diff --git a/ESPR-Evaluation/1-Current-Evidence.md b/ESPR-Evaluation/1-Current-Evidence.md
index 868a618..fcca64b 100644
--- a/ESPR-Evaluation/1-Current-Evidence.md
+++ b/ESPR-Evaluation/1-Current-Evidence.md
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ NVC is also supported by testimonial evidence that is both extremely copious and
 
 Given the above, what probability do I assign to NVC being full of bullshit? i.e., that the \~$3,000 courses it offers are only more expensive, not significantly more effective than the $15 book? Actually quite high. NVC seems to have a certain disdain of practical solutions: f.e.x, in Q4 from the measure developed by Steckal "When I listen to another in a caring way, I like to analyze or interpret their problems", an affirmative answer is scored negatively.  
 
-Sense of community. Prediction Spain.
+Sense of community. Prediction Spain. Scrap whole section?
 
 ## ESPR as distinct from CFAR.