From 45c8034d9e3a2bc80f7ea7fc9b2d760835cc70ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Nu=C3=B1o=20Sempere?= Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 22:56:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update Write-up.md --- ESPR-Evaluation/Write-up.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ESPR-Evaluation/Write-up.md b/ESPR-Evaluation/Write-up.md index 1bb5c88..388fdab 100644 --- a/ESPR-Evaluation/Write-up.md +++ b/ESPR-Evaluation/Write-up.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # ESPR-Evaluation Writeup (Epistemic status: Cognitive dissonance. Why does CFAR measure it's impact the way it does?) -Note: The question whose answer me here is not "Should I donate to CFAR?". +Note: The question whose answer I consider here is not "Should I donate to CFAR?". ## Introduction I have spent the last 2-4 months thinking about how to evaluate the impact of the European Summer Camp on Rationality (ESPR) [1], a selective program affiliated with CFAR (Center for Applied Rationality) which takes brilliant highschoolers and teach thems a variety of rationality techniques. Here are the highlights of what I have found, as well as some remarks on what CFAR could do if it was interested in measuring impact with a randomized controlled trial (an RCT).