From 1dd38cf5ea3e204cba30c8470bba2ac2fb2ba78b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NunoSempere <nuno.sempere@protonmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 16:52:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] tweak: resize README img again

---
 README.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index af8cf10..fc840bb 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Look at 10%, 20%,..., 80%, 90%, 100% of sequences, and give the probability of e
 As described [here](https://nunosempere.com/blog/2023/02/04/just-in-time-bayesianism/), Just-in-time bayesianism is this scheme: 
 
 
-<img src="https://images.nunosempere.com/blog/2023/02/04/just-in-time-bayesianism/bayes-jit.png" width="40%">
+<img src="https://images.nunosempere.com/blog/2023/02/04/just-in-time-bayesianism/bayes-jit.png" width="60%">
 
 I think that the implementation here provides some value in terms of making fuzzy concepts explicit. For example, instead of "did your past hypotheses do an ok job at predicting this new evidence", I have code which looks at whether past predictions included the correct completion, and which expands the search for hypotheses if not.