From 5fe21a5cb6898d220e1c846e630af5cd62bc1bf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Nu=C3=B1o=20Sempere?= Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 12:39:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update readme.md --- social-movements/readme.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/social-movements/readme.md b/social-movements/readme.md index 792cdb4..c93158a 100644 --- a/social-movements/readme.md +++ b/social-movements/readme.md @@ -29,4 +29,6 @@ b) For each, to what extent has it been achieved? I excluded "Salt March" because I saw it as doublecounting "Nonviolence", and excluded "Reform movements in the United States" because it was too broad a category. I kept "Student Movements", though. -Anyways, you can find a .csv table [here](https://github.com/NunoSempere/nunosempere.github.io/blob/master/social-movements/Social-movements.csv) or a Google Drive link [here](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15yjkTsS31nnc8MVaZwhK9CIoDg8dW0GB1i8r3CltrEs/edit?usp=sharing) +Anyways, you can find a .csv table [here](https://github.com/NunoSempere/nunosempere.github.io/blob/master/social-movements/Social-movements.csv) or a Google Drive link [here](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15yjkTsS31nnc8MVaZwhK9CIoDg8dW0GB1i8r3CltrEs/edit?usp=sharing). I might play around with the results further, but for the moment: + +Socially, the average movement does pretty well, with an average of 1.3/2, distributed as: 16% are 0s, 36% are 1s and 48% are 2s . With regards to effectiveness, the average is 0.72/2, distributed as: 44% are 0s, 40% are 1s and 16% are 2s.