update README
This commit is contained in:
parent
50fb88db7c
commit
c19738709a
|
@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ The name of this repository is a pun on two meanings of "time to": "how much tim
|
||||||
| Language | Time | Lines of code |
|
| Language | Time | Lines of code |
|
||||||
|-----------------------------|-----------|---------------|
|
|-----------------------------|-----------|---------------|
|
||||||
| C (optimized, 16 threads) | 5ms | 249 |
|
| C (optimized, 16 threads) | 5ms | 249 |
|
||||||
| squiggle.c | 37ms | 54 |
|
| squiggle.c | 37ms | 54* |
|
||||||
| Nim | 38ms | 84 |
|
| Nim | 38ms | 84 |
|
||||||
| Lua (LuaJIT) | 68ms | 82 |
|
| Lua (LuaJIT) | 68ms | 82 |
|
||||||
| OCaml (flambda mode) | 245ms | 112 |
|
| OCaml (flambda) | 164ms | 123 |
|
||||||
| Lua | 278ms | 82 |
|
| Lua | 278ms | 82 |
|
||||||
| C (naïve implementation) | 292ms | 149 |
|
| C (naïve implementation) | 292ms | 149 |
|
||||||
| Javascript (NodeJS) | 732ms | 69 |
|
| Javascript (NodeJS) | 732ms | 69 |
|
||||||
|
@ -119,6 +119,10 @@ sudo ln -sf luajit-2.1.0-beta3 /usr/local/bin/luajit
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Overall I'm thinking that a combination of lua at least for scripting and ¿nim/C/tbd? for more serious programs could be quite powerful.
|
Overall I'm thinking that a combination of lua at least for scripting and ¿nim/C/tbd? for more serious programs could be quite powerful.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### OCaml
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
OCaml was like meeting an old and forgotten friend. I found its syntax a bit clunky, but could get accustomed to it. Its list matching is nice, O(n) list element accessing, not so much. Honestly, I wanted to really like it, but I'm not sure yet. And it's *slow* compared to C.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Overall thoughts
|
### Overall thoughts
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Overall I don't think that this is a fair comparison of the languages intrinsically, because I'm just differentially good at them, because I've chosen to put more effort in ones than in others. But it is still useful to me personally, and perhaps mildly informative to others.
|
Overall I don't think that this is a fair comparison of the languages intrinsically, because I'm just differentially good at them, because I've chosen to put more effort in ones than in others. But it is still useful to me personally, and perhaps mildly informative to others.
|
||||||
|
|
12
time.txt
12
time.txt
|
@ -140,12 +140,12 @@ Time using 1 thread: 37.60ms
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## squiggle.ml
|
## squiggle.ml
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
— make fast && make time
|
— make fast && time make run
|
||||||
ocamlopt -O3 -unsafe samples.ml -o ./out/samples
|
ocamlopt -O3 -unsafe samples.ml -o ./out/samples
|
||||||
mv samples.cmi samples.cmx samples.o ./out/
|
mv samples.cmi samples.cmx samples.o ./out/
|
||||||
bash -c "time ./out/samples"
|
./out/samples
|
||||||
Mean: 0.886498
|
Mean: 0.884629
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
real 0m0.245s
|
real 0m0.164s
|
||||||
user 0m0.232s
|
user 0m0.159s
|
||||||
sys 0m0.012s
|
sys 0m0.004s
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user