Sutton and Barto, 2014)] (https://web.stanford.edu/class/psych209/Readings/SuttonBartoIPRLBook2ndEd.pdf) .\nHow many Reinforcement Learning e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period?\nThis question resolves as the total number of Reinforcement Learning e-prints published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question, Reinforcement Learning e-prints are those published under Computer Science that contain any of the following key words in \"all fields\":\n\"Reinforcement Learning\", \"DQN\", \"Q-learning\", \"Deep Q Network\", \"Temporal difference learning\", \"Sarsa\", \"TD learning\" \"Proximal policy optimization\"\nThe query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science). The query [may be executed here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=%22Reinforcement+Learning%22&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;terms-1-operator=OR&amp;terms-1-term=%22DQN%22&amp;terms-1-field=all&amp;terms-2-operator=OR&amp;terms-2-term=%22Q-learning%22&amp;terms-2-field=all&amp;terms-3-operator=OR&amp;terms-3-term=%22Temporal+difference+learning%22&amp;terms-3-field=all&amp;terms-4-operator=OR&amp;terms-4-term=%22Deep+Q+Network%22&amp;terms-4-field=all&amp;terms-5-operator=OR&amp;terms-5-term=%22Sarsa%22&amp;terms-5-field=all&amp;terms-6-operator=OR&amp;terms-6-term=%22TD+learning%22&amp;terms-6-field=all&amp;terms-7-operator=OR&amp;terms-7-term=%22Proximal+policy+optimization%22&amp;terms-7-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) .\nRunning this query for previous years gives:\n---779 for the calendar year 2017 \n---1,404 for the calendar year 2018 \n---2,287 for the calendar year 2019 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 129,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art performance on one-shot image classification on MiniImageNet be, on 2021-06-14, in accuracy?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5902/sota-1-shot-on-on-miniimagenet-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nImage Classification is the task of identifying an image by assigning to it a specific label. Typically, Image Classification refers to images in which only one object appears and is analysed. In contrast, object detection involves both classification and localisation tasks, and is used to analyse more realistic cases in which multiple objects may exist in an image.\nThe MiniImageNet dataset contains 100 classes randomly chosen from [ImageNet] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.0575.pdf) and 600 images of size 84×84 pixels per class. It is split into 64 base classes, 16 validation classes and 20 novel classes.\nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is ResNeSt-200 PT+MAP [(Hu et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.03806v2.pdf) , which achieves an accuracy of 82.92.\nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/few-shot-image-classification-on-mini-1) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art performance on one-shot image classification on MiniImageNet be, on 2021-06-14, in accuracy?\nThis question resolves as the highest level of performance achieved for one-shot image classification on MiniImageNet up until 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT. Only models trained on MiniImageNet's data qualify—no extra training data may be used.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 278,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art object detection performance on COCO be, at 2021-06-14 in Average Precision (AP)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5903/sota-object-detection-on-ms-coco-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nObject detection is the task of detecting instances of objects of a certain class within an image. [Microsoft's Common Objects in Context] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0312) (COCO) is a dataset from 2014 that is used to benchmark object recognition. The data places the question of object recognition in the context of the broader question of scene understanding. It contains images of complex everyday scenes containing common objects in their natural context. COCO includes a total of 2.5 million labeled instances in 328k images.\nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is YOLOv4- large [(Wang et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.08036v1.pdf) , which achieves an average precision (AP) of 55.8.\nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/object-detection-on-coco) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art object detection performance on COCO be, at 2021-06-14 in Average Precision (AP)?\nThis question resolves as the highest level of performance in AP achieved on COCO test-dev (COCO's test set) up until 2021-06-14 11:59 GMT. Only models trained on only the COCO data (no extra training data may be used). For the purpose of this question, models using [Test Time Augmentations] (https://www.kaggle.com/andrewkh/test-time-augmentation-tta-worth-it) may qualify.\nFor the purpose of this question, by AP, we mean the primary performance metric on the MS COCO dataset, which is AP when averaged are over multiple Intersection over Union (IoU) values (.5, .05, .95) (see [MS COCO] (https://cocodataset.org/#detection-eval) ).\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 168,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the value of the herein defined Image Classification Performance Index be on 2021-06-14?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5904/image-classification-index-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nImage classification is the task of identifying an image by assigning to it a specific label. Typically, Image classification refers to images in which only one object appears and is analysed. In contrast, object detection involves both classification and localisation tasks, and is used to analyse more realistic cases in which multiple objects may exist in an image.\nIndex\nThe index is constructed as follows:\n---We take the average (arithmetic mean) of of the state-of-the-art performance across all benchmarks in the index \n---The index is then defined by scaling this mean so that its average value for the year 2019 is 100 \nThe following benchmarks are included in the Image Classification Performance Index:\nImage classification on: [ImageNet] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet) (in top-1 accuracy), [STL-10] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-stl-10) , [CIFAR-100] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100) , [SVHN] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-svhn) , [MiniImagenet 5-way (1-shot)] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/few-shot-image-classification-on-mini-2) , [Tiered ImageNet 5-way (1-shot)] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/few-shot-image-classification-on-tiered) , [CUB 200 5-way 1-shot] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/few-shot-image-classification-on-cub-200-5-1) , [Stanford Cars] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/fine-grained-image-classification-on-stanford) , [CUB200] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/fine-grained-image-classification-on-cub-200-1) , [FGVC Aircraft] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/fine-grained-image-classification-on-fgvc) \nHistorical data on the [Image Classification Performance Index may be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lakiJFeKbgiw8KoYwJ-6NvuZlMZG0cUmx7AH5lUL998/edit?usp=sharing) . As of writing this question, the index is at 114.88 for December 2020.\nWhat will the value of the herein defined Image Classification Performance Index be on 2021-06-14?\nThis question resolves as the value of this index on 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT.\nModels that are trained on multiple datasets do not qualify for the purpose of this question—only models trained on benchmark-specific datasets will be considered.\nA benchmark will be removed from the index if:\n---At the time of resolution no new performance data is available for new models for the specific benchmark over the previous 6 months \n---The value of for that benchmark exceeds 10 \nIf a benchmark is removed from the index, the index shall simply be re-constructed according the procedure outlined above.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case error is not natively reported, it is constructed by taking 1-accuracy/100. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 166,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the total number of confirmed COVID-19 cases globally by the end of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5906/number-confirmed-global-covid-cases-by-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of 09 December, the World Health Organization (WHO) is reporting a total of 68,165,877 confirmed COVID-19 cases worldwide. This global case number figure is gathered and compiled on a daily basis from the relevant national health authorities of each WHO member country.\nWhat will be the total number of confirmed COVID-19 cases globally by the end of 2021?\nThe [WHO COVID-19 Dashboard] (https://covid19.who.int/) will be consulted on 1 January 2022 for confirmed case data reported by the WHO up to 31 December 2021. If their dashboard is not being actively updated at that time, then the latest [weekly WHO situation report] (https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports) will be consulted.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 165,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the total number of confirmed COVID-19 deaths globally by the end of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5907/number-confirmed-global-covid-deaths-by-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of 09 December, the World Health Organization (WHO) is reporting a total of 1,557,385 confirmed COVID-19 deaths worldwide. This global death number figure is gathered and compiled on a daily basis from the relevant national health authorities of each WHO member country.\nWhat will be the total number of confirmed COVID-19 deaths globally by the end of 2021?\nThe [WHO COVID-19 Dashboard] (https://covid19.who.int/) will be consulted on 1 January 2022 for confirmed death data reported by the WHO up to 31 December 2021. If their dashboard is not being actively updated at that time, then the latest [weekly WHO situation report] (https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports) will be consulted.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 130,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the total number of confirmed COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. by the end of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5908/confirmed-us-covid-deaths-by-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of 09 December, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is reporting a total of 285,351 confirmed COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. This national death number figure is gathered and compiled on a daily basis from the relevant state/territory health authorities of each U.S. state and territory.\nWhat will be the total number of confirmed COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. by the end of 2021?\nThe [CDC COVID Data Tracker] (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker) will be consulted on 1 January 2022 for confirmed death data reported by the CDC up to 31 December 2021.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 392,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the total number of COVID-19 vaccine doses purchased by the U.S. as of 30 June 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5909/covid-vaccine-doses-bought-by-us-by-june/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of 09 December, Operation Warp Speed (OWS) has purchased [800 million COVID-19 vaccine doses for the U.S.] (https://www.hhs.gov/coronavirus/explaining-operation-warp-speed/index.html) . This includes: 300M doses of the AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine candidate, 100M doses of the Novavax candidate, 100M doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech candidate, 100M doses of the Sanofi/GSK candidate, 100M doses of the Johnson &amp; Johnson candidate, and 100M doses of the Moderna candidate. The most recent purchase by OWS occurred on [11 August 2020] (https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2020/08/11/trump-administration-collaborates-with-moderna-produce-100-million-doses-covid-19-investigational-vaccine.html) . [OWS] (https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/fact-sheet-operation-warp-speed.pdf) is a public-private partnership by the U.S. government with the aim of facilitating and accelerating the development, manufacturing, and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics.\nWhat will be the total number of COVID-19 vaccine doses purchased by the U.S. as of 30 June 2021?\nThe OWS [“Fact Sheet,”] (https://www.hhs.gov/coronavirus/explaining-operation-warp-speed/index.html) page, which is regularly updated, will be consulted at the end of the day on 30 June 2021. If this page is no longer regularly updated, then the most recent public announcement by OWS will be considered. For resolution, all of the vaccine doses that have been announced to be purchased for the U.S. up until 30 June 2021 will be added up. If a purchase agreement announcement uses the “at least” terminology, then the lowest number of vaccine doses will be considered — for instance, on 21 May OWS announced it had made a purchase to secure “at least” 300 million doses of the AstraZeneca/Oxford for the U.S. and this question will consider this to be a total of 300 million doses of said vaccine.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 157,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many COVID-19 vaccines will be approved by the U.S. FDA as of 30 June 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5910/covid-vaccines-approved-by-us-fda-by-june/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of 09 December, no COVID-19 vaccines have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA is the national regulatory authority responsible for approving vaccines in the U.S. \nSo far, both Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna have filed requests for [emergency use authorization (EUA)] (https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained) of their respective vaccine candidates after meeting the primary end points requested by the FDA for their phase III trials. Pfizer/BioNTech [filed on 20 November] ( [https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/pre…] (https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-submit-emergency-use-authorization) ) and Moderna [filed on 30 November] (https://investors.modernatx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/moderna-announces-primary-efficacy-analysis-phase-3-cove-study) . The FDA vaccine advisory committee is meeting on [10 December] (https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/advisory-committee-calendar/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee-december-10-2020-meeting-announcement) to consider whether to recommend an EUA for the Pfizer/BioNTech candidate and will meet on [17 December] (https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/advisory-committee-calendar/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee-december-17-2020-meeting-announcement) to consider whether to recommend an EUA for the Moderna vaccine candidate. If positive, EUAs by the FDA may occur shortly thereafter.\nIn a [press briefing on 09 December] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlfW5nKtZ8I) , OWS provided the following updates on other vaccine candidates in development: \n--- \nthe Johnson &amp; Johnson vaccine candidate’s phase III trial has enrolled ~38,000 subjects and plans on completing its total enrollment of ~40,000 subjects in the next few days. If the initial readout on safety and efficacy data, expected to occur in early January, is positive then it is anticipated they will file for a FDA EUA in late January or early February.\n--- \nAstraZeneca/Oxford has a new phase III trial with ~18,000 subjects that is taking place in the U.S. and is intended to provide a clear outcome on safety and efficacy (this comes after a [series of missteps with its first phase III trial] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/08/business/covid-vaccine-oxford-astrazeneca.html) . An initial readout is expected in late January and, if it is positive, an FDA EUA filing is expected in late February.\n--- \nNovavax is actively preparing to begin its phase III trial\n--- \nSanofi/GSK is in discussion with OWS to begin its phase III trial\nHow many COVID-19 vaccines will be approved by the U.S. FDA as of 30 June 2021?\nThe FDA [“Emergency Use Authorization,”] (https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization#coviddrugs) page, which is regularly updated, will be consulted at the end of the day on 30 June 2021. If any COVID-19 vaccine candidates have received full FDA approval by then, they will of course also be considered.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 164,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the Federal Reserves' Industrial Production Index be for April 2021, for semiconductors, printed circuit boards and related products?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5911/april-2021-production-of-semiconducters/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nSemiconductor devices are key devices in modern electronics. The main applications as electronic devices are junction diodes, transistors, and memories, which are widely used in large-scale integrated circuits [[1]] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0123694019004976) . The [printed circuit board] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printed_circuit_board) is the platform upon which microelectronic components such as semiconductor chips and capacitors are mounted.\nWhat will the [Federal Reserves' Industrial Production Index] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPB53122S) be for May 2021, for semiconductors, printed circuit boards and related products?\nThis question resolves as the value of the Federal Reserves' Industrial Production (IP) Index [Industrial Production: Durable Goods Materials: Semiconductors, Printed Circuit Boards, and Other] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPB53122S) for May 2021. \nThe industrial production (IP) index measures the real output of all relevant establishments located in the United States, regardless of their ownership, but not those located in U.S. territories.\nThe index is constructed so that the mean value for the base period 2012 is 100. In case the Index adopts a different base period, we shall reconstruct the series so that the mean value for 2012 is 100 and use this transformed index to resolve the question.\nIn case a new base-period by the FED, admins will still resolve the question by constructing the index such that the base-period remains 2012. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 146,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the U.S. lift its Presidential Proclamation restricting travel from the European Schengen Area?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5912/when-will-us-allow-travel-from-europe/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "On 11 March, President Trump issued a [presidential proclamation] (https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/proclamation-suspension-entry-immigrants-nonimmigrants-certain-additional-persons-pose-risk-transmitting-2019-novel-coronavirus/) that suspended “...entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of all aliens who were physically present within the Schengen Area during the 14-day period preceding their entry or attempted entry into the United States.” This travel ban was issued in response to the high number of COVID-19 cases in the Schengen Area relative to the U.S. at the time. The Schengen Area is comprised of [26 European countries] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schengen_Area) . This ongoing suspension of travel from the Schengen Area to the U.S. does not apply to U.S. citizens, U.S. permanent residents, or most immediate family members of U.S. citizens/permanent residents.\nWhen will the U.S. lift its Presidential Proclamation restricting travel from the European Schengen Area?\nThe issuance of a presidential proclamation that fully lifts the suspension of travel from the Schengen Area will be considered for resolution. In the scenario that the U.S. lifts travel from the overall Schengen Area but keeps travel restrictions on some Schengen Area member countries, this will resolve if travel restrictions are lifted on at least 50% of Schengen Area countries, or at least 13 countries.\nIf the U.S. does not lift the suspension of travel from the Schengen Area before 2022, then this resolves as “&gt; Dec 31, 2021.”\n",
    "# Forecasts": 172,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Netanyahu be convicted by the end of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5914/will-netanyahu-be-convicted-by-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "31%",
    "Description": "Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been on trial in the Jerusalem District Court since May 2020 for [bribery, fraud and breach of trust] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-51868737) . Netanyahu has been indicted in three separate cases: Case 1000 accuses him of receiving gifts in exchange for favors, Case 2000 accuses him of offering to promote the circulation of a newspaper in exchange for favorable coverage, and Case 4000 accuses him of helping a shareholder in a telecom company with regulatory issues in exchange for positive coverage. The [evidentiary stage of the trial is set to begin in February 2021] (https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-trial-may-face-further-delay-as-judges-hint-indictment-must-be-revised/) , though this may be delayed.\nWill Netanyahu be convicted by the end of 2021?\nThis will resolve on the basis of an official court statement or otherwise credible media reporting announcing that Netanyahu has been convicted on at least one charge. Conviction on any charge unrelated to this trial would also count for positive resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 159,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the U.S. Affordable Care Act be expanded to include a public option before the end of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5915/will-us-aca-have-public-option-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "President-elect Joe Biden has stated he will seek to add a “public option” component to the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This would create a [Medicare-like public insurance plan that any American can buy into and that would compete with private insurance plans] (https://joebiden.com/healthcare/) . It [seems likely] (https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/11/09/932071991/what-bidens-election-means-for-u-s-health-care-and-public-health) that Republican senators will oppose the introduction of a public option.\nWill the U.S. Affordable Care Act be expanded to include a public option before the end of 2021?\nThis will resolve on the basis of whether a “public option” is created that allows any American to buy into a Medicare-like government insurance plan. Such an expansion of the ACA would have to be passed by Congress and signed into law by the President. \nA public option that is limited to certain groups of people — for instance, only those over 50 years of age — would count for resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 119,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will 2021 be the hottest year on record according to NASA?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5916/will-2021-be-the-hottest-year-on-record/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33%",
    "Description": "According to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Earth's average global surface temperature in 2019 was the [“...second warmest since modern record-keeping began in 1880”] (https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2945/nasa-noaa-analyses-reveal-2019-second-warmest-year-on-record/) and this continues the planet's long-term warming trend, with the last five years being the warmest of the past 140 years. The hottest year on record is 2016.\nWill 2021 be the hottest year on record according to NASA?\nThis will resolve on the basis of an announcement by NASA on whether 2021 is the hottest year on record — more specifically, whether Earth’s average global surface temperature in 2021 will be the hottest in the 1880-2021 time frame.\nIf the NASA (GISS) results are tied with another year, the NOAA numbers will be used to break the tie. If those are tied too, we'll go on to EU's Copernicus. If a tie remains, this resolves ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 198,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the U.S. rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5917/date-us-rejoins-paris-climate-agreement/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "On 4 November 2020, the U.S. [formally withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement] (https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-54797743) . This comes after President Trump announced such a move in June 2017, though it did not take effect until 4 November 2020.\nPresident-elect Joe Biden has [indicated] (https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/) he will recommit the U.S. to the Paris Climate Agreement. Biden [would not need Senate support] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/20/biden-to-rejoin-paris-climate-accord-heres-what-happens-next-.html) to rejoin since the accord is an executive agreement. Biden’s administration will just have to send a letter to the United Nations stating the intention to rejoin, and the official return would take effect in 30 days.\nWhen will the U.S. rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement?\nThis will resolve on the basis of an announcement by the future Biden administration in which it states that it is formally intending to rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement. This would mean that the Biden administration is sending a letter to the United Nations with the intention to rejoin and resolves as the date that this letter is sent.\nIf the U.S. does not announce it intends to rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement before 31 December 2021, then this resolves as “&gt; Dec 31, 2021.”\n",
    "# Forecasts": 293,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the world agree to new climate targets at the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5918/world-to-agree-to-new-climate-targets-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "67%",
    "Description": "The 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference, otherwise known as COP26, is the [26th United Nations Climate Change conference] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_United_Nations_Climate_Change_Conference) . It is scheduled to be held in Glasgow, United Kingdom in November 2021. This conference is the first time that member states are expected to commit to new targets since COP21 in 2015. It is expected that new targets will be selected by most countries and that these actions will be informed by the 2018 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report. All parties to the agreement must submit their new 2030 targets before this next major United Nations climate meeting.\nWill the world agree to new climate targets at the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference?\nThis question will resolve if at least 95% of countries that are party to the Paris Agreement at the time of the conference announce new targets prior to the COP26 conference.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 98,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the U.S. join the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership trade pact in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5920/us-to-join-rcep-trade-pact-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "19%",
    "Description": "The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is a free trade agreement between fifteen Asian countries, including members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and five of its regional partners. RCEP will connect about [30% of the world’s people and output] (https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2020/11/16/rcep-a-new-trade-agreement-that-will-shape-global-economics-and-politics/) , which likely makes it the largest free trade agreement in the world. The RCEP is generally seen as a successor to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), which [President Trump withdrew from in 2017] (https://www.brookings.edu/blog/unpacked/2017/03/24/trump-withdrawing-from-the-trans-pacific-partnership/) . President-elect Joe Biden has been [noncommittal on whether he would join the RCEP] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/15/business/china-trade-rcep.html) . Biden would need the approval of the Senate to join the trade pact.\nWill the U.S. join the RCEP trade pact in 2021?\nThis will resolve on the basis of whether Biden signs an agreement for the U.S. to join the RCEP following approval by the U.S. Senate.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 102,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be net migration to the United Kingdom in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5921/net-migration-to-uk-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Net migration to the United Kingdom was estimated to be [270,000 in 2019, down from a peak of 331,000 in the year ending March 2015] (https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/long-term-international-migration-flows-to-and-from-the-uk/) . Net migration prior to 2020 has been falling largely owing to Brexit and, in 2020, is expected to have fallen significantly further due to both Brexit and the COVID-19 pandemic.\nWhat will be net migration to the United Kingdom in 2021?\nThis will resolve on the basis of [long-term international migration statistics for the UK for the year ending December 2021] (https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration/bulletins/migrationstatisticsquarterlyreport/may2020#eu-and-non-eu-migration-over-time) that is published by the UK Office for National Statistics.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 154,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Scotland set a date for a new independence referendum in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5922/scotland-independence-referendum-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "55.00000000000001%",
    "Description": "Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has recently [“…pledged to publish draft legislation for a new Scottish independence referendum, including the question and timing of the vote, before the country’s parliamentary election next year ... [Sturgeon] put on hold plans for a second referendum in March to concentrate on the coronavirus crisis.”] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-scotland-independence/scottish-nationalists-announce-plans-for-new-independence-referendum-idUSKBN25S5SX?il=0) . The UK’s conservative government has [indicated that it will oppose] (https://www.ft.com/content/0f0ecf40-f30a-482e-9902-d74276bdc43f) the scheduling of any such independence referendum in Scotland.\nWill Scotland set a date for a new independence referendum in 2021?\nThis will resolve on the basis of whether in 2021 Scotland schedules a date for a new independence referendum. The UK does not have to agree to this for this question to resolve positively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 140,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the U.S. GDP growth (year on year) in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5923/us-gdp-growth-rate-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The US’s GDP declined rapidly with the onset of COVID-19, beginning with a [5%]( [https://www.bea.gov/news/2020/gross-domestic-…] (https://www.bea.gov/news/2020/gross-domestic-product-1st-quarter-2020-third-estimate-corporate-profits-1st-quarter-2020#:~:text=Real%20gross%20domestic%20product%20(GDP,real%20GDP%20increased%202.1%20percent) .) decrease in Q1 and then spiralling toward over a 30% decrease in Q2. Q3, however, saw a bounce back with a [33%] (https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product) increase in GDP from Q2, a relief for the [economically stricken United States] (https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/recovery-tracker/) . With the holiday season in full swing, and COVID cases rising, GDP is only expected to increase [11%] (https://www.frbatlanta.org/cqer/research/gdpnow#:~:text=Latest%20estimate%3A%2011.2%20percent%20%E2%80%94%20December,11.1%20percent%20on%20December%201.) in Q4, over a 20% growth reduction from Q3. \nAs we progress into 2021, with a new COVID vaccine on the horizon and a new president entering the White House, the future of the US economy could reside in the passing of the next stimulus package. GDP growth requires consumer expenditure, and with more people saving money through the economic downturn (at rates over [6%] (https://www.kiplinger.com/economic-forecasts/gdp) higher than average), it is not expected to increase unless additional stimuli are provided to consumers. With the addition of a stimulus package, most likely released by Q2 2021, total GDP growth for 2021 is expected to reach [4.4%] (https://www.kiplinger.com/economic-forecasts/gdp) .\nWhat will be the U.S. GDP growth (year on year) at the end of 2021?\nResolution criteria for this question will be sourced from the [Bureau of Economic Analysis] (https://www.bea.gov/) . It will represent the total percent change in GDP growth as measured between reported data from Q4 2020 and Q4 2021. The first estimate that is released will be considered. Data for each quarter for the last several years is provided [here] (https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=19&amp;step=2#) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 130,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art language modelling performance on WikiText-103 be at 2021-06-14 in perplexity?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5924/sota-perplexity-on-wikitext-103-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nLanguage modelling has been applied to a wide range of applications and domains with great success. To name a few, automatic speech recognition, machine translation, spelling correction, touchscreen “soft” keyboards and many natural language processing applications depend on the quality of language models.\nThe [WikiText language modelling dataset] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.07843.pdf) is a collection of over 100 million tokens extracted from the set of verified Good and Featured articles on Wikipedia. These articles have been reviewed by humans and are considered well written, factually accurate, broad in coverage, neutral in point of view, and stable. \nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is\nkNN-LM [(Khandelwal et al. 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.00172v2) , which achieves a perplexity of 15.79 on the WikiTex-103 test set.\nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/language-modelling-on-wikitext-103) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art language modelling performance on WikiText-103 be at 2021-06-14 in perplexity?\nThis question resolves as the lowest level of perplexity achieved by any language model on WikiText-103's test set before 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT. Qualifying models need to be trained on only the WikiText-103's training set—no extra training data may be used.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 156,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the EU GDP growth (year on year) in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5925/eu-gdp-growth-rate-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Annual GDP growth rate in Europe has gradually decreased by approximately 1% between 2017 and 2019, ending with an average growth rate in 2019 of [1.523%] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=EU) . Growth dropped into the negative ranges in 2020 with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, leaving GDP growth to flounder [3.3% in Q1, and fall again 14.8% in Q2] (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Quarterly_national_accounts_-_GDP_and_employment#Quarterly_GDP_growth) . Q3, following similar global trends, saw a bounce back with GDP growth of [12.7%] (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/10663774/2-30102020-BP-EN.pdf/94d48ceb-de52-fcf0-aa3d-313361b761c5) .\nAs new COVID-19 vaccines enter the horizon, the possibility of economic recovery in 2021 looks promising. Commissioner Gentiloni of the European Commission remarked in the Autumn 2020 Press Conference for Economic Forecasts that while GDP is expected to contract over [7% in 2020] (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_20_2040) , 2021 should see just over a [4% increase] (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_20_2040) in growth.\nWill will be the EU GDP growth (year on year) in 2021?\nResolution Criteria will be provided through the [WorldBank] (https://www.worldbank.org/) . It will reflect the total annual percentage change in GDP between 2020 and 2021 as seen in [this graph] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=EU) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 81,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the S&P 500 experience a bear market (peak to trough decline of 20% or more) in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5926/bear-market-in-sp-500-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "The S&amp;P 500 has recently closed at [new record highs] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/07/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-news.html) as part of a sustained recovery that follows a [34% bear market in March/April 2020] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/07/dow-sp-can-keep-climbing-markets-wall-of-worry-history-says.html) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Market analysts [have questioned] (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/stock-market-sentiment-hitting-ludicrous-territory-but-when-will-bulls-pay-the-piper-11607639918) how long the ongoing bullish market run will continue.\nWill the S&amp;P 500 experience a bear market (peak to trough decline of 20% or more)?\nThis will resolve on the basis of whether the [S&amp;P 500] (https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/?symbol=.SPX) experiences a bear market in 2021, defined here as when prices in the market decline by 20% or more. Such a fall can occur over a short time or extended period of time.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 225,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the the market cap of MSFT, AAPL, GOOG, FB, AMZN on 31 December 2021 as a percentage of the total S&P500?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5927/value-of-faang-stocks-as--of-sp-500/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), [Amazon.com] (http://Amazon.com) (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOGL) and Facebook (FB) are collectively widely known as the five big tech companies in the S&amp;P 500, otherwise known as [“FAAMG”] (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/faamg-stocks.asp) . They currently make up about 23% of the overall S&amp;P 500.\nWhat will the the market cap of MSFT, AAPL, GOOG, FB, AMZN on 31 December 2021 as a percentage of the total S&amp;P500?\nThis will resolve on the basis of the market cap of the “FAAMG” tech stocks — Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and Facebook as a percentage of the total S&amp;P 500 on 31 December 2021. Their individual market caps will be added up after the close in the day in question and divided by the overall S&amp;P 500 market value.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 185,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the WTI oil price in December 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5928/wti-oil-price-in-december-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Oil, arguably one of most important commodities in the world, is vital for understanding the global economy. The price for any commodity is driven through the intersection between consumer demand and production supply, so we can effectively use the price of oil to understand complications in consumer/producer dynamics. \nWe use oil for everything; for transportation, industry, agricultural, and residential needs. The transportation industry is the greatest consumer of oil by far, at [68%] (https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/oil-and-petroleum-products/use-of-oil.php) use in all transportation needs for the US and [56% globally] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/economics-econometrics-and-finance/oil-consumption) .\nHowever, with the onset of the novel coronavirus pandemic in 2020, global transportation demand has fallen as fewer people travel both domestically and abroad. An oil price war between Saudi Arabia and Russia during 2020 also caused production stressors. These supply and demand shocks significantly dropped the price of US oil to under <a>$40/barrel</a> in early September 2020. \nThe US Energy Information Association (EIA) [has published its 2021 predictions] (https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/#:~:text=EIA%20expects%20production%20to%20begin,especially%20in%20the%20Permian%20region.) :\n“The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) expects that Brent prices will average $49/b in 2021, up from an expected average of $43/b in the fourth quarter of 2020. The forecast for higher crude oil prices next year reflects EIA's expectation that while inventories will remain high, they will decline with rising global oil demand and restrained OPEC+ oil production. EIA forecasts Brent prices will average $47/b in the first quarter of 2021 and rise to an average of $50/b by the fourth quarter.”\nWhat will be the WTI oil price in December 2021?\nResolution criteria for this question will be obtained from the Federal Reserve and will represent the [global price of WTI crude oil] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/POILWTIUSDM) for the month of December 2021. Data is recorded in US Dollars and is not seasonally adjusted. Data can be retrieved from 1990 onward, and formatted into spreadsheets.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 196,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many plug-in electric vehicle sales will there be in the U.S. in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5929/us-pev-sales-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Information on sales at a global level is often not reported for electric vehicles specifically, making total tallies difficult to procure and often subject to error and estimation. However, according to [InsideEV’s Sales Scorecard] (https://insideevs.com/news/343998/monthly-plug-in-ev-sales-scorecard/) there was a total of 329,528 electric vehicles sold in the US in 2019, an [8.88% drop from 2018] (https://evadoption.com/2019-us-ev-sales-decreased-an-estimated-7-to-9-6-reasons-why/) . As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, electric vehicle sales are declining, partly due to the decrease in gas prices. In the first half of 2020, electric vehicle sales [fell 14%] (https://cleantechnica.com/2020/08/20/global-plugin-vehicle-volumes-fell-14-in-1st-half-of-2020-better-than-auto-markets-28-drop/) , only half of what the regular automobile market experienced with a fall of 28% in global sales.\nOur [question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5527/total-us-ev-sales-in-2020/) on total US PEV sales in 2020 predicts that 290k plug in electric vehicles will be sold throughout the year. This number is expected to grow in 2021 as new EV models enter the market, EV charging infrastructure expands, and as consumer consciousness about the environment increases. \nEV companies such Tesla, Nio and Li Automobile experienced a massive growth in share prices at [409%, 1158%, and 85%] (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/electric-car-boom-even-hotter-000000811.html) respectively since January 2020, showing an enormous movement by consumers and investors alike towards future thinking companies and industries despite hardships brought by COVID-19.\nHow many plug-in electric vehicle sales will there be in the U.S. in 2021?\nData will be provided through the [Alternative Fuels Data Center] (https://afdc.energy.gov/data/) run through the US Department of Energy. [Here] (https://afdc.energy.gov/data/10567) is the graph of PEV sales by company, which also includes the total sold in the US.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 110,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the total number of commercial flights in operation on 30 June 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5931/number-of-commercial-flights-on-30-june-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The daily number of flights in operation globally [dropped precipitously] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-airlines-iata/airlines-set-to-lose-157-billion-amid-worsening-slump-iata-idUSKBN2841KA) this past March/April as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and remains well below 2018 and 2019 figures. The 7-day moving average number of commercial flights on 30 June 2020 was 49,717 compared to 123,304 on 30 June 2019.\nWhat will be the total number of commercial flights in operation on 30 June 2021?\nFlightrader24’s [“2020 7-day moving average”] (https://www.flightradar24.com/data/statistics) for the number of commercial flights on 30 June 2021 will be considered for resolution. The 7-day moving average is used so as to smooth out any day-of-the-week effects.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 118,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will 1bn people have been vaccinated with any vaccine candidate(s) that have demonstrated an efficacy rate >60% in a n>500 RCT?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5934/1bn-people-vaccinated-against-covid-19/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus is a novel betacoronavirus that likely emerged late last year from an animal reservoir in China. There is little to no pre-existing immunity against it in the human population. The clinical picture for the disease it causes, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), ranges from very mild to fatal. The virus is highly transmissible and has spread globally.\nWhile the development of a vaccine is critical for its successful administration at scale, just as critical is the creation and execution of infrastructure necessary for widescale vaccination to greater than 1 billion people.\nThe WHO defines vaccine efficacy as follows:\nVaccine efficacy: % reduction in disease incidence in a vaccinated group compared to an unvaccinated group under optimal conditions\nWhen will 1bn people have been vaccinated with any vaccine candidate(s) that have demonstrated an efficacy rate &gt;60% in a n&gt;500 RCT?\nThis question resolves as the date when the first credible article is published that presents the claim that at least 1 billion people have been administered vaccines that had been shown to have an efficacy rate exceeding 60% in a randomized controlled trial with at least 500 participants. This may all be from the same vaccine, for from multiple vaccines. A vaccine is considered \"administered\" to a person if they receive all the doses as prescribed.\nIf this does not resolve before 31 December 2023, it resolves as &gt;31 December 2023.\nRelated question\n--- [When will 1bn people have been vaccinated with any vaccine candidate(s) that have demonstrated an efficacy rate &gt;75% in a n&gt;500 RCT?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5767/1bn-people-vaccinated-against-covid-19/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 97,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the combined sector weighting of Information Technology and Communications be, in the S&P 500 on 2021-06-14?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5935/it-and-comms-weighting-in-sp500-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nElectricity, internal combustion engines, and semiconductors facilitated automation in the last century, but AI now seems poised to automate many tasks once thought to be out of reach, from driving cars to making medical recommendations and beyond. \nHowever, measured productivity growth has actually declined by half over the past decade [[2]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w24001) . To some extent, this may be evidence that information technology and other conventional stuff (non-informational inputs or outputs) aren't actually so cheaply or widely substitutable [[3]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w21547.pdf) .\nThe prospects of growth of tech and automation may also be constrained by [Baumol’s “cost disease”] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumol%27s_cost_disease) : sectors with rapid productivity growth are able to charge lower prices and subsequently have their share of GDP decline, whilst those with relatively slow productivity growth experience increases in their share of the value contributed to the economy. This might effectively cap the rate of growth of the value of tech as a proportion of the total economy [ [4] (https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/AI.pdf) ].\nBrynjolfsson et al. [[5]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w24001.pdf) have argued that recent progress in AI and automation might well be radically productivity enhancing, but this might yet go largely unnoticed because of an implementation lag: it takes considerable time to be able to sufficiently harness technologies with broad potential application that they qualify as general purpose technologies. Will the stock market bear this out sometime soon?\nWhat will the combined sector weighting of Information Technology and Communications be, in the S&amp;P 500 on 2021-06-14?\nThis resolves as the sum of the sector weightings of Information Technology and Communication Services of the [SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF] (https://us.spdrs.com/en/etf/spdr-sp-500-etf-SPY) on 2021-06-14 (in %), according to its Index Sector Breakdown.\nAs of writing this question, the S&amp;P500 has a 27.71% weighting in IT and 11.13% in Communications Services. If it were to resolve now, it would resolve as 27.71% + 11.13% = 38.84%.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if the S&amp;P500 modifies its sector definition substantially. Specifically, it resolves ambiguously if after such a modification, either:\n--- \nCompanies amounting to &gt;25% of either the IT or Communications sectors by market cap that were previously in either sector are removed\n--- \nCompanies amounting to &gt;25% of of either the IT or Communications sectors that were previously not in either sector are added\n",
    "# Forecasts": 221,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the price of IGM be, on 2021-06-14?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5936/closing-price-igm-on-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \n[iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF] (https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239769/ishares-north-american-tech-etf) (IGM) is an exchange-traded fund that gives broad exposure to the technology sector. IGM holds many key technology companies that may stand to benefit from progress in AI. Its holdings include Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Nvidia, amongst others.\nWhat will the price of IGM be, on 2021-06-14, in nominal USD?\nThis question resolves as the closing price of IGM on 2021-06-14, according to [Yahoo Finance] (https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/IGM/holdings?p=IGM) . Prices are to be given in nominal USD.\nIn the case the ETF splits (or reverse splits), for the purpose of this question, the price at resolution will be scaled up by the split (e.g. a 2:1 split that results in the halving of the ETF price, will result in the resolution value being 2 times the price). In case multiple splits occur, the price will be scaled by the product of all split factors. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 182,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art performance on SuperGLUE be on 2021-06-14?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5937/sota-on-superglue-on-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \n[SuperGLUE] (https://super.gluebenchmark.com/) [(Wang et al., 2019)] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.00537) is a benchmark for evaluating general-purpose language understanding systems. The set of eight tasks in the benchmark emphasises diverse task formats and low-data training data tasks, with nearly half the tasks having fewer than 1k examples and all but one of the tasks having fewer than 10k examples.\nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is T5: Text-To-Text Transfer Transformer [(Raffel et al., 2019)] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10683) , which achieves an average score 89.3, just below the human baseline of 89.8\nThe SuperGLUE leaderboard may be accessed [here] (https://super.gluebenchmark.com/leaderboard) .\nWhat will the state-of-the-art performance on SuperGLUE be on 2021-06-14?\nThis question resolves as the highest level of performance achieved on SuperGLUE up until 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT amongst models trained on any number training set(s). Performance is given in a \"score\", which is the average of various performance metrics (see [Wang et al., 2019] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.00537) for more details).\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 236,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many e-prints on multi-modal machine learning will be published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5938/multi-modal-ml-2020-12-14-to-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\nMultimodal machine learning aims to build models that can process and relate information from multiple modalities (including linguistic, acoustic and visual signals). Multimodal machine learning enables a wide range of applications: from audio-visual speech recognition to image captioning [(Baltrusaitis et al., 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.09406.pdf) .\nHow many e-prints on multi-modal machine learning will be published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period?\nThis question resolves as the total number of e-prints on multi-modal ML systems will be published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question e-prints published over the 2020-12-14 to 2021-06-14 period (inclusive) under Computer Science that contain the following keywords:\n\"Multimodal Machine Learning”, \"multimodal representation”, “multimodal representation learning\", “multimodal AI”, “multimodal artificial intelligence”, “multimodal feature learning”, “multimodal observations”, “Multimodal deep Learning”, “Multimodal reinforcement learning”, “multimodal fusion”, Multi-modal Machine Learning”, Multi-modal Machine Learning”, “multi-modal representation learning”, “multi-modal AI”, “multi-modal artificial intelligence”, “multi-modal feature learning”, “multi-modal observations”, “Multi-modal deep Learning”, “Multi-modal reinforcement learning”, “multi-modal fusion”, “cross-modal learning”, “multi-modality learning”, “multimodality learning\"\nThe query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science). The query may be [executed here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=%22Multimodal+Machine+Learning%22&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;terms-1-operator=OR&amp;terms-1-term=%22multimodal+representation%22&amp;terms-1-field=all&amp;terms-2-operator=OR&amp;terms-2-term=%22multimodal+representation+learning%22&amp;terms-2-field=all&amp;terms-3-operator=OR&amp;terms-3-term=%22multimodal+AI%22&amp;terms-3-field=all&amp;terms-4-operator=OR&amp;terms-4-term=%22multimodal+artificial+intelligence%22&amp;terms-4-field=all&amp;terms-5-operator=OR&amp;terms-5-term=%22multimodal+feature+learning%22&amp;terms-5-field=all&amp;terms-6-operator=OR&amp;terms-6-term=%22multimodal+observations%22&amp;terms-6-field=all&amp;terms-7-operator=OR&amp;terms-7-term=%22Multimodal+deep+Learning%22&amp;terms-7-field=all&amp;terms-8-operator=OR&amp;terms-8-term=%22Multimodal+reinforcement+learning%22&amp;terms-8-field=all&amp;terms-9-operator=OR&amp;terms-9-term=%22multimodal+fusion%22&amp;terms-9-field=all&amp;terms-10-operator=OR&amp;terms-10-term=%22Multi-modal+Machine+Learning%22&amp;terms-10-field=all&amp;terms-12-operator=OR&amp;terms-12-term=%22multi-modal+representation+learning%22&amp;terms-12-field=all&amp;terms-13-operator=OR&amp;terms-13-term=%22multi-modal+AI%22&amp;terms-13-field=all&amp;terms-14-operator=OR&amp;terms-14-term=%22multi-modal+artificial+intelligence%22&amp;terms-14-field=all&amp;terms-15-operator=OR&amp;terms-15-term=%22multi-modal+feature+learning%22&amp;terms-15-field=all&amp;terms-16-operator=OR&amp;terms-16-term=%22multi-modal+observations%22&amp;terms-16-field=all&amp;terms-17-operator=OR&amp;terms-17-term=%22Multi-modal+deep+Learning%22&amp;terms-17-field=all&amp;terms-18-operator=OR&amp;terms-18-term=%22Multi-modal+reinforcement+learning%22&amp;terms-18-field=all&amp;terms-19-operator=OR&amp;terms-19-term=%22multi-modal+fusion%22&amp;terms-19-field=all&amp;terms-20-operator=OR&amp;terms-20-term=%22cross-modal+learning%22&amp;terms-20-field=all&amp;terms-21-operator=OR&amp;terms-21-term=%22multi-modality+learning%22&amp;terms-21-field=all&amp;terms-22-operator=OR&amp;terms-22-term=%22multimodality+learning%22&amp;terms-22-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=2019&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) .\nRunning this query for previous years gives:\n---45 for the calendar year 2017 \n---71 for the calendar year 2018 \n---91 for the calendar year 2019 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 165,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percent will software and information services contribute to US GDP in Q1 of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5939/it-as--of-gdp-in-q1-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nElectricity, internal combustion engines, and semiconductors facilitated automation in the last century, but AI now seems poised to automate many tasks once thought to be out of reach, from driving cars to making medical recommendations and beyond. \nHowever, measured productivity growth has actually declined by half over the past decade [[2]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w24001) . To some extent, this may be evidence that information technology and other conventional stuff (non-informational inputs or outputs) aren't actually so cheaply or widely substitutable [[3]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w21547.pdf) .\nThe prospects of growth of tech and automation may also be constrained by [Baumol’s “cost disease”] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumol%27s_cost_disease) : sectors with rapid productivity growth are able to charge lower prices and subsequently have their share of GDP decline, whilst those with relatively slow productivity growth experience increases in their share of the value contributed to the economy. This might effectively cap the rate of growth of the value of tech as a proportion of the total economy [ [4] (https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/AI.pdf) ].\nBrynjolfsson et al. [[5]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w24001.pdf) have argued that recent progress in AI and automation might well be radically productivity enhancing, but this might yet go largely unnoticed because of an implementation lag: it takes considerable time to be able to sufficiently harness technologies with broad potential application that they qualify as general purpose technologies. Will the economic data bear this out sometime soon?\nWhat percent will software and information services contribute to US GDP in Q1 of 2021?\nThis question resolves the the percentage of total US GDP that is contributed by \" [Publishing industries, except internet (includes software)] (https://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag511.htm) \" and \" [Data processing, internet publishing, and other information services\"] (https://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag51.htm) according to seasonally adjusted data by the [Bureau of Economic Analysis] (https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=150&amp;step=2&amp;isuri=1&amp;categories=gdpxind) .\nin Q2 of 2020, \"Publishing industries, except internet (includes software)\" generated $315.7bn and \"Data processing, internet publishing, and other information services\" generated $285.3bn (both at annual rates). Total annualised GDP for Q2 2020 was $19,520.1bn. Hence, the question for Q2 2020 would resolve as 3.08%.\nHistorical [data may be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YNd1d4W0atK7f0I_rnY7KWdPmzW0vpIFCbgKfGOCB5I/edit?usp=sharing) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 195,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the highest Exact Match rate of the best-performing model on SQuAD2.0 be on 2021-06-14?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5940/squad20-sota-perfomance-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nThe Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD) is a reading comprehension dataset, consisting of questions posed by crowdworkers on a set of Wikipedia articles, where the answer to every question is a segment of text, or span, from the corresponding reading passage, or the question might be unanswerable. SQuAD1 was introduced in 2016 by [Rajpurkar et al] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05250) .\nIn 2018, [Rajpurkar et al] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03822) introduced a SQuAD2.0, which combines the 100,000 questions in SQuAD1.1 with over 50,000 unanswerable questions written adversarially by crowdworkers to look similar to answerable ones. To do well on SQuAD2.0 systems must not only answer questions when possible (like in Squad1) but also determine when no answer is supported by the paragraph and abstain from answering.\nAs of writing this question, the best model is SA-Net on Albert (ensemble), which gets an exact match 90.724% of the time (meaning its predictions match the ground truth exactly, 90.724% of the time). Notably, this is better than human performance, which gets an exact rate at a rate of only 86.83%.\nWhat will the highest Exact Match rate of the best-performing model on SQuAD2.0 be on 2021-06-14?\nThis question resolves as the best SQuAD2.0, in Exact Match, as displayed on [the relevant leaderboard] (https://rajpurkar.github.io/SQuAD-explorer/) at 11:59 PM GMT on 2021-06-14. Performance results reported by e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, or blog articles by reputable AI labs may also be consulted.\nPerformance results must be available before 11:59 PM GMT on 2021-06-14 to qualify. In case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 180,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art language text-to-SQL performance on WikiSQL be at 2021-06-14 in logical form test accuracy?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5941/sota-text-to-sql-on-wikisql-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \n[Structured Query Language (SQL)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL) is a domain-specific language used to manipulate and query data in relational databases. \n[WikiSQL] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1709.00103.pdf) is a corpus of 80654 hand-annotated instances of natural language questions, SQL queries, and SQL tables extracted from 24241 HTML tables from Wikipedia.\nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is [IE-SQL +Execution-Guided Decoding] (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1t3xEltqKpYJGYekAhQ5vYFen1ocHJ3sY/view) , which achieves logical form accuracy of 87.8 on the WikiSQL test set.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art language text-to-SQL performance on WikiSQL be at 2021-06-14 in logical form test accuracy?\nThis question resolves as the highest logical form accuracy by any model on the test set of WikiSQL up until 2021-06-14.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify. Qualifying models may be trained on other datasets besides WikiSQL.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 176,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the total box office gross in the U.S. & Canada in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5942/box-office-gross-in-the-us--canada-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Movie theaters have been [hard-hit] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/09/theater-chains-amc-and-cinemark-take-big-q3-losses-amid-covid-pandemic.html) by COVID-19 public health protocols and public hesitancy. As of 10 December, the total box office gross for the U.S. and Canada in 2020 thus far is $2,035,211,644 as compared to $11,320,845,445 in 2019.\nWhat will be the total box office gross in the U.S. &amp; Canada in 2021?\nThe “total gross” for 2021 on the [“Domestic Yearly Box Office”] (https://www.boxofficemojo.com/year/?ref_=bo_nb_we_secondarytab) page of Box Office Mojo will be consulted for resolution. Here, “domestic yearly box office” refers to the total amount of money spent on tickets by moviegoers in the U.S. and Canada. The relevant figures are to be given in nominal USD.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 96,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many excess deaths will the United States experience during COVID-19 (March 8th 2020 through December 31st 2021)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5943/us-excess-covid-19-deaths/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Assessing [excess mortality] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortality_displacement) is a standard technique for determining the mortality effect of a disease outbreak that does not rely on accurate reporting of cases of disease. It involves estimating the number of deaths that would have occured using historical trends, then comparing that to the number of deaths observed.\nResearch has shown that in the case of COVID-19, [many cases are undetected] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7275155/) , which can result in an undercount of COVID derived mortality.\nAs of December 12th, 2020, [the CDC estimates] (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm) 352,650 excess deaths during the period of Mar 8th-Dec 12th.\nHow many excess deaths will the United States experience during COVID-19 (March 8th 2020 through December 31st 2021)?\nThis question resolves based on the excess deaths reported by the CDC for the period of March 8th 2020 to December 31st, 2021 on or before February 28th, 2022.\nThe value will be determined by downloading the CSV file provided on [this site from the CDC] (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm) . The value is calculated by summing the values in the \"Observed Number\" column and substracting the values in the \"Average Expected Count\" column for the weeks labeled 3/14/2020 through the date closest to 12/31/2021.\nIf this table is no longer being maintained in its exact form, then any comparable data source from the CDC will be used. If no such source is available from the CDC, then a comparable source from another reputable source will be used. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 68,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art performance on image classification on ImageNet be at 2024-12-14 in top-1 accuracy?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5946/sota-on-imagenet-on-2024-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nImage Classification is the task of identifying an image by assigning to it a specific label. Typically, Image Classification refers to images in which only one object appears and is analysed. In contrast, object detection involves both classification and localisation tasks, and is used to analyse more realistic cases in which multiple objects may exist in an image.\nImageNet [(Deng et al., 2009)] (http://www.image-net.org/papers/imagenet_cvpr09.pdf) is a large scale dataset images built upon the backbone of the [WordNet] (https://wordnet.princeton.edu/) structure. ImageNet is one of the largest visual recognition datasets which contains high-resolution images. It has tens of millions of annotated images organized by the semantic hierarchy of WordNet. \nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is EfficientNet-B8 [(Wei et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.11342v1.pdf) , which achieves a top-1 accuracy of 85.8% on ImageNet.\nA good reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art performance on image classification on ImageNet be at 2024-12-14 in top-1 accuracy?\nThis question resolves as the highest level of performance, in top-1 accuracy, achieved on ImageNet up until 2024-12-14, 11:59PM GMT amongst models trained on only the ImageNet's validation set (ImageNet does not clearly demarcate its validation and training sets). No extra training data may be used besides the original ImageNet dataset.\nFor the purpose of this question, augmented versions of the ImageNet dataset, such as ImageNet-V2 [(Recht, 2019)] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10811) , are considered different from [Deng et al., 2009's] (http://www.image-net.org/papers/imagenet_cvpr09.pdf) dataset.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2024-12-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 170,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art language modelling performance on WikiText-103 be at 2026-12-14 in perplexity?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5947/sota-perplexity-on-wikitext-103-2026-12-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nLanguage modelling has been applied to a wide range of applications and domains with great success. To name a few, automatic speech recognition, machine translation, spelling correction, touchscreen “soft” keyboards and many natural language processing applications depend on the quality of language models.\nThe [WikiText language modelling dataset] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.07843.pdf) is a collection of over 100 million tokens extracted from the set of verified Good and Featured articles on Wikipedia. These articles have been reviewed by humans and are considered well written, factually accurate, broad in coverage, neutral in point of view, and stable. \nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is\nkNN-LM [(Khandelwal et al. 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.00172v2) , which achieves a perplexity of 15.79 on the WikiTex-103 test set.\nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/language-modelling-on-wikitext-103) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art language modelling performance on WikiText-103 be at 2026-12-14 in perplexity?\nThis question resolves as the lowest level of perplexity achieved by any language model on WikiText-103's test set before 2026-12-14, 11:59PM GMT. Qualifying models need to be trained on only the WikiText-103's training set—no extra training data may be used.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2026-12-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 168,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the value of the herein defined Image Classification Performance Index be on 2026-12-14?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5948/image-classification-index-2026-12-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nImage classification is the task of identifying an image by assigning to it a specific label. Typically, Image classification refers to images in which only one object appears and is analysed. In contrast, object detection involves both classification and localisation tasks, and is used to analyse more realistic cases in which multiple objects may exist in an image.\nIndex\nThe index is constructed as follows:\n---We take the average (arithmetic mean) of of the state-of-the-art performance across all benchmarks in the index \n---The index is then defined by scaling this mean so that its average value for the year 2019 is 100 \nThe following benchmarks are included in the Image Classification Performance Index:\nImage classification on: [ImageNet] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet) (in top-1 accuracy), [STL-10] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-stl-10) , [CIFAR-100] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100) , [SVHN] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-svhn) , [MiniImagenet 5-way (1-shot)] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/few-shot-image-classification-on-mini-2) , [Tiered ImageNet 5-way (1-shot)] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/few-shot-image-classification-on-tiered) , [CUB 200 5-way 1-shot] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/few-shot-image-classification-on-cub-200-5-1) , [Stanford Cars] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/fine-grained-image-classification-on-stanford) , [CUB200] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/fine-grained-image-classification-on-cub-200-1) , [FGVC Aircraft] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/fine-grained-image-classification-on-fgvc) \nHistorical data on the [Image Classification Performance Index may be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lakiJFeKbgiw8KoYwJ-6NvuZlMZG0cUmx7AH5lUL998/edit?usp=sharing) . As of writing this question, the index is at 114.88 for December 2020.\nWhat will the value of the herein defined Image Classification Performance Index be on 2026-12-14?\nThis question resolves as the value of this index on 2026-12-14, 11:59PM GMT.\nModels that are trained on multiple datasets do not qualify for the purpose of this question—only models trained on benchmark-specific datasets will be considered.\nA benchmark will be removed from the index if:\n---At the time of resolution no new performance data is available for new models for the specific benchmark over the previous 6 months \n---The value of for that benchmark exceeds 10 \nIf a benchmark is removed from the index, the index shall simply be re-constructed according the procedure outlined above.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2026-12-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case error is not natively reported, it is constructed by taking 1-accuracy/100.\nFor the purpose of this question, the SOTA models in 2019 represent in the linked Google sheet are assumed to represent the ground-truth, and to maintain consistency, these won't be revised in case these are found to be erroneous or invalid. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 154,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the the sum of the level of performance (in exaFLOPS) of the all 500 supercomputers in the TOP500 be according to their November 2026 list?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5949/total-compute-top500-supercomputers-nov-2026/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nIn the seven decades since the invention of the [point-contact transistor] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point-contact_transistor) at Bell Labs, relentless progress in the development of semiconductor devices — Moore’s law — has been achieved despite [regular warnings] (https://www.nature.com/news/the-chips-are-down-for-moore-s-law-1.19338) from industry observers about impending limits.\nThe TOP500 project collects and ranks system performance metrics of the most powerful non-distributed computer systems in the world. The project was started in 1993 and publishes an updated list of the supercomputers twice a year. The first of these updates always coincides with the [International Supercomputing Conference] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISC_High_Performance) in June, and the second is presented at the [ACM/IEEE Supercomputing Conference] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACM/IEEE_Supercomputing_Conference) in November.\nThe TOP500 ranks high-performance computing (HPC) by recording how fast a computer system solves a dense n by n system of linear equations in double precision (64 bits) arithmetic on distributed-memory computers ( [TOP500, 2019] (https://www.top500.org/project/linpack/) ). This is an implementation of the High Performance Computing [Linpack Benchmark] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LINPACK_benchmarks) . \nWhat will the the sum of the level of performance (in exaFLOPS) of the all 500 supercomputers in the TOP500 be according to their November 2026 list?\nThis question resolves as the sum of performance (at Rmax) in exaFLOPS (1 exaFLOP = FLOPS) of all supercomputers listed on the November 2026 TOP500 list. \nHistorical data can [be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18Mha2f9RIQCAAg41vm_UkP524pt59vvD7TcjHZ1SHXw/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if TOP500 stops reporting performance in terms of Rmax measured in TFlop/s on the Linpack benchmark. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 149,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What share (in %) of the world's super-compute performance will  United States-based in the June 2030 TOP500 list?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5950/us-share-of-world-supercompute-june-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nSince the TOP500 project was started in 1993, supercomputers in the United States have always made up the majority of the world's super-compute performance [(TOP500, 2019)] (https://www.top500.org/statistics/overtime/) . According to TOP500's biannual report, the share of super-compute based in the United States peaked in November of 2008 at 67.02%, and has since been declining most years and was 28.18% in June 2020.\nWhat share (in %) of the world's super-compute performance will United States-based in the June 2030 TOP500 list?\nThe question resolves as the share of the world's super-compute performance at the maximum achieved performance on the LINPACK benchmark (Rmax), in teraFLOPS, that is based in the United States in the June 2030 TOP500 list. \nYou can find the [relevant chart of the historical shares here] (https://top500.org/statistics/overtime/) .\nData\nHistorical data can [be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zJ20X1TM16gdYuW5JERUqnVLfpwthynG_mAAzZQOxcM/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if TOP500 stops reporting performance in terms of Rmax measured in TFlop/s on the Linpack benchmark. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 143,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the average top price performance (in G3D Mark /$) of the best available GPU be, on December 14, 2026?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5951/top-price-performance-in-g3d-mark--of-gpu/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nMost modern neural network implementations are based on graphics processing units [[1]] (https://www.deeplearningbook.org/) . This is because GPUs have a much larger number of cores than CPUs, and are thus better suited to executing highly parallelizable programs. Hence, migrating data into graphical form and then using the GPU to scan and analyze it can create a large training speedup for training ML models [[2]] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14539) .\n[Videocard benchmarks] (https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/) is a benchmarking project by [Passmark] (https://www.passmark.com/) , a software company. It aggregates performance and price data on GPUs. One of the measures of performance it uses is [3DMark] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3DMark) , a computer benchmarking tool.\nWhat will the average top price performance (in G3D Mark /$) of the best available GPU be, on December 14, 2026?\nThis question resolves as the mean price performance (in G3D Mark / Price) of the top two currently available GPUs by price performance, on December 14, 2026, 11:59PM GMT, according to [Videocard benchmarks] (https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/) .\nGPU prices used to calculate price performance by Passmark will be converted to 2020 USD. Prices are adjusted to (average) 2020 prices using [Consumer Price Index: Total All Items for the United States] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPALTT01USQ661S) .\nThe question resolves ambiguously if [Videocard benchmarks] (https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/) ceases to report G3D Mark, or its methodology changes substantially. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 156,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will Alphabet Inc.'s market capitalisation be at market close on 2026-12-14 in 2020 USD?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5955/alphabet-incs-market-cap-on-2026-12-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nAlphabet Inc. is he parent company of Google. As of 5 December, 2020, Alphabet Inc.'s market capitalisation was $1.235tr (in 2020 USD).\nGoogle has a few AI labs. Amongst these are [Google Brain] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Brain) and [DeepMind] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeepMind) . Many of their products and services (such as their search engine and [their self-driving car subsidiary] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waymo) ) are much infused by the latest innovations in machine learning.\nWhat will Alphabet Inc.'s market capitalisation be at market close on 2026-12-14 in trillions of 2020 USD?\nThis question resolves as Alphabet Inc.'s market capitalisation in trillions of USD at market close on 2026-12-14, according to [Yahoo Finance] (https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/GOOG/) . \nIn case the financial market data reports different market capitalisations for different share classes, this question resolves according the the figure for Alphabet Inc Class A (ticker $GOOGL).\nPrices are are to be adjusted from Q4 2026 prices to average 2019 prices using [Consumer Price Index: Total All Items for the United States] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPALTT01USQ661S) .\nIn case Alphabet Inc. is no longer a publicly traded company on 2026-12-14, the question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 200,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percent will software and information services contribute to US GDP in Q4 of 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5958/it-as--of-gdp-in-q4-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nElectricity, internal combustion engines, and semiconductors facilitated automation in the last century, but AI now seems poised to automate many tasks once thought to be out of reach, from driving cars to making medical recommendations and beyond. \nHowever, measured productivity growth has actually declined by half over the past decade [[2]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w24001) . To some extent, this may be evidence that information technology and other conventional stuff (non-informational inputs or outputs) aren't actually so cheaply or widely substitutable [[3]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w21547.pdf) .\nThe prospects of growth of tech and automation may also be constrained by [Baumol’s “cost disease”] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumol%27s_cost_disease) : sectors with rapid productivity growth are able to charge lower prices and subsequently have their share of GDP decline, whilst those with relatively slow productivity growth experience increases in their share of the value contributed to the economy. This might effectively cap the rate of growth of the value of tech as a proportion of the total economy [ [4] (https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/AI.pdf) ].\nBrynjolfsson et al. [[5]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w24001.pdf) have argued that recent progress in AI and automation might well be radically productivity enhancing, but this might yet go largely unnoticed because of an implementation lag: it takes considerable time to be able to sufficiently harness technologies with broad potential application that they qualify as general purpose technologies. Will the economic data bear this out sometime soon?\nWhat percent will software and information services contribute to US GDP in Q4 of 2030?\nThis question resolves the the percentage of total US GDP that is contributed by \" [Publishing industries, except internet (includes software)] (https://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag511.htm) \" and \"[Data processing, internet publishing, and other information services] [https://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag51.htm()] (https://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag51.htm()) \" according to seasonally adjusted data by the [Bureau of Economic Analysis] (https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=150&amp;step=2&amp;isuri=1&amp;categories=gdpxind) .\nin Q2 of 2020, \"Publishing industries, except internet (includes software)\" generated $315.7bn and \"Data processing, internet publishing, and other information services\" generated $285.3bn (both at annual rates). Total annualised GDP for Q2 2020 was $19,520.1bn. Hence, the question for Q2 2020 would resolve as 3.08%.\nHistorical [data may be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YNd1d4W0atK7f0I_rnY7KWdPmzW0vpIFCbgKfGOCB5I/edit?usp=sharing) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 161,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the Federal Reserves' Industrial Production Index be for December 2026, for semiconductors, printed circuit boards and related products?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5960/dec-2026-production-of-semiconductors/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nSemiconductor devices are key devices in modern electronics. The main applications as electronic devices are junction diodes, transistors, and memories, which are widely used in large-scale integrated circuits [[1]] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0123694019004976) . The [printed circuit board] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printed_circuit_board) is the platform upon which microelectronic components such as semiconductor chips and capacitors are mounted.\nWhat will the [Federal Reserves' Industrial Production Index] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPB53122S) be for December 2026, for semiconductors, printed circuit boards and related products?\nThis question resolves as the value of the Federal Reserves' Industrial Production (IP) Index [Industrial Production: Durable Goods Materials: Semiconductors, Printed Circuit Boards, and Other] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPB53122S) for December 2026. \nThe industrial production (IP) index measures the real output of all relevant establishments located in the United States, regardless of their ownership, but not those located in U.S. territories.\nThe index is constructed so that the mean value for the base period 2012 is 100. In case the Index adopts a different base period, we shall reconstruct the series so that the mean value for 2012 is 100 and use this transformed index to resolve the question.\nIn case a new base-period by the FED, admins will still resolve the question by constructing the index such that the base-period remains 2012. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 120,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Reinforcement Learning e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2031-01-01 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5961/reinforcement-learning-2021-01-01-2031-01-01/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\nReinforcement learning (RL) is a subfield of machine learning, based on rewarding desired behaviours and/or punishing undesired ones of an agent interacting with its environment [(Sutton and Barto, 2014)] (https://web.stanford.edu/class/psych209/Readings/SuttonBartoIPRLBook2ndEd.pdf) .\nHow many Reinforcement Learning e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2031-01-01?\nThis question resolves as the total number of Reinforcement Learning e-prints published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2031-01-01 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question, Reinforcement Learning e-prints are those published under Computer Science that contain any of the following key words in \"all fields\":\n\"Reinforcement Learning\", \"DQN\", \"Q-learning\", \"Deep Q Network\", \"Temporal difference learning\", \"Sarsa\", \"TD learning\" \"Proximal policy optimization\"\nThe query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science). The query [may be executed here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=%22Reinforcement+Learning%22&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;terms-1-operator=OR&amp;terms-1-term=%22DQN%22&amp;terms-1-field=all&amp;terms-2-operator=OR&amp;terms-2-term=%22Q-learning%22&amp;terms-2-field=all&amp;terms-3-operator=OR&amp;terms-3-term=%22Temporal+difference+learning%22&amp;terms-3-field=all&amp;terms-4-operator=OR&amp;terms-4-term=%22Deep+Q+Network%22&amp;terms-4-field=all&amp;terms-5-operator=OR&amp;terms-5-term=%22Sarsa%22&amp;terms-5-field=all&amp;terms-6-operator=OR&amp;terms-6-term=%22TD+learning%22&amp;terms-6-field=all&amp;terms-7-operator=OR&amp;terms-7-term=%22Proximal+policy+optimization%22&amp;terms-7-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) .\nRunning this query for previous years gives:\n---779 for the calendar year 2017 \n---1,404 for the calendar year 2018 \n---2,287 for the calendar year 2019 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 179,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many e-prints on Few-Shot Learning will be published on arXiv over the 2020-01-01 to 2027-01-01 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5962/few-shot-learning-2020-12-14-to-2027-01-01/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\nFew-shot learning methods have been developed to explicitly optimize machine learning models that predict new classes using only a few labelled examples per class. Few-shot learners use prior knowledge, and can generalize to new tasks containing only a few samples with supervised information [(Wang et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.05046.pdf) .\nHow many e-prints on Few-Shot Learning will be published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2027-01-01 period?\nThis question resolves as the total number of Few-Shot Learning e-prints published on arXiv over the 2020-12-14 to 2027-01-01 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question, Few-Shot Learning e-prints are those published under Computer Science that contain any of the following key words in \"all fields\":\n\"few shot\", \"1-shot\", \"one-shot\", \"five-shot\", \"10-shot\", \"ten-shot\", \"zero shot\", \"0 shot\", \"low-shot learning\", \"small sample learning\"\nThe query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science).\nThe query can be [executed here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?advanced=&amp;terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=%22few+shot%22&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;terms-1-operator=OR&amp;terms-1-term=%221-shot%22&amp;terms-1-field=all&amp;terms-2-operator=OR&amp;terms-2-term=%22one-shot%22&amp;terms-2-field=all&amp;terms-3-operator=OR&amp;terms-3-term=%22five-shot%22&amp;terms-3-field=all&amp;terms-4-operator=OR&amp;terms-4-term=%2210-shot%22&amp;terms-4-field=all&amp;terms-5-operator=OR&amp;terms-5-term=%22ten-shot%22&amp;terms-5-field=all&amp;terms-6-operator=OR&amp;terms-6-term=%22zero+shot%22&amp;terms-6-field=all&amp;terms-7-operator=OR&amp;terms-7-term=%220+shot%22&amp;terms-7-field=all&amp;terms-8-operator=OR&amp;terms-8-term=%22low-shot+learning%22&amp;terms-8-field=all&amp;terms-9-operator=OR&amp;terms-9-term=%22small+sample+learning%22&amp;terms-9-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) . Running this query for previous years gives:\n---203 for the calendar year 2017 \n---350 for the calendar year 2018 \n---700 for the calendar year 2019 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 238,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the value of the herein defined Object Detection Performance Index be on 2021-06-14?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5965/object-detection-index-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nObject detection is the task of detecting instances of objects of a certain class within an image.\nWhat will the value of the herein defined Object Detection Performance Index be on 2021-06-14?\nIndex\nThe index is constructed as follows:\n---We take the average (arithmetic mean) of of the state-of-the-art performance across all benchmarks in the index \n---The index is then defined by scaling this mean so that its average value for the year 2019 is 100 \nThe following benchmarks are included in the Object Detection Performance Index:\nObject detection on: [COCO test] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/object-detection-on-coco) , [COCO minival] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/object-detection-on-coco-minival) , [CrowdHuman (full body)] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/object-detection-on-coco-minival) . 3D object detection on: [KITTI Cars Moderate] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-kitti-cars-moderate) , [KITTI Cars Easy] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-kitti-cars-easy) , [KITTI Cars Hard] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-kitti-cars-hard) , [KITTI Cyclists Hard] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-kitti-cyclists-hard) , [KITTI Pedestrians Moderate] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-kitti-pedestrians) , [SUN-RGBD val] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-sun-rgbd-val) , [Real-time object detection on COCO] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/real-time-object-detection-on-coco) , and [Weakly Supervised object detection on Pascal VOC 2007] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/weakly-supervised-object-detection-on-pascal-1) .\nHistorical data on the [Object Detection Performance Index may be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q1elx7DnblyQ9K9hoJiF8auiB-f6sErreWzjIecyq50/edit?usp=sharing) .\nWhat will the value of the herein defined Object Detection Performance Index be on 2021-06-14?\nThis question resolves as the value of this index on 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT.\nModels that are trained on multiple datasets do not qualify for the purpose of this question—only models trained on benchmark-specific datasets will be considered.\nA benchmark will be removed from the index if:\n---At the time of resolution no new performance data is available for new models for the specific benchmark over the previous 6 months \n---The value of for that benchmark exceeds 10 \nIf a benchmark is removed from the index, the index shall simply be re-constructed according the procedure outlined above.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nFor the purpose of the index, error is calculated as 1-(average precision)/100. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 172,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What proportion of last-round votes will Andrew Yang get in the 2021 New York mayoral primary election?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5974/yang-last-round-vote-share-2021-ny-mayor/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Andrew Yang is an entrepreneur and philanthropist from New York City who ran a surprisingly effective long-shot Democratic primary campaign in the 2020 Presidential election. He was noted for his quirky, upbeat campaigning style and raucous online fanbase.\nNew York mayor Bill de Blasio is ineligible to run for re-election in November 2021 due to term limits. With 70% of New York voters registered as Democrats to only 10% Republicans, the election to replace him is in effect the Democratic Party mayoral primary on June 22, 2021. There are already several strong declared and potential candidates, including city Comptroller Scott Stringer and Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams. As of mid-December, 2020, Yang is widely regarded as a candidate although he has yet made no public declaration.\nIn 2021, for the first time, New York's municipal elections will use a ranked-choice or \"instant runoff\" system. Voters rank up to five candidates in preference order, and if no candidate has an outright majority of first-round votes, an algorithm analogous to multiple rounds of eliminations and runoff elections produces an eventual winner.\nWhat proportion of last-round votes will Andrew Yang get in the 2021 New York mayoral primary election?\nThis question will resolve as the proportion of votes recieved by Yang in the last round, after enough candidates have been eliminated to give one candidate 50% or greater votes. If Yang is eliminated before the last round is reached, it will resolve as 0%. \nQuestion resolves according to official numbers published online by the NYC Board of Elections. Proportion is proportion of last-round votes, not share of the overall electorate as sometimes reported; for example, if [ballot exhaustion] (https://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_exhaustion) resulted in a final result reported as Yang 46%, Stringer 40%, Yang's proportion would be .535, not .46. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 59,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will enough signatures be gathered to schedule a recall election for California Govenor Gavin Newsom?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5979/ca-gov-newsom-petitioned-for-recall-election/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "81%",
    "Description": "An effort to recall California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) was launched on June 10, 2020. Supporters of the recall have until March 17, 2021, to collect the 1,495,709 signatures needed to require a recall election. In total, five recall petitions against Newsom have failed to qualify for the ballot.\nThe Constitution of California allows for recall elections to be held, if petitioners can collect signatures equal to 12% of the number of votes cast in the last election. In 2018, 12,464,235 total votes were cast in the governor's race.\nThe current recall petition has currently collected [495 thousand] (https://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/recalls/newsom-heatlie-sixth.pdf) signatures out of the 1.5 million needed.\nWill California Gov Gavin Newsom have a recall effort reach the signature threshold needed for certification before Mar 31, 2022 ?\nThis question resolves positive if the California Secretary of State certifies that a recall petition has reached the 1,495,709 signatures needed to trigger a recall. This question is for any recall effort which is sucessfully submitted by March 31, 2022, even if the current petition does not reach the required signatures.\nThe counting of the signatures and verification may take longer than March 31, 2022 to be confirmed. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 398,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a Glastonbury Festival take place in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5986/glastonbury-festival-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "45%",
    "Description": "The 50th Glastonbury Festival was supposed to take place in 2020, but was [cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic] (https://www.glastonburyfestivals.co.uk/a-statement-from-glastonbury-festival/) . It is now [scheduled to take place 23rd - 27th June 2021] (https://www.glastonburyfestivals.co.uk/a-statement-from-glastonbury-festival/#FAQ) .\nThe organisers are ['doing everything they can' to make the festival go ahead in 2021, but are 'still quite a long way from being able to say we're confident 2021 will go ahead'] (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-55315202) .\nWill a Glastonbury Festival take place in 2021?\nThis question resolves positively if a Glastonbury Festival with at least 100,000 people present and lasting at least 72 hours takes place in Pilton, Somerset in 2021. Otherwise, it resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 63,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the unemployment rate be for German law degree holders in 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5987/unemployment-rate-for-german-lawyers-in-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Artificial Intelligence (AI)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence) is causing job losses in many sectors. While the most obvious jobs being lost are related to easily automatizable tasks in factories [ [1] (http://(https://www.americanactionforum.org/insight/understanding-job-loss-predictions-from-artificial-intelligence/)) ], [many expect] (https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/08/self-driving-cars-will-destroy-a-lot-of-jobs-theyll-also-create-a-lot/) large numbers of jobs to be lost in the transportation sector in the coming years due to self-driving cars. However, not all job losses are related to lower class workers, [but also to higher class such as lawyers] (https://www.forbes.com/sites/cognitiveworld/2019/02/09/will-a-i-put-lawyers-out-of-business/) . These trends affect all industrialized nations. The German unemployment rate has, however, been [decreasing steadily for a number of years] (http://(https://www.statista.com/statistics/227005/unemployment-rate-in-germany/)) .\nWhat will the unemployment rate be for German law degree holders in 2025?\n---Numbers will be taken from [the Arbeitsagentur (the Federal Employment Agency)] (https://www.arbeitsagentur.de/en/welcome) . For instance, [the 2017 numbers are available in the 2020 report] (https://statistik.arbeitsagentur.de/DE/Statischer-Content/Statistiken/Themen-im-Fokus/Berufe/Generische-Publikationen/Broschuere-Akademiker.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&amp;v=4) , page 90. A total of 356000 people with a law degree in the workforce, and 4600 unemployed, thus giving a rate of 1.3%. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 30,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "For the month of February 2021, what will the US Bureau of Labor Statistics report as the preliminary monthly nonfarm payroll number (in millions)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5990/february-2021-us-nonfarm-payrolls-figure-be/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\n[Nonfarm payroll employment] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonfarm_payrolls) is a compiled name for goods, construction and manufacturing companies in the US. It does not include farm workers, private household employees, or non-profit organization employees.\nIt is an influential statistic and economic indicator released monthly by the United States Department of Labor as part of a comprehensive report on the state of the labor market.\nThe Bureau of Labor Statistics releases preliminary data on the third Friday after the conclusion of the reference week, i.e., the week which includes the 12th of the month, at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time; typically this date occurs on the first Friday of the month. Nonfarm payroll is included in the monthly Employment Situation or informally the jobs report and affects the US dollar, the Foreign exchange market, the bond market, and the stock market. \nYou can see [historical data for this figure here.] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/non-farm-payrolls) \nDue to the [ongoing coronavirus pandemic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic) , there has been a major selloff in world financial markets, and [more than 22 million Americans lost their jobs in a four-week period during March and April 2020.] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/jobless-claims) The unemployment rate, while falling slowly, sat at [6.7%] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE) by the end of November. And, by December, over [300,000] (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#cases_casesper100klast7days) Americans had lost their lives.\nWith [a vaccine] (https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-vaccines?adgroupsurvey={adgroupsurvey}&amp;gclid=Cj0KCQiA2uH-BRCCARIsAEeef3kg3TCUoqZseDlkxV2d9p1jPRvkWnPez6NAWX7QBlzz5pHhhOdaONUaAo5yEALw_wcB) on the way, more people should be able to return to work as the economy re-opens, raising the labor force and employment rates.\nFor the month of February 2021, what will the US Bureau of Labor Statistics report as the preliminary monthly nonfarm payroll number (in millions)?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution should cite the US Bureau of Labor Statistics release of the preliminary [NFP figure] (https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001&amp;output_view=net_1mth) for the month of February, which will be released in early March. This question does not refer to any later revisions that may be released.\nA similar question was asked for October [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4943/what-will-the-october-2020-us-nonfarm-payrolls-figure-be/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 67,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the average vacancy rate for commercial real estate (i.e. multi-family, industrial, retail, and hotel) be in Q2 of 2021, in the US?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5991/us-commercial-real-estate-vacancy-q2-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nThe coronavirus pandemic represents an unprecedented disruption to the commercial real estate market. Workplace policies are changing in remote-compatible industries – there is an ever-growing [list of companies] (https://www.fastcompany.com/90508784/heres-an-ever-growing-list-of-companies-that-will-let-people-work-from-home-forever) shifting toward allowing employees to work from home, in some cases permanently. At the same time, nearly half of retailers are not paying rent – only 58.6% of retail rents [were paid] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/06/03/next-big-problem-businesses-cant-or-wont-pay-their-rent-its-setting-off-dangerous-chain-reaction/) in April and May. However, with the winter season entering full gear, holiday retail sales are expected to increase [3.6 to 5.2%] (https://nrf.com/research/monthly-economic-review-december-2020) over 2019 with total sales estimated between $755B and 766B, which should hopefully increase the ability for retailers to begin paying full rent once more. \nAs of mid-May 2020, [CBRE] (https://www.cbre-ea.com/publications/deconstructing-cre-post/deconstructing-cre/2020/05/14/office-forecast-q1-2020) expected “U.S. office vacancy to rise from its current 12% to almost 15% within a year.” However, office vacancy had already risen to 17% in the first quarter of 2020, according to an [REIS] (https://www.reis.com/q1-2020-office-first-glance/) report. By the second quarter, it fell only 2% to [15%] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/194054/us-office-vacancy-rate-forecasts-from-2010/#:~:text=Office%20vacancy%20rates%20in%20the%20U.S.%202019%2D2020&amp;text=In%20the%20United%20States%2C%20vacancy,the%20impact%20of%20the%20coronavirus.) .\nIn May, the Urban Land Institute produced a [consensus forecast] (https://americas.uli.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/06/Spring-2020-Economic-Forecast-Final.pdf) that provides some context:\nCommercial real estate transaction volume reached $588 billion in 2019, a post-Great Financial Crisis peak. Volume is expected to be over 50% lower in 2020 with a forecast of $275 billion. Forecasts for ‘21 and ’22 show growth of $400 billion and $500 billion, respectively. \nAccording to a [National Association of Realtors survey from May 2020] (https://www.nar.realtor/sites/default/files/documents/2019-q4-commercial-real-estate-market-trends-and-outlook-04-14-2020.pdf) (p. 11), 22% of commercial members who responded believe that the commercial real estate market transactions will decrease by more than 20% in the next 12 months, while 15% believe that 1-year leasing volume will decrease by more than 20%. \n[Recent data] (https://cdn.nar.realtor/sites/default/files/documents/2020-real-estate-forecast-summit-2020-consensus-forecast-12-10-2020.pdf) from November through December, released from the National Association of Realtors Survey, indicates that office vacancy rates will fall 3% heading into 2021, while retail vacancy rates will continue to increase to 11%. Industrial and multi-family vacancy rates are predicted to stay level at 5% and 6% respectively, while hotels experience a 2% drop.\nWhat will the average vacancy rate for commercial real estate (i.e. multi-family, industrial, retail, and hotel) be in Q2 of 2021, in the US?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nThis question will resolve according to the average commercial vacancy rate reported by the National Association of Realtors' [Quarterly Commercial Real Estate Trends &amp; Outlook Report] (https://www.nar.realtor/commercial-real-estate-market-trends-and-outlook) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 37,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the total deal value be of all the US PE deals in billions of US$, in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5992/total-us-private-equity-deals-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nPrivate equity typically refers to investment funds, generally organized as limited partnerships, that buy and restructure companies that are not publicly traded.\nAs with most other economic activity in the United States, private equity has been impacted by the Covid-19. Some mechanisms through which the pandemic is affecting activity on private markets include [increased uncertainty] (https://www.ey.com/en_gl/private-equity/how-private-equity-will-respond-to-the-next-economic-downturn) about the long-run prospects of businesses, and a general economic slump that affects company valuations.\nTotal annual private equity deal value is tracked by Pitchbook, a financial data company. Previous total annual private equity deal values were, [according to Pitchbook] (https://chinookadvisors.com/owners-resources/2019/7/25/the-chinook-report-2h) , were:\n---2008: $312 \n---2009: $138 \n---2010: $284 \n---2011: $336 \n---2012: $375 \n---2013: $434 \n---2014 $544 \n---2015 $512 \n---2016 $610 \n---2017 $629 \n---2018 $730 \n---2019 $678 \nAll in billions of 2019 US$.\nWhat will the total deal value be of all the US PE deals in billions of US$, in 2021?\n\nResolution\n==========\n\nThis question resolves on the basis of Pitchbook data, in terms of 2021 US$. A similar question for 2020 can be found [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4722/what-will-the-total-deal-value-be-of-all-the-us-private-equity-deals-in-billions-of-us-in-2020/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 36,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Washington state’s Department of Revenue report a gross business income for Q1 2021 that reaches or exceeds pre-COVID levels from Q1 2019?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5993/washington-q1-2021-business-income--q1-2019/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "40%",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nTravel restrictions, market crashes, lockdown orders, and many other consequences related to COVID-19 are affecting businesses and workers. \nAs of now, over 300,000 Americans have died from COVID-19, however, with a vaccine on the way, the economy should, hopefully, be able to re-open and begin normal, pre-COVID operations in 2021.\nWill Washington state’s Department of Revenue report a gross business income for Q1 2021 that reaches or exceeds pre-COVID levels from Q1 2019?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nGross business income (across all industries) for each quarter can be found [here] (http://apps.dor.wa.gov/ResearchStats/Content/GrossBusinessIncome/Report.aspx) . Data until Q2 is currently available. \nAnother question for Q1 2020 can be found [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3923/what-will-washington-states-department-of-revenue-report-as-the-2020-q1-gross-business-income/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 38,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the average percentage change in property and casualty insurance premiums in Q1 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5994/-change-in-pc-insurance-premiums-q1-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nThe property and casualty insurance market is a [$1.6 trillion industry] (https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/financial%20services/our%20insights/state%20of%20property%20and%20casualty%20insurance%202020/state-of-property-and-casualty-insurance-2020.ashx#:~:text=As%20a%20whole%2C%20property%20and,has%20yet%20to%20be%20disrupted.) , and according to McKinsey, “remains one of the few industries that has yet to be disrupted.” P&amp;C insurance premiums represent an important metric for business owners as they plan for the cost of protecting their businesses from risk. According to the [National Association of Insurance Commissioners] (https://www.naic.org/documents/topic_insurance_industry_snapshots_2018_annual_property_casualty_analysis_report.pdf) :\nSoft market conditions have gripped the U.S. property and casualty insurance industry since 2007. Some characteristics of a soft market are flat or declining rates, more relaxed underwriting standards, and increased competition among insurers. \nFollowing the industry’s [2017 highest-ever losses] (https://www.swissre.com/media/news-releases/2018/nr20180410_sigma_global_insured_loses_highest_ever.html) , predominantly caused by a catastrophic increase in climate related incidents such as wildfires, flooding, and the hurricane season, the P&amp;C insurance market saw a [49.5% net income increase in 2018] (https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/topic_insurance_industry_snapshots_2018_annual_property_casualty_analysis_report.pdf) , followed by a [7.9% net income increase in 2019] (https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/YE2019%20Industry%20Report.pdf) .\nAccording to the [Council of Insurance Agents &amp; Brokers] (https://www.ciab.com/download/18848/) :\nPremium pricing increased an average of 3.5 percent in Q1 2019, compared to 2.4 percent in Q4 2018 and 1.6 percent in Q3 2018.\nThe same report identifies the highest premium increase in the last 10 years as 28.5% in Q4 of 2001.\nCOVID-19 appears to be precipitating a hardening of the market, and [CIAB reports] (https://www.ciab.com/resources/covid-19-and-continued-market-hardening-put-stress-on-p-c-market-in-q1-2020-according-to-ciab-market-survey/) that premium prices across all-sized accounts increased by an average of 9.6% in Q1 2020, representing the 10th consecutive quarter of premium increases.\nCIAB's report from Q2 2020 states that:\n\"The average premium price increase for all-sized accounts broke double digits in Q2 2020, at 10.8%, compared to 9.3% in Q1 and 7.5% in Q4 2019.\"\nWhat will be the average percentage change in property and casualty insurance premiums in Q1 2022?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nThis question will resolve according to [CIAB’s Quarterly Market Outlook report] (https://www.ciab.com/market-intel/) for Q1 2022.\nA question for Q1 2021 can be found [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4705/what-will-be-the-average-percentage-change-in-property-and-casualty-insurance-premiums-in-q1-2021/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "For the calendar year 2021, will peak monthly US unemployment occur within Q1?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5995/will-us-peak-unemployment-in-2021-be-in-q1/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "67%",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nIn February 2020, the [US unemployment rate] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate) fell from 3.6% to 3.5%, the lowest level in more than 50 years. However, due to the ongoing [COVID-19 pandemic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic) and associated shutdowns of economic activity, the US unemployment rate spiked to 14.7% in April, but has since decreased to 6.7% by November. \nHeading into winter, where outdoor social distancing becomes more difficult, and the holiday season draws people towards socializing with family and friends, COVID-19 deaths peaked over [300,000] (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#cases_casesper100klast7days) with over [2,500] (https://covidtracking.com/data/charts/us-daily-deaths) new deaths a day by December 16th. Rising cases and failure to social distance can [push cities back into lockdown] (https://www.usatoday.com/storytelling/coronavirus-reopening-america-map/) , causing economic duress and a potential return to higher unemployment rates like we saw in Q2 of 2020. \nHowever, as the new vaccine makes its way across America and herd immunity becomes an attainable goal, more people should be able to return to work. As the economy opens and consumption increases, putting money back into the hands of corporations, [employment should increase] (https://news.umich.edu/u-m-economists-see-us-growth-slowing-until-coronavirus-vaccine-becomes-broadly-available/) .\nFor the calendar year 2021, will peak monthly unemployment occur within Q1?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution should cite the official US unemployment rate from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics' monthly Employment Situation report.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 44,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will (seasonally-adjusted, annualized) unemployment insurance payments be in 2021 Q1, in billions of $USD?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5996/cares-act-unemployment-payments-in-2021-q1/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nIn the U.S., 2020 Q2 saw vastly expanded unemployment insurance transfers ( [FRED source] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/W825RC1) ), up to approximately $1.1 trillion in 2020 Q2 from a baseline of $27.7 billion in 2019 (figures seasonally adjusted and annualized).\nA [large fraction] (https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2020-07/effects-of-selected-federal-pandemic-response-programs-on-personal-income-2020q2-advance.pdf) of this increase was due to the Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation (PUC) program, which provided an additional $600/week unemployment payment until it expired on July 31st, 2020. \nA new [COVID-19 relief bill] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/14/what-is-in-the-bipartisan-coronavirus-relief-bill-unveiled-monday.html) came before Congress this Monday, December 14th, offering $908 billion dollars. \n“The package is broken into two bills: The $738 billion Bipartisan Emergency COVID Relief Act of 2020 includes funding for enhanced unemployment benefits, another round of small business loans, emergency food assistance and emergency rental relief, among many other provisions, according to a summary of the package. Meanwhile, the $160 billion Bipartisan State and Local Support and Small Business Protection Act of 2020 provides liability insurance for businesses and funding for state, local and tribal aid.”\nIn its [Personal Income and Outlays] (https://www.bea.gov/data/income-saving/personal-income) reports, the BEA provides monthly, quarterly, and annual figures including total unemployment insurance transfers.\nHistorical data is provided on BEA's National Accounts [archive] (https://apps.bea.gov/histdata/histChildLevels.cfm?HMI=7) . As an example, the data from July 2020 is provided [here] (https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/2020-08/pi0720.pdf#page=7) .\nA similar question for Q4 2020 can be found [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5242/cares-act-unemployment-payments-in-2020-q4/) \nWhat will (seasonally-adjusted, annualized) unemployment insurance payments be in 2021 Q1, in billions of $USD?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolves based on the latest BEA [Personal Income and Outlays report] (https://www.bea.gov/data/income-saving/personal-income) as of the question resolution date, titled \"Unemployment insurance\", using the seasonally-adjusted annualized figure for 2021 Q1. As of the October 2020 release, this row is on line 26 of Table 1. If no BEA estimates have been released by the question resolution date, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 97,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the US Q1 2021 GDP growth rate be according to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis Advance Estimate?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5997/us-q1-2021-gdp-growth-rate/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nEvery quarter, the US Bureau of Economic Analysis releases an Advance Estimate of GDP growth in the previous three months. The Advance Estimate is the first estimate of gross domestic product and its components for a quarter.\nYou can see historical quarterly GDP growth rates for the [United States here] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp-growth) .\nThe US economy expanded by an annualized 33.1% in Q3 2020, beating forecasts of a 31% surge. It was the biggest expansion ever, following a record 31.4% plunge in Q2, as the economy rebounds from the coronavirus pandemic. Metaculus estimates the [Q4 GDP growth rate] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5660/us-q4-2020-gdp-growth-rate/) for 2020 will be approximately 8.44%.\nWhat will the US Q1 2021 annualized GDP growth rate be according to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis Advance Estimate?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nThis data is expected to be released sometime in early Q2 2021. Resolution should cite the BEA's Advance Estimate, rather than any later revisions.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 77,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many athletes will have signed the High Impact Athletes giving pledge by the end of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5999/number-of-hia-pledges-by-end-of-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[High Impact Athletes] (https://highimpactathletes.com/mission) is a new organisation set up by professional tennis player [Marcus Daniell] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Daniell) , which aims to spread effective giving in professional sport. After [launching] (https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/Fm3HWDZKtwdkvBzGL/introducing-high-impact-athletes) at the end of November, their website now lists 20 professional athletes who have taken the pledge.\nThis question asks:\nHow many athletes with HIA pledges will there be at the end of 2021?\nTo count as having taken the pledge, athletes must commit to donating at least 2% of their earnings to effective charities. Resolution will be according to data from HIA themselves, who have been involved in this question's development. A current list is available [here] (https://highimpactathletes.com/athletes) , but at the time of question writing it is updated manually, so it is not guaranteed to remain perfectly up to date. \nIf HIA ceases to exist for any reason, this question will resolve as &lt;20. Athletes are not legally bound to their pledges, and so may renege on them. Athletes who have made a pledge but later decided to stop following it shall not count for the purposes of resolution. If HIA decides to change their minimum recommendation to more than 2%, athletes will count if their pledge is at least the minimum commitment at the time they made it. If HIA decides to change their minimum recommendation to less than 2%, athletes pledging less than 2% shall not be counted for the purposes of this question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 41,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will scientists conclude that delaying SARS-CoV2 vaccines second dose did or would have saved lives?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6000/lives-saved-by-seconddosedelay-for-vaccine/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "80%",
    "Description": "Delaying the second dose would allow more people to be vaccinated faster. This could control the pandemic sooner if immunity does not fade too quickly after the first dose. \nThe effectiveness of vaccine over time with/without the second dose is still being studied. Both the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines were designed to be administered in two doses, 21 days apart for Pfizer and 28 days for Moderna. \n[Michael Mina] (https://twitter.com/michaelmina_lab?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor) and [Zeynep Tupfekci] (https://twitter.com/zeynep?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor) advocate for investigating the possibility of delaying the second dose in the NYTimes. They describe many important considerations, including one of the key reasons for optimism about [#SecondDoseDelay] (https://twitter.com/search?q=%23SecondDoseDelay&amp;src=typeahead_click) :\nFor both vaccines, the sharp drop in disease in the vaccinated group started about 10 to 14 days after the first dose, before receiving the second. Moderna reported the initial dose to be 92.1 percent efficacious in preventing Covid-19 starting two weeks after the initial shot, when the immune system effects from the vaccine kick in, before the second injection on the 28th day.\nWill scientists conclude that delaying SARS-CoV2 vaccines second dose did or would have saved lives?\nQuestion resolves \"Yes\" if, on 2021-12-31, more than 50% of the scientific literature supports the claim that delaying the second dose (booster) of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines beyond their initial schedule probably saves or would have saved lives? \nThe relevant scientific literature is judged to include peer-reviewed studies nominated by Metaculus participants which explicitly compare estimated or actual mortality with longer delays for a second vaccine dose will be considered. Note: this criteria may exclude many editorials or published claims that don't include simulations or empirical data comparing counterfactual mortality with a delayed booster. \nQuestion will resolve \"No\" if more than 50% of studies meeting these criteria claim that a longer delay before the second dose would probably increase mortality.\nQuestion receives mixed resolution if neither the criteria for \"Yes\" or \"No\" are met. This would happen if, for example, most studies meeting the inclusion criteria don't indicate that either the originally scheduled or a delayed 2nd dose is likely to have saved lives overall.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 107,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the 10-year average Gross World Product growth rate exceed 6%?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6002/gwp-growth-to-exceed-6/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The gross world product (GWP) is the combined gross national income of all the countries in the world.\nWhen will the 10-year average Gross World Product annual growth rate first exceed 6%?\nThis question resolves as January 1st of the first year T, such that:\nMoreover, GWP at T must exceed 180% of the maximum over all years &gt;= 10 years prior.\nEach year's GWP is to be given in constant prices (adjusted for inflation), in USD.\n[World Bank data] (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD) should be used to resolve this question. If that's unavailable, other authoritative source of economic data may be used.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 30,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much will High Impact Athletes have donated by the end of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6003/total-donated-by-hia-athletes-by-end-of-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[High Impact Athletes] (https://highimpactathletes.com/mission) is a new organisation set up by professional tennis player [Marcus Daniell] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Daniell) , which aims to spread effective giving in professional sport. After [launching] (https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/Fm3HWDZKtwdkvBzGL/introducing-high-impact-athletes) at the end of November, their website now lists 20 professional athletes who have taken the pledge, and $44,000 already donated.\nThis question asks:\nHow much money will have been donated by HIA athletes by the end of 2021?\nTo count as having taken the pledge, athletes must commit to donating at least 2% of their earnings to effective charities, donations from athletes who have not made this commitment will not be counted. Resolution will be according to data from HIA themselves, who have been involved in this question's development. A current lower bound is available [here] (https://highimpactathletes.com/impact) , but at the time of question writing it is updated manually, so it is not guaranteed to remain perfectly up to date. It is a lower bound as dollar amounts are rounded down to the nearest $100.\nIf HIA ceases to exist for any reason, this question will resolve as the total amount donated during its existence. Athletes are not legally bound to their pledges, and so may renege on them. Donations from all athletes who count as having taken the pledge at the time of their donation will count, regardless of what later happens either to the athlete or the minimum recommended pledge. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 41,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What fraction of High Impact Athletes pledge-takers will maintain it through the end of 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6005/fraction-of-hia-pledges-still-active-in-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[High Impact Athletes] (https://highimpactathletes.com/mission) is a new organisation set up by professional tennis player [Marcus Daniell] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Daniell) , which aims to spread effective giving in professional sport. After [launching] (https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/Fm3HWDZKtwdkvBzGL/introducing-high-impact-athletes) at the end of November, their website now lists 20 professional athletes who have taken the pledge.\nTwo questions about the success of their first year are: [Total donated by HIA athletes by end of 2021?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6003/total-donated-by-hia-athletes-by-end-of-2021/) [Number of HIA pledges by end of 2021?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5999/number-of-hia-pledges-by-end-of-2021/) \nThis question asks:\nWhat fraction of athletes who take the pledge before the end of 2021 will maintain it through the end of 2024?\nTo count as having taken the pledge, athletes must commit to donating at least 2% of their earnings to effective charities. Resolution will be according to data from HIA themselves, who have been involved in this question's development. A current list is available [here] (https://highimpactathletes.com/athletes) , but at the time of question writing it is updated manually, so it is not guaranteed to remain perfectly up to date. \nIf HIA ceases to exist for any reason, this question will resolve as 0, not as ambiguous.\nFor athletes to count as having taken the pledge before 2021, they must be counted in [this] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5999/number-of-hia-pledges-by-end-of-2021/) question. For them to count as still active at the end of 2024, they must have maintained at least their original commitment continuously until the end of 2024. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 29,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech, or Oxford/AstraZeneca start producing an updated vaccine targeting a SARS-CoV-2 variant before 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6007/vaccine-update-due-to-mutation/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "99%",
    "Description": "There are already several notable variants of SARS-COV-2 circulating, two of the highest profile are described below.\nIn Early November 2020, [a variant strain was identified in Denmark as having an association with mink farming] (https://www.who.int/csr/don/06-november-2020-mink-associated-sars-cov2-denmark/en/) . This led to the immediate cull of all Danish farmed mink (more than 17 million) including breeding stock. \nOn 16 December 2020, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) published a [briefing] (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4857) on VUI-202012/01, a variant of SARS-COV-2 consisting of 17 mutations, including N501Y, a mutation in the spike protein. Three days later, in response, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson [announced] (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/explainers-55056375) a new set of national restrictions, including a \"Tier 4\" full lockdown across the southeast, and considerable curtailment of the plans to ease restrictions for 5 days over the Christmas period.\nIt is at least in principle possible that a mutation to SARS-COV-2 could reduce the efficacy of current vaccines. \nThis question asks:\nWill Moderna, Pfizer/BioNTech, or Oxford/AstraZeneca start producing an updated vaccine targeting a SARS-CoV-2 variant before 2023?\nThis question resolves positively if and only if there is a credible media report before 2023 that Moderna, Pfizer, BioNTech, University of Oxford, or AstraZeneca have produced at least one dose of an updated vaccine targeting SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). The report must mention that one reason for the update was a mutation. The dose does not have to be administered, and no trials need to be planned.\n--- \nThe report can mention more than one reason for updating the vaccine, as long as one of those reasons is a mutation.\n--- \nThe vaccine does not need to be approved before the resolution date.\n--- \nSome of these vaccines were developed in a partnership between two companies. The updated vaccine doesn’t need to be part of the same partnership. For example, if AstraZeneca starts working on an updated vaccine independently, that is sufficient for positive resolution. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 297,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 2023, will the United States CDC recommend that those who have already been vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) be vaccinated again due to a mutation in the virus?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6008/united-stated-cdc-to-recommend-revaccination/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "57.99999999999999%",
    "Description": "On December 16th, 2020 England’s health secretary, Matt Hancock, [announced] (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4857) that a new variant of SARS-CoV-2 had been detected in the UK. Amid worries that the new variant may be more transmissible, PM Boris Johnson [announced new lockdowns] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/19/world/europe/coronavirus-uk-new-variant.html) in London and England's southeast, including a ban on Christmas gatherings. The new variant is [said to account for 60%] (https://www.vox.com/2020/12/19/22190874/uk-lockdown-tier-4-boris-johnson) of the infections in London.\nThe spread of a new variant has [prompted concerns] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/20/health/coronavirus-britain-variant.html) that a mutation in SARS-CoV-2 could lead to the currently approved vaccines and treatments becoming less effective. The [British Medical Journal] (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4857) has the following to say about this possibility:\nThe new variant has mutations to the spike protein that the three leading vaccines are targeting. However, vaccines produce antibodies against many regions in the spike protein, so it’s unlikely that a single change would make the vaccine less effective.\nOver time, as more mutations occur, the vaccine may need to be altered. This happens with seasonal flu, which mutates every year, and the vaccine is adjusted accordingly. The SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t mutate as quickly as the flu virus, and the vaccines that have so far proved effective in trials are types that can easily be tweaked if necessary.\nPeacock said, “With this variant there is no evidence that it will evade the vaccination or a human immune response. But if there is an instance of vaccine failure or reinfection then that case should be treated as high priority for genetic sequencing.”\nIf there is a mutation and the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine must be updated, it is possible the United States CDC will start recommending revaccination with an updated vaccine. This question asks how likely that scenario is.\nBefore 2023, will the United States CDC recommend that those who have already been vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) be vaccinated again due to a mutation in the virus?\nThis question resolves positively if and only if before 2023 the United States CDC posts guidance on their [website] (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/index.html) that those who have been vaccinated should get vaccinated again. The guidance must mention that one reason for revaccination is a mutation in SARS-CoV-2.\n---The guidance must recommend revaccination with a different vaccine than the one that was originally administered. \n---The guidance can mention more than reason for getting revaccinated so long as one of those reasons is mutation. \n---Currently, there are several approved vaccines that require a second booster shot. These booster shots do not count toward positive resolution because they are not for the purpose of immunizing against a mutation. \n---If the US CDC recommends that only a proper subset of those who are vaccinated get revaccinated due to a mutation, for example because one of the original vaccines remains effective against the new variant, this still counts toward positive resolution. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 152,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What proportion of COVID infections in England will be estimated to have been acquired in health care settings?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6010/england-proportion-of-hospital-acquired-covid/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Even in normal times, nosocomial or hospital-acquired infections in the United Kingdom are believed to cause thousands of deaths each year. The first SARS had a strong tendency to spread in hospital settings, and although conflicting estimates exist of the prevalence of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection, numerous hospital outbreaks have been documented. There is significant concern in the UK about hospital-acquired COVID, with NHS England having recently estimated that some 1 in 6 confirmed cases are \"probable healthcare-associated infections\".\nIn the end, what proportion of COVID infections in England will be estimated to have been acquired in health care settings?\n--- \nEstimated proportion of all COVID infections throughout England's pandemic which were acquired in hospitals or other health care settings, not to include nursing / care homes.\n--- \nResolves as the median of estimates (or the geometric mean of the two median estimates).\n--- \nIf no estimates are available at resolve time, resolves according to the first estimate that subsequently becomes available.\n--- \nEstimates qualify if published by official UK governmental bodies such as NHS England, or published as peer-reviewed scientific research in a reputable scholarly journal. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 57,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will FromSoftware release Elden Ring?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6013/elden-ring-release/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "From [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elden_Ring) :\nElden Ring began development in early 2017 following the release of The Ringed City, a piece of downloadable content for Dark Souls III. As with Miyazaki's Souls games, Elden Ring will have the ability for players to create their own custom characters instead of playing as a fixed protagonist. Miyazaki also considered Elden Ring to be a more \"natural evolution\" to the Souls series, as the game will be much larger in scale compared to them, featuring an open world with new gameplay mechanics such as horseback riding and combat. However, unlike many other open world games, Elden Ring will not feature populated towns with non-player characters, with the world having numerous dungeon-like ruins in place of them instead. When asked about the possibility of the story being novelized, Miyazaki stated that he would rather have players experience it themselves by playing the game, as he thinks that the game's secrets and mysteries would be spoiled otherwise. The score is being written by Yuka Kitamura, who has composed for many of Miyazaki's previous games.\nAs of the creation of this question (December 2020), no gameplay footage for Elden Ring has been released.\nWhen will FromSoftware release Elden Ring?\nThis will resolve to the date on which Elden Ring is first released for sale to the public in any region. Any release of an alpha, beta, and/or 0.X version of the game does not count. \nIf Elden Ring is not released before 2025-12-30, then this question resolves as \"&gt;2025-12-30\". \nIn case the game is released under a different name the question resolves only if the game is essentially that which the relevant gamers recognise to be what \"Elden Ring\" previously referred to, according to moderators and/or admins.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 26,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Restaurant Brands International cease sourcing pork in North America from suppliers that use gestation stalls by Jan 1, 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6018/burger-king-to-cease-using-gestation-stalls/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8%",
    "Description": "Restaurant Brands International is the parent company for Burger King and various other fast-food chains. In their [now-taken-down 2016 Sustainability Framework] (https://www.rbi.com/Cache/IRCache/33ba8475-a7df-ed29-3361-27ba8f6bb380.PDF?O=PDF&amp;T=&amp;Y=&amp;D=&amp;FID=33ba8475-a7df-ed29-3361-27ba8f6bb380&amp;iid=4591210) (p. 6.) ( [archive link #1] (https://web.archive.org/web/20200902082204/https://www.rbi.com/Cache/IRCache/33ba8475-a7df-ed29-3361-27ba8f6bb380.PDF?O=PDF&amp;T=&amp;Y=&amp;D=&amp;FID=33ba8475-a7df-ed29-3361-27ba8f6bb380&amp;iid=4591210) , [archive link #2] (https://archive.is/JcAS2) ), they stated:\n“Restaurant Brands International is committed to sourcing pork globally only from suppliers that do not use gestation stalls, and we aim to accomplish this goal in North America by 2022.”\nA gestation crate, also known as a sow stall, is a metal enclosure in which a farmed sow used for breeding may be kept during pregnancy. Animal welfare advocates regard the use of gestation crates as one of the most inhumane features of intensive animal production. (Source: [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestation_crate) )\nSee: [Will companies meet their animal welfare commitments?] (https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/XdekdWJWkkhur9gvr/will-companies-meet-their-animal-welfare-commitments) for a sceptical perspective.\nWill Restaurant Brands International cease sourcing pork in North America from suppliers that use gestation stalls by Jan 1, 2022?\nQuestion will resolve according to popular media reports, or according to an announcement by Restaurant Brands International which contains unambiguous language (\"we have made progress towards our commitment\" would resolve negatively, whereas \"globally, we are only sourcing pork from suppliers that do not use gestation stalls\" would resolve positively). \nIf the result is unknown or unverified, the question resolves negatively, with the assumption being that any change would be well publicised.\nThis question belongs to the [Animal Charity Evaluators Strategy] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--ace) series. This is a series of questions intended to introduce Animal Charity Evaluators to the idea of using forecasting as a tool to inform their strategy. The questions were created by Misha Yagudin and Nuño Sempere, in consultation with ACE. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 48,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any of the nonprofits incubated by Charity Entrepreneurship become a future ACE top or standout charity by Jan 1, 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6020/charity-entrepreneurship-to-birth-top-ace-ngo/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "45%",
    "Description": "Charity Entrepreneurship is a meta-charity dedicated to creating other charities. Recently, animal welfare charities have been one of their major focuses. Past charities created by Charity Entrepreneurship can be found [here] (https://www.charityentrepreneurship.com/charity-ideas.html#) . \nAnimal Charity Evaluators is a non-profit charity evaluator founded in 2012, dedicated to finding and promoting the most effective ways to help animals, much like GiveWell does so for the global health and development charity sector. ACE updates their [recommendations] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/donation-advice/recommended-charities/) at the end of November each year. The evaluation process is described in \" [Evaluating Charities] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/charity-reviews/evaluating-charities/) \", the evaluation criteria are described in \" [Evaluation Criteria] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/charity-reviews/evaluating-charities/evaluation-criteria/) \".\nWill any of the nonprofits incubated by Charity Entrepreneurship become a future ACE top or standout charity by Jan 1, 2022?\nQuestion will resolve positively if any of the charities on [Charity Entrepreneurship: Incubated Charities] (https://www.charityentrepreneurship.com/incubated-charities.html) are in [ACE: Top and Standout charities] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/donation-advice/recommended-charities/) by Jan 1, 2022.\nThis question belongs to the [Animal Charity Evaluators Strategy] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--ace) series. This is a series of questions intended to introduce Animal Charity Evaluators to the idea of using forecasting as a tool to inform their strategy. The questions were created by Misha Yagudin and Nuño Sempere, in consultation with ACE. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 47,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any of the nonprofits incubated by Charity Entrepreneurship become a future ACE top or standout charity by Jan 1, 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6021/ce-to-incubate-ace-recommended-ngo-by-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "60%",
    "Description": "Charity Entrepreneurship is a meta-charity dedicated to creating other charities. Recently, animal welfare charities have been one of their major focuses. Past charities created by Charity Entrepreneurship can be found [here] (https://www.charityentrepreneurship.com/charity-ideas.html#) . \nAnimal Charity Evaluators is a non-profit charity evaluator founded in 2012, dedicated to finding and promoting the most effective ways to help animals, much like GiveWell does so for the global health and development charity sector. ACE updates their [recommendations] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/donation-advice/recommended-charities/) at the end of November each year. The evaluation process is described in \" [Evaluation Charities] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/charity-reviews/evaluating-charities/) \", the evaluation criteria are described in \" [Evaluation Criteria] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/charity-reviews/evaluating-charities/evaluation-criteria/) \".\nWill any of the nonprofits incubated by Charity Entrepreneurship become a future ACE top or standout charity by Jan 1, 2025?\nQuestion will resolve positively if any of the charities on [Charity Entrepreneurship: Incubated Charities] (https://www.charityentrepreneurship.com/incubated-charities.html) are in [ACE: Top and Standout charities] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/donation-advice/recommended-charities/) by Jan 1, 2025.\nThis question belongs to the [Animal Charity Evaluators Strategy] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--ace) series. This is a series of questions intended to introduce Animal Charity Evaluators to the idea of using forecasting as a tool to inform their strategy. The questions were created by Misha Yagudin and Nuño Sempere, in consultation with ACE. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 40,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the first course on wild animal welfare be taught at a top university?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6022/when-will-wild-animal-welfare-reach-top-uni/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The movement to reduce wild-animal suffering is relatively new (see: [Timeline of wild-animal suffering] (https://timelines.issarice.com/wiki/Timeline_of_wild-animal_suffering) ). It was previously the realm of charismatic individuals, with organizations working on the topic being started from 2013 onwards. A course at a top university would constitute a further step towards mainstream acceptance.\nWhen will the first course on wild animal welfare be taught at a top university?\nTo qualify as a \"top\", a university needs to be in the top-200 of [QS World University Rankings] (https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings) or in the top-200 of QS's rating for biological sciences at the time the course is taught.\nThis question will resolve as the date the course starts, and retroactively close on the date the course was announced.\nIf QS stops publishing any of the ratings, a clarification to this question will be made and another major university rating system will be chosen instead.\nIf the course is first announced, then delayed, then opens, the question retroactively closes on the date the delay was announced.\nThis question belongs to the [Animal Charity Evaluators Strategy] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--ace) series. This is a series of questions intended to introduce Animal Charity Evaluators to the idea of using forecasting as a tool to inform their strategy. The questions were created by Misha Yagudin and Nuño Sempere, in consultation with ACE. \nEdit 2020-01-03: added provision that resolve date = class starts and close date = class announced. Also fine-print about delays. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 79,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a charity primarily operating in China become an ACE Top Charity in 2021 or 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6023/charity-in-china-to-ace-aces-criteria/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "Animal Charity Evaluators is a non-profit charity evaluator founded in 2012, dedicated to finding and promoting the most effective ways to help animals, much like GiveWell does so for the global health and development charity sector. ACE updates their [recommendations] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/donation-advice/recommended-charities/) at the end of November each year. The evaluation process is described in \" [Evaluation Charities] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/charity-reviews/evaluating-charities/) \", the evaluation criteria are described in \" [Evaluation Criteria] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/charity-reviews/evaluating-charities/evaluation-criteria/) \". \nAs of November 2020, the [Good Food Fund] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/charity-review/good-food-fund/) , which primarily operates in China, has been rated as a Standout Charity by ACE, i.e., the level below \"Top Charity\".\nWill a charity primarily operating in China become an ACE Top Charity in 2021 or 2022?\nBy \"primarily operating in China\" we mean that at least half of their efforts or finances are spent on their work in China. For example, [ProVeg International] (https://proveg.com/) works in China but doesn't meet this criterion. However, a recommendation by ACE to ProVeg restricted to their work in China would qualify. This criterion is subject to reasonable interpretation; in ambiguous cases, the view of ACE will decide resolution. \nThe question resolves positively if a charity primarily operating in China features as a top charity in [ACE's recommendations] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/donation-advice/recommended-charities/) \nThis question belongs to the [Animal Charity Evaluators Strategy] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--ace) series. This is a series of questions intended to introduce Animal Charity Evaluators to the idea of using forecasting as a tool to inform their strategy. The questions were created by Misha Yagudin and Nuño Sempere, in consultation with ACE. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 81,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will ACE or any of its top or standout charities see a scandal related to sexual harassment or unwanted sexual advances in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6024/sexual-scandal-amongst-animal-advocates/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "[Animal Charity Evaluators] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/) is a non-profit charity evaluator founded in 2012, dedicated to finding and promoting the most effective ways to help animals, much like GiveWell does so for the global health and development charity sector. \nOne of their major focuses is building the global animal welfare community, and any kind of scandal in their midst would be a significant setback.\nWill ACE or any of its top or standout charities see a scandal related to sexual harassment or unwanted sexual advances in 2021?\nWhether an event is a \"scandal related to sexual harassment or unwanted sexual advances\" will be resolved per the [\"I know it when I see it\"] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it) standard from [Jacobellis v. Ohio] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobellis_v._Ohio) , possibly after consulting with ACE. In case of disagreement among Metaculus users, Metaculus Admins will decide resolution.\nThis question belongs to the [Animal Charity Evaluators Strategy] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--ace) series. This is a series of questions intended to introduce Animal Charity Evaluators to the idea of using forecasting as a tool to inform their strategy. The questions were created by Misha Yagudin and Nuño Sempere, in consultation with ACE.\nEdit 2020-01-03: Replaced \"In the case of disagreement among Metaculus users, ACE's ruling will decide resolution\" with \"In case of disagreement among Metaculus users, Metaculus Admins will decide resolution\". \n",
    "# Forecasts": 66,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will ACE or any of its top or standout charities see a scandal related to racial inequity or discrimination in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6025/diversity-debacle-amongst-animal-advocates/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "18%",
    "Description": "[Animal Charity Evaluators] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/) is a non-profit charity evaluator founded in 2012, dedicated to finding and promoting the most effective ways to help animals, much like GiveWell does so for the global health and development charity sector. \nOne of their major focuses is building the global animal welfare community, and any kind of scandal in their midst would be a significant setback. \nACE explicitly includes \"the organization has a healthy attitude toward representation/diversity, equity, and inclusion (R/DEI)\" as part of \"Criterion 5: Leadership and Culture\", one of their seven [evaluation criteria] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/charity-reviews/evaluating-charities/evaluation-criteria/) during their evaluation process. This approach has previously drawn both praise and criticism, for example with respect to their grant to [Encompass] (https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/ePDKZMpoGdx7J3PBh/announcing-our-summer-2020-ace-movement-grants#Encompass___35_000_) . \nWill ACE or any of its top or standout charities see a scandal related to racial inequity or discrimination in 2021?\nWhether an event is a \"scandal related to racial inequity or discrimination\" will be resolved per the [\"I know it when I see it\"] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it) standard from [Jacobellis v. Ohio] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobellis_v._Ohio) , possibly after consulting with ACE. In the case of disagreement among metaculus users, ACE's ruling will decide resolution.\nThis question belongs to the [Animal Charity Evaluators Strategy] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--ace) series. This is a series of questions intended to introduce Animal Charity Evaluators to the idea of using forecasting as a tool to inform their strategy. The questions were created by Misha Yagudin and Nuño Sempere, in consultation with ACE. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 62,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much money will be donated to ACE in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6026/2021-donations-to-animal-charity-evaluators/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Animal Charity Evaluators] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/) is a US-based non-profit charity evaluator founded in 2012, dedicated to finding and promoting the most effective ways to help animals. The coronavirus pandemic is expected to affect donations, and I'm curious to see if Metaculus can predict ACE's finances in a time of uncertainty. \nOn the other hand, Effective Altruism, a broader movement dedicated to \"doing the most good\" with which ACE identifies, has in the past considered [counter-cyclical donation schedules] (https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/NasdMzQfx2yT7AE9r/increase-impact-by-waiting-for-a-recession-to-donate-or) (i.e., to donate more to charities in a recession), but it's unclear to what extent the idea has gained traction.\nHow much money will be donated to ACE in 2021?\nThis question will be resolved according to ACE's own [financials page] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/transparency/financials/) , which includes data for past years. For example, ACE's revenue for 2019 can be found under 2019/Revenue by Source/Total, and amounts to $1,217,757\nIf the financials page has changed, but ACE makes the number available somewhere else on the internet, that will be used as a resolution. If it isn't available, we'll ask per email. If they don't answer, the question resolves ambiguously.\nThis question belongs to the [Animal Charity Evaluators Strategy] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--ace) series. This is a series of questions intended to introduce Animal Charity Evaluators to the idea of using forecasting as a tool to inform their strategy. The questions were created by Misha Yagudin and Nuño Sempere, in consultation with ACE. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 27,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much money will ACE estimate to have influenced in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6027/money-moved-by-animal-charity-evaluators/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Animal Charity Evaluators] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/) is a US-based non-profit charity evaluator founded in 2012, dedicated to finding and promoting the most effective ways to help animals. The coronavirus pandemic is expected to affect donations, and I'm curious to see if Metaculus can predict how much money ACE will influence in a time of uncertainty. \nOn the other hand, Effective Altruism, a broader movement dedicated to \"doing the most good\" with which ACE identifies, has in the past considered [counter-cyclical donation schedules] (https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/NasdMzQfx2yT7AE9r/increase-impact-by-waiting-for-a-recession-to-donate-or) (i.e., to donate more to charities in a recession), but it's unclear to what extent the idea has gained traction.\nHow much money will ACE estimate to have influenced in 2021?\nThis will be straightforwardly resolved as the number ACE claims on their own [financials page] (https://animalcharityevaluators.org/transparency/financials/) , which includes data for past years. For example, the donations influenced in 2019 can be found on the first graph, and amount to $8,904,521.\nIf the financials page has changed, but a calculation by ACE is available somewhere else on the internet, that will be used as a resolution. If it isn't available, we'll ask per email. If they don't answer, the question resolves ambiguously.\nThis question belongs to the [Animal Charity Evaluators Strategy] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--ace) series. This is a series of questions intended to introduce Animal Charity Evaluators to the idea of using forecasting as a tool to inform their strategy. The questions were created by Misha Yagudin and Nuño Sempere, in consultation with ACE. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 37,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a Nobel Prize for Economic Science be awarded for MMT before 2041-01-01?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6028/nobel-prize-for-mmt-by-2041/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "[Modern Monetary Theory] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Monetary_Theory) is currently a heterodox economics theory.\nMMT is debated with active dialogues about its theoretical integrity, the implications of the policy recommendations of its proponents, and the extent to which it is actually divergent from orthodox macroeconomics.\nWill a Nobel Prize for Economic Science be awarded for MMT before 2041-01-01?\nThis question resolves 'Yes' if any Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences is awarded before 2041-01-01 when both of these are true:\nA. To a person who, at any point, identifies as a founder, developer, or core contributor to MMT OR is considered as one of the core contributors or founders of MMT according to at least one peer-reviewed review articles or book chapter on the topic.\nB. The justification for the prize by the committee attributes the award to that person's contribution to MMT, Macroeconomics, or a core macroeconomics principle/idea (deficit, inflation, interest rates, government bonds, reserves)\nThis question resolves 'No' if no Nobel Prize is awarded before 2041-01-01 with that satisfies both conditions simultaneously. If it is the case that there is disagreement on whether the award is \"for\" contributions to MMT, the final ruling will be made by a Metaculus staff member (with a background in Economics if this is possible), who has not predicted on the question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many scheduled airline passengers in 2021 will verify their COVID-19 health statuses with IATA Travel Passes?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6029/flights-on-iata-vaccine-passports-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [Travel Pass Initiative] (https://www.iata.org/en/programs/passenger/travel-pass/) of the [International Air Transport Association] (https://www.iata.org/) , now in its final stages before launch, aims \"to re-open borders without quarantine\" by giving passengers the ability to share verifiable, accurate information on their COVID-19 health status, including vaccination and testing. World public opinion has largely not yet taken note, although certain bioethicists are already condemning the enshrinement of [\"immunoprivilege,\"] (https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/05/29/865048097/bioethicist-immunity-passports-could-do-more-harm-than-good) and the reactions of the conspiracy and anti-vax crowd online can be imagined. It is not clear yet on what basis the system will be adopted or how wide uptake will be.\nHow many scheduled airline passengers in 2021 will verify their COVID-19 health statuses with IATA Travel Passes?\n--- \nApplies to verification of any aspect of COVID-19 status for any purpose, even if it is not a precondition of making the flight.\n--- \nIn accordance with ICAO practice, \"passengers\" means passenger-flights, ie, the same passenger on multiple flights counts multiple times.\n--- \nResolves according to official IATA or ICAO statistics if and when available, or best available estimate at Metaculus/moderator discretion if no official statistics are available by the end of 2022. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 109,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a single novel SARS-CoV-2 variant that is at least 30% more transmissible than preexisting variants infect 10M worldwide before mid-2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6031/more-transmissible-variant-to-infect-10m/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "90%",
    "Description": "A novel SARS-CoV-2 variant, [VOC 202012/01] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VOC-202012/01) (also known as 'lineage B.1.1.7'), emerged in southeast England in November 2020. A [pre-print] (https://cmmid.github.io/topics/covid19/reports/uk-novel-variant/2020_12_23_Transmissibility_and_severity_of_VOC_202012_01_in_England.pdf) suggest that the variant is more transmissible than preexisting Sars-CoV-2 variants.\nWe estimate that VOC 202012/01 is 56% more transmissible (95% credible interval across three regions 50-74%) than preexisting variants of SARS-CoV-2.\nAnother variant under concern is [501.V2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/501.V2_Variant) , which was first detected in South Africa and reported by the country's health department on 18 December 2020. The COVID-19 [South African Online Portal] (https://sacoronavirus.co.za/2020/12/18/update-on-covid-19-18th-december-2020/?__cf_chl_captcha_tk__=be2f838cf56453016ad7dbf99d77089d843aa3ff-1609007372-0-AUbF61m4dEBXtFnkpTnnvmtcjtHti_qPvax6cPxQzAFDxaV-R06OYnJr8531gWrxW_KCmQkwWC7zPXDZJ3Zr0Av7VAP4jfcldxXQQuP-MSv4sSDuWGGQpvqeNModhOt7ffu6MfAq9pXJT0Ng1RDuKzM1uKwccOxvlqdn_yZd27ZLDoRiqvei1L5GJaSgT201h-fASs6kpdFwwIczWtWPne2LJirpkhlwBpjrF71BIyJTjAoOHbQ-GRlwXaTarIl6CoB210bGi_Hz7rPH43tH9bXjfzoVqeu8QIyBaLwgIEKrFTwhPu3ZFJmPQOySnKf5jQKnMtpL31NN1NMomLTOjU-5LjSrnF4QyGxAleR0z6kBS9e9WAUF-1Hd5sNy3hvhA0NbQ2Y_yHYCxkyLEn0IzblQQjQG-tVhINX4f6GpXDjmYjX7E4oauOBCeBUlR90g7P7MXnWqTo1uR9GOZID7O0TjXLBjCrHEmubestb86aX6Xo-k97BuleDvPqlCKLwZeE8KyQhPNtxbumChNDbfP-ookZPoggxaDhlTbfdeJrRAwcR8a_K3bfV1SeNsUbpCuXrI5EXpl-ZFdgswtx1Ug5TF0Y9YeCvbs7vxVihTyQCIOeF8732weBd7tplBJKVjvL6s1Gj4rZVbn_5AHYbuvG8) has suggested that the aforementioned variant is driving an increase of new cases:\nThe evidence that has been collated, therefore, strongly suggests that that the current second wave we are experiencing is being driven by [501.V2].\nWill a single novel SARS-CoV-2 variant that is at least 30% more transmissible than preexisting variants infect 10M worldwide before mid-2021?\nResolution\nThis question resolves positively if credible evidence indicates that a single variant that is at least 30% more transmissible than preexisting variants infects 10M worldwide before 2021-06-02. Evidence that emerges on the resolution date (2021-12-30) may be consulted.\nFor a single variant to be considered at least 30.0% more transmissible than preexisting variants, a credible meta-analysis or systematic review of at least 5 studies indicates that the Sars-CoV-2 variant is at least 30% more transmissible than were dominant previously. Specifically, it must indicate that its effective reproductive number Rt is estimated to be 30% greater than that of the previously dominant variant, holding all else (such as behaviour and NPIs) constant.\nTo establish that the variant has infected 10M worldwide, we shall consult either reports issued by national health-agencies (or institutes affiliated with national health agencies), or credible meta-analyses of estimates in the academic literature. Single estimates in academic literature do not suffice for the purpose of this question.\nSee this this question's sister question on &gt;50% transmissibility [here] (https://pandemic.metaculus.com/questions/6089/50-transmissible-variant-to-infect-10m/) .\n--- \nIn the likely case that estimates are given in credible or confidence intervals, any number below the 2.5th percentile of the interval in the relevant meta-analyses will be consulted.\n--- \nOnly evidence available at the resolution date (2021-12-30) may be consulted for resolution. \n--- \nMeta-analyses or systematic reviews do not need to be peer-reviewed, though these need to be credible (e.g. their authors have a track-record of producing high-quality relevant research). \n",
    "# Forecasts": 376,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will 1 bitcoin be worth $1,000,000 (2020 USD) or more?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6046/date-1-bitcoin-worth-1-million/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Description inspired by [Jgalt's] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3820/bitcoin-extremes-will-1-bitcoin-be-worth-100000-or-more-before-2025/) ]\n[Bitcoin] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin) is a [cryptocurrency] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptocurrency) . It is a decentralized digital currency without a central bank or single administrator that can be sent from user to user on the peer-to-peer bitcoin network without the need for intermediaries.\nThe price of bitcoins has gone through cycles of appreciation and depreciation referred to by some as bubbles and busts. In 2011, the value of one bitcoin rapidly rose from about $0.30 to $32 before returning to $2. In the latter half of 2012 and during the 2012–13 Cypriot financial crisis, the bitcoin price began to rise again, reaching a high of $266 on 10 April 2013, before crashing to around $50. On 29 November 2013, the cost of one bitcoin rose to a peak of $1,242. In 2014, the price fell sharply, and as of April remained depressed at little more than half 2013 prices. As of August 2014 it was under $600. Bitcoin prices reached a new apogee in December 2017, at just shy of $20,000 per coin. Then, prices fell to a local minimum of circa $4,500 per coin, in December 2019.\nIn December 2020 Bitcoin has reached a new all time high, with its price breaking the $24,000 mark.\nWhen will 1 bitcoin be worth $1,000,000 USD (adjusted to 2020 USD) or more?\nResolution should cite credible press reports in the financial media, or information from a cryptocurrency exchange or trading platform, that one bitcoin is valued at $1,000,000 USD adjusted to mean 2020 prices at any time before 1 January 2100.\nInflation adjustments are to be made with common US CPI, such as FRED's [Consumer Price Index: Total All Items for the United States] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPALTT01USQ661S) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 75,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any prediction market cause users to lose at least $1M before 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6047/1m-lost-in-prediction-market/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "There are many prediction markets now. Some popular ones are Predictit, FTX, Polymarket, and Augur. The latter three are crypto based; FTX being centralized while the other two are decentralized.\nSome crypto projects (unrelated to prediction markets) have been hacked, causing users to lose money. Some other crypto projects have led to exit scams with the same effect.\nWill any prediction market cause users to lose at least $1M before 2023?\nThis resolves positively if any prediction market causes more than $1 million in losses to users before 2023. This includes if the cause is hacking, an exit scam by the operators, a glitch causing funds to be lost, or an unambiguously incorrect resolution on some questions. For example, if a prediction market would pay out today that Trump won the 2020 election, that would count. Losses from predictions being resolved correctly do not count. Losses from coins losing value in exchange rate do not count unless the prediction platform in question was primarily used with a stablecoin tied to a major fiat currency, and that stablecoin ended up hacked/locked/significantly lower value/etc.\nThe $1 million can be from multiple different events, as long as it's on a single platform or site.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 49,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the the main tomb chamber of the mausoleum of Qin Shi Hua be opened?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6048/tomb-of-the-first-qin-emperor-opened/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The World Heritage-listed [Mausoleum of the First Qin Emperor] (https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/441/) in the Shaanxi province of China was constructed in the third century BC. It is a necropolis, of which the [\"garrison\" of Terracotta Warriors] (https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2016/10/china-first-emperor-terra-cotta-warriors-tomb/) is probably the best known feature. \nThe Chinese history Records of the Grand Historian [says the tomb chamber has arrow traps and \"rivers\" and \"seas\" of mercury] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mausoleum_of_the_First_Qin_Emperor#History) . The craftsmen who worked on the mausoleum were said to have been buried alive inside of it. \nUnusually high levels of mercury have been found at the site, lending credence to the account of \"rivers of mercury\". However, others have attributed the readings to local industrial pollution. \nThe risk of active traps and mercury poisoning are sometimes given as the reason why the main tomb chamber - where the first emperor of China is presumably buried - is yet to be excavated, although it seems more likely that the Chinese government is waiting until the resources and technology are available to preserve the mausoleum when it is excavated (a range of reasons are given [here] (https://www.travelchinaguide.com/attraction/shaanxi/xian/terra_cotta_army/mausoleum_2.htm) ).\nWhen will the the main tomb chamber of the mausoleum of Qin Shi Hua be opened?\nThis question will resolve positively according to credible reports that the main tomb chamber at the mausoleum complex has been opened at least enough to admit a light and a camera (i.e. a person doesn't need to gain entry provided there's enough of an opening to see inside). \nThis will also resolve positively if an opening is created by natural causes, retroactively if an existing entrance is found and reported after the opening of the question, and ambiguously if an existing entrance is reported to have been found before the opening of the question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Time person of the year in 2024 be the US president-elect?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6049/time-person-of-the-year-is-us-president-elect/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "74%",
    "Description": "Every year, Time magazine publishes an issue with [a person of the year] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Person_of_the_Year) , ostensibly the person with the greatest impact on the news of that year.\nSince 2000, every Time person of the year on an election year was the president-elect; George Bush in 2000 and 2004, Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012, Donald Trump in 2016, and [Joe Biden and Kamala Harris] (https://time.com/person-of-the-year-2020-joe-biden-kamala-harris) in 2020. Before then, the president-elect was also Time person of the year in 1992, 1980, 1976, 1964, 1948, and 1932.\nWill the Time person of the year in 2024 be the US president-elect?\nThis resolves positively if the Time person of the year in 2024 is the president-elect or both the president- and vice-president-elect, as determined by projected electoral votes as called by the Associated Press.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 76,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Andrew Yang win the 2021 New York City mayoral election?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6051/will-andrew-yang-be-the-next-mayor-of-nyc/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "35%",
    "Description": "In December 2020, Andrew Yang filed paperwork to run for mayor of New York and now appears on the candidates list with the New York City Finance Board: [https://www.nyccfb.info/follow-the-money/cand…] (https://www.nyccfb.info/follow-the-money/candidates/) \nIn a poll released 21 December 2020, Yang led the race as the top contender: [https://dfer.org/ny/erna-ny-poll-shows-andrew…] (https://dfer.org/ny/erna-ny-poll-shows-andrew-yang-leading-in-nyc-mayoral-race/) \nWill Andrew Yang win the 2021 New York City mayoral election?\nCredible open-source media reporting. In the case of an extremely close or disputed election, use the official results at the Board of Elections in the City of New York https://vote.nyc/page/election-results-summary\n",
    "# Forecasts": 369,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the median age of an employed person in the US in 2040?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6055/us-median-age-of-employed-person-by-2040/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Background\n==========\n\nThe US expects to see an increase in the age of its labor force as more workers put off full time retirement at the traditional age of 65. Slowing population growth amongst American citizens, as well as declining societal support for seniors, work together to increase the median age of the average worker in the US labor force. \nIn 2019, the median age for employment in the US was 42.3, up from 42.1 in 2011. However, as the [struggles surrounding social security] (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/12/business/social-security-shortfall-2020.html) rise, both from higher average life expectancies and and a growing elderly population, the US could see an increasingly older workforce. \nBarring the influence of population growth, the difference between the number of employed workers ages 16-19 and 65+ have increased from just over 2,000k workers to over 5,000k from 2011 to 2019, a trend that supports the slow growth of the median age. Although, according to a [research paper] (https://siepr.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Do.older_.workers.squeeze.out_.younger.workers_2.pdf) from Stanford, the age of the workforce does not necessarily influence or restrict entry into the workforce by younger workers.\nWhat will be the median age of an employed person in the US in 2040?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution criteria will come from the Bureau of Labor Statistics through their reports on the [Labor Force Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm) taken from the Current Population Survey. Historical data is also available for more detailed analysis and information.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many people in the US between the ages 16-24 will be employed in 2021 (in thousands)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6056/us-employment-of-ages-16-24-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Background\n==========\n\nEconomic downturns and periods of unemployment significantly affect the younger members of the workforce. With COVID-19 hitting the industries which often employ younger workers, such as leisure and hospitality, employment for the age group of young workers (16-24) jumped from [8% to almost 25%] (https://www.epi.org/publication/young-workers-covid-recession/) between spring of 2019 and 2020. \nYoung workers are expected to face significant hardship in the labor market even after the end of the pandemic, with long run negative effects in their futures, mimicking the economic downturn and effects brought about for young workers by the Great Recession in 2008. \nAs young workers attempt to enter the workforce to support their families, find jobs after college, or pay for their current education, monitoring their employment levels could act as an important measure of the health and growth of the economy.\nHow many people in the US between the ages 16-24 will be employed in 2021 (in thousands)?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution criteria will come from the Bureau of Labor Statistics through their reports on the [Labor Force Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm) taken from the Current Population Survey. Historical data is also available for more detailed analysis and information. \nThe number of employed persons in this age group in 2019 was 19,322k.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many people 65+ will be employed in the US in 2021 (in thousands)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6057/us-employment-of-ages-65-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Background\n==========\n\nThe US Labor Force is aging. As the population ages and social security flounders, more people over the age of 65 find themselves rejoining the workforce and entering the job market. \nThe [AARP] (https://www.aarp.org/work/employers/info-2019/americans-working-past-65.html) finds that:\n“As of February 2019, more than 20 percent of adults over age 65 are either working or looking for work, compared with 10 percent in 1985, says the report from United Income, a financial planning and investment management company targeted to those ages 50 to 70. The study analyzed data from the Current Population Survey, a report compiled monthly by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The BLS expects the trend of older people working to continue, estimating that 13 million Americans age 65 and older will be in the labor force by 2024.”\nOldest workers over 65 years of age were disproportionately hit hardest by the economic downturn of the Coronavirus with a drop of 16.6% in employment levels. Health risks also affect older workers, forcing them to exit the workforce in efforts to protect against the harmful effects of the Coronavirus. \n“In April and May, workers aged 65 and older had higher unemployment rates than those between the ages of 25 and 54—a scenario that Johnson says is unique to this recession. Older workers' seniority had protected them in earlier downturns, leading to lower unemployment rates than their younger counterparts. Johnson believes the change is a sign of how the virus is affecting older workers' employment amid this recession. \"I think this is going to be a trend,\" he says.”\nHow many people 65+ will be employed in the US in 2021 (in thousands)?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution criteria will come from the Bureau of Labor Statistics through their reports on the [Labor Force Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm) taken from the Current Population Survey. Historical data is also available for more detailed analysis and information.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many people will be employed in the US wholesale and retail industries in 2021 (in thousands)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6060/number-employed-in-us-retail-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Background\n==========\n\nThe world of retail is changing. As one of the hardest hit industries by COVID-19, the retail market has changed dramatically in order to reach customers in 2020. While the majority population of all generations within the US still [prefer a physical store] (https://review42.com/retail-statistics/) , 42% of Gen-Zers prefer to shop online. \nThe e-commerce industry is expected to breach the $4 trillion mark in 2020, however, this does not mean that the retail industry is dying. The retail industry as a whole, including e-commerce, is expected to continue to grow. While falling to its slowest growth rate in 2020 at an estimated [4.1%] (https://www.oberlo.com/statistics/retail-industry-growth-rate) , the industry is expected to reach parity with pre-COVID-19 growth rates by 2021. \nIn 2011, approximately [19.7] (https://www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm) million people were employed in the wholesale and retail trade industries, a number which has remained unchanged since 2011. As the market changes and moves online, it remains to be seen how employment in this industry will change.\nHow many people will be employed in the US wholesale and retail industries in 2021 (in thousands)?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution criteria will come from the Bureau of Labor Statistics through their reports on the [Labor Force Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm) taken from the Current Population Survey. It should represent the total amount of employment in the industry as a whole as observed in their annual industry tables. Historical data is also available for more detailed analysis and information.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 35,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many will be employed in the US transportation and warehousing industry in 2021 (in thousands)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6061/number-employed-in-us-transport-industry-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Background\n==========\n\nBetween 2011 and 2019, the number of people employed in the transportation and warehousing industries [increased by almost 2 million] (https://www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm) . \nMovements in the gig economy with the ride transportation market growing could greatly influence the potential growth of the number of people officially employed in the transportation industry. Over the last decade, the number of people employed in the taxi service industry grew over [500,000] (https://www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm) . However, in heated debates with California, [Uber has declared] (https://www.cnet.com/news/uber-says-158000-drivers-will-lose-work-if-theyre-reclassified-as-employees/) that movements to employ their drivers could actually reduce levels of employment among their drivers.\nHow many will be employed in the US transportation and warehousing industry in 2021 (in thousands)?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution criteria will come from the Bureau of Labor Statistics through their reports on the [Labor Force Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm) taken from the Current Population Survey. It should represent the total amount of employment in the industry as a whole as observed in their annual industry tables. Historical data is also available for more detailed analysis and information.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 41,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many people will be employed in the US education industry in 2021 (in thousands)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6062/number-employed-in-us-education-industry-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Background\n==========\n\nThe number of people employed in the US educational systems rose approximately [1.2 million] (https://www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm) over the last decade between 2011 and 2019. However, this growth is not expected to continue. By 2026, only [300,000] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/683023/us-employment-projection-for-education-sector/#:~:text=U.S.%20employment%20projection%20for%20education%20sector%202019%2D2026&amp;text=This%20statistic%20shows%20the%20projected,have%20around%2014.47%20million%20employees.) more people are expected to be employed in this industry, an unpleasant reality for a country with a government which routinely cuts the budgets for its public education facilities. In February of 2020, [President Trump announced] (https://www.forbes.com/sites/wesleywhistle/2020/02/10/trump-budget-proposes-cuts-to-education/?sh=368679fe708d) a new plan which would cut the education budgets by 8%. He also supported plans to cut standardized loans for students enrolling in higher education. \nWith resources already stretched thin during the economic crisis brought by COVID-19 in 2020, higher education institutions are forced to continue [furloughing employees] (https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/09/02/colleges-furlough-more-employees) due to decreased governmental support and student tuition payments. Teachers and staff in secondary schools across the country are also being asked to [take pay cuts] (https://www.edweek.org/education/battered-by-coronavirus-closures-some-school-districts-are-starting-to-furlough-staff/2020/04) and furloughed days. \nGoing forward, with new political leaders in federal and state governments, and a COVID-19 vaccine on the way, we should hopefully see budgets increase and teachers and staff returning to their positions in 2021. President Elect Biden has promised to [triple funding to K-12 programs] (https://www.bestcolleges.com/blog/joe-biden-education-policy-2020-presidential-election/) serving low income students, to an estimated $48 billion dollars, with requirements that most of the money initially go to teachers.\nHow many people will be employed in the US education industry in 2021 (in thousands)?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution criteria will come from the Bureau of Labor Statistics through their reports on the [Labor Force Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm) taken from the Current Population Survey. It should represent the total amount of employment in the industry as a whole as observed in their annual industry tables. Historical data is also available for more detailed analysis and information. \nIn 2019, over 14 million people were employed in this industry, up from just under 13 million in 2011.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 32,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the US achieve racial unemployment parity between racial groups labeled 'black' and 'white' by the Bureau of Labor Statistics?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6064/us-black-white-unemployment-parity/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Background\n==========\n\nThe gap in unemployment between black and white workers between the ages 35-44 stood at 2 percentage points in 2019, with black workers observing unemployment levels almost twice as high as those of their white peers. \nIn 2020, this historical trend between workers of all ages intensified.\n“The [Black unemployment rate] (https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/news/2020/09/28/490702/persistent-black-white-unemployment-gap-built-labor-market/) reached a high of 16.6 percent in May 2020, and as of August 2020, it was still at 13.2 percent. Conversely, the white unemployment rate fell to 6.9 percent in August 2020 from a high of 12.8 percent in April, or nearly half of the Black unemployment rate. The ratio of Black-to-white unemployment went from 1.27 in April 2020 to 1.97 in August 2020—that is, the Black unemployment rate is currently double the white unemployment rate.”\nIn case of the 2007 recession, the employment impacts in the US were felt most strongly black and Hispanic workers, men, youth, and low-education workers ( [Hoynes et al., 2012] (https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.26.3.27) ). These dramatic differences in the cyclicality across demographic groups are generally found to be stable across throughout recessionary periods. \nMoreover, some evidence suggests that labour market discrimination is counter-cyclical (such as [Johnston and Lordan (2015)] (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/63622/1/Lordan_Racial%20Prejudice.pdf) and [Jayadev and Johnson, (2017)] (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12114-017-9264-y) ).\nWhen will the US achieve racial unemployment parity?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution criteria can be obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics in their data analysis on the employment status of Americans by age, sex, and race. The table should be available from [here] (https://www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm) in the annual tables for employment by detailed demographic group (age, sex, and race).\nWhen unemployment levels for men between the ages of 35-44 in both the ‘White’ and ‘Black’ categories are equal, or 'Black' unemployment is lower than 'White' unemployment.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 50,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much will the US federal government spend on income security in 2021 (in billions)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6065/us-federal-budget-for-income-security-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Background\n==========\n\nIn 2020, with the spread of the Coronavirus pandemic, income security spending increased to [$1.5 trillion dollars by December 2020] (https://www.usaspending.gov/explorer/budget_function) . In Q1 2020, the allocated budget was only 7.9% of the total budget, with a monetary value of $134.7 billion dollars. However, by Q2, the percentage of the budget jumped up 2% to 9.8%. By Q3, it became the greatest percentage of the federal budget, over military, social security, and all healthcare payments, at more than 15%. \nWith the [new stimulus package/COVID-19 relief funding] (https://www.cnet.com/personal-finance/everything-in-the-new-stimulus-bill-600-stimulus-300-unemployment-checks-more/) expected for release sometime in 2021, at a total of over $900 billion dollars, the budget allocated for income security is likely to remain higher than normal. As the US attempts to re-open the economy, and lower the rate of transmission with the newly introduced vaccine, what the federal government chooses to support, and how they will fund it, remains an interesting question.\nHow much will the federal government spend on income security in 2021 (in billions)?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution criteria will be obtained from [USAspending.gov] (https://www.usaspending.gov/explorer/budget_function) . Data for 2021 should be available early in 2022, and historical data from 2017 is also present for each portion of the fiscal year (per quarter and month). It should represent the total amount by December 31st spent by the government, in billions, on income security.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 34,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of the US federal budget will be used for Medicare in 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6066/us-federal-budget-for-medicare-in-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Background\n==========\n\n[Medicare] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicare_(United_States)) , brought into existence by President Johnson in 1966, aimed to provide health insurance to US citizens over the age of 65 and to other individuals with disability status. In 2018, Medicare provided aid to almost 60 million individuals across America. At the end of 2020, Medicare constituted the second largest portion of the federal budget at 13.5% with a total monetary allocation of $1.3 trillion dollars.\nWhile beneficial to millions of Americans, the program still faces distrust and dislike by some portions of the American public, and most recently, President Trump. In January 2020, President [Trump announced] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/01/22/trump-appears-open-overhauling-social-security-medicare-break-2016-campaign/) that if elected again, he would begin the process of rolling back essential programs like Medicare and Social Security. Although President Elect Biden secured the win in the presidential election in 2020, Medicare is still estimated to [run out of proper funding] (https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/health/medicare-and-medicaid/2012-05/The-Future-Of-Medicare.pdf) for all expected expenses by 2024. \nWith an aging population in the US, the amount of money dedicated to health insurance, especially during the period of time during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, will need to increase to fully cover the growing number of health expenses. Since 2017, the amount of money dedicated to Medicare has already increased by approximately $300 billion dollars.\nWhat percentage of the federal budget will be used for Medicare in 2024?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution criteria will be obtained from [USAspending.gov] (https://www.usaspending.gov/explorer/budget_function) . Data for 2024 should be available early in 2025, and historical data from 2017 is also present for each portion of the fiscal year (per quarter and month).\n",
    "# Forecasts": 27,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the income ratio between men and women employed full-time by 2025 in the US?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6070/us-gender-income-ratio-by-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Background\n==========\n\nThe gender based pay gap has long existed as an issue across the US. Across all professions, levels of seniority, and time spent working, women made only [$0.81 to even man’s dollar] (https://www.payscale.com/data/gender-pay-gap) . Up 2% from 2019, and 7% from 2015, this gap is continuing to slowly close. It is estimated that without gender based pay discrimination and inequality, the natural gap would exist at approximately 98%. \nConsidering only individuals who work full time, ages 15 and greater, the gap is actually smaller, with rates in 2019 at [almost 83%] (https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/visualizations/2020/demo/p60-270/figure5.pdf) . Across the country, women are consistently employed in part time jobs at rates much higher than men, a significant factor in the continuation of these pay differneces. [Working part time fuels the pay gap] (https://www.epi.org/publication/part-time-pay-penalty/) and general gender inequality by decreasing hourly earnings below that of full-time workers, and also through the denial of employment benefits.\nWhat will be the income ratio between men and women employed full-time by 2025?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution will come from the [United States Census Bureau from Figure 5] (https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2020/demo/p60-270.html) (as of 12/20). Figure 5 is labeled as \"Female-to-Male Earnings Ratio and Median Earnings of Full-Time, Year-Round Workers 15 Years and Older by Sex: 1960 to 2019.\" Historical data is also available from 1959 onward. Predictions should be represented as the a ratio between 0 and 1.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Netanyahu remain Prime Minister of Israel following the Israeli legislative election of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6074/will-netanyahu-win-the-march-2021-election/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "68%",
    "Description": "On 23 March 2021, an election is scheduled for the Israeli Knesset.\nIn Israel, voters do not vote for Prime Minister but instead vote for their preferred political party. There are 120 seats in the Knesset, and whichever candidate can gain a 61-seat coalition [gets to form the ruling goverment] (https://www.jta.org/2019/09/26/israel/netanyahu-didnt-win-israels-election-so-why-is-he-getting-the-chance-to-form-a-government) , with the President of Israel stepping in to lead the process.\nWill Netanyahu remain Prime Minister of Israel following the Israeli legislative election of 2021?\nThis question resolves positive if Benjamin Netanyahu is sworn in as Prime Minister of the thirty-sixth goverment of Israel, according to either official Israeli sources or credible open-source media reporting (The Jerusalem Post, AP, Reuters, etc.). In cases of unclear resolution or failure to form new government (meaning Netanyahu remains PM), go with whether Netanyahu is still listed as PM on 30 June 2021 [on the official gov.il site] (https://www.gov.il/en/departments/prime_ministers_office) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 120,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will AI be able to accurately infer the implied ending of the children's book, \"I Want My Hat Back\"?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6087/when-will-ai-understand-i-want-my-hat-back/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The ending of the children's book \" [I Want My Hat Back] (https://smile.amazon.com/I-Want-My-Hat-Back/dp/0763655988/ref=smi_www_rco2_go_smi_4368549507?_encoding=UTF8&amp;%2AVersion%2A=1&amp;%2Aentries%2A=0&amp;ie=UTF8) \" by Jonathan Klassen implies that a rabbit was eaten by a bear. It is not stated explicitly, but clues throughout the short picture book make it clear what happened. Most human readers of a certain age can connect the dots, but when could AI?\nI call it the Bear Eats A Rabbit (BEAR) Test.\nI am working on a documentary about this very question and looking for more opinions on the feasibility of the task (hence why I am asking you fine people!). \nSee the first episode [here] (https://vimeo.com/477404920) .\nSo what do you think?\nWhen will AI be able to infer the implied ending of the children's book \"I Want My Hat Back\" and accurately answer the question: \"What happened to the rabbit\"?\nThis resolves positively when an AI system can take a scanned or digital copy of the book \"I Want My Hat Back\" as input and is able to correctly respond to the question \"What Happened to the rabbit?\" within no more than five tries. \nCorrect responses to the question are statements of the effect that the bear ate the rabbit (\"The bear ate it\", \"It was eaten by the bear\", or some equivalent). \nIf no serious attempts are made before 2041-01-01, this question resolves as \"&gt;2041-01-01\".\n",
    "# Forecasts": 184,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much will Open Philanthropy grant in their focus area of Potential Risks from Advanced Artificial Intelligence in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6091/open-phil-grants-to-ai-safety-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "One of [Open Philanthropy] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/) 's focus areas for making grants is reducing the chances of a [global catastrophic risk from advanced artificial intelligence] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/focus/global-catastrophic-risks/potential-risks-advanced-artificial-intelligence) . \nIn previous years, the total amounts granted were:\n---2020: $14,210,367 \n---2019: $63,234,500 ( [including a $55,000,000 grant to found the Center for Security and Emerging Technology] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/giving/grants/georgetown-university-center-security-and-emerging-technology) ) \n---2018: $4,160,392 \n---2017: $43,222,473 ( [including a $30,000,000 grant of general support to OpenAI] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/focus/global-catastrophic-risks/potential-risks-advanced-artificial-intelligence/openai-general-support) ) \n---2016: $7,749,985 \n---2015: $1,186,000 ( [to the Future of Life Institute] (Future of Life Institute) ) \nHow much will Open Philanthropy grant in their focus area of Potential Risks from Advanced Artificial Intelligence in 2021?\nThis will resolve at the total amount listed on Open Philanthropy's [Grants Database] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/giving/grants) page under the focus area Potential Risks from Advanced Artificial Intelligence made in the year 2021, when the first grant from 2022 is listed.\n---A grant is made in 2021 if the award date listed on its grant page is in 2021. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 44,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will YouTube be blocked in Russia in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6094/possible-youtube-ban-in-russia-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "Currently (on 30 Dec 2020) [there is a draft legislation has been passed] (https://www.financialexpress.com/industry/technology/russia-could-ban-facebook-twitter-youtube-for-censoring-content/2157891/) in Duma, Russian parliament, that will allow authorities to ban the websites for \"discriminating Russian media's content\". This legislation was passed after authorities received several complaints from the Russian media that their accounts were being censored by Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. Also, Russian political activist Alexey Navalny [published a video] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smhi6jts97I) on his YouTube channel, where he accuses FSB, Russian security service, of attempting to kill him.\nWill YouTube be blocked in Russia in 2021?\nThis question will be resolved positively if, according to at least 3 independent media reports, the entire Youtube website is blocked in Russia for at least 7 consecutive days in 2021. Otherwise it will be resolved negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 128,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the global average Democracy Index score be for 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6100/average-democracy-index-score-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Every year The Economist publishes the \"Democracy Index,\" scoring entities (166 countries, plus Hong Kong) from 0 to 10 based on five criteria (electoral process &amp; pluralism, functioning of government, political participation, political culture, and civil liberties). The most recent report is for 2019, and includes scores for 167 countries. Norway scores the highest at 9.87, and North Korea is last at 1.08. The global average is 5.44.\nThe numerical scores are also grouped into 4 categories:\n--- \nFull democracies (8-10]; 22 countries in 2019\n--- \nFlawed democracies (6-8]; 54 countries in 2019\n--- \nHybrid regimes (4-6]; 37 countries in 2019\n--- \nAuthoritarian regimes ([0-4]; 54 countries in 2019\nWhat will the global average Democracy Index score be for 2021?\nThis prediction resolves as the raw, unweighted arithmetic mean of all scores as assigned by The Economist for its report covering 2021. (I expect this to be published sometime in early 2022.) Note that not everything that gets a score is a full-fledged sovereign state. Data can be found at the Economist Intelligence Unit's website ( [here's 2019] (https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=democracyindex2019) , probably gated) and at [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 31,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will an anti-5G attack take a life in 2021 or 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6102/anti-5g-attack-to-take-life-in-20212022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "35%",
    "Description": "U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies [warned in May of 2020] (https://www.wired.com/story/the-dhs-prepares-for-attacks-fueled-by-5g-conspiracy-theories/) of escalating threats against 5G infrastructure. British [telecoms masts have been burned] (https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/3/21276912/5g-conspiracy-theories-coronavirus-uk-telecoms-engineers-attacks-abuse) and [British telecoms workers menaced] (https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/3/21276912/5g-conspiracy-theories-coronavirus-uk-telecoms-engineers-attacks-abuse) ; much the same at lesser scale has taken place in many other countries. Then on Christmas Day 2020 came [the bombing in Nashville] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Nashville_bombing) of an AT&amp;T building by a lone wolf extremist, who took himself out in the blast, but no others.\nWill an anti-5G attack take another's life in 2021 or 2022?\nWill a non-perpetrator be killed in an attack motivated in large part by opposition to 5G wireless technology before January 1st, 2023 (Eastern time)?\nResolves positive on multiple credible media reports that a non-perpetrator has been killed in an attack motivated in large part by opposition to 5G wireless technology, anywhere in the world. The killing must be directly in the course of the attack itself, including the final approach towards the target. Killings incidental to the preparation of the attack, such as a premature explosion during the construction phase of a bombing, or the shooting death of a police officer trying to arrest a person later found to have been planning a bombing, do not trigger a positive resolution. In close cases, whether the 5G motivation is \"in large part\" is ultimately a judgment call by Metaculus or Metaculus's moderator(s) based on their summation of credible media reports. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will ≥3 million Americans be locked down because of B117 by March 11th, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6104/b117-to-lock-down-3m-in-us-by-2021-03-11/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "SARS-CoV-2 var. B.1.1.7, the coronavirus strain first identified in the United Kingdom, is likely already seeded in most areas of the world. At question-writing time the community thinks it is [probably at least 50% more transmissible] (https://pandemic.metaculus.com/questions/6089/50-transmissible-variant-to-infect-10m/) than previous strains. If so this is likely to have serious consequences. [The New York Times describes] (https://www.baltimoresun.com/coronavirus/sns-nyt-new-virus-variant-response-20201231-o7ducojblzbnrli7jdneisnc2u-story.html) the situation as \"threatening to complicate what had seemed a hopeful, if halting, path to recovery\" and quotes an expert describing \"the overall picture\" as \"pretty grim.\"\nWill ≥3 million Americans be locked down because of B117 by March 11th, 2021?\nResolves positive if at any point, a total of three million or more people in the United States are reported to be under lockdown specifically because of B117. \"Lockdown\" means, in general, extraordinary measures more characteristic of last March and April than the rest of the pandemic, that are widely reported as \"lockdown\" (\"locking down,\" \"locked down,\" etc) in credible sources. Explicit official indications that the measures are extraordinarily severe, comparable to England's introduction of a new \"Tier 4\" of restrictions, are also strong evidence of \"lockdown.\" The lockdown cannot be probably or inferentially because of B117, but must be [explicitly stated by those mandating it] (https://news.yahoo.com/u-k-prime-minister-cites-180046044.html) to have been caused by B117, or by B117 and the South African 501.V2 variant collectively. In all close cases it is ultimately a judgment call by Metaculus or Metaculus's moderator(s) based on their summation of credible media reports.\n(The cutoff date is one year post-March 11th, 2020, the day the seriousness of the coronavirus epidemic in America hit home for many there.) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 145,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the UK reach herd immunity (>53.3m) for Covid-19?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6105/uk-covid-herd-immunity-533m-date/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Two vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been approved for use in the UK and the vaccination programme is underway. The Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine has an estimated efficacy of [~95%] (https://www.statnews.com/2020/11/18/pfizer-biontech-covid19-vaccine-fda-data/) and the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine has an estimated efficacy of [62%-90%] (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32661-1/fulltext) , depending on the dosing schedule. \nHerd immunity is expected to be reached when a sufficient proportion of the population has become immune to the virus, either through vaccination or past infection. [Current research suggests] (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.27.20081893v3.full-text) that the herd immunity threshold for this virus is 60%-70%. \nHowever, recent evidence indicates that [a more transmissible variant of SARS-CoV-2 has become dominant in the UK] (https://app.box.com/s/3lkcbxepqixkg4mv640dpvvg978ixjtf/file/756964987830) , which could raise the herd immunity threshold.\nWhen will the UK reach herd immunity &gt;53.3m for Covid-19?\nThis question resolves as the date when the first reliable media report is published stating that &gt;53.3m people in the UK ( 80% of the UK population) have either received a Sars-Cov-2 vaccine or been infected by the virus.\nSince the herd immunity threshold is difficult to ascertain, this question resolves when &gt;80% of people have been vaccinated or infected. This value is taken to be a proxy for herd immunity. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 148,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many ratings will Toby Ord's book The Precipice have on Amazon on January 1st 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6107/the-precipice-amazon-ratings-1-1-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Inspired by the previous [question for 1st Jan 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5119/how-many-ratings-will-toby-ords-book-the-precipice-have-on-amazon-on-january-1st-2021/) ]\nIn March 2020, Oxford philosopher [Toby Ord] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toby_Ord) published The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. It argues that safeguarding humanity's future is among the most important moral issues of our time. Fans of the book include [Nate Silver] (https://open.spotify.com/episode/4KRRk0hR6QengH1HsXyAi4) , [Max Roser] (https://twitter.com/maxcroser/status/13337236773309603840) , [Tom Chivers] (https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-close-is-humanity-to-destroying-itself) , [Scott Alexander] (https://slatestarcodex.com/2020/04/01/book-review-the-precipice/) , and [Cate Blanchett] (https://www.vogue.com.au/culture/features/cate-blanchett-and-rose-byrne-discuss-working-together-on-their-latest-emmynominated-series-mrs-america/news-story/3da3603822afd3c1b5d8b40bdbe2068c) . A [paperback edition] (https://www.amazon.com/Precipice-Existential-Risk-Future-Humanity/dp/031648492X) will be published in March 2021 in the US.\nAs of January 1st 2021 the book has [235 ratings on Amazon] (https://www.amazon.com/product-reviews/0316484911/) . You can view historical data in this [spreadsheet] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15Xm3KD_R45jYnVyqYbfNqxDTdHhR_Zs7uwlNI5ol35I/edit?usp=sharing) .\nHow many ratings will Toby Ord's book The Precipice have on Amazon on January 1st 2022?\nResolves according to ratings on [Amazon.com] (https://www.amazon.com/Precipice-Existential-Risk-Future-Humanity/dp/0316484911) at resolution time.\nA previous question resolved ambiguously due to confusion about ratings vs. reviews, see [the lengthy discussion here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4054/how-many-reviews-will-toby-ords-book-the-precipice-have-on-amazon-on-january-1st-2021/#comment-36532) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 48,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Norway leave EEA before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6108/norway-eea-membership-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "In 1994 Norway joined the EEA (at its creation) meaning that it participates in the single market allowing for the freer flow of goods, services, capital and people, but Norway doesn't have a say on the content of the rules of the single market as it is not in the EU. Also being in the EEA, but not in the EU allows countries to be outside of the EU VAT area, Common fisheries policy (this is seen as particularly important for Norway), Common Agricultural Policy, the Customs Union and the jurisdiction of the ECJ. When the implementation period ended the UK left the EEA and Sweden was just a member of the EEA before it entered the EU a year later in 1995.\nOn 31 December 2020 the UK entered into a trade agreement with the EU and left the EEA giving the UK more control of standards, but more trade friction due to rules of origin (though there is a one year exemption) and divergence of standards. In this context the [Center party in Norway has suggested it wants to leave the EEA and is performing well in the polls.] (https://www.politico.eu/article/norway-eu-relationship-center-party-euroskeptics/) \nWill Norway leave EEA before 2025?\nThis question will resolve when any of the following conditions occurs; the first to occur determines the resolution:\n---Norway leaves the EEA (Positive resolution) \n---2025-01-01 is reached (Negative resolution) \n---Either organization seizes to exist (Ambiguous resolution) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 46,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2025, according to the EA Survey, what percentage of donated dollars will go to charities that did not exist in 2020?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6109/ea-donations-to-new-charities-in-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Each year, the Effective Altruism Survey tracks information about how the EA community donates. For example, [the 2019 survey] (https://www.rethinkpriorities.org/blog/2020/2/14/ea-survey-2019-series-donation-data) found that, in 2018, survey participants reported $4 million in donations to specific charities. The Against Malaria Foundation was the most funded charity, with $1.1 million; followed by GiveWell, with $837,000.\nIn 2025, according to the EA Survey, what percentage of donated dollars will go to charities that did not exist in 2020?\nDonation data for 2025 should be taken from the 2026 EA Survey, or from whatever survey reports on 2025 donations. If no such survey is published by the end of 2027, then the question resolves ambiguously.\nThe set of donations to be considered is exactly the set of donations that are reported on the EA Survey.\nA charity is considered to exist at the date of whichever of the following conditions occurs first:\n1--The charity becomes a legally registered entity in at least one country. For the purposes of this question, a \"charity\" does not have to be a non-profit. (For example, an LLC that receives donations counts as a \"charity\".) \n2--The charity can receive public donations. (For example, a few organizations have been able to receive donations through the Centre for Effective Altruism before achieving registered charity status.) \nEdge cases:\n---If a charity founded in or before 2020 changes its name in 2021 or later, it is considered to have existed in 2020. \n---If a charity exists as the result of a merger between charities where each original charity existed prior to 2021, then it is considered to have existed in 2020. \n---If a charity exists as the result of a merger between charities, at least one of which was founded after 2020, then it is considered NOT to have existed in 2020. \n---If a charity that was founded in 2020 spins off a separate entity in 2021 or later, then the new entity is considered to have existed in 2020. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 32,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of final round votes will Sadiq Khan win in the 2021 London mayoral election?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6111/khan-final-round-mayoral-election-vote-share/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Sadiq Aman Khan] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sadiq_Khan) , born 8 October 1970, is a British politician serving as Mayor of London since 2016. He previously was Member of Parliament for Tooting from 2005 until 2016. A member of the Labour Party, Khan is on the party's soft left and has been ideologically characterised as a social democrat.\n[The 2021 London mayoral election] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_London_mayoral_election) will be held on 6 May 2021 to elect [the mayor of London] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayor_of_London) . It will be held simultaneously with elections for the London Assembly and other local elections. The mayoral and Assembly elections were originally due to be held on 7 May 2020, but in March 2020 it was announced the election would be postponed until 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.\nThe election will use a supplementary vote system, in which voters express a first and a second preference for candidates. \n--- \nIf a candidate receives more than 50% of the first preference vote, that candidate wins.\n--- \nIf no candidate receives more than 50% of first preference votes, the top two candidates proceed to a second round and all other candidates are eliminated.\n--- \nThe first preference votes for the remaining two candidates stand in the final count.\n--- \nVoters' ballots whose first and second preference candidates have both been eliminated are discarded.\n--- \nVoters whose first preference candidates have been eliminated and whose second preference candidate is one of the top two have their second preference votes added to that candidate's count.\nThis means that the winning candidate has the support of a majority of voters who expressed a preference among the top two.\nIn [the 2016 London mayoral election] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_London_mayoral_election#Results) , Khan's final round vote share was 56.8%.\n[Opinion polling] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_London_mayoral_election#Opinion_polls) in 2020 has shown Khan to be heavily favoured to win the election.\nWhat percentage of final round votes will Sadiq Khan win in the 2021 London mayoral election?\nThis question resolves as the percentage of the popular vote that Sadiq Khan wins in the final round of the 2021 London mayoral election. If the election is not held in 2021, this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 76,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many federal judges will the US Senate confirm in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6114/will-the-senate-confirm-many-judges-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The number of federal judges each president can get confirmed in the US Senate is enormously consequential for US government and policy. In 2019, the US Senate confirmed 102 judges, the 2nd highest total in its history. In 2020, [the Senate confirmed 55 judges (see previous Metaculus question here)] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/3514/how-many-judges-will-the-us-senate-confirm-in-2020/) . \nHowever, with a divided government looking likely in 2021, the Senate may confirm far fewer judges in 2021. Or they might confirm a whole lot. So:\nHow many federal judges will the US Senate confirm in 2021?\nResolution will be based on the number of judges confirmed in 2021 as listed on [this .gov page] (https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/judicial-vacancies/confirmation-listing) of US judges confirmed by Congress. If that source becomes unavailable, a source of comparable quality, including credible media reports if necessary, should be used at resolution time.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 64,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will there be at least one billion Americans?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6119/when-will-there-be-at-least-1bn-americans/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[One Billion Americans: The Case for Thinking Bigger] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Billion_Americans) is a book by [Matthew Yglesias] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Yglesias) , first published in 2020. \nOne Billion Americans argues for a variety of programs, including increased government spending on child care and day care, the use of S-trains for urban transportation, and increased immigration to the United States, under the general rubric of increasing the American population. It suggests that a substantial increase to the population of the United States is necessary to perpetuate American hegemony. The book gives special attention to housing policy, critiquing zoning requirements that limit urban density in American cities.\nAs of January 2021, [the US population is estimated to be approximately 330,779,000.] (https://www.census.gov/popclock/) \nYou can view [historical US population data since 1935 here.] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States#Vital_statistics) \nWhen will there be at least one billion Americans?\nThis question resolves as the earliest date when at least one billion persons are estimated to live in the United States, according to the US Census Bureau.\nIf the question does not resolve before January 1, 2121, it resolves as \"After January 1, 2121.\"\nIf no estimate from the Census Bureau is available (or an estimate from an equivalent department of the US government), another credible source, such as the CIA World Factbook or United Nations will be used. This question resolves when any of these sources estimate that at least one billion persons live in the United States. If any of the listed sources cease to exist before the question resolves, Metaculus administrators may select new credible sources of information.\nThis question tracks the resident population (not just US citizens) of every state in the US, as well as territories within the contiguous US. In 2021, this means the 50 states as well as the District of Columbia, and the various American Indian reservations, but not Puerto Rico, American Samoa, etc.\n[Emulated people] (https://ageofem.com/) shall be counted if they are included in the Census Bureau's typical (default) estimates of US residency. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 64,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the UK's Index of Economic Freedom score be for 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6121/uk-index-of-economic-freedom-score-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [Index of Economic Freedom] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Economic_Freedom) is an annual index and ranking created in 1995 by conservative, pro-market think-tank The Heritage Foundation and the The Wall Street Journal to measure the degree of economic freedom in the world's nations. The creators of the index claim to take an approach inspired by Adam Smith's in The Wealth of Nations, that \"basic institutions that protect the liberty of individuals to pursue their own economic interests result in greater prosperity for the larger society\". \nIn 2020, [the United Kingdom was ranked 7th in the world] (https://www.heritage.org/index/country/unitedkingdom?version=241) , with an overall score of 79.3.\nIn 2020, [the United Kingdom left the European Union] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brexit) . Some observers have suggested that the UK should seek to profit from Brexit by becoming a more economically free country after leaving the EU; this concept is sometimes known as [Singapore-on-Thames.] (https://capx.co/the-case-for-a-singapore-on-thames-brexit/) Singapore itself [scored 89.4 in the 2020 issue of the index] (https://www.heritage.org/index/country/singapore?version=247) , ranking first in the world.\nWhat will the UK's Index of Economic Freedom score be for 2025?\nThis question resolves as the overall score of the United Kingdom in the Index of Economic Freedom report for the year 2025.\nIf there is no sovereign state known as the United Kingdom in 2025, this question resolves ambiguously. This question also resolves ambiguously if the index or its 'overall score' are discontinued before 2025, or changed so substantially that Metaculus administrators consider that it would be inappropriate to continue with this question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 24,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the AstraZeneca/Oxford developed SARS-CoV-2 vaccine be granted emergency use authorization by the US FDA?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6124/astrazenecaoxford-vaccine-us-eua-date/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "AZD1222 (the AstraZeneca/Oxford developed SARS-CoV-2 vaccine) has been approved for use by [the United Kingdom] (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/oxford-universityastrazeneca-vaccine-authorised-by-uk-medicines-regulator) and granted emergency use authorization by [Argentina] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-argentina-astrazen/argentine-regulator-approves-astrazeneca-oxford-covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-idUSKBN29421P) , [El Salvador] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-el-salvador-vaccin/el-salvador-greenlights-astrazeneca-oxford-university-covid-19-vaccine-idINKBN2942HQ) , and [India] (https://in.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-india-vaccine-idINKBN296290) . This vaccine has been highly anticipated, [promising benefits] (https://www.vox.com/21590994/oxford-vaccine-results-covid-19-astrazeneca-trial-pfizer-moderna) such as stable storage in normal refrigerators and doses costing $3 to $4.\nHowever, as of January 3rd, Phase III trials are still ongoing. These trials have had issues, including a [failure to roll out a consistent dosing regimen] (https://www.wired.com/story/the-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-data-isnt-up-to-snuff/) and less than transparent disclosure.\nThe United States has pre-ordered [500m doses of the vaccine] (https://launchandscalefaster.org/COVID-19) , by far their largest order. However, the head of Operation Warp Speed was [reported as saying] (https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/30/astrazeneca-vaccine-april-452371) :\nAmericans likely won’t receive AstraZeneca's coronavirus vaccine before April because of lingering questions about its effectiveness in certain groups.\nWhen will the AstraZeneca/Oxford developed SARS-CoV-2 vaccine be granted emergency use authorization by the US FDA?\nThis question retroactively closes when the first reliable media report is published stating that AZD1222 has been submitted to the FDA for EUA. It resolves on the date when the FDA issues a statement (such as [this] (https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/moderna-covid-19-vaccine) for the Moderna vaccine) reporting the issuing of an emergency use authorization for AZD1222. If a EUA is never granted, this resolves as &gt;2021-12-31. If the EUA application is rejected, and later resubmitted, the close date will not change.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 55,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How good will the best available retinal prosthesis be in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6125/quality-of-retinal-implants-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[36 million people worldwide have total vision loss.] (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01107-8) Full availability of prevention and treatment would address many, but not all of those cases. Many millions are blind as a result of conditions that currently have no effective treatment, such as age-related macular degeneration. AMD is already a leading cause of incurable blindness in developed countries, and likely to become increasingly prevalent worldwide as standards of living and life expectancies increase.\nWhen enough functioning cells remain, as in most cases of AMD, it is possible to restore vision by implanting electrodes directly in the retina, to which the output of a camera is connected. To date [four such devices have been approved] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350159/) by regulators. The best visual acuity achieved, by the [Argus II] (https://secondsight.com/discover-argus/) , has been 1.8 logMAR (20/1260) over an 18×11° section – a life-changing improvement to be sure, but still well within the ≥1 logMAR score region considered legally blind.\nHow good will the best available retinal prosthesis be in 2030?\nThe question resolves according to the lowest achieved logMAR score for a retinal implant approved for general medical use in jurisdictions totalling populations of at least 50 million people.\nThe logMAR score (or equivalent) must be reported in a credible peer-reviewed journal article or in official submissions to regulators, made under penalty for misstatement, which were accepted in approving the device. It may be the best reported case, but it must refer to a normal, unmodified device in the configuration and manner of use approved by regulators, not to a one-off or prototype. It must be scaled to the Argus II's 198-square-degree vision field. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 47,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How good will the best available visual cortex prosthesis be in 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6126/quality-of-visual-cortex-implants-in-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[36 million people worldwide have total vision loss.] (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01107-8) Full availability of prevention and treatment would address many, but not all of those cases. When enough functioning cells remain, as in most cases of age-related macular degeneration, it is possible to restore vision by implanting electrodes directly in the retina, to which the output of a camera is connected. To date one such device has been approved by regulators, the [Argus II] (https://secondsight.com/discover-argus/) . However, when the retina or optic nerve itself is damaged, as typical of glaucoma, a more radical approach may be necessary. The same company that released the Argus II is currently trialing the [Orion] (https://www.bcm.edu/news/second-sight-study-brings-sight-to-blind) , a similar device that implants directly into the visual cortex. Described as \"basically a modified Argus II,\" it is likely to be approved within a few years.\nHow good will the best available visual cortex prosthesis be in 2030?\nThe question resolves according to the lowest achieved logMAR score for a cortical implant approved for general medical use in jurisdictions totalling populations of at least 50 million people.\nThe logMAR score (or equivalent) must be reported in a credible peer-reviewed journal article or in official submissions to regulators, made under penalty for misstatement, which were accepted in approving the device. It may be the best reported case, but it must refer to a normal, unmodified device in the configuration and manner of use approved by regulators, not to a one-off or prototype. It must be scaled to the Argus II's 198-square-degree vision field. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 47,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the largest 7-day average number of newly confirmed COVID-19 cases in the UK be, by June 1st, 2021",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6127/maximum-number-of-covid-19-cases-by-june-1st/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The UK is one of several European countries which have, in recent weeks, experienced a large uptick in COVID-19 cases. As of December 24th, the 7-day average number of cases was 38k per day.\nRecently, a new SARS-CoV-2 variant, [VOC 202012/01] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VOC-202012/01) (also known as 'lineage B.1.1.7'), emerged in England. Studies, such as this [pre-print] (https://cmmid.github.io/topics/covid19/reports/uk-novel-variant/2020_12_23_Transmissibility_and_severity_of_VOC_202012_01_in_England.pdf) , suggest that the variant is more transmissible than preexisting Sars-CoV-2 variants.\nWhat will the largest 7-day average number of newly confirmed COVID-19 cases in the UK be, by June 1st, 2021\nThis question resolves as the largest 7-day average of newly number of confirmed COVID-19 cases ('cases by specimen date'), according to the [UK's Dashboard] (https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/cases) before (but excluding) June 1st of 2021. \nThis question will resolve on June 7th 2021, so that accounting lags can be made up for.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 97,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much money will GiveWell move in 2031?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6140/how-much-money-will-givewell-move-in-2031/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[GiveWell] (https://www.givewell.org/) is a charity evaluator that recommends a shortlist of charities that have the greatest impact per marginal donation.\nGiveWell tracks how much money it moves to recommended charities. For instance, GiveWell [moved $152 million] (https://blog.givewell.org/2020/12/09/givewells-money-moved-in-2019/) in 2019.\nHow much money will GiveWell move in 2031?\nIf GiveWell does not exist, this question resolves as ambiguous.\nIf GiveWell does not report its money moved in 2031 and this information is not publicly accessible, this question resolves as ambiguous.\nFor this question, money moved equals the amount that can confidently be attributed to GiveWell's recommendations (in [the 2019 post] (https://blog.givewell.org/2020/12/09/givewells-money-moved-in-2019/) , \"headline money moved\" rather than \"best guess of total money directed to charities\").\n",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By January 14 2022, what will be the maximum compute (measured in petaFLOPS-days), used in training in an AI experiment?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6148/maximum-compute-in-ai-experiment-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nVarious figures in AI research have noted the importance of computer hardware for AI progress ( [LeCun et al., 2015] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14539) ; [Schmidhuber, 2015] (https://www2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/DeepLearningInNeuralNetworksOverview.JSchmidhuber2015.pdf) ). Exponential improvements in the computing power available for a given price, and the development of particular technologies such as graphics processing units (GPUs), have accelerated progress in multiple AI domains ( [Brundage, 2016] (https://www.milesbrundage.com/uploads/2/1/6/8/21681226/modelingprogressinai.pdf) ). \nRecent progress in has been accompanied by the use of increasing amounts of computation. [According to OpenAI] (https://openai.com/blog/ai-and-compute/) , since 2012, the amount of compute used in the largest AI training runs has been increasing exponentially with a 3.5 month doubling time. This trend sustained by both the continued progress in hardware performance, and increased spending on AI experiments [(AI Impacts, 2018)] (https://aiimpacts.org/interpreting-ai-compute-trends/) .\nBy January 14 2022, what will be the maximum compute (measured in petaFLOPS-days), used in training in an AI experiment?\nThis question shall resolve as a credible estimate of the cost of the most compute used in a \"single AI experiment\", as estimated using the methodology outlined below. By \"single AI experiment\" we mean an effort to train a set of models running on a set of \"architectures\". The effort should be completed within a determinate amount of time (the experiment must not have an open-ended time frame). For our purposes, the publication of the principal results of the effort ends the experiment. \nBy \"architectures\" we mean the systems described in the relevant publications that define how inputs signal or percept sequences are to be mapped on various outputs. These outputs might be probability distributions over actions (in the case of a policy network), representations over expected value or reward of futures states (in the case of value networks) or descriptions of futures states.\nMethodology\nThe following methodologies that were used by OpenAI [(Amodei et al., 2018)] (https://openai.com/blog/ai-and-compute/) shall produce our estimates. Method 1: \nWhen we had enough information, we directly counted the number of FLOPS (adds and multiplies) in the described architecture per training example and multiplied by the total number of forward and backward passes during training. \nIf there is not enough information to produce a reliable estimate using method 1, we shall use method 2:\nWhen we didn’t have enough information to directly count FLOPs, we looked GPU training time and total number of GPUs used and assumed a utilization efficiency (usually 0.33). For the majority of the papers we were able to use the first method, but for a significant minority we relied on the second, and we computed both whenever possible as a consistency check. In the majority of cases we also confirmed with the authors. The calculations are not intended to be precise but we aim to be correct within a factor 2-3.\nIn order to handle disputes over the correct resolution value, Metaculus admins will arrive at a preliminary compute estimate two weeks before the tournament resolution deadline and will post the estimate as a comment on this question, along with justification. Participants in the tournament will then have up to two weeks to dispute the preliminary estimate, and to offer alternative estimates. At the end of this two week period, the Metaculus admins will make a final determination as to the correct compute estimate, taking into account the arguments given during the dispute resolution period.\nThe results of any AI experiments published during the dispute resolution period will be ignored for the purpose of resolution. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 83,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much will the average degree of automation change for key US professions from December 2020 to January 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6149/change-in-degree-of-automation/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \n[The Occupational Information Network (O*NET)] (https://www.onetonline.org/) is a free online database that contains hundreds of occupational definitions to help students, job seekers, businesses and workforce development professionals to understand today's world of work in the United States.\nO*NET reports its estimate of the current level of the “degree of automation” for each job in its database. The scale ranges from 0 to 100 (0=slightly automated; 50=moderately automated; 75=highly automated; 100=completely automated).\nHow much will the average degree of automation change for key US professions from December 2020 to January 2022?\nFor the purpose of this question, the key profession are the following (with the degree of automation in December 2020 in brackets):\nGeneral and Operations Managers (32); Registered Nurses (26); Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers (39); Compliance Managers (18); Regulatory Affairs Managers (17); Retail Salespersons (29); Fast Food and Counter Workers (32); Cashiers (23); Customer Service Representatives (46); Lawyers (22); Treasurers and Controllers (40); Financial Managers (39); Baristas (41); Personal Care Aides (16); Wind Energy Operations Managers (39)\nThe average degree of automation of these professions is 30.6.\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the percentage change in the average degree of automation from the values in December 2020 (listed above) to the values on 2022-01-14 according to O-NET. Note in particular that:\n--- \nthe question resolves as the percent change from 30.6 to the value on 2022-01-14, not the average point change\n--- \npositive number represent an increase of the degree in automation, and negative numbers represent a decrease in the degree of automation\nIf any of the listed profession is no longer reported by O*NET, the calculation is to be done with the relevant profession dropped from both the December 2020 values the 2022-01-14 values.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 88,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art language modelling performance on One Billion Word be on 2022-01-14, in perplexity?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6154/sota-one-billion-words-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nLanguage modelling has been applied to a wide range of applications and domains with great success. To name a few, automatic speech recognition, machine translation, spelling correction, touchscreen “soft” keyboards and many natural language processing applications depend on the quality of language models.\nThe [One Billion Word dataset] (https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//pubs/archive/41880.pdf) , is a large dataset that consists of 829,250,940 tokens over a vocabulary of 793,471 words. Importantly, sentences in this model are shuffled and hence context is limited.\nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is Transformer-XL [Dai et al., 2019] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.02860v3.pdf) , which achieves at perplexity of 21.8.\nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/language-modelling-on-one-billion-word) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art language modelling performance on One Billion Word be on 2022-01-14, in perplexity amongst models not trained on additional data?\nThis question resolves as the lowest level of perplexity achieved by any language model on One Billion Words's test set up until 2022-01-14, 11:59 GMT. Qualifying models need to be trained on only the One Billion Words's training set—no extra training data may be used.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2022-01-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 78,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the value of the herein defined Image Classification Performance Index be on 2022-01-14?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6155/image-classification-index-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nImage classification is the task of identifying an image by assigning to it a specific label. Typically, Image Classification refers to images in which only one object appears and is analysed. In contrast, object detection involves both classification and localisation tasks, and is used to analyse more realistic cases in which multiple objects may exist in an image.\nIndex\nThe index is constructed as follows:\n---We take the average (arithmetic mean) of - ln (error) of the state-of-the-art performance across all benchmarks in the index \n---The index is then defined by scaling this mean so that its average value for the year 2019 is 100 \nThe following benchmarks are included in the Image Classification Performance Index:\nImage classification on: [ImageNet] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet) (in top-1 accuracy), [STL-10] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-stl-10) , [CIFAR-100] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100) , [SVHN] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-svhn) , [MiniImagenet 5-way (1-shot)] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/few-shot-image-classification-on-mini-2) , [Tiered ImageNet 5-way (1-shot)] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/few-shot-image-classification-on-tiered) , [CUB 200 5-way 1-shot] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/few-shot-image-classification-on-cub-200-5-1) , [Stanford Cars] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/fine-grained-image-classification-on-stanford) , [CUB200] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/fine-grained-image-classification-on-cub-200-1) , [FGVC Aircraft] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/fine-grained-image-classification-on-fgvc) \nHistorical data on the [Image Classification Performance Index may be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lakiJFeKbgiw8KoYwJ-6NvuZlMZG0cUmx7AH5lUL998/edit?usp=sharing) . As of writing this question, the index is at 114.88 for December 2020.\nWhat will the value of the herein defined Image Classification Performance Index be on 2022-01-14?\nThis question resolves as the value of this index on 2022-01-14, 11:59PM GMT.\nModels that are trained on multiple datasets do not qualify for the purpose of this question—only models trained on benchmark-specific datasets will be considered.\nA benchmark will be removed from the index if:\n---At the time of resolution no new performance data is available for new models for the specific benchmark over the previous 6 months \n---The value of - ln (error) for that benchmark exceeds 10 \nIf a benchmark is removed from the index, the index shall simply be re-constructed according the procedure outlined above.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2022-01-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case error is not natively reported, it is constructed by taking 1-accuracy/100, or 1-(percentage correct)/100.\nFor the purpose of this question, the SOTA models in 2019 represent in the linked Google sheet are assumed to represent the ground-truth, and to maintain consistency, these won't be revised in case these are found to be erroneous or invalid. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 71,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many e-prints on AI Safety, Interpretability or Explainability will be published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6157/ai-safety--other-2021-01-14-to-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\nAI Safety refers to a field aimed at developing techniques for designing AI systems that do not display unintended and harmful behaviour [(Amodei et al., 2016)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.06565.pdf) . A related problem is that of (the lack of) transparency and interpretability of complicated ML systems. Transparency and interpretability techniques aim to generate insights about what ML systems are doing. Such techniques may enable meaningful human oversight and in building fair, safe, and aligned AI systems [(Olah, 2018)] (https://distill.pub/2018/building-blocks/) .\nHow many e-prints on AI Safety, interpretability or explainability will be published on ArXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period?\nThis question resolves as the total number of Natural Language Processing e-prints published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question e-prints published under Computer Science that contain the following keywords in \"all fields\" (i.e. the abstract and title):\n\"ai safety\", \"ai alignment\", \"aligned ai\", \"value alignment problem\", \"reward hacking\", \"reward tampering\", \"tampering problem\", \"safe exploration\", \"robust to distributional shift\", \"scalable oversight\", \"explainable AI\", \"interpretable AI\", \"explainable model\", \"verification for machine learning\", \"verifiable machine learning\", \"interpretable model\", \"interpretable machine learning\", \"cooperative inverse reinforcement learning\", \"value learning\", \"iterated amplification\", \"preference learning\", \"AI safety via debate\", \"reward modeling\", \"logical induction\"\nThe query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science). You can [execute the query here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=%22ai+safety%22&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;terms-1-operator=OR&amp;terms-1-term=%22ai+alignment%22&amp;terms-1-field=all&amp;terms-2-operator=OR&amp;terms-2-term=%22aligned+ai%22&amp;terms-2-field=all&amp;terms-3-operator=OR&amp;terms-3-term=%22value+alignment+problem%22&amp;terms-3-field=all&amp;terms-4-operator=OR&amp;terms-4-term=%22reward+hacking%22&amp;terms-4-field=all&amp;terms-5-operator=OR&amp;terms-5-term=%22reward+tampering%22&amp;terms-5-field=all&amp;terms-6-operator=OR&amp;terms-6-term=%22tampering+problem%22&amp;terms-6-field=all&amp;terms-7-operator=OR&amp;terms-7-term=%22safe+exploration%22&amp;terms-7-field=all&amp;terms-8-operator=OR&amp;terms-8-term=%22robust+to+distributional+shift%22&amp;terms-8-field=all&amp;terms-9-operator=OR&amp;terms-9-term=%22scalable+oversight%22&amp;terms-9-field=all&amp;terms-10-operator=OR&amp;terms-10-term=%22explainable+AI%22&amp;terms-10-field=all&amp;terms-11-operator=OR&amp;terms-11-term=%22interpretable+AI%22&amp;terms-11-field=all&amp;terms-12-operator=OR&amp;terms-12-term=%22explainable+model%22&amp;terms-12-field=all&amp;terms-13-operator=OR&amp;terms-13-term=%22verification+for+machine+learning%22&amp;terms-13-field=all&amp;terms-14-operator=OR&amp;terms-14-term=%22verifiable+machine+learning%22&amp;terms-14-field=all&amp;terms-15-operator=OR&amp;terms-15-term=%22interpretable+model%22&amp;terms-15-field=all&amp;terms-16-operator=OR&amp;terms-16-term=%22interpretable+machine+learning%22&amp;terms-16-field=all&amp;terms-17-operator=OR&amp;terms-17-term=%22cooperative+inverse+reinforcement+learning%22&amp;terms-17-field=all&amp;terms-18-operator=OR&amp;terms-18-term=%22value+learning%22&amp;terms-18-field=all&amp;terms-19-operator=OR&amp;terms-19-term=%22iterated+amplification%22&amp;terms-19-field=all&amp;terms-20-operator=OR&amp;terms-20-term=%22preference+learning%22&amp;terms-20-field=all&amp;terms-21-operator=OR&amp;terms-21-term=%22AI+safety+via+debate%22&amp;terms-21-field=all&amp;terms-22-operator=OR&amp;terms-22-term=%22reward+modeling%22&amp;terms-22-field=all&amp;terms-23-operator=OR&amp;terms-23-term=%22logical+induction%22&amp;terms-23-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) .\nRunning this query for previous years gives:\n---80 for the calendar year 2017 \n---127 for the calendar year 2018 \n---275 for the calendar year 2019 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 66,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Fluvoxamine receive authorization for treatment of Covid by the United States FDA before 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6158/fluvoxamine-to-get-eua-for-covid-in-us/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "There is [theoretical] (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7382922/) and [observational] (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.09.20143339v2) data suggesting SSRI antidepressants might be helpful for Covid. Fluvoxamine (brand name Luvox) is an SSRI with [strong Sigma1R activation] (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24508523/) , which [may also be relevant] (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00406-020-01231-x) .\nA recent [small preregistered RCT] (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2773108) of Fluvoxamine reported a very positive effect, as did a not-yet-published [observational report] (https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AOES37qSxYr%5FN88&amp;cid=F3C3887684911EE4&amp;id=F3C3887684911EE4%2163948&amp;parId=F3C3887684911EE4%2159777&amp;o=OneUp) . A [larger trial is underway] (https://stopcovidtrial.wustl.edu/) by the same investigators as the first one.\nSummaries of the case for Fluvoxamine are available [here] (https://www.treatearly.org/promising-drugs) and [here] (https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1u7resy2bGA1_HIgj6Nc7ahzeS7DrpOtkiK5ywhQhmpk/edit#slide=id.gaeebd14cc9_0_79) from the director of a nonprofit which partially funded both trials. A writeup from WIRED magazine can be found [here] (https://www.wired.com/story/how-a-medication-for-ocd-ended-up-in-a-covid-19-trial/) .\nThis question asks:\nBefore 2022, will Fluvoxamine receive authorization for treatment of Covid by the United States FDA before the end of the pandemic?\nThis question resolves positively if, before 2022, the US FDA grants an emergency use authorization for the use of Fluvoxamine as a treatment for Covid.\nIn the unlikely event of full authorisation being granted without emergency use authorisation, this question will resolve positive.\nIf an EUA is granted but later revoked, this would not change the outcome of the question.\nThis resolves positively even if the authorization is limited to certain classes of higher-risk patients, as was the case for Bamlanivimab, and even if other governmental agencies (eg. NIH) do not recommend it as standard of care. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 28,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will most people in England be able to meet socially in a group of six in public outdoor places?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6168/meetings-of-six-people-outside-in-england/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "On 4th January 2021, Prime Minister Boris Johnson [announced that England would enter a third national lockdown] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQopV_NlYNc) .\nThe [restrictions] (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/national-lockdown-stay-at-home) include a ban on socially meeting anyone outside your home or 'support bubble' (but allow you to exercise outdoors with one such person).\nBefore this lockdown, it was possible in some regions (those in 'tier 3' or below out of four) to meet others in public outdoor places, such as beaches or parks, but only in groups of up to 6 people.\nWhen will most people in England be legally able to meet socially in a group of six in public outdoor places?\nThis question resolves on the earliest date on which the majority of the population of England are legally allowed to meet any five other local people in public outdoor places, such as beaches or parks.\nBy 'any five local people', we mean that the question should not resolve if (say) each person were allowed to pick a fixed 'bubble' of people they are allowed to meet with. But the question should resolve positively even if mixing is not allowed with people from certain other regions.\nTo be precise, the question should resolve when the majority of people in England could truthfully say \"There are at least 10,000 people I could legally arrange to meet in a public outdoor place today in a group of six, if I could contact them and they agreed.\" \n",
    "# Forecasts": 90,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will most people in England be legally able to meet socially in a group of six in private indoor places?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6169/meetings-of-six-people-inside-in-england/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "On 4th January 2021, Prime Minister Boris Johnson [announced that England would enter a third national lockdown] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQopV_NlYNc) .\nThe [restrictions] (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/national-lockdown-stay-at-home) include a ban on socially meeting anyone outside your home or 'support bubble' (but allow you to exercise outdoors with one such person).\nIn the four-tiered system of restrictions in place before the lockdown, it was possible in \"tier 1\" regions to meet others indoors or outdoors, but only in groups of up to 6 people.\nWhen will most people in England be legally able to meet socially in a group of six in private indoor places?\nThis question resolves on the earliest date on which the majority of the population of England are legally allowed to meet any five other local people in a private indoor place, such as a house.\nBy 'any five local people', we mean that the question should not resolve if (say) each person were allowed to pick a fixed 'bubble' of people they are allowed to meet with. But the question should resolve positively even if mixing is not allowed with people from certain other regions.\nTo be precise, the question should resolve when the majority of people in England could truthfully say \"There are at least 10,000 people I could legally arrange to meet inside my home today in a group of six, if I could contact them and they agreed.\" \n",
    "# Forecasts": 52,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will government guidance allow indoor parties of any 100 people in England?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6170/indoor-party-of-100-people-in-england/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "One of the main measures the UK government has taken against the COVID-19 pandemic is a series of restrictions on social gatherings. Some of these restrictions have been legally enforceable, while others have just been guidance. In particular, the law and guidance has variously restricted the size of social gatherings, the location (indoors or outdoors), who can attend, and the distance that should be kept between people.\nWhen will government guidance allow indoor parties of any 100 people in England?\nThis question resolves when it is no longer against the law or government guidance for any 100 people in England to meet socially (for non-essential purposes) in a private place indoors with no physical distancing between people and no face coverings being worn.\n'Any 100 people in England' implies that the question should not resolve if only people in a fixed 'bubble' can meet, or if there are any restrictions on travel between parts of England, or if only people with negative tests or who have been vaccinated can have such parties. It should obviously ignore cases such as prisoners who are not allowed to meet others.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 64,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many consecutive Presidents of the United States will there be?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6175/number-of-united-states-presidents/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [United States of America] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States) is a North American country that was established on July 4, 1776. The first [President of the United States] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States) was George Washington, and Donald John Trump is the 45th and current President.\nAlthough it may seem hard to imagine a future where there is no President of the United States for an extended period of time, political systems and the fates of nations change over time.\nUntil now, there have only been [minor gaps of a few days] (https://www.quora.com/Whats-the-longest-time-the-United-States-has-gone-without-a-president) between the end of one president's term and the swearing in of the next.\nHow many consecutive Presidents of the United States will there be, until that office remains vacant for a period of three consecutive months?\nThe question will resolve after the first span of three consecutive months where the office of the President of the United States is vacant, retroactively to the time at which the office became vacant. The time of resolution will be determined by the judgement of the Metaculus moderators on the basis of reliable news reports.\nIf the chief executive office is renamed, such that there is no longer a President of the United States, but there is still a single chief executive with the same or broadly similar powers and responsibilities, this will not trigger resolution. The aim of the question is to identify the date when there is no longer a single chief executive officer of the US.\nThe question shall track presidents who are democratically elected, or those appointed through the constitutional line of succession. If the US constitution is amended, such that presidents no longer have term limits or are appointed by other methods, the question will include those presidents, so long as they hold their power legally (defined by the contemporaneous constitution). \n",
    "# Forecasts": 40,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the USA enter a second civil war before 2031?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6179/second-us-civil-war-before-2031/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "Context\n\nAlthough democracies are generally unlikely to enter civil war (see this [list of civil wars] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_civil_wars#1945_to_2020) for a rough overview), the United States faces a particularly unusual situation at the moment. The current [COVID-19 pandemic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic) , [social protests] (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/03/us/george-floyd-protests-crowd-size.html) , effects of [social media platform manipulation] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PGm8LslEb4) , and the [presidential election] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election) all have the potential to disrupt social cohesion and garner negative attitudes toward the government. See this related question for a shorter timeframe: [Will the USA enter a second civil war before July 2021?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4764/will-the-usa-enter-a-second-civil-war-before-july-2021/) \nThis question asks, Will the United States of America (USA) enter a second civil war before 2031?\n\nResolution Criteria\n\nThis resolves positively if and only if all of the following are met before 2031:\n---The [Insurrection Act] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act_of_1807) is invoked. \n---While the Insurrection Act is invoked, there are at least 500 deaths in a 6 month period as a result of armed conflicts between US residents and a branch of the US military, national guard, or in conflicts between/among such branches. \n---All of these deaths occur in any US state (including DC). \nThis will retroactively close 14 days prior to the 500th death (as closely as metaculus admins can determine). Credible sources will be used to determine the total number of deaths and when and where they occurred.\nAny conflicts between the US military and the armed forces of another country will be excluded from consideration in this question. Conflicts between the US military and US residents, possibly supported by other nations with weapons or resources, will be included.\nConflicts between civilians and local police will not be included, unless there are active armed forces in the region providing mutual support.\nDeaths are calculated among all of the states (and Washington, DC) in the United States. New states which are admitted shall be included, states which secede or are removed, will not be included. Suicides do not count towards the death count. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 161,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art language modelling performance on WikiText-103 be at 2022-01-14 in perplexity?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6182/sota-wikitext-103-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nLanguage modelling has been applied to a wide range of applications and domains with great success. To name a few, automatic speech recognition, machine translation, spelling correction, touchscreen “soft” keyboards and many natural language processing applications depend on the quality of language models.\nThe [WikiText language modelling dataset] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.07843.pdf) is a collection of over 100 million tokens extracted from the set of verified Good and Featured articles on Wikipedia. These articles have been reviewed by humans and are considered well written, factually accurate, broad in coverage, neutral in point of view, and stable. \nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is\nkNN-LM [(Khandelwal et al. 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.00172v2) , which achieves a perplexity of 15.79 on the WikiTex-103 test set.\nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/language-modelling-on-wikitext-103) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art language modelling performance on WikiText-103 be at 2022-01-14 in perplexity amongst models not trained on additional data?\nThis question resolves as the lowest level of perplexity achieved by any language model on WikiText-103's test set before 2022-01-14, 11:59PM GMT. Qualifying models need to be trained on only the WikiText-103's training set—no extra training data may be used.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2022-01-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 71,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art performance on image classification on ImageNet be at 2022-01-14 in top-1 accuracy?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6183/sota-imagenet-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nImage Classification is the task of identifying an image by assigning to it a specific label. Typically, Image Classification refers to images in which only one object appears and is analysed. In contrast, object detection involves both classification and localisation tasks, and is used to analyse more realistic cases in which multiple objects may exist in an image.\nImageNet [(Deng et al., 2009)] (http://www.image-net.org/papers/imagenet_cvpr09.pdf) is a large scale dataset images built upon the backbone of the [WordNet] (https://wordnet.princeton.edu/) structure. ImageNet is one of the largest visual recognition datasets which contains high-resolution images. It has tens of millions of annotated images organized by the semantic hierarchy of WordNet. \nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is EfficientNet-B8 [(Wei et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.11342v1.pdf) , which achieves a top-1 accuracy of 85.8% on ImageNet.\nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art performance on image classification on ImageNet be at 2022-01-14 in top-1 accuracy amongst models not trained on additional data?\nThis question resolves as the highest level of performance, in top-1 accuracy, achieved on ImageNet up until 2022-01-14, 11:59PM GMT amongst models trained on only the ImageNet's validation set (ImageNet does not clearly demarcate its validation and training sets). No extra training data may be used besides the original ImageNet dataset.\nFor the purpose of this question, augmented versions of the ImageNet dataset, such as ImageNet-V2 [(Recht, 2019)] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10811) , are considered different from [Deng et al., 2009's] (http://www.image-net.org/papers/imagenet_cvpr09.pdf) dataset.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2022-01-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 89,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the highest Exact Match rate of the best-performing model on SQuAD2.0 be on 2022-01-14?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6184/sota-on-squad20-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nThe Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD) is a reading comprehension dataset, consisting of questions posed by crowdworkers on a set of Wikipedia articles, where the answer to every question is a segment of text, or span, from the corresponding reading passage, or the question might be unanswerable. SQuAD1 was introduced in 2016 by [Rajpurkar et al] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05250) .\nIn 2018, [Rajpurkar et al] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03822) introduced a SQuAD2.0, which combines the 100,000 questions in SQuAD1.1 with over 50,000 unanswerable questions written adversarially by crowdworkers to look similar to answerable ones. To do well on SQuAD2.0 systems must not only answer questions when possible (like in Squad1) but also determine when no answer is supported by the paragraph and abstain from answering.\nAs of writing this question, the best model is SA-Net on Albert (ensemble), which gets an exact match 90.724% of the time (meaning its predictions match the ground truth exactly, 90.724% of the time). Notably, this is better than human performance, which gets an exact rate at a rate of only 86.83%.\nWhat will the highest Exact Match rate of the best-performing model on SQuAD2.0 be on 2022-01-14?\nThis question resolves as the best SQuAD2.0, in Exact Match, as displayed on [the relevant leaderboard] (https://rajpurkar.github.io/SQuAD-explorer/) at 11:59 PM GMT on 2022-01-14.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 11:59 PM GMT on 2022-01-14 to qualify.\nIn case [the relevant leaderboard] (https://rajpurkar.github.io/SQuAD-explorer/) is not maintained, other credible sources should be consulted.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 63,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many e-prints on multi-modal learning will be published on ArXiv over the 2021-12-14 to 2022-01-14 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6185/multi-modal-ml-2021-01-14-to-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\nMultimodal machine learning aims to build models that can process and relate information from multiple modalities (including linguistic, acoustic and visual signals). Multimodal machine learning enables a wide range of applications: from audio-visual speech recognition to image captioning [(Baltrusaitis et al., 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.09406.pdf) .\nHow many e-prints on multi-modal learning will be published on ArXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period?\nThis question resolves as the total number of e-prints on multi-modal ML systems will be published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question e-prints published over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period (inclusive) under Computer Science that contain the following keywords:\n\"Multimodal Machine Learning”, \"multimodal representation”, “multimodal representation learning\", “multimodal AI”, “multimodal artificial intelligence”, “multimodal feature learning”, “multimodal observations”, “Multimodal deep Learning”, “Multimodal reinforcement learning”, “multimodal fusion”, Multi-modal Machine Learning”, Multi-modal Machine Learning”, “multi-modal representation learning”, “multi-modal AI”, “multi-modal artificial intelligence”, “multi-modal feature learning”, “multi-modal observations”, “Multi-modal deep Learning”, “Multi-modal reinforcement learning”, “multi-modal fusion”, “cross-modal learning”, “multi-modality learning”, “multimodality learning\"\nThe query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science). The query may be [executed here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=%22Multimodal+Machine+Learning%22&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;terms-1-operator=OR&amp;terms-1-term=%22multimodal+representation%22&amp;terms-1-field=all&amp;terms-2-operator=OR&amp;terms-2-term=%22multimodal+representation+learning%22&amp;terms-2-field=all&amp;terms-3-operator=OR&amp;terms-3-term=%22multimodal+AI%22&amp;terms-3-field=all&amp;terms-4-operator=OR&amp;terms-4-term=%22multimodal+artificial+intelligence%22&amp;terms-4-field=all&amp;terms-5-operator=OR&amp;terms-5-term=%22multimodal+feature+learning%22&amp;terms-5-field=all&amp;terms-6-operator=OR&amp;terms-6-term=%22multimodal+observations%22&amp;terms-6-field=all&amp;terms-7-operator=OR&amp;terms-7-term=%22Multimodal+deep+Learning%22&amp;terms-7-field=all&amp;terms-8-operator=OR&amp;terms-8-term=%22Multimodal+reinforcement+learning%22&amp;terms-8-field=all&amp;terms-9-operator=OR&amp;terms-9-term=%22multimodal+fusion%22&amp;terms-9-field=all&amp;terms-10-operator=OR&amp;terms-10-term=%22Multi-modal+Machine+Learning%22&amp;terms-10-field=all&amp;terms-12-operator=OR&amp;terms-12-term=%22multi-modal+representation+learning%22&amp;terms-12-field=all&amp;terms-13-operator=OR&amp;terms-13-term=%22multi-modal+AI%22&amp;terms-13-field=all&amp;terms-14-operator=OR&amp;terms-14-term=%22multi-modal+artificial+intelligence%22&amp;terms-14-field=all&amp;terms-15-operator=OR&amp;terms-15-term=%22multi-modal+feature+learning%22&amp;terms-15-field=all&amp;terms-16-operator=OR&amp;terms-16-term=%22multi-modal+observations%22&amp;terms-16-field=all&amp;terms-17-operator=OR&amp;terms-17-term=%22Multi-modal+deep+Learning%22&amp;terms-17-field=all&amp;terms-18-operator=OR&amp;terms-18-term=%22Multi-modal+reinforcement+learning%22&amp;terms-18-field=all&amp;terms-19-operator=OR&amp;terms-19-term=%22multi-modal+fusion%22&amp;terms-19-field=all&amp;terms-20-operator=OR&amp;terms-20-term=%22cross-modal+learning%22&amp;terms-20-field=all&amp;terms-21-operator=OR&amp;terms-21-term=%22multi-modality+learning%22&amp;terms-21-field=all&amp;terms-22-operator=OR&amp;terms-22-term=%22multimodality+learning%22&amp;terms-22-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=2019&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) .\nRunning this query for previous years gives:\n---45 for the calendar year 2017 \n---71 for the calendar year 2018 \n---91 for the calendar year 2019 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 53,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art performance on one-shot image classification on miniImageNet be, at 2022-01-14 in accuracy?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6191/sota-on-miniimagenet-at-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nImage Classification is the task of identifying an image by assigning to it a specific label. Typically, Image Classification refers to images in which only one object appears and is analysed. In contrast, object detection involves both classification and localisation tasks, and is used to analyse more realistic cases in which multiple objects may exist in an image.\nThe miniImageNet dataset contains 100 classes randomly chosen from [ImageNet] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.0575.pdf) and 600 images of size 84×84 pixels per class. It is split into 64 base classes, 16 validation classes and 20 novel classes.\nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is ResNeSt-200 PT+MAP [(Hu et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.03806v2.pdf) , which achieves an accuracy of 82.92.\nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/few-shot-image-classification-on-mini-1) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art performance on one-shot image classification on miniImageNet be, at 2022-01-14 in accuracy amongst models not trained on additional data?\nThis question resolves as the highest level of performance achieved on miniImageNet up until 2022-01-14, 11:59PM GMT amongst models trained on only the miniImageNet's data—no extra training data may be used.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2022-01-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 72,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "By January 1st 2031, what will be the maximum compute (measured in petaFLOPS-days), used in training in an AI experiment?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6192/maximum-compute-in-ai-experiment-2031-01-01/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nVarious figures in AI research have noted the importance of computer hardware for AI progress ( [LeCun et al., 2015] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14539) ; [Schmidhuber, 2015] (https://www2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/DeepLearningInNeuralNetworksOverview.JSchmidhuber2015.pdf) ). Exponential improvements in the computing power available for a given price, and the development of particular technologies such as graphics processing units (GPUs), have accelerated progress in multiple AI domains ( [Brundage, 2016] (https://www.milesbrundage.com/uploads/2/1/6/8/21681226/modelingprogressinai.pdf) ). \nRecent progress in has been accompanied by the use of increasing amounts of computation. [According to OpenAI] (https://openai.com/blog/ai-and-compute/) , since 2012, the amount of compute used in the largest AI training runs has been increasing exponentially with a 3.5 month doubling time. This trend sustained by both the continued progress in hardware performance, and increased spending on AI experiments [(AI Impacts, 2018)] (https://aiimpacts.org/interpreting-ai-compute-trends/) .\nBy By January 1st 2031, what will be the maximum compute (measured in petaFLOPS-days), used in training in an AI experiment?\nThis question shall resolve as a credible estimate of the cost of the most compute used in a \"single AI experiment\", as estimated using the methodology outlined below. By \"single AI experiment\" we mean an effort to train a set of models running on a set of \"architectures\". The effort should be completed within a determinate amount of time (the experiment must not have an open-ended time frame). For our purposes, the publication of the principal results of the effort ends the experiment. \nBy \"architectures\" we mean the systems described in the relevant publications that define how inputs signal or percept sequences are to be mapped on various outputs. These outputs might be probability distributions over actions (in the case of a policy network), representations over expected value or reward of futures states (in the case of value networks) or descriptions of futures states.\nMethodology\nThe following methodologies that were used by OpenAI [(Amodei et al., 2018)] (https://openai.com/blog/ai-and-compute/) shall produce our estimates. Method 1: \nWhen we had enough information, we directly counted the number of FLOPS (adds and multiplies) in the described architecture per training example and multiplied by the total number of forward and backward passes during training. \nIf there is not enough information to produce a reliable estimate using method 1, we shall use method 2:\nWhen we didn’t have enough information to directly count FLOPs, we looked GPU training time and total number of GPUs used and assumed a utilization efficiency (usually 0.33). For the majority of the papers we were able to use the first method, but for a significant minority we relied on the second, and we computed both whenever possible as a consistency check. In the majority of cases we also confirmed with the authors. The calculations are not intended to be precise but we aim to be correct within a factor 2-3.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 66,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the average top price performance (in G3D Mark /$) of the best available GPU be, on Jan 14, 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6194/top-price-performance-in-g3d-mark--of-gpu/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nMost modern neural network implementations are based on graphics processing units [[1]] (https://www.deeplearningbook.org/) . This is because GPUs have a much larger number of cores than CPUs, and are thus better suited to executing highly parallelizable programs. Hence, migrating data into graphical form and then using the GPU to scan and analyze it can create a large training speedup for training ML models [[2]] (https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14539) .\n[Videocard benchmarks] (https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/) is a benchmarking project by [Passmark] (https://www.passmark.com/) , a software company. It aggregates performance and price data on GPUs. One of the measures of performance it uses is [3DMark] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3DMark) , a computer benchmarking tool.\nWhat will the average top price performance (in G3D Mark /$) of the best available GPU be, on Jan 14, 2022?\nThis question resolves as the mean price performance (in G3D Mark / Price) of the top two currently available GPUs by price performance, on January 14th, 2022, 11:59PM GMT, according to [Videocard benchmarks] (https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/) .\nGPU prices used to calculate price performance by Passmark will be converted to Q2 2020 USD. Prices are adjusted to (average) 2019 prices using [Consumer Price Index: Total All Items for the United States] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPALTT01USQ661S) .\nThe question resolves ambiguously if [Videocard benchmarks] (https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/) ceases to report G3D Mark, or its methodology changes substantially. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 70,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will 50% of the US population be vaccinated against Covid-19?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6200/50-of-the-us-vaccinated-against-covid-when/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The Covid-19 vaccination rollout in the United States has been much [slower than anticipated] (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/covid-19-vaccine-doses.html) , with fewer than 7 million people having received a shot by Jan. 7, 2021, far short of the goal of 20 million by the end of December 2020.\nHowever, new attempts are being made in streamlining the vaccination process. This may speed up the rate that shots are delivered, or it may do very little. So:\nWhen will 50% of the US population be vaccinated against Covid-19?\nResolves positive when 165 million people in the US have completed their course of vaccination (so, after both shots for multi-shot treatments) for a vaccine with efficacy &gt;70%. Resolution via credible media reports.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 189,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will 25% of the US population be vaccinated against Covid-19?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6201/25-of-the-us-vaccinated-against-covid-when/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The Covid-19 vaccination rollout in the United States has been much [slower than anticipated] (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/covid-19-vaccine-doses.html) , with fewer than 7 million people having received a shot by Jan. 7, 2021, far short of the goal of 20 million by the end of December 2020.\nHowever, new attempts are being made in streamlining the vaccination process. This may speed up the rate that shots are delivered, or it may do very little. So:\nWhen will 25% of the US population be vaccinated against Covid-19?\nResolves positive when 82.5 million people in the US have completed their course of vaccination (so, after both shots for multi-shot treatments) for a vaccine with efficacy &gt;70%. Resolution via credible media reports.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 117,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the UK have a 7 day rolling average above 2,000 covid deaths before June?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6202/uk-2kday-covid-deaths/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "7.000000000000001%",
    "Description": "The UK is experiencing its highest number of coronavirus cases, and recently reached its highest single day death figure (1325 on 8 January 2021). A [previous question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5746/uk-second-wave-deadlier-than-first/) on whether the UK's second wave will be more deadly than the first has a community prediction currently sitting at 99%. Will this wave continue to get worse?\nWill the UK have a 7 day rolling average above 2,000 COVID deaths before 1 June 2021?\nThis resolves on the basis of deaths data from the UK government's [COVID-19 dashboard] (https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/deaths) . This question will resolve positively if, before the end date of the second wave as defined below, there is a 7-day period over which the Deaths within 28 days of positive test by date reported on the dashboard exceed 14000.\nIf the UK government dashboard is unavailable, resolution will be according to [ourworldindata] (https://ourworldindata.org/) .\nData updates meaning that more than 6000 previously unrecorded deaths are recorded on a single day are not sufficient for resolution. If such an update occurs, the number of deaths for that day shall be taken to be the number of deaths recorded 7 days prior (to ensure the same day of the week).\nThis question should retroactively close 24 hours before the data update which causes resolution. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 351,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Washington D.C. become a state before 2025-01-20?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6218/dc-statehood-before-before-2025-01-20/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "24%",
    "Description": "Residents of Washington DC have long been frustrated by a lack of (voting) representation in the US Congress, as well as local governance problems arising from the city's status as a federal district. \nMembers of Congress have in the past introduced legislation intending to convert much of the current federal district into a new state. President-elect Biden has in the past vocalized support for such resolutions. \nThere are numerous proposals for the exact details of such a transition, most including a prominent 'rump federal district' around the US Capitol building.\nWill Washington D.C. become a state before 2025-01-20?\nThis question resolves yes if legislation making some portion of DC a new state becomes law before January 20, 2025. The legislation need not go into effect by that date. This question resolves No if DC's status remains unchanged, if DC is retroceded to Maryland, or if DC is otherwise granted some, but not all rights afforded to a state.\nResolution by credible reports and/or absence of credible reports. If the result is unclear, this question may resolve ambiguous. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 99,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many patients will the Shandong Yinfeng Life Science Research Institute report by 2026?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6221/patients-at-chinese-cryonics-org-by-2026/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "From the [South China Morning Post] (https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/article/3103054/freezing-bodies-reanimation-china-and-why-countrys) ,\nThe Shandong Yinfeng Life Science Research Institute is the only cryonics research centre in China and one of only four such institutes in the world. The centres provide cryonic suspension: preserving bodies at extremely low temperatures with the hope of one day “reviving” them. But Yinfeng’s research goes further, and has the potential to revolutionise organ transplant, body-part reattachment and other medical treatments.\nAccording to the Oregon Cryonics page on [terminology] (http://www.oregoncryo.com/terminology.html) , \nWe refer to a body or brain that we are trying to preserve as a patient.\nAs of September 27th 2020, the Shandong Yinfeng Life Science Research Institute is storing 10 patients.\nHow many patients will the Shandong Yinfeng Life Science Research Institute report by 2026?\nThis question resolves as the number of patients stored by the Shandong Yinfeng Life Science Research Institute as of the most recent media or official report published before 2026. If no such report is published after or during 2024, this question resolves ambiguously.\nIn case the organization changes its name, this question resolves according to the new organization, which is its successor. In the case the Shandong Yinfeng Life Science Research Institute goes bankrupt or ceases to exist, this question resolves as the number of patients they stored before they stopped existing, if a report was published after or during 2024.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 18,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the next interstellar object be discovered?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6225/next-interstellar-object/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The first [interstellar object] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstellar_object) , 1I/2017 ( ['Oumuamua] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CA%BBOumuamua) ) was discovered by the Pan-STARRS survey in 2017. The second interstellar object, [2I/Borisov] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2I/Borisov) was discovered at the MARGO observatory in Crimea in August 2019.\nAlthough only two Solar System interlopers of definitive interstellar origin have been discovered thus far, next generation sky surveys such as the [Vera Rubin Observatory/LSST] (https://www.lsst.org/) (first light expected in October 2021) are expected to find more such objects. Nonetheless, the population and occurrence of these objects is relatively unconstrained.\nWhen will the next interstellar object be discovered?\nThis question resolves on the date that a newly discovered interstellar object receives an [\"I\" designation] (https://minorplanetcenter.net//mpec/K17/K17V17.html) from the [IAU Minor Planet Center] (https://minorplanetcenter.net/) . That is, regardless of any available \" [precovery] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precovery) \" data, this question resolves when the formal \"interstellar\" label is given. If no objects are given this designation before 12/31/2030, this question resolves as \"&gt;12/31/30.\"\n",
    "# Forecasts": 45,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art performance on semantic segmentation on Cityscapes be at 2022-01-14 in mean IoU in percent (MIoU%)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6227/sota-segmentation-cityscapes-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nSemantic segmentation, or image segmentation, is the task of clustering parts of an image together which belong to the same object class. It is a form of pixel-level prediction because each pixel in an image is classified according to a category [(Thoma, 2016)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.06541.pdf) .\n[Cityscapes] (https://www.cityscapes-dataset.com/) is a large-scale dataset that contains a diverse set of stereo video sequences recorded in street scenes from 50 different cities, with high quality pixel-level annotations of 5,000 frames in addition to a larger set of 20,000 weakly annotated frames.\nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for semantic segmentation on Cityscapes is ResNeSt-200 [(Zhang et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.08955v1.pdf) , which achieves 83.3 mIoU% (see their [detailed results here] (https://github.com/zhanghang1989/ResNeSt) . \nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/semantic-segmentation-on-cityscapes) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art performance on semantic segmentation on Cityscapes be at 2022-01-14 in mean IoU in percent (MIoU%) amongst models not trained on additional data?\nThis question resolves as the highest level of performance (in MIoU%) achieved on the [Cityscapes (2016)] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.01685) dataset up until 2022-01-14, 11:59PM GMT amongst models trained on only the Cityscapes's training set—no extra training data may be used. The model's level of performance is to be evaluated on the Cityscape's test set.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2020-06-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 65,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art performance on image classification on ImageNet be at 2026-12-14 in top-1 accuracy?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6228/sota-on-imagenet-2026-12-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nImage Classification is the task of identifying an image by assigning to it a specific label. Typically, Image Classification refers to images in which only one object appears and is analysed. In contrast, object detection involves both classification and localisation tasks, and is used to analyse more realistic cases in which multiple objects may exist in an image.\nImageNet [(Deng et al., 2009)] (http://www.image-net.org/papers/imagenet_cvpr09.pdf) is a large scale dataset images built upon the backbone of the [WordNet] (https://wordnet.princeton.edu/) structure. ImageNet is one of the largest visual recognition datasets which contains high-resolution images. It has tens of millions of annotated images organized by the semantic hierarchy of WordNet. \nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is EfficientNet-B8 [(Wei et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.11342v1.pdf) , which achieves a top-1 accuracy of 85.8% on ImageNet.\nA good reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art performance on image classification on ImageNet be at 2026-12-14 in top-1 accuracy amongst models not trained on additional data?\nThis question resolves as the highest level of performance, in top-1 accuracy, achieved on ImageNet up until 2020-06-14, 11:59PM GMT amongst models trained on only the ImageNet's validation set (ImageNet does not clearly demarcate its validation and training sets). No extra training data may be used besides the original ImageNet dataset.\nFor the purpose of this question, augmented versions of the ImageNet dataset, such as ImageNet-V2 [(Recht, 2019)] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10811) , are considered different from [Deng et al., 2009's] (http://www.image-net.org/papers/imagenet_cvpr09.pdf) dataset.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2026-12-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 60,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art language modelling performance on WikiText-103 be at 2024-12-14 in perplexity?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6229/sota-on-wikitext-103-2024-12-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nLanguage modelling has been applied to a wide range of applications and domains with great success. To name a few, automatic speech recognition, machine translation, spelling correction, touchscreen “soft” keyboards and many natural language processing applications depend on the quality of language models.\nThe [WikiText language modelling dataset] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1609.07843.pdf) is a collection of over 100 million tokens extracted from the set of verified Good and Featured articles on Wikipedia. These articles have been reviewed by humans and are considered well written, factually accurate, broad in coverage, neutral in point of view, and stable. \nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is\nkNN-LM [(Khandelwal et al. 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.00172v2) , which achieves a perplexity of 15.79 on the WikiTex-103 test set.\nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/language-modelling-on-wikitext-103) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art language modelling performance on WikiText-103 be at 2024-12-14 in perplexity amongst models not trained on additional data?\nThis question resolves as the lowest level of perplexity achieved by any language model on WikiText-103's test set before 2024-12-14, 11:59PM GMT. Qualifying models need to be trained on only the WikiText-103's training set—no extra training data may be used.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2024-12-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 66,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the highest score be, on Atari 2600 Montezuma's Revenge, by any ML model that is un-augmented with domain knowledge on 2022-01-14?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6230/sota-montezumas-revenge-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \n[Reinforcement learning] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinforcement_learning) is a type of machine learning which focuses on methods that enable agents to learn to maximize some posited conception of cumulative reward. It has been become a core method of AI and machine learning research and practice. Atari games have been a long-standing benchmark in the reinforcement learning (RL) community for the past decade.\nAt the time of writing this question, the model Go-Explore [(Ecoffet et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.12919v2.pdf) has achieved the highest score at 43,791 without augmentation with domain knowledge. Although this exceeds the average human performance, it's still far below the human [world record of 1,342,100] (http://www.ataricompendium.com/game_library/high_scores/high_scores.html) \nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/atari-games-on-atari-2600-montezumas-revenge) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the highest score be, on Atari 2600 Montezuma's Revenge, by any ML model that is un-augmented with domain knowledge on 2022-01-14?\nThis question resolves as the highest score achieved by any model that does not harness any game-specific domain knowledge on Atari 2600 Montezuma's Revenge on 2022-01-14.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2022-01-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nDomain knowledge include the position of the agent, details about the room numbers, level numbers, and knowledge about the location of keys (for a description of 'domain knowledge' in the context of Montezuma's Revenge, see [Ecoffet et al., 2020] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.12919v2.pdf) ).\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 93,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the value of the herein defined Object Detection  Performance Index be on 2022-01-14?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6231/object-detection-index-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nObject detection is the task of detecting instances of objects of a certain class within an image.\nWhat will the value of the herein defined Object Detection Performance Index be on 2022-01-14?\nThe index is constructed as follows:\n--- \nWe take the average (arithmetic mean) of - ln (error) of the state-of-the-art performance across all benchmarks in the index\n--- \nThe index is then defined by scaling this mean so that its average value for the year 2019 is 100 \nThe following benchmarks are included in the Object Detection Performance Index:\nObject detection on: [COCO test] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/object-detection-on-coco) , [COCO minival] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/object-detection-on-coco-minival) , [CrowdHuman (full body)] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/object-detection-on-coco-minival) . 3D object detection on: [KITTI Cars Moderate] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-kitti-cars-moderate) , [KITTI Cars Easy] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-kitti-cars-easy) , [KITTI Cars Hard] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-kitti-cars-hard) , [KITTI Cyclists Hard] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-kitti-cyclists-hard) , [KITTI Pedestrians Moderate] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-kitti-pedestrians) , [SUN-RGBD val] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-sun-rgbd-val) , [Real-time object detection on COCO] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/real-time-object-detection-on-coco) , and [Weakly Supervised object detection on Pascal VOC 2007] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/weakly-supervised-object-detection-on-pascal-1) .\nHistorical data on the [Object Detection Performance Index may be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q1elx7DnblyQ9K9hoJiF8auiB-f6sErreWzjIecyq50/edit?usp=sharing) .\nThis question resolves as the value of this index on 2022-01-14, 11:59PM GMT.\nModels that are trained on multiple datasets do not qualify for the purpose of this question—only models trained on benchmark-specific datasets will be considered.\nA benchmark will be removed from the index if:\n---At the time of resolution no new performance data is available for new models for the specific benchmark over the previous 6 months \n---The value of - ln (1 - error) for that benchmark exceeds 50 \nIf a benchmark is removed from the index, the index shall simply be re-constructed according the procedure outlined above.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2022-01-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nFor the purpose of the index, error is calculated as 1-(average precision)/100. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 65,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the the sum of the level of performance (in exaFLOPS) of the all 500 supercomputers in the TOP500 be according to their November 2021 list?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6232/total-compute-top500-supercomputers-nov-21/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nIn the seven decades since the invention of the [point-contact transistor] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point-contact_transistor) at Bell Labs, relentless progress in the development of semiconductor devices — Moore’s law — has been achieved despite [regular warnings] (https://www.nature.com/news/the-chips-are-down-for-moore-s-law-1.19338) from industry observers about impending limits.\nThe TOP500 project collects and ranks system performance metrics of the most powerful non-distributed computer systems in the world. The project was started in 1993 and publishes an updated list of the supercomputers twice a year. The first of these updates always coincides with the [International Supercomputing Conference] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISC_High_Performance) in June, and the second is presented at the [ACM/IEEE Supercomputing Conference] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACM/IEEE_Supercomputing_Conference) in November.\nThe TOP500 ranks high-performance computing (HPC) by recording how fast a computer system solves a dense n by n system of linear equations in double precision (64 bits) arithmetic on distributed-memory computers ( [TOP500, 2019] (https://www.top500.org/project/linpack/) ). This is an implementation of the High Performance Computing [Linpack Benchmark] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LINPACK_benchmarks) .\nWhat will the the sum of the level of performance (in exaFLOPS) of the all 500 supercomputers in the TOP500 be according to their November 2021 list?\nThis question resolves as the sum of performance (at Rmax) in exaFLOPS (1 exaFLOP = FLOPS) of all supercomputers listed on the November 2021 TOP500 list. \nHistorical data can [be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18Mha2f9RIQCAAg41vm_UkP524pt59vvD7TcjHZ1SHXw/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if TOP500 stops reporting performance in terms of Rmax measured in TFlop/s on the Linpack benchmark. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 72,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What share (in %) of the world's super-compute performance will be based in the United States in the November 2026 publication of TOP500 list?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6233/us-share-of-world-supercompute-june-2026/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nSince the TOP500 project was started in 1993, supercomputers in the United States have always made up the majority of the world's super-compute performance [(TOP500, 2019)] (https://www.top500.org/statistics/overtime/) . According to TOP500's biannual report, the share of super-compute based in the United States peaked in November of 2008 at 67.02%, and has since been declining most years and was 28.18% in June 2020.\nWhat share (in %) of the world's super-compute performance will be based in the United States in the November 2026 publication of TOP500 list?\nThe question resolves as the share of the world's super-compute performance at the maximum achieved performance on the LINPACK benchmark (Rmax), in teraFLOPS, that is based in the United States in the November 2026 TOP500 list. \nYou can find the [relevant chart of the historical shares here] (https://top500.org/statistics/overtime/) .\nData\nHistorical data can [be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zJ20X1TM16gdYuW5JERUqnVLfpwthynG_mAAzZQOxcM/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if TOP500 stops reporting performance in terms of Rmax measured in TFlop/s on the Linpack benchmark. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 79,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the the performance be of the top-performing supercomputer (in exaFLOPS) in the TOP500 be according to their June 2030 list?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6234/performance-of-top-supercomputer-in-june-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nThe TOP500 project collects and ranks system performance metrics of the most powerful non-distributed computer systems in the world. The project was started in 1993 and publishes an updated list of the supercomputers twice a year. The first of these updates always coincides with the [International Supercomputing Conference] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISC_High_Performance) in June, and the second is presented at the [ACM/IEEE Supercomputing Conference] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACM/IEEE_Supercomputing_Conference) in November.\nThe TOP500 ranks high-performance computing (HPC) by recording how fast a computer system solves a dense n by n system of linear equations in double precision (64 bits) arithmetic on distributed-memory computers ( [TOP500, 2019] (https://www.top500.org/project/linpack/) ). This is an implementation of the High Performance Computing [Linpack Benchmark] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LINPACK_benchmarks) .\nWhat will the the performance be of the top-performing supercomputer (in exaFLOPS) in the TOP500 be according to their June 2030 list?\nThis question resolves as highest performance (at Rmax) in exaFLOPS (1 exaFLOP = FLOPS) of all supercomputers listed on the June 2030 TOP500 list. \nData\nHistorical data can [be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18Mha2f9RIQCAAg41vm_UkP524pt59vvD7TcjHZ1SHXw/edit?usp=sharing) . Please make a copy by clicking \"file\" and then \"make a copy\" if you wish to edit it.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if TOP500 stops reporting performance in terms of Rmax measured in TFlop/s on the Linpack benchmark. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 97,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much will the average degree of automation change for key US professions change from December 2020 to December 2026?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6236/change-in-degree-of-automation-20-to-26/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \n[The Occupational Information Network (O*NET)] (https://www.onetonline.org/) is a free online database that contains hundreds of occupational definitions to help students, job seekers, businesses and workforce development professionals to understand today's world of work in the United States.\nO*NET reports its estimate of the current level of the “degree of automation” for each job in its database. The scale ranges from 0 to 100 (0=slightly automated; 50=moderately automated; 75=highly automated; 100=completely automated).\nFor the purpose of this question, the key profession are the following (with the degree of automation in December 2020 in brackets):\nGeneral and Operations Managers (32); Registered Nurses (26); Software Quality Assurance Analysts and Testers (39); Compliance Managers (18); Regulatory Affairs Managers (17); Retail Salespersons (29); Fast Food and Counter Workers (32); Cashiers (23); Customer Service Representatives (46); Lawyers (22); Treasurers and Controllers (40); Financial Managers (39); Baristas (41); Personal Care Aides (16); Wind Energy Operations Managers (39)\nThe average degree of automation of these professions is 30.6.\nHow much will the average degree of automation change for key US professions change from December 2020 to December 2026?\nThis question resolves as the percentage change in the average degree of automation from the values in December 2020 (listed above) to the values on 2026-12-14 according to O-NET. Note in particular that:\n--- \nthe question resolves as the percent change from 30.6 to the value on 2026-12-14, not the average point change\n--- \npositive number represent an increase of the degree in automation, and negative numbers represent a decrease in the degree of automation\nIf any of the listed profession is no longer reported by O-NET, the calculation is to be done with the relevant profession dropped from both the mean for December 2020 and for the values on 2026-12-14.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 78,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will 32 million people in the UK have received a dose of a COVID-19 vaccine?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6238/date-32m-first-covid-vaccine-doses-in-uk/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "From [the UK COVID-19 vaccines delivery plan] (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-covid-19-vaccines-delivery-plan) :\n4.3 The government’s top priority is to ensure that everyone in cohorts 1-4 is offered the opportunity to receive their first dose of vaccination against COVID-19 by 15 February. It will likely take until Spring to offer the first dose of vaccination to the JCVI priority groups 1-9, with estimated cover of around 27 million people in England and 32 million people across the UK.\n4.4 It is estimated that taken together, these at-risk groups account for 99% of all deaths from COVID-19 to date.\nThe UK [is prioritising giving more people one dose of the vaccine] (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prioritising-the-first-covid-19-vaccine-dose-jcvi-statement/optimising-the-covid-19-vaccination-programme-for-maximum-short-term-impact) , with the second dose given around 12 weeks later.\n[This BBC article on the vaccine rollout] (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55274833) provides some useful context.\nWhen will 32 million people in the UK have received a dose of a COVID-19 vaccine?\nThis question resolves when the UK government reports [here] (https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/healthcare) that the cumulative number of people who have received a first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine across the UK reaches 32,000,000.\nIf there is a reporting lag, the question resolves on the date the vaccinations actually exceeded 32 million, rather than the date of the public report.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 169,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the combined sector weighting of Information Technology and Communications be, in the S&P 500 on 2022-01-14?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6240/it-and-comms-weighting-in-sp500-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nElectricity, internal combustion engines, and semiconductors facilitated automation in the last century, but AI now seems poised to automate many tasks once thought to be out of reach, from driving cars to making medical recommendations and beyond. \nHowever, measured productivity growth has actually declined by half over the past decade [[2]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w24001) . To some extent, this may be evidence that information technology and other conventional stuff (non-informational inputs or outputs) aren't actually so cheaply or widely substitutable [[3]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w21547.pdf) .\nThe prospects of growth of tech and automation may also be constrained by [Baumol’s “cost disease”] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumol%27s_cost_disease) : sectors with rapid productivity growth are able to charge lower prices and subsequently have their share of GDP decline, whilst those with relatively slow productivity growth experience increases in their share of the value contributed to the economy. This might effectively cap the rate of growth of the value of tech as a proportion of the total economy [ [4] (https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/AI.pdf) ].\nBrynjolfsson et al. [[5]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w24001.pdf) have argued that recent progress in AI and automation might well be radically productivity enhancing, but this might yet go largely unnoticed because of an implementation lag: it takes considerable time to be able to sufficiently harness technologies with broad potential application that they qualify as general purpose technologies. Will the stock market bear this out sometime soon?\nWhat will the combined sector weighting of Information Technology and Communications be, in the S&amp;P 500 on 2022-01-14?\nThis resolves as the sum of the sector weightings of Information Technology and Communication Services of the [SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF] (https://us.spdrs.com/en/etf/spdr-sp-500-etf-SPY) on 2021-06-14 (in %), according to its Index Sector Breakdown.\nAs of writing, the S&amp;P500 has a 27.71% weighting in IT and 11.13% in Communications Services. If it were to resolve now, it would resolve as 27.71% + 11.13% = 38.84%.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 69,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the 7-day rolling average for US COVID-19 deaths drop below 500?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6241/us-covid-19-deaths-below-500/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This US is currently experiencing its [third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic] (https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus/country/united-states?country=~USA) , infecting individuals at a rate higher than that seen in either previous wave. While vaccines are currently being [rolled out at an increasing rate] (https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEHpFx-7p1eOTt6cw8LQpAGoqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow4uzwCjCF3bsCMIrOrwM?hl=en-US&amp;gl=US&amp;ceid=US:en) , the threat of the [novel B.117 variant] (https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/covid-19/report-42-sars-cov-2-variant/) with increased infectiousness threatens to counteract those effects.\n[According to the CDC] (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#trends) , there has only been two days since April 1st when the rolling 7 day average of COVID deaths has dropped below 500 (July 5th and July 6th).\nWhen will the 7-day rolling average for US COVID-19 deaths drop below 500?\nThis question retroactively closes and resolves as the first date which the CDC reports the 7-day moving average of COVID deaths is less than 500 on [this page] (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#trends) .\nIf the CDC is no longer updating this page, a suitable alternative resolution source will be found.\nIf no such date occurs on or before December 28, 2021, this question resolves as &gt;December 28, 2021.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 115,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many e-prints on Few-Shot Learning will be published on ArXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6245/few-shot-learning-2021-01-14-to-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\nFew-shot learning methods have been developed to explicitly optimize machine learning models that predict new classes using only a few labelled examples per class. Few-shot learners use prior knowledge, and can generalize to new tasks containing only a few samples with supervised information [(Wang et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.05046.pdf) .\nHow many e-prints on Few-Shot Learning will be published on ArXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period?\nThis question resolves as the total number of Few-Shot Learning e-prints published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question, Few-Shot Learning e-prints are those published under Computer Science that contain any of the following key words in \"all fields\":\n\"few shot\", \"1-shot\", \"one-shot\", \"five-shot\", \"10-shot\", \"ten-shot\", \"zero shot\", \"0 shot\", \"low-shot learning\", \"small sample learning\"\nThe query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science).\nThe query can be [executed here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?advanced=&amp;terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=%22few+shot%22&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;terms-1-operator=OR&amp;terms-1-term=%221-shot%22&amp;terms-1-field=all&amp;terms-2-operator=OR&amp;terms-2-term=%22one-shot%22&amp;terms-2-field=all&amp;terms-3-operator=OR&amp;terms-3-term=%22five-shot%22&amp;terms-3-field=all&amp;terms-4-operator=OR&amp;terms-4-term=%2210-shot%22&amp;terms-4-field=all&amp;terms-5-operator=OR&amp;terms-5-term=%22ten-shot%22&amp;terms-5-field=all&amp;terms-6-operator=OR&amp;terms-6-term=%22zero+shot%22&amp;terms-6-field=all&amp;terms-7-operator=OR&amp;terms-7-term=%220+shot%22&amp;terms-7-field=all&amp;terms-8-operator=OR&amp;terms-8-term=%22low-shot+learning%22&amp;terms-8-field=all&amp;terms-9-operator=OR&amp;terms-9-term=%22small+sample+learning%22&amp;terms-9-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) . Running this query for previous years gives:\n---203 for the calendar year 2017 \n---350 for the calendar year 2018 \n---700 for the calendar year 2019 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 61,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Natural Language Processing e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6246/nlp-e-prints-2021-01-14-to-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\nNatural language processing (NLP) combines linguistics and artificial intelligence to enable computer systems to understand, process or generate human or natural language input.\nHow many Natural Language Processing e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the total number of Natural Language Processing e-prints published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question, Natural Language Processing e-prints published under Computer Science that are have the [cs.CL] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=cs.cl&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) category. Note that for the purpose of this question, the tag will be searched in \"all fields\". The query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science). The query [may be executed here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=cs.cl&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) .\nThe [cs.CL] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=cs.cl&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) cross-list category category, [according to arXiv] (https://arxiv.org/corr/subjectclasses) :\nCovers natural language processing. Roughly includes material in ACM Subject Class I.2.7. Note that work on artificial languages (programming languages, logics, formal systems) that does not explicitly address natural-language issues broadly construed (natural-language processing, computational linguistics, speech, text retrieval, etc.) is not appropriate for this area.\nRunning this query for previous years gives:\n---2,397 for the calendar year 2017 \n---3,726 for the calendar year 2018 \n---5,390 for the calendar year 2019 \n---7,127 for the calendar year 2020 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 56,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art object detection performance on COCO be, at 2022-01-14 in average precision (AP)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6248/sota-object-detection-on-ms-coco-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nObject detection is the task of detecting instances of objects of a certain class within an image. [Microsoft's Common Objects in Context] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0312) (COCO) is a dataset from 2014 that is used to benchmark object recognition. The data places the question of object recognition in the context of the broader question of scene understanding. It contains images of complex everyday scenes containing common objects in their natural context. COCO includes a total of 2.5 million labeled instances in 328k images.\nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is YOLOv4- large [(Wang et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.08036v1.pdf) , which achieves an average precision (AP) of 55.8.\nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/object-detection-on-coco) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art object detection performance on COCO be, at 2022-01-14 in average precision (AP)?\nThis question resolves as the highest level of performance in AP achieved on COCO test-dev (COCO's test set) up until 2022-01-14 11:59 GMT. Only models trained on only the COCO data (no extra training data may be used). For the purpose of this question, models using [Test Time Augmentations] (https://www.kaggle.com/andrewkh/test-time-augmentation-tta-worth-it) may qualify.\nFor the purpose of this question, by AP, we mean the primary performance metric on the MS COCO dataset, which is AP when averaged are over multiple Intersection over Union (IoU) values (.5, .05, .95) (see [MS COCO] (https://cocodataset.org/#detection-eval) ).\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2022-01-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 55,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the Federal Reserves' Industrial Production Index be for November 2021, for semiconductors, printed circuit boards and related products?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6249/november-2021-production-of-semiconductors/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nSemiconductor devices are key devices in modern electronics.. The main applications as electronic devices are junction diodes, transistors, and memories, which are widely used in large-scale integrated circuits [[1]] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0123694019004976) . The [printed circuit board] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printed_circuit_board) is the platform upon which microelectronic components such as semiconductor chips and capacitors are mounted.\nWhat will the [Federal Reserves' Industrial Production Index] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPB53122S) be for November 2021, for semiconductors, printed circuit boards and related products?\nThis question resolves as the value of the Federal Reserves' Industrial Production (IP) Index [Industrial Production: Durable Goods Materials: Semiconductors, Printed Circuit Boards, and Other] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPB53122S) for November 2021. \nThe industrial production (IP) index measures the real output of all relevant establishments located in the United States, regardless of their ownership, but not those located in U.S. territories.\nThe index is constructed so that the mean value for the base period 2012 is 100. In case the Index adopts a different base period, we shall reconstruct the series so that the mean value for 2012 is 100 and use this transformed index to resolve the question.\nIn case a new base-period by the FED, admins will still resolve the question by constructing the index such that the base-period remains 2012. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 53,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Reinforcement Learning e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6250/reinforcement-learning-2021-01-14-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\nReinforcement learning (RL) is a subfield of machine learning, based on rewarding desired behaviours and/or punishing undesired ones of an agent interacting with its environment [(Sutton and Barto, 2014)] (https://web.stanford.edu/class/psych209/Readings/SuttonBartoIPRLBook2ndEd.pdf) .\nHow many Reinforcement Learning e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the total number of Reinforcement Learning e-prints published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question, Reinforcement Learning e-prints are those published under Computer Science that contain any of the following key words in \"all fields\":\n\"Reinforcement Learning\", \"DQN\", \"Q-learning\", \"Deep Q Network\", \"Temporal difference learning\", \"Sarsa\", \"TD learning\" \"Proximal policy optimization\"\nThe query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science). The query [may be executed here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=%22Reinforcement+Learning%22&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;terms-1-operator=OR&amp;terms-1-term=%22DQN%22&amp;terms-1-field=all&amp;terms-2-operator=OR&amp;terms-2-term=%22Q-learning%22&amp;terms-2-field=all&amp;terms-3-operator=OR&amp;terms-3-term=%22Temporal+difference+learning%22&amp;terms-3-field=all&amp;terms-4-operator=OR&amp;terms-4-term=%22Deep+Q+Network%22&amp;terms-4-field=all&amp;terms-5-operator=OR&amp;terms-5-term=%22Sarsa%22&amp;terms-5-field=all&amp;terms-6-operator=OR&amp;terms-6-term=%22TD+learning%22&amp;terms-6-field=all&amp;terms-7-operator=OR&amp;terms-7-term=%22Proximal+policy+optimization%22&amp;terms-7-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) .\nRunning this query for previous years gives:\n---779 for the calendar year 2017 \n---1,404 for the calendar year 2018 \n---2,287 for the calendar year 2019 \n---3,046 for the calendar year 2020 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 49,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When there will be the first European trillion-dollar company?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6251/the-first-european-trillion-dollar-company/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Currently, only [five companies] (https://companiesmarketcap.com/) in the world have a market capitalization valuation of more than USD 1 trillion. Four of them (Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet) are based in the United States. One of them is a Saudi Arabian oil company, Saudi Aramco. \nThe list of companies with the highest market valuation is dominated by companies based in the USA and China. \nOnly 3 European companies have a market valuation of more than $300 B. These are food producer Nestlé, healthcare company Roche, and luxury goods conglomerate LVMH. The most valuable tech company SAP has a valuation only above $150 B.\nWhen there will be the first European trillion-dollar company?\nThis question will resolve positively on the day when credible media sources report that the first publicly traded European company has reached a market capitalization of $1 trillion. Value will be calculated by multiplying the total number of a company's outstanding shares by the current market price of one share.\nAs a European company counts any company with headquarters in Europe. Europe is defined as being a member of the Schengen Area or the European Union. The share price will be taken from any European stock exchange where the company is listed and actively traded.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 22,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the value of the herein defined Object Detection  Performance Index be on 2026-12-14?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6252/object-detection-index-2026-12-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nObject detection is the task of detecting instances of objects of a certain class within an image.\nWhat will the value of the herein defined Object Detection Performance Index be on 2026-12-14?\nThe index is constructed as follows:\n--- \nWe take the average (arithmetic mean) of - ln (error) of the state-of-the-art performance across all benchmarks in the index\n--- \nThe index is then defined by scaling this mean so that its average value for the year 2019 is 100 \nThe following benchmarks are included in the Object Detection Performance Index:\nObject detection on: [COCO test] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/object-detection-on-coco) , [COCO minival] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/object-detection-on-coco-minival) , [CrowdHuman (full body)] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/object-detection-on-coco-minival) . 3D object detection on: [KITTI Cars Moderate] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-kitti-cars-moderate) , [KITTI Cars Easy] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-kitti-cars-easy) , [KITTI Cars Hard] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-kitti-cars-hard) , [KITTI Cyclists Hard] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-kitti-cyclists-hard) , [KITTI Pedestrians Moderate] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-kitti-pedestrians) , [SUN-RGBD val] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/3d-object-detection-on-sun-rgbd-val) , [Real-time object detection on COCO] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/real-time-object-detection-on-coco) , and [Weakly Supervised object detection on Pascal VOC 2007] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/weakly-supervised-object-detection-on-pascal-1) .\nHistorical data on the [Object Detection Performance Index may be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q1elx7DnblyQ9K9hoJiF8auiB-f6sErreWzjIecyq50/edit?usp=sharing) .\nThis question resolves as the value of this index on 2026-12-14, 11:59PM GMT.\nModels that are trained on multiple datasets do not qualify for the purpose of this question—only models trained on benchmark-specific datasets will be considered.\nA benchmark will be removed from the index if:\n---At the time of resolution no new performance data is available for new models for the specific benchmark over the previous 6 months \n---The value of - ln (1 - error) for that benchmark exceeds 50 \nIf a benchmark is removed from the index, the index shall simply be re-constructed according the procedure outlined above.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2026-12-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nFor the purpose of the index, error is calculated as 1-(average precision)/100. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 59,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the price of IGM be, on 2030-12-13, in 2019 USD?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6255/closing-price-igm-on-2030-12-13/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \n[iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF] (https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239769/ishares-north-american-tech-etf) (IGM) is an exchange-traded fund that gives broad exposure to the technology sector. IGM holds many key technology companies that may stand to benefit from progress in AI.\nWhat will the price of IGM be, on 2030-12-13, in 2019 USD?\nThis question resolves as the closing price of IGM on 2030-12-13, according to [Yahoo Finance] (https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/IGM/holdings?p=IGM) . Prices are to be adjusted to 2019 prices. Specifically, prices are to be adjusted to 2019 prices using [Consumer Price Index: Total All Items for the United States] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPALTT01USQ661S) .\nIn the case the ETF splits (or reverse splits), for the purpose of this question, the price at resolution will be scaled up by the split (e.g. a 2:1 split that results in the halving of the ETF price, will result in the resolution value being 2 times the price). In case multiple splits occur, the price will be scaled by the product of all split factors. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 49,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the median annual wage for Computer and Information Research Scientists be in the United states in 2029, in 2019 USD?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6256/median-wage-for-computer-scientists-2029/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nOne important driver of progress in AI, as well as potential bottleneck for the development and diffusion of AI systems, is the number of professionals with the relevant skills. A proxy for their demand is the median wage of the professionals with those skills.\nIn the United States, as of 2019, the median wage for Computer and Information Research Scientists is $122,840 per year, according to the [Bureau of Labour Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/computer-and-information-research-scientists.htm) .\nWhat will the median annual wage for Computer and Information Research Scientists be in the United states in 2029, in 2019 USD?\nThis question resolves as the median wage for \"Computer and Information Research Scientists\" in the US for the year [year] according to the [Bureau of Labour Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/computer-and-information-research-scientists.htm) .\nPrices are to be adjusted to mean 2019 prices using [Consumer Price Index: Total All Items for the United States] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPALTT01USQ661S) . For the purpose of this question, median wages for year 2029 reported by the [Bureau of Labour Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/computer-and-information-research-scientists.htm) are assumed to be given in the mean price level for 2029. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 52,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will there be a day on which no one in the UK dies with COVID-19?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6257/first-day-with-no-uk-covid-19-deaths/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of mid January 2021, more than a thousand people are dying in the UK with COVID-19 every day.\nWhen will there be a day on which no one in the UK dies with COVID-19?\nThis question resolves on the first day for which [the UK government's dashboard] (https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths#card-deaths_within_28_days_of_positive_test_by_date_of_death) reports there were no deaths of people who had had a positive test result for COVID-19 and died within 28 days of the first positive test.\nThis should resolve according to [the \"by date of death\" panel] (https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths#card-deaths_within_28_days_of_positive_test_by_date_of_death) , not [the \"by date reported\" panel] (https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths#card-deaths_within_28_days_of_positive_test_by_date_reported) , although the latter is the figure usually reported by the media.\nNote that resolution should only occur when data is acknowledged as complete (currently this takes five days), but the question should resolve retroactively to the first date of zero deaths (e.g. five days earlier).\nIf still open, the question should close retroactively one day prior to the date of zero deaths.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 98,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will none of Trump's immediate family be indicted in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6291/trump-family-indictments-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33%",
    "Description": "As a part of the Future Perfect 2021 series, this question is inspired by one of the predictions in [this article] (https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/22167877/predicting-biden-coronavirus-transition-vaccines-2021) , where Dylan Matthews suggests a prediction of 65% here.\nAs Donald Trump leaves the presidency, there are open questions about his legal vulnerabilities and those of his family. There have been several issues raised that could, in principle, lead to members of the Trump family being charge with crimes.\nA key issue here is that, as president, Donald Trump only has the power pardon individuals for federal crimes and so states could still indict a Trump family member.\nHere are some articles describing these issues:\n--- [Trump’s Family Pardon Plan Might Make Him a Bigger Criminal Target] (https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/12/donald-trump-family-pardon-plan-ivanka-don-jr.html) \n--- [The Criminal Investigation Trump Can’t Pardon His Way Out of Is “Significantly Escalating”] (https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/12/donald-trump-cy-vance-criminal-investigation) \n--- [Could Trump pardon family members if they haven't been charged with crimes?] (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/could-trump-pardon-family-members-if-they-haven-t-been-n1249707) \nWill none of Trump's immediate family be indicted by 2022-01-01?\nThis question will resolve negative in the event of the production of a publicly available court filing or indictment document detailing a specific indictment of one of the Trump family members described below. If the resolution date of the question arrives before the public availability of such a document then the question resolves positive. Any Indictment, whether federal or state-level, will qualify.\nThis question will not consider reports of a sealed or otherwise non-public indictment to be meaningful. This question will also disregard the results of the case and only considers that a member of the family is charged for a crime.\nFor the purposes of this question, 'Members of the Trump family' shall be taken to include only the following:\n---Donald Trump \n---Donald Trump Jr. \n---Eric Trump \n---Ivanka Trump \n---Tiffany Trump \n---Melania Trump \n---Barron Trump \n---Jared Kushner \n",
    "# Forecasts": 141,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will US poverty be higher in November 2021 than it was in November 2020?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6295/increase-in-us-poverty-from-2020-to-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "61%",
    "Description": "As a part of the Future Perfect 2021 series, this question is inspired by one of the predictions in [this article] (https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/22167877/predicting-biden-coronavirus-transition-vaccines-2021) . \nThe state of the American economy and rising income inequality have been hot topics of recent political discourse even before the COVID-19 pandemic. While politicians continue to debate the best way to respond to the pandemic, the aid package passed in early 2020 appears to have had significant impact. By some measures the poverty rate fell despite lock-downs and a rise in unemployment. These measures eventually expired and the proportion of Americans in poverty rose as 2020 entered its final months.\n--- [US poverty fell in April and May due to federal relief programs, even as COVID-19 ravaged the economy, new study suggests] (https://www.businessinsider.com/us-poverty-april-stimulus-may-federal-relief-programs-coronavirus-study-2020-6) \n--- [U.S. poverty jumps the most in 60 years] (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/poverty-8-million-americans-june-november/) \n--- [U.S. Incomes Surged, Poverty Fell to 60-Year Low Before Virus] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-09-15/u-s-median-household-income-jumped-6-8-in-2019-poverty-fell) \n--- [U.S. Poverty Hit a Record Low Before the Pandemic Recession] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/15/business/economy/poverty-record-low-prior-to-pandemic.html) \nWill US poverty be higher in November 2021 than it was in November 2020?\nThis question will resolve positively if the percentage of people below the poverty line as described [here] (http://povertymeasurement.org/covid-19-poverty-dashboard/) is higher in November 2021 than for November 2020. When consulting the graph, the following settings will be used:\n---Income Measure: \"Percent Below 100% of Federal Poverty Line\" \n---Sample: \"All Individuals\" \nThe value for November 2020 was 11.7%. This question will resolve positively if the same value for November 2021 is above 11.7% and will otherwise resolve negatively.\nIf the data is not available from this source, the question will resolve ambiguously.\nNovember was the most recent data available at the time of writing for the Future Perfect article and so this will be the proxy for \"late 2021\". \n",
    "# Forecasts": 58,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the US unemployment rate stay above 5% through November 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6296/us-unemployment-above-5-through-nov-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "67%",
    "Description": "In 2020, following the [COVID-19 pandemic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic) the [unemployment rate] (https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-unemployment-rate.htm) spiked to 14.8%. Since then the unemployment rate has declined, finishing the year around 6.7%. This is still much higher than the rate pre-pandemic of 3.5%.\nWill the US unemployment rate stay above 5% through November 2021?\nThe question will resolve based on [US Bureau of Labor Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov) data. This question will resolve positive if the months Jan-Nov (inclusive) are &gt;= 5.0 for Civilian Labour Force Unemployment rate. Currently Dec-20 is 6.7 as of Jan-21. This question should resolve on the basis of BLS's November Employment Situation, released in early December. Historical values can be viewed [here] (https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-unemployment-rate.htm) .\nRelated Questions \n--- [Unemployment in the US in 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4032/what-will-unemployment-be-in-the-us-in-2021/) \n--- [Minimum US unemployment rate for 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5735/minimum-us-unemployment-rate-for-2021/) \nIf the Civilian Labour Force Unemployment rate drops below 5.0 at any time before the close date, the question will retroactively close at the time of publication.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 58,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6298/cv-e-prints-2021-01-14-to-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\n[Computer vision] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_vision#:~:text=Computer%20vision%20is%20an%20interdisciplinary,human%20visual%20system%20can%20do.) is a field that deals with how computers can gain high-level understanding from digital images or videos. Pattern recognition is the related problem of recognition of patterns and regularities in data.\nHow many Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period?\nThis question resolves as the total number of Computer Vision e-prints published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question, Computer Vision e-prints published under Computer Science that are have the \" [cs.CV] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=cs.cv&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_firstt) \" tag. Note that for the purpose of this question, the tag will be searched in \"all fields\". The query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science). The query [may be executed here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=cs.cv&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) .\nThe [cs.CV] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=cs.cv&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) category, [according to arXiv] (https://arxiv.org/corr/subjectclasses) :\nCovers image processing, computer vision, pattern recognition, and scene understanding. Roughly includes material in ACM Subject Classes I.2.10, I.4, and I.5.\nRunning this query for previous years gives:\n---5,721 for the calendar year 2017 \n---8,592 for the calendar year 2018 \n---11,596 for the calendar year 2019 \n---15,313 for the calendar year 2020 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 46,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Natural Language Processing e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2030-01-14 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6299/nlo-e-prints-2021-01-14-to-2030-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\nNatural language processing (NLP) combines linguistics and artificial intelligence to enable computer systems to understand, process or generate human or natural language input.\nHow many Natural Language Processing e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2030-01-14 period?\nThis question resolves as the total number of Natural Language Processing e-prints published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2030-01-14 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question, Natural Language Processing e-prints published under Computer Science that are have the [cs.CL] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=cs.cl&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) category. Note that for the purpose of this question, the tag will be searched in \"all fields\". The query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science). The query [may be executed here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=cs.cl&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) .\nThe [cs.CL] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=cs.cl&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) cross-list category category, [according to arXiv] (https://arxiv.org/corr/subjectclasses) :\nCovers natural language processing. Roughly includes material in ACM Subject Class I.2.7. Note that work on artificial languages (programming languages, logics, formal systems) that does not explicitly address natural-language issues broadly construed (natural-language processing, computational linguistics, speech, text retrieval, etc.) is not appropriate for this area.\nRunning this query for previous years gives:\n---2,397 for the calendar year 2017 \n---3,726 for the calendar year 2018 \n---5,390 for the calendar year 2019 \n---7,128 for the calendar year 2020 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 60,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Reinforcement Learning e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2027-01-01 period?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6300/reinforcement-learning-2021-01-14-2027-01-01/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \n[arXiv] (http://arxiv.org) is a repository of electronic preprints approved for posting after moderation, but not full peer review. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathematics, physics, astronomy, electrical engineering, computer science, quantitative biology, statistics, mathematical finance and economics, which can be accessed online. \nMany machine learning articles will be posted on arXiv before publication. In theoretical computer science and machine learning, over 60% of published papers have arXiv e-prints [(Sutton et al. 2017)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.05225.pdf) .\nReinforcement learning (RL) is a subfield of machine learning, based on rewarding desired behaviours and/or punishing undesired ones of an agent interacting with its environment [(Sutton and Barto, 2014)] (https://web.stanford.edu/class/psych209/Readings/SuttonBartoIPRLBook2ndEd.pdf) .\nHow many Reinforcement Learning e-prints will be published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2027-01-01 period?\nResolution\nThis question resolves as the total number of Reinforcement Learning e-prints published on arXiv over the 2021-01-14 to 2022-01-14 period (inclusive), as per the e-print's \"original submission date\".\nDetails of the search query\nFor the purpose of this question, Reinforcement Learning e-prints are those published under Computer Science that contain any of the following key words in \"all fields\":\n\"Reinforcement Learning\", \"DQN\", \"Q-learning\", \"Deep Q Network\", \"Temporal difference learning\", \"Sarsa\", \"TD learning\" \"Proximal policy optimization\"\nThe query should include cross-listed papers (papers listed on other subjects besides Computer Science). The query [may be executed here] (https://arxiv.org/search/advanced?terms-0-operator=AND&amp;terms-0-term=%22Reinforcement+Learning%22&amp;terms-0-field=all&amp;terms-1-operator=OR&amp;terms-1-term=%22DQN%22&amp;terms-1-field=all&amp;terms-2-operator=OR&amp;terms-2-term=%22Q-learning%22&amp;terms-2-field=all&amp;terms-3-operator=OR&amp;terms-3-term=%22Temporal+difference+learning%22&amp;terms-3-field=all&amp;terms-4-operator=OR&amp;terms-4-term=%22Deep+Q+Network%22&amp;terms-4-field=all&amp;terms-5-operator=OR&amp;terms-5-term=%22Sarsa%22&amp;terms-5-field=all&amp;terms-6-operator=OR&amp;terms-6-term=%22TD+learning%22&amp;terms-6-field=all&amp;terms-7-operator=OR&amp;terms-7-term=%22Proximal+policy+optimization%22&amp;terms-7-field=all&amp;classification-computer_science=y&amp;classification-physics_archives=all&amp;classification-include_cross_list=include&amp;date-filter_by=all_dates&amp;date-year=&amp;date-from_date=&amp;date-to_date=&amp;date-date_type=submitted_date_first&amp;abstracts=show&amp;size=50&amp;order=-announced_date_first) .\nRunning this query for previous years gives:\n---779 for the calendar year 2017 \n---1,404 for the calendar year 2018 \n---2,287 for the calendar year 2019 \n---3,046 for the calendar year 2020 \n",
    "# Forecasts": 49,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percent of total GDP will software and information services contribute to US GDP in Q3 of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6301/it-as--of-gdp-in-q3-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nElectricity, internal combustion engines, and semiconductors facilitated automation in the last century, but AI now seems poised to automate many tasks once thought to be out of reach, from driving cars to making medical recommendations and beyond. \nHowever, measured productivity growth has actually declined by half over the past decade [[2]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w24001) . To some extent, this may be evidence that information technology and other conventional stuff (non-informational inputs or outputs) aren't actually so cheaply or widely substitutable [[3]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w21547.pdf) .\nThe prospects of growth of tech and automation may also be constrained by [Baumol’s “cost disease”] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumol%27s_cost_disease) : sectors with rapid productivity growth are able to charge lower prices and subsequently have their share of GDP decline, whilst those with relatively slow productivity growth experience increases in their share of the value contributed to the economy. This might effectively cap the rate of growth of the value of tech as a proportion of the total economy [ [4] (https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/AI.pdf) ].\nBrynjolfsson et al. [[5]] (https://www.nber.org/papers/w24001.pdf) have argued that recent progress in AI and automation might well be radically productivity enhancing, but this might yet go largely unnoticed because of an implementation lag: it takes considerable time to be able to sufficiently harness technologies with broad potential application that they qualify as general purpose technologies. Will the economic data bear this out sometime soon?\nWhat percent of total GDP will software and information services contribute to US GDP in Q3 of 2021?\nWhat percent of total GDP will software and information services contribute to US GDP in Q3 of 2021?\nThis question resolves the the percentage of total US GDP that is contributed by \"Publishing industries, except internet (includes software)\" and \"Data processing, internet publishing, and other information services\" according to seasonally adjusted data by the [Bureau of Economic Analysis] (https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=150&amp;step=2&amp;isuri=1&amp;categories=gdpxind) .\nin Q2 of 2020, \"Publishing industries, except internet (includes software)\" generated $315.7bn and \"Data processing, internet publishing, and other information services\" generated $285.3bn. Total annualised GDP for Q2 2020 was $19,520.1bn. Hence, the question for Q2 2020 would resolve as 3.08%.\nHistorical [data may be found here] (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YNd1d4W0atK7f0I_rnY7KWdPmzW0vpIFCbgKfGOCB5I/edit?usp=sharing) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 51,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art performance on one-shot image classification on miniImageNet be, at 2024-12-14 in accuracy?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6302/sota-1-shot-on-miniimagenet-at-2024-12-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nImage Classification is the task of identifying an image by assigning to it a specific label. Typically, Image Classification refers to images in which only one object appears and is analysed. In contrast, object detection involves both classification and localisation tasks, and is used to analyse more realistic cases in which multiple objects may exist in an image.\nThe miniImageNet dataset contains 100 classes randomly chosen from [ImageNet] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.0575.pdf) and 600 images of size 84×84 pixels per class. It is split into 64 base classes, 16 validation classes and 20 novel classes.\nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is ResNeSt-200 PT+MAP [(Hu et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.03806v2.pdf) , which achieves an accuracy of 82.92.\nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/few-shot-image-classification-on-mini-1) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art performance on one-shot image classification on miniImageNet be, at 2024-12-14 in accuracy amongst models not trained on additional data?\nThis question resolves as the highest level of performance achieved on miniImageNet up until 2024-12-14, 11:59PM GMT amongst models trained on only the miniImageNet's data—no extra training data may be used.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2024-12-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 71,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the Federal Reserves' Industrial Production Index be for January 2030, for semiconductors, printed circuit boards and related products?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6304/us-semiconductor-fab-capacity-jan-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nSemiconductor devices are key devices in modern electronics.. The main applications as electronic devices are junction diodes, transistors, and memories, which are widely used in large-scale integrated circuits [[1]] (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0123694019004976) . The [printed circuit board] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printed_circuit_board) is the platform upon which microelectronic components such as semiconductor chips and capacitors are mounted.\nWhat will the [Federal Reserves' Industrial Production Index] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPB53122S) be for January 2030, for semiconductors, printed circuit boards and related products?\nThis question resolves as the value of the Federal Reserves' Industrial Production (IP) Index [Industrial Production: Durable Goods Materials: Semiconductors, Printed Circuit Boards, and Other] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPB53122S) for January 2030. \nThe industrial production (IP) index measures the real output of all relevant establishments located in the United States, regardless of their ownership, but not those located in U.S. territories.\nThe index is constructed so that the mean value for the base period 2012 is 100. In case the Index adopts a different base period, we shall reconstruct the series so that the mean value for 2012 is 100 and use this transformed index to resolve the question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 60,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Median Bay Area House Prices decline by >= 5% in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6307/median-bay-area-house-prices-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "27%",
    "Description": "During the [COVID-19 pandemic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic) there was an concerted shift to work from home. [Google] (https://edition.cnn.com/2020/07/27/tech/google-work-from-home-extension/index.html) , [Facebook] (https://variety.com/2020/digital/news/facebook-permanent-work-from-home-1234613548/) and other large tech firms in the Bay Area have signalled that their staff might not need to come back to the office for a long time. \nThere have also been some [high profile] (https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/13/tech/silicon-valley-moving-to-austin-miami/index.html) tech executives and [companies] (https://edition.cnn.com/2020/12/11/tech/oracle-headquarters-austin-texas-california/index.html) moving out of Silicon Valley. \nThe above factors are expected to reduce pressure on Bay Area housing costs, which have generally been [growing faster than the rest of the country] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=zXYd) .\nWill Median Bay Area House Prices decline by &gt;= 5% in 2021?\nThis question resolves based on the YoY change in [Median Prices of Existing Single Family Homes] (https://www.car.org/en/marketdata/data/housingdata) for S.F. Bay Area from Nov-2020 to Nov-2021 using data from the California Association of Realtors. As of Nov-2020 this is $1.1mm, so this resolves positive if the Nov-2021 value for \"S.F. Bay Area\" is &lt;= $1.045mm\n",
    "# Forecasts": 26,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the % change of sexually transmitted infections diagnoses in England from 2019 to 2020 be?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6308/change-in-stis-from-2019-to-2020-in-england/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the UK has [increased over the past 3 years] (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/912781/2019_Table_1_New_STI_diagnoses_and_rates_in_England_by_gender.ods) .\nHowever, it has been suggested that the Covid-19 pandemic [might affect the epidemiology of STIs] (https://sti.bmj.com/content/early/2020/08/12/sextrans-2020-054543) .\nHow will the number of sexually transmitted infections diagnoses in England change from 2019 to 2020, in percent?\nThe question will resolve according to the annual report published by the UK government. The report and data is most likely going to be found here: [Sexually transmitted infections (STIs): annual data tables] (https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/sexually-transmitted-infections-stis-annual-data-tables) \nThis question will resolve specifically according to the \"% change 2019-2020\" for the row \"Total new STI diagnoses - total\". This total refers to the total percentage change, across both genders, in the numbers of all reported STIs.\nIf this data is no longer reported for 2020 or the methodology significantly changes, the question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 57,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Executive Orders per week will President Biden issue?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6311/biden-executive-orders-in-first-term/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Executive Orders] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order) are a means by which the President can govern via their executive powers. They are often seen as a way for the President to circumvent Congress in order to achieve their policy agenda. Some recent Executive Orders by Trump include:\n--- [Trump's travel ban] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13780) \n--- [Revival of the National Space Council] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Space_Council#Revival) \nHow many [Executive Orders] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order) will President Biden have issued, on a weekly basis, prior to 2025 and while he is president?\nHere are the last seven presidents for comparison:\nCarter: 1.53 E.O./week\nReagan: 0.91 E.O./week\nBush I: 0.80 E.O./week\nClinton: 0.87 E.O./week\nBush II: 0.70 E.O./week\nObama: 0.65 E.O./week\nTrump: ~1,00 E.0./week (as of 14-Jan-21)\nHow many Executive Orders per week will President Biden issue?\nThe [Federal Register] (https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders) will provide the final numbers. This question resolves on January 31th 2025 at the latest (Federal Register numbers can take a few days after the White House’s statements).\nRelated Questions \n--- [How much will President Trump govern by decree] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1430/how-much-will-president-trump-govern-by-decree/) \n",
    "# Forecasts": 41,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be fewer than 6 conservative justices on the SCOTUS on January 20th, 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6313/conservative-scotus-majority-to-recede/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "27%",
    "Description": "Define a conservative Supreme Court of the United States justice as a justice appointed by a Republican president. As of January 14th 2021, there are [6 conservative Supreme Court justices] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_justices_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States) : John Roberts, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.\nWill there be fewer than 6 conservative justices on the SCOTUS on January 20th, 2025?\nThis question resolves positively if by the moment Joe Biden's first term in office is scheduled to end (on January 20th, 2025), there are fewer than 6 conservative justices on the Supreme Court of the United States, as per reliable sources. Otherwise, it resolves negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 86,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will India's GDP grow in all first three quarters of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6316/india-gdp-growth-in-q1-q3-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "70%",
    "Description": "India is a middle-income country [ranking 3rd in GDP and 124th in GDP per capita] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_India) (both in PPP-adjusted dollars). India's economy grew uninterruptedly between 1980 and 2020.\nIn 2020, [the COVID-19 pandemic caused it to plunge into a recession for the first time in 40 years] (https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/22167877/predicting-biden-coronavirus-transition-vaccines-2021) . The International Monetary Fund's World Economic Outlook report currently [estimates this contraction at -10.29% of GDP] (https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2020/October/weo-report?c=534,&amp;s=NGDP_RPCH,NGDPD,PPPGDP,NGDPDPC,PPPPC,PPPSH,PCPIPCH,&amp;sy=1980&amp;ey=2020&amp;ssm=0&amp;scsm=1&amp;scc=0&amp;ssd=1&amp;ssc=0&amp;sic=0&amp;sort=country&amp;ds=.&amp;br=1) .\nWill India's GDP grow in the first three quarters of 2021?\nResolution will be based on the [Federal Reserve Economic Data series NAEXKP01INQ657S] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?id=NAEXKP01INQ657S,) , which shows seasonally adjusted quarter-to-quarter growth in India's GDP at constant 2015 prices. The question will resolve positive if all three data points for Q1, Q2, and Q3 of 2021 are positive. It will resolve negative otherwise.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 35,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will USA's GDP/c growth rate be in 2020-2029?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6320/usas-gdpc-growth-in-2020-2029/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "related question:\n--- [Before Q1 2030, what will be the highest level of calendar year percentage GDP growth in the US?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2622/what-will-be-the-highest-level-of-annual-gdp-growth-in-the-us-before-2030/) \nEconomic growth is of central importance to many people and events. Presidential elections seem affected by whether the economy was doing well at the time or not. [GDP growth rates also relate to the geopolitical power races] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)) . With the 2020 elections just about completed, and the economy affected by the Coronavirus pandemic, one may wonder:\nWhat will USA's GDP/c growth rate be in 2020-2029?\nThis resolves as USA's average GDP/capita growth according to IMF in 2020-2029 (inflation adjusted). Specifically, it resolves a the geometric mean in percent, calculated as\nthis question will use data reported by the IMF to calculate the average GDP per capita. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 35,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Trump gain at least 10M followers on another platform?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6322/trump-gain-10m-followers-on-new-platform/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "74%",
    "Description": "[With Donald Trump being banned from most major platforms] (https://www.axios.com/platforms-social-media-ban-restrict-trump-d9e44f3c-8366-4ba9-a8a1-7f3114f920f1.html) , thereby losing his 88 million followers on Twitter ( [6th largest account] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-followed_Twitter_accounts) ), there is a question of whether he will move to an alternative platform. If he does, he may pull a substantial number of users with him, and regain many of his followers.\nWill Trump gain at least 10M followers on another platform?\n---If an official Trump account reaches at least 10M followers (no matter the terminology) on a platform that isn't Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Twitch, Youtube, Instagram, Snapchat, Tiktok, Discord, or Twilio, (such as Parler or Gab), this resolves positively. \n---This must be achieved before the next US presidential election in November 2024. \n---Platforms must be open to the public. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 121,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many scheduled airline passengers in 2021 will verify their COVID-19 health statuses with CommonPass?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6323/flights-on-commonpass-health-passport-in-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The World Economic Forum and The Commons Project Foundation are launching [CommonPass] (https://commonpass.org/) , an app intended as \"a secure and verifiable way [for travelers] to document their health status as they travel and cross borders,\" including COVID-19 vaccination and testing information. World public opinion has largely not yet taken note, although certain bioethicists are already condemning the enshrinement of [\"immunoprivilege\"] (https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/05/29/865048097/bioethicist-immunity-passports-could-do-more-harm-than-good) ; professor Douglas Kamerow of the British Medical Journal [fears a new class divide,] (https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n85) but would be reassured \"if some government agencies or WHO were leading this activity\"; and the reactions of the conspiracy and anti-vax crowd online can be imagined. It is not clear yet on what basis the system will be adopted or how wide uptake will be, but major airline alliances are already signed on and the system is in the early deployment phase.\nHow many scheduled airline passengers in 2021 will verify their COVID-19 health statuses with CommonPass?\n--- \nApplies to verification of any aspect of COVID-19 status for any purpose, even if it is not a precondition of making the flight.\n--- \nIn accordance with ICAO practice, \"passengers\" means passenger-flights, ie, the same passenger on multiple flights counts multiple times.\n--- \nResolves according to official CommonPass, ICAO, or IATA statistics if and when available, or best available estimate at Metaculus/moderator discretion if no official statistics are available by the end of 2022. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 26,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the 7-day rolling average for US COVID-19 deaths drop below 100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6325/us-below-100-covid-deaths-per-day/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Related questions:\n[When will the 7-day moving average of daily confirmed COVID-19 cases first drop below 10% of a previous peak in the US? ] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4831/when-will-the-7-day-moving-average-of-daily-confirmed-covid-19-cases-first-drop-below-10-of-a-previous-peak-in-the-us/) \n[When will the 7-day rolling average for US COVID-19 deaths drop below 500?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6241/us-covid-19-deaths-below-500/) \nThis US is currently experiencing its third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. While vaccines are currently being rolled out at an increasing rate, the threat of the novel B.117 variant with increased infectiousness threatens to counteract those effects.\nAccording to the CDC, there have been no days since late March when the rolling 7 day average of COVID deaths has dropped below 100 in the US.\nWhen will the 7-day rolling average for US COVID-19 deaths drop below 100?\nThis question retroactively closes and resolves as the first date which the CDC reports the 7-day moving average of COVID deaths is less than 100 on [this page] (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#trends) .\nIf the CDC is no longer updating this page, a suitable alternative resolution source will be found.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 49,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When, if ever, will 17 year olds vote in the US?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6326/17-year-old-suffrage-in-the-us/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In 1971, the US [ratified the 26th Amendment and lowered its voting age from 21 to 18] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#:~:text=In%201970%2C%20Senator%20Ted%20Kennedy,%2C%20state%2C%20and%20local%20elections.) .\nSince then, several proposals to lower the voting age have been put forward. None have passed nationally, but [a number of states and municipalities allow limited forms of voting by people younger than 18] (https://www.youthrights.org/issues/voting-age/voting-age-status-report/) .\nWhen, if ever, will people &lt;18 years old vote in national elections in the US?\nThis question resolves positive if at least 50.1% of 17-year-old US citizens are able to vote in federal elections. They must be able to vote in races for at least 2 of 3 offices: US Senate, House of Representatives, or President.\nOnly [general federal elections] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_v._Mitchell) will be considered, primaries, state and local elections are not relevant to the question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 26,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many countries will allow 17 year olds to vote in 2026?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6327/youth-voting-around-the-world-in-2026/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Currently, [14 countries] (https://www.youthrights.org/issues/voting-age/voting-age-status-report/) allow voting by young people with no major restrictions (as of Jan. 16, 2021). Another 14 countries allow some citizens &lt;18 years of age suffrage with major qualifications, usually related to marriage, employment, or type of election.\nA number of [movements or proposals to allow minors to vote] (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/19/us/politics/voting-age.html) are active or have been proposed in dozens of countries as of 2021.\nHow many countries will allow people younger than 18 to vote, with no major conditions, in 2026?\nBroad enfranchisement, with no major restrictions, of the chosen age group in a country is required for that country to be added to the total. Restrictions that require marriage (as in Hungary and Indonesia) or employment (as in Slovenia and Croatia) or restrict &lt;18 voters to local elections only/European elections only (as in Scotland or Belgium) disqualify a country for purposes of this question. \nRestrictions commonly applied to voting adults do not disqualify a country; it's okay if &lt;18 voters need ID, or must be a citizen, or have no criminal convictions, etc.\nVoting age must be lowered at least ten months below 18 years old to count; e.g. 17-year-old suffrage counts, but 17.5-year-old suffrage does not.\nAt least 70% of the age group in question must be enfranchised to count; places like Germany and the US where minors may vote in states or municipalities comprising &lt;70% of the country's population do not suffice.\nResolution will use [the NYRA tracker] (https://www.youthrights.org/issues/voting-age/voting-age-status-report/) as a primary source, or [Wikipedia] (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_age) and credible media reports if necessary.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 25,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Mike Pence be a candidate for President in the 2024 cycle?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6331/will-mike-pence-run-for-president-in-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "54%",
    "Description": "Nineteen out of the 48 Vice Presidents of the United States have gone on to run for President. Since World War 2, Joe Biden, Al Gore, Walter Mondale, Gerald Ford, Richard Nixon, Lyndon Johnson and Harry Truman have all been VPs who have either gone on to become President or presidential candidates.\nWill Mike Pence be a candidate for President in the 2024 cycle?\nResolves as yes upon widespread media reports of former Vice President Michael R. Pence declaring his candidacy for the 2024 election. Closing date of 11/15/23 is the filing deadline for the New Hampshire primary.\nIn the event of any ambiguity, go with whether he (or agents acting on his behalf and with his consent) has filed \"FEC Form 2: Statement of Candidacy\" with the Federal Election Commission for the 2024 United States Presidential election. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 161,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the CDU continue to govern Germany after the 2021 elections?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6338/cdu-governs-germany-after-the-2021-elections/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "84%",
    "Description": "[CDU - the Christian Democratic Union of Germany] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Democratic_Union_of_Germany) is the major party of the center-right in German politics:\nThe CDU has headed the federal government since 2005 under Angela Merkel, who also served as the party's leader from 2000 until 2018. The CDU previously led the federal government from 1949 to 1969 and 1982 to 1998. Germany's three longest-serving post-war Chancellors have all come from the CDU; Helmut Kohl (1982–1998), Angela Merkel (2005–present), and Konrad Adenauer (1949–1963). The party also leads the governments of six of Germany's sixteen states.\n-- [CDU, wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Democratic_Union_of_Germany) \nCDU currently forms a coalition government with [CSU (Christian Social Union)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Social_Union_in_Bavaria) , and [SPD (Social Democratic Party)] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Democratic_Party_of_Germany) . CDU and CSU hold an agreement that CDU does not run candidates in Bavaria, while CSU does not run candidates anywhere besides Bavaria. In forming this alliance, it is not unlikely that CSU may appoint the next chancellor following the elections, even if they win fewer seats than CDU.\nThe 2021 German federal election is expected to be held on 2021-09-26, the date chosen by President Steinmeier. However, there is still a possibility of the snap election at an earlier date.\nAs of the moment of writing this question, the [CDU/CSU union] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CDU/CSU) steadily leads in [election polls] (https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/germany/) . In Vox's Future Perfect series, [Dylan Matthews] (https://twitter.com/dylanmatt) [forecasted] (https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/22167877/predicting-biden-coronavirus-transition-vaccines-2021) an 80% chance that CDU will continue to govern Germany throughout 2021.\nWill the Chancellor of Germany following the next election be from the CDU/CSU union?\nThis question resolves positive if the Chancellor of Germany is from the CDU or CSU when they are elected after the next Bundestag Election. If they are a member of any other party, the question resolves negative.\nThe election need not happen on 2021-09-26 nor must the chancellor be elected immediately. In the case there is an acting government while parties negotiate to form a formal government, this question will wait to resolve until a new government is formed.\nIn the case an election is scheduled earlier, the question will close 1 day before polls are opened.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 59,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the second SpaceX Starship flight be?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6339/date-of-second-starship-flight/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "On December 8th 2020, Starship SN8 was the first SpaceX Starship prototype to fly to a height of at least 1 km (12.5 km to be specific). SpaceX intends to one day use Starship to bring humans to Mars.\nWhen will the second SpaceX Starship flight be?\nThis question resolves to the time of the next Starship flight after the December SN8 flight. The criteria for \"flight\" are the same as in [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4622/how-many-more-starship-prototypes-will-be-destroyed-before-one-flies/) , notably, the Starship must reach a height of at least 1 km intact for resolution, and what counts as a Starship is outlined in [this other question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4588/when-will-spacexs-starship-carry-a-human-to-orbit/) .\nThis question has [a sister] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6340/when-will-the-third-starship-flight-be/) , asking about the 3rd Starship flight.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 242,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the third SpaceX Starship flight be?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6340/when-will-the-third-starship-flight-be/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "On December 8th 2020, Starship SN8 was the first SpaceX Starship prototype to fly to a height of at least 1 km (12.5 km to be specific). SpaceX intends to one day use Starship to bring humans to Mars.\nWhen will the third SpaceX Starship flight be?\nThis question resolves to the time of the third Starship flight, with the December SN8 flight considered to be the first. The criteria for \"flight\" are the same as in [this question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4622/how-many-more-starship-prototypes-will-be-destroyed-before-one-flies/) , notably, the Starship must reach a height of at least 1 km intact for resolution, and what counts as a Starship is outlined in [this other question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4588/when-will-spacexs-starship-carry-a-human-to-orbit/) .\nThis question has [a sister] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6339) , asking about the 2nd Starship flight.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 101,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a SpaceX Starship reach orbit?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6341/when-will-starship-reach-orbit/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "SpaceX is rapidly developing their Starship launch system, a full reusable two-stage rocket intended to bring humans to Mars. So far one prototype, SN8, has flown high in the Earth's atmosphere, to a height of 12.5 km.\nWhen will a SpaceX Starship reach orbit?\nThis question resolves to the date a Starship reaches orbit. If the Starship is launched more than 200,000 miles away form Earth without ever orbiting Earth, that will also be considered to be reaching orbit. There need not be a human on board for this question to resolve\nA Starship is defined as a SpaceX vehicle meeting the following criteria (based on the criteria [used here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4588/when-will-spacexs-starship-carry-a-human-to-orbit/) ):\n---Not an existing member of the Falcon family (Falcon 9/Heavy) or a Falcon derivative \n---Intended to be fully reusable, with every stage returned to Earth (smaller portions such as fairings may be expended) \n---The vehicle must have a stated payload to LEO of at least 20,000 kg (of pure payload, e.g. the Space Shuttle Orbiter would not count as payload mass). This is very conservative, so Starship would qualify even if it were greatly scaled down from today. \n---The vehicle should be representative of a vehicle intended to carry a payload to Mars at some point, according to public statements of SpaceX or its representatives. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 37,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the price of a Taco Bell Crunchwrap Supreme in Westfield, Indiana in 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6344/2025-price-of-a-crunchwrap-supreme/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Joe Biden has signaled that he intends to increase the minimum wage] (https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS925US925&amp;biw=1440&amp;bih=741&amp;tbm=nws&amp;ei=r_cGYJPbMZCa5gL81brAAw&amp;q=Joe+Biden+minimum+wage&amp;oq=Joe+Biden+minimum+wage) (see [related Metaculus question here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?order_by=-rank&amp;search=minimum%20wage&amp;categories=) ). People have been arguing over whether this will increase prices, and a popular meme on the internet has been about the price of a [Taco Bell Crunchwrap Supreme] (https://twitter.com/search?q=minimum%20wage%20Crunchwrap%20Supreme&amp;src=typed_query) .\nThe current price, [per the Taco Bell website] (https://www.tacobell.com/food/specialties/crunchwrap-supreme) in Westfield, Indiana (where the minimum wage is currently the federal minimum of $7.25), is $3.79.\nWhat will be the price of a Taco Bell Crunchwrap Supreme in Westfield, Indiana in 2025?\nOn 1 January 2025, this URL will be consulted: [https://www.tacobell.com/food/specialties/cru…] (https://www.tacobell.com/food/specialties/crunchwrap-supreme) \nIf the store / price location is not relative to Westfield, Indiana, it will be set to be Westfield, Indiana.\nThe price on that site will be used as resolution. The price will not be adjusted for inflation. In the case of any promotions or sales, the regular price will be used for resolution, if this is known. If not, the on-sale price will be used, without any discount codes, combos or coupons.\nIf that URL is not available, another page on the Taco Bell website showing the price of a Crunchwrap Supreme in Westfield, Indiana may be used. If multiple competing prices are available using this method, the question will resolve ambiguous.\nIf a search of the Taco Bell website does not show the price of a Crunchwrap Supreme in Westfield, Indiana (maybe because the Crunchwrap Supreme is discontinued or there are no longer Taco Bell locations in Westfield, Indiana), this question will resolve ambiguous.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 108,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will EA Global London 2021 be cancelled, rescheduled, or moved online again?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6348/ea-global-london-2021-rescheduled/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "45%",
    "Description": "[Effective Altruism Global] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_Altruism_Global) , abbreviated EA Global, is a series of philanthropy conferences that focuses on the effective altruism movement. [EA Global London 2021 is currently scheduled] (https://www.eaglobal.org/events/london2021/) for 29-31 October 2021 in-person at The Brewery in London, UK.\nIt was previously scheduled for 30 October 2020 to 1 November 2020, but was postponed due to COVID (see [the Metaculus question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4318/will-ea-global-london-2020-be-cancelled-or-rescheduled-due-to-covid-19/) ).\nIt was then scheduled for 30 April 2021 to 2 May 2021, but was postponed again (see [the Metaculus question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4821/will-ea-global-london-2021-be-cancelled-rescheduled-or-moved-online/) ).\nWill EA Global London 2021 be cancelled, rescheduled, or moved online again?\nThe question resolves negatively if the EA Global London 2021 takes place in the originally scheduled physical location (London UK) at the scheduled dates (29-31 October 2021).\nThis question resolves positively if the event is cancelled or the dates are moved, or if the venue is moved online or away from London.\nThis question will close retroactively to 48 hours before the date of any public announcement of rescheduling, if that occurs.\nNote that if the location is changed but stays within London, the question will resolve positively. Anywhere within London is fine, even if not The Brewery.\nNote that the resolution does not require COVID-19 — or anything else — to be cited as a reason for any changes to the event. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 23,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Insurrection Act be invoked before 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6352/insurrection-act-invoked-before-2025/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "[The Insurrection Act of 1807] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act_of_1807) is a United States federal law that empowers the U.S. president to call into service the U.S. Armed Forces and the National Guard under the following circumstances:\n--- \nwhen requested by a state's legislature, or governor if the legislature cannot be convened, to address an insurrection against that state ( [§ 251] (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/251) ),\n--- \nto address an insurrection, in any state, which makes it impracticable to enforce the law ( [§ 252] (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/252) ),\n--- \nor to address an insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination or conspiracy, in any state, which results in the deprivation of constitutionally secured rights, and where the state is unable, fails, or refuses to protect said rights ( [§ 253] (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/253) ).\nThe Act was first used by 1808 by Thomas Jefferson. It has been used at least [23 more times] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act_of_1807#Invocations_of_the_act) , most recently in 1992 by George H. W. Bush [in response to the 1992 Los Angeles riots] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Los_Angeles_riots#Day_3_–_Friday,_May_1) .\nRecent events, including the COVID-19 pandemic, protests by both left-leaning and right-leaning movements, and the Capitol Hill attack, have raised the possibility of the Insurrection Act being invoked again. This question asks:\nWill the Insurrection Act be invoked before 2025?\nThis question resolves positively if a [credible source] (https://www.metaculus.com/help/faq/#definitions) indicates that the Insurrection Act has been invoked in the United States prior to 1 January 2025. No additional criteria need be met for this question to resolve positive.\nThis question will close retroactively to two days prior to the invocation of the Act should the Act be invoked. If the exact time of the invocation cannot be determined, the time of the first credible report will be used instead.\n\nRelated questions\n-----------------\n\n--- [Second US civil war before July 2021?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4764/will-the-usa-enter-a-second-civil-war-before-july-2021/) \n--- [Second US civil war before 2031?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6179/second-us-civil-war-before-2031/) \nIf positive resolution is triggered, and it is later determined by a court or judge that the invocation was invalid or illegal, that will have no bearing on the resolution of this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 39,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will AES-256 be publicly broken by 2040?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6356/aes-256-broken-by-2040/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "AES-256 is a widely-implemented specification for a symmetric block cipher algorithm for encrypting digital data. It is the strongest version of the Rijndael algorithm underlying the AES specification with 14 rounds of transformation and a 256 bit key size. The key size of 256 bits appears to render a brute-force search of the keyspace infeasible on foreseeable classical and quantum computers--the latter still must search an effective keyspace of 128 bits (see Grover's algorithm). The best publicly known attack on AES-256 requires the search of a keyspace slightly greater than 254 bits, which is infeasible. This keyspace is so large that a brute force search would be energy-constrained on a solar-system scale even with unlimited computing power at the physical limits of efficiency. \nThere is some consideration that mathematical and / or cryptoanalytic advances may enable new attacks on AES-256 that could make key recovery computationally feasible. Public, and presumably private, cryptanalysis of AES-256 is ongoing so it is plausible that by some means a practical break could become public knowledge by 2040. Advances in AI before the resolution date may plausibly speed up the rate of relevant mathematical and crytoanalytic discoveries. \nWill AES-256 be publicly broken by 2040?\nAnything that is not a computationally feasible break of the algorithm itself will not resolve positive. For example, any kind of dictionary attack, including AI-generated dictionaries, does not resolve positive. Side-channel attacks do not resolve positive. Any other attacks on implementations of AES-256, but not the specification for the AES-256 algorithm itself, do not resolve positive. Non-cryptographic means of key recovery, such as interrogation, brain scan, theft or espionage do not resolve positive. \nThis question resolves positive if before 12:01 AM GMT on January 1 2040 a credible, practically demonstrated* means of determining a AES-256 secret key without any special knowledge except the given ciphertext is made known to the public. Correspondingly, attacks that require a plaintext or more than one ciphertext for a given key do not resolve positive.\n*\"Practically demonstrated\" means that a successful attack against AES-256 was actually carried out.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 57,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will USA's GDP per capita (PPP) fall out of the world top 20?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6362/usa-drop-out-of-world-top-20-gdpc/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[The wealth of nations] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wealth_of_Nations) is a topic going back 100s of years. Some countries are clearly many times richer than others. But why? And is it predictable who comes out ahead and who falls from the pedestal? There are significant changes over time, even in the period since 1900. [Argentina was among the top 10 wealthiest countries in 1913] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_history_of_Argentina) , but today lingers around [position 50-60 among countries with at least 1M population] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita) . The recent political crisis of the USA's open the question of whether USA's position among the most wealthy countries will continue. USA is currently the 6th wealthiest country in GDP per capita (PPP).\nWhen will USA's GDP per capita (PPP) fall out of the world top 20?\n---Countries with 1M population size only. \n---Primary source of data on GDP per capita, PPP from IMF's collection. Only if it goes defunct, should we use World Bank data. If that goes, admins choose one. \n---Hong Kong and Macau are not included (non-sovereign). \n---If this question does resolve positively on any in-range date, it resolves as &gt;. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 38,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Riemann Hypothesis be proved true, if it is proved by 2100?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6365/riemann-h-proved-true-if-settled-by-2100/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "90%",
    "Description": "previous Metaculus questions:\n--- \n[Will a Millenium Prize problem be solved by 2027?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/236/will-another-millennium-prize-problem-be-solved-in-the-next-decade/) \n--- \n[When will the next Millenium Prize problem be solved?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/1048/when-will-the-next-millennium-prize-problem-be-solved/) \nThe [Riemann hypothesis] (https://www.claymath.org/sites/default/files/official_problem_description.pdf) is a conjecture stating that the nontrivial zeroes of the [Riemann zeta function] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_zeta_function) all have real part equal to . The Riemann zeta function also has zeroes at the strictly negative even integers , which are by definition its trivial zeroes. The hypothesis would therefore be correct if all zeroes of the Riemann zeta function other than these trivial zeroes had real part equal to .\nThe conjecture is significant because it implies the tightest possible error bounds on a wide range of estimates in analytic number theory, starting from the tight asymptotic for the prime counting function . It has now become standard practice to prove theorems of analytic number theory conditional on the Riemann hypothesis or some of its closely related generalizations.\nWill the Riemann Hypothesis be proved true by 2100?\nThis question will resolve positively if the Millennium Prize for the proof of the Riemann hypothesis is awarded before the resolve date of this question. It will resolve negatively if the Millennium Prize is awarded, according to rule 5.c of the [Millennium Prize Rules] (https://www.claymath.org/sites/default/files/millennium_prize_rules_0.pdf) , for the disproof of the Riemann hypothesis. It will resolve ambiguously if the Prize is not awarded for either achievement until the resolve date of the question, or if the Prize is awarded for a proof that the Riemann hypothesis is undecidable in ZFC set theory.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 46,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the University of California Berkeley be primarily in-person for Fall 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6367/university-of-california-in-person-fall-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "77%",
    "Description": "In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, all University of California campuses, including the flagship campus, UC Berkeley, temporarily authorized online delivery of all undergraduate courses. Online delivery of classes has persisted as the dominant mode of instruction throughout the Fall 2020 semester, and seems exceedingly likely to do so for the duration of the Spring 2021 semester. \nThe office of the president has [announced] (https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/press-room/uc-plans-fall-2021-person-instruction-across-its-10-campuses) that the university intends to resume in-person instruction in Fall 2021, one indication of widespread belief that the end of the pandemic is now in sight. \nThe UC Berkeley [course catalog] (https://classes.berkeley.edu/search/class/) currently lists only 19.8% of classes as either \"in-person\", \"flexible\", or \"hybrid\" with the large majority being listed as \"remote\".\nWill UC Berkeley Resume In-person classes for Fall 2021?\nThis question resolved positively if on August 25th, 2021 at the [start of undergraduate courses for Fall 2021] (https://registrar.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/pdf/UCB_AcademicCalendar_2021-22_V2.pdf) at least 80% of classes are listed as being delivered by either \"in-person\", \"flexible\", or \"hybrid\" modes of instruction. The question resolves negatively if by this date, the course catalog lists fewer than 80% of classes as being delivered via these modes. \nIn the event that the course catalog is not published for the Fall 2021 semester, or is published but no longer lists mode of instruction for classes, this question resolves ambiguously.\nIf a new class type is added outside of in-person, flexible, hybrid, and remote, and enough classes fall under this category that it affects the resolution of this question, the admin staff will decide if that new type should be grouped with remote or not. If it cannot be clearly grouped, the question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 65,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will UK festival Shambala take place in August 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6371/uk-festival-shambala-to-take-place-aug-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "45%",
    "Description": "On 21st January 2021, [it was announced] (https://www.glastonburyfestivals.co.uk/a-statement-from-%c2%a7/) that Glastonbury festival, due to take place in late June, would again be cancelled due to the Covid-19 pandemic.\nThis has prompted discussion about whether any festivals will take place in the UK this year. A BBC article on 23rd January, [\"Will any festivals happen this summer?\"] (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-55767061) , struck a largely pessimistic tone:\nIn the middle of winter, dreaming of summer plans is one of the things that gets you through. Now, more than ever, those dreams are so important to cling on to.\nBut if those dreams involve drinking warm cider in a muddy field and singing your heart out with thousands of others, it's suddenly looking a bit bleak again.\n[Shambala] (https://www.shambalafestival.org/) is a four-day festival that takes place at a country estate in England. It has existed for 20 years. Whereas Glastonbury is at the beginning of the festival season and has 200,000 attendees, Shambala is due to take place 26-29th August and [has consistently had attendance of 15,000 since 2010] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shambala_Festival) .\nWill UK festival Shambala take place in August 2021?\nIf a Shambala festival takes place in August 2021 with at least 5,000 attendees and with attendees on site for at least 72 hours, this question resolves positively. If no reduction in capacity or length is announced, these conditions will be assumed to be met.\nIf not such festival takes place, this question resolves negatively. This question also resolves negatively if it is publicly announced that Shambala festival will not take place in August 2021. If the question is open when such an announcement is made, the question will retrospectively close 24 hours before the announcement.\nShambala should not be confused with Shambhala Music Festival, which is Canadian.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 32,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In the March 2021 Knesset election, will Likud win a plurality of seats?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6372/israeli-election-march-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "78%",
    "Description": "An [election] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Israeli_legislative_election) will take place in Israel this March. The Likud party [won the previous election] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Israeli_legislative_election) and is [leading in polls] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2021_Israeli_legislative_election) .\nThis question will resolve positively if Likud win more Knesset seats than any other party. Unlike [a related question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6074/will-netanyahu-win-the-marchw-2021-election/) this does not consider post-election coalition negotiations.\nIn the March 2021 Knesset election, will Likud win a plurality of seats?\nThis will resolve negatively if Likud ties with another party for number of seats. It will resolve ambiguously if no election takes place in March 2021\n",
    "# Forecasts": 64,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a song have been streamed 4 billion times on Spotify?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6373/date-song-first-streamed-4b-times-on-spotify/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Spotify] (https://www.spotify.com/) is an audio streaming provider, launched in 2008. From [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spotify) : \nSpotify offers digital copyright restricted recorded music and podcasts, including more than 60 million songs, from record labels and media companies. As a freemium service, basic features are free with advertisements and limited control, while additional features, such as offline listening and commercial-free listening, are offered via paid subscriptions. Users can search for music based on artist, album, or genre, and can create, edit, and share playlists.\nSpotify is available in most of Europe and the Americas, Oceania, and parts of Africa and Asia; on most modern devices including Windows, macOS, and Linux computers; iOS and Android smartphones and tablets; and AI enabled smart speakers such as Amazon Echo and Google Home. As of October 2020, the platform has 320 million monthly active users, including 144 million paying subscribers.\nAs of 2021-01-22, the song that has been streamed the greatest number of time on Spotify is \"Shape of You\" by Ed Sheeran, with 2.695 billion streams. Wikipedia maintains [a list of the most-streamed songs] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-streamed_songs_on_Spotify) .\nWhen will a song have been streamed 4 billion times on Spotify?\nThis question resolves when Spotify data shows that this has happened. For example, the current web interface shows the number of streams of each artist's popular songs (e.g. [Ed Sheeran] (https://open.spotify.com/artist/6eUKZXaKkcviH0Ku9w2n3V) ), and of any track by hovering over its popularity bar. Credible media reports are also sufficient for resolution.\nIf it is known that this has never happened, then the question resolves as greater than the upper bound. This could happen if Spotify does not continue to exist.\nIf it is unknown whether this has ever happened, for instance because Spotify does not make these data available, then the question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the release date of the first song to be streamed 4 billion times on Spotify be?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6374/release-date-of-1st-song-w-4b-spotify-plays/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "[Spotify] (https://www.spotify.com/) is an audio streaming provider, launched in 2008. From [Wikipedia] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spotify) : \nSpotify offers digital copyright restricted recorded music and podcasts, including more than 60 million songs, from record labels and media companies. As a freemium service, basic features are free with advertisements and limited control, while additional features, such as offline listening and commercial-free listening, are offered via paid subscriptions. Users can search for music based on artist, album, or genre, and can create, edit, and share playlists.\nSpotify is available in most of Europe and the Americas, Oceania, and parts of Africa and Asia; on most modern devices including Windows, macOS, and Linux computers; iOS and Android smartphones and tablets; and AI enabled smart speakers such as Amazon Echo and Google Home. As of October 2020, the platform has 320 million monthly active users, including 144 million paying subscribers.\nAs of 2021-01-22, the song that has been streamed the greatest number of time on Spotify is \"Shape of You\" by Ed Sheeran, with 2.695 billion streams. It was released on 6th January 2017.\nWikipedia maintains [a list of the most-streamed songs] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-streamed_songs_on_Spotify) , including their date of release.\nWhat will the release date of the first song to be streamed 4 billion times on Spotify be?\nThere is a [parent Metaculus question] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6373/) that asks when a song will first have been streamed 4 billion times on Spotify.\nIf that question resolves below its upper bound, then this question resolves as the release date of the song that caused its resolution.\nIf that question resolves as above upper bound or resolves ambiguously, then this question resolves ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a major nuclear accident before 2030?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6378/major-nuclear-accident-before-2030/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "previous Metaculus questions:\n--- [Will there be a major nuclear or radiological accident before 1 January 2022?] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/2512/will-there-be-a-major-nuclear-or-radiological-accident-before-1-january-2022/) \nThe [International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Nuclear_Event_Scale) (INES) was introduced in 1990 by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in order to enable prompt communication of safety-significant information in case of nuclear accidents.\nThe scale is intended to be logarithmic, similar to the moment magnitude scale that is used to describe the comparative magnitude of earthquakes. Each increasing level represents an accident approximately ten times more severe than the previous level.\nCompared to earthquakes, where the event intensity can be quantitatively evaluated, the level of severity of a man-made disaster, such as a nuclear accident, is more subject to interpretation. Because of the difficulty of interpreting, the INES level of an incident is assigned well after the incident occurs.\nThe INES scale consists of eight levels, with level seven - 'Major Accidents' - being the most serious. A level seven event involves a major release of radioactive material with widespread health and environmental effects requiring implementation of planned and extended countermeasures.\nTo date, there have been two level seven Major Accidents: the [Chernobyl disaster] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster) that began on 26 April 1986, and the [Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster) , a series of events beginning on 11 March 2011.\nAs INES ratings are not assigned by a central body, high-profile nuclear incidents are sometimes assigned INES ratings by the operator, by the formal body of the country, but also by scientific institutes, international authorities or other experts which may lead to confusion as to the actual severity.\nWill there be a major nuclear accident before 2030?\nThis question resolves positively if an event or series of events that begins prior to 01 January 2030 is classified as a level seven Major Accident on the INES scale, with that classification being issued before 01 January 2031, by any of the following: a national nuclear regulatory authority (for example, any of the agencies featured on [this list] (https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/appendices/nuclear-regulation-regulators.aspx) or [this list] (http://www.ensreg.eu/members-glance/national-regulators) ), the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Head of State or Head of Government of the country in which the incident takes place, or any Permanent Member of the United Nations Security Council.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 30,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the publicly-traded company GameStop (GME) reach a $420.69 stock price by the end of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6379/will-gamestop-gme-reach-42069-by-eoy/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "99%",
    "Description": "As of January 2021, the stock price of GameStop (GME) is seeing the sharpest rise in its history. \nThe Reddit user [/u/deepfuckingvalue] (https://www.reddit.com/user/DeepFuckingValue/) active on [r/wallstreetbets] (https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/) seems to have predicted the rise of this stock as early as 2 years ago. Now r/wallstreetbets is very bullish on GME and they predict a [$420.69 price] (https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l3mpmw/disgraceful_false_media_narrative_about_gme/) .\nr/wallstreetbets, and the GME rise in general, has gotten a lot of media attention. This atypical situation, in which r/wallstreetbets seems to play a sort of role (it's still unclear how influential they really are) has also happened recently with the relatively sudden rise of other stocks such as TSLA, PLTR, and NIO.\nWill the publicly-traded company GameStop (GME) reach a $420.69 stock price by the end of 2021?\nThe question will resolve positively if the GME stock price will reach $420.69 by the end of 2021, as indicated by Google. Otherwise, negatively.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 530,
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the US rejoin the Iran Nuclear Deal before 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6381/us-rejoins-iran-deal-before-2022/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "59%",
    "Description": "The [Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Comprehensive_Plan_of_Action) (JCPOA, also known informally as the Iran Nuclear Deal) is an international agreement between the United States, Iran, and multiple other nations, focused primarily on reducing Iran's capacity to enrich uranium (necessary to create nuclear weapons), in exchange for the United States and other nations lifting sanctions on Iran. In 2018-05-08, the Trump Administration [officially withdrew] (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/world/middleeast/trump-iran-nuclear-deal.html) from the deal and re-imposed sanctions on Iran. Iran responded to this by building more centrifuges and enriching uranium greater than the limits allowed under the JCPOA.\nOn 2020-09-13, President-Elect Biden [stated] (https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/13/opinions/smarter-way-to-be-tough-on-iran-joe-biden/index.html) that if \"Iran returns to strict compliance with the nuclear deal, the United States would rejoin the agreement as a starting point for follow-on negotiations.\" Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif [similarly stated] (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/11/18/iran-urges-joe-biden-to-lift-sanctions-rejoin-nuclear-deal) that the United States could rejoin the agreement \"automatically and with no need to set conditions [if] the United States carries out its duties under Security Council Resolution 2231.\"\nWill the US rejoin the Iran Nuclear Deal before 2022?\nThis question resolves positively if the United States lifts or waives sanctions previously mandated by the JCPOA, before 2022-01-01, 00:00 UTC. The order must go into effect before 2022-01-01, a conditional announcement or promise does not suffice. The question will resolve regardless of whether Iran agrees to any terms or reduces its nuclear production capacity. Credible media reports or an official statment will suffice as a source.\nIf the US and Iran negotiate a new deal related to sanctions or nuclear production capacity, this question will resolve positively if the sanctions lifted by the US are greater or equal to those mandated under the original JCPOA. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 33,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be an episode of The Simpsons with an IMDb rating ≥ 8/10 before 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6384/a-new--good-episode-of-the-simpsons/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "12%",
    "Description": "The Simpsons is famous for many things, one of them that the show is widely considered to be incredibly funny in its earlier seasons but less and less so in its later seasons. \nOn [a chart of IMDb ratings] (https://www.ratingraph.com/tv-shows/the-simpsons-ratings-3857/) you can see a clear downward trajectory to the point where newly released episodes get averages of around 6/10 compared to earlier seasons where most episodes scored well above 8/10.\nThe most recent episode to get an 8 or above was [Barthood] (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4773522/) in 2015.\nWill there be an episode of The Simpsons with an IMDb rating ≥ 8/10 before 2022?\nThis question resolves positively if any future episode of The Simpsons scores ≥ 8.0/10 on IMDb with ≥ 300 user votes, before 2022.\nBecause there is no historical IMDB ratings data and ratings change over time, this question will resolve based on credible user reporting. If a report is made by a Metaculus user that the resolution criteria has been met, and it is judged credible by a Metaculus admin, the question will resolve positive. If no such report is made, it will resolve negative. A credible report might include a screenshot or a snapshot from a service like [Wayback Machine] (https://archive.is) or [Archive.Today] (https://archive.is) .\n---The rating of the episode must specifically come from the weighted average listed on the episode's IMDb page. See [here] (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9761050/ratings?ref_=tt_ov_rt) for an example. \n---If a crossover episode, like [Simpsorama] (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3144282/) , achieves a ≥ 8/10 rating, the question will still resolve positively as long as the episode is listed on [The Simpsons IMDb page] (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096697/) and not the page of the show it crosses over with. \n---This can also resolve positive if an admin sees firsthand that an episode has met the resolution criteria. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 39,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "[short fuse] Will the Tampa Bay Buccaneers win Super Bowl LV?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6393/buccaneers-win-super-bowl-lv/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "43%",
    "Description": "[Super Bowl LV] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_LV) is the 55th Super Bowl that decides the league champion for the 2020 NFL season. Defending Super Bowl champions Kansas City Chiefs will play the Tampa Bay Buccaneers on 7 February 2021 at Raymond James Stadium in Tampa, Florida.\nMetaculus has predicted in a variety of domains but can Metaculus do well at sports?\nThe Buccaneers will be the first team to play a Super Bowl in their home stadium and their quarterback, Tom Brady, will play in a record 10th Super Bowl - the most for any quarterback.\nWill the Tampa Bay Buccaneers win Super Bowl LV?\nThis question resolves positive if the Buccaneers win Super Bowl LV, per credible media reporting.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 124,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the total deal value be of all the US PE deals in billions of US$, in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6396/total-us-private-equity-deals-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nPrivate equity typically refers to investment funds, generally organized as limited partnerships, that buy and restructure companies that are not publicly traded.\nAs with most other economic activity in the United States, private equity has been impacted by the Covid-19. Some mechanisms through which the pandemic is affecting activity on private markets include [increased uncertainty] (https://www.ey.com/en_gl/private-equity/how-private-equity-will-respond-to-the-next-economic-downturn) about the long-run prospects of businesses, and a general economic slump that affects company valuations.\nTotal annual private equity deal value is tracked by Pitchbook, a financial data company. Previous total annual private equity deal values were, [according to Pitchbook] (https://chinookadvisors.com/owners-resources/2019/7/25/the-chinook-report-2h) , were:\n---2008: $312 \n---2009: $138 \n---2010: $284 \n---2011: $336 \n---2012: $375 \n---2013: $434 \n---2014 $544 \n---2015 $512 \n---2016 $610 \n---2017 $629 \n---2018 $730 \n---2019 $678 \nAll in billions of 2019 US$.\nWhat will the total deal value be of all the US PE deals in billions of US$, in 2021?\n\nResolution\n==========\n\nThis question resolves on the basis of Pitchbook data, in terms of 2021 US$. A similar question for 2020 can be found [here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/4722/what-will-the-total-deal-value-be-of-all-the-us-private-equity-deals-in-billions-of-us-in-2020/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the 4-week average of initial jobless claims filed in March 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6398/initial-jobless-claims-in-march-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\n[Initial jobless claims] (https://www.investing.com/economic-calendar/initial-jobless-claims-294) reflect the number of people filing for unemployment insurance over the last week. A higher number should be read negatively as higher unemployment reduces the productivity of the economy.\nGreatly impacted by the spread of COVID-19, the [number of initial jobless claims skyrocketed in March] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ICSA) but has gradually begun to decrease since then. However, the current level for the beginning of August is over five times the level recorded in December of 2019. \nJanuary 14th saw a [larger than expected increase] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-economy/u-s-weekly-jobless-claims-jump-on-covid-19-renewed-supplementary-payments-idUSKBN29J1Q8) in initial jobless claims, causing an uptick in a previously downward trend. As mutations of the virus spread and the [pandemic worsens] (https://time.com/5913620/covid-third-wave/) across America, fears concerning the weakening of the labor market are beginning to grow. \nThe level of initial jobless claims is an excellent indicator of the health of the jobs market, and the economy as a whole. Low levels of claims can signal that companies might have a more difficult time hiring workers, and that workers currently employed will need overtime pay or higher compensation as an enticement. [Wage inflation can increase interest rates and decrease the price of bonds and stocks in the investment market] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=509825&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) , which is bad news to investors and is watched carefully by the Federal Reserve.\nRelated questions:\n[Initial Jobless Claims January 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5793/initial-jobless-claims-in-january-2021/) \n[Initial Jobless Claims February 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5794/initial-jobless-claims-in-february-2021/) \nWhat will be the 4-week average of initial jobless claims filed in March 2021?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nThe resolution criteria for this question will be provided through either the [Federal Reserve] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ICSA) , or through the reports organized on [Econoday’s calendar] (https://us.econoday.com/byweek.asp?cust=us) . This number will reflect the 4-week average of weekly reports for that month. Those data points will include the reporting dates: 5-March, 12-March, 19-March, 26-March\n",
    "# Forecasts": 23,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the 5-week average of initial jobless claims filed in April 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6399/initial-jobless-claims-in-april-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\n[Initial jobless claims] (https://www.investing.com/economic-calendar/initial-jobless-claims-294) reflect the number of people filing for unemployment insurance over the last week. A higher number should be read negatively as higher unemployment reduces the productivity of the economy.\nGreatly impacted by the spread of COVID-19, the [number of initial jobless claims skyrocketed in March] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ICSA) but has gradually begun to decrease since then. However, the current level for the beginning of August is over five times the level recorded in December of 2019. \nJanuary 14th saw a [larger than expected increase] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-economy/u-s-weekly-jobless-claims-jump-on-covid-19-renewed-supplementary-payments-idUSKBN29J1Q8) in initial jobless claims, causing an uptick in a previously downward trend. As mutations of the virus spread and the [pandemic worsens] (https://time.com/5913620/covid-third-wave/) across America, fears concerning the weakening of the labor market are beginning to grow. \nThe level of initial jobless claims is an excellent indicator of the health of the jobs market, and the economy as a whole. Low levels of claims can signal that companies might have a more difficult time hiring workers, and that workers currently employed will need overtime pay or higher compensation as an enticement. [Wage inflation can increase interest rates and decrease the price of bonds and stocks in the investment market] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=509825&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) , which is bad news to investors and is watched carefully by the Federal Reserve.\nRelated questions:\n[Initial Jobless Claims January 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5793/initial-jobless-claims-in-january-2021/) \n[Initial Jobless Claims February 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5794/initial-jobless-claims-in-february-2021/) \nWhat will be the 5-week average of initial jobless claims filed in April 2021?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nThe resolution criteria for this question will be provided through either the [Federal Reserve] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ICSA) , or through the reports organized on [Econoday’s calendar] (https://us.econoday.com/byweek.asp?cust=us) . This number will reflect the 4-week average of weekly reports for that month. Those data points will include the reporting dates: 2-April, 9-April, 16-April, 23-April, 30-April\n",
    "# Forecasts": 17,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the total retail sales including food services be for March 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6400/total-retail-sales-in-march-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\n[Retail sales] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=510128&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) measure the total receipts from all stores that sell merchandise and related products to final consumers. This helps to track consumer demand for durable and non-durable goods over a specified time frame. The retail sales data is compiled monthly by the [US Census Bureau] (https://www.census.gov/retail/marts/www/timeseries.html) , and it also reported through the [Econoday calendar] (https://us.econoday.com/byweek.asp?cust=us) .\nPatterns in consumer spending inform total consumer demand, which has great influence on the stock and bond markets. Should retail sales fall, it would indicate a drop in demand, foretelling potential economic contraction. Consumers generally buy more when they feel confident in the economy and its future.\nTotal retail sales are generally divided into different sections, usually by durability. These include: apparel, department stores, food and beverage stores, electronics and appliances, furniture stores, gas stations, and car dealers\nUnderstanding the movements in consumer demand across these different industries can help investors know when, where, and how to invest across the stock market, and provide clues to the Federal Reserve and other parties on the future movements of the economy.\nRelated questions:\n[Total Retail Sales January 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5795/total-retail-sales-in-january-2021/) \n[Total Retail Sales February 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5796/total-retail-sales-in-february-2021/) \nWhat will the total retail sales including food services be for March 2021?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution criteria will be provided through the US Census Bureau on their [monthly retail trade reports] (https://www.census.gov/retail/marts/www/timeseries.html) . It will include all retail sales including food services. If this data is no longer collected or posted, this question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the total retail sales including food services be for April 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6401/total-retail-sales-in-april-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\n[Retail sales] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=510128&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) measure the total receipts from all stores that sell merchandise and related products to final consumers. This helps to track consumer demand for durable and non-durable goods over a specified time frame. The retail sales data is compiled monthly by the [US Census Bureau] (https://www.census.gov/retail/marts/www/timeseries.html) , and it also reported through the [Econoday calendar] (https://us.econoday.com/byweek.asp?cust=us) .\nPatterns in consumer spending inform total consumer demand, which has great influence on the stock and bond markets. Should retail sales fall, it would indicate a drop in demand, foretelling potential economic contraction. Consumers generally buy more when they feel confident in the economy and its future.\nTotal retail sales are generally divided into different sections, usually by durability. These include: apparel, department stores, food and beverage stores, electronics and appliances, furniture stores, gas stations, and car dealers\nUnderstanding the movements in consumer demand across these different industries can help investors know when, where, and how to invest across the stock market, and provide clues to the Federal Reserve and other parties on the future movements of the economy.\nRelated questions:\n[Total Retail Sales January 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5795/total-retail-sales-in-january-2021/) \n[Total Retail Sales February 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5796/total-retail-sales-in-february-2021/) \nWhat will the total retail sales including food services be for April 2021?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution criteria will be provided through the US Census Bureau on their [monthly retail trade reports] (https://www.census.gov/retail/marts/www/timeseries.html) . It will include all retail sales including food services. If this data is no longer collected or posted, this question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the Industrial Production Index number for March 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6402/industrial-production-index-march-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nThe Federal Reserve keeps an [Industrial Production Index] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/INDPRO) which measures and records the monthly real output of all industrial facilities within the United States including manufacturing, mining, electric, and gas utilities, and is seasonally adjusted.\nThe industrial sector, along with construction, [accounts for most of the variation in national output] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=509752&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) over the business cycle. Large drops in industrial production from a drop in supply or consumer demand would indicate a change in economic growth, and potentially signal the beginning of a period of economic contraction. Likewise, a large boom in production and demand would indicate economic expansion, and boost investor confidence in those industries. Understanding economic fluctuations and health is imperative for investors and companies alike involved in the stock market.\nAnother important metric which often accompanies the Industrial Production Index is the Capacity Utilization Rate. This [rate provides an estimate of how much factory capacity is in use] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=509752&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) .\nRelated questions:\n[Industrial Production Index January 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5797/industrial-production-index-january-2021/) \n[Industrial Production Index February 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5798/industrial-production-index-february-2021/) \nWhat will be the Industrial Production Index number for March 2021?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nThe resolution criteria for this question will be provided by the [Federal Reserve] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/INDPRO) and their monthly measurements of the Industrial Production Index. If data is not collected or recorded, then this question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 23,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the Industrial Production Index number for April 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6403/industrial-production-index-april-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nThe Federal Reserve keeps an [Industrial Production Index] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/INDPRO) which measures and records the monthly real output of all industrial facilities within the United States including manufacturing, mining, electric, and gas utilities, and is seasonally adjusted.\nThe industrial sector, along with construction, [accounts for most of the variation in national output] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=509752&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) over the business cycle. Large drops in industrial production from a drop in supply or consumer demand would indicate a change in economic growth, and potentially signal the beginning of a period of economic contraction. Likewise, a large boom in production and demand would indicate economic expansion, and boost investor confidence in those industries. Understanding economic fluctuations and health is imperative for investors and companies alike involved in the stock market.\nAnother important metric which often accompanies the Industrial Production Index is the Capacity Utilization Rate. This [rate provides an estimate of how much factory capacity is in use] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=509752&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) .\nRelated questions:\n[Industrial Production Index January 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5797/industrial-production-index-january-2021/) \n[Industrial Production Index February 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5798/industrial-production-index-february-2021/) \nWhat will be the Industrial Production Index number for April 2021?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nThe resolution criteria for this question will be provided by the [Federal Reserve] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/INDPRO) and their monthly measurements of the Industrial Production Index. If data is not collected or recorded, then this question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 21,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the seasonally adjusted CPI-U (less energy and food) for March 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6404/cpi-u--change-for-march-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nThe CPI, or Consumer Price Index, is one of the most widely used measures of inflation by investors. Created by analyzing the price of a certain basket of widely used, urban consumer goods over time with relation to a base time, the CPI can show either monthly or yearly price fluctuations. The CPI for specific cities, types of goods, and by wage-earners can also be calculated. Complete CPI data is released [monthly by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov/cpi/) .\nUnderstanding the CPI is vitally important not only for investors, but also for people saving for retirement, or taking out loans on a mortgage or education. If the CPI rises, showing a positive percent increase in inflation, [goods will become more expensive in the future] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=509446&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) , thereby decreasing the purchasing power of savings and increasing the amount necessary to pay back on loans of all kinds.\nConsidered a cost-of-living index, however components like food and energy consumption can fluctuate widely by month, [so monitoring the core CPI (without including either of these factors) is often more stable] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=509446&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) . However, both the full CPI and the core CPI track each other when graphed over the long-run.\nOther Related Questions:\n[CPI-U January 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5791/cpi-u-for-january-2021/) \n[CPI-U February 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5792/cpi-u--change-for-february-2021/) \nWhat will be the seasonally adjusted CPI-U (less energy and food) for March 2021?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution criteria will be provided through the [Bureau of Labor Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov/) through their reports on the CPI. These reports are also posted on [Econoday] (https://us.econoday.com/byweek.asp?cust=us) through their economic calendar. If data is not provided monthly by either of these sources, recorded either as M/M % change or the % change from month prior, the question will resolve ambiguously. The data must be seasonally adjusted as well.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the seasonally adjusted CPI-U (less energy and food) for April 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6405/cpi-u--change-for-april-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nThe CPI, or Consumer Price Index, is one of the most widely used measures of inflation by investors. Created by analyzing the price of a certain basket of widely used, urban consumer goods over time with relation to a base time, the CPI can show either monthly or yearly price fluctuations. The CPI for specific cities, types of goods, and by wage-earners can also be calculated. Complete CPI data is released [monthly by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov/cpi/) .\nUnderstanding the CPI is vitally important not only for investors, but also for people saving for retirement, or taking out loans on a mortgage or education. If the CPI rises, showing a positive percent increase in inflation, [goods will become more expensive in the future] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=509446&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) , thereby decreasing the purchasing power of savings and increasing the amount necessary to pay back on loans of all kinds.\nConsidered a cost-of-living index, however components like food and energy consumption can fluctuate widely by month, [so monitoring the core CPI (without including either of these factors) is often more stable] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=509446&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) . However, both the full CPI and the core CPI track each other when graphed over the long-run.\nOther Related Questions:\n[CPI-U January 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5791/cpi-u-for-january-2021/) \n[CPI-U February 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5792/cpi-u--change-for-february-2021/) \nWhat will be the seasonally adjusted CPI-U (less energy and food) for April 2021?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution criteria will be provided through the [Bureau of Labor Statistics] (https://www.bls.gov/) through their reports on the CPI. These reports are also posted on [Econoday] (https://us.econoday.com/byweek.asp?cust=us) through their economic calendar. If data is not provided monthly by either of these sources, recorded either as M/M % change or the % change from month prior, the question will resolve ambiguously. The data must be seasonally adjusted as well.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the total stock of crude oil and other petroleum products for March 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6406/eia-petroleum-stock-march-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nThe [EIA] (https://www.eia.gov/) , or Energy Information Administration, records the inventories of US and foreign produced petroleum, these inventory levels directly affect the price of petroleum sold in the United States and abroad.\nJust like any other good or service, [petroleum prices are determined by the supply and demand forces of the energy market] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=510261&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) . When the market is expanding and the economy is characterized by positive growth, inventories decrease due to high levels of demand, which causes a supply shortage, thereby jacking up prices. In contrast, when the market is contracting and the economy is slowing, there is an excess of supply as inventories build and demand drops, decreasing prices.\n[Crude oil, gas, and petroleum remain linchpins of today’s economy] (https://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/press_room/900.htm) , and contribute heavily to global employment, manufacturing, and transportation amongst other things. Because of its involvement in a variety of sectors and industries across the globe, fluctuations in price can heavily impact the direction and growth of any one, or many, economies. Changes in the price of these goods cannot impact inflation, as inflation represents the rise in price of all goods, which would keep oil’s relative price to other goods the same. However, [fluctuations in petroleum pricing can and do impact the PPF] (https://www.econlib.org/oil-prices-and-inflation/) (production possibility frontier) for both itself and for other goods, which can create an effect which resembles short term changes in inflation. But here the cause for this effect stems from a change in the entire production capabilities of the economy, and not from the simple change in price from a single good.\nBecause of this, we can [observe trends in changes of consumer prices] (https://www.frbsf.org/education/publications/doctor-econ/2007/november/oil-prices-impact-economy/#:~:text=Oil%20price%20increases%20are%20generally,goods%20made%20with%20petroleum%20products.&amp;text=Increases%20in%20oil%20prices%20can,the%20costs%20of%20producing%20them.) . As the price of oil falls, consumer prices tend to moderate as the costs of production fall for the economy. As the price of oil increases, the cost of production for a variety of goods increases as well, raising consumer prices.\nIt is obvious that generating an understanding of oil production levels on a frequent basis is paramount to anticipating market trends and potential expansion or collapse.\nOther Related Questions:\n[EIA Petroleum Status Report January 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5784/eia-petroleum-stock-january-2021/) \n[EIA Petroleum Status Report February 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5801/eia-petroleum-stock-february-2021/) \nWhat will be the total stock of crude oil and other petroleum products for March 2021?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nThe resolution criteria will be provided from the [EIA through their measurements on the weekly stocks of petroleum and other liquids] (https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_stoc_wstk_dcu_nus_w.htm) . This metric is recorded as the total stock of crude oil and other petroleum products excluding SPR (strategic petroleum reserve) in thousands of barrels. If this data is not released, or no longer collected, the question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 20,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the total stock of crude oil and other petroleum products for April 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6407/eia-petroleum-stock-april-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\nThe [EIA] (https://www.eia.gov/) , or Energy Information Administration, records the inventories of US and foreign produced petroleum, these inventory levels directly affect the price of petroleum sold in the United States and abroad.\nJust like any other good or service, [petroleum prices are determined by the supply and demand forces of the energy market] (https://us.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=510261&amp;cust=us&amp;wiconly=1&amp;lid=0#top) . When the market is expanding and the economy is characterized by positive growth, inventories decrease due to high levels of demand, which causes a supply shortage, thereby jacking up prices. In contrast, when the market is contracting and the economy is slowing, there is an excess of supply as inventories build and demand drops, decreasing prices.\n[Crude oil, gas, and petroleum remain linchpins of today’s economy] (https://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/press_room/900.htm) , and contribute heavily to global employment, manufacturing, and transportation amongst other things. Because of its involvement in a variety of sectors and industries across the globe, fluctuations in price can heavily impact the direction and growth of any one, or many, economies. Changes in the price of these goods cannot impact inflation, as inflation represents the rise in price of all goods, which would keep oil’s relative price to other goods the same. However, [fluctuations in petroleum pricing can and do impact the PPF] (https://www.econlib.org/oil-prices-and-inflation/) (production possibility frontier) for both itself and for other goods, which can create an effect which resembles short term changes in inflation. But here the cause for this effect stems from a change in the entire production capabilities of the economy, and not from the simple change in price from a single good.\nBecause of this, we can [observe trends in changes of consumer prices] (https://www.frbsf.org/education/publications/doctor-econ/2007/november/oil-prices-impact-economy/#:~:text=Oil%20price%20increases%20are%20generally,goods%20made%20with%20petroleum%20products.&amp;text=Increases%20in%20oil%20prices%20can,the%20costs%20of%20producing%20them.) . As the price of oil falls, consumer prices tend to moderate as the costs of production fall for the economy. As the price of oil increases, the cost of production for a variety of goods increases as well, raising consumer prices.\nIt is obvious that generating an understanding of oil production levels on a frequent basis is paramount to anticipating market trends and potential expansion or collapse.\nOther Related Questions:\n[EIA Petroleum Status Report January 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5784/eia-petroleum-stock-january-2021/) \n[EIA Petroleum Status Report February 2021] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5801/eia-petroleum-stock-february-2021/) \nWhat will be the total stock of crude oil and other petroleum products for April 2021?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nThe resolution criteria will be provided from the [EIA through their measurements on the weekly stocks of petroleum and other liquids] (https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_stoc_wstk_dcu_nus_w.htm) . This metric is recorded as the total stock of crude oil and other petroleum products excluding SPR (strategic petroleum reserve) in thousands of barrels. If this data is not released, or no longer collected, the question will resolve ambiguously.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 21,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "For the month of March 2021, what will the US Bureau of Labor Statistics report as the preliminary monthly nonfarm payroll number (in millions)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6408/march-2021-us-nonfarm-payrolls/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\n[Nonfarm payroll employment] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonfarm_payrolls) is a compiled name for goods, construction and manufacturing companies in the US. It does not include farm workers, private household employees, or non-profit organization employees.\nIt is an influential statistic and economic indicator released monthly by the United States Department of Labor as part of a comprehensive report on the state of the labor market.\nThe Bureau of Labor Statistics releases preliminary data on the third Friday after the conclusion of the reference week, i.e., the week which includes the 12th of the month, at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time; typically this date occurs on the first Friday of the month. Nonfarm payroll is included in the monthly Employment Situation or informally the jobs report and affects the US dollar, the Foreign exchange market, the bond market, and the stock market. \nYou can see [historical data for this figure here.] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/non-farm-payrolls) \nDue to the [ongoing coronavirus pandemic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic) , there has been a major selloff in world financial markets, and [more than 22 million Americans lost their jobs in a four-week period during March and April 2020.] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/jobless-claims) The unemployment rate, while falling slowly, sat at [6.7%] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE) by the end of December. And, by late January, over [400,000] (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#cases_casesper100klast7days) Americans had lost their lives.\nWith [the vaccines] (https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-vaccines?adgroupsurvey={adgroupsurvey}&amp;gclid=Cj0KCQiA2uH-BRCCARIsAEeef3kg3TCUoqZseDlkxV2d9p1jPRvkWnPez6NAWX7QBlzz5pHhhOdaONUaAo5yEALw_wcB) currently being distributed, more people should be able to return to work as the economy re-opens, raising the labor force and employment rates.\nSimilar Questions:\n[January 2021 US nonfarm payrolls] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5989/january-2021-us-nonfarm-payrolls-figure-be/) \n[February 2021 US nonfarm payrolls] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5990/february-2021-us-nonfarm-payrolls-figure-be/) \nFor the month of March 2021, what will the US Bureau of Labor Statistics report as the preliminary monthly nonfarm payroll number (in millions)?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution should cite the US Bureau of Labor Statistics release of the preliminary [NFP figure] (https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001&amp;output_view=net_1mth) for the month of February, which will be released in early March. This question does not refer to any later revisions that may be released.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 19,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "For the month of April 2021, what will the US Bureau of Labor Statistics report as the preliminary monthly nonfarm payroll number (in millions)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6409/april-2021-us-nonfarm-payrolls/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Context\n=======\n\n[Nonfarm payroll employment] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonfarm_payrolls) is a compiled name for goods, construction and manufacturing companies in the US. It does not include farm workers, private household employees, or non-profit organization employees.\nIt is an influential statistic and economic indicator released monthly by the United States Department of Labor as part of a comprehensive report on the state of the labor market.\nThe Bureau of Labor Statistics releases preliminary data on the third Friday after the conclusion of the reference week, i.e., the week which includes the 12th of the month, at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time; typically this date occurs on the first Friday of the month. Nonfarm payroll is included in the monthly Employment Situation or informally the jobs report and affects the US dollar, the Foreign exchange market, the bond market, and the stock market. \nYou can see [historical data for this figure here.] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/non-farm-payrolls) \nDue to the [ongoing coronavirus pandemic] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic) , there has been a major selloff in world financial markets, and [more than 22 million Americans lost their jobs in a four-week period during March and April 2020.] (https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/jobless-claims) The unemployment rate, while falling slowly, sat at [6.7%] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE) by the end of December. And, by late January, over [400,000] (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#cases_casesper100klast7days) Americans had lost their lives.\nWith [the vaccines] (https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-vaccines?adgroupsurvey={adgroupsurvey}&amp;gclid=Cj0KCQiA2uH-BRCCARIsAEeef3kg3TCUoqZseDlkxV2d9p1jPRvkWnPez6NAWX7QBlzz5pHhhOdaONUaAo5yEALw_wcB) currently being distributed, more people should be able to return to work as the economy re-opens, raising the labor force and employment rates.\nSimilar Questions:\n[January 2021 US nonfarm payrolls] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5989/january-2021-us-nonfarm-payrolls-figure-be/) \n[February 2021 US nonfarm payrolls] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/5990/february-2021-us-nonfarm-payrolls-figure-be/) \nFor the month of April 2021, what will the US Bureau of Labor Statistics report as the preliminary monthly nonfarm payroll number (in millions)?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution should cite the US Bureau of Labor Statistics release of the preliminary [NFP figure] (https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001&amp;output_view=net_1mth) for the month of February, which will be released in early March. This question does not refer to any later revisions that may be released.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 16,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will WeRide begin testing their autonomous and fully driverless taxis in California?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6411/weride-autonomous-vehicle-testing-in-ca/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Background\n==========\n\nClosing their [$310M Series B round] (https://www.weride.ai/en/series-B-update-en/) on January 13th, [WeRide.ai] (http://WeRide.ai) is gearing up to commercialize their self-driving technology for widespread use. \nWeRide made its [pilot appearance] (https://cn.weride.ai/robotaxi-service/) in Guangzhou, China in November 2020, launching their Robo-Taxis for customer use over 144.65 km of area in the city. These cars are fully autonomous, in that they can successfully drive paying customers using AI technology without the presence of any safety staff on board in case of an accident.\nAccording to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) through their AV Test Initiative, California is one of the largest [hotspots of activity] (https://www.nhtsa.gov/automated-vehicles-safety/av-test-initiative-tracking-tool) for autonomous vehicle testing in the United States. There are currently [over 80 companies] (https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a32872492/dot-standardized-autonomous-vehicle-reports/#:~:text=It%20has%20been%20reported%20that,companies%20are%20testing%20autonomous%20vehicles.) testing autonomous vehicles within the US, although only 20 have submitted safety information to the NHTSA and registered with the AV Test Initiative. WeRide, who has access to [test their vehicles in Silicon Valley] (https://werideai.medium.com/weride-compares-china-us-road-test-data-bdd4a32a84d8) with a driver on board, completed a highway test drive of over [50 km in 2019] (https://werideai.medium.com/weride-moments-silicon-valley-highway-road-test-d5100783d4ac) . However, [only five companies] (https://www.theverge.com/2020/11/23/21591045/california-robotaxi-paid-rides-cpuc-permits) (Cruise, Waymo, Nuro, Zoox, and AutoX) are allowed to deploy autonomous vehicles on public roads without a safety driver in California. \nAs WeRide progresses in China and proves the capabilities of its AI technology, it could be one of the next companies to secure a permit from the CPUC (California Public Utilities Commission) to test their fully autonomous vehicles in California on public roads without any company safety personnel on board. \nPredictions should reflect the date that WeRide obtains a permit from the CPUC to test their driverless cars in California. There is a current list [here] (https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicle-industry-services/autonomous-vehicles/autonomous-vehicle-testing-permit-holders/) . This will not include the deployment of vehicles for passenger use.\nWhen will WeRide begin testing their autonomous and fully driverless taxis in California?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nResolution will be sourced from any reliable news source including direct announcements from [WeRide.ai] (http://WeRide.ai) on their [company website] (https://cn.weride.ai/) or from the state of [California’s DMV] (https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicle-industry-services/autonomous-vehicles/autonomous-vehicle-testing-permit-holders/) online website.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 15,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the final asking price of Roblox stock at the end of its first trading day?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6413/roblox-rblx-first-trading-day-stock-price/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Background\n==========\n\nFounded in 2004 by David Baszucki and Erik Cassel and released to the public in 2006, Roblox is expected to [enter the NYSE (New York Stock Exchange)] (https://marketrealist.com/p/roblox-direct-listing-date/) sometime this February 2021. Market Realist estimates that with private funding for a direct listing at $45 dollars a share, the company could reach a valuation of almost $30 billion dollars. \n[Roblox] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roblox) , an online gaming and game creation system platform, allows users to both develop and program their own games as well as play games created by other users. With a collected revenue of [$589 million in the first nine months of 2020] (https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/12/24/should-you-invest-in-the-roblox-ipo/#:~:text=The%20stock%20hit%20the%20market,shares%20of%20and%20recommends%20Netflix.) and a 68% increase in revenue over the same period from 2019, Roblox is experiencing massive growth. During this time, order bookings, which account for the main bulk of Robux (an in-game currency) purchases, grew 171% to a total of $1.24 billion. As user engagement grows, the value of Roblox stock as a growth stock increases as well, making it an interesting choice to speculate on its initial asking price by the end of its first day of trading. \nOther online gaming companies like Zynga and King Digital Entertainment, the creator of Candy Crush, [encountered massive failures] (https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/mar/26/candy-crush-king-digital-shares-collapse-ipo) after the release of their IPOs. While Roblox is confident in their ability to avoid a similar fate by allowing their users to create and play new games, the company continues to experience a [low life span] (https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/12/24/should-you-invest-in-the-roblox-ipo/#:~:text=The%20stock%20hit%20the%20market,shares%20of%20and%20recommends%20Netflix.) for the average paying customer at 23 months. As Roblox generates the majority of its revenue from Robux sales to users, and does not require a standardized subscription payment, a short lifespan could cause worry amongst investors.\nPredictions should reflect the end of day asking price for the RBLX stock on the NYSE on the day of its public direct listing. According to the [NYSE] (https://www.nyse.com/ipo-center/filings) , there are no current listings for expected pricing of the stock, however that information is expected to be released sometime in the near future.\nWhat will be the final asking price of Roblox stock at the end of its first trading day?\n\nResolution Criteria\n===================\n\nThe resolution can be sourced from any reliable source that shows continual updates in the NYSE stock market.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 38,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Australia reopen for quarantine-free international travel?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6415/date-of-australian-border-reopening/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Since March 2020, in order to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, Australia [has closed its borders] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_Australia#Travel_restrictions) to international arrivals other than citizens and permanent residents and those granted individual exemptions.\nFurthermore, those resident in Australia may not leave without being granted an exemption.\nFinally, those who are permitted to enter are required to enter supervised quarantine for 14 days in hotels upon arrival. Exceptions to this include foreign diplomats (who are expected to self-quarantine), some travellers who have made alternate quarantine arrangements to the satisfaction of Australian authorities, and arrivals from New Zealand, who have been exempt from quarantine since October 2020.\nWhen will Australia reopen for quarantine-free international travel?\nThis question will resolve on the first day that all of the following criteria are met:\n1-- \nAustralia no longer requires non-citizens/residents from the majority of countries to apply for an individual exemption in order to travel to Australia, instead reverting to the requirement to hold a visa or to be a citizen of a country with which Australia has visa-free travel arrangements.\n2-- \nAustralia no longer requires arrivals from the majority of countries to quarantine upon arrival (either self-quarantine or supervised quarantine).\n3-- \nAustralia no longer requires those resident to apply for an exemption in order to leave Australia.\nThese criteria being met must be reported on by at least two reputable media sources. (The same source may be used to support multiple criteria). \n",
    "# Forecasts": 10,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene (R, GA-14) be expelled or resign by 1 Jan 2022",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6419/marjorie-taylor-greene-expelled/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "[Marjorie Taylor Greene] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marjorie_Taylor_Greene) is an American politician, businesswoman, and conspiracy theorist currently serving as a U.S. Representative for Georgia's 14th congressional district. She was elected to Congress in the November 2020 elections, and took office on January 3, 2021.\nGreene has voiced support for conspiracy theories including [Pizzagate] (https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/25/politics/kfile-marjorie-greene-spread-conspiracies/index.html) , [QAnon] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/03/us/politics/qanon-candidates-marjorie-taylor-greene.html) , [false flag shootings] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/22/marjorie-taylor-greene-parkland-sandyhook/) as a means for Congress to legislate for gun control, [9/11 conspiracy theories] (https://www.mediamatters.org/false-flag-conspiracy-theory/facebook-2018-rep-marjorie-taylor-greene-endorsed-conspiracy-theories) , and [\"Frazzledrip\"] (https://twitter.com/willsommer/status/1354176025274404864) (Hillary Clinton torturing a baby and wearing its face as a mask). She [has also expressed support for executing leading Democratic politicians on Facebook] (https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/26/politics/marjorie-taylor-greene-democrats-violence/index.html) .\nDue to her controversial views and outspoken style, she is potentially at risk of expulsion. [Five members of congress have been expelled in the past] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expulsion_from_the_United_States_Congress#Expulsions_from_Congress) and it takes a two-thirds majority to do so.\nWill Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene (R, GA-14) be expelled or resign by 1 Jan 2022\nThis question resolves positively if Majorie Taylor Greene is expelled from Congress or she resigns her seat and is not a member of Congress (House or Senate) by 1 Jan 2022.\nThis question resolves ambiguously if Majorie Taylor Greene is not alive on 1 Jan 2022.\nThis question resolves negatively otherwise.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 157,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Substack be valued at 1B+ before 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6421/substack-to-become-unicorn/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "43%",
    "Description": "Substack is a new publishing platform that has been growing quickly. They raised 120k from YC, $2M in a seed round, and $15.3M in a Series A, per [Crunchbase] (https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/substack/company_financials) .\nWill substack be valued at 1B+ before 2024?\nThis resolves positively if credible reports say that Substack has raised funds at a valuation exceeding $1 billion prior to the resolution date.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 25,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will anyone make over $1M/year as a solo Substack author before 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6422/substack-millionaire-before-2024/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "97%",
    "Description": "Substack is a new publishing company that has been growing rapidly and attracting high profile authors. \nOne organization, The Dispatch, [has passed 1M in annual revenue] (https://techcrunch.com/2020/03/17/the-dispatch-substack-1-million-revenue) . However, The Dispatch has multiple authors.\nWill anyone make over $1M/year as a solo Substack author before 2024\nThis resolves positively if credible reports say that an individual author is earning over $1M/year from Substack subscribers. \nThey are allowed to have editors and still count as a solo author.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 84,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the subreddit /r/wallstreetbets be banned before Jan 1st, 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6425/the-future-of-wallstreetbets/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "The well-known subreddit /r/wallstreetbets has attracted significant media attention in the past week because of the ongoing short squeeze of GameStop (GME), which has caused the stock price to skyrocket. As a result, multiple hedge funds who were shorting GME incurred significant losses. On Jan 27th 2020, the official wallstreetbets Discord server was banned, and the subreddit was made private for 56 minutes, leading to speculation that the subreddit could be banned. [In a heavily upvoted post, one user described the ongoing situation as \"an existential threat to our community\".] (https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l6izw5/stay_calm_a_quick_explanation_about_why_the_sub/) \n[CBS: How Reddit posters made millions as Wall Street lost billions on GameStop's wild stock ride] (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wallstreetbets-reddit-gamestop/) \n[Vox: The GameStop stock frenzy, explained] (https://www.vox.com/the-goods/22249458/gamestop-stock-wallstreetbets-reddit-citron) \n[Ars Technica: Discord bans WallStreetBets as subreddit briefly goes private] (https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2021/01/discord-bans-wallstreetbets-as-subreddit-briefly-goes-private/) \nWill the subreddit /r/wallstreetbets be banned before Jan 1st, 2022?\nThis question resolves positively if the subreddit /r/wallstreetbets is temporarily or permanently banned from the Reddit platform. \nThis question resolves ambiguously if Reddit ceases to exist as a website or company before Jan 1st, 2022.\nThis question resolves negatively otherwise.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 238,
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the single-dose Johnson & Johnson SARS-CoV-2 vaccine be granted emergency use authorization by the US FDA?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6437/jj-single-dose-vaccine-us-eua-date/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The single-dose adenovirus-vectored vaccine Ad26.COV2.S, which encodes the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, is currently undergoing [Phase III testing] (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04505722) with the support of Johnson &amp; Johnson. This randomized double-blind Phase III trial, known as ENSEMBLE, has enrolled [45,000 adult participants] (https://www.jnj.com/innovation/questions-about-johnson-johnson-investigational-covid-19-vaccine) in [multiple countries] (https://www.jnj.com/johnson-johnson-initiates-pivotal-global-phase-3-clinical-trial-of-janssens-covid-19-vaccine-candidate) . \nOn 29 January, Johnson &amp; Johnson [reported interim results] (https://www.jnj.com/johnson-johnson-announces-single-shot-janssen-covid-19-vaccine-candidate-met-primary-endpoints-in-interim-analysis-of-its-phase-3-ensemble-trial) from the ENSEMBLE trial, which includes 72% efficacy in the US and 66% overall efficacy. Johnson &amp; Johnson has previously said it expects to file with the FDA for an emergency use authorization (EUA) in [early February] (https://www.statnews.com/2021/01/29/jj-one-dose-covid-vaccine-is-66-effective-a-weapon-but-not-a-knockout-punch/) .\nWhen will the single-dose Johnson &amp; Johnson SARS-CoV-2 vaccine be granted emergency use authorization by the US FDA?\nThis question retroactively closes when the first credible media report is published stating that Ad26.COV2.S has been submitted to the FDA for EUA. It resolves on the date when the FDA issues a statement reporting the issuing of an emergency use authorization for Ad26.COV2.S. If an EUA is never granted, this resolves as &gt; 31 December 2021. If the EUA application is rejected, and later resubmitted, the close date will not change.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 45,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art object detection performance on COCO be, at 2021-06-14 in box Average Precision (box AP)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6439/sota-object-detection-on-ms-coco-2021-06-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Maximum Likelihood Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=contest:ml-round) . \nObject detection is the task of detecting instances of objects of a certain class within an image. [Microsoft's Common Objects in Context] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0312) (COCO) is a dataset from 2014 that is used to benchmark object recognition. The data places the question of object recognition in the context of the broader question of scene understanding. It contains images of complex everyday scenes containing common objects in their natural context. COCO includes a total of 2.5 million labeled instances in 328k images.\nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is Cascade Eff-B7 NAS-FPN [(Ghiasi et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.07177v1.pdf) , which achieves a box average precision (box AP) of 57.3.\nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/object-detection-on-coco) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art object detection performance on COCO be, at 2021-06-14 in box Average Precision (AP)?\nThis question resolves as the highest level of performance in box AP achieved on COCO test-dev (COCO's test set) up until 2021-06-14 11:59 GMT. Models trained on additional dataset do qualify. For the purpose of this question, models using [Test Time Augmentations] (https://www.kaggle.com/andrewkh/test-time-augmentation-tta-worth-it) may also qualify.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2021-06-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 39,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will the state-of-the-art object detection performance on COCO be, at 2022-01-14 in box average precision (box AP)?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6440/sota-object-detection-on-ms-coco-2022-01-14/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question is part of the Hill Climbing Round of the [Forecasting AI Progress Tournament] (https://www.metaculus.com/ai-progress-tournament/) . You can view all other [questions in this round here] (https://www.metaculus.com/questions/?search=cat:series--hill-climbing) . \nObject detection is the task of detecting instances of objects of a certain class within an image. [Microsoft's Common Objects in Context] (https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0312) (COCO) is a dataset from 2014 that is used to benchmark object recognition. The data places the question of object recognition in the context of the broader question of scene understanding. It contains images of complex everyday scenes containing common objects in their natural context. COCO includes a total of 2.5 million labeled instances in 328k images.\nAs of writing this question, the state-of-the-art model for is Cascade Eff-B7 NAS-FPN [(Ghiasi et al., 2020)] (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.07177v1.pdf) , which achieves a box average precision (box AP) of 57.3.\nAn excellent reference for tracking state-of-the-art models is [PapersWithCode] (https://paperswithcode.com/sota/object-detection-on-coco) , which tracks performance data of ML models.\nWhat will the state-of-the-art object detection performance on COCO be, at 2022-01-14 in box Average Precision (AP)?\nThis question resolves as the highest level of performance in box AP achieved on COCO test-dev (COCO's test set) up until 2022-01-14 11:59 GMT. Models trained on additional dataset do qualify. For the purpose of this question, models using [Test Time Augmentations] (https://www.kaggle.com/andrewkh/test-time-augmentation-tta-worth-it) may also qualify.\nPerformance figures may be taken from e-prints, conference papers, peer-reviewed articles, and blog articles by reputable AI labs (including the associated code repositories). Published performance figures must be available before 2022-01-14, 11:59PM GMT to qualify.\nIn case the relevant performance figure is given as a confidence interval, the median value will be used to resolve the question. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 39,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will an Australian Federal Election be held in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6444/australian-federal-election-2021/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "70%",
    "Description": "[Australia is a parliamentary constitutional monarchy] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Government) ; its bicameral legislature, the [Federal Parliament] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_of_Australia) , holds a general election at least once every three years.\nThere is some constitutional flexibility on the exact election date, however:\n--- [The House of Representatives 'expires' after three years, but can be dissolved at any time] (http://www6.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/s28.html) , with the latest possible date of the next election being within 68 days from the (three year) expiry of the House. \n---Senators from Australian States are elected with six year terms, with half of the seats expiring every three years. [According to Section 13 of the Constitution] (http://www6.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/s13.html) , elections for these retiring Senators must be held \"within one year before the places are to become vacant.\" \nWhile not constitutionally required, the half-Senate elections are customarily held at the same time as House of Representatives elections. (The [Australian Parliament House Library website] (https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1920/NextElection) provides a longer discussion of these rules and customs.)\nThe combination of rules means that a general election for Australian Federal Parliament will almost certainly be held between [Saturday 7 August 2021 and Saturday 21 May 2022] (https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1920/NextElection) .\nWill an Australian Federal Election be held in 2021?\nThis question resolves positively iff an election is held for the Australian House of Representatives in 2021. This election need not also include the Australian Senate, nor will an election for only the Senate qualify. If the [Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) website] (https://www.aec.gov.au/) gives an announcement for the date of the next election, the question will close retroactively to the day before the announcement.\nNote that the Australian federal parliament is composed of two houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate . There is no constitutional requirement that elections for the two houses be held simultaneously, but they are customarily held together. (The last time a half-Senate only election was held was in 1970.) This question resolves according to the House of Representatives election only. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the 7-day rolling average for Covid-19 vaccines given on March 1st in the United States?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6450/doses-of-vaccine-given-per-day-march-1st-us/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The [Bloomberg Vaccine Tracker] (https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/covid-vaccine-tracker-global-distribution/) records the number of Covid-19 doses given per day in the United States and worldwide. As January 31st, an average of 1.35 million doses are given per day in the United States, when calculated as the 7-day rolling average.\nWhat will be the 7-day rolling average for Covid-19 vaccines given on March 1st in the United States?\nThis question resolves as the number of vaccines doses given per day in the United States, according to the 7-day rolling average reported by the [Bloomberg Vaccine Tracker] (https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/covid-vaccine-tracker-global-distribution/) , at the end of the day on March 1st 2021. In case some archives conflict with each other (such as due to continuously updating data), the archive from latest in the day on March 1st in Pacific Standard Time is used for resolution. In case Bloomberg does not continue reporting this statistic, as it was understood on January 31st 2021, then this question resolves ambiguously.\nAny disputes about the wording of this question will be resolved via consensus in the comment section. In the case where more than 2 moderators dispute a proposed admin-given resolution, then this question must resolve ambiguously. \n",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the cumulative number of people who have received one or more doses of a COVID-19 vaccine in the U.S. on 2021-02-28?",
    "URL": "https://www.metaculus.com/questions/6472/cumulative-us-vaccinations-28-february/",
    "Platform": "Metaculus",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Two COVID-19 vaccines — produced by [Pfizer/BioNTech] (https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine) and [Moderna] (https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/moderna-covid-19-vaccine) — have been approved by the FDA and are currently being distributed in the U.S. The vaccine produced by Pfizer-BioNTech has a reported efficacy of [95%] (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577) and the vaccine produced by Moderna has a reported efficacy of [94%] (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389) .\nAs of 2021-02-03, [27,154,956 people] (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations) have received one or more doses of a COVID-19 vaccine, and more than 4M doses per week of the [Pfizer] (https://data.cdc.gov/Vaccinations/COVID-19-Vaccine-Distribution-Allocations-by-Juris/saz5-9hgg) and [Moderna] (https://data.cdc.gov/Vaccinations/COVID-19-Vaccine-Distribution-Allocations-by-Juris/b7pe-5nws) vaccines are delivered to the US according to vaccine distribution reports maintained by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.\nPublic health officials can use forecasts of the number of people expected to receive one or more doses of a COVID-19 vaccine to (i) better predict incident cases and deaths and (ii) communicate the potential risks of infection to the public. \nData sources and more information:\n--- [COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution: The Process] (https://www.hhs.gov/coronavirus/covid-19-vaccines/distribution/index.html) \n--- [Vaccine recommendations from the CDC] (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations-process.html) \n--- [CDC COVID Data Tracker] (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations) \nWhat will be the cumulative number of people who have received one or more doses of a COVID-19 vaccine in the U.S. on 2021-02-28?\nThis question will resolve as the cumulative number of people who receive one or more doses of a COVID-19 vaccine on 2021-02-28 as recorded by the [Centers for Disease Control COVID-19 Data tracker] (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations) in the column \"Number of People Receiving 1 or More Doses.\" The dashboard is updated daily by 8pm ET and will be accessed on 2021-02-28 at approximately 10:00pm ET.\n",
    "# Forecasts": 11,
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which of these 5 European leaders will leave office next?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/5717/Which-of-these-5-European-leaders-will-leave-office-next",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Following the launch of this market, the first among the officials named in the contracts in this market to cease to formally hold the office listed next to his or her name shall be the individual named in the contract. No additional contracts may be added to this market following its launch. In the event that the time and date upon which two or more of the listed individuals cease to formally hold their respective offices is identical or so similar as to be indistinguishable, as determined at PredictIt's sole discretion, the contract listing the candidate with the first alphabetical last name among the individuals in question will resolve as Yes, while all other contracts will resolve as No. At 11:59:59 p.m. (ET) 30 calendar days following an officially announced effective date of at least one listed individual's departure from such office, if this market is not already resolved due to insufficient clarity regarding the relative timing of the departure of two or more such individuals, the alphabetical tie breaker described above will be used to resolve this market. PredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: N/A\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Trump pardon himself in his first term?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6453/Will-Trump-pardon-himself-in-his-first-term",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "Please Note: PredictIt added a supplementary comment at the bottom of the Rules on 01/08/2021.\nDuring his first term, President Donald Trump shall grant a pardon to himself for one or more criminal offences, charges or convictions. Such pardon will be considered to have been granted only if Mr. Trump himself appears on the official list of presidential pardons granted by President Trump, maintained by the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of the Pardon Attorney (available upon launch of this market at https://www.justice.gov/pardon/clemencyrecipients) by 11:59 pm on February 15, 2021 (the “End Date”).\nA self-pardon for Mr. Trump that is announced but does not appear on such official list by the End Date shall not be sufficient to cause this market to resolve Yes. Subsequent removal, revocation or legal challenge to such a pardon grant that appears on the official list at any time before the End Date shall have no bearing on the outcome of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 02/15/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n\nSupplementary Comment(s)\n\nCreated On: 01/08/2021 11:57 AM (ET)\nIn response to trader inquiry: The first sentence of this rule is intended to include any \"blanket\" self-pardon.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which party will win the 2020 House race in Iowa's 2nd District?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6789/Which-party-will-win-the-2020-House-race-in-Iowa's-2nd-District",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which names the party whose candidate wins the 2020 election to the House of Representatives from Iowa's 2nd Congressional District. A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee, or has a ballot-listed or otherwise identifiable party preference, of the party in question.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which party will win the 2020 House race in New York's 22nd District?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6861/Which-party-will-win-the-2020-House-race-in-New-York's-22nd-District",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Please Note: PredictIt added a supplementary comment at the bottom of the Rules on 01/21/2021.\nThe contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which names the party whose candidate wins the 2020 election to the House of Representatives from New York's 22nd Congressional District. A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee, or has a ballot-listed or otherwise identifiable party preference, of the party in question.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n\nSupplementary Comment(s)\n\nCreated On: 01/21/2021 2:09 PM (ET)\nIn response to trader inquiry: Should this race be ordered to be re-run, it will be considered to be a continuation of the 2020 election for purposes of this market.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which party will win the 2024 U.S. presidential election?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6867/Which-party-will-win-the-2024-US-presidential-election",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the party whose candidate on Election Day wins the 2024 U.S. presidential election.\nShould the winner of the presidential election not be the candidate of any party listed in this market at the time of resolution, all contracts shall resolve to No. Should no presidential election be held in the United States in 2024, all contracts in this market shall resolve to No.\nShould the winner of the presidential election be the candidate of the Democratic Party or the Republican Party, this market shall resolve in favor of such winning party, regardless of any candidacy, association, endorsement, or relationship the winning candidate may also hold with or from any other party.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which party will control the Senate after 2022 election?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6874/Which-party-will-control-the-Senate-after-2022-election",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the party that, at the End Date listed below, enjoys the support of more than half of the voting members of the U.S. Senate or, in the event that the vice president has the same party affiliation, the support of half or more of the voting members. For purposes of resolving this market, a Senator's party affiliation or support shall be determined by whichever party’s caucus she or he is a member of on the End Date.\nPredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 01/31/2023 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which party will win the House in the 2022 election?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6892/Which-party-will-win-the-House-in-the-2022-election",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall identify the political party whose candidates are elected in a majority of districts in the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2022 general election. A candidate shall be considered to be associated with a political party if such candidate is elected with a ballot-listed or otherwise identifiable affiliation with that party or in the event that such candidate, as of 12:01 a.m. (ET) on November 8, 2022, most recently publicly stated an intention to caucus with that party.\nFor purposes of resolving this market, delegates and resident Commissioners who are members of the House shall not be considered.\nDetermination of the winners of House seats shall be based on state election authority certification or other final official determination of the 2022 election results for each state; provided that, if a certification or other final official determination is challenged, PredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. PredictIt also reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any other ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances.\nIf there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many U.S. House delegations will Republicans win in the 2020 election?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6925/How-many-US-House-delegations-will-Republicans-win-in-the-2020-election",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which corresponds to the number of U.S. House state delegations controlled by the Republican Party as a result of the 2020 general election. The Republican Party shall be considered to control any state delegation in which a majority of representatives have been elected with a ballot-listed or otherwise readily identifiable party preference as Republican on the day of the election. Should such preference be unidentifiable, a candidate shall be considered a Republican only if prior to the election he or she has most recently indicated an intention to caucus with Republicans.\nDetermination of a House seat won shall be based on state election authority certification or other final official determination of the 2020 U.S. House election results for such state; provided that, if a certification or other final official determination is challenged, PredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled.\nMembers of the House of Representatives who are \"delegates” or “resident commissioners” not chosen by the people of a state are not included for purposes of resolving this market.\nIf there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed Secretary of State on Feb. 15?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6944/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-Secretary-of-State-on-Feb-15",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as U.S. Secretary of State subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Secretary of State be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 02/15/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be more than 9 Supreme Court justices at any point in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6946/Will-there-be-more-than-9-Supreme-Court-justices-at-any-point-in-2021",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "9%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that, at any point during the 2021 calendar year, there are more than nine current members of the United States Supreme Court.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 12/31/2021 5:00 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed Secretary of Defense on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6949/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-Secretary-of-Defense-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as U.S. Secretary of Defense subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Secretary of Defense be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed Secretary of Labor on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6951/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-Secretary-of-Labor-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as U.S. Secretary of Labor subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Secretary of Labor be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed Attorney General on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6952/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-Attorney-General-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as U.S. Attorney General subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Attorney General be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Kamala Harris file to run for president before the end of 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6953/Will-Kamala-Harris-file-to-run-for-president-before-the-end-of-2022",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "24%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that Kamala Harris becomes a candidate for president of the United States in the 2024 general election, by filing a Statement of Candidacy with the Federal Election Commission before the End Date listed below. Filing by an authorized representative of the candidate shall be deemed filing by the candidate.\nAbsent such filing or decision, the market will not resolve to Yes, notwithstanding declarations by Ms. Harris and/or her representatives regarding intentions to run, fundraising activities, hiring of campaign staff, and/or establishment of other campaign infrastructure.\nThe filing of clerical, corrective, or other administrative updates, amendments, or disclosures related to Ms. Harris' previous presidential campaigns or campaign committees will be insufficient to cause this market to resolve as Yes.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 12/31/2022 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed Treasury Secretary on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6957/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-Treasury-Secretary-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as U.S. Secretary of the Treasury subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Secretary of the Treasury be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed HUD Secretary on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6958/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-HUD-Secretary-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Secretary of Housing and Urban Development be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed HHS Secretary on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6965/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-HHS-Secretary-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Secretary of Health and Human Services be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed Commerce Secretary on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6966/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-Commerce-Secretary-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as U.S. Secretary of Commerce subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Secretary of Commerce be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed Homeland Security Secretary on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6971/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-Homeland-Security-Secretary-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Secretary of Homeland Security be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed Energy Secretary on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6972/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-Energy-Secretary-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as U.S. Secretary of Energy subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Secretary of Energy be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Mike Pence file to run for president before the end of 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6975/Will-Mike-Pence-file-to-run-for-president-before-the-end-of-2022",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "21%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that Mike Pence becomes a candidate for president of the United States in the 2024 general election, by filing a Statement of Candidacy with the Federal Election Commission before the End Date listed below. Filing by an authorized representative of the candidate shall be deemed filing by the candidate.\nAbsent such filing or decision, the market will not resolve to Yes, notwithstanding declarations by Mr. Pence and/or his representatives regarding intentions to run, fundraising activities, hiring of campaign staff, and/or establishment of other campaign infrastructure.\nThe filing of clerical, corrective, or other administrative updates, amendments, or disclosures related to Mr. Pence's previous campaigns or campaign committees will be insufficient to cause this market to resolve as Yes.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 12/31/2022 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed Interior Secretary on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6976/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-Interior-Secretary-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as U.S. Secretary of the Interior subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Secretary of the Interior be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed CIA Director on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6977/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-CIA-Director-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Director of the Central Intelligence Agency be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed Secretary of Education on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6978/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-Secretary-of-Education-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as U.S. Secretary of Education subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Secretary of Education be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed Transportation Secretary on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6979/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-Transportation-Secretary-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as U.S. Secretary of Transportation subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Secretary of Transportation be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed Agriculture Secretary on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6980/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-Agriculture-Secretary-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as U.S. Secretary of Agriculture subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Secretary of Agriculture be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed EPA Administrator on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6981/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-EPA-Administrator-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run  in the 2022 Democratic primary in NY-14?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6983/Will-Alexandria-Ocasio-Cortez-run-in-the-2022-Democratic-primary-in-NY-14",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "51%",
    "Description": "Please Note: PredictIt added a supplementary comment at the bottom of the Rules on 11/19/2020.\nThis market shall resolve to Yes in the event that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a ballot-listed candidate in the 2022 Democratic primary election for Representative in Congress from New York's 14th District. Should no such primary election be held, due to Ms. Ocasio-Cortez running unopposed, this market will resolve as Yes.\nPredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time. PredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n\nSupplementary Comment(s)\n\nCreated On: 11/19/2020 9:55 AM (ET)\nIn response to trader inquiry: The Rules expressly state that this market concerns whether Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez will be \"a ballot-listed candidate in the 2022 Democratic primary election for Representative in Congress from New York's 14th District.\" If she is not a ballot-listed candidate in such primary in the district numbered NY-14, this market will resolve No.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed Veterans Affairs Secretary on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6987/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-Veterans-Affairs-Secretary-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as U.S. Secretary of Veterans Affairs subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Secretary of Veterans Affairs be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed Director of National Intelligence on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6989/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-Director-of-National-Intelligence-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as Director of National Intelligence subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Director of National Intelligence be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Amy Klobuchar be confirmed to a Cabinet position by Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6990/Will-Amy-Klobuchar-be-confirmed-to-a-Cabinet-position-by-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "This contract shall resolve to Yes in the event that Senator Amy Klobuchar has been confirmed by the U.S. Senate to serve in a Cabinet position before the End Date listed below.\nFor the purpose of resolving this market, the Cabinet shall be defined as the Attorney General; the Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, State, Transportation, Treasury, and Veterans Affairs; United States Trade Representative; and the heads of the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Management and Budget, Central Intelligence Agency, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and Small Business Administration.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Elizabeth Warren be confirmed to a Cabinet position by Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6991/Will-Elizabeth-Warren-be-confirmed-to-a-Cabinet-position-by-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "This contract shall resolve to Yes in the event that Senator Elizabeth Warren has been confirmed by the U.S. Senate to serve in a Cabinet position before the End Date listed below.\nFor the purpose of resolving this market, the Cabinet shall be defined as the Attorney General; the Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, State, Transportation, Treasury, and Veterans Affairs; United States Trade Representative; and the heads of the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Management and Budget, Central Intelligence Agency, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and Small Business Administration.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed OMB Director on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6992/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-OMB-Director-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as Director of the Office of Management and Budget subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of Director of the Office of Management and Budget be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed U.S. Trade Representative on Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6993/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-US-Trade-Representative-on-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as United States Trade Representative subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of United States Trade Representative be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Donald Trump file to run for president before the end of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/6994/Will-Donald-Trump-file-to-run-for-president-before-the-end-of-2021",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "30%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that Donald Trump becomes a candidate for president of the United States in the 2024 general election by filing a Statement of Candidacy with the Federal Election Commission, or by amending an existing Statement of Candidacy, designating a principal campaign committee for the office of President of the United States in the 2024 election, or otherwise filing with the FEC a communication having the same effect as the filing of a Form 2 Statement of Candidacy for that election, before the End Date listed below. Filing by an authorized representative of the candidate shall be deemed filing by the candidate.\nAbsent such filing or decision, the market will not resolve to Yes, notwithstanding declarations by Mr. Trump and/or his representatives regarding intentions to run, fundraising activities, hiring of campaign staff, and/or establishment of other campaign infrastructure.\nThe filing of clerical, corrective, or other administrative updates, amendments, or disclosures related to Mr. Trump's previous campaigns or campaign committees will be insufficient to cause this market to resolve as Yes.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 12/31/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which party will win the 2021 New Jersey gubernatorial election?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7000/Which-party-will-win-the-2021-New-Jersey-gubernatorial-election",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which names the party whose candidate wins the 2021 New Jersey gubernatorial election. A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee, or has a ballot-listed or otherwise identifiable party preference, of the party in question.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which party will win the 2021 Virginia gubernatorial election?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7001/Which-party-will-win-the-2021-Virginia-gubernatorial-election",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which names the party whose candidate wins the 2021 Virginia gubernatorial election. A candidate shall be considered to represent a party in the event that he or she is the nominee, or has a ballot-listed or otherwise identifiable party preference, of the party in question.\nFor purposes of this market, only one candidate can represent a party listed in a contract. A candidate running as an independent would not be considered to represent the Republican party or Democratic party, even if that candidate otherwise identifies as a member of one of those parties.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be elected New York City mayor in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7002/Who-will-be-elected-New-York-City-mayor-in-2021",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual elected Mayor of New York, NY in the 2021 general election. PredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Andrew Yang run  in the 2021 NYC Democratic Mayoral primary?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7003/Will-Andrew-Yang-run-in-the-2021-NYC-Democratic-Mayoral-primary",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "96%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that Andrew Yang is a ballot-listed candidate in the 2021 Democratic primary election for mayor of New York City. Should no such primary election be held, due to Mr. Yang running unopposed, this market will resolve as Yes.\nPredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time. PredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Israel hold national elections for Knesset in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7007/Will-Israel-hold-national-elections-for-Knesset-in-2021",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "99%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that Israel holds national elections for members of the Knesset during the 2021 calendar year.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 12/31/2021 4:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a woman be elected U.S. president in 2024?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7013/Will-a-woman-be-elected-US-president-in-2024",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "41%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that a female candidate wins the 2024 U.S. presidential election.\nPredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez file to run for president before the end of 2023?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7014/Will-Alexandria-Ocasio-Cortez-file-to-run-for-president-before-the-end-of-2023",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez becomes a candidate for president of the United States in the 2024 general election, by filing a Statement of Candidacy with the Federal Election Commission before the End Date listed below. Filing by an authorized representative of the candidate shall be deemed filing by the candidate.\nAbsent such filing or decision, the market will not resolve to Yes, notwithstanding declarations by Ms. Ocasio-Cortez and/or her representatives regarding intentions to run, fundraising activities, hiring of campaign staff, and/or establishment of other campaign infrastructure.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 12/31/2023 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez run  in the 2022 NY Democratic Senate primary?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7015/Will-Alexandria-Ocasio-Cortez-run-in-the-2022-NY-Democratic-Senate-primary",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a ballot-listed candidate in the 2022 Democratic primary election for Senator from New York. Should no such primary election be held, due to Ms. Ocasio-Cortez running unopposed, this market will resolve as Yes.\nPredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time. PredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which party will win the U.S. Senate election in Pennsylvania in 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7016/Which-party-will-win-the-US-Senate-election-in-Pennsylvania-in-2022",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The winner of the 2022 Pennsylvania general election for U.S. Senate shall be the nominee of, or have a ballot-listed or otherwise identifiable party preference of, the party identified in the contract. PredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which party will win the U.S. Senate election in North Carolina in 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7017/Which-party-will-win-the-US-Senate-election-in-North-Carolina-in-2022",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The winner of the 2022 North Carolina general election for U.S. Senate shall be the nominee of, or have a ballot-listed or otherwise identifiable party preference of, the party identified in the contract. PredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Donald Trump Jr. run in the 2022 Pennsylvania Republican Senate primary?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7018/Will-Donald-Trump-Jr-run-in-the-2022-Pennsylvania-Republican-Senate-primary",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that Donald Trump Jr. is a ballot-listed candidate in the 2022 Republican primary election for Senator from Pennsylvania. Should no such primary election be held, due to Mr. Trump running unopposed, this market will resolve as Yes.\nPredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time. PredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Lara Trump run  in the 2022 North Carolina Republican Senate primary?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7019/Will-Lara-Trump-run-in-the-2022-North-Carolina-Republican-Senate-primary",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "37%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that Lara Lea Trump is a ballot-listed candidate in the 2022 Republican primary election for Senator from North Carolina. Should no such primary election be held, due to Ms. Trump running unopposed, this market will resolve as Yes.\nPredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time. PredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be the Senate-confirmed USAID Administrator on Mar. 16?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7020/Who-will-be-the-Senate-confirmed-USAID-Administrator-on-Mar-16",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Please Note: PredictIt added a supplementary comment at the bottom of the Rules on 12/31/2020.\nThe contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the individual who, as of the End Date listed below, serves as Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) subsequent to Senate-confirmation to that office. Upon the End Date, should the office of USAID Administrator be vacant or filled on an interim basis, all contracts shall resolve to No.\nContracts identifying additional individuals may be added to this market, as circumstances warrant, at any time prior to settlement.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/16/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n\nSupplementary Comment(s)\n\nCreated On: 12/31/2020 9:01 AM (ET)\nNote: A typographical error in the title was corrected to Mar. 16, the End Date set forth in the Rules\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Ivanka Trump run  in the 2022 Florida Republican Senate primary?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7021/Will-Ivanka-Trump-run-in-the-2022-Florida-Republican-Senate-primary",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "26%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that Ivanka Trump is a ballot-listed candidate in the 2022 Republican primary election for Senator from Florida. Should no such primary election be held, due to Ms. Trump running unopposed, this market will resolve as Yes.\nPredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time. PredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which party will win the U.S. Senate election in Florida in 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7024/Which-party-will-win-the-US-Senate-election-in-Florida-in-2022",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The winner of the 2022 Florida general election for U.S. Senate shall be the nominee of, or have a ballot-listed or otherwise identifiable party preference of, the party identified in the contract. PredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will win the 2021 Virginia Democratic gubernatorial primary?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7030/Who-will-win-the-2021-Virginia-Democratic-gubernatorial-primary",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the winner of the 2021 Virginia Democratic gubernatorial primary election. PredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time.\nShould no such primary election be held, due to a single candidate running unopposed, that candidate will be considered the winner of the primary election for purposes of this market.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Benjamin Netanyahu be prime minister of Israel on June 30, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7035/Will-Benjamin-Netanyahu-be-prime-minister-of-Israel-on-June-30,-2021",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "71%",
    "Description": "This contract shall resolve to Yes in the event that Benjamin Netanyahu is prime minister of Israel upon the End Date listed below, according to the United Nations' Protocol and Liaison Service's list of heads of state, located upon launch of this market at protocol.un.org/dgacm/pls/site.nsf/HSHGNFA.xsp (the \"Settlement Source\"). \nShould that Settlement Source not be available or not appear to be updated in a timely manner, PredictIt may at its sole discretion await its availability or select an alternate settlement source.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 06/30/2021 4:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many seats will Israel's Likud Party win in the next Knesset election?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7036/How-many-seats-will-Israel's-Likud-Party-win-in-the-next-Knesset-election",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the number of seats in the Knesset won by the Likud Party in Israel's next legislative election.\nPredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be enough signatures by Mar. 17 for a vote on recall of Gov. Newsom?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7039/Will-there-be-enough-signatures-by-Mar-17-for-a-vote-on-recall-of-Gov-Newsom",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "66%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that proponents of the recall of California Governor Gavin Newsom shall, by March 17, 2021, file recall petitions sufficient to trigger a recall election. Review of any such timely filed petitions for sufficiency to trigger such recall election need not be complete by March 17, 2021. Any extension of time that may be granted to recall efforts currently underway shall have no bearing on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time. PredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be chancellor of Germany on Dec. 31?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7040/Who-will-be-chancellor-of-Germany-on-Dec-31",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the Chancellor of Germany upon the End Date listed below, according to the United Nations' Protocol and Liaison Service's list of heads of state, located upon launch of this market at protocol.un.org/dgacm/pls/site.nsf/HSHGNFA.xsp (the \"Settlement Source\"). \nShould that settlement source not be available or not appear to be updated in a timely manner, PredictIt may at its sole discretion await its availability or select an alternate settlement source.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 12/31/2021 6:00 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will win the 2021 Virginia Republican gubernatorial nomination?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7041/Who-will-win-the-2021-Virginia-Republican-gubernatorial-nomination",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the winner of the 2021 Virginia Republican gubernatorial nomination. PredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Senate convict Donald Trump in Biden's first 100 days?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7050/Will-the-Senate-convict-Donald-Trump-in-Biden's-first-100-days",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "7%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that, after noon (ET) January 20, 2021 but before the End Date listed below, the U.S. Senate shall, by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Members present, convict Donald J. Trump on one or more articles of impeachment.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/29/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Lisa Murkowski be a Republican on April 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7051/Will-Lisa-Murkowski-be-a-Republican-on-April-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "90%",
    "Description": "This market will resolve to Yes in the event that Senator Lisa Murkowski publicly identifies herself as a member of the Republican Party as of the End Date listed below. Senator Murkowski's continued participation or membership in the Senate Republican Conference as of the End Date shall not be sufficient by itself to cause this market to resolve to Yes.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/01/2021 12:01 AM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will win the 2024 Republican presidential nomination?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7053/Who-will-win-the-2024-Republican-presidential-nomination",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the person who wins the 2024 nomination of the Republican Party for U.S. president. Replacement of the nominee for any reason prior to election day will have no impact on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Senators will vote to convict Donald Trump on incitement by Apr. 29?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7054/How-many-Senators-will-vote-to-convict-Donald-Trump-on-incitement-by-Apr-29",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which corresponds to the number of members of the U.S. Senate casting votes to convict Donald J. Trump on the charge of incitement of insurrection, before the End Date listed below.\nShould no such vote conclude before the End Date, or should such vote result in acquittal of Mr. Trump via voice vote or other procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes, the contract identifying the range \"50 or fewer\" shall resolve to Yes. Should such vote result in the conviction of Mr. Trump via voice vote or other procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes, the contract identifying the range \"67 or more\" shall resolve to Yes.\nThis market shall close upon the first such Senate vote. Any subsequent such Senate vote shall have no bearing on the resolution of this market. The Vice President, as President of the Senate, is not a Senator for purposes of this market.\nThe outcomes of committee votes, hearings, or reports, and cloture or other procedural votes will have no impact on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/29/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Mitch McConnell vote to convict on incitement by Apr. 29?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7055/Will-Mitch-McConnell-vote-to-convict-on-incitement-by-Apr-29",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "18%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that, by the End Date listed below, the U.S. Senate shall hold a vote on the conviction of Donald J. Trump in a Senate trial on the charge of incitement of insurrection (\"Senate Vote\"), and Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) votes to convict. Should no such Senate Vote conclude by the End Date, this market will resolve to No.\nThis market shall close upon the first such Senate Vote. Any subsequent Senate Vote shall have no bearing on the resolution of this market.\nAny Senate vote on potential conviction that does not result in the recording of votes shall not be considered sufficient for this market to resolve to Yes, regardless of the outcome of that vote. Any other type of vote (e.g., procedural votes, votes on whether to dismiss charges without trial, or votes on whether to call witnesses), shall have no bearing on the outcome of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/29/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Mitt Romney vote to convict on incitement by Apr. 29?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7056/Will-Mitt-Romney-vote-to-convict-on-incitement-by-Apr-29",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "93%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that, by the End Date listed below, the U.S. Senate shall hold a vote on the conviction of Donald J. Trump in a Senate trial on the charge of incitement of insurrection (\"Senate Vote\"), and Senator Mitt Romney (R-UT) votes to convict. Should no such Senate Vote conclude by the End Date, this market will resolve to No.\nThis market shall close upon the first such Senate Vote. Any subsequent Senate Vote shall have no bearing on the resolution of this market.\nAny Senate vote on potential conviction that does not result in the recording of votes shall not be considered sufficient for this market to resolve to Yes, regardless of the outcome of that vote. Any other type of vote (e.g., procedural votes, votes on whether to dismiss charges without trial, or votes on whether to call witnesses), shall have no bearing on the outcome of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/29/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will win the 2024 Democratic presidential nomination?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7057/Who-will-win-the-2024-Democratic-presidential-nomination",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the person who wins the 2024 nomination of the Democratic Party for U.S. president. Replacement of the nominee for any reason prior to election day will have no impact on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Susan Collins vote to convict on incitement by Apr. 29?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7058/Will-Susan-Collins-vote-to-convict-on-incitement-by-Apr-29",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "71%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that, by the End Date listed below, the U.S. Senate shall hold a vote on the conviction of Donald J. Trump in a Senate trial on the charge of incitement of insurrection (\"Senate Vote\"), and Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) votes to convict. Should no such Senate Vote conclude by the End Date, this market will resolve to No.\nThis market shall close upon the first such Senate Vote. Any subsequent Senate Vote shall have no bearing on the resolution of this market.\nAny Senate vote on potential conviction that does not result in the recording of votes shall not be considered sufficient for this market to resolve to Yes, regardless of the outcome of that vote. Any other type of vote (e.g., procedural votes, votes on whether to dismiss charges without trial, or votes on whether to call witnesses), shall have no bearing on the outcome of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/29/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will John Thune vote to convict on incitement by Apr. 29?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7059/Will-John-Thune-vote-to-convict-on-incitement-by-Apr-29",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "9%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that, by the End Date listed below, the U.S. Senate shall hold a vote on the conviction of Donald J. Trump in a Senate trial on the charge of incitement of insurrection (\"Senate Vote\"), and Senator John Thune (R-SD) votes to convict. Should no such Senate Vote conclude by the End Date, this market will resolve to No.\nThis market shall close upon the first such Senate Vote. Any subsequent Senate Vote shall have no bearing on the resolution of this market.\nAny Senate vote on potential conviction that does not result in the recording of votes shall not be considered sufficient for this market to resolve to Yes, regardless of the outcome of that vote. Any other type of vote (e.g., procedural votes, votes on whether to dismiss charges without trial, or votes on whether to call witnesses), shall have no bearing on the outcome of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/29/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many seats will Holland's VVD win in the next election?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7060/How-many-seats-will-Holland's-VVD-win-in-the-next-election",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the number of parliamentary seats won by the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) in the Netherlands' next general election.\nPredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Thom Tillis vote to convict on incitement by Apr. 29?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7066/Will-Thom-Tillis-vote-to-convict-on-incitement-by-Apr-29",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "6%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that, by the End Date listed below, the U.S. Senate shall hold a vote on the conviction of Donald J. Trump in a Senate trial on the charge of incitement of insurrection (\"Senate Vote\"), and Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) votes to convict. Should no such Senate Vote conclude by the End Date, this market will resolve to No.\nThis market shall close upon the first such Senate Vote. Any subsequent Senate Vote shall have no bearing on the resolution of this market.\nAny Senate vote on potential conviction that does not result in the recording of votes shall not be considered sufficient for this market to resolve to Yes, regardless of the outcome of that vote. Any other type of vote (e.g., procedural votes, votes on whether to dismiss charges without trial, or votes on whether to call witnesses), shall have no bearing on the outcome of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/29/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Joe Manchin vote to convict on incitement by Apr. 29?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7067/Will-Joe-Manchin-vote-to-convict-on-incitement-by-Apr-29",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "91%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that, by the End Date listed below, the U.S. Senate shall hold a vote on the conviction of Donald J. Trump in a Senate trial on the charge of incitement of insurrection (\"Senate Vote\"), and Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) votes to convict. Should no such Senate Vote conclude by the End Date, this market will resolve to No.\nThis market shall close upon the first such Senate Vote. Any subsequent Senate Vote shall have no bearing on the resolution of this market.\nAny Senate vote on potential conviction that does not result in the recording of votes shall not be considered sufficient for this market to resolve to Yes, regardless of the outcome of that vote. Any other type of vote (e.g., procedural votes, votes on whether to dismiss charges without trial, or votes on whether to call witnesses), shall have no bearing on the outcome of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/29/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be elected mayor of Boston in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7068/Who-will-be-elected-mayor-of-Boston-in-2021",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the person elected Mayor of Boston, MA in the first mayoral election held in 2021. PredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Richard Burr vote to convict on incitement by Apr. 29?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7070/Will-Richard-Burr-vote-to-convict-on-incitement-by-Apr-29",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "9%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that, by the End Date listed below, the U.S. Senate shall hold a vote on the conviction of Donald J. Trump in a Senate trial on the charge of incitement of insurrection (\"Senate Vote\"), and Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) votes to convict. Should no such Senate Vote conclude by the End Date, this market will resolve to No.\nThis market shall close upon the first such Senate Vote. Any subsequent Senate Vote shall have no bearing on the resolution of this market.\nAny Senate vote on potential conviction that does not result in the recording of votes shall not be considered sufficient for this market to resolve to Yes, regardless of the outcome of that vote. Any other type of vote (e.g., procedural votes, votes on whether to dismiss charges without trial, or votes on whether to call witnesses), shall have no bearing on the outcome of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/29/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Rob Portman vote to convict on incitement by Apr. 29?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7071/Will-Rob-Portman-vote-to-convict-on-incitement-by-Apr-29",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "24%",
    "Description": "Please Note: PredictIt added a supplementary comment at the bottom of the Rules on 01/25/2021.\nThis market shall resolve to Yes in the event that, by the End Date listed below, the U.S. Senate shall hold a vote on the conviction of Donald J. Trump in a Senate trial on the charge of incitement of insurrection (\"Senate Vote\"), and Senator Rob Portman (R-OH) votes to convict. Should no such Senate Vote conclude by the End Date, this market will resolve to No.\nThis market shall close upon the first such Senate Vote. Any subsequent Senate Vote shall have no bearing on the resolution of this market.\nAny Senate vote on potential conviction that does not result in the recording of votes shall not be considered sufficient for this market to resolve to Yes, regardless of the outcome of that vote. Any other type of vote (e.g., procedural votes, votes on whether to dismiss charges without trial, or votes on whether to call witnesses), shall have no bearing on the outcome of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/29/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n\nSupplementary Comment(s)\n\nCreated On: 01/25/2021 1:45 PM (ET)\nNote: Senator Portman's state has been corrected to Ohio\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Senate censure Ted Cruz before May 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7072/Will-the-Senate-censure-Ted-Cruz-before-May-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that the U.S. Senate formally censures (sometimes referred to as condemnation or denouncement) Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) before the End Date listed below.\nA censure vote will be considered to have commenced once at least one Senator has cast a vote. So long as such a vote commences before the End Date, the full results of the vote will be used to resolve this market, even if the vote concludes after the End Date. The results of the vote need not be available at the identified settlement source at the End Date.\nThe outcomes of committee votes, hearings, or reports, cloture votes and other procedural votes will have no impact on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/30/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Senators vote to confirm Gina Raimondo as Commerce Secretary?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7073/How-many-Senators-vote-to-confirm-Gina-Raimondo-as-Commerce-Secretary",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall correspond to the number or range of votes cast in the U.S. Senate, in a vote commencing before the End Date listed below, in favor of the confirmation of Gina Raimondo to the position of Secretary of Commerce, according to the official vote tally reported by the website senate.gov or, should that source be unavailable, the Congressional Record or other official source.\nA vote on the nomination shall be considered to have commenced once at least one Senator has cast a vote. So long as such a vote commences before the End Date, the full results of the vote will be used to resolve this market, even if the vote concludes after the End Date. The results of the vote need not be available at the identified settlement source at the End Date.\nShould no confirmation vote on the nomination of Ms. Raimondo to the position of Secretary of Commerce commence before the End Date; or should such a vote result in the rejection of the nominee via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes; or should Ms. Raimondo be confirmed to position of Secretary of Commerce in a vote that commences only after the End Date; the contract identifying the range \"67 or fewer\" shall resolve to Yes. Should a vote result in the confirmation of the nominee via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes, the contract identifying the range \"92 or more\" shall resolve to Yes. Should more than one Senate confirmation vote on the nomination of Ms. Raimondo to the position of Secretary of Commerce be held before the End Date, the outcome of the first such vote will be used to resolve this market. \nThe outcomes of committee votes, hearings, or reports, cloture votes and other procedural votes will have no impact on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Senate censure Josh Hawley before May 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7074/Will-the-Senate-censure-Josh-Hawley-before-May-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "16%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that the U.S. Senate formally censures (sometimes referred to as condemnation or denouncement) Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) before the End Date listed below.\nA censure vote will be considered to have commenced once at least one Senator has cast a vote. So long as such a vote commences before the End Date, the full results of the vote will be used to resolve this market, even if the vote concludes after the End Date. The results of the vote need not be available at the identified settlement source at the End Date.\nThe outcomes of committee votes, hearings, or reports, cloture votes and other procedural votes will have no impact on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/30/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Biden policy to raise minimum wage to $15 per hour in 2021 succeed?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7075/Will-Biden-policy-to-raise-minimum-wage-to-$15-per-hour-in-2021-succeed",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "7%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that the federal minimum wage in effect for covered non-exempt employees is $15 or more per hour at any point between the launch of this market and the End Date listed below, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. \nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 12/31/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Lisa Murkowski vote to convict on incitement by Apr. 29?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7077/Will-Lisa-Murkowski-vote-to-convict-on-incitement-by-Apr-29",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "85%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that, by the End Date listed below, the U.S. Senate shall hold a vote on the conviction of Donald J. Trump in a Senate trial on the charge of incitement of insurrection (\"Senate Vote\"), and Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) votes to convict. Should no such Senate Vote conclude by the End Date, this market will resolve to No.\nThis market shall close upon the first such Senate Vote. Any subsequent Senate Vote shall have no bearing on the resolution of this market.\nAny Senate vote on potential conviction that does not result in the recording of votes shall not be considered sufficient for this market to resolve to Yes, regardless of the outcome of that vote. Any other type of vote (e.g., procedural votes, votes on whether to dismiss charges without trial, or votes on whether to call witnesses), shall have no bearing on the outcome of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/29/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Italy hold national elections before June 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7078/Will-Italy-hold-national-elections-before-June-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "17%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that ltaly holds national legislative elections before the End Date listed below.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 05/31/2021 4:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Ben Sasse vote to convict on incitement by Apr. 29?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7080/Will-Ben-Sasse-vote-to-convict-on-incitement-by-Apr-29",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "80%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that, by the End Date listed below, the U.S. Senate shall hold a vote on the conviction of Donald J. Trump in a Senate trial on the charge of incitement of insurrection (\"Senate Vote\"), and Senator Ben Sasse (R-NE) votes to convict. Should no such Senate Vote conclude by the End Date, this market will resolve to No.\nThis market shall close upon the first such Senate Vote. Any subsequent Senate Vote shall have no bearing on the resolution of this market.\nAny Senate vote on potential conviction that does not result in the recording of votes shall not be considered sufficient for this market to resolve to Yes, regardless of the outcome of that vote. Any other type of vote (e.g., procedural votes, votes on whether to dismiss charges without trial, or votes on whether to call witnesses), shall have no bearing on the outcome of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/29/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Senators vote to confirm Jennifer Granholm as Energy Secretary?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7081/How-many-Senators-vote-to-confirm-Jennifer-Granholm-as-Energy-Secretary",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall correspond to the number or range of votes cast in the U.S. Senate, in a vote commencing before the End Date listed below, in favor of the confirmation of Jennifer Granholm to the position of Secretary of Energy, according to the official vote tally reported by the website senate.gov or, should that source be unavailable, the Congressional Record or other official source.\nA vote on the nomination shall be considered to have commenced once at least one Senator has cast a vote. So long as such a vote commences before the End Date, the full results of the vote will be used to resolve this market, even if the vote concludes after the End Date. The results of the vote need not be available at the identified settlement source at the End Date.\nShould no confirmation vote on the nomination of Ms. Granholm to the position of Secretary of Energy commence before the End Date; or should such a vote result in the rejection of the nominee via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes; or should Ms. Granholm be confirmed to position of Secretary of Energy in a vote that commences only after the End Date; the contract identifying the range \"67 or fewer\" shall resolve to Yes. Should a vote result in the confirmation of the nominee via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes, the contract identifying the range \"92 or more\" shall resolve to Yes. Should more than one Senate confirmation vote on the nomination of Ms. Granholm to the position of Secretary of Energy be held before the End Date, the outcome of the first such vote will be used to resolve this market. \nThe outcomes of committee votes, hearings, or reports, cloture votes and other procedural votes will have no impact on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Sarah Huckabee Sanders win the 2022 Arkansas GOP gubernatorial primary?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7082/Will-Sarah-Huckabee-Sanders-win-the-2022-Arkansas-GOP-gubernatorial-primary",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "80%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that Sarah Huckabee Sanders wins the 2022 Arkansas Republican gubernatorial primary election. Should no such primary election be held, due to a single candidate running unopposed, that candidate will be considered the winner of the primary election for purposes of this market. \nPredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time. PredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the District of Columbia become a U.S. state in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7083/Will-the-District-of-Columbia-become-a-US-state-in-2021",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that the territory known upon launch of this market as the District of Columbia is admitted to the Union (regardless of name change) as a single state, and such admission has taken effect by the End Date listed below. The exclusion of portions of the present District of Columbia from the territory admitted to the Union shall have no bearing on the settlement of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 12/31/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Pat Toomey vote to convict on incitement by Apr. 29?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7084/Will-Pat-Toomey-vote-to-convict-on-incitement-by-Apr-29",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "68%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that, by the End Date listed below, the U.S. Senate shall hold a vote on the conviction of Donald J. Trump in a Senate trial on the charge of incitement of insurrection (\"Senate Vote\"), and Senator Pat Toomey (R-PA) votes to convict. Should no such Senate Vote conclude by the End Date, this market will resolve to No.\nThis market shall close upon the first such Senate Vote. Any subsequent Senate Vote shall have no bearing on the resolution of this market.\nAny Senate vote on potential conviction that does not result in the recording of votes shall not be considered sufficient for this market to resolve to Yes, regardless of the outcome of that vote. Any other type of vote (e.g., procedural votes, votes on whether to dismiss charges without trial, or votes on whether to call witnesses), shall have no bearing on the outcome of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/29/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which party will win the U.S. Senate election in Ohio in 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7085/Which-party-will-win-the-US-Senate-election-in-Ohio-in-2022",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The winner of the 2022 Ohio general election for U.S. Senate shall be the nominee of, or have a ballot-listed or otherwise identifiable party preference of, the party identified in the contract. PredictIt may determine how and when to settle the market based on all information available to PredictIt at the relevant time.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Senators vote to confirm Marcia Fudge as HUD Secretary?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7086/How-many-Senators-vote-to-confirm-Marcia-Fudge-as-HUD-Secretary",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall correspond to the number or range of votes cast in the U.S. Senate, in a vote commencing before the End Date listed below, in favor of the confirmation of Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-OH) to the position of Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, according to the official vote tally reported by the website senate.gov or, should that source be unavailable, the Congressional Record or other official source.\nA vote on the nomination shall be considered to have commenced once at least one Senator has cast a vote. So long as such a vote commences before the End Date, the full results of the vote will be used to resolve this market, even if the vote concludes after the End Date. The results of the vote need not be available at the identified settlement source at the End Date.\nShould no confirmation vote on the nomination of Rep. Fudge to the position of Secretary of Housing and Urban Development commence before the End Date; or should such a vote result in the rejection of the nominee via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes; or should Rep. Fudge be confirmed to position of Secretary of Housing and Urban Development in a vote that commences only after the End Date; the contract identifying the range \"61 or fewer\" shall resolve to Yes. Should a vote result in the confirmation of the nominee via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes, the contract identifying the range \"86 or more\" shall resolve to Yes. Should more than one Senate confirmation vote on the nomination of Rep. Fudge to the position of Secretary of Housing and Urban Development be held before the End Date, the outcome of the first such vote will be used to resolve this market. \nThe outcomes of committee votes, hearings, or reports, cloture votes and other procedural votes will have no impact on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will win the 2022 Ohio Republican Senate primary?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7087/Who-will-win-the-2022-Ohio-Republican-Senate-primary",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the winner of the 2022 Ohio Republican primary election for U.S. Senate. Should no such primary election be held, due to a single candidate running unopposed, that candidate will be considered the winner of the primary election for purposes of this market.\nPredictIt reserves the right to wait for further official, party, judicial or other relevant announcements, reports or decisions to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty before the market is settled. Markets may stay open or incur a delay in settlement well past the date of the contest in certain circumstances. If there is any change to an event, or any situation arises, that is not in PredictIt’s view addressed adequately by the market rules, PredictIt will decide the fairest and most appropriate course of action.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Puerto Rico become a U.S. state in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7088/Will-Puerto-Rico-become-a-US-state-in-2021",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "6%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that the territory known upon launch of this market as the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is admitted to the Union (regardless of name change) as a single state, and such admission has taken effect by the End Date listed below. The exclusion of portions of the present commonwealth from the territory admitted to the Union shall have no bearing on the settlement of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 12/31/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Chuck Grassley vote to convict on incitement by Apr. 29?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7089/Will-Chuck-Grassley-vote-to-convict-on-incitement-by-Apr-29",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that, by the End Date listed below, the U.S. Senate shall hold a vote on the conviction of Donald J. Trump in a Senate trial on the charge of incitement of insurrection (\"Senate Vote\"), and Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) votes to convict. Should no such Senate Vote conclude by the End Date, this market will resolve to No.\nThis market shall close upon the first such Senate Vote. Any subsequent Senate Vote shall have no bearing on the resolution of this market.\nAny Senate vote on potential conviction that does not result in the recording of votes shall not be considered sufficient for this market to resolve to Yes, regardless of the outcome of that vote. Any other type of vote (e.g., procedural votes, votes on whether to dismiss charges without trial, or votes on whether to call witnesses), shall have no bearing on the outcome of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 04/29/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Senators vote to confirm L. Thomas-Greenfield as UN Ambassador by 3/15?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7090/How-many-Senators-vote-to-confirm-L-Thomas-Greenfield-as-UN-Ambassador-by-3-15",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall correspond to the number or range of votes cast in the U.S. Senate, in a vote commencing before the End Date listed below, in favor of the confirmation of Linda Thomas-Greenfield to the position of Ambassador to the United Nations, according to the official vote tally reported by the website senate.gov or, should that source be unavailable, the Congressional Record or other official source.\nA vote on the nomination shall be considered to have commenced once at least one Senator has cast a vote. So long as such a vote commences before the End Date, the full results of the vote will be used to resolve this market, even if the vote concludes after the End Date. The results of the vote need not be available at the identified settlement source at the End Date.\nShould no confirmation vote on the nomination of Ms. Thomas-Greenfield to the position of Ambassador to the United Nations commence before the End Date; or should such a vote result in the rejection of the nominee via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes; or should Ms. Thomas-Greenfield be confirmed to position of Ambassador to the United Nations in a vote that commences only after the End Date; the contract identifying the range \"58 or fewer\" shall resolve to Yes. Should a vote result in the confirmation of the nominee via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes, the contract identifying the range \"83 or more\" shall resolve to Yes. Should more than one Senate confirmation vote on the nomination of Ms. Thomas-Greenfield to the position of Ambassador to the United Nations be held before the End Date, the outcome of the first such vote will be used to resolve this market. \nThe outcomes of committee votes, hearings, or reports, cloture votes and other procedural votes will have no impact on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/15/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Biden Cabinet members will be confirmed by Mar. 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7091/How-many-Biden-Cabinet-members-will-be-confirmed-by-Mar-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the number of members of the U.S. Cabinet who have been confirmed by the Senate to their respective positions by the End Date listed below.\nFor purposes of resolving this market, the Cabinet shall be understood to consist of the following 23 positions –\nThe Secretaries of: Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, State, Transportation, Treasury and Veterans Affairs --\nAnd the Attorney General, US Ambassador to the United Nations, Director of National Intelligence and US Trade Representative --\nAnd the heads of the: Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Management and Budget, Council of Economic Advisers, Office of Science and Technology Policy and Small Business Administration.\nAny confirmation vote that may be underway, but have not concluded, upon the End Date shall not be considered for the purpose of resolving this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the federal minimum wage be $9.50 per hour or higher by September 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7092/Will-the-federal-minimum-wage-be-$950-per-hour-or-higher-by-September-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "31%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that the federal minimum wage in effect for covered non-exempt employees is $9.50 or more per hour at any point between the launch of this market and the End Date listed below, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. \nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 09/01/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Senators vote to confirm Tom Vilsack as Agriculture Sec. by 3/31?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7093/How-many-Senators-vote-to-confirm-Tom-Vilsack-as-Agriculture-Sec-by-3-31",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall correspond to the number or range of votes cast in the U.S. Senate, in a vote commencing before the End Date listed below, in favor of the confirmation of Tom Vilsack to the position of Secretary of Agriculture, according to the official vote tally reported by the website senate.gov or, should that source be unavailable, the Congressional Record or other official source.\nA vote on the nomination shall be considered to have commenced once at least one Senator has cast a vote. So long as such a vote commences before the End Date, the full results of the vote will be used to resolve this market, even if the vote concludes after the End Date. The results of the vote need not be available at the identified settlement source at the End Date.\nShould no confirmation vote on the nomination of Mr. Vilsack to the position of Secretary of Agriculture commence before the End Date; or should such a vote result in the rejection of the nominee via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes; or should Mr. Vilsack be confirmed to position of Secretary of Agriculture in a vote that commences only after the End Date; the contract identifying the range \"70 or fewer\" shall resolve to Yes. Should a vote result in the confirmation of the nominee via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes, the contract identifying the range \"95 or more\" shall resolve to Yes. Should more than one Senate confirmation vote on the nomination of Mr. Vilsack to the position of Secretary of Agriculture be held before the End Date, the outcome of the first such vote will be used to resolve this market. \nThe outcomes of committee votes, hearings, or reports, cloture votes and other procedural votes will have no impact on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/31/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Senate subpoena any witnesses in trial of President Trump by Feb. 28?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7094/Will-the-Senate-subpoena-any-witnesses-in-trial-of-President-Trump-by-Feb-28",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes if, in the trial of Donald J. Trump, the Senate shall vote, by the End Date listed below, to approve, issue, authorize or enforce a subpoena of any specific witness or witnesses. A vote to hear testimony from a witness who appears voluntarily without being subpoenaed will not cause this market to resolve Yes.\nA vote will be considered to have commenced once at least one Senator has cast a vote. So long as such a vote commences during the prescribed period of time, the full results of the vote will be used to resolve this market, even if the vote concludes after expiration. The results of the vote need not be available upon expiration.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 02/28/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Liz Cheney be House Republican Conference Chair on March 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7095/Will-Liz-Cheney-be-House-Republican-Conference-Chair-on-March-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "98%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) serves in the position of House Republican Conference Chair upon the End Date listed below.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 12:01 AM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Marjorie Taylor Greene sit on the House Education Committee on March 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7096/Will-Marjorie-Taylor-Greene-sit-on-the-House-Education-Committee-on-March-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "3%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) is a member of, or is assigned to, the House Committee on Education and Labor upon the End Date listed below.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/01/2021 12:01 AM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Senators vote to confirm Denis McDonough as VA Secretary by 3/31?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7097/How-many-Senators-vote-to-confirm-Denis-McDonough-as-VA-Secretary-by-3-31",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall correspond to the number or range of votes cast in the U.S. Senate, in a vote commencing before the End Date listed below, in favor of the confirmation of Denis McDonough to the position of Secretary of Veterans Affairs, according to the official vote tally reported by the website senate.gov or, should that source be unavailable, the Congressional Record or other official source.\nA vote on the nomination shall be considered to have commenced once at least one Senator has cast a vote. So long as such a vote commences before the End Date, the full results of the vote will be used to resolve this market, even if the vote concludes after the End Date. The results of the vote need not be available at the identified settlement source at the End Date.\nShould no confirmation vote on the nomination of Mr. McDonough to the position of Secretary of Veterans Affairs commence before the End Date; or should such a vote result in the rejection of the nominee via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes; or should Mr. McDonough be confirmed to position of Secretary of Veterans Affairs in a vote that commences only after the End Date; the contract identifying the range \"70 or fewer\" shall resolve to Yes. Should a vote result in the confirmation of the nominee via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes, the contract identifying the range \"95 or more\" shall resolve to Yes. Should more than one Senate confirmation vote on the nomination of Mr. McDonough to the position of Secretary of Veterans Affairs be held before the End Date, the outcome of the first such vote will be used to resolve this market. \nThe outcomes of committee votes, hearings, or reports, cloture votes and other procedural votes will have no impact on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/31/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Brad Raffensperger testify publicly in Trump's Senate trial by Feb. 28?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7098/Will-Brad-Raffensperger-testify-publicly-in-Trump's-Senate-trial-by-Feb-28",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "7%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that Brad Raffensperger testifies publicly, under subpoena or otherwise, by the End Date listed below, before the Senate in any trial on any article of impeachment of former President Donald Trump.\nLive testimony given remotely shall be sufficient to cause this market to resolve to Yes. Videotaped testimony shown to the Senate shall not be sufficient to cause this market to resolve to Yes. Testimony before a Congressional committee or subcommittee shall not be sufficient to cause this market to resolve to Yes.\nShould Mr. Raffensperger appear at any such trial, whether in person or remotely, but answer no substantive questions asked by any questioner, this market shall resolve as No, whether or not Mr. Raffensperger submits a sworn statement or reads all or part of such statement aloud during the hearing or trial.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 02/28/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the House censure or reprimand Marjorie Taylor Greene before April 1?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7099/Will-the-House-censure-or-reprimand-Marjorie-Taylor-Greene-before-April-1",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "25%",
    "Description": "This market shall resolve to Yes in the event that the U.S. House of Representatives votes to censure or reprimand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) before the End Date listed below.\nA vote shall be considered to have commenced once at least one Representative has cast a vote. So long as such a vote commences before the End Date, the full results of the vote shall be used to resolve this market, even if the vote concludes after the End Date. The results of the vote need not be available at the End Date.\nThe outcomes of committee votes, hearings, or reports, and other procedural votes shall have no impact on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/31/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the Senate vote on whether to convict Donald Trump?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7100/When-will-the-Senate-vote-on-whether-to-convict-Donald-Trump",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which corresponds to the date upon which the Senate votes on whether to convict former President Donald J. Trump in his Senate impeachment trial.\nA vote shall be considered to have commenced once at least one Senator has cast a vote. So long as such a vote commences before the End Date, the full results of the vote shall be used to resolve this market, even if the vote concludes after the End Date. The results of the vote need not be available at the End Date.\nShould no such vote commence before the End Date, whether because no such trial has begun, remains ongoing upon that date, or has been abandoned without a vote on conviction, the contract identifying the range \"February 20 or later\" shall resolve to Yes.\nThe outcomes of committee votes, hearings, or reports, and cloture or other procedural votes shall have no impact on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 02/20/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Senators vote to confirm Miguel Cardona as Education Secretary by 3/31?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7101/How-many-Senators-vote-to-confirm-Miguel-Cardona-as-Education-Secretary-by-3-31",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The contract that resolves to Yes shall correspond to the number or range of votes cast in the U.S. Senate, in a vote commencing before the End Date listed below, in favor of the confirmation of Miguel Cardona to the position of Secretary of Education, according to the official vote tally reported by the website senate.gov or, should that source be unavailable, the Congressional Record or other official source.\nA vote on the nomination shall be considered to have commenced once at least one Senator has cast a vote. So long as such a vote commences before the End Date, the full results of the vote shall be used to resolve this market, even if the vote concludes after the End Date. The results of the vote need not be available at the identified settlement source at the End Date.\nShould no confirmation vote on the nomination of Mr. Cardona to the position of Secretary of Education commence before the End Date; or should such a vote result in the rejection of the nominee via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes; or should Mr. Cardona be confirmed to position of Secretary of Education in a vote that commences only after the End Date; the contract identifying the range \"64 or fewer\" shall resolve to Yes. Should a vote result in the confirmation of the nominee via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes, the contract identifying the range \"89 or more\" shall resolve to Yes. Should more than one Senate confirmation vote on the nomination of Mr. Cardona to the position of Secretary of Education be held before the End Date, the outcome of the first such vote shall be used to resolve this market. \nThe outcomes of committee votes, hearings, or reports, cloture votes and other procedural votes shall have no impact on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 03/31/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Votes to remove Marjorie Taylor Greene from House committees by Feb. 12?",
    "URL": "https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7102/Votes-to-remove-Marjorie-Taylor-Greene-from-House-committees-by-Feb-12",
    "Platform": "PredictIt",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Please Note: PredictIt added a supplementary comment at the bottom of the Rules on 02/03/2021.\nThe contract that resolves to Yes shall be that which identifies the number of members of the U.S. House of Representatives who, before the End Date listed below, vote in favor of a resolution with the effect to remove Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) from the House of Representatives standing committees on the Budget and on Education & Labor.\nA vote shall be considered to have commenced once at least one Representative has cast a vote. So long as such a vote commences before the End Date, the full results of the vote shall be used to resolve this market, even if the vote concludes after the End Date. The results of the vote need not be available at the End Date. \nShould no such vote commence before the End Date, the contract identifying the range \"212 or fewer\" shall resolve to Yes. Should a vote result in the rejection of a qualifying resolution via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes, the contract identifying the range \"212 or fewer\" shall resolve to Yes. Should a vote result in the passage of a qualifying resolution via a procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes, the contract identifying the range \"245 or more\" shall resolve to Yes. Should more than one vote on a qualifying resolution be held before the End Date, the outcome of the first such vote will be used to resolve this market. \nThe outcomes of committee votes, hearings, or reports, and other procedural votes shall have no impact on the resolution of this market.\nPredictIt’s decisions and determinations under this rule shall be at PredictIt’s sole discretion and shall be final.\nEnd Date: 02/12/2021 11:59 PM (ET)\n\nSupplementary Comment(s)\n\nCreated On: 02/03/2021 11:21 PM (ET)\nNOTICE: WE ARE EXPECTING VERY HEAVY TRADING IN THIS MARKET DURING THE VOTE ON REMOVAL.\nOffers are processed in the order in which they are received. This means that an offer you submit when a certain price is showing may not be filled at that price -- or at all -- because of all the offers already submitted ahead of yours. Do not resubmit offers that are already in process. See also Section 3 iii of PredictIt's Terms and Conditions.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Tesla announce a Bitcoin purchase before March 1, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-tesla-announce-a-bitcoin-purchase-before-march-1-2021",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "9.92%",
    "Description": "This is a market on if Tesla ($TSLA) will announce either their intention to purchase Bitcoin ($BTC) off their balance sheet, the completion of such a purchase, or in any other way, ownership of BTC on their balance sheet. This announcement may come from either Tesla's official channels, or Elon Musk's official channels. This market will resolve to “Yes” if Tesla satisfies any of the aforementioned resolution conditions before the resolution date, March 1, 2021, 12:00am EST. If, for any reason the aforementioned market conditions are not met by the resolution date, this market will resolve to “No”. In the event of ambiguity in regards to the outcome of this market, it will be resolved in good faith at the sole discretion of the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC).",
    "# Forecasts": "1351",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will DeFi Dominance on CoinGecko be above 10% on March 15, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-de-fi-dominance-on-coin-gecko-be-above-10-on-march-15-2021",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "13.48%",
    "Description": "This is a market on if the DeFi Dominance metric, according to CoinGecko, will be above 10% on March 15, 2021, 12:00pm EST. This market will resolve to “Yes“ if DeFi Dominance is listed as being greater than or equal 10.0% on the resolution date. The market will resolve to “No“ if DeFi dominance is less than 10.0% at that time of resolution. The resolution source for this market will be the metric currently listed on [https://www.coingecko.com/en/defi](https://www.coingecko.com/en/defi) as “Defi Dominance (vs. Global)“. In the event of ambiguity in terms of the market outcome, the market will be resolved at the sole discretion of the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC). The resolution date for this market will be March 15, 2021.",
    "# Forecasts": "139",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will the world's richest person be on February 27, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/who-will-the-world-s-richest-person-be-on-february-27-2021",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This is a market on who will be the world's richest person on February 27, 2021, 12PM EST, according to Forbes' billionaires list. The resolution options for this market are Jeff Bezos, current CEO of Amazon, Elon Musk, current CEO of Tesla, and “Other“, representing anyone else being the top of the Forbes list. This market will resolve to Jeff Bezos if, according to the resolution source, he has the world's highest net worth in terms of USD on the resolution date. The market will resolve to Elon Musk if, according to the resolution source, he is the world's highest net worth individual in terms of USD on the resolution date. If for any reason, any individual other than Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk is listed as the highest net worth individual in the world on the resolution date, this market will resolve to “Other”. In the event of ambiguity in terms of the market outcome, the market will be resolved at the sole discretion of the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC). The resolution source will be [forbes.com/real-time-billionaires/](http://forbes.com/real-time-billionaires/).",
    "# Forecasts": "803",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Senators will vote to convict Donald Trump on incitement by March 1?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/how-many-senators-will-vote-to-convict-donald-trump-on-incitement-by-march-1",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This is a market on the number of U.S. Senators who will vote to convict Donald J. Trump on the charge of incitement of insurrection prior to March 1, 2021. If no such vote takes place prior to the resolution date, or if Trump is acquitted via voice vote or another procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes, “52 or fewer\" will resolve to “Yes\". Should such a vote result in the conviction of Trump via voice vote or other procedure that does not result in the recording of a tally of votes, “62 or more\" will resolve to “Yes\". The Vice President, as President of the Senate, is not a Senator for purposes of this market. The outcome corresponding to the number of U.S. Senators who vote to convict Trump on the charge of incitement will resolve to “Yes\".\n\nThe resolution source for this market will be the guilty vote count on the corresponding legislative page of https://www.senate.gov/legislative.\n\nClarifying note: This market will resolve upon the first such Senate vote.",
    "# Forecasts": "537",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "title": "Will YFI total supply be greater than 30,000 by March 15th?",
    "url": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-yfi-total-supply-be-greater-than-30-000-by-march-15th",
    "address": "0x93A384B3daE1E27DbeCF02673C384a5acB264675",
    "description": "This is a market on if the total supply of $YFI, the native token of yearn.finance, will be greater than 30,000 by March 15th, 2021, 4pm EST. Currently there is much debate around adding inflation to the current fixed supply of 30,000 YFI tokens, as a means of creating further incentive for team members and core devs to be committed to the project. If this happens, and the total supply of YFI exceeds 30,000 before the resolution date, the market will resolve to \"Yes\". If the total supply of YFI remains 30,000 on the resolution date, even if a governance proposal set to change that has been approved, the market will resolve to \"No\". If the token gets redeployed and a migration happens, where there is social consensus on a new YFI token that governs yearn.finance, that will be treated as YFI. The main resolution sources will be Coingecko (https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/yearn-finance) and the current ERC20 contract (https://etherscan.io/token/0x0bc529c00c6401aef6d220be8c6ea1667f6ad93e)."
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will 100 million people have received a dose of an approved COVID-19 vaccine in The US by April 1, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-100-million-people-have-received-a-dose-of-an-approved-covid-19-vaccine-in-the-us-by-april-1-2021",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "63.00%",
    "Description": "This is a market on whether 100 million people in The United States of America will have initiated vaccination, according to the CDC COVID tracker, by the resolution date, April 1, 2021, 12pm EST. This market will resolve to \"Yes\" if 100 million people or more are listed as having received their initial dose of vaccination by the resolution source. This only concerns the first dose of vaccination. For vaccines requiring two doses for inoculation, this market considers only the first dose to be considered having initiated vaccination. This market will resolve to \"No\" if, for any reason, fewer than 100 million people have initiated vaccination by the resolution date. The resolution source for this market will be the official data published by the CDC available at https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations\n\n ",
    "# Forecasts": "1211",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Suns or the Pelicans win their February 3rd matchup?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-the-suns-or-the-pelicans-win-their-february-3rd-matchup",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "0.05%",
    "Description": "This is a market on which team will win the February 3rd, 2021 matchup between the Phoenix Suns and the New Orleans Pelicans. In the event this game is delayed for whatever reason, the resolution of this market will be delayed until the game takes place. In the extraordinarily unlikely event the game is canceled altogether, the market will resolve to 50/50. In the event of overtime, this market will resolve to the eventual winner. Results of this market will be decided by official scores available on https://www.nba.com/.",
    "# Forecasts": "499",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Joe Biden be President of the USA on March 1, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-joe-biden-be-president-of-the-usa-on-march-1-2021",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "95.49%",
    "Description": "This is a market on if Joe Biden will be President of the United States on March 1, 2021, 11:59 PM EST. This market will resolve to “Yes“ if, on the resolution date, Joe Biden is listed as being the current President of the United States according to official US government sources, like the link provided as the resolution source. If, for any reason, Joe Biden is not the sitting President of the United States on that date, this market will resolve to “No“. In the event of ambiguity in terms of the market outcome, the market will be resolved in good faith at the sole discretion of the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC). The resolution source for this market will be the official website of the United States President, [https://www.whitehouse.gov/](https://www.whitehouse.gov/)",
    "# Forecasts": "3583",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will $BTC break $50k before April 1st, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-btc-break-50k-before-april-1st-2021",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "45.52%",
    "Description": "This is a market on if the USD price of Bitcoin $BTC will be above $50,000 at any point before April 1st, 2021, 12:00am EST, according to Coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin. This market starts on January 4, 2021. This market will resolve to “Yes“ whenever BTC breaks $50,000 according to Coinmarketcap, and if that condition is not met by April 1st, 2021, it will resolve to “No“. In the event of ambiguity in terms of the market outcome, the market will be resolved in good faith at the sole discretion of the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC).",
    "# Forecasts": "1592",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Bitcoin or Tesla have a higher market cap on March 1, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-bitcoin-or-tesla-have-a-higher-market-cap-on-march-1-2021",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "33.44%",
    "Description": "This is a market on if Bitcoin ($BTC) or Tesla ($TSLA) will have the higher market capitalization on the resolution date, March 1, 2021, 4pm EST. If Bitcoin’s market capitalization (according to Coinmarketcap, based on circulating supply) is higher than Tesla’s at that time, this market will resolve to “Bitcoin”, and vice versa.\n\nThe resolution sources for this market will be the official website of the NASDAQ, https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/tsla, for Tesla’s market capitalization, and https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/ for Bitcoin’s market capitalization.",
    "# Forecasts": "367",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Floyd Mayweather beat Logan Paul in their boxing exhibition match?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-floyd-mayweather-beat-logan-paul-in-their-boxing-exhibition-match",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "91.84%",
    "Description": "This is a market on whether Floyd Mayweather will win his boxing exhibition match against Logan Paul set to take place on February 20th, 2021. If Floyd Mayweather is declared the winner of this bout, either by knockout or by judgement, this market will resolve “Yes.” If Logan Paul is declared the winner, or this fight is declared a draw, this market will resolve to “No”. If this match is, for any reason, postponed to a date earlier than May 1st, 2021, the same market resolution conditions will apply for whenever the fight is rescheduled. In the event the boxing match does not take place before then, the market will resolve to .90 for \"Yes\" and .10 for \"No\", which is in line with existing market odds at time of deployment. More info can be found about this fight on the Fanmio website here: https://fanmio.com/products/floyd-mayweather-vs-logan-paul-special-exhibition-fight. In the event of ambiguity in regards to the outcome, this market will be resolved in good faith by the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC).",
    "# Forecasts": "499",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be enough signatures for a vote on the recall of Gov. Newsom by March 17?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-there-be-enough-signatures-for-a-vote-on-recall-of-gov-newsom-by-march-17",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "61.73%",
    "Description": "This is a market on if there will be enough petition signatures for a vote on the recall of California Governor Gavin Newson prior to March 17, 2021. This market will resolve to \"Yes\" if a recall election is triggered and \"No\" otherwise. The linked PredictIt question will be referenced as the leading resolution source, https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7039/Will-there-be-enough-signatures-by-Mar-17-for-a-vote-on-recall-of-Gov-Newsom. This market will resolve when the PredictIt market is resolved, to the same outcome.",
    "# Forecasts": "168",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Donald Trump be President of the USA on March 31, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-donald-trump-be-president-of-the-usa-on-march-31-2021",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "6.47%",
    "Description": "This is a market on if Donald Trump will be President of the United States on March 31, 2021, 12pm EST. This market will resolve to “Yes“ if, on the resolution date, Donald Trump is the current President of the United States, officially substantiated by official US government sources, like the links provided as the resolution source. If, for any reason, Donald Trump is not the sitting President of the United States on that date, this market will resolve to “No\". The resolution sources are: 1. https://www.loc.gov/rr/print/list/057_chron.html , 2. https://history.house.gov/Institution/Presidents-Coinciding/Presidents-Coinciding/ and 3. https://www.whitehouse.gov/. \n\nIf any of these 3 sources list Donald Trump officially as the current sitting president on the resolution date, this market will resolve to \"Yes\". In the event of ambiguity in terms of the market outcome, the market will be resolved in good faith at the sole discretion of the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC).",
    "# Forecasts": "1620",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many subscribers will /r/wallstreetbets have on February 7, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/how-many-subscribers-will-rwallstreetbets-have-on-february-7-2021",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This is a market on the number of subscribers the r/wallstreetbets subreddit will have by the resolution date, February 7, 2021, 12:00pm EST. The options for this market are less than 6.5 million, 6.5-7.5 million, 7.5-8.5 million, 8.5-9.5 million, 9.5-10.5 million, and greater than 10.5 million. The market will resolve to whichever option corresponds to the resolution source's count of r/wallstreetbets' current subscribers. If r/wallstreetbets is inaccessible because of a ban or suspension at the time of market resolution, this market will resolve to \"less than 6.5 million\". If Reddit as a whole is offline at the time of market resolution, market resolution will be delayed until the earliest time at which the site is accessible. The resolution source for this market will be the \"reader\" count listed on https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/. In the event of ambiguity in terms of the market outcome, the market will be resolved in good faith at the sole discretion of the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC).",
    "# Forecasts": "3281",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Superbowl 55: Kansas City Chiefs vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-the-kansas-city-chiefs-win-superbowl-55",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "61.53%",
    "Description": "This is a market on whether the Kansas City Chiefs will win the NFL Super Bowl 55. This market will resolve to “Yes” if, according to https://www.nfl.com/, the Kansas City Chiefs win Super Bowl 55. If they are eliminated from the NFL playoffs beforehand, or they lose the Super Bowl game, this market will resolve to “No”. In the event of any postponement of the Super Bowl, this market will not be resolved until the game is played, unless the Kansas City Chiefs are not competing in this match.\n\nNote: in the event the Chiefs make the Superbowl, this market may be rephrased to \"Chiefs vs Team 2\", as opposed to Chiefs winning the Superbowl. Ultimately, it will have the exact some resolution and meaning, but may be easier to interpret.\n\nNote 2 (1-25-21): Chiefs made the Superbowl and market outcomes have been changed from \"Yes | No\" to \"Chiefs | Bucs\".",
    "# Forecasts": "715",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Senate convict Donald Trump on impeachment by April 29, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-the-senate-convict-donald-trump-on-impeachment-before-june-1-2021",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "6.98%",
    "Description": "This is a market on whether Donald Trump will be convicted of one or more articles of impeachment prior to April 29, 2021, 11:59pm EST. This market will resolve to “Yes“ if the U.S. Senate, by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Members present, convicts President Trump on one or more articles of impeachment. This market will resolve to “No“ if the U.S. Senate does not convict President Trump of any articles of impeachment by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Members present prior to the resolution date. In the event of ambiguity in terms of the market outcome, the market will be resolved in good faith at the sole discretion of the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC).\n\nThe resolution source for this market will be the equivalent PredictIt market, https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7050/Will-the-Senate-convict-Donald-Trump-in-Biden's-first-100-days.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "659",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "$2000 stimulus checks by February 28, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/2000-stimulus-checks-by-february-28-2021",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "22.33%",
    "Description": "This market concerns whether or not legislation will be signed into law by February 28, 2021, 11:59pm EST which includes direct government stimulus payments to US citizens of $2000. This market will resolve to “Yes” if any such legislation becomes law prior to the resolution date according to the official Congress website, regardless of if the stimulus checks have been paid out yet. This market will resolve to “No” if no such legislation becomes law prior to the resolution date. In the event of ambiguity in terms of the market outcome, the market will be resolved at the sole discretion of the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC). The resolution source will be congress.gov/bill, the official website of Congress.\n\nClarifying Note: In the event of an amendment that effectively increases stimulus payments from $600 to $2000, this market will resolve to \"Yes\". In the event of an additional payment of $1400 to supplement existing $600 payments, this market will resolve to \"Yes\". In the event of a $2000 payment to supplement the existing $600 payment, this market will resolve to \"Yes\".",
    "# Forecasts": "1224",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "title": "What rating will theneedledrop give Drake’s \"Certified Lover Boy\"?",
    "url": "https://polymarket.com/market/what-rating-will-theneedledrop-give-drake-s-certified-lover-boy",
    "address": "0x5E1b4c3e4Cd53e72DdFd7783F2ee8C3E00B93A31",
    "description": "This is a scalar market on what Anthony Fantano, aka theneedledrop, will rate Drake’s upcoming album, set to be titled “Certified Lover Boy”, in his Youtube review. The lower bound is 0 and the upper bound is 10. Ratings like “strong”, “light” and other similar words will be interpreted in good faith by the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC). For example, in the case of “a strong 6 to light 7”, the market would resolve to 7, while “a light to decent 6” would resolve to 6.25. A “Not Good” will resolve as 0. Market starts December 7th, 2020, and this market will be based on Drake's next album release after this date, even if it is not titled \"Certified Lover Boy\". In the unlikely event that theneedledrop does not rate Drake's upcoming album, this market will resolve to 5.\n\nAs this is a Scalar market, you can use the calculator to the right (underneath the Buy modal) to calculate how each Long or Short Token price corresponds with theneedledrop rating. Long and Short shares will settle proportionally to the outcome value. In the event of ambiguity in terms of the market outcome, the market will be resolved in good faith at the sole discretion of the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC)."
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will LINK be above $30 on February 10th?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-link-be-above-30-on-february-10th-1",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "17.90%",
    "Description": "This is a market on if the USD price of Chainlink $LINK will be above $30 on February 10th, 2021, 12:00pm EST, according to coinmarketcap.com/currencies/chainlink/. This market will resolve to “Yes“ if LINK is trading above $30 according to Coinmarketcap on the resolution date, and “No“ otherwise. In the event of ambiguity in terms of the market outcome, the market will be resolved in good faith at the sole discretion of the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC).",
    "# Forecasts": "149",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will ETH be above $2000 on March 1st, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-eth-be-above-2000-on-march-1st-2021",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "37.13%",
    "Description": "This is a market on if the USD price of Ether $ETH will be above $2000 on March 1st, 2021, 12:00pm EST, according to coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ethereum/. This market will resolve to “Yes“ if ETH is trading above $2000 according to Coinmarketcap on the resolution date, and “No“ otherwise. In the event of ambiguity in terms of the market outcome, the market will be resolved in good faith at the sole discretion of the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC).",
    "# Forecasts": "143",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "title": "Will Coinbase delist Ripple (XRP) before they begin publicly trading?",
    "url": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-coinbase-delist-ripple-xrp-before-they-begin-publicly-trading",
    "address": "0x361A583ef3A5f41Aa126465387b7f5e978F8A0C1",
    "description": "This is a market on if Coinbase will delist Ripple’s token, XRP, prior to the day they begin publicly trading. This market will resolve to “yes” if, before Coinbase stock begins trading, XRP has been delisted from Coinbase for US Users - meaning it can no longer be traded on either Coinbase or Coinbase Pro, for all Americans. This market will resolve to “no” if, for any reason, XRP is still available for trading to US Coinbase users on the day Coinbase begins publicly trading. The primary resolution source for this market will be Coinbase’s official webpage, which lists supported cryptocurrencies, https://help.coinbase.com/en/coinbase/getting-started/general-crypto-education/supported-cryptocurrencies, and specifically pertains to the US category. Even if XRP is available for trading via Coinbase in a jurisdiction other than the United States, or mentioned on the website or app, if it is not available for trading in the US, this market will resolve to “yes”. The resolution date for this market will be 10:00am EST on the day Coinbase becomes publicly traded. If Coinbase stock does not begin publicly trading by September 1, 2021, this market will resolve to “no”. In the event of ambiguity in terms of the market outcome, this market will be resolved in good faith at the sole discretion of the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC)."
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many more tweets will be on the @MCuban account on February 10, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/how-many-more-tweets-will-be-on-the-mcuban-account-on-february-10-2021",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This is a market on the number of tweets which will be posted to Mark Cuban's Twitter account prior to the resolution date, February 10, 2021 at 3:00pm EST. \n\nAt 3:00pm EST on the resolution date, the number of total tweets posted by the Twitter account @MCuban, shall exceed 3,453 (the \"Baseline\") by the number or range identified in the contract, as indicated by the number under the label \"TWEETS\" on the account detail viewable on the desktop version of https://tweetdeck.twitter.com/. This account detail can be viewed by using a Twitter account to log into the website https://tweetdeck.twitter.com/, searching for @MCuban, then clicking the verified account labeled \"@MCuban\" from the search results. Should the total tweets reported by that source at that time appear not to include one or more tweets posted by @MCuban just before 3:00 pm, and still available on that account's timeline at 3:00 pm, Polymarket may use additional sources in determining whether any such tweet(s) should be included in the market's resolution. The number by which the total tweets at expiration exceeds the Baseline may not equal the number of tweets actually posted over that time period, in light of numerous factors, including but not limited to the fact that the account's total tweets upon launch of the market may differ from the Baseline, tweets may be deleted prior to expiration of this market, and specialized tweets such as quotes, retweets, replies, promoted tweets, may or may not be included in that total.\n\nNeither Mark Cuban, nor any authorized user of the account in question, need be the author of any such tweets, nor must any authorized user maintain control of the account. Should the settlement source be unavailable at that date and time, for any reason other than deletion, deactivation, or a change in the privacy settings of the account, Polymarket may postpone settlement of this market until the source becomes available. In such a case, the account's total tweets will be measured once Polymarket becomes aware that the source has again become available. If Polymarket deems the source to be permanently unavailable, the lowest bracket will resolve to \"Yes\". Should an updated count of total tweets not be available from twitter.com at the date and time of expiration, due to apparent deletion, deactivation, or a change in privacy settings by a user of the account or by Twitter, all contracts in this market will resolve as No. The blocking of one or more Twitter accounts by @MarkCuban will not be considered to render the settlement source unavailable.\n\nShould the navigation, layout, URL, or labeling of the elements of the settlement source be altered by Twitter or Tweetdeck prior to expiration (other than via deletion or deactivation of the account), this market will still be resolved according to the aforementioned formula, so long as Polymarket can reasonably determine the relevant number of total tweets from twitter.com. The merging, migration, or other combination of one or more Twitter accounts will not in and of itself cause the settlement source to be considered unavailable, so long as an updated count of total tweets can be determined according to the aforementioned formula, even if such combination causes an increase or decrease in that count that does not represent the number of tweets posted to the account during the time period in question.\n\nIn the event of ambiguity in terms of the market outcome, the market will be resolved in good faith at the sole discretion of the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC).",
    "# Forecasts": "240",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": " Will Kim Kardashian or Kanye West file for divorce before March 1, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://polymarket.com/market/will-kim-kardashian-or-kanye-west-file-for-divorce-before-march-1-2021",
    "Platform": "PolyMarket",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20.42%",
    "Description": "This is a market on whether Kanye West or Kim Kardashian will officially file for a divorce before March 1st 2021. Filing for divorce, in the context of this market, can be defined empirically as either an official announcement directly from either Kim or Kanye that they're getting divorced, or an official filing of divorce, including but not limited to certified copies of divorce decrees available from the Superior Court in the county where the decree was granted. This market will resolve \"Yes\" if the aforementioned conditions are met and \"No\" otherwise. In the event of ambiguity in terms of the market outcome, the market will be resolved at the sole discretion of the Markets Integrity Committee (MIC).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "178",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much funding will private U.S. tech companies raise between July 1 and December 31, 2021, inclusive?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/111-how-much-funding-will-private-u-s-tech-companies-raise-between-july-1-and-december-31-2021-inclusive",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "5",
    "# Forecasters": "5",
    "Description": "Related question. This question was previously issued for the period July 1 to December 31, 2020. You can view it here. The crowd's mean forecast was $73.7 billion, and the correct answer was $59.0 billion. Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on Crunchbase data. Crunchbase classifies every company under multiple “category groups.” For this question, companies are classified as “tech” if software, hardware, internet services, or information technology are among their category groups. These categories are overlapping. A company is \"private\" if it's not publicly traded. This question resolves on January 30, 2022, 30 days after the forecast period ends. The question -- and the graph below -- therefore includes only transactions entered into Crunchbase within 30 days of the date of its announcement. Historically, 80% of new funding is entered into Crunchbase within 30 days. The chart below does not include an anomalous $100 billion raised by Broadcom Limited in February 2018. The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for the following scenarios: Tech Companies Threaten Democracy The Impact of COVID-19 on the ML Research Field Three Possible 2025 Worlds that Should Inform Policy Today For more on this metric, see the accompanying Foretell metric analysis: \"Are Established Tech Companies Crowding Out Startups?\"\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much funding will U.S. tech startups raise between July 1 and December 31, 2021, inclusive?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/110-how-much-funding-will-u-s-tech-startups-raise-between-july-1-and-december-31-2021-inclusive",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "5",
    "# Forecasters": "5",
    "Description": "Related question. This question was previously issued for the period July 1 to December 31, 2020. You can view it here. The crowd's mean forecast was $19.35 billion, and the correct answer was $18.67 billion. Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on Crunchbase data. Crunchbase classifies every company under multiple “category groups.” For this question, companies are classified as “tech” if software, hardware, internet services, or information technology are among their category groups. These categories are overlapping. A company is classified as a startup if the funding round in question is any of the following: pre-seed, seed, angel, series a, series b, or venture round. This question resolves on January 30, 2022, 30 days after the forecast period ends. The question -- and the graph below -- therefore includes only transactions entered into Crunchbase within 30 days of the date of its announcement. Historically, 80% of new funding is entered into Crunchbase within 30 days. The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for the following scenarios:Tech Companies Threaten DemocracyFor more on this metric, see the accompanying Foretell metric analysis: \"Are Established Tech Companies Crowding Out Startups?\"\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the opening price of GameStop stock on Tuesday, February 16? ",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/112-what-will-be-the-opening-price-of-gamestop-stock-on-tuesday-february-16",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "17",
    "# Forecasters": "15",
    "Description": "Context. The stock price of GameStop has increased 1700 percent over the past month after users on a Reddit subforum, Wall Street Bets, decided to invest in the stock. After the Reddit users noticed that institutional investors had aggressively shorted the stock -- indeed, shorting more than 100 percent of available shares -- they concluded that the stock price would have to increase when the institutional investors bought back their shares. By driving the price up before the institutional investors bought back their shares, the Reddit users effectively forced the institutional investors to sell at a higher price, further increasing the stock's value. The dynamics at play are unprecedented and have resulted in a stock price entirely unmoored from the value of the underlying company. Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on the opening GameStop stock value on Tuesday, February 16, as reported by Yahoo! Finance.The data underlying the graph is here.\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Conditional on President Trump NOT being convicted of \"incitement of insurrection,\" what will the Senate's average Bipartisan Index score be from 2021-2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/109-conditional-on-president-trump-not-being-convicted-of-incitement-of-insurrection-what-will-the-senate-s-average-bipartisan-index-score-be-from-2021-2022",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "81",
    "# Forecasters": "75",
    "Description": "Related question. This question has a sister question conditional on President Trump's conviction. You can view it here. After the Senate trial, we will close and void (not score) the question whose condition didn't occur and keep the other question open. Context. On January 13, 2021, the U.S. House of Representatives impeached President Trump for \"incitement of insurrection,\" setting up a trial in the Senate. If two-thirds of present Senators vote to convict President Trump, it would take only a simple majority of Senators to bar him from federal office in the future. A point of disagreement is whether a conviction would lead to a more or less divided country. Congressional bipartisanship is one measure, albeit an imperfect one, of how divided the country is.Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on the average Bipartisan Index score of all members of the Senate during the117th Congress, which runs from January 3, 2021 through January 3, 2023. The Bipartisan Index, a joint project of the Lugar Center and Georgetown's McCourt School of Public Policy, quantifies congressional members’ bipartisan behavior on the basis of bill sponsorship and co-sponsorship. The Bipartisan Index scores for this period are expected to be published in March 2023.The graph below shows the Senate's average Bipartisan Index score over time. Notably, the average score increased during the Trump Administration. The Lugar Center has hypothesized a \"Trump Effect\" in which \"the details of legislative work have offered Republican Senators an avenue to express subtle independence and broaden their appeal without reference to the daily media focus on President Trump.\" \n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Conditional on President Trump being convicted of \"incitement of insurrection,\" what will the Senate's average Bipartisan Index score be from 2021-2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/108-conditional-on-the-senate-convicting-president-trump-of-insurrection-what-will-be-the-average-bipartisan-index-score-for-the-senate-during-congress-s-117th-session-2021-2022",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "75",
    "# Forecasters": "70",
    "Description": "Related question. This question has a sister question conditional on President Trump not being convicted. You can view it here. After the Senate trial, we will close and void (not score) the question whose condition didn't occur and keep the other question open. Context. On January 13, 2021, the U.S. House of Representatives impeached President Trump for \"incitement of insurrection,\" setting up a trial in the Senate. If two-thirds of present Senators vote to convict President Trump, it would take only a simple majority of Senators to bar him from federal office in the future. A point of disagreement is whether a conviction would lead to a more or less divided country. Congressional bipartisanship is one measure, albeit an imperfect one, of how divided the country is.Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on the average Bipartisan Index score of all members of the Senate during the117th Congress, which runs from January 3, 2021 through January 3, 2023. The Bipartisan Index, a joint project of the Lugar Center and Georgetown's McCourt School of Public Policy, quantifies congressional members’ bipartisan behavior on the basis of bill sponsorship and co-sponsorship. The Bipartisan Index scores for this period are expected to be published in March 2023.The graph below shows the Senate's average Bipartisan Index score over time. Notably, the average score increased during the Trump Administration. The Lugar Center has hypothesized a \"Trump Effect\" in which \"the details of legislative work have offered Republican Senators an avenue to express subtle independence and broaden their appeal without reference to the daily media focus on President Trump.\" \n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much will the U.S. Department of Defense spend on AI research contracts between July 1 and December 31, 2021, inclusive?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/106-how-much-will-the-u-s-department-of-defense-spend-on-ai-research-contracts-between-july-1-and-december-31-2021-inclusive",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "71",
    "# Forecasters": "66",
    "Description": "Related question. This question was previously issued for the period July 1 to December 31, 2020. You can view it here. The crowd's mean forecast was $441 million, and the correct answer was $302.8 million. This question is the crowd's biggest miss to date. DoD AI contracts over this period were notably lower than they were during the first half of 2020 ($490.5 million).Context.  The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) funds research through both grants and contracts. In the annual budget justification, DoD distinguishes research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&amp;amp;E) with procurement, i.e., acquiring systems. The budget justification includes both grants and contracts under RDT&amp;amp;E. Data on actual DoD expenditures, collected primarily in the Federal Procurement Data System, carves the space differently, separating grants and contracts and not separating RDT&amp;amp;E and procurement. Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on Bloomberg Government (BGOV) data. Using data from several sources, including the Federal Procurement Data System, Sam.gov, and Freedom of Information Act requests, BGOV classifies contract transactions into one or more market area. For this question, a contract is an \"AI contract\" if BGOV classified it in the \"Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning\" market. It's a \"research\" contract if it has a \"Research and Development\" Product Service Code. The years are calendar years, not fiscal years. The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for the following world forecast: Three Possible 2025 Worlds that Should Inform Policy Today Tech Companies Threaten Democracy To suggest a change or clarification to this question, please select Request Clarification from the green gear-shaped dropdown button to the right of the question.\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much will the U.S. Department of Defense spend on AI grants between July 1 and December 31, 2021, inclusive?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/107-how-much-will-the-u-s-department-of-defense-spend-on-ai-grants-between-july-1-and-december-31-2021-inclusive",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "84",
    "# Forecasters": "78",
    "Description": "Related question. This question was previously issued for the period July 1 to September 30, 2020. You can view it here. The crowd's mean forecast was $94.6 million, and the actual value was $41.3 million. Context. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) funds research through both grants and contracts. This question focuses only on grants.Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on data from the Dimensions grant database. For this question, a grant is an \"AI grant\" if the abstract mentions either \"artificial intelligence\" or \"machine learning.\" The graph below does not include data for the first half of 2020. As of June 20, 2020, the Dimensions grants data reflects grants through May 27, 2020, and shows a total of $7,104,943 in grant spending in 2020. This question resolves when CSET receives Dimensions grant data through December 31, 2021.  The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for the following scenarios: Tech Companies Threaten Democracy Three Possible 2025 Worlds that Should Inform Policy Today To suggest a change or clarification to this question, please select Request Clarification from the green gear-shaped dropdown button to the right of the question.\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many AI papers will be posted on arXiv between July 1 and December 31, 2021, inclusive?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/103-how-many-ai-papers-will-be-posted-on-arxiv-between-july-1-and-december-31-2021-inclusive",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "27",
    "# Forecasters": "27",
    "Description": "Related questions. This question was previously issued for the period July 1 to September 30, 2020. You can view it here. The crowd's mean forecast was 10,793, and the correct answer was 10,808. Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on arXiv data. ArXiv is an open-access repository for pre-print papers. Authors organize their papers under one or more arXiv category. For this question, a paper is an \"AI\" paper if it's labeled any of the following: artificial intelligence; computer vision; computation and language; machine learning; or robotics. This question resolves when CSET receives arXiv data through September 30, 2020. The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for the following world forecasts: The Impact of COVID-19 on the ML Research Field Three Possible 2025 Worlds that Should Inform Policy Today To suggest a change or clarification to this question, please select Request Clarification from the green gear-shaped dropdown button to the right of the question.\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many members will the Alphabet Workers Union have by December 31, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/105-how-many-members-will-the-alphabet-workers-union-have-by-december-31-2021",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "70",
    "# Forecasters": "64",
    "Description": "Context. On Monday, January 4, a group of Google tech workers announced they'd formed the Alphabet Workers Union. The union, unprecedented in Silicon Valley, is the culmination of years of employee activism at Google relating to issues such as sexual harassment, algorithmic bias, and pay equity. In addition, as reported by Vox, \"Google worker concerns also include ethical questions about how the company is run, like whether it should be making software used in warfare or border patrol.\"The union is a minority union, meaning it doesn't seek to represent a majority of Google employees in a \"bargaining unit\" under U.S. labor law. As reported by the New York Times, \"workers said it was primarily an effort to give structure and longevity to activism at Google, rather than to negotiate for a contract.\" Nevertheless, whether the union affects how Google is run will depend in part on how many members it attracts. As of Monday, it reported more than 225 members, out of the over 260,000 eligible employees and contractors. The union has not yet reported how many new members it attracted after Monday's public announcement.Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on the most recent membership numbers reported by the union as of December 31, 2021. ***\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of U.S. news articles about AI will be about privacy and security between July 1 and December 31, 2021, inclusive?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/104-what-percentage-of-u-s-news-articles-about-ai-will-be-about-privacy-and-security-between-july-1-and-december-31-2021-inclusive",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "36",
    "# Forecasters": "34",
    "Description": "Related question. This question was previously issued for the period June 15 to August 15, 2020. You can view it here. The crowd's mean forecast  was 1.15%, and the correct answer was 1.3%. Those two months were not representative of the second half of 2020 overall, however, which was 0.7%.Data and resolution details. This question is based on data from Nexis Metabase, a corpus of global news articles on a variety of topics. An article is on the topic of AI if it mentions the term \"artificial intelligence\"; and it's on the topic of privacy and security if it mentions the terms \"privacy\" and \"security.\"  The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for the following world forecasts: COVID-19 Surveillance Strengthens Authoritarian Governments Three Possible 2025 Worlds that Should Inform Policy Today \n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will NVIDIA acquire Arm by March 31, 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/102-will-nvidia-acquire-arm-by-march-30-2022",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "",
    "# Forecasts": "74",
    "# Forecasters": "55",
    "Description": "Context. On September 13, 2020, U.S.-based chipmaker NVIDIA announced an agreement with SoftBank to acquire the U.K.-based Arm Limited. CNN reports that the acquisition would make NVIDIA the largest chip company in the west by market value and global reach, and might leave China more vulnerable to U.S. controls over the semiconductor industry. Arm's energy efficient chip architectures are used in 95 percent of the world's smartphones and 95 percent of the chips designed in China. CNN states that \"China’s chip industry has urged Beijing to investigate the deal, warning that it will hand the U.S. control over a key technology that is used in almost all of the world’s phones.\"The transaction is subject to audit in the United Kingdom, China, the European Union, and the United States. In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission's audit of the transaction is underway. NVIDIA has not yet requested approval from regulators in the European Union, the United Kingdom, or China. In China, the Ministry of Commerce or State Administration for Market Regulation cold block the deal. NVIDIA has stated that it expects the deal to be completed in 18 months. Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on an NVIDIA press release stating that it has acquired Arm.***\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many of the top chipmakers in China will be subject to new export controls in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/101-on-how-many-of-china-s-top-chipmakers-will-the-united-states-impose-new-export-controls-in-2021",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "72",
    "# Forecasters": "66",
    "Description": "Related questions. This question is part of a cluster that includes U.S. exports of semiconductor chips to China, U.S. exports of semiconductor manufacturing equipment to China, Chinese imports of semiconductor chips, Chinese imports of semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and the percentage of top SME producers' revenue that comes from China.Context. The semiconductor manufacturing process has many components manufactured through complicated, highly globalized supply chains. China's ability to produce advanced semiconductor chips is particularly dependent on imports of advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment (SME). Chinese chipmakers can then use imported or domestically produced SME to produce chips domestically.For chip foundries, the top Chinese companies are Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), Hua Hong Semiconductor, Hua Li Microelectronics, and XMC. In September 2020, the Commerce Department notified the chip industry that SMIC was subject to military end-use end-user controls.For memory chips, China had three national champion companies: ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), Yangtze Memory Technology Co. (YMTC), and Fujian Jinhua Semiconductor. In October 2018, the Trump Administration placed Fujian Jinhua on the Entity List, effectively ending its ability to operate.The United States can impose export controls on technologies or companies. For the latter, the two primary mechanisms are (i) the Commerce Department's Entity List, and (ii) \"military end-use or end-user controls,\" which apply to exports to any Chinese end-user if the goods will be used for military purposes. Although the latter applies automatically to exports that satisfy the regulatory standard, the Commerce Department often notifies the chip industry when it determines that military end-use or end-user controls apply to a company, as it recently did for SMIC.For additional background, see Khan, U.S. Semiconductor Exports to China: Current Policies and Trends (2020).Data and resolution details. For this question, top chipmakers include: ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) Yangtze Memory Technology Co. (YMTC) Hua Hong Semiconductor Hua Li Microelectronics XMC SMIC and Fujian Jinhua are excluded because they were recently subjected to new export controls.New export controls will be considered imposed on a company if either (i) the Federal Register includes the addition to the Entity List, or (ii) popular media reports that the Commerce Department has notified the chip industry that the company is subject to military end-use or end-user controls.***This question is a metric for the following scenario:Four Possible Scenarios for U.S.-China [De]Coupling in the Semiconductor Industry\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of the combined revenue of the top five semiconductor manufacturing equipment producers will come from China in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/100-what-percentage-of-the-collective-revenue-of-the-leading-semiconductor-manufacturing-equipment-producers-will-come-from-china-between-july-1-2020-and-june-30-2021-inclusive",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "51",
    "# Forecasters": "48",
    "Description": "Related questions. This question is part of a cluster that includes U.S. exports of semiconductor chips to China, U.S. exports of semiconductor manufacturing equipment to China, Chinese imports of semiconductor chips, and Chinese imports of semiconductor manufacturing equipment.Context. The semiconductor manufacturing process has many components manufactured through complicated, highly globalized supply chains. China's ability to produce advanced semiconductor chips is particularly dependent on U.S., Japanese, and Dutch imports of advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment (SME) -- i.e., the tools used by chip factories to make chips. The top five SME companies globally are: United States: Applied Materials; Lam Research; KLA Japan: Tokyo Electron Netherlands: ASML Although China is building up its chip manufacturing capacity using imported SME, it is still reliant on imports for most of the semiconductor chips it consumes. China is especially reliant on the United States, Taiwan, and South Korea for imports of the most advanced semiconductor chips. Therefore, export controls on chips could reduce China's access to them. If China cannot import SME, it will remain dependent on imports for chips. This question focuses on SME. The United States is considering a number of actions that would reduce the export of SME to China. In September, the Trump Administration restricted exports to China’s Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC). Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on the companies' quarterly and annual public filings through the quarter ending December 31, 2021. At that date, we expect to have data for all five companies through all of 2021 with the exception that we'll have data for KLA only through June 30, 2020. As of December 3, 2020, the figure for 2020 in the graph below includes the following: Lam Research through September 30, 2020; Applied Materials through September 30, 2020; KLA through June 30, 2020; and Tokyo Electron through September 30, 2020. We will supplement the graph with additional 2020 data as it becomes available. In particular, ASML data for all of 2020 will be added after ASML submits its annual financial report covering the period through December 31, 2020.The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for a forthcoming scenario on the future of the semiconductor industry.\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the United States return to compliance with the 2015 Iran nuclear deal by December 31, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/99-will-the-united-states-re-enter-the-2015-nuclear-deal-with-iran-by-december-31-2021",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "64%",
    "# Forecasts": "169",
    "# Forecasters": "127",
    "Description": "Context. In September 2015, the United States entered into the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal, a multilateral agreement involving Iran, the United States, China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, Germany, and the European Union. The United Nations endorsed the agreement in Resolution 2231, which also provided for the \"lifting of all UN Security Council sanctions as well as multilateral and national sanctions related to Iran’s nuclear programme, including steps on access in areas of trade, technology, finance, and energy.\" In May 2018, the Trump Administration announced it would withdraw from the agreement and reimpose sanctions on Iran (see Presidential Memorandum and Executive Order 13846).On September 13, 2020, President-Elect Biden stated that if \"Iran returns to strict compliance with the nuclear deal, the United States would rejoin the agreement as a starting point for follow-on negotiations.\" Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif similarly stated that the United States could rejoin the agreement \"automatically and with no need to set conditions [if] the United States carries out its duties under Security Council Resolution 2231.\"Doing so might prove challenging for numerous reasons, however. President Trump is reportedly \"pushing a plan to slap a long string of new sanctions on Iran in the 10 weeks left until Joe Biden’s inauguration.\" The recent assassination of Iran's chief nuclear scientist and a possible administration change in Iran after the June election could provide additional challenges.Data and resolution details. This question resolves affirmatively if the United States lifts or waives sanctions related to Iran's nuclear program, as required by UN Security Council Resolution 2231. An official statement by the United States that it's compliant with the sanctions requirements in Resolution 2231 will suffice. ***\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the value, in dollars, of all Chinese imports of semiconductor manufacturing equipment in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/95-what-will-be-the-value-in-dollars-of-all-chinese-imports-of-semiconductor-manufacturing-equipment-in-2021",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "66",
    "# Forecasters": "56",
    "Description": "Related questions. This question is part of a cluster that includes U.S. exports of semiconductor chips to China, U.S. exports of semiconductor manufacturing equipment to China, and Chinese imports of semiconductor chips.Context. The semiconductor manufacturing process has many components manufactured through complicated, highly globalized supply chains. China's ability to produce advanced semiconductor chips is particularly dependent on U.S., Japanese, and Dutch imports of advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment (SME) -- i.e., the tools used by chip factories to make chips. Although China is building up its chip manufacturing capacity using imported SME, it is still reliant on imports for most of the semiconductor chips it consumes. China is especially reliant on the United States, Taiwan, and South Korea for imports of the most advanced semiconductor chips. Therefore, export controls on chips could reduce China's access to them. If China cannot import SME, it will remain dependent on imports for chips. This question focuses on SME. The United States is considering a number of actions that would reduce the export of SME to China. In September, the Trump Administration restricted exports to China’s Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC). Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on United Nations Comtrade data. We classified imports as SME if they have any of the following Harmonized System (HS) codes 8486, 903082, 903141, 854311, 901041.  The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for a forthcoming scenario on the future of the semiconductor industry.\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Ant Financial have an IPO in China or Hong Kong?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/97-when-will-ant-financial-have-an-ipo-in-china-or-hong-kong",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "155",
    "# Forecasters": "111",
    "Description": "Context. Tensions between China's president, Xi Jinping, and one of its wealthiest entrepreneurs, Jack Ma, escalated on November 3 when President Xi personally made the decision to suspend the IPO of Ant Financial (link in Chinese). Ant Financial uses big data harvested from its Alipay app -- one of China’s most ubiquitous mobile payment platforms -- to target users for financial services such as loans, credit, and insurance plans. Its IPO was anticipated to be the largest in history and bring the company’s market capitalization to over $300 billion.The decision to postpone Ant’s IPO followed meetings between Chinese regulators and its executives, including Jack Ma, co-founder of Alibaba and Ant’s largest shareholder. Ma has previously criticized regulators for suppressing innovation in the fintech sector, and the government’s move to apply more stringent regulations is widely seen as a win for China’s state-owned banking sector.Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on popular media sources. If an IPO in China or Hong Kong has not occurred by November 18, 2021, we will consider the correct answer \"after November 17, 2021.\" In other words, the latest option includes the possibility an IPO never occurs in China or Hong Kong. ***\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the value, in dollars, of all Chinese imports of semiconductor chips in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/96-what-will-be-the-value-in-dollars-of-all-chinese-imports-of-semiconductor-chips-in-2021",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "66",
    "# Forecasters": "56",
    "Description": "Related questions. This question is part of a cluster that includes U.S. exports of semiconductor chips to China, U.S. exports of semiconductor manufacturing equipment to China, and Chinese imports of semiconductor manufacturing equipment.Context.  The semiconductor manufacturing process has many components manufactured through complicated, highly globalized supply chains. China's ability to produce advanced semiconductor chips is particularly dependent on U.S., Japanese, and Dutch imports of advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment (SME) -- the tools used by chip factories to make chips. Although China is building up its chip manufacturing capacity using imported SME, it is still reliant on imports for most of the semiconductor chips it consumes. China is especially reliant on the United States, Taiwan, and South Korea for imports of the most advanced semiconductor chips. Therefore, export controls on chips could reduce China's access to them. If China cannot import SME, it will remain dependent on imports for chips. This question focuses on semiconductor chips.Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on United Nations Comtrade data. We classified imports as semiconductor chips if they have Harmonized System (HS) code 8542.  The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for a forthcoming scenario on the future of the semiconductor industry.\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the value, in dollars, of U.S. exports of semiconductor chips to China in the first half of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/93-what-will-the-dollar-value-of-u-s-exports-of-semiconductor-chips-to-china-be-in-the-first-half-of-2021",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "72",
    "# Forecasters": "57",
    "Description": "Related questions. This question is part of a cluster that includes U.S. exports of semiconductor manufacturing equipment to China, Chinese imports of semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and Chinese imports of semiconductor chips.Context. The semiconductor manufacturing process has many components manufactured through complicated, highly globalized supply chains. China's ability to produce advanced semiconductor chips is particularly dependent on U.S., Japanese, and Dutch imports of advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment (SME) -- the tools used by chip factories to make chips. Although China is building up its chip manufacturing capacity using imported SME, it is still reliant on imports for most of the semiconductor chips it consumes. China is especially reliant on the United States, Taiwan, and South Korea for imports of the most advanced semiconductor chips. Therefore, export controls on chips could reduce China's access to them. If China cannot import SME, it will remain dependent on imports for chips. This question focuses on semiconductor chips.Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on United Nations Comtrade data. We classified exports as semiconductor chips if they have Harmonized System (HS) code 8542.  The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for a forthcoming scenario on the future of the semiconductor industry.\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the value, in dollars, of U.S. exports of semiconductor manufacturing equipment to China in the first half of 2021? ",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/92-what-will-the-dollar-value-of-u-s-exports-of-semiconductor-manufacturing-equipment-to-china-be-in-the-first-half-of-2021",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "59",
    "# Forecasters": "45",
    "Description": "Related questions. This question is part of a cluster that includes U.S. exports of semiconductor chips to China, Chinese imports of semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and Chinese imports of semiconductor chips.Context. The semiconductor manufacturing process has many components manufactured through complicated, highly globalized supply chains. China's ability to produce advanced semiconductor chips is particularly dependent on U.S., Japanese, and Dutch imports of advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment (SME) -- i.e., the tools used by chip factories to make chips. Although China is building up its chip manufacturing capacity using imported SME, it is still reliant on imports for most of the semiconductor chips it consumes. China is especially reliant on the United States, Taiwan, and South Korea for imports of the most advanced semiconductor chips. Therefore, export controls on chips could reduce China's access to them. If China cannot import SME, it will remain dependent on imports for chips. This question focuses on SME. The United States is considering a number of actions that would reduce the export of SME to China. In September, the Trump Administration restricted exports to China’s Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC). Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on United Nations Comtrade data. We classified exports as SME if they have any of the following Harmonized System (HS) codes 8486, 903082, 903141, 854311, 901041.  The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for a forthcoming scenario on the future of the semiconductor industry.\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of U.S. residents will have an unfavorable view of China, as reflected in the 2022 Pew Global Attitudes Survey?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/91-conditional-on-vice-president-biden-s-election-what-percentage-of-u-s-residents-will-have-an-unfavorable-view-of-china-as-reflected-in-the-2022-pew-global-attitudes-survey",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "157",
    "# Forecasters": "136",
    "Description": "Related questions. This question was previously conditioned on Vice President Biden's election. Now that Vice President has been elected, we dropped the condition. We also closed the sister question conditional on President Trump's re-election. You can view it here. We previously asked a non-conditional version of this question regarding the 2021 pew survey, which is still live. You can view it here. Context. The percentage of U.S. residents with unfavorable views of China has increased steeply in response to concerns over the trade war, China’s growing military, and lack of faith in President Xi Jinping. According to a 2018 survey by the Pew Research Center, 47 percent of U.S. residents had an unfavorable view of China. That number has since risen steadily, reaching 66 percent in a March 2020 survey and 73 percent in a June-July 2020 survey.Data and resolution details. Pew conducts its U.S. Global Attitudes Survey at irregular intervals. Since 2014, it's conducted the survey annually between February and June. In 2020, it conducted two surveys, one in March and a second in June-July. This question resolves based on the results of a Pew U.S. Global Attitudes Survey that begins sometime between February 1 and June 30, 2022. If no survey begins during that period, this question will not be scored. You can read more about Pew's sampling methodology here. The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for the following scenario: Three Possible 2025 Worlds that Should Inform Policy Today To suggest a change or clarification to this question, please select Request Clarification from the green gear-shaped dropdown button to the right of the question.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of U.S. AI publications will have a Chinese co-author in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/86-what-percentage-of-u-s-ai-publications-will-be-u-s-china-collaborations-in-2021",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "90",
    "# Forecasters": "85",
    "Description": "Context. As U.S.-China tensions increase, policymakers are paying greater attention to areas in which the two countries are entangled. One such area relevant to tech-security policy is AI research collaborations. To date, the U.S.-China decoupling trends apparent in economic and immigration data do not appear to be impacting research collaborations. Whether potential conflicts between academic and security interests will begin to affect research collaborations is unclear.Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on Dimensions data. We classified publications as AI/ML-relevant or not using a predictive model trained on arXiv publication data, where a publication is relevant if it’s categorized on arXiv under any of artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer vision, computation and language, multiagent systems, or robotics. To read more about this method, see “Identifying the Development and Application of Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Text.” A publication is a U.S. publication if any author is affiliated with a U.S.-based organization. A publication is a U.S.-China collaboration if at least one author is affiliated with a U.S.-based organization and at least one author is affiliated with a China-based organization. The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for the following scenarios: Three Possible 2025 Worlds that Should Inform Policy Today An Isolated China in a Globalized World To suggest a change or clarification to this question, please select Request Clarification from the green gear-shaped dropdown button to the right of the question.\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the U.S. government file an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, Amazon, or Facebook between January 20, 2021 and January 19, 2025?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/89-conditional-on-vice-president-biden-s-election-will-the-u-s-government-file-an-antitrust-lawsuit-against-apple-amazon-or-facebook-between-january-20-2021-and-january-19-2025",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "70%",
    "# Forecasts": "141",
    "# Forecasters": "109",
    "Description": "Related questions. This question was previously conditioned on Vice President Biden's election. Now that Vice President has been elected, we dropped the condition. We also closed the sister question conditional on President Trump's re-election. You can view it here. Context. Because the commercial sector, rather than the U.S. government, is pushing the frontier of AI development, the relationship between tech companies and the U.S. government has national security implications. This relationship has been affected by the increasingly likely prospect that the U.S. government will use antitrust laws to break up the companies. After a 16 month investigation, the Democratic members of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust concluded on October 6, 2020 that Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google have engaged in anti-competitive behavior. On October 20, 2020, the Department of Justice filed a long-awaited antitrust lawsuit against Google. Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on a court filing or official announcement by the U.S. government. A lawsuit qualifies as an antitrust lawsuit if it's brought, at least in part, under the Sherman Act of 1890, Clayton Act of 1914, or Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914. ***This question is a metric for the following scenarios:Three Possible 2025 Worlds that Should Inform Policy Today\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of U.S. residents will have an unfavorable view of China, as reflected in the 2021 Pew Global Attitudes Survey?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/80-what-percentage-of-u-s-citizens-will-have-an-unfavorable-view-of-china-as-reflected-in-the-2021-pew-global-attitudes-survey",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "215",
    "# Forecasters": "169",
    "Description": "Context. The percentage of U.S. residents with unfavorable views of China has increased steeply in response to concerns over the trade war, China’s growing military, and lack of faith in President Xi Jinping. According to a 2018 survey by the Pew Research Center, 47 percent of U.S. residents had an unfavorable view of China. That number has since risen steadily, reaching 66 percent in a March 2020 survey and 73 percent in a June-July 2020 survey.Data and resolution details. Pew conducts its U.S. Global Attitudes Survey at irregular intervals. Since 2014, it's conducted the survey annually between February and June. In 2020, it conducted two surveys, one in March and a second in June-July. This question resolves based on the results of a Pew U.S. Global Attitudes Survey that begins sometime between February 1 and June 30, 2021. If no survey begins during that period, this question will not be scored. You can read more about Pew's sampling methodology here. The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for the following scenario: Three Possible 2025 Worlds that Should Inform Policy Today To suggest a change or clarification to this question, please select Request Clarification from the green gear-shaped dropdown button to the right of the question.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of O visas will go to Chinese nationals in FY 2021 (October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021)?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/79-conditional-on-biden-s-election-what-percentage-of-o-visas-will-go-to-chinese-nationals-in-fy-2021-october-1-2020-to-september-30-2021",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "91",
    "# Forecasters": "74",
    "Description": "Related question. This question was previously conditioned on Vice President Biden's election. Now that Vice President has been elected, we dropped the condition. We also closed the sister question conditional on President Trump's re-election. You can view it here. A variation of this question—specific to O-1 visas—was previously issued for July 1 to September 30, 2020. You can view those forecasts here. Context. This question includes O-1, O-2, and O-3 visas. O-1 is a category of U.S. visa for individuals with extraordinary ability or achievement in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics. O-2 visas are for individuals who assist the recipients of O-1 visas, and O-3 visas are for the spouses or children of recipients of O-1 or O-2 visas. The initial authorized period of stay is up to three years, with the possibility of extension.Data and resolution details. This question asks about what will happen assuming Vice President Biden is elected. If he is not, this question will not be scored. If President Trump is re-elected, the companion question will be scored instead.This question is based on U.S. Department of State data. The Department of State provides both annual and (unofficial) monthly statistics on nonimmigrant visa issuances. This question resolves when the Department of State publishes O visa statistics for either fiscal year 2021 or the month of September 2021, whichever comes first. This question includes visas for Mainland China only, not Taiwan.    The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for the following scenarios: Three Possible 2025 Worlds that Should Inform Policy Today An Isolated China in a Globalized World To suggest a change or clarification to this question, please select Request Clarification from the green gear-shaped dropdown button to the right of the question.\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will total U.S. trade volume with China (imports and exports of goods) be in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/76-what-will-total-u-s-trade-volume-with-china-imports-and-exports-of-goods-be-in-2021",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "86",
    "# Forecasters": "65",
    "Description": "Related question. This question was previously issued for 2020. You can view those forecasts here. The actual data for 2020 will be included in the graph below as soon as it's available.Context. The U.S. and China are the world's two largest economies and each other's largest trading partner. Since 2018, they have been engaged in an escalating trade war, and the COVID-19 pandemic has further reduced trade.  Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on U.S. Census Bureau data. It includes trade in goods only, not services. Total exports and imports for the eight months ending August 30, 2020 were $332 billion, which puts the 2020 figure on pace for $498 billion. Data for those eight months are not included in the graph below.  The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for the following scenarios: Three Possible 2025 Worlds that Should Inform Policy Today An Isolated China in a Globalized World To suggest a change or clarification to this question, please select Request Clarification from the green gear-shaped dropdown button to the right of the question.\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What percentage of U.S. corporate press releases about AI will reference AI ethics in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/45-what-percent-of-u-s-corporate-press-releases-about-ai-will-be-about-ai-ethics-in-2021",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "175",
    "# Forecasters": "129",
    "Description": "Data and resolution details. This question is based on data from the Nexis Metabase (2020), a corpus of global news articles on a variety of topics. The question is limited to press releases by companies that Nexis categorizes as corporate and located in the United States. A press release is on the topic of AI if it mentions the term \"artificial intelligence\" of \"machine learning\"; and it's on the topic of AI ethics if it also mentions either \"ethics,\" \"bias,\" fairness,\" or any variant of those terms.  The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for the following scenarios:The Impact of COVID-19 on the ML Research Field\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How much will the U.S. government spend on surveillance-related AI grants between June 1, 2020 and May 31, 2021, inclusive?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/41-how-much-will-the-u-s-government-spend-on-surveillance-related-ai-grants-between-june-1-2020-and-may-31-2021-inclusive",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "88",
    "# Forecasters": "69",
    "Description": "Context. The U.S. government funds research through both grants and contracts. This question focuses only on grants.Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on data from the Dimensions grant database. For this question, a grant is an \"AI grant\" if the abstract mentions either \"artificial intelligence\" or \"machine learning.\" A grant is \"surveillance related\" if its abstract includes the term \"surveillance,\" \"facial recognition,\" or a variant on those terms. This question resolves when CSET receives Dimensions grant data through May 31, 2021. For the first third of the year in question -- not reflected in the graph below -- the U.S. government spent $1.1 million on surveillance-related AI grants.  The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for the following scenarios: Tech Companies Threaten Democracy COVID-19 Surveillance Strengthens Authoritarian Governments \n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many times will the Japanese Air Force respond to threats to Japan's territorial airspace by Chinese military aircraft between April 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021, inclusive?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/32-how-many-sorties-against-chinese-aircraft-will-the-japanese-air-self-defense-force-conduct-by-april-30th-2020",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "90",
    "# Forecasters": "57",
    "Description": "Context. Japan is a U.S. treaty ally and a major U.S. strategic partner in the Indo-Pacific. When Chinese military aircraft enter Japanese airspace without authorization, the Japanese air force sends fighter jets in response. The frequency of Chinese incursions into Japanese air space reflects tensions between China and Japan and the aggressiveness of China's foreign policy. For example, the spike in 2016 coincided with Japan's announced intention to revise its constitution in a manner China found threatening (Gui Yongtao).Data and resolution details. This question resolves in April 2021 based on official figures released by the Japanese government (Japan Air Self-Defense Force). The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for the following scenarios:Three Possible 2025 Worlds that Should Inform Policy TodayTo suggest a change or clarification to this question, please select Request Clarification from the green gear-shaped dropdown button to the right of the question.\n",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many new H-1B visa applications submitted by the \"Big 5\" tech companies will the U.S. grant between October 1, 2020 and September 30, 2021, inclusive?",
    "URL": "https://www.cset-foretell.com/questions/23-how-many-new-h-1b-applications-submitted-by-the-big-5-tech-companies-will-the-u-s-grant-in-fy-2020",
    "Platform": "CSET-foretell",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "# Forecasts": "120",
    "# Forecasters": "75",
    "Description": "Context. H-1B is a visa category for skilled workers, accounting for about 108,000 annual entrants (Arnold et al.). It's also a common immigration pathway for AI-skilled workers. Data and resolution details. This question resolves based on \"initial approvals\" reported in the USCIS annual summary for FY 2020.  The chart below is based on the same data for previous fiscal years. The\"Big 5\" tech companies are Google, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Microsoft, including all affiliates with those words at the beginning of their title. For example, Amazon includes Amazon Web Services and Amazon Fulfillment Services. The date range, October 1 through September 30, is the government fiscal year.The H-1B Employer Data Hub provides quarterly updates on H-1B statistics. For example, if one downloads all data for FY 2020 and then filters by the Big-5 tech companies, they'll see H-1B statistics as of the most recent quarter for which there's data. As of December 2020, the Employer Data Hub has data through Q3 of FY 2020 (June 30, 2020). In the first three quarters of FY 2020, 4,650 new H-1B applications submitted by the \"Big 5\" tech companies were granted. This figure is not reflected in the chart below. The data underlying the graph is here.This question is a metric for the following scenarios:Three Possible 2025 Worlds that Should Inform Policy TodayTo suggest a change or clarification to this question, please select Request Clarification from the green gear-shaped dropdown button to the right of the question.\n",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Joe Biden cease to be president of the United States?",
    "URL": "https://goodjudgment.io/superforecasts/",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Opened 22 January 2021\nThe next inauguration for president of the United States is scheduled for [20 January] (https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/amendments-11-27#xx) 2025. A transfer of presidential powers and duties to an acting president under Section 3 or Section 4 of the [25th Amendment] (https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/amendments-11-27#xxv) for more than 30 consecutive calendar days would count.\nWhen he took the oath of office, Joe Biden became the oldest newly inaugurated US president in history and also the oldest sitting president ever. Does this imply increased odds he will cease to be president before the end of his term? Good Judgment's Superforecasters assign 7% probability to this outcome. Actuarial tables suggest a US male at age 78 will live another nine years on average. President Biden has no known underlying health conditions. He also has arguably the best health care in the world, and his father died at 87. \nBut, as one Superforecaster pointed out, much can happen in four years. Ceasing on 20 January 2025, when Biden's first term expires, currently has the highest probability (49%). Stepping down or losing a re-election bid could be potential reasons. As to the latter, the base rate, since 1860, for incumbent presidents winning re-election is about 70%. However, Biden would be 82 years old in 2025 and that might affect both his chances and his decision to run. \nSuperforecasters also collectively assign 44% probability that Biden will not cease to be president of the United States before 21 January 2025.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 January 2023, will legislation raising the top marginal tax rate for long-term capital gains in the U.S. to higher than 20% become law?",
    "URL": "https://goodjudgment.io/superforecasts/",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Opened 20 November 2020\nPresident-elect Joe Biden has signaled his intention to [change] (https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-joe-bidens-tax-increase-wish-list-could-affect-you-11605263403) current [tax] (https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-biden-capital-gains-tax/fact-check-biden-willonlytax-capital-gainsat-40for-those-earning-over-1-million-annually-idUSKBN26Z2CA) rates, however his ability to do so may turn on [control] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/14/us/politics/georgia-runoffs-senate-control.html) of the [Senate] (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/06/2020-georgia-runoff-election-senate-loeffler-ossoff/6192322002/) . As of 20 November 2020, the top tax rate for long-term capital gains is [20%] (https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/101515/comparing-longterm-vs-shortterm-capital-gain-tax-rates.asp) . [Exceptions] (https://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc409) where certain capital gains are taxed at rates greater than the top tax rate would not count. The date the raise would take effect would be immaterial. If relevant legislation does not become law, the question will close No on the appropriate party control bin as of the closing date.\n20 January 2021 - Good Judgment's professional Superforecasters consider, as the outside view, historical levels of the top marginal tax rate in the US and the measure's potential political divisiveness. The inside view includes the size of the initial Covid stimulus plan, and the second bill expected in February, as well as the role of Senators Bernie Sanders and Ron Wyden in President Biden's tax and spending agenda. \n",
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 January 2023, will legislation raising the top corporate tax rate in the U.S. to higher than 21% become law?",
    "URL": "https://goodjudgment.io/superforecasts/",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Opened 20 November 2020\nPresident-elect Joe Biden has signaled his [intention] (https://www.investopedia.com/explaining-biden-s-tax-plan-5080766) to change current tax rates, however his ability to do so may turn on [control] (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/06/2020-georgia-runoff-election-senate-loeffler-ossoff/6192322002/) of the [Senate] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/14/us/politics/georgia-runoffs-senate-control.html) . As of 20 November 2020, the top corporate tax rate is [21%] (https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/statistics/corporate-top-tax-rate-and-bracket) . The date the raise would take effect would be immaterial. A surtax on specific subsets of corporations (e.g., \"Big Tech\" firms) would not count. If relevant legislation does not become law, the question will close No on the appropriate party control bin as of the closing date.\n19 January 2021 - Professional Superforecasters see an increased probability (63% on aggregate) that Democrat-controlled Senate may increase top corporate tax rate to higher than 21%. Several Superforecasters point out corporate tax rates are currently at a historic low. On the other hand, this tax represents only a small portion of federal revenue and the higher rate may encourage more offshoring by large corporations.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 January 2023, will legislation creating a \"public option\" health insurance plan administered by the federal government become law?",
    "URL": "https://goodjudgment.io/superforecasts/",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Opened 20 November 2020\nPresident-elect Joe Biden pledged to create a \" [public] (https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/11/09/932071991/what-bidens-election-means-for-u-s-health-care-and-public-health) [option] (https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/07/joe-biden-policies-health-care-433626) \" for the U.S. health care system, however his ability to do so may turn on control of the [Senate] (https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-virus-outbreak-senate-elections-30e139b2435439fc8497304cdca600dd) . A \"public option\" would be a federally-administered insurance plan open to the public. The date a \"public option\" would be available would be immaterial. If relevant legislation does not become law, the question will close No on the appropriate party control bin as of the closing date.\n19 January 2021 - In pondering the likelihood of a \"public option\" health insurance plan in the US before 2023, Good Judgment's professional Superforecasters examine such issues as the incoming administration's priority list, filibuster, and the possible budget reconciliation process. Several Superforecasters assign greater probability that the Biden administration will pursue other, less politically challenging options.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 January 2023, will the United States ratify the TPP and/or the CPTPP?",
    "URL": "https://goodjudgment.io/superforecasts/",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Opened 20 November 2020\nControl of the U.S. Senate will impact the next administration's policy options, including the ratification of [global] (https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/11/16/business/economy-business/japan-rcep-joe-biden-us/) [trade] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/04/biden-would-want-the-us-to-rejoin-tpp-says-harvard-scholar.html) [agreements] (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43491.pdf) , in this case ratification requiring a simple majority in both the Senate and the House. President Trump withdrew the US from the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement ( [TPP] (https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-trans-pacific-partnership-tpp) ) [prior] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-tpp-mcconnell/obamas-tpp-deal-wont-get-senate-vote-this-year-mcconnell-idUSKCN1102CM) to ratification, and remaining parties went forward without the US and ratified the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership ( [CPTPP] (https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/cptpp-ptpgp/index.aspx?lang=eng) ). Ratification of a revised trade deal which includes the same members as TPP/CPTPP (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam) would count. If no relevant trade deal is ratified, the question will close No on the appropriate party control bin as of the closing date.\n19 January 2021 - With almost two years remaining in the timeframe of the question, Good Judgment's professional Superforecasters currently see a low (2%) probability on aggregate that the US will ratify the TPP and/or CPTPP. It doesn't appear as one of the Biden administration's priorities, but the effect of China's actions will be something to watch. \n",
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the U.S. real GDP for the second quarter of 2021 relative to the U.S. real GDP for the second quarter of 2019?",
    "URL": "https://goodjudgment.io/superforecasts/",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Opened 1 May 2020\nSpeculations are wide and numerous about how much the Covid [outbreak] (https://www.morningstar.com/articles/976107/coronavirus-update-long-term-economic-impact-forecast-to-be-less-than-2008-recession) will [impact] (https://www.cbo.gov/publication/56335) U.S. real [GDP] (https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-hit-to-us-economy-gdp-jobs-only-just-starting-2020-4) in the long term. The outcome will be determined using data for both Q2 2019 and Q2 2021 from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) as reported by the Federal Reserve Economic Data ( [FRED] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPC1) ) database upon the release of BEA's advance estimate for Q2 2021. Historical data are also available on [BEA] (https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=19&amp;step=2#reqid=19&amp;step=2&amp;isuri=1&amp;1921=survey) 's website (select \"view data in XLS or other formats, and see Table 1.1.6 in the Section 1 file). The real GDP reported for Q2 2019 as of launch was $19,021.860 billion (subject to future revisions).\n27 January 2021 - Vaccine rollout, however slow, and the expected additional stimulus bill are good news for the economic outlook in the United States. The second quarter of 2021 may not yet be the time when their full benefits are felt, but Good Judgment's Superforecasters predict the country should be well on the way to a modest economic growth by then. Some segments of the society, especially white-collar workers, did not experience the economic fallout from the pandemic as acutely as their blue-collar counterparts did, and these are the segments that tend to have most impact on the economy through consumer spending. Companies are expected to increase economic activity in anticipation of recovery. Superforecasters are assigning the highest probability (68%) to the second-quarter GDP for 2021 being lower by 0% to 5% relative to the second quarter of 2019, and 29% probability to it being higher. There is now zero probability on aggregate that Q2 2021 GDP will be lower by more than 10% relative to the corresponding figure for 2019.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will enough doses of FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine(s) to inoculate 100 million people be distributed in the United States?",
    "URL": "https://goodjudgment.io/superforecasts/",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Opened 15 December 2020\nThis question was commissioned by [Open Philanthropy] (https://www.openphilanthropy.org/blog/forecasting-covid-19-pandemic) .\nDozens of [companies] (https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines) are trying to [develop] (https://www.economist.com/leaders/2020/08/06/the-world-is-spending-nowhere-near-enough-on-a-coronavirus-vaccine) a [viable] (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker.html) vaccine for COVID-19. The [FDA] (https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-key-action-fight-against-covid-19-issuing-emergency-use-authorization-first-covid-19) has authorized [Pfizer] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/12/how-fedex-ups-plan-to-distribute-fda-approved-covid-vaccine-when-will-you-get-the-coronavirus-vaccine.html) 's COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use and is executing its plan for distribution. Information on FDA approval processes and circumstances when those processes can be waived can be found [here] (https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/development-approval-process-cber/vaccine-development-101) and [here] (https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization) . \" [Compassionate use] (https://www.fda.gov/news-events/public-health-focus/expanded-access) \" and \" [emergency use] (https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization) \" authorizations would count as approval, and any vaccine doses distributed in the United States prior to its approval would also count. Reporting from credible public health sources, such as the CDC and FDA, will be used to determine the number of doses distributed. Approximately [169.1] (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/prevent/vaccinesupply-2018.htm) million vaccine doses for the 2018-2019 flu season were distributed in the United States. If an approved COVID-19 vaccine requires the administration of more than one dose, then the threshold would be the total number of doses needed to inoculate 100 million people (e.g., if two doses are required, then 200 million doses would need to be distributed to resolve the question).\n11 January 2021 - Superforecasters currently assign 77% probability that the US will see distribution of enough doses of FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine(s) to inoculate 100mn people between 1 April and 31 May 2021 (Bin C). Bin B \"is aspirational at best,\" according to one Superforecaster. Change in the recommended dosage or the advent of J&amp;J and AstraZeneca vaccines, which do not require the same cold storage as the Pfizer vaccine, could propel distribution toward Bin B timeline (\"Between 1 February 2021 and 31 March 2021\"); however, Superforecasters assign this outcome about 10% probability. On the other hand, slippage along the logistics chain could lead to a Bin D resolution (\"Between 1 June 2021 and 31 July 2021\"), with 11% probability.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Germany report that 75 million cumulative vaccine doses for COVID-19 have been given?",
    "URL": "https://goodjudgment.io/superforecasts/",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Opened 15 January 2021\nThe Pfizer vaccine was developed with German partner BioNTech, but the rollout in Germany has been [criticized] (https://www.dw.com/en/coronavirus-vaccine-german-health-minister-jens-spahn-under-fire/a-56144390) for being [slow] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-vaccines-germany/scarce-doses-and-empty-vaccination-centres-germanys-vaccine-rollout-headache-idUSKBN29F0BP) . The outcome will be determined using data published by the German government's [Robert Koch Institut] (https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Daten/Impfquoten-Tab.html) [in German]. Click on the first link under \"Daten\" at the bottom of the page to download an xlsx file. In the xlsx file that opens (currently named \"Impfquotenmonitoring.xlsx\"), see the \"Gesamt_bis_einschl_[date]\" (Total up to and including [date]) sheet. Refer to column \"Gesamtzahl bisher verabreichter Impfstoffdosen\" (Total number of vaccine doses given to date) in the row \"Gesamt\" (Total). The question will resolve on the date indicated in the xlsx file. Whether a particular vaccine's regimen requires one or more doses is immaterial.\n22 January 2021 - This question opened on 15 January. To gauge initial estimates, professional Superforecasters are looking at the evolving vaccination rate, breakdown by population groups, and statements by Germany's health officials. Unless the supply and speed of inoculations are improved significantly, Superforecasters are seeing low probability this would resolve before Q3.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the UK report that 35 million people in the UK have been vaccinated for COVID-19?",
    "URL": "https://goodjudgment.io/superforecasts/",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Opened 7 December 2020\nThe UK gave the first dose of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine on 8 December 2020 and is [pushing] (https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/12/08/944125280/u-k-begins-nationwide-coronavirus-immunization-largest-in-nations-history) to [execute] (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-55227325) its [plan] (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-protocol-for-covid-19-mrna-vaccine-bnt162b2-pfizerbiontech) . The outcome will be determined using data when and as reported by the [UK] (https://www.gov.uk/coronavirus) [government] (https://twitter.com/nadhimzahawi/status/1339167258866814976) . For the purposes of this question, a person will be considered to have been vaccinated upon receiving a single dose of a vaccine, irrespective of plans or requirements for additional doses for the same people.\n6 January 2020 - Superforecasters currently see the highest (50%) probability that 35 million people in the UK will have been vaccinated between 1 May 2021 and 30 June 2021 (Bin C). Potential issues with logistics, up to 25% of population reportedly [skeptical] (https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-britain-conspiraci-idUSKBN28H0FI) of the vaccine, and the spread of Covid-19 mutations, on the one hand, and the positive impact of approving additional vaccines on the other, have been pointed out among the factors that will affect the resolution of this question. Probability of Bin E (\"Not before 1 September 2021\") is deemed very low because of one-shot resolution criteria and a fairly limited bar of 52.5% of population vaccinated paired with AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine approval.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2021, what percentage of corporate board seats at S&P 500 firms will be held by racial minorities, according to The Conference Board?",
    "URL": "https://goodjudgment.io/economist/",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Opened 9 October 2020\nIn its 2020 report, The [Conference] (https://conferenceboard.esgauge.org/boardpractices) [Board] (https://conferenceboard.esgauge.org/assets/Corporate%20Board%20Practices%202020%20Edition.pdf) reported that in 2019 only about 10 percent of S&amp;P 500 companies explicitly disclosed [board] (https://www.economist.com/business/2019/11/07/how-to-make-your-firm-more-diverse-and-inclusive) members' races; among those identified, 78% of directors were white. The outcome will be determined using data for firms that disclose their individual directors' races in The Conference Board's 2022 Corporate Board Practices [report] (https://www.conference-board.org/us/) . \n04 January 2021 - Bin B (\"Between 23% and 27%, inclusive\") remains a clear leader among the options since the question launched in October. A new NASDAQ rule for disclosing board composition by gender and race is a sign of a trend toward increased diversity expectations; however, the way things stand at present, the shift may not be rapid enough to go beyond 27% in 2021.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the world's GDP in 2021 relative to the world's GDP in 2019, according to the IMF?",
    "URL": "https://goodjudgment.io/economist/",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Opened 9 October 2020\nThe International Monetary Fund ( [IMF] (https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/06/24/WEOUpdateJune2020) ) and [others] (https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2020/09/16/is-the-world-economy-recovering) are projecting a significant [contraction] (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/09/oecd-global-gdp-pre-pandemic-level-2021-sustainable-resilient/) in the global economy in the coming years. The outcome will be determined using IMF purchasing power parity GDP data from the first release of the World Economic Outlook Database in 2022, which is expected in April 2022. At the IMF [website] (https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/SPROLLS/world-economic-outlook-databases#sort=%40imfdate%20descending) , choose the appropriate \"World Economic Outlook Database\"; then choose \"Entire Dataset\"; then download the \"By Country Groups\" file in the \"Tab Delimited Values\" section. On the spreadsheet, refer to the line of data, usually near the top, that has the Subject Descriptor as \"Gross domestic product, current prices\" and Units as \"Purchasing power parity; international dollars.\" Scroll over to the appropriate year. World GDP for 2019 in current prices, purchasing power parity, was $142,005.65 billion according to the [April 2020] (https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2020/01/weodata/WEOApr2020alla.xls) report.\n04 January 2021 - Bin D (\"Higher by between 0% and 4%, inclusive\") remains the Superforecasters' top choice for the resolution of this question. Positive news on vaccine roll-out and Asia's economic recovery appeared to solidify this position.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the value of sustainable funds' estimated annual flows in the U.S. in 2021 relative to 2020, according to Morningstar?",
    "URL": "https://goodjudgment.io/economist/",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Opened 9 October 2020\nInterest in [sustainable] (https://www.morningstar.com/articles/994219/sustainable-funds-continue-to-rake-in-assets-during-the-second-quarter) [sector] (https://www.morningstar.com/articles/984776/theres-ample-room-for-sustainable-investing-to-grow-in-the-us) [investment] (https://www.economist.com/business/2020/10/03/the-proliferation-of-sustainability-accounting-standards-comes-with-costs) [has] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-25/trump-administration-targets-esg-funds-with-proposed-401-k-rule) been high in Europe and is increasing in the U.S.; the first half of 2020 has already seen nearly as much in the way of annual sustainable funds flows in the U.S. as in all of 2019. The outcome will be determined using [data] (https://www.morningstar.com/lp/global-esg-flows) from [Morningstar] (https://www.morningstar.com/articles/961765/sustainable-fund-flows-in-2019-smash-previous-records) for sustainable funds' estimated annual flows in the U.S. for 2020 and 2021.\n04 January 2021 - Of the three options, Bin B (\"Higher by between 0% and 100%\") remains the most likely one. However, Bin C (\"Higher by more than 100%\") saw a slight increase in the past week. Superforecasters are noting the success of ESG funds in the US in 2020 and potential ESG-friendly developments a Biden administration is likely to bring.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will enough doses of FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine(s) to inoculate 200 million people be distributed in the United States?",
    "URL": "https://goodjudgment.io/economist/",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Opened 9 October 2020\nDozens of companies are trying to [develop] (https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/draft-landscape-of-covid-19-candidate-vaccines) a [viable] (https://www.economist.com/leaders/2020/08/06/the-world-is-spending-nowhere-near-enough-on-a-coronavirus-vaccine) [vaccine] (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker.html) for COVID-19. Information on FDA approval processes and circumstances when those processes can be waived [can] (https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/development-approval-process-cber/vaccine-development-101) be [ found] (https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization) [here] (https://www.fda.gov/news-events/public-health-focus/expanded-access) . \"Compassionate use\" and \"emergency use\" authorizations would count as approval, and any vaccine doses distributed in the United States prior to its approval would also [count] (https://www.fda.gov/news-events/public-health-focus/expanded-access) . Reporting from credible public health sources, such as the CDC and FDA, will be used to determine the number of doses distributed. Approximately 169.1 million vaccine doses for the [2018-2019] (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/prevent/vaccinesupply-2018.htm) flu season were distributed in the United States. If an approved COVID-19 vaccine requires the administration of more than one dose, then the threshold would be the total number of doses needed to inoculate 200 million people (e.g., if two doses are required, then 400 million doses would need to be distributed to resolve the question). \n8 January 2021 - A bottleneck in vaccinations has been curbing distribution numbers. Superforecasters continue to debate whether this question will resolve in Q2 or Q3 of 2021. Their commentary highlights the view that once early errors in distribution are resolved and more vaccines become approved and available, distribution pace would pick up. But would it slip just beyond Q2?\n",
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "As of 1 July 2021, what will be the United Kingdom's Office for National Statistics (ONS) latest report of the percentage of working adults who &quot;worked from home exclusively&quot;?",
    "URL": "https://goodjudgment.io/economist/",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Opened 9 October 2020\nThe COVID-19 pandemic has forced many [workers] (https://www.economist.com/briefing/2020/09/12/covid-19-has-forced-a-radical-shift-in-working-habits) to work from [home] (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-53946487) , and this trend may continue even after the pandemic has passed. The outcome will be determined using data as reported in the ONS' Opinions and Lifestyle Survey. In their report from 1 October 2020, the [ONS] (https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/bulletins/coronavirustheukeconomyandsocietyfasterindicators/1october2020#social-impacts-of-the-coronavirus-on-great-britain) reported that 24% of working adults worked from home exclusively (see Figure 2 under Section 3). In the event that the release of the reports is changed or delayed, the outcome will be determined based on the most recently reported figure as of the close of business on 1 July 2021.\n04 January 2021 - Ever since this question opened, Bin B (\"More than 10% but less than 20%\") has been a clear leader and continues to gain ground since the end of October. Although certain advantages to working from home (WFH) are noted, from savings in company budgets to reduced emissions from commute, the percentage of jobs that lend themselves exclusively to remote work is relatively low and municipalities need tax revenue from downtown business where people spending on lunch hours, breaks, and after-work get-togethers.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★★☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many people in the U.S. will have received one or more doses of a COVID-19 vaccine as of 28 February 2021, according to the CDC?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1924-how-many-people-in-the-u-s-will-have-received-one-or-more-doses-of-a-covid-19-vaccine-as-of-28-february-2021-according-to-the-cdc",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The outcome will be determined using COVID-19 vaccination data as recorded by the CDC (updated daily) under “Number of People Receiving 1 or More Doses” at approximately 10:00PM ET on 28 February 2021 ( [CDC] (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "14",
    "# Forecasters": "14",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many U.S. adult and pediatric hospital admissions with confirmed COVID-19 cases will there be for the week starting 21 February 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1921-how-many-u-s-adult-and-pediatric-hospital-admissions-with-confirmed-covid-19-cases-will-there-be-for-the-week-starting-21-february-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The outcome will be determined using hospital admissions data as recorded in the Department of Health and Human Services' \"COVID-19 Reported Patient Impact and Hospital Capacity by State Timeseries\" for the week starting 21 February 2021 ( [Healthdata.gov] (https://healthdata.gov/dataset/covid-19-reported-patient-impact-and-hospital-capacity-state-timeseries) ). The total will be calculated by adding data from two columns, \"previous_day_admission_adult_covid_confirmed\" and \"previous_day_admission_pediatric_covid_confirmed,\" inclusive of the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands. As these are \"previous day\" data, we will use the data dated 22 February 2021 through 28 February 2021, inclusive. The data will be accessed no sooner than 6 March 2021.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "6",
    "# Forecasters": "5",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many deaths attributed to COVID-19 in the U.S. will be reported for the week starting 21 February 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1922-how-many-deaths-attributed-to-covid-19-in-the-u-s-will-be-reported-for-the-week-starting-21-february-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The outcome will be determined using COVID-19 deaths data as recorded in the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) CSSE GitHub data repository for 21 February 2021 through 27 February 2021, inclusive ( [JHU CSSE GitHub] (https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19/blob/master/csse_covid_19_data/csse_covid_19_time_series/time_series_covid19_deaths_US.csv) ). The total will be calculated by taking the sum of the 20 February 2021 column and subtracting it from the sum of the 27 February 2021 column, inclusive of all rows. The data will be accessed no sooner than 6 March 2021.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "11",
    "# Forecasters": "11",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the U.S. will be reported for the week starting 21 February 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1923-how-many-confirmed-cases-of-covid-19-in-the-u-s-will-be-reported-for-the-week-starting-21-february-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The outcome will be determined using COVID-19 confirmed cases data as recorded in the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) CSSE GitHub data repository for 21 February 2021 through 27 February 2021, inclusive ( [JHU CSSE GitHub] (https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19/blob/master/csse_covid_19_data/csse_covid_19_time_series/time_series_covid19_confirmed_US.csv) ). The total will be calculated by taking the sum of the 20 February 2021 column and subtracting it from the sum of the 27 February 2021 column, inclusive of all rows. The data will be accessed no sooner than 6 March 2021.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "7",
    "# Forecasters": "7",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a new prime minister of Italy before 1 September 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1919-will-there-be-a-new-prime-minister-of-italy-before-1-september-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "78%",
    "Description": "After the resignation of Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, how the next Italian government will be formed -- and how Italy will continue to weather the COVID-19 crisis -- remains to be seen ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/lots-of-eu-cash-for-italy-but-what-about-structural-reform) , [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-55802611) , [thelocal.it] (https://www.thelocal.it/20210105/early-elections-or-waste-of-time-heres-what-italys-latest-political-crisis-means) ). Neither a reappointment of Conte nor the appointment of a caretaker prime minister would count.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "92",
    "# Forecasters": "59",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the United States report more deaths attributed to COVID-19 as of 31 December 2021 than will the European Union?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1916-will-the-united-states-report-more-deaths-attributed-to-covid-19-as-of-31-december-2021-than-will-the-european-union",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "The outcome will be determined using deaths data as reported by WHO for the United States and for those countries that were EU member states as of 1 January 2021 ( [WHO] (https://covid19.who.int/table) , see 'Deaths - cumulative total',  [European Union] (https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/countries_en#tab-0-1) ). Data for 2021 will be evaluated at approximately 5:00PM ET on 3 January 2022 and inclusive of deaths before this question's launch.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "102",
    "# Forecasters": "70",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many vacancies will arise on the U.S. Supreme Court in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1915-how-many-vacancies-will-arise-on-the-u-s-supreme-court-in-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The last vacancy on the Supreme Court occurred when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed away in 2020 ( [NPR] (https://www.npr.org/2020/09/18/100306972/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-champion-of-gender-equality-dies-at-87) , [Supreme Court] (https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx) ). For the purposes of this question, any new seats established by Congress would constitute arisen vacancies.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "103",
    "# Forecasters": "84",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the combined U.S. domestic theater box office gross for June, July, and August 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1920-what-will-be-the-combined-u-s-domestic-theater-box-office-gross-for-june-july-and-august-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The movie industry has seen its box office returns plummet due to the coronavirus pandemic, and there is concern it may never fully recover ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/the-pandemic-has-shaken-up-the-movie-business) , [LA Times] (https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2020-12-09/everything-hollywood-lost-during-the-pandemic) ). The outcome will be determined by Box Office Mojo with the sum of the \"Cumulative Gross\" column for June, July, and August 2021 ( [Box Office Mojo] (https://www.boxofficemojo.com/month/by-year/2021/?grossesOption=calendarGrosses) ). For June, July, and August 2020, the combined U.S. domestic theater box office gross was $39,293,148.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "46",
    "# Forecasters": "34",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 October 2021, will the Republic of Chad announce that legislative elections currently scheduled for 24 October 2021 will be postponed or canceled?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1918-before-1-october-2021-will-the-republic-of-chad-announce-that-legislative-elections-currently-scheduled-for-24-october-2021-will-be-postponed-or-canceled",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "90%",
    "Description": "Elections for Chad's legislature, the National Assembly, were last held in 2011, with 2015 elections postponed five times ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/covid-19-will-help-unscrupulous-incumbents-in-african-elections) , [Barron's] (https://www.barrons.com/news/chad-sets-october-2021-for-delayed-legislative-election-state-radio-01593699304) , [Le Monde] (https://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2020/07/03/tchad-les-legislatives-reportees-depuis-5-ans-fixees-a-octobre-2021_6045040_3212.html) [in French]).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "33",
    "# Forecasters": "27",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "At close of business on 16 June 2021, will the upper limit of the Federal Reserve's target range for the federal funds rate be lower, the same, or higher than it was at close of business on 28 April 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1917-at-close-of-business-on-16-june-2021-will-the-upper-limit-of-the-federal-reserve-s-target-range-for-the-federal-funds-rate-be-lower-the-same-or-higher-than-it-was-at-close-of-business-on-28-april-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The U.S. federal funds rate is the interest rate charged for overnight lending among financial institutions with accounts at the Federal Reserve and sets the base rate for borrowing costs across the financial system ( [Federal Reserve] (https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomc.htm) ). The target range for the federal funds rate is set by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). Its June meeting is scheduled for 15-16 June 2021.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "45",
    "# Forecasters": "41",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the UN declare that a famine exists in any part of Yemen in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1908-will-the-un-declare-that-a-famine-exists-in-any-part-of-yemen-in-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "50%",
    "Description": "Years of civil war and other factors have greatly increased food insecurity in Yemen, and the UN and others fear that US policy toward Houthi rebels may exacerbate the problems and lead to famine in the country ( [UN] (https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/01/1082082) , [Radio Canada International] (https://www.rcinet.ca/en/2021/01/16/aid-groups-worry-u-s-terrorist-designation-of-yemen-rebels-will-hasten-famine/) , [In Depth News] (https://www.indepthnews.net/index.php/sustainability/food-security-nutrition-sustainable-agriculture/4093-desert-locust-upsurge-continues-to-threaten-food-security-in-the-horn-of-africa) ). For general information on how famines are declared, see: [Integrated Food Security Phase Classification] (http://www.ipcinfo.org/ipcinfo-website/alerts-archive/issue-24/en/) , [NPR] (http://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/02/23/516642447/who-declares-a-famine-and-what-does-that-actually-mean) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": "102",
    "# Forecasters": "69",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Russia conduct a flight test of an RS-28 Sarmat ICBM before 1 August 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1912-will-russia-conduct-a-flight-test-of-an-rs-28-sarmat-icbm-before-1-august-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "68%",
    "Description": "Russia has been developing a new intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), the RS-28 Sarmat, for years ( [TASS] (https://tass.com/defense/1236575) , [Daily Mail] (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9110579/Russia-planning-flight-test-new-missile-capable-destroying-area-size-France.html) ). Russia reportedly planned for five flight tests in 2020, but none were conducted ( [CSIS] (https://missilethreat.csis.org/russia-to-deploy-sarmat-icbm-in-2021/) ). Whether the flight test is deemed successful is immaterial.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "92",
    "# Forecasters": "69",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Chinese businessman Jack Ma physically appear in public outside of the People's Republic of China (PRC) before 1 April 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1909-will-chinese-businessman-jack-ma-physically-appear-in-public-outside-of-the-people-s-republic-of-china-prc-before-1-april-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8%",
    "Description": "Alibaba founder Jack Ma made his first public appearance on 20 January 2021 after three months since an October 2020 event in Shanghai where he was critical of Chinese regulators ( [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/china-alibaba-jack-ma/alibabas-jack-ma-makes-first-public-appearance-in-three-months-idINKBN29P0CV) , [NPR] (https://www.npr.org/2021/01/08/954046428/alibaba-founder-jack-ma-has-fallen-off-the-radar-here-are-some-clues-why) , [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/24/alibaba-founder-jack-ma-on-ant-group-ipo-pricing.html) ). An early January report indicated that Ma wasn't missing, but rather \"lying low\" ( [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/05/alibaba-founder-jack-ma-is-laying-low-for-the-time-being-not-missing.html) , [Newsweek] (https://www.newsweek.com/jack-ma-missing-billionaire-video-alibaba-1558672) ). For the purposes of this question, both Hong Kong and Macau are considered to be parts of the PRC.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "133",
    "# Forecasters": "103",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will U.S. President Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin hold a bilateral meeting in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1911-will-u-s-president-joe-biden-and-russian-president-vladimir-putin-hold-a-bilateral-meeting-in-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "The world is watching how U.S.-Russia relations will evolve under President Biden ( [NPR] (https://www.npr.org/2020/12/21/948736756/putin-and-biden-signal-chilly-relations-to-come) , [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/17/biden-national-security-advisor-calls-for-russia-to-release-navalny.html) , [New Statesman] (https://www.newstatesman.com/international/places/2020/12/what-will-joe-biden-bring-us-russia-relationship) ). For the purposes of this question, a bilateral meeting would be a pre-planned summit or event, rather than, e.g., a one-on-one on the sidelines of a multilateral meeting. A virtual meeting would not count.\nVersión en Español:\nPregunta: ¿Celebrarán el presidente de los Estados Unidos, Joe Biden, y el presidente ruso, Vladimir Putin, una reunión bilateral en 2021?\nInformación adicional: El mundo está observando cómo evolucionarán las relaciones entre Estados Unidos y Rusia bajo el presidente Biden ( [NPR] (https://www.npr.org/2020/12/21/948736756/putin-and-biden-signal-chilly-relations-to-come) , [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/17/biden-national-security-advisor-calls-for-russia-to-release-navalny.html) , [New Statesman] (https://www.newstatesman.com/international/places/2020/12/what-will-joe-biden-bring-us-russia-relationship) ). A los efectos de esta pregunta, una reunión bilateral sería una cumbre o evento planificado previamente, en lugar de, por ejemplo, un \"uno a uno\" al margen de una reunión multilateral. Una reunión virtual no contaría a efectos de esta pregunta.\nSi tiene alguna duda o pregunta, por favor lea nuestras Preguntas Frecuentes ( [FAQs] (https://www.gjopen.com/faq#question) ) o envíenos un [correo electrónico] (/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcbfb0bdaeb5bab5bfbda8b5b3b2af9cbbb3b3b8b6a9b8bbb1b9b2a8f2bfb3b1e3afa9beb6b9bfa8e18da9b9afa8b5b3b2f9eeec9fb0bdaeb5bab5bfbda8b5b3b2) . Para aprender más sobre Good Judgment y Superpronósticos (Superforecasting), por favor [clique aquí] (https://goodjudgment.com/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": "227",
    "# Forecasters": "158",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) report 1.1 million or more total cases of COVID-19 in Canada?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1914-when-will-the-public-health-agency-of-canada-phac-report-1-1-million-or-more-total-cases-of-covid-19-in-canada",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "COVID-19 cases in Canada jumped with the onset of winter, and officials are working to get the outbreak under control ( [CBC] (https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/coronavirus-covid19-canada-world-january21-2021-1.5881761) ). The outcome will be determined based on data provided by PHAC ( [PHAC] (https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/2019-novel-coronavirus-infection.html) ). Daily number data can be obtained by clicking the \".CSV\" button to the right of the primary graphic on the linked PHAC page. See daily number data (\"numtoday\") associated with daily entries for \"Canada\" under \"prname.\"\n",
    "# Forecasts": "128",
    "# Forecasters": "63",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many U.S. states will have an infection rate of 1.0 or greater for COVID-19 as of 31 March 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1913-how-many-u-s-states-will-have-an-infection-rate-of-1-0-or-greater-for-covid-19-as-of-31-march-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The infection rate (also known as Rt) \"is the estimated number of new people each COVID-positive person will infect\" ( [COVID Act Now - Glossary] (https://covidactnow.org/glossary#infection-rate) ). The outcome will be determined using data from [covidactnow.org] (https://covidactnow.org) at approximately 5:00PM ET on 31 March 2021. See the table \"Compare,\" set to \"States,\" under \"INFECTION RATE.\" As of 19 January 2021, 19 states had an infection rate at or above a 1.0. For the purposes of this question, the District of Columbia is considered a state.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "141",
    "# Forecasters": "75",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 January 2022, will there be a lethal confrontation between the national military forces of Iran and the United States either in Iran or at sea?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1910-before-1-january-2022-will-there-be-a-lethal-confrontation-between-the-national-military-forces-of-iran-and-the-united-states-either-in-iran-or-at-sea",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "",
    "Description": "Tensions between the U.S. and Iran remain high ( [AP] (https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-iran-coronavirus-pandemic-baghdad-ali-khamenei-de61647fe1796de76dc718f8933690c9) , [Bloomberg] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-06/iran-tests-suicide-drones-amid-its-tense-standoff-with-trump) , [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-55530366) ). A lethal confrontation is one that results in at least one fatality (total, not each) for the national military forces of either side. For the purposes of this question, Iran's national military forces include the Revolutionary Guard Corps and Law Enforcement Forces. A lethal confrontation taking place in Iranian airspace or international airspace over the sea would count.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "109",
    "# Forecasters": "90",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Scottish National Party win a majority of seats in the next Scottish Parliament election?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1904-will-the-scottish-national-party-win-a-majority-of-seats-in-the-next-scottish-parliament-election",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "90%",
    "Description": "The next Scottish Parliament election is scheduled to be held on 6 May 2021 ( [Edinburgh Live] (https://www.edinburghlive.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/covid-scotland-nicola-sturgeon-says-19564859) , [Parliament.scot] (https://www.parliament.scot/visitandlearn/96259.aspx) , [Parliament.scot - Current State of the Parties] (https://www.parliament.scot/msps/12450.aspx) ). First Minister of Scotland Nicola Sturgeon, leader of the Scottish National Party and opponent of Brexit, is seeking a strong result in the election to build momentum for a new referendum on Scottish independence from the United Kingdom ( [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-54879211) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "151",
    "# Forecasters": "121",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Nicaragua diplomatically recognize the People's Republic of China before 7 November 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1903-will-nicaragua-diplomatically-recognize-the-people-s-republic-of-china-before-7-november-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "11%",
    "Description": "In recent decades, many countries have ceased to recognize the Republic of China (ROC), commonly known as Taiwan, in favor of recognition of the People's Republic of China (PRC). A handful of countries continue to recognize the ROC, including Nicaragua ( [Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs] (https://www.mofa.gov.tw/en/AlliesIndex.aspx?n=DF6F8F246049F8D6&amp;sms=A76B7230ADF29736) , [Springer Link] (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11366-020-09682-8#Sec5) , [Taipei Times] (https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2020/10/27/2003745865) , [AP] (https://apnews.com/article/90e8938980404130a63641162d125db2) ). An announcement by Nicaragua would count (e.g., [NY Times] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/12/world/middleeast/bahrain-israel.html) , [CNN] (https://edition.cnn.com/2020/08/13/middleeast/mideast-trump-full-statement-uae-israel-intl/index.html) ).\nVersión en Español: \nPregunta: ¿Nicaragua reconocerá diplomáticamente a la República Popular China antes del 7 de noviembre de 2021?\nInformación adicional: En las últimas décadas, muchos países han dejado de reconocer a la República de China, comúnmente conocida como Taiwán, en favor del reconocimiento de la República Popular de China. Un puñado de países continúan reconociendo a la República de China, incluyendo Nicaragua ( [Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Taiwán] (https://www.mofa.gov.tw/en/AlliesIndex.aspx?n=DF6F8F246049F8D6&amp;sms=A76B7230ADF29736) , [Springer Link] (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11366-020-09682-8#Sec5) , [T] (https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2020/10/27/2003745865) [aipei Times] (https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2020/10/27/2003745865) , [AP] (https://apnews.com/article/90e8938980404130a63641162d125db2) ). Un anuncio de Nicaragua contaría a efectos de la resolución de esta pregunta (por ejemplo, [NY Times] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/12/world/middleeast/bahrain-israel.html) , [CNN] (https://edition.cnn.com/2020/08/13/middleeast/mideast-trump-full-statement-uae-israel-intl/index.html) ). La versión en español de esta pregunta ha sido incluida sólo a efectos informativos, y en situaciones donde existe una diferencia de interpretación entre las versiones en inglés y español, prevalecerá la versión original en inglés.\nSi tiene alguna duda o pregunta, por favor lea nuestras Preguntas Frecuentes ( [FAQs] (https://www.gjopen.com/faq#question) ) o envíenos un [correo electrónico] (http://clarifications@goodjudgment.com) . Para aprender más sobre Good Judgment y Superpronósticos (Superforecasting), por favor [clique aquí] (https://goodjudgment.com/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": "60",
    "# Forecasters": "46",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many seats will the United Russia party win in the 2021 Russian State Duma elections?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1902-how-many-seats-will-the-united-russia-party-win-in-the-2021-russian-state-duma-elections",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Elections for the Russian State Duma, the lower house of Russia's federal legislature, are currently scheduled for 19 September 2021 ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/vladimir-putin-v-alexei-navalny) , [Moscow Times] (https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/02/12/early-state-duma-elections-a69267) ). The United Russia Party will need to win 226 or more seats to maintain its majority in the Duma ( [RT] (https://www.rt.com/russia/509962-putin-kremlin-foreign-interference-election/) , [Forbes] (https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesrodgerseurope/2020/12/19/russia-in-2021-six-things-to-watch/?sh=5406dcf922d7) ). In the event of a delay/postponement of the elections, the closing date would not be extended for this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "89",
    "# Forecasters": "67",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 15 July 2021, will an election be held for Moldova's parliament?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1906-before-15-july-2021-will-an-election-be-held-for-moldova-s-parliament",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Newly elected Moldovan President Maia Sandu of the Action and Solidarity Party (PAS) has called for parliament to be dissolved and snap elections to be held ( [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/moldova-president-premier/moldovan-president-appoints-interim-pm-but-pushes-for-snap-election-idINKBN29512D) ). Since she won on a pro-EU platform, it remains to be seen if the pro-Russian Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova (PSRM) can maintain its support ( [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-55135213) , [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-moldova-election-results/moldova-set-for-coalition-talks-after-inconclusive-election-idUSKCN1QE11O) ). The closing date for this question will not be extended.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "50",
    "# Forecasters": "33",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a new Dutch government be sworn in after the 2021 general election?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1907-when-will-a-new-dutch-government-be-sworn-in-after-the-2021-general-election",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The next Dutch general election is scheduled for 17 March 2021 ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/a-difficult-year-looms-for-the-european-union) , [Dutch News] (https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2020/12/a-record-86-parties-register-for-the-march-2021-general-election/) , [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-55674146) , [houseofrepresentatives.nl] (https://www.houseofrepresentatives.nl/cabinet) ). After the 2017 election, it took political parties a record amount of time for a new coalition government to be installed ( [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-netherlands-government/new-dutch-government-sworn-in-after-record-negotiations-idUSKBN1CV15D) ). A caretaker government would not count.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "94",
    "# Forecasters": "61",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will a Russian senior government official or Russian naval vessel visit Nicaragua before 7 November 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1900-will-a-russian-senior-government-official-or-russian-naval-vessel-visit-nicaragua-before-7-november-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "52%",
    "Description": "While the Nicaraguan government faces sanctions and pressure from the U.S. government and others, Russia's ties with the Central American nation seem to remain strong ( [Costa Rica News] (https://thecostaricanews.com/russia-confirms-plans-to-produce-its-coronavirus-vaccine-in-nicaragua/) , [The Moscow Times] (https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2021/01/04/foreign-policy-experts-map-russias-plans-for-2021-a72365) , [Kyiv Post] (https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/ukraine-starts-applying-sanctions-against-nicaragua-because-of-consulate-in-crimea.html) , [Washington Post] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/the-soviet-union-fought-the-cold-war-in-nicaragua-now-putins-russia-is-back/2017/04/08/b43039b0-0d8b-11e7-aa57-2ca1b05c41b8_story.html) ). For the purposes of this question, a Russian senior government official is the head of state or an official listed as such by the Russian government ( [government.ru] (http://government.ru/en/gov/persons/) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "64",
    "# Forecasters": "40",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will Uber's end-of-day market capitalization be on 31 December 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1905-what-will-uber-s-end-of-day-market-capitalization-be-on-31-december-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Outcome will be determined by the end-of-day \"Market Cap\" figure as reported by Bloomberg ( [Bloomberg] (https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/UBER:US) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "118",
    "# Forecasters": "59",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which NFL team will win Super Bowl LV?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1898-which-nfl-team-will-win-super-bowl-lv",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Super Bowl LV (55) is scheduled for Sunday 7 February in Tampa, FL ( [NFL] (https://www.nfl.com/super-bowl) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "195",
    "# Forecasters": "103",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will North Macedonia announce that it has completed its census before 1 October 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1897-will-north-macedonia-announce-that-it-has-completed-its-census-before-1-october-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "75%",
    "Description": "North Macedonia has not completed a census since 2002, partly due to concern that it could disrupt the country's ethnic-conscious government ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/emigration-and-low-birth-rates-are-affecting-the-balkans) , [Financial Times] (https://www.ft.com/content/5dafc7e1-d233-48c4-bd6b-90a2ed45a6e7) , [OBC Transeuropa] (https://www.balcanicaucaso.org/eng/Areas/North-Macedonia/North-Macedonia-census-yes-census-no-207268) , [Balkan Insight] (https://balkaninsight.com/2020/10/09/north-macedonia-makes-fresh-push-for-long-overdue-census/) ). A census that is started but not completed would not count (e.g., [OBC Transeuropa] (https://www.balcanicaucaso.org/eng/Areas/North-Macedonia/Census-fails-in-Macedonia-105372) ). The actual release of data is immaterial.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "94",
    "# Forecasters": "56",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Mexico hold a referendum on President Andrés Manuel López Obrador before 1 September 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1895-will-mexico-hold-a-referendum-on-president-andres-manuel-lopez-obrador-before-1-september-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, known by AMLO, has suggested that a referendum on his presidency be held in conjunction with the June 2021 midterm elections ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/amlo-proposes-a-referendum-on-his-presidency-in-mexico) , [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mexico-president/mexico-presidents-rating-at-one-year-high-with-election-in-sight-poll-idUSKBN2820SU) ). Whether a referendum is binding or has any legal effect would be immaterial.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "81",
    "# Forecasters": "51",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 October 2021, will any group of Amazon employees in the U.S. vote in the affirmative to form a union?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1894-before-1-october-2021-will-any-group-of-amazon-employees-in-the-u-s-vote-in-the-affirmative-to-form-a-union",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "78%",
    "Description": "An election is expected to be held at a warehouse near Birmingham, Alabama, one of the first times Amazon workers have held a vote on whether to unionize ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/new-thinking-is-needed-on-workers-rights) ,  [NY Times] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/22/business/amazon-union-vote-bessemer-alabama.html) , [The Hill] (https://thehill.com/policy/technology/531500-amazon-workers-in-alabama-inch-closer-to-union-vote) ). A vote must be sanctioned by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to count.\nNOTE 11 January 2021: Any Amazon subsidiary wholly-owned by Amazon would count.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "149",
    "# Forecasters": "99",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the U.S. leveraged loan default rate reach or exceed 5.0% before 1 September 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1896-will-the-u-s-leveraged-loan-default-rate-reach-or-exceed-5-0-before-1-september-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "The economic impacts of COVID-19 have seen an increase in loan default rates, but when the default cycle will peak remains unknown ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/corporate-defaults-will-be-surprisingly-few) , [S&amp;P Global] (https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/blog/2021-leveraged-loan-survey-defaults-edge-higher-credit-quality-a-concern) ). The outcome will be determined using the U.S. leveraged loan default rates published by S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence at https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/campaigns/leveraged-loan. Under the \"Leveraged Loan Trends\" section, click on the \"Default Rate\" tab to show the \"Leveraged loan default rates - US (principal amount)\" graph. The rate reported for 30 September 2020 was 4.17.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "150",
    "# Forecasters": "76",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Daniel Ortega cease to be the president of Nicaragua before 11 January 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1891-will-daniel-ortega-be-cease-to-be-the-president-of-nicaragua-before-11-january-2022",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4%",
    "Description": "President Daniel Ortega is expected to run for reelection in the 2021 Nicaraguan general election, scheduled for 7 November 2021 ( [ABC News] (https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/nicaraguan-government-sets-date-presidential-election-71785222) , [Council on Foreign Relations] (https://www.cfr.org/blog/ten-elections-watch-2021) , [AP] (https://apnews.com/article/elections-blockades-central-america-daniel-ortega-nicaragua-14d04033e443f6da9bf3d11aec0dae47) ). Inauguration day is set by Article 148 of the constitution at 10 January 2022 ( [Nicaragua Constitution] (https://noticias.asamblea.gob.ni//constitucion/Libro_Constitucion.pdf) [in Spanish], [Nicaragua Constitution] (https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Nicaragua_2014.pdf?lang=en)  [in English]).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "76",
    "# Forecasters": "35",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 15 March 2021, will there be a lethal confrontation between the national military forces of Iran and the United States either in Iran or at sea?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1892-before-15-march-2021-will-there-be-a-lethal-confrontation-between-the-national-military-forces-of-iran-and-the-united-states-either-in-iran-or-at-sea",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "Tensions between the U.S. and Iran remain high ( [AP] (https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-iran-coronavirus-pandemic-baghdad-ali-khamenei-de61647fe1796de76dc718f8933690c9) , [Bloomberg] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-06/iran-tests-suicide-drones-amid-its-tense-standoff-with-trump) , [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-55530366) ). A lethal confrontation is one that results in at least one fatality (total, not each) for the national military forces of either side. For the purposes of this question, Iran's national military forces include the Revolutionary Guard Corps and Law Enforcement Forces. A lethal confrontation taking place in Iranian airspace or international airspace over the sea would count.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "196",
    "# Forecasters": "137",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. (AMC), the parent company of AMC Theatres, file for bankruptcy?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1893-when-will-amc-entertainment-holdings-inc-amc-the-parent-company-of-amc-theatres-file-for-bankruptcy",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "AMC, the world's largest movie theater chain, is facing challenges as the COVID-19 pandemic continues ( [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/05/coronavirus-amc-seeks-550-million-as-stock-closes-at-record-low.html) , [Motley Fool] (https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/12/14/amc-entertainment-lenders-urge-it-to-declare-bankr/) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "155",
    "# Forecasters": "59",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "At close of business on 31 December 2021, will Apple be the most valuable publicly traded company in the world?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1884-at-close-of-business-on-31-december-2021-will-apple-be-the-most-valuable-publicly-traded-company-in-the-world",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "On 31 July 2020, Apple passed Saudi Aramco to become the world's most valuable publicly traded company ( [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/31/apple-surpasses-saudi-aramco-to-become-worlds-most-valuable-company.html) , [NPR] (https://www.npr.org/2020/08/19/903858871/apple-is-1st-2-trillion-american-company) ). The outcome will be determined using market capitalization data as provided by Bloomberg ( [Bloomberg - APPL] (https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/AAPL:US) , see \"MARKET CAP\"). For companies with shares denominated in a currency other than U.S. dollars, the relevant dollar exchange rate as of 31 December 2021 will be used to assess its value in dollars (e.g., [Bloomberg - ARAMCO] (https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/ARAMCO:AB) , [Bloomberg - SAR] (https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/USDSAR:CUR) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "148",
    "# Forecasters": "97",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which team will win the World Cup qualifying match between Nicaragua and St. Lucia?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1885-which-team-will-win-the-world-cup-qualifying-match-between-nicaragua-and-st-lucia",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Nicaragua is scheduled to face St. Lucia in a first round World Cup qualifying match on 24 March 2021 ( [CONCACAF] (https://www.concacaf.com/en/world-cup-qualifying-men/schedule-results-world-cup-qualifying-men#tab_team=rounds) ).\nVersión en Español: \nPregunta: ¿Qué equipo ganará el partido de clasificación entre Nicaragua y Santa Lúcia para el Mundial de Fútbol?\nInformación adicional: Nicaragua va a enfrentarse con Santa Lúcia en la primera rueda de clasificación para el Mundial de Fútbol el 24 de marzo de 2021 ( [CONCACAF] (https://www.concacaf.com/en/world-cup-qualifying-men/schedule-results-world-cup-qualifying-men#tab_team=rounds) ). La versión en español de esta pregunta ha sido incluida sólo a efectos informativos, y en situaciones donde existe una diferencia de interpretación entre las versiones en inglés y español, prevalecerá la versión original en inglés. \nSi tiene alguna duda o pregunta, por favor lea nuestras Preguntas Frecuentes ( [FAQs] (https://www.gjopen.com/faq#question) ) o envíenos un [correo electrónico] (/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87e4ebe6f5eee1eee4e6f3eee8e9f4c7e0e8e8e3edf2e3e0eae2e9f3a9e4e8eab8f4f2e5ede2e4f3bad6f2e2f4f3eee8e9a2b5b7c4ebe6f5eee1eee4e6f3eee8e9) . Para aprender más sobre Good Judgment y Superpronósticos (Superforecasting), por favor clique [aquí] (https://goodjudgment.com/) . \n",
    "# Forecasts": "91",
    "# Forecasters": "67",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many seats in the Legislative Assembly will New Ideas (Nuevas Ideas) win in the 2021 Salvadoran legislative election?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1889-how-many-seats-in-the-legislative-assembly-will-new-ideas-nuevas-ideas-win-in-the-2021-salvadoran-legislative-election",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The 2021 Salvadoran legislative election is scheduled for 28 February 2021 and all 84 seats in the Legislative Assembly are to be contested ( [21votes.com] (https://21votes.com/el-salvador-elections/) , [El Salvador Perspectives] (http://www.elsalvadorperspectives.com/2020/08/el-salvador-looks-toward-2021-national.html) ). New Ideas (Nuevas Ideas) is a political party recently created by Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele ( [NY Times] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/05/world/americas/el-salvador-nayib-bukele.html) , [World Politics Review] (https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/24345/el-salvador-s-elections-reveal-voters-frustration-with-politics-as-usual) ). A seat gained as part of a Coalition Pact (Pacto de Coalición) will count toward the resolution of this question ( [Tribunal Supremo Electoral] (https://www.tse.gob.sv/elecciones-2021/inicio#pactos-de-coalicion)  [in Spanish], [Gato Encerrado] (https://gatoencerrado.news/2020/09/01/nuevas-ideas-pacto-91-coaliciones-con-gana-pcn-y-cd-para-elecciones-2021/)  [in Spanish]).\nVersión en Español:\nPregunta: ¿Cuantos escaños ganará Nuevas Ideas en la Asamblea Legislativa de El Salvador en las elecciones de 2021? \nInformación adicional: Las elecciones legislativas de El Salvador están agendadas para el 28 de febrero de 2021 y todos los 84 escaños en la Asamblea Legislativa están en juego ( [21votes.com] (https://21votes.com/el-salvador-elections/) , [El Salvador Perspectives] (http://www.elsalvadorperspectives.com/2020/08/el-salvador-looks-toward-2021-national.html) ). Nuevas Ideas es un partido político recientemente creado por el Presidente de El Savador, Nayib Bukele ( [NY Times] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/05/world/americas/el-salvador-nayib-bukele.html) , [World Politics Review] (https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/24345/el-salvador-s-elections-reveal-voters-frustration-with-politics-as-usual) ). Un escaño obtenido como parte de un Pacto de Coalición contará para la resolución de esta pregunta ( [Tribunal Supremo Electoral] (https://www.tse.gob.sv/elecciones-2021/inicio#pactos-de-coalicion) , [Gato Encerrado] (https://gatoencerrado.news/2020/09/01/nuevas-ideas-pacto-91-coaliciones-con-gana-pcn-y-cd-para-elecciones-2021/) ). La versión en español de esta pregunta ha sido incluida sólo a efectos informativos, y en situaciones donde existe una diferencia de interpretación entre las versiones en inglés y español, prevalecerá la versión original en inglés. \nSi tiene alguna duda o pregunta, por favor lea nuestras Preguntas Frecuentes ( [FAQs] (https://www.gjopen.com/faq#question) ) o envíenos un [correo electrónico] (/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bf8f7fae9f2fdf2f8faeff2f4f5e8dbfcf4f4fff1eefffcf6fef5efb5f8f4f6a4e8eef9f1fef8efa6caeefee8eff2f4f5bea9abd8f7fae9f2fdf2f8faeff2f4f5) . Para aprender más sobre Good Judgment y Superpronósticos (Superforecasting), por favor clique [aquí] (https://goodjudgment.com/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": "44",
    "# Forecasters": "22",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the closing price of Mercado Libre stock on 15 February 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1888-what-will-be-the-closing-price-of-mercado-libre-stock-on-15-february-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Latin American e-commerce company Mercado Libre has had a major surge in business during the COVID-19 pandemic ( [eMarketer] (https://www.emarketer.com/content/mercado-libre-will-surpass-20-billion-ecommerce-sales-2020) ). The outcome will be determined by the end-of-day closing value reported by Bloomberg ( [Bloomberg] (https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/MELI:US) ).\nVersión en Español: \nPregunta: ¿Cual será el precio de cierre de la acción de Mercado Libre el 15 de febrero de 2021?  \nInformación adicional: La empresa de e-commerce latino-americana Mercado Libre ha visto un gran crecimiento durante la pandemia de COVID-19 ( [eMarketer] (https://www.emarketer.com/content/mercado-libre-will-surpass-20-billion-ecommerce-sales-2020) ). El resultado de esta pregunta será determinado por el precio de cierre reportado por Bloomberg ( [Bloomberg] (https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/MELI:US) ). La versión en español de esta pregunta ha sido incluida sólo a efectos informativos, y en situaciones donde existe una diferencia de interpretación entre las versiones en inglés y español, prevalecerá la versión original en inglés. \nSi tiene alguna duda o pregunta, por favor lea nuestras Preguntas Frecuentes ( [FAQs] (https://www.gjopen.com/faq#question) ) o envíenos un [correo electrónico] (/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b38373a29323d32383a2f323435281b3c34343f312e3f3c363e352f7538343664282e39313e382f660a2e3e282f3234357e696b18373a29323d32383a2f323435) . Para aprender más sobre Good Judgment y Superpronósticos (Superforecasting), por favor clique aquí.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "232",
    "# Forecasters": "49",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the closing yield for the 30-year U.S. Treasury on 31 December 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1883-what-will-be-the-closing-yield-for-the-30-year-u-s-treasury-on-31-december-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The yield on 30-year U.S. Treasury saw new record lows in March 2020 as the scale of the economic impact of COVID-19 became clear ( [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/09/10-year-treasury-yield-plunges.html) , [Investopedia] (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/1/30-yeartreasury.asp) ). The outcome will be determined using data as reported by CNBC ( [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/?symbol=US30Y) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "141",
    "# Forecasters": "66",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will legislation amending or repealing Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 become law before 14 August 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1882-will-legislation-amending-or-repealing-section-230-of-the-communications-act-of-1934-become-law-before-14-august-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "Section 230 is a statute that protects social media companies from liability for content their users post ( [CBS News] (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-is-section-230-and-why-do-so-many-lawmakers-want-to-repeal-it/) , [Council on Foreign Relations] (https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/trump-and-section-230-what-know) , [Federation of American Scientists] (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/LSB10306.pdf) , [Cornell] (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230) , [TechCrunch] (https://techcrunch.com/2020/12/23/trump-ndaa-veto-section-230/) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "157",
    "# Forecasters": "80",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies approve the Federal Law for the Regulation of Cannabis?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1890-when-will-mexico-s-chamber-of-deputies-approve-the-federal-law-for-the-regulation-of-cannabis",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "After several delays and being approved by the Senate of the Republic, the Federal Law for the Regulation of Cannabis is scheduled for a vote by Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies sometime between February and April 2021 ( [Forbes] (https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthoban/2021/12/27/will-we-see-mexico-legalize-cannabis-in-2021/?sh=180c18034ed9) , [Wall Street Journal] (https://www.wsj.com/articles/mexico-set-to-become-worlds-largest-legal-cannabis-market-11609263506) , [Xataka] (https://www.xataka.com.mx/medicina-y-salud/consumir-marihuana-sera-legal-mexico-todo-que-hay-que-saber-nueva-regulacion-consumo-ludico-cannabis)  [in Spanish], [El Economista] (https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/politica/Diputados-deben-subsanar-deficiencias-en-legislacion-que-descriminaliza-la-mariguana-expertos-20201129-0008.html)  [in Spanish]). The approval of an amended version of the legislation approved by the Mexican Senate would count. Whether the legislation actually becomes law is immaterial, and procedural votes other than final approval by the Chamber would not count.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "29",
    "# Forecasters": "19",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "On 1 March 2021, how many states will have a number of daily new COVID-19 cases per 100k residents of 75.0 or higher?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1881-on-1-march-2021-how-many-states-will-have-a-number-of-daily-new-covid-19-cases-per-100k-residents-of-75-0-or-higher",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As the U.S. tries to reduce COVID-19 cases, the question remains whether the U.S. health care system can handle the load ( [CDC] (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/covidview/index.html) ). The outcome will be determined using data from https://covidactnow.org at 5:00PM ET on 1 March 2021. See the table \"Compare,\" set to \"States,\" under \"DAILY NEW CASES PER 100K.\" For the purposes of this question, the District of Columbia is considered a state.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "352",
    "# Forecasters": "90",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "On 1 March 2021, how many states will have a COVID-19 positivity rate greater than 10.0%?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1880-on-1-march-2021-how-many-states-will-have-a-covid-19-positivity-rate-greater-than-10-0",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As the U.S. tries to reduce COVID-19 cases, the question remains whether the U.S. health care system can handle the load ( [CDC] (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/covidview/index.html) ). The outcome will be determined using data from https://covidactnow.org at 5:00PM ET on 1 March 2021. See the table “Compare,” set to \"States,\" under \"POSITIVE TEST RATE.\" For the purposes of this question, the District of Columbia is considered a state.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "271",
    "# Forecasters": "87",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 April 2021, will an election be held for Israel's Knesset?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1879-before-1-april-2021-will-an-election-be-held-for-israel-s-knesset",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Disagreements within the ruling coalition, most recently over the budget, may lead Israel to hold its fourth election in two years ( [NY Times] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/02/world/middleeast/israeli-parliament-election.html) , [Times of Israel] (https://www.timesofisrael.com/bill-to-dissolve-knesset-set-for-delay-until-next-week-angering-blue-and-white/) , [Foreign Policy] (https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/12/22/israeli-knesset-likely-to-dissolve-as-extension-vote-fails/) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "239",
    "# Forecasters": "129",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "At close of business on 28 April 2021, will the upper limit of the Federal Reserve's target range for the federal funds rate be lower, the same, or higher than it was at close of business on 17 March 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1877-at-close-of-business-on-28-april-2021-will-the-upper-limit-of-the-federal-reserve-s-target-range-for-the-federal-funds-rate-be-lower-the-same-or-higher-than-it-was-at-close-of-business-on-17-march-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The U.S. federal funds rate is the interest rate charged for overnight lending among financial institutions with accounts at the Federal Reserve and sets the base rate for borrowing costs across the financial system ( [Federal Reserve] (https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomc.htm) ). The target range for the federal funds rate is set by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). Its April meeting is scheduled for 27-28 April 2021.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "92",
    "# Forecasters": "74",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 January 2022, will the Diem Association, co-founded by Facebook, launch a stablecoin?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1876-before-1-january-2022-will-the-diem-association-co-founded-by-facebook-launch-a-stablecoin",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "45%",
    "Description": "The Diem Association, formerly known as Libra Association and related to Facebook, is planning to launch a single-currency stablecoin in 2021 ( [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/08/facebook-hopes-the-cryptocurrency-diem-it-backs-will-launch-in-2021.html) , [Diem] (https://www.diem.com/en-us/white-paper/) , [Securities.io] (https://www.securities.io/investing-in-diem-facebooks-libra-project-everything-you-need-to-know/) , [Investopedia] (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stablecoin.asp) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "121",
    "# Forecasters": "72",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 19 June 2021, will the end-of-day closing value for the Turkish lira against the U.S. dollar exceed 9.00?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1878-before-19-june-2021-will-the-end-of-day-closing-value-for-the-turkish-lira-against-the-u-s-dollar-exceed-9-00",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2%",
    "Description": "The lira has been under pressure amid Turkey's tensions with the U.S. and the EU, compounded by COVID-19 ( [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/emerging-markets/emerging-markets-turkeys-lira-falls-past-8-per-dollar-fx-stocks-eye-6th-week-of-gains-idUSL4N2IR24P) , [Bloomberg] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-11/turkish-lira-declines-as-u-s-sanctions-risk-sours-appetite) ). The outcome will be determined using data as reported by Bloomberg ( [Bloomberg] (https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/USDTRY:CUR) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "132",
    "# Forecasters": "58",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the People's Republic of China and the EU sign a Comprehensive Agreement on Investment before 1 January 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1875-will-the-people-s-republic-of-china-and-the-eu-sign-a-comprehensive-agreement-on-investment-before-1-january-2022",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "While both China and the EU have committed to reaching an agreement by the end of 2020, it is uncertain this will be the case ( [European Parliament - Briefing] (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/652066/EPRS_BRI(2020)652066_EN.pdf) , [European Parliament - (EU-CHINA CAI)] (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-a-balanced-and-progressive-trade-policy-to-harness-globalisation/file-eu-china-investment-agreement) , [CEPS] (https://www.ceps.eu/eu-china-comprehensive-agreement-on-investment/) , [South China Morning Post] (https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3113906/eu-and-china-set-further-investment-talks-end-year-deadline) , [Core.ac.uk] (https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/148912339.pdf) ). For details on the negotiation and ratification process of trade agreements involving the EU, please see the following: https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2012/june/tradoc_149616.pdf, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-a-balanced-and-progressive-trade-policy-to-harness-globalisation/file-eu-china-investment-agreement.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "368",
    "# Forecasters": "179",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the EU's European Medicines Agency (EMA) approve a COVID-19 vaccine from Chinese companies Sinovac or Sinopharm before 1 September 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1869-will-the-u-s-food-and-drug-administration-fda-and-or-the-eu-s-european-medicines-agency-ema-approve-a-covid-19-vaccine-from-chinese-companies-sinovac-or-sinopharm-before-1-september-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Sinovac and Sinopharm are among the many Chinese developers of COVID-19 vaccines ( [NY Times] (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker.html) , [Sinopharm] (http://www.sinopharm.com/1156.html) , [Sinovac] (http://www.sinovac.com/) , [Guardian] (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/14/chinas-sinopharm-vaccine-how-effective-is-it-and-where-will-it-be-rolled-out) , [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-55212787) ). For more details of the EMA’s vaccine approval process, please see: [AP] (https://apnews.com/article/europe-vaccine-approval-explained-193bc87c8930c54bfc9b9b21c4a9e3f0) , [EMA] (https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/public-health-threats/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/treatments-vaccines-covid-19) , [EMA - Approvals] (https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/public-health-threats/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/treatments-vaccines/covid-19-vaccines-studies-approval) . For more details regarding the FDA’s vaccine approval process, please see: [FDA - Vaccine Development] (https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/development-approval-process-cber/vaccine-development-101) , [FDA - Emergency Preparedness] (https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/covid-19-vaccines) . Emergency use approvals would count.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "331",
    "# Forecasters": "199",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 January 2022, will a commercial, open to the public, ride-hailing service that uses autonomous vehicles without back-up drivers nor remote operators be launched in the People's Republic of China?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1870-before-1-january-2022-will-a-commercial-open-to-the-public-ride-hailing-service-that-uses-autonomous-vehicles-without-back-up-drivers-nor-remote-operators-be-launched-in-the-people-s-republic-of-china",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "Several companies are developing autonomous vehicles in China with the goal of launching a commercial open to the public ride-hailing service ( [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/04/fully-driverless-cars-are-being-tested-in-china-for-the-first-time.html) , [TechCrunch] (https://techcrunch.com/2020/12/02/autox-removes-safety-drivers/) , [CGTN] (https://news.cgtn.com/news/2020-10-11/Baidu-rolls-out-self-driving-taxi-service-in-Beijing-UvCnsSa3g4/index.html) ). The service must involve payment to count for resolution of this question.\nNote 2 February 2021: A ride-hailing service using AVs that have remote monitors capable of taking control of the vehicle would not count.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "229",
    "# Forecasters": "142",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the United States and China sign a trade agreement before 1 July 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1872-will-the-united-states-and-china-sign-a-trade-agreement-before-1-july-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2%",
    "Description": "The latest trade agreement between the United States and China was the so-called “Phase One” agreement signed in January 2020 ( [U.S. Trade Representative] (https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/agreements/phase%20one%20agreement/US_China_Agreement_Fact_Sheet.pdf) , [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/15/trump-and-china-sign-phase-one-trade-agreement.html) , [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china-details-factbox-idUSKBN1ZE2IF) , [FOX Business] (https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/us-china-phase-one-trade-deal-whats-next) , [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china-idUSKBN28C0HV) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "288",
    "# Forecasters": "209",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 14 August 2021, will an executive order be signed or federal legislation become law that would forgive $10,000 or more in principal on federal student loan debts for at least five million student loan borrowers?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1873-before-14-august-2021-will-an-executive-order-be-signed-or-federal-legislation-become-law-that-would-forgive-10-000-or-more-in-principal-on-federal-student-loan-debts-for-at-least-five-million-student-loan-borrowers",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "20%",
    "Description": "Some Democrats are pushing President-elect Joe Biden to cancel federal student loan debt on his first day in office, while Biden has pushed for congressional action ( [Forbes] (https://www.forbes.com/sites/zackfriedman/2020/12/12/10-questions-about-bidens-plan-to-cancel-student-loans/) , [NY Times] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/10/us/biden-clashes-with-liberals-over-student-loan-cancellation.html) , [Nerd Wallet] (https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/loans/student-loans/student-loan-debt#total-federal-student-loan-debt) ). There is also disagreement as to whether the president can cancel student loan debt without Congress ( [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/21/can-joe-biden-forgive-student-debt-without-congress-experts-weigh-in.html) , [Forbes] (https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertberger/2020/11/30/will-biden-cancel-your-student-loans-in-january) ). Any injunction sought to block such an executive order or federal legislation would be immaterial, as would the date that principal forgiveness would take effect.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "200",
    "# Forecasters": "95",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the monthly occupancy level of European hotels next reach 50.0% or higher before June 2021, according to Smith Travel Research?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1874-will-the-monthly-occupancy-level-of-european-hotels-next-reach-50-0-or-higher-before-june-2021-according-to-smith-travel-research",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "15%",
    "Description": "Travel demand in Europe has taken a major hit due to the COVID-19 pandemic ( [Fodor's Travel Guide] (https://www.fodors.com/news/news/coronavirus-outbreak-should-you-cancel-a-trip-to-europe-right-now) ). The outcome will be determined using data as reported by Smith Travel Research and its monthly European hotel performance reports, which are generally released the third week of the following month. The reports can be found at https://str.com/data-insights/news/press-releases by setting \"Region\" to \"Europe,\" and \"Type\" to \"Monthly.\" After selecting a particular monthly report, see \"Occupancy\" under the \"Euro Constant currency\" section. In October 2020, the occupancy level was 32.3% ( [Smith Travel Research] (https://str.com/press-release/str-europe-hotel-performance-october-2020) )\n",
    "# Forecasts": "271",
    "# Forecasters": "96",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 15 July 2021, will Canadians Michael Kovrig and/or Michael Spavor leave China?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1867-before-15-july-2021-will-canadians-michael-kovrig-and-or-michael-spavor-leave-china",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Soon after Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou was arrested in Vancouver in December 2018, two Canadian nationals, Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, were arrested in China ( [Guardian] (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/12/china-canada-diplomat-michael-kovrig-detention-latest-) , [Toronto Star] (https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2020/06/24/two-michaels-fight-is-bigger-than-canada-global-observers-say-and-the-world-is-watching.html) , [CBC] (https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1395286595882) , [South China Morning Post] (https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3112949/huaweis-meng-wanzhou-back-canadian-court-first-time-reports) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "229",
    "# Forecasters": "100",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Japan, the People's Republic of China, and South Korea sign a trilateral free trade agreement before 1 January 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1868-will-japan-the-people-s-republic-of-china-and-south-korea-sign-a-trilateral-free-trade-agreement-before-1-january-2022",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8%",
    "Description": "In the wake of the signing of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), there's speculation that a trilateral free trade agreement among Japan, the People's Republic of China, and South Korea may be within reach ( [Yahoo News] (https://sg.news.yahoo.com/china-japan-south-korea-rcep-051029662.html) , [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-china/japan-and-china-agree-to-restart-business-travel-coordinate-on-east-china-sea-idUSKBN284042) , [Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs] (https://www.mofa.go.jp/ecm/ep/page23e_000337.html) ). Ratification by the parties to the agreement is not required for a \"Yes\" resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "190",
    "# Forecasters": "119",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will a Carnival Cruise Line cruise next depart from the continental U.S.?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1866-when-will-a-carnival-cruise-line-cruise-next-depart-from-the-continental-u-s",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "While CDC restrictions due to COVID-19 have been relaxed, there is ongoing uncertainty regarding when a Carnival Cruise Line cruise will depart next ( [CNN] (https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/carnival-cruise-canceled-trnd/index.html) , [CDC] (https://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/cruise/index.html) ). A cruise must include ticketed passengers to count.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "185",
    "# Forecasters": "94",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 January 2022, will a release date for The Winds of Winter be announced by the author and/or publisher?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1864-before-1-january-2022-will-a-release-date-for-the-winds-of-winter-be-announced-by-the-author-and-or-publisher",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "51%",
    "Description": "The Winds of Winter is the sixth novel in the fantasy series that inspired HBO's Game of Thrones ( [Rotten Tomatoes] (https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/game-of-thrones) ). There has been talk that the book could be released soon, though similar claims have been made in the past ( [NY Times] (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/24/books/george-rr-martin-winds-of-winter.html) , [Express] (https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/books/1359042/Winds-of-Winter-release-date-George-RR-Martin-blog-ASOIAF-expert-Game-of-Thrones) , [Entertainment Weekly] (https://ew.com/article/2015/04/03/george-rr-martin-winds-date/) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "70",
    "# Forecasters": "43",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 7 May 2021, will the Bank of England set its Bank Rate to below zero?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1861-before-7-may-2021-will-the-bank-of-england-set-its-bank-rate-to-below-zero",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "6%",
    "Description": "The Bank of England's benchmark interest rate is known as the \"Bank Rate\" ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/britain-will-face-disruption-and-deficit-while-many-britons-will-face-the-dole) , [Bank of England] (https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetary-policy/the-interest-rate-bank-rate) ). Amid the COVID-19 pandemic and negotiations with the EU regarding an end to the Brexit transition period, the Bank of England has explored setting negative interest rates for the UK ( [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/business-54314971) , [Guardian] (https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/oct/20/bank-of-england-negative-interest-rates-gertjan-vlieghe-covid) , [S&amp;P Global] (https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/uk-banks-ready-for-painful-negative-interest-rates-market-has-baked-them-in-61330250) ,  [Financial Times] (https://www.ft.com/content/72500c20-4a49-4fa9-a3c8-40ce1d26f436) ). \n",
    "# Forecasts": "273",
    "# Forecasters": "184",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will net international migration between the U.S. and abroad for 2021 be higher than the net international migration for 2020?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1865-will-net-international-migration-between-the-u-s-and-abroad-for-2021-be-higher-than-the-net-international-migration-for-2020",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "90%",
    "Description": "Net international migration between the U.S. and abroad projected for 2019 was at its lowest level of the decade at 595,000 ( [Census Bureau] (https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2019/12/net-international-migration-projected-to-fall-lowest-levels-this-decade.html) ). The outcome will be determined using data on the projected net international migration for 2021 as first reported by the U.S. Census Bureau ( [Census Bureau] (https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/time-series/demo/popest/2010s-state-total.html) ). Download the Excel file \"Population, Population Change, and Estimated Components of Population Change.\" See the row designated \"10\" under \"SUMLEV\" and \"United States\" under \"NAME.\" The relevant data are titled \"INTERNATIONALMIG[year].\" For methodological information, see the \"Nation, States, Counties, and Puerto Rico Population\" Methodology file here: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/technical-documentation/methodology.html.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "90",
    "# Forecasters": "58",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, will the Supreme Court rule that California's access regulation, as applied to Cedar Point Nursery, is a per se physical taking under the federal constitution?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1863-in-cedar-point-nursery-v-hassid-will-the-supreme-court-rule-that-california-s-access-regulation-as-applied-to-cedar-point-nursery-is-a-per-se-physical-taking-under-the-federal-constitution",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "70%",
    "Description": "Cedar Point Nursery sued California over state regulations allowing union organizers access to employees on their employers' property without compensation under limited circumstances ( [Oyez] (https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/20-107) , [SCOTUSblog] (https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/cedar-point-nursery-v-hassid/) , [Bloomberg Law] (https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/california-farmers-get-supreme-court-review-of-union-access-rule) , [National Law Review] (https://www.natlawreview.com/article/scotus-to-consider-whether-california-unconstitutionally-takes-private-property-when) ). The trial court dismissed the lawsuit and the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed ( [Casetext] (https://casetext.com/case/nursery-v-shiroma) ). The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its 2020 term, but if it does not, the question will close as \"No.\" If the Court decides this case without addressing this question's particular issue of law, the question will close as \"No.\"\n",
    "# Forecasts": "56",
    "# Forecasters": "31",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the closing price of natural gas (per MMBtu) on 1 June 2021, according to Bloomberg?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1858-what-will-be-the-closing-price-of-natural-gas-per-mmbtu-on-1-june-2021-according-to-bloomberg",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The outcome will be determined using futures price data as reported by Bloomberg ( [Bloomberg] (https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/NG1:COM) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "145",
    "# Forecasters": "40",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 July 2021, will presidential and/or parliamentary elections be held in Kyrgyzstan?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1854-before-1-july-2021-will-presidential-and-or-parliamentary-elections-be-held-in-kyrgyzstan",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Kyrgyzstan experienced political upheaval in the wake of vote-rigging allegations in its October 2020 parliamentary elections ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2020/11/10/whats-happening-in-kyrgyzstan) , [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-54493185) ). On 17 November 2020, the Kyrgyz parliament adopted amendments to the law on elections mandating that they take place no later than June 2021 ( [Diplomat] (https://thediplomat.com/2020/10/kyrgyzstan-punts-on-elections-to-pursue-constitutional-reforms/) ). Whether results are annulled after the election is held would not impact the counting of an election having been held (e.g., [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-54432030) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "91",
    "# Forecasters": "29",
    "Stars": "★★☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the IMF estimate for world GDP growth for 2021 be higher in its April 2021 World Economic Outlook report relative to its October 2020 report?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1856-will-the-imf-estimate-for-world-gdp-growth-for-2021-be-higher-in-its-april-2021-world-economic-outlook-report-relative-to-its-october-2020-report",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "",
    "Description": "The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and others are projecting a significant contraction in the global economy in the coming years ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/16/governments-must-judge-if-the-economic-recovery-needs-more-help) , [IMF - June 2020] (https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/06/24/WEOUpdateJune2020) , [World Economic Forum] (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/09/oecd-global-gdp-pre-pandemic-level-2021-sustainable-resilient/) ). The outcome will be determined using IMF purchasing power parity GDP data from the first release of the World Economic Outlook Database in 2021, which is expected in April 2021. At the IMF website ( [IMF] (https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/SPROLLS/world-economic-outlook-databases#sort=%40imfdate%20descending) ), choose the appropriate \"World Economic Outlook Database\"; then choose \"Entire Dataset\"; then download the \"By Country Groups\" file in the \"Tab Delimited Values\" section. On the spreadsheet, refer to the line of data, usually near the top, that has the Subject Descriptor as \"Gross domestic product, constant prices\" and Units as \"Percent change.\" Scroll over to the appropriate year. Estimated world GDP growth for 2021 was 5.152%, according to the October 2020 report ( [IMF - October 2020] (https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/WEO/WEO-Database/2020/02/WEOOct2020alla.ashx) ).\nThe Superforecaster version of this question is at [The Economist dashboard] (https://goodjudgment.io/economist/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": "294",
    "# Forecasters": "164",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will win the 2021 presidential election in Peru?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1853-who-will-win-the-2021-presidential-election-in-peru",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Peru has seen a series of presidents come and go in late 2020 ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/latin-americas-leaders-will-have-plenty-of-headaches) , [CNN] (https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/18/americas/peru-protests-explainer-scli-intl/index.html) , [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-peru-politics-idUSKBN27W1KU) ). The presidential election is scheduled for 2021 with the first round of voting taking place on 11 April 2021 and a runoff scheduled for 6 June 2021 if needed ( [Peruvian Times] (https://www.peruviantimes.com/09/general-elections-to-be-held-april-2021/32266/) ).\nNOTE 15 December 2020: If the first round of the election takes place and requires a subsequent runoff scheduled for after 30 September 2021, the suspend date would be extended to accommodate the runoff. If no election takes place before 1 October 2021, the suspend date would not be extended and the question would resolve on that answer bin.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "117",
    "# Forecasters": "71",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 4 June 2021, will the United Kingdom's Office for National Statistics (ONS) report that the percentage of working adults who \"worked from home exclusively\" fell below 20%?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1855-before-4-june-2021-will-the-united-kingdom-s-office-for-national-statistics-ons-report-that-the-percentage-of-working-adults-who-worked-from-home-exclusively-fell-below-20",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "50%",
    "Description": "The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many workers to work from home, and this trend may continue even after the pandemic has passed ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/16/new-technological-behaviours-will-outlast-the-pandemic) , [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-53946487) ). The outcome will be determined using data as reported in the ONS' Opinions and Lifestyle Survey. In their report from 26 November 2020, the ONS reported that 30% of working adults worked from home exclusively ( [ONS] (https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/bulletins/coronavirustheukeconomyandsocietyfasterindicators/26november2020) , see Figure 1 under Section 4). In the event that the release of the reports is changed or delayed, the outcome will be determined based on the most recently reported figure as of the close of business on 3 June 2021.\nThe Superforecaster version of this question is at [The Economist dashboard] (https://goodjudgment.io/economist/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": "380",
    "# Forecasters": "185",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be appointed as the next leader of the Communist Party in Vietnam?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1848-who-will-be-appointed-as-the-next-leader-of-the-communist-party-in-vietnam",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Vietnam's next National Party Congress is scheduled for January 2021, at which the next secretary-general of the party is meant to be appointed ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/vietnams-communist-party-will-have-a-new-leader) , [Vietnam Times] (https://vietnamtimes.org.vn/website-of-13th-national-party-congress-launched-24904.html) ). Rumors have suggested some of the top leadership positions could be consolidated ( [Diplomat] (https://thediplomat.com/2020/09/three-horse-race-for-vietnams-next-communist-party-chief/) ).\nNOTE 26 January 2021: If a new leader other than the incumbent is not appointed before 1 March 2021, then the question will close \"A new leader will not be appointed before 1 March 2021.\"\n",
    "# Forecasts": "217",
    "# Forecasters": "98",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be China's year-on-year GDP growth rate for the second quarter of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1850-what-will-be-china-s-year-on-year-gdp-growth-rate-for-the-second-quarter-of-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "After bouncing back from the worst domestic economic effects of COVID-19, whether China can meet or exceed its prior pace of growth remains to be seen ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/chinas-economy-will-hold-up-well-in-the-coming-year) ). The outcome will be determined based on data released by China's National Bureau of Statistics ( [National Bureau of Statistics] (http://data.stats.gov.cn/english/easyquery.htm?cn=B01) ). The relevant data are listed as \"Indices of Gross Domestic Product (preceding year=100), Current Quarter.\" For 2Q 2020, the index was 103.2, which equates to 3.2% growth. The question will be suspended on 30 June 2021 and closed when the relevant data for 2Q 2021 are released, scheduled for July 2021.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "428",
    "# Forecasters": "232",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many COVID-19 vaccines will be approved and/or authorized for emergency use by the U.S. FDA as of 31 March 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1849-how-many-covid-19-vaccines-will-be-approved-and-or-authorized-for-emergency-use-by-the-u-s-fda-as-of-31-march-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The race to develop COVID-19 vaccines is on ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/16/the-path-to-a-covid-19-vaccine-may-be-quick-but-it-will-be-bumpy) , [FDA] (https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/covid-19-vaccines) , [FDA] (https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "929",
    "# Forecasters": "310",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many vehicles will Tesla deliver to customers in the first half of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1852-how-many-vehicles-will-tesla-deliver-to-customers-in-the-first-half-of-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As more automakers jockey for electric vehicle market share, Tesla will continue to push for its own growth ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/the-battle-within-the-electric-vehicle-industry-will-intensify) ). Tesla delivered 88,496 vehicles during Q1 2020 and 90,891 vehicles during Q2 2020, for a total of 179,387 in the first half of 2020 ( [Tesla Q1 2020] (https://tesla-cdn.thron.com/static/HZTKGL_TSLA_Update_Letter_2020-1Q_VGVL6F.pdf) , [Tesla Q2 2020] (https://tesla-cdn.thron.com/static/DK2EWG_TSLA_Update_Letter_2020-2Q_G6S6GG.pdf) ). The outcome will be determined using Tesla's official quarterly updates once available, typically found under \"Shareholder Deck\" here: https://ir.tesla.com. The question will be suspended on 30 June 2021 and closed when the relevant data for Q2 2021 are released, expected in July 2021.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "416",
    "# Forecasters": "198",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 October 2021, will Jair Bolsonaro cease to be the president of Brazil?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1851-before-1-october-2021-will-jair-bolsonaro-cease-to-be-the-president-of-brazil",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "6%",
    "Description": "Since taking office in 2019, President Bolsonaro has thus far survived scandals and the devastating effects of COVID-19 in the country ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/neither-plagues-nor-scandals-will-topple-brazils-populist-president) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "264",
    "# Forecasters": "192",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the average price of a gallon of gasoline fall below $1.95 for any week before 2 March 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1847-will-the-average-price-of-a-gallon-of-gasoline-fall-below-1-95-for-any-week-before-2-march-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "The initial onset of the COVID-19 pandemic drove gasoline prices under $2.00 per gallon across much of the country ( [Newsweek] (https://www.newsweek.com/gas-prices-are-lowest-years-oil-prices-plummet-due-coronavirus-outbreak-1498622) ). The outcome will be determined using data as reported by the Energy Information Administration for \"Weekly U.S. All Grades All Formulations Retail Gasoline Prices\" ( [EIA] (https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&amp;s=EMM_EPM0_PTE_NUS_DPG&amp;f=W) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "364",
    "# Forecasters": "133",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Nicolas Maduro cease to be president of Venezuela before 1 April 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1843-will-nicolas-maduro-cease-to-be-president-of-venezuela-before-1-april-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "",
    "Description": "Nicolas Maduro remains in power despite continued international pressure and domestic instability ( [Guardian] (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/25/leopoldo-lopez-flees-venezuela-vowing-to-continue-fighting-maduro-regime) , [Al Jazeera] (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/11/9/maduro-hopes-to-resume-decent-dialogue-with-us-after-biden-win) , [Newsweek] (https://www.newsweek.com/venezuela-defend-start-dialogue-trump-biden-wins-1544542) ).\nThis question is a longer-term companion of [#1642] (https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1642-will-nicolas-maduro-cease-to-be-president-of-venezuela-before-1-january-2021) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": "400",
    "# Forecasters": "188",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2021, will total fire activity in the Amazon exceed the 2020 total count?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1842-in-2021-will-total-fire-activity-in-the-amazon-exceed-the-2020-total-count",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "70%",
    "Description": "The increasing number of fires in South America, particularly Brazil, has captured international attention ( [Guardian] (https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/oct/01/brazil-amazon-rainforest-worst-fires-in-decade) , [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-53893161) ). The outcome will be determined with data reported by the GFED in its \"Cumulative Monthly Fire Counts\" chart in the “Totals” section, seeing whether the Cumulative Monthly Fire Counts for 2021 exceeds the entire total for 31 December 2020 ( [Global Fire Emissions Database] (http://www.globalfiredata.org/forecast.html) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "204",
    "# Forecasters": "117",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the U.S. consume more energy from renewable sources in May 2021 than it did in May 2019, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1840-will-the-u-s-consume-more-energy-from-renewable-sources-in-may-2021-than-it-did-in-may-2019-according-to-the-u-s-energy-information-administration-eia",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "95%",
    "Description": "A record amount of renewable energy was consumed in 2019, though COVID-19 took its toll on overall energy consumption in the Spring of 2020 ( [EIA 19 October 2020] (https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=45516) , [EIA 30 June 2020] (https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=44276) ). The outcome will be determined using data provided by the EIA for \"Total\" under \"Renewable Energy\" ( [EIA TABLE 1.3 PRIMARY ENERGY CONSUMPTION BY SOURCE] (https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/browser/index.php?tbl=T01.03) ). In May 2019, the U.S. consumed 1.059944 quadrillion Btus of energy from renewable sources.\nNOTE 4 January 2021: The EIA figure for \"Total\" under \"Renewable Energy\" has been slightly revised since the question was launched. To be clear, the outcome will be determined using data as reported for May 2019 and May 2021 when May 2021 data are first reported by the EIA.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "266",
    "# Forecasters": "175",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "On 12 May 2021, will Ethiopia's Tigray region be under a federally-imposed state of emergency?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1841-on-12-may-2021-will-ethiopia-s-tigray-region-be-under-a-federally-imposed-state-of-emergency",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "85%",
    "Description": "On 4 November 2020, Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed declared, and lawmakers approved, a state of emergency in the Tigray region following unrest that included an attack on a military base and controversial regional elections ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/abiy-ahmed-presents-ethiopias-voters-with-an-unhappy-choice) ,  [Al Jazeera] (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/11/4/ethiopia-declares-state-of-emergency-in-opposition-tigray-region) , [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-54805088) , [CNN] (https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/05/africa/ethiopia-abiy-unrest-explainer-intl/index.html) ). The state of emergency can last up to 6 months at which point it expires or the government votes to renew it ( [Ethiopian Constitution] (https://www.servat.unibe.ch/icl/et00000_.html) , see Article 93).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "245",
    "# Forecasters": "159",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Between 13 November 2020 and 12 February 2021, will the closing price per barrel of WTI crude oil be higher than the closing price per barrel of Brent crude oil?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1839-between-13-november-2020-and-12-february-2021-will-the-closing-price-per-barrel-of-wti-crude-oil-be-higher-than-the-closing-price-per-barrel-of-brent-crude-oil",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "0%",
    "Description": "West Texas Intermediate (WTI) is a benchmark price for oil in the U.S., while Brent is a benchmark price for oil from the North Sea ( [Investopedia] (https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/052615/what-difference-between-brent-crude-and-west-texas-intermediate.asp) ). The spread, or difference, between the price of the two is an important metric in energy markets ( [Oil Price] (https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/The-Big-Oil-Price-Gamble-US-Producers-Cut-Back-On-Hedging.html) , [CME Group] (https://www.cmegroup.com/education/whitepapers/worldwide-oil-wti-brent-spread.html) ). The outcome will be determined using futures prices as provided by Bloomberg (WTI: [Bloomberg - WTI] (https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/CL1:COM) , Brent: [Bloomberg - Brent] (https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/CO1:COM) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "261",
    "# Forecasters": "111",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the World Health Organization (WHO) report more than 20 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 for the South-East Asia Region?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1835-when-will-the-world-health-organization-who-report-more-than-20-million-confirmed-cases-of-covid-19-for-the-south-east-asia-region",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The outcome will be determined using data as reported by the World Health Organization ( [WHO COVID-19 Dashboard] (https://covid19.who.int/) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "233",
    "# Forecasters": "86",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the People's Republic of China (PRC) officially declare an air-defense identification zone (ADIZ) over any part of the South China Sea before 1 March 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1832-will-the-people-s-republic-of-china-prc-officially-declare-an-air-defense-identification-zone-adiz-over-any-part-of-the-south-china-sea-before-1-march-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4%",
    "Description": "In recent years, there has been speculation that China would declare an ADIZ over the South China Sea ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/south-east-asian-countries-are-trapped-between-two-superpowers) ,  [National Interest] (https://nationalinterest.org/feature/will-china-set-air-defense-identification-zone-south-china-sea-160896) , [CNN] (https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/13/asia/south-china-sea-ruling-reaction-adiz/) ). An extension of the existing East China Sea ADIZ to cover part of the South China Sea would count. For more information on air defense identification zones and the conflict in the South China Sea, see: [Defense.info] (https://defense.info/global-dynamics/2020/08/will-china-declare-an-air-defense-identification-zone-in-south-china-sea/) , [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/china/2020/06/17/chinas-next-move-in-the-south-china-sea) , [Inquirer.net] (https://globalnation.inquirer.net/188899/china-plan-to-control-south-china-sea-airspace-dangerous-says-lorenzana) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": "366",
    "# Forecasters": "211",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Between 9 November 2020 and 28 February 2021, will a country cease to formally recognize Taiwan?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1831-between-9-november-2020-and-28-february-2021-will-a-country-cease-to-formally-recognize-taiwan",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2%",
    "Description": "In recent decades, many countries have ceased to recognize the Republic of China (ROC), commonly known as Taiwan, in favor of recognition of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). A handful of countries continue to recognize the ROC ( [Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs] (https://www.mofa.gov.tw/en/AlliesIndex.aspx?n=DF6F8F246049F8D6&amp;sms=A76B7230ADF29736) ). Two countries in Oceania, the Solomon Islands and Kiribati, were the countries to most recently cease to recognize the ROC ( [Newsweek] (https://www.newsweek.com/who-recognizes-taiwan-two-change-china-1460559) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "455",
    "# Forecasters": "226",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Russia and the People's Republic of China (PRC) conduct any joint naval exercises before 1 March 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1833-will-russia-and-the-people-s-republic-of-china-prc-conduct-any-joint-naval-exercises-before-1-march-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "95%",
    "Description": "Russia and China have engaged in joint naval exercises in the past, both bilaterally and with other nations ( [Diplomat] (https://thediplomat.com/2019/04/china-russia-kick-off-bilateral-naval-exercise-joint-sea/) , [CNN] (https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/27/asia/china-russia-iran-military-drills-intl-hnk/index.html) ). Both Russia and the PRC conducting joint naval exercises with one or more other navies would also count.\nNOTE 13 November 2020: The joint exercises must include both Russia and China to count.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "382",
    "# Forecasters": "150",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the World Health Organization (WHO) report more than 35 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 for the Europe Region?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1834-when-will-the-world-health-organization-who-report-more-than-35-million-confirmed-cases-of-covid-19-for-the-europe-region",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Europe’s “second wave” of COVID-19 has increased concerns regarding the impact of the disease on the continent ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/briefing/2020/11/07/the-second-wave-of-covid-19-has-sent-much-of-europe-back-into-lockdown) , [Guardian] (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/05/europes-second-wave-anger-in-italy-as-covid-restrictions-bite-across-continent) ). The outcome will be determined using data as reported by the World Health Organization ( [WHO COVID-19 Dashboard] (https://covid19.who.int/) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "376",
    "# Forecasters": "103",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "At close of business on 17 March 2021, will the upper limit of the Federal Reserve's target range for the federal funds rate be lower, the same, or higher than it was at close of business on 27 January 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1824-at-close-of-business-on-17-march-2021-will-the-upper-limit-of-the-federal-reserve-s-target-range-for-the-federal-funds-rate-be-lower-the-same-or-higher-than-it-was-at-close-of-business-on-27-january-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The U.S. federal funds rate is the interest rate charged for overnight lending among financial institutions with accounts at the Federal Reserve and sets the base rate for borrowing costs across the financial system ( [Federal Reserve] (https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomc.htm) ). The target range for the federal funds rate is set by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). Its March meeting is scheduled for 16-17 March 2021.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "140",
    "# Forecasters": "86",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 May 2021, will Mahmoud Abbas cease to be president of the Palestinian Authority?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1825-before-1-may-2021-will-mahmoud-abbas-cease-to-be-president-of-the-palestinian-authority",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2%",
    "Description": "Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas finds himself under increased pressure as Arab states improve ties with Israel and political rivals jockey for position ( [Middle East Monitor] (https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20201027-the-growing-calls-to-replace-the-palestinian-leadership/) , [Times of Israel] (https://www.timesofisrael.com/abbas-slams-israel-sudan-deal-no-one-can-speak-on-behalf-of-palestinians/) , [Foreign Policy] (https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/10/30/mohammed-dahlan-uae-palestinians-israel/) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "174",
    "# Forecasters": "56",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 January 2022, will Amazon announce that it will spin off Amazon Web Services (AWS)?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1822-before-1-january-2022-will-amazon-announce-that-it-will-spin-off-amazon-web-services-aws",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2%",
    "Description": "As Amazon has grown it has received increased scrutiny, and there have been calls for it to spin off its cloud computing platform, Amazon Web Services (AWS) ( [Medium] (https://medium.com/swlh/should-amazon-spin-off-aws-e15d6e307506) , [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/24/former-amazon-senior-engineer-calls-for-aws-spinoff.html) , [Vox] (https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/10/6/21505027/congress-big-tech-antitrust-report-facebook-google-amazon-apple-mark-zuckerberg-jeff-bezos-tim-cook) , [Investopedia] (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/spinoff.asp) ). The date when the spinoff would take effect is immaterial to the resolution of this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "260",
    "# Forecasters": "144",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Apple's iPhone net sales be higher in FY 2021 than FY 2019?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1823-will-apple-s-iphone-net-sales-be-higher-in-fy-2021-than-fy-2019",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "95%",
    "Description": "Apple's iPhone net sales have fluctuated over the years, and as of October 2020 Apple has begun to sell the new iPhone 12 and its variants ( [Apple] (https://www.apple.com/iphone/) ). Industry analysts speculate whether 5G capability will bolster declining iPhone sales or if the pandemic's global impact on supply chains and expendable income will hinder iPhone sales ( [9 to 5 Mac] (https://9to5mac.com/2019/11/25/iphone-12-5g-demand/) , [ABS-CBN] (https://news.abs-cbn.com/business/10/14/20/in-china-apples-5g-iphone-12-sparks-fever-pitch-but-divided-reaction) ). Apple Inc.'s Fiscal Year (FY) annual report for 2021 is expected by early November 2021 at https://investor.apple.com/investor-relations/default.aspx under the \"Annual Reports on Form 10-K\" section. For FY 2020, Apple reported net iPhone sales of $137.781 billion, compared to $142.381 billion in FY 2019 ( [Apple 10-K (2020)] (https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0000320193/7b5717ca-6222-48e6-801c-9ea28feeef86.pdf) , see page 21).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "238",
    "# Forecasters": "102",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many countries will have 100,000 or more deaths attributed to COVID-19 as of 30 April 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1819-how-many-countries-will-have-100-000-or-more-deaths-attributed-to-covid-19-as-of-30-april-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of 23 October 2020, 3 countries have more than one hundred thousand deaths from COVID-19: the U.S., Brazil, and India ( [France24] (https://www.france24.com/en/20201003-india-s-covid-19-death-toll-tops-100-000-behind-us-and-brazil) ). The outcome of this question will be determined using data reported by the World Health Organization at approximately 5:00PM ET on 30 April 2021 ( [WHO COVID-19 Dashboard] (https://covid19.who.int/) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "1044",
    "# Forecasters": "181",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Prayut Chan-o-cha cease to be the prime minister of Thailand before 23 April 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1820-will-prayut-chan-o-cha-cease-to-be-the-prime-minister-of-thailand-before-23-april-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha faces an array of challenges, including calls for him to resign and protests in the streets of Bangkok against the actions of the monarchy ( [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-54573349) , [Deutsche Welle] (https://www.dw.com/en/thailand-pm-refuses-to-step-down-as-protesters-defy-police/a-55301495) , [CNN] (https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/19/asia/thailand-weekend-protests-monarchy-intl-hnk/index.html) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "242",
    "# Forecasters": "60",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 September 2021, will Egypt, Ethiopia, and Sudan sign an agreement governing the filling of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) reservoir?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1815-before-1-september-2021-will-egypt-ethiopia-and-sudan-sign-an-agreement-governing-the-filling-of-the-grand-ethiopian-renaissance-dam-gerd-reservoir",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "4%",
    "Description": "Tensions between Egypt, Ethiopia, and Sudan have escalated over Ethiopia's filling of the GERD, designed to become the largest hydroelectric plant in Africa and provide electricity to millions of people ( [Al-Monitor] (https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/10/egypt-ethiopia-sudan-talks-stalled-nile-dam.html) , [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-53432948) , [Foreign Policy] (https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/09/28/renaissance-dam-ethiopia-egypt-negotiations/) ). The filling of the reservoir has stoked diplomatic backlash from Egypt and Sudan due to the potential impacts on water flows, including a referral of the matter to the UN Security Council ( [Egypt Today] (https://www.egypttoday.com/Article/1/88770/Egypt-refers-GERD-issue-to-UN-Security-Council) , [UN] (https://www.un.org/press/en/2020/sc14232.doc.htm) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "171",
    "# Forecasters": "60",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Between 16 October 2020 and 31 December 2021, how many successful flight tests of the Common Hypersonic Glide Body (C-HGB) will the United States conduct?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1818-between-16-october-2020-and-31-december-2021-how-many-successful-flight-tests-of-the-common-hypersonic-glide-body-c-hgb-will-the-united-states-conduct",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The U.S., China, Russia, and other countries are working to develop hypersonic weapons ( [Federation of American Scientists] (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/R45811.pdf) , [ScienceMag.org] (https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/national-pride-stake-russia-china-united-states-race-build-hypersonic-weapons) , [NY Times] (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/19/magazine/hypersonic-missiles.html) ). The U.S. Army and Navy collaborated on and successfully tested the C-HGB in March 2020 and are looking to conduct further flight tests in 2021 ( [Defense News] (https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/smd/2020/08/05/heres-how-the-dod-plans-to-meet-its-ambitious-hypersonic-missile-test-schedule/) ). A flight test will be considered “successful” if the U.S. military announces that the C-HGB reaches its designated impact point ( [Defense News] (https://www.defensenews.com/smr/army-modernization/2020/03/20/pentagons-major-hypersonic-glide-body-flight-test-deemed-success/) ).\nNOTE 29 October 2020: The simultaneous successful testing of two C-HGBs would count as two tests.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "132",
    "# Forecasters": "40",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Boom Technology's XB-1 supersonic aircraft complete a successful test flight before 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1816-will-boom-technology-s-xb-1-supersonic-aircraft-complete-a-successful-test-flight-before-2022",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "98%",
    "Description": "Boom Technology recently unveiled the XB-1, a one-third scale prototype of its future Overture supersonic airliner, and plans to test fly it for the first time in 2021 ( [Boom Supersonic] (https://boom-press-assets.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/Boom-Supersonic-XB1-Rollout-Press-Release.pdf) , [BoomSupersonic.com] (https://boomsupersonic.com) , [Flight Global] (https://www.flightglobal.com/airframers/boom-rolls-out-xb-1-supersonic-demonstrator-lays-out-overture-timeline/140513.article) ). For the purposes of this question, a test flight would be deemed successful if the aircraft takes off and lands. \n",
    "# Forecasts": "122",
    "# Forecasters": "53",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Canada next permit discretionary travel for foreign nationals arriving from the United States?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1817-when-will-canada-next-permit-discretionary-travel-for-foreign-nationals-arriving-from-the-united-states",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Travel from the U.S. to Canada for discretionary reasons (non-essential), such as for tourism, recreation or entertainment, is currently prohibited due to COVID-19 ( [Government of Canada] (https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/services/covid/non-canadians-canadiens-eng.html) , [U.S. Embassy - Canada] (https://ca.usembassy.gov/travel-restrictions-fact-sheet/) , [Bloomberg] (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-10-08/canada-will-pitch-safe-tourism-to-travelers-once-borders-open) ). Permitting discretionary travel for one or more points of entry from the U.S. to Canada would count.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "416",
    "# Forecasters": "141",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "For any seven consecutive day period between 9 October 2020 and 15 June 2021, will there be fewer than 50,000 combined total confirmed new cases of COVID-19 in the United States?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1806-for-any-seven-consecutive-day-period-between-9-october-2020-and-15-june-2021-will-there-be-fewer-than-50-000-combined-total-confirmed-new-cases-of-covid-19-in-the-united-states",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "The outcome of this question will be determined using data for the United States reported by the World Health Organization between 9 October 2020 and 30 June 2021 ( [WHO COVID-19 Dashboard] (https://covid19.who.int/region/amro/country/us) ). For the seven consecutive day period from 22 September 2020 and 28 September 2020 (using daily numbers), WHO reported 305,412 combined total confirmed new cases. Total confirmed new cases data for days prior to 9 October 2020 are immaterial to the resolution of this question. The data provided on the WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard at approximately 5:00PM ET each day will now be used to resolve this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "551",
    "# Forecasters": "150",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the delinquency rate on commercial real estate loans (excluding farmland) in the United States in the second quarter of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1798-what-will-be-the-delinquency-rate-on-commercial-real-estate-loans-excluding-farmland-in-the-united-states-in-the-second-quarter-of-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic continues to grow, there are fears that the commercial real estate market will get hit particularly hard ( [LMTonline] (https://www.lmtonline.com/business/article/Wave-of-foreclosures-seen-hitting-commercial-real-15573246.php) , [Real Estate Weekly] (https://rew-online.com/wave-of-distressed-sales-on-horizon-as-loan-delinquency-jumps/) , [Commercial Property Executive] (https://www.cpexecutive.com/post/commercial-multifamily-mortgage-delinquency-rates-affected-by-the-pandemic/) ). The question will be suspended on 30 June 2021 and the outcome determined using data provided by the Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) database, sometime in the third quarter 2021 ( [FRED] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DRCRELEXFACBS) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "222",
    "# Forecasters": "64",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the annual rate of housing starts for April 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1799-what-will-be-the-annual-rate-of-housing-starts-for-april-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The future rate of housing starts, a measure of new home building in the US, will likely be impacted by the economic fallout from the coronavirus pandemic, fires in the western United States straining the lumber industry, and record-low mortgage rates ( [Morningstar] (https://www.morningstar.com/news/dow-jones/202009175758/us-housing-starts-slip-in-august) , [KATU] (https://katu.com/news/following-the-money/timber-industry-hit-hard-by-fires-will-have-generational-impact) ). The question will be suspended on 30 April 2021 and the outcome determined using data provided by the Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) database for April 2021, typically in May ( [FRED] (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/HOUST) ). For April 2020, housing starts totaled 0.934 million.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "351",
    "# Forecasters": "90",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will Lebanon's parliament give a vote of confidence to a new government?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1801-when-will-lebanon-s-parliament-give-a-vote-of-confidence-to-a-new-government",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Mustapha Adib, who was chosen to form a government after the previous one had been toppled following a massive explosion in Beirut in early August 2020, resigned on 26 September 2020, citing tensions among the various political groups in the country ( [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-54307896) , [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2018/12/21/why-lebanon-struggles-to-form-governments) , [France24] (https://www.france24.com/en/20200927-live-france-s-macron-speaks-about-lebanon-s-crisis-after-pm-designate-quits) , [AP] (https://apnews.com/article/virus-outbreak-beirut-emmanuel-macron-lebanon-financial-markets-257abf1fd90d95ef27f8344204be30e3) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "358",
    "# Forecasters": "63",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 March 2021, will there be a lethal confrontation at sea between the forces of India and the People's Republic of China?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1795-before-1-march-2021-will-there-be-a-lethal-confrontation-at-sea-between-the-forces-of-india-and-the-people-s-republic-of-china",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "0%",
    "Description": "A violent clash in mid-June 2020 between soldiers along a disputed stretch of border between India and China left at least 20 dead, sparking concerns over continued escalation of tensions between the two neighbors ( [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-53061476) , [Washington Post] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/why-chinese-and-indian-troops-are-clashing-again/2020/09/02/0c1f5f90-ed01-11ea-bd08-1b10132b458f_story.html) , [Fox News] (https://www.foxnews.com/world/china-india-shots-fired-border-dispute) , [Wall Street Journal] (https://www.wsj.com/articles/india-seeks-naval-edge-as-china-penetrates-indian-ocean-11600945203) ). A lethal confrontation is one that results in one or more fatalities of the forces-the national military forces, militia, and/or law enforcement officials-of either side. For the purposes of this question, \"at sea\" means any territorial or international waters and the airspace above them.\nNOTE 29 September 2020: Pangong Tso/Pangong Lake would not be considered to be \"at sea.\"\n",
    "# Forecasts": "380",
    "# Forecasters": "186",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In Fulton v. City of Philadelphia (City), will the Supreme Court rule that the City's requirement that Catholic Social Services (CSS) not discriminate against same-sex couples as a condition for working with the City's foster children is unconstitutional?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1796-in-fulton-v-city-of-philadelphia-city-will-the-supreme-court-rule-that-the-city-s-requirement-that-catholic-social-services-css-not-discriminate-against-same-sex-couples-as-a-condition-for-working-with-the-city-s-foster-children-is-unconstitutional",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "97%",
    "Description": "In March 2018, the City barred Catholic Social Services (CSS) from placing children in foster homes because of the CSS policy of not licensing same-sex couples to be foster parents ( [Oyez] (https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/19-123) ). CSS sued, arguing for its right to free exercise of religion and free speech ( [Ballotpedia] (https://ballotpedia.org/Fulton_v._City_of_Philadelphia,_Pennsylvania) ). The district court and Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled for the City ( [Third Circuit Court of Appeals] (http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/182574p.pdf) , [SCOTUSblog] (https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/fulton-v-city-of-philadelphia-pennsylvania/) ). The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its 2020 term, but if it does not, the question will close as no. If the Court decides this case without addressing this question's particular issue of law, the question will close as \"No.\"\n",
    "# Forecasts": "195",
    "# Forecasters": "64",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Recep Tayyip Erdoğan cease to be president of Turkey before 15 July 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1792-will-recep-tayyip-erdogan-cease-to-be-president-of-turkey-before-15-july-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2%",
    "Description": "Erdoğan is embroiled in several controversies in the region, including active engagement in the Libyan civil war, oil &amp; gas exploration in the eastern Mediterranean, and Turkey's acquisition of Russian S-400 missile systems despite warnings from the U.S. and NATO ( [Al Jazeera] (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/07/turkey-illegitimate-haftar-withdraw-key-libya-areas-200722160827376.html) , [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53906360) , [Defense News] (https://www.defensenews.com/breaking-news/2020/08/12/congress-has-secretly-blocked-us-arms-sales-to-turkey-for-nearly-two-years/) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "352",
    "# Forecasters": "153",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which country will the 2020-21 UEFA Champions League final winner be from?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1790-which-country-will-the-2020-21-uefa-champions-league-final-winner-be-from",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The 2020-21 UEFA Champions League final is scheduled to be played at Atatürk Olympic Stadium in Istanbul, Turkey on 29 May 2021 ( [UEFA] (https://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/news/025e-0fac7ce8f2d4-6d86444e8807-1000--2020-21-all-you-need-to-know/) , [UEFA (Clubs)] (https://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/clubs/) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "240",
    "# Forecasters": "106",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will 25,000 or more fans next attend a Premier League match?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1788-when-will-25-000-or-more-fans-next-attend-a-premier-league-match",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Fans in the UK have been restricted from sporting events due to the coronavirus, and there is uncertainty about when they can return in large numbers ( [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/sport/54094363) , [Sky Sports] (https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11661/12069059/coronavirus-premier-league-concerned-by-delays-to-fans-return) , [Goal] (https://www.goal.com/en-us/news/will-there-be-fans-at-premier-league-matches-in-2020-21-when/1sz2evfoff4101efeqoy9hmppq) , [Premier League] (https://www.premierleague.com/fixtures) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "562",
    "# Forecasters": "193",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 18 September 2021, will Boris Johnson cease to be prime minister of the United Kingdom?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1789-before-18-september-2021-will-boris-johnson-cease-to-be-prime-minister-of-the-united-kingdom",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "",
    "Description": "Prime Minister Boris Johnson's premiership began in July 2019 after Theresa May stepped down ( [Britannica] (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-Johnson) ). He continues to lead the UK through final Brexit negotiations with the EU ( [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-world-ahead/2020/11/17/brexit-and-covid-19-show-up-the-disunited-kingdom) ,  [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-54156419) , [Independent] (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/keir-starmer-coronavirus-self-isolating-labour-covid-19-symptoms-b435681.html) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "952",
    "# Forecasters": "428",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a complex coordinated terrorist attack (CCTA) in the United States either directed or inspired by a foreign terrorist organization before 1 September 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1780-will-there-be-a-complex-coordinated-terrorist-attack-ccta-in-the-united-states-either-directed-or-inspired-by-a-foreign-terrorist-organization-before-1-september-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "CCTAs are a major concern for law enforcement and emergency planners ( [FEMA] (https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1532550673102-c4846f270150682decbda99b37524ca6/Planning_Considerations-Complex_Coordinated_Terrorist_Attacks.pdf) ). For the purposes of this question, a CCTA is an [1] act of terrorism [2] involving multiple perpetrators working in concert [3] initiated with little or no warning [4] and employing one or more weapon systems (e.g., firearms, explosives, fire as a weapon, poison gas) [5] that is intended to result in large numbers of casualties. For the purposes of this question, \"terrorism\" is as defined by federal law in 18 U.S.C. § 2331(5) ( [Cornell] (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2331) ). A foreign terrorist organization (FTO) is an organization designated as an FTO by the US Department of State ( [State.gov] (https://www.state.gov/foreign-terrorist-organizations/) ). Examples of CCTAs include the 2004 Madrid train bombings, the 2008 Mumbai attacks, 2013 Boston Marathon bombings, and the 2015 San Bernardino, CA, office attack.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "343",
    "# Forecasters": "158",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will any 2020 California election results be altered by a cyberattack against a voting system?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1782-will-any-2020-california-election-results-be-altered-by-a-cyberattack-against-a-voting-system",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "0%",
    "Description": "Cyberattacks against voting systems in the 2020 elections are an object of continuing concern, including in California ( [Washington Post] (https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/russian-hackers-who-disrupted-2016-election-targeting-political-parties-again-microsoft-says/2020/09/10/301dd5fe-f36c-11ea-bc45-e5d48ab44b9f_story.html) , [CBS SF BayArea] (https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2020/09/08/san-mateo-co-voter-registrar-working-with-state-feds-to-repel-hackers-foreign-cyberattacks/) , [California AB 2125] (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180AB2125) , [National Conference of State Legislatures] (https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/post-election-audits635926066.aspx) ). A relevant cyberattack against a federal, state, or local election system that changes vote totals and/or an election outcome for California would count. For purposes of this question, \"voting system\" is a system as defined by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission ( [U.S. Election Assistance Commission] (https://www.eac.gov/voting-system) ). This question will resolve based on available evidence no later than 1 May 2021.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "292",
    "# Forecasters": "145",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a complex coordinated terrorist attack (CCTA) in the United States before 1 September 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1781-will-there-be-a-complex-coordinated-terrorist-attack-ccta-in-the-united-states-before-1-september-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "",
    "Description": "CCTAs are a major concern for law enforcement and emergency planners ( [FEMA] (https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1532550673102-c4846f270150682decbda99b37524ca6/Planning_Considerations-Complex_Coordinated_Terrorist_Attacks.pdf) ). For the purposes of this question, a CCTA is an [1] act of terrorism [2] involving multiple perpetrators working in concert [3] initiated with little or no warning [4] and employing one or more weapon systems (e.g., firearms, explosives, fire as a weapon, poison gas) [5] that is intended to result in large numbers of casualties. For the purposes of this question, \"terrorism\" is as defined by federal law in 18 U.S.C. § 2331(5) ( [Cornell] (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2331) ). Examples of CCTAs include the 2004 Madrid train bombings, the 2008 Mumbai attacks, 2013 Boston Marathon bombings, and the 2015 San Bernardino, CA, office attack.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "576",
    "# Forecasters": "152",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) next screen two million or more travelers in a single day?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1776-when-will-the-transportation-security-administration-tsa-next-screen-two-million-or-more-travelers-in-a-single-day",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Commercial air travel in the U.S. is increasing, but still remains much lower than before the COVID-19 pandemic ( [CNN] (https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/tsa-checkpoint-numbers-new-pandemic-high/index.html) ). The outcome will be determined using Total Traveler Throughput data reported by the TSA ( [TSA] (https://www.tsa.gov/coronavirus/passenger-throughput) ). The TSA last screened two million or more travelers in a single day on 8 March 2020.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "695",
    "# Forecasters": "160",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In Google v. Oracle America, will the Supreme Court rule that the Copyright Act protects the Oracle computer source code that Google copied for its Android operating system?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1775-in-google-v-oracle-america-will-the-supreme-court-rule-that-the-copyright-act-protects-the-oracle-computer-source-code-that-google-copied-for-its-android-operating-system",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "92%",
    "Description": "To implement its Android operating system, “Google copied 11,500 lines of Oracle’s original, human-readable computer source code, as well as the intricate structure and organization of 37 large packages of computer programs” ( [Supremecourt.gov] (https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-956/93436/20190327160337558_190311%20for%20E-Filing.pdf) ). Oracle sued Google for copyright infringement and the issue has reached the Supreme Court ( [Oyez] (https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/18-956) , [SCOTUSblog] (https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/google-llc-v-oracle-america-inc/) , [Lexology] (https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ecf5cd6d-2b66-4240-b5d9-efab3c581830) , [ZDNet] (https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-vs-oracle-the-next-chapter/) ). Whether the Supreme Court rules on Google’s copying of Oracle’s code being fair use or not is immaterial to the resolution of this question. The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its 2020 term, but if it does not, the question will resolve as \"No.\" If the Court decides this case without addressing this question's particular issue of law, the question will close as \"No.\"\n",
    "# Forecasts": "187",
    "# Forecasters": "75",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In California v. Texas, will the Supreme Court rule that reducing the penalty amount for the individual mandate of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to zero rendered the individual mandate provision unconstitutional?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1774-in-california-v-texas-will-the-supreme-court-rule-that-reducing-the-penalty-amount-for-the-individual-mandate-of-the-affordable-care-act-aca-to-zero-rendered-the-individual-mandate-provision-unconstitutional",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "0%",
    "Description": "After the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the ACA in NFIB v. Sibelius, Congress subsequently reduced the penalty for failing to acquire health insurance to $0 ( [Kaiser Family Foundation] (https://www.kff.org/health-reform/issue-brief/explaining-texas-v-u-s-a-guide-to-the-case-challenging-the-aca/) , [Law.cornell.edu] (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/5000A) (see §(3)(A)), [The Hill] (https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/365785-congress-repeals-obamacare-mandate-fulfilling-longtime-gop-goal) ). Texas sued to have the ACA declared unconstitutional and prevailed in both District Court and the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ( [Politico] (https://static.politico.com/17/86/6721f2eb435fb2512430e54c2904/220.pdf) , [Casetext] (https://casetext.com/case/texas-v-united-states-31) ). The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its decision in its 2020 term, but if it does not, the question will close as no. If the Court decides this case without addressing this question's particular issue of law, the question will close as \"No.\"\n",
    "# Forecasts": "304",
    "# Forecasters": "75",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 January 2022, will the United States Olympic Committee announce that it is boycotting the 2022 Winter Olympics?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1764-before-1-january-2022-will-the-united-states-olympic-committee-announce-that-it-is-boycotting-the-2022-winter-olympics",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5%",
    "Description": "Countries have boycotted the Olympics for various reasons throughout history ( [Montreal Gazette] (https://montrealgazette.com/sports/montreal-olympics-african-boycott-of-1976-games-changed-the-world) , [Dept. of State] (https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/qfp/104481.htm) , [History.com] (https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/soviets-announce-boycott-of-1984-olympics) ). Some groups are calling on nations to boycott the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics due to China's treatment of its Uighur population ( [Daily Sabah] (https://www.dailysabah.com/world/asia-pacific/rights-group-criticizes-ioc-over-uighurs-issue-in-china) , [Politico] (https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/25/trump-administration-china-genocide-uighurs-401581) , [Olympic.org] (https://www.olympic.org/beijing-2022) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "510",
    "# Forecasters": "173",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Arab League member states other than Palestine will diplomatically recognize the State of Israel as of 28 August 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1763-how-many-arab-league-member-states-other-than-palestine-will-diplomatically-recognize-the-state-of-israel-as-of-28-august-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The Arab League consists of 22 member states ( [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-15747941) , [CNN] (https://www.cnn.com/2013/07/30/world/meast/arab-league-fast-facts/index.html) , [Arab League] (http://www.lasportal.org/Pages/Welcome.aspx) ). As of 28 August 2020, three members other than Palestine--Egypt, Jordan, and recently the United Arab Emirates--diplomatically recognize Israel, though others could follow ( [France24] (https://www.france24.com/en/20200824-after-uae-israel-deal-which-arab-nation-will-next-forge-ties) , [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2020/08/22/the-arab-countries-most-likely-to-recognise-israel) , [Whitehouse.gov] (https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/joint-statement-united-states-state-israel-united-arab-emirates/) ). A suspended Arab League member diplomatically recognizing Israel would count ( [Guardian] (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/12/syria-suspended-arab-league) ).\nNOTE 2 September 2020: The question is framed \"as of,\" so Egypt, Jordan, and the UAE would count toward resolution so long as they diplomatically recognize Israel as of 28 August 2021.\nNOTE 14 December 2020: As of the date of this clarification (14 December 2020), for the purposes of this question, the October announcement on the normalization of relations between Sudan and Israel constitutes Sudan diplomatically recognizing the State of Israel.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "447",
    "# Forecasters": "93",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the EU amend its Own Resources Decision to help finance the EU's proposed COVID-19 recovery package?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1762-when-will-the-eu-amend-its-own-resources-decision-to-help-finance-the-eu-s-proposed-covid-19-recovery-package",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As part of the COVID-19 recovery plan called the \"Next Generation EU\" (NGEU), an amendment of the Own Resources Decision has been proposed ( [European Council] (https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/45109/210720-euco-final-conclusions-en.pdf) , [European Parliament] (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-new-boost-for-jobs-growth-and-investment/file-mff-post-2020-own-resources) , [European Commission] (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_20_935) ). An amendment of the Own Resources Decision requires approval by all Member States in accordance with their constitutional requirements ( [Ernst &amp; Young] (https://taxnews.ey.com/news/2020-1869-european-council-adopts-conclusions-on-recovery-plan-and-eu-budget-for-2021-2027-including-agreement-on-introduction-of-new-taxes) , [European Commission] (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/QANDA_20_1024) ). The question would resolve upon the last Member State approving the amendment. When the amended Own Resources Decision would take effect is immaterial.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "196",
    "# Forecasters": "49",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many Cybertrucks will Tesla deliver to customers in 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1760-how-many-cybertrucks-will-tesla-deliver-to-customers-in-2022",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Tesla recently announced it will manufacture the Cybertruck at its new factory location in Austin, TX ( [Digital Trends] (https://www.digitaltrends.com/cars/tesla-cybertruck-price-interior-release-date-specs-news/) , [The Verge] (https://www.theverge.com/2020/7/22/21334860/tesla-cybertruck-factory-austin-texas-location-model-y) , [Teslarati] (https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-cybertruck-gigafactory-austin-texas-video/) , [Inverse] (https://www.inverse.com/innovation/61141-tesla-cybertruck-pics-price) ). The outcome will be determined using Tesla's official quarterly updates once available, typically found here: https://ir.tesla.com/financial-information/quarterly-results.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "320",
    "# Forecasters": "107",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 January 2023, will Amazon or a subsidiary use a Zoox autonomous vehicle to deliver a package and/or for a public ride-hailing service?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1745-before-1-january-2023-will-amazon-or-a-subsidiary-use-a-zoox-autonomous-vehicle-to-deliver-a-package-and-or-for-a-public-ride-hailing-service",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "In late June 2020, Amazon acquired self-driving technology company Zoox for approximately $1.3 billion ( [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/26/amazon-spending-1-billion-on-zoox-will-have-to-invest-billions-more.html) , [Forbes] (https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradtempleton/2020/07/16/amazon-zoox-deal-details-leak-and-hint-at-expensive-acquihire/#50676c1d4ec2) ). While Amazon has framed the acquisition as a move into ride-hailing, there is speculation that the move could lead to greater automation of package deliveries ( [Amazon] (https://blog.aboutamazon.com/company-news/were-acquiring-zoox-to-help-bring-their-vision-of-autonomous-ride-hailing-to-reality) , [India Times] (https://www.indiatimes.com/auto/alternative/amazon-zoox-robo-delivery-518186.html) , [Forbes] (https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidsilver/2020/07/03/autonomous-delivery-will-reduce-the-cost-of-residential-package-delivery/#77928f2f4844) ). An autonomous vehicle with a backup driver would count for resolution. A public ride-hailing service does not need to involve payment to count for resolution.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "236",
    "# Forecasters": "99",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 14 February 2021, will former King Juan Carlos I and/or former Catalan President Carles Puigdemont return to Spain?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1740-before-14-february-2021-will-former-king-juan-carlos-i-and-or-former-catalan-president-carles-puigdemont-return-to-spain",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Former King Juan Carlos I of Spain has reportedly left Spain in light of recent controversies, while former Catalan President Carles Puigdemont has continued living abroad in exile following the 2017 independence referendum that the Spanish government declared to be illegal ( [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53710555) , [CatalanNews] (https://www.catalannews.com/politics/item/carles-puigdemont-elected-jxcat-president-with-99-3-of-votes) , [AP] (https://apnews.com/4f40dee005924aab99670da40122309e) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "246",
    "# Forecasters": "105",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 January 2023, how many major automakers will debut a passenger vehicle powered by a solid-state battery?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1744-before-1-january-2023-how-many-major-automakers-will-debut-a-passenger-vehicle-powered-by-a-solid-state-battery",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Recent advances in battery technology, particularly solid-state batteries, could give rise to a new generation of electric vehicles ( [Car and Driver] (https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a31409442/samsung-solid-state-battery-revealed/) , [Electrek] (https://electrek.co/2020/04/23/work-on-goodenoughs-breakthrough-solid-state-ev-battery-moves-forward/)) . Some companies have announced plans to debut such vehicles, even if not necessarily for mass production yet ( [Road/Show] (https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/toyota-solid-state-battery-electric-olympics/) , [Digital Trends] (https://www.digitaltrends.com/cars/toyota-may-introduce-solid-state-batteries-for-electric-cars-by-2020/) ). For examples of vehicle debuts, see: [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/06/gms-push-to-compete-with-tesla-begins-with-cadillac-lyriq-crossover-debut-thursday.html) , [Axios] (https://www.axios.com/tesla-debuts-first-electric-pickup-truck-cee48fef-fccc-4390-bdc5-1dfede8a8a3e.html) . For the purposes of this question, \"major automakers\" refers to any of the 50 motor vehicle manufacturers included by the International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers in its 2017 list ( [OICA] (http://www.oica.net/wp-content/uploads/World-Ranking-of-Manufacturers-1.pdf) ). A vehicle would not need to be solely powered by solid-state batteries to count.\nNOTE 20 August 2020: For purposes of this question, for a vehicle to be considered \"powered\" by a solid-state battery it must be propelled, at least in part, by the use of a solid-state battery\nNOTE 2 October 2020:  For purposes of this question, a \"passenger vehicle\" is a motor vehicle with at least four wheels, used for the transport of passengers, and comprising no more than eight seats in addition to the driver's seat (http://www.oica.net/wp-content/uploads/stats-definition1.pdf). \n",
    "# Forecasts": "245",
    "# Forecasters": "74",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will SpaceX's satellite internet service, Starlink, begin offering commercial service in North America?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1741-when-will-spacex-s-satellite-internet-service-starlink-begin-offering-commercial-service-in-north-america",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "As of early August 2020, SpaceX had launched nearly 600 of Starlink's expected 12,000 satellites and begun beta testing Starlink's internet service with users across the United States ( [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/10/spacex-starlink-satellte-production-now-120-per-month.html) , [TechCrunch] (https://techcrunch.com/2020/07/15/leak-reveals-details-of-spacexs-starlink-internet-service-beta-program/) , [Starlink] (https://www.starlink.com/) ). For the purposes of this question, commercial service must be non-beta.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "490",
    "# Forecasters": "99",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Between August 2020 and July 2021, will global land and ocean surface temperatures rise 1.5°C or more above the 20th century average for any single month?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1715-between-august-2020-and-july-2021-will-global-land-and-ocean-surface-temperatures-rise-1-5-c-or-more-above-the-20th-century-average-for-any-single-month",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2%",
    "Description": "Some expect the 1.5°C temperature threshold to be breached within the next five years, and recent predictions indicate any climate warming reprieve due to the global shutdown in the wake of COVID-19 may be temporary ( [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-53342806) , [World Meteorological Organization] (https://public.wmo.int/en/our-mandate/climate/wmo-statement-state-of-global-climate) , [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-45678338) ). The outcome will be determined using data provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Global Climate Reports ( [NOAA] (https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/) ). For June 2020, the global land and ocean surface temperature was 0.92°C above the 20th century average for June ( [NOAA - June 2020 Report] (https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/202006) ).\nConfused? Check our  [FAQ] (https://www.gjopen.com/faq#question)  or  [ask us for help] (/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dab9b6bba8b3bcb3b9bbaeb3b5b4a99abdb5b5beb0afbebdb7bfb4aef4b9b5b7e5a9afb8b0bfb9aee78bafbfa9aeb3b5b4ffe8ea99b6bba8b3bcb3b9bbaeb3b5b4) . To learn more about Good Judgment and Superforecasting,  [click here] (https://goodjudgment.com/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": "262",
    "# Forecasters": "130",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 January 2022, will the U.S. Senate expand the scope of matters for which a filibuster cannot be used?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1718-before-1-january-2022-will-the-u-s-senate-expand-the-scope-of-matters-for-which-a-filibuster-cannot-be-used",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "10%",
    "Description": "In April 2017, Senate Republicans eliminated the filibuster for the confirmation of Supreme Court Justices by changing the rules so that debate on nominees could be ended with a simple majority vote rather than a three-fifths majority ( [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-gorsuch-idUSKBN17814Y) ). Whether the filibuster will be further eroded remains to be seen ( [The Atlantic] (https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/07/why-senate-filibuster-could-be-gone-2021/614278/) , [Brookings Institute] (https://www.brookings.edu/policy2020/votervital/what-is-the-senate-filibuster-and-what-would-it-take-to-eliminate-it/) ).\nConfused? Check our  [FAQ] (https://www.gjopen.com/faq#question)  or  [ask us for help] (/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#42212e23302b242b2123362b2d2c3102252d2d26283726252f272c366c212d2f7d313720282721367f13372731362b2d2c677072012e23302b242b2123362b2d2c) . To learn more about Good Judgment and Superforecasting,  [click here] (https://goodjudgment.com/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": "546",
    "# Forecasters": "134",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022, will a firm or paid backup driver operating a self-driving vehicle face criminal charges in relation to an accident involving a self-driving vehicle in the U.S.?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1696-between-1-january-2021-and-31-december-2022-will-a-firm-or-paid-backup-driver-operating-a-self-driving-vehicle-face-criminal-charges-in-relation-to-an-accident-involving-a-self-driving-vehicle-in-the-u-s",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Legal liability for accidents involving self-driving vehicles and features allowing autonomous driving continue to evolve ( [Ars Technica] (https://arstechnica.com/cars/2020/06/tesla-driver-blames-autopilot-for-crash-into-police-car/) ,  [ABC News] (https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/us-agency-eyes-fatal-crash-involving-driving-car-66374234) ,  [NY Times] (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/05/technology/uber-self-driving-car-arizona.html) ,  [Centre for International Governance Innovation] (https://www.cigionline.org/articles/who-responsible-when-autonomous-systems-fail) ). The charges for a firm or backup driver are not required to be related to the same accident for resolving this question.\nThis question is the longer-term companion of question  [#1695] (https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1695-between-10-july-and-31-december-2020-will-a-firm-or-paid-backup-driver-operating-a-self-driving-vehicle-face-criminal-charges-in-relation-to-an-accident-involving-a-self-driving-vehicle-in-the-u-s) . The questions are substantively the same, save for the relevant time period. While they are companions, they are independent questions and the resolution of one will not necessarily impact the other.\nNOTE 13 November 2020: For the purposes of this question, to \"face criminal charges\" is to be criminally charged, irrespective of any future scheduled trial. Charges filed in 2020 or earlier against a person or firm who/that continues to be criminally charged in 2021 or beyond would not count toward the resolution of this question (2021-2022) unless they/it were criminally charged in relation to a different criminal offense.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "212",
    "# Forecasters": "89",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many new energy vehicles (NEVs) will be sold in China in 2021 and 2022 combined?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1698-how-many-new-energy-vehicles-nevs-will-be-sold-in-china-in-2021-and-2022-combined",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Chinese government announced in March 2020 that it would extend subsidies on NEVs through 2022, though at lower levels than in the past ( [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-autos-electric-subsidies/china-to-cut-new-energy-vehicle-subsidies-by-10-this-year-idUSKCN225177) ,  [Shine.cn] (https://www.shine.cn/biz/auto/2006089801/) ,  [CNBC] (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/04/electric-cars-take-the-spotlight-in-chinas-post-coronavirus-stimulus-plans.html) ,  [Inside EVs] (https://insideevs.com/news/428471/china-market-sales-may-2020-nev/) ). In 2019, NEV sales were 1.206 million ( [Caam.org] (http://www.caam.org.cn/chn/4/cate_154/con_5228367.html)  [in Chinese]). The outcome will be determined using data from the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) for 2020 (e.g.,  [Caam.org.cn - Automotive Statistics] (http://www.caam.org.cn/chn/21/cate_463/list_1.html) ,  [Caam.org.cn] (http://www.caam.org.cn/)  [in Chinese],  [Caam.org.cn] (http://www.caam.org.cn/english)  [in English],  [China Daily] (https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202001/14/WS5e1cfea2a310128217270a2c.html) ).\nThis question is the longer-term companion of question  [#1697] (https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1697-how-many-new-energy-vehicles-nevs-will-be-sold-in-china-in-2020) . The questions are substantively the same, save for the relevant time period. While they are companions, they are independent questions and the resolution of one will not necessarily impact the other.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "201",
    "# Forecasters": "54",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many public DC fast charge electric vehicle charging stations will be available in the United States by 31 December 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1678-how-many-public-dc-fast-charge-electric-vehicle-charging-stations-will-be-available-in-the-united-states-by-31-december-2022",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) is subject to a \"chicken and egg\" problem such that potential consumers are waiting for an extensive charging network and businesses are awaiting more electric cars on the roads to justify building more charging stations. This problem is especially relevant for DC fast charge stations that can fully charge the EV in less than 30 minutes ( [MY EV] (https://www.myev.com/research/buyers-sellers-advice/heres-what-you-need-to-know-about-dc-fast-charging) ). The outcome will be determined using data from the U.S. Department of Energy's Alternative Fuels Data Center on 31 December 2022 at 5:00PM ET ( [Alternative Fuels Data Center] (https://afdc.energy.gov/fuels/electricity_locations.html#/find/nearest?fuel=ELEC) ). Data on public DC fast charge stations can be found by selecting the \"Advanced Filters\" tab.  First select \"Location\" on the left and set \"Country\" to be \"United States\" while keeping \"State/Territory\" to be \"All.\" Then select \"Fuel\" on the left. Under \"Filter by Fuel Type\" select \"Electric\" and set \"Charger types\" to be only \"DC Fast\" while keeping \"Connectors\" and \"Networks\" to be \"All.\"\n",
    "# Forecasts": "194",
    "# Forecasters": "41",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many cases of COVID-19 will be reported by the Africa CDC as of 1 April 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1674-how-many-cases-of-covid-19-will-be-reported-by-the-africa-cdc-as-of-1-april-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the African continent, home to over 1.2 billion people, remains a topic of intense speculation ( [CNN] (https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/16/africa/africa-coronavirus-cases-prevention-intl/index.html) , [Scientific American] (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/african-countries-scramble-to-ramp-up-testing-for-covid-19/) , [Lancet] (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31237-X/fulltext) ). The outcome will be determined using cases data from the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) Dashboard at 5:00PM ET on 1 April 2021 ( [Africa CDC] (https://africacdc.org/covid-19/) ).\nCheck our  [FAQ] (https://www.gjopen.com/faq#question)  or  [ask us for help] (/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8fece3eefde6e9e6eceefbe6e0e1fccfe8e0e0ebe5faebe8e2eae1fba1ece0e2b0fcfaede5eaecfbb2defaeafcfbe6e0e1aabdbfcce3eefde6e9e6eceefbe6e0e1) . To learn more about Good Judgment and Superforecasting,  [click here] (https://goodjudgment.com/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": "966",
    "# Forecasters": "141",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 May 2021, will it be officially announced that the Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympics and/or Paralympics will be canceled?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1668-before-1-may-2021-will-it-be-officially-announced-that-the-tokyo-2020-summer-olympics-and-or-paralympics-will-be-canceled",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Coronavirus concerns already forced the postponement of the 2020 Olympics and Paralympics to summer 2021 ( [ESPN] (https://www.espn.com/olympics/story/_/id/28946033/tokyo-olympics-officially-postponed-2021) , [Olympic Games] (https://tokyo2020.org/en/) , [Paralympic Games] (https://tokyo2020.org/en/paralympics/) ). Various concerns such as cost, vaccine availability, and international travel safety have some concerned about the rescheduled games taking place at all ( [BBC] (https://www.bbc.com/sport/olympics/52747797) ). Postponement(s) alone would not count.\nCheck our  [FAQ] (https://www.gjopen.com/faq#question)  or  [ask us for help] (/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dab9b6bba8b3bcb3b9bbaeb3b5b4a99abdb5b5beb0afbebdb7bfb4aef4b9b5b7e5a9afb8b0bfb9aee78bafbfa9aeb3b5b4ffe8ea99b6bba8b3bcb3b9bbaeb3b5b4) . To learn more about Good Judgment and Superforecasting,  [click here] (https://goodjudgment.com/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": "1182",
    "# Forecasters": "385",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022, will legislation enabling the creation of federal safety standards for autonomous vehicles (AVs) become law?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1659-between-1-january-2021-and-31-december-2022-will-legislation-enabling-the-creation-of-federal-safety-standards-for-autonomous-vehicles-avs-become-law",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "75%",
    "Description": "Congress has yet to adopt legislation to create federal safety standards for the testing and/or use of AVs ( [The Hill] (https://thehill.com/policy/transportation/automobiles/472341-wheels-begin-to-turn-on-self-driving-car-legislation) ,  [Federation of American Scientists] (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45985.pdf) ,  [Congress.gov (House Bill)] (https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/3388) ,  [Congress.gov (Senate Bill)] (https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/1885) ). Legislators are renewing efforts the 116th Congress, though the COVID-19 pandemic has acted as a \"bump in the road\" ( [The Hill] (https://thehill.com/policy/technology/498863-action-on-driverless-cars-hits-speed-bump-as-congress-focuses-on-pandemic) ,  [Legal Reader] (https://www.legalreader.com/self-driving-cars-and-the-law/) ). The date the law and/or standards would take effect is immaterial.\nThis question is the longer-term companion of question #1658. The questions are substantively the same, save for the relevant time period. If the shorter-term question closes Yes, then this longer-term question will be voided.\nCheck our  [FAQ] (https://www.gjopen.com/faq#question)  or  [ask us for help] (/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e7848b86958e818e8486938e888994a7808888838d9283808a828993c984888ad89492858d828493dab6928294938e8889c2d5d7a48b86958e818e8486938e8889) . To learn more about Good Judgment and Superforecasting,  [click here] (https://goodjudgment.com/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": "221",
    "# Forecasters": "106",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will there be a lethal confrontation between the national military forces, militia, and/or law enforcement personnel of the People's Republic of China and those of Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and/or Vietnam before 1 April 2021?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1652-will-there-be-a-lethal-confrontation-between-the-national-military-forces-militia-and-or-law-enforcement-personnel-of-the-people-s-republic-of-china-and-those-of-brunei-indonesia-malaysia-the-philippines-singapore-and-or-vietnam-before-1-april-2021",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "",
    "Description": "Over the years, China has used various forces to project power toward its neighbors in and around the South China Sea ( [CNN] (https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/07/asia/china-malaysia-indonesia-south-china-sea-intl-hnk/index.html) , [Center for Strategic and International Studies] (https://amti.csis.org/maritime-claims-map/) , [Council on Foreign Relations] (https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/territorial-disputes-south-china-sea) , [Diplomat] (https://thediplomat.com/2015/11/little-blue-men-doing-chinas-dirty-work-in-the-south-china-sea/) ). A lethal confrontation is one that results in one fatality for the military forces, militia, and/or law enforcement of either side.\nCheck our  [FAQ] (https://www.gjopen.com/faq#question)  or  [ask us for help] (/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d0e010c1f040b040e0c190402031e2d0a0202090718090a00080319430e0200521e180f07080e19503c18081e19040203485f5d2e010c1f040b040e0c19040203) . To learn more about Good Judgment and Superforecasting,  [click here] (https://goodjudgment.com/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": "905",
    "# Forecasters": "417",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many total Model 3 and Model Y vehicles will Tesla deliver to customers in 2021 and 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1647-how-many-total-model-3-and-model-y-vehicles-will-tesla-deliver-to-customers-in-2021-and-2022",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Adding to ongoing Model 3 car deliveries, Tesla began Model Y SUV deliveries ahead of schedule during the first quarter of 2020 ( [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-deliveries/tesla-sees-strong-model-y-production-deliveries-shares-rise-idUSKBN21K3A3) ). Combined deliveries of Model 3 and Model Y vehicles during Q1 2020 totaled 76,266 ( [Tesla] (https://ir.tesla.com/static-files/c1723af4-ffda-4881-ae12-b6f3c972b795) ). The outcome will be determined using Tesla's official quarterly updates once available, typically found here https://ir.tesla.com/financial-information/quarterly-results.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "259",
    "# Forecasters": "79",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "How many total Fast Charge (&gt;22kW) public charging points for electric vehicles will be installed in the European Union by 31 December 2022?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1634-how-many-total-fast-charge-22kw-public-charging-points-for-electric-vehicles-will-be-installed-in-the-european-union-by-31-december-2022",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The adoption of electric vehicles is subject to a \"chicken and egg\" problem where potential consumers want a more extensive charging network, but businesses want more electric cars on the roads to justify building those new charging stations ( [Smart Energy International] (https://www.smart-energy.com/industry-sectors/electric-vehicles/european-countries-with-fastest-ev-charger-adoption-revealed/) , [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-autoshow-geneva-carbon-explainer/explainer-why-automakers-are-on-a-drive-to-sell-electric-cars-in-europe-idUSKBN20Q1MM) ). Europe has gone from zero Fast Charger locations in 2011 to 15,136 as of 2019. This question will be suspended on 30 June 2021 and resolved using data from the European Alternative Fuels Observatory ( [EAFO] (https://www.eafo.eu/alternative-fuels/electricity/charging-infra-stats) ) for all of 2022, via the graph \"Normal and Fast Public Charging Points (2022)\" when the filter for \"Charger type\" is set to \"Fast (&gt;22kW)\" and the filters at the top of the page are set to \"European Union\" and \"2022\".\n",
    "# Forecasts": "251",
    "# Forecasters": "72",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 January 2023, how many major automakers will sell a self-driving passenger vehicle manufactured without a steering wheel?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1633-before-1-january-2023-how-many-major-automakers-will-sell-a-self-driving-passenger-vehicle-manufactured-without-a-steering-wheel",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Many automakers are planning to unveil more autonomous vehicles in the coming years ( [NHTSA] (https://www.nhtsa.gov/technology-innovation/automated-vehicles-safety) , [U.S. News] (https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/cars-that-are-almost-self-driving,%20https://www.mobileye.com/future-of-mobility/history-autonomous-driving/) ). For the purposes of this question, \"major automakers\" refers to any of the 50 motor vehicle manufacturers included by the International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers in its 2017 list ( [OICA] (http://www.oica.net/wp-content/uploads/World-Ranking-of-Manufacturers-1.pdf) ). This question will be suspended on 30 June 2021. Vehicles on sale solely for fixed routes (e.g., shuttles) would not count. Presales would not count.\nCheck our  [FAQ] (https://www.gjopen.com/faq#question)  or  [ask us for help] (/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#84e7e8e5f6ede2ede7e5f0edebeaf7c4e3ebebe0eef1e0e3e9e1eaf0aae7ebe9bbf7f1e6eee1e7f0b9d5f1e1f7f0edebeaa1b6b4c7e8e5f6ede2ede7e5f0edebea) . To learn more about Good Judgment and Superforecasting,  [click here] (https://goodjudgment.com/) .\n",
    "# Forecasts": "362",
    "# Forecasters": "206",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022, will the European Union delay and/or relax the implementation and/or enforcement of any of its CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and/or new light commercial vehicles?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1620-between-1-january-2021-and-31-december-2022-will-the-european-union-delay-and-or-relax-the-implementation-and-or-enforcement-of-any-of-its-co2-emission-performance-standards-for-new-passenger-cars-and-or-new-light-commercial-vehicles",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "2%",
    "Description": "Due to impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the auto industry in the EU is seeking relief from CO2 emission performance standards regulations ( [European Automobile Manufacturers Association] (https://www.acea.be/news/article/covid-19-auto-sector-letter-to-von-der-leyen) ,  [Europa] (https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles/regulation_en) ,  [Electrive] (https://www.electrive.com/2020/03/30/european-car-industry-lobby-groups-question-co2-targets-in-the-face-of-covid19/) ). For more information on EU CO2 emission performance standards, see  [REGULATION (EU) 2019/631] (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R0631) , particularly Article 4 and the annexes. The date a change would take effect is immaterial to the resolution of this question.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "174",
    "# Forecasters": "86",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the 2022 industry-wide average cost of Li-ion batteries used in battery-powered electric vehicles?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1583-what-will-be-the-2022-industry-wide-average-cost-of-li-ion-batteries-used-in-battery-powered-electric-vehicles",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Lowering the cost of battery packs through R&amp;D investments, manufacturing improvements, and economies of scale is a major consideration for bringing down the price of battery-powered electric vehicles (BEVs) and making them more competitive with gasoline-fueled internal combustion engines ( [Clean Technica] (https://cleantechnica.com/2020/02/12/teslas-advantage-with-its-battery-technology-low-cost/) ,  [Financial Times] (https://www.ft.com/content/8441929c-5e43-11ea-b0ab-339c2307bcd4) ). This question will be suspended on 30 June 2021 and resolved using the Mack Institute's analysis for 2022, which will replicate an approach for calculating the industry-wide average cost of Li-ion batteries published in a  [2015 Nature Climate Change study] (https://mediamanager.sei.org/documents/Publications/SEI-Nature-pre-pub-2015-falling-costs-battery-packs-BEVs.pdf) . The Mack Institute found that there was \"a 16% annual decline in the cost of battery packs between 2007 and 2019, and the industry-wide average cost of battery packs in 2019 was US$ 161 per kWh\" ( [The Mack Institute] (https://mackinstitute.wharton.upenn.edu/2020/electric-vehicle-battery-costs-decline/) ).\n",
    "# Forecasts": "234",
    "# Forecasters": "92",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What total percentage of global vehicle sales in 2022 will be battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs)? ",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1582-what-total-percentage-of-global-vehicle-sales-in-2022-will-be-battery-electric-vehicles-bevs-and-plug-in-hybrid-electric-vehicles-phevs",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Climate change and other environmental concerns continue to drive a greater focus on electric vehicles ( [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-autoshow-geneva-carbon-explainer/explainer-why-automakers-are-on-a-drive-to-sell-electric-cars-in-europe-idUSKBN20Q1MM) , [NASDAQ] (https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/oil-prices-are-tumbling-but-global-electric-vehicles-will-be-just-fine-says-ubs-2020-03-11) , [CSP] (https://www.cspdailynews.com/fuels/what-global-economic-slump-means-evs) , [IEA] (https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2019) ). This question will be suspended on 30 June 2021 and the outcome will be determined using open source data provided by [EV-volumes.com] (http://www.ev-volumes.com/) for 2022, expected to be released in early 2023. The global BEV &amp; PHEV share for 2019 was 2.5% ( [EV-volumes.com] (http://www.ev-volumes.com/country/total-world-plug-in-vehicle-volumes/) ). In the event that the relevant data for 2022 are not available from EV-volumes.com in 2023, this question will be resolved using data from other credible automotive industry sources.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "356",
    "# Forecasters": "143",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 July 2021, will the Chilean government pass legislation that caps administrative fees and/or operating profits of the country's pension fund managers?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1411-before-1-july-2021-will-the-chilean-government-pass-legislation-that-caps-administrative-fees-and-or-operating-profits-of-the-country-s-pension-fund-managers",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "Amid large-scale economic protests, calls for reform of Chile’s pension system have grown ( [Financial Times] (https://www.ft.com/content/4f8107f8-0fd4-11ea-a7e6-62bf4f9e548a) , [AP] (https://apnews.com/31ab8e9f5b9a467abdda53616edc72c2) , [IPE] (https://www.ipe.com/reports/special-reports/global-defined-contribution/chile-chilean-pensions-under-pressure/www.ipe.com/reports/special-reports/global-defined-contribution/chile-chilean-pensions-under-pressure/10018671.fullarticle) , [El Universal] (https://www.eluniversal.com.mx/mundo/diez-puntos-para-entender-el-sistema-de-pensiones-que-no-quieren-los-chilenos) [in Spanish]). A constitutional amendment to the same effect would count. Legislation enabling or delegating new regulatory authority to cap administrative fees and/or operating profits would count.\nPlease note that this question is a companion to Question #1417, which closes in 2020 ( [Question #1417] (https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1417) ). We will be analyzing the differences between forecasts with the different closing dates.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "255",
    "# Forecasters": "96",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Before 1 July 2021, will the Chilean government pass legislation nationalizing private pension fund assets?",
    "URL": "https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1412-before-1-july-2021-will-the-chilean-government-pass-legislation-nationalizing-private-pension-fund-assets",
    "Platform": "Good Judgment Open",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "1%",
    "Description": "Amid large-scale economic protests, calls for the reform of Chile’s pension system have grown ( [Reuters] (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-chile-protests-pensions/chiles-fiery-anger-fueled-by-fears-of-poverty-in-old-age-idUSKBN1XB3U8) , [IPE] (https://www.ipe.com/reports/special-reports/global-defined-contribution/chile-chilean-pensions-under-pressure/www.ipe.com/reports/special-reports/global-defined-contribution/chile-chilean-pensions-under-pressure/10018671.fullarticle) , [Economist] (https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2019/06/08/chile-tinkers-with-its-ground-breaking-pensions-system) , [Economist Intelligence Unit] (https://www.eiu.com/industry/article/1898259973/chiles-pension-reform-makes-progress/2019-07-23) , [Financial Times] (https://www.ft.com/content/4f8107f8-0fd4-11ea-a7e6-62bf4f9e548a) ). Examples of nationalization include, but are not limited to, the enactment of legislation compelling the divestiture or transfer of privately held pension funds to a public entity or the state, or a constitutional amendment to the same effect. The date or dates of actual asset nationalization would be immaterial.\nPlease note that this question is a companion to Question #1418, which closes in 2020 ( [Question #1418] (https://www.gjopen.com/questions/1418) ). We will be analyzing the differences between forecasts with the different closing dates.\n",
    "# Forecasts": "288",
    "# Forecasters": "130",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the Ethereum block gas limit be >= 25,000,000 gas in any block on April 1st 2021?",
    "URL": "https://omen.eth.link/#/0x06c942fd737bc53571a34667b2ae3b669f1f502d",
    "Platform": "Omen",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "marginalPrices": [
      "0.9886301130345439673746235229155343",
      "0.01136988696545603262537647708446573"
    ],
    "Percentage": "98.8630%",
    "Description": "",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will UNI governance approve a new liquidity mining program by the end of February, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://omen.eth.link/#/0x32848849f5b7e30ff75f57838fea8f9663c3d9de",
    "Platform": "Omen",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "marginalPrices": [
      "0.1086728608079395832263016792869373",
      "0.8913271391920604167736983207130627"
    ],
    "Percentage": "10.8673%",
    "Description": "",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Uniswap V3 be launched and usable in Q1 2021? (includes mainnet or Layer2)",
    "URL": "https://omen.eth.link/#/0x8bcf27b20670a4f32973cbf231b8904029da1ccb",
    "Platform": "Omen",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "marginalPrices": [
      "0.4013812037799882539689575072876216",
      "0.5986187962200117460310424927123784"
    ],
    "Percentage": "40.1381%",
    "Description": "",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the FDA approve the use of an existing, orally-administered vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19?",
    "URL": "https://omen.eth.link/#/0x9598659e3fc7d5a618b57e94be2ac37e5d774905",
    "Platform": "Omen",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "marginalPrices": [
      "0.01515661495857047678999833535985743",
      "0.01515661495857047678999833535985743",
      "0.01515661495857047678999833535985743",
      "0.01515661495857047678999833535985743",
      "0.9393735401657180928400066585605703"
    ],
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will The Flippening happen in 2021? (Will another blockchain's market cap exceed Bitcoin's market cap in 2021?)",
    "URL": "https://omen.eth.link/#/0xa6da2bc89a433b9cdcc7271077a119139f4d305c",
    "Platform": "Omen",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "marginalPrices": [
      "0.5",
      "0.5"
    ],
    "Percentage": "50.0000%",
    "Description": "",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Joe Biden be the US President at the end of 2021?",
    "URL": "https://omen.eth.link/#/0xd450b6c4db569f600cb42acc0a6cd3a140c4894b",
    "Platform": "Omen",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "marginalPrices": [
      "0.8510322451182968590048070388296782",
      "0.1489677548817031409951929611703218"
    ],
    "Percentage": "85.1032%",
    "Description": "",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the outcome of the 2020 US Presidential Election for the office of President of the United States, where the winner is the one receiving the most votes from certified electors of the Electoral College, those votes having been officially counted by the United States Congress under VICE PRESIDENT MICHAEL PENCE on January 6, 2021 (per the Electoral Count Act of 1887)?",
    "URL": "https://omen.eth.link/#/0xdbf41f1f2d28216eb4e76b9ed3856180c2daa479",
    "Platform": "Omen",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "marginalPrices": [
      "0.9900000000000001225706801609666705",
      "0.00999999999999987742931983903332947"
    ],
    "Percentage": "99.0000%",
    "Description": "",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Compound Chain be launched and usable by the end of Q2 2021?",
    "URL": "https://omen.eth.link/#/0xe018254be84e200bfb9947dc57df8943cb2ac1b2",
    "Platform": "Omen",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "marginalPrices": [
      "0.399999999999999999999976",
      "0.600000000000000000000024"
    ],
    "Percentage": "40.0000%",
    "Description": "",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will UNI governance approve a new liquidity mining program by the end of February, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://omen.eth.link/#/0xed6940e49cee029c4664d9794c04d5f9e5597632",
    "Platform": "Omen",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "marginalPrices": [
      "0.1095186501966299113862061692110534",
      "0.8904813498033700886137938307889466"
    ],
    "Percentage": "10.9519%",
    "Description": "",
    "Stars": "★☆☆☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2021, will Donald Trump be barred from holding future elected office in the USA?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=USA",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "21.82%",
    "Description": "\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will Kamala Harris be the first woman to become president of the United States?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=USA",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "71.00%",
    "Description": "This question will settle when a woman becomes president of the United States of America.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "At the 2021 Tokyo Olympics, will the USA earn more medals than they ever did during Obama's presidency (121)?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=USA",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "35.00%",
    "Description": "While Barack Obama was president, the United States won: - 121 medals in 2016 - 104 medals in 2012 - 112 medals in 2008 24/01/2021: If the Tokyo Olympics are canceled in 2021, this question will be resolved according to the medals obtained at the next Olympics.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2021, will Joe Biden invoke the Insurrection Act?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=USA",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "5.00%",
    "Description": "The Insurrection Act is a United States federal law that empowers the President of the United States to deploy U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops within the United States in particular circumstances, such as to suppress civil disorder, insurrection and rebellion. See: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act_of_1807] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act_of_1807) \n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will be elected president of France in 2022?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=FRA",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will compete in the second round of the French presidential election?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=FRA",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The French presidential election is scheduled in the spring of 2022. In this question, \"Le Pen\" refers to Marine Le pen, not to her niece Marion Marechal Le Pen.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In France, when will the first round of the regional elections take place?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=FRA",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In France, when will the 7 day average of new confirmed cases of Covid-19 fall back below 5,000?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=FRA",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question will be settled according to the numbers published by OurWorldInData here: [https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/daily-covid-cases-7-day?tab=chart&stackMode=absolute&time=2020-08-08..latest&country=~FRA&region=World] (https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/daily-covid-cases-7-day?tab=chart&stackMode=absolute&time=2020-08-08..latest&country=~FRA&region=World) \n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "At the 2021 Tokyo Olympics, will Japan or France earn more medals?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=FRA",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "24/01/2021: If the Tokyo Olympics are cancelled, or if they take place elsewhere than in Japan, the shares will be paid out at the following prices: France = 23 H Japan = 74 H Same = 3 H\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Following the next parliamentary elections win Morocco, who will succeed Saad-Eddine El Othmani as prime minister?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=AFR",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Parliamentary elections are scheduled in September 2021. The PJD (Justice and Development Party) has been in power for the last ten years. Shall the party be renamed or splinter before the elections, any personality issued for its ranks before the renaming or split shall still be considered \"from PJD\".\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In Niger, who will win the (February) 2021 presidential election?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=AFR",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "The second round of the presidential election is scheduled on February 21, 2021.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2021, will Faustin-Archange Touadéra lose power in the Central African Republic?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=AFR",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8.00%",
    "Description": "Shares of the correct outcome will be worth 100&Hopf; while the other will be worthless (0&Hopf;). Touadéra, president of the Central African Republic, will be deemed to have lost power in the following cases: 1) death; 2) imprisonment, house arrest, or capture by hostile forces for at least 48 hours; 3) resignation; 4) been stripped of his office and/or replaced by formal government, judicial, or electorate action; 5) fled the country, gone into exile, or disappeared entirely from public view such that it is unclear whether he is alive or residing within his country; 6) been deemed in a prolonged state of mental incapacitation. In the first four situations, the question will close immediately; for options 5 and 6, we will observe a two-week waiting period beginning when the circumstance is first reported in the media, then judge the date of power-loss retroactively. However, if 31 December 2021, the question's expiry date, falls within the 2-week waiting period for options 5 or 6, we will consider that Touadéra has lost power before the end of the year (local time).\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2021, will Abdelmadjid Tebboune lose power in Algeria?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=AFR",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8.00%",
    "Description": "Shares of the correct outcome will be worth 100&Hopf; while the other will be worthless (0&Hopf;). Tebboune, president of Algeria, will be deemed to have lost power in the following cases: 1) death; 2) imprisonment, house arrest, or capture by hostile forces for at least 48 hours; 3) resignation; 4) been stripped of his office and/or replaced by formal government, judicial, or electorate action; 5) fled the country, gone into exile, or disappeared entirely from public view such that it is unclear whether he is alive or residing within his country; 6) been deemed in a prolonged state of mental incapacitation. In the first four situations, the question will close immediately; for options 5 and 6, we will observe a two-week waiting period beginning when the circumstance is first reported in the media, then judge the date of power-loss retroactively. However, if 31 December 2021, the question's expiry date, falls within the 2-week waiting period for options 5 or 6, we will consider that Tebboune has lost power before the end of the year (local time).\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In January 2021, how many battle deaths will there be in the G5 Sahel countries?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=AFR",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "8.00%",
    "Description": "This question will be judged according to the number of \"fatalities\" published by ACLED ( [http://www.acleddata.com] (http://www.acleddata.com) ) in the \"Battle\" category. A public dashboard with regular updates and historical data is available here: [https://acleddata.com/dashboard/#/dashboard] (https://acleddata.com/dashboard/#/dashboard) \n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In Congo, who will win the (March) 2021 presidential election?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=AFR",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A presidential election is planned on march 21, 2021. It could also be pushed back to a later date in 2021, in which case it would just delay the resolution of this question.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In Chad, who will win the (April) 2021 presidential election?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=AFR",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A presidential election is planned on April 11, 2021. It could also be pushed back to a later date in 2021, in which case it would just delay the resolution of this question.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In Somalia, who will win the (Feb) 2021 presidential election? ",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=AFR",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "A presidential election is planned for February 2021. It could also be pushed back to a later date in 2021, in which case it would just delay the resolution of this question.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will worldwide commercial air traffic rise back above 100,000 flights per day?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=INT",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "This question will be settled according to the data published by [Flightradar24.com] (https://www.flightradar24.com/data/statistics) in the \"Number of commercial flights...\" chart.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2021, who will succeed Benjamin Netanyahu as prime minister of Israel?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=INT",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Shares of the correct outcome will be worth 100ℍ, while the others will be worthless (0ℍ). Parliamentary elections are scheduled in March 2021.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2021, how much will the arctic sea ice shrink?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=INT",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Shares of the correct outcome will be worth 100&Hopf; while the others will be worthless (0&Hopf;). \nFollow daily updates of the arctic sea ice shrinkage with <a target=_new href='http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/charctic-interactive-sea-ice-graph/'>this link</a>\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Who will succeed Angela Merkel as chancellor of Germany?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=INT",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Parliamentary elections are scheduled in Germany at the end of September.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will the FDA approve a COVID-19 vaccine?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=COV",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which threshold will gold prices (per ounce) reach first? ",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=ECO",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "39.00%",
    "Description": "Shares of the correct outcome will be worth 100ℍ, while the other will be worthless (0ℍ).\nFollow godlier prices here: [https://www.monex.com/gold-prices/] (https://www.monex.com/gold-prices/) \n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the closing share price of GameStop (GME) on Feb. 26, 2021?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=ECO",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Description": "Follow GameStop's stock price here: [https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/GME] (https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/GME) \n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which threshold will the Dow Jones Industrial Average hit first?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=ECO",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "66.00%",
    "Description": "This question starts on November 16, 2020, but there is no time limit on its resolution. It will be resolved as soon as the value of the Dow Jones index reaches or crosses either of the specified thresholds, even temporarily.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Which threshold will the French index CAC 40 hit first?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=ECO",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "60.00%",
    "Description": "This question starts on November 16, 2020, but there is no time limit on its resolution. It will be resolved as soon as the value of the CAC 40 index reaches or crosses either of the specified thresholds, even temporarily.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "Will the new Bond film \"No Time to Die\" be released in 2021?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=ECO",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "91.26%",
    "Description": "On January 22, MGM pushed back the film's release to October 8, 2021... 23/01/21: It doesn't matter how the movie is released - online or in theaters - as long as it is via a distribution channel approved by MGM.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "In 2021, will the Olympic Games take place?",
    "URL": "https://predict.hypermind.com/dash/dash/dash.html?list=ECO",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Binary question?": true,
    "Percentage": "67.00%",
    "Description": "The Olympics Games are currently scheduled to start in Japan in July 2021... This question will resolve as \"Yes\" if the Olympic Games take place anywhere at anytime in 2021.\n",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the year-over-year growth rate of U.S. Nominal GDP in Q1 2021?",
    "URL": "https://prod.hypermind.com/ngdp/en/showcase/showcase.html",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Description": "This question compares 2021:Q1 to 2020:Q1. It should be read as: “What will be the Year-over-year growth rate in Q1 2021?\"\nThe 'answer' to this question will be based on the advance estimate of nominal GDP growth in 2021:Q1, which will be published in the spring of 2021.\nAll of the information used to calculate the growth rate will appear in the BEA website, Table 1.1.5, line 1:\nhttps://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=19&amp;step=2#reqid=19&amp;step=2&amp;isuri=1&amp;1921=survey\nThe growth rate will be calculated using the latest estimates of both 2021:Q1 and 2020:Q1 nominal GDP:\nGrowth Rate (%) = 100 * (2021:Q1/2020:Q1 - 1)\nNote that the nominal GDP growth rate is expressed as a percentage (not decimal.) It is then rounded off to the nearest tenth of a percent.\nFinally, beware that the 2020:Q1 estimate that will be used in the calculation is the revised estimate that will be published along with the release of the 2021:Q1 estimate.\n",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the year-over-year growth rate of U.S. Nominal GDP in Q4 2021?",
    "URL": "https://prod.hypermind.com/ngdp/en/showcase/showcase.html",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Description": "This question compares 2021:Q4 to 2020:Q4.\nThe 'answer' to this question will be based on the advance estimate of nominal GDP growth in 2021:Q4 which will be published in 2022:Q1.\nAll of the information used to calculate the growth rate will appear in the BEA website, Table 1.1.5, line 1:\nhttps://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=19&amp;step=2#reqid=19&amp;step=2&amp;isuri=1&amp;1921=survey\nThe growth rate will be calculated using the latest estimates of both 2021:Q4 and 2020:Q4 nominal GDP:\nGrowth Rate (%) = 100 * (2021:Q4/2020:Q4 - 1)\nNote that the nominal GDP growth rate is expressed as a percentage (not decimal.) It is then rounded off to the nearest tenth of a percent.\nFinally, beware that the 2020:Q4 estimate that will be used in the calculation is the revised estimate that will be published along with the release of the 2021:Q4 estimate.\n",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "What will be the year-over-year growth rate of U.S. Nominal GDP in Q4 2022?",
    "URL": "https://prod.hypermind.com/ngdp/en/showcase/showcase.html",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Description": "This question compares 2022:Q4 to 2021:Q4. \nThe 'answer' to this question will be based on the advance estimate of nominal GDP growth in 2022:Q4, which will be published in 2023:Q1.\nAll of the information used to calculate the growth rate will appear in the BEA website, Table 1.1.5, line 1:\nhttps://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=19&amp;step=2#reqid=19&amp;step=2&amp;isuri=1&amp;1921=survey\nThe growth rate will be calculated using the latest estimates of both 2022:Q4 and 2021:Q4 nominal GDP:\nGrowth Rate (%) = 100 * (2022:Q4/2021:Q4 - 1)\nNote that the nominal GDP growth rate is expressed as a percentage (not decimal.) It is then rounded off to the nearest tenth of a percent.\nFinally, beware that the 2021:Q4 estimate that will be used in the calculation is the revised estimate that will be published along with the release of the 2022:Q14estimate.\n",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "As of April 1, 2021, how many million individuals in the United-States will have received at least one dose of an FDA-approved Covid-19 vaccine?",
    "URL": "https://prod.hypermind.com/ngdp/en/showcase2/showcase.html?sc=Covid19",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Description": "This question will be preferably* settled according to the data published on April 1, 2021 by the CDC here: [https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations] (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations) .\nFor the purposes of this question, FDA “Emergency Use Authorization” or “compassionate use” counts as approval.\n* Should this data source not be available in a timely manner to settle the question, Hypermind will rely on the source for this statistic used by Our World in Data. If Our World in Data does not track this statistic (as of Dec 26 2020 it does not), Hypermind will rely on other sources it deems most reliable and relevant to settle the question, such as public health sources like the FDA or credible reporting by major news publications.\n",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "As of July 1, 2021, how many million individuals in the United-States will have received at least one dose of an FDA-approved Covid-19 vaccine?",
    "URL": "https://prod.hypermind.com/ngdp/en/showcase2/showcase.html?sc=Covid19",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Description": "This question will be preferably* settled according to the data published on July 1, 2021 by the CDC here: [https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations] (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations) .\nFor the purposes of this question, FDA “Emergency Use Authorization” or “compassionate use” counts as approval.\n* Should this data source not be available in a timely manner to settle the question, Hypermind will rely on the source for this statistic used by Our World in Data. If Our World in Data does not track this statistic (as of Dec 26 2020 it does not), Hypermind will rely on other sources it deems most reliable and relevant to settle the question, such as public health sources like the FDA or credible reporting by major news publications.\n",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "As of October 1, 2021, how many million individuals in the United-States will have received at least one dose of an FDA-approved Covid-19 vaccine?",
    "URL": "https://prod.hypermind.com/ngdp/en/showcase2/showcase.html?sc=Covid19",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Description": "This question will be preferably* settled according to the data published on October 1, 2021 by the CDC here: [https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations] (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations) .\nFor the purposes of this question, FDA “Emergency Use Authorization” or “compassionate use” counts as approval.\n* Should this data source not be available in a timely manner to settle the question, Hypermind will rely on the source for this statistic used by Our World in Data. If Our World in Data does not track this statistic (as of Dec 26 2020 it does not), Hypermind will rely on other sources it deems most reliable and relevant to settle the question, such as public health sources like the FDA or credible reporting by major news publications.\n",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will new confirmed COVID-19 deaths in the USA (7-day rolling average) first drop below 3 per million people?",
    "URL": "https://prod.hypermind.com/ngdp/en/showcase2/showcase.html?sc=Covid19",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Description": "This question will be preferably* settled according to the data published by Our World in Data here: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&amp;time=2020-03-01..latest&amp;country=USA&amp;region=World&amp;deathsMetric=true&amp;interval=smoothed&amp;perCapita=true&amp;smoothing=7&amp;pickerMetric=total_cases&amp;pickerSort=desc\n* Should this data source not be available in a timely manner to settle the question, Hypermind will rely on other sources it deems most reliable and relevant to settle the question, such as public health sources like the CDC or WHO.\n",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will new confirmed COVID-19 deaths in the USA (7-day rolling average) first drop below 1 per million people?",
    "URL": "https://prod.hypermind.com/ngdp/en/showcase2/showcase.html?sc=Covid19",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Description": "This question will be preferably* settled according to the data published by Our World in Data here: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&amp;time=2020-03-01..latest&amp;country=USA&amp;region=World&amp;deathsMetric=true&amp;interval=smoothed&amp;perCapita=true&amp;smoothing=7&amp;pickerMetric=total_cases&amp;pickerSort=desc\n* Should this data source not be available in a timely manner to settle the question, Hypermind will rely on other sources it deems most reliable and relevant to settle the question, such as public health sources like the CDC or WHO.\n",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  },
  {
    "Title": "When will new confirmed COVID-19 deaths in the USA (7-day rolling average) first drop below 0.1 per million people?",
    "URL": "https://prod.hypermind.com/ngdp/en/showcase2/showcase.html?sc=Covid19",
    "Platform": "Hypermind",
    "Description": "This question will be preferably* settled according to the data published by Our World in Data here: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&amp;time=2020-03-01..latest&amp;country=USA&amp;region=World&amp;deathsMetric=true&amp;interval=smoothed&amp;perCapita=true&amp;smoothing=7&amp;pickerMetric=total_cases&amp;pickerSort=desc\n* Should this data source not be available in a timely manner to settle the question, Hypermind will rely on other sources it deems most reliable and relevant to settle the question, such as public health sources like the CDC or WHO.\n",
    "Binary question?": false,
    "Percentage": "none",
    "Stars": "★★★☆☆"
  }
]