# Magic-Wormhole This library provides a primitive function to securely transfer small amounts of data between two computers. Both machines must be connected to the internet, but they do not need to have public IP addresses or know how to contact each other ahead of time. Security and connectivity is provided by means of an "invitation code": a short string that is transcribed from one machine to the other by the users at the keyboard. This works in conjunction with a baked-in "rendezvous server" that relays information from one machine to the other. ## Modes This library will eventually offer multiple modes. For now, only "transcribe mode" is available. Transcribe mode has two variants. In the "machine-generated" variant, the "initiator" machine creates the invitation code, displays it to the first user, they convey it (somehow) to the second user, who transcribes it into the second ("receiver") machine. In the "human-generated" variant, the two humans come up with the code (possibly without computers), then later transcribe it into both machines. When the initator machine generates the invitation code, the initiator contacts the rendezvous server and allocates a "channel ID", which is a small integer. The initiator then displays the invitation code, which is the channel-ID plus a few secret words. The user copies the code to the second machine. The receiver machine connects to the rendezvous server, and uses the invitation code to contact the initiator. They agree upon an encryption key, and exchange a small encrypted+authenticated data message. When the humans create an invitation code out-of-band, they are responsible for choosing an unused channel-ID (simply picking a random 3-or-more digit number is probably enough), and some random words. The invitation code uses the same format in either variant: channel-ID, a hyphen, and an arbitrary string. The two machines participating in the wormhole setup are not distinguished: it doesn't matter which one goes first, and both use the same Wormhole class. In the first variant, one side calls `get_code()` while the other calls `set_code()`. In the second variant, both sides call `set_code()`. Note that this is not true for the "Transit" protocol used for bulk data-transfer: the Transit class currently distinguishes "Sender" from "Receiver", so the programs on each side must have some way to decide (ahead of time) which is which. Each side gets to do one `send_data()` call and one `get_data()` call. `get_data` will wait until the other side has done `send_data`, so the application developer must be careful to avoid deadlocks (don't get before you send on both sides in the same protocol). When both sides are done, they must call `close()`, to let the library know that the connection is complete and it can deallocate the channel. If you forget to call `close()`, the server will not free the channel, and other users will suffer longer invitation codes as a result. To encourage `close()`, the library will log an error if a Wormhole object is destroyed before being closed. ## Examples The synchronous+blocking flow looks like this: ```python from wormhole.blocking.transcribe import Wormhole from wormhole.public_relay import RENDEZVOUS_RELAY mydata = b"initiator's data" i = Wormhole(b"appid", RENDEZVOUS_RELAY) code = i.get_code() print("Invitation Code: %s" % code) i.send_data(mydata) theirdata = i.get_data() i.close() print("Their data: %s" % theirdata.decode("ascii")) ``` ```python import sys from wormhole.blocking.transcribe import Wormhole from wormhole.public_relay import RENDEZVOUS_RELAY mydata = b"receiver's data" code = sys.argv[1] r = Wormhole(b"appid", RENDEZVOUS_RELAY) r.set_code(code) r.send_data(mydata) theirdata = r.get_data() r.close() print("Their data: %s" % theirdata.decode("ascii")) ``` ## Twisted The Twisted-friendly flow looks like this: ```python from twisted.internet import reactor from wormhole.public_relay import RENDEZVOUS_RELAY from wormhole.twisted.transcribe import Wormhole outbound_message = b"outbound data" w1 = Wormhole(b"appid", RENDEZVOUS_RELAY) d = w1.get_code() def _got_code(code): print "Invitation Code:", code return w1.send_data(outbound_message) d.addCallback(_got_code) d.addCallback(lambda _: w1.get_data()) def _got_data(inbound_message): print "Inbound message:", inbound_message d.addCallback(_got_data) d.addCallback(w1.close) d.addBoth(lambda _: reactor.stop()) reactor.run() ``` On the other side, you call `set_code()` instead of waiting for `get_code()`: ```python w2 = Wormhole(b"appid", RENDEZVOUS_RELAY) w2.set_code(code) d = w2.send_data(my_message) ... ``` Note that the Twisted-form `close()` accepts (and returns) an optional argument, so you can use `d.addCallback(w.close)` instead of `d.addCallback(lambda _: w.close())`. ## Verifier You can call `w.get_verifier()` before `send_data()/get_data()`: this will perform the first half of the PAKE negotiation, then return a verifier object (bytes) which can be converted into a printable representation and manually compared. When the users are convinced that `get_verifier()` from both sides are the same, call `send_data()/get_data()` to continue the transfer. If you call `send_data()/get_data()` before `get_verifier()`, it will perform the complete transfer without pausing. The Twisted form of `get_verifier()` returns a Deferred that fires with the verifier bytes. ## Generating the Invitation Code In most situations, the "sending" or "initiating" side will call `i.get_code()` to generate the invitation code. This returns a string in the form `NNN-code-words`. The numeric "NNN" prefix is the "channel id", and is a short integer allocated by talking to the rendezvous server. The rest is a randomly-generated selection from the PGP wordlist, providing a default of 16 bits of entropy. The initiating program should display this code to the user, who should transcribe it to the receiving user, who gives it to the Receiver object by calling `r.set_code()`. The receiving program can also use `input_code_with_completion()` to use a readline-based input function: this offers tab completion of allocated channel-ids and known codewords. Alternatively, the human users can agree upon an invitation code themselves, and provide it to both programs later (with `i.set_code()` and `r.set_code()`). They should choose a channel-id that is unlikely to already be in use (3 or more digits are recommended), append a hyphen, and then include randomly-selected words or characters. Dice, coin flips, shuffled cards, or repeated sampling of a high-resolution stopwatch are all useful techniques. Note that the code is a human-readable string (the python "str" type: so unicode in python3, plain bytes in python2). ## Application Identifier Applications using this library must provide an "application identifier", a simple bytestring that distinguishes one application from another. To ensure uniqueness, use a domain name. To use multiple apps for a single domain, just use a string like `example.com/app1`. This string must be the same on both clients, otherwise they will not see each other. The invitation codes are scoped to the app-id. Note that the app-id must be a bytestring, not unicode, so on python3 use `b"appid"`. Distinct app-ids reduce the size of the connection-id numbers. If fewer than ten initiators are active for a given app-id, the connection-id will only need to contain a single digit, even if some other app-id is currently using thousands of concurrent sessions. ## Rendezvous Relays The library depends upon a "rendezvous relay", which is a server (with a public IP address) that delivers small encrypted messages from one client to the other. This must be the same for both clients, and is generally baked-in to the application source code or default config. This library includes the URL of a public relay run by the author. Application developers can use this one, or they can run their own (see src/wormhole/servers/relay.py) and configure their clients to use it instead. ## Polling and Shutdown TODO: this is mostly imaginary The reactor-based (Twisted-style) forms of these objects need to establish TCP connections, re-establish them if they are lost, and sometimes (for transports that don't support long-running connections) poll for new messages. They may also time out eventually. Longer delays mean less network traffic, but higher latency. These timers should be matched to the expectations, and expected behavior, of your users. In a file-transfer application, where the users are sitting next to each other, it is appropriate to poll very frequently (perhaps every 500ms) for a few minutes, then give up. In an email-like messaging program where the introduction is establishing a long-term relationship, and the program can store any outgoing messages until the connection is established, it is probably better to poll once a minute for the first few minutes, then back off to once an hour, and not give up for several days. The `schedule=` constructor argument establishes the polling schedule. It should contain a sorted list of (when, interval) tuples (both floats). At `when` seconds after the first `start()` call, the polling interval will be set to `interval`. The `timeout=` argument provides a hard timeout. After this many seconds, the sync will be abandoned, and all callbacks will errback with a TimeoutError. Both have defaults suitable for face-to-face realtime setup environments. ## Serialization TODO: only the Twisted form supports serialization so far You may not be able to hold the Wormhole object in memory for the whole sync process: maybe you allow it to wait for several days, but the program will be restarted during that time. To support this, you can persist the state of the object by calling `data = w.serialize()`, which will return a printable bytestring (the JSON-encoding of a small dictionary). To restore, use the `from_serialized(data)` classmethod (e.g. `w = Wormhole.from_serialized(data)`). There is exactly one point at which you can serialize the wormhole: *after* establishing the invitation code, but before waiting for `get_verifier()` or `get_data()`, or calling `send_data()`. If you are creating a new invitation code, the correct time is during the callback fired by `get_code()`. If you are accepting a pre-generated code, the time is just after calling `set_code()`. To properly checkpoint the process, you should store the first message (returned by `start()`) next to the serialized wormhole instance, so you can re-send it if necessary. ## Bytes, Strings, Unicode, and Python 3 All cryptographically-sensitive parameters are passed as bytes ("str" in python2, "bytes" in python3): * application identifier * verifier string * data in/out * derived-key "purpose" string * transit records in/out Some human-readable parameters are passed as strings: "str" in python2, "str" (i.e. unicode) in python3: * wormhole code * relay/transit URLs * transit connection hints (e.g. "host:port") ## Detailed Example ```python ```