From d32f4937f99f14fd29e88d2eaa7121d74d732ab3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Nu=C3=B1o=20Sempere?= Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:10:18 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update Analysis.md --- rat/EA-predictions/Analysis.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rat/EA-predictions/Analysis.md b/rat/EA-predictions/Analysis.md index 495699e..0a1b60e 100644 --- a/rat/EA-predictions/Analysis.md +++ b/rat/EA-predictions/Analysis.md @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ I got this answers using R from the data released by the EA survey people, avail ## Results For the 35 people who took part in the original prediction making, their results can be seen in the following graphics: -![](https://nunosempere.github.io/rat/EA-predictions/Scatterplot.jpeg) +![](https://nunosempere.github.io/rat/EA-predictions/Scatterplot3.png) ![](https://nunosempere.github.io/rat/EA-predictions/Scatterplot2.jpeg) ![](https://nunosempere.github.io/rat/EA-predictions/histogram.jpeg) ![](https://nunosempere.github.io/rat/EA-predictions/Brier-scores.jpeg) @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ The average accuracy is 55.12%, that is, the average participant got 13.22 out o ## Is this an spurious result because a small number of questions were really, really hard? No. See the following scatterplot: -![](https://nunosempere.github.io/Scatterplot-questions.png) +![](https://nunosempere.github.io/rat/EA-predictions/Scatterplot-questions.png) ## Further analysis