feat: recompute time for Squiggle
This commit is contained in:
parent
94119e0173
commit
7cecdd24b8
|
@ -21,11 +21,12 @@ With the [time](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/time.1.html) tool, using 1
|
||||||
| Language | Time |
|
| Language | Time |
|
||||||
|----------|-----------|
|
|----------|-----------|
|
||||||
| C | 0m0,442s |
|
| C | 0m0,442s |
|
||||||
| Squiggle | 0m0,488s |
|
|
||||||
| Node | 0m0,732s |
|
| Node | 0m0,732s |
|
||||||
|
| Squiggle | 0m1,536s |
|
||||||
| R | 0m7,000s |
|
| R | 0m7,000s |
|
||||||
| Python (CPython) | 0m16,641s |
|
| Python (CPython) | 0m16,641s |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
I was very surprised that Node/Squiggle code was almost as fast as the raw C code. For the Python code, it's possible that the lack of speed is more a function of me not being as familiar with Python. It's also very possible that the code would run faster with [PyPy](https://doc.pypy.org)
|
I was very surprised that Node/Squiggle code was almost as fast as the raw C code. For the Python code, it's possible that the lack of speed is more a function of me not being as familiar with Python. It's also very possible that the code would run faster with [PyPy](https://doc.pypy.org)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Languages I may add later
|
## Languages I may add later
|
||||||
|
@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ I was very surprised that Node/Squiggle code was almost as fast as the raw C cod
|
||||||
The future of this project is uncertain. In most words, I simply forget about this repository.
|
The future of this project is uncertain. In most words, I simply forget about this repository.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To do:
|
To do:
|
||||||
- [ ] Check whether the Squiggle code is producing 1M samples.
|
- [x] Check whether the Squiggle code is producing 1M samples.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Other similar projects
|
## Other similar projects
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user