From 78b481718d17e71d187953c8e319ec40f08a69c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Nu=C3=B1o=20Sempere?= Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 16:25:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update readme.md --- rat/eamentalhealth/analysis/readme.md | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rat/eamentalhealth/analysis/readme.md b/rat/eamentalhealth/analysis/readme.md index 82a9273..40d10df 100644 --- a/rat/eamentalhealth/analysis/readme.md +++ b/rat/eamentalhealth/analysis/readme.md @@ -447,10 +447,14 @@ Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ ``` Notice that the regression can be rewritten as: - +``` hours_lost ~ Dummy_for(Thinks they need some kind of healthcare) + Dummy_for(Thinks they need some kind of healthcare)\*Dummy_for(Is receiving the mental healthcare they think they need). +``` -And that Dummy_for(Thinks they need some kind of healthcare) ~ Dummy(Has a mental condition) +And that +``` +Dummy_for(Thinks they need some kind of healthcare) ~ Dummy(Has a mental condition) +``` If this was fully rigorous, giving people "the mental healthcare they need" would reduce hours lost per two weeks from 10.3071 to 7.7986, that is, a difference of 2.5 hours per two weeks, or 1.25 hours per week. Results are similar if we: - ask instead "How satisfied are you with the mental healthcare you've received?"