update README

README.md

@@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ The name of this repository is a pun on two meanings of "time to": "how much tim
 | Language                    | Time      | Lines of code |
 |-----------------------------|-----------|---------------|
 | C (optimized, 16 threads)   | 5ms       | 249  |
-| squiggle.c                  | 37ms      | 54   | 
+| squiggle.c                  | 37ms      | 54*  | 
 | Nim                         | 38ms      | 84   |
 | Lua (LuaJIT)                | 68ms      | 82   |
-| OCaml (flambda mode)        | 245ms     | 112  |
+| OCaml (flambda)             | 164ms     | 123  |
 | Lua                         | 278ms     | 82   |
 | C (naïve implementation)    | 292ms     | 149  |
 | Javascript (NodeJS)         | 732ms     | 69   |
@@ -119,6 +119,10 @@ sudo ln -sf luajit-2.1.0-beta3 /usr/local/bin/luajit
 
 Overall I'm thinking that a combination of lua at least for scripting and ¿nim/C/tbd? for more serious programs could be quite powerful.
 
+### OCaml
+
+OCaml was like meeting an old and forgotten friend. I found its syntax a bit clunky, but could get accustomed to it. Its list matching is nice, O(n) list element accessing, not so much. Honestly, I wanted to really like it, but I'm not sure yet. And it's *slow* compared to C.
+
 ### Overall thoughts
 
 Overall I don't think that this is a fair comparison of the languages intrinsically, because I'm just differentially good at them, because I've chosen to put more effort in ones than in others. But it is still useful to me personally, and perhaps mildly informative to others. 

time.txt

@@ -140,12 +140,12 @@ Time using 1 thread: 37.60ms
 
 ## squiggle.ml
 
-— make fast && make time
+— make fast && time make run
 ocamlopt -O3 -unsafe  samples.ml -o ./out/samples
 mv samples.cmi samples.cmx samples.o ./out/
-bash -c "time ./out/samples"
-Mean: 0.886498
+./out/samples
+Mean: 0.884629
 
-real    0m0.245s
-user    0m0.232s
-sys     0m0.012s
+real    0m0.164s
+user    0m0.159s
+sys     0m0.004s