From ff361186ec043f2ea41630ce6c7b6aed24fd81e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NunoSempere <nuno.sempere@protonmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 21:28:52 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] add clarification about stan

---
 README.md | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index ca04eef3..03180b69 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -102,13 +102,14 @@ Overall I don't think that this is a fair comparison of the languages intrinsica
 - [ ] Julia (TuringML) 
 - [ ] Rust
 - [ ] Lisp
-- [ ] Stan
 - [ ] Go 
 - [ ] Zig
 - [ ] Forth
 - [ ] OCaml
 - [ ] Haskell
 - [ ] CUDA
+- [-] Stan => As far as I can tell, Stan is designed to generate samples from the posterior distribution given some data, not to create data by drawing samples from an arbitrary distribution.
+  - [ ] Maybe still worth reversing the process?
 - ... and suggestions welcome
 
 ## Roadmap