Update Analysis.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
78b7680ac5
commit
771efaa441
|
@ -100,11 +100,15 @@ I got this answers using R from the data released by the EA survey people, avail
|
|||
For the 35 people who took part in the original prediction making, their results can be seen in the following graphics:
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://nunosempere.github.io/rat/EA-predictions/Scatterplot3.jpeg)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The average accuracy is 55.12%, that is, the average participant got 13.22 out of 24 questions right. If it had been reached, a target credence of 80% would imply an average of 19.2 correct answers. In other words, in this limited domain, when these people say 80%, the thing happens 55% of the time. If they bet, they'd be replacing ~1:1 bets with 1:4 bets.
|
||||
|
||||
### Other ways to break down the data:
|
||||
![](https://nunosempere.github.io/rat/EA-predictions/Scatterplot2.jpeg)
|
||||
![](https://nunosempere.github.io/rat/EA-predictions/histogram.jpeg)
|
||||
![](https://nunosempere.github.io/rat/EA-predictions/Brier-scores.jpeg)
|
||||
|
||||
The average accuracy is 55.12%, that is, the average participant got 13.22 out of 24 questions right. If it had been reached, a target credence of 80% would imply an average of 19.2 correct answers. In other words, in this limited domain, when these people say 80%, the thing happens 55% of the time. If they bet, they'd be replacing ~1:1 bets with 1:4 bets.
|
||||
|
||||
## Is this an spurious result because a small number of questions were really, really hard?
|
||||
No. See the following scatterplot:
|
||||
|
@ -119,7 +123,6 @@ Questions for further analysis:
|
|||
|
||||
I expect to answer those questions in the near future.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Code.
|
||||
|
||||
You can find [Predictions.csv](https://nunosempere.github.io/rat/EA-predictions/Predictions.csv) and [answers.csv](https://nunosempere.github.io/rat/EA-predictions/answers.csv) by following the links.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user