small readability reorder
Thought a bit about whether having OR instead of AND changes performance, and concluded it probably didn't. In particular, think about when it jumps to the inner part of the if/else condition
This commit is contained in:
parent
aec062db2e
commit
496cd811a1
|
@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Comparison with wc.
|
## Comparison with wc.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The GNU utils version ([github](https://github.com/coreutils/coreutils/tree/master/src/wc.c), [savannah](http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=blob;f=src/wc.c;hb=HEAD)) is a bit over 1K lines of C. It does many things and checks many possible failure modes.
|
The GNU utils version ([github](https://github.com/coreutils/coreutils/tree/master/src/wc.c), [savannah](http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=blob;f=src/wc.c;hb=HEAD)) is a bit over 1K lines of C. It does many things and checks many possible failure modes. I think it detects whether it should be reading from stdin using some very wrapped fstat.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The busybox version ([git.busybox.net](https://git.busybox.net/busybox/tree/coreutils/wc.c)) of wc is much shorter, at 257 lines, while striving to be [POSIX-compliant](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/), meaning it has flags.
|
The busybox version ([git.busybox.net](https://git.busybox.net/busybox/tree/coreutils/wc.c)) of wc is much shorter, at 257 lines, while striving to be [POSIX-compliant](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/), meaning it has flags.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
20
ww.c
20
ww.c
|
@ -4,25 +4,19 @@
|
||||||
int wc(FILE* fp)
|
int wc(FILE* fp)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
char c[1];
|
char c[1];
|
||||||
int seen_word = 0, seen_sep_after_word = 0, num_words = 0;
|
int word = 0, num_words = 0;
|
||||||
int fn = fileno(fp);
|
int fn = fileno(fp);
|
||||||
while (read(fn, c, sizeof(c)) > 0) {
|
while (read(fn, c, sizeof(c)) > 0) {
|
||||||
if (*c == '\n' || *c == ' ' || *c == '\t') {
|
if (*c != ' ' && *c != '\n' && *c != '\t') {
|
||||||
if (seen_word) {
|
word = 1;
|
||||||
seen_sep_after_word = 1;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
seen_word = 1;
|
if (word) {
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
// exercise: what happens if you only track seen_sep,
|
|
||||||
// instead of seen_sep_after_word?
|
|
||||||
// test with: $ echo " hello world" | ./wc
|
|
||||||
if (seen_word && seen_sep_after_word) {
|
|
||||||
num_words++;
|
num_words++;
|
||||||
seen_sep_after_word = seen_word = 0;
|
word = 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
num_words+=seen_word;
|
}
|
||||||
|
num_words+=word;
|
||||||
printf("%i\n", num_words);
|
printf("%i\n", num_words);
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user