From 99221315722deca37ec7a5860e1ef4403159adf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Nu=C3=B1o=20Sempere?= Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:34:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update 1-Current-Evidence.md --- ESPR-Evaluation/1-Current-Evidence.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ESPR-Evaluation/1-Current-Evidence.md b/ESPR-Evaluation/1-Current-Evidence.md index 868a618..fcca64b 100644 --- a/ESPR-Evaluation/1-Current-Evidence.md +++ b/ESPR-Evaluation/1-Current-Evidence.md @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ NVC is also supported by testimonial evidence that is both extremely copious and Given the above, what probability do I assign to NVC being full of bullshit? i.e., that the \~$3,000 courses it offers are only more expensive, not significantly more effective than the $15 book? Actually quite high. NVC seems to have a certain disdain of practical solutions: f.e.x, in Q4 from the measure developed by Steckal "When I listen to another in a caring way, I like to analyze or interpret their problems", an affirmative answer is scored negatively. -Sense of community. Prediction Spain. +Sense of community. Prediction Spain. Scrap whole section? ## ESPR as distinct from CFAR.