personal/nunosempere.com
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix weird rss error.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Nuno Sempere 2023-08-16 20:05:07 +00:00
parent 17b0599fdc
commit 7f44d84bb0
1 changed files with 1 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
blog/2023/02/04/just-in-time-bayesianism/index.md
View File

@ -78,9 +78,7 @@ Just-in-time Bayesianism would explain this as follows.
\end{cases}
\]
The second estimate is the estimate produced by [Laplace's law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_succession)---an instance of Bayesian reasoning given an ignorance prior---given one "success" (a dog biting a human) and \(n\) "failures" (a dog not biting a human).
Now, because the first hypothesis assigns very low probability to what the man has experienced, a whole bunch of the probability goes to the second hypothesis. Note that the prior degree of credence to assign to this second hypothesis *isn't* governed by Bayes' law, and so one can't do a straightforward Bayesian update.
The second estimate is the estimate produced by [Laplace's law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_succession)---an instance of Bayesian reasoning given an ignorance prior---given one "success" (a dog biting a human) and \(n\) "failures" (a dog not biting a human). <p>Now, because the first hypothesis assigns very low probability to what the man has experienced, a whole bunch of the probability goes to the second hypothesis. Note that the prior degree of credence to assign to this second hypothesis *isn't* governed by Bayes' law, and so one can't do a straightforward Bayesian update.</p>
But now, with more and more encounters, the probability assigned by the second hypothesis, will be as \(\frac{2}{n+2}\), where \(n\) is the number of times the man interacts with a dog. But this goes down very slowly: