more cleanup after imgur
This commit is contained in:
parent
e9383e9ed0
commit
5ed19e0164
|
@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ I also had a payout for insightful comments, such that the nth most upvoted comm
|
|||
|
||||
Note that the projects were _not_ chosen so as to maximize impact, but rather as to maximize information about whether their value could be predicted.
|
||||
|
||||
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fb81/1fb8137790a9f8e6bfca52ac5cacd3944f07668a" alt=""
|
||||
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c345/9c3450edb2548cc8e5c4a4417d8d02b2a5a10934" alt=""
|
||||
|
||||
We observe that:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ Predictions:
|
|||
* Centered 50% confidence interval: 33 to 74
|
||||
* Centered 95% confidence interval: 11 to 111
|
||||
|
||||
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10ebd/10ebdf019d758b8a4329b98f4615d2782a150d3b" alt=""
|
||||
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06505/065057be7274e1c18011f4bb153f3ba6289382c9" alt=""
|
||||
|
||||
Actual upvotes after one month: 31
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ Predictions:
|
|||
* Centered 50% confidence interval: 28 to 68
|
||||
* Centered 95% confidence interval: 9 to 106
|
||||
|
||||
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9384e/9384e41ac32e5592c05b35bfe41581eb16814894" alt=""
|
||||
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04299/04299c6d1c9932a2072cd0e63bac774f755e906d" alt=""
|
||||
|
||||
Actual upvotes after one month: 20 for the [first post](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/yWmmYLCJft7u7XL5o/some-examples-of-technology-timelines), 49 for the [second one](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/FaCqw2x59ZFhMXJr9/a-prior-for-technological-discontinuities). I'm taking 49 as the resolution.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ Predictions:
|
|||
* Centered 50% confidence interval: 15 to 57
|
||||
* Centered 95% confidence interval: 4 to 91
|
||||
|
||||
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a81a/4a81a541b5eecc3b59d5373bb42e9d5f15b79760" alt=""
|
||||
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7b63/e7b630473e05718564a9ea610548c966d354ef7d" alt=""
|
||||
|
||||
Actual upvotes after one month: 22
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ Predictions:
|
|||
* Centered 50% confidence interval: 17 to 60
|
||||
* Centered 95% confidence interval: 6 to 102
|
||||
|
||||
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa571/aa57191afdfbbb574581bcadc9af9312722bd3d3" alt=""
|
||||
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34d40/34d405ecb9983641995dea83d0c9248cab15a714" alt=""
|
||||
|
||||
Actual upvotes after one month: 20
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ Predictions:
|
|||
* Centered 50% confidence interval: 19 to 59
|
||||
* Centered 95% confidence interval: 7 to 92
|
||||
|
||||
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6103e/6103eaf2227e8e88f798905d55bae239e9056dac" alt=""
|
||||
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ca26/0ca26f2bc6761898ec369bc7493a8b9b42fe3817" alt=""
|
||||
|
||||
Actual upvotes after one month: 27
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ A further idea was my proposal for my Summer Research Fellowship at FHI, though
|
|||
* Centered 50% confidence interval: 24 to 70
|
||||
* Centered 95% confidence interval: 10 to 103
|
||||
|
||||
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e0cc/6e0cc4e2b27bd54f5f40ea4697685aed7ead5716" alt=""
|
||||
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c45ea/c45ea724ac5493e7787063cb5e0dfd865532928a" alt=""
|
||||
|
||||
I take these data-points as further evidence that this setup is interesting or worth it; arguably a major take-away for this project is “a fairly simple forecasting system is able to produce a project which gets accepted to the FHI summer fellowship.” Because the program got ~300 [applications](https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/EPGdwe6vsCY7A9HPa/review-of-fhi-s-summer-research-fellowship-2020), but only 27 participants were accepted, this puts this forecasting setup on the top 9% of applicants in terms of some fuzzy “optimization power” (though this is a simplification, because the project proposal was probably one of many factors.)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user